HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-09-15 PB Minutes.docxDRAFT
Town of Lansing
Monday, February 9, 2015 6:30 PM PLANNING BOARD MEETING
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
(*Denotes present)
*Tom Ellis, Chairman
*Norman (Lin) Davidson, Vice-Chairman
*Larry Sharpsteen
Richard Prybyl
*Al Fiorille
* Gerald Caward
* Ray Farkas
* Deborah Trumbull (Alternate)
* Guy Krogh, Esq.
Other Staff
Michael Long, Planning Consultant
Doug Dake, Town Board Member
David Herrick, P.E. Town Engineer
Public Present John Vineyard
Carol Vineyard
Richard Schuler
John Stevens
Karen Piersanti
Jim Piersanti
John Andersson, P.E.
Jack Young
Anne Sheldon
Other Business
Thomas Ellis called the Planning Board Meeting to order at 6:30 PM. Chairman Ellis enacted Alternate Member Deborah Trumbull as a voting Member this evening.
Planning Federation Conference
Sharon Bowman has requested that if any Member is planning on attending the Planning Federation Conference, she would like to know as soon as possible so she may sign Members up before
the deadline. The Town Supervisor also would like to see as many Members go as possible.
Public Comments/Concerns other than Agenda Items
Thomas Ellis, Chairman inquired if there were any comments from the Public. There were none.
Public Hearing (s ) SEQR & Overall Final Preliminary Plat Review for Novalane Subdivision, Applicant: John E. Young, Susan M. Barnett, James R. Young and Julie Rd. Young, 1714 East
Shore Drive, Tax Parcel # 36.-1-17.40
Gerald Caward made a motion to open the Public Hearing on the SEQR & overall Application for the Novalane Subdivision at 6:37 PM. Norman (Lin) Davidson seconded the motion and it was
carried by the following roll call vote:
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Norman (Lin) Davidson, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Ray Farkas, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Larry Sharpsteen, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Alternate
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Member
Mr. John Andersson, P.E. for the Applicants’ gave a brief slide show of the proposed Subdivision.
The owners of tax parcel # 36-1- 17.40 (32.71 acres) propose to subdivide the western portion of the property (approximately 14 acres) into seven (7) building lots. These lots will be
larger than required by the applicable zoning laws and larger than the lots in adjacent subdivisions. The balance of the property will remain in cultivation for the time being, although
it is anticipated that the entire property will eventually be developed for residential uses as permitted by its existing R-1 (low density residential) zoning.
Lot 6 will be for Stormwater which will be proposed as a Stormwater Drainage District. Each individual lot will have their own bio retention area to collect the roof water and a portion
of their driveway. There will also be a treatment area for the roads. The western edge of the property is located in the UNA # 64 area. This area is basically the wooded area. Mr.
Young did hire specialist twice to look at the vegetation and the site conditions and they have provided the Developer with their findings. Chairman Ellis states the Survey satisfies
the County’s 239 requirements.
Public Comments/Concerns
Jim Piersanti inquired about the northern boundary of Lot 2 with regards to the existing drainage ditch that is on that lot and also one on his. In addition, there is a large existing
culvert at the bottom of the hill and he has concerns with additional water being streamed to that.
John Andersson states the Novalane project will not add any water to the existing northern boundary. The Piersant’s have concerns with that the northern boundary of Novalane’s property
line being damaged or taken out and then have the excess water come onto their property. Mr. Andersson states it will not be touched.
John Stevens, Legal Counsel for Windswept, LLC inquired as to the proposed retention pond for lot 1. Mr. Stevens inquired to know where the overflow from that pond would go, and how
far from the western edge of lot 1 will there be construction.
John Andersson showed Mr. Stevens on the diagram where the proposed construction would start, also no additional water from the retention pond would go down the hill.
Carol Vineyard inquired if there is a strict blueprint of where the homes can go on each lot? What are the plans to connect to the Eastlake neighborhood?
Mr. Andersson states even though the lots are large, due to the lay of the land with the rock and slope, the requirements for the septic systems, and the stormwater there really isn’t
much room to move the homes.
Mike Long states it’s been a long term plan from the Town Board and Planning Board was to connect the two roads (Eastlake and Sun Path). Currently the Town is looking through the logistics
of putting it in, timing and how it will all work.
Dave Shuler states 24 years ago when he purchased his property he saw a map with a totally different layout of a future connector road. Mr. Shuler has asked that the Planning Board
request to see the full build out of Mr. Young’s property and think the road situation out thoroughly so that it will benefit the Community. Note: Future Road Maps have not changed in
20 years.
SEQR -Public Hearing Comments/Concerns
A Gentlemen inquired as to what the definition of SEQR is. Mike Long, Planning Consultant explained.
Mike Long gave an update on the Traffic capacity with the Route 34 roadway near the proposed project. Mr. Long states he met with the Tompkins County Transportation Department and was
provided with updated statics that show the road is in very good shape. The County has taken the surrounding Subdivisions into consideration when making their determination that the
area is at approximately at 51% of capacity. This information is available on the Town’s Website; www.lansingtown.com
Larry Sharpsteen states this does not mean the Town will say what the County has provided is good enough. They will continue pursuing the State for assistance with improvements.
It was the consensus of the Planning Board Members to keep the Public Hearing opened until such time that amended Maps come back before the Board.
Chairman Ellis shared the following email he received from Developer, Jack Young;
From: John Young [mailto:jack@youngbros.com] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 10:19 PMTo: 'Tom Ellis'Cc: 'Mike Long'; 'John Andersson'; lday8@twcny.rr.comSubject: Novalane Subdivision
Hi Tom,
I’m writing (as suggested) to confirm several of the statements I made at tonight’s meeting. If you could pass this message along to the rest of the Planning Board, I would greatly
appreciate it.
First, as I mentioned at the meeting, we have no desire to see any portion of our property rezoned commercial, and I can’t imagine ever lobbying the Town Board to make such a change.
Obviously we have no ability to change our zoning any more than we can guarantee that some future board won’t change it on their own. But I can assure you that we have no interest in
seeing the zoning in that area altered, and we certainly won’t suggest any substantive changes ourselves.
Additionally, I want to confirm that we remain committed to seeing Smuggler’s Path extended to connect with Eastlake Road as soon as possible. I agree with the 2006 Comprehensive Plan
completely when it states that such an extension would deliver “immediate benefits for pedestrian connectivity, multimodal transportation and intersection safety”. The longer the Town
waits to make this connection the more expensive and politically difficult it will become, so I would hate to see us kick this issue down the road again. I want to feel that our subdivision
is going provide tangible and immediate benefits to the neighborhood and community, and seeing the Smuggler’s Path extension go through would assure that.
Thanks again for your help navigating the subdivision process. When I got home tonight my wife asked why I feel the need to go through all this, and I told her that I felt that I was
getting a valuable education from working through our plans with the Planning Board and the Town of Lansing’s staff. Hopefully the knowledge I gain will be useful to me in the future,
and I do hope that if any questions come up between now and February 9th that you will all feel free to forward them to me at your convenience.
Thanks very much,
Jack
Minor Four (4) Lot Subdivision & SEQR Approval, Applicant: Anne Sheldon, Tax Parcel 12.-1-18.2, 1511 Ridge Road
Ms. Sheldon appeared before the Board for a Minor four (4) lot Subdivision. The following project overview from Mike Long was presented as well as a Final Plat from the Applicant.
Project Overview:
This project was previously discussed by the Planning Board for a proposed subdivision by Anne Sheldon to subdivide 1511 Ridge Road parcel of 99.701 acres into four (4) separate parcels
to be sold. This was discussed at the request of Lynn Day at the June 23, 2014 and Sept. 8, 2014 Planning Board Meetings. The minutes reflected a conversation about a requested by
the Code Enforcement Officer (CEO) to waive the storm water requirements of the anticipated “Exempt Subdivision”. As the subdivision request meets the criteria of the existing subdivision
ordinance, the Code Enforcement Officer has the authority to issue this as an “Exempt subdivision” if they determine it meets the subdivision requirements. This matter was further complicated
by the adjacent owner’s interest in acquiring the adjacent property. The owner only wishes to sell off the various parcels and continue the same existing uses. The two previous parties
have not been able to work together and wish to remain as two separate planning board issues going forward. Each application will need to be treated as a separate application.
A more detailed investigation reveals that the storm water regulations are a State of New York regulation and cannot be waived and remain with the property to be developed. The intent
is to address the proposed subdivision of the four (4) parcels as the initial action item. On January 28th, 2015, a request of the property owner was made that the CEO (who has the
authority) to complete the Exempt Subdivision. If the CEO had determined that they would not grant the Exempt Subdivision request, the applicant could have requested the Planning Board
to approve the exempt subdivision. The CEO would complete the required New York State SEQR assessment form and have the “Unlisted Action” issue a negative declaration by the authorized
individual in order the complete the exempt subdivision approval process.
Going forward, any of the four (4) individual parcels, should they be subsequently purchased and developed, would fall under the 3 year requirement for further subdivision and would
be classified as a major subdivision under the current regulations. The Planning Board has the ability to waive the 3 year requirement and consider any further subdivision requests,
should a new owner request that additional parcels be further subdivided.
Resolution:
The owner has again requested that the four (4) lot subdivision is completed in order to sell the parcels. Any new owner would be required to comply with current Town of Lansing Subdivision
regulations, storm water regulations, building codes requirements, etc…
In order to complete the SEQR review and issue a Negative Declaration, I would request the Planning Board to treat this project as a “Minor Subdivision” request and to complete the formal
review and approval process. While the Code Enforcement Officer is able to complete this request as an “Exempt Subdivision”, the Planning Board would have the ability to issue the conditions
as I have outlined in the attached proposed resolutions.
The Planning Board Members reviewed Part I and completed Part II of the Full Environmental Assessment Form.
Larry Sharpsteen offered the following Resolution. Al Fiorille seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll call vote:
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Norman (Lin) Davidson, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Ray Farkas, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Larry Sharpsteen, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Alternate
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Member
RESOLUTION PB 15-01
TOWN OF LANSING PLANNING BOARD
RESOLUTION OF STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW (SEQR) NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED
SHELDON MINOR SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, an application was made by Anne Sheldon for subdivision approval for 4 lots on certain land located at 1511 Ridge Road (NYS Route 34B), Lansing, New York, and otherwise known
as Tax Parcel #12.-1-18.2, consisting of a total of 99.709 +/- acres, RA Rural Agricultural Zone; and
WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision, shown on a “Survey Map showing lands owned by Elizabeth H. Sheldon”, located on Ridge Road – N.Y.S. Route 34B, Town of Lansing, Tompkins County, New
York,” dated 12/22/2014, would consist of Parcel A (13.197 +/- farmland acres), Parcel B with existing house (3.415+/- acres), Parcel C (33.06 +/- farmland acres), and Parcel D (50.037
+/- wooded acres); and
WHEREAS, this proposed action is an “Unlisted Action” for which the Town of Lansing Planning Board is an involved agency for the purposes of environmental review; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Lansing Planning Board, in performing its independent and uncoordinated environmental review in accordance with Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation
Law - the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQR”), (i) pursued its thorough review of the applicant’s completed Environmental Assessment Form Part I, and any and all other documents
prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action and its environmental review, and (ii) thoroughly analyzed the potential relevant areas of environmental concern of the project
to determine if the proposed action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR Section 617.7(c), and (iii) reviewed and completed
the EAF, Part II on the record;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
RESOLVED, that the Planning Board of the Town of Lansing, NY be and hereby is again declared to be the Lead Agency, and after consideration of the above action and the criteria for determining
significance listed at 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c), the Lead Agency finds that the proposed action – Minor four (4) Lot Subdivision - will have no potential moderate or significant negative environmental
impacts or consequences; and it is further
RESOLVED AND DETERMINED, that this declaration is made in accord with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law of the State of New York and the regulations promulgated thereunder
and, accordingly, the Lead Agency, based upon (i) its thorough review of the EAF and all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action and its environmental
review, (ii) its thorough review of the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed action may have any significant or moderate adverse impacts on
the environment, including but not limited to the criteria identified at said § 617.7(c), and (iii) its completion of the EAF, including the findings noted therein (which findings are
incorporated herein), hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance (“Negative Declaration”) in accordance with SEQRA and determines that an Environmental Impact
Statement is therefore not required; and it is further
RESOLVED, that a Responsible Officer of the Planning Board of the Town of Lansing, NY be and is hereby authorized and directed to complete and sign the determination of significance
confirming the foregoing Negative Declaration, which fully completed and signed EAF and determination of significance shall be incorporated by reference in this Resolution, and such
Officer shall ensure the filing of such determination and this resolution with the Lead Agency and the Town Clerk.
Dated: February 9, 2015
Motion by: Larry Sharpsteen
Seconded by: Al Fiorille
VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
Gerald Caward, Jr. – Aye
Norman (Lin) Davidson, Aye
Raymond Farkas – Aye
Al Fiorille – Aye
Larry Sharpsteen – Aye
Deborah Trumbull – Aye
Thomas Ellis - Aye
Norman (Lin) Davidson offered the following Resolution. Gerald Caward seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll call vote:
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Norman (Lin) Davidson, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Ray Farkas, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Larry Sharpsteen, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Alternate
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Member
RESOLUTION PB 15-02
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LANSING PLANNING BOARD
APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS
SHELDON MINOR SUBDIVISION, RIDGE ROAD
WHEREAS, an application was made by Anne Sheldon for subdivision approval for 4 lots on certain land located at 1511 Ridge Road (NYS Route 34B), Lansing, New York, and otherwise known
as Tax Parcel #12.-1-18.2, consisting of a total of 99.709 +/- acres, RA Rural Agricultural Zone; and
WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision, shown on a “Survey Map showing lands owned by Elizabeth H. Sheldon”, located on Ridge Road – N.Y.S. Route 34B, Town of Lansing, Tompkins County, New
York,” dated 12/22/2014, would consist of Parcel A (13.197 +/- farmland acres), Parcel B with existing house (3.415+/- acres), Parcel C (33.06 +/- farmland acres), and Parcel D (50.037
+/- wooded acres); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered and carefully reviewed the requirements of the Town’s Laws relative to subdivisions and the unique needs of the Town due to the topography,
the soil types and distributions, and other natural and man-made features upon and surrounding the area of the proposed Subdivision, and the Town has also considered the Town’s Comprehensive
Plan and compliance therewith; and
WHEREAS, on February 9, 2015, the Planning Board determined that the proposed subdivision meets the definition and requirements for a minor subdivision in that the subdivision of this
parcel involves 4 or less lots in any consecutive 3 year period, and there are no roads or infrastructure proposed to be developed, and based on that determination, the Planning Board
classified the subject proposal as a minor subdivision, pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, Section 502.C of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Lansing, enacted as Town
of Lansing Local Law No. 2 of 2008; and
WHEREAS, this is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act which requires environmental review; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Lansing Planning Board is an involved agency pursuant to State Law governing local environmental review; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Lansing Planning Board has the primary responsibility for approving or carrying out the action and is conducting an uncoordinated environmental review of this action
pursuant to State Law governing local environmental review; and
WHEREAS, this action is exempt from the General Municipal Law County Planning referral requirements of 239-l, 239-m, and 239-n (of Article 12-B) through an Inter-governmental Agreement
between the Tompkins County Planning Department and the Town of Lansing, dated December 17, 2003, as “residential subdivisions of fewer than 5 lots all of which comply with local zoning
standards and Tompkins County Sanitary Code requirements, and do not involve new local roads or streets directly accessing a State or county road” are excluded from the General Municipal
Law referral requirements; and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2014, September 8, 2014, and February 9, 2015 the Planning Board reviewed and considered the aforementioned subdivision application in the Lansing Town Hall, 29
Auburn Road, Lansing, New York 14882 and resolved to waive public hearings on the subdivision application and on the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) review on this action;
and
WHEREAS, on February 9, 2015, this Board, acting on an uncoordinated environmental review of the proposed action, reviewed and accepted as adequate a Short Environmental Assessment Form
(‘EAF”) Part I, submitted by the Applicant, the comments (if any) of the Town Engineer, and other application materials, and the Town of Lansing Planning Board completed Part II of the
EAF; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution adopted on February 9, 2015, the Town of Lansing Planning Board has determined that, pursuant to the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act,
the proposed subdivision will result in no significant impact on the environment and has issued a Negative Declaration of environmental significance for purposes of Article 8 of the
Environmental Conservation Law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board has duly considered the proposed subdivision in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Lansing including existing development
in the surrounding area, public facilities and services available, the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Ordinance, site characteristics and issues, and any potential on and off
site environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, upon due consideration and deliberation by the Town of Lansing Planning Board, now therefore be it
RESOLVED: that the Town of Lansing Planning Board grant Approval of the Application for a minor four (4) lot subdivision of certain land located on 1511 Ridge Road, NYS Route 34B, Lansing,
New York and otherwise known as Tax Parcel #12.-1-18.2, consisting of a total of 99.709 +/- acres, as shown on a “Survey Map Showing Lands of Elizabeth H. Sheldon, Located on Ridge Road,
Town of Lansing, Tompkins County, New York,” dated 8/12/2014 by T.G. Miller, would consist of Parcel A (13.197 +/- farm land acres), Parcel B with existing house (3.415+/- acres), Parcel
C (33.06 +/- farm land acres), and Parcel D (50.037 +/- wooded acres); and; subject to the following conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits on any of the subdivided
parcels:
(1) signing of the approved subdivision plat by the Planning Board Chair and the signed plat with Tompkins County Assessment Department stamp followed by filing in the Tompkins County
Clerk’s Office, followed by provision of proof of such filing within the time limit requirements with the Town of Lansing Code Enforcement Office; and
(2) any further re-subdivision of these parcels will be required to be reviewed and approved under the then Town of Lansing Subdivision Local Laws classifying the level of activity and
following the proper policy and procedures; and
(3) if lots are to developed in the future obtaining approval from the Tompkins County Health Department for the installation of any septic systems on the approved lots; and
(4) Submission of a plot plan for each approved lot for approval by the Code Enforcement Officer showing the proposed layout and dimensions of any proposed buildings, driveways, and
other improvements, as well as a drainage plan with details sufficient to demonstrate that adequate storm drainage facilities can be provided.
(5) No plantings other than lawn shall be permitted within the front yard setback areas (i.e., within 30 feet of the road right-of-way) so that visibility along the road is not restricted.
February 9, 2015
Motion by: Norman (Lin) Davidson
Seconded by: Gerald Caward, Jr.
VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
Gerald Caward, Jr. – Aye
Norman (Lin) Davidson - Aye
Raymond Farkas – Aye
Al Fiorille – Aye
Larry Sharpsteen – Aye
Deborah Trumbull – Aye
Thomas Ellis - Aye
Approval/Denial of January 26, 2015 Minutes
Larry Sharpsteen states page 9, untaken should be undertaken
Al Fiorille states page 10, 3rd paragraph there will be
Norman (Lin) Davidson made a motion to approve as amended. Deborah Trumbull seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll call vote:
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Norman (Lin) Davidson, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Ray Farkas, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Larry Sharpsteen, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Alternate
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Member
Mike Long, Planning Consultant offered the following project update;
Planning Board Project Update: Feb 9, 2015 meeting
Cayuga Farms (102 dwelling Unit Site Plan) –
Requested DEC review of package system – follow up approvals needed.
Public Hearing – January 12, Meeting held open for additional comments.
SEQR / Site Plan approval required – February 23, 2015 mtg.
Novalane – Jack Young
Preliminary Plat subdivision plan with turn around extension of Smugglers Path.
Received the revised map of the future balance of parcel from John Anderson.
Tompkins Co. 239 Review has been completed.
Preliminary Plat Jan 26, 2015 meeting tonight.
SEQR – classified as an “Unlisted Action” and will have resolutions available.
Feb. 9th 2015 - Schedule Public Hearing for the “Flag Lots”
Preliminary – Feb 23 meeting and Final Plat approvals.
Forest Circle Drive – Major subdivision plan.
Tompkins Co. 239 review has been completed.
Storm water plan revisions requested T.G. Miller.
Will require a variance as 1 lot is less than 150 foot of road frontage.
Required Public Hearing – establish date for Feb / March.
Whispering Pines VI –
Revised Plans being developed by engineer.
Completing County Health Dept. perk testing.
Need 239 Review from Tomkins County?
Need to establish a public hearing date.
West view Partners, Boris Simkin – Major Subdivision.
Designated a Major subdivision (4 lots and ROW issues) – later phase plan completed by T.G. Miller.
Revised Subdivision Plan submitted – updating the Storm Water Plan for 4 lots.
Revised subdivision plan to 239 Review from County
Need to establish a Public Hearing date…
Anne Sheldon – Minor subdivision approval (4 lots)
Exempt from 239 review
Planning Board agenda for Feb 9th meeting
Village Solars – PDA revision (move one building footprint to a new location)
239 Review to be requested
Town Board will also need to approve
Comprehensive Plan – Wed. Feb 11th at 7:00 PM
To review Agricultural Plan – Monika Roth
Gerald Caward made a motion to adjourn the Regular Meeting at 7:45 PM and enter into Executive Session to discuss a Contract negotiation. Deborah Trumbull seconded the motion and it
was carried by the following roll call vote:
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Norman (Lin) Davidson, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Ray Farkas, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Larry Sharpsteen, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Alternate
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Member
Ray Farkas made to a motion to exit the Executive Session at 8:00 PM and reconvene the Regular Meeting. Larry Sharpsteen seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll
call vote:
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Norman (Lin) Davidson, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Ray Farkas, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Larry Sharpsteen, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Alternate
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Member
Larry Sharpsteen made a motion to adjourn the Meeting at 8:00 PM. Gerald Caward seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll call vote:
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Norman (Lin) Davidson, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Ray Farkas, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Larry Sharpsteen, Member
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Alternate
Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Member