Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-10-21 October 21, 2015
1
REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING
October 21, 2015
A Regular Meeting of the Lansing Town Board was held at the Town Hall Board Room,
29 Auburn Road, Lansing, NY on the above date at 6:01 p.m. The meeting was called to
order by the Supervisor, Kathy Miller and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the
flag. Roll call by Debbie Crandall, Town Clerk, showed the following to be
PRESENT:
Kathy Miller, Supervisor Robert Cree, Councilperson
Doug Dake, Councilperson Ruth Hopkins, Councilperson
Edward LaVigne, Councilperson
ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Sharon Bowman, Deputy Supervisor, Guy Krogh, Town Counsel,
Charlie “Cricket” Purcell, Deputy Highway Superintendent, Steve Colt, Parks and
Recreation Superintendent, Dan Veaner, Lansing Star, Ted Laux, Connie Wilcox, Chris
Williams, Matthew Dedrick, and a few other attendees.
RESOLUTION TO REQUEST REDUCTION OF SPEED LIMIT ON ATWATER
ROAD
Supervisor Kathy Miller noted that prior to the meeting a resident submitted a petition for
a speed limit reduction on Atwater Road resulting in the following resolution of support.
RESOLUTION 15-110
RESOLUTION TO REQUEST REDUCTION OF SPEED LIMIT
ON ATWATER ROAD
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Lansing has received a request from the
residents along Atwater Road concerned about excessive speeds, and a representative of
the neighborhood has presented a petition signed by the residents in support thereof; and
WHEREAS, Atwater Road is a Town Highway between Asbury Road and Route 34 at a
distance of 0.5± mile. There is a rise approximately ¼ mile from the end of Route 34 that
will hide a vehicle from view that presents a visibility hazard when pulling out of
driveways. The road consists of many homes and several commercial businesses. This
section of road is used by many non-resident drivers as a short cut going to and from
North Triphammer Road and Route 34. The road is also used by joggers, walkers and
bicyclists with limited or no shoulders on either side; and
WHEREAS, upon consideration and deliberation upon the same, the Town Board of the
Town of Lansing has hereby
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Lansing supports the requested
reduction in speed limit and hereby directs that the Town requests the New York State
Department of Transportation to conduct a traffic study along Atwater Road in the Town
of Lansing for the purpose of considering reduced speed to enhance safety.
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Supervisor Kathy Miller, duly seconded by Councilperson Doug Dake, and put to a roll
call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree – Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins – Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne – Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller – Aye
October 21, 2015
2
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015
THREE COLOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT ROUTE 34B AND NORTH
TRIPHAMMER:
Supervisor Kathy Miller informed the Town Board and public present that she and
Michael Long, Planning Consultant met with the NYSDOT. She noted that it could take
at least three years to install the three color traffic signal at this intersection and they will
also be considering a roundabout. The NYSDOT noted that the arms of the light would
be on land and only one easement is needed. Supervisor Kathy Miller stated that even
though the Town Board was not in favor of this installation it did not make a difference
in their decision. She would provide the study to the Town Board members for their
review.
MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING – LOCAL LAW #7 – TOWN OF
LANSING COMMUNICATIONS TOWER LOCAL LAW
Supervisor Kathy Miller moved to OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
AND ADOPT LOCAL LAW #7 TOWN OF LANSING COMMUNICATIONS
TOWER LOCAL LAW at 6:10 pm. Councilperson Robert Cree seconded the motion.
All in Favor - 5 Opposed - 0
No one addressed the Town Board.
A copy of Local Law #7 was available online and at the meeting.
MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
All persons desiring to be heard, having been heard, Supervisor Kathy Miller moved to
CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING at 6:11 pm. Councilperson Ruth Hopkins seconded
the motion.
All in Favor - 5 Opposed - 0
MOTION TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING – LOCAL LAW #8 – LICENSING,
IDENTIFICATION, AND CONTROL OF DOGS IN THE TOWN OF LANSING
Supervisor Kathy Miller moved to OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
AND ADOPT LOCAL LAW #8 LICENSING, IDENTIFICATION, AND
CONTROL OF DOGS IN THE TOWN OF LANSING at 6:12 pm. Councilperson
Robert Cree seconded the motion.
All in Favor - 5 Opposed - 0
Dan Veaner stated he thought the town had a local dog law and was inquiring what
happened to it.
Counsel Guy Krogh noted that the dog law had periodically been amended since 2004
with the current one being when NYS Ag and Markets, as an unfunded mandate, turned
over the licensing to municipalities, (counties and towns, not villages). He noted there
were substantial infirmities beyond due process and it had some problems. The Parks
Department was not able to write tickets for nuisance dogs in the parks as the dog law
didn’t apply to dogs that were not on a leash. He noted that with the new local law, dog
control will actually mean dog control.
A copy of Local Law #8 was available online and at the meeting.
MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
All persons desiring to be heard, having been heard, Supervisor Kathy Miller moved to
CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING at 6:14 pm. Councilperson Robert Cree
seconded the motion.
All in Favor - 5 Opposed - 0
October 21, 2015
3
TOMPKINS COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE – MIKE SIGLER
Mike reviewed the following report and it was made available as a handout.
TOMPKINS COUNTY LEGISLATOR
MICHAEL SIGLER
REPORT FOR 10/21/2015
Hello and thanks for having me. It’s been a busy month at the County
Legislature as we went through the budget. Last night we passed the
budget. We adopted amendments to the County Administrator’s 2015
Recommended Budget and the Capital Program for the next five years.
The vote was 10-2. The amended budget would increase the County tax
levy 1.12%, compared to the 1.3% included in the Administrator’s
budget, to meet the Legislature’s 2016 levy goal. The recommended tax
rate of $6.73 per thousand is down by 1.77% from 2015. As part of the
amended budget, the County Soil Waste Fee would increase by $3.00
from the 2015 level, to $55.00 per household, a dollar less than was in
the Recommended Budget.
The one thing I added in was a new Community Nurse for the Early
Intervention program. I have some experience with this program and for
me it’s the most valuable program at the county. The head of the
department said he needed the position so I put in for it and there were
enough votes to move ahead. The county roads will be getting a
$100,000 boost over what was recommended which after the winter’s
we’ve had is welcome and the county will be putting more money into a
program that reintegrates those released from jail back into the
community. This stemmed from the task force set up during the debate
over the jail expansion.
The Legislature will hold the public budget hearing on Tuesday,
November 10 beginning at 7 p.m. at Legislature Chambers, located at the
Governor Daniel D. Tompkins Building (Second Floor), 121 E. Court
Street, Ithaca. The Legislature’s final budget adoption vote is scheduled
for November 17, and changes may still be made prior to final adoption.
Amendments to the Recommended Budget, as well as other information
regarding the 2015 budget process, are available for review online at the
County website at www.tompkinscountyny.gov/ctyadmin/2016budget.
We heard findings from the latest survey on homeless you last night.
The summary of findings from the fourth Independent Living Survey
Project, conducted by the Tompkins County Youth Services Department,
Cornell University’s Bronfenbrenner Center for Translation Research,
and the Learning Web.
Among the many findings, that the issue of housing is crucial, with a
very unstable housing situation for young people. In the survey of 208
young people who met the definition of being homeless, one-third
indicated that they don’t feel safe; many left home due to conflict; most
citing employment concerns, with transportation often being a factor in
employment. Substance abuse trends show a decline in use of such
substances as marijuana and alcohol, but an increase in those including
tobacco, cocaine, and heroin. Top current needs the youth identified
included transportation, help finding and affordable housing, and help
finding a job.
October 21, 2015
4
Read the full study report, posted on the County’s website at
www.tompkinscountyny.gov/files/ctyadmin/IndependentLivingSurvey
Summary 2015.pdf. – Contact Director Amie Hendrix, Tompkins County
Youth Services, 274-5310
Some good news on sales tax. Finance Director Rich Snyder reported a
1.68% increase in County share, compared to the third quarter of 2014,
which he characterized as “fairly robust” growth after the year’s first two
negative quarters. He noted that the third quarter receipts of $8,788,893
are “historically, the highest third quarter on record”.
From earlier in the month: The Legislature approved a request from the
Tompkins County Sheriff’s Office to appropriate more than $360,000
from the Contingent Fund to cover anticipated shortfalls in the 2015
budget related to overtime expense in the Road Patrol and Corrections
Divisions, and inmate board-out costs.
Thanks again for your time and thanks again to Marcia Lynch for her
highlights which I draw liberally from for this report.
Supervisor Kathy Miller was concerned about the intersection of Asbury and North
Triphammer Roads and the blinking light. Mike Sigler will talk to Jeffrey Smith,
Tompkins County Highway Director concerning this intersection.
LANSING COMMUNITY LIBRARY REPORT – was available has a handout.
Town Board Updates from Lansing Community Library
October 21, 2015
1. On Tuesday October 27, 2015 at 4:30 PM,LCL is hosting a new story time for
young adult readers that includes:
A discussion about the story line, characters, setting, etc.
An interactive part (role-playing, puppets and more)
A hands-on activity(crafts and make-and-takes)
2. The Come and GO Lego program, held every Saturday, continues to be well
attended and will run through the fall.
3. The Library Garden has now been decorated for fall so we encourage everyone
to go out and walk through it.
4. The Fall Book Sale will be a two day even this year for the first time. On Friday,
November 6 the sale will be open from 4 to 7 PM. On Saturday, November 7,
2015, the Book Sale will run from 9 AM to 3 PM.
5. In conjunction with the Fall Book Sale, the Cornell Center for Materials Research
Educational Outreach Program will again host Science Saturday at the
Community Center, starting at 10 AM.
6. Our community-authored book idea, Heroes of Lansing, has taken a twist. LCL
would like to publish stories about local heroes on its Facebook page. Stories
(about 1-3 paragraphs) can be sent to LansingHeroes@gmail.com and pictures
are particularly welcome.
7. The Tompkins County Board has approved an increase to their annual funding
for rural libraries and the Finger Lakes Library System. The increase will be
$1,400.
8. The Friends LCL are hosting an Artisan Fair is Friday, December 3 from 4-7 PM and
Saturday, December 4, 10-5 PM. The vendor fee is $40 and there are still vendor
spots available. Interested parties can find the application forms at the
circulation desk. They will also be holding a raffle of a gift basket with artisan "wares"
and selling donation "cards" to benefit the Friends.
9. Through October, the LCL artist display is Bowery & Basketry, the sculptural
weavings of Gerry Monaghan.
October 21, 2015
5
10. Upcoming programs include:
Fall Book Sale November 6 and 7, 2015
Science Saturday, November 7, 2015
Craft Fair, November 2015
PARKS AND RECREATION REPORT – STEVE COLT
Steve reviewed the following report and it was made available as a handout:
Parks & Recreation Department
10/21/15
Town Board Meeting
RECREATION
Youth Soccer just completed their schedule this past Thursday, a week later than
usual, due to the late Labor Day holiday this year. We had a really good turn-out
this season with only one rain cancelation. We have great volunteer coaches!!!
Flag Football and Small Fry Football are still active with one more game to
complete. We have very young teams this year that have shown great
improvement.
We have a multitude of programs just starting or about to start for the late fall
and early winter seasons. These include: Friday Indoor Soccer, Youth Yoga,
Open Bowling, Fall Jump Around, Horse Riding & Handling Camp, Ski Club,
Volleyball Camp, Adult Open Swim, Boys & Girls Basketball, Gymnastics, Adult
Strength and Stretch, Cardio Step Class, Adult COED Volleyball.
These programs are listed on our web page and have been listed in the Ithaca
Journal. We have registration forms in the schools and here in the Town Hall.
We have also used the school’s email system to reach the Lansing school families
directly.
Within a couple of weeks I will start to recondition our fall program equipment
and replace what needs to be based on safety concerns or playability.
PARKS
Our parks have finally slowed to an off season pace. The Columbus Day holiday
was nearly sold out for camping in Myers Park. The weather was great, but
camping is finished for the season. People will continue to exercise walk in the
park all winter if weather permits.
The fall clean-up process has started. This is very important for us and directly
impacts how the parks will look in the spring. Getting this work done now saves
our crew a lot of time in the spring.
We have several memorial trees to pick up and install before we close in early
November. Late fall is a great time of the year to plant and is also the best time
of the year to purchase!!
Current art work that is hanging is from Ed Brothers (oil pastel paintings) and
there will be an organized showing this Friday from 7 – 9 PM.
PLANNING CONSULTANT REPORT – MICHAEL LONG – was made available as
a handout.
October 21, 2015
6
Novalane – Jack Young
o Preliminary Plat subdivision plan with turn around extension of Smugglers
Path.
o SEQR – classified as an “Unlisted Action” and will have resolutions
available.
o Public Hearing opened Feb 9th for the “Flag Lots” – still open.
o Storm Water Plan SWPPP reviewed by TG Miller, letter dated Jan 26,
2015 of issues, revisions currently underway
o Site meeting to walk future Smugglers Path road extension – 5/7/2015 –
o Request for 1 lot subdivision as an interim step before the entire
subdivision is completed – Sept 28, 2015.
o Preliminary and Final Plat approvals - TBD.
West view Partners, Boris Simkin – Major Subdivision – 4 Lots.
o Designated a Major subdivision (4 lots and ROW issues) – phase plan
completed by T.G. Miller with ROW access and future roads included
(drawing dated 12/15/2015).
o Revised Subdivision Plan - submitted to TG Miller Storm Water Plan for 4
lots.
o Revised 239 Review from County – response 50 foot buffer 3/30/2015
o SWPPP plan reviewed by TG Miller, recommended changes, Meeting
held on 4/8/2015 – still waiting on revisions.
o Field work completed 9/4/29015 with Dave Herrick on site.
o Public Hearing date – after storm water plan revisions are approved by
T.G. Miller…
Whispering Pines VI – Subdivision 28 lots - Richard Thaler
o Revised Plans being developed by engineer. (submitted 3/26/2015)
o 239 Review from Tomkins County – letter dated 4/24/2015 with 100 foot
setback from stream bank.
o Storm Water Review – T.G. Miller currently underway – Lot #7 ok with
drainage easement. Balance of site still being reviewed.
o Water District Extension –Town Board Public Hearing held 4/15/2015 with
Town Board Approval completed.
o Lot #7 – Treat as VI - #1A – Flag Lot public hearing 5/11/2015 and
requesting Final Plat / SEQR approval and site plan approval 5/11/2015
meeting.
o Public Hearing – Completed May 11, 2015 – SEQR and Preliminary Plat
Subdivision approved.
o SEQR / Preliminary Platt / Final Platt – TBD.
Forest Circle Drive – Major subdivision of 17 lots.
o Tompkins Co. 239 review has been completed.
o Storm water plan revisions requested T.G. Miller.
o Will require a variance as 1 lot is less than 150 foot of road frontage.
o Revisions are being made to the SWPPP materials.
o Revised plan will remove flag lot condition as per Engineer Tim Buhl
o SEQRA, Preliminary and Final Plat approvals – TBD.
Ag Plan – Follow up meeting – finalize report meeting June 1, 2015
o Joint Planning Board and Town Board meeting held– June 22, 2015
o Town Board Public Hearing Meeting – July 15, 2015
o Town Board establishes 2nd Public Hearing for Sept. 16, 2015
o Town Board to establish an Agriculture Committee as per the
recommendations.
Eisenhut Subdivision / (Sciarabba) Flag Lot - Minor subdivision (2 parcels).
October 21, 2015
7
o Sketch Plan review (Aug 10, 2015).
o Planning Board waiver for length of driveway over 500 feet and waiver
for shared drive)
o Public Hearing required – Sept 14th.
o Subdivision Approved - Sept 14th meeting.
Conway Subdivision ( Lansing Station) Flag Lot – Minor subdivision (2 parcels)
o Sketch Plan Review (Aug 10, 2015).
o Planning Board waiver required for 3 continuous flag lots
o Public Hearing required – Sept 14th.
o Subdivision Approved - Sept. 14th meeting.
Mirabito Holdings, Inc. – Site Plan Requested
o 3 acre phased development – LP Gas storage facility
o Preliminary Site Plan meeting – tentative Oct 26, 2015
o SEQRA, SWPPP and Site Plan approval – TBD.
A. Scott Piney – Peruville Road Site Plan to add 15 additional duplex buildings
o SEQRA, SWPPP and Site Plan approval – TBD.
Comprehensive Plan – Wed. November 11, 2015 at 7:00 PM
PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR
No one addressed the Town Board.
RESOLUTION SCHEDULING PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED
SPECIAL DISTRICTS BUDGET FOR 2016
RESOLUTION 15-111
RESOLUTION SCHEDULING PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE SPECIAL DISTRICTS PROPOSED
BUDGET FOR 2016
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Lansing has prepared the Assessment
Rolls of parcels of land included in the Lansing Consolidated Water Districts, CWD Ext.
1, and CWD Ext. 2 and Lansing Light Districts No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 and the Lansing
Drainage Districts, Pheasant Meadow, Whispering Pines, Lake Forest, Farm Pond Circle
and Lansing Sewer Districts, Warren Road and Cherry Road and has apportioned and
assessed upon such parcels of land in proportion in the amount of benefits the
improvements shall confer upon the same the cost chargeable to said Districts in
connection with the construction of Public Water, Lighting, Drainage and Sewer
Districts, therein which are payable in the year 2016 and therefore, pursuant to Section
239 of the Town Law, the Town Board shall hold a Public Hearing at the Lansing Town
Hall, 29 Auburn Road, Lansing, New York at 6:02 p.m., on the 4th day of November,
2015 to hear and consider any objections which may be made to said roll.
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Supervisor Kathy Miller, duly seconded by Councilperson Ruth Hopkins, and put to a
roll call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins - Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne - Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
RESOLUTION SCHEDULING PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED
BUDGET FOR 2016
October 21, 2015
8
RESOLUTION 15-112
RESOLUTION SCHEDULING PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE PRELIMINARY BUDGET FOR 2016
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the preliminary budget of the Town of Lansing,
Tompkins County, New York for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2016 has been
completed and filed in the office of the Town Clerk of said Town, where it is available
for inspection by any interested persons at all reasonable hours and
FURTHER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Town Board of the Town of
Lansing will meet and review said preliminary budget and hold a Public Hearing thereon
at the Lansing Town Hall, 29 Auburn Road, Lansing, New York at 6:04 p.m. on the 4th
day of November, 2015 and that at such hearing any person may be heard in favor of or
against the preliminary budget as compiled or for or against any items therein contained
and
FURTHER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 108 of the Town Law,
that the following are proposed yearly salaries of elected Town Officials of this Town:
Supervisor $ 30,306.00
Councilperson (4)
Total $ 38,964.00
Each $ 9,741.00
Deputy Town Supervisor $ 3,447.00
Town Clerk $ 42,921.00
Highway Superintendent $ 72,162.00
Town Justice (2)
Total $ 36,028.00
Each $ 18,014.00
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins, duly seconded by Councilperson Robert Cree, and put to a
roll call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins -Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne - Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING LOCAL LAW #7 OF 2015 – TOWN OF LANSING
COMMUNICATIONS TOWER
Supervisor Kathy Miller asked Counsel Guy Krogh to review the Short Environmental
Assessment Form and Project Information, Part 1 and Part 2. He noted that EAF maps
are available.
Within the Projection Information Part 1 the following Narrative Description of the Plan
is provided: This action by local law proposes to update definitions, standards and
procedures of review, and site planning for tower locations based upon the updates and
amendments of the Telecommunications Law of 1996 (“TCA”), to establish locational
prioritization reviews, to review tower height, lighting, safety, design, and colocation
issues, to address site planning, NEIR, FCC permitting, and RFI requirements, to address
traffic, intermunicipal, and emergency response plan issues, to address decommissioning
requirements, to establish general review standards for existing and new towers, and to
provide for the enforcement of such requirements, including by criminal process and
fines. Given that tower site locations usually do not exceed 1 acre, no significant land
resources are considered to be likely impacted by this local law, and the only resource
impact would be visual impacts, the consideration of which will be reviewed upon a site
October 21, 2015
9
specific basis under this local law by and through, among other requirements, a visual
EAF addendum and site plan review.
RESOLUTION 15-113
RESOLUTION MAKING NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
SIGNIFICANCE AND APPROVING AND ADOPTING LOCAL LAW NO. 7 OF
2015 TOWN OF LANSING COMMUNICATIONS TOWER LOCAL LAW
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, the Town has long recognized a need to update its cellular tower ordinance
given substantial changes in FCC regulations concerning the scope of authority to review,
and process and procedures governing the review of, communications facilities and
towers, including antennae, tower siting, and related issues, and for almost a year the
Town has reviewed and developed an updated and modernized local law designed to
comply with known changes in law and regulations; and
WHEREAS, such local law proposes to update definitions, standards and procedures of
review, and site planning for tower locations based upon the updates and amendments of
the Telecommunications Law of 1996 (“TCA”), to establish locational prioritization
reviews, to review tower height, lighting, safety, design, and colocation issues, to address
site planning, NEIR, FCC permitting, and RFI requirements, to address traffic,
intermunicipal, and emergency response plan issues, to address decommissioning
requirements, to establish general review standards for existing and new towers, and to
provide for the enforcement of such requirements, including by criminal process and
fines; and
WHEREAS, as this is not a reordering of any regulations but merely an update to an
already existing regulatory scheme, this action is classified as an Unlisted Action under
SEQRA such that an environmental review is required, and the Town did duly declare its
intent to act as lead agency, prepare a SEAF and all EAF and ERM mapping to examine
any potential environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was duly held at the Lansing Town Hall, 29 Auburn Road,
Lansing, New York, on the 21st day of October, 2015, to consider the adoption of
proposed Local Law #7 of 2015 and the environmental impacts thereof, and all persons
were duly heard and all evidence submitted duly considered; and
WHEREAS, the County Planning Department issues its § 239 review and made no
official comments and noted no negative county-wide or inter-community effects, and no
notified involved agency has objected to the Town Board of the Town of Lansing acting
as lead agency for this environmental review; and
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2015, the Town of Lansing Town Board, in performing its
reviewing agency functions in conducting an environmental review in accordance with
Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law and SEQRA: (i)
pursued its thorough review of the project and the completed SEAF, as well as a review
of all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action; and
(ii) thoroughly analyzed the potential relevant areas of environmental concern of the
project to determine if the proposed action may have any moderate or significant adverse
impacts on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR Section
617.7(c); and (iii) reviewed the SEAF on the record; and
WHEREAS, each identified potential environmental impact was analyzed and duly
considered by the Town Board in relation to the question of whether any potential
environmental impacts were so probable of occurring or so significant as to require a
positive declaration, and after weighing the above and all other potential impacts arising
from or in connection with this project, and after also considering: (i) the probability of
each potential impact occurring; (ii) the duration of each potential impact; (iii) the
irreversibility of each potential impact, including permanently lost resources of value;
(iv) whether each potential impact can or will be controlled or mitigated by permitting or
October 21, 2015
10
other processes; (v) the regional consequence of the potential impacts; (vi) the potential
for each impact to be or become inconsistent with the Town’s master plan or
Comprehensive Plan and local needs and goals; and (vii) whether any known objections
to the Project relate to any of the identified potential impacts, the Town Board found that
these factors did not cause any potential impact to be or be likely to become a moderate
or significant impact such that a negative declaration will be issued.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. After consideration of the potential environmental impacts, including those
reviewed in accord with 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c), the Town Board finds that the proposed
action of approving and adopting Local Law #7 of 2015 – regulating cellular and
communications towers in the Town of Lansing, will have no moderate or significant
negative environmental consequences or impacts.
2. This declaration is made in accord with Article 8 of the New York State
Environmental Conservation Law and SEQRA, and the regulations promulgated
thereunder, and accordingly, the Town Board of the Town of Lansing, based upon: (i) its
thorough review of the SEAF, and any and all other documents prepared and submitted
with respect to this proposed action and its environmental review; (ii) its thorough review
of the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed
action may have any moderate or significant adverse impact on the environment,
including, but not limited to, the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c); and (iii) its
completion of the SEAF, including the findings noted therein (if any, and which findings
are incorporated herein as if set forth at length), hereby makes a negative determination
of environmental significance (“Negative Declaration”) in accordance with SEQRA for
the above referenced proposed actions, and determines that an Environmental Impact
Statement is therefore not required.
3. A Responsible Officer of the Town Board of the Town of Lansing is hereby
authorized and directed to complete and sign, as required, the determination of
significance, confirming the foregoing Negative Declaration, which fully completed and
signed SEAF and determination of significance shall be incorporated by reference in this
Resolution.
4. Local Law Number 7 of 2015 be and hereby is approved and adopted in the form
as presented to this meeting, and in such form “be it so enacted.”
5. In accord with §21 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, the final adopted version of
this Local Law shall be presented to the Supervisor for approval, and upon such approval
by the Supervisor (or other approval occurring pursuant to said §21 of the Municipal
Home Rule Law), and within 20 days after the final adoption of this Local Law, the
Town Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Local Law, together with the required
certifications, if any, as follows: (i) in the Office of the Town Clerk; and (ii) with the
New York State Secretary of State as required by Municipal Home Rule Law §27 (said
filing may be made by delivery to the State Records and Law Bureau, Department of
State, 41 State Street, Albany, New York 12231).
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Councilperson Robert Cree, duly seconded by Councilperson Edward LaVigne, and put
to a roll call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins - Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne - Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING LOCAL LAW #8 OF 2015 – LICENSING,
IDENTIFICATION, AND CONTROL OF DOGS IN THE TOWN OF LANSING
October 21, 2015
11
RESOLUTION 15-114
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING LOCAL LAW NO. 8 OF 2015
REGARDING THE LICENSING, IDENTIFICATION, AND
CONTROL OF DOGS IN THE TOWN OF LANSING
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, in 2009 and 2010 the State of New York mandated that municipalities
assume almost all responsibility for dog licensing and control, and as a result the Town
adopted local law #2 of 2010 for the purpose of meeting such mandate and amending the
rules for dog control in the Town, and since such date several problems have arisen and
been recognized relative to such local law, including insufficient fine levels, insufficient
controls for the leashing of dogs, inadequate provisions for harboring dogs, and improper
impounding requirements, and these problems have spilled over into public areas and
Town parks, and a request for a new local law with meaningful controls and penalties
was forwarded to the Town Board from the town constables and the Director of Parks
and Recreation, among others; and
WHEREAS, this updated local law proposes to supersede and amend Local Law No. 2 of
2010, the prior dog control local law, and to replace and amend the same by, among other
things: (i) updating and adding definitions; (ii) specifying updated processes for dog
licenses and renewals; (iii) adding administrative provisions covering lost, stolen, or
decease dogs, making rules for purebred licenses and kenneling, prohibiting acts of
cruelty to animals and dog licensure, requiring leashing, prohibiting nuisances and
chasing, worrying, and attacking of animals, vehicles and persons, and prohibiting
damage to property; (iv) addressing dangerous dogs and proceedings; (v) providing for
nuisance abatement and remedial order procedures; (vi) addressing impoundments and
enforcement, including increased levels of fines for violations as criminal procedures;
(vii) providing for redemption and adoption processes consistent with the NYS Ag. and
Markets Law; and (viii) making numerous provisions for administering such licensing
and dog control requirements, including the adoption of a license and fee schedule for
such law; and
WHEREAS, this action is a Type II SEQRA Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR Parts
617.5(c)(20) and 617.5(c)(27), and therefore no environmental review is required; and
WHEREAS, the Town Attorney and the Village of Lansing attorney duly communicated
concerning this local law being enforced and effective within the Village, and the need
for the Village to assent or otherwise qualify or authorize the same (given that the Town
has no authority to impose its laws over an incorporated village), and Village Counsel
noted provisions in the Village Code and the approval and consent of the Village, such
that the prior practice of the Town handling all dog licensing and control matters
throughout the Town, including in the Village, will remain as standard operating practice
relative to dog control, as envisioned both in the NYS Agriculture and Markets law and
in this local law; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was duly held at the Lansing Town Hall, 29 Auburn Road,
Lansing, New York, on the 21st day of October, 2015, to consider the adoption of
proposed Local Law #8 of 2015, and all persons were duly head and all evidence
submitted duly considered; and
WHEREAS, upon consideration and deliberation upon such proposed local law, and
upon the input, advice and consent from the Town Clerk and Court Justices, the Town
board of the Town of Lansing has hereby resolved as follows:
1. Local Law Number 8 of 2015 be and hereby is approved and adopted in the form
as presented to this meeting, and in such form “be it so enacted.”
2. In accord with §21 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, the final adopted version of
this Local Law shall be presented to the Supervisor for approval, and upon such approval
by the Supervisor (or other approval occurring pursuant to said §21 of the Municipal
October 21, 2015
12
Home Rule Law), and within 20 days after the final adoption of this Local Law, the
Town Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Local Law, together with the required
certifications, if any, as follows: (i) in the Office of the Town Clerk; and (ii) with the
New York State Secretary of State as required by Municipal Home Rule Law §27 (said
filing may be made by delivery to the State Records and Law Bureau, Department of
State, 41 State Street, Albany, New York 12231).
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Councilperson Edward LaVigne duly seconded by Councilperson Doug Dake, and put to
a roll call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins - Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne - Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
LICENSING, IDENTIFICATION, AND CONTROL OF
DOGS IN THE TOWN OF LANSING,
LOCAL LAW NUMBER 8 OF 2015
FEE SCHEDULE
Adopted by Resolution of the Lansing Town Board
October 21, 2015
The following fees and surcharges apply to Dogs as of the effective date of the resolution referenced
above. Any terms appearing in this fee schedule shall be defined in accord with said Local Law #8 of
2015.
1. DOG LICENSE FEES:
EACH ALTERED DOG: $ 14.00
EACH UNALTERED DOG: $ 22.00
NYS POPULATION CONTROL FEE (Per Altered Dog) $ 1.00
NYS POPULATION CONTROL FEE (Per Unaltered Dog) $ 3.00
2. PUREBRED LICENSE FEES:
BASE PUREBRED LICENSE FEE (5 to 20 Dogs) $ 100.00
BASE PUREBRED LICENSE FEE (21+ Dogs) $ 200.00
NYS POPULATION CONTROL FEE (Per Altered Dog) $ 1.00
NYS POPULATION CONTROL FEE (Per Unaltered Dog) $ 3.00
3. LATE LICENSE RENEWAL SURCHARGE (after ticketing) $ 10.00
4. UNLICENSED SURCHARGE, FROM ENUMERATION: $ 15.00
5. REPLACEMENT IDENTIFICATION TAG FEE: $ 5.00
6. IMPOUNDMENT FEES:
First Impoundment Base fee (includes day 1): $ 30.00
First Impoundment per diem fee: $ 10.00
Second Impoundment Base fee (includes day 1): $ 50.00
Second Impoundment per diem fee: $ 10.00
Third Impoundment Base fee (includes day 1): $ 100.00
Third Impoundment per diem fee: $ 10.00
Dangerous Dog Impounding and Handling base fee: $ 100.00
Dangerous Dog Impounding and Handling per diem fee: $ 20.00
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF THE FINISHED ROADWAYS,
STORMWATER FACILITIES, AND EASEMENTS FOR THE CAYUGA WAY
SUBDIVISION, BOTH AS THE TOWN OF LANSING AND AS AGENT FOR
DRAINAGE DISTRICT #8
October 21, 2015
13
RESOLUTION 15-115
RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF THE
FINISHED ROADWAYS, STORMWATER FACILTIES, AND EASEMENTS
FOR THE CAYUGA WAY SUBDIVISION, BOTH AS THE TOWN OF
LANSING AND AS AGENT FOR DRAINAGE DISTRICT #8
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, the Developers of the Cayuga Way Subdivision, being comprised of Cayuga
Way and part of Lakeview Phase II (the so-called Phase III), being WB Realty Group,
LLC and WB Property Group, LLC (jointly and together, the “Developers”), completed
the whole of the roadway system for such subdivision and the as-built survey mapping
for the same; and
WHEREAS, the Town Highway Department has inspected such roads, and the drainage
and supporting structures therefor, and has approved the same as ready for dedication as
public highways, and the Town Engineer has concurred; and
WHEREAS, the stormwater lots, ponds, swales and other facilities have been constructed
and likewise approved, subject to only one repair as identified below and already
communicated to the Developer, and the easements needed to support stormwater
reporting, operation, and maintenance have been duly mapped in accord with the
conditions of approval imposed by the Planning Board and the requirements of the
SWPPP; and
WHEREAS, based upon the easements and the roadways being dedicated in fee, the
overall plan for dedication allows the Town and the CWD access to the water lines and
improvements within such subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Attorney for the Town has examined title and the proposed dedication
forms and maps and has approved the same, and the Developers have now formally
offered for dedication certain lands and easements, and rights therein, all as memorialized
in certain deeds and maps to be filed in furtherance hereof at the Tompkins County
Clerk’s Office; and
WHEREAS, upon due deliberation thereupon, the Town Board of the Town of Lansing
has duly
RESOLVED that, since the as-built certified maps have been submitted to Bolton Point
for review and approval, this proffer of dedication be and hereby is approved and
accepted subject to the following conditions: (i) that Bolton Point approve the mapping as
submitted; and (ii) that the Developer re-grade the uphill side of the detention pond in
Cayuga Way to remove deep wheel ruts and restore positive drainage from the upland
area into the pond, and thereafter seed and mulch the area to stabilize soils; and it is
further
RESOLVED, that upon satisfaction of such conditions (or the submission of acceptable
plans or agreements to satisfy the same) the proposed dedications of lands, easements,
and highways for and in connection with the Cayuga Way Subdivision, as approved in
form by the Town Attorney, be and hereby are accepted by and in the name of the Town
of Lansing, in its corporate capacity and as nominee for the to-be-formed Drainage
District #8, as referenced in and required by the SWPPP for Cayuga Way, and the
Attorney for the Town be and is hereby authorized to take such other and further steps as
are or may be necessary to finalize the form of all such documents and to cause the same
to be recorded in said County Clerk’s Office; and it is further
RESOLVED, that the Attorney for the Town, the Town Supervisor, and the Deputy
Supervisor be, and each is hereby, severally authorized to execute such documents and
deeds as are necessary to finalize and record such dedications of record in the said
October 21, 2015
14
County Clerk’s Office by, for, on behalf of, and in the name of the Town of Lansing and
said Drainage District #8, as assignee from the Town of Lansing.
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Councilperson Doug Dake, duly seconded by Councilperson Robert Cree, and put to a
roll call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake -Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins -Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne -Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING AND DECLARING PROPERTY LINE AND
PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THE TOWN AND NEIGHBORING LANDOWNER
(WILSON) AT LUDLOWVILLE PARK IN RESPECT OF ANCIENT PROPERTY
LINE AMBIGUITY, PRIOR BOUNDARY LINE RESOLUTION, DE MINIMUS
RULE, AND NEED TO CLARIFY TITLE AND ESTOP ALL INTERESTED
PARTIES FROM MAKING ANY FUTURE ADVERSE CLAIMS IN RESPECT
OF TITLE, INCLUDING ANY APPLICATION OR MISAPPLICATION OF THE
PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE
RESOLUTION 15-116
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING AND DECLARING PROPERTY LINE AND
PROPERTY RIGHTS OF THE TOWN AND NEIGHBORING LANDOWNER
(WILSON) AT LUDLOWVILLE PARK IN RESPECT OF ANCIENT PROPERTY
LINE AMBIGUITY, PRIOR BOUNDARY LINE RESOLUTION, DE MINIMUS
RULE, AND NEED TO CLARIFY TITLE AND ESTOP ALL INTERESTED
PARTIES FROM MAKING ANY FUTURE ADVERSE CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF
TITLE, INCLUDING ANY APPLICATION OR MISAPPLICATION
OF THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, Ludlowville Park is a public park in the Town of Lansing that has an ancient
past and which was comprised and built over many, many decades by individual pieces
of land dedicated to the Town and as parkland, with title being traceable going back to
the late 1800s through the 1940s, when the old flour mill and saw mill were key
landmarks operating on a portion of the waters diverted from the falls to power such
mills; and
WHEREAS, Ludlowville Park has never been the subject of any federal or state funding
with respect to land acquisition, improvements, general support, nor for any other
purposes; and
WHEREAS, in 1992 the Town of Lansing entered into a boundary line agreement with
the then owner of 171 Ludlowville Road (TPN 26.-7-10) (as more particularly described
below) to clarify an ancient boundary and eliminate any created confusion by transferring
0.05 acres to the Town, being land alread y and since 1947 in operation as parkland (and
even including a swing set), and the Town transferred to said landowner 0.03 acres of
land that was never used as parkland, but which was used residentially by such
landowner, including by having a driveway over such lands (which driveway has existed
since the early 1900s and is arguably shown in an 1886 Atlas); and
WHEREAS, title conveyed several times and in 2014 (and at present) the owner is Donna
Wilson, whose prior attorney alleged that the public trust doctrine precluded good title
from being transferred by such boundary agreement absent approval by the New York
State Legislature, and thus request was duly made of the Town to clear title; and
October 21, 2015
15
WHEREAS, rather than accept that the public trust doctrine applied to lands never used
as parkland, the Town directed its attorney to again research title and ascertain if there
was a problem and what, in any case, may be a solution to avoid a dispute and provide
comfort to the landowner that the Town could not, and would not, ever assert an adverse
claim in title given this boundary line issue and the location of adjacent and neighboring
parklands; and
WHEREAS, such research, in a nutshell, revealed the following: (1) that the boundary
line was and always had been indeterminate as it was not monumented, but was instead
described in relation to a sluice from a now long gone grain mill (sometimes in title
referred to as a “flour mill”); (2) since 1912, and again in 1947, the Town and the
landowners throughout such times had established a boundary line based upon use and
occupancy that established where everyone had historically thought the property line was
located; (3) the description of the neighboring lands, now owned by Wilson, were also
historically indeterminate as they were described as starting 15.5’ northeasterly of the
outside corner of a blacksmith’s shop, which is also long gone; and equally puzzling is
that the historical information shows two different blacksmith shops in Ludlowville, but
neither in this location; (4) the public trust doctrine does not apply to lands never
converted to public use or parklands, regardless of whether owned by the municipality,
such that such lands, if ever owned by the Town (and all evidence to date suggests it was
not so owned by the Town), were never placed within the public trust but remained
owned by the Town in its proprietary capacity; and (5) the cases decided on this type of
issue are rare, but they universally tend to declare that de minimus issues and transfers do
not require legislative approval by the state, particularly where there is no impairment of,
transfer of, or detriment to the public’s rights in, and use, and enjoyment of, such
parkland (see further below); and
WHEREAS, in 1992, and for reasons unknown, a surveyor noted an alternate potential
location for the property line that was different than the historical and occupational use
line, but because one of the parties was a municipality the more ready solutions of
adverse possession, prescriptive rights, or encroachment agreements were not a viable
solution, such that the then attorneys and the then Town Attorney entered into a boundary
line agreement to forever solve the problem, and to fix the permanent property line in the
location of occupational use, all in recognition of the fact that the line’s location was
ambiguous, that the historical use line was the best evidence of what prior, but now
deceased owners, intended, and the fact that the land was never considered or used as part
of Ludlowville Park (even though the land to be “acquired” was a part of the park and the
net effect of this documentation and fixing of the boundary was de minimus, but also
technically increased the size of the park, or did not result in any potential argument that
the public use or enjoyment was impaired, as the net land gain was 0.02 acres±); and
WHEREAS, the only potential adverse claim against the land and title interests of Wilson
would come from the Town, and while in the absence of assent a government is not
generally subject to the equitable doctrine of estoppel, here the Town is expressly
adopting this resolution and declaration to effect equitable and legal estoppel against any
such claim, both in law and in equity, and the Town is hereby forever waiving its rights
to any such adverse claim in title to Wilson and its rights to assert affirmatively or in
defense any right of estoppel in respect of the location of the herein discussed property
line; and
WHEREAS, and further, in order to know whether the land was ever parkland subject to
the public trust and its restrictions against alienation in the first place, one must per force,
affirmatively establish that the Town actually owned the land, and secondly, one must
establish whether the nature and degree of the alienation requires state legislative
approval, as there are some known exceptions to the rules about alienability in respect of
the public trust doctrine (which often prevents the alienation of public lands by certain
sovereigns inferior to the State of New York); and
WHEREAS, it is not possible to conclusively determine that the Town ever owned this
gore of land, but it is indisputable that such gore of land was never part of Ludlowville
Park; and
October 21, 2015
16
WHEREAS, the deed that is relevant to the title of Wilson (but not to Ludlowville Park
lands) is from 1912, and it begins the parcel description as starting 15.5' northeasterly of
the corner of the old blacksmith's building, and in that era there were two blacksmith
shops but neither exists or can today be located and no plotted boundary of such parcel
then described in 1912 matches the known title or occupational lines of the park; and
WHEREAS, the main body of Ludlowville Park was pulled together in 1947 based upon
the dedication of multiple parcels, but again it is near impossible to map precise
boundaries or locations as such deed(s) dedicates multiple parcels using the old flour mill
and its raceway sluices as the measuring points, and such raceway sluices were located in
a manmade, side creek that came off the Ludlowville Falls which purposefully diverted
water from the top of the falls to create kinetic energy and force to run the old
Ludlowville sawmill and flour mill, all before such diverted creek, farther downstream,
rejoined the Falls’ pool and stream leaving the Falls area and then traversing under Dug
Road; and such deeds also do not conclusively establish the exact location of the
boundary line between the then Town-owned parkland and the land next door now owned
by Wilson; and
WHEREAS, despite some contrary conclusions in 2014 (the attorneys in 1992 were in
accord that there was ambiguity, no transfer of parkland, and that a boundary line
agreement was a title curative, not a “deed” in the traditional sense), since 1912 and 1947
everyone knew where the property line was—it was the historical occupational line used
by both parties, but confusion arose in 1992 when a surveyor drew map lines that said
that what the parties had been doing for 90 years might not be reflective of where the real
property line was, but after again reexamining title it became clear that nobody did know
where the actual line was, but as we were addressing small triangles of land that were
proposed to be swapped to just let the parties do what they had been doing for up to 90
years, the Town Board at the time agreed to a boundary line agreement whereby each
party would quit claim title to the land with uncertain ownership to the other party merely
to cement the historical use and occupancy line as the final boundary line; and
WHEREAS, the current Town attorney and the current attorney for Wilson have also
each examined this title history and the cases set forth or referenced below, and concur
that there is no proof the Town ever used any lands now purportedly owned by Wilson as
parkland, that the de minimus rule applies in respect of this matter, and that the ghosts of
title past shall be hereby exorcised and title forever made clear by these recitations, and
the findings and declarations below; and
WHEREAS, upon due deliberation and consideration of this matter, its 103 year history,
and the rights and interests of the Town, Wilson, and the public in and to the Ludlowville
Park, the Town of Lansing does hereby find, determine, order, and resolve as follows:
1. The boundary line between Ludlowville Park and the lands of Wilson at 171
Ludlowville Road shall now and forever hereafter be as shown in a certain survey map
entitled “SURVEY MAP OF NO. 171 LUDLOWVILLE ROAD, TOWN OF LANSING,
TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK,” as drawn by T.G. Miller P.C., Lee Dresser, L.S.
(#050096), and dated July 22, 2015 (as amended September 10, 2015 only to show the
prior triangle areas referenced in prior survey map related to boundary agreement, as set
out in reference 2 upon such map) (the “Survey Map”)
2. Triangle Area “A” is 1,528 ft2 (approximately 0.03 acres), as shown upon the
Survey Map. There is no proof the Town ever owned Triangle Area “A” and Triangle
Area “A” was never used by the Town as part of Ludlowville Park. Triangle Area “A”
was quitclaimed by the Town to the predecessor in title of Wilson to verify and confirm
the location of the existing property and occupational use line.
3. Triangle Area “B” is 2,384 ft2 (approximately 0.05 acres), as shown upon the
Survey Map. There is no proof that Wilson or any of her predecessors in title ever used or
owned Triangle Area “B” and the Town had, since at least as early as 1947, used the
whole of Triangle Area “B” as part of Ludlowville Park, even improving the same from
time to time, maintaining it as parkland, and regulating and using the land as public
parkland, including having public use thereof and emplacing a swing set and playground
October 21, 2015
17
thereupon at some indeterminate time in the 1970s and 1980s, and upon which a swing
set and play area remain even to this day. Wilson’s predecessor in title quitclaimed
Triangle Area “B” to the Town to verify and confirm the location of the existing property
and occupational use line.
4. Thus, even if there was an actual transfer of land: (i) there was a net gain of
approximately 0.02 acres in parkland; (ii) the transfer preserved land that was used in the
public trust; (iii) the transfer did not effect a transfer of any lands within the park or the
public trust; and (iv) in any case, the transfer would have been de minimus.
5. The Town hereby declares that the boundary line agreement filed in 1992 by and
between the Town of Lansing and Toivanan (R.O.), entitled “BOUNDARY LINE
AGREEMENT & MUTUAL QUIT-CLAIM,” as dated August 13, 1992 and filed in the
Tompkins County Clerk’s Office at Liber 681 of Deeds, at Page 355 et seq., was
principally a boundary line agreement that: (i) established the historical and occupational
boundary line as the true boundary between such properties; (ii) did not affect any
transfer of land or title; (iii) did not affect any alienation of parkland or land within the
public trust; and (iv) contained quitclaim language only to clarify title and the meaning
and purpose of such boundary line agreement.
6. Even if there was an ancillary transfer of land by the Town, whether known or
unknown, the same is and remains a de minimus transfer and, under the public trust
doctrine, such ancillary impact to lands that were not parklands falls within the ambit of
the “de minimus rule” (sometimes spelled “de minimis,” following the traditional Latin
spelling) as propounded by the New York Courts. An example is the famous Roosevelt
Island Octagon project case:
Moreover, even assuming, arguendo, that this shifting did constitute alienation of EQBA parkland,
such alienation is properly deemed de minimus. The well-recognized maxim de minimus non curat
the law does not concern itself with trifles has been applied in a variety of contexts where failure
to adhere strictly to statutory requirements is excusable because the alleged violation is so
insignificant as to be totally inconsequential. See, e.g., Dworman v. New York State Div. of Hous.
and Cmty. Renewal, 94 NY2d 359, 704 NYS2d 192 (1999) (applying the de minimis exception to
income verification filing requirements); Flora Co. Ingilis, 233 AD2d 418, 650 NYS2d 24 (2d
Dep't 1996) (applying de minimis doctrine to excuse failure to comply with timing and filing
requirements of CPLR); Staber v. Fidler, 110 AD2d 38, 493 NYS2d 161 (2d Dep't 1985)
(applying de minimis doctrine to excuse failure to comply strictly with Election Law
requirements); Carol Mgmt. Corp. v. Comm'r of Dep't of Hous. and Cmty. Renewal, 140 Misc2d
673, 531 NYS2d 839 (Sup. Ct. Queens County 1998) (approving agency's application of de
minimis exception to excuse landlord's failure to comply strictly with New York City Rent
Stabilization Code); Young v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 62 Misc2d 147, 307 NYS2d 895 (Sup. Ct.
Nassau County 1970), aff'd 35 AD2d 430, 317 NYS2d 396 (2d Dep't 1970), aff'd 29 NY2d 685,
325 NYS2d 417 (1971) (applying the de minimis exception to excuse failure to comply strictly
with setback requirements under zoning regulation). Furthermore, the Court of Appeals has held
that it falls within a regulatory agency's discretion to determine whether or not the de minimis
doctrine should be applied. See, e.g., Elkin v. Roldan, 94 NY2d 853, 704 NYS2d 201 (1999)
(remanding matter to DHCR to consider ”in its discretion“ whether filing delay was so minimal as
to be excusable under the de minimis doctrine).
See, Roosevelt Is. Residents Assn. v Roosevelt Is. Operating Corp., 7 Misc.3d 1029(A),
2005 WL 1306479 (N.Y.Sup.), 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 50811(U) (NY Co. 2005). This rule
has been applied with some frequency, and in each case such facts and the appl ication of
the de minimus rule supports the conclusion, legally and factually, that this boundary line
agreement meets all standards of the de minimus rule. See e.g., Town of Riverhead v.
County of Suffolk, 39 A.D.3d 537 (2nd Dept. 2007); Friends of Van Cortlandt Park v
City of New York, 95 N.Y.2d 623 (2001) (in respect of an underground water treatment
plant, the Court of Appeals noted that while there are ““de minimis” exceptions from the
public trust doctrine, the magnitude of the proposed project does not call upon us to draw
such lines in this case”; further citing Wigand v City of New York, (NYLJ, Sept. 25,
1967, at 21, col 5), a 1967 unreported Richmond County Supreme Court decision finding
that installation of two underground water tanks, after which the area was to be
completely restored “with beautification greater than that which originally existed” and
27 acres of parkland added, did not violate public trust doctrine).
7. As no right of public use or enjoyment of the Ludlowville Park was impaired or
here occurred, as the park may have only increased in size and its existing public use
October 21, 2015
18
features were preserved, and as there is no known actual transfer of land, let alone
parkland, the Town declares and determined that this prior boundary line agreement is the
quintessential de minimus situation the courts are talking about.
8. Further, and as a matter of construction and law, if there is an ambiguity in a
contract or deed (or any number of other innumerable types of documents and
agreements) the actions of the parties speak, and parole evidence is not barred, such that,
here, the best evidence of the actual location of the property line is what the landowners
actually did, and most importantly the predecessors in title. Since 1912, all landowners in
the area treated the herein-affirmed property line as the true property line, and the prior
boundary line agreement and these resolutions merely seek to affirm the location of such
line.
9. The Town of Lansing thus hereby reaffirms such boundary location, and hereby
declares the Town of Lansing forever estopped by fact, law, the equitable doctrine of
estoppel, from claiming any alternate boundary line location. These resolutions shall be
construed and applied to forever estop the Town from claiming any right or interest,
direct or indirect, in fact or inchoate, in the lands of Wilson as depicted in such Survey
Map, and the boundary line between the lands of the Town (known as Ludlowville Park)
and the lands or Wilson shall now and forever hereafter be as depicted upon such Survey
Map.
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Supervisor Kathy Miller duly, seconded by Councilperson Robert Cree, and put to a roll
call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins -Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne -Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
RESOLUTION AND ORDER SETTING PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING
TRIPHAMMER TERRACE CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO EXTEND A WATER MAIN DOWN
TRIPHAMMER TERRACE, AND TO CONSIDER POTENTIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THEREOF
RESOLUTION 15-117
RESOLUTION AND ORDER SETTING PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING
TRIPHAMMER TERRACE CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO EXTEND A WATER MAIN DOWN
TRIPHAMMER TERRACE, AND TO CONSIDER POTENTIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THEREOF
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, several properties along Triphammer Terrace are and have for years been within the
CWD and paying taxes to the CWD for capital improvement costs, and the Triphammer Terrace
corridor has seen steady residential and residential subdivision development for almost three
decades, such that those within the CWD need water main connections for their homes, and there
is a need to achieve benefits for the CWD by also closing the loop along Triphammer Terrace by
connecting the two mains, one which terminates near Tahoe Trail and one that terminates near
Aspen Way, especially as additional development is expected; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board had previously referred this matter to the Water & Sewer Advisory
Board and authorized a study of the area and, after solutions were so presented, the Town Board
duly authorized the preparation of a map, plan and report (“MPR”) to identify, describe, and
create a cost estimate as to a viable and feasible solution for extending a water main down
October 21, 2015
19
Triphammer Terrace to service properties within the CWD, and the WSAB has reviewed and
recommended proceeding to a public hearing to consider such project, its costs, and whether it is
in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the project involves installing 1,280’ of 6” pipe, mainly between Aspen Way and
Tahoe Trail, with two connections to existing mains, one hydrant assembly to enhance
firefighting capabilities in such neighborhoods, and two sampling taps, along with the acquisition
of easements for such mains from landowners along the westerly side of Triphammer Terrace (the
“Project”); and
WHEREAS, the easements to be acquired include a standard permanent waterline easement 15’
wide within the highway bounds of Triphammer Terrace (and generally within 5-10’ of the edge
of existing pavement), together with a slightly larger temporary construction easement, more
particularly affecting the following lands:
(i) TPN 40.-4-14.331, being real property located at 88 Triphammer Terrace (Donald and
Janice Viands, R.O.), said easement being needed along the land at the front of such property,
within highway boundaries and mandatory zoning setbacks, and being across the most
southerly 200±’ of such front property boundary line and starting from an existing main
crossing under Triphammer Terrace from the Tahoe Trail intersection;
(ii) TPN 40.-4-13, being real property located at 80 Triphammer Terrace (Paul and Georgia
Hotchkiss, R.O.), said easement being needed along the land at the front of such property,
within highway boundaries and mandatory zoning setbacks, and being across the entire front
boundary line of such parcel, being 225±’;
(iii) TPN 40.-4-14.321, being real property located at 66 Triphammer Terrace (Robert and
Caroline Rasmussen, R.O.), said easement being needed along the land at the front of such
property, within highway boundaries and mandatory zoning setbacks, and being across the
entire front boundary line of such parcel, being 403±’;
(iv) TPN 40.-4-14.322, being real property located at 56 Triphammer Terrace (Richard
Pinney and Carmelita Mix, R.O.), said easement being needed along the land at the front of
such property, within highway boundaries and mandatory zoning setbacks, and being across
the entire front boundary line of such parcel, being 150±’;
(v) TPN 40.-4-14.323, being real property located at 52 Triphammer Terrace (Todd and
Susan Mix, R.O.), said easement being needed along the land at the front of such property,
within highway boundaries and mandatory zoning setbacks, and being across the entire front
boundary line of such parcel, being 122±’; and
(vi) TPN 40.-4-15.2, being real property located at 48 Triphammer Terrace (Floyd and Eileen
Wilcox, R.O.), said easement being needed along the land at the front of such property,
within highway boundaries and mandatory zoning setbacks, and being across the most
northerly 100±’ of such front property boundary line, thereafter crossing under such road to
connect with an existing main at the Aspen Way intersection;
WHEREAS, the proposed cost of such water main and loop connection is $96,000, which amount
is proposed to be financed through either the issuance of bond anticipation notes followed by a
20-year serial bond, or from capital reserves of the CWD. The overall financing plan will result in
no tax increase in the CWD charge of $155 as this is a small Project compared to the overall debt
of the CWD and existing tax and water charge revenues are sufficient to pay such BAN or serial
bonds if obtained, such that the cost to benefitted properties will remain $353 per year, being
comprised of the tax benefit assessment of $155 per year for capital costs, improvements, and
capital debt retirement, plus four quarterly water bills averaging $49.50 as based upon 2016 water
rates; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Lansing is thus proposing to repair and improve the
facilities of the Consolidated Water District by adding a main to service additional properties
October 21, 2015
20
within the CWD and to close a loop along Triphammer Terrace, all as more specifically defined
in the § 202-b Plan and Report for the Project (the “Engineering Study”); and
WHEREAS, the Engineering Study for this Project be and is hereby approved and
includes a description of the Project, the proposed infrastructure of such Project, and the
costs thereof, amounting in all to a cost estimate of $96,000, which amount is hereby
declared to be the maximum estimated cost to the CWD, and which costs shall be paid by
issuance of BANs and 20-year serial bonds or the use of reserve funds, all as set forth in
the MPR and as to be hereafter further specified in any final engineering analysis and
cost study per Town Law § 202-b; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the public need for such repairs and improvements and
the public interest so served thereby, and upon due deliberation upon the foregoing, the
Town Board of the Town of Lansing has duly
RESOLVED AND DETERMINED, that
1. This action is classified as an Unlisted Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part
617.2(ak);
2. The Town Board of the Town of Lansing proposes to be the Lead Agency for
environmental review, subject to consent or any requests for Lead Agency status or
review by any Involved Agency, as applicable;
3. The Involved Agencies are determined to be the Tompkins County Health
Department and SCLIWC (Bolton Point);
4. The Town of Lansing Planning Board is determined to be the sole Interested
Agency; and it is further
RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that a Public Hearing will be held at the Lansing Town
Hall, 29 Auburn Road, Lansing, New York, being in the Town of Lansing, on the 16th
day of December, 2015, at 6:05 pm, to consider the Triphammer Terrace CWD Water
Main Improvement Project and the environmental and potential environmental impacts
thereof, the Engineering Study, and the costs thereof, each and all as required by Town
Law § 202-b, and to thereat hear all persons interested in the subject thereof, and to take
such action thereon as is required or permitted by law; and it is further
RESOLVED AND DETERMINED, as follows:
1. The boundaries of the proposed Project include the above-described lands along
Triphammer Terrace, on the westerly side thereof, mainly between Tahoe Trail and
Aspen Way, all in accord with the map set forth in the said Engineering Study and the
land survey and metes and bounds descriptions and maps as are on file in the
Tompkins County Clerk’s Office for the each of the said tax parcel numbers within
the CWD as afore-described; namely TPNs 40.-4-14.331, 40.-4-13, 40.-4-14.321, 40.-
4-14.322, 40.-4-14.323, and 40.-4-15.2;
2. The public improvements for such Project to be installed by the Town and CWD
and include 280’ of 6” pipe, mainly between Aspen Way and Tahoe Trail, with two
connections to existing mains, one hydrant assembly to enhance firefighting
capabilities in such neighborhoods, and two sampling taps;
3. The maximum amount proposed to be expended by the Town of Lansing and the
CWD for such Project is $96,000;
4. The one time estimated cost of connection, including hook-up fees, is estimated at
$1,500.00 as each new connection will need to be made from the house to the curb
stop, with an approximate permit connection fee of $250.00, ¾” meters estimated at
$265.00 per meter, estimated 1”-2” service line extensions from the future curb boxes
at approximately $35.00 per linear foot;
October 21, 2015
21
5. The annual cost to the typical property is estimated to be $353.00. The typical
property is a single family dwelling measured by EDUs, and such cost was thus
calculated as follows: (i) $155.00 per EDU for CWD Capital Costs (which is the
current rate – this Project does not propose any increase in such rates); plus (ii)
annual water consumption fees of $198.00 per EDU (also not representing an increase
in cost of the water). The Project cost is planned to be financed through the issuance
of bond anticipation notes and a 20-year serial bond or through use of capital reserve
funds, all subject to the final engineering and cost study per the requirements of Town
Law § 202-b;
6. CWD financing is applicable to this Project in the form of 5-years of BANs and a
20-year bond issuance, in an amount not greater than $96,000;
7. The Engineering Study is on file for public review and inspection at the Office of
the Town Clerk;
8. As aforesaid, the Public Hearing be and hereby is set for 6:05 p.m. upon
December 16, 2015, at the Lansing Town Hall, 29 Auburn Road, Lansing, New York,
where at all persons interested in the subject hereof will be heard, the Town Board
will take all evidence presented, and such other or further action as is required or
permitted by law may be considered or taken; and
9. The Engineering Study describes in detail how the financing, hook-up costs, and
other costs and expenses were estimated and computed, and therefore complies with
Town Law §§ 202-b and 193 as it constitutes the detailed statement of costs and
expenses as therein required; and it is further
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Lansing, Tompkins County, New
York, is hereby authorized and directed a Notice of Public Hearing to be published in the
official newspaper of the Town of Lansing, and also to post a copy thereof on the Town
signboard maintained by the Town Clerk, in accord with law; and it is further
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk immediately cause a Notice of Intent relative to Lead
Agency status to be issued and delivered to all Involved and Interested Agencies.
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins duly, seconded by Councilperson Robert Cree, and put to a
roll call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins - Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne -Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
RESOLUTION APPOINTING MAUREEN COWEN AS AN ALTERNATE TO
THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
RESOLUTION 15-118
RESOLUTION APPOINTING MAUREEN COWEN
AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, there is a vacancy for an alternate position on the Town of Lansing Zoning
Board of Appeals (ZBA); and
WHEREAS, the ZBA has recommended that Maureen Cowen be appointed to fill the
vacancy term on said Board as an alternate; and
October 21, 2015
22
WHEREAS, Maureen Cowen is qualified and willing to serve in such capacity as an
alternate member of the ZBA; and
WHEREAS, upon consideration and deliberation upon the same, the Town Board of the
Town of Lansing has hereby
RESOLVED, that Maureen Cowen be and is hereby appointed as an Alternate Member
of the ZBA effective October 21, 2015 and expiring December 31, 2015, (replacing
Donna Scott) to serve at the pleasure of this Board.
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Councilperson Robert Cree, duly seconded by Supervisor Kathy Miller, and put to a roll
call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins - Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne - Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
RESOLUTION HIRING JAMAR B. REDMOND, MOTOR EQUIPMENT
OPERATOR EFFECTIVE 11/9/15
RESOLUTION 15-119
RESOLUTION PROVISIONALLY HIRING
JAMAR R. REDMOND AS MOTOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, the Town of Lansing Highway Superintendent is retiring, and there is a need
for a Motor Equipment Operator (MEO) at the Town of Lansing Highway Department;
and
WHEREAS, the MEO position was posted and several applications and resumes were
reviewed; and
WHEREAS, said position has been classified and deemed as a Civil Service Non-
Competitive position by the Tompkins County Department of Personnel; and
WHEREAS, Jamar B. Redmond has been identified as a qualified candidate and has
previously completed the required training necessary; and
WHEREAS, the Deputy Highway Superintendent, Charlie “Cricket” Purcell recommends
that Jamar B. Redmond be hired as a MEO at the Town of Lansing Highway Department;
and
WHEREAS, upon a review and discussion of the matter, the Town Board of the Town of
Lansing has hereby:
RESOLVED, that Jamar B. Redmond be and hereby is approved to be employed as a
MEO, Grade C, in the Town of Lansing Highway Department, effective November 9,
2015, at a rate of $19.31 per hour.
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Councilperson Edward LaVigne, duly seconded by Councilperson Robert Cree, and put
to a roll call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins - Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne - Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
October 21, 2015
23
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
APPROVE AUDIT
RESOLUTION 15-120
Councilperson Robert Cree moved that the Bookkeeper is hereby authorized to pay the
following bills:
CONSOLIDATED ABSTRACT # 010
DATED _10/21/2015__
AUDITED VOUCHER #’s 992 -1095
PREPAY VOUCHER #’s 992 -1002
AUDITED T & A VOUCHER #’s 78 - 87
PREPAY T & A VOUCHER #’s 78 - 80
FUND TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS
GENERAL FUND (A&B) $ 81,694.40
HIGHWAY FUND (DA&DB) $ 289,783.43
LANSING LIGHTING (SL1, 2 &3) $ 1,336.86
LANSING WATER DISTRICTS (SW) $ 10,743.33
TRUST & AGENCY (TA) $ 37,496.96
WARREN ROAD SEWER DISTRICTS (SS1-) $ 60.21
CHERRY ROAD SEWER DISTRICT (SS3-) $ 0.00
CAPITAL PROJECT BPWTP (HB) $_ 527,668.68
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins seconded the motion and it was carried by the following
roll call vote:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins - Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne - Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Doug Dake
Emergency Preparedness Committee:
Doug noted he was not able to attend the meeting. Dan Ferguson and the committee
continue to work on the draft report and have moved on to the appendixes.
TC3 Soccer:
October 21, 2015
24
Doug reported that his daughter plays on the TC3 soccer team and they had just won the
conference championship!!
Edward LaVigne – No Report
Robert Cree – No Report
Ruth Hopkins
Part Time Planner:
Ruth noted that in recent days she has been asked if she knew whether there has been
money saved by hiring a part time planner. She reported that after researching the
accounting reports, correcting for inflation and comparing the expenses from 2012 when
there was a full time person, she found that expenses in the planning and zoning account
are projected to be $9,000 higher in 2015 than they were in 2012.
She noted she did find that the part time planner portion of the expenses are less, but the
legal and zoning expenses are greater. In addition the revenues from permits and
developers have increased 60% over 2012. She stated in her opinion this shows a greater
need for a full time planner to help guide and administer the additional work.
She noted the current contract for the part time planner calls for a minimum of 14 hours
in the office and the town has suffered because day to day questions must wait for a time
when the planner is available.
Ruth also noted that the Supervisor is performing work normally done by the planner.
Examples given are, getting water distribution easements and responding to citizen
concerns on planning, zoning and storm water issues
Ruth offered to share the information on her findings.
Kathy Miller
Heath Insurance Consortium:
Kathy reported, from the last consortium meeting, that they are in very good financial
shape. She noted municipalities and counties can join the consortium if it is contiguous
with Tompkins County and there has been discussion to allow others to come in. The
increase for the town this year was 3% when many others increased by 15%.
Bolton Point Rate Change:
Kathy reported that Bolton Point continues to work on the rate change in regards to the
10,000 gallon minimum charge.
Bone Plain Road Water:
Kathy reported that things are moving along and completion is anticipated for early
spring of 2016.
Monthly Report
The Supervisor submitted her monthly report for the months of August and September,
2015 to all Board Members and to the Town Clerk.
TOWN COUNSEL REPORT
Guy Krogh
October 21, 2015
25
PDA:
Guy informed the Town Board that he is working with Michael Long on preparing the
zoning mapping for the five PDA’s (Planned Development Areas). They are working
with Tompkins County GIS. Guy noted that they will be done by local law and will
follow in the months to come.
ADJOURN REGULAR MEETING TO BUDGET WORK SESSION
Regular Meeting adjourned to a Budget Work Session at the call of the Supervisor at 6:55
p.m.
Budget Work Session adjourned at the call of the Supervisor at 7:55 p.m.
RECONVENE REGULAR TOWN BOARD MEETING
Regular meeting was reconvened at the call of the Supervisor at 7:56 p.m.
RESOLUTION SCHEDULING PUBLIC HEARING ON LOCAL LAW #9 OF
2015 A LOCAL LAW TO REPEAL LOCAL LAW #5 OF 2015 AND REINSTATE
THE TAX CAP LIMITS ESTABLISHED IN GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW § 3-C
RESOLUTION 15-121
RESOLUTION SCHEDULING PUBLIC HEARING UPON
PROPOSED LOCAL LAW #9 OF 2015
A LOCAL LAW TO REPEAL LOCAL LAW #5 OF 2015
AND REINSTATE THE TAX CAP LIMITS
OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW § 3-C
The following Resolution was duly presented for consideration by the Town Board:
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2015, the Town Board adopted a local law to override tax cap
limits set forth in GML § 3-C (Local Law #5 of 2015), and due to other NYS legislation
allowing certain limited tax refunds under stated conditions, one of which is that no tax
cap override may be in place at the time of adoption of a final budget for 2016, the Town
Board has decided to repeal Local Law #5 of 2015, the Tax Cap Override Local Law; and
WHEREAS, said action is a Type II SEQRA action for which no environmental review is
required, and upon due consideration thereupon, the Town Board of the Town of Lansing
has hereby
RESOLVED, that a Public Hearing will be held at the Lansing town Hall, 29 Auburn
Road, Lansing, New York, being in the Town of Lansing, on November 4, 2015 at 6:06
p.m. to consider the adoption of proposed Local Law #9 of 2015, and to hear all persons
interested in the subject thereof, and to take such action thereon as is required or
permitted by law; and it is further
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk of the Town of Lansing, Tompkins County, New
York, is hereby authorized and directed to cause a Notice of Public Hearing to be
published in the official newspaper of the Town of Lansing, and also to post a copy
thereof on the Town signboard maintained by the Town Clerk, in accord with law and at
least 5 days before such public hearing.
The question of the adoption of such proposed Resolution was duly motioned by
Supervisor Kathy Miller, duly seconded by Councilperson Robert Cree, and put to a roll
call vote with the following results:
Councilperson Robert Cree - Aye Councilperson Doug Dake - Aye
Councilperson Ruth Hopkins - Aye Councilperson Edward LaVigne - Aye
Supervisor Kathy Miller - Aye
October 21, 2015
26
Accordingly, the foregoing Resolution was approved, carried, and duly adopted on
October 21, 2015.
ADJOURN REGULAR MEETING
Meeting adjourned at the call of the Supervisor at 7:57 p.m.
Minutes taken by the Town Clerk and Deputy Supervisor (after budget work session) and
executed by the Town Clerk.
Respectfully submitted,
Debbie S. Crandall, RMC