The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-26-17 APPROVED PB Minutes APPROVED Town of Lansing Monday, June 26, 2017 6:30 PM PLANNING BOARD MEETING PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS (*Denotes present) * Tom Ellis,Chairman Norman(Lin)Davidson,Vice-Chairman Larry Sharpsteen * Al Fiorille * Gerald Caward * Deborah Trumbull * Sandra Dennis Conlon * Dean Shea,Alternate Other Staff Lynn Day, Zoning Officer Doug Dake, Planning Board Liaison Mike Long, AICP Edward LaVigne, Town Supervisor Guy Krogh, Esq. Public Present Justin Rejman Melissa Giannone Andy Sciarabba Jay Engels Carol Engels Ms. Marty Moses Joseph Wetmore Chairman Tom Ellis called the Planning Board Meeting to order at 6:32 PM. Comments/Concerns of Items not on the Agenda No Response. Chairman Tom Ellis enacted Alternate Member Dean Shea as a voting Member this evening as Lin Davidson and Larry Sharpsteen are not present. Approval/Denial of Planning Board Minutes for June 12, 2017 Page 3 fourth bullet point add buildings 2 &22. Page 3 sixth bullet point add no new building permits for buildings 117 &36. Page 3 number 3 under Guy, line 4 after local law should be "as it". Page 4 third bullet point before fencing add "information on". 1 APPROVED Deborah Trumbull made a motion to approve with amendments. Sandra Dennis Conlon seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll call vote: Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Sandra Dennis Conlon, Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Dean Shea, Alternate Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Chairman Legal Notice for the Hunter & Engels Minor Subdivision was published in the Ithaca Journal as required by Law. 6:43 PM OPENED PUBLIC HEARING - HUNTER & ENGELS MINOR SUBDIVISION 554 SCOFIELD ROAD, TAX #30-1-6.3, 30-1-6.43, 30-1-6.41 Dean Shea made a motion to open the public hearing. Al Fiorille, seconded the motion. This public hearing will be open for two separate actions: • For the State Environmental Quality Review Act called SEQR, which deals with the environmental impacts of this subdivision. • For the overall Minor Subdivision Approval Comments/Concerns with Hunter & Engels Minor Subdivision No response, Chairman Tom Ellis will leave the public hearing open throughout the meeting in case anyone is late. 6:45 PM SITE PLAN APPROVAL - NO BARKS ABOUT IT, 3114 N. TRIPHAMMER RD TAX #37.1-2-21 No Public Hearing scheduled as they are only adding a few fences and nice shrubs that will be aesthetically pleasing to the eye. Driveway entrance and Building will stay the same. Summary of Comments/Concerns with No Barks About it • Fencing should not be a problem with line of site at the Intersection. • Location has a new Septic System. • The Health Department and The State do not regulate Doggie Day Care Facilities. They have their own industry regulations that they follow. If dogs are kenneled over night that would be controlled by the Ag and Markets. "No Barks About It" will not be kenneling overnight. 2 APPROVED • Dog waste will go into doggie poop bags and contained in diaper containers before making the trash container. This process reduces odor. Dumpster is currently emptied once a month. • Hours of operation will be from 7:30 am to 6:30 pm Monday -Friday and they will probably extend by a half an hour in each direction to accommodate their Cornell clients. • Only Grooming and Training Class on Saturday, no day care. • Self-Wash Stations are available as well. NO BARKS ABOUT IT - Short Environmental Assessment Form Review SEAF Only change is on page one, number four. Checked both boxes, for commercial and residential. bf 7.20 Short Fro.Wrtorrrx&mLW AssrsJrm ent Form IUjtMCtIP13_9fr Part S-Frnj�et Inrn4=a9iVM 'tom■appUm4l ar prejectspaumr b rnpOodble for tLe tieaapl"iaw oFPart 1. Rwpuq�a bwornt pail of the appll—il= Ft-epp,ov-4 of Raiding,wrwubyac3 to pvtr:-sm-dc—, idmaX bo41-Nm#]a!'wrTa r+ J3_v-�. C mWIcleFart k hanad un infra. tim.ktt cuj,m lyr availabLa, ]Fadditional rm a 0i va 4nYm6gatiaa would be needed Io fu1Fy ca*pwd ie apy iWo.pInfise angywc"tt*mZNy■s poasibLe brit an egre It inronmsLb M. C'ompJade e]I Jim irk Pad f. You FMy 264*prtvide wW adddt9oral L7iFwF faaeeon which yvu be]owe well b c nI d by of +—fal to duclsad Lyme}':uurh pdd *gAIpan"M rnBURMary t+}ffLMPPkTXK3MMAY 11cm- Para 1-praJaa cad Spaocor Ic rar muco fiiram of AdRugt or TmjecZ -- Ftpje t Laceliott{dcr--s,end 4lhch a kmpfiion -sp): -4 $�G��+ipleon t�Ptepaaa1,14c1ia� r``t__ti ii c 4ti , c { t r rx l;7ta %ice-kcr a I( �I1CL-rt_+q i l''� Cc C%, ti<4s k y T 1 C j 74eme of ApPiLko It or sp wlalm: Tacp,dtrnr• I `- , E-Mail:� ' 1I-i 1 1 r_�h - 1 sum°Oilc&UA .--- __ T JL. 2-P' : l•p r6e a rsq pp1Y l'+e epe Ir alevw rdnpuan afa play LwA]aw,aadiin r— ]'!{! Vim aduin;_IO %e rule.orregwt+rion4 Ifyck aebsrh a oaprpdtro tlavoiPtkin cf1ho icy or the p►+ropPmmd maLu k and the aixatam rdzJ rmaeumcu tJhm r cpay tw KM=44 Jo the eagtjeoWity and prc+aaed 6e PwI 2- If na,carmrtue 6a quesupn Z- Z 11:.i=dw priupowd arai®mquus t!Wit_approval or fLEcLdLn6 from any-bi-gsanronenco-1+iS—q6 Na Vks Sf Ytk,bsi espnL- A)r6w"and pe mlt rat+rP?^7wf: 3.a.7OW acre gcaflpeblcOftlhapaepOetd■rboa7 4 r acrm Jlr_Told arse robe physi=Ny d;Fhated7 r r _ a.7vtaL ado{proaau[Ito red any camipuocu owr-cd _ or axtmro3NW by the applicant or priNic 1 apa=ml 4_ E hect aJ]Iwd uses that ner_ur tie,adjuvnLna and near the propca n4arrion. C2Urb.%-i j_]lodus ri.' C:ornrnerdaJ Aeaidraaal{tukwrixan) O Pates =r.ettculeure ❑Aquali- er(rpec ify): [-3YrltJ4Lr.d Fega i of 4 R�S�T APPROVED d. Is'he:prvpowd adian. --- VM ; Nth ■. A perm icl cd use un�r I11a rating r-c gw hi u-3 as? b.Cwvla nl w ikh %d*pled enprc�cvulve glary? 6. fa*a pra�pawd na m aanoaanl wLh the prc&mwx el ebb ofthe ei oAg buih ar nuwsl i 90 YE$ btmdwjW 7. Is.ube eh-6 or Lho prapeae.d scion]ocdnd in,ur doors rl quoins a sm . 6��'nDal Ewrimi maser Amm7 NO YES Vx :9. a. Will the PmPo ed a ilen reaalL fn is MLbM 11411-creose m tre it aWye pr #r4t le-Adg? NO YYS b.Am plc lk Uwtup`kW ian a fc Ctl)&WELIANC at or roes&C si r oFtfx prupasad 4ai c.Am any paulzm&im reap m=dattoea or beetle rmLn switJ41W en a}r aea,r 4rw of tho lompmed=tk70 5, Do=tho pmpmsd erst?oet nuW or+Bawd the=We a s=&code ra unett om.' If the peoponzL arum w4l4mmul rbWA eta,*)gory m d#lge fetwo end uwhOolagier -- — ❑ 2 L 0. WJU the rJcgMUJ EL&LPM OWWIP9 14 Wj avrtixtff PWbhQepUvaaa wasaf a.pplx4 J410 TMI If No,dewnhr rncb d fey pm' mdimg pmble wuer EJ L t.W dpe prapt> cwj wwon uxuea jo axauna wagr m w uq]cttea7 No 1<' Ir No.dead 6r:'mod far prbvit[4%oaf 4-smumL; ]2- d Qetr the rf Stu n ar •e that i Lraard a� tfaer r11t�^ra ar?�I�to fiF R e�ir�er of Yi�nri� N1� Ir. ]a Sire prated artlem l Ln an arxkrcod csi sera:live area;'' 91 13.oDmw and pnrfiam of dK xliw of tho propDwd MCbCW,,cw leads Maiming Ihls pry lrclicn.qamwin YES wldlands o<arfrer I=re:guJelarl 17r it fdIMML plate Of low) >? b.WoWd the pmpovcd cmm phymei]4 after,ar c mks,rear emiathg vcdand or wsurbW ❑ JIM%Waofy the wn:nxd or uWftbudly artd connnt a e=tawtimv u sghwn rom or wm Idw0y the typical habits)vfp m dW omw W,or IRmly td hw found on the e"bon. Cb vc;k tll tlral appd�r, ❑guW im U Form 0 A4v i aulrurLVUwaalanda C3F�ri). q6d w!uW a L 5.Dave&M 01M Of thr pxe¢ppr•$400cm owwUm my epodes of animal,ar ewfoocW d h:aMM>6 liatx+d AFa YES by*a S ms w redr:rl pwara wok w 0=4enad cc aiergw"W t6,Is the prujw wile kmmmd in the LOD)�w flood plain? IY� 17.WkN the pnvpa*ad WhUn Wonbe 6►UM waver diAgbor,ejeha_—fiwm pa n't or non-p•a:nt eu 7 I No YU If Yet ❑ at W91I storm vramr digfi 114+x m#dint CE 2WG 05C$$ 12,W01 94M WV=dJWAVgm9 bedir=U:d to c0mbliOuid Kj+i *t �(ruhoffargdsbam dmimr JCYOr,brWay a msanbc: O NG M'pS z 0r4 RESET 4 APPROVED E M.IMw&pmpmad sr_�iva indade lion or Atha&ZILViitM&At mull 10 0 a LMpaL0dn m1 w Val watim•ar atha l:.qd do(oZ r I on PWA wLae JmWm,dm)? IfYw ftpa;p purpawand aim 19.lH.s tW eU 40f the pled oct cm ae sn rdipmarig pwpftcy bod the Ipui i9p 4: mri auiyc qr v No YES wlid Ww rnaM (acll if'f m 6,mb, -- -- - LJ -Hu rho rl r of dF c propmled umm or aA adjommi pmpwry bcm rNe spbJez�of mmu6"an jWSving we �E IM adF fin hLwdaus wodc Irym F AFFMM TWAT Tlllfl� FK q.MATI0211 YROV DLD ABOVE IS TR LTE A}"AECTIRATE TO TEM REST G1p My KNOWLEDGE 7-7- Part 2 -Lmpret Amy L Tbm imd A4Vbwy h Iewpoadble for the empk&b of F MI;L AAWIW U ortafa lr%W gamwnu i a Fw 2.w;mg[he a+{crr ilium 4`ir&d n Pare i AF4 01�ffit c-umhwJn wbidiad la}'1w prolrO 4w Ql�r�ow.iLab:a 1ff�rr.�eanc_ VE'krm�p,F�1s�tha gL�lrane fps r�ewr:nc�r�d ha�i�dd tx5+11rr cC"l�hro dlpr rr a bt=rog6D at4o umpdnu%ft aadE wwd =A=L of Lha FQgcscd sMunr No.or modwez Im" la ]am a� m� er"r acew 1. � � kpro�p�red aeaoa�'Is s ms�al�.�ki wi �1d�p+r�i]e�ti we plan aQ aonsng Z Wig duo pad rrnJl;n a chLr.p in 121w use cr'Lnrmmiif a m or imo 3, vio tho Mho-.imps&tie charaum w quii'ityr a f ft cdaing m=mLa itf 4, Wnt Or WDposod w6cm hero an urpw m thx cay4mu4 ud M4 cs LW mum. ff dm a I&Mdttmnt or aCrthlcd Eavir UO Jkrrra(ClA)7 5. VW the propo*ad act cm ftwJI in w IdYww&Rhp M the aim level in€p7►fic ar 9F=ME'[" u,frsxtrummre far rasa Ira=L bl"or wruk�fty? 6, Will tha propel dal m rmm ja Lummdts ib 1he m of ow1D'and it.fails Io irroorporacs � El rea�akbL 4�iLrblr m a finewab{e� `tfa37 I Will the proposed Jv4w Lmpw rxlwi tg' El e.public I priwm wrta:suppEiol7 b.pau} e f pfiwelic wraleti►n.la tmmtmmt util hire E L Will ehc proPoad agivn i 1be chwuw cu quWi ry of ur,pm'1n; h'uumi z� e lob u&l, 9, WOL thp,pmp w ioa mmM in■8 rdvcm cA=p Co-necti ml mmxwc4a(c 2, wK wabftbo& t,sra=6varr,iidgmft ilom.md FawnsV Poe 3 of 4 RESET APPROVED "U'or =go to line impwt U" Mo MY QMr CCLW 1 , Wll th a pmposed L::tf m s =:, in ri �awmw f rr Oc paWltitl rar a0FiMN 00odia or d a I-1 pevbl�a�7 J—J l I. 1VI 1 I Ih&pfopom3d to-'a%=tcf a heard to cffv n= gALMl rtvur�=ar Ku ma hcidlb? Pert 1-paurminnaoa a trlpfdF== The LA%d ArmHrY is Mpaodbl*Mr ch&c8m0k o Offrt 1. RN cvwy pvW. 1 it ftt 2 the wau auwer d 11Mc rfalc v lard i rdphd rMy 9W d ar IF of M A&4oW W EX Why 1 PWf-rW eJero�oG e f pup etticn rrt+ cr w f1E nd r��I L in a■fFUMC&nc eery ) f mph p!aaw cum;:ece pert I p t 3 Lhna,4 IE kLiric:atq$cWj,kobTy iho f mwp -, �ieludjng any:!6wLmm OF 6mign dtawb dwu ham b=IndIIded by tbope$}xa%panwT to ovoid of induce ir� �W phm4d saw explain hew&r lsd Lgertcx do -r&ad that W hpM may air will noc be iip::EMDL EMh potwUd inkp&aat&wld he wed wmiderimp+U a-ft Pmhl d UCY u fQ=flTfn& dwwiaN imrecralbi I iLy,aw&Mh:i! mope wd d ibrdr- ALM w3filig the podasjial fw Lbw--Uffm lmg-Lraim M4 =nulojLve IM . C hV-k k6 bUM a + hWM d'u--u wL b�dd=tl�tnfrarnatlan rtild cmliyaz aMvc,ata A MY CUpWJftg dwMMU=M 4 W Ilya pmpand ate m ntayr rimwlt to oe;a ao m peLEntufflY ImV aw dPi Ef{+RJet Ndmw IrrtpawJ"era ont,'oMCAMW impad■��nwot#"qumw. Chcck this bqx Ff-y=hAye ddaMdeodL baxd an The etifarara ZM and aLW s is gWwr,mid ahoy v4pmljnl dDnww%*n. tbg tk e!propumd&alien wi,:aat N*dt In any dXrLjAmnr Wvcm4wviimnmcnW Gmpwu- Due _ C, AfIa side o porxu ■ le AV" $'ip ma a Px*uer or dwaim. Emrn u ibl4 Dffi ccd PRINT pASG d a f t FtE SET APPROVED RESOLUTION PB 17-07 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW RESOLUTION MAKING NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR THE PROPOSED "NO BARKS ABOUT IT" DOG DAYCARE SITE PLAN AT 3114 NORTH TRIPHAMMER ROAD WHEREAS, an application was made by Melissa Giannone (tenant) for site plan approval for the proposed construction of site improvements at an existing commercial building located at 3114 North Triphammer Road,Lansing,New York, also known as TPN 37.1-2-21, located in the B2 Commercial Use Zone and consisting of approximately 1.02± acres, and such proposal more specifically will add two fenced in areas and utilize the existing driveway and parking areas of the current site; and WHEREAS, a stormwater review, for considering the additional impacts of development on site improvements and the stormwater system, shows a negligible impact arising from the addition of new fencing and fence posts and such disturbances are below the stormwater local law's threshold for review; and WHEREAS, this proposed action is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Lansing Planning Board is the sole involved agency for the purposes of a State Environmental Quality Review Act("SEQRA")review,and the Planning Board will thus undertake as Lead Agency an uncoordinated review of the Short-form Environmental Assessment Form ("SEAF") under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, this project is a reuse of an existing commercial building with no additional expansion, and is thus exempt from General Municipal Law § 239 referrals to Tompkins County Planning per such statute and the review guidelines of County Planning; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2017, the Town of Lansing Planning Board, in performing its reviewing agency functions in conducting an environmental review in accordance with Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law and SEQRA regulations: (i) pursued its thorough review of the project and the Applicant's SEAF, as well as a review of all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action;and (ii) thoroughly analyzed the potential relevant areas of environmental concern of the project to determine if the proposed action may have any moderate or significant adverse impacts on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c); and (iii) reviewed the SEAF on the record; and WHEREAS, each identified potential environmental impact was analyzed and duly considered by the Planning Board in relation to the question of whether any potential environmental impacts were so probable of occurring or so significant as to require a 7 APPROVED positive declaration, and after weighing the above and all other potential impacts arising from or in connection with this project, and after also considering: (i) the probability of each potential impact occurring; (ii) the duration of each potential impact; (iii) the irreversibility of each potential impact, including permanently lost resources of value; (iv) whether each potential impact can or will be controlled or mitigated by permitting or other processes; (v) the regional consequence of the potential impacts; (vi) the potential for each impact to be or become inconsistent with the Towns master plan or Comprehensive Plan and local needs and goals; and (vii) whether any known objections to the Project relate to any of the identified potential impacts, the Planning Board found that these factors did not cause any potential impact to be or be likely to become a moderate or significant impact such that a negative declaration will be issued. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. After consideration of the potential environmental impacts,including those reviewed in accord with 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c), the Planning Board finds that the proposed action of approving the proposed commercial site plan and its minor improvements,based upon the site plan as submitted, will individually and cumulatively have no moderate or significant negative environmental consequences or impacts. 2. This declaration is made in accord with Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law and SEQRA regulations promulgated thereunder, and accordingly,the Planning Board of the Town of Lansing,based upon: (i)its thorough review of the SERF, and any and all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action and its environmental review; (ii) its thorough review of the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed action may have any moderate or significant adverse impact on the environment, including, but not limited to, the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c); and (iii) its completion of the SEAF, including the findings noted therein (if any, and which findings are incorporated herein as if set forth at length),hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance ("Negative Declaration") in accordance with SEQRA for the above referenced proposed actions, and determines that an Environmental Impact Statement is therefore not required. 3. A Responsible Officer of the Planning Board of the Town of Lansing is hereby authorized and directed to complete and sign,as required,the determination of significance, confirming the foregoing Negative Declaration, which fully completed and signed SEAF and determination of significance shall be incorporated by reference in this Resolution Dated: June 26, 2017 Motion by: Gerald Caward Seconded by: Al Fiorille 8 APPROVED VOTE AS FOLLOWS: Gerald Caward,Jr. - Aye Sandra Dennis Colon-Aye Al Fiorille - Aye Dean Shea,Alternate -Aye Deborah Trumbull-Aye Thomas Ellis-Aye NO BARKS ABOUT IT - SITE PLAN APPROVAL RESOLUTION PB 17-08 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ISSUING FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR "NO BARKS ABOUT IT"DOG DAYCARE-3114 NORTH TRIPHAMMER ROAD WHEREAS, an application was made by Melissa Giannone (tenant) for site plan approval for the proposed construction of site improvements at an existing commercial building located at 3114 North Triphammer Road,Lansing,New York,also known as TPN 37.1-2-21,located in the B2 Commercial Use Zone and consisting of approximately 1.02± acres, and such proposal more specifically will add two fenced in areas and utilize the existing driveway and parking areas of the current site; and WHEREAS,the proposed business and improvements,and the installation of fencing,will not trigger excavation or land disturbances at a level as would trigger formal stormwater review under the Town's Stormwater Local Law, and applicant's proposal will not create any additional impacts of development on the site or the stormwater system such that the stormwater system and its capacity were reviewed and found capable of handling the small additional temporary disturbances of installing removable fence posts; and WHEREAS, this proposed action is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Lansing Planning Board duly issued a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, this project is considered exempt from a General Municipal Law § 239 review by the Tompkins County Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has again considered and carefully reviewed the requirements of the LUO relative to site plan review, the unique needs of the Town due to the topography, the soil types and distribution, and other natural and man-made features upon and surrounding the area of the proposed site plan, and the Planning Board has also considered the zoning in the area and the project in light of the Town's Comprehensive Plan and compliance therewith, and the Planning Board has again reviewed and considered the aforementioned amended site plan application and determined that no public hearing is required for this site plan due to its small size, the fact that no new stormwater controls or permanent practices are triggered, as no SEQRA or 239 impacts were found, as the use is a permitted as of right use within the B2 Commercial Use Zone,and as the site plan utilizes an already existing and developed site; and 9 APPROVED WHEREAS, on June 26, 2017 the Planning Board duly considered the proposed site plan in accordance with the provisions of LUO § 701.4 et seq., including concerns addressing site drainage, lighting, nearby residences, landscaping,parking, buffering, screening, driveways, and any potential on and off site environmental impacts, and upon due consideration thereupon and deliberation by the Town of Lansing Planning Board, now therefore be it RESOLVED, that the "No Barks About It" site plan application for the proposed fencing and landscape improvements located at 3114 North Triphammer Road,Lansing,New York,be and hereby is granted and approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Site plan approvals shall include the application materials, site plan map dated 5/15/2017 and sketches and illustrations as submitted. 2. Applicant and site users will continue to utilize the existing driveway entrance from North Triphammer Road and existing parking areas. 3. Building Permits will be required to construct the approved building interior improvements and such plans must meet all code requirements, including the sealing of plans by a licensed engineer or architect, and be constructed in compliance with all building code requirements. 4. All existing or previously required vegetative buffers (including as shown on the updated site plans described above) shall be maintained as healthy and natural non-invasive vegetation designed to provide both visual and sound buffering. Emphasis shall be placed upon solid cover barriers, such as hedges and offset rows of evergreen trees, or densely placed deciduous trees with variable heights and interspersed with evergreens or other plants that provide for such cover. Existing and any new Buffers shall be properly maintained and any dead, diseased, or dying trees or plants shall be promptly replaced,and any tree or plants that,whether singularly or in combination, due to lack of growth, death, recession, disease or other cause, cease to function as buffers shall be replaced in a manner as promotes the goal of such buffer as stated in this site plan approval. This condition shall be deemed to augment and further define prior site plan approval conditions and site plan features hereby or heretofore approved by the Town. June 26, 2017 Motion by: Deborah Trumbull Seconded by: Gerald Caward VOTE AS FOLLOWS: Gerald Caward, Jr. -Aye Sandra Dennis Conlon—Aye Al Fiorille—Aye Dean Shea, Alternate - Aye Deborah Trumbull -Aye Thomas Ellis—Aye 10 APPROVED Chairman Tom Ellis asked, if there was anyone who would like to comment on Hunter & Engels Public Hearing. No Response. Dean Shea made a motion to close Hunter and Engels Public Hearing at 6:57 PM. Gerald Caward seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll call vote: Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Sandra Dennis Conlon, Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Dean Shea, Alternate Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Member Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Thomas Ellis, Chairman SEQR REVIEW-APPROVAL- HUNTER & ENGELS MINOR SUBDIVISION 554 SCOFIELD ROAD, TAX #30-1-6.3, 30-1-6.43, 30-1-6.41 Summary of Discussion prior to Part II Review: • In the SEAR Review, #13a is changed to a yes due to the creek in the lower parcel (C). • The only condition made is if there were further subdivision of these properties, it would require Planning Board Review. • Parcel C currently does not have a driveway access. A standard culvert permit to add driveway access would be needed. • A tax revision is needed to consolidate Al, A2 and A3 to one tax parcel as per the resolution. • A tax revision is needed to consolidate B1 and B2 to one tax parcel as per the resolution. • Condition of the Minor subdivision is that no New Construction Project/ Building Permits will be issued for any of the new parcels A, B, C until consolidation has happened. Building Permits for repairs will be permitted. SEQR REVIEW 6I a0 App..Atv 8 Short EnWb%rtr and Farm Ranwoolumg MF CaMPIICt1A Par#1-fso=i Lr'rormaft&3. Thb uppKm ud or in npam r m respam*ft ftr the nwnpletlnu df gpt 1- bra bo g.cm wub]ed w pwbUa rwA aw.ad=W b4=Nrot tu Ablher werffic=rr. convicu-Pmrt 1 horny rm mrwmo*iw a =ay zvaibblr- iraddWwaimmd m im m wouldban=&Ato rnxpwd qo any itwu pLmn anumw all omkoly+of pavogUm band as ctarmt ararmbo. rAmplrinao fly fn n7l!. Ym rmy mbcopnavJrkwW oddirbndinrormaJon Which you h1d1uYe%6TU be rmcdod by�rLedW i a do Irad oampry almph rddWoW poem as rmoommy to arppkmmt any i Cerra F3"1-1 amd$pomp 03MUMU" ►i 71 1 4 Celrn) fin[ L'i tVnms GrAoca a or pm} ns- `- f y J dr � 11 APPROVED af {i �1 elf I c 1r%tt" Ltd ti d#-s i ILK Ur-eW' Y� a,J 6 2-OLI, It far 0 f r rLd5tl� s,— �l til+-#,e &s#alk, U v-I.FrLrIcref I +�kf Cornb: n# rf Js A-J. A -Z , -3 rimed a - I d a -L Nim=af Applioo a ar Somu= on 60-7 40 r� MdrcwL 3-51/ Jed ry Sow /V I_Di m-&M psaI ogtkM QMbF MMAWo dtM eSa phi lvml IMW. MM"a odmidwWwarkh or i+quln T f Ydti�ot-uh rs scrodro dmwipxiam oft ho WUM of tic pQMW QvCWM and 60 Fffvkm=navW Srdptrm" ° � ❑ =W be offixud to an lry Nm*pm=W ea e'wM if=r tam la q 2. 2: 0�O roqdm apannk eppavd or ilmdlM Amm wW c t w proor=vn"A40ftW fjY�[��i IfY�I L b�naurer parr arappiowil. EL �1 tsW thIS Ca of LEV v. OMM Pt k TinW ar?mv w kw phy*kaLlyr dim t=M o�rer fl,Twat - mp(prr-qfm vim mrtl ony comMamuo propeedg*)awraed of MUMMUM by the VpHC E w pr%aC#apenwo —4{]'5 act . Chwk dl LwW cases thcxooau rra.m4ourtirg wd nrwtlreprcpw aS2cb=. ClUA n I]fnd=ulat 0rw nrmw W EgRarfdm nid(rubwti-n) ClFomw MA ltam O urMir 00cher(Cif' ). C7rawana a �F RMET S, In Ifif pgpolso nslian. IL ChXddAMI vrlllh Iho**pled _ -ivcOm? Al pbo prnpu=d nawn mmacb it w th CIA Fv&mmrmt chm LW OfOR araimg hullt CT nrNusol lands _ 7, b the 94laaflfwpmpn@W aoloo Incdcd iry or d*M 11 C94D 1,hNWCIWW CRtMal EnvuunmlnlArm? Nib tfYcl�Idbg :" L oL Vll ftprmpu=dM 0n rr:lt ura tip] cjcrm in tm!'�Faba4'cprmwl kw ll7 k AreprwUlu bwApuwliomnaAdcgiu)wvofl at Dyluc&r am gLi+tofthaFkgg doilhon? c,+ airy+padarlr;�I aQ:a I IFS e7 c]e M i"wM-h b*Im uF near aim Of thn Fjlu audog? IK fan ffin pl w=Tmno cr-ram Ifs wu ammgy codo rov"mm"? To Iftbspropb=dDolnsl ,ll d rc uu Rl drdcftba dedgm rcdwm Md bdodlholo�l W AIR* tub ism muxiinb put wowa9w Jjr N%dMobe Mdkd for pvvsd M9 POMMO t APPROVED fLWAOtpavcmd Mon=mWtuWUFIN ,er TIMI 6.LIOnpm mc�up Un agrpwdm-of tbaMtdk�m iz LIO&4cbft tb+wedAg wdho a or v&jwwawbodjm Tcp4abcd by Q faftmL am cc]asad DPW 6.WOW the FTVP=d physilulft filter,of aKT0Euk MY exhins Wudwd or uRd~ ibr vd od or wn?a"ffid CcUnk Off is J feet Qff=eg= l4. fdmifrfY the I�rX� hvWMd rYW thO Omw cm,ur u Jay tD ha fma 2d cry'M-FgftdffftC40dL ad' &Vptf 132wdinx OFUM Q 1QlydjeOd C3 uzbaa, baa is.on=&a aiie br acft mat*any of f.or oasa� lwlcd I�o�r M&HOW IUD vu b j da4 er I?adcnd Sp�mnaat uu dew Cr a� rav it is& e=Slim m&100 tomes P�ni R tlra arr#��reeah�dorm 14 �Y I har a p[m!cr �f=U ]i"S9 �.YM 0,%V!bl IMM W"ad=rw flow w cowwa prQpMMI Li No Elm El b,'Q� 1 atcm� dirdrar�e bodir��d la ostJs�lGi +�raymyr�a�r rri animdbra&gray? VYc4bdoily denba tNO MM Pap 2-of 4 T B.Da doe add=icm indudn ro9uarnwlum-or Mhm nem"4d1 dwt Mxd4 iP ilrc ir�umbrowL of 111� 7fi& ww=or olhe-r Isqulda[a&-"atLm penA wn4c Jusaun.d IW if V'cn cxpldn pwp=rnd rme - - M.ffz*Llm Q m cif Cho prapmsad eat=*ran a ngWuPwrYi NO V= �1J�i woae �nc�rlts Crll f tnUJIY7 irvzi�.acerb .Hw rho s*c cr&v pop+R CH amoa or=a am to pap"h? Ilia mthimt 0 reTLnffajd=(emirs or No yw amwkipa ELM j L y4xhdPI -'IHp L Awritu'RAT Tim ufm IR—Daw FiffPSMANOVE 38 TRUIL AND AcuyAA7'9 7-0 TuxOwrOF my APPROVED JW I_ftWx9 Ammm%uW. Mhe Lmd Apavk ft ft Gi pm l mwwff a Cftiz row emu,im FM 2000 ft mforumbm=tow im Fm I wd C&W MWo-Ohl M&MUM by to Ftleg wu=" ma Gd as ftnammm. Wbm wwown the m do mmu%w be macd by du r zw mr�bw MMMWa Qwu&FmGtW WkWund caaI of than aT" -� o umbww mm to Im sw M" l 2- WH Ulm mm root im a chmp k&a m or ia#m*#f=arkm& 3. Ihd � rt6sa r _ MM of;a 04wd Svvk=omKW Arm(CW Fm wtion Itk as w mEmm dmp bti liliu %Irm of t or a&ot m3oft font fw =wit,biUg at vWkW 6. VW t Ed=umm oa dmmoAw the Imormw md Rio 14 i r. { 7, mill the PUPD ed acCiw Miffft L pia J FiMM WUW I<WUM? WM the FopwKs mtkm! =Wtbacbmaw or gmml ly of tm�Wmic,mdmmnlgg" W*k%&Gw car mff&e#ic CUMM1,01 11�II �1 a lib mow=,mt qu&cty.Om aad k=M 14 APPROVED Jt er �Mdrdlr =rm to kw Impod &d UUV MUW gaeoM oaaw WHOM the prnp�uNod cclm rill inort mrr��ep�mt rwmsp oar, f[aodma oeditdmlp r 'J 1 _ VAll1ho Fr9p9MJ MCUUIL uMNIC o�orooa shWWJ W—V&— kGntJ bwb u mo bmith7 1 .0 part.3=Leb mlootffie c f U�pM=m Thp;Ldmd AWwo Ib Topmov*fhr tko eaoeplftu ed'Jl W 3. For every gwobl ar�"pm 2 ow weg www&md Ammkraa#e Cp imp Jnwad vW amp',or Ifthere i ea neW to amp in wby tt Cully ekrnmt pIrLl m prq m 0 aman r�to VWM CAA ra S&kn a ad t ad�tw::= Phase a Fes#3, Fart 3 6ouW,in miffk a t dda .dm*ftimplO,ind ammm m Qr"On 6cmmb a d Ohara bm indudat by tm1 Pedant t6 avoid cr rodaj= I o toa impad Mey at WUJ not hpApis=r. tfichPad UmpmA amrld byammid a,,nI .SJM F&eWHYofac=xf> . darowa nn.!h t v,n Ml ty.p3gghic mmys and mpiMdft Alom mmMw tha P UMUlml Iw&nd4mrn,bcOmm W curwumvm Impedh 04 this bM ff you :,ffl*dM=bK booW 02 And= 'tyefo Eld4th�a py?o=d jai mmy mmltm®bcwrnmpomao+leilylMM&mglfminhmtml pmtovndm bapml El ne*Umd. 11bie 4Qx�f�Jkar��m�1>��dtie int�c+e�alcn a� end�dirpl►� 4 tW the paapond nt.ipa Ma Ingot FCJWt ul My,ri fles!sdvtrcrQ easviro ,d ierO&ft Kimy •4!+ Oda or ��Mawcmwim mot wpm=ofderiaLad-Apuy Arid= ° F rs fd3ffamli�ask rrbiobP�t APPROVED RESOLUTION PB 17-09 TOWN OF LANSING PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION OF MAKING SEQRA NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR PROPOSED HUNTER ESTATE AND ENGELS 3-LOT MINOR SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, an application was made by Jay and Carol Engels for a three-lot subdivision approval, thus reorganizing three existing lots at Scofield Road, Groton, New York, and otherwise known as TPNs 30.-1-6.3, 30.-1-6.41 and 30.-1-6.43, consisting of a total of 45.419± acres in the Rural Agriculture (RA) Zone; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is shown on a"Survey Map showing the lands of Jay and Carol Engels and Malcolm and Eleanor Hunter, Scofield Road, Town of Lansing, Tompkins County, New York," dated May 5, 2015, and proposes to re-subdivide existing parcels to become Parcel A (15.729± acres, consisting of areas demarked as parcels Al, A2 and A3), Parcel B (12.87± acres, consisting of areas demarked as parcels B1 and B-2), and Parcel C (16.82± acres, demarked as parcel C); and WHEREAS, this proposed action is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Lansing Planning Board is an involved agency for the purposes of environmental review; and WHEREAS,a public hearing was duly noticed and held upon June 26,2017 to consider such minor subdivision and the potential environmental impacts thereof,and the public was free to provide opinions and evidence in respect of such matters and all members of the public were duly heard and all evidence taken; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2017, the Town of Lansing Planning Board, in performing its reviewing agency functions in conducting an environmental review in accordance with Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law and SEQRA regulations: (i) pursued its thorough review of the project and the Applicant's SEAF, as well as a review of all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action;and (ii) thoroughly analyzed the potential relevant areas of environmental concern of the project to determine if the proposed action may have any moderate or significant adverse impacts on the environment, including the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c); and (iii) reviewed the SEAF on the record; and WHEREAS, each identified potential environmental impact was analyzed and duly considered by the Planning Board in relation to the question of whether any potential environmental impacts were so probable of occurring or so significant as to require a positive declaration, and after weighing the above and all other potential impacts arising from or in connection with this project,and after also considering: (i) the probability of each potential impact occurring; (ii) the duration of each potential impact; (iii) the irreversibility 16 APPROVED of each potential impact, including permanently lost resources of value; (iv) whether each potential impact can or will be controlled or mitigated by permitting or other processes; (v) the regional consequence of the potential impacts; (vi) the potential for each impact to be or become inconsistent with the Towri s master plan or Comprehensive Plan and local needs and goals; and (vii) whether any known objections to the Project relate to any of the identified potential impacts, the Planning Board found that these factors did not cause any potential impact to be or be likely to become a moderate or significant impact such that a negative declaration will be issued. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. After consideration of the potential environmental impacts,including those reviewed in accord with 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c), the Planning Board finds that the proposed action of approving the proposed minor 3-lot subdivision, as based upon the proposed survey and plat as submitted, will individually and cumulatively have no moderate or significant negative environmental consequences or impacts. 2. This declaration is made in accord with Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law and SEQRA regulations promulgated thereunder, and accordingly,the Planning Board of the Town of Lansing,based upon: (i)its thorough review of the SEAF, and any and all other documents prepared and submitted with respect to this proposed action and its environmental review; (ii) its thorough review of the potential relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the proposed action may have any moderate or significant adverse impact on the environment, including, but not limited to, the criteria identified in 6 NYCRR § 617.7(c); and (iii) its completion of the SEAF, including the findings noted therein (if any, and which findings are incorporated herein as if set forth at length),hereby makes a negative determination of environmental significance ("Negative Declaration") in accordance with SEQRA for the above referenced proposed actions, and determines that an Environmental Impact Statement is therefore not required. 3. A Responsible Officer of the Planning Board of the Town of Lansing is hereby authorized and directed to complete and sign,as required,the determination of significance, confirming the foregoing Negative Declaration, which fully completed and signed SEAF and determination of significance shall be incorporated by reference in this Resolution June 26, 2017 Motion by: Gerald Caward Seconded by: Sandra Dennis Conlon VOTE AS FOLLOWS: Gerald Caward,Jr. - Aye 17 APPROVED Sandra Dennis Conlon-Aye Al Fiorille - Aye Dean Shea,Alternate -Aye Deborah Trumbull - Aye Thomas Ellis-Aye RESOLUTION PB 17-10 RESOLUTION OF TOWN OF LANSING PLANNING BOARD CONDITONALLY APPROVING HUNTER ESTATE AND ENGELS MINOR 3 LOT SUBDIVISION, 522-554 SCOFIELD ROAD WHEREAS, an application was made by Jay and Carol Engels for a three-lot subdivision approval, thus reorganizing three existing lots at Scofield Road, Groton, New York, and otherwise known as TPNs 30.-1-6.3, 30.-1-6.41 and 30.-1-6.43, consisting of a total of 45.419± acres in the Rural Agriculture (RA) Zone; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision is shown on a "Survey Map showing the lands of Jay and Carol Engels and Malcolm and Eleanor Hunter, Scofield Road, Town of Groton, Tompkins County, New York," dated May 5, 2015, and proposes to re-subdivide existing parcels to become Parcel A (15.729± acres, consisting of areas demarked as parcels Al, A2 and A3), Parcel B (12.87± acres, consisting of areas demarked as parcels B 1 and B-2), and Parcel C (16.82±acres, demarked as parcel C); and WHEREAS, on June 12, 2017, the Planning Board classified the proposed subdivision as a minor subdivision, including as there are no new lots being created, there are only 3 lots, and there are no roads or infrastructure proposed to be developed; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and held upon June 26, 2017 to consider such minor subdivision and the potential environmental impacts thereof, and the public was free to provide opinions and evidence in respect of such matters and all members of the public were duly heard and all evidence taken; and WHEREAS, a negative declaration of environmental impacts was duly issued under SEQRA, this action is exempt from the § 239 requirements under the General Municipal Law, and this land, even though within an RA District, is not currently farmed such that no agricultural impacts are expected; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered and carefully reviewed the requirements of the Town's laws and regulations relative to subdivisions and the unique needs of the Town due to the topography, the soil types and distributions, and other natural and man-made features upon and surrounding the area of the proposed subdivision, and the Town has also considered the Town's 18 APPROVED Comprehensive Plan and compliance therewith, and the Planning Board has further considered the proposed subdivision in relation to the surrounding area and neighborhoods, the public facilities and services available, the site characteristics, and any potential on and off site environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, upon due consideration and deliberation by the Town of Lansing Planning Board, now therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Town of Lansing Planning Board grants Final Plat Subdivision Approval of the application for a three-lot minor subdivision of certain land located at 522-554 Scofield Road, Lansing, New York, and that the afore-described survey map shall suffice as a Final Plat when so amended in accordance with the following conditions and findings: 1. The land and the resulting parcels may not be further subdivided or have any boundaries changed without further subdivision or other approval of and by the Town of Lansing Planning Board, and this condition shall be stated on the face of the Final Plat referenced below. 2. The Survey Map shall be re-labelled as a "Minor Subdivision Final Plat" and all other plat requirements, for good cause as shown, shall be waived in connection with such final plat, including the various requirements of Local Law#3 of 2016,§6(B),in that:(i)such additional information is not necessary for this review; (ii)the lot configurations comply with requirements of zoning and the subdivision law; (iii) no new lots are hereby being created; and (iv) the Planning Board has determined that this waiver of requirements for a final plat will not have any adverse effect on this review or the neighborhood. 3. Owner Agrees to consolidate each parcel as soon as practical. No New Construction Projects/Building Permits will be issued until consolidation has happened. Building Permits for repairs will be permitted. 4. The sealing and endorsement of such Minor Subdivision Final Plat shall be made by the Planning Board Chair, and the Developer shall thereafter present and obtain the signing of the plat by Tompkins County Assessment Department, followed by filing in the Tompkins County Clerk's Office, followed by the provision of proof of such filing promptly delivered to Town of Lansing Code Enforcement Office, all within the time limit requirements of the Town's Subdivision Local law(Local Law#3 of 2016). 5. Developer shall obtain all necessary curb-cut/work permits from the appropriate State or local Highway Department(s) for any driveways connecting with Scofield Road, as well as for any culverts that are to be installed in conjunction with such future driveways. 6. Submission of a plot plan for each approved lot if and when any new building permits are sought, including to show a proposed layout and dimensions of any proposed buildings, driveways, and other improvements, as well as a drainage plan with details sufficient to demonstrate that adequate drainage facilities can be provided to protect houses and structures from flooding,standing water,or other potential drainage problems. June 26, 2017 With amendments as discussed(Condition#3) Motion by: Dean Shea Seconded by: Deborah Trumbull VOTE AS FOLLOWS: 19 APPROVED Gerald Caward,Jr.—Aye Sandra Dennis Conlon -Aye Al Fiorille—Aye Dean Shea,Alternate -Aye Deborah Trumbull—Aye Thomas Ellis -Aye Mike Long briefly reviewed updates in the Planning Department • The update from last meeting is still current • Still waiting on information on The Cell Tower for the Fall Zone and from NYSEG • Be ready for upcoming discussions on the Cargill Shaft Site Plan o Cargill has been working with the State on the SEQR process o Shaft is mainly for people o At some point there will be a Public Hearing • Revision 3 for the Site Plan Proposal for Lansing Climbing Gym- o Height is the same. o Foot Print is the same,only moved away from the building a little more. o Landscaping stays the same. o Parking is the same. o Would like to see color change,mural or windows to help break up the massive wall. Gerald Caward made a motion at 7:26 PM to accept the amended revision 3 Site Plan for the Climbing Gym with a condition to visually make the front side of the massive wall more pleasing as mentioned above,. Deborah Trumbull seconded the motion and it was carried by the following roll call vote: Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Gerald Caward, Member • Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Sandra Dennis Conlon, Member • Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Al Fiorille, Member • Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Dean Shea, Alternate Member • Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye) Deborah Trumbull, Member • Vote of Planning Board . . . (Aye)Thomas Ellis, Chairman Chairman Tom Ellis would like to make a recommendation to move Gerald Caward to Vice Chair due to Lin Davidson having a full plate. Lin Davidson, Gerald Caward, Ed LaVigne and I have agreed this would be a good transition for both. 20 APPROVED A recommendation will be sent to the Town Board along with Lin Davidson sending a letter to step down from the Vice Chair position. Lynn Day we are putting water districts on Wilson Road, Buck Road, Drake Road, Conlon Rd Area, if we want growth where the services are. Could we change the density requirements on the land use to 20,000 square feet now, before we work on the full land use changes? This would deter a long wait time for many, as the full land use changes could take a few years. • A Public Hearing would need to be made before a change could be made. Chairman Tom Ellis would like to see a Solar and Alternative Energy Package made before we start to work on the Land Use Ordinance. Dean Shea is working on a proposal for Micro Ag. Both the City and Town of Ithaca have this. The Town of Ithaca has a Conservation Zone that allows almost any farm use if you own over 7 acres. Dean Shea made a motion to adjourn at 7:45 PM. Al Fiorille seconded the motion. 21