HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-10-08 To Auburn
To Seneca Falls
1
S TOWN of LANSING
`F " Home of Industry, Agriculture and Scenic Beauty "
't,��
Town of Lansing ``
ORDINANCE DEPT.
Box 186 1 I �
Lansing, New York 14882
To Ithaca
LANSING PLANNING BOARD MEETING
Date : October 08 , 1990
Time : 7 : 30 P . M .
Place : Lansing Town Hall Boardroom
From : George L . Totman
410
AGENDA
7 : 30 P . M . a) General Business - Approve Minutes of September 10th & 24th .
b ) Boundary change request - Bruce Abbott
8 : 00 P . M . Meet with Tom Neiderkorn - Site Plan Review
8 : 30 P . M . Review SEQR Process - George Schlect
9 : 00 P . M . Any other business to come before the Board .
® TOWN OF LANSING
PLANNING BOARD MEETING
Monday , October 8 , 1990 ; ,7 : 30 p . m .
PLANNING BOARD
* Denotes Present
* Al White Larry Sharpsteen
Carol Kammen * Roger Hagin
* Linda Hirvonen * Viola Mullane
* Frances Ramin
* Larry Tvaroha , Town Councilman
* George Totman , Planning , Zoning and Code Administration
Office
* David Herrick , Town Engineer
PUBLIC PRESENT
George Schlecht Tom Niederkorn
Bruce Abbott Donald Roeser
411
Al White , Chairman , called the Planning Board Meeting to order
at 7 : 29 p . m .
REVIEW OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 10 , 1990 AND
SEPTEMBER 24 , 1990
The first order of business was to review the Planning Board
Minutes of September 10 , 1990 and September 24 , 1990 .
September 10 , 1990 Minutes
Page 2 . Barney Termina , 6 Lot Subdivision Located on Armstrong
Road ( Near Franklin Drive ) , Tax Map No . 38 - 1 - 1 . 2 .
Chairman White stated that in Paragraph 2 regarding the Termina
Subdivison , that his statement that " . . . the Health Department
claims that two of the lots do not meet the acreage requirements
for public water " should be corrected to read that " . . . the Health
Department claims that two of the lots do not meet the acreage
requirements for private water , " noting that the same correction
should be made to the last sentence in the same paragraph .
September 24 , 1990 Minutes
Page 4 . Alan Euvrard , Proposed 4 Lot Minor Subdivision ( Located
on the Northeast Side of Hillcrest Road ) , Tax Map No . 41 . - 2 - 12 .
Frances Ramin requested the revision of her statement in Paragraph
2 as follows : " Frances Ramin stated for the record that she
approves of the plan as submitted , however , she would like to see
no further development to the area surrounding the subdivision
which is in the airport hazard zone . "
Frances Ramin moved that the Planning Board Minutes of September
10 , 1990 and September 24 , 1990 be accepted , as corrected ; Viola
Mullane seconded the motion .
VOTE : ALL IN FAVOR
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
*
BRUCE D . and JACQUELINE A . ABBOTT and DONALD B . and SANDRA J .
ROESER , BOUNDARY CHANGE REQUEST, TAX MAP NOS . 26 - 4 - 7 . 2 AND 26 - 4 - 3 .
Mr . Bruce Abbott and Mr . Donald Roeser appeared before the Planning
® Board seeking approval for the consolidation of two parcels of land
bearing Tax Map Nos . 26 - 4 - 7 . 2 and 26 - 4 - 3 . Mr . Abbott explained
that they want to combine Tax Map No . 26 - 4 - 3 , which is 1 . 07 acres
and borders Route 34B with Tax Map No . 26 - 4 - 7 . 2 , which is 42 . 40
acres and is bounded by Route 34B , Lakeview Drive and Sperry Lane .
Mr . Abbott stated their intention was to combine the parcels and
then subdivide them to create three parcels with acreage of 10 . 42 ,
10 . 42 and 22 . 23 each . Mr . Abbott further stated that each parcel
would have at least 300 feet of road frontage .
The Planning Board members then reviewed the Petition and
supporting documents for the Abbott and Roeser request .
Frances Ramin moved that Planning Board approval be given to Mr .
Abbott and Mr . Roeser to make the necessary boundary change
adjustment ; Linda Hirvonen seconded the motion .
VOTE : ALL IN FAVOR
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
Mr . Abbott asked Chairman White if they would receive written
notification of approval from the Planning Board . Chairman White
asked George Totman to forward the approval letter . Chairman White
stated that if Messrs . Abbott and Roeser were going to have their
surveyor resurvey the three lots , that the survey should delete the
2
® line on the map connecting the two parcels and that when all three
lots are subdivided , the map would have to be presented to Chairman
White for signature and affixation of the Town of Lansing Planning
Board seal .
SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL
Mr . Thomas Niederkorn appeared at the Planning Board meeting to
present and review with the Planning Board members the proposed
local law for Site Plan Review and Approval . Mr . Niederkorn stated
that the handouts previously forwarded to the Planning Board
members were a combination of work that had been done by the
Planning Board in the past .
Mr . Niederkorn stated that the intent of the local law would be to
give the Planning Board authority to review and approve site plans
in the Town of Lansing . Mr . Niederkorn stated that since there are
no zoning ordinances in the Town of Lansing , Site Plan Review and
Approval would have to become a local law . Mr . Niederkorn stated
that the proposal would have to be submitted to the Town of Lansing
Town Board , the Town Board would have to hold a Public Hearing and
® would then have to enact Site Plan Review and Approval as a local
law for the whole Town .
The Planning Board members and Mr . Niederkorn reviewed Sections 100
t hrough 500 of the draft proposal and had general discussion . It
was decided that Mr . Niederkorn would attend the November 12 , 1990
P lanning Board meeting to present the revisions to Sections 100
t hrough 500 and that the Planning Board would complete review and
discussion of Section 600 through 700 .
* * * * *
SEQR
Mr . George Schlecht appeared before the Planning Board for general
discussion regarding SEQR . Mr . Schlecht stated that the SEQR
process leaves a lot to the Planning Board ' s judgment because the
law is so convoluted .
Mr . Schlecht stated that the interpretation and procedures followed
vary in each town . Mr . Schlecht further stated that environment
impact statements are expensive for the applicant and for the town
itself . Chairman White stated that Mr . Schlecht had previously
stated that there were some viable alternatives to the environment
impact statement and that he would like to hear them . Mr . Schlecht
41. stated that Part I of the SEQR contains factual questions and
3
information that is required to be provided by the applicant and
that Part II of the SEQR is basically an evaluation of the
information provided in Part I by the reviewing entity . Mr .
Schlecht stated that if there are any questions in Part II , the law
directs you to fill in Part III , which is a narrative to Part II
and that the Planning Board has authority to act on the Part III
narrative . Mr . Schlecht further stated that the Planning Board can
give the applicant a list of questions in the form of an
environmental impact statement , the Board would review the form and
hold a Public Hearing and act or not act if they think it would be
adverse environmental impact . Mr . Schlecht stated that the
applicant would be more inclined to provide a thorough Part III
narrative vs . having to complete an environmental impact statement .
There being no further business , the Planning Board meeting was
adjourned at 10 : 04 p . m .
Respectfully submitted ,
410
Barbara L . Evans
NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING : MONDAY , NOVEMBER 12 , 1990
110
4
/ "QA) o h4NsAv ,
1 0 - 0 . _ 90
7L4NN / IJ9 6oaac /71749 •
lir &wee 0 . 11- b golf / 13 LivieevieN r. , Lansiñj / Vir2
a Dat,tttct &cs4r /ØNit) (,tajs Sbkecrs n
3 44, 4Loac4W . C SA44 —e .l'rs Po-. '-'orA'�� 1% ,r/.Y
4 R .G.
cAcideeend
_ /0-ensts. ezie.ev—titrizoLte
.
9 .
io _
11. .
12 _
a
17
1. 8
19
20
21
22
23
24 .
21i - . . _
26
Z �
28 _