No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTB Minutes 2013-10-07 F f Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board y..a, Monday, October 7, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. dt F gf7 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 Agenda 1. Call to order and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Report of Tompkins County Legislature and Ithaca Common Council 3. Persons to be Heard and Board Comments 4. Public Hearings regarding 2013 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas a. Consider adoption 5. Public Hearing regarding amending the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Agreement Increasing Water Rate Charges Effective January 1, 2014 a. Consider Adoption 6. Discuss and consider approval of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission employee wages for 2014 7. Public Hearing regarding the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission 2014 Preliminary Budget a. Consider adoption 8. Public Hearing regarding a proposed increases to the Town of Ithaca Water Rate and Sewer Rents a. Consider adoption 9. Public Hearing regarding a proposed local law amending Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code, titled "Zoning", and the official Zoning Map to rezone certain lands between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road from Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Agricultural Zones and Planned Development Zone No. 8 to Conservation Zone a. Consider SEQR b. Consider Adoption 10. Discuss and consider setting a public hearing regarding a proposed local law amending Chapter 184 of the Town of Ithaca Code Entitled "Noise"to Delete Section 184-12 A (9) Concerning Notification of Neighbors and Add a Section 184-12 E to Permit the Waiving of Public Hearings. (The Town will take responsibility for notification of neighbors) 11. Discuss and consider setting a public hearing regarding a proposed local law amending Chapter 200 of the Town of Ithaca Code Entitled "Parks and Recreation Areas" to Change Section 200-3, Paragraphs B, E, F and G concerning use of the parks by multiple persons, cleaning up pet waste and locations for field games and picnics 12. Discuss and Consider Referral of a Zoning Board of Appeals Request for Review of Chapter 270 Section 205-A Regarding Existing Non-Conforming Structures 13. Discuss and consider declining Safe Routes to School Grant— Speed Indicators 14. Discuss and consider authorization for the Chief Operator of Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility to sign the NYSEG Interconnection Agreement for Cogeneration System 15. Discuss and consider a resolution of appreciation for Ronald Krantz, Zoning Board Member 16. Discuss and consider authorization for the Town Supervisor to sign a Trail and Easement Agreement with Ithaca Center Service Company(Longview) a. SEQR b. Adoption 17. Consider Consent Agenda Items a. Approval of Town Board Minutes of August 12, 2013 b. Town of Ithaca Abstract c. Bolton Point Abstract d. Appoint Project Assistant—Codes 18. Continue review of Draft Comprehensive Plan Comments 19. Report of Town Officials 20. Report of Town Committees 21. Intermunicipal Organizations 22. Review of Correspondence 23. Consider Adjournment F f Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board L,,,, Monday, October 7, 2013 &�tr gf7 Minutes Board Members Present: Herb Engman, Supervisor; Bill Goodman, Deputy Town Supervisor; Pat Leary, Tee-Ann Hunter, Eric Levine, Rich DePaolo, and Rod Howe Staff Present: Susan Ritter, Director of Planning, Bruce Bates, Director of Code Enforcement; Mike Solvig, Director of Finance, Judy Drake, Director of Human Resources; Paulette Terwilliger, Town Clerk and Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town Item 1 Call to order and Pledge of Allegiance Supervisor Engman called the meeting to order at 5:32 Mr. Engman, with approval from the Board, added and an agenda item to accept the court audit Item 2 Report of Tompkins County Legislature and Ithaca Common Council Mr. Stein reported on budget deliberations, stating they are hearing presentations from each department head and he explained the process. He noted there was an alarming item in the paper where Gov. Cuomo has set up a new commission to reduce the property tax levy to make New York more competitive. Mr. Stein stated there is no way to do that so the fact that they are even talking about decreasing the tax levy is pretty scary. Mr. Stein mentioned our town budget meeting that he missed but said that he is hopeful we work something out with TCAT and that at the next TCAT Board meeting they will formally make the decision to allow a permanent liaison from the Town to TCAT. Item 3 Persons to be Heard and Board Comments Mr. Engman followed up on his comments from the October 3rd meeting regarding Cornell contributions; a news release was printed in the Journal saying Cornell contributes $3.2 million to the community but only$1.2 million is to the City of Ithaca and out of that, $750 thousand goes to the Fire Department budget. So we do not get anything for the educational budget, the schools etc., and doing that which costs us time and money to work with and for Cornell. He wanted to make it clear that it is not $3.2 and Cornell is far below what their peer institutions contribute to their communities and that is the point the Mayor has been trying to make and what the press release was replying to. Mr. Goodman noted there is a town/gown meeting at the high school Wednesday and he thought this topic was on the agenda. Mr. Howe said he was going. Item 4 Public Hearings regarding 2013 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas Public hearing was opened at 5:40 pm, there was no one wishing to address the Board and the hearing was closed. TB Resolution No. 2013- 120: Adoption of the 2013 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas for Tax Year 2014 Adopted 11-8-2013 1 Whereas, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca held a properly advertised public hearing at the Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca,New York, on the 7th day of October 2013, to consider the 2013 Assessment Rolls for Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas for the Town of Ithaca for Tax Year 2014; Now, therefore,be it Resolved, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves and adopts the 2013 Assessment Rolls for the Special Benefit Districts and Special Benefit Areas of the Town of Ithaca for Tax Year 2014 as follows: Fire Protection District: Assessed Value - $989,892,615. Forest Home Light District: Assessed Value - $35,072,100. Glenside Light District: Assessed Value - $4,265,000. Renwick Heights Light District: Assessed Value - $12,832,600. Eastwood Commons Light District: Assessed Value - $12,742,500. Clover Lane Light District: Assessed Value - $29290,000. Winners Circle Light District: Assessed Value - $2,500,000. Burleigh Drive Light District: Based upon 3,971.1 lineal feet. Westhaven Road Light District: Based upon Road Frontage of 6,732.0 lineal feet. Coddington Road Light District: Based upon Road Frontage of 7,060.3 lineal feet. Water Improvement Benefit Area: Units Available & Connected- 7,967.62. Sewer Improvement Benefit Area: Units Available & Connected- 7,615.97. Moved: Rod Howe Seconded: Rich DePaolo Vote: Ayes—Howe, DePaolo, Hunter, Levine, Leary, Goodman and Engman Item 5 Public Hearing regarding amending the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Agreement Increasing Water Rate Charges Effective January 1, 2014 Public hearing was opened at 5:43 pm, there was no one wishing to address the Board and the hearing was closed. TB Resolution No. 2013 - 121: Amend the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Agreement Increasing the Water Rate Charges Whereas, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca held a properly advertised public hearing at the Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca,New York, on the 7th day of October 2013, for the purpose of considering the proposed increase in the Water Rate Charges contained and put forward in the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Preliminary Budget, Now, therefore,be it Resolved, that the Town Board approves and authorizes the execution of an amendment to the agreement of intermunicipal cooperation between the Town and several other Adopted 11-8-2013 2 municipalities pursuant to which the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission was formed, which amendment would increase the water rate charged by the Commission from $4.00 per 1,000 gallons to $4.08 per 1,000 gallons, said changes to be effective January 1, 2014. Moved: Bill Goodman Seconded: Eric Levine Vote: Ayes - Goodman, Levine, Leary, DePaolo, Hunter, Howe and Engman Item 6 Discuss and consider approval of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission employee wages for 2014 TB Resolution No. 2013— 122: Approval of Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Employee Wages for 2014. Whereas, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca has reviewed the proposed wage scale and wages for Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission's (Commission) employees for the year 2014; and Whereas, the said wages have been approved by the Commission at their August 8, 2013 meeting; Now, therefore,be it Resolved, the governing Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the said wage scale and wages for the Commission's employees for the year 2014 filed in the Human Resources Office. Moved: Tee Ann Hunter Seconded: Rich DePaolo Vote: Ayes—Hunter, DePaolo, Engman, Leary, Levine, Howe and Goodman Item 7 Public Hearing regarding the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission 2014 Preliminary Budget Public hearing was opened at 5:45 pm, there was no one wishing to address the Board and the hearing was closed. TB Resolution No. 2013 123: Adopting the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Preliminary 2014 Budget as the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Final 2014 Budget Whereas, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca held a properly advertised public hearing at the Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca,New York, on the 7th day of October 2013, for the purpose of considering the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Preliminary 2014 Budget; Now,therefore,be it Adopted 11-8-2013 3 Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca has considered and approves the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Preliminary 2014 Budget as the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission Final 2014 Budget. Moved: Rod Howe Seconded: Eric Levine Vote: Ayes—Howe, Levine, Leary, Engman, Goodman, DePaolo and Hunter Item 8 Public Hearing regarding a proposed increase to the Town of Ithaca Water Rate and Sewer Rents Public hearing was opened at 5:46 pm, there was no one wishing to address the Board and the hearing was closed. TB Resolution No. 2013 - 124: Increasing Sewer Rents in the Town of Ithaca Sewer Improvement Area and Increasing Water Rates Chargeable to Consumers of Water in the Town of Ithaca Whereas the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca wishes to revise the sewer rent and water rate schedules for the Town of Ithaca Sewer Improvement Area and the Town of Ithaca Water Improvement Area; and Whereas a public hearing, duly advertised and posted as required by law, was held at 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca,New York on the 7a' day of October 2013, and the public was permitted an opportunity to be heard on the proposed increases; and Whereas pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, it has been determined by the Town Board that adoption of the proposed resolution is a Type II action because it constitutes "routine or continuing agency administration and management, not including new programs or major reordering of priorities that may affect the environment," and thus this action is not subject to review under SEQRA; Now, therefore,be it Resolved that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby establishes and imposes the following: (1) Effective January 1, 2014 there is hereby imposed a sewer rent payable by all users connected to the Town-wide sewer system at a rate of$4.25 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed. (2) In addition, and notwithstanding the foregoing rate structure, there shall be a minimum base charge for regular quarterly bills sent on or after January 1, 2014 in the amount of $34.00, which minimum charge is based on 8,000 gallons of usage, regardless of whether that amount is actually used. Adopted 11-8-2013 4 (3) Multiple housing and mobile home parks of over two dwelling units, using a master water meter, will be computed as follows: The quarterly master water meter reading will be divided by the number of dwelling units and the sewer rent charge will be figured on this number as if the unit was individually metered. The sewer rent will then be multiplied by the number of units on the master water meter and this will be the billing rendered and the amount payable. If the calculation of the water consumed per dwelling unit is less than the amount that would be permitted before exceeding the minimum sewer rent set forth above, then the billing will be calculated by multiplying the number of units served by the master water meter times the minimum sewer rent set forth above. (4) The charges set forth above shall be effective with respect to bills rendered on or after the effective dates set forth above, even if the measurement is for consumption prior to the above effective dates (i.e., any bill rendered on or after January 1, 2014, shall be calculated at the 2014 rate even if the sewer use occurred prior to January 1, 2014). (5) In the event a property is connected to public sewer, but is not connected to a water meter, the sewer rent shall be based upon estimated water consumption as reasonably determined by the Director of Public Works based upon recognized methods of estimating typical consumption for the type of facility involved(e.g., gallons per day per bedroom). Further Resolved that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby establishes a water rate of$5.99 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed with the following water rate schedule: WATER RATE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2014 The rate charged for water consumption shall be $5.99 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed. The foregoing rate will be the rate charged for all regular quarterly bills sent on or after January 1, 2014. Actual or base consumption may occur prior to January 1, 2014. Notwithstanding the foregoing rates, the following minimum base charges shall be applicable to the meter size indicated below for regular quarterly bills issued on or after January 1, 2014. The table below also shows the amount of water consumption that is permitted before the minimum base charge would be exceeded: METER SIZE BASE MINIMUM (INCHES) CONSUMPTION CHARGE (in Gallons) 3/4 10,000 $ 59.90 1 30,000 $ 179.70 1-1/2 45,000 $ 269.55 Adopted 11-8-2013 5 2 90,000 $ 539.10 3 140,000 $ 838.60 4 200,000 $ 1,198.00 6 350,000 $ 2,096.50 Multiple Housing and mobile home parks of over 2 dwelling units,using a master meter, will be computed as follows: The quarterly master meter reading will be divided by the number of dwelling units and the water charge will be figured on this number as if the unit was individually metered. The water charge will then be multiplied by the number of units on the master meter and this will be the billing rendered. If the calculation of the water consumed per dwelling unit is less than the allowable consumption for a three-quarter inch meter, then the billing will be calculated by multiplying the number of units on the master meter times the minimum charge for a three-quarter inch meter. The water application fee for each new application for water service shall be the charges for new water connections charged by the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission including application fees, meter charges, service tap fees, inspection fees, accessory materials, installation costs, and any other fee or cost charged by the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission for connecting new water services. An annual charge for each fire protection main serving a fire suppression system will be billed along with the first quarterly water bill of the calendar year. The annual charge for this service shall be $20.00 per diameter inch of the pipe supplying the fire suppression system or such other amount as is charged by the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission for such systems. The pipe supplying the fire suppression system is the pipe needed to supply the fire suppression system, installed downstream of the system control valve. In addition to any other charges due to the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission or the Town, there shall also be due to the Town a charge of$25 for disconnecting and a charge of$25 for reconnecting water service where water service has been disconnected pursuant to Town Code § 261-4 for failure to pay water rates or other charges. Moved: Bill Goodman Seconded: Eric Levine Vote: Ayes—Goodman, Levine, Leary, DePaolo, Hunter, Howe and Engman Item 9 Public Hearing regarding a proposed local law amending Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code,titled "Zoning", and the official Zoning Map to rezone certain lands between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road from Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Agricultural Zones and Planned Development Zone No. 8 to Conservation Zone Adopted 11-8-2013 6 Public hearing was opened at 5:48 pm. Susan Titus addressed the Board thanking them for all the work on this proposal. She said she bought a piece of land 4 years ago and she loves that she will be in the middle of a conservation zone. There was no one else wishing to address the Board and the public hearing was closed. TB Resolution No. 2013- 125: SEOR: Proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code, Titled "Zoning", and the Official Zoning May to Rezone Certain Lands Between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road from Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Agricultural Zones and Planned Development Zone No. 8 to Conservation Zone Whereas, this action is the enactment of a local law amending Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code, Titled"Zoning", and the Official Zoning Map to rezone certain lands between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road from Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Agricultural Zones and Planned Development Zone No. 8 to Conservation Zone; and Whereas, this is a Type I Action for which the Town of Ithaca Town Board is acting as Lead Agency in an environmental review with respect to the enactment of this local law; and Whereas, the Town Board, at their regular meeting held on October 7, 2013, has reviewed and accepted as adequate the Full Environmental Assessment Form(EAF), Parts I and II, for this action, prepared by the Town Planning staff, Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, 6 NYCRR Part 617 New York State Environmental Quality Review, and Chapter 148 Environmental Quality Review of the Town of Ithaca Code for the above-referenced action as proposed, based on the information in the EAF Part I and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Part II, and, therefore, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. Moved: Tee Ann Hunter Seconded: Rod Howe Vote: Ayes—Hunter, Howe, Engman, DePaolo, Leary, Levine and Goodman Mike Smith, Planner—Mr. Smith noted that he was still waiting on the signed GML letter from the County. He did have a draft of the letter, in which they raised the issue that a corner of the Tompkins County Highway Department property is in the proposed Conservation Zone (CZ) which follows our critical environmental area line and they would like the whole property excluded from the Conservation Zone. Discussion followed on what the County could do with that small section of property and the Board felt they could apply for a variance if needed. They could continue the use they have at this time but could not expand it without a variance and there are regulations regarding our critical environmental area through zoning that would prohibit Adopted 11-8-2013 7 some uses anyway. The Board was aware of the need for a super majority to not make the change. The Board seemed to think that they could come in for a variance if needed. The Board received the final, signed letter during discussions on this topic. TB Resolution No. 2013-126: Adoption of Local Law 8 of 2013 Amending Chapter 270 of the Town of Ithaca Code, Titled "Zoning", and the Official Zoning May to Rezone Certain Lands Between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road from Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Agricultural Zones and Planned Development Zone No. 8 to Conservation Zone WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan(1993)recommends protection for environmentally sensitive and unique natural areas in the Town, and has indicated on a map entitled"Anticipated Land Use Patterns"that a portion of land between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road should be considered for Conservation/Open Space, and WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Park, Recreation& Open Space Plan(1997), recommends Conservation Zoning as a means to protect lands with steep slopes, gorges and ravines, key stream corridors, and other significant natural areas, and the Plan includes a map entitled"Potential Zoning for Open Space and Purchase of Development Rights Target Areas," that identifies an area between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road, as "recommended for conservation zoning", and WHEREAS, the Unique Natural Area Inventory of Tompkins County(revised January 2000) conducted by the Tompkins County's Environmental Management Council, identifies the "Coy Glen Hackberry Woods" (UNA-138), "Coy Glen" (UNA-139), and"Culver Creek Ravine and Woods" (UNA-140) Unique Natural Areas, all located between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road, and describes the areas as containing steep slopes, erodible soils, numerous watercourses and deep gorges, rare and scarce plant and animal species, and having a scenic/ aesthetic value, and WHEREAS, in 1979, the Town of Ithaca used the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act to designate the lower section of Coy Glen (between Elm Street Extension and Five Mile Drive) as a Critical Environmental Area, and WHEREAS, the Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan(December 2004) identifies the area to be rezoned as part of"The Gorges" area, which is one of the "Natural Features Focus Areas", that the Comprehensive Plan recommends be considered for conservation efforts to insure protection, and WHEREAS, the Planning Committee of the Ithaca Town Board has examined the area in and adjacent to the Southwest Glens and Creeks area, has examined the Conservation Board's report entitled"Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone" (Draft Report 11/05/2012), and based on that documentation, has recommended a delineated area to be rezoned to a Conservation Zone based on the need to protect the areas' rich ecological and scenic resources, and to minimize long-term impacts posed by development on the steep slopes (and erodible soils), and Adopted 11-8-2013 8 WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Town Board in Resolution No. 2013-120 referred the proposed rezoning to the Planning Board and the Conservation Board for review and comment, and WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Planning Board held a public hearing on September 17, 2013 to consider comments from the public regarding this rezoning request, and WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 270-236(H) of the Town of Ithaca Code, the Town of Ithaca Planning Board in Resolution No. 2013-041 found: 1. There is a need for a Conservation Zone in the proposed area to protect valuable natural resources and environmentally sensitive lands, and 2. The existing and probable future character of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected by the proposed rezoning, and 3. The proposed rezoning is in accordance with a Comprehensive Plan of development of the Town, and WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Planning Board in Resolution No. 2013-041 recommended that the Town Board adopt the proposed local law to rezone the above-described property as a Conservation Zone, and WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Planning Board in Resolution No. 2013-041 also recommended that the map attached to the local law more clearly describe the Conservation Zone boundaries, and include where appropriate, metes and bounds descriptions, and WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Conservation Board, on October 3, 2013,passed a resolution which recommended that the Town Board establish a Conservation Zone to preserve and protect this valuable open space, as shown on Exhibit A (dated September 24, 2013), and WHEREAS, the Tompkins County Planning Department, in a letter dated October 7, 2013,under GML 239 indicating that they would like the Tompkins County Highway Department parcel to be excluded entirely from the conservation zone, and WHEREAS, the Town Board discussed the County's request and determined that the parcel should not be excluded, noting the County could apply for a variance should they feel it necessary, and WHEREAS, at its meeting on September 9, 2013, the Town of Ithaca Town Board reviewed and discussed the proposed rezoning and adopted a resolution for a public hearing to be held by said Town Board on October 7, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. to hear all interested parties on the proposed local law entitled"A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE, TITLED "ZONING",AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN LANDS BETWEEN MECKLENBURG ROAD AND BOSTWICK Adopted 11-8-2013 9 ROAD FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND AGRICULTURAL ZONES AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE NO. 8 TO CONSERVATION ZONE", and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly advertised in the Ithaca Journal, and WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly held on said date and time at the Town Hall of the Town of Ithaca and all parties in attendance were permitted an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said proposed local law, or any part thereof, and WHEREAS,pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQR) and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, adoption of said local law is a Type I Action for which the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, acting as lead agency in an environmental review with respect to adoption of this local law, has, on October 7, 2013, made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate the Full Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II prepared by the Town's Planning staff, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board hereby finds that the proposed rezoning: will protect the area's rich natural resources and environmentally sensitive lands; will minimize long-term impacts posed by development on steep slopes and erodible soils, including uncontrolled erosion and sedimentation, degraded water quality, increased stormwater runoff, and slope instability; will not adversely affect the existing and probable future character of the neighborhood affected by the rezoning; and is in accordance with a Comprehensive Plan of development of the Town, and it is further RESOLVED, that the Town of Ithaca Town Board hereby adopts Local Law 8 of 2013 entitled"A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 270 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE, TITLED "ZONING",AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN LANDS BETWEEN MECKLENBURG ROAD AND BOSTWICK ROAD FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND AGRICULTURAL ZONES AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE NO. 8 TO CONSERVATION ZONE", and it is further RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file said local law with the Secretary of State as required by law. Moved: Tee Ann Hunter Seconded: Bill Goodman Vote: Ayes—Hunter, Goodman, Leary, Levine, Engman, Howe and DePaolo Item 10 Discuss and consider setting a public hearing regarding a proposed local law amending Chapter 184 of the Town of Ithaca Code Entitled "Noise" to Delete Section 184- 12 A(9) Concerning Notification of Neighbors and Add a Section 184-12 E to Permit the Adopted 11-8-2013 10 Waiving of Public Hearings. (The Town will take responsibility for notification of neighbors) TB Resolution No. 2013 - 127: Setting a Public Hearing Regarding a Local Law Amending Chapter 184 of the Town of Ithaca Code Entitled "Noise" to Delete Section 184-12 A (9) Concerning Notification of Neighbors and Modify Section 184-12 E to Permit the Waiving of Public Hearings Whereas notification had been the responsibility of the noise permit applicant and Whereas the Town of Ithaca will be assuming responsibility for notifying neighbors of public hearings to be held regarding events for which noise permits are required, Now Therefore Be It Resolved that the Ithaca Town Board will hold a public hearing at 5:30 p.m. at a meeting to be held at the Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca,New York on the 18th day of November, 2013 regarding a proposed local law amending Chapter 184 of the Town of Ithaca Code Entitled"Noise"to Delete Section 184-12 A (9) Concerning Notification of Neighbors and Modify Section 184-12 E to Permit the Waiving of Public Hearings, and Be it further resolved that at such time and place all persons interested in the proposed local law may be heard concerning the same; and Be it further resolved that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca Journal and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the Town of Ithaca. Moved: Bill Goodman Seconded: Tee Ann Hunter Vote: Ayes—Goodman, Hunter, DePaolo, Levine, Leary, Howe and Engman Item 11 Discuss and consider setting a public hearing regarding a proposed local law amending Chapter 200 of the Town of Ithaca Code Entitled "Parks and Recreation Areas" to Change Section 200-3, Paragraphs B, E,F and G concerning use of the parks by multiple persons, cleaning up pet waste and locations for field games and picnics TB Resolution No. 2013 - 128: Setting a Public Hearing Regarding a Local Law Amending Chapter 200 of the Town of Ithaca Code Entitled "Parks and Recreation Areas" to Change Section 200-3, Paragraphs B, E, F and G Concerning Use of the Parks by Multiple Persons, Cleaning up Pet Waste and Locations for Field Games and Picnics Be It Resolved that the Ithaca Town Board will hold a public hearing at 5:30 p.m. at a meeting to be held at Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca,New York on the 18th day of November, 2013 regarding a proposed local law amending Chapter 200 of the Town of Ithaca Code Entitled"Parks and Recreation Areas"to Change Section 200-3, Paragraphs B, E, F and G Adopted 11-8-2013 11 concerning use of the parks by multiple persons, cleaning up pet waste and locations for field games and picnics, and Be it further resolved that at such time and place all persons interested in the proposed local law may be heard concerning the same; and Be it further resolved that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca Journal and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the Town of Ithaca. Moved: Bill Goodman Seconded: Tee Ann Hunter Vote: Ayes—Goodman, Hunter, Engman, Levine, Leary, Howe and DePaolo Item 12 Discuss and Consider Referral of a Zoning Board of Appeals Request for Review of Chapter 270 Section 205-A Regarding Existing Non-Conforming Structures Mr. Bates and Ms. Brock explained that the Zoning Board of Appeals has requested clarification and review of this section of the Code because they have gotten a number of appeal requests and they have interpreted it the same as the Code Department but it could be interpreted another way and the Zoning Board wants to be clear they are interpreting the intent of the Town Board Code and to ask the Town Board to clarify it so residents understand it better and to make it less ambiguous. The recent example was changing a porch to an enclosed room and that was interpreted as a increasing the nonconformity and they disagreed. If a footprint is not enlarged, there is no increase in the mind of the residents but the Zoning Board interprets that it is. Many of the same type of increase requests come from lakefront property and the change there can be dramatic and affect other people's view of the lake. Discussion followed with Ms. Hunter saying she felt pretty strongly that no increase should be allowed and she wanted to be clear that the Codes and Ordinances should know what the Board as a whole thinks on this issue prior to examining it. Ms. Brock went over various examples of increases. Discussion followed. The Board forwarded the topic to Codes and Ordinances for review and recommendation to the full Board. Item 13 Discuss and consider declining Safe Routes to School Grant—Speed Indicators Mr. DePaolo stated that he is hesitant to say no to money and asked Mr. Weber to elaborate on the 100 hours of staff time he is saying it would take to do what the State is requiring. Mr. Weber explained that they would have to revise the engineering plans that were done for the Warren Road walkway to bring them up to current standards; they would have to meet with the State's Archeology and Environmental Departments which is a catch as catch can and it took us over a month for someone to do the site visit for the little bridge associated with the walkway. Mr. DePaolo still thought 100 hours was a lot and Mr. Weber said it is basically babysitting the State and chasing them down which can take weeks if not months. Mr. Weber added that the State changed their guidelines since the initial Warren Road grant we thought we were going to be able to just piggyback on. After we submitted this grant request they told us we could not piggyback and we really only wanted two to begin with; they told us to ask for two more to make it"worthier"but we only want and need two. The two we want would Adopted 11-8-2013 12 cost us the same as what our matching costs in the grant will be. Mr. Weber added they were hoping to have this in place by the beginning of this school year. TB Resolution No. 2013-129: Rescind Acceptance of Grant Award from NYS Department of Transportation for the Safe Routes To School Grant for Speed Indicator Signs, Pin 3755.66 Whereas, the Town Board on September 10, 2012 authorized(TB Resolution No. 2012-170) applying to New York State for funding through the Safe Routes to School grant program for the purchase and installation of Speed Indicator Signs in the School Zone on Warren Road; and Whereas, the Town Board on April 8, 2013 authorized(TB Resolution No. 2013-059) acceptance of the NYS Department of Transportation grant award for the purchase and installation of Speed indicator signs; and Whereas, the New York State Department of Transportation has not yet executed the Federal- Aid Local Project Agreement (PIN 3755.66)regarding this grant award; and Whereas, the Town has not yet designed or installed the Speed Indicator signs included in this grant award and has incurred no costs for which it would be entitled to reimbursement pursuant to this grant award; and Whereas, the Town will not incur any penalties if it rescinds its acceptance of this grant award; and Whereas, the Public Works Committee discussed this issue at its September 17, 2013 meeting and recommended the Town Board rescind the grant acceptance; and Whereas, for the reasons outlined in the Memo from the Director of Public Works to the Town Board dated October 7, 2013, it is not in the Town's best interest to participate in this Safe Routes to School program; Now Therefore Be It Resolved, the Town of Ithaca rescinds acceptance of the funding awarded by the NYS Department of Transportation for the Speed Indicator signs, and the Supervisor of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized to send a letter to the NYS Department of Transportation stating that the Town Board has rescinded its acceptance and withdraws its approval of the Federal-Aid Local Project Agreement, PIN 3755.66. Moved: Rod Howe Seconded: Bill Goodman Vote: Ayes—Howe, Goodman, Engman, Leary and Levine Nays—DePaolo and Hunter Adopted 11-8-2013 13 Item 14 Discuss and consider authorization for the Chief Operator of Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility to sign the NYSEG Interconnection Agreement for Cogeneration System TB Resolution 2013 - 130 : Authorization for the Chief Operator of IAWWTF to Sign NYSEG Interconnection Agreement for Cogeneration System Whereas, the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility(IAWWTF) is a jointly owned facility by the City of Ithaca and Towns of Dryden and Ithaca, and Whereas, a new biogas utilizing microturbine cogeneration system was installed as part of the Johnson Controls Inc. Energy Performance Contract, and Whereas,NYSEG supplies electricity to the IAWWTF into which the cogeneration system is connected and Whereas,NYSEG requires that any interconnection comply with"New York State Standardized Interconnection Requirements and Application Process for New Distributed Generators 2 MW or Less Connected in Parallel with Utility Distribution Systems", and Whereas, the interconnection agreement contained within the requirements must be signed, now, therefore be it Resolved, that the IAWWTF Chief Operator be authorized to sign the required Interconnection Agreement. Moved: Tee Ann Hunter Seconded: Rich DePaolo Vote: Ayes—Hunter, DePaolo, Engman, Levine, Leary, Goodman and Howe Item 15 Discuss and consider a resolution of appreciation for Ronald Krantz, Zoning Board Member TB Resolution No. 2013 - 131: Recognition of Ronald Krantz Dedicated Years of Service to the Community Whereas, Ronald Krantz was appointed to the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 10, 1996 and has served continuously through September 25, 2013; and Whereas, Ron has served on the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals with distinguished devotion for over 17 years; and Whereas, the Town of Ithaca has greatly benefited from Ron's thoughtful consideration, devotion, expertise, enthusiasm and his desire to serve our community in order to make it a better place to live; and Adopted 11-8-2013 14 Whereas, the Town of Ithaca is indebted to Ron for his invaluable contributions and devotion to the community; Now, Therefore Be It Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca, on behalf of the Town and its citizens, expresses its sincere appreciation, admiration and gratitude to Ronald Krantz for his distinguished and dedicated service to our community. Moved: Tee Ann Hunter Seconded: Eric Levine Vote: Hunter, Levine, Leary, Goodman, DePaolo, Howe and Engman Item 16 Discuss and consider authorization for the Town Supervisor to sign a Trail and Easement Agreement with Ithaca Center Service Company(Longview) TB Resolution No. 2013-132: SEOR— Acceptance of a Trail Easement and Right-of-Way Agreement on the Longview Property owned by Ithacare Center Service Company, Inc. and Tompkins County Industrial Development Agency WHEREAS, this action is the acceptance by the Town Board of a trail easement and right-of-way for future development of a trail that will traverse (north-south) through a portion of Tax Parcel#39-1-1.31 (1 Bella Vista Drive) owned by Ithacare Center Service Company, Inc. and Tompkins County Industrial Development Agency and on which the Longview Senior Living Community is located, and WHEREAS, this is an unlisted action for which the Town of Ithaca Town Board is acting in an uncoordinated environmental review with respect to the project, and WHEREAS, the Town Board, on October 7, 2013, reviewed and accepted as adequate the short Environmental Assessment Form(EAF), Parts I and II for this action, RESOLVED: that the Town of Ithaca Town Board hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance in accordance with the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act for the above referenced action as proposed based on the information in the EAF Part I and for the reasons set forth in the EAF Part II, and, therefore, neither a Full Environmental Assessment Form nor an Environmental Impact Statement will be required. Moved: Rod Howe Seconded: Tee Ann Hunter Vote: Ayes—Howe, Hunter, DePaolo, Leary, Levine, Goodman and Engman TB Resolution No. 2013-133: Acceptance by Town and Authorization for Town Supervisor to Sign Trail Easement and Right-of-Wav Agreement with Ithacare Center Service Company,Inc. and Tompkins County Industrial Development Agency Adopted 11-8-2013 15 Whereas, the Town's Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan(1997) identifies the "Aurora Street to Upper Buttermilk Path" as a proposed recreational trail that would extend north-south from Aurora Street to King Road West(Upper Buttermilk Falls State Park) in the Town of Ithaca, and Whereas, the property owned by Ithacare Center Service Company, Inc. ("Ithacare") and the Tompkins County Industrial Development Agency, located off Route 96B in the Town of Ithaca, on Tax Parcels #39-1-1.31 and#39-1-3.2,potentially offers an important link in this future multi-modal 10-foot wide trail, and Whereas, Ithacare is constructing and intends to operate patio homes for its senior living community on tax parcel No. 39-1-3.2, a 6± acre parcel of land, and Whereas, during discussions with the Town concerning the patio homes project, the Town of Ithaca requested, and Ithacare agreed, to grant the Town a 150-foot wide floating easement for future development by the Town of a trail which will be open to the public; and Whereas, because of a lack of space on the patio homes parcel to accommodate the trail, and to align the trail with a future trail in the vicinity that is identified in the Town's Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan, the floating easement is to be located on parcel#39-1-1.31, where the Longview Senior Living Community is located; and Whereas, the Town of Ithaca Planning Board required this floating easement as a condition of its May 15, 2012 Resolution No. 2012-026 approving the Final Site Plan for the Longview Patio Homes, and Whereas, once the trail is constructed the Town will relinquish its rights to the 150-foot wide easement and will maintain rights solely for that property necessary for trail maintenance, repair and reconstruction purposes, whose width is to be no greater than 18-feet, and Whereas, this action is classified as an Unlisted Action for which the Town Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, made a negative determination of environmental significance on October 7, 2013, Now Therefore Be It Resolved, that the Town Board approves and accepts the Trail Easement and Right-of-Way agreement with Ithacare Center Service Company, Inc. and Tompkins County Industrial Development Agency, and authorizes the Town Supervisor to enter into and execute thee Trail Easement and Right-of Way on behalf of the Town, subject to the approval of the Attorney for the Town. Moved: Bill Goodman Seconded: Rich DePaolo Vote: Ayes—Goodman, DePaolo, Hunter, Levine, Leary, Engman and Howe Adopted 11-8-2013 16 Added Item Acknowlege Receipt of the Independent Audit Report of the Town of Ithaca Justice Court Fund TB Resolution No. 2013 - 134: Acknowledge Receipt of the Independent Audit Report of the Town of Ithaca Justice Court Fund. Whereas, in accordance with the Uniform Justice Court Act, the Town Justice Courts provided their court records and dockets for examination to the Town, and Whereas, Sciarabba Walker and Company, LLP conducted an examination of Year Ending 2012 as prescribed and submitted their summary to the Town. Therefore Be It Resolved,that the Town Board acknowledges receipt of said report and will forward said report to the Court Clerks for submission to the New York State Office of Court Administration as required. Moved: Rod Howe Seconded: Tee Ann Hunter Vote: Ayes—Howe, Hunter, Leary, Levine, Goodman, Engman and DePaolo Item 17 Consider Consent Agenda Items TB Resolution No. 2013 - 135: Adopt Consent Agenda Be It Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves and/or adopts the following Consent Agenda items: a. Approval of Minutes of August 12, 2013 b. Town of Ithaca Abstract c. Bolton Point Abstract d. Approval of Project Assistant–Codes TB Resolution No. 2013 - 135a: Approval of Minutes of August 12, 2013 Whereas, the draft minutes of the August 12, 2013 meeting of the Town Board have been submitted for review and approval; Therefore Be It Resolved, that the Town Board hereby approves the submitted minutes as the final minutes of the August 12, 2013 meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca. TB Resolution No. 2013 - 135 b: Town of Ithaca Abstract Whereas the following numbered vouchers have been presented to the Ithaca Town Board for approval of payment; and Adopted 11-8-2013 17 Whereas the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town Board; now therefore be it Resolved that the governing Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of the said vouchers in total for the amounts indicated. VOUCHER NOS. 4372 - 4417 General Fund Town wide 29,593.44 General Fund Part Town 6,942.22 Highway Fund Part Town 106,391.27 Water Fund 12,387.24 Sewer Fund 285,793.04 Gateway Trail 13,892.02 Salt Storage Building Replacement 208,189.65 Whitetail Drive Reconstruction 146,988.75 Forest Home Lighting District 147.26 Glenside Lighting District 41.10 Renwick Heights Lighting District 58.86 Eastwood Commons Lighting District 145.06 Clover Lane Lighting District 16.82 Winner's Circle Lighting District 56.80 Burleigh Drive Lighting District 57.02 West Haven Road Lighting District 171.45 Coddington Road Lighting District 102.27 Trust and Agency 4,000.00 TOTAL 814,974.27 TB Resolution No. 2013-135c: Bolton Point Abstract Whereas, the following numbered vouchers for the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission have been presented to the governing Town Board for approval of payment; and Whereas, the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town Board; now, therefore, be it Resolved, that the governing Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of the said vouchers. Voucher Numbers: 2008-2007 Check Numbers: 14888-14887 Burdick Hill Tanks Project $ 350,286.70 Capital Impr/Repl Project $ 339,585.79 Operating Fund $ 43,781.89 TOTAL $ 733,654.38 Adopted 11-8-2013 18 Less Prepaid $ 35,647.25 TOTAL $ 698,007.13 TB Resolution No. 2013 - 135d: Appointment of Project Assistant-Codes Whereas, there is presently a vacancy in the temporary position of Project Assistant in the Code Enforcement Department, which is a position not to exceed six months as an internship opportunity working on a specific project; and Whereas, Code Enforcement has budgeted to hired a temporary project employee to receive valuable support on items such as scanning building permits and checking databases and files for accurate information for transfer to Municity software; and Whereas, the Director of Code Enforcement has determined that Allison Lonsky possesses the necessary knowledge and skills to satisfactorily perform the duties of the Project Assistant position for these projects and makes the recommendation for his appointment; Now, therefore,be it Resolved, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the appointments of Allison Lonsky as Project Assistant for Code Enforcement, effective October 3, 2013 through December 31, 2013 as a temporary position not to exceed 240 hours for the remainder of the year, at the hourly wage of$11.65, from account number B8010.100, no benefits apply. Moved: Tee Ann Hunter Seconded: Bill Goodman Vote: Ayes—Hunter, Goodman, Leary, Levine, DePaolo, Howe and Engman Item 18 Continue review of Draft Comprehensive Plan Comments Sue summarized the second round of comments from Cornell saying they were concerned about the Future Land Use Map and what was and was not included in the Institutional area. Ms. Ritter said they have had conversations with them explaining that the Future Land Use Map is not a zoning map but rather a character map and so those areas designated are supposed to stay in character so for example, their horse barns should stay horse barns, not apartment complexes and that type of thing. They are worried that changes that they want to do will not be allowed in what we envision some zones to be. Mr. Engman thought the latest comments are not that different from what we have heard from them before and the word"institutional" is misleading and what we really mean is designating campuses without us being so involved. We were searching for a way to make it easier for them without opening up floodgates to allow them to do whatever they wish wherever they wish. Yes, right now they are pastures, but they could be thinking anything in the future so we have to make sure we are protected from uses we don't want to see. Ms. Ritter also said they think the proposed density for the East Hill Plaza area is too low and she will be contacting them to get more details on that. Adopted 11-8-2013 19 Mr. Tasman added that we do have a definition of campus which includes a group of buildings serving a certain purpose so it encompasses things like the hospital, South Hill Business Campus and the colleges. He said in talking with their representative, he did not think our visions are all that different but they were confused with the terminology. Natural Resource section—Ms. Ritter read her suggested changes in response to a comment about noise. There would be a new goal with two new recommendations Goal—Protect neighborhoods from noise disturbances and pollution including the cumulative impacts of noise. 1. Prevent noise pollution through ongoing enforcement of noise regulations 2. Establish performance and design standards to address and reduce the effects of noise pollution. The second recommendation could be done through site plan approval. Land Use Map We had two areas we were going to look at again. There is the triangle area on Troy Road and also West Hill and then the increase in density for the Agricultural designation. West Hill The Board discussed the future of the Holochcuk site and the options that are in play now that it is on the market. Ms. Ritter noted that she and Dan have been talking and wanted to change some of the current designation to semi-rural instead of existing neighborhood because it is close to Coy Glen and there are issues with sewer. The section under discussion is divided into a number of smaller parcels so we would like to take some of those out and make them yellow, Semi-Rural Neighborhood. There was no objection to that. Mr. DePaolo asked about the lot lines north of Elm Street and Elm Street Extension and asked if there was a development planned for that already or already there. His concern is that Elm Street is not configured for an increase in traffic so he would favor including that area in the low density Semi-Rural designation. Discussion focused on looking at what we could do to minimize development on the south end and look to the north for new centers or neighborhoods etc. and how we could do this through form-based code and the different kinds of transects were talked about. Ms. Hunter asked about the area north of Mecklenburg Road which is identified as an Established Neighborhood which is the Lindermann Creek development and she asked if that type of density corresponded with the Established Neighborhood density. Mr. Tasman said it is probably lower and the design is not what we are looking for in increased density. She asked if there was something developed already, are we identifying it as Existing Neighborhood? Mr. Tasman explained that they are and any future development proposed in the area we would influence through form-based design. Ms. Hunter asked about the Hollochuck property and what happens if it doesn't sell? Can we designate it as something other than what it has been approved as? Ms. Brock responded that we can change zoning and their rights are not vested until they have substantial expenditure and substantial construction. So as long as the zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Adopted 11-8-2013 20 you can change the zoning. Can you go back and change the underlying document, being the Comprehensive Plan and Ms. Brock thought the Board could if it was consistent with the Town's vision. Ms. Hunter said she has a bit of a conflict because as we have approved projects over the recent years, we are backing into the Route 96 Corridor and we need to take a look at that and perhaps minimize development to the south so we can concentrate a vibrant build out that will sustain the New Neighborhood concept. Ms. Ritter added that one of the ideas is to do a professional charette for that area and turn it into a regulatory plan so everything is laid out. There was some discussion regarding the land still available around Lindermann and Ms. Hunter would really like to have more control over the build out requirements there and designate it New Neighborhood to allow for that. Mr. Goodman added that this is why the Land Use Map does not have parcel lines and the areas are fluid and can change in any direction either smaller or larger. The boundaries are not exact and won't be until zoning is established. Mr. Engman stated that he felt we are at a point where we have to make some decisions because we can have a lot of positive influence if we can get this Comprehensive Plan done and move on through the process. We have dodged a bullet with that particular development and we need to move forward so we can influence what happens there in the future. We need to come to the next meeting ready to make some decisions on the triangle area and the agricultural density. Ms. Ixary said she is not willing to take housing off the table and Mr. DePaolo responded that they are not suggesting that but rather up-zoning other areas to keep housing together and support small commercial etc. Ms. Leary asked how many potential units we have just taken off the map and all she has heard is how can we take more off the map. She asked if anyone else on the Board felt we needed more housing in the Town and Mr. DePaolo said he is not saying take housing of the map, rather he is suggesting we up-zone in the areas we are proposing to build in. The same number of units but in a different place because you are more likely to get the proximity to the services that people are going to want if they live in these places. Spreading these places out is a losing proposition and we need to do what we can do to put more people in a smaller area. Ms. Leary responded that some of these developments that haven't happened are a lost opportunity to her rather than dodging a bullet. Wanting more housing does not mean we are selling out to private developers. Mr. Engman clarified that he meant we had little control over what that development would look like and in that way we have dodged a bullet; we can do better than some of the projects that have been proposed and built but we have to have the framework to do it. Mr. Tasman thought the Board might want to look at the density numbers for the New Neighborhood areas. There are wide ranges to accommodate the transects. Ms. Leary said she wants a range of housing options not just Fall Creek density or Green Acres and Mr. DePaolo responded that he agrees there should be choice and there will be different choices. Housing stock will turn over, we are just concentrating on other styles as well which we don't really have Adopted 11-8-2013 21 now so they are not mutually exclusive. We just may want to up-zone some more so we are not so spread out. Mr. Howe asked for an outline on the topics and questions we need to address at the next meeting. Meeting was adjourned upon motion and a second at 7:35 p.m. Submitteabv/ Paulette Terwilliger Adopted 11-8-2013 22 �0[7 Tompkins County DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING I 121 East Court Street Ithaca,New York 14850 Edward C.Marx,AICP Telephone(607)274-5560 Commissioner of Planning Fax(607)274-5578 October 7,2013 Mr.Michael Smith,Environmental Planner Town of Ithaca 215 N.Tioga Street Ithaca,NY 14850 9 Re: Review Pursuant to§239—I,-m and—n of the New York State General Municipal Law Action: Rezoning proposal for certain lands between Mecklenburg and Bostwick Road to Conservation Zone Dear Mr.Smith: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposal identified above for review and comment by the Tompkins County Planning Department pursuant to§239-1 and-m of the New York State General Municipal Law.The Department has reviewed the proposal,as submitted,and has determined that it may have negative inter-community,or county-wide impacts as described below.We recommend modification of the proposal. If the Board does not incorporate the recommendations,such approval will require a vote of a supermajority (meaning a majority plus one)of all members of the decision-making body. Recommended Modifications • The proposed Conservation Zone boundary includes the northeast corner of the Tompkins County Public Works facility grounds which is regularly utilized by the County Highway Division.We note that the Low Density Residential Zone currently allows for this type of"municipal or public utility purpose"whereas Conservation Zones make no such provisions. We recommend that the boundary of the Conservation Zone be modified so as to exclude Tax Parcel 31.-1-10.1 that is currently used by the County Highway Division for materials storage. Please inform us of your decision so that we can make it a part of the record. Sincerely, Edward C.Marx,AICP Commissioner of Planning i E 1 InAsion through(Diversity I Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone Proposal 617.20 October 2, 2013 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: El Part 1 FVIPart 2 F Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ®■ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ®C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Rezoning-Enactment of a Local Law to Amend Chapter 270 of Ithaca Code,Titled"Zoning"and Associated Map Name of Action Town of Ithaca Town Board Name of Lead Agency Herbert J. Engman Town Supervisor Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signatu Responsi Officer in ad Agency Signature of Pre rer(If different from responsible officer) Date Page 1 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: Urban 17 Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) MT Forest ID Agriculture Other approximately 12 residences cemetery,old gravel mine site (Data Source: Tompkins County 2. Total acreage of project area: 717 acres. Land use GIs Coverage, 2007) APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 103 acres unchanged acres Forested 561 acres unchanged acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 25 acres unchanged acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) unknown acres unchanged acres Water Surface Area unknownacres unchanged acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 11 acres unchanged acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1 acres unchanged acres Other(Indicate type) cemetery 4 acres unchanged acres residential(lawn driveway,house,etc) 12 acres unchanged acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: Well drained 76%of site Fi Moderately well drained 9%of site. Poorly drained 8%of site Rock Outcrop & Former Gravel Mine 7% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 20+/- acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Fol Yes No a. What is depth to bedrock variable (in feet) 5, Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: (Data Source: Tompkins County 0-10% 30% 10- 15% 30 % ®✓ 15% or greater 40 % soil Survey) 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes ®■ No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? r Yes FN]No g, What is the depth of the water table? variable (in feet) g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Yes El No Hunting possible with private owner's 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities resent) exist in the project area? Yes n Nopermisshun; Cornell g, g g pp presently P .1 allows hunting with permit Page 3 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? r]Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes r7 No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes RNo 18. Is the site located in EYes gricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? M. No 19. Is the site located in or substantial[ contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? rolYes No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? El Yes ®. No B, Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: N/A acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: N/A acres initially; N/A acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: N/A acres. (717 +/- acres to be rezoned) d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: N/A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially N/A N/A N/A N/A Ultimately N/A N/A N/A N/A i. Dimensions (in feet)of largest proposed structure: N/A height; N/A width; N/A length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? N/A tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Yes 11 No N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 17 Yes 17 No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? R Yes ri No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? N/A acres. Page 5 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes F70No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ©Yes RNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? F]Yes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? MYes RMNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes r No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24, Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? F]Yes 17M No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 2. What is the zoning classifications) of the site? Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential,Agricultural,and Planned Development Zone No. 8 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? See Attached Analysis 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Conservation Zone 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? See Attached Analysis 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes No EBoththe wn of It haca's Comprehensive Plan(1993)and Park,Recreation,and Open Space Plan(1997)state the Town's nt to ensuring protection of sensitive environmental resources and target this general area for protection. 7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile radius of proposed action? Land uses include residential,agriculture,municipal facilities,church,cemetery,Town parks and preserves,and open space. Zoning classifications include Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential,Agricultural,High Density Residential, Multiple Residence,and Planned Development Zone No. 8. g, Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/4 mile? Yes No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone Proposal Rezoning of Certain Lands Between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road State Environmental Quality Review Part I—Project Information C.Zoning and Planning Information 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? The proposed rezoning will affect approximately 717 acres of land currently zoned Low Density Residential (LDR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), Agricultural (AG),and Planned Development Zone (PDZ) No. 8. The LDR zone allows a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet (1.5 lots per acre), the MDR zone allows a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet (2.9 lots per acre), and the AG zone allows one lot for every 7 acres (0.14 lots per acre) and includes clustering restrictions. The PDZ No. 8 allows a mix of uses on the EcoVillage property, but the "EcoVillage Site Usage Areas" map (2012) shows the area to be rezoned already classified as Natural Area, a permanently preserved natural open space area, and does not have any development potential under either zoning situation. The Conservation Zone allows a minimum lot size of 7 acres(0.14 lots per acre)and includes clustering restrictions. Of the 717 acres, approximately 12 acres are roads (and associated right-of-ways) and would not be affected by the rezoning. Of the remaining 705 acres, there are 561 acres (35 properties) currently zoned LDR, 10 acres (1 property)currently zoned MDR, 128 acres (4 properties) currently zoned AG, and 6 acres (1 property) currently zoned PDZ No.8. Also not affected by the rezoning are 127 acres owned by Cornell University (Coy Glen Natural Area)and 23 acres on Culver Road owned by the Town of Ithaca (Dress Woods Preserve and Gerda Knegtmen Glen Preserve). These 150 acres are already protected open space (deed restrictions or other permanent protection) and would not have any development potential. Tompkins County also owns 3 acres within the proposed conservation zone boundary as part of their Public Works Facility on Bostwick Road,which has also been removed from the potential development acreage. There may be other properties within the proposed zone that also have deed restrictions or other limitations on future development, but those have not been removed from this analysis, as all individual deeds were not reviewed. The total acreage available under each zone is shown in the following table. Acres Available for Development in each Zone Current Zone Acres within Proposed Acres Owned by Town, Acres Available for Conservation Zone County or Cornell Development in Proposed Conservation Zone LDR 561 153 408 MDR 10 0 10 AG 128 0 128 PDZ No. 8 6 0 6 Total. 705 153 552 1 Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone Proposal difficult because of the extra precautions and soil importation needed to stabilize the slopes for road construction and create stable and weight bearing house pads. While sparse individual housing sites could potentially be developed, full-scale development would be prohibitively expensive and unwise. For that reason, the area identified as having Hudson and Dunkirk soils (approximately 7 acres) was removed from the development potential calculation. This area was also already removed in the slopes 25%or greater analysis above,as they typically have these steeper slopes. The total acreage amounts for each of the environmental constraints is as follows: Environmental Constraints Totals Current Zone Acres within Total Acres of Total Acres of Total Acres of Total Acres of Proposed Stream Buffer 25%or Greater Hudson and Environmental Conservation Slopes Dunkirk Soils Constraints Zone LDR 561 99 171 6 276 MDR 10 4 1 1 6 AG 128 28 26 0 54 PDZ No.8 6 0 0 0 0 Total: 705 131 198 7 1 336 Before the environmental constraints can be subtracted from the developable acreage of each zone,the overlapping areas of stream buffers, steep slopes, and Hudson and Dunkirk soils were determined and subtracted out. The acreage for the Town, County, and Cornell owned lands which wouldn't have any development potential, also have been removed from the development acreage. Since these lands also overlap with some of the environmental constraints, that was determined and subtracted out. The table below provides the total developable acreage for each zone. Developable Acreage for each Zone Current Zone Acres within Total Acres of Total Acres of Developable Acreage Proposed Environmental Envir.Constraints Conservation Constraints with and Protected Zone Overlaps Properties with Removed Overlaps Removed LDR 561 220 279 282 MDR 10 4 4 6 AG 128 42 42 86 PDZ No. 8 6 0 0 N/A Total: 705 266 325 374 The number of potential housing units were calculated based on the number of developable acres for each zone, as calculated above,the allowed density in each zone, as modified by a buildable area factor and accessory apartment factor. The buildable area factor accounts for streets, parks or open space, and other land not actually devoted to building lots. In the LDR, MDR, AG, and Conservation Zone, an accessory apartment is allowed, so that was factored into the total number of potential new units in both the existing and proposed zoning calculations. 3 WO Att chr�ent ' E vironme' tital A00sshent 0. Rezoning Proposal Southwe-t Glens ' � Cr ee s Co.wrserua iQr Zone Str ar $offers,Mopes 5'%crr ,rater, Mudsor�j�unkia k 5olls,.ah4 f6wn/Coon-Y/Cornell Owned Properties 0 Meckl rt ur Rd- proposed Conservation Zone i Stream Buffers Slopes 25%or Greater s (�D Hudson and Dunkirk Soils (�D Town/County/Cornell Owned Properties Streams Topography(10'contours) coy atural pods , Pce'° e * GeY - • t< Glen �, _ _ `4°%`=- - ber e - - - _ �;_ 'far'rrpkii�s" , ,. a eounEV i IF Feet map Produced by:Town of Ithaca Planning Department N 0 Sao t,aoo 2.oQO;. September 24,2013 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) ! In completing the farm the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. ! The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. ! The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. ! The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ! In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO YES rl Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ® M Yes MNo rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table Yes []No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more E] Yes r7No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or [--] Yes MNo generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or M Yes MNo involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove r Yes E]No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? EINO M YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. 17 Yes M No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not M Yes 0 No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater M E]Yes 1:1 No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water Yes F1 No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ©Yes El No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which M Yes r]No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons M M Yes M No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into r Yes No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or M F]Yes ❑No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without r] El M Yes D No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ® M Yes n No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: El DYes 11 No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. M M F7 Yes ri No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, r7 Yes 17No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: El 0 DYes E]No g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? r7m NO 17 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident 1 17 Yes No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of 17 Yes F1 No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: El E]Yes D No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to F7 ® 17 Yes M No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields, pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of M M Yes M No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 M Yes M No acres of agricultural land or,if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: 0Yes D No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? F] NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. r] U Yes r7 No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ri M M Yes 17No • Other impacts: El El ❑Yes O No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? r27 NO ri YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ri FiYes riNo • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the Yes ri No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the rl ri 17 Yes 17No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the M F] Fl Yes n No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ E]Yes r1No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [ENO M YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of M n 17Yes 0 No hazardous substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" 11 E]Yes oNo in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous,highly reactive,radioactive, irritating, infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied 11 MYes 0 No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other E]Yes 1:1 No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: 11 E]Yes ONo IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? [E NO rJYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the 0 ® riYes 0 No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating 17 0 E]Yes n No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ® nYes ®No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. 0 17Yes O No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, M ❑ nYes 17No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community 17 17 rYes DNo services(e.g.schools,police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone Proposal Rezoning of Certain Lands Between Mecklenburg Road and Bostwick Road State Environmental Quality Review Part II—Description of Project Impacts and Their Magnitude Impact on Plants and Animals 8.Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? 9.Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? The project will have a positive impact on plants and animals. The Coy Glen UNA (UNA-139) identifies one plant species (Spring Avens, Geum vernum—G5, S1/S2, L3) designated in New York State as endangered,threatened, rare or exploitably vulnerable that is found on this site. The three Unique Natural Area descriptions also identify several rare or scarce plants and animals that exist in this area. Other reasons for the selection of the UNAs include rare or scarce community types, diverse fauna, old-growth forests, quality example of plant community, and diverse flora. New York Nature Explorer (www.dec.nv.gov/natureexplorer/) has identified several plants that are identified as threatened or endangered that may be located in the proposed Conservation Zone area. The plants identified include Basil-balm (last documented in 1922, endangered — G5, S1/S2), Catfoot (last documented in 1919, endangered — G4/G5/T3?, SH), Reflexed Sedge (last documented in 2001, threatened — G5, S2/S3), Spreading Chervil (last documented in 1894, endangered — G5, S1), Swamp Lousewort, threatened — G5, S2), and Marsh Horsetail (last documented in 1999, threatened —G5, S2). A comprehensive field study has not been completed to verify the presence of any of these or other rare or scarce plant species within the proposed Conservation Zone boundary. The reduction in density will help this area to remain largely undeveloped with the potential that these and other rare and scarce plant or animal species will to continue to exist in the unique habitats. Impact on Agricultural Land Resources 10.Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? The project will not have a negative impact on agricultural land resources. Within the proposed conservation zone area, there are approximately 25 acres of active agricultural lands on two farms within Tompkins County Agricultural District No. 2. A"garden, nursery or farm" is a permitted principal use within the existing Conservation Zone (Town Code Section 270-11). These farms also have large amounts of forested areas on their properties. Forest management and timber harvesting is also allowed as either a principal or accessory use in the existing Conservation Zone. It is not anticipated that these farms will be impacted by the proposed rezoning. Impact on Aesthetic Resources 11.Will proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? The project will have a positive impact on aesthetic resources. 1 Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone Proposal Impact on Transportation 15.Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? The project will have a positive impact on transportation systems. The proposed rezoning will insure a lower density of development on more than 700 acres of land, thus contributing less traffic to the already rising congestion coming off West Hill as it enters the City of Ithaca. The development potential will be reduced from approximately 398 new housing units under the existing zoning to approximately 46 new housing units under the proposed Conservation Zone. Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood 19.Will proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? The project will have a positive impact on the character of the community. The Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan (1993) designates the general area of the proposed Conservation Zone as conservation/open space and the Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan (1997), also identifies the area as a target for conservation zoning. Both of these Plans clearly state the Town's commitment to ensuring protection of its open space and sensitive environmental resources, to insure maintaining the quality and character of community. The area identified for rezoning contains environmentally sensitive areas with steep slopes, erodible soils, numerous watercourses and deep gorges, and unique rare plant species. This largely undeveloped area provides important habitat for plants and animals and provides an important scenic resource valued by the community. The Tompkins County Environmental Management Council has designated three individual Unique Natural Areas (Coy Glen Road Hackberry Woods — UNA-138, Coy Glen — UNA-139, and Culver Creek Ravine and Woods — UNA-140) within the area proposed for rezoning. This designation is due to the existence of steep slopes, erodible soils, numerous watercourses and deep gorges, rare and scare plant and animal species,old-growth forest, and because of its contribution of scenic and aesthetic value. The Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan (2004) also recognizes the important character of this area. The Plan identifies fourteen distinct and significant "Natural Features Focus Areas" in Tompkins County. The area proposed to be rezoned is included as part of "The Gorges" area, and is described as having "hanging cliffs with substantial waterfalls". The Plan recommends the area be considered for conservation efforts to insure protection. The proposed Conservation Zone will help to protect these important scenic and ecological amenities that give the Town and the surrounding area its special quality and character. In addition, the Conservation Zone will help to insure that development does not occur on the environmentally sensitive steep slopes, which could pose lasting impacts due to uncontrolled erosion and sedimentation, degraded water quality, increased stormwater runoff, and concerns for slope stability. 3 /icir v 12-12-79(3199)-9c SEQR State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Project Number N/A Date: October 8, 2013 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Town of Ithaca Town Board as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant environmental impact and a Draft Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Rezoning - Enactment of a Local Law to Amend Chapter 270 of Ithaca Town Code, Titled "Zoning" and Associated Map. SEQR Status: Type 1 ✓❑ Unlisted ❑ Conditioned Negative Declaration: ❑ Yes ❑ ✓ No Description of Action: The proposed action is the enactment by the Town of Ithaca Town Board of a local law that would amend the Town of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance and Map to rezone certain lands along and adjacent to Five Mile Drive, Coy Glen Road, Elm Street Extension, Culver Road, Bostwick Road, Poole Road, and Mecklenburg Road from Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Agricultural, and Planned Development Zone No. 8 to Conservation Zone. The rezoning affects approximately 717 acres of mostly undeveloped land. This area proposed for rezoning is considered environmentally sensitive and includes natural and scenic resources considered to be of significance to the community as indicated in the Town's Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan (1997) and Comprehensive Plan (1993), and as summarized in the Conservation Board's draft report entitled "Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone" (11/05/2012). The Town seeks to minimize environmental impacts to this area from future development by reducing residential densities and encouraging sensitive land use. The Conservation Zone provides a mechanism to achieve this goal by minimizing development to one house per seven acres, and providing additional protective measures and guidelines as outlined in Article V of the Town of Ithaca Code. Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county. A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended.) Within the Town of Ithaca, approximately 717 acres between Mecklenburg Rd and Bostwick Rd Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone Attachment to Negative Declaration Form Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Reasons Supporting This Determination: Based on review of the project at a Town Board meeting on October 7, 2013, a negative determination of environmental significance has been made for the above referenced action by the Town of Ithaca Town Board, in accordance with the requirements of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 148 Environmental Quality Review of the Town of Ithaca Code. The proposal was found to have multiple positive environmental impacts, with no significant adverse environmental impacts having been identified. The Town Board, at their October 7, 2013 meeting, reviewed and accepted as adequate the Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I and II prepared by the Town Planning staff, and other materials. The above EAF references a draft report prepared by the Town Conservation Board and Planning staff. In particular,the following specific conclusions were reached by the Town Board. 1. Impact on Plants and Animals: The project will have a positive impact on plants and animals. The Coy Glen UNA (UNA-139) identifies one plant species (Spring Avens, Geum vernum — G5, S1/S2, L3) designated in New York State as endangered, threatened, rare or exploitably vulnerable that is found on this site. The three Unique Natural Area descriptions also identify several rare or scarce plants and animals that exist in this area, Other reasons for the selection of the UNAs include rare or scarce community types, diverse fauna, old-growth forests, quality example of plant community, and diverse flora. New York Nature Explorer (www.dec.nv.gov/natureexplorer/) has identified several plants that are identified as threatened or endangered that may be located in the proposed Conservation Zone area. The plants identified include Basil-balm (last documented in 1922, endangered — G5, S1/S2), Catfoot (last documented in 1919, endangered — G4/G5/T3?, SH), Reflexed Sedge (last documented in 2001, threatened — G5, S2/S3), Spreading Chervil (last documented in 1894, endangered — G5, S1), Swamp Lousewort, threatened — G5, S2), and Marsh Horsetail (last documented in 1999, threatened — G5, S2). A comprehensive field study has not been completed to verify the presence of any of these or other rare or scarce plant species within the proposed Conservation Zone boundary. The reduction in density will help this area to remain largely undeveloped with the potential that these and other rare and scarce plant or animal species will to continue to exist in the unique habitats. 2. Impact on Agricultural Land Resources: The project will not have a negative impact on agricultural land resources. Within the proposed conservation zone area, there are approximately 25 acres of active agricultural lands on two farms within Tompkins County Agricultural District No. 2. A "garden, nursery or farm" is a permitted principal use within the existing Conservation Zone (Town Code Section 270-11). These farms also have large amounts of forested areas on their properties. Forest management and timber harvesting is also allowed as either a principal or accessory use in the existing Conservation Zone. It is not anticipated that these farms will be impacted by the proposed rezoning. Southwest Glens and Creeks Conservation Zone Ithaca. The development potential will be reduced from approximately 398 new housing units under the existing zoning to approximately 46 new housing units under the proposed Conservation Zone. 7. Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood: The project will have a positive impact on the character of the community. The Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan (1993) designates the general area of the proposed Conservation Zone as conservation/open space and the Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan (1997), also identifies the area as a target for conservation zoning. Both of these Plans clearly state the Town's commitment to ensuring protection of its open space and sensitive environmental resources, to insure maintaining the quality and character of community. The area identified for rezoning contains environmentally sensitive areas with steep slopes, erodible soils, numerous watercourses and deep gorges, and unique rare plant species. This largely undeveloped area provides important habitat for plants and animals and provides an important scenic resource valued by the community. The Tompkins County Environmental Management Council has designated three individual Unique Natural Areas (Coy Glen Road Hackberry Woods — UNA-138, Coy Glen — UNA-139, and Culver Creek Ravine and Woods — UNA-140) within the area proposed for rezoning. This designation is due to the existence of steep slopes, erodible soils, numerous watercourses and deep gorges, rare and scare plant and animal species,old-growth forest, and because of its contribution of scenic and aesthetic value. The Tompkins County Comprehensive Plan (2004) also recognizes the important character of this area. The Plan identifies fourteen distinct and significant "Natural Features Focus Areas" in Tompkins County. The area proposed to be rezoned is included as part of "The Gorges" area, and is described as having "hanging cliffs with substantial waterfalls". The Plan recommends the area be considered for conservation efforts to insure protection. The proposed Conservation Zone will help to protect these important scenic and ecological amenities that give the Town and the surrounding area its special quality and character. In addition, the Conservation Zone will help to insure that development does not occur on the environmentally sensitive steep slopes, which could pose lasting impacts due to uncontrolled erosion and sedimentation, degraded water quality, increased stormwater runoff,and concerns for slope stability. This notice is being distributed to: Herb Engman, Supervisor,Town of Ithaca Town Board Kristine Shaw, Chair,Town of Ithaca Conservation Board /7 A0 �A�"e 617.20 SEQR PROJECT ID NUMBER APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1.APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME Ithacare Center Service Co.and Tompkins County IDA Acceptance of Trail Easement& ROW Agreement 3.PROJECT LOCATION: 1 Bella Vista Drive Tompkins Municipality County 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections, Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map 1 Bella Vista Drive, Tax Parcel#39-1-1.31 5.IS PROPOSED ACTION: ✓❑ New ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: The action is the acceptance of a 150 foot wide floating easement for the purpose of developing a future 10-foot wide trail segment. This segment of trail, located on the Longview property, is part of the"Aurora Street to Upper Buttermilk Path" as identified in the Town's Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan (1997). This trail runs north-south from Aurora Street to King Road West(between Route 96B and Stone Quarry Road, west of the existing Longview facility). The route for this trail has never been surveyed so the exact location is not known. The floating easement will provide flexibility in siting the trail on the Longview property(within the 150 foot easement)when the exact trail location is determined. Once the trail is constructed the easement will be reduced in size to that needed for trail maintenance, repair, and reconstruction (no more than 18-feet wide). 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially +/-2.5 acres Ultimately < 1.0 acres 8.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No If no,describe briefly: 9.WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) aResidential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Agriculture n Park/Forest/Open Space 0 Other (describe) Longview residential includes Assisted Living and Advanced Assisted Living services. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) ❑Yes I No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 11.DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? nYes ❑No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: Town of Ithaca Planning Board Final Site Plan approval (Resolution No. 2012-026, dated May 15, 2012). 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? Dyes Q No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponsor Name Date: Signature ` - °'�Z \-c'* l3 If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment ° ..C�'1., .i 4, K -'1 E/a$em8fl� qE4 � • '. Ri �~ • �' f. pPr TN a 14 � : ��� � � �*�.MAO "'s 4�4m .H't.. pC t �M , , a� a , ✓; ,tea � �`v �'''" yR. "°;"b p-" $ pan ' r � v � r. i � 7r ,'fir ^•`, i� *` J ys-::. r ♦ + �I, IW q S �` wY k' - TOWN OF ITHACA Public Works Department Months of August/September Board Report October 7,2013 Town Board Meeting Roads: Prepared roads and completed the surface treatment in the Northeast on August 5*^ & 6*^. Painting of roadway lines and symbols, including crosswalks, stop bars, parking lots, and traffic calming devices continued throughout the Town. Repaired localized flood damage, due to heavy rains on August 8*^ on Seven Mile Drive, Woodgate Lane, Culver Road, Drew Road and Indian Creek Road Performed ditch cleaning on Calkins Road, Coy Glen Road, Happy Lane, and Updike Road. Assisted the City of Ithaca, Towns of Newfield, Ulysses, and Lansing with trucking. They provided the trucks for our surface treating and paving. Reconstructed the lower section of Whitetail Drive, which was not included in the bid project. Roadside mowing continued. Removed hazardous trees at various sites. A bucket truck was hired to assist our crew. Delivered surplus equipment to the municipal auction. Performed hot patching and shoulder repairs. The brush pile was ground into mulch on 9/30/13. Site work continued for the new salt storage bam. Three staff members began a six week Supervising training Took delivery of the "Low Boy" trailier Parks, Trails, and Preserves: Regular grounds maintenance continued without the normal slowdown in mid-summer. Demolition of the old wooden playground structure and installation of the new structure was completed at Tudor Park. Swing sets were ordered and will be installed in early October. Fibar mulch was freshened up at existing playgrounds. Performed surface treatment on Pinetree Walkway and Pew Trail. Began rehabilitation of the ball field at Coddington Road Community Center. Cornell P.O.S.T student volunteers assisted with cleanup and vine removal at Inlet Valley Cemetery. Forest Home Park volunteers assisted with invasive species removal, added topsoil, and cleaned up at the park site. Removed the old wooden swing set at Eastern Heights Park. Cleaned out and improved various sections of the ditch on South Hill Trail. Performed hydro- seeding with a wetland native grass seed and wildflower seed mixture. Removed hazardous trees on several trails. Summer League play continued at Valentino Field. • Support for the Commimity Garden continued. Water tanks were drained, power-washed, and winterized. Water: Completed hydrant painting for the year. 210 hydrants were painted. Completed final site work at the Danby Road Water Tank upon the Contractor finishing their work. Repaired water valves at 106 Salem Drive and Northview Road West. Repaired water main breaks at Cayuga Medical Center and South Hill Business Campus. Repaired a hydrant on Orchard Hill Road and Hackberry Lane. Began mowing at T-Mains. Sewer: • A total of 238 Dig Safely New York mark-outs were completed. • Began mowing of sewer easements. Engineering: • Inspected 20 simple SWPPPs • Current Development Inspections Underway: o Longview Patio Homes - SWPPP o Ecovillage TREE - SWPPP o Montessori School - SWPPP Closed o Belle Sherman Estates - SWPPP o Ithaca Beer - SWPPP Closed o Cayuga Medical Lab Addition - SWPPP Closed o Holly Creek Townhouses - SWPPP o Cleveland Estates - SWPPP o Westview Subdivision - SWPPP o College Crossings - SWPPP • Out to Bid: None • Construction Started: o Salt Storage Building o 2013 Bolton Point T-Main Project, Pleasant Grove Road o Whitetail Drive Reconstruction o Northeast Water Study o Trumansburg Road Sanitary Sewer Reline and Manhole Rehabilitation o Hanshaw Road Water Main - Blackstone to Warren Road (Part of County Project) • Projects Finished: o Town Hall Parking Lot o Danby Road Water Tank o Danby Road Water Main o Began warranty repairs on Harris B. Dates Drive • Maps and Plans Prepared for: o South Hill Trail Pipe Replacement o Elm Street Extension Culvert slope failure • Development Review: None • Attended Stormwater Coalition meetings. • Attended Planning Board meetings. • Attended Bolton Point E&O meetings. October/November Projects: Fall brush pickup will be held the week of October 15*^ -18*^ 2013. Fall leaf pickup will be held the weeks of November 4^^ - and 11*^ -15^^. Leaf removal will be conducted at parks and on trails. Hot-patching and shoulder work will be completed. Paving and site restoration will be performed for the salt storage building. T-Main and sewer easement mowing will be completed. Installation of swings and final site restoration will be completed at Tudor Park. Culverts will be replaced on the South Hill Trail at the Juniper Drive trailhead. Hydrant replacements. Town of Ithaca Department of Code Enforcement Monthly Activity Report for September 2013 Category Description Entries Building Permit Inspection In the Field inspection tied to a building permit 186 Building Permit Consultation In-office or in-field consultation w/project managers or contractors regarding building projects 38 Building Permit Review Review and processing of building permits 142 Complaint New Investigation New complaint investigation 8 Complaint Follow-Up Processing of complaints 3 Continuing Education Training, seminars, CEU's 3 Fire Incident Investigation Fire Incident Investigation following dispatched call 5 Fire Safety/Operating Permit Inspection Fire Safety inspection for and/or operating permit. Processing of notes and issuance of permit.2 Fire Safety/Operating Permit Re-Inspection Processing of Fire Safety re-inspection notes and issuing operating permit/follow-up.1 Legal Processing Order to Remedy, issuing Appearance Tickets, and actual court appearances 1 Meeting Attendance at Departmental meetings. Board meetings. Committee meetings & Staff meetings, etc.35 Miscellaneous Counter service, phone calls not associated with an active file.103 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Review Field Inspection/Report 0 Zoning Board of Appeals Review and research of ZBA applications 5 Addresses (911)All related work for address changes 0 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 9/1/2013-9/30/2013 Building Permits Issued BP#Date Value Description fee category 9778 9/6/2013 $10,900.00 Strip and reshingle main roof. Strip and install EPDM rubber on back porch roof. $80.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9795 9/6/2013 $8,600.00 Install 12' X 24' x 24' wood storage shed on a gravel base w/NO utility connections, behind existing Parish Center $65.00 Miscellaneous 9789 9/9/2013 $5,000.00 Strip and reshingle front face of house and front porch roofs. $65.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9796 9/9/2013 $0.00 Temporary Membrane structure 20x 80 Tent $50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 9790 9/10/2013 $30,000.00 Alteration of A & E building; lower level to allow for multiple tenant occupancy. All modifications to maintain protection In stat $150.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9775 9/10/2013 $3,000.00 Construct an 8 ft by 10 ft roof over front doorway $60.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9786 9/11/2013 $10,900.00 Strip roof to deck and reshingle $80.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9787 9/11/2013 $13,000.00 Strip main house, porch, and garage roofs and reshingle. $80.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9800 9/11/2013 $12,999.00 Tear off and replace roof covering with like material $80.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9791 9/11/2013 $2,000.00 Construct a12ftby16ft deck attached to back of house and repair roof on front foyer area $50.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9780 9/11/2013 $40,000.00 Strip roof to deck and reshingle $200.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9781 9/12/2013 $60,000.00 Demolish projections on back of house, add new back wall, renovate kitchen, bath & closet. $300.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Tuesday, October 01,2013 Page 1 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 9/1/2013-9/30/2013 9783 9/17/2013 $0.00 Temporary Membrane 20 x 40 9/28/13 event SPCA $50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 9777 9/17/2013 $5,980.00 Install Mitsubishi Hyper Heat Ductless A/C System. Outside unit to be under porch with inside portion on inside wall common with p $65.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9802 9/17/2013 $14,000.00 Install 494 square foot roof mounted photovoltaic system $80.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9805 9/19/2013 $11,400.00 Strip roof to decl and reshingle $80.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9804 9/19/2013 $10,794.00 Strip roof to deck and reshingle $80.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9806 9/23/2013 $3,500.00 Strip roof to deck and reshingle $60.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9797 9/24/2013 $86,200.00 install new accu SW side of bidg svc new blower coil unit in Mech Rm w/underground refrig, 2 new split sys svc Rm204 & hallway $300.00 Renovations & Additions to Commercial 9793 9/24/2013 $18,595.00 Strip existing siding off house and replace with cement board siding. Strip roof to deck and reshingle. $80.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9801 9/26/2013 $46,570.00 Strip roof to deck, apply new sheathing, replace 2 skylights and reshingle; replace boiler. Install new heat pump/2 ton central a/ $200.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 9810 9/27/2013 $20,900.00 Strip roof to deck and install standing seam metal roof covering. $150.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Totals $414,338.00 1 $2,405.00 Certificates of Occupancy Issued BP#Address Description CO Temp 9342 1211 HanshawRd Rebuild front porch floor and extend it out 9/4/2013 □ an additional 24 to 30 inches from original for a total of 7 feet or less Tuesday, October 01,2013 Page 2 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 9/1/2013-9/30/2013 9579 133 Kendall Ave Construct a new 2 story, 2 family house on a concrete slab. 9/4/2013 □ 9588 1211 Hanshaw Rd Remodel kitchen 9/4/2013 □ 9415 154 Wetland Way build carport 9/10/2013 □ 9410 133 Wetland Way Garage 9/10/2013 □ 9413 150 Wetland Way build carport 9/10/2013 □ 9691 321 Old Gorge Rd Build a 346 sq ft plus deck 9/10/2013 □ 9563 950 Danby Rd Extend demo permit issued 4.3.13 to allow construction of assembly area and venting area in lower level/construct tasting room 9/11/2013 □ 9357 Holly Creek Ln Construction of a 3 unit recycling shed 9/12/2013 □ 9356 Holly Creek Ln Construction of an 8 unit recycling shed 9/12/2013 □ 9409 131 Wetland Way build carport 9/12/2013 □ 9492 52 Rachel Carson Way Construct 384 SF Utility structure to protect water pump and controls 9/12/2013 □ Tuesday, October 01, 2013 Page 3 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 9/1/2013-9/30/2013 9661 240 Farrier Rd Animal Health Diagnostic Ctr third floor space alterations (office renovation) A3206, 3208, 3210 & 3321 OA 9/12/2013 □ 9388 344 Rachel Carson Trail Construct single family residence with 3 bdrms and study 9/16/2013 □ 9517 343 Rachel Carson Trail Construct single family residence without basement; 2 bdrms; 2 studies and 78 SF Porch/storage area. 9/16/2013 □ 9387 340 Rachel Carson Trail Construct single family residence with 3 bdrm and study 9/16/2013 □ 9516 345 Rachel Carson Trail Construct single family residence with 2 bdrms and 2 rooms designated as study rooms. 9/16/2013 □ 9386 336 Rachel Carson Trail Construct single family residence with 3 bdrms and study 9/16/2013 □ 9518 341 Rachel Carson Trail Construct new single family residence with 2 bdrms; 2 studies; 78 sf porch/storage area attached. 9/16/2013 □ 9515 337 Rachel Carson Trail Construct single family residence with 2 bedroom; 2 studies and 78 SF exterior porch and storage area 9/16/2013 □ 9647 125 Conservatory Dr Demo and replace water tank 9/17/2013 □ 9567 124 WoolfLn Reroof single family home 9/17/2013 □ 9702 344 Rachel Carson Trail Install two 32-square foot solar collectors on roof of new structure and install heat exchanger in utility room of same structure. 9/23/2013 □ Tuesday, October 01,2013 Page 4 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 9/1/2013-9/30/2013 9699 340 Rachel Carson Trail Install two 32-square foot solar collectors on roof of new structure and Install heat exchanger In utility room of same structure. 9/23/2013 □ 9697 336 Rachel Carson Trail Install two 32-square foot solar collectors on roof of new structure and Install heat exchanger in utility room of same structure. 9/23/2013 □ 9777 76 Lois Ln Install Mitsubishi Hyper Heat Ductless A/C System. Outside unit to be under porch with inside portion on inside wall common with p 9/23/2013 □ 9272 2 Dove Dr Build two car garage attached to house and expand front entryway into house 9/24/2013 □ 9670 1319 Hanshaw Rd Reroof house 9/24/2013 □ 9392 151 Northview Rd Build detached garage 9/24/2013 □ 9491 132 Glenslde Rd Tear off existing roof cover and replace with self-absorbing modified bitumen roofing product. 9/24/2013 □ 9512 954 Coddington Rd Construct a detached garage/wood storage building of pole type construction - no electric or plumbing 9/24/2013 □ 8847 27 Fairway Dr New single-family residence 9/24/2013 □ 9779 1 Candlewyck Dr Replace existing roof cover with like material BIdg. 3 9/26/2013 □ 9404 606 Elmira Rd Remove non load bearing partition between retail sales area and office/storage area 9/26/2013 □ Tuesday, October 01, 2013 Page 5 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 9/1/2013 - 9/30/2013 9699 3 Orchard Hill Rd Extend a 14' wide portion of existing deck 8' & construct screened porch addition with roof. 9/30/2013 □ 9701 343 Rachel Carson Trail Install two 32-square foot solar collectors on roof of new structure and install heat exchanger in utility room of same structure. 9/30/2013 □ 9703 345 Rachel Carson Trail Install two 32-square foot solar collectors on roof of new structure and install heat exchager in utility room of same structure. 9/30/2013 □ Complaints Received Date Address Complaint Type Disposition 9/4/2013 120 Drew rd occupancy Other 9/5/2013 235 Coddington Rd drainage No Violation Found 9/5/2013 229 Coddington Rd drainage No Violation Found 9/6/2013 1045 Taughannock Blvd property maintenance Pending 9/9/2013 77-77.5 Slaterviile Rd property maintenance Pending 9/16/2013 103 Bundy Rd fire 9/13/2013 1028 Ellis Hollow Rd fill 9/26/2013 214 Christopher Ln occupancy Pending Tuesday, October 01,2013 Page 6 Town of Ithaca Codes Department Building Permit Applications Received September 2013 DateRec'd CEO BP§StU Street Name Status 9/4/2013 BB 9796 1551 Slaterviile Rd Issued 9/4/2013 MK 9797 1 Plantations Rd Issued 9/6/2013 MK 9799 36 Penny Ln pending 9/6/2013 SW 9800 1134 Danby Rd Issued 9/9/2013 SW 9802 154 Westhaven Rd Pending 9/9/2013 MK 9801 233 Troy Rd Issued 9/10/2013 MK 9803 16 Saunders Rd pending 9/11/2013 MK 9804 142 Whitetail Dr Issued 9/11/2013 MK 9805 12 Marcy Ct Issued 9/12/2013 MK 9807 381 Pine Tree Rd Pending 9/13/2013 MK 9806 1409 Slaterviile Rd Issued 9/16/2013 MK 9808 343 Coddington Rd Pending 9/17/2013 MK 9810 16 Saunders Rd Issued 9/18/2013 MK 9809 175 King Rd East Pending 9/19/2013 BB 9811 953 Danby Rd Pending 9/19/2013 BB 9812 953 Danby Rd Pending 9/19/2013 BB 9813 953 Danby Rd Pending 9/19/2013 BB 9814 953 Danby Rd Pending 9/19/2013 MK 9815 201 Maple Ave G11 Pending 9/23/2013 MK 9817 412 Winttirop Dr.Pending Tuesday, October 01,2013 Page 1 of 2 DateRec'd CEO BP#St#Street Name Status 9/23/2013 MK 9/23/2013 MK 9/25/2013 SW 9/25/2013 SW 9/25/2013 MK 9/27/2013 MK 9/27/2013 MK 9/30/2013 SW 9818 9816 9821 9820 9819 9823 9824 9826 255 209 1114 1114 120 1050 1046 238 Troy Rd Christopher Ln East Shore Dr East Shore Dr Conservatory Dr East Shore Dr East Shore Dr Bundy Rd Pending Pending pending pending Pending pending pending Pending Tuesday, October 01,2013 Page 2 of2