Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB Minutes 1975-02-18 TOTQ7N OF ITHACA PLANNING BOARD
FEBRUARY 18 , 1975
The Planning Board of the Town of Ithaca met on Tuesday ,
February 18 , 1975 , at 7 : 30 p . m . in the Town of Ithaca Office , 108 East
Green Street , Ithaca , New York ,
PRESENT : Chairwoman Barbara P . Holcomb , Robert Scannell , Liese
Bronfenbrenner , Sam Slack , Robert Christianson , Richard Black ,
Lawrence Fabbroni ( Planning Engineer/Building Inspector ) ®
ABSENT and EXCUSED : Maurice Harris , Daniel Baker ,
ALSO PRESENT : David Cassel , J . Brinkerhoff , G . Kirchgessner ,
H . Mahr , Mr . and Mrs . J . Novak , Roger Battistella , Nancy Krook ,
Richard Fischer , E . Phillips , Mr . and Mrs . J . Sullivan , Kenneth Strike ,
Beverly Livesay , Lorraine McCue , Eva Hoffmann , Paul Hartman , Brad
Kalbfeld ( WTKO ) .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION by Mrs , Barbara Holcomb , seconded by Mr . Sam Slack :
RESOLVED , that Planning Board Minutes of November 5 , 1974 ,
November 19 , 1974 , and December 3 , 1974 , be approved as submitted .
Aye - Holcomb , Slack , Christianson .
Abstain - Scannell , Bronfenbrenner , Black ,
OCarried .
REPORT OF PLANNING ENGINEER
Mr . Fabbroni reported that he is making progress on the zoning
ordinance . He also reported that there are several problem areas
apart from the zoning ordinance that he is working on .
TRAFFIC HAZARD NOTED
Mr . Slack reported that he had been down by the Millbrook Bakery
where the site of the grocery store is that the Planning Board
approved ( Bell ' s ) , He stated that he felt there was a very bad traffic
hazard there .
WALKERS FROM ELLIS HOLLOW ELDERLY HOUSING PROJECT
Mrs . Holcomb wished to discuss the problem of people in Ellis
Hollow Elderly Housing. walking along the side of the road ( Ellis
Hollow Road ) in order to get to the shopping center . There followed
a discussion of the possibility of a walkway over to the shopping
center . Mr . Fabbroni thought that there could be a culvert pipe in-
stalled over the drainage stream between the apartments and the shop
ping center or a bridge- like structure over it , Mr . Black thought
that a light-weight bridge might be as cheap as a culvert pipe .
Mr . Scannell asked who is going to do it and whose responsibility
for maintenance is it ?
Mrs . Holcomb stated that she would think that it might be the
Town of Ithaca Planning Board - 2 - February 18 , 1975
Town ' s responsibility , She further stated that she had talked to Ben
Boynton and he thought they might give us a temporary easement . Mr .
. Black added that it would be simple to bridge across from the parking
lot of the shopping center over to the parking lot of the Elderly
Housing where it is high and dry .
Mr . Christianson asked if the Planning Board said at the time of
the approval by the Planning Board that the access should be put in by
the developer , Mr . Slack said there is no problem once you get the
people to the parking lot . There is also a big dirt pile there that
could be used to make a walkway ,
Mrs . Holcomb stated that the Planning Board has a meeting on
March 4th before the next Town Board meeting which is March 10th , Mrs .
Holcomb will check on whose responsibility it is for the walkway . Mr .
Slack stated that he did not think he will be able to attend the Plan-
ning Board meeting on March 4 , 1975 .
REPORT OF COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
Mrs . Holcomb reported that the Department of Environmental Con ®
servation will have in effect on April 1 , 1975 , a new land mining
ordinance which requires State permits for extraction of sand , gravel ,
ore , etc . , for companies that move more than 1 , 000 tons in 12 consecu-
tive months , It is the Planning Board ' s thinking that we will incor
porate this State control as the main part of our Environmental Protec�
tion Ordinance but will enlarge ours to cover also those of less than '
1 , 000 tons a year . The problem of oil and gas drilling is not covered .
This is a problem that we cannot ignore . Under our zoning ordinance
we do not mention oil and gas drilling at all as a permitted use . If
it is not specifically named it is not allowed , so at least we do have
some protection ,
REQUEST OF ITHACA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TO BURY A FUEL TANK ON SCHOOL
BUS DEPOT PROPERTY
Mr . Ruggles did not appear as scheduled ,
PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION WITH MR , STEIN ® STEIN BUILDERS , RE EASTERN
HEIGHTS 'PARK
The Secretary reported that Mr . Stein ° s office had called to
report that Mr . Stein was ill and would not be present .
OPEN DISCUSSION WITH EAST ITHACA TOWN ASSOCIATION RE PRESENT PROBLEMS
AND FUTURE NEEDS OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD .
Mr . David Cassel , President , East Ithaca Town Association and
several citizens from that area were present . Mrs . Holcomb stated
that the Planning Board would like to hear about any problems in East
Ithaca and any solutions that they might have . She noted that the dis�
cussion is not limited to roads and traffic .
® Mr . Cassel then passed out sheets of questions and problems and
solutions as had been compiled by the East Ithaca Town Assoc . The
papers were read by the people in attendance and the members of the
Planning Board . ( See attachment to the Official Minutes ) .
Town of Ithaca Planning Board - -
• q 3 February 18 , 1975
Mrs . Holcomb said that she had some questions . She referred to
Page 21 paragraph 2 and asked Mr . Fabbroni to reply to the following .&
® " We support the efforts to improve the safety of children who go from
the Maple Avenue Apartments to Belle Sherman School . If pedestrian
lanes are gained by covering drainage ditches in that area , they might
serve as a model for other parts of our area . Perhaps the roads
leading into the East Hill Plaza could be the next step . Here the
interference with residences would be minimal and pedestrian traffic
to the shopping center would be safer . After some experience in this
area the idea could be extended to residential areas , if there is
widespread agreement on its utility and feasibility . Certainly if
past experience is to be our guide , residents living along a road
ti that is to be improved in this manner must be involved in early stages
of the planning . "
Mr . Fabbroni outlined the steps under way for solution of the
Mitchell Street walk problem . He stated that he has done a mini- study
and has come up with four alternatives . One of these alternatives
appeared as the most feasible way to go . Place pipe in a ditch on
the north side of Ellis Hollow Road and bring it to the City line .
This ditch would then be covered to provide a walkway from the north
side to the south side of Ellis Hollow Road where there is already a
sidewalk in the City . This recommendation was passed along by the
Town Board to Mr . Howard Stevenson , Highway Commissioner . Also an
area-wide speed limit should be installed in the area bounded by
Route 79 , Route 366 , City line and Town of Dryden line . The requested
speed limit would be 35 m . p . h . for all those roads in the area such
® as Pine Tree , Snyder Hill , Maple Avenue , etc ,
A person suggested that Route 79 be a 35 m . p . h . zone , Mrs .
Holcomb noted that it is very difficult to get a State route to be
35 m . p . h . We hope that the area speed limit itself works . There is
certainly no guarantee .
Mr . Fabbroni said that what has happened now is to sit down
with Howard Stevenson and Bill Mobbs and work out the details of
constructing the walkway . Several suggestions have been made as to
shared responsibility . There would be a wide shoulder to enable
plowing ,
Mrs . Holcomb also noted that it has been recommended that the
Town establish a no parking zone from the City line to the Judd Falls
Road and Pine Tree Road intersections on both sides of the road , in
order to keep cars off the area that one might walk on , particularly
in the area around Koppers . This will be added to our no parking
ordinance in the Town . However , it will not be effective until the
signs are installed which may be some time yet .
Mrs . Holcomb questioned page 3 , paragraph 5 which reads .& " There
are several particularly dangerous intersections in our area , the
corners of Honness Lane - Route 79 , the corners at the East Hill Plaza ,
and the Judd Falls - Route 79 intersection . what can we do to improve
them? Can we start with stop signs or traffic lights , or must our
only solution begin with cutting down trees and digging into yards ? "
With reference to the dangerous intersection at Honness Lane and
Route 79 , Mrs . Holcomb noted that the approval for Eastwood Commons
involved a drainage ditch to the Route 79 intersection . The agreement
was that the Town would put in the ditch pipe underground and widen
the ditch . That was supposed to be done last summer but the Bolton
Town of Ithaca Planning Board - 4 - February 18 , 1975
Point water line was supposed to go in there so the project was de-
layed . The Bolton Point line has been moved and this project will be
on the agenda for next summer . We wanted the State to continue under ®
grounding the ditch along Slaterville Road to the City line but they
are opposed to undergrounding ditches .
Mr . Cassel stated that you simply cannot see when you are coming
down Honness Lane on to Slaterville Road . Mr . Fabbroni asked if it is
high weeds or the bank that causes the problem , Mr . Cassel said that
it is the high bank . Mr . Cassel said that one thing that might help
is trying to do something about traffic control , such as a 35 m . p . h .
speed limit on that part of Route 79 near Honness Lane , He pointed
out that the people in the East Ithaca area would like to find " non-
construction " solutions to traffic problems . Mr . Fabbroni pointed
out the East Hill Plaza corner as being a " non- construction " type of
improvement where the County work on the corner has been helpful .
Mrs . Holcomb commented on the suggestion that perhaps developers
complete environmental parts of agreements before occupancy . One can
require people to post a bond so that items not done can be done by
the Town . Mrs . Holcomb also commented on the suggestion that the
Town should be very conservative in rezoning or granting variances in
the direction of higher density residential or commercial development .
We are developing a concept of density zoning by neighborhood for the
new zoning ordinance . The area represented by the people present here
is the East Ithaca neighborhood , Within that neighborhood the
Planning Board intent is a mixture of dwellings with a limit to the
number of " high density " to a proportion of low density . The intent
is to have also a commercial center for each neighborhood - East
Ithaca has theirs already in place .
Mr . Fabbroni wished to comment on item 1 on page 4 which reads :
" Drainage from Eastern Heights seems to be a perennial problem . " He
said that he has been looking at Eastern Heights Subdivision on lower
Tudor Road as far as flooding , He has been looking at that for six
months . Check dams have been put in and seem to be functioning well ,
Mr . Cassel stated that these comments came from people not in Eastern
Heights . They are from people on Slaterville Road and the up-hill
side of Pine Tree Road . They have water in their basements and general
run-off increase since Eastern Heights has been built . Mr . Cassel
reported that it has been suggested that no more units should go in
there until this situation is cleared up . Mr . Fabbroni said that one
of the problems that exists is how you quantify it . The water that
they get in their basements is coming along the top layer of the rock
and is under the ground and not identifiab le on top of the ground .
The Marion ditch seems to be functioning well . He has a ditch which
carries a lot of water from Eastern Heights Subdivision Section 1 and
down Mr . Marion ' s property . The people ' s problem on Pine Tree Road
is probably coming from the Marion property . For the remainder of
Eastern Heights , whoever develops it , the Town Board has taken a hard
line . They have never resolved the question of draining the remainder
of their upper subdivision . Stein Builders may back off because they
® are inheriting a problem that the developer never took care of .
Mr . Ken Strike who lives on lower Tudor Road asked what is the
status of Circle Lane development . He pointed out that a Swale was
cut along behind two properties and then does a gradual turn to go
over to the drainage course through Marion ' s property . The way the
Town of Ithaca Planning Board - 5 - February 18 , 1975
lots are divided on the plot plan it would be very difficult to
build there . He noted that he would be the prime recipient of the
• water . He asked Mr . Fabbroni if he were aware of the swale . Mr .
Fabbroni said that he was aware of the swale . Mr . Fabbroni said that
he understood that the swale was deepened after the flood in 1972 ®
Mr . Strike said that there was not anything to deepen out . They came
in with a bulldozer and cut a Swale . If one built a house on it one
would have to interdict the Swale .
Mr . Elmer Phillips said that he has pictures of the rain falling
there . The whole hillside is very peculiar as to its water content
and release . Mrs . Livesay also pointed out that she had provided
pictures of springs popping up out of the ice sheets .
Mrs . Holcomb wished to comment on Item 2 on page 4 which reads .
" The road lighting at the entrance to Eastwood Commons is apparently
excessive and disturbing to neighbors on Honness Lane . " She asked if
it is the one within Eastwood Commons ? It is . Mr . Cassel said that
this kind of problem seems to be capable of a technical solution . Mrs .
Livesay said that also the light on Honness Lane is a problem - - so
there are two lights . Mr . Fabbroni discussed a shielding arrangement .
Mrs . Livesay stated that what really hurts is that there is another
light on Honness Lane that is not lighting an intersection yet ,
Mrs . Holcomb commented on Item 3 , page 4 which reads : " The
second entrance road for Eastwood Commons is left in an unfinished
state . " She stated that that is intentional - - it will be the second
intersection . Mr . Cassel was hoping that a way could be found to
finish it a little more for the people who live next to it .
Mrs . Holcomb commented on Item 4 , page 4 which reads : " Street
lighting at the entrance to the Mahle Avenue Apartments is apparently
inadequate . " She noted that no lighting exists . The Town places
lights at intersections of public roads . If additional lighting is
needed such as the intersection of Coddington Road and the entrance to
Ithaca College , street lights were put in there and paid for by
Ithaca College . Also lights were put in at Pleasant Grove Apartments
and Hasbrouck at Cornell ° s expense . Eastwood Commons lighting is paid
for by Eastwood Commons . Maple Avenue Apartments road is a private
road . Mrs , Holcomb suggested that Maple Avenue Apartments could be
asked to form a lighting district . The Civic Association should
approach Maple Avenue Apartments owners and then they come to the
Town Board to set up a lighting district .
With reference to Item 5 , page 4 which reads < " The Maple Avenue
residents feel that the snow removal is not adequate . Have the snow
removal and other road maintenance routines reflected the increased
use of Maple Avenue ? " Mr . Fabbroni stated that he will mention the
Maple Avenue snow plowing to Mr . Parkin , the Town Highway Superinten-
dent . Mr . Elmer Phillips said that he thought that Maple Avenue is a
school bus route and should be plowed early ,
Mr . Fabbroni commented on Item 6 , page 4 which reads ° " Nearly
two years after the FBC went out of business we still have their sign ,
which was never considered an asset to the community . " He stated
that letters have , gone out from the Zoning Officer to FBC which is
Kennilworth and Kennilworth is in financial difficulty . The letters
keep coming back undelivered . We just cannot get to the right person .
F
Town of Ithaca Planning Board ® 6 ® February 18 , 1975
We threatened to just take it down . Mr . Gallagher of Gallagher Real
Estate is helping out now and he will attempt to take care of it . We
hope to do something in the next month ,
Mrs . Krrok stated that the parking lot at the Plaza has not been
cleaned of accumulated trash since the Family Bargain Center went out
of business . The fields grow wild and uncut . It is an aesthetic
wasteland . No bus has been provided for the elderly either . At the
time of approval for the elderly apartments it was very clear that a
bus was going to be provided . How do you enforce your zoning regula®
tions ? Mrs . Krook referred to the Pichel residence on the corner of
Pine Tree Road and Slaterville Road which she called a disaster area
covered with garbage and junk including a coffee table on the roof .
Mr . Fabbroni said that one of the purposes of this meeting is to
find out things like Mrs . Krook referred to . As far as the parking
lot and surrounding lands at the Plaza go , Mr . Fabbroni said that he
has been on the Barnes ' property and was not aware of the huge piles
of garbage referred to . Mr . Fabbroni said that he has also been
checking on Pichel and from the cars that he has seen there he has no
substantiation of excessive occupants . The problem of dogs and gar -
bage which existed last year was understood to have ceased with the
new tenants in the Fall . He also noted that he is somewhat hampered
by the present zoning ordinance since the Pichel property cannot be
established as a junk yard . Mr . Fabbroni suggested that Mrs . Krook
call the Health Department ,
Mr . Cassel noted that the push that generated this approach to
the East Ithaca Town Association by the Planning Board was originally
road and traffic problems . Traffic is considered to be a serious issue
in the East Ithaca area . The main traffic problem that the people see
is the traffic of people , trucks and gravel trucks going through the
area , i . e . , the thru traffic problem . He outlined some of the solution :
that have been talked about . The by-pass road was proposed . Some
people on Pine Tree Road thought that this would be a good idea also .
But they now seek an alternative solution to construction . There is
a strong feeling that solutions should not be found by making new
roads , but by finding other ways . Mr . Cassel said that he had mixed
feelings himself but that he is trying to represent the feelings of
his neighborhood . In the meeting with Mr . Liguori there were 50 people ,
none of whom voted for any kind of road construction . They wanted other
routes to be taken such as making traffic safe and acceptable . The
East Ithaca Town Association would like to suggest that the Town care -
fully investigate alternate means of reducing traffic problems . If it
is proven that alternate means do not work , we might consider this
approach .
1 . Bus transportation . People claim that they would like to see bus
transit to the City and/or Cornell . They claim they would use it .
2 . Pedestrian traffic and bicycle use has increased a great deal . If
we make it safe we could increase it even more . Speed limits are
a problem . T%Te have addressed that already . We approve of and
encourage the 35 m . p . h . area speed limit - - however , we must
realize that traffic regulations are not enforced in that area ,
particularly on Pine Tree Road . The Sheriff is very rarely there .
Mrs . Holcomb said that consideration has been given to improving
the intersection of Pine Tree Road and Ellis Hollow Road .
Town of Ithaca Planning Board - 7 - February 18 , 1975
There were two suggestions made in discussion stage . Cornell
® owns land on both sides of Pine Tree Road. They might be willing to
cooperate in allowing a re- alignment of Pine Tree Road to intersect
Ellis Hollow Road at Judd Falls Road - - making a four - legged inter -
section . The other possibility is to go in the other direction and
align Pine Tree Road to intersect Ellis Hollow Road where the pro-
posed loop road right of way is designated .
Mr . Cassel stated that his personal reaction is that of those
two solutions the more sensible one would be the one to make a four-
corner arrangement . You would really have to include more traffic
Xa control such as a traffic light or a four -way stop .
Mr . Elmer Phillips asked if there has been any discussion with
Howard Stevenson , County Highway Commissioner , as to his plans . Mr .
Phillips felt that Mr . Stevenson is thinking very seriously about
this problem and he thought that the Planning Board should talk to
Stevenson soon .
Mrs . Livesay preferred the four -corner concept , which she
thought was abandoned from the County plans due to the proposed by-
pass .
Mrs . Holcomb asked if there are pulses of traffic on Pine Tree
Road , Mr . Cassel said yes -- coming and going from work .
® A lady from the floor mentioned the children in the area of the
shopping center and urged the lowering of the speed limit on Mitchell
Street . She also noted the problem of Mitchell Street intersecting
State Street in the City .
Another lady from the floor stated that everybody keeps talking
about long range solutions - - what about stop lights now . Mrs .
Holcomb noted that this requires State permission .
Mr . Cassel urged the Town to keep going with their attempts to
get controls on State roads .
A gentleman from the floor stated that he is opposed to any road
such as Mr . Mahr suggests which will make it easier to get to Cornell .
He stated that he is really tired of traffic . He also noted that a
lot of traffic goes down Mitchell Street to State Street .
Another gentleman urged the inauguration of a traffic patrolman
in the Town of Ithaca .
Mrs . Novak stated that Slaterville Road is very bad and does a
child have to get killed to have anything done ?
Mr . Fischer asked where do the people come from who cross Pine
Tree Road ? He wondered if there was not some way to get the traffic
® to Cornell or downtown if that is where it is going . He noted that
this discussion at the East Ithaca Town Association meeting led to
bus service . Mass transit . The Association remembered a request that
came from the Town Board and the Planning Board about how revenue
sharing money should be used . Plass transit was one of the points
made .
Town of Ithaca Planning Board - 8 - February 18 , 1975
Mrs . Holcomb noted that Prof . Meyburg is conducting a two-year
study of mass transit being funded by the Federal government . Tomp-
® kips County is the pilot for this model . This study is in its second
year . A lot of data is specifically applied to Tompkins County even
though it is for a wide application . The Town Board has asked Larry
Fabbroni and Mrs . Holcomb to talk to the City about expanding their
system . The City cannot give $ and answers to just expanding
systems . They need to know what area might be expanded . The City
bus system does not have any excess capacity in terms of being able
to extend existing routes and put in new ones , Turn around time on
the run to Dryden Road- Ithaca Road intersection is too short to allow
this run to be extended without shortening the run on the other end .
We are beginning to try to develop a possibility of a pilot project
maybe on the basis of a leased bus that might come out to East Ithaca ,
East Ithaca seems to be a good place to try because of the Ellis
Hollow Elderly Housing . This pilot project would be paid for by the
Town using City system and City bookkeeping and management . Mrs .
Holcomb asked for comments .
Mr . Fischer said that it would be good if we had a bus that
started at the Ithaca-Dryden Town line and made stops of the sort
that school busses make going downtown and to Cornell .
Mr . Scannell asked how often should busses run to take people
into Cornell ? Cornell professors come and go at all sorts of weird
times . This problem has been seen by Prof . Meyburg .
® Mrs . Bronfenbrenner noted that the bus in the Northeast area
has worked out . Mr . Scannell suggested a mini -bus system .
Mr . Phillips was of the opinion that the road proposed by Mr .
Mahr will dump more traffic on Pine Tree Road . He remembered two
other plans from the Town to by®pass Pine Tree Road , We assume that
the computer could come out with mass transit - - but if it does not
- - what about widening Pine Tree Road , bikes , tricycles , horses - -
I am saying that we must have alternatives should mass transit not
operate .
A gentleman suggested that the Red Cross has applied for two
vans with lift capacity for the Elderly Housing transportation . Mr .
Fabbroni pointed out that that was a private grant that the Red Cross
applied for and was for elderly and people associated with Red Cross
services and handicapped . The meeting that we had indicated that
there was little chance for everybody to use this service .
Mrs . May asked for clarification of what she had thought had
been the case . She stated that she had attended lots of meetings on
the Elderly Housing and she thought they were going to provide trans -
portation . She asked if we do not have any clout to make them meet
the terms of the contract ?
Mr . Fabbroni stated that it is very clear in the contract that
they were to provide transportation if public transportation were not
available .
A gentleman said from the floor that he had an E . O . C . volunteer '
bus to go out to the elderly housing . He talked to the management
and asked for a lease . He received no response . The times would have
L .714
been 11 : 00 a . m . departure and return at 1 : 00 p . m .
Mrs . Novak stated that she is in the real estate business and
is seeing more and more that people are asking if there is bus ser®
® vice available before they purchase a home .
Mrs . Holcomb asked if a bus went downtown and to the Ellis
Hollow Elderly Housing , would your children use it ? The response
from the audience was " yes °' .
Mr . Fabbroni spoke on the funding of mass transit . It is a
serious responsibility in that the decision-makers have to look at
the continuing effect of their decisions for years to come . Most of
our funding comes from the State . We are too small to be able to
draw from the large Federal appropriations such as the approximate
11 billion just passed in the fall for transportation . Initial
equipment is almost paid for 100 % . It is very important to see what
happens with the operating subsidy legislation . This operating sub
sidy is a temporary thing in a transition time and once they are off
the ground we will see most future bills go to equipment or replace-
ment , less go to operating . He was saying that we might right now be
able to get equipment to set up bus lines and have nobody riding them
and then one day the floor drops out and we have this huge deficit to
add to the taxes to keep it operating . The Federal Govt . is really
hot to do dial -a -bus systems . Many are failing . There is potential
shown on the West Coast for service through taxi companies on a
contract basis to pick up three or four riders . A lot has to be done
in New York with unions .
Mr . Cassel said that " we are not communicating " . We have been
0 told that nothing is going to work . You still hear us saying , which
we are not saying , that the only way to solve traffic problems is by
building more roads .
Mr . Fabbroni said that all he was saying is that you have to be
very careful so as not to get into a huge cost problem .
Mr . Cassel said - ® let ' s see more action on the busses and less
on the road .
Mr . Fabbroni said that he thought that the people are communica-
ting . He noted that they certainly did on the loop road . He said
that he was trying to match the hopes and dreams on mass transit with
more of the realities .
Mrs . Holcomb stated that the planning board is not saying that
these things will not work . They are saying that they are trying
these things . The Planning Board did not want to leave the impression
that there is lots of money and we can get in on the ground floor .
A gentleman from the floor asked about Sarlene Drive paving
situation . Mr . Fabbroni said that there are going to be problems
with that road for the next three years . Utilities were put in after
the road was in . The developers will be meeting with the highway
superintendent . The Town is well aware of that problem . The gentle-
man asked if the highway department can put in some patches ? Mr .
Fabbroni said that the Town can cold patch . He further said that the
developer fixed it up in September but by the very nature of the road
Town of Ithaca Planning Board - 10 - February 18 , 1975
and because of the unusual winter the pot holes keep cropping up ®
At this point , Mrs . Holcomb stated that she would like to have
the citizens present come back , if they would like , to discuss parks
and developments .
Mr . Fischer said that at 10 ° 00 o ' clock he had a really good
feeling . This is great - - we are being listened to . At 5 minutes
after 109. 00 I had just been told that you " kiddies " want to have a
picnic and you buy the things and it may rain and you may not be able
to have the picnic . But , why do you not say " let ' s try it " ?
Mr . Fabbroni said that he thinks that we need to try something
but it may be somewhat short of what you want to happen . He was
suggesting staging into any project .
Mr . Scannell said that he is a firm believer in people power .
He thought that if the people want mass transit it will happen . He
thought the process goes from the people to the Town ,
Mr . Cassel said that he thought that the idea of inviting the
East Ithaca Town Association was a good idea . He thought that there
are a lot of technical problems that need to be discussed , and we
should talk with you and set up an avenue for attacking these problems ,
He suggested that small workable groups should be set up .
Mrs . Livesay said that she thought that the idea of parks is
very important to people in our section of the Town ( East Ithaca ) and
was not meant to be overlooked in the papers presented . Also recrea-
tion programs not only in cooperation with the City but also as a
separate program .
Mrs . Holcomb noted in closing that a bikeway study at Cornell
( Department of Landscape Architecture ) funded by the Town and City is
underway .
ADJOURNMENT
Upon Motion the Meeting was adjourned at 109. 40 p . m .
Respectfully submitted ,
Nancy M . Fuller , Secretary .
February i8 , j915
To : The Ithaca Town Planning Board
rFrom : The Board of Directors of the East Ithaca Town Association
We appreciate thin invitation to discuss planning problems
that .particularly af ' ect our area at this meeting . Traffic and
control of development appear to be the main concerns of residents
in our area . This neighborhood includes a variety of roads that
are residential streets , as well as routes connecting different
kinds of sources and goals of traffic . Therefore , we have a
variety of problems which do not always lend themselves to
the same kind of solution . Nevertheless , we have tried to
distill a few comments on planning in our area that we feel
are consistent with the views of the majority of our constituents .
TRAFFIC PROBLEMS :
Several roads in our neighborhood , Route 79 , Pine Tree
Road , Honness Lane , and Ellis Hollow Road carry heavy traffic
between Cornell or downtown Ithaca and area- s in or beyond our
neighborhood . In the last few years traffic on these roads has
increased substantially . Furthermore , pedestrian and bicycle
traffic along these roads has swelled , especially with the
construction of the Maple Avenue and Ellis Hollow Road apartment
Projects . The somewhat rural appearance of the arra , the
patchwork quilt of speed limits and the haphazard enforcement
of traffic regulations seem to conspire to make the traffic
fast as well as heavy . Since their is generally no space
other than the road surface for bicycle and pedestrian traffic ,
the roads are very hazardous . Several types of solutions for these
problemB have been widely discusse3 :
1 • Introduction of Extensive Bus Service .
2 • Construction of Pedestrian - Bicycle Lanes .
3 • Rationalization of the Pattern of Speed Limits .
4 . Stricter Enforcement of Traffic Regulations .
5 • Improving Safety at Dangerous Intersections .
6 • Construction of Bypass Roads .
7 • Rebuilding Existing Roads to Make Driving on Them Easier .
® Although 6 and 7 seem to be the traditional approaches to
traffic problems like ours , they apparently meet with little
enthusiasm in our neighborhood . Residents seem to prefer to
try to decrease motor traffic and increase the safety of
pedestrian and bicycle traffic . If these goals are kroven
to be unattainable , the enthusiasm for 6 and 7 might increase .
Our more extensive comments on these suggestions include a
number of questions for the Town Planning Board and the Town
Board .
1 . We strongly endorse proposals to extend bus service into our
area . The minimal service that should be considered is frequent
service from downtown Ithaca to the Ellis Hollow Apartments , which
would include a stop at the Maple Avenue Apartments and at the
East Hill Plaza . Extending this service to a loop thru Honness
Lane on the return trip would substantially increase the value
of the service . However this plan leaves out Cornell , which
is the goal of much of our purely local traffic . Could this
® bus somehow skirt the edge of the Cornell Campus , maybe reversing
its direction between early morning and late afternoon ? How
could Snyder Hill Road be included in bus plans ? Is it possible
to reduce thru traffic by introducing bus service to outlying
areas ? We understand that the answers to these problems are
not easy to find . Perhaps we should have extensive feasibility
study followed by an experiment .
2 . We support the efforts to improve the safety of children
who go from the Maple Avenue Apartments to Belle Sherman School .
If Pedestrian lanes are gained by covering drainage ditches in
that area , they might serve as a model for other parts of our
area . Perhaps the roads leading into the East Hill Plaza could
be the next step . Here the interference with residences would
be minimal and pedestrian traffic to the shopping center would
be safer . After some experience in this area the idea could be
extended to residential areas , if there is widespread agreement
on its utility and feasibility . Certainly if past experience
is to be our guide , residents living along a road that is to be
improved in this manner must be involved in early stages of the
planning . , . .
3 . Reduction of the speed limits on the four roads radiating
from the East Hill Plaza would be very helpful in increasing
safety . We endorse the proposal described in the December
Memorandum to the Town Board concerning the Maple Avenue children ,
for an area - wide 35 MPH speed limit .
~ 4 . It is our experience that lower speed limits will not be
j effective without better law enforcement . Could we have a radar
car in the area as often as one - half day per week , at a different
time each week ? It is obvious that there needs to be a strong
I'
j Judge backing up the police work .
5 . There are several particularly dangerous intersections in our
area , the corners of Honness Lane - Route 79 , the corner at the
i
East Hill Plaza , and the Judd Falls - Route 79 intersection . What
can we do to improve them ? Can we start with stop signs or
E.
traffic lights , or must our only solution begin with cutting
down trees and digging into yards ?
6 . As mentioned above , the majority view in our neighborhood
® seems to be that the first five approaches should be tried
first , and bypass roads should be built as a last resort , if at
all . Perhaps the attitude that new roads are the only viable
solution for reducing thru traffic on residential streets is
outmoded .
7 . Proposals which include reconstruction of existing roads to
handle more traffic are the proposals that meet the strongest
resistance from residents in our area . Plans to construct roads
to bypass other areas that include roads that feed into existing
roads in this area are in the same category .
DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS :
Our experience with commercial development , and extensive
residential development in our area has not always been pleasant .
We feel that development must be kept on a tighter leash than
previously . For example , perhaps developers should be required to
complete the environmental parts of the agreements before
occupancy is allowed . Furthermore , we feel that the Town should
be very conservative in rezoning or granting variances in the
direction of higher density residental or commercial development .
i
l
- 4
We would like to draw attention to a few outstanding
specific problems from .previous recent development .
1 . Drainage from .Eastern Heights seems to be a perennial problem .
t 2 . The road lighting at. the entrance to Eastwood Commons
is apparently excessive and disturbing to neighbors on Honness Lane .
I ^' 3 . The second entrance road for Eastwood Commons is left in
an unfinished state .
4 . Street lighting at the entrance to the Maple Avenue
Apartments is apparently inadequate .
5 . The Maple Avenue residents feel that the snow removal is
not adequate . Have the snow removal and other road maintenance
routines reflected the increased use of Maple Avenue ?
Nearly two years after the FBC went out of business we still b
have their sign , which was never considered an asset to the
i community .
CONCLUSIONS :
We recognize that the issues raised in this report will
require careful thought and hard choices . The Board of Directors
of the East Ithaca Town Association would like to express its
willingness to work with the Town in finding equitable solutions
to our problems .
For the Board of Directors ,
David G . Cassel
i r
I
i
Members of our Board :
i
I .
Mrs . Archibald 114 Honness Lane 272 - 8595
! : Mr . Cassel 152 Pine Tree Road 273 - 1708
Mr . Fischer 135 Pine Tree Road 273 - 2077
j Mrs . Jones 150 Honness Lane 273 - 2538
4
Mr . Livesay 147 Snyder Hill Road 272 - 2776
Mrs , May 1360 Slaterville Road 272 - 8224
i
1
The East Ithaca Town As .sociation has been invited to discuss
planning issues that specifically affect our area with the Ithaca
Town Planning Board at their next meeting on Tuesday February 18
at 7 : 30 PM . We expect that the main subjects for discussion will
be roads , traffic and control of development , but we are by no
means restricted to these topics . Most of ' the members of the
Board of Directors of our Association will attend the meeting
to try to represent our interests , but we understand that the
invitation extends to the whole Association , so you would also
be welcome at the meeting .
We need your help in order to present an organized and
balanced view of our problems , together with suggestions for
solutions that do not create worse problems . Please call one
of us or write a short note to . inform us of your views . Our
addresses andphone numbers are included below , for your convenience .
( A note in one of our newspaper boxes is fine : ) We would appreciate
having your response by Monday afternoon , so we have time to
organize ourselves . The sort of issues which will face us are
the following .
1 . We may eventually be forced into choosing between new bypass
roads and " improvement " of existing roads in order to handle thru
( as opposed to local ) traffic . Which do we choose ? If we want new
roads , where should they be ? If we want " improvement " of existing
roads , what sort of " improvements " are we willing .to tolerate ?
2 . How do we react to plans for bypass roads for Forest Home or
other areas that could funnel more traffic into our existing roads ?
3 . Can we envision solutions to the thru traffic problems that
do not involve roadbuilding ? For exampl . e. , would stricter enforcement ,
bicycle paths or sidewalks reduce the thru traffic danger to an
acceptable level ? Are we willing to pay their costs , especially
for those like sidewalks for which we , ourselves , must pay essentially
the total cost ? Can we envision a workable public transportation
system that would significantly reduce thru ( again as opposed to
local ) traffic ?
4 . Is the impact of new " development " on the neighborhood
sufficiently well - controlled ? Do we have workable suggestions that
would help in controlling future development ? Are there outstanding
problems from past " development " that still demand solution ?
I
5 . There is currently some preliminary discussion
about establishing bus service to our area , at least to connect
the new Maple Avenue and Ellis Hollow Apartments with the downtown
area . Would this be useful ? Would it be much more useful if
N the bus returned to the downtown area via Honness Lane and
Slaterville Road ? Are we interested mainly in bus service for
the downtown . area , for Cornell , or are both necessary ? At what
times of day must buses run be useful ?
For the _Bo.ard of Directors ,
David G . . Cassel
Members of our Board .
Mrs . Archibald 114 Honness Lane 272 - 8595
Mr . Cassel 152 Pine Tree Road 273 - 1708
Mr . Fischer 135 Pine Tree Road 273 - 2077
Mrs . Jones 150 Honness Lane 273 - 2538
Mr . Livesay 147 Snyder Hi11 Road : 272 - 2776
Mrs . May 1360 Slaterville Road 272 - 8224
. I .K X i� hUzoly ©ku//SOW-If
* Applicable to any operator kaho mines more than 1 , 000 tons of minerals
in 12 successive months .
• S
-r
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT TO THE NEW YORK STATE ENVIRON`ZENTAL
CONSERVATION LAJ
Article 23 , Title 27 , New York State Mined Land Reclamation Law ,
Approved June 15 , 1974 , Effective April 1 , 1975
I . APPLICATION
1 . Application to be submitted annually or triannually
2 . Fee to be $ 100 for one year or $ 200 for three years
3 . Information required :
a) common commercial name and geological description
b ) identity of applicant and operation
c ) estimated surface acres to be disturbed by mining
d ) name & address of surface land owner ' ( except for un -
derground mines )
e ) name & address of owner of mineral rights
f ) permanent & temporary address of applicant
g) number of any permits held by surface or mineral owner
h) chief executive offices if corporate .owner
i ) - details of any previous permit revocation
* �bee •Note J ) Mined Land Use Plan
paff . 3 MINED LAND USE PLAN
1 . Graphic and written descriptions of following :
a) affected land as it presently exists
b ) outline of area of minerals to be removed
c ) mining method to be used
d) Reclamation Plan
2 . Maps to describe sections a & b above shall require .
a) existing and requested excavation
b ) existing streams rivers and lakes
® c ) roads
d) other relevant geographical or cultural features
3 . Section c above shall include :
,. a ) existing and requested excavation
b ) existing and requested settling pond and washing plant
• c ) existing and requested treatment facilities
d) proposed mineral storage area
e ) existing or proposed spoil banks
f ) proposed area for overburden or topsoil stockpiling
i
g) description of mining methods to indicate : j
i . proposed screening of all storage areas to confine
dust and flying particles ;
ii . sequence of excavation as they . affect reclamation
plans
iiie location of haulageways to minimize intrusion into
residential areas and treatment to minimize dust
iv . planned drainage and water control to minimize
soil erosion
.v , planned impoundments for lakes or ponds and pro -
. posed purpose
. 4 . Any deviation from an approved plan shall require the
department ' s written approval
III . RECI.AMATIOI!1 PLAN
1 . Reclamation plan shall consist of two parts :
a) reclamation map on same basis as mined land use plan
map showing proposed final stage of reclamation
b ) written description indicating proposed use of land
such as :
i . farming
• ii . pasture
forestry
iv . recreation
ve industrial
V10 commercial
vii . residential
V11219 solid waste disposal
ix . other uses acceptable to commissioner
2 . Reclamation plan shall specify
a) revegetation
b ) disposal of debris , refuse , tailings , waste or spoil
c ) grading plans
3 . Where possible the reclamation plan shall provide for
orderly , continuing reclamation concurrent with mining operation
Iv . RECLAMATION BOND
1 . Amount of bond to be determined by department (not
. required of a municipal operator)
2 . Form and terms of bond to be determined by department
3 . If bond is cancelled , operator shall provide valid
replacement -within 30 days ,
4 . If permit is revoked , surety is to complete reclamation
5 . Release from bonding upon satisfying requirements of the
reclamation plan
6 . A two year period allowed for reclamation of mined land
7 . A portion of the bond may be released for the portion of
the land reclaimed
* NOTE : I . k) Applicant required to notify adjacent property owners and
municipality affected of application for permit . DEC to
notify such persons whether application was approved or
disapproved . ,
f
From Constructioneer 10/ 28 / 74