Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTB Minutes 2008-01-07ORGANIZATIONAL & REGULAR MEETING OF THE ITHACA TOWN BOARD
MONDAY, JANUARY 7, 2008 AT 5:30 P.M.
215 NORTH TIOGA ST, ITHACA, NY
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Official Oath of Office administered to newly elected and re-elected Town Board Members:
Hon. Peter Stein; Councilmember's elect: Eric Levine and Wiliiam G. Goodman
4. Report of Tompkins County Legislature
5. Report of Ithaca Common Council
6. Report of Fire Commissioners
7. 5:45 p.m. - Betty Faicao, Health Planning Councii, discuss and answer questions pertaining
to Assisted Living Centers
8. 6:00 p.m. - Persons to be heard and Board comments
9. 6:15 p.m. - Public Hearing - re: passage of a Local Law increasing the minimum income
level for eligibility to receive a property tax exemption for persons with disabilities and limited
income
10. Consider adoption of Local Law increasing the minimum income ievei for eiigibiiity to
receive a property tax exemption for persons with disabiiities and limited income
11. 6:20 p.m. - Public Hearing - re: passage of a Local Law increasing the minimum income
ievei for eiigibiiity to receive a property tax exemption for Persons sixty-five years of age or
over
12. Consider adoption of Local Law increasing the minimum income Ievei for eiigibiiity to
receive a property tax exemption for Persons sixty-five years of age or over
13. 6:30 p.m. - The Viilage at South Pointe Assisted Living Community presentation
14. Consider Resoiution of appreciation for iong-time Conservation Board Member, Lenore
Durkee
15. 7:00 p.m. - Conservation Board Presentation and Recommendations re: Scenic Resources
Study (20 min +/-)
16. Discuss and consider amending the EcoViilage Special Land Use District to aiiow Bed and
Breakfast Facilities
17. Consider authorization for additional service to SCLIWC and additionai compensation to
Budget Officer
18. Consider and approve Birthday Recognition
Final - January 3, 2008
19. Consider Approval of 2008 Town Board Meeting Schedule
20. Consider appointment of Deputy Town Supervisor j |
21. Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Planning Board Chair
22. Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Chair
23. Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Conservation Board Chair
24. Consider appointment to the Town of Ithaca Planning Board
25. Consider appointment to the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeais
26. Consider appointments to the Town of Ithaca Conservation Board
27. Consider appointments to the Town of ithaca Ethics Board
28. Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Highway Superintendent
29. Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Town Clerk
30. Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Town Engineer
31. Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Receiver of Taxes
32. Consider and approve Town of Ithaca Board Protocol and Procedures Manual j
33. Consider Supen/isor's Board and Committee appointments
34. Consider appointment of Citizen Advisory Committees
35. Consider Intermunicipal Committee Appointments
36. Consider approval of revisions to First Deputy and Deputy Town Clerk job descriptions
37. Consider and acknowledge the appointment of the First Deputy Town Clerk and Deputy
Town Clerk
38. Consider appointment of Town Historian
39. Consider Confirmation of Arrangements and Appointment of Attomey(s) for the Town
40. Consider setting Public Hearings for Stormwater Management Laws
41. Discuss 2008 Association of Towns Resolutions and Consider designation of 2008 Officiai
Delegate and Alternate Delegate for the New York State Association of Towns 2006 Annual
Meeting
42. Consider and approve Herb Engman and Biil Goodman as members of the Tompkir/^
Council of Governments ' I
' )
43. Consider Agreement for the Expenditure of Highway Monies
Final - January 3, 2008
44. Consider Consent Agenda Items
a. Approval of Town Board Minutes of December 10,2007
b. Town of Ithaca Abstract
c. Bolton Point Abstract
d. Voucher deadlines for 2008
e. Cash management and investment policies and procedures
f. Consider Approval of Records Disposition List
g. Designation of Official Newspaper
h. Designation of Official Depositories of Town Funds
I. Official Bonds of Town Officers and Employees
j. Reappolntment of Deputy Highway Superintendent
k. Holiday Tree Pickup
45. Reportof Town Committees
a. Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Committee
b. Capital Projects and Fiscal Planning Committee
c. Cayuga Lake Watershed Intermuniclpal Organization
d. Codes and Ordinances Committee
e. Lake Source Data Sharing Committee
f. Personnel Committee
g. Public Works Committee
h. Recreation Partnership
I. Records Management Advisory Board
]. Safety Committee
k. Sewer Joint Subcommittee
I. Sewer Contract Committee
m. Southern Cayuga Lake Intermuniclpal Water Commission
n. Transportation Committee
46. Consider Adjournment
Final - January 3, 2008
TOWN OF ITHACA
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION
I, Karen M. Billings, being duly sworn, say that I am the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca,
Tompkins County, New York that the following notice has been duly posted on the sign board
of the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca and the notice has been duly published in the official
newspaper, Ithaca Journal:
ADVERTISEMENT: NOTICES OF PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Consider a Local Law amending Chapter 239 of
the Town of Ithaca Code, entitled "Taxation",
regarding Exemption for Certain Disabled
Persons with Limited Incomes
AND
Consider a Local Law Amending Chapter 239 of
the Town of Ithaca Code, entitled "Taxation",
regarding Senior Citizen Exemption.
Location of Sign Board Used for Posting: Town Clerk's Office
215 North Tioga Street
Ithaca, NY 14850
Date of Posting: Thursday, December 20, 2007
Date of Publication: Monday, December 24, 2007
Karen M. Billings
Town Clerk,
Town of Ithaca
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS:
TOWN OF ITHACA)
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 26^^ day of December, 2007
Notary Public
CARRIE WHITMORE
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01WH6052877
Tioga County OnU)
Commission Expires December 26.
o
Monday, December 24, 2007 iThe Ithaca Journal
TOWN OF ITHACA
NOTICE OF
PUBUC HEARINGS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV-
EN that the Town Boord of '
the Town of ithoco will *
hold two public hearings
on Monday, Jonuoiy
7, 2008 in the Town Hall,
located ot 215 North Tio-
go Street, tthoca, NY
at 6:15 p.ni. for the
purpose of considering a
Local law amending
Chapter 239 of the Town
of (thaca Code, entitled"taxofion," regarding Ex
emption for Certain Diso-
bled Persons with Limited
Incomes;
AND
at 6:20 p.m. for the
purpose of considering a
Local low amending
Chapter 239 of the Town
of Ithaca Code, entitled,
"Taxotion," regarding Se
nior Citizen Exemption.
Copies of the proposed
ocol taws ore on file in the
fown Clerk's Office at
215 North Tioga Street,
Ithaca, NY end available
for review during norrrwl
business hours, Monday
through Fridoy, 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m.
FURTHER NOTICE IS
HEREBY GIVEN that ot
such time and ploce all
persons interested in theEroposed local laws may
e heard concerning the
some, ond
FURTHER NOTICE IS
GIVEN that upon request,
assistance will be provided
to persons with sp^ial
' needs. Persons desiring
ossistance most make a re
quest to the Town Clerk
not less than 48 hours pri-
• or to the time of the public
heoring.
Karen M. Billings
Town Clerk
Doted:
December 20, 2007
12/24/07
Town of Ithaca Town Board
Sign-In Sheet
Meeting Date:
Please Print your information to ensure accuracy in the meeting minutes
Print Name Print Address e-mail
Sitn'r
Cdjv
Qeb^'cfi
l?v\\§o
fPf^L Vr/n
L-19- t -/cTD
K) f^3tA\i/.iOAj
\m fe(/ A j-y. Ml
//( RiuLA CoAs-o^
Qcn^ (J,
h U 4^ihL6A LSaito^lk
1^/ CoP^/6to Fau^ Lcs
if?
g fA-LCAO^ ti^drd,
f(jO>f\^
uj^l n CoT^({bf'C(pinormc.n IfHl^Leh
fOs // V<^^.>c7fe.
l\2, r 3 ^ <=-lf-^.
Por<^(.
^t3'
Approved February 11, 2008
Regular Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board
Monday, January 7,2008 at 5:30 p.m.
215 Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850
Those Present
Supervisor Engman; Councilman Burbank, Councilman Stein, Councllwoman Leary,
Councilman Cowie, Councilman Goodman
Excused
Councilman Levine
Staff Present
Karen Billings, Town Clerk; Dan Walker, Director of Engineering; Fred Noteboom,
Highway Superintendent; Jonathan Kanter, Director of Planning; Judy Drake, Human
Resources Manager; Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town.
Excused
Al Carvill, Budget Officer
Others Present
Betty Faicao, Tompkins County Human Services Coalition; Gail Carson, 111 Rachel
Carson Way; Rebecca Norman, 402 Teton Ct; Lucia Sacco, 18 Ringwood Ct.; Bill
Sonnenstuhl, 206 Winston Dr.; Chris & Paul Vitale, SouthPointe Assoc.; Tom and Patti
Farell, 151 Enfield Falls Rd.; Liz Norton, 320 W. State St.; James W. Hamilton, 1003
Slaterville Rd.; Diane Conneman, Town of Ithaca Conservation Committee; George
Conneman, 197 Christopher Ln.; Larry Sallinger, 14 Peachtree Ln.; Sitephen Wagner.
Call to Order
Supervisor Engman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. and led the assemblage in
the Pledge of Allegiance.
Agenda Item No. 3. Official Oath of Office administered to newlv elected and re-
elected Town Board Members: Hon. Peter Stein: Councilmember's elect: Eric
Levine and William D. Goodman by Town Clerk, Karen Billings.
Eric Levine - absent.
Agenda Item No. 4. Report of the Tompkins Countv Legislature ~
None present.
Agenda Item No. 5. Report of the Ithaca Common Council -
None present.
f
Agenda Item No. 6. Report of the Fire Commissioners (See attachment #1)
None present.
Page 1 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
' \
Agenda Item No. 7. (Presentation) Bettv Falcao. Health Planning Council, discuss
and answer guestions pertaining to Assisted Living Centers (See attachment #2)
Supervisor Engman introduced Betty Falcao to the board. Betty is the Director of the
Health Planning Council, which is part of the Human Services Coalition in Tompkins
County, a not-for-profit community organization. Betty was joined by Rebecca Norman,
Director of the Long Term Care Services Unit at the Department of Social Services.
Betty passed out literature (refer to attachment #2) and provided an overview.
Betty stressed that the County needs Assisted Living Program Beds in the
County and this need has existed for more than ten (10) years;
Pent up demand exists because the state has had a moratorium on new beds
across the state;
Most long-term care recipients receive care in their own homes (70% - 80% of
care is provided in this way) leading to a host of services necessary to provide
this care;
Many of the adult home care units are for those with private pay resources;
Longview takes some who are on SSI (Supplemental Securities Income) -
$32/day;
Assisted Living Program - Medicaid - this is what SouthPointe is being
considered for;
NYS put out an RFP (Request for Proposal) to get more applications, and
assigned a certain number of beds statewide.
The Berger Commission and the State determined that Tompkins County needs
more beds;
We have no Medicaid Assisted Living Centers now;
The Private Pay Adult Homes are going to be applying for Assisted Living Level
of care, but it's a different pot of money;
NYS is primarily concerned with Medicaid clients;
Over 40% of Medicaid expenditures in New York City are for Long-Term Care
and Medicaid pays 74% of Nursing Home Care;
Home care is expensive - Home Health Aides cost $20/hr. and a nursing visit
can be $100/hr.
There are a fair number of people who really need this level of care - Assisted
Living Center;
The evolution of the long-term care system in NYS has made Nursing Homes the
long-term care facilities of the poor and Assisted Living has become the long-
term care of the rich. Having Medicaid funded Assisted Living Centers would
give those with lesser Income the opportunity to live in an Assisted Living Center;
Questions from the Board Members:
Councilwoman Leary had researched and asked for clarification that this application
(SouthPointe) will not compete with Longview's application. Betty advised that Home
care was the older model, and the state did not want to build more facilities because it ^
would create a need, but family care is becoming impossible for families to do. f
Page 2 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
^ Supervisor Engman asked how many slots have been allocated for Tompklns County.
Betty responded that the allocation is statewide and providers need to submit proposals.
Councilman Burbank asked about the quality of care and whether or not the
SouthPointe application would affect Longview's application. Betty responded that the
state monitors facilities and Longview's application, to the best of her understanding, will
not be affected by SouthPointe's application.
Betty mentioned that keeping the centers in the county allows for more visitations from
family members, which also provides a better level of monitoring and supplemental
care.
Councilman Burbank questioned the zoning issues and proximity to other places,
because of the decision that the Town Board members have to make.
Betty responded that she can respond to need-based questions but zoning is an issue
for the Town Board members to consider.
Councilman Stein wanted to know what the difference is between Assisted Living
Program vs. Assisted Living Program Medicaid; is it services provided or the level of
services? Betty responded that Assisted Living Medicaid is an Adult Home (like
Longview) The Medicaid System overlay is additional assistance provided. This is the
mechanism, in NYS, for providing this to low income individuals.
Councilwoman Leary wanted to assist with an answer, because she had spoken with
Mark Macera and she understands that the level of medical care that is given is limited
in an Assisted Living Center, she said that if there is not a Medicaid component the
facility personnel are not allow to administer medications.
Betty closed by stating that providing a certain level of care to people is the primary
motive.
Agenda Item No. 8 - Persons to be heard
None.
Board Comments:
Councilwoman Leary wanted to update the Board Members on correspondence from a
resident who had a situation with a Taxi Company. She clarified that the letter writer
wanted to provide suggestions to the Town Board on how to update the current law;
from our standpoint we need to update the Taxi Company on provisions in the law. The
letter writer is not filing a formal complaint.
Supervisor Engman highlighted the Youth Recreation Partnership display in the Town
Hall Lobby; asked Town Board members if anyone from the Board could go before the
Tompklns County Legislature to make a presentation on behalf of the Town on
Tuesday, January 15^ at approximately 5:30 p.m. - no volunteers.
Page 3 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
NOW, THEREFORE, BEIT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, on behalf of the Town and its
citizens, expresses our sincere appreciation and gratitude to Lenore Durkee for her
dedicated and valuable service to our community.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman Stein,
aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye
Absent: Councilman Levine
Approved: Unanimous
Agenda Item No. 16. Discuss and consider amending the EcoVillaqe Special Land
Use District to allow Bed and Breakfast Facilities (See attachment #3)
Supervisor Engman introduced this amendment for discussion and recapped the
purpose of the proposed law.
! \
Agenda Item No. 14. Consider Resolution of appreciation for long-time
Conservation Board Member. Lenore Durkee
The resolution was introduced by Supervisor Engman.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 001: Resolution of AoDreciation and Recognition of
Service for Lenore Durkee
WHEREAS, Lenore Durkee was appointed to the Town of Ithaca Conservation Board in
January 2001, and served as Chair of such board from January 2003 through 2005,
serving with distinction for more than seven years; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Durkee has been a significant member of the Board, who has devoted
much personal time and energy to Conservation Board projects, including serving on
the Environmental Review Committee, the Richard B. Fischer Award Committee, as
well as spearheading the drafting of the Stream Setback Law; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Durkee, a professor emeritus of bioiogy, whose education, experience,
and passion for environmental concerns has been a valuable asset to the board, and
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca is indebted to Ms. Durkee for her contributions and
service to the town and its citizens in these capacities;
I t
Page 4 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
^ Applicant recap: Gail Carson from the EcoVillage's Wild Goose Bed & Breakfast,
which already exists at EcoVillage (illegally), briefly outlined her facility and its purpose.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008 - 002: RESOLUTION TO REFER TO THE TOWN OF
ITHACA PLANNING BOARD FOR ITS CONSIDERATION AND TO SCHEDULE A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ENACTMENT OF THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED
LOCAL LAW:
A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 271 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE,
ENTITLED "ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS", ADDING BED-AND-
BREAKFAST AS A PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USE IN ECOVILLAGE'S SPECIAL LAND
USE DISTRICT NO. 8
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby refers the above-
referenced Local Law to the Planning Board for a recommendation; and
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hold a public hearing at
the Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York, on the day of March
2008, at 6:00 p.m. for the purpose of considering the enactment of the proposed local
law described above; and it is further
RESOLVED, that at such time and place all persons Interested in the proposed
[ '] amendment may be heard concerning the same; and it is further
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and
directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca Journal published in the
City of Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the
Town of Ithaca, said publication and posting to occur not less than ten days before the
day designated above for the public hearing.
MOVED: Councilman Cowie
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne
Bill Goodman - recused himself
6:15 p.m. Supervisor Engman opened the Public Hearing:
Agenda Item No. 9. Publlc Hearing - re: passage of a Local Law increasing the
minimum income ievel for eiigibilitv to receive a property tax exemption for
persons with disabilities and iimited income (See attachment #4)
Page 5 of 41
/ t
Approved February 11, 2008
No individuals came forward to speak on behalf of or in opposition to this Local Law
proposal.
Agenda Item No. 10. Consider adoption of Local Law increasing the minimum
income level for eligibility to receive a property tax exemption for persons with
disabilities and limited income
Supervisor Engman introduced this item. No discussion.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 003: ADOPTING A LOCAL LAW AMENDING
CHAPTER 239 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE. TITLED "TAXATION".
REGARDING EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN DISABLED PERSONS WITH LIMtTED
INCOMES
WHEREAS, a resolution was duly adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca for
a public hearing to be held by said Town on January 7, 2008 at 6:15 p.m., to hear ail
interested parties on a proposed local law amending Chapter 239 of the Town of Ithaca
Code, Titled 'Taxation", regarding exemption for certain disabled persons with limited
incomes: Qnd
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly advertised in the Ithaca Journal; and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly held on said date and time at the Town Hall of
the Town of Ithaca and ail parties in attendance were permitted an opportunity to speak
on behalf of or in opposition to said proposed local law, or any part thereof; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act
("SEQRA") and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, it has been
determined by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca that adoption of this local law is a
Type 11 action because it constitutes "routine or continuing agency administration and
management, not including new programs or major reordering of priorities that may
affect the environment," and thus, adoption of this local law is not subject to review
under SEQRA,
NOW, THEREFORE, be it
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby adopts said local law
entitled "LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 239 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA
CODE, TITLED "TAXATION", REGARDING EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN DISABLED
PERSONS WITH LIMITED INCOMES a copy of which is attached hereto and made a
part of this resolution; and it is further
RESOLVED, that, the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file said local law
with the Secretary of State as required by law. , ^
/ \
f
Page 6 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
^ MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye
Councilman Burbank, aye
Councilman Stein, aye
Councilman Cowie, aye
Councilwoman Leary, aye
Councilman Goodman, aye
Councilman Levine - absent
Motion passed: unanimous
Agenda Item No, 11. Pubiic Hearing - re: passage of a Local Law increasing the
minimum income level for eiigibilitv to receive a property tax exemption for
Persons sixtv-five years of age or over (See attachment #5)
No individuais came forward to speak on behalf of or in opposition to this Local Law
proposal.
^ TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 004: Consider adoption of a "Local Law Amending
Chapter 239 of the Town of Ithaca Code. Titled "Taxation." Reaardina Senior
Citizen's Exemption"
WHEREAS, a resolution was duiy adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca for
a public hearing to be held by said Town on January 7, 2008 at 6:20 p.m. to hear all
interested parties on a proposed local law entitled " Local Law Amending Chapter 239
of the Town of Ithaca Code, Titled Taxation," Regarding Senior Citizens Exemption":
and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly advertised in the Ithaca Journal; and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly held on said date and time at the Town Hall of
the Town of Ithaca and all parties in attendance were permitted an opportunity to speak
on behalf of or in opposition to said proposed local law, or any part thereof; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act
("SEQf^") and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, it has been
determined by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca that adoption of this local law is a
Type II action because it constitutes "routine or continuing agency administration and
management, not including new programs or major reordering of priorities that may
affect the environment," and thus, adoption of this local law is not subject to review
under SEQRA,
NOW, THEREFORE, be it
Page 7 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
f^\
i ^
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby adopts said local law n
entitled "Local Law Amending Chapter 239 of the Town of Ithaca Code, Titled
"Taxation, "Regarding Senior Citizens Exemption ", a copy of which Is attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and it is further
RESOLVED, that, the Town Clerk Is hereby authorized and directed to file said local law
with the Secretary of State as required by law.
MOVED: Councilman Goodman
SECONDED: Councilman Stein
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye
Councilman Burbank, aye
Councilman Stein, aye
Councilman Cowie, aye
Councllwoman Leary, aye
Councilman Goodman, aye
Councilman Levine, absent
Motion Passed: Unanimous
Agenda Item No. 13. Presentation bv the Village at SouthPointe Assisted Living
Community (See attachment #6)
Supervisor Engman introduced this item.
Chris and Paul Vitale, representing SouthPointe Associates, did a joint presentation.
They referred to information previously passed out at the last Town Board meeting and
passed out two additional copies for new Town Board Members.
Chris spoke of the November 19^^ presentation and reiterated the concems expressed
by the Town Board members at that time. The plot and location were of primary
concern. In an effort to meet the needs of the Board members, SouthPointe picked
another location that they believe is a better location, primarily because it is off the main
highway (Route 13) and located on route 327. Entry is adjacent to Robert Treman Park.
Chris said the new site is about 2 miles from downtown Ithaca, on a 10.69 acre piece of
property that's contiguous, all public utilities and drainage are available and in place.
No site plan was put together with an engineer - this is a very preliminary presentation.
Proposal is for an eighty bed facility.
Councilman Stein asked to have this referred to the Planning Committee.
Page 8 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
^ TB Resolution No. 2008-005: Approve sending the request for re-zonina for an
Assisted Living Community, entitled the ViUaae at SouthPointe bv SouthPoint
Assisted Living Community, to the Town of ithaca Piannina Committee
WHEREAS, SouthPointe Associates would like to construct an Assisted Living Center
In the Town of Ithaca; and
WHEREAS, SouthPointe Associates made a presentation to the Town Board at Its
November 19, 2007 Town Board meeting and the Board members asked SouthPointe
to look at other locations, and
WHEREAS, SouthPointe Is now asking for preliminary approval of the Town Board to
consider a new site In the Town of Ithaca and would like more approvals from the Town
Board prior to engaging the resources of an engineer to more fully study sites,
NOW THEREFORE BE iT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca refers SouthPointe Associates'
newest proposal to the Town of Ithaca Planning Committee for Its review and
recommendations to the Town of Ithaca Town Board for further consideration.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councllwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Councllwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levlne,
absent.
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item No. 15. Conservation Board Presentation and Recommendations re:
Scenic Resources Study (See attachment #7)
The Conservation Board's Scenic Resources Study was presented by Diane
Conneman.
PowerPoint Presentation - refer to attachment. She gave a brief background on the
project, then introduced and explained the scenic views covered in the presentation.
Ms. Conneman then solicited questions from the board.
Board members asked the following questions:
• What would a Tree Ordinance involve? Are there models?
o Conservation Board has models to build on and it is one of its priorities.
• What mechanisms were looked into for protecting scenic views?
Page 9 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
o Several mechanisms were looked into briefly. Ms. Conneman highlighted
the "Scenic Overlay Zone".
• Has the Conservation Board communicated to the Planning Board its impression
of the Ithaca College view?
o Eva Hoffmann, Planning Board Member, worked with the Scenic Views
Committee.
Suggestions/Comnnents:
• Put Scenic Tour Map on the Town's Web site;
• Put Saving Ithaca's Views report on Town Web site with an executive summary;
• Include protection of scenic views into Comprehensive Ran;
• Initiate discussions with other (sister) municipalities regarding protecting views;
• Views contribute to quality of life;
• Develop zoning provisions to ailow more flexibility on the part of the Planning
Board in its review process in order to protect views. The current wording in
Saving Ithaca's Views report may create problems;
• Refer protecting scenic views to the Planning Committee with assistance from
Conservation Board - we need to set priorities;
• Weigh the trade offs between sociai needs and vistas.
Supervisor Engman suggested the board formally refer the item to the Planning
Committee.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-006: Referral of Scenic Resources Studv to the
Planning Committee
BE iT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca refer the Scenic
Resources Study to the Planning Committee for consideration.
MOVED: Councilman Goodman
SECONDED: Councilman Stein
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item No. 17 - Consider authorization for additional service to SCLIWC and
additional compensation to Budget Officer (See attachment #8)
The Personnel Committee reviewed and recommended authorizing additional services
to Boiton Point (SCLIWC),
Page 10 of 41
I I
' 1
' I
Approved February 11, 2008
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-007: Authorization for Additional Service to SCLIWC
and Additional Compensation to Budget Officer
WHEREAS, the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission
requested additionai services from the Town of ithaca for the Budget Officer for training
and consuiting for the Finance Manager in 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Commission wiii reimburse the Town of ithaca for additionai
wages and fringes (see attached sheet) for the Budget Officer, whiie providing said
additionai duties;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of ithaca does hereby authorize
the additional services of the Budget Officer to the Southern Cayuga Lake
Intermunicipal Water Commission for 2008; and be it further
RESOLVED, the Town Board authorizes the additionai wage portion of the
reimbursement from Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission to be
paid to the Budget Officer for the additionai work load he is assuming.
MOVED: Councilman Cowie
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item No. 18 - Consider and Approve Birthday Recognition
Supervisor Engman introduced the item and explained that birthday recognition is
currently practice and not policy. The proposed resolution brings it into policy and
makes it part of the Personnel Manual.
TB RESOLUTiON NO. 2008-008: ApDrovai of Birthday Recognition Program
WHEREAS, the previous Town Supervisor started a birthday recognition
program for the employees in 1997; and
WHEREAS, the program provides time off to hourly (including Court Clerks)
employees as recognition of their birthday, which is based on their years of service, and
is to be used within 30 days of their birthday; and
Page 11 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
( \
WHEREAS, the Personnel Committee discussed this program and recommends ^
having the program become an official program approved by the Town Board versus a
memo program under the Town Supervisor;
Now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve of the
Birthday Recognition Program as outlined beiow; and be it further
RESOLVED, the Human Resources Manager is hereby directed to add this
program to the Personnel Manual.
MOVED: Councilman Cowie
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent.
Motion passed: unanimous. \
I \
Birthday Recognition Program:
In recognition and celebration the Town provides paid time off to the hourly employees
(including the Court Clerks) for their birthday. An employee will receive a birthday card
and certificate signed by the Town Supervisor. An employee will receive time off from
work in recognition of their birthday based on their years of service, as of the
employee's birthday. The time shall be used within 30 days of receipt. The certificate
should be attached to their time card in the pay period the time is being taken. The time
should be coded as "O" for other time. Salaried management staff will receive a card
only from the Town Supervisor.
Recoanition schedule
Years of Service Time off
Less than 1 year 1 hour
1-4 years 2 hours
5-9 years day
10 or more years 1 full day
Agenda Item No. 19 - Consider Approval of 2008 Town Board Meeting Schedule
I ^
Page 12 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-009: Set Dates for 2008 Town Board Meetings
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves
the following schedule for Its 2008 Town Board meeting dates:
Monday, February 11, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, March 10, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, April 7, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, May 12, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, June 9, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, July 7, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, August 11, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, September 8, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Thursday, October 2, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, October 20, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Thursday, November 6, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, November 10, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Monday, December 8, 2008 5:30 p.m.
Wed., December 31, 2008 10:00 a.m. Year-End Meeting
Budget Discussion
(Monday, Oct. 13^ is Columbus Day)
Budget Discussion
MOVED:Councilman Stein
SECONDED:Councilman Cowie
VOTE:Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent.
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item 20 - Consider Appointment of Deputy Town Supervisor
Supervisor Engman stated he would like to appoint Councilman Burbank as deputy
supervisor and asked If someone would move the resolution.
Page 13 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Point of order - why is board voting on supervisor appointment? Ms. Drake explained ^ ^
that affirmation of some appointments are necessary in order to provide a paper trail for
civil service.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-010: Appointment of Deputy Town Supervisor
The Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby acknowledges the Town
Supervisor's appointment of Will Burbank as Deputy Supervisor to serve at the pleasure
of the Town Supervisor.
RESOLVED, as Deputy Supervisor, Councilperson Burbank is hereby afforded
all duties and responsibilities of the said position as prescribed by Section 42 of Town
Law, General Municipal Law, and the Public Officer's Law of the State of New York.
MOVED: Supervisor Engman
SECONDED: Counciiman Stein
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent.
I )
Motion passed: unanimous. '
Agenda Item No. 21 - Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Planning Board
Chair
Supervisor Engman proposed Rod Howe serve as Planning Board Chair.
TB RESOLUTION NO, 2008-011: Appointment of Planning Board Chair for the
Year 2008
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby appoints
Rod Howe to serve as Chair of the Planning Board for the term January 1, 2008 to
December 31, 2008.
MOVED: Counciiman Burbank
SECONDED: Counciiman Stein
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilwoman
Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman,
aye; Councilman Levine, absent.
, >
Motion passed: unanimous. ^
Page 14 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
\
Agenda Item No, 22 - Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board
of Appeals Chair
Supervisor Engman recommended Kirk Sigel to serve as the Zoning Board Chair.
TB RESOLUTION NO, 2008-012: Appointment of Zoning Board of Appeals Chair
for the Year 2008
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby appoints
Kirk Sigel to serve as Chair of the Zoning Board of Appeals for the term January 1, 2008
to December 31, 2008.
MOVED: Councilman Goodman
SECONDED: Counciiwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Counciiwoman
Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman,
aye; Councilman Levine, absent
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item No. 23 - Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Conservation
Board Chair
Supervisor Engman suggested Diane Conneman serve a Conservation Board Chair.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-013: APPOINTMENT OF CONSERVATION BOARD
CHAIR FOR THE YEAR 2008
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby appoints
Diane Conneman to serve as Chair of the Conservation Board for the term January 1,
2008 to December 31, 2008.
MOVED: Supervisor Engman
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent.
Motion passed: unanimous.
Page 15 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Agenda Item No. 24 - Consider appointment to the Town of Ithaca Planning Board i s
( 'I
Supervisor Engman recommended Hollis Erb be appointed to the Planning Board for a
7-year term.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-014: Aooointment of Planning Board Member
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby appoints
Hollis Erb to serve on the Planning Board for a seven year term beginning January 1,
2008 and ending December 31, 2014.
MOVED: Supervisor Engman
SECONDED: Councilman Stein
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilwoman
Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Counciiman Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman,
aye; Councilman Levine, absent.
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item No. 25 - Consider appointment to the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board
of Appeals \
Supervisor Engman recommended David Mountin be appointed to the Zoning Board for
a 5-year term.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-015: Appointment of Zoning Board of Appeals
Member
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby appoints David
Mountin to serve on the Zoning Board of Appeais for a term of office beginning January
1, 2008 and ending December 31, 2012.
MOVED: Councilman Cowie
SECONDED: Councilman Goodman
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Counciiman Burbank, aye;
Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Counciiman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent.
Motion passed: unanimous.
Page 16 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Agenda Item No. 26 - Consider appointments to the Town of Ithaca Conservation
Board
Supervisor Engman recommended Diane Conneman, Mike Goettel, Chris Benedict, and
Larry Sallinger be appointed to the Conservation Board.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-016: APPOINTMENT OF CONSERVATION BOARD
MEMBERS
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby appoints
the following individuals to the Conservation Board for terms beginning January 1, 2008
and ending December 31, 2009:
Diane Conneman
Michael Goettel
Chris Benedict
Larry Saiilnger
MOVED: Supervisor Engman
SECONDED: Councilman Stein
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item No. 27 - Consider appointments to the Town of Ithaca Ethics Board
Supervisor Engman recommended Gary Stewart be appointed to the Ethics Board.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008'017: Appointment of Ethics Board Member
BE IT RESOLVED, that the governing Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby
appoints Gary Stewart, as an Independent member to the Ethics Board to fill a new five
(5) year term beginning January 1, 2008 and ending December 31, 2012.
MOVED: Supervisor Engman
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Page 17 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levins,
absent.
I ^
\
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item No. 28 - Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Highway
Superintendent
Councilman Stein confirmed the appointment was a board appointment.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-018: Apoomtment of Highway Superintendent
BE IT RESOLVED, Fred Noteboom is hereby re-appointed as Highway
Superintendent, for a term continuing until the f day of January next succeeding the
next biennial Town election to wit, January 1, 2010.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levins, / ^
absent. '
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda No, 29 - Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Town Clerk
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-019: ApDointment of Town Clerk
BE IT RESOLVED, Karen Billings is hereby re-appointed as Town Clerk, for a
term continuing until the day of January next succeeding the next biennial Town
election to wit, January 1, 2010.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye;
Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levins,
absent.
Motion passed: unanimous. >
f
Page 18 of 41
(
Approved February 11, 2008
Agenda Item No. 30 - Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Town Engineer
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008'020: ADDointment of Town Engineer
BE IT RESOLVED, that Daniel Walker, P.E. is hereby re-appointed as Town
Engineer and Director of Engineering for a term continuing until the 1^* day of January
next succeeding the next biennial Town election to wit, January 1, 2010.
MOVED: Councilman Goodman
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Durbank, aye;
Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Stein, aye; Councilman
Cowie, aye; Councilman Goodman, aye; Councilman Levine,
absent.
Motion passed: unanimous.
Agenda Item No. 31 - Consider appointment of the Town of Ithaca Receiver of
Taxes
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-021: AoDointment of Receiver of Taxes
BE IT RESOLVED, Deborah Kelley is hereby re-appointed as Receiver of Taxes,
for a term continuing until the 1^^ day of January next succeeding the next biennial Town
election to wit, January 1, 2010.
MOVED: Supervisor Engman
SECONDED: Councilman Stein
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine
Agenda Item No. 32 - Consider and approve Town of Ithaca Board Protocol and
Procedures Manual
Councilman Burbank suggested the item be pulled from the agenda and reviewed at the
February board meeting. There was consensus from the board to do so.
Agenda Item No, 33 - Consider Supervisor's Board and Committee appointments
Page 19 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Supervisor Engman brought the resolution to dissolve the Agricultural Land ' ^
Preservation Committee and the Transportation Committee, and create the Planning ^
Committee up for discussion. Ms. Brock reminded the Board that it is the Town
Supervisor's function to create and dissolve committees as well as to determine their
scope. Supervisor Engman clarified that the committees being dissolved are citizen
committees.
Ms. Brock suggested changes to the resolution reflecting that the Town Board dissolved
the Agricultural Land Preservation Committee and the Transportation Committee and
the Town Supervisor established the Planning Committee.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-022: DISSOLVING THE AGRICULTURAL LAND
PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND THE TRANSPORTATION
COMMITTEE AND INCORPORATING THEIR RESPECTIVE FUNCTIONS INTO THE
NEW PLANNING COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Town Board established the Town of Ithaca Agricultural
Land Preservation Advisory Committee as part of the Policies and Procedures Manual
for the Town of Ithaca Agricultural Land Preservation Program, adopted July 12, 1999
and updated March 13, 2006, to (a) advise the Town Board on all proposed policies,
rules and regulations for the administration of the program; (b) review all applications for
participation In the program; and (c) make recommendations to the Town Board
regarding all agricultural conservation easement acquisitions; and ^
I I
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Town Board established the Town of Ithaca
Transportation Committee on April 9, 2001 to address a broad range of Intermodal
transportation Issues specific to the Town of Ithaca, and to study and make
recommendations to the appropriate bodies on Town-wide transportation Issues with
coordination from neighboring entitles such as Cornell University and the City of Ithaca,
and to lay the groundwork for developing a Town of Ithaca Transportation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Committee completed the Town of Ithaca Transportation
Plan, and the Town Board adopted that Plan on July 9, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the Town Supervisor proposes to establish a new Planning Committee,
which could among other functions. Incorporate the functions of the Agricultural Land
Preservation Advisory Committee and the Transportation Committee; now therefore, be
It
RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board does hereby dissolve the Town of
Ithaca Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Committee; and It Is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby
dissolve the Town of Ithaca Transportation Committee; and It Is
! ^
/ ,
Page 20 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board does hereby recommend
that the functions of the Town of Ithaca Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory
Committee and Town of Ithaca Transportation Committee shall be incorporated, among
others, into the functions of the Town of Ithaca Planning Committee; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board does hereby amend the
Policies and Procedures Manual for the Town of Ithaca Agricultural Land Preservation
Program to (1) modify all references to the "Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory
Committee" by adding the phrase "or successor Committee", and (2) delete the entire
third paragraph on page 3 of the Manual containing the mandatory listing of members of
the Agricultural Land Preservation Advisory Committee.
MOVED: Counciiman Stein
SECONDED: Councilman Cowie
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Biil
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine
Supervisor Engman next Introduced the resolution dissolving the Alternate Energy
Committee and the Recreation and Human Services Committee and establishing the
Operations Committee.
Supervisor Engman confirmed the Alternate Energy Committee and the Recreation and
Human Services Committee were citizen committees. Ms. Brock suggested changes to
the resolution reflecting the Town Board dissolved Alternate Energy Committee and the
Recreation and Human Services Committee and the Town Supervisor established the
Operations Committee.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-023: DISSOLVING THE ALTERNATIVE ENERGY
COMMITTEE AND THE RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE AND
INCORPORATING THEIR RESPECTIVE FUNCTIONS INTO THE NEW OPERATIONS
COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Town Board established the Alternative Energy
Committee to advise the Town Board on policies and programs related to alternative
energy options for Town facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Town Board established the Recreation and Human
Services Committee to advise the Town Board regarding policies and programs related
' to recreation, youth programs, and other human services programs in the Town of
Ithaca; and
Page 21 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
( t
WHEREAS, the Town Supervisor proposes to establish a new Operations Committee, ^
which could among other functions, incorporate the functions of the Alternative Energy
Committee and the Recreation and Human Services Committee; now therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board does hereby dissolve the Alternative
Energy Committee; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board does hereby dissolve the
Recreation and Human Services Committee; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board does hereby recommend
the establishment of the Town of Ithaca Operations Committee; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board does hereby recommend
that the functions of the Alternative Energy Committee and Recreation and Human
Services Committee shall be incorporated, among others, into the functions of the Town
of Ithaca Operations Committee.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilman Goodman
I
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman *
Stein, aye; Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine
Councilman Stein asked if there is a formal way to record the Supervisor's
appointments. Ms. Brock explained that, pursuant to the Procedures and Protocol
Manual, the Supervisor creates the committees and appointments the members; then
pursuant to tradition, the Town Board ratifies the appointments. Such resolution was
then introduced by Supervisor Engman.
Counciiwoman Leary commented that she thought there would be three board members
on each committee. Supervisor Engman explained he was not able to get enough
volunteers for each committee and solicited volunteers. The proposed resolution was
changed to reflect additional members to the Budget & Management Committee and the
Operations Committee.
Supervisor Engman urged the committees to meet as soon as possible to set its
meeting schedule for the year. Counciiwoman Leary suggested that a matrix or
spreadsheet could be developed of committee schedules. Councilman Burbank added On
that committees also needed to determine its scope of work. \
Page 22 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-024: Town Supervisor's Town Board Committee and
Records Management Advisory Board Appointments
BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca ratifies the following Town
Supervisor's Town Board Committee and Records Management Advisory Board
appointments for a term beginning January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008:
Budget & Management Committee
Eric Levlne, Chair
Herb Engman
Pat Leary
Personnel Committee
JeffCowie, Chair
Peter Stein
Pat Leary
Operations Committee
Herb Engman, Chair
Will Burbank
Jeff Cowie
' Public Works Committee
Peter Stein, Chair
Pat Leary
Bin Goodman
Planning Committee
Will Burbank, Chair
Pat Leary
Peter Stein
Records Management Advisory Board
Town Supervisor, Herb Engman
Town Councilor, Pat Leary
Town Clerk, Karen Billings, Chair
Town Historian, Laura W. Johnson-Kelly
Town Engineer, Dan Walker
GailKroll
Lisa Carrier-Titti - Staff Appointment
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank
Page 23 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman i *
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill Goodman, aye. ^
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine
Agenda Item No. 34 & 35- Consider appointment of Citizen Advisory Committees.
Consider Intermunicipal Committee appointments
Supervisor Engman Introduced the resolution containing committee appointments.
Councilwoman Leary suggested that Supervisor Engman also serve on the Codes and
Ordinances Committee and Increase the number of Town Board members on the
committee to 4. Supervisor Engman agreed to continue serving on the committee.
Board continued to discuss Increasing Town Board membership on COC.
Councilman Stein moved to add a fourth Town Board member to the Codes and
Ordinances Committee and that Herb Engman serve as the fourth member.
Councilwoman Leary seconded.
IB RESOLUTION NO, 2008-025: Increase Membership on Codes and Ordinances
Committee
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca adds a fourth Town ^
Board member to the Codes and Ordinances Committee and that Herb Engman serve ' '
as the fourth member.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill Goodman, aye.
Unanimous.
Absent: Councilman Levine
Supervisor Engman reviewed the committee appointments on the proposed resolution.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-026: Town Board Citizen Committee and
Intermunicipai Organization Appointments
BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca makes the following
Citizen Committee and Intermunicipal Organization appointments for a term beginning
January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008:
I \
CITIZEN COMMITTEES '
Page 24 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
r\
Codes and Ordinance Committee
Bill Goodman, Chair
Herb Engman
Pat Leary
Eric Levins
Fred Wllcox, representing Planning Board
Kirk SIgel, representing Zoning Board of Appeals
Eva Hoffman, representing Conservation Board
Agriculture Committee
James Baker
Jenifer Bokaer-Smlth/John Bokaer-Smlth
Nelson Eddy
Claire Forest
Jeff Hanavan/Kate Lunde
Tom McMllllan/Chrlstlne White
George Sheldrake
Jan Suwinskl/Sue SuwInskI
Alan Teeter/Debbie Teeter
Herb Engman - Town Board Liaison
Comprehensive Plan Committee
Herb Engman, Chair
Pat Leary
Peter Stein
Hollls Erb
DIanne Conneman
Joe Wetmore
Stephen Wagner
Kate Lunde
Dave Mountin
iNTERMUNiCiPAL ORGANiZATiONS
Cavuaa Lake Watershed intermunicioai Organization
Will Burbank, Town Representative
Herb Engman, as alternate
Citv/Town Shared Services Committee
Peter Stein, as liaison
intermunicioai Trail Committee (a.k.a. Gatewav Trail Steering Committee)
Herb Engman and Will Burbank as Town of Ithaca representatives
Cavuga Medical Center
Pat Leary
Page 25 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
t
( \
Human Services Coalition i '
Karen Billings
Fire Contracts Committee
Herb Engman
Al Carvill
ithaca-Tomokins County Transportation Councii
Poiicy Committee - Pat Leary, Herb Engman as alternate
Planning Committee - Jonathan Kanter, Fred Noteboom, Susan Ritter as alternate
Lake Source Cooiina Data Sharing Group
Herb Engman
Peaasvs Oversight Committee
Will Burbank, Town recommendation to City
Recreation Partnership
Eric Levine
Herb Engman
Jeff Cowie as alternate
) \
Soeciai Joint Committee (Sewer) ' ^
Herb Engman
Bill Goodman
Pat Leary
Southern Cavuaa Lake intermunicioai Water Commission
Herb Engman
Bill Goodman
Tomokins County Area DeveioomenVs Economic Deveiooment Coiiaborative
Jonathan Kanter
Tomokins County Councii of Governments (TCOG)
Herb Engman
Bill Goodman as alternate
Tomokins County Joint Youth Commission
Lorraine Moran 2-year (1/1/08-12/31/09)
Diane Jayne 2-year (1/1/08-12/31/09)
Jeff Cowie - Ithaca Town Board Representative 1-year (1/1/08-1/31/08) - Liaison
Sandy Gittelman - Cayuga Heights Representative 1-year (1/1/08-1/31/08) ^
i >
TCCOG Health Benefits Committee ^
Page 26 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Judy Drake
Route 96 Corridor Management Committee
Jonathan Kanter
Ithaca College Community Committee
Pat Leary
Dan Walker
MOVED: Councilman Durbank
SECONDED: Councilman Stein
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Counciiman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Counciiman Cowie, aye; Biii Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Counciiman Levine
Agenda Item No. 36 - Consider approval of revisions to First Deputy and Deputy
Town Clerk job descriptions (See attachment #9)
Ms. Drake gave a brief description of the change in law and explained that the Town
had had two-level deputies. It would be a title change to match the law for the senior
level deputy. Councilman Cowie added that the Personnel Committee reviewed the job
descriptions.
IB RESOLUTION NO. 2008'027: Approval of Revisions to Job Descriptions - First
Deputy Town Clerk and Deputy Town Clerk
WHEREAS, the Town Cierk has made revisions to the First Deputy Town Cierk
job description to better describe the duties and to incorporate changes made to NY
Town Law Section 30, which for the Town of ithaca includes a title change from Deputy
Town Clerk/Deputy Receiver of Taxes to First Deputy Town Cierk; and
WHEREAS, the Town Cierk and Personnei Committee recommends revisions to
the Deputy Town Clerk Job desaiption to better describe the duties and to incorporate
changes made to NY Town Law Section 30;
Now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of ithaca does hereby approve the
attached revised Job description for the Deputy Town Clerk position; and, be it further
RESOLVED, the Town Board acknowiedges the revisions made by the Town
Clerk to the attached Job description for the First Deputy Town Clerk position.
Page 27 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
MOVED: Councilman Cowie '
SECONDED: Supervisor Engman
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councllwoman Leary, aye; Councilman CowIe, aye; Bill Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne
Agenda Item No. 37 - Consider and acknowledge the appointment of the First
Deputy Town Clerk and Deputy Town Clerk
IB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-028: APPOINTMENT OF FIRST DEPUTY TOWN CLERK
BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca acknowledges the
appointment made by the Town Clerk, Carrie Coates Whitmore Is appointed as First
Deputy Town Clerk to serve at the pleasure of the Town Clerk.
MOVED: Councilman Goodman
SECONDED: Councllwoman Leary
' 1
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councllwoman Leary, aye; Councilman CowIe, aye; Bill Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-029: APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY TOWN CLERK
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby
acknowledge the appointment made by the Town Clerk, Paulette Nellsen Is appointed
as Deputy Town Clerk to serve at the pleasure of the Town Clerk.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councllwoman Leary, aye; Councilman CowIe, aye; Bill Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne
Agenda Item No. 38 - Consider appointment of Town Historian ^
Page 28 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-030: Reappointment of Town Historian
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby reappoint
Ms. Laura Johnson-Kelly, 48 Comfort Road, Ithaca, New York as Town Historian for the
term of January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008.
MOVED: Supervisor Engman
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine
Agenda Item No. 39 - Consider Confirmation of Arrangements and Appointment
of Attornev(s^ for the Town (See attachment #10)
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-031: Accept Susan Brock's Engagement Letter for
Legal Services for 2008
BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca accepts Susan
Brock's Engagement Letter for Legal Services for 2008.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-032: Accept Guv Kroah's Agreement Letter for Leaal
Services for 2008
BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca accepts Guy
Krogh's Agreement Letter for Legal Services for 2008.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
f SECONDED: William Goodman
Page 29 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman ' >
Stein, aye; Councllwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill Goodman, aye. '
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne
Agenda Item No. 40 - Consider setting Public Hearings for Stormwater
Management Laws
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-033: RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING TO
CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED LOCAL LAWS:
1. A LOCAL LAW DELETING CHAPTER 228 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE,
TITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT," AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER
228 TITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL"
2. A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE,
TITLED "ZONING," TO ADD STORMWATER PLAN SUBMISSION
REQUIREMENTS
3. A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 234 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE,
TITLED "SUBDIVISION OF LAND," TO ADD STORMWATER POLLUTION ^ \
PREVENTION PLAN SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ' ^
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hold a public hearing at
the Town Hall, 215 North Tloga Street, Ithaca, New York, on the 11^ day of February
2008, at 6:15 p.m. for the purpose of considering the proposed local laws described
above; and It Is further
RESOLVED, that at such time and place all persons Interested In the proposed
amendment may be heard concerning the same; and It Is further
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca Is hereby authorized and
directed to publish a notice of such public hearing In the Ithaca Journal published In the
City of Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the
Town of Ithaca, said publication and posting to occur not less than ten days before the
day designated above for the public hearing.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: William Goodman
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councllwoman Leary, aye; Councilman CowIe, aye; Bill i ^
Goodman, aye. Unanimous '
Page 30 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Absent: Councilman Levins
Agenda Item No. 41 - Discuss 2008 Association of Towns Resolutions and
Consider Designation of 2008 Official Delegate and Alternate Delegate for the
New York State Association of Towns 2008 Annual Meeting (See attachment #11)
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-034: Official Delegate for Year 2008 NYS Association
of Towns Annual Meeting
WHEREAS, the NYS Association of Towns Annual Meeting will be held on
February 17, 2008 through February 20, 2008 in New York City; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca is a member in good standing with the NYS
Association of Towns and is eligible to have voting rights at the said meeting; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the governing Town Board to appoint an Official
Delegate who will have voting rights on behalf of the Town of Ithaca at the said meeting;
now therefore be It
RESOLVED, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby appoints
Herbert J. Engman, as the Official Delegate on behalf of the Town of Ithaca at the 2008
NYS Association of Towns Annual Meeting.
MOVED: Councilman Burbank
SECONDED: Councilman Goodman
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008: Alternate Delegate for Year 2008 NYS Association of
Towns Annual Meeting
WHEREAS, the NYS Association of Towns Annual Meeting wili be held on
February 17, 2008 through February 20, 2008 in New York City; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Is a member in good standing with the NYS
Association of Towns and is eligible to have voting rights at the said meeting; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the governing Town Board to appoint an Official
Alternate Delegate who will have voting rights on behalf of the Town of Ithaca at the
said meeting; now therefore be it
i
\
Page 31 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
RESOLVED, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby appoints
William D. Goodman, as the Alternate Delegate on behalf of the Town of Ithaca at the
2008 NYS Association of Towns Annual Meeting.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilman Cowie
ROLL CALL VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine.
Supervisor Engman brought the board's attention to the Association of Town's 2008
proposed resolutions and asked for board comments. The board discussed resolution
number 8 - Restore and Secure Equity in Collective Bargaining. Councilwoman Leary
and Supervisor Engman were not in support of this resolution.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-036: Resolution of non-suDDort for resolution no. 8 of
the Association of Towns 2008 proposed resolutions
Be it Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does not support Resolution \
No. 8 - Restore and Secure Equity in Collective Bargaining, of the Association of Towns '
2008 proposed resolutions.
MOVED: Councilwoman Leary
SECONDED: Supervisor Engman
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bili
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine.
The board also discussed resolution number 9 - Preserve Local Control over Active and
Retiree Health Insurance Benefits. Councilwoman Leary and Supervisor Engman were
not in support of this resolution.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-037: Resolution of non-support for resolution no. 9 of
the Association of Towns 2008 proposed resolutions
Be it Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does not support Resolution
No. 9 - Preserve Local Control over Active and Retiree Health Insurance Benefits, of \
the Association of Towns 2008 proposed resolutions. '
Page 32 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
MOVED: Councilman Burbank
SECONDED: Councllwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councllwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine.
Councilman Burbank briefly explained the voting process at the Association of Towns
meeting.
Agenda Item No. 42 - Consider and approve Herb Engman and Bill Goodman as
members of the Tompkins Countv Councii of Governments
Item was voted upon as part of agenda items 34 and 35, IB Resolution No. 2008-026.
Agenda Item No. 43 Consider Agreement for the Expenditure of Highwav Monies
Supervisor Engman gave a brief Introduction of the agenda Item.
IB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-038: Agreement for the Expenditure of Highway
Monies
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of §284 of the New York State Highway
Law the Town Board is required to enter into an agreement with the Highway
Superintendent outlining the expenditure of monies levied and collected in the Town for
the repair and improvement of highways, and for monies received from the State of New
York as State Aid for the repair and improvements of highways; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Highway Superintendent has outlined the total
expenditure of $405,750 for this purpose; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves, adopts
and authorizes the "2008 Agreement for the Expenditure of Highway Monies", as
prepared by the Highway Superintendent
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilman Cowie
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
f Stein, aye; Councllwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Biii
\ Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Page 33 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Absent: Councilman Levins. < >
Agenda Item No. 44 - Consent Agenda
Councilwoman Leary requested that item "g" Designation of Official Newspaper be
pulled for discussion. Councilman Stein moved and Councilwoman Leary seconded
this motion.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008'039: Consent Agenda Items
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves
and/or adopts the resolutions for Consent Agenda items:
a. Approval of Town Board Minutes of December 10, 2007 and December
31, 2007
b. Town of Ithaca Abstract
c. Boiton Point Abstract
d. Voucher deadlines for 2008
e. Cash management and in vestment policies and procedures
f. Consider Approval of Records Disposition List
g. (item pulled)
h. Designation of Official Depositories of Town Funds ' \
/. Official Bonds of Town Officers and Employees
j. Reappointment of Deputy Highway Superintendent
k. Holiday Tree Pickup
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-039a: Town Board Minutes of December 10. 2007 and
December 31. 2007
WHEREAS, the Town Clerk has presented the minutes for the Regular Town
Board Meeting held on December 10, 2007 and the Year-End Meeting held on
December 31, 2007 to the Town Board for their review; now therefore be it
RESOLVED, the Town Board does hereby approve for filing the minutes of the
meetings held December 10, 2007 and December 31, 2007 as submitted.
Page 34 of 41
I N
t
Approved February 11, 2008
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Counciiwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Biii
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine.
TB RESOLUTiON NO. 2008'039b: Town of Ithaca Abstract
WHEREAS, the following numbered vouchers have been presented to the Ithaca
Town Board for approval of payment; and
WHEREAS, the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town
Board; now therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the governing Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of
the said vouchers in total for the amounts indicated.
VOUCHER NOS. 4759 - 4782
General Fund Townwide $ 21,121.36
General Fund Part Town $ 5,303.34
Water Fund $ 7,413.20
Sewer Fund $ 225.50
Risk Retention Fund $21,162.29
Trust & Aaencv $ 5.523.75
TOTAL: $60.749.44
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Counciiwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman Stein,
aye; Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Biii Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008'039c: Bolton Point Abstract
f
Page 35 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
WHEREAS, the following numbered vouchers for the Southern Cayuga Lake i >
Intermunlcipal Water Commission have been presented to the governing Town Board ^
for approval of payment; and
WHEREAS, the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town
Board; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the governing Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of
the said vouchers.
Voucher Numbers: 780 - 837
Check Numbers: 10566 -10623
Operating Fund $ 133,446.55
1998 SO ADA Capital Protect $ 2.757.87
TOTAL S 136.204.42
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary ; ^
I
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Coundlwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-039d: YEAR 2008 PROCESSING VOUCHERS /
INVOICES DEADLINE DATES
WHEREAS, to facilitate an efficient and timely method for processing
vouchers/invoices for the monthly abstracts It is necessary to establish a deadline for
submission of vouchers/invoices by vendors, staff, and other service people; and
WHEREAS, the Accounting Department has determined that one week is
needed to properly prepare the vouchers/invoices for approval of the Town Board at
their monthly meeting; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, the Town Board does hereby adopt the following schedule for the
year 2007 as the last date by all vendors, staff, and other service people to submit
vouchers/invoices to the Accounting Department for presentation to the Town Board on
the Abstract Date: / >
/
Page 36 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
Processing Voucher/
Invoice Deadline Dates:
Wednesday. January 30, 2008
Thursday. February 28, 2008
Friday. March 28, 2008
Wednesday. April 30, 2008
Thursday. May 29, 2008
Friday. June 27, 2008
Wednesday July 30, 2008
Thursday. August 28, 2008
Friday. September 26, 2008
Thursday. October 30, 2008
Wednesday. Noyember 26,2008
Monday. December 29, 2008
**For Abstract Date:
Monday, February 11, 2008
Monday, March 10, 2008
Monday, April 7, 2008
Monday, May 12, 2008
Monday, June 9, 2008
Monday, July 7, 2008
Monday, August 11, 2008
Monday, September 8, 2008
THURSDAY, October 2, 2008 (Budget)
THURSDAY, Noyember 6, 2008 (Budget Final)
Monday, December 8, 2008
Wednesday, December 31, 2008(Year-End)
**Abstract date is synonymous with Town Board meeting date.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, youchers/inyoices must be submitted no later that
12:00 p.m. on the Processing Voucher/lnyoice Deadline Date; and it be further
RESOLVED, any emergency or extraordinary youchers/inyoices will be
considered as deemed appropriate by the Chief Fiscal Officer and the Budget Officer.
MOVED:Counciiman Stein
SECONDED:Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Superyisor Engman, aye; Counciiman Burbank, aye; Councilman Stein,
aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Counciiman Cowie, aye; Bill Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Leyine.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-039e: Cash Management and investment Policies and
Procedures for 2008
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby adopts the
Town of Ithaca Cash Management and investment Policies and Procedures for the year
2008 as presented.
MOVED:
SECONDED:
Counciiman Stein
Councilwoman Leary
Page 37of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Counciiman ' ^
Stein, aye; Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Counciiman Cowie, aye; Biii n
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Counciiman Levine.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-039f: Records Management Disposition Listing
WHEREAS, the Records Management Officer has determined that the meeting
tapes listed below are eligible for disposition according to the State Archives and
Records Administration (SARA) Records Retention and Disposition Schedule MU-1;
and
WHEREAS, the Records Management Officer (Town Clerk) has reviewed and
approved the disposition of the said tapes; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, the governing Town Board does hereby authorize and direct the
Records Management Officer to dispose of the meeting tapes as described below
according to the procedure developed by SARA.
Planning Board Meeting Tapes January 2007 - August 2007
Town Board Meeting Tapes January 2007 - August 2007
Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Tapes January 2007 - August 2007
MOVED: Counciiman Stein
SECONDED: Counciiwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Counciiman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Counciiwoman Leary, aye; Counciiman Cowie, aye; Biii
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Counciiman Levine.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-039h: Designation of Official Depository of Town
Funds
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby designates
Tompkins Trust Company as the official depository for monies coming into the hands of
the Town Supervisor, Budget Officer, Town Clerk, and Receiver of Taxes for the year
2008; and, be it further
RESOLVED, the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward a
certified copy of this resolution to the Tompkins Trust Company and M&T Manufacturers
and Traders Trust Company.
I \
I \
\
t
Page 38 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
' MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008'039i: OFFICIAL BONDS FOR TOWN OFFICERS &
EMPLOYEES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, that the Faithful
Performance Bonds for the Town Officials and Employees for the year 2008 are
approved as followed:
Town Supervisor/Fiscal Officer $3,000,000.00
Deputy Town Supervisor $3,000,000.00
Budget Officer $3,000,000.00
Receiver of Taxes $3,000,000.00
^ Town Cierk $ 25,000.00
Town Justice, James Salk $ 25,000.00
Town Justice, David Kiein $ 25,000.00
Highway Superintendent $ 25,000.00
All Other Employees (Per Person) $ 25,000.00
Forgery & Alteration $ 5,000.00
MOVED: Counciiman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levine.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008'039i: Appointment Deoutv Highway Superintendent
BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby acknowledges
the appointment made by the Town Highway Superintendent, Eugene Redman be re-
appointed as Deputy Highway Superintendent to serve at the pleasure of the Town
Highway Superintendent.
f
^ MOVED: Councilman Stein
Page 39 of 41
Approved February 11, 2008
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman Stein,
aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill Goodman, aye.
Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne.
TB RESOLUTION NO, 2008-'039k: Holiday Tree Pick Up
WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Highway Department picks up holiday trees for
the residents of the Town now, therefore, be It
RESOLVED, that from January 14^*^ through January 2007, the Highway
Department will pick up holiday trees for the residents of the Town of Ithaca.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilwoman Leary
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, aye; Councilman CowIe, aye; Bill ^
Goodman, aye. Unanimous
Absent: Councilman Levlne.
Designation of Officiai Newspaper
The board discussed designating an official newspaper. Ms. Brock read the legal
requirements for an official newspaper. The board decided to research alternatives
during the year and move ahead with designating the Ithaca Journal as the official
newspaper.
TB RESOLUTION NO. 2008-040: DESIGNATiON OF OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby designates
the Ithaca Journal as the official newspaper for the Town of Ithaca for the year 2008;
and, be It further
RESOLVED, the Town Clerk Is hereby authorized and directed to forward a
certified copy of this Resolution to the Ithaca Journal.
MOVED: Councilman Stein
SECONDED: Councilman Burbank i \
I
Page 40 of 41
I \
(
Approved February 11, 2008
VOTE: Supervisor Engman, aye; Councilman Burbank, aye; Councilman
Stein, aye; Councilwoman Leary, nay; Councilman Cowie, aye; Bill
Goodman, aye. Carried
Absent: Councilman Levine.
Agenda Item No. 45 - Report of Town Committees
No reports.
Report of Town Officials (See attachment #12)
Correspondence (See attachment #13)
Agenda item No, 46 - Consider Adiournment
Upon motion by Councilman Stein, seconded by Councilman CowIe, Supervisor
Engman adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
Re^pecffully Submitted,
Karen M. Billings,
I s Town Clerk
Page 41 of 41
Toioa)
01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD
ATTACHMENT §1
^/k£4>77A/e S/X>/Z^s - ^U&C'i&T'/ijLi>
Mo
C^jQXX/^ O'-ro/yp U/zAi^^ <s/;^^/^J> lo^j^ as a ^A€X/<sA/7i:^
O/O Me C^es 7t> rMe A/&^ rT^s. /^/9-AJAi/cfS /^yAe:J>^zZAikX£,
3e \,Od^ekei> A Mf^^/G^^n^^/ii^AAAA^/cL Aa^A^ mas AA^^oaOy ^Si?
//^. aA M/S 3IaS/c. 7^//U/a/& .
JliJ/^M.{//£i(Xs AMe MA^l>e(OAy AaA^ TMs. eAiS/v^/t/^ <f>AA/C£ /^AS/77/>zc) i/kcA^C/&^.
^jJjMTy (3fi/AAf£^A//CA</AAs AiO^ /^jA&AAA'* - y^iAi:iOS£A>fAJS £0/77^ 77i^
1 (^AkiAAA77£>A) AiC^ iAs77aJC S>A 7%r /^/eAlc> '\MAiJ£ ySy^7Z/-f <^aA:£. AAL. 7^s/y>t^G /s
^^f^AAyi.1? ^/3d/7i^ 77¥S- ^(£p//AC^ AMS ^/STtAAS £>*tJ AAMa:-
Cc/JScMS AA Tf^£~ ^Ai/^u/JzcAT/AzU ^^LuJTiA. AAAC. AlsyMG A/772A sMXS£^ ZLJgCC.
^zO SaJ Se>77A /Jeuj AAS^ s'ysz^/s,
!
I
^//y A/Ae . ~ ozOG£>/Ae jM/sac^ssacAs •" /s aJ&uz a //QA
^
£y^eA^£>/AG 7k£ eA>/MAAcX^AOM/c/¥ A>^Mr/i€£> 0/J Osc.^z,2a>o3.
pA/^T^^zUZ/i)^ "4 aoi/^Azi^/A/G /OAMXcZ/tZe e^urp/n^
iOiLL rM/hSe 4 TlezJyeAA. ^£AJ//<^e AiAe&O A/AjtA/es^lA. e^Utp/^eAX
THIS M-)rAM Be M ceHl0rp£d^77fiiU At:>A. AijfD/^ BMSe£/7/t/6 tACc/s/^MS.
j {jHf^iH^P ^fiK£ ^escu£i Azfc^. 'I^MS seezu ms /SzacAcs s^P' tap ts jucXse^sAsr^e
67a MGeAcy CoVf/McP Sp/KC (HozHl . ^/£AJ /a Asjz^eczss£i>y Xac AS/ty/r/ /Ve^S^
I A TkAM /s SoslAfAASZC^ Hr Po/a/T/iP Hfilf 7^^ XP-P. pi>t-(o/j e^A^'CAes^s.
Z^S /S/ 7H£. Bp^SP I^A/S &AfA/SS^^'^AZAs^ /5 7t> PsspfioP 70 A ^Z{ SZAZM A^ azJ £*V4fM;ecj(/c.y
PM6cjiAi^ 4G£Z/<!H^ /OAo\/CP£ (BSM d{fP(p£ZAAjr P^sccze s^AWce^ /fjr TTf-AT
- Ob 01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETING
ATTACHMENT #2
Prepared by Betty Falcao, Director, Health Planning Council, a program of the Human Services Coalition Jan-08
Homes (single-family, apartments, senior
apartments, etc)
Independent Senior Apartments
(some have "hotel" services)
Most people needir
Total: 1120
(1994: 758)
Cost/month
$500 - $800+
ig Long Term Care
Current figures include:
Alterra (46)
Kendal (215)
Longview(IOl)
Planned: 72 at Conifer
Supplements to Self-Care in the home
Unpaid Caregivers (family, friends)
Paid Caregivers (via agency, or privately)
Home Health Care Agencies (nursing visits, home health aides)
Many others: Meals on Wheels, Gadabout, Friendly visiting, groceiy shopping, snow shoveling, etc.
Adult Home
Room and board, congregate meals, 24-hour
supervision, personal care (less than 3.5 hrs/wk),
transportation and activities.
The typical home consists of two-person rooms with
shared baths.
Total: 178
(1994: 94)
Cost/dav
SSI: $32
Private $100 -250
Deer Haven (Spencer, 3)
Evergreen (Jacksonville, 6)
Old Hundred (Ithaca, 6)
Alterra Clare Bridge (36)
Bridges at Cornell Hts (27)
Kendal (36)
Longview (64)
Planned: 32 more at Longview
Assisted Living Program - Medicaid
Combines home health services with an adult home to
provide an intermediate residential level. Personal care
(more than 3.5 hrs/wk), intermittent skilled nursing, case
management, adult day health care, therapies,
medication, and transportation.
Cost/dav
SSI for adult home,
plus 50% of SNF
for home care
portion
NONE
Applied for
South Pointe (80)
Lakeside (80)
Assisted Living Residence
Same as above; but may upgrade to provide dementia
care, and to allow people to "age in place."
Cost/month
Private Pay -
$3,000 - $8,000
NONE
Applied for
Alterra, Bridges, Kendal
Nursing Home (Skilled Nursing Facility-SNF)
Provides 24-hour nursing care, activities, supervision
and social services, and access to medical care to frail
elderly, chronically ill, and disabled persons, as well as
people who need short-term treatment.
Total: 475
(1994: 510)
Medicaid
$110-$160/day
Private rate
$220 - $250/day
Beechtree (120)
Groton (80)
Kendal (35)
Lakeside (250; 180 staffed)
Oak Hill (60)
From the Bureau of Long Term Care Reimbursement, NYS Dept. of Health (May 2006)
State Medicaid spending for Long Term Care: over 40% of Medicaid expenditures in NYS are for LTC,
totaling over $15 billion in 2003.
Who Pays for Nursing Home Care? In NYS (2003): 74% Medicaid; 12% Medicare; 14% Other
Even home care can be quite costly. A home health aide may cost $20/hr; a nursing visit may cost SlOO/hr.
HUMAN SERVICES COALITION OF ToMPKiNS County, Inc.
Human Service Planning • Information & Referral Service • Health planning Council
Health Planning Council
Highlights ofAccomplishments - 2007
Acute/Primary Care
• Launched Get Serious About
Asthma Control to mitigate the
effects of asthma in elementary
school children. Developing a
local clearinghouse of resources;
working with four schools to
provide additional tools including
equipment, education and ways to
track the impact.
Thanks to the
Park Foundation and
the Community Foundation
for asthma program support.
Expanded Urgent Rx to the
Ithaca Free Clinic and people
scharged from Cayuga Medical
enter inpatient units. UrgentRx
ifers free generic medications,
from a limited formulary, to people
with no insurance who receive care
at the new sites or at CMC's
Emergency Room and its Lansing
Urgent Care facility. Also gave
follow-up information about other
health care subsidy programs.
Over the past year, have provided
1,658 prescriptions valued at about
$39,000 to more than 760 people.
Kudos to Urgent Rx partners
Cayuga Medical Center,
Kinney Drugs,
Tompkins Health NetM'ork, and
United Way of Tompkins County.
• Based on local data, represented
the needs of uninsured people via
op-eds, NYS hearing testimony,
chart with gaps in health insurance
^ verage and contributed to special
'verage in The Ithaca Journal.
Long Term Care
• Advocated for the community's
need to maintain Lakeside Nursing
and Rehabilitation Center services;
protested the Berger Commission
recommendation to close Lakeside,
which would displace over 160
current residents. Supported the
proposed conversion of 80 beds to
assisted living program beds. NYS
decisions are still pending.
• Led Sharing Your Wishes
Coalition to encourage and support
advanced health care planning.
Enhanced skills of more than 45
health care professionals and
volunteers, distributed over 9,000
booklets, and gave presentations to
senior groups and employees
including "Talking with your
family about your wishes."
• Started phase one of our Long
Term Care Needs Assessment.
Identified existing providers and
services, surveyed consumers and
residential providers.
Advisory Board
Special appreciation to the
Tompkins County Legislators
for their ongoing support.
• Organized presentations on
older adults with mental illness,
pain management initiatives and
other current topics.
• Participated in the Statewide
Rural Aging Summit sponsored by
NYS legislators, Ithaca College
Gerontology Institute and others.
• Helped the County Legislature
administer TompkinsRx, a free
card for prescription discounts.
More than 750 users a month have
saved over $248,000 annually, an
average of 21%. Distributed cards
to medical offices, pharmacies,
agencies and individuals.
• Helped develop a pamphlet on
Support for Smokers Who Want to
Quit as part of the T-Free Zone
Coalition of Tompkins County.
Tompkins Health Network implementation projects:
> PMAP (Prescription Meds Access Program): Counseled over 200 clients
about prescription medicines; helped people obtain drugs valued at
over $50,000, free from pharmaceutical companies or at low-cost.
> Get Covered Info Line: Started a health insurance info phone line in
May; provided help to more than 165 people to date.
>• Health Careers Awareness: Partnering with others to institute My
Health Careers: a web-based tool with required training, salaries, and
regional job opportunities. To be operational in 2008.
> Get Healthy Tompkins: Celebrated the launch of this on-line tool for
healthy living; provided support for this Cayuga Medical Center project.
Supported byfunds from the New York State Office ofRural Health.
00 West Seneca Street, Suite 300, Ithaca, New York 14850-4138
PHONE:f607) 273-8686 n FAX:(607)273-3002 n www.hsctc.org
Information & Referral Assistance (607)272-9331
Tke Human Services Coalition of
Tompkins County, Inc.
cordially invites you to its
34tli An nua 1 Meeting
Future Trends in Human Services
Keynote Speaker
Jerry Friedman
Executive Director
American Public Human Services ALSSociation
Waskin^ton, D.C.
Friday, Fetruary 8tk, 2008
Noon - 2:00 PM
Women's Conmnuiit>' Buil^in^, Auditorium
100 W. Seneca St., Itkaca
Also features presentation of tke 2008 Community Service Awards:
Ruth PQtiengiJJ Award for outstanding liuman services professional
Anne Tompkins Jones Award for outstanding volunteer
Registration - $15.00
All are invited to attend. Full kuffet lunckeon
Wheelchair Accessible Vegetarian entree available
To register; Please complete tliis form. Mail it witli your died for ^1d {lAade out to the Human Services
Coalition) to HSC, 100 Seneca bt., Suite 300, Itliaca, Nl IASdO. No credit carls. Call
(607) 273-8686 or E-mail cmf20@comell.edu for more information. RbAT' Ly Januarj' 31st.
Capacity may le limited so reservations will te accepted on a first come first serve Fasis.
me
• >_/rganization, if any
btreet address
E-mail address Pli
01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETINGATTACHMENT #3 ^enda # 1 ®
^ TOWN OF ITHACA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO; TOWN BOARD
FROM: JONATHAN KANTER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING L
RE: PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO ALLOW BED-AND-BREAKFASTS IN
ECOVILLAGE'S SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICT
DATE: DECEMBER 27,2007
The Town of Ithaca has received an application from EcoVillage at Ithaca to amend the EcoVillage
Special Land Use District No. 8 (now referred to as a Planned Development Zone) to allow bed-and-
breakfasts. This matter is scheduled for the Board's consideration at the January 7, 2008 Town Board
meeting. A representative from EcoVillage will attend and will be available to present the proposal to
the Board and answer questions regarding the proposed amendment.
I have taken the liberty of drafting a proposed local law (see attached) for the Board's consideration.
The proposed amendment would allow bed-and-breakfasts as a permitted principal use in the
Residential Area of EcoVillage designated on the attached map, entitled "EcoVillage Site Usage Areas
- 1998". The reasons for the proposed amendment are outlined in the attached letter from William D.
Goodman, dated November 28, 2007. In brief, there have been several bed-and-breakfasts operating in
EcoVillage for a number of years. This recently came to the attention of the Town's Code
Enforcement Office and Planning Department. Upon reviewing the provisions of the Planned
Development Zone, it became apparent that bed-and-breakfasts are not listed as a permitted use, and
therefore, are prohibited. The proposed amendment would legalize the existing (and future) bed-and-
breakfasts in EcoVillage.
Also attached for the Board's information is the current EcoVillage Planned Development Zone
(Section 271-9. Special Land Use District No. 8, Limited Mixed Use, EcoVillage) and the current
definition of "bed-and-breakfast" in Section 270-5 of the Zoning Chapter.
Possible Board Action at January Meetins: Consider referring proposed local law to Planning
Board for a recommendation.
The adoption of the proposed local law would probably be classified as a "Type I" action under SEQR
because it involves "the adoption of changes in the allowable uses within any zoning district, affecting
25 or more acres of the district". The Residential Area within the EcoVillage Planned Development
Zone includes approximately 37.6 +/- acres. Although this would require the completion of a Full
Environmental Assessment Form, there are no Involved Agencies other than the Town Board, so this
can be processed (presumably as a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance) at such time
as the local law comes back to the Town Board for consideration of adoption.
Meanwhile, please let me know if there are any questions prior to the meeting.
Att.
cc: William D. Goodman, EcoVillage at Ithaca Village Association, Inc.
K ii; 0
I ; n EfioVillage at Ithaca VA, Inc.
/ j i ij; NOV 2 9 200? i Rachd C^on Way
i } j
The Town Board, Town of Ithacia i i
By Hand ' ; Ca
It
28
liaca,NY 14850
,2007
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: Amendment to EcoVillage Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 271, Section 9
Special Land Use District (SLUD, now called PDZ) No. 8
On behalf of the three entities that own the property comprising "EcoVillage" (EcoVillage at
Ithaca, Inc., EcoVillage at Ithaca Village Association, Inc. and EcoVillage CoHousing Cooperative, Inc.)
1 request that our zoning be changed to allow Bed and Breakfasts as a permitted use in our Residential
Area, under such conditions as the Board deems necessaiy.
This letter will explain briefly the history behind this request. Around 1999, after Rachael and
Elan Shapiro had lived for a few years in the First Neighborhood at EcoVillage (FROG), they began
renting out a spare room in their house to visitors and called their new business Frog's Way B & B. They
arranged with Tompkins County to collect the Room Occupancy Tax, but were unaware that they needed
to secure any approval from the Town of Ithaca to start their B & B.
The EcoVillage SLUD was originally created in 1995 (including just the 30 acres then owned by
FROG) and allowed "customary home occupations" in the Residential Area. In 2001, when the SLUD
was amended to include the entire 175 acres that comprise EcoVillage (and after Frog's Way had begun
operation), no one thought to list Bed & Breakfasts separately, assuming they were a customary home
occupation.
Around 2004, the Shapiros bought a home in the Second Neighborhood (SONG) and moved their
B & B to their new home, where they rent out two extra bedrooms. After the Shapiro's left FROG,
another couple that had moved into FROG in 2001, Gail Carson and Barbara Pease, started renting out
their two spare bedrooms to visitors, calling their new business The Wild Goose B & B. Again, they
arranged with Tompkins County to collect the Room Occupancy Tax, but were unaware that they needed
to secure any approval from the Town of Ithaca to start their B & B.
TTie Town Codes Enforcement Officer and Planner have notified us that because the language in
our SLUD/PDZ does not specifically mention Bed and Breakfasts, these two businesses are in violation
of the Town's Zoning Ordinance. In order to bring them into compliance, we request that our
SLUD/PDZ be amended in a manner deemed most appropriate by the Board.
One of the principles of an EcoVillage is to encourage residents to make a living where they live,
so that they are not using fossil fuels to commute to a job away from their home, and so that they are
present in the village on a more constant basis than if they worked elsewhere, thus fostering more
frequent interactions with their neighbors and strengthening their community bonds.
By allowing residents to operate B & Bs using extra bedrooms in their houses, the FROG and
SONG housing Cooperatives not only encourage this form of right livelihood for some of their
shareholders, but also promote one of the main missions of EcoVillage at Ithaca, educating the public
about sustainable living. We receive a constant stream of visitors not only from around the country, but
also from around the world. By having B & Bs where guests can stay on site, we encourage them not to
use fossil fuels driving back and forth to local hotels, and we give them a taste of what sustainable living
means in practice.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please call me at
269-0646, or email me at billg@ecovillage.ithaca.ny.us.
Sincerely Yours, ^
William D. Goodman, Board Secretary
EcoVillage at Ithaca Village Association, Inc.
§ 271-8 ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS § 271-9
Running thence south 11 degrees 31 minutes 55 seconds west along the
hiehway line of New York State Route 96B, the Danby Road for a distaiice of 525.0
fe!t to an iron pin set, said iron pin marks the northeasterly comer of the scenic
overview area as appropriated by the State of New York;
Running thence north 78 degrees 33 minutes 31 seconds west along the northerly line of
the scenic overview area for a distance of 60.0 feet to an iron pin set;
Running thence south 11 degrees 30 minutes 40 seconds west along the westerly line of
the sceL overview area for a distance of 335.64 feet to an iron pin set, the point and
place of beginning.
Said parcel contains 28.010 acres of land to the highway line.
I 271-9. Special Land Use District No. 8 (Limited Mixed Use, EcoVillage). [Adopted
1-30-1995 by L.L. No. 1-1995]
A. Findings.
(1) The Town of Ithaca's Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of
environmentally sound housing communities; and
^ (0) A group, now known as First Residents Group, is in the process of fonmng a
' ^ Cooperative Housing Corporation under the laws of the State of New York to be
' named EcoVillage Co-Housing Cooperative for the purpose of developing an
owning such housing; and
(3) EcoVillage at Ithaca, another entity, has agreed to sell approximately 33 acres to
the First Residents Group or its successor cooperative, contingent upon the
rezoning provided by this section and receipt of all other requisite approvals by the
Town of Ithaca and Tompkins County; and
(4) The proposed project will:
(a) Contribute to the variety of housing styles and patterns of development
available in the Town;
(b) Develop and model a neighborhood design for pedestrians, with minimal
traffic, attractive landscaping, and safe play areas for children;
(c) Utilize clustering to create an aesthetic, quiet and safe neighborhood space to
help foster a sense of community;
(d) Utilize interior acreage for housing, which will allow preservation of better
aoricultural soils, avoid strip-type residential development along roadways,
create a safer environment, preserve existing rural character and existing
views along roadways;
(e) Demonstrate the manner in which housing may be developed to conseiwe
energy and water, by utilizing passive solar designs, super-insulation, caretul
landscaping for wind protection and low-flow water devices;l4r
22 j *05 06 - 01 • 2004
§271-9 ITHACA CODE §271-9 ^ ^
building smaller individual dwellings and conceniraiing otherwise-duplicated,
energy-consuming spaces into a community center or "common house";
(g) Demonstrate how meaningful open space may be preserved in conjunction
with construction of new housing at ordinarily-permitted densities.
B. Purpose. It is the purpose and intent of this section to allow, by creation of a Special
Land Use District, an opportunity for the implementation of the foregoing goals and
objectives in an environmentally and ecologically sound manner.
C. Amendments to Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Ithaca, as
readopted, amended and revised, effective February 26, 1968, and thereafter further
amended, be further amended as follows:
(1) Addition of Special Land Use District No. 8. Article II, Section 2, of the Town of
Ithaca Zoning Ordinance" is amended by adding to the permissible districts
itemized in said section a district designated as "Special Land Use District No. 8."
D. Principal use regulations. In Special Land Use District No. 8 (the "SLUD ) the following
areas, as shown on document "EcoVillage Site Usage Areas 1998" on file with the Town
of Ithaca Planning Department, are defined with their permitted uses: [Amended
9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001] ^
' ^
1. Natural Area: This area is a permanently preserved natural, open space with the J
following permitted uses: forest, natural succession, forest management including
logging in accordance with good forest management practices, no more than one
retreat cabin not exceeding 500 square feet in floor area (unless up to two
additional cabins are authorized by the Planning Board), outdoor areas for
aquaculture, constructed wetland or other water cleansing demonstration projects,
an auxiliary utility building, gardens, walking trails, and other similar
non-intrusive types of uses. Structures other than related to the above are
prohibited in the Natural area. For the purpose of this section, "aquaculture"
means use of ponds for agricultural production to demonstrate how natural
ecosystems can produce edible plants, fish and other aquatic species for domestic
noncommercial consumption.
TI. Agricultural Area: Permitted uses shall include all principal and accessory
agricultural uses (except residential uses) set forth below, except as the same may
be limited by other restrictions placed upon the land by EcoVillage of Ithaca, Inc.
or others.
23. Editor's Note: Numbering refers to the Zoning Ordinance as it existed in 1995, when this section was adopted. See ^
now § 270-6.
271:26 06-01-2004
§271-9 ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS §271-9
III Resideniial Area: This area will be allowed to coniain up to 150 dwelling units in
up to five neighborhoods. Each neighborhood shall consist of a minimum parcel
of five areas of land. Subdivisions of land (as defined in the Town's Subdivision
Reoulations) whether for sale, lease or other transfer shall be permitted only
within the SLUD area designated as "Residential." In the Residential
building shall be erected or extended and no land or building or part thereof shall
be used'for other than any of the following purposes:"
(1) A one-family dwelling. A one-family dwelling may be occupied by not more than:
(a) One family, or
(b) One family plus no more than one boarder, roomer,, lodger, or other
occupant.
(9) A iwo-family dwelling. A iwo-family dwelling may be occupied by not more than
two families and each dwelling unit in a two-family dwelling may be occupied by
no more than:
(a) One family, or
(b) One family plus no more than one boarder, roomer, lodger, or other
, , occupant.
(3) A multifamily dwelling. Each dwelling unit in a multiple residence shall be
occupied by no more than: [Added 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
(a) One family or
(b) One family plus no more than two boarders, roomers, lodgers or other
occupants.
(4) Up to five community centers, also known as "common houses which may
recreation, meeting, and dining space, children's playrooms, kitchen facilities
common laundry facilities, and other accessory uses permitted in this Special Land
Use District and/or other community space, compatible with its purpose of being
an extension of residents homes provided, however, that the community center is
to be used primarily by the residents of the dwellings located within this Special
Land Use District. At least one, but no more than one, community center shall be
constructed for each 30 residences, unless the Planning Board issues a waiver o
this requirement or limitation in the process of site plan review for good cause
shown. [Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
(5) Special approval uses.
(a) The following uses but only upon receipt of a special approval for same by
the Board of Appeals in accordance with the procedures described below.
22 06 • 01 - 2004
§ 271-9 ITHACA CODE § 271-9
[1] Church or other places of worship, convent and parish house.
[2] Public library, public museum, public, parochial and private schools,
day-care center, and nursery school.
[3] Publicly owned park or playground including accessory buildings and
improvements.
[4] Nursing or convalescent home, or medical clinics.
(b) The application for approval of any of the foregoing uses shall be referred to
the Planning Board and no final action by the Board of Appeals shall be
taken until the Planning Board has reviewed at least a preliminary site plan
and approved same. If the Zoning Board of Appeals approves same, and if
only a preliminary site plan was approved by the Planning Board, the matter
shall be returned to the Planning Board for final site plan approval. The site
plan approval process shall be as set forth in Article DC of the Zoning
Ordinance" supplemented by the provisions of this section. No building
permit shall be issued unless the proposed structure is in accordance with the
final site plan approved by the Planning Board.
(6) Garden, nursery, of farm, except there shall be no hog farm where the principal
food is garbage and there shall be no commercial raising or sale of livestock or
fish. Sale of other farm and nursery products shall be subject to the provisions of
Section 18, Subdivision 7, of the Ordinance.^® Usual farm buildings are permitted,
provided that; [Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
(a) Any building in which farm animals are kept shall be at least 100 feet from
any dwelling or community center and any street right of way, and if
subdivision approval is obtained, at least 100 feet from any lot line.
(b) No manure shall be stored within 100 feet of any dwelling or community
center or street right of way, and if subdivision approval is obtained, within
100 feet of any lot line.
(7) Any municipal, public or private utility purpose necessary to the maintenance of
utility services.
(8) Cemetery and the buildings and structures incident thereto, but only upon special
approval of the Board of Appeals.
(9) A roadside stand or other structure for the display and sale of farm or nursery
products incidental to farming and as a seasonal convenience to the owner or
owners of the land. Any such stand shall be located a minimum of 15 feet from the
street line, in such a manner as to permit safe access and egress for automobiles,
and parking off the highway right of way and shall not be operated more than eight
months out of any one year.
24. Editor's Note: Nunil>cring refers to the Zoning Ordinance as It existed in 1995, when this section was adopted.
25. Editor's Note: Numbering refers to the Zoning Ordinance as it existed in 2001, when this section was amended.
271:28 06 - OJ - 2004
I \
t >
I \
t i
§271-9 ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS §271-9
(10) Signs, as regulaied by Chapter 221, Signs, of the Code of the Town of Ithaca.
(11) Day-care homes and group day-care facilities.
(12) Group family day-care homes upon special approval by the Board of Zoning
Appeals pursuant to Section 77, Subdivision 7.^
E. Accessory uses. Permitted accessory uses in Special Land Use District No. 8 shall be
limited to the following:
(1) Office of a resident doctor, dentist, musician, engineer, teacher, lawyer, artist,
architect, computer consultant, software consultant, or member of other recopized
profession and quasi-profession where such office is a part of the residence
building provided that not more than three additional persons not residing on t e
premises may be employed.
(2) Customary home occupation.
(a) A customary home occupation (such as dressmaking, hair dressing,
laundering, home cooking, carpentry, electrical, and plumbing work or
similar manual or mechanical trade) operated solely by a resident of the
dwelling provided that:
' [1] No additional person not residing on the premises may be employed
therein; and
[2] No goods or products are publicly displayed or advertised for sale; and
[3] There is no outside storage; and
[4] No noise, dust, disorder, or objectionable odor is experienced beyond
the dwelling where such use is conducted.
(b) Any of the above mechanical trades that are conducted in the home shall be
conducted within the confines of the dwelling or the basement of the
dwelling or in a garage area not to exceed 200 square feet.
(3) Offices or occupations as set forth in Subsection E(l) and (2) above may be
conducted in the common house provided:
(a) The person or persons conducting such profession or home occupation is a or
are permanent residents of the Special Land Use District except, as to
professions enumerated in Subsection E(l) above, no more than one
additional nonresident person may be employed by any one professional or
quasi-professional, and no more than four additional nonresident persons may
be employed in the aggregate by all of the professionals and
quasi-professionals occupying work space in the common house; and
^ (b) No more than eight separate offices or work spaces are so occupied in the
common house; and
26. Editor's Note: Numbering refers to ttie Zoning Ordinonce as it existed in 1995, when this section was adopted.
271*'?9 06 - 01 - 2004
f \
I I
c
§ 271-9 ITHACA CODE § 271-9
(c) The aggregate space of all the offices and occupation spaces combined does
not exceed 20% of the total gross floor area of the common house; and
(d) No goods or products are publicly displayed or advertised for sale; and
(e) There is no outside storage; and
(f) No noise, dust, disorder, or objectionable odor is experienced beyond the
space where such occupation or use is conducted; and
(g) No one office or trade authorized above shall be conducted in any space in
excess of 200 square feet; and
(h) The total number of offices or occupations set forth in Subsection E(l) and
(2) located anywhere in this Special Land Use District, whether in common
houses or in residences, shall not in the aggregate exceed the number of
dwelling units, (i.e., there shall be no more home occupations or professional
offices authorized within the Special land Use District than if the property
were in a Residence District R30). [Amended 9-10-2001 by L..L. No.
4-2001]
(4) Off-street garage or parking space for the occupants, users and employees in
connection with uses specified above, but subject to provisions of Section 45 and
Section 69 of the Ordinance,^' and subject to the other provisions of this section. / \
(5) A temporary building for commerce or industry, where such building is necessary ^ )
or incidental to the development of the residential area. Such buildings may not be
continued for more than one year except upon special approval of the Board of
Appeals.
(6) Accessory buildings such as dog houses, storage sheds, carports, gazebos, or other
small structures clearly ancillary and related to dwelling uses in the Special Land
Use District and subject to all other provisions of this section,
(7) The keeping of domestic animals or fowl in accessory buildings, provided that no
such building shall be nearer than 50 feet to any other dwelling and shall be
located on land owned or leased by the person occupying the principal dwelling to
which such building is accessory, and further provided that there shall be no
raising of fur-bearing animals, keeping of horses for hire, or kennels for more than
three dogs over six months old.
(8) Signs, as regulated by Chapter 221, Signs, of the Code of the Town of Ithaca.
F. Manner of land ownership.
(1) The property in this Special Land Use District may be owned in the following
manners:
27. Editor's Note: Numttering refers to the Zoning Ordinance as it existed in 1995, when this section was adopted.
271:30 06-01-2004
I 27].9 ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS § 27J-9
# ) (a) Each dwelling unii may be owned individually by more Jj"®"
enliiy (wiih or withoul a homeowners" association or similar body) proyi
that there is compliance with Chapter 234, Subdivision of Land, of the Code
of the Town of Ithaca (including the cluster subdivision regulations); or
(b) As a cooperative (where there is one entity that owns the land and which
leases land to individuals who then erect dwelling units on the leased land or
where one entity owns the land and all buildings and leases specific dwelling
units and associated accessory buildings to individuals or families); or
(c) As a condominium; and [Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
(d) Common land, facilities and infrastructure (roadways, water and sewer lines
and other infrastructure) may be owned by a separate ^nporution controlled
by the residents of all EcoVillage neighborhoods. [Added 9-10-2001 by LX.
No. 4-2001]
(e) Open land with or without building structures may be owned by the nonprofit
EcoVillage at Ithaca, Inc. [Added 9-10-2001 by LX. No. 4-2001]
O) Reoardless of the manner of ownership, before construction of any improvements
^ ' anywhere in the Special Land Use District is commenced, except as
^ specifically provided by this section, a site plan for such construction shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Board.
It i (3) In the event land is to be owned by a cooperative, a final site plan, providing such
detail as is normally required for a subdivision and showing the d—ons ^
location, in such detail as the Planning Board may require, of the P^Pf
areas, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Board ^building permits are issued. The criteria for approval of such site P'®" ^
same criteria used by the Planning Board in approving site
set forth elsewhere in the Zoning Ordinance and in the Planning Board s
Subdivision Regulations (Chapter 234, Subdivision of Land).
G. Density limitations. There shall be no more than 150 dwelling units
this Special Land Use District. There shall be a maximum of 30 dwelling P^neighborhood unless otherwise authorired by the Planning Board. For every dwellm^unifs, a minimum of one acre of land will be ""ig-ted as pan of *e n^ghborh^dfootprint, as defined in the approved site plan. [Amended 9-10-2001 by LX. No.
4-2001]
H Yard regulations. The minimum distance between buildings shall be ih compliance withdie Ne^ York Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code, except m the case of
multifamlly dwellings in which case the distance between any two ^"'Wmgs
less than the height of the two buildings when averaged together, or 20 feet, whichever
greater. [Amended 9-10-2001 by LX. No. 4-2001]
1. Height regulations. In this Special Land Use District no building shallor extended to exceed 40 feet in height from the lowest interior ^
from the lowest exterior grade, whichever is lower. No structure other than a build »
271:31 06-01 -2004
§ 271.-9 ITHACA CODE § 271-9 ' \
shall be erected, altered, or extended to exceed 30 feet in height. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Planning Board may grant special approval for construction of accessory
towers in excess of 40 feet but in no event shall any structure exceed 60 feet in height.
J. Lot coverage. No structure or structures, including accessory buildings or structures and
including parking area and other paved areas, shall be erected, constructed, altered or
extended to cover, in the aggregate, more than 10% of the land area within the Special
Land Use District or more than 50% of each neighborhood footprint. [Amended
9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
K. Parking. [Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
(1) There shall be provided paved parking, or parking spaces surfaced in such other
manner as may be approved by the Town Planning Board and the Town Engineer,
at the rate of at least 1 1/2 parking spaces for each dwelling unit plus one parking
space for each 400 square feet of enclosed building space in any community
center.
(2) Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Planning Board determines that a reduction
in the required number of parking spaces will not adversely affect traffic flow on
the proposed site, will leave adequate parking for all of the reasonably anticipated
uses or occupancies on the site, and will not otherwise adversely affect the general
welfare of the community, such Board may authorize the minimum number of
parking spaces to be reduced by no more than 25%. If the Planning Board permits
such a reduction, it may impose such reasonable conditions, including the m
conditions set forth with respect to reductions of parking spaces in business ^
districts, as may, in the judgment of the Planning Board, be necessary to assure
that such reduction will not cause congestion, create undesirable traffic flows or
hazards, or otherwise be adverse to the general welfare of the community. In any
event, unless expressly waived by the Planning Board, such reduction shall be
subject to the same mandatory conditions as are set forth with respect to business
district parking area reductions.
L. Size limitations. The maximum square footage for any dwelling unit shall not exceed
2,000 square feet. However, these units may be attached in a duplex or townhouse
configuration or as stacked units. [Added 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
M. Buffer zones. No buildings or structures shall be located within 50 feet of the boundaries
of the Special Land Use District. In addition, no buildings or structures shall be located
within a twenty-five-foot buffer zone surrounding each neighborhood footprint, except
for structures that are established for the joint benefit of contiguous neighborhoods.
[Added 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
N. Building permits and site plan approval.
(1) In accordance with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance a final site plan shall
be submitted to and approved by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board before
issuance of any building permits. Any significant revisions to the Preliminary Site , ^
Plan ("Drawing No. 2A - Project Plan, EcoVillage Co-Housing Cooperative,
Revised Road, Revised Property Lines" made by House Craft Builders dated )
271:32 06-01 -2004
§271-9 ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS §271-9
^ ) October 26, 1994, a copy of which is on file at the Town of Ithaca Planning
Department), submitted to the Town Board at the time of the creation of this
Special Land Use District, shall be submitted to and be approved by the Town
Board before issuance of any building permits.
(a) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Planning Board is authorized to permit
modifications of the Preliminary Site Plan in granting final site plan approval
provided that:
[1] As modified such site plan is in general conformity with the purposes
and objectives of this section creating this Special Land Use District;
and
[2] The modifications are in accordance with the provisions of this section
and other provisions of the Zoning Ordinance unless a variance for a
deviation has been obtained from the Board of Appeals, and
[3] The modifications do not significantly reduce the open space provided
for on the preliminary site plan.
(b) Each neighborhood's site plan shall show exact locations and dimensions of
proposed buildings. [Added 9-10-2001 by LX. No. 4-2001]
. > (2) Building permits shall be required for any construction. Such permits shall not be
- issued unless and until the exterior design, specifications, and plans for the
• ) buildings and all other improvements to be constructed in the Special Land Use
District and construction of all outside facilities including lighting and signs shall
have been shown on the final site plan approved by the Planning Board, and any
construction hereafter shall be in accordance with said site plan as finally
approved. In determining whether to approve the site plan, the Planning Board
shall employ the same considerations it would employ in approving a site plan
pursuant to Sections 46 and 78 of this Ordinance.^
O. Primary ingress and egress to the Special Land Use District. [Amended 9-10-2001 by
LX. No. 4-2001]
(1) No building permits shall be issued for construction of any structures within the
Special Land Use District unless the following exist at the time of the issuance of
such permit to assure adequate ingress and egress to the property:
(a) A primary access road from Mecklenburg Road is legally available to all
current and potential future residents, constructed, and maintained to the
extent of providing, in the opinion of both the Town Engineer and Town
Highway Superintendent, a usable, serviceable roadway for ingress and
egress of residential, emergency and service vehicles, to all dwellings and
community buildings in the Special Land Use District as shown on the final
site plan.
c 28. Edilor's Note: Numbering refers to the Zoning Ordinance as it existed in 1995, when this section was adopted.
271:33 06-01 -2004
[2] If it determines that such waivers will not prevent the normal and
reasonable access in all seasons of fire and medical emergency vehicles;
and
[3] The Town Highway Superintendent and the Town Engineer recommend
such waiver, and
[4] There is proof provided to the Town Engineer and Planning Board that
there is adequate financial support available to the developer to
complete the road, such proof being in the form of a dedicated escrow
account, performance bond, letter of credit, or other proof satisfactory
and acceptable to the Town Engineer, Attorney for the Town and the
Planning Board; and
[5] The Town Engineer and Town Highway Superintendent recommend
granting the waiver.
(b) If such a waiver is granted, the Planning Board may impose such reasonable
conditions upon the grant as it may deem appropriate to assure completion of
the road in a timely and workmanlike manner.
Secondary ingress and egress to the Special Land Use District. No building permits and
no certificates of occupancy shall be issued for any buildings constructed in the Special
Land Use District unless there is in existence at the time of such issuance: [Amended
9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
I \
^ )§ 271 -9 ITHACA CODE § 271 -9
(b) Suitable provisions to assure continuing legal access and continuing
maintenance of the road to a standard which will allow unimpeded passage of
emergency vehicles at all times and in all seasons.
(c) A sign posted at the intersection of the private road and Route 79 indicating
that the road is not a Town road.
(2) No certificates of occupancy shall be issued, and no permits for construction of
more than ten dwelling units for any new neighborhood cluster within the Special
Land Use District shall be issued, unless and until:
(a) The road referred to above, plus any additional road necessary to provide fire
and emergency protection for the new neighborhood cluster, has been
completed in accordance with the applicable Town of Ithaca highway
specifications in effect at the time immediately prior to the issuance of the
first building permit for any such structure, except that if the Town of Ithaca
highway specifications require paving of the road, paving may be omitted,
and except that as to spur roads sen'ing individual neighborhood groups from
the main road (Rachel Carson Way) the Planning Board may waive the
application of any part of the Town Highway specifications:
[1] If it determines that full compliance with such specifications is not
necessary to provide adequate traffic circulation;I \
t
271:34 06-01-2004
\ §271-9 ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS §271-9
^ ^ (1) A secondary access road from West Haven Road with a surface at least 10 feet
wide over a strip of land at least 30 feet wide legally available to. emergency fire,
rescue, and medical vehicles (in fee or by easement), constructed, and maintained
to the extent of providing, in the opinion of both the Town Engineer and Town
Highway Superintendent, a usable, serviceable emergency roadway for ingress and
eoress of residential, emergency and service vehicles, to a point where it joins the
primary access road at a point no further than 1,200 feet from any dwelling unit
and community center proposed to be constructed as shown on the final site plan.
The surface need not be asphalt provided that the surface constructed is, in the
opinion of the Town Engineer and the Town Highway Superintendent, sufficient to
provide year-round access for emergency vehicles.
(2) Suitable provisions to assure continuous rights of access and continuous
maintenance of the road to a standard which will allow unimpeded passage of
emergency vehicles at all times and in all seasons.
Q. Limitation of culs-de-sac. No cul-de-sac of greater than 1,200 feet from a point providing
two means of access to and from public roads (Mecklenburg Road and/or West Haven
Road) existing at the effective date of this section shall be constructed in the Special
Land Use District. [Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
^ R. Dedication of road to the Town of Ithaca. The road or roads may be offered for
dedication to the Town provided that the road is constructed or reconstructed to TownC) specifications as in effect at the time of said proposed dedication except that, at the
) option of the Town, the Town may waive the requirement for paving provided that
arrangements satisfactory to the Town, either by assessment, agreement, or otherwise, are
provided such that if the Town paves the road, the cost of such paving shall be recouped
within a reasonable period of time, satisfactory to the Town, from the owners or lessees
of land in the Special Land Use District and any other users of the land. Said
arrangements may, at the option of the Town, include letters of credit, bonds, deposits of
funds, and/or personal guarantees of the owner and/or residents of the Special Land Use
District. Nothing in this provision is intended to compel the Town to accept such
dedication.
S Maintenance of open space. All the open space shown on the site plan will be owned
maintained, and the use thereof controlled by a residents association or duly formed
cooperative housing corporation or the nonprofit EcoVillage at Ithaca, Inc., pnmanly for
the enjoyment, passive and active recreation, and agricultural purposes of the residents ot
the Special Land Use District provided, however, that if any land is dedicated to the
Town as part of any required park or open space recreation dedication, those areas
owned by the Town will be owned, maintained, and the use thereof controlled by the
Town. [Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
T. Construction requirements. All construction for which a permit is required or granted
shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, rules and regulations.
U. Ownership of ingress and egress roads. The primary road providing access
property running from Mecklenburg Road to the area within the Special Land Use
District shall be owned in fee title by the cooperative, homeowners' association.
271 *35 06 - 01 - 2004
§271-9 ITHACA CODE §271-9 ' ^
[3] It would be a substantial hardship to one or more individuals to delay
construction of more than 10 of dwelling units; and
icondominium association, or all of the owners of any individual lots contained within the
Special Land Use District, as approved by the Planning Board upon the advice of the
Attorney for the Town to assure continued access to and from public roads for the
property in the Special Land Use District. This provision shall terminate at such time, if
ever, as the road is conveyed to the Town or other public road access approved by the
Planning Board is provided to the property within the District. Lots subdivided within the
Residential Area do not have to have frontage or minimum lot width on a public street,
so long as access and the necessary cross-easements for access to the primary EcoVillage
road is guaranteed to the satisfaction of the Town. [Amended 9-10-2001 by LX. No.
4-2001]
V. Provision of sewer facilities. No certificates of occupancy will be issued, and no permits
for construction of more than 10 dwelling units per neighborhood cluster within the
Special Land Use District shall be issued, unless and until the following shall have
occurred: [Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
(1) Sewer easements for the benefit of the Town for a public sewer line running from
a presently existing public sewer to the location of the proposed dwelling units and
corruTJunity center as shown on the finally approved site plan are obtained in the
form normally required by the Town of Ithaca from all landowners over which
said sewer line must run and the same recorded in the Tompkins County Clerk's
Office; and
(2) A sewer line is constructed by the developer or other owner of land in the Special ^ i
Land Use District, at such party's expense, in accordance with all applicable ^ j
specifications and requirements (including the Town of Ithaca and Tompkins
County specifications) to the satisfaction of the Tompkins County Health
Department and the Town of Ithaca Town Engineer and the line is transferred and
dedicated to the Town of Ithaca.
(a) The developer may request a waiver from the requirement of this Subsection
V(2) to the extent of obtaining additional building permits earlier than would
otherwise be authorized by applying for such a waiver to the Planning Board.
The Planning Board may, but is not required to, authorize the issuance of
more than ten building permits if the Planning Board finds:
[1] The plans for the sewer line have been approved by all applicable
agencies;
[2] Work has been commenced on the construction of the line and is
progressing with sufficient rapidity that it is reasonable to expect that it
will be completed before any certificates of occupancy for any dwelling
units eire issued;
[4] There is proof provided to the Town Engineer and Planning Board that
there is adequate financial support available to the developer tocomplete the line, such proof being in the form of a dedicated escrow ^ )
271:36 06-01-2004
12719 ZONING; SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS §271-9
Planning Board; and
[5] The Town Engineer recommends granting the waiver.
the sewer line in a timely and workmanlike manner.
W. Provision of adequate water facilities.
development: [Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
,a) water lines built by tj.
« theTequ— of" h:tmpkins'county Health Depantnenh -d^ ap^Se plumbing and building eodes, as the same perta.n to a pnvate
water system; and
i i "
reasonable judgment of the ^ rtmvide sufficient flows of♦u T/^mrtVinc Countv Health Department, to provide suiiiciethe don^stie household use and at the common
water at the dwelling inca iw* fire orotection
and any other proposed use requiring water.
(C) A meter installed by .he developer at the^vd^^^^^^^^^^
West Haven Road where District in
Water Commission, and any other municipal agency s requirem
supply purposes.(2) The developer ^mUs^^Lfihan
w™er^i^ be permilied by applying for such ^The Planning Board may, bul is nol required to, aulhonze ihethan ten building permits if ihe Planning Board finds.
(a) The plans for ihe waier line have been approved by all applicable agencies:
271:37 06.oi.M04
§271-9 ITHACA CODE §271-9 ^ i
ibe completed before any certificates of occupancy for any dwelling units are
issued;
(c) It would be a substantial hardship to one or more individuals to delay
construction of more than 10 of dwelling units; and
(d) There is proof provided to the Town Engineer and Planning Board that there
is adequate financial support available to the developer to complete the line
and associated facilities, such proof being in the form of a dedicated escrow
account, performance bond, letter of credit, or other proof satisfactory and
acceptable to the Town Engineer, Attorney for the Town and the Planning
Board; and
(e) The Town Engineer recommends granting the waiver.
(3) If such a waiver is granted, the Planning Board may impose such reasonable
conditions upon the grant as it may deem appropriate to assure completion of the
water line and associated facilities in a timely and workmanlike manner.
X. Modification of site plan. Any change in the site plan as finally approved by the Town
Planning Board shall not be made until an application for a modification of site plan is
provided to and approved by the Town Planning Board.
29. Editor's Note: Said Schedule A is included at the end of § 271-9.
271:38 06-01-2004
! SArea rezoned. The area encompassed and rezoned in accordance with this section to be
Special Land Use District No. 8 is described on Schedule A to this section.-' The Official ^
Zoning Map of the Town of Ithaca is hereby amended by adding such district at the ^
location described.
Reversion.
(1) Unless work has materially commenced in accordance with a final site plan within
one year from the issuance of the building permit authorizing such work, or within
36 months of the date the Planning Board gave final site plan approval, or within
four years of the effective date of this section, whichever is earlier, any building
permit shall lapse, the site plan approval (both final and preliminary, if any) shall
expire, and the zoning change effected by this section shall terminate and the
zoning shall revert to that in effect prior to the adoption of this section, unless in
the interim there has been a general rezoning of the area surrounding the area
being rezoned by this section, in which event the zoning shall revert to the same
zoning as then in effect along a majority of the perimeter of the land being rezoned
as a Special Land Use District by this section. The Planning Board, upon request
of the applicant, after a public hearing, and upon a finding that the imposition of
the time limits set forth above would create an undue hardship on the applicant,
may extend the time limits for such additional periods as the Planning Board may
reasonably determine. An application for such extension may be made at the time
of filing of the original application for site plan approval or at any time thereafter
up to, but no later than, six months after the expiration of the time limits set forth
above. . ^
c
f >
§ 271-9 ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS § 271-9
(2) For the purposes of this section, work will not have "materially commenced
unless, at a minimum, i) a building permit, if required, has been obtained; ii)
construction equipment and tools consistent with the size of the proposed work
have been brought to and been used on the site; and iii) substantial excavation
(where excavation is required) or significant framing, erection, or construction
(where excavation is not required) has been started and is being diligently pursued.
AA Invalidity. If any provision of this section is found invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions of this section which
shall remain in full force and effect.
Schedule A
Description of Area Rezoned Special Land Use District No. 8
2001 Amendment
[Amended 9-10-2001 by L.L. No. 4-2001]
All that tract or parcel of land situate in the Town of Ithaca, County of Tompkins, State
of New York, bounded and described as follows:
t i
271*39 06-01 -2004
§ 271 -9 ITHACA CODE §271-9 I I
tBeginning at a point in the center line of Mecklenburg Road which point is
approximately 225 feet westerly from the intersection of such center line with the center
line extended of West Haven Road; thence southerly on a line parallel with and 225 feet
westerly from the center line of West Haven Road a total distance of approximately
1282.15 feet to the northwesterly comer of lands now or formerly of Robert A. and
Elizabeth Hesson (L. 603, P. 564); thence S 1° 48' 31 E along the westerly line of said
lands of Hesson, passing through a point at the southwesterly comer of said lands of
Hesson and continuing a total distance of 482.53 feet to a point located in the centerline
of a creek; thence along the center line of said creek, being also the northerly line of
lands now or formerly of Frank & Rose V. Racco (L. 548, P. 9), the following six (6)
courses and distances: (1) N 76° 25' 16" W, a distance of 76.65 feet to a point; (2)
thence S 83° 51' 07" W, a distance of 185.05 feet to a point; (3) thence S 87° 57' 22"
W, a distance of 106.21 feet to a point; (4) thence N 40° 30' 59" W, a distance of
117.33 feet to a point; (5) thence N 8° 36' 54" W, a distance of 47.43 feet to a point; (6)
thence N 52° 59' 10" W, a distance of 119.59 feet to a point being a northerly comer in
said Flacco premises; thence S 3° 49' 6" W along the westerly line of said lands of
Flacco a total distance of 716.89 feet to an iron pin located at the southwesterly comer
of said lands of Flacco; thence S 86° 57' 21" W, along a northerly line of lands now or
formerly of Donald F. & Genievieve W. Henry (L. 737, P. 141), a distance of 84.76 feet
to an iron pin located at a northwesterly comer of said lands of Henry; thence S 6° 49'
6" E, along a westerly line of premises of Helen DeGraff (L. 310, P. 15 & L. 448, P.
1027), a distance of 1066.73 feel to an iron pin; thence S 87° 37' 09" W, along a ^
northerly line of lands of DeGraff, and continuing along the northerly line of lands now i
or formerly of Longhouse Cooperative, Inc. (L. 546, P. 742), a total distance of 2072.73 j
feet to an iron pin located at a comer of lands now or formerly of Longhouse
Cooperative, Inc. (L. 635, P 482 7 L 635, P. 492); thence N 03° 14' 12" W, along the
easterly line of said lands of Longhouse Cooperative, Inc.," a distance of 400.29 feet to
an iron pin located at a northeasterly corner of said lands of Longhouse Cooperative,
Inc.; thence N 86° 45' 49" W along a northerly line of said lands of Longhouse
Cooperative, Inc. a distance of 1047.69 feet to an iron pin located at a northwesterly
comer of said lands of Longhouse Cooperative, Inc. being also an easterly line of lands
reputedly owned by Comell University; thence N 1° 17' 37" W, along an easterly line of
said lands of Comell, a distance of 700.38 feet to an iron pin located at a northeasterly
comer of said lands of Comell, being also a southerly line of lands now or formerly of
YMCA of Ithaca and Tompkins County (L. 606, P. 172); thence N 88° 01' 30" E, along
a southerly line of said lands of YMCA, a distance of 421.59 feet to an iron pin located
at a southeasterly corner of said lands of YMCA; thence N 2° 23' 46" W, along an
easterly line of said lands of YMCA, a distance of 965.44 feet to an iron pipe; thence N
87° 36' 14" E along a southerly line of said lands of YMCA, and continuing along the
southerly line of lands now or formerly of Robin Bottie and David Warden (L. 633, P.
728) a total distance of 1725.73 feet to an iron pin located at the southeasterly comer of
said lands of Bottie and Warden;
271:40 06-01-2004
§271-9 ZONING: SPECIAL LAND USE DISTRICTS §271-10
^ thence N 01° 49' 46" W, along the easterly line of said lands of Bottle and Warden and
continuing along the easterly line of the lands now or formerly of Joseph and Daisy
Schimmenti (L. 557, P. 454) and the easterly line of the lands "O"' ™
Sadegn Deljoo and Ngem Puang (L. 656, P. 235) a total distance of 128L8 feet to a
point in the said center line of Mecklenburg Road; thence N 87 50 16 E, alon„ th
said center line of Mecklenburg Road a total distance of 563.93 feet lo a poinu 'heiiM S
01° 48' 31" E, along the westerly line of lands now or formerly of Michael Carroll (. .
732, P. 330) a'lotal distance of 721.5 feet to an iron pin; thence N 87° 50' 16" E, along
the southerly line of said lands of Carroll a distance of 404.0 feet to an iron pin; thence
N 01° 48' 31" W, along an easterly line of the said lands of Carroll a distance oi IdV. _
feet to a point; thence N 88° 11' 29" E, along a southerly line of the said lands of
CaiToll a distance of 125.00 feet to a point; thence N 01° 48' 31" W, along an easterly
line of said lands of Carroll a distance of 300.00 feet to a point; ^
W, along a northerly line of the said lands of Carroll a distance of 125.00 feet to a
point; thence N 01° 48' 31" W, along an easterly line of said lands of Carroll ^ distance
of 281 76 feet to a point in the said center line of Mecklenburg Road; thence N 88
53" E, along the said center line of Mecklenburg Road, a distance of approximately
522.14 feet to the point or place of beginning, being net 165.72 acres more or less.
The above description is in accordance with a map entitled
ECOVIL.LAGE COHOUSIING COOPERATIVE MECKLENBURG ROAD - N.Y.S.
RTE. 79 TOWN OF ITHACA, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK" with a sheet title
' of "SUBDIVISION PLAN MAP" Sheet 1, dated June 11, 2(W1, made by T.G. Miller
P.C., a copy of which is on file with the Town of Ithaca Planning Office.
c
§271-10. Special Land Use District No. 9 (Limited Mixed Use, Cornell Precinct 7).
[Adopted 12-11-1995 by L.L. No. 14-1995]
A. Preamble.
(1) WHEREAS, Cornell University has plans for long term development of a portion
of the Cornell University Campus known generally as "Precinct 7" of the recent
Planning Study done by Cornell; and
(2) WHEREAS, the plans are for development of this are solely for educational
purposes and to further the education mission of the University; and
(3) WHEREAS, in order to assess the short- and long-term environmental and other
effects of development of this area, the University voluntarily undertook to prepare
a Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement ("DGEIS"); and
(4) WHEREAS, the Town, Cornell, and many residents of the Town have participated
in the analysis of the proposed development and the drafting of the DGEIS; and
^ (5) WHEREAS, the DGEIS has now been completed and a Final Genenc
^ Environmental Impact Statement ("FGEIS") has been prepared by the Town,
taking into account the concerns and comments expressed at several public
hearings on the proposed development; and
I \
271 *41 06 - 01 - 2004
^ § 270-5 ITHACA CODE § 270-5
» 1
(4) Any change, addition, or removal of partitions, or any change in walls, ceiling,
windows, or doors.
B. The term "ALTER," in its various modes and tenses and its participial form, refers to the
making of an alteration.
AMATEUR RADIO FACILITIES — Structures and equipment used by amateur radio
operators who are licensed by the Federal Communications Commission, including antennas,
towers, rotors, mounts, guy wires and anchors, but this term shall not include mobile
equipment that is contained in a car or other motor vehicle or is completely portable and not
affixed in any manner to realty (the exception for mobile equipment does not extend to any
antennas attached, directly or indirectly, such as on a tower or other structure, to realty or to
other facilities used in connection with such mobile equipment). [Added 8-13-2007 by L.L.
No. 7-2007]
BASEMENT— That space of a building that is partly below grade which has half, or more
than half, of its height, measured from floor to ceiling, above the average finished grade of the
ground adjoining the building.
BED-AND-BREAKFAST— A building originally built and used as a dwelling other than a
hotel or motel in which accommodations for transients are regularly offered for compensation
and which accommodations include provision of at least one meal, and in which building no
_ more than four bedrooms are utilized for such accommodations.
BUILDING — A structure having a roof supported by columns or by walls and intended for
shelter, housing, protection or enclosure of persons, animals or property.
BUILDING, ACCESSORY — A detached building subordinate and clearly incidental to the
principal building on the same lot and used for purposes customarily incidental to those of the
principal building.
BUILDING AREA— The total areas taken on a horizontal plane at the main grade level of
the principal building and all accessory buildings exclusive of uncovered porches, terraces and
steps.
BUILDING CODE — The New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code (9
NYCRR Part 600 et seq.) as the same may be amended from time to time, and any successor
regulations, laws or codes.
BUILDING LINE — The line formed by the intersection of the vertical plane that coincides
with the most projected exterior point of a building on any side and the ground. Front, side,
and rear building lines are respectively the building lines closest to the highway right-of-way,
side property line and rear property line.
BUILDING, PRINCIPAL — A building within which is conducted the primary uses of the
lot on which the building is located.
CATERER — A person or enterprise that prepares food for hire for consumption
predominantly off premises.
270:10 09- 15 -2007
z\ \coOOOOOOOOOO^^CCC'::^OOOOOC>CC
I *
?v
i^«-7
J.<5i,5.
D©®®oo®oooeeoooeo
'.r
->i'f ■'* '
01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETING
ATTACHMENT #4
TOWN OF ITHACA
LOCAL LAW NO. OF THE YEAR 2008
A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 239 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA
CODE, TITLED "TAXATION," REGARDING EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN
DISABLED PERSONS WITH LIMITED INCOMES
Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 239 (Taxation), Article IV (Exemption for Certain
Disabled Persons With Limited Incomes) of the Town of Ithaca Code, Section 239-11,
titled "Statutory authority'* is amended by deleting the phrase "Chapter 531 of the Laws
of 2006" and replacing it with the phrase "Chapter 348 of the Laws of 2007", so that this
section reads as follows:
"This article is enacted pursuant to § 459-c of the Real Property Tax Law of the
State of New York as amended through Chapter 348 of the Laws of2007."
Section 2. Chapter 239 (Taxation), Article IV (Exemption for Certain
Disabled Persons With Limited Incomes) of the Town of Ithaca Code, Section 239-12.A,
titled "Grant of exemption; conditions" is amended by adding the words "or real property
owned by one or more persons, some of whom qualify under § 459-c and the others of
whom qualify under § 467 of the Real Property Tax Law of the State of New York," after
the words "at least one of whom has such a disability," in the first sentence, and by
deleting the income/exempt percentage schedule in subparagraph A and replacing it with
the following income/exempt percentage schedule so that subparagraph A reads as
follows:
"Pursuant to the provisions of § 459-c of the Real Property Tax Law of the State
of New York, real property located in the Town of Ithaca, owned by one or more
persons with disabilities as defined in § 459-c, or by a husband, wife, or both, or
by siblings, at least one of whom has such a disability, or real property owned by
one or more persons, some of whom qualify under § 459-c and the others of
whom qualify under § 467 of the Real Property Tax Law of the State of New
York, and whose income is limited by reason of such disability, shall be partially
exempt fi*om taxation by said Town for the applicable taxes specified in said
§ 459-c based upon the income of the owner or combined incomes of the owners.
Such partial exemption shall be to the extent set forth in the schedule following:
December 20,2007
Annual Income of Owner or Percentage Assessed Valuation j ^
Combined Annual Income Exempt From Taxation ^
of Owners
Up to and including $27,000 50%
More than $27,000 but less than $28,000 45%
$28,000 or more but less than $29,000 40%
$29,000 or more but less than $30,000 35%
$30,000 or more but less than $30,900 30%
$30,900 or more but less than $31,800 25%
$31,800 or more but less than $32,700 20%
$32,700 or more but less than $33,600 15%
$33,600 or more but less than $34,500 10%
$34,500 or more but less than $35,400 5%"
Section 3. Chapter 239 (Taxation), Article IV (Exemption for Certain
Disabled Persons With Limited Incomes) of the Town of Ithaca Code, Section 239-15,
titled "When effective" is amended by replacing the two references to "2007" with
"2008" so that this section reads as follows:
"The schedule in § 239-12.A shall apply to assessment rolls prepared on the basis
of taxable status dates occurring on or after March 1, 2008. With respect to
assessment rolls prepared on the basis of taxable status dates prior to March 1, t )
2008, the partial exemption allowed by the Town of Ithaca shall be limited to
qualified properties, to those persons otherwise qualified under, and to the
amounts permitted by, the applicable Town of Ithaca local laws in effect on the
relevant taxable status date."
Section 4. If any provision of this local law is found invalid by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions of this local
law, which shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 5. This local law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the
Secretary of State of the State of New York.
I \
f \
December 20,2007
01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETING
ATTACHMENT #5
488iiSi#n
TOWN OF ITHACA
LOCAL LAW NO. OF THE YEAR 2008
A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 239 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE,
TITLED "TAXATION," REGARDING SENIOR CITIZENS EXEMPTION
Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 239 (Taxation), Article I (Senior Citizens Exemption) of
the Town of Ithaca Code, Section 239-1, titled "Statutory authority" is amended by
deleting the phrase "Chapter 186 of the Laws of 2006" and replacing it with the phrase
"Chapter 434 of the Laws of2007", so that this section reads as follows:
"This article is enacted pursuant to § 467 of the Real Property Tax Law of the
State of New York as amended through Chapter 434 of the Laws of 2007."
Section 2. Chapter 239 (Taxation), Article I (Senior Citizens Exemption) of
the Town of Ithaca Code, Section 239-2.A, titled "Grant of exemption" is amended by
adding the words "or real property owned by one or more persons, some of whom qualify
under § 467 and the others of whom qualify under § 459-c of the Real Property Tax Law
of the State of New York," after the words "or real property owned by husband and wife
or by siblings, one of whom is 65 years of age or over," in the first sentence, and by
deleting the income/exempt percentage schedule in subparagraph A and replacing it with
the following income/exempt percentage schedule so that subparagraph A reads as
follows:
"Pursuant to the provisions of § 467 of the Real Property Tax Law of the State of
New York, real property located in the Town of Itiiaca, owned by one or more
persons, each of whom is 65 years of age or over, or real property owned by
husband and wife or by siblings, one of whom is 65 years of age or over, or real
property owned by one or more persons, some of whom qualify under § 467 and
the others of whom qualify under § 459-c of the Real Property Tax Law of the
State of New York, shall be partially exempt from taxation by said Town for the
applicable taxes specified in said § 467 based upon the income of the owner or
combined incomes of the owners. Such partial exemption shall be to the extent
set forth in the schedule following:
Annual Income of Owner or Percentage Assessed Valuation
Combined Annual Income Exempt From Taxation
of Owners
Up to and including $27,000 50%
More than $27,000 but less than $28,000 45%
$28,000 or more but less than $29,000 40%
$29,000 or more but less than $30,000 35%
$30,000 or more but less than $30,900 30%
December 20,2007 l
I i
$30,900 or more but less than S31,800 25%
$31,800 or more but less than $32,700 20%
$32,700 or more but less than $33,600 15% ^
$33,600 or more but less than $34,500 10%
$34,500 or more but less than $35,400 5%"
Section 3. Chapter 239 (Taxation), Article I (Senior Citizens Exemption) of
the Town of Ithaca Code, Section 239-5, titled "When effective" is amended by replacing
the two references to "2007" with "2008" so that this section reads as follows:
"The schedule in § 239-2.A shall apply to assessment rolls prepared on the basis
of taxable status dates occurring on or after March 1, 2008. With respect to
assessment rolls prepared on the basis of taxable status dates prior to March 1,
2008, the partial exemption allowed by the Town of Ithaca shall be limited to
qualified properties, to those persons otherwise qualified under, and to the
amounts permitted by, the applicable Town of Ithaca local laws in effect on the
relevant taxable status date."
Section 4. If any provision of this local law is found invalid by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions of this local
law, which shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 5. This local law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the
Secretary of State of the State of New York.
t I
^1
/ \
December 20,2007
, ^ 01/07/2008 TOWN BOA]
ATTACHMENT #6 '
TOWN OF ITHACA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: TOWN BOARD
FROM: JONATHAN KANTER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ^
RE: THE VILLAGE AT SOUTH POINTE - ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, NEW
SITE ON ENFIELD FALLS ROAD - PROPOSAL TO REZONE TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT ZONE (PDZ)
DATE: DECEMBER 27,2007
TTiis is a follow-up to the presentation and discussion at the November 19^*" Town Board meeting
regarding the proposal by South Pointe Associates for an assisted living facility in the southern
end of the Town of Ithaca. The original site proposed by South Pointe Associates was adjacent
to the former Turbacks' building on Elmira Road/Route 13. Several Town Board members had
concerns with that site pertaining to its proximity to a Conservation Zone area, its location on a
very busy State highway, the relative isolation of the site, and the lack of public transit in this
area. South Pointe Associates is now proposing a new site for the assisted living facility located
• s nearby on Enfield Falls Road/Route 327. The new site is slightly larger, consisting of 10.69 +/-
; , acres (compared with 9 +/- acres on the previous site). The new site is also zoned Low Density
Residential (LDR) and is located just across from the main entrance to Robert H. Treman State
Park. Please refer to the attached location map showing both the previous site and the current
site of the proposed assisted living facility. South Pointe Associates has submitted the attached
letter (dated 12/19/07 from Chris Vitale) requesting that the Town Board consider rezoning the
new site on Enfield Falls Road from LDR to Planned Development Zone.
I have attached excerpts from the applicant's earlier report, entitled "The Village at South Pointe
- An Assisted Living Community" (11/02/07)) for the Board's easy reference. Those of you
who have a copy of that earlier report should refer to it because much of the information
regarding the proposal is still relevant (except for the new site). This follow-up discussion is
scheduled for the January 7, 2008 Town Board meeting. The applicant will attend and will be
available to discuss the proposal with the Board and answer questions regarding the proposal and
the new site. In addition, Betty Falcao, from the Health Planning Council has been invited to
attend the meeting to discuss and answer questions pertaining to assisted living centers and the
need for such facilities in the Finger Lakes area.
The proposal includes an assisted living facility that would require licensing by the NYS
Departments of Social Services and Health. The current information that we have is that the
facility would be a one-story building, consisting of +/- 30,000 square feet, and would include 80
beds in 40 units. The facility would also include a cafe, ice cream parlor, barber shop, beauty
salon, and private dining room for resident use, along with +/- 39 parking spaces. The rezoning
is entirely at the Town Board's discretion, under its legislative authority. Article XXI of the
Town of Ithaca Zoning Code (Chapter 270) includes the purpose and requirements of a PDZ.
Article XXII includes the procedures for the creation of new zones. The following are some
preliminary observations regarding the current proposed site on Enfield Falls Road.
Comprehensive Plan Recommendation: Located in a transitional area, partly designated as
"Suburban Residential" and a portion shown as "Rural Residential" in the 1993 Town of Ithaca
Comprehensive Plan. Adjoining areas are shown as "Agricultural" to the north and "Recreation"
to the south (reflecting the presence of Robert H. Treman State Park).
Current Site Use: Vacant, undeveloped, consisting of former farm fields and woods.
Surrounding Zoning: Additional Low Density Residential (LDR) to the west and east;
Conservation Zone to the south; Agricultural Zone to the north.
Surrounding Land Use: Robert H. Treman State Park is located directly across Enfield Falls
Road to the south; low density, single-family residences are situated adjacent and to the west of
the site; and active agricultural land is located to the north, along with a small cemetery and a
single-family residence. The intersection of Enfield Falls Road and Elmira Road/Route 13 is just
north of the site.
Local Law to Rezone to PDZ: If the Town Board decides to pursue the concept of this proposal,
a local law would need to be drafted to rezone the property to a Planned Development Zone
(PDZ) as part of the approval process. It would make sense to have a draft local law, covering
development limits, allowed uses and other considerations, prior to further consideration of the
proposal. However, drafting a local law would only be appropriate if the Town Board decides to
pursue this proposal.
Environmental Review: This would be a "Type I" action pursuant to the State Environmental
Quality Review Act (SEQR) and Chapter 148 of the Town of Ithaca Code regarding
Environmental Quality Review, since the proposal includes the construction of 30 or more
residential units and/or the construction of more than 30,000 square feet of floor space. If the
Town Board decides to refer this proposal to the Planning Board for a recommendation, the
Town Board should consider whether it wants to be lead agency or whether it wants to request
that the Planning Board establish itself as lead agency to coordinate the environmental review for
the proposed project. Possible actions would include a re-zoning by the Town Board and site
plan approval by the Planning Board.
Possible Board Actions at January Meetine:
f ^ ^
(
( ^
Public Sewer and Water: Public sewer and water lines are available in the vicinity of the project
site. The Engineering Department will need to assess the capacity and suitability of these
facilities in regard to the needs of the proposed assisted living community.
Option 1: Consider referring zoning proposal to Planning Board for recommendation,
Confirm classification as "Type I" Action pursuant to SEQR, and if Type I, consider
whether the Town Board or Planning Board should be Lead Agency to coordinate the
environmental review, if referred.
• Option 2: Indicate interest in the proposal, and request that the applicant prepare a
draft local law, in consultation with the Attorney for the Town and Director of
Planning, Refer the proposal and the draft local law to the new Planning Committee
prior to referring the matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation,
• Option 3: Take no action at this time. Request additional information from applicant
for further consideration,
• Option 4: Indicate that the Town Board is not interested in considering the requested
rezoning.
There are many more details in the applicant's original report. Please review these materials for
the January 7*'' Town Board meeting. Meanwhile, please let me know if there are any questions
prior to the meeting.
Att.
cc: Chris Vitale
Charles Guttman
31
32
■•J 8.7;
■
31
81^1 Ac'C
©
8.34
22.38 Ac
11.93AcC V -k. ; = ■*■'•• \ A ■.■ "-'a
► ^ • V^ ' ^3 ^
'^rO'-S.BlTAe
•/j'4,12
3.00 Ac A'
^•-.7.2
•. c.
;Pv^^OSiJ ^ ^ ~
12.
S<i__72.47Ac
• - i - - » .1 -v ; WMlSCeMmBT
Tt«'
^ rrtuCAVE'reRAN1.3 AREUEf«*SSO^
fi .lSAc
44.43 AeC
44.70 Ac 610.—, .•••,.■
16.78 *4r'
---rftrtAc •;■■,?7^N.«M^T^NbF,m|l^A 1;
-2
fld" 5SvA.tt\ 10 TiaT^ ,/';
->
33.7 AeC
ROBERT H TREI.UN
STATE PARK
V'7^s
'. 13.01 AeC rt f'
■JWVtf
^•v72J0AcC
FINGER LAKES LAND TRUST \{SWEEDIER PRESERVE)
Proposed Pezoning
Village at South Pointe
ItMn of Ithaca, NY12/27/07
LEGEND
;l99t
:ins & Flint Lol Number
Parcel Connector
Properly Line
Former Property Line
Cuneni Year Changes
Blodr Limit
External Tax Map
Block Number
43.1 Parcel Lol Numba
j u Previous Lot Number
' I Subdivision Lol Number
J.SAc Deed/Survey Acreage
2.11 AcC Computed Acreage
1880Ac6 Grouped (Total) Acreage
loOt Scaled (Calculated) Acreage
rood Deed Dimension
TOWN OF ITHACA
TOMPtUNS COUNTY. N.Y.
m e 400
MAP: 33
SCALE; r-400'
10:35 7811494
12/19/07
Town of Ithaca
215N.Tioga
Ithaca, NY 14850
SENECA LAKE TERRACE PAGE 02
I ..i ii';!>: 11 li. 1 n n
DEC 1 9 2007
^3 A"•EER:MG
Dear Town Board:
Re: Re-zoning of property on Enfield Falls Road
Tax Map# 33.-1-9.2
10.5 Acres
I respectfully request that you consider re-zoning the above referenced property located off
Enfield Falls Road, just west of Rt 13, South in the Town of Ithaca.
This particular piece of property encompasses more than 10 acres and is much more conducive
to the construction of an 80 bed Assisted Living Community for a number of reasons as stated
below.
• The location is such that the property is NOT off a mtyor highway but instead has
almost 500 feet of road front^e on a safer, less traveled Enfield Falls Road.
• From the North of the property, elevation offers a slight slope down to meet the road,
allowing for our building to be placed in better view from the road, providing
maximum exposure.
• The property is NOT adjacent to a conservation area and has all necessary utilities
including, Gas, electric, sewer and water.
• Contrary to initial concerns about the distance of our property from town, this property
is less than 2 miles outside of the center of town and is located in a fairly residential
area.
• The property has few neighbors and has a cemetery located behind it (not in view)
• Please note that in all of our existing communities wc are located in residential
neighborhoods and provide service to the people of that surrounding area.
It is our belief that a quality Assisted Living Community should be a part of any
comprehensive plan for a developed neighborhood. This Building will be an attractive,
unassuming and modest sized ranch style home that serves to fill a void in Tompkins County.
In addition this building will provide a sizable tax base for the town of Ithaca and finally, this
location is appropriate for not only the above mentioned reasons but also because it has been
demonstrated that Tompkins County needs this service. The Town of Ithaca is in a position to
benefit fix>m this project and currently there arc NO options on the south side of Ithaca for
residents of Tompkim County.
Thank you for your continued assistance on this project and I look forward to working with the
Town towards a common goal t^erve the population of Tompkins County.
Sincerely,
Chris Vitale - Operator
l'^/20/2B07 10:35 7811494 SENECA LAKE TERRACE PAGE 03
DFC 1 9 2007
f
C.e:5Ac
DEC-19-2007 01:14 AM P . 02
l2/e5/2887 23:
1
isiEjssd^
fr>tfih/ vi^ i9a9QWjf/t^
f \
> \
Southe Pointe Associates Background
The owners of South Pointe Associates are primarily made up of two Brothers from
Aubum, NY named Chris and Paul Vitale.
From their early youth, Chris and Paul had the opportunity to work in Healthcare.
Working for their father who ran a 170 bed adult home in Aubum NY, they learned form
having direct hands on experience in all aspects of caring for the elderly. From
dishwashing, maintenance, and planned activities to managing a kitchen that was
responsible for providing meals for 170 residents, 3 times a day.
After high school, Chris and Paul attended the SUNY Institute of Technology at Utica,
NY to obtain a degree in Health Services Management. After College, and becoming
licensed as a Skilled Nursing Home Administrators, Both Paul and Chris pursued
separate opportunities with corporately owned Nursing Homes facilities. Chris and Paul
had successful careers and enjoyed the responsibility but missed the experiences they had
in Assisted Living.
1
In 1999, after living South of New York for more than 8 years, Paul moved back to NY
and the brothers collaborated with their father to build, own, and operate a 66 bed
Licensed Assisted Living Community located in Geneva, NY named Seneca Lake
Terrace Assisted Living. In April of2001, Park Terrace Assisted Living Community was
opened.
Both of their facilities have become a familiar and welcomed part of the local landscape
in their home towns and continue to provide a needed service in their respective
communities. Collectively, Chris and Paul Vitale have been working in the healthcare
industry for more than 30 years and have dedicated their lives to serving the needs of the
frail elderly.
The Vitale brothers have a reputation for providing excellent care and are directly
involved in ALL aspects of managing their building. The intended project in Ithaca is an
extension of their commitment to providing quality, affordable Assisted Living services
to the elderly.
L
Chris Vitale
4771 West Lake Road
Auburn. New York 13021 315-252-9962
CJV2552@rochester.rr.coni
Objective
^erm cL'coS"® ^ Long
Experience 1988-1996 Northbrook Heights Adult Home Auburn, NY
Dietary Cook/Activities Coordinatai^-nteiiance '
n Responsible for feeding up to 160 residents 3 times daily.
^ resident participation and satisfacttan tor a full
^^tafon sPeofically desgned to meet the needs of an elderly
maintenance personnel to make sure all aspects ofthe home was up to par in regard to DOH regulation and policy.
P®'<°mied over an extended period of time from highsch^mrough college and into my eariy career. Working closely with alldecent heads to gam valuable knowledge of the business of caring for the
Servtees''^'"
DoS'p^l^ aid
" ""paid <^a'ms andresolving billing errors to achieve reimbursement from County and State offices
n Directly managed quality of care through an extensive quality improvement
program developed with the Director of Nursing and Administrator.
1997- 2000 Howd Nursing Home
Administrator
Moravia, NY
Responsible for all facets of operation for this 40 bed Nursing Facility
regulations and procedure maintaining
pmnin ' "managing a 1.8 miliion dollar budget and working closely withemployees and management to ensure employee satisfaction.
Seneca Lake Terrace Assisted Living Community1999 - Present
Geneva, NY
Operations Manager/Administrator
* S 66 bed
n maintaining a healthy cash flow through dose budget management and
5511-12J7 Wtt»rfbrd BiufT (PlP)783-5351 h{>n«
Raleigh. N C. 27612 (7(>») i;06-Q393 Ml!
PaulRVitale
: n To continue in a Health Care .Administrative position thai v»ill albw me ;o
utilize my skills, education and experience.
1994 - 2000 Integrated Health Services
Raleigh, NC11/199S
&(ecutive Director-- - North Carolbia
• Managed 9 Skilled Nursing Facilities. (1100 beds). 7 of \vhich» .soon after
acquisition.
• Implemenicd i.K.S. policies, procedures and mission into facilities
• Managed and provided Support to .Administrators.
• Liaison between the ccrporation and the facilides.
11/1996 - ] 1/1998 Raleigh. NC
Senior Admirdstrator-IJH.S. of Raleigh/Treybum fltehab
I.H.S. of Rnltfigh:
• Primary Administrator / overall manogement of 1 bed Sub-acuie SNl-
including 20 bed ventilator unit.
• Successfully managed 2 Full State Surveys with subsiantial improvemem over
previous surveys and very positive outcomes, minor citations on 1998
survey, 50% reduction In citations from 1996 survey to 1997 survvy).
• Irfiplemenied retention programs that reduced Una staff lurnovci sljnihcamiy.
• Improved / developed rccruiiment efforts and retention prtigrams.
• Direct Supervision of U Deparimcnt heads.
• Overall manager of ovur 200 cniployecs.
Treyburn Rehab:
• Senior Admiristraior of Treyburn Rehab. 150 bed Sub-acute SNF.
• Hired Administrator for facility.
• .Achieved I deficiency free Full Stale .Survey and ! single deficiency full Stale
Survey.
• Provioed support and auidance to facility, (clinical a.td financial).
• Mediator lo employ^ie and HR issues.
• Cououcied / participated in mcnlhly financial reviews to erasure efficxncy.
• Promoted to E.KCCUli vc Director tor I.H S. in 11/S8.
P0.20 39tfd 30VdiGl >iy"5'd Z0&S8e9Siet 87:06 i.00c/3e/TT
( .
10/1994 - 1 1/1996 Tarpon Springs, FU
Adniintstmtor- of Tarpon Springs
» Overall management of 120 bed Sub-acute SNF.
• Managed 2 very successful Full State Surveys, substantially iniprovi.'ig from
previous surveys and attaining Florida's '"superior rating*' both lirnes.
• Achieved Accreditation from JCAHO for both LTC and Sub-acute.
<• Direct vSupervtsion of! 1 Depariment heads.
• Overall manager for more than 140 employees.
• Consistently exceeded budgeted "run rate", 22 out of 24 months.
» Exceeded annual budgetjed "run rate'* by more than 20% for 1995 and 1996-
• Developed inceiiiivc program for key department heads 10 mcci budgeted
expenses and census.
• Consistently met budgeted expenses and cen.sus.
• Achieved "Administrator of the Vcar" award in 1996 with
l.H.S. for outstanding Clinical and Financial performance.
• Promoted to Senior Administrator in 11/96.
( (
' )
1993 - 1.994 Beverly Enterprises
10/1993 - 10/1994 Dadc C hy. FL
Administrator • Dade City Qeriatric Center
• Overall management of 120 bed LTC SNF
• Successfully managed 1 superior rated Annual State Survey.
• improved census mix to be able co serve shon lerrn rehab Residents.
• Direct Supervision of 8 Department heads,
• Overall nuanager for more tlwn 100 employees.
• Achieved the Beverly "6" award for exceilence.
1/1993-10/199,3 Ocala.FL
Administrator iik Trailing - Stoncgate Nursing Cantor
• Successfully completed Florida A.l.T. while participating in
numerous administrative functions, (I.e. hiring, disctpitning,
recruitment and retention).
• Assisted in numerous other Beverly Facilities during Siaio
Survey process.
• Attended Florida Health Care Association Conference and
regular meetings.'■ i
be. 5:0 SB-Jd BWdbSl MdVd i0S3e£9STei 8t?:6e l22Z/Z^f/ll
The Villase at South Pointe will be a licensed Assisted Livine Prosram.
Assisted Livine Proeram Definition: An Assisted Living Program facility is licensed by
the New York State Department of Health and provides supportive housing and
convalescent home care nurse services to individuals who are medically eligible for
placement in a skilled Nursing facility but, whose needs can be met in a less restrictive
and lower cost residential setting. Home care services may be paid for through a
capitates Medicaid rate or private pay rater set by the facility operator. Payment for the
residential services may be through Supplement Security Income (SSI) level HI or private
pay.
Services to be provided at the Villase at South Pointe
The Village at South Pointe will provide a range of services to its residents that include
the following:
n Nursing Services
n On-going health management
n Medication administration
n Coordination of services such as physical therapy, occupational
therapy, speech therapy, etc...
n Providing all meals, housekeeping, laundry and linen services.
n A full range of activities that are held both inside the facility as
well as the surrounding Ithaca area.
n Organize and arrange for personal care services that include
assistance with dressing, bathing, toileting, grooming and overall
health.
n Dietary consultation and planning of meals,
n Arrangement for Physician appointments with ongoing follow-up
and transportation.
n 24 hour supervision and staff on site
n Ongoing case management and coordination of all aforementioned
services.
All of the above services will be part of the basic plan of care for each resident at The
Village at South Pointe.
Operational Logistics
The Village at South Pointe will be staffed 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The staff
will consist of Administration, Case manager, RN managers, LPN supervisors. Personal
care aides. Home Health Aides, Housekeepers, Dietary staff, Maintenance staff, as well
as Activity coordinators.
The above staff will work together to provide a seamless array of services that will enable
(our residents) the frail elderly to live up their highest practicable well being. Residents
will have opportunity to stay active and participate in many local and cultural events of
the surrounding Ithaca area. The Village of South Pointe will strive to be an important
part of the local landscape in Ithaca, constantly reaching out to bring local culture into the
facility as well as taking our residents out of the building to enjoy so much that Tompkins
County has to offer.
The VUlaee at South Pointe buildins description
The Village at South Pointe will be an upscale, beautifully landscaped one stoiy building
with brick-face accents. The inside of the building will be themed to mimic a small, town
square atmosphere. The building will have a design that makes use of natural lighting via
skylights, allowing for an optimal natural atmosphere for people and plant life to thrive.
Our home will include a fimctioning Ice Cream parlor that is decorated as a 1950's soda
shop. Our layout will include a full sized Beauty salon and Barber shop that will serve
the need of all residents. Also, our building will include a large living room with a gas
fireplace and beautifully designed furniture arrangements allowing for areas conducive to
conversation. There will be several lounge areas and activity areas. The building will
have a separate homelike "Country Kitchen" that one may have in their own home,
allowing for residents to participate in baking, cooking and crafts while being supervised
by activity staff. In addition to common areas, this building will include a chapel and
library for those residents that enjoy personal time reading or reflecting.
The main dining room of the building will have access to an outdoor courtyard that is
beautifully designed and will include much landscaping, this area will include walking
paths that will be enclosed and provide a safe outdoor area for residents to enjoy.
In conclusion
The New York State mandated Berger Commission report of2006 determined that
Tompkins County was in desperate need of Assisted Living Program beds. After many
discussions with local Department of social services leaders, Tompkins Office of the
Aging staff and many other healthcare professionals in the Ithaca areas, it's clear that the
Village at South Pointe will be a beautiful and much needed addition to the lacking
Assisted Living Program services in Tompkins County.
Our intention is to provide an exceptional alternative for the frail elderly who currently
have few options for housing when faced with needing Assisted Irving services.
Currently elderly residents are forced to move out of the area or into a skilled Nursing
Home when their needs could be met in a less restrictive, more residential style
community. It will be our commitment to operate this building making it something that
Ithaca can be proud of and will meet the overwhelming need of many Tompkins County
residents.
Chris Vitale - Developer
! \
t \
The Village at South Polnte
Program Attachment #: 1
updated: 9/8/2007
The Village at South Pointe will be a new licensed 80 bed Assisted Living Program located in the
town of Ithaca just South of the city of Ithaca in Tompkins County. This new 80 bed facility will
be operated by South Pointe Associates, Inc. d/b/a The Village at South Pointe. South Pointe
Associates, Inc., d/b/a The Village at South Pointe leases from South Pointe Associates, a
partnership. Principals are the same in each organization with the same interests.
Christopher Vitale, Paul Vitale, Jonathan Vitale and Joseph P. Vitale are the principals. Two of
the 4 principals also operate Adult Care Homes and Assisted Living Program facilities in Geneva,
New York and Baldwinsville, New York^ Paul-Vitale is the administrator of Park Terrace at
Radisson Assisted Living Community, a 65 bed ACF including 17 Assisted Living Program beds.
Chris Vitale is the Administrator of Seneca Lake Terrace Assisted Living Community, a 66 bed
ACF including 15 Assisted Living Program beds. These buildings have been operating since
1999 and 2001 respectively and as operators we have demonstrated commitment to quality since
that time.
The operators of Park Terrace at Radisson and Seneca Lake Terrace have had strong and
successful relationships with local Department of Social Services districts in the following counties:
Ontario, Onondaga, Oswego, Seneca, Yates, Wayne and Cayuga. Recently we have made
contacts with Tompkins County Department of Social Services staff to discuss the proposal
of this type of facility in Tompkins County. After meeting with DSS Commissioner Patricia Carey
^ and her staff as well as Tompkins County Department of Health officials it is clear that there is^ overwhelming support for this type of project in Tompkins County, specifically the town of Ithaca.
As a direct result of recommendations contained In the Commission on Health Care Facilities
in the 2Tst Century (aka The Berger Report), recommendations which have become law, in
accordance with the enabling statute of the Commission (section 31 of part E of chapter 63 of the
laws of 2005). the NYS Dept of Health is sbliciting applications for 80 ALP beds in Tompkins
County. This application is our response to that solicitation. It is our belief that as successful
existing ALP operators in more than 8 counties, we look forward to the opportunity of expanding
the ALP program into Tompkins County.
As operators of other ALP's including 15 beds in Geneva, and 17 beds in Baldwinsviile, we are
knowledgeable and competent in our ability to successfully operate an 80 bed ALP in Tompkins
County. Our existing ALP's have operated successfully since inception in 1999 and 2001
respectively. Registered Nurses will be employed and experienced staff from our existing facilities
will be shared to optimize the success of the new operation in Ithaca.
The Village at South Pointe
Program Attachment#: 2 ^ i
page: 1 ' )
updated: 9/8/2007
The 80 bed ALP will be operated essentially the same as our present ALP operations In Geneva
and Baldwinsvllle. The contractors will be Tompkins County Dept. of Social Services and the CHHA
is proposed to be Tompkins County Health Dept. Certified Home health Agency.
Prospective applicants to our ALP will be first assessed by our Registered Nurse to determine
whether we can meet the applicants care needs. Arrangements would then be made with our
local county Dept of Social Services and CHHA (Tompkins County Health Dept), to assess the
proposed ALP resident A PRI assessment would also be completed at this time to determine the
appropriate RUG score and again to determine what care needs are appropriate and to develop a
care plan. A DSS 4449C Medical Evaluation will be completed prior to admission and, if
appropriate, a Mental Health Evaluation would be completed as well. If a Mental Health
Evaluation is necessary, then appropriate mental health provider linkages would be made, as
appropriate, to assure the availability and provision of mental health services for the resident.
A unique feature of this proposed 80 bed ALP program is that it would finally serve Medicald
eligible / SSI residents in Tompkins County. It is important to note that the need for this type of
ALP facility has been recommended by the Berger Commission Report As operators we have
made several contacts with County officials to reaffirm the fact that there is a significant need
for this type of facility in Tompkins County. In addition, as in our existing ALP facilities our
building will mimic a 'Town Square" Atmosphere, allowing for potential residents who are in
need of ALP services to live in a beautifully designed, modem, non-institutional setting with many
amenities including: Ice Cream Parlor, Beauty Shop, sky lit lounges, outdoor walkways and
much more.
Target Pooulation:
Our target population will be those residents that are currently in need of some skilled services
but do not belong in a skilled setting." They will ihclude prirriarily those frail, elderly people who
would otherwise be at risk of inappropriate placement in a Nursing Home. As in our existing ALP's
we will seek to serve those residents who need more personal care and assistance than can be
provided in a typical adult home but are considered a low RUG score nursing home resident. It
has been our experience that in many skilled nursing homes there are consistently residents
whose needs could be met in a less institutional setting. These residents are our intended
population to be served.
^ The Village at South Polnte
Program Attachment#: 2
K page: 2
updated: 9/8/2007
Relationships to other providers and services:
It is expected that our referrals will come from a range of different sources. After discussions with
County officials and Tompkins County "single point of entry" patient coordinator, Liz Norton it is
evident that the "single point of entry" system will be a significant referral source. In addition.
Cayuga Medical Center (Ithaca's only hospital) will provide an additional referral source.
Surrounding skilled nursing homes will provide referrals for those residents who would benefit from
an Assisted Living placement verses skilled nursing home placement As in our existing ALP
facilities, the Village at South Pointe will have transfer contracts in place with all surrounding
skilled nursing homes to provide for a smooth transition to a skilled nursing home when needed.
In addition, area skilled nursing homes including Groton Community Health Center, Kendall at
Ithaca, Lakeside Nursing Home, Beechtree Care Center and Oak Hill Manor collectively seek
to discharge low scoring RUG category residents to our ALP.
Currently we are working to nurture relationships with the aforementioned Long Term Care facilities.
Hospital discharge planners as well as County Long Term Care Patient Coordinators. We will
continue to seek and develop those important community relationships that will improve our ability
to serve Tompkins County elderly population as we have in our present ALP facilities.
As Operators, we recognize the importance of being an integral part of the community in which our
buildings are located. Should we receive permission to operate an ALP facility in Tompkins
' County, we will strive to not only keep our residents involved in their local community, but bring the
^ the Tompkins County community into our building, (ie...having local schools, clubs, service
organizations and child daycare centers be involved in our activity programming). As in our existing
facilities. The Village at South Pointe's residents will have abundant opportunities to visit local
parks, be involved in local events, and continue having strong ties to their community. We hold
tradition in high regard and are committed to helping residents maintain social well being by
encouraging participation in not only facility based activities but Ibcai community based activities
as well.
Additionally, our resident population will benefit from case manage management and coordination of
community based services that include, but are not limited to, home care, dental care, PCP
coordination, mental health (if necessary), spiritual support, and other kinds of services that may be
available to any resident of Tompkins County.
Proposed site:
Our proposed site Is located 2 miles South of the City of Ithaca on Route 13 (Elmira Road) in the
Town of Ithaca. The site is set on more than 8 acres of land and has all utilities. This site is
adjacent to state owned protected land that can never be developed and offers beautiful views of
the Ithaca landscape. This site is in close proximity to all that Ithaca has to offer. Ithaca has much
culture and is home to one of the largest Ivy league schools in the country, Comell University. In
In addition, Ithaca has become a thriving community of businesses, farming communities and
academically based culture. The Village at South Pointe will active search out opportunities to
become an integral part of the Ithaca Community.
Proiected Time Frames for Construction.
It is our intention, upon approval, to start construction in Spring of 2008 and be ready to open and
operate 8-10 months there after, assuming the Department provides final approval.
The Village at South Pointe
Program Attachment#: 3 <
updated: 9/5/2007 ^
Please see attached letters of community support. Also, please be advised that there has been
considerable concern on behalf of the Tompklns County Department of Social Services and other
local community organizations that there are-no ALP beds available for residents in Tompklns
County. This results, In many cases, in residents having to go to a skilled nursing home when
our Assisted Living Program would be able to meet their needs In a much less Institutional and
less costly setting. Please see attached letters.
' )
•ENECA LAKE TERRACEOur Mission:After caring for older adults forover 25 years, Seneca LakeTerrace recognizes that everyperson has the right to a fulfillingproductive life. It is our commitment to enable every person inour community to live up to theirhighest practicable well being.We respect the dignity andindividuality of those we serve,while enriching the quality oftheir lives.icr'U'kft...Assisted Living begins with you, we provideresident-focused activities, services and careall within the home-like atmosphere of SenecaLake Terrace.Our philosophy is to incorporate residentpreference and suggestion with our wellestablished procedures to provide a highquality service that results in an exceptionallevel of satisfaction.Located in Geneva, nestled between thefingerlakes, residents of Seneca Lake Terraceare encouraged to take advantage of the parklike setting. Some community activities includecommunity walkways, state parks and wineries.Finally, Seneca Lake Terrace provides first classservice and surroundings at a reasonablemonthly rate.24 hour access to staffLicensed Nurses on staffPersonal care services; assistance withbathing, dressing and groomingNutritious, delicious meals and snacks servedrestaurant styleModern private and semi-private apartmentswith full bathroomDaily recreational programsMedication monitoringOngoing monitoring of health care needsHousekeeping and laundry services24 hour emergency call system in everyapartmentSpecially scheduled transportationand outingsBeauty salon / Barber shopIce cream parlor / cafeMemory care neighborhoodAnd much more...
Private Room - 290 sq. ft.Assisted Living Community• Resident outings - shopping, picnics,movies, scenic rides, etc...• Wellness Program - resident exercises, healtheducation• Community interaction• Weekly ice cream socials and happy hourswith entertainment• In-house religious services• Special events□On^^Seneca Lake Terrace...A Lifestyle of Wellness,A Tradition of Excellences^Deluxe Suite - 380 sq. ft.\Deluxe Private - 450 sq. ft.Seneca, Lake Terrace3670 PreEmption Road (County RD #6)Geneva, New York 14456Phone: (315) 789-4162Fax: (315) 781-1494Website: www.senecalaketerrace.com
/ s
01/97/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETING ^ -
ATTACHMENT if 7 ^611(33 # 1 5
Planning Department Memorandum
To: Town Board Members
From: Susan Ritter, Assistant Director of Planning j)?
Date: January 2, 2008
Re: Scenic Resource Committee Report & Presentation
Enclosed please find the Scenic Resource Committee's report Ssving Ithsce's
Views, along with an accompanying summary cover memo from the
Conservation Board. Saving Ithaca's Views was produced by members of the
Scenic Resource Committee, a longstanding committee of the Conservation
Board. The report provides background information on the committee's work to
date, including the inventorying and evaluation of scenic views in the town, and a
list of recommended actions for protecting these views. The committee is looking
for input from Town Board members, including comments on the report itself, its
recommendations, and especially for guidance on what Board members see as
next steps in the process.
The Scenic Resource Committee will be providing a presentation to the Town
Board at the January 7^^ meeting. The presentation is intended to help
summarize the key elements of the report, and to facilitate discussion with the
Board.
Enc.
^ To: Ithaca Town Board
; \ From: The Town of Ithaca Conservation Board
^ Re: Findings and recommendations for "Saving Ithaca's Views," here presented in Executive
Summary, and attached in full
Date: November 1, 2007
Dear Sirs and Madams:
We hereby accept, recommend and present to you the attached report from our Scenic Resources
Committee (SRC). We trust you will read this report in full, but summarize here its main points.
"Saving Ithaca's Views" provides in-depth background on the efforts of our SRC to research, catalogue and
evaluate our town's scenic beauty. We have identified the most important views in the Town and prepared
specific strategies to save them.
Whereas
• Town of Ithaca residents have in repeated surveys confirmed that saving views is important to them;
• the Town's Comprehensive Plan and Open Space Plan both call for the preservation of scenic areas;
• a comprehensive program of view protection coupled with a strong program of land conservation can
ensure long-range preservation of the Town's environment;
• poorly located buildings cause lasting harm to the quality of views;
• improperly maintained woodlots can obstruct important views;
• the Town's Comprehensive Plan is currently under review;
• we believe the time is right to take some important action.
Therefore, to preserve our treasured scenic resources, we recommend that the Town of Ithaca take such
steps as:
• incorporate our list of best views, most in need of conservation, into the revised Town
^ ^ Comprehensive Plan;
^ • establish a Natural Heritage Program to outline the use of funds for purchasing development rights
and view easements;
• develop a Town Tree Ordinance to conserve important trees, and clear other trees when they
obscure scenic views;
• arrange a cooperative relationship with agricultural interests in the Town to conserve open space
affording beautiful views;
• construct a few road-side pull-offs, near the Pine Tree and Snyder Hill Road intersection for
example, to facilitate view enjoyment by motorists, cyclists and walkers;
• make immediate progress toward an interconnected Town trail system to reduce use of
automobiles for scenic enjoyment;
• cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions to save important views;
• purchase or negotiate a view easement to protect the long view from the Danby Road;
• require building permit applicants to identify specific trees and woodlots that are to be preserved
during and after construction;
• require vigorous on-site reviews of construction projects by Town staff or their designees to
ensure preservation of scenic resources;
• encourage approval of variances to existing ordinance when this enhances or preserves the Town's
scenic resources;
• elicit public feedback to "Saving Ithaca's Views" via the Town's website and printed copies
available at Town Hall.
We encourage the Town Board to respond to the attached SRC report, and look forward to a cooperative
and continued engagement between the Town Board and Conservation Board in the many actions "Saving
Ithaca's Views" recommends. Together, we hope to save views from roads, parks, and other public spaces.
^ \ Respectfully submitted.
The Town of Ithaca Conservation Board
Attached: "Saving Ithaca's Views"
i \
I
t \
\
Saving Ithaca's Views
In the early 1990s, the Town of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council (the CAC,
now the Conservation Board) became concerned about losing some of the magnificent scenic
views we enjoy around the Ithaca area. We had seen some attractive landscape disappearing,
or being seriously damaged by thoughtless construction, poorly placed plantings or abandoned
open land and overgrown farm fields.
Imagine how one misplaced building could spoil a scenic vista. A panoramic view,
which brought pleasure to people driving along a certain stretch of road, which made them smile
when sunlight hit a colorful hillside in the fall, or when it was covered with glittering snow in
winter, could be ruined by that building wrongly sited. We had seen this happen, and we wanted
to keep it from happening again in Ithaca.
We recognized that our scenic views, especially those seen from roads, parks and
other public places, are great assets to the community. They are valuable to the local residents,
who see them all the time, as well as to visitors and tourists, who often come here because they
are attracted to the natural beauty of the Town and surrounding area.
The Town of Ithaca Residents Survey, sponsored by the Town Board's
Comprehensive Planning Committee in 1990 to help determine what Ithacans liked about living
here, provided a basis of public opinion for the Comprehensive Plan completed in 1993. The
survey showed that Town residents valued the scenic beauty around them. This encouraged the
CAC to form a committee (now called the Scenic Resources Committee: SRC) to consider the
importance of views.
Since 1991, the SRC has tried to identify the most special views and to
photograph, describe, map and document them. We have done surveys to discover what others
thought were the best views. We have learned how to rate views valued differently by different
people and how to protect such views. We have worked long enough now to be able to identify
the most valued of our views, and to recommend Town action to preserve them.
Appreciating a view may be subjective, but such enjoyment can still be evaluated
and such evaluations ranked. To conserve our scenic resources, we need to do all we can to
identify and to preserve the best of them. Toward this end, we are reporting the location and
character of the best viewing points in the Town, and identifying the most beautiful areas viewed
from such viewpoints, with special concern for preserving those areas most in need of
protection.
The Town of Ithaca's Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan, adopted by the
Town Board in December, 1997, recognized the need to "establish a coordinated program to
preserve environmentally sensitive land and important scenic areas in the Town of Ithaca." As
enjoyment of the Town's scenic beauty is a form of recreation, it is not surprising that we should
wish to reaffirm many of the objectives identified in this Plan ten years ago. We especially
^ N commend that Plan's intent to "improve the environment and preserve and protect it from
degradation" (pg. 1). Now that the Town recognizes the need to update its old Comprehensive
Plan, we should take the advice of New York State's Department of State's Counsel's Office: its
1
Legal Memorandum LU09 explains that a Comprehensive Plan "must be viewed as a tool which
can provide the venue and the process for identifying how people in a community want to live, ^ ^
what is important to their lives and what natural and built environments bring the 'sense of place' ^
people crave."
In order to identify the best views, the SRC has compiled an inventory of
photographs of them, and ranked them by a system that puts the most priority on conserving
views that are both readily accessible to the public at present, and yet could be obscured,
spoiled, or otherwise put at risk by future development. We recognize, for example, that views of
Buttermilk Falls are tremendously important; but the State Park in which they are found can be
trusted to preserve them, and so they are not included in our inventory. A view from Route 968
at a prime location now provided a pull-off parking spot by the State Department of
Transportation, on the other hand, has already been partially obscured by the construction of
the Longview nursing home. The remaining spectacular view of Cayuga Lake and is still at risk
of further obstruction if the business on this property were to put tall buildings in the wrong
place.
How has the SRC decided which of the Town of Ithaca's views need saving?
To compile our inventory of scenic views, the SRC has photographed them,
mostly from the rights of way on public roadsides, in all seasons and in differing weather, and f
filed them by location on a Town of Ithaca grid map. These views were then ranked by criteria , ^
we believe should prioritize the views most worth preserving by a specific or readily-applied
Town action. Views that the Town should be most concerned with saving would score highest in
these five categories: Magnitude, Distinctiveness, Quality, Appeal, and Opportunity (see
Appendix A). For each category, SRC members ranked the views either 3,2, or 1.
By "Magnitude," we found a pedestrian and vehicular view to be enjoyed by either
many (3), or few (1) people.
The "Distinctiveness" of a view could represent either a natural or manmade
feature, such as a college tower or lake or waterfall; a 3 would signify it was recognizable and
unique to the Town of Ithaca, while a 1 might represent a fine view common to any place
anywhere.
The "Quality" of a view ranked it as to whether it was pristine or somehow
damaged, a 3 identifying the view as intact, with clear ridge-lines, cross-valley vistas,
contrasting open spaces and woods or interior views of streams, rocks, and trees. A 3 meant
there was noteworthy seasonal variation, with the view enhanced by changes in foliage or
precipitation, and with no or very limited detractions. A 1 vote for "Quality" meant the view was
disturbed, as for example by noise, odors, traffic, mining, power transmission lines, or any
unattractive development or obstruction.
For evaluating the "Appeal" of a view, we considered what we also called "The
wow Factor": a 3 vote here recognized that the viewer might, in awe, have to say "Wow!" at ^
such views. A 3, or Big Wow View, would highlight natural features as well as landmark n ^
structures. Such views attract tourists, residents and newcomers to the Town, and enhance
local economic development. A view scoring only 1 for Appeal would not have such big impact,
' ^ though it still might be charming in a small way.
The fifth and final factor, "Opportunity," was intended to rank the ease of protecting
a view: a 3 vote here meant that it would not be hard for the Town to protect it. If a view could
be conserved by easily performed actions, such as by the careful placement of pull-offs, parks
or viewing platforms and educational signage, or by the removal of obstructions such as
overgrown brush or junk trees, which could be trimmed to recover a view, then that view rated a
3. A 1 here would recognize the difficulty of preserving or recovering a view.
Once all the scenic views in the SRC inventory had been ranked, we revisited the
top-scoring views as a group to verify whether they merited such high scores. A few sites were
reconsidered, but the SRC eventually agreed on a Top Ten list of places from which the best
Town of Ithaca views, most in need of conservation, could be seen.
These Top Ten views were presented to the public in the April 2007 Town of
Ithaca Newsletter (see Appendix B), as well as in an exhibit on display in the Town Hall lobby
during the months of April and May, 2007. Public feedback was requested in the newsletter, by
ballot forms (see Appendix C) in the lobby, and on the internet at the Town's web-site. Visitors
to the Town Hall were offered a "Tour the Town Views Map to Scenic Locations" (see Appendix
D), with a suggested travel route that interested tourists could take that would lead them through
all ten of the Top Ten view sites. Though the 25 residents' responses we received was not large
enough to be considered a statistically representative sample of Town opinion, we include here
a compilation of that feedback (in Appendix E) to indicate how these individuals supported our
project.
t \
\
While these last stages of the SRC project were going on, the Tompkins County
Planning Department was completing its own Scenic Resources Evaluation, "developing a list of
the most valued scenic resources in the county." Several SRC members attended public
meetings of the County's project in June and September of 2006, where we found several of the
views we had deemed most important were also included. We noted, however, that the County
evaluation depended more on aesthetic criteria, and made no attempt to rank views as to
whether or not they actually needed preservation. The park views in the County inventory are
not included in ours because we do not believe they need any further action for protecting them.
We note in this regard, however, that future developments in the Town might eventually change
the conditions around currently protected views so much that they could some day need
protective action to prevent such unforeseen misfortune. To keep up with such potential
development, as well as to continue the Conservation Board's efforts to protect scenic
resources, the SRC will continue to meet periodically to determine what could best be done next
to save views.
As we reviewed the sites where scenery deserved conserving, we realized that
several of the areas in the views themselves were in need of preservation. There would be no
reason to look out from the Top Ten sites if the land seen from there were not worth looking at.
These open spaces, some of them in Unique Natural Areas and Conservation Zones, are
identified as four general areas: one on West Hill above Taughannock Blvd. (Rte. 89) in the
Lake Slopes and Indian Creek Conservation Zone as seen from Cayuga Lake and East Shore
Park, two on the northwest and southeast slopes of the Inlet Valley as seen from Sandbank and
Bostwick Roads, and another on the northeast side of South Hill as seen from various spots on ^ y
Slaterville Road and East Hill (see Appendix F part 1 map, shaded green "Scenic areas: ' ^
important for being viewed from near and far locations"). These areas are now beautifully
wooded hillsides, valued Town sights in all seasons and weathers (most recently viewed on a
June 29, 2007 SRC field trip, to more accurately outline them for the map in Appendix F; these
outlines to be more exactly surveyed as the Town requires), and most deserve concerted Town
efforts to keep at least the majority of their woods intact.
While the ranking of the Top Ten View sites (see locations and sample photos in
Appendix F) and the four open spaces most important for being viewed from such sites is
intended to prioritize particular resources most in need of conservation, the SRC would not want
to imply that the many other scenic resources it has inventoried in the Town are not of sufficient
value to merit conserving as well. Rather we would have the complete and thorough inventory
kept current and regularly re-evaluated to be sure that changing conditions are kept under
constant consideration and review. Perhaps readers of this present report, who consider the
complete Scenic Resources Inventory (Appendix G) of all views we've recognized, will be able
to bring to our attention a missed view or preferred priority for keeping Ithaca gorgeous.
Having identified the scenic resources in need of conservation, the SRC would
also like to report some strategies it has considered for preserving such valued views.
Most importantly, the updated Comprehensive Plan should recognize the views ^ ^
we've identified and the need to protect them as crucial to our sense of what's best about our
Town.
We urge the Town to purchase or negotiate a view easement for the area north of
the Danby Road pull-off next to Longview, as recommended in the 1997 Open Space Plan
(p. 16). As Alterra and Longview own land near two of the ten best view points, we should
negotiate cooperative arrangements with them recognizing the public good of access to viewing
positions both on roads near them and on the right of way at roadside through their properties.
In a more general sense, when certain lands providing scenic views become available for the
town to acquire, a well-formulated Natural Heritage Program should outline the use of funds
available for purchasing development rights or other such easements to protect the scenic
views afforded by such lands.
When scenic areas full of beautiful woods are threatened by inappropriate
development, a Town Tree Ordinance should conserve those trees needed both for the health
of our ecosystem as well as for the public appreciation of the views they provide. The view of
West Hill seen from the Town's East Shore Park, for example, would not be very scenic if all the
trees in the new Lake Slopes and Indian Creek Conservation Zone were removed for new home
construction. Even some limited clearing of land in such scenic areas could spoil a view, and ^
the Town Planning Board should be empowered to preserve scenic views in site plan reviews / i
and to seek new opportunities for opening up important viewpoints from which fine scenes could
^ ^ be seen.
As many of our best views depend on open fields keeping sight-lines clear, we
should cooperate with agricultural interests in order to preserve open space in agricultural lands.
The great views from Pine Tree Road, for example, require open fields for distant hills to remain
visible. The Cayuga Lake shore along Route 34 just north of East Shore Park needs to be clear
for the present panoramic scene; a spectacular view from Westhaven Preserve is now visible
only in winter, as brush has grown up to obscure it. A town plan cooperating with land owners to
mow fields and clear brush that grows up to obscure certain best views would assure that they
remain to be enjoyed.
For five of the Town's best views, two of which already have parking areas, the
construction of simple road-side pull-offs, with a picnic table, perhaps a viewing platform or
gazebo, and signage identifying distant landmarks, would recognize the importance of these
viewpoints and enhance view appreciation and public awareness of such places. The new
Shirley Raffensberger gazebo in the East Hill Preserve is an excellent example of a modest
Town construction establishing a small landmark as proof of the excellence of the view to be
found there. Signage at the Danby and East Shore parking areas, if they find public favor, could
be followed by similar interpretive signs at roadside pull-offs along Pine Tree Rd across from the
, ^ Snyder Hill Rd intersection, along Mecklenburg Rd near the EcoVillage bus stop, and along
\ Trumansburg Rd between Alterra and PRI. Signs such as those at Buttermilk Falls and
Taughannock Park help educate the public and enhance their appreciation of scenic qualities; a
few such scenic interpretive signs strategically placed at the Town's best viewpoints could be
similarly effective.
So that the public need not rely exclusively on the use of automobiles for the
enjoyment of views, the Town should complete its trail system, both to allow access by foot and
bicycle paths to important viewpoints, as well as traversing the most important areas viewed.
The Town should encourage development of the Black Diamond trail. The Pine Tree walkway
and Pew Trail have this summer been connected to the East Ithaca Recreation Way and a new
TCAT bus shelter; such interconnection allows walkers, hikers and bicyclists access to many
great views from East Hill. Wherever possible, Town Parks (as well as State Parks, Cornell
University Plantations and Ithaca College Natural Areas) should be accessible, or even
connected, by multi-use recreational trails. The State's Scenic Byway ought to be tied in to such
trails. The trails through Westhaven Preserve should be linked to EcoVillage and Bostwick
Road's views. Not all such trails need to be paved, either. Low-impact narrow footpaths, such as
those of the Finger Lakes Trail system, should be promoted, too. The Town's Transportation
Plan recognizes the need to provide for pedestrian and bicycle traffic, and should be applied in
connecting scenic view-ways to non-motorized corridors as well.
\* N
The Town should also do its best to coordinate with all involved governmental and
institutional bodies to preserve views not entirely under Town jurisdiction. The view of Cayuga
Lake seen by traffic descending Route 13 through Cayuga Heights and the Town of Ithaca and '
into the City of Ithaca should not be neglected just because the municipal boundaries along that ^
view-way are so complicated. Some brush cutting and tree removal in a few spots along this ' '
way would reopen a spectacular view being lost to recent plant growth. Cooperation with Cornell
University Plantations' Open Areas Committee might help preserve such open field habitat as
that affording the Pine Tree Road view. Ithaca College's Natural Lands Committee might also
welcome an opportunity for administrative cooperation where Town views intersect with college
property.
We hope that the Town Planning Board will incorporate the list of top ranked
scenic views into its updated Comprehensive Plan. We want the Planning Board to use our list
in project planning and review activities when these views are impinged upon or could be
improved. Whether a proposed building is in a viewed area or perhaps obstructing the sight-
lines from an important viewpoint, criteria for evaluating development should require visual
assessment in a scenic context. Balloon tests at building sites identified by the Environmental
Review Committee should ensure that our best views are not harmed. Careful analysis of
photographic and computer-generated simulations of view impacts could also help protect
views. On ridge lines and other sensitive view areas, building heights and roof colors should be
regulated. For adequate review during site visits, all plans for blasting, cut and fill volumes,
height and depths of retaining walls should be clearly disclosed.
\
Sites for proposed construction should have clearly delineated areas where cutting
and clearing trees is allowed, distinguished from areas where woods must be conserved, with
individually identified trees marked for preservation when needed to maintain and to enhance
the best views. Landscaping plans should specify the appropriate tree species for planting to
buffer unsightly construction and to avoid blocking scenic vistas. The recent preservation of
selected trees along Ellis Hollow Road during the Rite Aid development that replaced Ide's
Bowling Lanes can serve as example of tree conservation practiced to good effect. The
Museum of the Earth is an excellent model of scenically-sensitive development for future
construction to emulate. When feasible, major transmission lines and communication wires
should be buried; utility and communications companies should know that Ithaca values its
views. Road and building signs should be located and sized to harmonize with views. Night
views should be protected by careful application of the new lighting ordinance.
During the construction of new development. Town building inspectors should
conduct vigorous on-site supervision to be sure that sensitive terrain and scenic locales are
preserved. Their work should take care to verify which trees are to be kept healthy before any
site work is done, as well as the maintenance of storm run-off silt barriers and all other required
environmental conservation practices. Under the State Environmental Quality Review Act
(SEQR), the Town Planning Board has the authority to specify deed restrictions (rather than
resolutions) to prevent the improper cutting of trees in sensitive areas such as a Unique Natural ( "4
Area (UNA). As we promote excellence in construction design, so should we avoid visually
offensive mistakes such as large buildings which block cross-valley views, or homes which scar
/
Conservation Zones (CZ), such as those built on bulldozed woods in the Six Mile Greek and
' ^ Lake Slopes CZs.
In areas of particular beauty such as Forest Home, design criteria should be
developed to reflect neighborhood character and ensure that new construction fits in. The
History Center and Town historians should be encouraged to identify and to map significant
cultural and historic resources which would complement scenic views.
As ordinances are developed to protect views, so should variances from
established laws be allowed whenever such variances protect scenic views. For example, a
building might be allowed further downhill, closer to a property boundary than usually allowed, if
such siting could keep a good view open.
By vigorously seeking, encouraging, and supporting all initiatives to protect and to
enhance the scenic qualities of the Town of Ithaca, the Scenic Resources Committee hopes to
establish a sense of place that we can continue to enjoy. To be sure that we agree with our
fellow Town residents, this report should be published in a form easily accessible to this public
and in a format inviting and welcoming feedback and revision. It should be posted on the Town's
website, with hard copies available at Town Hall. The advice and opinion herein can only be
incorporated into the Town's Comprehensive Plan to the extent that it is recognized as
presenting a shared public sense of community. If these views—scenic as well as political—
represent the Town of Ithaca we know and love, then let us do all we can to conserve them.
Respectfully submitted by the Scenic Resources Committee to the Town of Ithaca
Conservation Board, October 2007, and to the Town Board upon Conservation Board
consideration, revision, and approval on November 1, 2007.
f \
Appendix A: View Evaluation Criteria for Ranking Top Views
Appendix B: April 2007 Town Newsletter insert seeking public input
Appendix C: Ballot form handout for feedback to Spring 2007 display (also on Town website)
Appendix D: "Tour the Town Views Map" handout at Town Hall display; this map of "Scenic
Locations" has a touring route connecting the Ten Best Views described on its back
Appendix E: Compiled public feedback to SRC survey
Appendix F: Scenic resources inventory in two parts: 1) map of scenic areas, top view-ways and
photo locations; 2) thumbnail photos of ten "top ranked views" with narrative captions
Appendix G: Complete SRC inventory in two parts: 1) grid map identifying photo location and
orientation by season; 2) complete views list (views cross-referenced to numbered grid with
brief text caption)
\
( \
Appendix A
Criteria for Ranking Scenic Views
FACTORS RATING SCALES
Magnitude 3 Hiohiv Expressed - 1 Low
Includes pedestrian and vehicular views available to many people
Distinctiveness 3 Distinct - 1 Common
Natural or manmade, i.e. Buttermilk Falls or Ithaca Towers
Recognizability, different from other areas
Qualitv 3 Intact - 1 Disturbed
Intactness
Noteworthy seasonal variation (Obscures negative components or adds attractiveness)
Limited factors that detract (noise, odors, traffic, mining, unattractive structures)
Appeal - The WOW factor 3 Bio - 1 Little
Includes natural features as well as structural landmarks
Attracts tourists and new residents for community economic enhancement
Opportunitv (Ease of Protection) 3 Easv - 1 Difficult
Still can be protected (limit development) or enhanced (develop or recover
a view point); Obstruction(s) can be removed (trim trees)
Public Value and Preference 3 Hioh - 1 Low
Use to prioritize resources that have made the list
Appendix B
f ^Town Conservation Board Seeks Public Input for Scenic View Preservation
* >
» 1
The Scenic Resources Committee (SRC) of the
Town of Ithaca Conservation Board asks Town
residents to help us preserve the beautiful scenery
surrounding us. For several years, this committee
has been compiling, analyzing, and evaluating an
inventory of views seen from roads, parks, and
other public places. Now we are finalizing recom
mendations to the Town Board on the best of the
many scenes and how they might be preserved
and maintained.
Of the dozens of scenic views we considered, we
prioritized views most in need of protection, by
ranking them according to five criteria:
1) The number of people who could regularly
enjoy them;
2) Their distinctive and recognizably Ithacan
quality, unique to our Town;
3) The aesthetic quality of their attractive fea
tures;
4) The "wow" factor, or magnitude of their ap-
peal;
5) The ease and feasibility of protecting and main
taining these views.
Please visit the Town Hall lobby by May 15th to
see our exhibit of the Top Ranked Views of Ithaca
or visit our website at www.town.ithaca.nv.us/
scenicviews.htm. Learn about our ranking process.
Share your ideas. We need your help!
Have we missed any great public views?
What is most important to you?
• Sweeping vistas?
• Cayuga Lake?
• Woods or open fields?
How should we preserve these special views?
• Promote scenically sensitive development?
• Purchase development rights?
• Keep open spaces clear to protect views?
Pick up a Views Map so you can visit the sites
we've selected. While photos suggest the beauty of
Views Map
rJ 11*7^^ "P.
Photo
B
Hfinsjs Vlltigaof
C»uo«H«ights
Cltyof llhaca
^•wic
Photo
. ButtBrrrtlK
/ Falls
» Slate Park
RTremai
State
TBimoroaaftr
ToMf? or Ne
Stars (★) indicate important scenic view points.
See back of this insert for Photos A, B, C, and D.
This map highlights the views selected
for your review. A detailed copy of
this map is part of the photo exhibit in
our Town Hall lobby where you can
leam more about this SRC project. We
invite you to visit the exhibit, as well as
the view locations themselves, and to
provide us your reactions before May
15th via mail, phone or email at:
1) Conservation Board, 215 N. Tioga
Street, Ithaca, NY 14850; or
2) Phone Susan Ritter at the Planning
Department at 273-1747; or
3) Email to:
scenicviews@town.ithaca.ny.us
Your suggestions can also be submitted
directly from our website at:
www.town.ithaca.nv.us/scenicviews.htm
Appendix B
Page 2
A Sampling of Scenic Views in the Town of Ithaca
This northern edge of lakeside panorama is viewed
from a small park offering the Town's only public ac
cess to Cayuga Lake. Over the far horizon, beyond
typical private lakeside development, a smoke plume
marks the coal-powered electric plant in Lansing.
(Photo B)
\
This view of Williams Glen falls shows one of seven
small creek gorges in the area of Taughannock Boule
vard (State Route 89). The Town has recently re-
zoned this area to a Conservation Zone. State Route
89 is an important part of the Cayuga Lake Scenic By
way. (Map Photo A)
"t .
r\
East Hill's best views south and west can be
seen along Pine Tree Road, over the large open field
across from the Snyder Hill Road intersection and
from between Cornell structures. The views can also
be enjoyed while driving west down Snyder Hill
Road, and especially while waiting at the stop sign,
where it joins Pine Tree Road. The Pine Tree Road
walkway allows pedestrians to really savor these
views along its length. (Photo C)
Bostwick Road affords many views like this, with farm
fields in the foreground and a complex horizon, where
the western slope of South Hill, smoothed by glacial ac
tion, contrasts with more rugged hills further out Inlet
Valley. (Photo D)
To see more such views visit the display in the lobby of Town Hal! through May 15th.
Have we missed a terrific view? Please let us know!
Appendix C
f \
' The Scenic Resources Committee
Needs Your Opinion.
1. Which are your favorite views of our top 10?
Why?
Have we missed a great public view in the Town of Ithaca that needs protection?
If so, describe and give location.
Which are the best ways to protect special views?
Promote public recognition and appreciation of
important scenic landscapes and views.
Locate new parks in areas with scenic views.
Encourage sensitive placement, design, and
construction techniques of buildings and plantings
(discretionary).
Require scenically sensitive development through
legislation or zoning (mandatory).
( N Use tax dollars to purchase development rights
or scenic easements.
Do nothing
Other - please describe.
4. Other suggestions or questions:
Name and contact Information If you would like us to contact you with further Information.
Appendix D
f s
t s
TOUR THE TOWN
Views Map to Scenic Locations
See reverse side for a
Scenic Views information guide.
irfftPF' n TownWof Ithaca Village_Qnsn§i
Cayuga Village of
Cayuga Heights r„
ff hanshAWRD _HAYTSRD
S BUNDY RD
MECKLENBUR
thaca
BUEFALO
w r.i INTON
POOLE_RD
pSTH^/
Buttermilk
Falls
w/ State Park ^
Town of Ithaca
0.8 Mies\ Townofuanby
Robert H. Tremar(96
State Parl
Town of Ithaca
Town of NewTield
Produced 3/28/07
Suggested Travel Route for Viewing
r\j Scenic View Ways
Photo location & direction
information provided by the
Scenic Resources Committee of the
Town of Ithaca Conservation Board
Appendix 0
Page 2
Tour of the Town's Ten Top Scenic Locations
You can start this tour of the Town of Ithaca's best scenes anywhere. If you start on Cayuga Lake's Scenic
Byway heading north from the City of Ithaca's Cass Park on Rte. 89, you may see from Point 1 onward seven ^ ^
small gorges descending from a conservation zone on the west. These little creeks, emerging from old culverts ' ^
under the former Lehigh Valley Railroad, come splashing down bedrock shale north of Cass Park and the
Hangar Theatre. There is a plan to develop the railroad bed into the Black Diamond multi-use recreational trail,
and to preserve this wooded Unique Natural Area. You may notice some recent construction has cleared a
once-wooded lot here.
By looping around Glenwood Heights Rd. and Duboise Rd. in Ulysses, return to Ithaca heading south on Rte.
96 to see from Point 2 a fine view of East Hill above Cayuga Lake beyond a complex of 1930s Collegiate
Gothic structures on your left. Note how well the new Museum of the Earth unobtrusively fits into this view.
A right turn up Bundy Rd., then right again on Hopkins Rd. and left on Hayts Rd. will take you up to Sheffield
Rd. on the Enfield/Town of Ithaca border with many views. The panoramic view from the Genex Coop
entrance off Sheffield Rd. is long and wide. A left on Rte. 79 heading east will bring you a view of the steep
descent to the lake as farm fields along the road give way to city sights. The bus stop at the corner of Rachel
Carson Way near Point 3 offers an especially good view of the Cornell University campus against the
backdrop of the Dryden headlands.
Taking a right on West Haven Rd. before the City line, you will pass near the undeveloped Westhaven
Preserve, a new town park with views from Point 4 of Ithaca College's campus on South Hill across the
Cayuga Inlet valley. Clearing trees and brush in selected parts of this preserve would open up space for better
scenic viewing.
Heading right, back uphill on Elm St. Extension and Poole Rd. to a left heading south on Sheffield Road again,
there are several great long views from the heights of West Hill over the lake valley to the hills and valleys in
the east, as seen from Point 5. / >
f )
Taking a left east on Bostwick Rd., brings you to the many long and complex views like Point 6 from Bostwick
Road, over farm fields in the foreground to a distant horizon to the south and east made of various slopes and
edges of hills across South Hill, smoothed by glacial erosion. You'll see more rugged hills and spurs further
out Inlet Valley into Newfield and Danby.
A right turn on Rte. ISA, and then left on 13, brings you across the valley bottom to Sand Bank Rd. in
Buttermilk Falls State Park, which gets you back up to great views like Point 7 from the side of South Hill
facing the side of West Hill you just left. Sandbank Rd. offers alternating views across Inlet Valley, from wide-
open panoramas to intimate forest.
A left on West King Rd. crosses more State Park territory, but the huge long view of Cayuga Lake on Rte. 96B
is so impressive that the State Department of Transportation has built a small parking lot pulloff at Point 8, just
above a nursing home named Longview for the scene from here. The construction of Longview has impinged
on a spectacular view to the west. A viewshed easement could protect the remaining view. Perhaps other
pulloffs should provide roadside parking at a few more of these Best View Points? Similar long views of
Cayuga to the north can be seen from the Ithaca college campus, from South Hill Elementary School, and from
Troy Rd. near the Eldridge Wilderness.
Heading east on East King Rd. and across Coddington to Burns Rd. brings you down South Hill across the Six
Mile Creek Valley. Taking a left to the west on Rte. 79, and then north to the right up Pine Tree Rd., brings you
to one of the best panoramic views of South and West Hills from Point 9 and the Pine Tree Walkway on East
Hill, south of East Hill Plaza.
Heading north from here along East Hill brings you down and up across the Cascadilla Creek and Fall Creek f s
valleys, through Cornell's east campus. Forest Home, and the villages of Lansing and Cayuga Heights, with ^
many pretty intimate views of Judd Falls and Fall Creek as you cross bridges over these creeks. We'd like to
leave you at East Shore Park on Rte. 34, also part of Cayuga Lake's Scenic Byway, where you can find our
Town's only public access to Cayuga Lake and a grand wide lakeside panorama from Point 10.
Appendix E
Summary of Scenic Resource Survey fas of 6/11/07^
Favorite Views
Scenic View Total Votes
1 Taughannock Blvd waterfalls 7
2 Trumansburg Rd. Odd Fellows complex 7
3 Mecklenburg Rd - view toward city & distant forested hills 3
4 Westhaven Preserve 2
5 Sheffield Rd - view of near city & distant forested hills 2
6 Bostwick Rd.- undeveloped fields and forested hills 6
7 Sandbank Rd - undeveloped fields, forested hills, w/ sparse development 2
8 Danby Rd - panoramic view of C. lake valley with lake & forested hill slopes 9
9 Pine Tree Rd. - Ithaca College & forested hills 4
IDE. Shore Drive - near lakeshore lake view 8
( \
"Why" are these vour favorite views - comments received:
- Open views of undeveloped hills and areas best;
- Only unadorned (undeveloped) view (chose) #6;
- Distant hills on Bostwick (#6);
- Harvey Hill Rd Enfield;
-1 support this "view" (#10) the most because I think preserving public access to the lake is
important;
- The following comment suggests person intended to vote for #9, comments as foiiows: I live at
the edge of this property so I am biased, but what I love about it is the way people slow down to
see the sunset, dramatic clouds, or herds of deer appearing suddenly on their way home, the
numbers of people who come sit here for a free view of the fireworks on the 4th of July, or just
pull over to look at the gazillion fireflies on a summer evening. Those who stop to see deer may
see the red tailed hawk hovering, a fox, even a coyote. It is Cornell's best offering as a gateway
view along its entrance from the east/NYC (and 10 benefits as the focal point!);
- The sweeping vistas. Next would be woods and fields, and third the lake;
- I like #2 best of all - not so much because of the view, but because I like looking across the lake
from East Hill towards the open fields and farms around the Odd Fellows home.
- #8, #10 and #3 have the panoramic qualities that take your breath away, and that I always linger
to enjoy, every time I see them, and I've lived here 27 years! #1 is also very much "Ithaca" but
there are other similar views in our area.
- All of them - Why not? Most are gone already.
- Of #8, see it all the time, not of Cornell.
- Of #1, it's intimate, cooling and relaxing.
- Of #6 and #3, open space - farm fields.
- Of #5, broad horizon.
- Regarding #9 and #1, a belated thanks for the photographs. The view I know best is the one
from East Hill, because I live in the area and see it daily, it is beautiful in every season and in
any kind of weather, even if there's no "view". #1 Cayuga Lake looks lovely doesn't it. But it is
largely inaccessible because of "typical private lakeside development" as you politely phrase it.
The lake is effectively off limits. (Added 9 and 1 to the list, assuming these are being voted on.)
"Missed views" - comments received:
- Hanshaw Road/near Dryden line (open fields and woods);
- None;
- Westhill as seen from Route 13;
- From the trail on the north side of Six Mile Creek there's a place which is high up overlooking the
lake above one of the dams - it is totally wild, awesome!;
Appendix E
Page 2 ^
f \
\
- The panoramic view form Sunset Park in the Village of Cayuga Heights is fantastic.
Unfortunately, the views are increasingly obscured and disturbed by rapid growth of weed/scrub
brush and trees particularly to the north.
- Sunset Park in Cayuga heights has great views of open farms - but again it is because of the
unspoiled scenery on West Hill. West Hill should have carefully controlled development.
- Buttermilk
- Near the Stewart Avenue bridge.
- All of them - Why not? Most are gone already.
- Yes, everyone - everywhere, why leave any out? The view from house is really great!!
- Must be a great corn field somewhere!
- From west end of Poole Road looking east, focused on distance by tunnel of trees.
- No, perfect!
- Hillside and ridge above Route 13 as seen from the stretch near the Kmart parking lot, this area is
beautiful and changes color with the season.
The following were submitted from one respondent whose computer did not allow him to interface
with the Town's website, so he provided the following list as recommended scenic viewsheds:
- View northeast and northwest along and across Fall Creek from Forest Home Drive, east of - -
Forest Home in the Flatrock area
- Views up and downstream from the upstream bridge in Forest Home
- Views up and downstream from the downstream bridge in Forest Home
(The best views are upstream from the upstream bridge, and downstream from the downstream
bridge, the side that the walkways are on.)
- View of waterfall behind the Byway. You get just a glimpse of this from Forest Home Drive when
heading east into Forest Home, between Mclntyre Place and the Byway. It's also mostly a
seasonal view, blocked by leaves during the summer. Perhaps some limited, sensitive trimming of •
one or two branches might open this up for year- round viewing. I think the Plantations has done ^
some trimming here in the past. ' n
~ Views of and across Beebe Lake from Forest Home Drive, particularly from Plantations' little
overlook at the intersection of Forest Home Drive and Plantations Road. Note that this view could
be improved by planting trees on the far slope to screen the view of Helen Newman Hall.
- View northeast from Greenhouse Overlook on Plantations Road. This
view has been obstructed recently by trees growing on the slope. -
- View southwest across the Warren Farm from Hanshaw Road west of Sapsucker Woods Road to
Ithaca's South and West Hills
~ View southeast across the Warren Farm from Hanshaw Road near Sapsucker Woods Road to
the hills of Dryden and Caroline
- View east from Game Farm Road between Rte 366 and Stevenson Rd across the Game Farm to
the hills of Dryden
~ View northwest across the Southside Farm from near the Game Farm Rd/Ellis Hollow Rd
intersection. Views are from both Game Farm and Ellis Hollow.
~ View northeast across the Southside Farm from Ellis Hollow Road toward the hills of Dryden
~ View from the top of Hungerford Hill
~ View east from Rte 79 West, just as you crest the hill and a breathtaking vista of Ithaca opens up
before you
~ View from Sunset Park in Cayuga Heights
~ As I recall. Burns Road has some scenic views, but I don't have any specific information on that
~ I seem to remember that Bostwick Road has some striking views, but again, I don't have
specifics on this
~ The Culver Road corridor is nice
- The view from Rte 13 in the Village of Cayuga Heights of Cayuga Lake and West Hill is great.
Unfortunately, the view of Rte 13 from Cayuga Lake and West Hill is ugly. ^
In addition, the Forest Home community, the Plantations and State Parks are all scenic areas. f
Appendix E
Page 3
Ways to Protect Total Votes
Promote public recognition and appreciation of views/landscapes 13
Locate new parks in areas with scenic views 11
Encourage sensitive placement...8
Require scenically sensitive development through regulation 11
Use tax dollars to purchase ...9+2 maybes
Do Nothing 0
Other 6
One respondent provided a ranking for the protection mechanisms: 1 - use tax dollars,
2 - promote public recognition, 3- locate new parks in areas with scenic views,
4- require scenically sensitive development.
"Other suggestions/questions" - comments received:
- Implement design standards;
- stop allowing mass production of factory built homes in areas that are beautiful to look at
undeveloped;
- develop turnoffs to allow people to stop off-road and enjoy the view- provide signage for scenic
view & parking ahead;
- voted for using tax dollars but only if reasonable and easy, like for a picnic area by the side of the
road;
- From person who intended to vote for #9 -
Be active in the Cornell Master Planning processing that is happening now.
Be active in the Transportation Planning processes-parking lots alter a lot of views!
For this view, encourage CorneH's Natural Areas committee of Cornell Plantation to continue
^ their interest in the site. The Open Areas committee is concerned with loss of open field habitat,
' and for humans, the loss of views.
- On a regularly basis, clear scrub brush and tress blocking views at Sunset Park in the Village of
Cayuga Heights. The growth of these weeds are shrinking the panoramic view.
- Don't let strip development and new housing developments continue to spread. Cluster new
development in carefully limited areas - and leave the rest of the town as fields and open
spaces.
- In response to your article in your recent newsletter, I would like to express my views on scenic
views. I think it is great you are trying to preserve such views. The most important of the three
suggestions you listed would be, for me, the sweeping vistas. Next would be woods and fields,
and third the lake. All are important though. I was especially pleased to see in your samples the
Pine Tree Road and Snyder Hill area, since I live near there. Please continue trying to keep
open vistas.
- Also use grant money and private donations for protecting views.
Total Submitted Comments = 25
16 via Town Hall Exhibit
8 via emailAA/eb
1 via phone call
Appendix F(1)
Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventory
Top Ranked Views and Scenic Areas
7bviTj\ of Uvsses
Town thaca
96' o
QfLans/nQ
aflh^Town
Cayuga
Lake
Village of
Cayuga Heightsh«qsrd
bunoy rd
MECKLe^B
City of Ithaca
cuntonm
Buttermim^^
Falls
State Pafk
Robert H. Treman
State Park _ V" _
Town ofDanby 8/24/97
Scenic Areas in Best views
from near and far
Scenic View-ways: see Top
Ranked Views from here
Photos of Best Views from
these points, arrows show total
view extent
^^Town of Ithaca Scenic Resource Inventory
Top Ranking Scenic Views
Appendix F(2)
(Please note that photos can only begin to reflect the beauty of the views from these points,
here arranged in geographical order counterclockwise, from west, to south, to east, and north)
1. This intimate westward view captures Williams Glen Creek emerging from
a rustic culvert under the former Lehigh Valley Railroad, splashing down
bedrock shale near Cass Park. This small gorge, one of seven similar
streams in the Indian Creek Lake Slopes Conversation Zone, will be seen
from the future Black Diamond Trail on the old railroad bed. Conservation
zoning limits the number of homes that may be built in the area but has not
been effective in preventing landowners from bulldozing woods. Revision of
town conservation zoning law is needed for further protection. Completing
the development of the Black Diamond trail should be promoted more
vigorously.
2. Beyond this complex of 1930's Collegiate Gothic structures along State
Route 96, the Cornell campus stands out on East Hill above Cayuga Lake
valley. Future development could obscure this long view so careful limitations
on buildings and their placement are critical. Establishing a parking pull-off
would create an opportunity for people to stop and appreciate the distant
hills.
n r,
3. One of many eye-catching views from West Hill's Route 79 entry to Ithaca
begins to reveal the descent to Cayuga Lake as farm fields along the road
give way to city sights. The Cornell campus can be seen against the
backdrop of the Dryden headlands. A parking pull-off near Eco Village's bus
stop shelter would allow travelers to stop and appreciate this sight. Further
conversion of the farm fields to development should be discouraoed.
4. Peeking through trees in Westhaven Preserve, a new Town park, we
see Ithaca College's campus appears on the shoulder of South Hill, across
the Inlet Valley. Brush-clearing in this and other similar areas would open
up such scenes for better viewing year-round.
5. This long vista across farm fields from the heights of West Hill is one of
many great views on Sheffield, Hayts, Poole, and Bundy Roads. Distant
hanging deltas and truncated spurs are part of the landforms created by
glacier action in previous Ice ages. Such views depend on agricultural
operations keeping the fields open far enough below the road for the views to
be clear. Planning tools such as easements might be needed to keep
housing development from blocking sight lines.
Appendix F(2)
Page 2
6. This view from Bostwick Road, with farm fields in the foreground and
Newfield hills in the distance, is one of many in a variety of directions.
Wooded hillsides on the south-west bank of Inlet Valley, farm fields off
Sandbank Road and Buttermilk Falls can all be seen from Bostwick Road.
Again viable agriculture provides the open areas and needs to be preserved
for the future.
7. Complimentary to the previous view, the rich farmlands along Bostwick
Road to the northwest across Inlet Valley and wooded slope of
southwestern West Hill are seen from Sandbank Road. This road
meanders down the hill through open areas and Buttermilk Falls State Park.
Preserving these views has the added benefit of protecting the park.
8. This view of Cayuga Lake is so spectacular that there is already a
parking pull-off from which to see it. A once great view to the west from
here has been obscured by the construction of Longview, an Ithacare
Community. Further development of the property to the north of the pull-off
could further block this view. A scenic easement could limit the height of
any future buildings and trees. Interpretive signage and a picnic shelter
could promote public appreciation of this view and help preserve the lake
view.
9. East Hill's best view of South and West Hills across Six Mile Creek and
Cayuga Lake valleys depends on the open field across from Snyder Hill
Road and south of Cornell's pig barns. The Polo and Tennis buildings have
blocked much of the view from Pine Tree Road; the remaining excellent
vista deserves preservation. A parking pull-off with picnic table and shelter
would recognize the beauty of this site.
10. This northern edge of lakeside panorama is viewed from a small Town
park offering the Town's only public access to Cayuga Lake. The shelter,
parking lot, and shore here are already much used. An interpretive sign
would identify the interesting parts of the panorama, and could promote
public interest in preserving the natural features in the Indian Creek Lake
Slopes Conservation Zone seen to the west across the lake.
Appendix G(1)
f s Inventory Grid Map
Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Project
nmctmiKA
• TOWTcPlfWci96ys
. A -.-T ' •«'■•i7 * - •.» turt 5\, Cayug Lake \fllla9«.of 'Cr^''11'.C%uga H^ts f.y ' vi^*«nsHk
•iW.fSK'- V.v:";';
wtoiid^•>-.V 'Vr
SJSSCFT ^11-9 .CfSS\^
PiwV
12^C«WEU.T1
UNlWRSfTYCity of Ithaca
' 11-7
aoi nay£^^/. SlMCJHlLUI
KAOGE
B . 1M
JRNS
iinAK \
auLS
JQtZ ':
UPPEflBUTTifl
rAOS s.PsWf
ronwcFfCHfisi)
^ Does not meet location criiteria for public accessibility - no photo necessary
No scenic or picture important areas located
Spring/Summer Photos
Winter Photos ^ Fall Photos
Working Map of the
Scenic Resources Committee
A
2000 2000 4000 Feet Map Produced 12/16/04
Modified 2/05,6/05,10/05,6/06
)3Worksheet for Evaluating Scenic Views (Updated April 26,2006)Grid/description of locationMag.Dist.Qua!.WOWOpporTotalComments and Notes0-5 agriculture212128Potential for Ag easement1-5 Bostwick ag views to S-SE3232212Char. Ag/long views seen from 4-1&20-2 Gray Road222129Need summer shot4-2 Sand Bank - Voss332314Potential Ag Easement; great view of Bostwick7-4 Pulloff on 96B atLongview3333315Defines our community; add picnic facilities10-1 Troy Road222129Winter shot needed; verify location9-1 /9-3 Troy Road222129View of Cornell12-1 Coddington Rd.212128Entrance to the town12-4 Eastern Heights Park322128Nice area but limited long views12-8 Rt. 366 farm views322119Overlap with Town of Dryden11-5 Park area112116Limited potential11-6 Pine Tree view to W/SW32(3)22312Include area from beginning of open area toMitchell12-6 Game farm &Ellishollow22112(3)8Opens up from Ellis Hollow10-7 Cascadilla Creek fromRt 366 S121(2)1(2)16Difficult for further development10-8 Views from upstreambridge over Fall Creek1(2)23117Trusses can frame view; seasonal10-8 Forest Home/Beebe lake132219View from end of road invites you to linger12-9 Fall Creek Pull-off inForest Home Drive112116Pleasant interior view10-9/10-10 Cornell Golfcourse222118Gives sense of place along stretch of road11-11/12-11 Hanshaw West2121(2)28Panorama7-11 Rt. 13 west3121(2)18Challenge of 3 govts; pulloff recommended7-11 East Shore Drive Park3333315N to S 180 panorama; make permanent parkrather than Cornell lease7-10/7-13 Rt 13 W&S333214Need to work with Village of Cayuga Heights>■D•DCD3O.x'Q"Ni
ccc3-12/4-12 Waterfalls/ Rt. 893321211Conservation Zone protection needed2-11 Hayts Rd. & cemetery2121173-10 PRI Odd Fellows entrypt.3322313Potential Pull-off3-10 Bundy Road and PerryLane122229Potential Opp with new road; may merit a pull-off3-10 Bundy N to Hopkins111126Views of fields0-10 Sheffield (betweenBundy and Hayts)2322312Good view of area glacial action results0- 7 Sheffield (South ofintersection w/ Rt. 79.2322:>12Open field protected by Ag easement0-8 MecklenburgRd./Sheffield3(2)121310(11)Open field2-8/3-8 Mecklenb'g Rd to east3223313Views of city for some distance; suggest pull-offand picnic pavilion at Rachel Carson Drive4-7 West Haven111115Lost with new development3-6 New park off Valley View2232312Dev view area
t ~ ^
f s
Preserving Scenic Views
In the Town of Ithaca ' ^ 2 I
• ':^ » • ■> •'- .n ' '1
...
Why?
Scenic views
enhance our lives
Scenic views enhance our lives
Encourage appreciation of natural surroundings
Scenic views enhance our lives
Give a sense of place and belonging
Scenic views enhance our lives
Provide economic value through
tourism and increasing property values
Scenic views enhance our lives
Existing views are under threat from development
Threats to Scenic Views
Insensitively placed residential or
commercial development
Uncontrolled growth of vegetation
Poorly placed utility poles,
communication towers and similar
structures
Examples of lost views
Once gone, these views are lost forever
Examples of lost views
Once gone, these views are lost forever
Examples of lost views
Once gone, these views are lost forever
Examples of lost views
Once gone, these views are lost forever
Actions to Date
Scenic View preservation began in the
early 1990's
Local Residents identified favorite views
Photos were taken and legal research
done.
The Town endorsed the value of views
We can and should do more
Plan of Action ~ The next steps
Finalize criteria for evaluating scenic resources;
-- Unique Natural Resources
- Cultural Identity
- Historic Relevance
- Recreational Significance
- Entry Points to Itie City Of Ithaca
- Importance to Tourism
• Scope of Exposure
Plan of Action
Use a grid to i —^
catalogue town views '! I , ;>5cr.
J,.;. J, .11 n
Plan of Action
Systematically expand picture flies
Plan of Action
Evaluate and rank views with public input
.^SK--r?u4,
Plan of Action
Develop methods to protect "most-valued"
views
Plan of Action/Timetable
• Finalize criteria for
evaluating scenic
resources
• Use a grid to catalogue
town views
• Systematically take
pictures
• Evaluate and rank views
• Develop recommended
protection methods for
^most-valued" views
October, 2004
May, 2005
September, 2005
V
The direction is clear.
The NYS Constitution delegates to local municipalities
the power to preserve scenic views
The Town endorsed the value of views in the 1993
Comprehensive Plan
The 2004 Zoning Ordinance reflects the importance of
scenic views.
We ask for your support.
-r—
Thank You
1
/ 1
01/0f/200C TOWN BOARD MEETINGATTACHMEJ^^3^1§3 Item;
/ \ -
Budget Officer:
2007 2008
Annualized amount $5811 x 2.7% = $5,968
35% fringes $2033 =$2.088
Total: $7844 =$8,056
To be paid each pay through payroll processing.
By the Town of Ithaca:
To be paid to out to the Budget Officer:
$5,968 / 26 pays = $229.54 per pay.
f \
01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETIN(
ATTACHMENT ff9
FIRST DEPUTY TOWN CLERK
Duties and Responsibilities
TOWN OF ITHACA
Department Town Clerk
C. 8. Classification EXEMPT
Job Classification Grade M
Approved 1/10/2000 Res# 8(n
Revised 1/7/08 TB Res#
DISTINGUISHiNG FEATURES OF THE CLASS: This is a senior level clerical position
that assists the Town Clerk In carrying out the administrative duties and responsibilities of the
department. The First Deputy Town Clerk Is appointed by the Town Clerk and serving at his or
her pleasure, which Is then acknowledged by the Town Board. The Town Clerk has authority to
establish the duties and responsibilities of the First Deputy Town Clerk, which are then to be
acknowledged by the Town Board. Such First Deputy Town Clerk shall possess the powers
and perform the duties of the Town Clerk during the absence or Inability to act for the Town
Clerk, or during a vacancy In the office of Town Clerk. Appointment Is a two-year term
commencing the first day of January next succeeding the next biennial Town election. Work Is
performed under the general supervision of the Town Clerk with moderate autonomy and
Independent judgment when carrying out the details of the work. Supervision may be exercised
over a small clerical staff.
TYPICAL WORK ACTIViTiES:
Primarv Responsibilities:
Assumes all duties and responsibilities, under law, of the Town Clerk In his/her absence;
Collects Information and compiles reports and documentation;
Attends Town Board, Planning Board, Zoning Board as necessary and other meetings as
requested and produces minutes for the Town Clerk;
Assists with Town Board meeting preparation. Town Newsletters, and dog enumeration;
Assists In the maintenance of and disposition of department files and organization files In
accordance with the records management policies, MVS Laws and Town of Ithaca
Code;
Performs administration duties associated with legal postings and filings;
Works closely with the Town Clerk to achieve department goals and tasks;
In conlunctlon with the Deoutv Town Clerk:
Assists In opening and closing Town Hall;
Assists In balancing cash drawer for dally business, and In the preparation of bank deposits;
Assists In answering various Inquiries from residents and other customers;
Assists In answering Incoming telephone calls and directs them to appropriate departments /
personnel;
Assists In Issuing marriage, dog, handicapped and other licenses or permits and other
documents and transcripts offered by the town;
Assists with mailings, typing and copying;
Assists with the collection of permit fees, and other fees and charges payable to the town;
Assists with tax searches;
Works closely with the Deputy Town Clerk and assists with overflow;
Performs other duties as assigned.
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
FIRST DEPUTY TOWN CLERK (CONT.>
FULL PERFORMANCE KNOWLEDGE. SKILLS. ABILITIES AND PERSONAL
CHARACTERISTICS:
Ability to maintain confidentiality;
Ability to deal tactfully and courteously with board members, committee members, constituents,
co-workers and other people who interface with the Town Clerk Department;
Good knowledge of office terminology and procedures;
Good knowledge of business arithmetic and English;
Knowledge of accounting practices.
Ability to understand and carry out oral and written instructions;
Ability to compose reports and maintain records;
Ability to obtain a Notary Public license;
Ability to operate a typewriter, personal computer, and calculator;
Good knowledge of word processing and spreadsheet programs;
Knowledge of the Ithaca and Tompkins County area;
Possession of integrity and honesty;
Physical condition commensurate with the demands of the position;
Ability to obtain bond - desirable;
Good working knowledge of municipal government - desirable;
Be an elector of the Town of Ithaca - desirable.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Graduation from high school or possession of a high school equivalency
diploma with a concentration in business AND three years of office clerical experience
preferably in a municipal office dealing with the public and working with cash transactions and
one year of Deputy Town Clerk experience.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. Ability to take and subscribe the constitutional Oath of Office, and file such in the Town of
Ithaca Town Clerk's Office before assuming duties.
2. Obtain and maintain Notary License within 6 months of appointment.
First OTC update 1/2008
DEPUTY TOWN CLERK
Duties and Responsibilities
TOWN OF ITHACA
Department Town Clerk
Civil Service Classification EXEMPT
Job Classification Grade K
Approved 1/10/2000 Res. # 8(1)
Revised 1/08 TB
DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF THE CLASS:
This is a responsible clerical position that assists the Town Clerk in carrying out the
administrative duties and responsibilities of the department. Deputy Town Clerk{s) are
appointed by the Town Clerk and acknowledged by the Town Board. The Town Board
has authority to establish the powers and duties of the position, which may be
delegated to the Town Clerk. Appointment is a two-year term commencing the first day
of January next succeeding the next biennial Town election. Work is performed under
the direct supervision of the Town Clerk with a minimal level of autonomy and
independent judgment when carrying out the details of the work.
TYPICAL WORK ACTIVITIES:
Assists in opening and closing Town Hall;
Assists in balancing cash drawer for daily business, and in the preparation of bank
deposits;
Assists in answering various inquiries from residents and other customers;
Assists in answering incoming telephone calls and directs them to appropriate
departments / personnel;
Assists in issuing marriage, dog, handicapped and other licenses or permits and other
documents and transcripts offered by the town;
Assist in attendance at Town Board, Planning Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals
meetings and other meetings, and produces minutes for the Town Clerk;
Collects permit fees and other miscellaneous fees and charges;
Provides assistance in the collection of water and sewer billings;
Provides assistance in the collection of Town and County tax bills;
Assists with Town Board meeting preparation. Town Newsletters, and dog enumeration;
Assists in the maintenance of and disposition of department files and organization files
in accordance with the records management policies, NYS Laws and Town of
Ithaca Code;
Assists with duties associated with legal postings and filings;
Assists with mailings, typing and copying;
Assists in completing reports and documentation;
Performs tax searches upon request;
Substitutes for the Town Clerk when requested;
Performs other duties as assigned.
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
DEPUTY TOWN CLERK (CONT.)
FULL PERFORMANCE KNOWLEDGE. SKILLS. ABILITIES AND PERSONAL
CHARACTERISTICS:
Ability to maintain confidentiality;
Ability to deal tactfully and courteously with board members, committee members,
constituents, co-workers and other people who interface with the Town Clerk
Department;
Good knowledge of office terminology and procedures;
Good knowledge of business arithmetic and English;
Knowledge of accounting practices.
Ability to understand and carry out oral and written instructions;
Ability to compose reports and maintain records;
Ability to obtain a Notary Public license;
Ability to operate a typewriter, personal computer, and calculator;
Good knowledge of word processing and spreadsheet programs;
Knowledge of the Ithaca and Tompkins County area;
Possession of integrity and honesty;
Physical condition commensurate with the demands of the position;
Ability to obtain bond - desirable;
Good working knowledge of municipal government - desirable;
Be an elector of the Town of Ithaca - desirable.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
Graduation from high school or possession of a high school equivalency
Diploma with a concentration in business AND two years of office clerical experience
preferably in a municipal office dealing with the public and working with cash
transactions.
Special Requirements:
1. Ability to take and subscribe to the constitutional Oath of Office, and file such in
the Town Clerk's office before assuming duties.
2. Obtain and maintain Notary Public license within 6 months of appointment.
DEPTY-TC.DOC JaivOQ/ revised 7/07/1/08
01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETING
ATTACHMEN^^IO-
y D)\v;/
r
SUSAN H. BROCK "
^ Attorney at Law
I » 306 East State Street, Suite 230 $
Ithaca, New York 14850
Telephone: 607-277-3995 E-mail: brock@clarityconnect.com
Facsimile: 607-277-8042
December 20, 2007
Supervisor-Elect Herbert J. Engman
Town of Ithaca
215 N. Tioga St.
Ithaca, NY 14850
Re: Engagement Letter for Legal Services
Dear Supervisor-Elect Engman:
This will confirm the terms on which the Town of Ithaca is retaining me to provide legal services
as the attorney for the Town.
My hourly rate for these services in 2008 will remain at $150.00, which is my third year at the
^ same rate. All time, including but not limited to meetings, telephone calls, document drafting, court
appearances and research, will be billed on an hourly basis, to the nearest one-tenth of an hour. In
addition to my time charges, I will bill for my actual disbursements, including but not limited to long
distance telephone and long distance fax charges, photocopying in bulk, and other miscellaneous out-of-
pocket expenses.
I will submit monthly bills showing a detailed description of services and a breakdown by day as
to how much time was spent on Town matters. The bills will also show an itemization of disbursements
for which the Town is being charged. Upon the Town's request, I will provide separate bills for specific
matters.
In the event that a dispute arises between us relating to my fees, the Town shall have the right to
arbitration of the dispute pursuant to Part 137 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts, a
copy of which will be provided to you upon request.
If the foregoing accurately describes our agreement, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter
after the Town Board approves it and return it to me. The original is for your records.
Please do not hesitate to discuss with me any questions you may have about this letter or any
future bills. I have very much enjoyed working with the Town and look forward to my continued work
with the Town in 2008.
Sincerely,
n
1 Susan Hajda Brock
Enclosures
Signature: Date:
01/02/08 11:39 FAX 6072728466 THALER & THALER @002
<
\
AGREEMENT as to LEGAL REPRESENTATION between the
TOWN OF ITHACA and GUY K. KROGH, ESQ., of THALER & THALER
This agreement (the "Agreement") is made between the undersigneds as of January 1,
2008.
The Town of Ithaca, with its offices at 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York 148M
(herein, the 'Town"), has requested that Guy K. Rrogh, Esq. (the "Attorney") provide
services to the Town as an Attorney for the Town, and accordin^y die Town hereby
engages said Guy K. Kro^ (of Thaler and Thaler, 309 Norlh Tioga Street, Ifliaca, New
York 14850) to provide legal services to the Town at the request of Susan Brock, ^ Town
Supervisor, the Town Board, the Planni^ Department, and/ or any other official of the
Towiv including, but not necessarily limited to:
> Preparing and reviewing necessary or desired legal documents
primarily regarding real estate matters;
> Attending Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board Of
Appeals Meetings upon request;
^ The provision of such other or further legal services as the Town may
desire or request.
Fees for services performed by the Attorney, and his associates and employees, (herein,
the "Fees") will be based upon the amount of time devoted by the individuals
performing the services, multiplied by those individuals' respective hourly billing rates.
For this Agreement, billing rates for 2008 are as follows: Attorney - $150.00 per hoxir;
Paralegal - $90.00 per hour. Hours will be billed in minimum increments of a tenth of
an hour. Hourly rates apply to all time expended relative to Town matters, including
but not limited to:
> Meetings and conferences;
> Telephone calls and telephonic conferences, either placed by or
placed to the Town, or otherwise made or had on the Town's behalf
or related to Town matters;
^ Preparation, review and revision of correspondence and documents,
memoranda, or papers relative to Town matters;
> Legal research;
> Court appearances and court conferences;
> Preparation time for any meeting or court matters;
> Travel time; and
^ Any other time expended on behalf of or in connection with Town
matters that are traditionally billed in the Attome/s business.
However, not all time will be deemed billable or will be billed by the Attorney, who may
exercise his discretion to "no charge" any time and billing entries. The Attorney will not
bill for any time, charges or expenses incurred for responding to any billing inquiries that
01/02/08 11:39 FAX 6072728466 THALER & THALER @003
/ I
may aiise, nor wiU the Attorney biU for any time, charges or expenses incurred for Ite
negotiation or drafting of any documents concerning the terms of employment of the
Attorney.
The Attorney and his firm will incur various costs and expenses in performing services,
including but not limited to, filing fees, subpoena and service of process fees, r^orting
and transcription expenses, postage, courier delivery expenses, long distance
telecommunications, document reproduction and/or printing expenses, travel expeises,
and rnmpiiter assisted legal and factual research expenses. The Town agr^ to reiirtou^
the Attorney for any such costs and expenses actually and necessarily incurred by the
Attorney on behalf of toe Town. Such costs and expenses shall be deemed and billed as
Fees under this Agreement.
The Attorney will provide the Town with copies of all correspondences, documents, and
pleadings, and will keep the Town apprised of the status of each matter being handled, in
whole or in part, by the Attorney.
The Town has sole discretion in determining whether to terminate the Attome5r's
representation at any time, for any or no reason.
While the Attorney and his firm seek to avoid fee disputes with the Town, and encourage
open discussion to resolve any fee disputes, the Town is advised that it has the right, at itselection, to seek arbitration to resolve any fee dispute. In such event, the Attorney shall ^
advise the Town in writing by certified mail that the Town has 30 days from receipt of
such notice in which to elect to resolve the dispute by arbitration, and the Attorney sM
enclose a copy of the arbitration rules and a form for requesting arbitration. The decision
resulting from arbitration is binding upon both the Attorney and the Town. The Town is
referred to Part 137 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the New York State Courts
for more information about arbitration. At any time, even if there is no fee dispute, the
Attorney wiU forward the complete text of Part 137 to the Town.
The Attorney also has the right to withdraw from representing the Town in the event of
the Town's failure to communicate or cooperate in the provision of legal services, or if the
Town engages in any conduct which would make it inappropriate to continue
representation, or if any bill rendered for Fees remains unpaid, in part or in full, for a
period of 90 or more days after such bill is delivered to the Town.
The Attorney will send the Town an invoice every month, or more or less frequently,
upon request of the Town.
The Town is hereby made aware that in the provision of municipal legal services there are
often facts and circumstances that call for a legal judgment and for which there is no
specific or unanimous "correct" answer. The Attorney shall exercise his best judgment in
^ V 01/02/08 11:40 FAX 6072728466 THALER & THALER Igl004
all cases and at all times to provide legal services and advice tMt are comistent vdih law
and controlling or persuasive legal precedents, and that will minimize the risk and
expense to the Town. Despite these best efforts, the Town acknowledges that there is no
assurance or guarantee of the outcome of any matter, the length of time it may take to
resolve any matter, or the costs which may be incurred to attempt to resolve any mat^.
The Attorney will endeavor to advise the Town as to any and all risks and expens^ that
any proposed course of action or conduct may entail so that the Town may wei^ its
alternatives and make a decision that is in the best interests of the Town and its
constituents.
The Town has reviewed and understands this Agreement. The Town has had an
opportunity to ask any and all questions it may have pertaining to this Agreement, md
has had each such question answered to its full satisfaction and understanding.
Accordingly, the Town and the Attorney each agree to all of the terms set forth in this
Agreement.
Town of Ithaca ("Town")Title Date
. ("Attorney") Title^ Date
l/z/62
01/02/08 11:39 FAX 6072728466 THALER & THALER 121002
/ ^
AGREEMENT as to LEGAL REPRESENTATION between the
TOWN OF ITHACA and GUY K. KROGH, ESQ., of THALER & THALER
This agreement (Ae "Agreement") is made between Ae undersigneds as of January 1,
2008.
The Town of Ithaca, wA its offices at 215 NorA Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York 14^
(herein, Ae "Town"), has requested that Guy K. Krogh, Esq. (Ae Attome/) provide
^ces to Ae Town as an Attorney for Ae Town, and accordingjy the Town hereby
anfragps said Guy K. Kro^ (of Thaler and Thaler, 309 NorA Tioga Street, Ithaca, New
York 14850) to provide legal services to the Town at Ae request of Susan Brock, Ae Town
Supervisor, Ae Town Board, fiie Planni^ Department, and/or any oAer official of Ae
Town, including, but not necessarily bnuted to:
> Preparing and reviewing necessary or desired legal documents
primarily regarding real estate matters;
> Attending Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board Of
Appeals Meetings upon request;
> The provision of such other or further legal services as the Town may
desire or request.
^ Fees for services performed by the Attorney, and his associates and employees, (herein,
the "Fees") will be based upon the amount of time devoted by the individuals
performing the services, multiplied by those individuals respective hourly billing rates.
For this Agreement, billing rates for 2008 are as follows: Attorney - $150.00 per hour;
Paralegal - $90.00 per hour. Hours will be billed in minimum increments of a tenth of
an hour. Hourly rates apply to all time expended relative to Town matters, including
but not limited to:
> Meetings and conferences;
> Telephone calls and telephonic conferences, either placed by or
placed to the Town, or otherwise made or had on the Town's behalf
or related to Town matters;
> Preparation, review and revision of correspondence and documents,
memoranda, or papers relative to Town matters;
> Legal research;
> Court appearances and court conferences;
> Preparation time for any meeting or court matters;
> Travel time; and
> Any other time expended on behalf of or in connection with Town
matters that are traditionally billed in the Attorney's business.
However, not all time will be deemed billable or will be billed by the Attorney, who may
^ exercise his discretion to "no charge" any time and billing entries. The Attorney ^ not
biU for any time, charges or expenses incurred for responding to any billing inquiries that
01/02/08 11:39 FAX 6072728466 THALER & THALER (2)003
may arise, nor wiU the Attorney Ml for any time, charges or expewes teurred fornegotiation or drafting of any documents concemmg the terms of employment of the
Attorney.
The Attorney and his firm will incur various costs and expenses in perfoi^g services,
indudine but not limited to, filing fees, subpoena and service of process fees, reportmg
and transcription expenses, postage, courier deUvery expenses, long distance
telecommunications, document reproduction and/or printing expenses, travel exp^,
and computer assisted legal and factual research expenses. The Town agr^ to
the Attorney for any such costs and expenses actuaUy and necessarily inoirrM by the
Attorney on behalf of the Town. Such costs and expenses shall be deemed and billed as
Fees under this Agreemait.
The Attorney will provide tiie Town with copies of all correspondences, d,ocu^te, and
pleadings, and wiU keep the Town apprised of the status of each matter being handled, m
whole or in part, by the Attorney.
The Town has sole discretion in determining whether to terminate the Attome/s
representation at any time, for any or no reason.
While the Attorney and his firm seek to avoid fee disputes with the Town, and encotirage
open discussion to resolve any fee disputes, the Town is advised that it tbe right, at ite
election, to seek arbitration to resolve any fee dispute. In such event, the Attorney shall
advise the Town in writing by certified mail that the Town has 30 days from receipt of
such notice in wHch to elect to resolve the dispute by arbitration, and the Attorney sl^
enclose a copy of the arbitration rules and a form for requesting arbitration. The decision
resulting from arbitration is binding upon both the Attorney and the Town pie Town is
referred to Part 137 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the New York State Courts
for more'information about arbitration. At any time, even if there is no fee dispute, the
Attorney will forward the complete text of Part 137 to the Town.
The Attorney also has the right to withdraw from representing the Town in the event of
the Town's faUure to communicate or cooperate in the provision of legal services, or if the
Town engages in any conduct which would m^e it i^ppropriate to contoue
representation, or if any biU rendered for Fees remains unpaid, in part or in fuU, for a
period of 90 or more days after such biU is deUvered to the Town.
The Attorney wiU send the Town an invoice every month, or more or less frequently,
upon request of the Town.
The Town is hereby made aware that in the provision of municipal legal se^ices there are
often facts and circumstances that call for a legal judgment and for which there is iio
specific or unanimous "correct" answer. The Attorney shall exercise his best judgment m
01/02/08 11:40 FAX 6072728466 THALER & THALER ®004
t \
all cases and at all times to provide legal services and advice that are corais^t wA Iwand controlling or persuasive legal precedents, and that minimize the nsk ^d
expense to the Town. Despite these best efforts, the Town acknowM^ that there b no
assurance or guarantee of the outcome of any matter, the length of time it may tak^o
resolve any matter, or the costs which may be incurred to attempt to resolve any
The Attorney will endeavor to advise the Town as to any and all risks and expensM^
any proposed course of action or conduct may entail so that tfie Toira ^y wei^ ite
alt^tives and make a decision that is in the best interests of the Town and its
constituents.
The Town has reviewed and understands this Agreement The Town has had an
opportunity to ask any and aU questions it may have pertaining to this Agreement,
has had each such question answered to its full satisfaction and understodmg.
Accordin^y, the Town and the Attorney each agree to all of the terms set forth m ttus
Agreement.
Town of Ithaca ("Town")Title Date
/i z/62
^
sq. ("Attomejr") Title' Date
01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETING
ATTACHMENT #l^enda Item No. 41
2008 Proposed
Legislative Program
As reported by the Resolutions Committee of the Association of Towns, November
2007. Please note that more resolutions may be reported out of the February 2008
Resolutions Committee meeting.
Resolution No. 1
Mandate Relief
WHEREAS, local governments are in partnership with the State and Federal
Government to protect and preserve the health, safety and welfare of the American
people; and
WHEREAS, a partnership requires collaboration in order to effectively accomplish these
goals; and
WHEREAS, the imposition of tax-shifting unfunded State and Federal mandates
(commonly occurring in the areas of public works, procurement, personnel
management, provision of local service, environmental quality enhancements, and loss
of local tax base) represents a barrier to effective collaboration and good governance;
and
WHEREAS, the growing expense of tax-shifting unfunded mandates, both individually
and collectively, places financial burdens on local governments and ultimately the
taxpayer, and has in some instances forced local governments to drastically under-fund
crucial local services such as road maintenance, public safety, and recreational and
cultural services, NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Association of Towns calls upon the President and Congress to
enhance the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA; P.L. 104-4) to expand
the definition of the term "unfunded mandate" and to fully fund Federal programs
administered at the state and local level; and BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Association of Towns calls upon the Governor and the New York
State Legislature to enact comprehensive mandate relief legislation that would take into
consideration the following among other relief measures: (1) inventory and fully fund
existing and future mandates and (2) require all future legislation to include
comprehensive local fiscal impact notes.
Agenda Item No. 41
Resolution No. 2
I I
Increase in Justice Court Funding ^
WHEREAS, town justice courts provide an essential service that is primarily funded by
local real property taxes; and
WHEREAS, the state established reimbursement fund (General Municipal Law [GML]
§99-1), designed to assist local governments with the operational expenses of justice
courts, has not been amended to reflect an increase in operational expenses for the
past 10 years; and
WHEREAS, the New York State Police recently discontinued the practice of prosecuting
and plea-bargaining traffic violations in town justice courts, placing a burden on local
governments to provide prosecutors for traffic violations, further increasing operational
expenses of the court; NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the Association of Towns requests legislative action to increase GML,
§99-1 reimbursement fees to assist local taxpayers in funding justice court operational
expenses.
f \
t \
Agenda Item No. 41
Resolution No. 3
Fund the Unfunded MS4 Mandate
WHEREAS, the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
promulgated the Phase II Stormwater regulations (regulations) in 1999 requiring owners
and operators of small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in urbanized
areas to obtain a permit to discharge stormwater to the waters of the U.S.; and
WHEREAS, the EPA requires MS4s in New York State to obtain permit coverage under
the New York State Pollutant Discharge and Elimination System (SPDES) General
Permit for Stormwater Discharges from MS4s (GP-02=G2); and
WHEREAS, the MS4 permit requires regulated municipal MS4s to develop and fully
implement a Stormwater Management program by 2008, and
WHEREAS, Stormwater Management programs must contain appropriate management
practices in each of the six minimum control measures (Public Education and Outreach;
Public Participation and Involvement; Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination;
Construction Site Runoff Control; Post-Construction Runoff Control and Pollution
Prevention and Good Housekeeping), and
WHEREAS, to date. Phase II regulations are an unfunded mandate, and
WHEREAS, the U.S. EPA has estimated MS4s will spend $3.00 - $60.00 per capita to
comply with these regulations, and
WHEREAS, New York State has not sufficiently funded the Environmental Protection
Fund (EPF) to assist communities in the development and implementation of their MS4
programs, and that EPF funding is distributed in the form of competitive grants and
therefore not guaranteed to all regulated MS4 municipalities, NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that to guarantee that the program is implemented and enforced uniformly
throughout the State, the Association of Towns calls for fully funding the development,
implementation and enforcement of this program.
Agenda Item No. 41
Resolution No. 4
Highway Transportation Funding
WHEREAS, local highways and bridges make up 85% of our State's highway system;
and,
WHEREAS, recent local road system studies continue to identify a multi-billion dollar
shortfall in funding of local highways and bridges; and
WHEREAS, upgrading the State's 90,000 miles of county and town roads to meet the
American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) minimum
standards would cost in excess of $9.7 billion dollars; NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Association of Towns calls upon the Governor and Legislature to
continue their support of the Consolidated Highway Improvement Program (CHIPS) and
to explore every way possible to increase highway aid.
Resolution No. 5
Speed Limits on Town Roads
WHEREAS, current provisions of the Vehicle & Traffic Law, §1662-a authorize only
certain towns (i.e., suburban towns and those with over 50,000 in population -
approximately 8.6% of towns) to set speed limits on all highways within a town other
than state highways maintained by the state, while all cities and villages regardless of
classification or population set their own speed limits; and
WHEREAS, the NYS Department of Transportation can take as much as two years to
process requests for speed limit reductions and has, in most instances, declined to
reduce speed limits on town highways when requested to do so by local officials; and
WHEREAS, town governments are better positioned to work with their citizens to set
speed limits on town roads and more likely to be responsive to their residents' concerns;
and
WHEREAS, town officials are legally required to set speed limits based upon the same
engineering standards and traffic investigation techniques as the State DOT, cities and
villages are required to employ; NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Association of Towns urges the Legislature and Governor to
extend to all towns the option - through adoption of a local law - to assume
responsibility and authority to set speed limits on town roads within their respective
jurisdictions, within the limits as defined in §1662-a of the Vehicle & Traffic Law, and so
long as those roads have been functionally classified by the Department of
Transportation as local roads.
Agenda Item No. 41
Resolution No. 6
Preserve and Strengthen Local Government's Role in the Siting of Energy Generation
Facilities
WHEREAS, the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) adopted a new
renewable energy policy which includes the Wind Energy Facilities (WEFs) on
September 22, 2004 that requires 25 percent of the state's electricity to be supplied
from renewable energy sources by 2013; and
WHEREASTthe proper regulation of the siting and installation of WEFs is necessary for
the purpose of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of neighboring property owners
and the general public; and
WHEREAS, WEFs have the potential to cause significant aesthetic, environmental, and
quality of life impacts if not properly sited, because of their large size, lighting, noise and
shadow flicker effects; and
WHEREAS, local governments have successfully developed, implemented and
administered local WEFs siting laws and policies with the input and guidance of local
taxpayers, residents, business and agricultural representatives, environmentalists,
energy generators, planners and lawyers; and
WHEREAS, Article X of the Public Service Law (PSL), which set forth the siting
procedure to construct and operate major power generation facilities with a capacity of
80 megawatts or more expired December 31, 2002 thereby requiring electric generating
project developers to undergo local zoning review and environmental review pursuant to
the State Environmental Quality Review Act (Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law); NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, the Association of Towns calls upon the Governor, State Legislature and
State Agencies to develop new laws and regulations that will preserve local authority
over the siting of WEFs and that will provide local government officials from a host
municipality with a seat on the New York State Board on Electric Generation Siting and
the Environment (Siting Board).
Agenda Item No. 41
Resolution No. 7
I (
GML 207-c Disability Benefits for Law Enforcement Reform
WHEREAS, law enforcement personnel are entitled to payment of municipal
compensation benefits including, payment of salary, fringe benefits and all medical
costs when they are injured in the line of duty pursuant to General Municipal Law
(GML), §207-c and these payments are non-taxable and can continue for years or even
decades until there Is recovery, a disability retirement or attainment of retirement age;
and
WHEREAS, the New York Court of Appeals decided (Matter of Theroux v. Rellly et al)
that all law enforcement officers who are Injured or fall III In the performance of their
duties, regardless of the duties performed or the nature of the Injury, are entitled to the
payment of the full benefits provided by GML, §207-c; and
WHEREAS, the Office of the New York State Comptroller has the final determination as
to when a law enforcement officer Is eligible for a disability retirement and historically
has been reluctant to Issue disability retirements to law enforcement officers who are
receiving section 207-c benefits; and
WHEREAS, law enforcement officers have been known to stay on municipal payrolls
receiving 207-c benefits for multiple years thereby filling a roster spot In a department
that could be filled by a healthy law enforcement officer; and [ ^
WHEREAS, this Interpretation of GML, §207-c by New York Court of Appeals will
substantially Increase municipal compensation costs and create a great hardship to
taxpayers at all municipal government levels; NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the New York State Association of Towns supports legislation to
amend General Municipal Law, §207-c to require disability retirement benefits to be
extended to any law enforcement officer who has been receiving GML, §207-c benefits
for a period of 36 months without the ability to return to work.
f \
f
Agenda Item No. 41
f L-
Resolution No. 8
Restore and Secure Equity In Collective Bargaining
WHEREAS, one out of every eight New York workers is a unionized government
employee with more than a million New Yorkers represented by public sector unions;
and
WHEREAS, employee salaries and benefits account for the majority of municipal
government operating expenses; and
WHEREAS, the Taylor Law (officially the Public Employees Fair Employment Act) was
enacted in 1967 to promote a balance in the relationship between public employees and
their employers; and
WHEREAS, legislation, case law, arbitration awards and administrative rulings by the
Public Employee Relations Board (PERB) have lead to inequity in the collective
bargaining process; NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the Association of Towns calls upon the New York State Legislature,
Governor and Public Employee Relations Board to restore equity in the collective
bargaining process by taking measured steps including but not limited to: (1) reform or
repeal "compulsory binding arbitration" by including the ability to pay - without raising
taxes - as a priority consideration for binding arbitration panels and requiring higher
employee contributions towards benefits such as health care costs; (2) reform or repeal
the "Triborough Amendment" which makes it an "improper practice" for an employer to
refuse to continue all of the terms of an expired agreement until a new agreement is
negotiated; (3) resist employer penalty legislation (e.g. S. 3178 [2006] which would have
imposed a penalty on employers found to be acting in bad faith by requiring the
taxpayers to provide a one percent increase in salaries for all members of a collective
bargaining unit) without any corresponding penalty for unions or their members found to
be bargaining in bad faith.
-"1 .-7
I i
P \
Agenda Item No. 41
Resolution No. 9
; ;
Preserve Local Control over Active and Retiree Health Insurance Benefits
WHEREAS, GASB 45 requires GAAR (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles)
compliant municipalities to account for non-pension, post employment benefits such as
retiree health care costs in their financial reports; and
WHEREAS, many towns choose to provide health Insurance benefits, although
provision of health insurance benefits to town officers, employees and retirees is
permissive (General Municipal Law, §92-a); and
WHEREAS, towns currently have the authority to adjust health insurance benefits upon
reasonable notice and subject to any applicable collective bargaining agreements; and
WHEREAS, many towns are facing double-digit increases in health care costs while
their budgets are already overburdened with mandated costs such as for pension
payments, workers' compensation and the like; and
WHEREAS, real property taxes in New York are among the highest in the nation; NOW
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Association of Towns is opposed to any State Legislation (e.g. S.
6030/A.8829 (2007)) that would affect a local government's control over the provision of '
health care benefits to its active or retired officers and employees.
iX/{\
Agenda Item No. 41
Resolution No. 10
Reform the Real Property Tax and Assessment System
WHEREAS, towns primarily rely on real property tax revenues to fund important
government services; and
WHEREAS, New York's property tax burden is higher than the national average,
thereby impacting our standard of living and economic vitality; and
WHEREAS, a contributing factor to high real property taxes is the volume of legislation
passed each year granting particular property owners either a partial or full exemption
from the payment of real property taxes, a practice that has continued unabated in the
most recent (2007) State Legislative Session; and
WHEREAS, the legislative trend to grant exceptions from established taxable status
dates, either at local option or statewide, contributes to the increase in real property
taxes paid by homeowners and small businesses; and
WHEREAS, it is essential that the cumulative long-term impact of real property tax
exemptions be studied in New York particularly in light of the retroactive exemptions for
specific properties annually enacted and the expanding scope of existing exemptions;
^ NOW. THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Association of Towns requests the Governor and Legislature to
study, define and enact a uniform, well-defined approach to exemption and taxable
status date legislation that will provide state funding for any state-mandated or
encouraged exemption programs and protect local property tax revenues.
Agenda Item No. 41
Resolutlon No. 11
Reform Condominium Assessments
WHEREAS, Real Property Law, §339-y has been interpreted by courts to limit an
assessor's method of establishing a condominium assessment to the income approach,
resulting in the assessment for each unit significantly under market value, sometimes by
as much as 50% or more; and
WHEREAS, further abuse of section 339-y now includes attempts by developers to take
large tracts of land, construct large single-family houses on one or two acres and,
instead of simply subdividing the property, establish a condominium with two classes of
common areas, a limited common area (consisting of all the parcels surrounding each
residence), which is for the exclusive use of the owner and occupant of the
"condominium unit", and one general common area consisting only of the roadways
within the development; and
WHEREAS, by structuring ownership of the property in the manner just described,
section 339-y limits the assessing unit to setting assessments on all the units as if the
property were a single parcel, resulting in a steep reduction in what the assessment
would otherwise be; NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Association of Towns again calls upon the Legislature and the
Governor to repeal Real Property Law, §339-y so as to provide equal treatment for all
types of residential housing and to prevent the continuing abuses of section 339-y as
described above.
***This is not a complete listing. The resolutions listed above are what were available
from the Association of Towns on January 3, 2008.
01/07/2008 TOWN BOARD MEETING
TOWN CLERK'S MONTHLY REPORT attachment n2
TOWN OF ITHACA, NEW YORK
TO THE SUPERVISOR:
DECEMBER, 2007
PAGE!
Pursuant to Section 27, Subd 1 of the Town Law, I hereby make the following statement of all fees and moneys received
by me in connection with my office during the month stat^ above, excepting only such fees and moneys the apphcation
and payment of which are otherwise provided for by Law:
A1255
7 MARRIAGE LICENSES NO. 07129 TO 07135 122.50
2 MISC. COPIES 16.60
2 POSTAGE 4.10
1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12.00
1 PARK OPEN SPACE FULL RPT 4.50
2 MARRIAGE TRANSCRIPT 20.00
TOTAL TOWN CLERK FEES 179.70
A1557
1 SPCA IMPOUND FEES 70.00
TOTAL A1557 70.00
A2188
1 FACILITY USE FEE 75.00
TOTAL A2188 75.00
A2544
DOG LICENSES 259.03
TOTAL A2544 259.03
B2110
10 BUILDING PERMIT 1,875.00
4 BUILDING PERMIT EXTENSIN 1,812.50
1 FIRE SAFETY INSPECTIONS 110.00
3 ZONING BOARD MTG 300.00
6 TEMP CERTIFICATE OCCUP 660.00
1 OPERATING PERMIT 100.00
TOTAL B2110 4,857.50
B2115
1 SITE PLAN PRELIM. PLAN 2,500.00
1 SITE PLAN FINAL PLAN 250.00
TOTAL B2115 2,750.00
B2691
1 FILL PERMIT 100.00
TOTAL B2691 100.00
TOWN CLERK'S MONTHLY REPORT
DECEMBER, 2007
I
page 2 \
DISBURSEMENTS
PAID TO SUPERVISOR FOR GENERAL FUND 583.73
PAID TO SUPERVISOR FOR PART TOWN FUND 7,707.50
PAID TO COUNTY TREASURER FOR DOG LICENSES 43.47
PAID TO AG & MARKETS FOR DOG LICENSES 3.00
PAID TO NYS HEALTH DEPT FOR MARRIAGE LICENSES 157.50
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 8,495.20
o
JANUARY 2, 2008 V^./ C., - — ^ SUPERVISOR
HERBERT J.EJKjMAN
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF TOMPKINS, TOWN OF ITHACA
I, KAREN BILLINGS, being duly sworn, says that I am the Clerk of the TOWN OF ITHACA
that the foregoing is a full and true statement of all Fees and moneys received bw me duiihg the month above stated, excepting
only such Fees the application and payment of which are otherwise provided fyr by la^
Subscribed and sworn to before me this y-'
/j ^ f Town Clerk
(7 day of. uj/luranj 20 o2
Notary Public
CARRIE WHITMORE
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01WH6052877
Tioga County >7 a /a
Commission Expires December 26.^^'
TOWN OF ITHACA
Public Works Department's Monthly Board Report
December Report for the January 7,2008 Meeting
ROADS
1*1 We had several snow storms and some icing events to deal with.
1*1 Salt and majic were mixed.
1*1 Trucks and equipment were worked on in between plowing.
1*1 Several hazardous trees were cut down and removed in the Southwoods development.
1*1 Cold patching of pot holes and problem areas.
1*1 Cleaned up flooding damage on several roads.
1*1 Compost pile was turned.
PARKS AND TRAILS
^ Weekly site inspections were performed.
Snow removal on commuter trails and walkways.
VATER
* Repairs to curb stops on Williams Glen Road.
* Pump station and water tank access roads were plowed several times.
* Repairs were made on several hydrants and valves.
* A leaking valve was repaired on Route 13 by Early Bird Farm.
* Water main breaks on Brandywine Drive, Coddington Road, West King Road, and Roseliill
Road were fixed.
* Daily inspections at new Trumansburg Road and Hanshaw Road water main projects.
SEWER
0 Mark-outs were done for Dig Safely New York.
0 Weekly pump station inspections were performed.
0 Several sewer mains and manholes were jetted out and cleaned on lines where we have
chronic problems with blockages.
lanuarv Projects
^^1. Snow removal and de-icing, as necessary.
2. Christmas tree pick-up the week of January 14^ through the 18^.
3. Vehicle and equipment maintenance.
4. Continue water valve and hydrant repairs.
5. Tree and brush trimming.
6. Cold patching.
TOWN OF ITHACA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
215 NORTH HOGA STREET, ITHACA, N.Y. 14850
Jonathan Kanter, A.I.C.P. (607) 273-1747
Director of Planning FAX (607) 273-1704
Planning Director's Report for January 7. 2008 Town Board Meeting
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
December 18. 2007 Planning Board Meeting:
1093 Group LLC 2-Lot Subdivision, 330 Pine Tree Road: The Planning Board granted Final
Subdivision Approval for the proposed 2-lot subdivision located at 330 Pine Tree Road, Town of
Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 62-1-3.2, Community Commercial Zone. The proposal involves
subdividing the +/- 5.959 acre lot into two parcels consisting of a +/- 1.703 acre parcel,
containing the existing Rite Aid Pharmacy, and a +/- 4.256 acre parcel located off Mitchell Street
which would be available for future development. 1093 Group, LLC, Owner/Applicant.
Wedemeyer Equestrian Center, Between 1456 and 1460 Trumansburg Road: The Planning
Board granted Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed Equestrian Center located between
1456 and 1460 Trumansburg Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 24-1-19.12, Agricultural
Zone. The proposal involves the development of an equestrian center including pastures,
outdoor hunter-jumper and dressage arenas, paddocks, an interior arena and stalls (+/- 33,000
square feet), and a hay storage and machinery bam. The project will also include a future
residence for the owners, stormwater facilities, lighting and parking. Robert & Paula
Wedemeyer, Owners/Applicants; Peter J. Trowbridge, Trowbridge & Wolf, LLP, Agent.
Recommendation to Town Board Regarding Proposed Stormwater Local Laws: The
Planning Board issued an affirmative recommendation to the Town of Ithaca Town Board
regarding three proposed local laws associated with the enactment of the new Stormwater
Management and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Law, specifically:
a. a recommendation regarding a proposed Local Law deleting Chapter 228 of the
Town of Ithaca Code, titled "Storm Water Management," and adding a new
chapter 228 titled, "Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment
Control;"
b. a recommendation regarding a proposed Local Law amending Chapter 270 of the
Town of Ithaca Code, titled "Zoning," to add Storm Water Plan Submission
Requirements:
c. a recommendation regarding a proposed Local Law amending Chapter 234 of the
Town of Ithaca Code, Titled "Subdivision of Land," to add Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan Submission Requirements.
The three local laws are intended to implement the NYS mandated Phase 2 Stormwater
Regulations for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System's (MS4).
January 7, 2008 Town Board Meeting
Holochuk Homes 106 Unit Subdivision, Between Trumansburg Road and Taughannock
Boulevard: The Planning Board designated itself as Lead Agency, and issued a Positive
Declaration of Environmental Significance (Pos. Dec.) for the proposed Holochuck Homes
Subdivision, located between Trumansburg Road (NYS Route 96) and Taughannock Boulevard
(NYS Route 89), Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s 24-3-3.2, 25-5-5.1, 25-2-41.2, 26-4-37, 26-4-
38, and 26-4-3, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Conservation Zones.
The proposal involves the construction of +/- 106 town home type units in a clustered
development with two entrances proposed from Trumansburg Road. The development would be
concentrated on the west side of the property closest to Trumansburg Road, zoned Low and
Medium Density Residential, with more than half of the eastem portion of the property, mainly
zoned Conservation, remaining undeveloped. The eastem portion of the property will be
conveyed to the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation.
Holochuck Homes, LLC, Owner/Applicant; David M. Parks, Esq., Agent. The Pos. Dec. was
agreed upon by the applicant, and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will be
prepared by the applicant. The applicant also agreed to a public scoping process for the DEIS,
and will prepare and submit a draft scoping outline to determine the scope and content of the
DEIS for the Planning Board's approval, after which a public scoping session will be held.
Ithaca College Athletic & Events Center, Ithaca College Campus: The Planning Board heard
a preliminary presentation and had a preliminary discussion regarding the determination of
adequacy for public review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the
proposed Ithaca College Athletic and Events Center located on the eastem side of the Ithaca
College campus near the Coddington Road campus entrance. Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No.'s
41-1-30.2, 41-1-24, and 42-1-9.2, Medium Density Residential Zone. The proposal includes the
construction of +/- 300,000 square feet of indoor athletic facilities including an indoor 200M
track with practice/game field, Olympic size pool and diving well, tennis courts, rowing center,
gymnasium, strength and conditioning center, and floor space for large indoor events. Outdoor
facilities include a lighted artificial turf field, a 400M track with open space for field events, and
lighted tennis courts. The project is proposed in several phases and will also include the
constmction of +/- 1,002 parking spaces (687 displaced spaces and 315 new spaces), relocating
overhead power lines, constmcting a new loop road, walkways, access drives, stormwater
management facilities, lighting and landscaping. Ithaca College, Owner/Applicant; Richard
Couture, Agent. The Planning Board will continue its discussion regarding the adequacy of the
DEIS at its January 8, 2008 meeting.
Reviews for Zoning Board (ZBA): Seven applications for the Zoning Board were processed
since the December report, resulting in seven variances granted with conditions as follows. The
ZBA also approved dates for its January and Febmary 2008 meetings (Jan. 28^*^ and Feb. 25^"^,
2008), and recommended that the Town Board reappoint Kirk Sigel as Chair of the ZBA for
2008.
December 17, 2007 ZBA Meeting:
GRANTED - ADJOURNED APPEAL of Sheri Johnson Henry and James R. Henry,
Owners/Appellants, requesting variances from the requirements of Chapter 270, Article IX,
Sections 270-73(B) and (C) of the Town of Ithaca Code to create a lot by subdivision, located at
- January 7, 2008 Town Board Meeting
1020 Hanshaw Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 71-1-66.2, Medium Density Residential
Zone (MDR). The parcel has insufficient lot widths at the street and at the required front yard
setback for parcels in the MDR Zone.
GRANTED - APPEAL of Nathaniel Greenspun, Tom Greenspun, and Barbara Gizewski,
Owners/Appellants, requesting variances from the requirements of Chapter 270, Article VI,
Section 270-34(C) of the Town of Ithaca Code, to create two lots by subdivision, located on
Bostwick Road, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 32-2-3.22, Agricultural Zone. The parcels
received Subdivision approval by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board on November 27, 2007.
Both lots have insufficient lot widths at the maximum required front yard setbacks for parcels in
the Agricultural Zone.
GRANTED - APPEAL of Harold Bierman Jr., Owner/Appellant, requesting a variance from the
requirements of Chapter 270, Article IX, Section 270-71 (A) of the Town of Ithaca Code, to be
pennitted to construct a building addition located at 109 Kay Street, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel
No. 71-1-46, Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zone. The proposed addition will encroach
into the minimum 25-foot front yard setback required for buildings in the MDR Zone.
[PLEASE NOTE: The following four appeals relate to the 1985 "Forest Home Highland
Subdivision" on Fairway Drive, in which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board erroneously
granted waivers forfour lots to have insufficient lot widths at the street line and at the front yard
setback line. The Planning Board did not have the legal authority to grant the dimensional
waivers from the Zoning Code. Therefore, these four appeals are being sponsored by the Town
of Ithaca on behalfof the owners to correct the 1985 error]:
GRANTED - APPEAL of Chen Jian & Zhihong Chen, Owners/Appellants, Town of Ithaca,
Agent, requesting variances from the requirements of Chapter 270, Article IX, Sections 270-
73(B) and (C) of the Town of Ithaca Code, to be permitted to maintain a home on a parcel with
insufficient lot width at the street and at the maximum required front yard setback line, located at
12 Fairway Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 66-3-3.521, Medium Density Residential
(MDR) Zone. The Planning Board, in 1985, erroneously granted a "waiver" to allow lots 6, 7, 8,
and 9 (now 12, 14, 15, and 17 Fairway Drive) to have less than the permitted lot widths at the
street and at the required front yard setbacks.
GRANTED - APPEAL of Robert & PhyllisAnne DiPaola, Owners/Appellants, Town of Ithaca,
Agent, requesting variances from the requirements of Chapter 270, Article IX, Sections 270-
73(B) and (C) of the Town of Ithaca Code, to be permitted to maintain a home on a parcel with
insufficient lot width at the street and at the maximum required front yard setback line located at
14 Fairway Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 66-3-3.522, Medium Density Residential
(MDR) Zone. The Planning Board at the time erroneously granted a "waiver" to allow lots 6, 7,
8, and 9 (now 12, 14, 15, and 17 Fairway Drive) to have less than the permitted lot widths at the
street and at the required front yard setbacks.
GRANTED - APPEAL of Karel V. & Cynthia Lynn Sedlacek, Owners/Appellants, Town of
Ithaca, Agent, requesting variances from the requirements of Chapter 270, Article IX, Sections
270-73(B) and (C) of the Town of Ithaca Code, to be pennitted to maintain a home on a parcel
with insufficient lot width at the street and at the maximum required front yard setback line
Town of Ithaca Planning Director's Report "'
Januar)' 7, 2W8 Town Board Meeting
. ..
located at 15 Fairway Drive, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 66-3-3.523, Medium Density
Residential (MDR) Zone. The Planning Board at the time erroneously granted a "waiver" to
allow lots 6, 7, 8, and 9 (now 12, 14, 15, and 17 Fairway Drive) to have less than the permitted
lot widths at the street and at the required front yard setbacks.
GRANTED - APPEAL of Michele Bailey, Owner/Appellant, Town of Ithaca, Agent, requesting
variances from the requirements of Chapter 270, Article IX, Sections 270-73(B) and (C) of the
Town of Ithaca Code, to be permitted to maintain a home on a parcel with insufficient lot width
at the street and at the maximum required front yard setback line located at 17 Fairway Drive,
Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 66-3-3.524, Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zone. The
Planning Board at the time erroneously granted a "waiver" to allow lots 6, 7, 8, and 9 (now 12,
14, 15, and 17 Fairway Drive) to have less than the peimitted lot widths at the street and at the
required front yard setbacks.
CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECTS/FUNCTIONS
The following have been accomplished over the past month.
Codes and Ordinances Committee (COO: The Committee met on December 19, 2007 and
continued discussion regarding comments received from the public regarding the proposed
amendments to the Lakefront Residential Zone and continued review of a proposed local law
regarding illicit discharges, activities and connections to municipal separate storm sewer
systems. The Committee approved revised amendments to the Lakefront Residential Zone to be
sent to the Town Board (for the February meeting). The next COC meeting is scheduled for
January 16, 2008. Tentative agenda items include continuation of review of proposed State
mandated regulations regarding illicit discharges into municipal separate storm sewer systems,
possible revisions to the local laws regarding stormwater management, proposed 2008 meeting
schedule, and proposed 2008 work plan priorities.
A public information meeting regarding the proposed stormwater management laws was held by
staff of the Planning and Engineering Departments on December 11, 2007. Although not heavily
attended, several comments and suggestions were raised at the meeting. These will be reported
to the Codes & Ordinances Committee at the January 16^'' meeting.
ITCTC Joint Planning and Policv Committee: The Planning and Policy Committees of the
Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council (ITCTC) met on December 18, 2007 at their
Joint Meeting. Agenda items included election of officers for 2008. Bill Gray was elected to
continue as Chair of the Planning Committee for 2008, and Dan Kwasnowski (Town of Dryden)
was elected as Vice-Chair for 2008. Mayor Carolyn Peterson was elected as Chair of the Policy
Committee for 2008, and Dooley Kiefer was elected as Vice-Chair for 2008. Other agenda items
included approval of the 2008 meeting schedule, a presentation regarding New York State
DOT'S 20-Year Transportation Needs Assessment by Astrid C. Glynn, DOT's new
Commissioner, and the Route 96 Corridor Study. (See below for update on Route 96 Study).
The next meeting of the Planning Committee will be held on February 12, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.
oi lif.i/ca Phinnmy
January 7 200^ Town Board Met
Cornell University Community Support Initiative - Transportation: The ITCTC Planning
Committee established a sub-committee to recommend a list of potential transportation
projects/programs that could be funded under Cornell's recently announced Community Support
Initiative. The sub-committee, consisting of representatives from the City and Town of Ithaca,
ITCTC, Tompkins County, Town of Dryden and Cornell University, met on December 17, 2007.
Tentative transportation projects identified in the Town of Ithaca that could qualify under the
Cornell funding program include:
1) North Campus Gateway Improvements: Examples of elements of this project would
include construction of a new connector road around A-Lot from Pleasant Grove Road
toward campus, enhanced Gateway treatments, such as new signs and possibly a Visitor
Center or booth, re-alignment of intersections to encourage vehicle movements toward
campus, relocation of stop signs as necessary. This is based on recommendations of the
North Campus Gateway Committee and is addressed in the Cornell University Draft
Campus Master Plan.
2) Construction of a Bicycle/Pedestrian path through Cornell property from Hanshaw Road
(across from Salem Drive) approximately following the alignment of Blue Grass Lane,
and crossing Warren Road and Pleasant Grove Road into North Campus. This is part of
the proposed "Sapsucker Woods to Cornell University Path" designated in the Town of
Ithaca "Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan" and in the Town of Ithaca Transportation
Plan (designated on Map 11 "Prioritized Pedestrian Corridor Needs" and Map 12
"Prioritized Bicycle Corridor Needs"). This is also consistent with the recommendations
in the Cornell Draft Campus Master Plan, and would connect with the walkway that will
be constructed along Hanshaw Road (from Cayuga Heights to Salem Drive) as part of the
Tompkins County reconstruction project.
3) Remainder of Hanshaw Road Walkway from Salem Drive to Sapsucker Woods Road:
This would add the portion of the walkway along Hanshaw Road from Salem Drive to
Sapsucker Woods Road that was originally proposed by Tompkins County as part of the
Hanshaw Road reconstruction project. This portion of the walkway was deleted from the
County project due to lack of sufficient Federal and State funds. Funding of this
remainder of the walkway within the Hanshaw Road project area would enhance
pedestrian safety, and would provide additional pedestrian connections from the
Northeast residential area to the Cornell campus. This portion of the walkway is
designated in the Town of Ithaca Transportation Plan (Map 11 "Prioritized Pedestrian
Corridor Needs").
4) Pedestrian/Bicycle path connection from East Ithaca Recreation Way to Route 366
Intersection: Construction of the short connection from the East Ithaca Recreation Way
(at the bridge over Pine Tree Road) to the Route 366/Pine Tree Road intersection.
Completing this short connection would greatly enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety
and provide a more formal direct link from the Recreation Way into the Cornell campus.
This project has already been discussed by the Town of Ithaca and Cornell University.
5) Pine Tree Road Reconstruction: This is also being proposed by Tompkins County. It was
proposed for the most recent TIP, but was not approved by NYS DOT. This is an
Town of Ithaca Planning Director's Repoirim^^i
January 1, 2008 Town Boq^4 Meetingli"
essential vehicular commuter connection from the heavily travelled NYS Route 79 to the
Cornell campus. The project would include sidewalks, bicycle lanes, crosswalks at
appropriate locations, as part of the road reconstruction project. This would have to be a
context sensitive design that would address the neighborhood livability issues in this
residential area.
6) Forest Home Traffic Calming Improvements: The Town is currently working with the
Forest Home neighborhood on finalizing recommendations in the Forest Home Traffic
Calming Plan. At the same time, Tompkins County will be rehabilitating the upstream
Forest Home Bridge (included in the 2007-2012 TIP). This provides an opportunity for
the Town of Ithaca to work with Forest Home, Tompkins County and Cornell University
on prioritizing traffic calming improvements in the Forest Home neighborhood to
enhance safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in the context of preserving the
character of the historic neighborhood.
Conservation Board: The Conservation Board met on January 3, 2008. Agenda items included
committee reports and updates, discussion of the Interim Report on an Environmental Assessment of
Lands Adjacent to Sapsucker Woods, work plan priorities for 2008, and committee assignments for
2008. The next meeting is scheduled for February 7, 2008.
Route 96 Corridor Management Studv: The participating municipalities and the County have
selected a preferred consultant, and are in the process of negotiating a contract for the study. The
consultant's scope of services came out to a higher cost than the participating municipalities had
estimated. Representatives from Tompkins County attended the December 18, 2007 Joint Meeting
of the Planning and Policy Committees of the Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council
(ITCTC), and requested that ITCTC contribute funds representing the difference between what the
participating municipalities had agreed upon ($49,000) and the consultant's cost estimate ($62,200).
The ITCTC Policy Committee agreed to contribute an additional $15,000 from existing carryover
funds to make up the difference in the cost of the study to ensure that a full project scope can be
accommodated. The starting date for the study is January 2008 with completion anticipated by the
end of 2008.
Mavor's Housing Forum and Housing Trust Group: The Housing Trust Group, consisting of
representatives from the Town and City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, Better Housing for Tompkins
County, Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services (INHS), Rural Opportunities, Inc., Tompkins
County Area Development (TCAD), met on December 19, 2007 as part of the Mayor's Housing
Forum to present and discuss a recommendation regarding the establishment of a Community
Housing Trust and a Housing Affordability Fund, which were priorities stated in the Housing
Strategy for Tompkins County, and how these housing priorities could fit into the Cornell
University Community Support Initiative for Housing. Additional elements of the proposal include
a set of Guiding Principles, an Employer Assisted Housing Program, Rental Housing Development,
and Tax Exempt Bond Financing.
Training of Planning and Zoning Board Members: The Director of Planning and Human Resources
Manager met to discuss the mandatory training program for Planning and Zoning Board members.
Records of all training credits obtained during 2007 were tumed over to the Human Resources
Manager. In summary, all current Planning and Zoning Board members continuing in 2008
W^ivH^of JihacdPtdnning Director's Report
Wanuary 7. 2008 Town Board Meeting
obtained at least the minimum of four hours of qualifying training in 2007. Several members
accumulated more than the minimum required four hours, and will be able to carry those excess
hours into 2008 to meet future training requirements. While the Planning Department will continue
the direct communications with Planning and Zoning Board members regarding ongoing training
credits and programs, the Human Resources Office will take on the responsibility of logging and
tracking credit hours obtained by each board member.
Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report
12/1/07 Until 12/31/07
Building Permits
BP#Date Value Description fee category
7028 12/3/2007 $1,500.00 2 freestanding pilings 12 feet from dock $25.00 miscellaneous
7029 12/4/2007 $12,000.00 112 square foot freestanding
photovoltaic system
$60.00 miscellaneous
7030
7032
12/6/2007
2/11/2007
$18,712.23
$2,700,000.00
252 square foot enclosed porch to
replace existing 168 square foot
screened porch
Construct 2 classrooms and passageway
$60.00
$2,000.00
additions to
residential
business
7032 2/11/2007 $2,700,000.00 Construct 2 classrooms and passageway $2,000.00 business
7031 2/11/2007 $12,895.00 Storage shed $60.00 miscellaneous
7033 2/13/2007 $46,357.00 Install new siding, replacement windows
over 50% & construct roof over entrance
$100.00 renovations to
residential
7034 2/17/2007 $17,300.00 Demolish fire damaged home $60.00 miscellaneous
7035 2/19/2007 $3,500.00 Extend existing deck four feet $35.00 renovations to
residential
7036 2/20/2007 $29,900.00 Add fire sprinkler system to two-family
home
$70.00 renovations to
residential
7038 2/26/2007 $5,001.00 Repair foundation wall $45.00 renovations to
residential
7037 2/26/2007 $12,000.00 Convert basement into habitable space $60.00 renovations to
residential
7039 2/26/2007 $400,000.00 New 4 bedroom, single-family home with
attached 2-car garage
$850.00 new single-family
homes
7040 2/31/2007 $200,000.00 Remodel Suite 200 office &
manufacturing space used by Goodrich
Corp
$550.00 business
Totals $6,159,165.23 1 $5,975.00
Certificates of Occupancy
BP # Address
6998 1002 DanbyRd
6985 1201 Danby Rd
6955 10 Chase Ln
Wednesday, January 02,2008
Description
Re-roof, add 1 dormer & 2 skylights
CO Temp
12/3/2007 □
12/5/2007 0
Construct 400 sq ft storage shed addition 12/11/2007 □
Update interior finishes and bring
facilities into ADA Compliance
Page 1
Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report
12/1/07 Until 12/31/07
6677 211 Park Ln New 3 bedroom single family with
finished walkout and 2 car garage
12/11/2007 0
6992 341 Pine Tree Rd Interior Office Modifications - demolition
Phase 1
12/12/2007
6073 1465 Mecklenburg Rd Renovations basement level single-
family home
12/19/2007 0
6894 133 Glenslde Rd Addition to single-family home 12/20/2007 0
6303 207 Eldrldge CIr New 4 bedroom home with attached 2
car garage
12/21/2007 □
7026 11 Apple Blossom Ln Add roof over front porch and finish
basement
12/27/2007 0
6999 341-3 Strawberry Hill Cir Kitchen remodel 12/28/2007 □
i
Complaints
Date Address Complaint Type Disposition
12/3/2007 358-2 KingRdW building code Abated
12/10/2007 107 Pine Tree Rd building code Pending
12/10/2007 253 HaytsRd fire Pending
12/11/2007 162B TroyRd electrical certificate Other
12/7/2007 618 Elmira Rd water/sewer/septic Other
Existing Building CO
Field Visits
Building Code
Complaint/Investigation
Fire Safety
Fire Emergency
Total
57
4
1
2
64
Wednesday, January 02,2008 Page 2
01/02/2008
09:13:40
TOWN OF ITHACA
B2110 - B2110 Transaction Report
For the period 12/01 /2007 through 12/31 /2007
Type Date Comment Name Quantity Fee
B2110
60.00l.BP 12/03/2007 72.-1-27 THOMAS, JAMES 1
2. BP 12/04/2007 44.-1 »-4.35 FRANZISKA BACKER 1 70.00
CENTER
3.BP 12/06/2007 39.-1-1.1 SOUTH HILL BUSINESS 1 550.00
CAMPUS
4.BP 12/10/2007 72.-1-1.187 GILLESPIE, GRAHAM 1 45.00
5. BP 12/12/2007 72.-1-1.106 LEVY, ANN 1 60.00
6. BP 12/13/2007 44.2-2-5 HERITAGE PARK 1 700.00
TOWNHOUSES
7.BP 12/17/2007 38.-3.11.1 SUNNY BROOK BUILDERS 1 60.00
8.BP 12/18/2007 39.-1-1.2 SOUTH HILL BUSINESS 1 200.00
CAMPUS
9.BP 12/20/2007 28.-1-34.42 BENTLEY, MARY 1 60.00
10. BP 12/26/2007 71.-1-4 CROWN CONSTRUCTION 1 70.00
10 1,875.00
ll.BPE 12/06/2007 21.-2-26 MENNEN, RICHARD AND 1 87.50
SALLY
/^.BPE 12/18/2007 66.-6-2 CRANE, BRIAN 1 50.00
BPE 12/20/2007 66.-3-3.13 EASTWIND BUILDERS 1 175.00
.BPE 12/28/2007 27.-1-1312, 13.-162 CONIFER REALTY 1 1,500.00
1,812.50
15.FSI 12/27/2007 24.-3-4 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 1 110.00
ASSOC.
110.00
16.0P 12/20/2007 64.-1-1 CORNELL UNIVERSITY 1 100.00
1 100.00
17.TC0 12/05/2007 36.-3-1.1 ITHACA JEHOVAH'S 1 100.00
WITNESSES
18.TC0 12/11/2007 56.-3-26.5 SCOTT W FLATT BUILDING 1 275.00
CO
19.TC0 12/12/2007 62.-2-1.121 CORNELL UNIVERSITY 1 100.00
20.TCO 12/19/2007 28.-1-3.3 CUTLER, MICHELE 1 50.00
21.TC0 12/20/2007 30.-2-1 BRENNER, CLAUDIA 1 100.00
22.TCO 12/27/2007 33.-3-8.11 WELLS, JAMES 1 35.00
660.00
23.ZBM 12/13/2007 62-1-3.2 1093 GROUP, LLC 1 100.00
24.ZBM 12/19/2007 63.-1-5,63.-1-8.1,-8.2 CORNELL UNIVERSITY 1 100.00
25.ZBM 12/20/2007 28.-1-34.42 BENTLEY, MARY 1 100.00
3 300.00
Total Sales 25 4,857.50
Page: 1
Town Engineer's Report for 1/8/2007
Town Board Meeting
TOMPKINS COUNTY EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE
The Town Engineer is the Public Officials Representative member of the Emergency Planning Committee.
I serve on the Public Works Sub-Committee and the Public Officials sub committee. The Public Officials
Sub-committee is charged with developing the means to provide information to the officials in the county
municipal governments regarding emergency management programs in the county. The sub-committee will
meet in January to develop plans for a public officials conference for early 2007.
EARTH FILL PERMITS
No earth fill permits were issued in December 2006.
WATER PROJECTS
Trumansburg Road Water Main Improvements
Final design is is being completed for a capital project to replace the 80-year-old, 6-inch cast iron water
main, which serves Trumansburg Road from the city line to Harris Dates drive. This project has been on
the capital plan for construction in 2007.
The Hanshaw Road water main replacement design and contract documents are being completed and will be
reviewed by the public works committee, prior to bring the plan to the Board for authorization to bid the
project. The project has been on hold until the County has finalized a construction schedule for the
Hanshaw Road reconstruction project.
SEWER PROJECTS
Sewer Joint Committee
There was no SIC meeting in December.
Joint Interceptor Sewer Projects
Construction of the interceptor sewer on Aurora Street between Hudson Street the block above Prospect Street
was completed in October. Work will be started on the remainder of Aurora Street in the spring when
rehabilitation of the Aurora Street bridge begins.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
The Town Engineers office is continuing to work on the watershed plan for t he Northeast area. A public
meeting was held on December 6th and information gathered from the residents is being used in the
development of alternative solutions for the drainage problems.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
CAYUGA MEDICAL CENTER
Engineering staff is monitoring the sediment and erosion control practices. Most of the site work has been
completed and restored.
TOWN ENGINEERS REPORT 12/11/2006
WEIDERMEIR SUBDIVISION
Sediment and erosion controls are being monitored. The NYS stormwater monitoring regulations require a
subdivision developer to maintain the sediment and erosion control components of the entire site until all
construction is completed on all lots in the subdivision.
SOUTHWOODS
Construction of phase 11 improvements is complete except for final pavement. Legal responsibility for
maintenance of the permanent storm water management measures is in the process of being finalized.
Deeds and easements for the road and utilities are also being finalized.
WESTVIEW SUBDIVISION
The Engineering staff is monitoring the sediment and erosion control program for the site, which is currently
in compliance with the sediment and erosion control plan and general permit from DEC. Phase 11 work on
the project has begun with clearing of the road area.
OVERLOOK ON THE WEST HILL
Most of the site restoration and Landscaping work has been completed. The Engineering staff is monitoring
the site sediment and erosion control measures.
BIGGS BUILDING DEMOLITION
Demolition of the old Biggs A building was delayed and final site restoration will be completed in the
spring. The primary hard fill disposal area at the old power plant site has been filled and covered and is
being protected by the required sediment and erosion control measures. Placement of hard fill at the
secondary fill area has is being monitored by the Engineering Department.
Town Engineer's Report January 8,2007
Daniel R. Walker Page 2 1/3/2008
e yil View Favoiites JooIj Help
Town of Ithaca, NY
i Government ^ Services ^ Communily [►Contact
Vebsite
letwork
Network/Record Specialist Report
January 8, 2007
New Page: 2007 Final Budget
Site of tine Montli page: Cayuga Lake Waterslned Network
MS Office 2003 upgrade for Town Hall computers has begun.
New firewall appliance installed at Town Hall & Public Works.
New wireless access points (WAP) installed in Town Board room, Tioga
and Aurora conference rooms and Employee lounge in Town Hall, More
details about how to use this new technology in next month's report or contact Lisa
with specific questions.
hdditional:
Chief Justice Judith Kaye of The State of New York Unified Court System release a report last
November called "Action Plan for the Justice Courts". The Action Plan announces dozens of new
initiatives and programs falling across four broad areas: court operations and administration; auditin
and financial control; education and training; and facility security and public protection. The most
significant change as it relates to Information Technology is that all Justice Courts will be integrated
into the Office of Court Administration's (OCA) Division of Technology service system. OCA will equ
and support, at State expense, the following technologies: Desktop computers, printers, internet
connectivity, credit card machine and dedicated connection, fax machine, all desktop software and
digital recording devices. The report also stated that OCA will assume all central responsibility for
supporting software and hardware. Essentially, the Town's Network/Record Specialist will no longer
provide technology support for the Town Court and their technology budget will no longer be the
responsibility of the Town of Ithaca. Please contact Justice Klein for more specific information as it
relates to other areas of this report.