Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPart 3 Lansing 2013 Survey Results including town only- Summary 9-20-16 Final 9-20-16 Lansing 2013 Survey Results —prepared by Survey Research Institute (SRI) at Cornell https://www.sri.cornell.edu/sri/ Summary prepared by Tom Butler, Comprehensive Plan Committee. Town and Village of Lansing included 673 randomly sampled survey participants (54% (n=365)from Town,46%(n=308) from Village. Unless otherwise noted,the margin of error for the Town plus Village sampling is+/-4%.The margin of error for the Town only residents (not including the village) sample is+/-5%.These figures are based on the 2010 population census of 11,033 for the entire town and 7,504 for the Town not including the Village. These results are from the staff at the Cornell Survey Research Institute and: 1) file codebook with the written title of"Town and Village of Lansing Comprehensive Plan Survey 2013 673 cases 8/13/2013" and 2) file Town of Lansing Crosstabulations.pdf with the written title, "CROSSTABS Village of Lansing, NY Comprehensive Plan Survey 9/17/2013". Despite the title the data are only for Town of Lansing residents outside of the village (n=365). There is a third file Village of Lansing Crosstabulations.pdf with the written title, "CROSSTABS Village of Lansing, NY Comprehensive Plan Survey 9/17/2013" (which has the same written title as 2) above but includes data only for the Village of Lansing (n=308). North or South Lansing asked only of Town residents(n= 308), not Village North 45% (n=164) South 55% (n=200) 1 Ala Top reason to live in Town/Village #1 reason Good location, easy to get to places and convenient to everything 19% (n=130) Quality of public schools 18% (n=124) Rural nature of town 16% (n=108) Close to work/school 11% (n=77) Born and raised here 9% (n=56) Main reason for living in Lansing 30 = 25 C- 20 15 — Q- 10 0 5 1 1 0 `o ay k�° ar er ado k`\e� oa\o °k� oteo ta�ye o��\ �e IQ \ \ya (10 ■Town&Village ■Town only Town only residents #1 reason Rural nature of town 28% (n=66) Born and raised here 23% (n=53) Good location, easy to get to places and convenient to everything 16% (n=38) Close to my family/friends 11% (n=26) I am able to afford living in town 10% (n=24) Quality of public schools* *There was no category for"Quality of schools" in the town only data from SRI. 2 Alb 2nd top reason #2 reason Good location, easy to get to places and convenient to everything 18% (n=122) Rural nature of town 16% (n=108) Quality of public schools 12% (n=79) Overall quality of life 11% (n=77) Close to work/school 11% (n=75) No town only residents information for 2"d top reason 3 A2 In general, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with living in the Town of Lansing? Very satisfied 49% (n=328) Satisfied 45% (n=304) Dissatisfied or very dissatisfied 6% (n=41) Satisfaction w/ living in Lansing Satisfaction w/ living in Lansing I T&V Town only residents residents ■very satified satisfied dissatisfied very dissatisfied ■very satified satisfied ■dissatisfied ■very dissatisfied Town only residents Very satisfied 46% (n=167) Satisfied 48% (n=175) Dissatisfied or very dissatisfied 6% (n=23) 4 A3 Likelihood of living in Lansing in 5 years Very likely 68% (n=457) Somewhat likely 18% (n=122) Somewhat likely 8% (n=52) Very unlikely 6% (n=40) Likelyhood of living in Lansing in Likelyhood of living in Lansing in 5 5 years years 11 0 T&V Town only residents residents ■very likely somewhat likely ■very likely somewhat likely smewhat unlikely very unlikely ■smewhat unlikely ■very unlikely Town only residents Very likely 76% (n=276) Somewhat likely 15% (n=54) Somewhat likely 6% (n=20) Very unlikely 4% (n=14) 5 A4 Reason for leaving Town/Village(asked to the 14%(n=92)who said "somewhat unlikely" or very unlikely) Too expensive (includes high taxes) 4%of total (n=26) Retiring and want to move to a different place 3%of total (n=18) Town only residents Too expensive (includes high taxes) 3.3%of 365 (n=12) Retiring and want to move to a different place 2.5%of total (n=9) B1a Should Lansing encourage housing for moderate income residents? Strongly encourage 25% (n=166) Encourage 51% (n=345) Discourage 18% (n= 120) Strongly discourage 5% (n= 36) Housing for moderate-income Housing for moderate-income residents residents hk A411h T&V Town only residents residents ■strongly enourage encourage ■strongly enourage encourage discourage strongly discourage ■discourage ■strongly discourage Town only residents Strongly encourage 24% (n=85) Encourage 53% (n=191) Discourage 18% (n=65) Strongly discourage 5% (n=20) 6 B1b Should Lansing encourage multi-family housing? Strongly encourage 11% (n=77) Encourage 42% (n=283) Discourage 36% (n= 240) Strongly discourage 9% (n= 59) Multi-family housing Multi-family housing T&V Town only resident residents ■strongly enourage encourage ■strongly enourage encourage discourage strongly discourage ■discourage ■strongly discourage Town only residents Strongly encourage 9% (n=31) Encourage 45% (n=163) Discourage 36% (n= 131) Strongly discourage 10% (n= 35) 7 B1c Should Lansing encourage Senior housing? Strongly encourage 30% (n=201) Encourage 53% (n=357) Discourage 13% (n=85) Strongly discourage 3% (n= 17) Senior housing Senior housing 1 T&V �%� residents Town only IF residents AKO ■strongly enourage ■encourage ■strongly enourage ■encourage discourage ■strongly discourage ■discourage ■strongly discourage Town only residents Strongly encourage 31% (n=112) Encourage 55% (n=198) Discourage 11% (n=41) Strongly discourage 2% (n= 18) 8 C1a If there was a town center development do you support locally-owned shops? Strongly support 34% (n=229) Support 43% (n=290) Oppose 16% (n= 110) Strongly oppose 6% (n= 38) Locally-owned shops in Town Locally-owned shops in Town Center Center T&V residents Town ■strongly support support oppose strongly oppose ■strongly support support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 36% (n=131) Support 42% (n=151) Oppose 15% (n=54) Strongly oppose 7% (n= 27) 9 C1b In Town Center,would you support national retail stores? Strongly support 9% (n=60) Support 29% (n=195) Oppose 40% (n=271) Strongly oppose 21% (n= 139) National retail stores in Town National retail stores in Town Center Center Agri T&V resident Town only residents ■strongly support ■support oppose ■strongly oppose ■strongly support ■support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 8% (n=29) Support 26% (n=95) Oppose 39% (n=141) Strongly oppose 27% (n=96) 10 C1c In town center would you support services such as medical and professional offices, banking, restaurants and coffee shops. Strongly support 28% (n=185) Support 47% (n=315) Oppose 18% (n=118) Strongly oppose 7% (n=47) In T.Center, medical, professional, In T. Center, medical, profesional, banking, restaurants, coffee shops banking, restaurants, coffee shops 1h &I 1h T&V Town only residents residents ■strongly support support oppose strongly oppose ■strongly support support ■ oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 27% (n=99) Support 47% (n=172) Oppose 17% (n=60) Strongly oppose 9% (n=33) 11 C1d In town center would you support apartments and single family homes? Strongly support 20% (n=136) Support 49% (n=324) Oppose 22% (n=149) Strongly oppose 8% (n=55) in T. Center support of apartments in T. Center support of apartments and single-family homes and single-family homes W 1W T&V ik residents Town only residents ■strongly support support oppose strongly oppose ■strongly support support ■ oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 19% (n=70) Support 46% (n=168) Oppose 24% (n=88) Strongly oppose 10% (n= 36) 12 C2a Support of tourism (including ecotourism, agro tourism, bed and breakfast,wine tourism. Strongly encourage 34% (n=229) Encourage 51% (n=345) Discourage 11% (n=73) Strongly discourage 3% (n= 22) Tourism (ecotourism, agro Tourism (ecotourism, agro tourism, tourism, B&B's, wine tourism B&B's, wine tourism 11 T&V Town only residen residents ■strongly enourage ■encourage discourage ■strongly discourage ■strongly support ■support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly encourage 36% (n=131) Encourage 50% (n=181) Discourage 10% (n=37) Strongly discourage 3% (n= 12) 13 C2b Should the town encourage light industry such as warehouse or storage facilities, research and development and other low impact industries? Strongly encourage 21% (n=143) Encourage 51% (n=344) Discourage 20% (n=135) Strongly discourage 7% (n=48) Light industry (e.g. warehouse or Light industry (e.g. warehouse or storage facilities, R&D and other storage facilities, R&D and other low impact activites) low impact activities W &I W T&V residents Town only residents ■strongly encourage encourage ■strongly encourage encourage discourage strongly discourage ■discourage ■strongly discourage Town only residents Strongly encourage 22% (n=82) Encourage 50% (n=182) Discourage 20% (n=71) Strongly discourage 8% (n= 29) 14 C2c Should the town encourage heavy industry such as heavy manufacturing and other high impact industrial uses such as Borg Warner and Cargill? Strongly encourage 7% (n=46) Encourage 31% (n=208) Discourage 34% (n= 228) Strongly discourage 28% (n=186) Heavy Insustry such as heavy Heavy Industry such as heavy manufacturing and other high manufacturing and other high impact industrial uses impact industrial uses idix- T&V Town only residents residents ■strongly enourage ■encourage ■strongly encourage ■encourage discourage ■strongly discourage ■discourage ■strongly discourage Town only residents Strongly encourage 8% (n=31) Encourage 30% (n=107) Discourage 33% (n= 120) Strongly discourage 29% (n=105) 15 Natural gas development. This question was asked two different ways to make the least biased as possible (50%of survey participants received only one of the two questions) C2dV1 Should the town encourage natural gas development known as horizontal drilling, high volume hydraulic fracturing commonly known as "hydrofracking"or"fracking"? Strongly encourage 4% (n=15) Encourage 19% (n=65) Discourage 26% (n= 88) Strongly discourage 48% (n=161) Natural gas development described Natural gas development described as "hydrofracking" or "fracking" as "hydrofracking " or "fracking" I T&V residents Town only residents ■strongly enourage ■encourage ■strongly enourage ■encourage discourage ■strongly discourage ■discourage ■strongly discourage Town only residents Strongly encourage 3% (n=11) Encourage 18% (n=32) Discourage 28% (n=50) Strongly discourage 48% (n=84) Margin of error is+/- 7.3% 16 C2cIV2 Should the town encourage shale oil or gas development? Strongly encourage 3% (n=18) Encourage 11% (n=75) Discourage 11% (n= 74) Strongly discourage 25% (n=165) Natural gas development described Natural gas development described as "shale oil or gas development" as "shale oil or gas development" T&V residents Town only residents ■strongly enourage ■encourage ■strongly enourage ■ encourage discourage ■strongly discourage ■discourage ■strongly discourage Town only residents Strongly encourage 6% (n=11) Encourage 24% (n=43) Discourage 21% (n=39) Strongly discourage 49% (n=89) Margin of error is+/-7.3% 17 Totals for natural gas development(sum of previous two separate questions) Strongly encourage 5% (n=33) Encourage 21% (n=140) Discourage 24% (n= 162) Strongly discourage 48% (n=326) Natural Gas Development Natural Gas Development (2 previous questions combined) (2 previous questions combined) Town only T&V residents resident ■strongly enourage ■encourage ■strongly enourage ■encourage discourage ■strongly discourage ■discourage ■strongly discourage Town only residents Strongly encourage 6% (n=22) Encourage 20% (n=75) Discourage 24% (n=89) Strongly discourage 47% (n=173) No margin of error given 18 These data are also strongly supported in all voting districts by a previous survey of Town voters on election day November 2011. This survey was not a random sample, but consisted of voters who were asked to fill out the survey anonymously outside of all polling places in Lansing.There is no estimate of margin of error, since it was not a random sample. Question 3 of that survey was: Do you oppose gas drilling using HVHF (high volume hydrofracking) and would like to see it banned from the town? 916- town residents completed the survey (45%of voters that day, 14%of all registered voters). 80% Vote to ban HVHF - results by district 60% Yes 40% No 20% Undecided 0% 1 & 3 2 & 8 4 5 & 7 6 19 D1a Use of tax dollars for adding or improving sidewalks that lead to stores or services in your neighborhood and/or the Town and Village centers. Strongly support 31% (n=207) Support 39% (n=263) Oppose 19% (n=126) Strongly oppose 11% (n=75) Sidewalks - use of tax dollars Sidewalks - use of tax dollars T&V -resident Town only residents ■strongly support support oppose strongly oppose ■strongly support support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 24% (n=89) Support 34% (n=124) Oppose 25% (n=91) Strongly oppose 16% (n=60) 20 D1b Use of tax dollars for adding or improving bike paths and designated bike lanes within and between communities in the Town and Village. Strongly support 38% (n=259) Support 36% (n=244) Oppose 18% (n=119) Strongly oppose 7% (n=49) Bike paths/lanes -use of tax dollars Bike paths/lanes - use of tax dollars T&V Town only reside 14 residents ■strongly support ■support oppose ■strongly oppose ■strongly support ■support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 35% (n=128) Support 34% (n=125) Oppose 21% (n=75) Strongly oppose 10% (n= 35) 21 D1c Use of tax dollars for improving public transportation including services for the elderly and persons with disabilities. Strongly support 46% (n=309) Support 41% (n=276) Oppose 11% (n=75) Strongly oppose 1% (n=9) Transportation for elderly/disabled Transportation for elderly/disabled - - use of tax dollars use of tax dollars T&V residents Town only 4residents ■strongly support ■support oppose ■strongly oppose ■strongly support ■support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 46% (n=166) Support 44% (n=159) Oppose 9% (n=33) Strongly oppose 1% (n= 5) 22 D1d Use of tax dollars for traffic calming measures such as a roundabout, speed limit reductions, traffic lights etc. Strongly support 21% (n=143) Support 40% (n=271) Oppose 27% (n=183) Strongly oppose 10% (n=70) Traffic calming measures - use of Traffic calming measures - use of tax dollars tax dollares T&V resident Town only residents ■strongly support support oppose strongly oppose ■strongly support support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 17% (n=61) Support 41% (n=148) Oppose 28% (n=102) Strongly oppose 14% (n=50) 23 D2 Agree or disagree—The roadways and intersections in the Town and Village are safe for pedestrians. Strongly agree 7% (n=47) Agree 44% (n=298) Disagree 35% (n=233) Strongly disagree 13% (n= 90) Roadways are safe for pedestrians Roadways are safe for pedestrians F 4 F T&V Town only resident residents s ■strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree ■strongly agree agree ■ disagree ■strongly disagree Town only residents Strongly agree 7% (n=25) Agree 41% (n=150) Disagree 35% (n=127) Strongly disagree 17% (n=61) 24 Eta Rank ambulance service quality Excellent 20% (n=131) Good 35% (n=233) Fair 12% (n=80) Poor 5% (n= 31) Ambulance service quality Ambulance service quality T&V Town only resident residents ■exellent ■good fair ■ poor ■exellent ■good ■fair ■poor Town only residents Excellent 20% (n=71) Good 34% (n=126) Fair 14% (n=52) Poor 7% (n= 24) 25 E1b Rank fire service quality Excellent 31% (n=206) Good 39% (n=263) Fair 7% (n=44) Poor 2% (n= 11) Fire service quality Fire service quality T&V Town only residents residents ■exellent good fair poor ■ exellent good ■fair ■ poor Town only residents Excellent 34% (n=126) Good 40% (n=145) Fair 7% (n=24) Poor 3% (n= 10) 26 Etc Rank police service quality Excellent 18% (n=121) Good 48% (n=322) Fair 14% (n=92) Poor 4% (n= 26) Police service quality Police service quality IN 'now 110� Town only T&V 4 residents residents It Air ■exellent ■good fair ■poor ■exellent good ■fair ■ poor Town only residents Excellent 17% (n=61) Good 50% (n=181) Fair 17% (n=63) Poor 4% (n= 16) 27 Fla Is the use of tax dollars for the development of a local "arts scene" important to you? Very important 14% (n=97) Important 34% (n=232) Not so important 34% (n=228) Not at all important 17% (n= 113) Local arts scene - use of tax dollars Local arts scene - use of tax dollars 1 0 PAA T&V residents Town only residents ■very important ■important ■very important ■ important not so important ■not at all important ■ not so important ■ not at all important Town only residents Very important 12% (n=44) Important 36% (n=131) Not so important 31% (n=114) Not at all important 21% (n= 75) 28 F1b Is the use of tax dollars for the development of recreational biking/hiking ad walking trails important to you? Very important 27% (n=180) Important 40% (n=269) Not so important 23% (n=155) Not at all important 10% (n= 67) Biking/hiking/walking trails - use Biking/hiking/walking trails - use of of tax dollars tax dollars T&V Town only residents Air residents ■very important ■important ■very important ■ important not so important ■not at all important ■not so important ■ not at all important Town only residents Very important 22% (n=82) Important 41% (n=150) Not so important 24% (n=86) Not at all important 13% (n=46) 29 F1c Is the use of tax dollars for supporting lakeside commercial development such as restaurants, lodging, boating,camping etc. important to you? Very important 17% (n=113) Important 41% (n=275) Not so important 28% (n=185) Not at all important 14% (n=97) Lakeside commercial development - Lakeside commercial development use of tax dollars - use of tax dollars 4k, 46q T&V Town only residents residents ■very important ■ important ■very important ■ important not so important ■ not at all important ■ not so important ■not at all important Town only residents Very important 18% (n=67) Important 38% (n=140) Not so important 28% (n=100) Not at all important 16% (n=57) 30 G1a To what extent do you support enactment of laws or policies to protect historical sites and structures? Strongly support 33% (n=221) Support 51% (n=344) Oppose 13% (n=87) Strongly oppose 2% (n= 12) Protection of historical sites and Protection of historical sites and structures structures IP4 P4 A T&V Town only residents residents ■strongly support support oppose strongly oppose ■strongly support support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 33% (n=119) Support 55% (n=199) Oppose 10% (n=36) Strongly oppose 2% (n= 8) 31 G1b To what extent do you support laws or policies that would require new housing developments to include open green spaces, parks or trails? Strongly support 34% (n=232) Support 42% (n=280) Oppose 19% (n=126) Strongly oppose 5% (n=33) Require new housing Require new housing developments to include open developments to include open green spaces, parks or trails green spaces, parks, or trails V4 T&V Town only residents residents ■strongly support support oppose strongly oppose ■strongly support support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 29% (n=107) Support 44% (n=160) Oppose 20% (n=72) Strongly oppose 7% (n= 25) 32 G1c To what extent do you support laws or policies to protect scenic views and natural areas? Strongly support 52% (n=350) Support 38% (n=259) Oppose 8% (n=55) Strongly oppose 1% (n= 8 Support protection of scenic views Support protection of scenic and natural areas views and natural areas T&V Town only resident residents ■strongly support support oppose strongly oppose ■strongly support support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 51% (n=187) Support 39% (n=143) Oppose 7% (n=26) Strongly oppose 2% (n=8) 33 G1d To what extent do you support laws or policies to protect agricultural lands or districts? Strongly support 47% (n=318) Support 41% (n=275) Oppose 10% (n=69) Strongly oppose 1% (n= 8) Support of Agriculture Support of Agriculture T&V residents � Town only residents ■strongly support ■support oppose ■strongly oppose ■strongly support ■support ■oppose ■strongly oppose Town only residents Strongly support 52% (n=187) Support 39% (n=143) Oppose 8% (n=30) Strongly oppose 1% (n=3) 34 H1a In terms of future growth of Lansing, how important is the development of renewable energy sources(e.g. solar and wind)? Very important 36% (n=239) Important 37% (n=248) Not so important 19% (n=126) Not at all important 9% (n= 59) The importance of renewables in The importance of renewables future growth in future growth 41k T&V Town only residents residents ■very important important ■very important important not so important not at all important ■ not so important ■ not at all important Town only residents Very important 37% (n=136) Important 36% (n=133) Not so important 16% (n=58) Not at all important 10% (n= 37) 35 H1b In terms of future growth of Lansing how important is the prevention of soil erosion and storm water runoff control? Very important 46% (n=310) Important 44% (n=294) Not so important 7% (n=48) Not at all important 2% (n= 14) The importance of controling soil The importance of controlling soil erosion and stormwater runoff erosion and strormwater runoff T&V Town only residents residents 1 very important ■important ■very important ■ important not so important ■not at all important ■ not so important ■ not at all important Town only residents Very important 45% (n=162) Important 44% (n=157) Not so important 9% (n=33) Not at all important 2% (n=9) 36 H1c In terms of the future growth of Lansing how important are green building practices and energy efficient housing? Very important 39% (n=260) Important 43% (n=289) Not so important 14% (n=91) Not at all important 4% (n= 30) The importance of green building The importance of green building practices and energy efficient practices and energy efficient housing housing 441 T&V Town only residents residents ■very important important ■very important important not so important not at all important ■ not so important ■ not at all important Town only residents Very important 38% (n=138) Important 44% (n=161) Not so important 14% (n=49) Not at all important 4% (n= 16) 37 H2 Do you support green infrastructure(e.g. porous pavements,green roofs, solar panels, rain gardens etc.) in the Village(asked only village residents) even if it is more costly than current practices. Strongly agree 13% (n=90) Agree 20% (n=131) Disagree 10% (n=68) Strongly disagree 2% (n= 14) Support of green infrastructure in the Village ■strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree This question was only asked of village residents. 38 11 What is your preferred method of receiving information about the Town/Village of Lansing? Email 34% (n=227) Newsletter(currently placed in shopper 11% (n=76) Postal mail 34% (n=229) Meeting attendance 3% (n=17) Social media 3% (n=21) Website 14% (n=96) Preferred communication mode for Preferred communication mode for Town/Village information Town information :44 Aw"', T&V Town onlyAir residents residents ■email ■ newsletter ■email ■ newsletter ■ postal mail meeting attendance ■ postal mail meeting attendance ■social media ■website ■social media ■website Town only residents Email 27% (n=99) Newsletter(currently placed in shopper 21% (n=76) Postal mail 31% (n=114) Meeting attendance 3% (n=10) Social media 4% (n=14) Website 14% (n=50) 39 12 The Village provides a newsletter 2 times per year electronically. Does this work for you? (asked only of Village residents. Format works 26% (n=165) Prefer hard copy 18% (n=121) Preference for village newsletter 4 WF ■electronic copy ■ hard copy 40 13a How is the performance of your town officials in communicating information to you? Excellent 10% (n=67) Good 37% (n=249) Fair 31% (n=209) Poor 20% (n= 135) Communication from town officials Communication from town officials to to you you T&V all residents Town only residents ■exellent good fair poor ■exellent good ■fair ■ poor Town only residents Excellent 4% (n=15) Good 38% (n=135) Fair 37% (n=134) Poor 21% (n= 76) 41 13b How is the performance of your town officials in responding to resident concerns? Excellent 10% (n=68) Good 35% (n=238) Fair 29% (n=196) Poor 18% (n= 118) How well do town officials respond How well do town officials respond to to resident concerns resident concerns T&V Residents Town only residents ■exellent good fair poor ■exellent good ■fair ■ poor Town only residents Excellent 5% (n=17) Good 39% (n=132) Fair 38% (n=129) Poor 18% (n= 60) 42 J1 Age of survey participants (town and village) 18-24 2% (n=17) 25-34 6% (n=37) 35-44 13% (n=86) 45-54 24% (n=160) 55-64 22% (n=149) 65-74 22% (n=147) 75-84 8% (n=56) 85 or older 3% (n=19) of survey participants by age (town& village) 30 c m .2- 20 U C 10 I 0 0 1-0 01 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 >85 Age Age of survey participants Town &Village Town only 18-44 21% (n=140) 20% (n=73) 45-64 46% (n=309) 52% (n=188) 65+ 33% (n=222) 28% (n=104) of survey participants by age 60 m 40 a 20 m � ■ . a 0 4- 0 18-44 45-64 65+ a Age ■Town&Village ■Town only 43 J2 How many years have you lived in the Town/Village? Town &Village Average = 22 years Median = 18 years Minimum 0.5 years Maximum 85 years Town only residents < 5 yrs 9% (n=33) 5 to 20 yrs 39% (n=136) > 20 yrs 52% (n=182) Years lived in town Town only residents ■<5 yrs 5 to 20 yrs ■ >20 yrs J3 Do you currently rent or own where you live? Own 82% Rent 17% Town residents only Own 92% Rent 8% Do you own or rent where you Do you own or rent where you live? live? Ilk T&V Town only residents residents Own Rent ■Own ■ Rent 44 A Children under 18 in household? Town and Village 0 72% (n=488) 1 13% (n=86) 2 10% (n=70) 3 3% (n= 18) More than 3 1.4% (n=11) Children under18 in household 80 c 60 s v 40 0 s 0 20 0 0 T&V residents _ 1 2 3 more than 3 number of children under 18 in household 45 J5 Household income in 2012 <$10K 2% (n=17) $10K to $25K 5% (n=31) $26K to $50K 17% (n=115) $51K to $75K 17% (n=112) $76K to $100K 15% (n=102) $101K to$150K 19% (n=128) Greater than $150K 20% (n=135) Household income of survey participants im 25 a 20 15 a 10 0 ■ i 0 17 Town and Village Town only residents <or= $50K 24% (n=163) 25% (n=86) $51K to$100K 32% (n=214) 36% (n=124) >$100K 39% (n=263) 40% (n=139) Houshold income 60 0 40 s c 20 x 0 0 <$50K $51K to$100K >$100K ■Town&Village ■Town only 46 J6 Current employment status of survey participants: Town and Village Employed full time 46% (n=311) Employed part time or part of year 9% (n=61) Self employed 8% (n=57) Homemaker 2% (n=17) Retired and not working 28% (n=186) Unemployed and looking for work 2% (n=19) Unemployed and not looking for work 1% (n=4) Student 2% (n=17) Employment status (town and village) 50 4 40 30 L Q 20 W. 0 0 10 . I 0 employed emplyed self homemaker retired unemployed unemployed student full time part time employed &looking not looking Employment Town &Village Town only residents Employed 64% (n=429) 68% (n=246) Not employed 35% (n=237) 32% (n=113) % of participants employed or unemployed V) 80 a 60 L 40 �a 20 0 ONO 0 Town&Village Town residents only ■employed ■not employed 47 J7 Gender of participants: Town &Village Male 47% (n=317) Female 53% (n=355) Gender of survey participants T&V III residents ■ male ■female 48