The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTB Minutes 2011-08-08f ^ Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board Monday, August 8, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. f ^ 215 North Tloga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Report of Tompkins County Legislature 3. Report of Ithaca Common Council 4. Persons to be Heard and Board Comments 5. Presentation of Stormwater Report 6. TCAD - Discussion with Michael Stamm Regarding PILOTs 7. 6:00 p.m.: Public Hearing regarding a Local Law Amending Zoning Chapters 270 and 271 of the Town of Ithaca Code to Provide a Planned Development Zone for the Ithaca Beer Company on Route 13 a. Consider adoption r\ f' 8. Consider Setting A Public Hearing Regarding A Local Law Amending Chapter 250 Of The Town Of Ithaca Code, Titled "Vehicles And Traffic," To Prohibit Parking Along Penny Lane And Lois Lane." 9. Presentation of Independent Audit Town of Ithaca Year Ending 2010 10. Discuss and Consider Amending the Town of Ithaca Fee Schedule to Establish an Operating Permit Fee for Mobile Home Parks and Building Permit Fees for Heating Units 11. Consider Sale of Town Property - East King Road 12. Consider Approval of Ulysses Water Agreement 13. Consider Authorization to Enter into an Encroachment License between Sylvia Bedford-Guaus and the Town of Ithaca Regarding 118 Eastern Heights Drive Drainage Easement 14. Discuss Determination made by the Ethics Board, and Suggested Change(s) to the Ethics Disclosure Statement and Local Law 15. Authorization to Award Contract for Town Hall Roof Repair 16. Consider Consent Agenda Items f \ a. Approval of Town Board Minutes July 11, and 25, 2011 b.Town of Ithaca Abstract c. Bolton Point Abstract d. Appointment of Civil Engineer e. Appointment of Electrical Code Inspector f. Approval to apply for JCAP Grant 17. Report of Town Officials 18. Report of Town Committees 19. Intermunlclpal Organizations 20. Review of Correspondence 21. Consider Adjournment ' \ Meeting of the Ithaca Town Board Monday, August 8, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 Minutes Present : Herb Engman, Supervisor; Councilpersons Bill Goodman, Pat Leary, Tee-Ann Hunter, and Eric Levine Absent: Rich DePaolo and Nahmin Horwitz Staff : Bruce Bates, Director of Code Enforcement; Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town Judy Drake, Human Resources; Susan Ritter, Director of Planning; Mike Solvig, Budget Officer; Paulette Terwilliger Town Clerk, and Jim Weber, Director of Public Works Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance Supervisor Engman called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. and led the assemblage in the pledge of allegiance. Mr. Engman proposed additional agenda items; approved by the Board. Report of Tompkins County Legislature Peter Stein, District 11 which covers the eastern part of the town. Mr. Stein reported that it is a very busy time for the Legislature and the budget is very, very dire. An increase of 13% would be needed just to maintain services and if the County adheres to the 2% cap, it would require an 11% cut to the budget. He reported that several months ago at a retreat the Legislature asked the County Administrator for 2 budgets, 1 with the 2% cap and 11% cut and 1 with a 6% cap which would raise the levy by 5%. The latter would require the county board to override the 2% cap with a super majority and they are in the middle of preparing the two budgets to see if staying in the 2% is possible. He added that the county has been taking significant cuts for the last two years and it is hard to find any fat when going through their programs and it is now coming to what can we do without as opposed to what fat can we cut because there isn’t any. There is a th community forum on the subject at the Lutheran Church on August 10 and there will be more scheduled. Mr. Stein then spoke about the redistricting and he presented an idea to the county redistricting committee which involved the town in a large way. The legislature has 15 representatives now but we can have between 12 – 19 and the last time redistricting was done, there was a lawsuit between the Town and the County because several of the “city” representatives represented significant portions of the Town. Because a larger part of those districts are in the city, it is likely that the person elected would be from the city and the town thought that was not correct. His suggestion was to split the city into 4 districts and lower the number of representative to 14 and the problem would disappear. He also noted that he walks every night on the new Warren Rd sidewalk and its great and very pleasant to walk on. Herb added that the inspector from NYS DOT came to Page 2 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 inspect the use of the grant money, she said it was the best one in the entire upstate district Report of Ithaca Common Council -- None Persons to be Heard and Board Comments Mr. Engman opened the floor to the public, noting that this is the time to address the Board on any subject not scheduled for a public hearing this evening. Patricia Speno spoke regarding Calvary Cemetery and asked to have a member of the Board appointed to help her with issues regarding her mother’s estate. Mr. Engman stated that he would get in touch with her. Ms. Speno submitted a written letter (Attachment #1) Harold Miller , Upstate Director for New York Committee for Change. The organization works with on issues of social and economic injustice and they have been working with homeowners struggling with foreclosure. He thanked the supervisor and the Board for considering taking action to not bond with J P Morgan Chase until they institute fair lending practices and although Chase isn’t the only, but they prides themselves on being good corporate citizens but the data proves otherwise. By singling out JP Morgan Chase, the organization is in no way condoning the other institutions that have bad practices, they are starting with one of the most egregious. Mr. Miller quoted some research and statistics for the area. (The Board had some background material supplied by the organization to Mr. Engman for the added agenda item concerning this topic) Paul Chamandy , Commonland Community Mr. Chamandy spoke about the meeting they had with the Town, City and law enforcement regarding the problems from people parking and the problems. They are putting together a petition (attachment #2). They are looking to change the restrictions on the road from parking on the road and using it as a beach. Of the 117 households on the street, they already have reached 70 and only 3 declined to sign because they were concerned about having parties of their own and not being able to park on the street. There are 43 houses left to approach. Residents have spoken about harassment and being taunted and seniors are afraid to walk down the street and some parents can’t allow their children out. He added that those that have signed realize they will not be able to park on the street either, but feel it is a necessary evil to get relief. Ralph Thompson , Penny Lane who was the first inhabitant of Penny Lane and has watched the situation for the last 25 years. He sent a letter years ago to the city of Ithaca when the city expressed interest in a lot nearby. He and his neighbors have documented the invasion on sunny clear days and he estimates 3 people per car and conservatively estimates 300 people on good days. He talked about the swimming, drinking, underage partying, littering etc and jumping. (Attachment #3) He stated that Page 3 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 their petition is looking to make it inconvenient for people to park there and easier to enforce. Linda Russo Penny Lane commented that it is important to put this into a historical context remembering that the access road that goes through the last part of Commonland has been used and they use it but over time the makeup of the people going down has changed significantly and now a lot of out of town people come because of YouTube and the like and they come speeding in and they aren’t local and don’t care and the numbers have just exploded. It is day and night, drugs and drinking and she reiterated that she would like a seasonal ban. She added that it is really scary what is going on there. These kids are getting riskier and riskier and they are going to get hurt. It is dangerous and laws are being broken left and right. Mary Turnerpalm (sp) Focused on her 16 year old daughter who is afraid to walk the dog because of the gangs or groups of kids… She stated that she will resend the document that has testimonials about her fears and issues. (Attachment #4)The growing disrespect is the problem; if they were respectful of the neighborhood, they would not have a problem. They kids also leave their cars with animals in them and just windows cracked and they have had to call TCAC. She talked about the types of things she has to pick up and the amount of trash bags she has filled on a regular basis. She is in favor of the seasonal ban. Mr. Engman went over the process of setting the public hearing and then voting on the ban in September followed by the erection of signs etc. Added Agenda Item JP Morgan Chase Resolution Mr. Engman read the proposed resolution and moved it for discussion and Mr. Goodman seconded. Ms. Hunter asked if there are any families in our town that have been dealing with this? Mr. Engman responded that he did not know about their activity in the town. Ms. Hunter stated that she had trouble with the statements saying the town “finds” or “knows” because she doesn’t have first hand knowledge. She added that there are certainly practices she doesn’t agree with, but she doesn’t have firsthand knowledge. Mr. Engman noted that he sent out information and he has read a number of articles regarding Chase. There are other municipalities that have passed the same resolution. Discussion followed. The second whereas was changed to address her concern; replacing “finds” with “has received information”. Change was approved by the mover and seconder. Mr. Solvig reminded the Board that we have bonds going out to bid in less than 2 weeks and neither he nor Ms. Brock could comment on what would or could happen to those bond issues. Discussion followed. Ms. Hunter also thought it might be a little arbitrary to pick on Chase when there may be others just as guilty. Mr. Engman responded that you have to start somewhere and this is a campaign and this is how it is traditionally done to send messages. Discussion followed. Page 4 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 123: URGING JP MORGAN CHASE TO DEVELOP FAIR LENDING PRACTICES THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE WHEREAS the Town of Ithaca (the Town) has long had an interest in supporting workforce and other affordable housing and WHEREAS the Town received information that JP Morgan Chase (“Chase”) is the holder and/or servicer of mortgages within the State that have been foreclosed or are currently at risk for foreclosure and WHEREAS Chase has demonstrated a lack of willingness to engage in good-faith efforts to negotiate permanent mortgage modifications that would help keep residents in their homes and WHEREAS the Town does not wish to support nor do business with any company that does not support efforts to reduce foreclosures NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca that the Town shall not use JP Morgan Chase in any way when issuing bonds to raise revenue for any purpose. MOVED: Herb Engman SECONDED: Bill Goodman VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, and Levine Nays: Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Motion passed 4 to 1. Presentation of Stormwater Report Creig Hebdon, Town Engineer summarized the report. The Town was audited and we did very well and the DEC actually took some of our forms to share with other municipalities. Next year the Tompkins County Stormwater Coalition has entered into an agreement with the Tompkins County Soil and Water Conservation District and they are going to do the reports for the entire Coalition and there will be a central website and outreach. TCAD – Discussion with Michael Stamm Regarding PILOTsPiLo – ayments n ieu f T axes Michael Stamm explained that the Industrial Development Agency of IDA had the authority granted by the State to grant property tax abatement, sales tax abatement and mortgage recording tax abatement to projects that meet state law. He explained the makeup and members of the IDA here and stated that they have a very conservative policy, probably the most conservative in the state. The standard policy is a tax abatement over a 7 year period, starting at 90 % and then declining in equal increments over the 7 years and only affects new taxes that are generated by a project. Other IDA’s give 100% for 5 or 10 years and then might scale down over another 5 or 10 year period. He gave some history and stated that they were the first IDA to deny Wegman’s Page 5 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 and they also do not grant abatements to big box stores. They are careful not to help one business compete with another in the same community and focus on businesses that provide goods or services that are sold outside of the community. They also give abatements or incentives for anti-sprawl/urban development such as recently, at the request of the City of Ithaca, to Gateway Plaza, Seneca Place, Cayuga Green etc. Mr. Stamm went on to describe their application process which they feel is very rigourous and they look at the quality of jobs and how they match the community. Over the years the IDA has delivered incentives to 96 projects in the community with a total level of about $16m, and that is new taxes, and the total taxes paid by the same projects exceeds $ 24 million so they believe they have realized a great return on this carefully managed investment. They have created over 7,500 jobs with an average non-management wage of over $19 an hour. So if you look around our community at any manufacturing or high tech company, our IDA has probably delivered some kind of incentive to them. He reiterated that the authority is granted by the State and each IDA has the authority to make its own guidelines and policies and theirs is very progressive in how they look at projects and very, very conservative in the amount of property taxes they give to the project(s) they want to support. Board questions. Ms. Hunter asked if the State mandates the makeup of the Board and Mr. Stamm responded that it does not and it is a hot topic right now. He added that many are populated by business people and some are heavily influenced by the bad side of politics, so if it’s a democratic community, a republican business owner won’t get incentives and things like that. He stated that his IDA is mostly local elected officials with a couple of business people. Ms. Hunter asked what the chances were of having a Town representative on the IDA. Mr. Stamm suggested that the Board talk to Martha Robertson who is the Chair of the IDA and the County Legislature. He did add that there is some pressure from the state and locally to have a member of the School Board on the IDA also. Ms. Hunter asked if the IDA was taking the 2% tax cap issue(s) into consideration and Mr. Stamm responded that they are and feel that many of their projects would not have moved forward without their help and that help generates taxes. A little in the beginning but more and more and something is better than nothing. Ms. Leary asked if any companies have folded or failed before they were required to pay full taxes. Mr. Stamm responded that that was another excellent question and that this IDA is one of the rare IDA’s that has a recapture policy so under certain circumstances if incentives are delivered and the company shifts out of the County, they have the legal right to recapture those benefits. A good example is Emerson, when they moved out of the county, the IDA recaptured those and the Town got money back. He added that certainly some fail, but they can recapture those businesses that move. Page 6 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Mr. Engman asked about the notification process because he had not heard anything about Ithaca Beer going for an abatement until he read the legal ad in the Journal. Mr. Stamm responded that the IDA sends out a notification to all affected municipalities right after the initial meeting with an applicant. Mr. Stamm will look into it at his end. Mr. Engman then asked how the process starts, who initiates the process? Mr. Stamm responded that the IDA markets a variety of incentives to local businesses in a proactive way targeting companies that are committed to our community or have a history of being in the community. They also assist these businesses about other type of programs out there to help them be viable. Ms. Leary responded that they don’t work with the municipality they are taking the money away from and asked what criteria they use because she thought this program was designed to attract companies from outside that otherwise wouldn’t be growing or locating in the Town. Mr. Stamm responded absolutely not and that in economic development, 85%-90% of quality jobs come from expansions of existing businesses or from businesses started by existing entrepreneurs. He stated that they spend very little time trying to attract outside business to Tompkins County because they do not know them and they are not committed to the community. It is important that they are already here and committed and if they need help, we try to help them. Discussion followed. Ms. Hunter talked about the planned development zone process that many of our current projects go through and stated that it would help us with the planning process and our own economic development activities if we could be considering the impacts of tax relief into those plans and she asked if the IDA would be willing to explore involving the town in the process so we know what is going on. Mr. Stamm responded that TCAD has close relationships with municipalities and he would work with the Town. Ms. Leary asked if Mr. Stamm could tell the Board why they felt Ithaca Beer needed a tax abatement and Mr. Stamm responded that they looked at their business plan and their debt services etc, and they determined that they needed some assistance and they are considering a sales tax abatement on the supplies they buy for the expansion and an abatement on the state portion of the mortgage recording tax and the standard tax abatement of 90% of new taxes which would have been paid on the expansion and declines over the 7 year period. From a property tax point of view, over a 7 year period, new taxes paid with PILOT in place are about $149K, the taxes abated during that 7 year period with a PILOT in place are about $145K. So the local taxing jurisdictions will receive about $149K and the company will receive a benefit of about $145K over that 7 year period. He added that these are estimates working with the Assessment Department. Mr. Engman thanked Mr. Stamm, adding that the information was very helpful. Page 7 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 6:00 p.m.: Public Hearing regarding a Local Law Amending Zoning Chapters 270 and 271 of the Town of Ithaca Code to Provide a Planned Development Zone for the Ithaca Beer Company on Route 13 Mr. Engman opened the public hearing at 6:52 pm Larry Salinger , Peachtree Ln read from a prepared statement (Attachment #4) He spoke about the difference between what was initially presented and what now seems to be in the plans. It seemed small and neighborhood friendly at first and now seems to be 45K square feet with 150 parking spots. He was concerned about the economic impacts to his property and was not in favor of the PDZ. John Tasman , Apple Blossom Dr. asked if there has been any type of report by an independent party regarding the economic impacts. He didn’t feel that it was right to change zoning right after someone buys property because it isn’t fair to others who may have not even looked at that property because they knew the zoning in place would prohibit what they were looking to do so they bought elsewhere at commercial prices. Ms. Ritter responded that the Planning Board went through the SEQR process looking at any environmental impacts and determined there would be none and although they do not look at impacts on property values, she felt that the Route 13 corridor in a depressed area in the vicinity of Ithaca Beer and there are high hopes that bringing Ithaca Beer in will rejuvenate the area and create some interest in the area. Mr. Tasman responded that those empty store fronts are not involved in the project so they won’t be filled and Ms. Ritter responded that the hope is they will be. Mr. Tasman felt that an independent report should be done to back up the theory and hope of the Planning Board and Planning Department that this is worthwhile and the effects it will have on the neighborhood. Tom Fuller , Seven Mile Dr. read from a prepared statement (Attachment #5) concerned about impact on the neighborhood, safety of children, property values and noise. He felt that moving the brewery back into the residential section of the area as opposed to closer to the road was “ludicrous”. George Sheldrake , Earlybird Farms Mr. Sheldrake spoke as the only famer in inlet valley, stating that he was 100% supportive of this project because it is the best use for the land. This is an agrelated business and he is keeping open fields and production and his proposal is unbelievably thorough. He could not see any adverse effects for the area; the 7 Mile Drive area is not even affected because they will be entering off Route 13 or 13a and the fields will offer a huge buffer to the residential area. He reminded the Board and the public that the land is not zoned residential, it’s light industrial now and although he doesn’t know what else could possibly go in there, he certainly wouldn’t like a factory or something that might be allowed under the light industrial. He reiterated that this is the best possible use for that land. Kurt Komaromi , Peachtree Lane Mr. Komaromi thought they are a very successful local business and deserve a lot of support but worried about the effect on the Page 8 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 neighborhood. He assumed it was going to be up around the brewery and there has been land cleared right up against peoples property and that is concerning. He admitted that he did not know the details of the project but he was concerned about the clearing. Ms. Ritter responded that the clearing is for an agricultural pond for irrigation and all the land that is up in that area are proposed to be for agricultural purposes and there will be a lot of fields in between the residential area and the brewery. Mr. Komaromi asked where he could see materials and Ms. Hunter gave him her info from her packet and Mr. Engman stated that details are always available here at Town Hall. John Slash, Apple Blossom Lane agreed with the other commenters and he is concerned about the future and whether there are limits to what he can do such as Beer Fests etc. Mr. Engman noted that the Town has Noise and Light ordinances and Ms. Ritter added that the project is approved for a certain size and any additional expansions would have to go before the Planning Board and there would be public hearings at that time again. Right now it is 15K square feet and she explained that the PDZ allows for some expansion so any changes don’t have to come back to the Town Board, but any changes would have to go before the Planning Board and there are generally 2 public input opportunities at least, one of which is a formal public hearing. Sean Varma , Apple Blossom Ln He would like to know more about the project and added that it is not always convenient to go to the Planning Board meetings etc and he is supportive of the project but with a balance between the brewery and the property owners. Ms. Ritter responded that information can be sent digitally also and residents just need to ask. Mr. Engman added that only 12 out of the 80 acres are planned for the commercial enterprise and only those 12 acres would be in the planned development zone with the other 70 or so going into a County Agricultural District which has its own restrictions. Thomas Steenhuis , Bostwick Rd Spoke about the neighborhood not really knowing what was going on and suggested it might be better if the decision were postponed and the neighborhood and the developer could talk adding that if they had known, maybe the excitement would not have happened and maybe it would be fine. There was no one else wishing to address the Board and Mr. Engman closed the public hearing at 7:18. Board discussion Ms. Hunter asked about the timing and whether the community should have an opportunity to look at this more closely. Ms. Ritter responded that the production being put in place right now is dependent on this moving forward. He would have no where to put his product that he is gearing up for. Ms. Leary wondered why Mr. Mitchell never mentioned going for an abatement and if he really needed one. Mr. Mitchell volunteered to answer the question. Page 9 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Dan Mitchell responded that the question never came up about any of the financing for this project, but if it had, he probably would have said he would be looking at for every bit of assistance to get this project off the ground. He stated that he budgeted this for $2.5 million and he is hoping he will only be $1 million over that. He stated that he has posted all the notices for all the meetings as required and he hasn’t been contacted by any of the neighbors except for one who said all the neighbors were for this. He added that when he was told something like this might be possible with a planned development zone, he was told to think far ahead and all of the possibilities you can envision which is how we got to the 45,000 feet. The reality is he doesn’t own the building he is in and it has been successful but he hasn’t even paid corporate taxes yet in the 12 years he has been doing this because he hasn’t made a profit yet. Everything goes back into the business. He went on to say that he and his wife and three children will be building their house there and they will be the closest neighbor to the brewery and the brewery is placed on or as close to the Light Industrial zone as possible. New York State makes it very hard for small businesses unlike the Wegman’s mentioned. Mr. Mitchell added that he wants to be the anchor for the area and bringing this property back to farming is a good thing and a great thing for the area. He stated that he has already added onto a building that he doesn’t own at his own cost and has had the full support of the town and has not heard any of these negatives and what he brings in future sales tax and future jobs will far exceed any abatement he gets now. Mr. Levine asked about the effect of a delay and Mr. Mitchell responded that he is shorting his wholesalers now and the timing is crucial right now, even a month will have significant implications. He agreed with the neighbors that there are issues with the process but he has put up his notices out front and in the brewery and he also responded to the comment from someone who said put it somewhere else, and you can’t. There has to be public water and sewer for one thing. Discussion followed. Mr. Smith, the Planner working with Mr. Mitchell on this project noted that there have been at least 9 meetings of various Boards and Committees with this project and its details for residents to attend and learn about the details and Ms. Brock added that there were neighbors at previous meetings of the Planning Board where mockups were available and many details and she specifically remembered residents looking at these and listening and being very supportive of the project. Mr. Goodman agreed saying that he was a Planning Board meeting where the project was discussed and all the residents spoke in favor of it, he also added that he assumed a PILOT would be sought and granted so he was surprised tonight but still supportive of the project because many of the concerns expressed have already been addressed and the neighbors are just not aware of it. Ms. Leary asked if the abatement would be a deal breaker and Mr. Mitchell responded that it wouldn’t, because it couldn’t be. He explained that he has “scratched and clawed” his way to this point and has worked so hard financially, emotionally and physically that he would have to find another way. Mr. Engman added that he thought issues with tax abatements should be taken up with the IDA, not the developer. Page 10 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Mr. Goodman brought the Board’s attention to the County’s GML recommendation(s) which Mr. Engman read aloud for the public’s benefit. (Attachment #6) Mr. Engman thought that the issues that the County has recommendations regarding have already been addressed by the Planning Board and one of the parcels they are talking about is not even in the PDZ and the curb cuts are already there with the access from Route 13. The access from Peachtree Lane and Apple Blossom Lane referred to by the County is not on the parcel included in the PDZ and would be considered and debated when and if a project were to come before the Planning Board involving that option and would be dealt with then. He added that he thinks the protections already put into the PDZ already address the County’s concerns. Mr. Engman again stated that there is a large buffer zone and the existing LI zone is basically only being expanded a little bit towards the rear. Mr. Goodman added that it looks like the closest house is about 750 feet away and in his experience with 20 years in real estate; he does not believe the project will affect property values. This mixed use is also exactly what the Comprehensive Plan Committee is saying the Town prefers, and why a planned development zone was developed. He added that if residents do not like the idea of mixed uses, he encouraged them to attend meetings and let the Board know and become involved. Due to the GML comments from the County, a roll call vote followed with a unanimous outcome in favor of the Local Law establishing the Planned Development Zone. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2011-124: Proposed Adoption of a Local Law Amending Zoning Chapters 270 and 271 of the Town of Ithaca Code to Provide a Planned Development Zone for the Ithaca Beer Company on Route 13 WHEREAS , Ithaca Beer Co. is proposing to develop an approximately 12.52 acre portion of an +/- 82 acre parcel on Mancini Drive off Elmira Road (NYS Route 13), Tax Parcel No.’s 33-3-2.2, 31-3-3.12 and 33-3-2.9, to include a new brewery, welcome center, retail store and restaurant with outdoor patio and garden, which would require rezoning to a Planned Development Zone (PDZ); and WHEREAS , the Town of Ithaca Town Board at its meeting on March 8, 2010 referred the proposal to the Planning Committee for a preliminary recommendation on the concept of pursuing a PDZ; and WHEREAS , the Town of Ithaca Planning Committee at its meeting on June 10, 2010 recommended that the Town Board consider pursuing a PDZ to accommodate the proposed new brewery, welcome center and restaurant with an outdoor patio and garden; and WHEREAS, Ithaca Beer Co. prepared a draft PDZ local law and the Town of Ithaca Town Board at its meeting on July 12, 2010 referred the draft local law to the Town of Ithaca Planning Committee for review and consideration; and Page 11 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 WHEREAS , the Town of Ithaca Planning Committee has reviewed and discussed the draft PDZ at its meetings on July 14, 2010, February 10, 2011, and April 21, 2011; and WHEREAS , the Town of Ithaca Planning Committee at its meeting on April 21, 2011 recommended that the Town Board refer the draft PDZ local law to the Planning Board for a recommendation and to begin the in-depth review of the proposed Ithaca Beer Company development plans; and WHEREAS , the Town Board, at its meeting on June 13, 2011, did refer the draft PDZ local law to the Planning Board for a recommendation; and WHEREAS , the Planning Board, on June 21, 2011, did recommend that the Town of Ithaca Town Board enact the proposed local law; and WHEREAS , a resolution was duly adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca for a public hearing to be held by said Town Board on August 8, 2011, at 6:00 “A Local Law to p.m. to hear all interested parties on a proposed local law entitled Amend Zoning Chapters 270 and 271 of the Town of Ithaca Code to Provide a Planned Development Zone for the Ithaca Beer Company on Route 13” ; and WHEREAS , notice of said public hearing was duly advertised in the Ithaca Journal; and WHEREAS , said public hearing was duly held on said date and time at the Town Hall of the Town of Ithaca and all parties in attendance were permitted an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said proposed local law, or any part thereof; and WHEREAS , the adoption of this local law is, pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing Regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 148 of the Town of Ithaca Code (which laws and regulations thereunder, including the Town’s local law, are collectively referred to as “SEQR”), a Type I Action; and WHEREAS , the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, acting as lead agency in a coordinated environmental review, did on June 21, 2011 make a negative determination of environmental significance; and WHEREAS , the Town Board finds it is in the best interests of the Town and its citizens to adopt the local law; NOW, THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED , that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby adopts said local “A Local Law to Amend Zoning Chapters 270 and 271 of the Town of law entitled Ithaca Code to Provide a Planned Development Zone for the Ithaca Beer Company Page 12 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 on Route 13” , a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, and it is further RESOLVED , that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file said local law with the Secretary of State as required by law. MOVED: Bill Goodman SECONDED: Herb Engman Roll Call Vote: Herb Engman, Aye; Bill Goodman, Aye; Pat Leary, Aye; Eric Levine, Aye and Tee-Ann Hunter, Aye Absent: Rich DePaolo and Nahmin Horwitz Motion passed by a super majority; 5 to 0. Consider Setting A Public Hearing Regarding A Local Law Amending Chapter 250 Of The Town Of Ithaca Code, Titled “Vehicles And Traffic,” To Prohibit Parking Along Penny Lane And Lois Lane.” A discussion was held on the times and dates of the proposed local law and the word “seasonally” was added to the title of the resolution and will be detailed prior to the final version and title of the proposed local law. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 125: SET A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 250 OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA CODE, TITLED “VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC,” TO PROHIBIT PARKING SEASONALLY ALONG PENNY LANE AND LOIS LANE RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca will hold a public hearing at th Town Hall, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, New York, on the 12 day of September, 2011, at 5:50 p.m. for the purpose of considering a proposed Local Law Amending Chapter 250 of the Town of Ithaca Code, Titled “Vehicles and Traffic,” to prohibit parking along Penny Lane and Lois Lane; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that at such time and place all persons interested in the proposed amendment may be heard concerning the same; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to publish a notice of such public hearing in the Ithaca Journal published in the City of Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, and to post a copy of same on the signboard of the Town of Ithaca, said publication and posting to occur not less than ten days before the day designated above for the public hearing. MOVED: Bill Goodman SECONDED: Tee-Ann Hunter VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, Levine and Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Page 13 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Presentation of Independent Audit Town of Ithaca Year Ending 2010 Mr. Solvig reported that the audits for the Town and the Courts came back good and have been distributed to the Board and the Courts. He added that he was very happy with the auditors themselves and they had some informal suggestions that he will be looking at. Ms. Leary noted that we have only used 1.2% of our debt ceiling and Mr. Solvig added that the Town has a AA2 Bond Rating and a positive outlook by Moody’s. Discuss and Consider Amending the Town of Ithaca Fee Schedule to Establish an Operating Permit Fee for Mobile Home Parks and Building Permit Fees for Heating Units TB RESOLUTION NO. 2011-126: Amending the Town of Ithaca Fee Schedule to establish an Operating Permit fee for Mobile Home Parks and Building Permit fees for Heating Units. WHEREAS, TB Resolution No. 2009-227adoptedthe establishment and setting of fees by town board resolution; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance requires an operating permit for Mobile Home Parks, to be renewed annually, and authorizes the Town Board to establish an operating permit fee for Mobile Home Parks; and WHEREAS, the current fee schedule would require an excessive fee for the processing and inspection required by the code enforcement office for such operating permit; and WHEREAS, the Town of Ithaca Code requires building permits to be issued for the installation of heating units and the permit fee for such installation generally fall within the minimum fee charged for a project; and WHEREAS, there are occasionally situations where installation of large heating units would create an excessive fee for the processing and inspection of heating units; and WHEREAS, the Town Operations Committee, at its July 3, 2011 meeting, recommends that the Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Fee Schedule be amended to include: Operating Permit for Mobile Home Park ……………..$200 annually Heating Unit fee schedule a. Up to 185,000 BTU………………………………………$50.00 b. 185,000 to 1 Million BTU….……………………….……$150.00 c. Over 1 Million BTU……………………………………...$500.00; and Page 14 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the addition of these fees, and directs the Director of Code Enforcement to add the fees to the Town of Ithaca Fee Schedule effective August 9, 2011. MOVED: Tee-Ann Hunter SECONDED: Pat Leary VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, Levine and Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Consider Sale of Town Property – East King Road Mr. Engman noted that some Board members noticed that the letter from Montessori left out a couple of points in the initial offer in their description of the offer, so to make it absolutely clear, he drafted a resolution detailing the elements originally proposed so there can be no question of the terms. Discussion followed. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 127: ACCEPTANCE OF PURCHASE OFFER FOR TOWN LAND ON EAST KING ROAD WHEREAS the Town of Ithaca received a parcel of land, 43-1-2, as mitigation for a housing development nearby and WHEREAS the Town now does not intend to make the land into a town park and WHEREAS the Town permitted the Elizabeth Anne Clune Montessori School of Ithaca to develop a “Field of Dreams” on the Town property in anticipation of continued use NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Board accepts Montessori’s purchase offer if it includes the following elements: 1. A payment of $30,000 to be paid to the Town, plus 2. Town attorney fees to date of $1,067.50 to be paid to the Town, plus 3. All closing costs including any additional attorneys’ fees, abstract of title, property survey (if needed) and other closing costs to be paid directly by Montessori, plus 4. A first option for the Town to buy the property back at a cost of $30,000 in 2011 dollars (adjusted for inflation) should Montessori ever decide to sell the parcel. MOVED: Pat Leary SECONDED: Tee-Ann Hunter VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, Levine and Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Page 15 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Consider Approval of Ulysses Water Agreement Mr. Engman gave the background noting that Supervisor Roxanne Marino worked very, very hard on this which saved the Town some money and she also is the one that suggested that our attorneys work together on the drilling laws saving both municipalities some money. This has been a long time in the works with a lot of work into it. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2011-128 : AGREEMENT ON WATER BILLING AND WATER LOSS WITH THE TOWN OF ULYSSES WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca and the Town Board of the Town of Ulysses entered into an agreement to share water service for Ulysses Water District Number 3 and Town of Ithaca residences in the Woolf Lane area on October 30, 2003 and WHEREAS there has been disagreement since 2003 over the exact amount of water used in each municipality and WHEREAS there has been disagreement since 2004 over billings for water delivered to the Town of Ulysses and WHEREAS the Town of Ithaca Director of Public Works, previous Budget Officer and Supervisor investigated the matter thoroughly and exhausted the supply of information relative to the matter WHEREAS the Town Board believes that the below resolution of this matter is fair and in the public’s interest NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town of Ithaca agrees to accept from the Town of Ulysses $21,254.46 in full payment for any unpaid water billing balance and FURTHER RESOLVED that upon payment of $21,254.46 the Town of Ithaca agrees in principle with amending the 2003 water agreement to pay for water loss in the Woolf Lane area of the Town of Ithaca with the specific cost methodology to be negotiated by a subcommittee appointed by each Town Board and FURTHER RESOLVED that with the agreements on past billing and water loss as detailed in the Resolved sections above, the Town of Ithaca hereby rescinds intentions to construct a two-way water meter in collaboration with the Town of Ulysses. MOVED: Herb Engman SECONDED: Eric Levine VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, Levine and Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Motion passed unanimously. Page 16 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Consider Authorization to Enter into an Encroachment License between Sylvia Bedford-Guaus and the Town of Ithaca Regarding 118 Eastern Heights Drive Drainage Easement TB RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 129: Authorization to Enter into an Encroachment License between Sylvia Bedford-Guaus and the Town of Ithaca Regarding 118 Eastern Heights Drive Drainage Easement WHEREAS , Sylvia Bedford-Guaus (Owner) is the owner in fee simple absolute of a parcel of land with improvements thereon in the Town of Ithaca, County of Tompkins, State of New York, commonly known and designated as 118 Eastern Heights Drive, Ithaca, New York, Tax Parcel No. 57-1-8.113 (the “Premises”), as more particularly described in the deed to Owner from Stephen D. Younger and Azucena Ortega, dated August 18, 2004, and recorded in the Tompkins County Clerk’s Office on August 19, 2004, Instrument Number 459484-001 (the “Deed”); and WHEREAS , Protective Covenants for lots in the Eastern Heights Subdivision that includes the Premises, which Protective Covenants are dated March 25, 1969, and recorded in the Tompkins County Clerk’s Office on March 25, 1969, in Liber 480 of Deeds at Page 375, state in paragraph 4 as follows: “(The following shall be applicable where necessary and will be inserted in the deeds for lots where applicable) There is hereby reserved an easement for the installation and maintenance of sewer/water/ electric/gas and/or drainage facilities as presently installed or as may be required to be installed in the future development of the subdivision to a width of 10 feet on each side of the installed line. Within this easement area, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of said utility or which may change the direction or flow of drainage channels in the easement area or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through the drainage channel in said easement area. The easement area and all improvements in it shall be maintained continuously by the owner of the premises, except in the case of improvements for which a municipal authority or utility company is responsible.”; and WHEREAS , the Deed to Owner does not contain the easement language required by the Protective Covenants for the Town-owned stormwater facilities located on the Premises. However, the survey map referenced in the Deed, dated July 22, 1986 and last amended July 29, 2004, shows a 20 foot easement centered on a “48˝ C.M.P. culvert”, and further shows a portion of a deck attached to the house on the Premises encroaching into the easement area. Next to the notation about the 20 foot easement, the survey map refers to “480/375”, which is the Liber of Deeds and Page where the 1969 Protective Covenants are recorded; WHEREAS , to assure that the easement is properly conveyed to the Town, Owner is granting an easement to the Town for the municipal stormwater facilities on Page 17 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 the Premises through her execution of a Right-of-Way and Easement that will be recorded in the Tompkins County Clerk’s Office (the “Easement”); WHEREAS , a portion of the deck attached to the house on the Premises continues to encroach into the area covered by the Easement, as shown on a survey of the Premises titled “Survey Map, No. 118 Eastern Heights Drive, Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York”, dated April 28, 2011 and amended July 15, 2011, and prepared by Lee Dresser, Licensed Land Surveyor, of T.G. Miller P.C. (the “Survey Map”), which Survey Map is annexed hereto; WHEREAS , the Town is willing to allow the encroachment to remain unless and until it is required to be removed pursuant to the terms of the attached Encroachment License between Sylvia Bedford-Guaus and the Town of Ithaca; WHEREAS , pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, it has been determined by the Town Board that approval of the Encroachment License is a Type II action because it constitutes “routine or continuing agency administration and management, not including new programs or major reordering of priorities that may affect the environment,” and thus approval of the Encroachment License is not subject to review under SEQRA; Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca does hereby approve the attached Encroachment License and authorizes the Town Supervisor to execute it on behalf of the Town, subject to the approval of the Attorney for the Town. MOVED: Bill Goodman SECONDED: Tee-Ann Hunter VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, Levine and Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Motion passed unanimously Discuss Determination made by the Ethics Board, and Suggested Change(s) to the Ethics Disclosure Statement and Local Law Mr. Engman and Ms. Terwilliger gave the background on this noting that changes have to be made to the current local law to make it current and while doing so, the Ethics Board would like to change the boundaries of the listing of real estate owned to the entire county instead of just the Town or contiguous to it. There also is the issue of the determination made by the Ethics Board that home addresses must be listed regardless of whether they are in the Town of not. A staff member has appealed that determination to the Town Board for a decision. Discussion followed. Mr. Engman suggested the issue be referred to the Operations Committee for review. The Board agreed. Page 18 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Authorization to Award Contract for Town Hall Roof Repair TB RESOLUTION No. 2011- 130: Authorization to Award Contract and Establish a Capital Project Fund for the Construction of the Town Hall Roof Replacement Improvement Project WHEREAS: On July 27, 2011 the Town of Ithaca Director of Public Works/Highway Superintendent received bids for the Town Hall Roof, together with related ancillary facilities, and WHEREAS: The Director of Public Works has reviewed the bids and qualifications of the bidder and has recommended that the low bid of $230,099 for the total project made by Hale Contracting, Inc., 2054 Grand Central Avenue, Horseheads, NY, is a qualified bid, and WHEREAS: on November 4, 2010 the Town Board passed TB Resolution No. 2010- 201 adopting the Town of Ithaca 2011 Final Budget, setting a maximum amount of $300,000.00 to be expended by the Town of Ithaca for this Project, now therefore be it RESOLVED: that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca authorizes the award of the contract for the Town Hall Roof Replacement Improvement Project to Hale Contracting, Inc., subject to final approval of the contract documents by the Town Engineer and Attorney for the Town, and be it further RESOLVED: that the Town Supervisor is authorized to execute said contract upon such approval; and be it further RESOLVED: that the Director of Public Works is authorized to approve change orders to said contract, without prior authorization of this Board, upon receipt of appropriate justification provided that the maximum amount of such change orders shall not, in the aggregate, exceed $15,000; and further provided that the total project cost, including the contract, engineering, legal and other expenses does not exceed the maximum authorized cost of the project, and be it further RESOLVED: that the Town Budget Officer is directed and authorized to record all necessary and appropriate budgetary and cash transactions to establish the capital project fund “Town Hall Roof Replacement Improvement Project.” MOVED: Tee-Ann Hunter SECONDED: Bill Goodman VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, Levine and Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Motion passed unanimously Added Agenda Item Discussion Regarding Redistricting Mr. Engman suggested that the Town should send somebody to the meeting the County is having noting that he has had a number of Legislators approach him about the idea of Page 19 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 lowering the number of legislators but we should think about the ramifications and be prepared. Right now we have 7 different people representing portions of the Town of Ithaca that are adjacent to the City sections they represent and where most of them live. Discussion followed and the subject was moved to the Study Session for further thought. Consider Consent Agenda Items Mr. Goodman requested that the Bolton Point Abstract be pulled. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2010-131: Consent Agenda BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca hereby approves and/or adopts the resolutions for the following Consent Agenda items: a. Approval of Town Board Minutes July 11, 2011 b. Town of Ithaca Abstract c. Bolton Point Abstract – Pulled d. Appointment of Civil Engineer e. Appointment of Electrical Code Inspector f. Approval to apply for JCAP Grant MOVED: Bill Goodman SECONDED: Tee-Ann Hunter VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, Levine and Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Motion passed unanimously Bolton Point Abstract – Mr. Goodman noticed that there was no draft resolution detailing the amounts and Ms. Terwilliger printed one for him and read it aloud for the Board. TB RESOLUTION NO. 2011-132: Bolton Point Abstract WHEREAS , the following numbered vouchers for the Southern Cayuga Lake Intermunicipal Water Commission have been presented to the governing Town Board for approval of payment; and WHEREAS , the said vouchers have been audited for payment by the said Town Board; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED , that the governing Town Board hereby authorizes the payment of the said vouchers. Voucher Numbers: 379-438 Check Numbers: 13253-13255, 13257-13313 Page 20 of 20 TB 8-8-2011 Burdick Hill Tanks Project $ 0 Operating Fund $ 79.700.31 f 1TOTAL $ 79,700.31 Less Prepaid $ 5,903.41 TOTAL $ 73,796.90 MOVED: Bill Goodman SECONDED: Tee-Ann Hunter VOTE: Ayes: Engman, Goodman, Leary, Levine, and Hunter Absent: DePaolo and Horwitz Motion passed unanimously. Report of Town Officials Ms. Drake reported that Bolton Point has formed a new union and as the Governing Body, she felt the Town should do a resolution recognizing the Union which Ms. Brock concurred with. Mr. Engman added that he felt it was important for the other Commissioners to understand what the situation is because right now they think it is just the Commission that has to acknowledge and they are researching that. He did not want them to feel like we were stepping on their toes and we could do it at the study session. Attendance at the IDA meeting was discussed and Mr. Goodman stated that he will go and report at the study session. f \ Report of Town Committees - None Intermunicipal Organizations - None Review of Correspondence - None Consider Adjournment Motion made by Mr. Goodman, seconded by Mr. Levine at 9:05pm. Unanimous. RespectfdU^NSubmitted, aulette/re/willig own ^ V rv TOWN OF ITHACA TOWN BOARD SISN-IN SHEET DATE: August 8, 2011 (PLEASE PRINT TO ENSURE ACCURACY IN OFFICIAL MINUTES) PLEASE PRINT NAME PLEASE yP/?JA/rADDRESS/AFFILIATION VJtlCL^ /\0A/f}4hl T.rpfCA Flf\P APfl-r Ix Hc^oL/^. rn j /c _0 'TVN TSm.cA.\F}< \Ch \ .Ai4 0, ,Lfv^ (rlfJehl^kL-no Mil f -^Qujt iru^L S c-V u-\. .'-yt 7 fL' 1. yc')i\IIP) i1flile.^Pn,THliQ-cr^ AjoUi'st V La fEV ScpJ //j)s ^ fJl P(3:3<z])TF-e^ Alq y'nJ-haC.EL O'p [VI -p f fyvie. Carol JcJ/a pi^'Tay /I?e oc"/!n/6 r <17) SlAOfCH /3 ApP^r-r L'hLosSo/y ^Pyyu VtH/itrA^ )'L<\c Rth nVWpn P) r\cF\o>n^^ (Q-FTiZ, PO/lYt A pjA iST/■C' luM PrrNXPnriu.'f O Ppac U'lyUl.^ /Q <pu oAATo) paA<«U J 3/ )<^jVUa.Vr/lC( D ? PPPc oT' A>/ TOWN OF ITHACA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND PUBLICATION I, Debra DeAugistine, being duly sworn, say that I am the First Deputy Town Clerk of the Town , of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York that the following notice has been duly posted on the sign board of the Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca and the notice has been duly published in the official newspaper, Ithaca Journal: a ADVERTISEMENT cTnotice of public hearings Local Law Amending Zoning Chapters 270 and 271 of the Town of Ithaca Code to Provide a Planned Development Zone for the Ithaca Beer Company on Route 13. Location of Sign Board Used for Posting: Town Clerk's Office 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Date of Posting:July 29, 2011 Date of Publication: 29, 2011 (j.£lT± kebra DeAu) First Deputy Town Clerk STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS: TOWN OF ITHACA) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 2011. ,5^ day of Notary Public PAUt^TTC TERWILUGER Notary PuMe, State of New Vofk NO.01TE61S6809 Oualrfied in Tompfctes County Commission Expires Oaoeniber4i ' TOWN OF ITHACA , Notice of Public Hearing ~ H ' The Town Board will hold a ^ public hearing at 6:00 p.m. A 1 on August 8,2011 at Town « .•iJIbII, 215 N. Ttoga St. Itha- ^ • ca to hear comments re- { garding a proposed Local . ..Liw Amending Zoning P ^^Chapters 270 and 271 of — \ the Town of Ithaca Code to' H i Provide a Planned Develop- C ^ment Zone for the Ithaca A Bey Company on Route 2 j 13. The draft law is avalla- ^hia from the Town Oerka SORice during normal work- F g'ng hours. Jf ___. (p\ Sb.KiO(^if^ (M. _. n^t^cu V-S>J 14- 0 (^C^^^^T S sotl n .—rov^v\ cmF_ (nW:iCiN - . "uoap^ . . ^ (T^Wt^ A-j 1 4©^ fc o^- 213-\W=5G wv;. ) - _1 "r7^sr=>as iN2X,vi^=r ^4^ k14 ^ JUl/ ■z.a 2ot( IS (4 '?l%fw<=r to *4^ ko^W?'".5> _ . ts^TE tv-i tAk OP iT\Wj^ (4'i^ \vACLa.O\tJic\ _ 24W CWAte-T^4^ ffU 15 ^ (fi TtW TtiVJki tA'^f U-CjAs:^ 'P<=:Ctep>«.5=iC? 'CWct=w4y5tie ZotO 2Sio.fa,\v=t7 lA (3bWift^f Ckvfe^tapy T^=<i.v=v<r3E^ 29t0 ts •^v^dPFtSti-Sr^ M Ot= USnSTvO^t-L. t=«JP -W^UL^r j -^oO^'^^fcso lAJpsMvA RiSrlWs-l Tfewrvl , \^\ f^ccyecp^OB To ^:>/tcru_s ■Su'^rrpiSiTi (VU _ . iE=ovA\K5i.STi(Cf^m-I OP \srSTM^ , tlW 'T^ip»\KiivAc^ . N>w«vsv£.tP=iP^^ (v^iv^ces v% ^ j2rrSf^c\>- Sfev-io ^ s5y . t "p^ftSixSiiT^T h 0^ (:iPF10aPS?\'ftsj€' __._-TO\/ovi. soItA T^Kv^ssieo <5:^<:irtsSsS. o* -s<k / '__ TbAWU TO <?^0=£b!p vOvtA aP tsCU\t^Vi3P,tSfV<M (0?^ i»4 "rt^ CP v\\€ ^fens:. OF tovmnA (3?^ \'T4tsc.t^ T^Ss ivxs'\;fqvf.v<^5vjr / V _i <!>= \\\e: "KsyA-^ IS. lv;s.^\MAcj>Jr tn T^^iurr < ^0Ri\>-^T^ Of- ^.Ss\(:avI "to -fP^isW, (^ \^4pvs/ic>iXlN^ ^ to vovt4 JjW "W Uf5»©\UVvf tSTP>$^ ^X nW -pMc "rr^tsr i VAW-I "^^oask:^ vK>irt\ /:;4?^A\'^-il ..(> tA'i sPtS^fc^ (^tOi]P C(^ t^5>V<X^y^ ::a^ ^ i\AX^ (ao?,u<^ 0= oeuciic^wJ -to \^-w=ais- t4vS- -Uv\e, /-N ~7 r _r\ f * 0&fc©[ t ^ Petition to Change the Parking Ordinance for Penny Lane ^ and Lois Lane, Town of Ithaca, NY The residents of Penny Lane and Lois Lane have a problem that has escalated over the past several years and is in need of consideration by the Tov\/n of Ithaca. From late spring to early fall, v^^e experience problems with excessive traffic from vehicles filled with people that come to use our streets as an easy access to the 6 Mile Creek recreational area and swimming hole. This results in excessive noise, litter, racing traffic and invasion of privacy that we feel is damaging the quality of life in our neighborhood. Most importantly, there are legitimate concerns about personal safety - both for the residents and their properties. We the undersigned residents of Penny Lane and Lois Lane, Town of Ithaca, NY request that the town consider changes to the parking ordinance for these streets as follows: CHANGE CURRENT PARKING SIGNS ON THE NORTHWEST END OF PENNY LANE FROM: NO PARKING 11:00 PM TO 6 AM - MAY1 - SEPT 30 TO: NO PARKING ANYTIME - MAY1 - SEPT 30 INSTALL PARKING SIGNS ON THE SOUTH EAST END OF PENNY LANE TO READ: NO PARKING ANYTIME - MAY1-SEPT30 INSTALL PARKING SIGNS ON ALL OF LOIS LANE TO READ: NO PARKING ANYTIME - MAY1-SEPT30 To further discourage unla>A^ul parking we the undersigned request that the Town of Ithaca consider marking all signs with the following warning: TOW AWAY ZONE Thank you for your timely consideration for this request. / Petition to Change the Parking Ordinance, for Penny Lane Page 1 of and Lois Lane, Town of Ithaca, NY 8/4/11 Letter to the Ithaca Times, 4/7/11 c i / '.- .J \ (''-■ \ \ April?, 2011 Buffering Six Mile Creek and Safeguarding the Water Supply To the Editor: For twenty-five years I have been a neighbor of the Six Mile Creek Natural Area and a regular visitor of its trails and natural vistas. Six Mile Creek has contributed substantially to the quality of my life in Commonland Community. Joe Murtagh's story concerning the city's interest in acquiring an eight acre land parcel to buffer and protect the natural area set me thinking. The intent is commendable, yet it aims to address a potential future problem, in the meantime, the city of Ithaca seems to be paying little attention to a current threat to the Six Mile Creek area. That threat is the problem posed by the large and growing number of swimmers and partiers who descend upon Six Mile Gorge each summer. Commonland has its own issues with this population, which 1 do not mean to address here. 1 do want to offer some observations, however, on the basis of my long-term year-round presence. When 1 arrived in the summer of 1986, an occasional car would park on Penny Lane, and the occupants would head for a dip in the gorge. Even then, signs indicated that a variety of activities, swimming, drinking, and building fi res among them, were prohibited. The prohibitions were not enforced, but the levels of transgression were so low that no real harm seemed to be / > occurring. About ten years ago, however, the population of swimmers began to increase rapidly. By last summer, our area was averaging about 100 per day, calculated on the basis of the number of vehicles parked on Penny Lane and a conservative estimate of three occupants per vehicle. On peak days like the Fourth of July weekend, three times that number of people were swimming and drinking in our sector of Six Mile Creek gorge. Another area, about a mile southeast along the creek, was attracting additional visitors. City Attorney Dan Hoffman is quoted in the Ithaca Times piece as having stated, "We value the Six Mile Creek area because it's our water source. You want your water source to be as free from contamination as possible ..." In this context, 1 would ask: Is having a couple hundred people daily swimming in your water source, spreading litter around your water source and relieving themselves in the vicinity of your water source keeping that water source "as free from contamination as possible?" Although any single transgression may cause only slight degradation, hundreds of such individual acts become highly significant. 1 think it's fair to say the status quo is unacceptable. While Ithaca may be looking to the future of Six Mile Creek, 1 submit that it is overlooking the present. What was an innocuous situation twenty-five years ago has metastasized into a real and obvious problem every summer. I hope that Common Council and Mayor Peterson will consider a more vigorous and comprehensive response than the seasonal hiring of a park ranger. It's no longer simply a matter of a couple locals visiting the ol' swimmin' hole to cool off on a sweltering summer day. Ralph B. Thompson Ithaca / ^ 7/17/11 66 cars, 1 motorcycle Pitcc 3 <• 1 U Kf"- A•c»rTT*ii»ir ^P* The aftermath 7/18/11 6:30 AM m i wuiur m 7, ^ a. '.7 i*y; I V' ^'/'. 0 '.Y ' • J» .•'JW ^ r 1 1 i-V-SttStv -78s'5'y'i(®.^:ttMSi /^■•:*V. .*,•,:••-' -.rf-Ss«|lMs^Sir^i-iV. • mmi r> f ^ f ^ Swimmer threatening Laura & CJ Pollock 7/23/11 (photo: L. Pollock) OHIt^ t ^ Monday 7/25/11 6:00 AMm f \ , ^ I \ I \ ! \ August 8,2011 I am Larry Sallinger and live with my wife, Louise at 14 Peachtree Ln. which borders the 80+ acre parcel from which the roughly 12 acre parcel that is the subject of the proposed Planned Development Zone would be carved. We are opposed to the establishment of the PDZ. When we decided to purchase our property and live here, it was with the understanding that the adjacent lands were zoned residential and agricultural and that the overall character of the neighborhood and property values would not likely be affected by commercial ventures on these adjacent lands. Upon first learning of the planned expansion of the IBC, we thought that the idea of a brew pub with a small dining facility and outdoor features, including gardens to support the operation would be a nice, neighborhood friendly enterprise. Especially when it was indicated that the owners of IBC would be building a home on the property. I attended a Plaiming Board meeting on Jime 21,2011 at which IBC's Dan Mitchell spoke of his vision of a 3 phase development plan for the property that would ultimately result in a 45,000 sq. ft. facility with over 150 parking spaces. This seems to be a far ciy from the original proposal that garnered press publicity last year and would, in our opinion, have adverse economic and quality of life impacts on the neighborhood we live in as well as other neighborhoods proximate to this proposed PDZ. The prospects of diminished property values as a result of this PDZ could have a negative impact on residential property values and taxes received by the town from affected properties. < \ r \ f \ / s n The Town Board should also consider the economic impacts on owners of commercial real estate that is available and zoned to allow for the construction of an enterprise such as is being proposed by IBC. To make a special arrangement in such circumstances, particularly when the subject property was acquired with the knowledge that it wouldn't allow a project of this nature without special zoning treatment, and with other suitable property available, gives an unfair advantage to IBC and casts doubt on the fairness of the zoning process in the town. A special change in existing zoning laws to accommodate a venture that does not advance the public good, further the health and welfare of the commimity or provide a needed benefit to the public is contrary to the spirit of fairness, is in direct conflict with die purposes and authorizations of the local laws and ordinances that shall be followed to establish a PDZ and could, in fact be subject to legal challenge. I also want to bring to the attention of the Board as well as the public the fact that IBC has requested taxpayer subsidized financial assistance through the Tompkins County Industrial Development Agency for its expansion even before the Town Board has voted on the PDZ. A hearing on this is scheduled for August 17,2011. This, along with the article in the August 8,2011 Ithaca Joumal regarding tonight's public hearing, makes one wonder how objective the Town Board will be in considering the public's input when the deal appears to be a fait accompli. Thank you, Lany & Louise Sallinger 14 Peachtree Ln. Ithaca ^ .-v f \ ' \ < \ f \ / \ 8-8-11 Town of Ithaca Board Council, We as bordering Resident's are concerned with the proposed property variance for the purpose of building a Brewery. Among some of our concerns are the following: 1. What will be the impact on our neighborhood with the approval of the Commercial Zone for a Brewery? 2. Property values will decline because commercial business close proximity (lowering tax base.) 3. Noise pollution from Trucks and Brewery operation. ^ 4. Concern about the Eco Friendly Green environment e.g. Air pollution from brewery operation. 5. The safety and welfare of neighborhood children with a brew pub so close by. Tom & Carol Fuller 175 Seven Mile Drive Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-9216 0 \ P \ Edward C. Marx, AlCP Commissioner of Planning and Community Sustainability County • '.i DEPARTiilfejJIIrQF PLANNING n 1 t?l Ew Court Stre^t^ Itha^t^Ne^^drk /14^0 (g,flPW' :■ f AUG-2 201 TOWNOFirh*-^^ PLANNING/ENGIN£-:"'^C Telephone (607) 274-SSW) Fax (607) 274-5578 July 29,2011 Mr. Michael Smith, Environmental Planner Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca. NY 14850 Re; Review Pursuant to §239 -i, -m and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law Action: Planned Development Zone for proposed Ithaca Beer Company development, Town ofIthaca Tax Parcel Nos. 33-3-2.2 and 31-3-3.12, Low Density Residential and LightIndustrial Zones, Mitchell Ventures, LLC, Owner/AppUcant; Dan Mitchell, President, Ithaca Beer Company, Inc., Agent. rs 0 \ n Dear Mr. Smith: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposal identified above for review and comment by theTompkins County Planning Department pursuant to §239 -I and -m of the New York State General MumcipalLaw. The Department has re viewed the proposal, as submitted, and has determined that it may have negativeinter-commimity, or county-wide impacts as described below. We recommend modification of the proposal. Ifthe Board does not incorporate the recommendations, such approval will require a vote of a supermajority(meaning a majority plus one) of all members of the decision-makmg body. Recommended Modifications • The Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan (1993) identifies the anticipated land use in this area as'Suburban Residential'. The uses identified in Planned Development Zone (PDZ) No. 14 could conflictwith the surrounding Low Density Residential Zone and the options for developing the surroundingresidential land may be compromised. In not including Parcel A within the PDZ boundary there arc notmechanisms in place that would require this area to develop in a fashion other than Low DensityResidential. At minimum, the PDZ should outline provisions for buffering the land uses allowed m the PDZ fr om the adjacent residentially zoned area. • The PDZ should be designed in a way as to eliminate the need to create any future curb cuts onto Route 13 for future access to Parcel A. Several studies, including the Town's Comprehensive Plan, have identified the intersections on Route 13 around this site as being of concern. Added curb cuts wouldonly add to traffic and safety concerns along this corridor. The PDZ should be conditioned on arequirement that future access to Parcel A be limited to the use of the existing Mancini Drive and Road an^or Peachtree Lane and Amber Lane. IncCusion tdmigfi (Diversity Page 1 of 2 Please inform us of your decision so that we can make it a part of the record. Sincerely, t \ ! \ <r^r Edward C. Marx, AICP Commissioner of Planning and Community Sustainability f \ Indusian tfrnrnffH diversity Page2of2 f \ f \ < \ i \ I \ Town off Ithaca Department off Code Enfforcement Monthly Report ffor June 2011 Category Description Entries Building Permit Inspection In the Field inspection tied to a building permit 156 Building Permit Consultation In-office or in-field consultation w/project managers or contractors regarding building projects 29 Building Permit Review Review and processing of buiiding permits 182 Complaint New Investigation New complaint investigation 11 Complaint Follow-Up Processing of complaints 18 Continuing Education Training, seminars, CEU's 9 Fire Incident Investigation Fire Incident Investigation following dispatched call 0 Rre Safety/Operating Permit Inspection Fire Safety inspection for and/or operating permit. Processing of notes and issuance of permit.5 Fire Safety/Operating Permit Re-Inspection Processing of Rre Safety re-inspection notes and issuing operating permit^ollow-up.19 Legal Processing Order to Remedy, issuing Appearance Tickets, and actual court appearances 0 Meeting Attendance at Departmental meetings, Board meetings. Committee meetings & Staff meetings, etc.48 Miscellaneous Counter service, phone calls not associated with an active file.117 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Review Field Inspection/Report 0 Zoning Board of Appeals Review and research of ZBA applications 5 Addresses (911)All related work for address changes 6 ; S / \ Town of Ithaca Codes Department Building Permits Issued in June 2011 Date Last name Street Number Street Name Description 6/1/2011 East HttI Plaza 353 Pine Tree Rd Install new roof 6/1/2011 Monroe 114 Terracevlew Or Reroof house 6/2/2011 Wilson Lab 177 Synchrotron Dr 20* X 40'Tent 6/2/2011 Mix 808 Mitchell St Demolish bulldktg 6/3/2011 Mailhot-Rreston 512 Warren Rd Rmoof 6/7/2011 Circle Aparfmen 7 College Cir Demolish Building #7 6/7/2011 Circle Apartmen 9 College Clr Demolish buildtng #9 6/7/2011 Circle /Vparbnen 11 College Clr Demolish building #11 6/7/2011 Circle /Vparbnen 13 College Cir Demolish building #13 6/7/2011 Kilmkiewicz 359 Warren Rd New two-famlty home 6/8/2011 Therm, Inc 1001 Hudson StExt RefMace portion of roof 6/8/2011 Rrst Assembly 197 BostwIckRd TentSCxSC 6/8/2011 Six Mile Creek 1551 Slaterville Rd Tent40'x40' 6/9/2011 Sayet 803 Coddlngton Rd Repair fire damage 6^/2011 Longo 508 Warren Rd Reroof house 6/10«011 Plantations 528 Plantations Rd Tent20'x20' 6/13/2011 Bacom 108 RidgecrestRd Replace roof and r^ralr ceiling 6/14/2011 Butlerlleld Stadl 125 Conservatory Dr Tent20'x20' 6/15/2011 W&QKetcham 118 WoolfLn InstaH AC system 6/20/2011 Dumont 168 WhItetallDr Repair storm damage 6/20/2011 East Tower 143 Tower Skyline Dr Relocate Resident Director Apartment; exp 6/22/2011 Hohensteln 108 WfarstonOr Alterations to garage and laundry area 6/23/2011 Eng 42 DoveDr Reroof house 6/24/2011 Trible and West 13 Orchard Hill Rd Tear off roof cover and replace on existing s 6/24/2011 Heine 696 Coddlngton Rd Partial reroof 6/27/2011 Holly Creek To 119 KlngRdW Interior renovations 6/27/2011 Greer 123 QlensldeRd Remove existing metal siding and Install va ( \ i \ f \ ( \ Tuesday^ July 05,201J Page I of 2 ( \ I \ t \ f \ ; \ < \ f \ Date Last name Street Number Street Name Description 6/29/2011 Thompson 107 ParkLn Replaca windows Tuesday, July OS, 2011 2 of 2 Town of Ithaca Codes Department Building Permits Received in June 2011 Date Rec'd CEO BP# St# Street Name Status 6/1/2011 BB 8^125 Consen/atoiy Or Issued 6/1/2011 KG 8865 42 Dove Or Issued 6/2/2011 KG 8870 101 Kay St Pendkig a/2/2011 KG 8868 119 Clover Ln Pendbig 6/2/2011 SW 8867 13 Orchard Hit! Rd Issued 6/2/2011 KG 8869 126 ChflstopherClr Pending 6/2/2011 KG 8871 107 ParkU Issued 6/3/2011 8874 528 Plantations Rd Issued 6/3/2011 BB 8875 197 BostwIckRd issued 6«/2011 KG 8672 1032 HanshawRd Pending 6/3/2011 KG 8873 120 Warren Rd Pending 6/6/2011 BB 8877 1551 Slaterville Rd Issued 6/6/2011 SW 8876 108 RldgecrestRd Issued 6/7/2011 KG 8879 125 Textof Clr Pending 6/7/2011 KG 8880 31 Fairway Dr Pending 6/7/2011 KG 8878 125 TextorCtr Pending 6/9/2011 SW 8883 118 WoolfLn Issued 6/9/2011 SW 8882 119 KIngRdW Issued 6/9/2011 SW 8881 Mecklenburg Rd Pending 6/13/2011 SW 8884 120 OrewRd Pending 6/14/2011 SW 8885 210 Enfleld Falls Rd Pending i \ f \ t \ ( \ f \ Tuesday, July 05, 2011 Page I of 2 f \ f \ I f \ ! \ DaieRec'd CEO St # Street Name Status f > / \ 6/16/20 6/16/20 minto 6/21/20 6/21/20 6/22/20 6/22/20 6/22/20 6/22/20 6/22/20 6/22/20 6/2^0 6/24/20 6/24/20 6/24/20 6/24/20 6/28/20 6/29/20 6/26/20 SW SW SW SW SW KG KG SW KG SW KG 8886 8887 8888 8860 8889 8891 8892 8893 8894 8896 8897 8899 8900a 8900b 8898 8901 8902 8904 8903 696 123 168 721 314 230 230 230 230 198 537 215 302 302 167 204 202 110 132 Coddkigton Rd GlensideRd WhHetall Dr EtmiraRd Okt Gorge Rd Wiicffiowef Dr#1 WfldfiowerDf«2 WildftowrarDr#3 WildflowerDrM Tarayton Dr Warren Rd NTtogaSt St Catherine Cir St Catherine Clr WhitetallDf ^tstein Heights Muriel St Westhaven Rd Salem Or issued Issued Issued Pending Pending Pending Pending Pendhg Pending Pending Pending Pending P«>dfato P^brg Pending Pending Pending Pendfrrg Pendlr>g f \ \ Tuesday^ July 05, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report oe/oi/20ii-oa/3(V2oii i \ ( \ Building Permtts BP#Date Value Description fee category 8852 6/1/2011 $136,700.00 Install new roof $425.00 Renovations & Additions to Commercial 8856 6/1/2011 $6,435.00 Reroof house $60.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8861 6/2/2011 $824.00 20'X 40'Tent $50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8830 6/2/2011 $30,000.00 Demolish buHding $100.00 8823 6/3/2011 $13,688.00 Reroof $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8832 6/7/2011 $29,625.00 Demolish Building #7 $100.00 8833 6/7/2011 $29,625.00 Demoltsh building #9 $100.00 8834 6/7/2011 $29,625.00 Demolish building #11 $100.00 8835 6/7/2011 $29,625.00 Demolish building #13 $100.00 8813 6/7/2011 $245,000.00 New two-family home $650.00 New 1 & 2 Family Homes 8864 6/8/2011 $16,800.00 Replace portion of roof $75.00 Renovations & Additions to Commercial 8875 6/8/2011 $2,100.00 Tent 30'X 90'$50.00 Temporary Membrane Stnjcture 8877 6/8/2011 $0.00 Tent 40' x 40'$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8846 6/9/2011 $10,400.00 Repair fire damage $75.00 Renovation & Additions to Muttiole Res 8859 6/9/2011 $9,500.00 Reroof hcxjse $60.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8874 6/10/2011 $100.00 Tent 20'X 20'$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8876 6/13/2011 $6,635.00 Replace roof and repair ceiling $60.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8866 6/14/2011 $150.00 Tent 20'X 20'$50.00 Temporary Mernbrane Structure 8883 6/15/2011 $9,652.00 InstaH AC system $60.00 Renovatkms and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes Tuesday, July 05. 2011 Page 1 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 06/D1/2011-0e/3<V2011 8888 6/20/2011 $74,308.00 Repair storm damage $250.00 Renovations and Adcmionto1&2 Famllv Homes 8862 6/20/2011 $250,000.00 Relocate Resident Director Apartment; expand Reskientiai Life Office $650.00 Renovations & Additions to Commercial 8858 6/22/2011 $31,136.00 Alterations to garage and laundry area $150.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8885 6/23/2011 $8,700.00 Reroof house $60.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8867 6/24/2011 $13,900.00 Tear off roof cover and replace on existing structure $75.00 Renovations and Additiontol & 2 Familv Homes 8886 6/24/2011 $1,200.00 Partial reroof $50.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8882 6/27/2011 $49,000.00 Interior renovations $150.00 Renovations and Addtticm to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8887 6/27/2011 $3,200.00 Remove existing metal siding and install vapor resistant barrier and vinyl siding $55.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8871 6/29/2011 $18,300.00 Replace windows $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes Totals r $1,058,228.001 1 $3,805.00 1 BP#Address Dascriptfon CO Temp 8829 22 Saunders Rd Replace roof 6/2/2011 □ 8111 1407 Mecklenburg Rd New bam 6/6/2011 □ 8787 950 Oanby Rd Renovate Suite 90 as Primet OfRce Space 6/7/2011 □ 8860 950 Danby Rd Change of occupancy 6/9/2011 □ 8601 107 Parit Ln Strip roof shingles, replace shingles.6/13/2011 □ underiayment, drip edge, flashings and □8770 215 Enfield Falls Rd enclose porch on rear of house 6/13/2011 8722 1150-1 Danby Rd Install ventless gas stove In yellow bam 6/13/2011 □ 8264 150 Lyceum Or Build Athletics & Events Center 6/17/2011 8328 132 Pine Tree Rd Re-side and enclose porch Into non-6/17/2011 □ habltatbte space 8844 215 Snyder Hill Rd Reroof house 6«1/2011 Tuesday, July 05.2011 Page 2 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 06/01/2011 -06/30/2011 i \ ( \ 8342 111 Southwooda Dr Now 2-story house 6/24/2011 □ 8827 110 Qlenside Rd new deck 6/27/2011 □ 8883 118 WoolfLn Install AC system 6/29/2011 □ 8268 819 Taughannock Bivd New single-family residence 6/29/2011 □ 8821 122 Parkin Reroof house 6/30/2011 □ 8823 512 Warren Rd Reroof 6/30/2011 □ Comnlalnts Date Address Complaint Type Disposition 6/1/2011 207 Christopher In property maintenance /Abated 6/1/2011 1102 East Shore Dr correspondence Other 6/3/2011 1016 East Shore Dr building code Pending 6/6/2011 136 Seven MiiaDr building code Pending 6/6/2011 136 Seven Mile Dr building code Pending 6/6/2011 680 Sheffield Rd correspondence Other 6/10/2011 1016 East Shore Dr building code No Violation Found 6/10/2011 1028 Blls Hollow Rd building code Pending 6/13/2011 1354 Slaterviiie Rd zoning use Pending 6/28/2011 125 RidgecrestRd property maintenarKe Pending 6/27/2011 358 Warren Rd property maintenance No Violation Found 6/26/2011 950 DanbyRd building code No Violation Found 6/17/2011 103 BundyRd tHiiiding code Pending 6/29/2011 1318 HanshawRd property maintenance Pendirtg 6/28/2011 246 Sapsucker Woods Rd correspondence Other f \ ( \ Existing Building CO < \ Tuesday, July 05,2011 Page 3 t \ ' \ Town of Ithaca Department of Code Enforcement Monthly Report for July 2011 Category Description Entries Buildina Permit inspection In the Field inspection tied to a buildina permit 151 Building Permit Consultation In-office or in-field consultation w/project managers or contractors regarding building projects 21 Buildinq Permit Review Review and processing of buildina permits 168 Complaint New Investiqation New complaint investigation 8 Complaint Follow-Up Processing of complaints 13 Continuinq Education Training, seminars, CEU's 0 Fire Incident Investigation Fire Incident Investigation following dispatched call 0 Rre Safety/Operating Permit Inspection Rre Safety inspection for and/or operating permit. Processing of notes and issuance of permit.6 Fire Safety/Operating Permit Re-lnspection Processing of Rre Safety re-inspection notes and issuing operating permit^ollow-up.22 nnn - Legal Processing Order to Remedy, Issuing Appearance Tickets, and actual court appearances 1 Meeting Attendance at Departmental meetings. Board meetings, Committee meetings & Staff meetings, etc.53 Miscellaneous Counter service, phone calls not associated with an active file.91 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Review Field Inspection/Report 0 Zoning Board of Appeals Review and research of ZBA applications 7 Addresses (911)All related work for address changes 0 f \ , \ ' \ C V Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 07/01/2011 - 07/31/2011 Building Permtts BP # Date Value Description 8901 7/6/2011 $5,200.00 Reroof 8847 7/8/2011 $650,000.00 New single-family residence 8898 7/8/2011 $9,350.00 Tear off and recover existing roof cover fee category $60.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes $1,500.00 New 1 & 2 Family Homes 8885 7/11/2011 8870 7/12/2011 $325,000.00 Construct one-story addition and two-car attached garage (isp doesnl cover this work); bathroom remodel (issued) $4,300.00 Replace windows 8897 7/12/2011 $10,309,00 Reroof house 8903 7/12/2011 $10,912.00 Reroof house 8908 7/13/2011 $9,700.00 Strip existing roofing and reshingle 8884 7/13/2011 $150,000.00 New single-family home 8891 7/13/2011 $4,000.00 Reroof 8892 7/13/2011 8893 7/13/2011 8894 7/13/2011 $4,000.00 Reroof $4,000.00 Reroof $4,000.00 Reroof 8909 7/13/2011 $13,000.00 Strip existing roofing and reshingle 8911 7/13/2011 $10,000.00 Rnish basement 8915 7/13/2011 $19,700.00 Replace roof and heating system 8842 7/14/2011 $423,000.00 Addition to community building 8868 7/14/2011 $9,500.00 Reroof house 8908 7/18/2011 $58,500.00 Electrical and lighting upgrades, fire alarm installation $60.00 $800.00 $55.00 $75.00 $75.00 $60.00 $425.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $75.00 $120.00 $150.00 $1,000.00 $60.00 $250.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renoyations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renoyations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes New 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renoyations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations & Additions to C<»nmercial Renoyations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes Renovations & Additions to Commercial Monday, Au^t 01,2011 Page 1 Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 07/01/2011-07/31/2011 8913 7/19/2011 $1Q,000.00 Tear off existing and install new rubberized roof system $120.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8857 7/19/2011 $9,500.00 Install playhouse $60,00 Renovations & Additions to Commercial 8924 7/20/2011 $13,200.00 Reroof $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8914 7/20/2011 $500.00 Tent 20'X 60*$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8912 7/20/2011 $15,000.00 Constrxjct 396 sq ft deck on front of existing structure $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8919 7/20/2011 $10,588.00 Tear off and recover roof on existing single-family residence $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8922 7/20/2011 $300.00 Tent 20'x 30'$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8925 7/20/2011 $15,900.00 Reroof house $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8929 7/20/2011 $20,000.00 Tear-off and replace roof cover on existing structure (building 1) $100.00 Renovations & Additions to Commercial 8920 7/21/2011 $18,000.00 Construct 12' x 16' deck, resurface existing dock with Trex $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8930 7/21/2011 $4,000.00 Reroof house $110.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8926 7/25/2011 $2,500.00 install 4 skylights $50.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Famllv Homes 8641 7/25/2011 $70,000.00 Construct storage building #41 $250.00 Miscellaneous 8910 7/25/2011 $275.00 Tent 20'x 40'$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8932 7/26/2011 $12,000.00 Reconstruct chimney from roof deck to cap $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8907 7/27/2011 $95,000.00 Install lab casework, sinks and fumehoods to create R&O lab $250.00 Renovations & Additions to Commercial 8880 7/27/2011 $40,000.00 Finish basement area $150.00 Renovations and AddWontol &2 Famllv Horrwe 8896 7/27/2011 $12,361.00 Reroof two-family home $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8928 7/28/2011 $11,000.00 Extend rear deck $75.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Familv Homes 8921 7/28/2011 $100,000.00 Alter classrooms 4306 and 4308 to increase occupancy $250.00 Renovations & Additions to Commercial PMonday, August 01,2011 age 2 Town of ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 07/01/2011 - 07/31/2011 8927 7/29/2011 $1,000.00 Tent40'x180'$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8890 7/29/2011 $8,000.00 Install egress windows, 1 hour fire separation to basement ceiling $60.00 Renovations and Addition to 1 & 2 Family Homes 8935 7/29/2011 $250.00 Tent 90'X 30'$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8936 7/29/2011 $250.00 Tent 20* X 20'$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure 8938 7/29/2011 $250.00 Tent 20'X 20*$50.00 Temporary Membrane Structure Totals r $2,194,345.00 |$7,335.00 1 BP#/Address Description CO Temp 8710 129 WoolfLn New single-family residence 7/6/2011 □ 8849 1232 Trumansburg Rd Replace chimney 7/8/2011 □ 8876 108 RIdgecrest Rd Replace roof and repair celling 7/8/2011 □ 8730 919 East Shore Dr Reside house 7/12/2011 □ 8598 135 Burleigh Dr Convert storage room Into studio/workshop; Extend deck and add 7/13/2011 □ 8581 117 Concord PI New siding, fascia, soffit 7/13/2011 □ 8317 110 Blackstone Ave New 2-family residence 7/14/2011 □ 8887 123 Glenslde Rd Remove existing metal siding and install vapor resistant barrier and vinyl siding 7/20/2011 □ 8867 13 Orchard Hill Rd Tear off roof cover and replace on existing structure 7/20/2011 □ 8643 109 RIdgecrest Rd Strip and re-shingle house roof. Install aluminum soffit, facia, and gutters 7/20/2011 □ 8915 136 Westhaven Rd Replace roof and heating system 7/21/2011 □ 8903 132 Salem Dr Reroof house 7/25/2011 □ 8822 331 WInthrop Dr Reroof 7/25/2011 □ 8913 128 Westhaven Rd Tear off existing and Install new rubberized roof system 7/28/2011 □ Monday, August 01,2011 Pages / \ Town of Ithaca Code Enforcement Monthly Report 07/01/2011-07/31/2011 6615 1322 Hanshaw Rd New roof, 35' ice/water, 15# felt, 30 yr shingles 7/28/2011 □ 8611 1020 Ellis Hollow Rd Re-roofing 7/28/2011 □ 8911 103 Larisa Ln Rnish basement 7/29/2011 □ Complaints Data Address Complaint Type Disposition 7/6/2011 103 Larisa L41 building code Pending 7/8/2011 358 Warren Rd building code Pending 7/13/2011 165 Williams Glen Rd building code Pending 7/13/2011 546 Warren Rd other Local Law Abated 7/19/2011 207 Christopher Ln property maintenance Pending 7/25/2011 150 Lyceum Or other Local Law Pending 7/22/2011 302 St. Catherine Cir sign Abated Existing Building CO f \ Monday. August 01. 2011 Page 4 f \ ' \ f \ ' \ Town of Ithaca Codes Department Building Permits Issued in July 2011 Date Last name Street Number Street Name Description 7/6C011 Quo 204 Eastern Heights D Reroof 7/8/2011 Development, L 27 Fairway Or New single-family residence 7/8/2011 Sweeney 167 Whitelail Dr Tear off and recover existing roof cover 7/11/2011 Philipson, Samp 210 Enfieid Fails Rd Construct one-story addition and two-car att 7/12/2011 Gomez 101 Kay St Replace windovrs 7/12/2011 Studin 537 Warren Rd Reroof house 7/12/2011 Racker Center 132 Salem Or Reroof house 7/13/2011 Freeman 106 Grove Rd Strip existing roofing and reshlngta 7/13/2011 Yastictienko 120 DrewRd New skr^famlly home 7/13/2011 Smith 230 WfldflowerDr#1 Reroof 7/13/2011 Ward 230 Wlldftower Dr#2 Reroof 7/13/2011 Hatt 230 WtidflowerDr#3 Reroof 7/13/2011 Jacobs 230 Wlktflower Dr #4 Reroof 7/13/2011 Freeman 258 Dubois Rd Strip existing roofktg and reshlngle 7/13/2011 Westvtew Partn 103 LartsaLn Rntsh basemoit 7/13/2011 Matthews 136 Westhaven Rd Replace roof and heating system 7/14/2011 Circle Apartmen 30 College Circle Or Addition to community building 7/14/2011 Johnston 119 Clover Ln Reroof house 7/18/2011 Fuertes Obsen/209 Gradit Farm Dr Electrical and lighting upgrades, fire alarm 1 7/19/2011 HIKon 128 Westhaven Rd Tear off existing and Install new rubberized 7/19/2011 Montessori Sch 120 KIngRdE Install playttouse 7/20/2011 Zheng 171 Lexkigton Dr Reroof 7/20/2011 Park Hall 318 Grant E^eit Blvd Tent 20'X 60* 7/20/2011 Spaulding 285 Bums Rd Construct 396 sq ft deck on front of existing 7/20/2011 Perenyl 148 Rktgecrest Rd Tear off and recover roof on existing slngle-f 7/20/2011 Monastery 201 Tibet Dr TentZffxSC 7/20/2011 Santhanam 146 1 t o Reroof house ( \ \ Monday, August 01,2011 Page I of 2 / \ ' \ ( \ Date Las/ name Street Number Street Name Description 7/20/2011 Warrenwood 16 600 Warren Rd Tear*off aral ref^ce roof cover on existing s 7/21/2011 HamRton 201 Christopher Ln Construct 12* x 16' deck, resurface existing 7/21/2011 Jordan 238 Dubois Rd Reroot house 7/25/2011 Fbttman 140 Northview Rd install 4 skyll^ts 7/25/2011 Ctrcie Apartmen 230 Flora Brown Dr Construct storage building #41 7/25/2011 Wilson Lab 11 Synchrotron Dr Tent20'x40' 7/26«011 Kelly 130 Enfield Fails Rd Reconstruct chimney from roc^ deck to cap 7/27/2011 Primet Preclsio 950 Daniiy Rd Install tab casework, sinks and fumehoods t 7/27/2011 Smith 31 Fairway Dr Rnish basement area 7/27/2011 Dejong 198 Tareyton Dr Reroof two-family home 7/28/2011 Halfpenny 112 PInewood PI Extend rear deck 7/28/2011 Whalen Center f 146 Conservatory Dr Alter classrooms 4306 and 4308 to increase 7/29/2011 RTJ Golf Coure 213 Warren Rd Tent 40^x180* 7/29/2011 Philips 721 E^ira Rd Install egress wkrdows, 1 hour fire separatio 7/29/2011 Six Mile Greek 1551 Slatenrille Rd Tent 90* x 30* 7/29/2011 Six Mile Creek 1551 Slatervllle Rd Tent 20'X 20 7/29/2011 Six Mile Creek 1551 Statervllie Rd Tent 20x20 / N Monday, August 01,2011 Page 2 of 2 I \ t \ Town of Ithaca Codes Department Building Permits Received in July 2011 Date Rec'd CEO BP 11 S/# Street Name Status f \ 7/5/2011 CB 8906 209 Cradlt Farm Dr Issued 7/8/2011 SW 8907 950 Danby Rd Issued 7/11/2011 SW 8908 106 Grove Rd Issued 7/11/2011 SW 8909 258 Dubois Rd Issed 7/12/2011 BB 8910 11 Synchrotron Dr Issued 7/12/2011 SW 8912 285 Bums Rd Issued 7/12/2011 SW 8911 103 tarisaLn Issued 7/12/2011 SW 8913 128 Westhaven Rd Issued 7/13/2011 8914 318 Grant E^iert Blvd Issued 7/13/2011 8916 1316 HanshawRd Pending 7/13/2011 8918 147 HonneesLji Pending 7/13/2011 8917 503 Warren Rd Pending 7/13/2011 SW 8919 148 RIdgecrest Rd Issued 7/13/2011 8920 201 Qirlstopher Ln Issued 7/13/2011 8915 136 Westhaven Rd issued 7/14/2011 KQ 8921 146 Conservatory Dr Issued 7/15/2011 8922 201 Tibet Dr Issued 7/15/2011 KG 8923 103 Joanne Of Pendkig 7/15/2011 KG 8924 171 Lexington Dr Issued 7/15/2011 KG 8925 146 Lexington Dr Issued 7/18/2011 SW 8926 140 NorthviewRd Issued f \ Monday, August 01,2011 Page 1 of 2 ( \ / \ DauRec'd CEO BP#St # Street Name Status f \ 7/18/20 7/19«0 7/19/20 7/20/20 7/21/20 7/21/20 7/21/20 7/21/20 7122/20 7/25/20 7/25/20 7/27/20 7/27/20 BB KG SW SW SW KG 8927 8928 8929 8930 8935 8936 8937 8938 8931 8933 8932 8934 8939 213 112 600 238 1551 1551 1551 1561 152 528 130 950 325 Warren Rd PInewood PI Warren Rd Dubois Rd Slaten/ilta Rd Slatervtlle Rd Slaten/ille Rd Statervllle Rd RIdgecrestRd Plantations Rd EnfleM Falls Rd Dant>y Rd Pine Tree Rd Issued Issued Issued Issued Issued Issued Pending Issued pending Pending Issued Pendbig Pending ( \ Monday, August 01,2011 Page 2 of 2 08/05/2011 ccount# I V Town Clerk Monthly Report July 01, 2011 - July 31,2011 Account Description Fee Description Qty Page 1 Local Share Marriage License Marriage Fee 34 595.00 Marriage Transcript Marriage Transcript 4 40.00 Misc. Copies Misc. Copies 1 14.20 Tax Search Tax Search 1 5.00 Sub-Total:$654.20 Impound Fees Impound Fees 3 140.00 Sub-Total:$140.00 Park Rental Fee Park Rental Fee 1 25.00 Sub-Total:$25.00 Dog Licensing Female, Spayed 54 504.00 Female, Unspayed 4 68.00 Male, Neutered 61 621.00 Male, Unneutered 8 136.00 Sub-Total:$1,329.00 Electrical Permit Electrioal Permit 8 833.00 Sub-Total:$833.00 Zoning Board Meeting Appl.Zoning Board Meeting Appl.1 100.00 Sub-Total:$100.00 Building Permit Building Permit 28 3,125.00 Building Permit Extension Building Permit Extension 4 522.50 Sign Permit Sign Permit 1 90.00 Temp. Certif. of Occupancy Temp. Certif. of Occupancy 1 325.00 Sub-Total:$4,062.50 Operating Permit Fee Operating Permit Fee 3 7,600.00 Sub-Total:$7,600.00 Add. Mtg. Fee Agenda Process Add. Mtg. Fee Agenda Process 1 30.00 Add. Mtg. Fee PH Process Add. Mtg. Fee PH Process 1 50.00 Site Plan Final Plat Site Plan Final Plat 2 3,000.00 Subdiv. Rev Final Plat Subdiv. Rev Final Plat 2 630.00 Subdiv. Rev Initial App Subdiv. Rev Initial App 1 100.00 Sub-Total:$3,810.00 Fill Permit Fill Permit 1 100.00 Sub-Total:$100.00 Bid Spec Deposit Bid Spec Deposit 7 0.00 Sub-Total:$0.00 1255 t \ A1557 A2191 A2544 B210g B2110 ^^111 f \ B2113 B2115 B2691 TA30 f \ 08/05/2011 Town Clerk Monthly Report July 01,2011 - July 31,2011 Page Account#Account Description Fee Description Qty Local Share f N Total Local Shares Remitted: Amount paid to: NYS Ag. & Markets for spay/neuter program Amount paid to: State Health Dept. Total State, County & Local Revenues:$19,579.70 Total Non-Local Revenues: $18,653.70 f 161.00 765.00 $926.00 To the Supen/isor: Pursuant to Section 27, Sub 1, of the Town Law, I hereby certify that the foregoing is and true statement of all fees and monies received by me, Paulette Terwilliger, Town Clerk, Town of Ithaca during the period stated above, in cdntjBctionyWthjny office, excepting only such fees and monies, the application of which aiSLPtherwise provided for by law. upervis Town Clerk ■S. • \ I \ t \ ( ^