The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2001-01-28 ':%\11111.1 TOWN ofLANSING "Home of Industry, Agriculture and Scenic Beauty " • � ZONING , PLANNING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT Box 186 `, Lansing, NY 14882 I11�� Lansing Planning Board Meeting 1 /28/01 7 : 00PM Lansing Town Hall'. — Board Room t end • Time: Agenda Topics g p 7:00 PM Informal Discussion - Frank Rogan - 2 Duplex Units Tax Parcel # P/016.4 -34, Ridge Rd 7: 15 PM Joe Clare - 12 Sunset Dr - Request for Auto Sales at Home 7:30 PM Informal Discussion of Cluster Housing (42.4 -15, 16.2) 7:45 PM Approve Minutes of 12/10/01 8:00 PM Distibute Information Requested at Previous Meeting and Discussion Regarding. Resume Review of Ordinance and Maps • • Page 1 1,, \ TI At TOWN ofLANSING Q "Home of Industry, Agriculture and Scenic Beauty " • et ' A ZONING , PLANNING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT O�de., \ I Box 186 \,\ Lansing, NY 14882 II im� Town of Lansing Planning Board Meeting 1 /28/0t 7 : 00 PM Lansing Town Hall — Board Room Agenda . ,itaitifrejttaA r ,,,6A-) 011146 Time: Agenda Topics 7:00 PM Informal Discussion Frank Rogan - 2 Duplex Units Tax Parcel # P/016.-1 -34, Ridge Rd 7: 15 PM Joe Clare 12 Sunset Dr - Request for Auto Sales at Home 7:30 PM Informal Discussion of Cluster Housing (42. 4 -15, 16.2) - ensa a t- q-t - re.y i4- 5 .,><,r,%ue' s'soca 7:45 PM Approve Minutes of 7.2140/01 1fritek' 8:00 PM Distribute Information Requested at Previous Meeting and Discussion Regarding. Resume Review of Ordinance and Maps • • Page 1 /zMcgntAt I ar v Ye C l l a. �\ii '� • " � ' HOUSE rt of creek / 1 / :--------s\\%W lt? 1 r' .r \C dspl1.� 11 7 ,;6� \Q�/ driveAQ .. 1 i � �dII /� kN ^� •{ a o °2. � I _ \'I r.. - r. + � it ` • \ k, ( 2 ) � ' Cn 1 •.,,- \ � e- \, AREA - . 2 . 278 ACRES � � b t� D • 0 ` ' ,a , r y '� , � •+, o yy3, S6Q \ ii. \ \ , , \ ., , , \ y ! t to iY `. YY .. .._ . Z / A a' 1 na ` � 1 • "Apt,i'u; ed as conforming to the requirements of i the Town of Iarising Land LTse Control Ordinance (including current amendments) No review has herrn made attic suitability for sanilr-zy fatuities of water supply, or conformance with the regulations of other jurisdictions. 9 SET 5 /8 if rd< HAR It1 ,` 5 ;JR \.,/ it ,} C; AP By . ! '-'Y`S- -� * r A I S T I Id L5 i ft C 1 � PIPE minis r t r1 t,E,OI _ S SURVEY REF , P [. iNT — - - - - - OVERHEAD 1. 1T I ;_ 1 , f' csi . r,. _ Date_ -. �' �� / -_ MlaratAg ' tt to a vtetallaa al sinner, TBC § • $ ubdivielan 2 of Iha How Yark abate Sdeeotlwn t. sw to aIle . , in any warn a flap baalln9 itsa arlgisot aaai anti sirloins a1 or iiidAiao pr7ieerlandi . Orly maps t` 4arInc tuck eta , and iIQrfclrara trip bi ioe11ds ; 4d w0114 - " SUR VII DA71i OCT, Qat LIND M . BISHOP Int hlfP rARCat IQp . LADS OF , , S , - . . LOT . . ....- - 16 ` - 34 1 24 �t II GE ROAD ( Cd . - .� : FATE ; 3 �# B ) , MIL . L +J �r 6 1 BK . 652 /PG . 668 ( 7 ) LANSING' , TOMPKINS CO , , N . Y. D(+LA 'd1N 19Y — ._ . , . _.. . _ _ . . _ _ . . . . . . _. . , 4. '' AllC .;\. •^ .---__ I itgg [ BY CElknfr THAI NHS (AAP ACCURATELY REPRQsEsiia tii4 ACI :; AL. SURVEY G�� `" f-\ .,;: ,n z17-7 • rtRrORIdpC BY ME b4 t1HUtR MY OtREC1 $ UPI (KViB ION ANt3 , Is $ tiBJlCT TO ANY t trfi ' � . r' '' ` µ ` ---- tTATQE of FACTS THAT AK UP -. To - bATE An / ° ACT OF TITLE, SkAY S1iOW � C` ' ; " e f ' L-j• ,j fly �ti, 1 iu D Q . 6R 'UCE ` DAV Isct,i L . S , 49603 27 NORTH CIt1JRCIt STREET _ _�____ JOB Ao . - fti .. n54 t ark ` FRom : L:!HLPiILE ' t d 17— =9P- 4D7R FAX NO . . Jeri . 21 20A2 Al : 4sPm P2 WALPOLE REAL ES1Alt TE 147 MAIN ST, R. C . BOX 130 GROTON , NEW YORK 13073 ( 607 ) 89d - 3796 FAX ( 507 ) 898 - 4229 ROBERT F, WALPOLE, BROKER CHRISTINE WALPOLE, BROKER ASSOCIATE Owner of Record : Linda M . Bishop Asking Price ; $ I8 , 000 . 00 Address : Ridge Road Lansing , New York 14882 Tax Map Number : Part of 16 - 1 -- :34 • Assessment : Part of $ 1 , 550 . 00 Deed Reference ; 662 / 668 Lot Size : 1SO r �x 452 ' (Approximate 2 . 20 Acres ) Zoning : Agriculture • School i_r1 D71str1CtLansing =ire District : Lansi ng G' Water Supply ; Municipal Sewer System : Need Private System 4e_m Natural Gas : Not Available Electricity : Available Partially wooded lot , level and slope Possible Owner Financing s - • • NisiJ 4.,:,, dr • a, I. 11 , d3 1.1 i1 1 IN Y a,e ac• ,rs�a »•.°, tVicyu';tuls` -.'44 v r - • •w• °z MI iu I. / '.iV �� g L^Y Yui ,x.° r; W 1 P �" lir 1\ h 4,,,F P II \ . ) 1 �•iff a y�r 'S. e. 4st,A �,,, K48.' r' r C • ? �� I' :.A Ir"�' 4 Y� j! 6 We�Y }.., J 4. 'Pp '. 1 00 - i ii ( .,5^v'St t - w�43 wY •'rilx'Yi� q , r „ 9�9s ipe ,1�� • i .na . 2 � 1. � f, P4 R[i.�.TxiY • .rimI 1 '4''''- ,t,1 . c'.,g+ Y' y ..,,.. 41. Ite.S%°� ''t^ t* v� "iy �. 1a+,, .. t 4.t •b_ �K- - I • > • `".. Z z . ..„: -�. .A`. : A . ,...:::•;-•,.•-•_::.•, ' .j „0:.-„i � 1 ' {• N , I 00�,\ t �e . s , " 3� ` \ y S 7.' f 3 .+1 •-:-._!....... .8x •du � ' CJiiitI:mi : � a 71:<:,. 4 . • xi . , v `e .:;;a1 3' \Sa. j� ' • x �' • N4 i eide , ,... : • 11.: ,-/ 3 4:0 1 4'4% ...t‘' i,... 't '''T \ A V + Iz \) . P 4k • „..,. . i„,....„, ,,,.. .. .. s, ,,,,0 ,., . , . N1 s Dan v ... \ \\ ,, , . . . ir a W m --1 itill rts rjI °6roandHs�, � • N � jOve„c0 s 0 • .' . . 44 o I II e � oA ; \ O s. 1 _ —1 , 1 _ - N F� 'L'�i �i b: to 3111AON Ntll ID u, . . �, P / Pt, / % r < �, ^fig E Pg. m 1,,,,' �I 7 RNA/ v A \y • e • . OC 'N Vii. • (j� 1 � ,.� ^'.. ! �. 1 •� m O . t + 933 - _ 'n r. pll II .0,......„..........„.„...............c. - i _. J o �\ v lit s.-.. J� p ®A 1. an 1 p v doomed o i .+ r I o —1 �I NJ rt 1N00 �a. e l• • . m �+ L�m a I' -• ” " 1 r - LJ \ s u .. a0 100 3 p, � . . Y ' Ir. r ••• to igl OVDa • / v ,. `i a 0 O v r ,, 1 "V OQv�— W n N H 1 e 4.f li c, \ - �xasm n..* Ar .. O �r l. SH\; � ''P'^" z VR a II y O AVB n ::: � d F a A 0 0 /xx331Bdiri Ifr�i - 1 . .. __au v �Od , z Ipy ` 1 I a A .• - - Sr I 73 �J ....._ eJ'IF . VJ. gVOy 4"._' • a3wn\IN^f n 1.2 ; H11:10 C �9 Y B'_ .. . - . . :00 YC . R09• I '; f V`f/'> § _ I� ?: 'z'" - ` F�� m bCr� SS y _ 1'> f• i r I� i, "Y. 9 Oa lncol ��' 'iv �o�.—y r;` ;' 1 Iz I r P c 5n vl +yas. ? l+ t ` –.1 r, ovoa Lt 1 CT € n co saaov l Of .p % "� ii: 1 ONOai > o Naep , �i { ane40 �-- -t, T p —LI � ' I s.BENSON r l N i6 ;CO o c �_ir - avdP� - � - 03 30tl £ •fie •. ___ _ 11I r— isoI { � Rn.� 0 CD i. p 1 t i N r lu . me. .� pVOa �t I____43 .....43‘71 { W "z."A'- v reams NVA .. O41 I "-a Y i "R t�r. rt , .. .v • CO �' cant"' ro O 11 .._ i760a sNn1t"Y o ie\ ��g o Jz " . a .•. p I I. p N Wg 'DVD .1, V _ v _ IIl:,..., : ; a (O a v __�� '' v _- -♦ Jt _ _ es _ - _ . . - .it OA�o W EP w e o 1 avon 0131 : w NJ ti -'' i fr r1 1J i If— z r _ = ___.._-... IN r P II 7 _ .y 5 - w 1. ik- tat ' i3 IIs 11 I' c , A _; _ _ _ o -i, al ? • s '' a z- Ar j co nyy 8i a -. • cp( G II ii Tompkins County Highway Division 170 Bostwick Load Tompkins County Ithaca, NY 14850 • ATTN: John R. Lampman Highway Division PHONE: (607) 274-0307 FAX: (607) 272-8489 ii , apt To; Dick Platt, Town of Lansing From: John R. Lampman Fac 533-3507 Pages: , 3 P 533- 05 Date: January 28, 2002 hone. 7 4 anu ry Re: N . Triphammer Road Alignment CC: • Urgent ■ For Review ■ Please Comment ■ Please Reply U Please Recycle • Comments : Planned realignments of Hillcrest, Waterwagon and Triphammer Terrace intersections, as requested . • Please keep me posted regarding changes in the Park and Ronsvalle situations . s . Thanks. • • • il • II I • „war, • • " L . • • • • • yes r I rR' A O • �3jl� yet ors• • 4 r so'1` .5. � / °fir- s?r- • ' fr.s • . rEE / • Rtb / . • st 1... / • MATCH DRAWING PL- 11 t ' ♦40 r ii • rooyG; SUSAN M • •AETT, P� • J j S ram,, JUV +' NO "1NT y • , /e444 i / O 52 T .WA 9G49 q / s I04, 8? S2 rAR (28 . h INV�i �/� 4ti,AGI 1 aP • 1D tiU ' j T.c. zea. ” �I Jpv y .V. eDaN-103 Z9 . 1 APPRO% LO��11 . CHATTERTON. NOREEN o m� � / \1\ // APAP Na 371.6-3.9 R=12m �„r tor- ♦ \/ 60$ . PdGE 892 • "" ow 0 `N, 4 �� _ 41104:0/1ter pROp' A mit> 4 ��/ . NYSEG c ` 21 R-6m O NJT �'�► � u ' / h j `*4 ••er 77545 ! G 9pRR GOUISE M •-50 ' Tax ANAP N0. 'A!-d-25 w, �O , �/r, `?�' 'u 6008 .393 PAGE r45 f ^ P.M. 'fiaka r � - ' • n • 77// _ mi 0• w a i c, ` � � � . � " m is =lOmh '' STA ��pp+199.31TRT ��" 4 0 LC P�39, - _ .� _ 4 ��• ••• -•-• / /Di U IN , 98.846 ' R=i .I ,Bm ' 7� K _ ,' S 11 10 INV, 897.436 8,277 8� . \ " 0.49 5T g - 0+ 194..7 •10 300.432 BE I ITEM 624.0109 INv. 296.7 ITEM 620.03 . .I) _ - : , ' 25 1 ,11: , INY SRN 1 . 299.425C fi .l .,'•a:;vd.- l:P.3: - ':I ' ty IMV 98 700 � y_,_ m_:vs.o:< :.: ;,,.;;,,.. OOmm STA. Il 6MI. 1 , GMi CN. . END ITEM 624n0109 re�ASP/IALT �%oNALD 4QMlITErr 209.0608p 0 A. 11 + 2 : ARSD 18 ��, PAGE 263 �4'� � : • MATCH DRAWING PL999 • . • • • • ALL UTLITIES SHOWN ON THE: CONTRACT ORAWINGS tPUSLIC ANO PRIVATE) ARE QUALITY LEVEL D .- EXISTINC TOMPKINS COUNTY ANO TON OF LANSING UTLITY 05 70 15 20 I COMPANY RECORDS *ERE USED TO LOCATE SUBSURFACE � � I UTLI TIES I b.•� • NOR/ NMI AL SCALE mma.ims II• • • CONTRACT NO, • SHEET " •TOTAL N0, SHEETS �� pano.... • 45 89 NORTH TRIPHAMMER ROAD REHABILITATION ANORITSAKIS, CONSTANTINE & COUNTY ROAD 122 ANOAfTSAKIS, OFMWRI TOWN OF LANSING • TAX MAP Nov PPG-3-36 _ BOOK IC , PAGE WE Twit INS COUNTY H . 1 1P.LM. 3752.28 • 1 NARION• witFORQ& ROSE B.I N. � •. TAx MAP MO. 371.6.333 1 Wax 622 , PAGE 32 1 I 1 S. 1 Sip 70+000 I 1 . I 1* 0 ch PI STA. 12+ 178.346 I LI I ,� * ,t a SDOmm 9 m �_ G G 3 . �, ?s G 150mm G 5- 0 G . I 9944 � ;, MIMEO r ;� W . • xIs '_l NiG1iWA 20 h � A • ' � w • w w wjia � = , N — , - .roJ •3m ; r .I . . il AZ. 357° 13'10.0" 12+200 °1 PI STA 2.762$68 1 he :3m I . 1NV. 289.503ca cm ~` •II cc .Bill � - -yam •• fa- 4`° ,.1,•••, ��r _(JQj1iifl ARY _ _ - f�_ _ _ _ � ` I `r� ` • _- is i "Er UT INV. 89.9` r� �fa Z. PROP. NE uJT UT a . 'rs Lir , mil 209.0609 I a • i ORrELY. T,p-41frri d$,;k HOMAS ' M 1 ,1 p)fr:44r �y TAX MAP NO. 4Ora•w11f Z ,� BOOK 774. PAGE .293 Aglik i n 19 � ► o 1 O x g w g h REMOYAL OF EYISTJNC PAVEMENT TO BE INCLUDED ;; IN THE PRICE BID 10 FOR ITEM 203.02. .; i j NW ciii II 4 i i 0 y if/ ! PI Spvlrir X09 so1 / r / CURVE QATA PI StO 70�Od0.930 R = 50,000m 1 • Lod7.6g4m � ' % . ' Q - 43° 1056" /� sr • T = 19.787 m F 4 • / • �1 G / 111r, 'U' � Cp?�,� ALL OIMENSIDNS ARE IN m UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS BUILT REVISIONS 1 • it cid / /�/ SIGNATURE DATE • SHOW N THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS PLAN ( . RIVA E '.QUALITY LEVEL •D -. EXISTING STA. � q1 0 STA. 1 2 � 0 � NTT OWN OF LANSING UTLIT7 o RDS USEA SO LOCATE SUBSURFACE �ei;_ _' 10 15 20 251 m • Uir ` R TOMPKINS COUNTY. i '. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Ii. SCALE FILENAM I l: - GATE DRAWh .INO N0, 175228L.PLT . . MAY 2001 j ' PL- 12 I I' TOWN OF ' ANS!MG ORDINANCE DEPARTMENT THLY REPORT • Deco 1 2001 - January 10, 2 92 TO: Dick Platt FROM : Robin Cornell BUILDING PERMITS POLLACK, William 40 Bacon Rd ( 19.-1 -16. 1 ) 01-169 * New Residence Erect 42 x 60 Pole Barn **New Mobile Home ***New Business **ANDERSON , Phyllis 590 Buck Rd (29.-1 -4.2) 01 -170 Install Mobile H ome STEINHARDT, Mary 1868 E. Shore Drive (37. 1 -7-10.5) 01-171 Erect 24' x 24 Detached Garage WALDRON , Robert & Colette 155 Drake Rd (37. 1 -1 -26.2) 01 -172 2nd Story Addition HALTON , Steven 109 Weeks Rd (6 .- 1 -9.2) 02-01 Build Foundation, Pour Floor, & Build 1st floor deck CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY **BARTLETT, Jeff 58 Lansing Station Rd ( 15.-1 -30. 1 /1 ) 01 -117 LOAN , Gary & Karen 117 Horizon Drive (44.-1 -43.2) 01 -29 TANZOLA, Charles 740 Ridge Rd (22 .- 1 -26. 1 ) 01 -156 SMITH , Hubert 1205 Ridge Rd ( 15.-1 -14) 01 -157 DIEBOLT, Kent 369 Asbury Rd (39.- 1 -42) 00-68 MORAVEC , John & Sue 133 Farrell Rd (39.-1 -13.21 ) 99-156 SCRIVANI, Pete 2989 N . Triphammer Rd (37. 1 -4-2. 11 ) 01 -135 BAESE , Jase & FRANCO, Emily 142 Benson Rd (38.- 1 - 102) 01 -139 , � _ 6ti \ ei`\ „1/4 • 1/4- 3/6 ) Totals December 11 - January 10 2001 (Compared To) 2000 Fees Collected $ 259.00 $ 937.00 Estimated Project Cost $ 80,956.00 $ 312,000.00 Certificate of Occupancy 8 7 • Building Permits 5 4 Single Family Residences 0 1 New Mobile Homes 1 0 New Businesses 0 0 Multi-Family Residences 0 0 End of Year Totals 2001 (Compared To) 2000 Fees Collected $ 31 ,686.80 $ 47,017.83 Estimated Project Cost $ 10,399,791 .00 $ 15,778,610.00 Certificate of Occupancy 112 117 Building Permits 172 151 Single Family Residences 39 34 New Mobile Homes 20 10 New Businesses 1 2 Multi-Family Residences 0 3 I Year-To-Date Totals. We are: Fees Collected -$ 15,331 .03 Down (compared to 2000) Estimated Project Cost -$5,378,819 .00 Down Building Permits 21 Up Without AES we are: Fees Collected $ 6,493.97 Up Estimated Project Cost $ 1 ,896 , 181 .00 Up January 2002 Totals Fees Collected $ 25.00 Estimated Project Cost $ 2,500.00 Certificate of Occupancy 5 Building Permits 1 • Single Family Residences 0 New Mobile Homes 0 New Businesses 0 Multi-Family Residences 0 11 II . .• • C 0 2 .0 N C II O U _ o E d o a U li I f r- s;lined ;o JagwnN .9 8 8 8 8 8 $ 8 Q 8 0 (N u3 r .- r r - r— O u N g CO C) F- >- 8 N ..w .. ,....k . . .n N Ce LU O Nin M co M 'it 0 r— O r- N N a � � ooao � �r �nvr, C° 1nr` Cp -rr— r r• r" r- r r- r- V Z C C L o it J a • CO O eraZ CO N N M N M M O r- O CN1 CO (O red) 4 O) r— r- O) C 0 �j O 00 r N O co N O co r- O f0 �fT Z Q :Is." r- (O pl. co_- N O; (� O� Op N 00 M O N• J Q � No0N000O � N � - O � rnr`• V_ N r O co- r r O t1)', r— r N 00 CO CO Op r lrA (If C Q - � p �' 2 0 w CI N incsi ce) r co Si co' O O> O> O cocci O O) O O O O O O O N N N N 0) a - — - - 8 a co § § cp— IQ$ Q a co- f0 V N O OD co- N N .-- • uoi;anJ;suo3 Jo 3503 II � � COUNTY REFERRALS II I I re, ra o tes-i r ri tr-; 0 1111 , i t .1 40 , .1 —01 g et UNDER GENERAL B C IA n s 110 _ _ MUNICIPAL LAW Ott 1 ` 1 . II : div" . § 239 -M A PRACTICAI A II, / \ It. ' - nit iftj 1-15 et - . r. . , .. ----, - - , - -, --,, , APP �iO CH Under § 239- m of the General Municipal Law, certain matters which corn 11 ._.:.. ,-t-;-1 yam'=i i . .:. I -�_ZI, before municipal boards must be referred to the county planning agency Zo for review before a municipality can take final action on the matter. Stri sit ? adherence to GML §239- m is critically important because failure to refer matters to the county as required by this section of law is a procedural defect rendering any subsequent approval or' enactment by the local boa t�w�n null and void. ' Although this section of law seems complicated at first • x _ _:: Isimplified bybreakingit down into three comp( 1 .: ..... . .ti .. . _ _ it can be readilysim hfP • - _ :.; r. , _; : ; . . .:; glance, P red 2 . . . . neatparts : the types of proposed actions which must be referred, ( ) 11 _ . ( I ( 1) YP P P LTJ a 1e; � 4 :�- ' e Y " � n,2the instances when they must be referred, and (3) the procedure involve p ` ',' TYPES OF PROPOSED ACTIONS WHICH MUST BE REFERRED • i �� ! I �r ; �I ,'\ i� � = e ° „ ! Actions which must be referred include : , cue = , 6, , iva 1 r ' , ' ` I ' qti .e'� '. • • - r' tt _FE 1 3 1 . Adoption or amendment. of a comprehensive plan , rti amendment of a zoningordinance or local law, Adoption or e I 2 . = 1 ' . 3 . Issuance of a special use permit , P j • 5 . Grantingof use or area variances , III r which are granted pursuant to the local 6 . Anyother approvals • P - zoning code , and II < . 7 . Preliminary or final subdivision approval or proposal to o B develop certain undevelopede d plats alreadyon file with county cle ynrewrac , : p NYCOM Counsel WHEN A PROPOSED ACTION MUST BE REFERRED Any of the above types of actions must be referred whenever they invol 11 real property located within 500 feet of: II 1 . The boundary of any city. village or town, 2 . The boundary of any existing or proposed county or state pai II ill or any other recreation area . II 3 . The right of way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway, thruway, expressway, road or highway, II 4 . The existing or proposed right of way of any stream or drain P P rg channel owned by the county or for which the county has established channel lines , 5 . The existingor proposed boundary of an • county or state P P y J owned land on which a public building is situated, or 6 . The boundary of any farm operation located in an agricultur district, as defined by Article 25 - AA of the Agriculture and Markets Law. 3 PROCEDURE FOR REFERRAL • it : + propft e :it ` , uru meets die aho ': r crite _- ia . the local board r'i; risid .:.ri the proposed action , , lust send to the count' plar.nrng agency a full st ment of the proposed action which includes all the materials required NYCOM BULLETIN 32 JULY • AUGUST 200 I U II - . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . .. . . . . . . . . 1 II - , :'{fie local board to be submitted by the applicant as well 2nd — If the answer is no, no county referral is . :!' any materials required by the State Environmental required. If the answer is yes, ask whether it : .:Quality Review Act including completed environmental involves property within 500 feet of the listed li assessment forms. If the proposed action is the adoption boundaries. , , °.'pr amendment of a local law or ordinance, a complete 3rd — If the answer is yes to both questions 1 1 _ .. • xt of the proposed enactment as well as existing prove- and 2, you must refer the matter to th.e county -cions of local law which will be affected must also be for review by submitting a full statement of the .: • : included. Local boards may enter into agreements with proposed action (If the answer is no to either • ..- . 5 question, no countyreferral is required) . the countyto define what constitutes a full statement. • 4th - If you,ve referred it to the county and i n30 act - . ' the has 30 days from receipt of a full statement receive no response within days, you can • _��•� The county y . on the matter bymajority vote (unless you '�`- to report its recommendations on the matter to the local ] „ P board. If the countyrecommends modification or receive recommendation from county after 30 days but at least 2 daysprior to actingon the val of the proposed action, the local board Y ' '.. disapproval Y ' sa ch P P P cannot act contrary to the recommendation except by a matter) , or Isuper P er majority vote. This means that if the county -- If you receive a response from the county wit recommends that the local board either modify or in 30 days or at least , 2 days before the local II :5 disapprove the action, the local board can still approve board is scheduled to take action and the the action, but only if the vote to approve consistsofaresponse recommends approval or determines majority plus one vote of the total membership of the that the action has no county wide or impact, you can act on the inter-community local board. In other words, a simple majority vote to P„ P r approve an application is insufficient if the county has matter by majority vote , or • ``t; recommended modification or disapproval of the action . - - If you receive a response from the county A majority vote would still be sufficient, however, when - within 30 days or at least 2 days before the the countyrecommends approval or finds that the local board is scheduled to take action and the ever pp action has no county -wide or inter-community impact. response recommends disapproval or ii modification, you can act on the matter but yo ; -" • If the county fails to report its recommendations within will have to obtain a ''; majority plus one vote to 30 days of receiving a full statement, the local board can act in a manner contrary to the county's • take action on the matter without the county's report. recommendat 1 >ion . In this instance no super majority vote would be 5th — Within thirty days of taking final action required. If the local board receives a county report you must file a report with the county as to w• l • more than 30 days after the submission of the full state- action was taken . Iflyou acted contrary to the ment but 2 or more days before the local board meets to county'ss recomnendati ns > you must provide t take final action , thecountyreport must be considered reasons for doingso . . o I� , P . and a super majority vote would be required to overcome a recommendation of disapproval or modification. These End• notes time frames may be altered by agreement of the county 1 . Ferrari u: Penfield 181 A . D. 2d 149, 585 N. YS. 2d 925 (4t . Dept . 1992); Burchetta 'b. Town of Carmel 167 A. .D. 2d 339, . and the local board. . N. YS. 2d 305 (2d Dept. 1990). ii A local board must file with the county a report of its 2. Subdivision review referrals 'are actually governed by G�1 §239- n, not §239- m, but the procedure involved is the same. final action within thirty days of taking the action. If the final action of the local board was contrary to a For the type of proposal to develop an already filed u.ndeuel oped plat which requires referral, see GML §239- n( 1 )(b). county recommendation of modification or disapproval, 3. This section related to farmsi' does not apply to area the local board must set forth in the report reasons why variances. itacted insuch 4 . ! a counties without countyiv l Zang agency,ncy , but jurisdiction of a regional planning council, referral is to th( ISUMMARY regional planning council. To meet the requirements of GML §239 - m, follow these 5. Matters which have been previously referred, but have be steps . substantially revised must alsoi be referred. See Ferrari u. tl 2 927. P 5 1st — Ask whether the proposed action is of Penfield a G Z ,': ••• - the type that has to 1,e referred . 1ML Z:_ v_nt (6). NYCOM BULLETIN 33 JULY • AUGUST 200 I II II P I Steve White g 0 Town of Lansin Qillp ills pUllt Box 186 2:3 �1 Lansing NY 14882 DEPARTME 9 P� • INC. -_ }2 t � "fl Il eet dca;�j` �'or 148, James W. Hanson, Jr. * .� x Telephone (607) 274-5560 Commissioner of Planning - �� Fax (607) 274-5578 DATE: May 1 2001 TO : Supervisors and Mayors !, Planning Board Chairs and Staff Zoning Board Chairs and Staff Clerks FROM: Karen Flores, Circuit Rider Planner SUBJECT: GML § 239 Review: • Overview of process and clarification of actions subject to review • Changes in language in § 239 letters The purpose of this letter is to clarify the County ' s role in the development ent review process and identify the types of actions that are subject to review under NYS General Municipal Law (GML) §239. As you are probably aware, this topic has attracted a great deal of public attention and triggered various legal bg ,� g actions duringthe past few months . Therefore,e, rt seems timelyto clarify the GML fy § 239 review process. Additional ) the County • Y� has changed some of the for the § 239 review letters, described below. ters, and this is OVERVIEW OF PROCESS AND CLARIFICATION OF ACTIONS S SUBJECT TO REVIEW NYS GML § 239 mandates that municipalities submit certain rtam actions to the County for review, and that the County ' s review be conducted nducted within thirtydays of receipt of materials . Y p Actions subject to review: • Adoption or amendment of Comprehensive Plans, Zoning Ordinances, or Zoning Local Laws • Issuance of Special Use Permits, Use or Area Variances p, • Approval of Site Plans • Other � authorizations as may be required bylocal zoninglaw (such as a special approval or the application of special conditions) ) These actions subject to review i the property on which hick P P tT they are located is within 500 ee�t the f of following: • Boundary of any city, town, village • Boundaryof countyor state park or recreational area • Right-of-way of county or state road • Boundary of county- or state-owned land with a public building or institution Boundary• of a farm operation n to Gated in Agricultural District (except for are a variances) Impacts of GML review: Municipal decision-making bodies should be aware that a determination by the Countythat an action• ton "inter- community,may have inter community, County, or State impacts" requires the vote of a n Rectopaper Recled a er I" ANi it su ermajority (meaning a majority plus one) of all members of the decision-making body to be approved. It should also be stressed that failure to refer aprescribed action to the Countyfor review mayleave a • municipality vulnerable to legal action. CHANGES LN LANGUAGE in §239 LETTERS It has recently come to our attention that the wording, "significantignificant deleterious impacts,"cts," which we customarily use in our §239 letters, sometimes results in confusion with the determination of significance t under the State Environmental QualityReview Act SE RA . Therefore, we will no longer use the ( Q wording "significant deleterious impact. " Instead, we will refer to actions as either having "no negative e inter-community, County, or State impacts, " or as having some type of impact on inter-community, County, or State interests. For advice (free of charge) concerning matters related to GML §239 reviews, you may contact Lori Heitoff, Land Use Training Manager; Bernie Schmelz,Sc melz, Land Use Training Specialist II; or Harry Willis, Associate Attorneyat the Departmenti of State (DOS) at its local government "Helpline" at 11800-367- 8488 800-367- 8488 or (518) 486-9888, by fax at (518) 474-6572 , or through the Internet at http://www.state.ny.us/dos. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. cc : Jim Hanson, Commissioner of Planning Joan Jurkowich, AICP, Deputy Commissioner of Planning Katie Borgella, AICP, Land Programs Manager • Ih II II p w Purpose of GML §239 review 0 ➢ Bring pertinent actions to attention of County so it can consider intercommunity , county, state, and/or regional impacts Review Process 1 . Municipality submits proposal & letter requesting review to TCPD 2 . TCPD reviews proposal for intercommunity, County , or State impacts 3 . TCPD submits letter of response within 30 days In letter, TCPD may recommend approval , modification, or disapproval . - TCPD may also include comments of a general planning nature that are separate from the GML review. What are impacts of GML review ? ➢ If adverse intercommunity, County, or State impacts, requires vote of supermajority (majority + 1 ) of decision-making body . ➢ Failure to refer actions to County may leave a municipality vulnerable to legal action . \\PLAN_SNAPNW\SHAREI \Tcpd\Karen\239 Info\Presentation_Cornell_March 2001 \Cornell .presentation2_GML, 239_March 2001 . doc 1 ♦ u • Issues Reviewed by County COMMUNITY CHARACTER • Compatibility with surrounding area and the surrounding land uses • Would proposed use change character of the area? • Would there by adverse visual or noise impacts? ➢ COMMUNITY CHARACTER (cont) • Mitigation measures — such as buffering ➢ TRAFFIC - relates to safety for motorists, bicyclists , and pedestrians • Access to site • Circulation • Sight distance • Impact of traffic on nearby roads and neighborhoods • Proposed improvements or mitigation measures — such as signalization ➢ ENVIRONMENT • Impacts on natural features — e . g. , UNAs • Stormwater management & drainage • Erosion control • Potential contamination to soil , water, & air • Potential loss of vegetation • Mitigation measures Compatibility with municipal regulations • Atty t:nron File(s) Specific Uses Public Utilities j1'. A . ! „! `:° '°1 , / • • STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE 4 I STATE STREET ALBANY , NY 1 2 23 1 -000 1 RANDY A . DANIELS JAMES P . KING SECRETARY OF STATE . November 30 , 2001 GENERAL COUNSEL II Mr . Bradley L. Griffin c/o Highland Harbor Farm 8 3 B3uck Road Groton NY 13073 Re : Public Utility Facilities Dear Mr. Griffin : This will reply to your letter dated August 28, 2001 . We received this letter in our Counsel ' s Office on November 8`I' . You inquired concerning the extent of authority of the Town of Lansing over gas and electric utility facilities . • " Major utility transmission facilities"-- i .e . , certain large- scale electric and fuel gas transmission lines--are subject to regulation and approval by the Public Service Commission ( PSC ) under Article VII of the Public Service Law (PSL) . Where such regulation obtains, local governments may not require permits or approvals . PSL §;J30. They may; however, at the discretion of the PSC , 'apply reasonable dimensional and impact requirements . PSL 026(1) (9. Where no PSC jurisdiction exists, local governments may reasonably regulate utility facilities . In such instances, where utility facilities are a prohibited use, a local zoning board of appeals may not deny approval of a variance on the basis the applicant has failed to show "unnecessary hardship" . Rather, the utility transmission lines must be allowed, with appropriate conditions if applicable, where the utility shows a "public necessity". Matter of L. I. Lighting Co. v. Horn, 23 AD 2d • - 583, 256 NYS 2d 690 (2"d Dept , 1965). For further guidance on the extent of PSC jurisdiction , I refer you to Steven Blow, Esq . , NYS Public Service Commission , Empire State Plaza, Agency Building 3 , Albany NY 12223 , tel . 518- 474-6955 , email : web@dps .state. ny. us . I trust the foregoing will prove helpful . Very truly yours, ?v ',myta ,-- .. Harry J . Willis Associate Attorney • 2 .9 I '„ : N! . 5 I N ', 474 . 674O • I as . I H ) 47 : 1 c ) :' I I • lvvAv Oh^• '.' : At )- % . , . . • I . MAu . .. ; . r(.n) 1 .: . .% ' . 1A11 n; • : 1 Atty Ghron Files) Specific Uses Public Utilities ' ; • •2 — � r�r Fi • STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE 4 I STATE STREET ALBANY , NY 12231 -0001 RANDY A . DANIELS JAMES P . KING SECRETARY OF STATE November 30 , 2001 GENERAL COUNSEL Mr . Bradley L. Griffin do Highland Harbor Farm 8 3 ffiuck Road Groton NY 13073 Re : Public Utility Facilities Dear Mr. Griffin : This will reply to your letter dated August 28, 2001 . We received this letter in our Counsel ' s Office on November 8°i . You inquired concerning the extent of authority of the Town of Lansing over gas and electric utility facilities . "Major utility transmission facilities"-- i .e . , certain large- scale electric and fuel gas transmission lines--are subject to regulation and approval by the Public Service Commission ( PSC ) under Article VII of the Public Service Law (PSL) . Where such regulation obtains, local governments may not require permits or approvals . PSL §J30. They may; however, at the discretion of the PSC , apply reasonable dimensional and impact requirements . PSL §126(1) (/) . Where no PSC jurisdiction exists, local governments may reasonably regulate utility facilities . In such instances, where utility facilities are a prohibited use, a local zoning board of appeals may not deny approval of a variance on the basis the applicant has failed to show "unnecessary hardship" . Rather, the utility transmission lines must be allowed, with appropriate conditions if applicable, where the utility shows a "public necessity". Matter of L. 1. Lighting Co. v. Horn, 23 AD 2d • • 583, 256 NYS 2d 690 (2"" Dept. , 1965). For further guidance on the extent of PSC jurisdiction, I refer you to Steven Blow, Esq . , NYS Public Service Commission , Empire State Plaza, Agency Building 3 , Albany NY 12223 , tel . 518- 474-6955 , email : web@dps . state . ny. us . I trust the foregoing will prove helpful . Very truly yours, zvetAyLya Harry J . Willis Associate Attorney I '. : ut . `-i I ill 474 . 67 •'1 ( ) • I . Ax tr. . I Fit 4 .1 c) ? I I • www Ix?G. :Ar :' N • • f MAir • :i:i) I ': r'. ' . 1Alf r: • • II � ✓�. wE•R 2/P //p5 -- ; //Leo ,F' I L -- ,4--. 0. H ,„ . ft '� 'Q � .,� .. �,. u 7 5-� •• lei ^ . _ • . . �_ E �- Pi��rq o � { IO iTCi, • I1 , V '.a I 1 /SO. /B ' TOTAL Ali' 'II ' a a/,rr / sroare °R✓. U IF i • to a_ ``-. ---_ ►, 2 mss; n� r • a _ ` k t ' p t % l� 11� � �� •• i _ it � `V) 0 • vp V4 0obde' t I. �Q' 4 .f t\ Ater, 0. 39.2 ., W 41 l• h '4 : n n i � 4C� v. ,4 AC. To FoAp .. •• l� • n '0 I‘kl "I �` Q � O V 10. 305 AC. .U6r,� �j j O W � M .� 1\ .� f �i i, . • 10 , • , •441.,.1.‘.-1,:;":, E 4 C . ,yi \v ' I ki O r� f `a V . \ • � ' a,1t � f �a;n 5�t` .vt s.l;'£.el .rr; • �� v r 1 I� � � • I p ‘1.1:;1-421: v `e�V' rJY. �F3 `� w� 4Pr W X9. 83 rorA� p 1 • u �,; , .�•• • //!c . re :.Pin/_ Pi.✓ V �'j a: l • 0 IN 1 # 7S° 0 . ‘ o � . . PRaPpSEG OD • D ... }�, f�/7? D/ d/3 /n ✓ lr � � ''" Wr N. ' l \ moi • kA Ili If y I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA• 0 1 Iii A.P • a339AC. Tog` RoilO I, a0 (-0. 2eisAC. .✓ET> i PARCEL (I ‘kis 1 /197,P ' tor ' ' tiu 1/41 V it at• /,Z Pin/ P/.✓ .. ff d ' a,PEFEQE /CE Sd/CVflw > res i11 II ^ • :1 ‘4. Q ' /' St .9 40/W.C ,o,a CV ti t^A . MAP s�/owi�G A werio � of tAc/os 'at 1;1.! p NE \ V�� O,h4ki , ! O .17ot/ALO 8 . k/oeSELL 1 ,. . .4 MAVE 8S� clew l , l M l}* i. i /6. /r, < . s. . bATE40 S7. ••9/B!ot. "kl', " Iw, e °1. +' 0 • ,t: 1 �r � V Q V Q� O, $f' gy , t,7 i i at 1„.•• • 1. O _ i ' • �4 ' r " :'ii . � . rr � w� fir :41, • il ,k; r tr L i e. wil ::" , , • h � c JZ � � 19 1-4, vi tel N '4 r, ISI 3 < r4 IIt ... II o u • ', ' D II I 1 • P.9.eeEL 3 O A,eEA : e7 S /3 AC.2E To ,tRoAo (0. 11'78 flceEtiET) 2 .1 q / N � k le, Ai) • /1J 82 ' Tor• ° ` , AL 3 0 Na . 7, ' Pic/- Pig/ • �9 i, . -E O s7� o.. orp = �o .. \I j � � IIr 4 SU/eVEY AMP �IIi ii ,I • P,eoposro 5090 / 11 /S /04/ h . I. iANPS OF 'I ALLEN TUTTLE - 2. or 6 / • WO of q,ds/.vim rO tto,k- /s coc'Nre STATE OF Weld VOR4 /A/ REFEFENCE DEEP • ' L . 6907e S 9P (re, GE ser.) TAX �,4,QCEL /lo - / - 40. / • .'/a EA.o e4./....res - AMEA/OEif, 227 X98 7--.0 ,'/ac✓ hoc-AT/0A/ or ,A/020V6 .1EVtS 104/p ,oQOPos , D/V,sl iio ✓ L /n/ES / ✓ e x`99 . D32 • MANZARI & REAGAN , LAND SURVEYORS NOTE : ANY REVISIONS TO THIS MAP MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 7209. SUBDIVISION , MEAStgEo D/SrAice. NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION L GEAW ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS P 1) BOX 1124 . ORYDEN , NEW YORK 13053 COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE EMBOSSED SEAL OF THE 'GE 16071 844 - 8837 LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. DAIS DRAVVN JOB NO SURVEYED /lUG /99(o BY Ai AG ,(/ SCALE. / e_ l0 96 -235. rO M4v4's COa/,a/r✓ Y�vsrco.,.,p,t„v, , ,Ts Sv«6i,oeS A,/O/O.Q AJS,GNs `egrs , .P/s//rs , E I hereby certify to • A�E,,/ ;,,.eetis sray le e /oda lil TUrrLE coz a , Jur BE.t/eic, 'QF AsA/ that I am a licensed land surveyor . New York State License No . 019892 and that this � . 9 it ;., s' ' s1cr . OF rirGE' map correctly delineates an actual survey on the ground made by me or under my, direct 1 `� i 1 • -it /r/Es ar- zac - supervision , that it was prepared in accordance with the current code of practice for lan title ' ',EP, T. DS E SyDGc/A./ p p ri ehre- owty surveys adopted by the New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors : and that II /9 8 found no visible encroachments either way across property lines except as shown hereon . 3 l : • SIGNED : / ��j - • DATED : 8 // 45(79C0 ' 3/.98 . . ._t - w *SV 5 Cod eti eltor11�11C1I1 t linty\ DEPART11ii%iENT 01/fix 7NG t( 12iEN ' t • Ithaca\Ne f'2 .ic 1 850) t. N61,4)321 ,2106o striiFa�c �) 4-557,8 ° December 18, 2001 Mr. Richard G. Platt, Code Enforcement Officer Town of Lansing, Ordinance Department Box 186 Lansing, NY 14882 Re: Review Pursuant to § 239 -1 , -m, and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law Action: Subdivision, Burke, Van Ostrand Road, Tax Parcel No. 30. 4 -26. 26 Dear Mr. Platt: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposal identified above for review and comment by the Tompkins County Planning Department pursuant to §239 -1 , -m, and -n of the New York State General • Municipal Law . The Department has reviewed the proposal, as submitted, and has determined that it has no negative intercommunity, County, or State impacts . Please inform us of your decision so that we can make it a part of the record. Sincerely, 0 t an Jur o ich, AICP - • cting Commissioner of Planning •: -- . ue. - vv . L1 v •-a11V uec 11 ' ul 9 : 01 P. 03 : <<a - 1 t :.?. a distance of 270 . 02 feet to a pin ; proceeding thence S 84 ° 35 ' 00 " ' E , a distance of 163 . 64 feet to a pin set in the southerly line of 4. premises now or formerly of Johnson ( see Liber 679 of Deeds at Page 1 ) ; proceeding thence S 05 ° 47 ' 00 " W along premises - now or • formerly of Newton ( see Liber 472 of Deeds at Page 988 ; the remaining courses of this description being along the boundary between the Grantor and said Newton ) , a distance of 335 . 5 feet to an iron pin ; proceeding thence N 84 ' 35 ' 00 " W , a distance of 258 . 50 feet to an iron pin ; proceeding thence S 05 ` 40 ' 00 " W , a distance of 504 . 90 feet to an iron pin set at a 20 inch beech at a fence corner ; proceeding thence N 84 ° 25 ' 30 " W , a distance of 257 . 24 feet to the pin at the point or place of beginning _ TOGETHER with a right -of-way over said premises of New York --____..\\ State Electric & Gas Corporation ( Liber 367 of Deeds at Page 515 and Liber 405 of Deeds at Page 430 ) at a convenient point and of a width of 20 feet at such place as shall not interfere with New York State Electric & Gas Corporation ' s use of its premises for its own purposes , for ingress and egress to and from Parcel B , from and to Parcel A hereinabove described . IIIParcels A and B above are shown as Parcels reference is hereby made to a survey map erg ' B . BUCK , LOT 85 , TOWN OF LANSING . r " een 141-net YORK" , dated September 8 t fl wilCat ' SitialCo 14 °`// Licensed Surveyor Nl` Lien tor , filed co*- vi-tp 2 AP aaY of Road , Gto tt , andb age Olt ° / aatsOsttardtne first Pa NBW Yo�x Tags X � 26a of 5_m9 ' ZB 1�inetY � si EDcg of paYtY Road , lane on pa-rt , s a an RV -viva 13 0 3 3o Rfd9e tis $ec grata ea K`it►d vorgEEtj YoYK $�gycE of 9 party of in co trio in' a tY Y 3 - att ' of tre tY of 148 the HWfu tioeranepno tor6 .,cs of 1 era e a f e partY5l . 00idoi►SadZ6 aaaagi9r' ti .1\120ne e r a ,tha Donad vas- 9= $r Jtgeg n -.� unto the party .1•0011 El � 100ood an nreVal etrib _ . , d assigns forever . WZ D athgt doeei s , covenants as follows : of aOgg, and r'oY. Yar ris n _ the second St t a gc pa t . part shall quietly enjoy of to ona the ego said party of the first - o said premises _ part will forever WARRANT 411