HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-02-09 ZBA Minutes DRAFT
1 Town of Lansing
2 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting
3 Tuesday, February 9, 2021 6:30 PM
4 Via Zoom Meeting — Live on YouTube
5 Present
6 Richard Hayes
7 Peter Larson
8 Mary Stoe
9 Maureen Cowen
10 Jack Young, Alternate
11 Judy Drake, Chair
12
13 Other Staff Present
14 C.J. Randall, Director of Planning
15
16 General Business
17 Chair Judy Drake opened the meeting at 6:30pm.
18
19 Roll Call for Attendance:
20 Peter Larson-Aye
21 Maureen Cowen —Aye
22 Mary Stoe—Aye
23 Judy Drake—Aye
24 Jack Young—Aye
25 Chair Judy Drake enacted Jack Young, Alternate as a voting member due to Rick Hayes' absence.
26 Rick Hayes was having connection issues, so he was in attendance. Jack Young was not a voting
27 member at this meeting.
28
29 Read by Chair Judy Drake
30 PUBLIC HEARING: Electronically via conference call instead of a public meeting open for the
31 public to attend in person, on the following matter: All interested persons or representatives
32 thereof will be given an opportunity to be heard; send comments in writing to Town of Lansing,
33 Planning & Code Enforcement Department, 29 Auburn Rd, Lansing, NY 14882 or
34 tolcodes@lansingtown.com and your statement will be forwarded to the Zoning Board of
35 Appeals for their consideration. If you want your statement read aloud, please state that in
36 your letter or email. Meeting will be transcribed and posted on the Town's website at
37 https://www.lansingtown.com/town-docs
38 Any members of the public wishing to be heard by the Board may enter the meeting room at
39 the time of the respective Public Hearing at:
40 https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84817705277?pwd=czNGemJSQ2E4MDVlYU5MNkZ5emlwZz09 or by
41 calling 1-646-558-8656 and entering meeting ID 848 1770 5277 and Password 40313.
Page 1 of 6
DRAFT
42
43 PUBLIC HEARING:
44 Consideration of an Appeal made by Nolan Hatfield, Applicant and Owner, 248 Holden Rd., Tax
45 Parcel 8.-1-2, located in the Rural Agricultural (RA) Zoning District for an Area Variance from
46 Town of Lansing Code § 270, Schedule II which requires a 60' minimum setback from center of
47 road. Applicant is seeking a 15' Area Variance from the minimum setback to facilitate
48 construction of a new 40' x 60' pole barn (accessory building) with 16' x 60' attached lean-to.
49 This is a Type II Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(16).
50 The above referenced appeal and its supporting documents are available for inspection at
51 https://Ifweb.tompkins-co.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=50003&dbid=7&repo=Lansing
52
53 Motion to Open the Public Hearing for 248 Holden Road.
54 Motioned by: Maureen Cowen Seconded by: Richard Hayes (Motion Carried)
55 Roll Call for Opening the Public Hearing
56 Peter Larson —Aye
57 Richard Hayes—Aye
58 Maureen Cowen —Aye
59 Mary Stoe—Aye
60 Judy Drake—Aye
61
62 Variance request discussion with the ZBA
63 Applicant and Owner, Nolan Hatfield, was admitted to the meeting and discussed the variance
64 request.
65
66 Summary of discussion
67 • There is limited space between the road and the fence line for the pasture on the
68 property.
69 • The grade of the land slopes down to toward the pasture, which limits how far to the
70 west the structure can be built.
71 • The applicant would like to place the barn between the trailers and the farmhouse,
72 creating a barrier between himself and the tenants he rents the trailers to.
73 • There is an existing barn on the property that is closer than 45 feet to the road. The
74 applicant also believes the house may be closer than 60 feet to the road.
75 • The Director of Planning verified that the existing structures did not have variances
76 recorded for them. They were built before the Town had been zoned.
77 • The applicant expressed need of this larger sized barn.
78 • The trailers on the property, one single wide and one double wide, are permanent
79 structures. They cannot be moved.
80 • The Director of Planning explained that there would need to be a 5 foot separation
81 between the new barn and the existing structures.
82 • It is not possible to rotate the structure 90° due to the placement of entry doors.
83 • With the lean-to the applicant has planned, rotating the structure would still require a
84 variance.
Page 2 of 6
DRAFT
85 • The applicant intends the structure to be used for storage, repairs, etc. for matters
86 related to the farm.
87 • For clarity, the diagram the applicant submitted is inaccurate. The structure would be
88 closer to the road than depicted.
89
90 Public Comments
91 There were no public comments on this matter.
92
93 Motion to Close Public Hearin
94 Motion by: Richard Hayes Seconded by: Pete Larson (Motion Carried)
95
96 Roll Call for Closing the Public Hearing
97 Peter Larson-Aye
98 Richard Hayes—Aye
99 Maureen Cowen —Aye
100 Mary Stoe—Aye
101 Judy Drake—Aye
102
103 Board Deliberation
104
105 • This structure is appropriate with both the existing structures on this property, and with
106 other properties in the area.
107 • A neighbor sent a letter in support of the applicant's plan.
108 • The only property drainage would affect would be the applicant's. He will be responsible
109 for addressing drainage.
110
111 AREA VARIANCE FINDINGS AND DECISION
112 TOWN OF LANSING ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
113
114 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
115
116 Applicant: Nolan Hatfield Variance No: 21-01
117 248 Munson Road Zoning District: RA
118 Groton NY 13073 Public Hearing
119 Published on 02/02/2021
120 Mailed 600' Notices
121 Property Location: 248 Holden Road on: 02/04/2021
122 Tax Parcel #: 8.-1-2
123
124 Requirement for which Area Variance is requested: Town of Lansing Code (the "Code"): Section
125 270, Schedule II: Area, Frontage, Yard, Heights and Coverage Requirements.
126
127 RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS
128
Page 3 of 6
DRAFT
129 WHEREAS, Nolan Hatfield, Applicant, applied for an Area Variance to construct a new 2400 sq.
130 ft. Pole Barn with a 16' attached lean-to that is not compliant with the 60' Minimum Front Yard
131 Setback; and
132
133 WHEREAS,Applicant is requesting an Area Variance of 15'from the Minimum Front Yard Setback
134 requirement; and
135
136 WHEREAS, on February 9, 2021, the Town of Lansing Zoning Board of Appeals (the "ZBA")
137 thoroughly reviewed and analyzed: (i) the information and evidence submitted by the applicant
138 in support of the requested area variance; (ii) all other information and materials properly before
139 the ZBA; and (iii) the issues and impacts raised for consideration by neighbors, the public, and
140 the ZBA; and
141
142 WHEREAS,this application is classified as a Type II Action under 6 NYCRR Part 617.5 (c)(17) (such
143 that no further environmental review is required) and this matter also does not require General
144 Municipal Law §239 -1, -m, and -n referral as the items are excluded per an Inter-Governmental
145 Agreement between the Tompkins County Planning Department and the Town of Lansing dated
146 December 17, 2003; and; so, upon due deliberation upon the foregoing, the application, and all
147 evidence and testimony presented to the ZBA,
148
149 NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
150
151 1.The Town of Lansing Zoning Board of Appeals("ZBA") hereby makes the following findings with
152 respect to the specific criteria for an Area Variance as set forth in Town Law § 267-b(3)(b), and
153 other applicable provisions of law and of the Zoning Ordinance:
154
155 a. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a
156 detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance?
157
158 Yes _ No X Findings:
159 The Zoning Board feels this structure fits with the other structures on the property, so it will not
160 pose any detriment to the area.
161
162 b. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for
163 the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance?
164 Yes No X Findings:
165 Using a different type of building, size, or location may impose financial hardship to the applicant.
166 The building would be used for farm operations and is appropriate for such use.
167
168 c. Whether the requested area variance is substantial?
169
170 Yes No X Findings:
171 The applicant is applying for a 15ft variance into the 60ft front yard setback. This is not substantial
172 for the area.
Page 4 of 6
DRAFT
173
174 d. Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on
175 the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district?
176
177 Yes _ No X Findings:
178 This structure will fit in with the existing structures on the property, and with other properties in
179 the area. The owner of a neighboring property has expressed support for this structure.
180
181
182 e. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created?
183
184 Yes _ No X Findings:
185 The applicant has submitted all documents before beginning the project, so this is not self-
186 created.
187
188 2. DETERMINATION BASED ON THE ABOVE FACTORS (choose one):
189
190 It is hereby determined by the Town of Lansing Zoning Board of Appeals (the "ZBA") that the
191 following area variance is GRANTED, with any conditions hereafter stated (if any), it being
192 further found and determined that (i) the benefit to the applicant outweighs any potential
193 negative impacts or detriment to the neighborhood or community; and (ii) such area variance
194 are the minimum necessary as adequate to grant relief and, at the same time, preserve and
195 protect the character of the neighborhood and the safety and welfare of the community.
196
197 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC VARIANCE GRANTED: 15ft variance into the 60ft front yard setback.
198
199
200
201 ARE CONDITIONS IMPOSED WITH RESPECT TO THE AREA VARIANCE AS GRANTED?
202 Yes X No
203
204 STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS:
205
206 1. As variances are exceptions based upon exigent need or emergency, should applicant fail
207 to avail itself of the benefits of the above-described area variance within one year from
208 the date hereof, this approval and such area variance shall expire. In cases where
209 construction may be applicable, "avail itself of the benefits" shall mean a building permit
210 obtained (if necessary) and substantial construction as commenced. Said one-year
211 approval period may be extended for good cause by the ZBA if application for an
212 extension is submitted before the expiration of the then applicable variance period.
213
214
Page 5 of 6
215 THE VOTE ON THE FOREGOING DECISION, DETERMINATIONS,AND RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN
216 OF LANSING ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS WAS AS FOLLOWS:
217
218 Motion by: Mary Stoe
219 Seconded by: Maureen Cowen
220 Richard Hayes—Aye
221 Peter Larson —Aye
222 Mary Stoe—Aye
223 Maureen Cowen —Aye
224 Judy Drake—Aye
225
226 Dated: February 9, 2021
227
228
229
230 Any other business deemed necessary:
231 The Planning Board will be having a training session on Monday, March 8, 2021 to discuss
232 conditions in land use approvals. This is largely related to site plan, but the Zoning Board
233 members are welcome to attend.
234
235 Chair Judy Drake adjourned meeting at 7:02 PM
236
237 Minutes executed by Heather Dries
Page 6 of 6