Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-02-26ACCOUNT
J
Justice Fred Spry
Justice Floyd Ferris
continued February 20, 1988
BALANCE RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS
12/31/86 1987 1987
49634920
43,966.04
1,580.22
21,238.97
41,960.04
20,787.48
Unanimously carried
On motion, meeting adjourned at the call of the Supervisor.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the I
Town Board of the Town of
Lansing will hold, a Public i
Hearing at the Lansing Town
Hall, Lansing, Tompkins Coun-
ty, New York on March 10,
1988 at 7:30 P.M. to consider
Local Law No. 1 of-the year
1988 entitled SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT FACILITIES.
Copy of said Local Law is
available for inspection at the
Lansing Town Clerk's Office, i
29 Auburn Road, . Lansing, i
New York.
Bonita Boles
Lansing Town Clerk,'
February 23, 1988
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the State Comptroller 'has.i
caused an Examination to be
made of the Accounts and Fis-
cal Affairs of the Town of Lan- ,
sing, Tompkins County for the i
period beginning January 1,
1986 and ending on December
31, 1986. The re art of such i
examination has been filed in
my office wherd it'is a public
record, available for inspec- I
tion by all interested persons.
Bonita Boles
Lansing Town Clerk
February 23, 1988
February 26, 1988
BALANCE
12/31/87
6,390.20
2,031.71
n
The Lansing Town Board met in an Adjourned Meeting at the Lansing Town Hall
Board Room on February 26, 1988 at 9:00 A.M.
ROLL CALL
Jeannine Kirby Supervisor Present
Louis Emmick Councilman Present
Jeffrey Cleveland Councilman Present
Bonita Boles Town Clerk Present
The Supervisor called the meeting to order having the clerk take
Roll Call.
RESOLUTION offered by Mr. Cleveland, who moved its adoption, seconded by
Mr.. Emmick:
WHEREAS, Local Law # 1 - 1988, entitled " A Local Law Regulating Solid
Waste Management Facilities" was introduced at a meeting of the Town Board
held on Februa.ry 17, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board is considering the adoption of said Local Law
in order to regulate the manner in which solid waste is handled and disposed of
in the Town and in order to regulate the manner in which solid waste management
facilities are operated within the Town; and
• WHEREAS, no other agency has the legal- authority or jurisdiction to approve
or directly under take the adoption of a local law in this Town, such that there are
no other involved agencies within the meaning of the New York State Environmental
Quality Review Act (SEQR) with respect to the proposed adoption of said Local Law,
with the result that the Town Board shall act as lead agency in this matter; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of said Local Law is an unlisted action for purposes
of environmental review under SEQR; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board has determined that a short environmental assessemnt
form (EAF) shall be required in connection with this matter, and
WHEREAS, the'. said EAF has been prepared and has been reviewed by the Town
Board; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board has considered the adoption of said Local Law has
considered the criteria contained in 6 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 617.11 and has compared
the impacts which may be reasonably expected to result from the adoption of said
Local Law against said criteria; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board has also considered the potential and actual impacts
and effects which various forms of solid waste has or may have on people and
property within the Town and, in particular, the impact and effects which would
result if there were no regulations in place to control the manner in which such
solid waste is handled and disposed of in the Town; and has identified the lack
of such regulations as a serious area of concern with respect to the environment
in the Town;
NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Mr. Cleveland, seconded by Mr. Emmick, it is
RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that the proposed adoption of Local Law #1 - 1988
will have an effect on the environment but that such effect will not be significant
under SEAR; that, accordingly, and environmental impact statement shall not be
required; and that this resolution shall constitute a negative declaration under
SEQR; and it is further
RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that the reasons for the foregoing declaration are
as follows:
The adoption of proposed Local Law #1 - 1988 will improve the environment
in the Town by regulating the manner in which solid waste is handled and disposed
of in the Town and, in particular, by regulating the manner in which solid waste
management facilities will be managed and operated. Thus, the impact on the
environment will be a positive one rather than adverse and therefore will not
be "significant" under SEQR.
No substantial adverse change in air quality, ground or surface water
quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels will occur as a result of the
adoption of the proposed local law. In fact, the regulations imposed by the
proposed local law should maintain air quality by restricting the emission of
smoke and odors emanating from solid waste management facilities and should
protect ground and surface water by strictly controlling surface water run off
from such facilities. The proposed local law also contains provisions regulating
the use of motor vehicles for hauling solid waste and restricts the hours of
operation of solid waste management facilities to the daytime when.noise .interfer-
ence with neighboring properties will have a lesser impact.
The proposed local law will not increase the production of solid waste in
the Town. It may cause an increase in the levels of solid waste which are
deposited in areas outside of the Town. The Town Board would expect the
governing bodies.having jurisdiction over such areas to enact their own regulations,
perhaps similar to the proposed local law, for handling solid waste within their
jurisdictions.
There will be no substantial increase in the potential for erosion,
flooding, leaching or drainage problems as a result of the enactment of the
proposed local law. Nor will there be any adverse affect on vegetation,
fauna or wildlife. It is expected that enactment of the proposed local law
and the implementation of its provisions will minimize erosion, flooding,
leaching and drainage problems in and around solid waste management facilities
and will have a very positive effect on wildlife.
Adoption of the proposed local law will not attract large numbers of people
to particular places within the Town but may, over a period of time, encourage
people to move into and reside in the Town because of its improved environment.
Adoption of the proposed local law will not create a material conflict with
the community's current plans or goals. The Town Board believes the provisions
contained in the proposed local law are consistent with solid waste management
plans which have been developed by Tompkins County.
Adoption of the proposed local law will not impair the character or
quality of any historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resource
or of an existing community or neighborhood, and will not result in a major
change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. It is expected that
enactment of the proposed local law will do much to protect farmland, a
valuable resource, from possible temporary or permanent contamination which
could result from unrestricted spreading of certain forms of solid waste.
The provisions contained in the proposed local law should greatly reduce
the likelihood of hazards to human health by strictly controlling the manner
in which solid waste management facilities are operated. Of particular concern
to the Town Board is the effect that unregulated disposition of solid waste
may have on (1) surface and ground waters especially given the fact that so many
people residing in the Town do not have a source of public water and (2) agricultural
land and food crops given the fact that, according to some scientific experts,
the spreading of some solid waste on the land or its use as a fertilizer could
result in pathogenic organisms, heavy metals and other toxic substances being
introduced into the food chain.
Currently in the Town there is not wide spread use of land for solid waste
management facilities including the use of agricultural land for the spreading
of solid waste. The proposed local law will help preserve this status and will
regulate the manner in which land within the Town is used in the future for
the disposal or handling of solid waste.,
F An 11'IIIII' Lr\ IF In VIIRI L fYI nL rnH401040P J Ta. I I ITV WV HIV I, IfWIV I VV vy �yvVw II
A DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE 1 THRESHOLD IN 0 NYCRR. PART 411 127 it yes. coordinate the review procsee and vile tht FULL U►
yea rXI No /
9 WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 0 NYCRR, PART 017 07 If No, a negall.e dKleralbn
may be supersodod by another invnNed agency
L'; yes _W No
C COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING (Answers may be handwritten, II Iegiblel
CI Erlsling air quality, surface or groundwater quality of quantity, noise levels, exisling traffic patterns, solid waets production or dleposel,
potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly:
No, the proposed action is the adoption of a local law to regulate solid waste
management facilities in the Town. Such action is expected to improve the en-
vironment and not to result in any adverse effects thereto.
C2 Aesthetic, agricultural. archaeological, historic, or other natural of cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain brbfly:
No, see answer to C1
W. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, slgniflcanl habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly:
No, see answer to C1
CA. A community's existing plane or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain
No, see answer to C1
C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly.
No, see answer to C1
C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1,C5? Explain briefly.
No, see answer to C1
C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly.
No, see answer to C1
D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
❑ Yes ® No If Yes, explain briefly
PART I11— DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant.
Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d)
irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporling materials. Ensure that
explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed.
❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse Impacts which MAY
occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting
documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts,
AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination:
Town Board Town of Lansing
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Signature of Responsible Officer in lead Agency
2
Title of Responsible of icer
Signature of Preparer (of different frwn responsible o icer)
z��4
87
Adoption of the proposed local law may create a demand for the disposition
if solid waste in other municipalities. Again, it is the expectation of the
Town Board that the governing authorities of such municipalities will adopt
their own regulations to control the manner in which solid waste is handled
and disposed of. The Town Board is cognizant of the provisions contained in
Section 27 -0711 of the Environmental Conservation Law of the State of New York
which would seem to encourage local governments to adopt legislation to regulate
the disposition of solid waste and solid waste management facilities.
In its consideration of the foregoing the Town Board has considered the
long term, short term and cumulative affects of the adoption of the proposed
local law including its subsequent implementation and enforcement and the affect
it may have on all the residents of the Town and other communities. In so doing,
the Town Board has assumed the local law will remain in affect indefinitely but
will most likely be subject to later modifications and amendments as the Town
Board becomes aware of issues with respect to application of the Local Law to
various individuals and businesses and problems of enforcement and the like.
Of particular concern to the Town Board are the long term and cumulative affects
of repeatedly spreading municipal sludge on valuable farmland and the resulting
• potentail build up of heavy metals and other substances known to be harmful to
humans. Until more is known about the affect this will have on the health and
safety of Town residents, such activities must be strictly regulated. Those
persons desirous of operating solid waste management facilities in the Town
will be required to comply with relatively strict requirements and will, as a
result, incur some expense. Those persons desirous of bringing solid waste
into the Town from sources outside of the Town will be prevented from doing so
and will have to find other locations to deposit such solid waste. The resulting
inconvenience and expense to those few persons, although regrettable, is necessary
in order to promote the health, safety and enjoyment of the greater number of Town
residents. The Town Board has also assessed the ability of the Town to regulate
and monitor solid waste originating from sources outside of the Town. The Town
is essentially rural in nature and does not have a large tax base. The Town Board
has serious reservations as to the ability of the Town to direct its manpower and
financial resources to regulate and monitor, not only solid waste which originates
within the Town, but also solid waste which is brought into the Town from sources
located outside of the Town.
The question of the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly put to a
vote and
Vote
Vote
Vote
upon role
of Town
of Town
of Town
call, the vote was
Board . (Aye)
Board . (Aye)
Board . (Aye)
as follows:
Jeffrey Cleveland, Councilman
Louis Emmick, Councilman
Jeannine Kirby, Supervisor
The
foregoing
resolution
was thereupon declared duly adopted
DATED: February
26,
1988.
RESOLUTION offered by Mr. Emmick who moved its adoption, seconded by
Mr. Cleveland:
RESOLVED that the Town of Lansing hereby agrees to pay 22.5% of the
$24,000.00 billed to Tompkins County by the Costello, Cooney & Fear.on Law firm
in regard to the Munson Farm's sludge proposal.
Vote of Town Board . .(Aye) Jeffrey Cleveland, Councilman
Vote of Town Board . .(Aye) Louis Emmick, Councilman
Vote of Town Board . .(Aye) Jeannine Kirby, Supervisor
RESOLUTION offered by Mr. Cleveland who moved its adoption, seconded by
Mr. Emmick:
• RESOLVED that Highway Superintendent, Howard Groat is hereby authorized
to purchase one New 1988 10 Wheel Cab and Chassis from Genesee Truck Sales,
1280 Jefferson Road, Rochester, New York. Said amount of truck to be
$52,137.22 without a trade in. Genesee Truck Sales was not the lowest bidder
but lowest bidder did. not meet the specifications.
Vote of Town Board . (Aye) Jeffrey Cleveland, Councilman
Vote of Town Board . (Aye) Louis Emmick, Councilman
Vote of Town Board . ('Aye) Jeannine Kirby, Supervisor
RESOLUTION offered by Mr. Emmick who moved its adoption, seconded by
Mr. Cleveland:
RESOLVED, that the Town hereby amend the Resolution dated November 11,
1987 to read as follows:
RESOLVED that the the Supervisor is hereby aurhorized to negotiate the
the amount to be paid by the Town of Lansing for said Attorney and Engineer fees
in the sludge issue not to exceed a total amount of $6,000.00.
Vote of Town Board . .(Aye) Jeffrev Cleveland, Councilman
Vote of Twon Board . .(Aye) Louis Emmick, Councilman
Vote of Town Board . .(Ave) Jeannine Kirby, Supervisor
On motion, meeting adjourned at the call of the Supervisor,���