Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 1977-11-15 TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD TUESDAY' , NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 The Town of Ithaca Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday , 'November 15 , 1977 , in Town Hall , 126 East Seneca Street ( second floor ) , Ithaca , N . Y . , at 7 : 30 p . m . PRESENT : Chairman Liese Bronfenbrenner , Patrick Mackesey , Eva Hoffmann , James Baker , Henry Aron , Montgomery May , Lawrence Fabbroni ( Town Engineer ) , Robert Bonnell ( Assistant to the Town Engineer ) . ALSO PRESENT : Orlando Iacovelli , Attorney Wesley McDermott , Councilman Noel Desch , Paul Iacovelli , J . Hulbirt , Betty Li , C . Y . Li , Susan Fertik , Ralph Iacovelli , Janet Brady , Joseph R . Cardonia , Gracia Cardonia , Barbara Schultz , Aafke Steenhuis , Charles Kidney , Elizabeth Kidney , Helen Spanswick , Kay J . Johnson , Allen L . Johnson , Lyman E . Baker , Carl S . Baker , W . A . Baker , Edward Pesaresi , Ardis Pesaresi , W . C . Silvernail , Carol S . Silvernail , Patty L . Porter , Thomas B . Mills , George Kugler , Ron Simpson , Bonnie Simpson , Philip Lerman ( Ithaca Journal ) , Dan Bateson ( WHCU ) . Chairman Bronfenbrenner declared the meeting duly opened at 7 : 31 p . m . PUBLIC HEARING : CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF R . M . AND M . N . BROWN ( ORLANDO IACOVELLI AS AGENT ) TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 3 . 5 ACRES FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT R- 15 TO MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT , TAX PARCEL 6 - 53 - 1 - 10 , FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 16 - 18 UNIT APARTMENT IN THE VICINITY OF PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE EXTENSION . Chairman Bronfenbrenner declared the Public Hearing in the above - noted matter duly opened at 7 : 31 p . m . and presented for the record the Clerk ' s 'joAf. fidavit of Posting and Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing in Town Hall and the Ithaca Journal on November 8 , 1977 , and November 10 , 1977 , respec - tively , together with the Secretary ' s Affidavit of Service by Mail of said Notice to six neighbors and Mr . Orlando Iacovelli . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner reported on behalf of the ad hoc Committee to look into this proposal , its members being , Jonathan Bradley , Patrick Mackesey , Eva Hoffmann , Liese Bronfenbrenner , and Larry Fabbroni , that on the basis of land use and location this request for rezoning was not a good idea and to generate additional traffic on Coddington Road until it is improved is not a good idea , but , that this conclusion would not preclude the opening of Juniper Drive . Mr . Iacovelli tacked up on the bulletin board the proposed plans and Attorney Wesley McDermott spoke to the Board . Mr . McDermott stated that Mr . Iacovelli , as agent for a Mr . and Mrs . Brown , presented plans for the re - zoning of parcel no . 6 - 53 - 1 - 10 , 3 . 5 acres , on October 4 , 1977 . Mr . McDermott stated that , first of all , he would like to say a few things about Mr . Iacovelli - - he is presently a resident of Guelph , Ontario , Canada , and until the time he took the job as . head wrestling coach at Guelph University , he was a resident sof Ithaca , a graduate of the Ithaca schools , a graduate of Ithaca College where he did his graduate work . Mr . McDermott stated that as recently as last summer Mr . Iacovelli . has purchased land in the area that we are dis - cussing and in the near future he will be returning to the Ithaca area where he wishes to make his home . Mr . McDermott stated that Mr . Iacovelli ' s other and his three brothers are living in the area of Hudson Street and { endall Avenue to the south . Mr . McDermott noted that with reference to the zoning map , the parcel is south of Pennsylvania Avenue , south of the R - 9 and R - 15 and northeast of Juniper Drive ; and with reference to the tax map , parcel no . 53 - 1 - 10 is bounded on the south by the NYSEG right of way , formerly the Delaware and Lackawanna ' Planning Board - 2 - November 15 , 1977 Railroad right of way , and on the west by Mr . Kidney . He stated that Mr . Iacovelli also owns a parcel to the southwest adjacent to the NYSEG right of ,-� way and on which he hopes to build a home . He stated that to the east the parcel is bounded by a 40 acre parcel owned by Mr . Sincebaugh and to the north by Mr . Steenhuis . Mr . McDermott stated that the original plan as submitted on the 4th of October involved a proposal to develop this area with a 28 - unit apartment house consisting of three floors . Mr . McDermott stated that Mr . Iacovelli has reconsidered his proposal and is now proposing that it be rezoned and he be permitted to place an 18 -unit building on the parcel . Mr . McDermott noted again that the NYSEG right of way is t.o the south and the parcel Mr . Iacovelli has purchased is to the southwest and , to the east , Mr . Sincebaugh ' s parcel . He stated that the area is 3 . 5 acres , or , in excess of 150 , 000 sq . ft . He stated that the plan Mr . Iacovelli . proposes is excellent in terms of yard usage or space _ usage in that the structure occupies approximately 10 , 000 sq . ft . of area on the lot which is less than 10% of the entire lot , thus leaving open spaces , recreation area , room for plantings that will enhance the area without being inconsistent or crowding the area . Mr . McDermott pointed out that under the R - 15 provisions , the density permissible would exceed by far the density proposed here . He stated that the permissible square footage for a lot is 15 , 000 sq . ft . and one may have an apartment resulting in two families or two units per lot , but the present proposal for up to 18 units is substantially less than that . Mr . McDermott noted that to the north , which is downhill and , he thought of less concern , there is existing brush or tree line - - hedge - - or whatever you would call it , which screens it from the downhill area . He noted that to the south , the Juniper Drive side , there is a hedge which isnot shown here on the map , and furthermore , it is screened from the nearest dwelling by distance - - the nearest dwelling being on Juniper Drive which is roughly 250 ' away . He said that the contour drops off quite rapidly and , according to the information that they have and having actually visited the site , he believed that there are no visual obstructions by the proposal as it now stands . Mr . McDermott stated that he should point out that . , .th.e structure itself , as presently shown on the drawing , is the same at it was when Mr . Iacovelli made the pre - sentation on October 4th in terms of layout . He stated that he did not know , necessarily , that Mr . Iacovelli is committed particularly to that layout . He stated that in changing the number of units , Mr . Iacovelli considered eliminating the upper floor , but if , in fact , the zoning change is granted by the Town Board , this is something in terms of design that he would have to go back to the architect and work with. the Planning Board and the Town Board to determine what would be most architecturally pleasing in terms of the setting . He stated that the maximum height of the structure as shown here would be 26 ' , adding that he could change the current plan and still remain within the proposed 18 units . He noted two ways to do that : ( 1 ) eliminate the upper floor which would reduce the height ; or ( 2 ) use a slab on grade keeping the structure at the same height and not in any way interfering with the people to the south . Mr . McDermott stated that as for sewer and water provisions , it is his understanding that the east line of the property coincides with the main water line . He stated that with sewer there are two possibili gs : ( 1 ) to the west where there is an existing right of way of 20 ' whic reserved by the IsBrowns when they conveyed the property to the Browns ; ( 2 ) to the east along the 20 ' right of way on Mr . Kidney ' s property there is a sewer manhole which he would have access to and which could provide sewerage to the development . Mr . McDermott stated that , as for traffic flow , there are two possibili - ties ; probably both would be utilized . ( 1 ) to the south and into Juniper Drive ; ( 2 ) to the northwest along the existing right of way which has access to Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . He commented that he was not sure what the Planning Board - 3 - November 15 , 1977 ` road running off is called . Mr . McDermott pointed out that there was some question from the Minutes bf October 4th whether Mr . Iacovelli did have access or right of access . Mr . McDermott stated that Mr . Iacovelli does have access and the right to use the extension , both across the NYSEG right of way and the extension to the west which also goes on to Coddington Road and to the other direction which is north . He stated that for reference , that right of way or the use of Pennsylvania Avenue Extension was reserved in the Deed from Baker to Ayers recorded in Liber 250 of Deeds on Page 201 , and Ayers to Brown in Liber 279 of Deeds on page 591 . Mr . McDermott noted that by having the three alternatives for ingress and egress this diminishes drastically the traffic flow particularly on the downhill side which is most practical in the winter months as the main feeder out of the area . Mr . McDermott pointed out that with the limited density which Mr . Iacovelli proposes being less than that if he developed it under the present zoning rules , this eliminates some of the concern for the volume on to Coddington Road . He also noted , ,: . as was mentioned earlier in this meeting , the probability that at some point Juniper Drive would be extended to the north and , if one looks at the tax map , this is the most practical way to open up the property owned by Mr . Sincebaugh . He commented that that would feed into - either Pennsylvania Avenue or come in at the intersection opposite Kendall Avenue as it comes into Pennsylvania Avenue . Mr . McDermott , referring to the accommodations that Mr . Iacovelli proposes , s � i e proposes that he leave the parking as originally presented at 39 spaces , which is in excess of two spaces per unit , which , he believed , is more than ®; adequate to cover the question of parking in the area . �► Mr . McDermott stated that he had mentioned the screening , both to the north and the south , and in terms of visibility above from the south , to go with the distance involved and the drop - off contour , and the height when com - pleted , the structure itself will present no distraction of view for those in the Juniper Drive area . He added that to the north , it is already screened by the hedge and the existing tree line . Mr . McDermott , referring to other questions that have been raised , noted the question of safety and stated that certainly we are all concerned about this . He stated that this is one of the reasons why Mr . Iacovelli decided to reduce the number of units proposed so that there would not be as much traffic generated into the area , and particularly in the vicinity of the Juniper Drive / Coddington Road intersection . Mr . McDermott stated that he would like to point out that with the proposal as submitted tonight , the traffic that one might anticipate would , in fact , assuming a vehicle per unit , assuming two trips per unit per day , would be less than if developed in single lots in the R - 15 area . Mr . McDermott added that the other thing is that by opening up or being able to proceed to the north , the Pennsylvania Avenue extension , that exit would be the most attractive and the safest in terms of being able to operate and stop , particularly in the winter . Mr . McDermott stated that he thought Mr . Iacovelli has been very realistic in his approach to developing the area and he thought that Mr . Iacovelli has tried to present a quality structure which is not only consistent but less than the density that one might anticipate might develop under present zoning regulations . Mr . McDermott stated that the market that Mr . Iacovelli is concerned with , that he would like to promote , is Morse Chain , Ithaca College , National Cash Register - - he hopes to attract families that are employees at one of these three establishments . Mr . McDermott stated that this makes a great deal of sense and this is particularly marketable . Planning Board - 4 - November 15 , 1977 Mr . McDermott stated that he had mentioned maximum height and further stated that in the event that Mr . Iacovelli is granted the zoning change , he - , ( Iacovelli ) will insure that the architecture is compatible with the area and will not detract from those who will live around it . Mr . McDermott noted that Mr . Iacovelli is talking about a brick structure and quality construction , both for those who live in the building and those who surround it . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner asked how many bedrooms are planned per unit . Mr . Iacovelli replied that he is planning from two to three . Mrs ,. Bronfenbrenner asked how many of the lots have reserved right of way to Pennsylvania Avenue . Mr . McDermott referred to the Brown to NYSEG conveyance :_ and. „ specifically con - veyed .. to . Mr . . Kidney and reserved the 20 ' right of way for the remaining pro - perties of Brown - - properties to the east . Mr . McDermott stated that as for the right of ingress and egress over Pennsylvania Avenue Extension , that went back to the 1930s , he believed , in Baker to Ayers and that passed along to the grantees , successors , and assigns - - those , h is , that took from him and would pass to Mr . Iacovelli . Mrs . Bronfrenbrenner iq that was for the whole 3 . 5 acres . Mr . McDermott replied that it was . Mr . Wilbur Baker , Utica Street , owner of property on Pennsylvania Avenue , presented a petition to the Planning Board , dated November 15 , 1977 , contai - ning 31 names of people on Pennsylvania Avenue and Kendall Avenue opposed to the rezoning proposal . Mr . George Kugler , 101 Pineview Terrace , stated that the petition also contains 22 names of persons on Juniper Drive and Pineview Terrace opposed to the rezoning proposal . The Petition read as follows : " RE : Opposition of Rezoning in Our Neighborhood We , the undersigned , who live in the Juniper -Hickory - Pineview- Pennsyl - vania - Kendall areas , vigorously oppose , and will continue to oppose by all means at our disposal , the proposed multiple - apartment units on Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . We will also oppose all efforts to have rental houses , apartment - complexes , opening of roads , etc , that might change the character of our neighborhood or that are contrary to current zoning . The following are some of the reasons why we are united in strong opposi - tion of the construction of rental property on Pennsylvania Avenue Extension : 1 ) It would radically change the character of our neighborhood which is a quiet residential area with " no outlet ” dead - end streets , relatively large lots , and little traffic . 2 ) It would suddenly reduce the value of our property which we purchased after careful consideration of the neighborhood and the quality of life there . It would be clearly unfair and irresponsible to allow such a radical change in a nice area which is now built up . 3 ) It is implied that Juniper Drive would become a through - street con - necting it with Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . This is an outrageous propo - sition : Juniper Drive is a steep road and the heavy and careless traffic associated with dense rental property at the bottom of the street would create hazards to our children , produce noise , and invite strangers . 4 ) We already have trouble with traffic on Juniper Drive : the hill is very steep and the intersection with Coddington Road is hazardous . This is especially frightening because our children have to walk up to Coddington Road Planning Board - 5 - November 15 , 1977 and wait for the bus . Cars coming from the south from behind the hill cannot see what is at the intersection . Furthermore , it is frequently impossible or very difficult to drive up on Juniper Drive in the winter . Often cars park at the top of the hill so that they can get out in the morning ( for example , Mr . Fertik is a pharmacist who must get to work ) . The neighborhood would get to - gether after a heavy snowfall and help cars struggling on Juniper Drive . Hav - ing rental apartments at the foot of the hill would mean not only many more cars parked along the street , abandoned in the snow or blocking traffic , but it would also destroy the closeness that has developed among neighbors in this area . This is a friendly neighborhood and residing here greatly increases the joy of living in Ithaca . We trust the Planning Board will vote against this request for rezoning and will continue to do so whenever such requests are submitted . " Mr . Kugler stated that he would like to welcome this developer . backito South Hill as a resident and developer of a single family home . Mr . Kugler asked why Mr . Iacovelli is so favored as being granted spot zoning . Mr . Kugler stated that this petition applies to the Pennsylvania Avenue and Kendall Avenue people also . He stated that this is a basic petition . Mr . Kugler stated that Mr . Sincebaugh said that he ( Sincebaugh ) is interested in the single family zoning . Mr . Kugler said , as for the apartment thing , the students are flocking back to the Ithaca College Campus in huge numbers and he would question the need for apartments . Mr . Kugler stated that the thing the residents are concerned with is the change in values and the change in the type of neighborhood and spot zoning . Mr . Kugler stated that this would be a landmark case for spot zoning . He said this is a business enterprise for ,Mr . Iacovelli ' s own economic enri. :chmen.t . _ Mr . Lyman Baker , 257 Pennsylvania Avenue , stated that the cars generated by this project could cause damage to his home , and , the road is only 20 ' wide - - this is not safe , especially at the curve up by Steenhuis . Mr . Thomas Mills , 108 Pineview Terrace , stated that two or three times the term " present " or " presently " was used if this were allowed , and the term " present " keeps cropping up . He asked what might happen in the future ; are there additions contemplated in the future . Mr . McDermott replied that as far as the actual design of the building at this time Mr . Iacovelli found it financially prohibitive to go with the larger building . Mr . McDermott stated that Mr . Iacovelli is committed to the parking as shown and committed to the quality structure . He stated that with reference to the structure , he used the word " present " . Mr . Iacovelli has not in fact , because of cost , returned to the architect to determine what design would be compatible with the roads. , size , etc . - - would it be architecturally practical to eliminate the " wings " or what other changes might be made . Mr . McDermott stated that he did not mean that .; there would be any additional plans for the area . Mrs . Patty Porter , 104 Juniper Drive , stated that Mr . Iacovelli said " quality structure " . She stated that at the last meeting he talked about 900 sq . ft . for two or three bedrooms . She said that she did not think that is ®quality size for families . She stated that there would also be two or more cars . Mr . Iacovelli stated that he knew that there are other apartments in the Town of Ithaca - - Gere , Dennis - - where 800 to 900 square feet is done . Mr . Philip Lerman , Ithaca Journal , asked , other than the number of units 'Planning Board - 6 - November 15 , 1977 • could Mr . McDermott explain how this differs from the other proposal . Mr . McDermott replied , as follows : � l . The number of units , which is substantially less than the density permitted under R - 15 . 2 . The assurance of access to the northwest to Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . 3 . The determination that in fact sewer was available without obtaining additional easements . 4 . The access to Juniper Drive was proposed before . Mr . Lerman asked what the traffic flow would be from the building . Mr . McDermott replied that he thought one would be talking about at least one vehicle per unit and perhaps more , adding that he did not know what the experience is elsewhere . He stated that this would be dispersed probably from three potential entrances and exits , as follows : ( 1 ) Pennsylvania Avenue Extension to the north ; ( 2 ) across the right of way to the west under Baker to Ayers , Ayers to Brown and Brown to Iacovelli ; ( 3 ) other Brown to Ayers right of way . Mr . Carl Baker , 268 Pennsylvania Avenue , stated that they do not need any more sewer and they do not need any more traffic . Mrs . Susan Fertik , 113 Juniper Drive , stated that the winter driving is not for a very brief time . She stated that everyone was stuck on Monday . She stated that they do not need any additional traffic flow . ® Mr . Allen L . Johnson , 103 Juniper Drive , stated that he did not receive a notice of this hearing and asked if Mr . Iacovelli were notified of the results of the committee meeting . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner pointed out that the Planning Board only recommends to the Town Board on rezoning requests . Mr . Johnson stated that he objected to the gross distortion _ , of the facts referring to 150 , 000 sq . ft . and only 4 houses . Mr . McDermott pointed out that the requirements are 15 , 000 sq . ft . for a house . Mr . Fabbroni stated that he would like to make the same point that he knew Mr . McDermott made when he made the comment that this proposal was less density than single family zoning . He stated that the best he could do is 8 lots or 16 units which will make Mr . McDermott ' s point , but in a more realistic figure . It was noted that there are 3 railroad tracks in the area and the question was asked if any more go through this area . It was noted that there are no more . The question was asked - - would the 20 ' right of way be safe for fire equipment , and - - under the terms of the easements described would the Town be able to maintain such . Mr . Fabbroni stated that this would have to be only a driveway maintained by the owner . Mr . Fabbroni noted that the Town can only take a road that is 60 ' wide . Mr . Fabbroni stated that the access way to the northwest aside from the problem spoken to by the Bakers , that the access way to the Coddington Road is the most difficult access way in terms of grade and termination with Coddington Road - - it is nothing more than a d oveway at this point . He stated that the site has capabilities back up / oddington Road , which is somewhat the same problem , at exits at Juniper and Coddington . It was asked - - who is Brown and why is he conspicuously absent . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner replied that . he is the person selling to Mr . Iacovelli . It was stated that Mr . Iacovelli is trying to attract families from Morse Chain Planning Board - 7 - November 15 , 1977 and Ithaca College and National Cash and the voice questioned this and added that Mr . Iacovelli says - only that he is planning two and three bedroom apartments . It was asked what Mr . Iacovelli is doing to show his good faith . Mr . Iacovelli pointed out the open spaces for children to play , noting that there will be a large amount of play facilities - - swings , etc . Mr . McDermott stated that the proximity of these 3 facilities ( Morse Chain , I . C . , NCR ) would be one thing also . Mr . Iacovelli stated that also the quality of construction would attract families . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner said that she also sees rent and how much they would be charging as being relevant . Mr . Ron Simpson , 112 Pineview Terrace , stated that he thought - .- there - As a very important principal of government in question here . He stated that if the Town should change the zoning permitted , this would say that there is no zoning protection guarantee to the residents and when he bought his property he was quite aware of the zoning that existed and he has a lot of money in his property . He stated that this Board ( Planning ) would do the Town a great deal of justice to disapprove this and would be .guaranteeing the Town residents their zoning rights . Mr . Charles Kidney , 262 Pennsylvania Avenue , stated that his property would be adjacent to the west . He stated that he stands to have some of his land run over - - more than everyone . He referred to the 20 ' right of way and stated that this is not wide enough . He stated that it is not maintained anyway since the sewer went in . He stated that nothing has been done about it and they do not intend to do anything about it . He said it is private property owned by the residents and is the better way downhill in the ® wintertime . He noted the Ithaca College outlet , the traffic flow , Ithaca College dumping out on to Coddington , the knoll there . He stated that you cannot get out except when the City of Ithaca salts it . He stated that on z Monday he had to hug the hedges all the way down . He noted the Pennsylvania Avenue Extension curve . He stated that there is noway out Pennsylvania Avenue and no way out of Juniper . He stated that the traffic flow is bad . Mr : Lyman Baker , 257 Pennsylvania Avenue , stated that on Pennsylvania Avenue and Coddington Road they built a new apartment and there are ten to fifteen cars . He stated that you cannot see to get out of Pennsylvania Avenue , Mr . Fabbroni stated that he would like to make a comment on a portion of Mr . Kidney ' s comments , since he is present along with the other three land - owners on Pennsylvania Avenue Extension , as a clarification . He stated that the section of road known as Pennsylvania Avenue Extension which goes as a driveway to Steenhuis and goes past Schultz , to our knowledge the Town has no deed of record . He stated that if the residents are interested in having the road improved for drainage , totally aside from this proposal , under Section 200 of the Town Law , this could be done under a procedure whereby the residents could sign a petition and have the road taken over by the Town as a Town Road . Mr . Fabbroni said that because of the clouded history , he is not sure that the cost would involve very much . Mr . Fabbroni stated that it seems now from what we have heard from Baker , Schultz , Steenhuis , if only from the standpoint of drainage , it would be well to have the road improved and maintained . He stated that as far as that goes , the Town is interested in alleviating the property questions . Mr . Carl Baker , 268 Pennsylvania Avenue , stated that he worked for the Town of Ithaca and they maintained that road , adding that it was maintained up to just a short time ago and they even paved it once . Planning Board - 8 - November 15 , 1977 Mr . C . Y . Li , 112 Juniper Drive , asked Mr . Fabbroni to please maintain Juniper Drive better also . Mr . William C . Silvernail , 108 Juniper Drive , asked how many more times this will come up befor_p� this Board before the residents are sure that this will not happen . Mrs . Pronfenbrenner replied that she did not know how many times . Mr . Fabbroni stated that the Town Board will be presented with the Planning Board recommendations and at that time they will decide whether to call a Public Hearing on the matter . Mr . Silvernail stated that there is a problem with notification of public hearings . Mr . Desch suggested that the residents form a neighborhood association . Mrs . Fertik asked if the recommendation of the ad hoc committee will be considered . There being no further comments from the public , the Chair declared the Public Hearing duly closed at 8 : 38 p . m . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner asked for comments from the Planning Board , Mr . Aron stated that his comment would be that the Board accept the ad hoc committee report and that it be put in the Minutes . Mr . Mackesey said that he had three comments : ( 1 ) He felt that just by the proximity of being close to Ithaca College you will end up having students . He said that he based that on the property which he used to own on Hudson Street which was income property and he never had an inquiry which was not students ; ( 2 ) Traffic - - basically if you end up with students , you end up with more trips per person, per day ; ( 3 ) What is a 20 ' right of way capable of handling ? Is it capable of handling a two - lane driveway . Mr . Fabbroni replied that it was , adding that you would have to spend a lot for drainage and ditching to have nine foot lanes , no less . Mr . Aron stated to Mr . McDermott that he had mentioned that the height of the building is a maximum of 26 ' and further stated that Mr . McDermott had said that this would be compatible with the buildings and structures in the area . Mr . Aron stated that he has walked this area and seen the homes and they appear to be all one - family dwellings . Mr . McDermott stated that first of all 26 ' is not chiselled in stone - - that was Mr . Iacovelli ' s orginal presentation . - - 22 ' to the south and 26 ' to the north . He stated that in preference to misleading the Board , he preferred to leave it at the maximum height leaving the opening for slab on grade . He noted the prior plan to cut into the hillside with the first level and then it would be substantially less than 26 ' . He stated that he did not think that 26 ' is inconsistent with a two - family home with a peaked roof . He stated that Juniper Drive is mostly ranch . Mr . Aron stated that , having seen that plot of land , from Juniper Drive , there is a large ditch . He said he walked on Juniper and there is a terrific amount of traffic already . He pointed out that the exit would be on to Juniper in addition to whatever there is already . He stated that Mr . Iacovelli is talking about going across this ditch on to Juniper . Mr . McDermott stated , referring to the 201t : power right of way , that Mr . Iacovelli could deal with that only on an exit basis only . He stated that Planning Board - 9 - November 15 , 1977 the Board is not at that stage yet . He stated that if the zoning change were granted , this would be worked out with the Board . ® Mr . Aron stated that he needed more concrete evidence on which way they are going to go in order to represent people for their benefit as well as the developer ' s . He said he could not buy the other .options .. . . Mr . Iacovelli stated that the entrance on to Juniper Drive does not necessitate going on to the ravine - - .- the .., entrance would be to the north or left of that ravine . He said that the other way is the direction off the 20 ' right of way and does lead into Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . Mr . May stated that he was concerned about the height and the 20 ' right of way as indicated . Mr . Baker said that the uncertainty of the right of way looks to him to be the biggest problem . Mr . May expressed concern for fire protection safety . Mrs . Hoffmann stated that it is true that you could have a 26 - foot height in a single family home , but in this case you are talking about a massive facade and this gives a completely different impression from a single family home . Mrs . Hoffmann said that she was curious about the 26 ' when you consider 8 ' for each floor and 2 ' for the roof . Mr . McDermott stated that this is the exposed portion - - one story would be below ground . Mr . McDermott stated that he should emphasize that that is the maximum height and in pre - ference to misleading the Board , he thought to leave that height as was originally presented in the three - story presentation so that there was the option of eliminating the lowest level which would actually be the basement level and going to slab on grade , or eliminating the upper level and con - tinuing with the basement level and one floor exposure . He stated that this is one of the things that Mr . Iacovelli will have to go back and work with the architect on to find something architecturally desirable . He stated that he was not qualified to arbitrarily chop off the top floor . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner reminded the Board that the Planning Board makes a recommendation to the Town Board because this is a rezoning request . MOTION by Mr . Patrick Mackesey , seconded by Mr . Henry Aron : RESOLVED , that the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca recommend and hereby does recommend to the Town Board that the proposal of Mr . Orlando Iacovelli , as agent for R . M . and M . N . Brown , to rezone approximately 3 . 5 acres from Residence District R - 15 to Multiple Residence District , Tax Parcel No . 6 - 53 - 1 - 10 , for development of a 16 - 18 unit apartment in the vicinity of Pennsylvania Avenue Extension , be denied , based on the various things that have been discussed and the fact that it would be spot zoning and a definite change in the character of the neighborhood , as well as the concerns for the traffic , access to the property , the 20 ' right of way in particular and what that would involve , and , that it is located in an R- 15 district . There being no further discussion , the Chair called for a vote . Aye - Bronfenbrenner , Mackesey , Hoffmann , Baker , Aron , May . Nay - None . The MOTION was declared to be carried unanimously . PUBLIC HEARING : CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED 8 - CAR GARAGE AT 123 EAST KING ROAD ( " SPRINGWOOD " ) , TAX PARCEL 6 - 43 - 2 - 8 , ZONED MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT AND OWNED BY EVAN MONKEMEYER . Planning Board - 10 - November 15 , 1977 Chairman Bronfenbrenner declared the Public Hearing in the above - noted matter duly opened at 8 : 55 p . m . and presented for the record the Clerk ' s ® Affidavit of Posting and Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing in Town Hall and the Ithaca Journal on November 8 , 1977 , and November 10 , 1977 , res - pectively . Mr . Monkemeyer presented his plans for an 8 - car garage at " Springwood " . The site plan showed the garage to be of frame construction with an off - set roof system and the same exterior as " Springwood " - - plywood siding , Texture I - 11 , 12 ' x 24 ' in depth , located in the southeast quadrant of the parking lot , garage doors arranged to the south , for rental purposes , concrete slabs 4 " reinforced , overall length is 95 . 9 ' by 23 ' 11 " , slightly recessed in the ground , unheated , part of the garage to be used for storage . Mr . Monkemeyer stated that he plans to develop three structures which are just about ready now . He said he has a commitment from NYSEG . He stated that the garage would be completed in the spring . Mr . Monkemeyer stated that by spring there will be 7 buildings and this has all been approved and is still part of Phase 1 . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner asked if there were any comments from the public . There were none . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner asked if there were any comments from the Planning Board . There were none . MOTION by Mr . Henry Aron , seconded by Mr . Patrick Mackesey : RESOLVED , that the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca recommend and hereby does recommend to the Town Board approval of an 8 - car garage at 123 East King Road , Parcel No . 6 - 43 - 2 - 8 , said garage to be approximately 96 ' x 24 ' as presented to this Board through a site plan and elevations on November 15 , 1977 ) by Mr . Evan Monkemeyer . There being no further discussion , the Chair culled for a vote . Aye - Bronfenbrenner , Mackesey , Hoffmann , Baker , Aron , May . Nay - None . The MOTION was declared to be carried unanimously . ANNOUNCEMENTS Mrs . Bronfenbrenner stated that she was pleased to report that the Town Board reappointed Mr . May and Mr . Baker to the Planning Board - - Mr . May for a seven - year term expiring December 31 , 1984 , and Mr . Baker , our Agricultural member for a five - year term expiring December 31 , 1982 . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner announced that there will be a Joint Meeting of the Town Board and the Planning Board on November 29 , 1977 . DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED 10 - YEAR PARK PLAN Mrs . Bronfenbrenner noted that the Board had before them Mr . Fabbroni ' s 5 5 year plan for parks , called the 10 - year park plan . She stated that the Town Board would like to have the Planning Board ' s comments on the report and to know how the Planning Board feels about the different aspects of the plan . Mr . Fabbroni stated that a lot has happened in the month and a half since this was typed up ( 9 / 9 / 77 ) . He said that it is probably likely that only the $ 130 , 000 that we have for parks will be available for parks and that changes the picture quite a bit . He stated that the Planning Board may only Planning Board - 11 - November 15 , 1977 want to consider the planning aspects of parks . Mr . Fabbroni commented that if he were asked to sit down and change the timetable that would change things quite considerably - - into 1980 . Mr . Aron stated that he thought the Board should go over this whole thing in a work session - - what do we want within these priorities - - what are the priorities - - location ? Mr . Fabbroni stated that there are two things - - the number of areas and the scale of what you would do in different areas . He noted that this is a very large scale plan from which you get as much as what you would want to end up with around the Town . He said the other way is providing for the Town on a much- lower scale - - $ 130 , 000 . He said that there is no time limit on the $ 130 , 000 , and noted that this is very little money - - wherever we do something , the people will cry in another area . Mr . Fabbroni stated that his rationale with this is all those areas being best served . He said that at this point he is second guessing himself . due to money uncertainties . Town Councilman Noel Desch stated that the Planning Board should be informed that the Town Board has suggested to the Park Committee , which has been the prime mover in bringing this together , to identify the life cycle costs - - the commitment in tax dollars in on - going costs for that package . He said that the Town Board would appreciate all the Planning Board members ' input in accomplishing this 10 - year package . He stated that the Town Board does not have a real handle on what these costs would be . Mr . May stated that it seems that at the last meeting of the Planning Board Mr . Fabbroni presented very nicely over ten years a total park develop - ment program approaching an ultimate total utilization which could never be accomplished in terms of dollars . Mr . May asked what , really , does the Town Board want from us ? - - Do they want us to look at life cycle costs for all the parks ? - - realistically , that is not possible in terms of dollars . He suggested picking a park site and working towards it as perhaps being what the hoard wants . He asked what kind of parks are most desirable ? Mr . May - stated that he was confused and that he was glad Mr . Desch was here tonight . Mr . Desch stated that Mr . Fabbroni has an awful lot to do and we should not burden him with something that is not going to happen . He suggested the following : 1 . We ought to be developing a strategy for obtaining Coy Glen - - that is not easy . 2 . Develop life cycle costs in regard to DeWitt Junior High School park . 3 . Time should be spent to cost out the first element of that Report ( the 10 - year park plan ) - - 1978 , 1979 , down into 1980 . Mr . Fabbroni stated that his biggest problem is what scale the Board is working with - - that is a very important policy question to settle . He stated that if you work on half the scale , you would not put East Ithaca as high as it is . He said you would consider low maintenance facilities where life cycle costs would be very low - - with equipment of any kind , life cycle comes in and equipment cycle . Mr . Desch stated that the Town Board wants from the Planning Board a rundown on what they see needed and where and when - - the taxpayer wants to know how much this whole thing will run over the years . Mrs . Bronfenbrenner stated that the Town Board has a committee and the Planning Board - 12 - November 15 , 1977 Planning Board works separately . . Mr . Desch stated that there should be one joint committee . Mrs . Hoffmann stated that it seemed to her that the Town Board should have a lot of concrete information that the Planning Board should not spend more time gathering . Mr . Aron stated that he agreed with Mrs . Bronfenbrenner ' s point , adding that he favored that very much . Mr . May stated that the Town Board is going back to what we have already done here by the 5 + 5 year plan . Mr . Desch stated that he was not sure of the form of the request that the Planning Board received . He wondered if the Board were asked formally or verbally . He said he was aware of the confusing aspects . Mr . Desch continued and stated that life cycle costs are being asked for and the Town Board work association on the proposal also . He said the . Planning Board should be thinking about who it would appoint to this joint committee - - two or three people , the Town Board has three people . He said that perhaps in the next month the Planning Board might consider who that respresentative should be and from there we would look at these questions as a joint committee . Mr . May stated that it has been very confusing to him ; he has not been able to identify what was wanted . Mr . Desch stated that some parts are more definitive than others , and that is the problem . Mrs . Hoffmann stated that the Board also has not had a really good opportunity to see the park plan . She noted that with regard to scale of development , how far should each park be developed is the question . Mr . Desch stated that the level of development of each particular park and also the consequences of development of each of those pieces , is the key . He concluded by noting that it is the Planning Board that knows about the feelings and needs and how far people want to go . REPORT OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE COMMITTEE The Sign Ordinance Committee had asked that their report be postponed . The committee will meet on Thursday , November 17 , 1977 - - its members being Henry Aron , Montgomery May , and Robert Bonnell , RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN BOARD IN RE PLANNING BOARD CHAIRPERSON FOR 1978 MOTION by Mr . Henry Aron , seconded by Mrs . Eva Hoffmann : RESOLVED , that the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca recommend to the Town Board the appointment of Mrs . Liese Bronfenbrenner as Chairperson of the Planning Board for another term of office commencing January 1 , 1978 . There being no further discussion , the Chair called for a vote . Aye - Mackesey , Hoffmann , Baker , Aron , May . Nay - None . Abstain - Bronfenbrenner . The MOTION was declared to be carried . ADJOURNMENT Upon Motion , the meeting was adjourned at 9 : 55 p . m . Respectfully submitted , Nancy M . Fuller , Secretary . • A "GENDA TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD ® TUESDAY , NOVEMBER 15 , : 1977 7 : 30 P . M . PUBLIC HEARING : Consideration of request of R . M . and M . N . Brown ( Orlando I-acovelli as agent ) to rezone approximately 3 . 5 acres from Residence District R- 15 to Multiple Residence District , Tax Parcel 6 - 53 - 1 - 10 , for development of a 16 - 18 unit apartment in the vicinity of Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . m 8 : 00 P . M . PUBLIC HEARING : Consideration of proposed 8 -car garage at 123 East King Road ( " Springwood " ) , Tax Parcel 6 - 43 - 2 - 8 , zoned Multiple Residence District and owned by Evan Monkemeyer , 8 : 15 P . M . Discussion of proposed to year Park Plan 8 : 45 P . M . Report of Sign Ordinance Committee 9 : 00 P . M . ADJOURNMENT NOTE : IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING BOARD CANNOT ATTEND , PLEASE CALL ME IMMEDIATELY AT 273 - 1721 . I Nancy M . Fuller Secretary MEMO TO MEMBER PLANNING BOARD ONLY - 0 00 At 9 : 00 p . m . the Plan and will go into Work Session for a mock presentati to Planning Board by Cornell Landscape Archite re students their site plan analyses and developme proposals for the Be Hills site . p % o � ® )i � 1dft ��� •� a464ut ly Svt . � � Y l7 � c • }�+ • _ - 7W - - — - 1 ,�L!` -Q• �„f�r _n ,��-'___�. _�.- ley - S f ( ' Y s / z-� AIM, rip ec , _...�. 41 IL / SPO' 6 � � rh V Al i �e SQL./ u �..� W"� ,:'�•"'-- � � t1' `� � � � //�K6-'de'yi, ��.,` - 41 IK �1 a / �•s��• r . 3� 'r.J1✓S�I�C� . 4��.� ' �j V' i'? �r � � t ;i' � � .Jt . .-�C!`.y� .. l _ � . 1 . � a ,.r,�y�•" � �-ve'Y'�--f'•...Y^�, _ Y��f� _ . �\AIP �ib�_a_ .[t r • r AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING TOWN CLERK ' S OFFICE ITHACA , N . Y. I , Edward L . Bergen being duly sworn , say , that I am the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County , New York, that the following notice has . been duly posted -on the sign board of the Town Clerk of- the Town ,of Ithaca and that the notice has been duly published in the local newspaper : ( Ithaca Journal ) Notice of Public Hearings to be held by Planning Board of t-- hp 'T'nwn-_Laf ithaeR— on Tuegday , November 15 , 1977 , in Town Hall , 126 E Seneca - St ( second Amort _ Ithaca , N . Y . , at 7 : 30 p . m . and 8 : 00 p . m . respectively as per attached , cation of sign - board used for posting : Front Entrance to Town Hall Date of Posting ; November 8 , 1977 Date of Publication : November 10 , 1977 Edwad • Bergen Town Clerk Town of Ithaca State of New York County of Tompkins SS , Town of Ithaca Sworn to before me this 14th day of November , 19 77 r NOTARY 7 Z2 GW, RTRUM K B RGE1 / Na4ary Puhhcr State of New -York erNi, 55-4527897kins m Ex in Tompkins County , berm Expires It�arcb 30, 19 . r , , Ah it 22 ITACA J.QURNAL�- Thlursday; November 1 , 19tq , � . Notice`'. TOWN ` OF THACA PLANNINBO G`, j+ NOTICE OF EUBtIC?YiEARINGS: x ,TUESDAY +NQ' EMBER IS"AJr,1977t By direction of+ttieyCba�rmentoftthe ` ' ' Planning_`Bvard QTW%SrHERE: BY t�fUEN$th'3t0bli6fH&iinj will tie hoid,bv tWerPlanntng Board[of the Towle*bf� lihaca" ony Tuesday ;;, Novembrir�l5�I9riy,in*'Cown 'HA 126` astTSeneca Street ( sec ndfloort ; I hacaN„ . , atthe followeng- trmes. end on-theTtollowggtm," aMtter�t; + 17 30 �p rd*�Consttlef-ation+,ot!,requcst of R 111.-!$enp MtN. BI'llrown9Wrlando . lac ovellt''as agentl 'tokre`zone7apPprox- ' imaCel� '-315acresl3'fro'intResidence District " R'IS to Multrple^`Residenee Drstrre�Tyaxp�Parcetf;h"53`'i -10, for 1 dcvebgrttentr�f a'i6'tmt aparCmenl -in:the YiGtnrtv=of Pennsylva`niaExt 1011 4 rAvenue 8x00 P:M -onsideraUan of proposed 1 _ 8-car, garag>r, at 4123.:n st�King Road i'r, inIw0od i"gTaB`t?arcel, 6-43-2-8, zorat . 11 ltiPPle Residence•Districtand •1 owned,by Evan,Mone mever. r Said+ P,larimng' Board will at said limes and said place hear all persons . m.=support ottsuch ,matteroa;objec= ') lions thereto Persons mat +aFppe`ar_by pgen'i`rpr in pErson'' { M. Edward L .Bergen ay M. • - Todrn:Clerk TC ny , 41ttlaca Novembe�r�lo, •1977 "' TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS TUESDAY , NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 By direction of the Chairman of the Planning Board , NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Public Hearings will be held by the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday , November 15 , 1977 , in Town Hall , 126 East Seneca Street ( second floor ) , Ithaca , N . Y . , at the following times and on the following matters : 7 : 30 P . M . Consideration of request of R . M . and M . N . Brown ( Orlando Iacovelli as agent ) to rezone approximately 3 . 5 acres from Residence District R- 15 to Multiple Residence District , Tax Parcel 6 - 53 - 1 - 10 , for development of a 16 - 18 unit apartment in the vicinity of Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . 8 : 00 P . M . Consideration of proposed 8 - car garage at 123 East King Road ( " Springwood " ) , Tax Parcel 6 - 43 - 2 - 8 , zoned Multiple Residence District and owned by Evan Monkemeyer . Said Planning Board will at said times and said place hear all persons in support of such matter or objections thereto . Persons may appear by agent or in person . Edward L . Bergen Town Clerk Town of Ithaca Dated : November 8, 1977 Publish : November /0i 1977 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE . BY . MAIL STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF TOMPKINS ) Nancy M . Fuller , being duly sworn , deposes and says , that deponent is not a party to the actions , is over 21 years of age and resides at 316 Turner Place , Ithaca , N . Y . That on the 10th day of November , 1977 , deponent served the within Notice upon : John I Sincebaugh 1861 Hanshaw Road Ithaca , N . Y . 14850 Che -Yu and Betty A . Li 112 Juniper Drive Ithaca , N . Y . 14850 ® Clifford D . & Louise C . Gray 307 Coddington Road Ithaca , N . Y . 14850 Charles and Elizabeth Kidney 262 Pennsylvania Avenue Ithaca , N . Y . 14850 Tamme & Aafke Steenhuis 266 Pennsylvania Avenue Ithaca , N . Y . 14850 NYSEG , Head Office Route 13 & Route 366 Ithaca , N . Y . 14850 Orlando Iacovelli 43 Edgehill Drive Guelph , Ontario , Canada N1H 5E3 By depositing same enclosed in a postpaid addressed wrapper , in a post office under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Post Office Department within the State of New York . Na cy M . F 'ler Sworn to before me this 14th day of November , 1977 , Notary P PubhcfSta of ew York No. 555278725 Qualified in Tompkins Cou t Term Expires March 30, 197Y TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD ® NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS TUESDAY , NOVEMBER 15 , 1977 By direction of the Chairman of the Planning Board , NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Public Hearings will be held by the Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca on Tuesday , November 15 , 1977 , in Town Hall , 126 East Seneca Street ( second floor ) , Ithaca , N . Y . , at the following times and on the following matters : 7 : 30 P . M . Consideration of request of R . M . and M . N . Brown ( Orlando Iacovelli as agent ) to rezone approximately 3 . 5 acres from Residence District R- 15 to Multiple Residence District , Tax Parcel 6 - 53 - 1 - 10 , for development of a 16 - 18 unit apartment in the vicinity of Pennsylvania Avenue Extension , 8 : 00 P . M . Consideration of proposed 8 - car garage at 123 East King Road ( " Springwood " ) , Tax Parcel 6 - 43 - 2 - 8 , zoned Multiple Residence District and owned by Evan Monkemeyer . Said Planning Board will at said times and said place hear all persons in support of such matter or objections thereto . Persons may appear by agent or in person . Edward L . Bergen Town Clerk Town of Ithaca Dated : November 8, 1977 Publish : November /pi 1977 ae C ' F . IxIED 77 10 28 . NAV L 1977 TOVdN OF ITNACA Chairman , Town Planning Board , 108 Green Street , Ithaca , New York . Dear Chairman : On Tuesday , October 4th , I appeared before the Town Planning Board requesting rezoning of a parcel of approximately 3 . 5 acres of land , situated on the Pennsylvania Avenue extension . In this proposal I requested rezoning to permit building of a 24 to 28 unit apartment complex . At this time I would like to inform the committee that I would be in favour of building a smaller building - - 16 to 18 units , which I hope would solve some of the problems which were felt regarding density of population per 3 1 / 2 acres of land . If I can be of further assistance to your committee please do not hesitate to call on me . Sincer�ely// ,,��/ Y -`-7�' (J Londo Iacovelli , 43 Edgehill Drive , Guelph , Ontario . N1H 5E3 . 519 - 824 - 6810 P E T I T I O N TO : The Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca November 15 , 1977 FROM : Resident Homeowners in the Juniper Drive Area RE : Opposition of Rezoning in Our Neighborhood We , the undersigned , who live in the Juniper- Hickory - Pineview - Pennsylvania- Kendall areas , vigorously oppose , and will continue to oppose by all means at our disposal , the proposed multiple - apartment units on Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . We will also oppose all efforts to have rental houses , apartment - complexes , opening of roads , etc . that might change the character of our neighborhood or that are contrary to current zoning . The following are some of the reasons why we are united in strong opposition of the construction of rental property on Pennsylvania Avenue Extension : 1 ) It would radically change the character of our neighborhood which is a quiet residential area with "no outlet " dead - end streets , relatively large lots , and little traffic . 2 ) It would suddenly reduce the value of our property which we purchased after careful consideration of the neighborhood and the quality of life there . It would be clearly unfair and irresponsible to allow such a radical change in a nice area which is now built up . 3 ) It is implied that Juniper Drive would become a through - street connecting it with Pennsylvania Avenue Extension . This is an outrageous proposition . Juniper Drive is a steep road and the heavy and careless traffic associated with dense rental property at the bottom of the street would create hazards to our children , produce noise , and invite strangers . 4 ) We already have trouble with traffic on Juniper Drive : the hill is very steep and the intersection with Coddington Road is hazardous . This is especially , V frightening because our children have to walk up to Coddington Road and wait for the bus . Cars coming from the south from behind the hill cannot see what is at the intersection . Furthermore , it is frequently impossible or very difficult to drive up on Juniper Drive in the winter . Often cars park at the top of the hill so that they can get out in the morning ( for example , Mr . Fertik is a pharmacist who must get to work ) . The neighborhood would get together after a heavy snowfall and help cars struggling on Juniper Drive . Having rental apartments at the foot of the hill would mean not only many more cars parked along the street , abandoned in the snow or blocking traffic , but it would also destroy the closeness that has developed among neighbors in this area . This is a friendly neighborhood and residing here greatly increases the joy of living in Ithaca . We trust that the Planning Board will vote against this request for rezoning and will continue to do so whenever such requests are submitted . PETITION Page 2 November 15 , 1977 106 r i Iyf % !l y �. 7e vv l 7 7V, r:. l 13 PETITION, Page 3 November 15 , 1977 94rj �� Oil C2. `mt3 , rn Zoo a14d � OF f s,;2. ��— ho - ° l " C Av- IL 7 7 /«a1C aw. • 9/ 9/ 77 FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR PRIORITIES , PROGRAMMINGr AND COSTS ! ar Location ::1 Phase Cost Constr . MethodFunding Source 8 East Ithaca Bikeway Completion $ 3800 Force Account Local M7 $ 3800 178 Northview Rd . Wester ompletion $ 2000 Force Account Local $ 2000 Acquisition X78 Tareyton Road or Sand Area Northeast Tennis Courts $ 21500 Force Account Local $ 21500 Contract Local $ 3000 X79 DeWitt Junior High Completion $ 150000 Force Account School 3000 BOR 7500 Municips . 1500 179 Eastern Heights or Softball $ 28000 Contract Local $ 14000 East Ithaca Play Area Force Account BOR 14000 179 Coy Glen or Local $ 42500 Inlet Valley Acquisition $ 85000 N/A BOR 42500 Donations 80 Eastern Heights or Tennis Courts $ 30000 Contract Local $ 15000 East Ithaca BOR 15000 80 Tareyton Road Basketball $ 7300 Force Account Local $ 7300 Local $ 25000 180 Forest Home Site Acquisition $ 50000 N/A • BOR 25000 Donations Subdivisions Local $ 12500 81 South Hill Park Acquisition ' - $ 25000 N/A BOR . 12500 Donations Subdivisions '81 Eastern Heights or Paths $ 33000 Force AccountLocal $ 16500 East Ithaca Play Area Contract BOR 16500 Local $ 21250 81 Lick Brook Acquisition $ 42500 N/A BOR 21250 Donations Local $ 15000 82 West Hill Park Acquisition $ 30000 N/A BOR 15000 Donations Subdivisions 82 Eastern Heights or _ Basketball $ 35000 Contract Local ' $ 17500 ast Ithaca BOR 17500 82 Tareyton Road Pavilion $ 12000 Force - Account Local $ 12000 9 / 9 / 77 SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR PRIORITIES , PROGRAMMING , AND COSTS Y�lr Location Phase Cost Constr . Method Funding Sourc 1983 Forest Home Ballfields , $ 100000 Force Account Local $ 50000 Development Etc . Contract BOR 50000 1983 Eastern Heights or Lawn Games $ 41000 Force Account Local $ 20500 East Ithaca Nature Walk Contract BOR 20500 1984 South Hill Stage I . $ 50000 Force Account Local $ 50000 1984 Eastern Heights or Soccer $ 66000 Force Account Local $ 33000 East Ithaca Football Contract BOR 33000 1985 Coy Glen or Ballfields $ 100000 Force Account Local $ 50000 Inlet Valley Picnic Contract BOR 50000 1985 Eastern Heights or Soccer $ 66000 Force Account Local $ 33000 East Ithaca Football Contract BOR 33000 1986 South Hill Stage II $ 50000 Force Account Local $ 25000 Contract BOR 25000 1986 Eastern Heights or Soccer $ 66000 Force Account Local $ 33000 East Ithaca Football Contract BOR . 33000 1987 West Hill Stage I $ 75000 Force Account Local $ 37500 Contract BOR 37500 1987 Eastern Heights or Play Area $ 59000 Force Account Local $ 29500 East Ithaca Contract BOR 29500 ALL LOCAL FUNDING Accrued Income Balance Expenses To Balance Park Fund Budget 1977 $ 130 , 000 1978 $ 136 , 500 $ 109 , 200 - $ 27 , 300 0 1979 $ 114 , 660 0 4wo, $ 188 , 000 $ 73 , 340 1980 0 0 $ 87 , 300 $ 87 , 300 1981 0 0 - $ 105 , 500 $ 105 , 500 1982 0 0 - $ 77 , 000 $ 77 , 000 1983 0 0 4Mo $ 141 , 000 $ 141 , 000 1984 0 0 - $ 116 , 000 $ 116 , 000 1985 0 0 $ 166 , ODO $ 166 , 000 1986 0 0 - $ 1161r000 $ 116 , 000 1987 0 0 1,,1, $ 1341000 $ 134 , 000 $ 1 , 016 , 140 Avg . Budget of $ 100 , 000 per year 1978 , $ 100 , 000 $ 100 , 000 } 1979 $ 205 , 000 $ 131 , 660 - $ 73040 1980 $ 238 , 243 $ 150 , 943 - $ 87000 1981 $ 258 , 490 $ 152 , 990 - $ 105 , 500 1982 $ 260 , 639 $ 183 , 639 - $ 77 , 000 1983 $ 292 , 821 $ 151 , 821 - $ 141 , 000 1984 $ 259 , 412 $ 143 , 412 - $ 116000 1985 $ 250 , 583 $ 84 , 583 - $ 166 , 000 1986 $ 188 . 812 $ 72 , 000 - $ 116 , 000 1987 $ 176 , 453 $ 42 , 453 41mo $ 134 , 000 • LOCAL AND BOR FUNDING Accrued Income Balance Expenses To Balance Park Fund Budget 1977 . $ 130 , 000 1978 $ 136 , 500 $ 109 , 200 - $ 27 , 300 0 1979 $ 114 , 660 $ 28 , 160 - $ 86 , 500 0 1980 $ 29 , 568 0 - $ 47 , 300 $ 17 , 732 1981 0 0 - $ 50 , 250 $ 50 , 250 1982 0 0 - $ 591500 $ 59 , 500 1983 0 0 . - $ 701500 $ 70 , 500 1984 0 0 - $ 83 , 000 $ 83 , 000 1985 0 0 - $ 83 , 000,% $ 83 , 000 1986 0 0 - $ 58 , 000 $ 58 , 000 1987 0 0 - $ 67 , 000 $ 67 , 000 $ 488 , 982 ® Avg . Budget of $ 50000 per - year 1978 $ 50 , 000 $ 50 , 000 1979 $ 102 , 500 $ 102 , 500 • 1980 $ 157 , 625 $ 139 , 893 - $ 17732 1981 $ 196 , 887 $ 146 , 637 - $ 50 , 250 1982 . $ 203 , 969 $ 144 , 469 - $ 59 , 500 1983 $ 201 , 693 $ 131 , 193 - $ 70 , 500 1984 $ 187 , 752 $ 1041752 - $ 831000 1985 $ 159v990 $ 76 , 990 - $ 83 , 000 1986 $ 130 , 920 $ 72 , 920 . - $ 58 , 000 1987 $ 126 , 566 $ 59 , 566 - $ 67 , 000 rn U U tn a% m U rl rl to to cncc Ln . y U N W p� tri U a � o • U ch to cm► to a roi W h c m N C4 OC O► to M r4'. a r+ an► U En a cam+ U U b En 41 tv co 41 O 41 m ,C .*. >t W Q � to 3 Mb ON o z y •�l H O x x m O x to ° ° -am' o °� a -Q ° 1 o a • -'-t b 3 0 a o o r4 o41 E=4 er4 C d Q x H -•a +1 mrW4 U ,-t > V H V +� cq x • a W .[ 4J >. m .[ a' N E h 43 v -•, V O N 4.j x +i E) to O p m i4 ? m >, N H O V m Q - U a rd o m (a Q rd Q Q "A to .-+ p. W 2 q w U F W cn ra 3 to U ,