HomeMy WebLinkAbout10_18_05 Front yard setbacks for addition
TGZBA
OWN OF ROTON ONING OARD OF PPEALS
Minutes of Public Hearing/Meeting – Tuesday, 18 October 2005 – 7:30 PM
Groton Town Hall – 101 Conger Boulevard – Groton, NY
Board Members Others Present
(*absent)
Lyle Raymond, Chairman Joan Fitch, Recording Secretary
*Patricia Gaines Gary Coats, CEO
Geraldine Rapp
Steve Thane, Vice-Chairman
*Thomas Tylutki
Applicants/Public Present
Mary O’Bannion, Applicant; Jerry Dennis.
PH
UBLIC EARING
Mary O’Bannion, Applicant/RO – 337 Locke Road – TM #221.-2-3 – Area Variance for Proposed
Bedroom Addition
The Public Hearing was opened at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Lyle Raymond who read aloud the Notice of
Public Hearing as duly published. Proof of Publication has been placed on file for the record.
Chairman Raymond advised the Board members that the required fee had been paid by the
applicant. Members of the ZBA in attendance were introduced by the Chairman.
Chairman Raymond acknowledged that no communications had been received regarding the
application.
Chairman Raymond recognized Gary Coats, Town of Groton Code Enforcement Officer, who explained
that the applicant’s father, age 78, lived quite some distance away, lived alone in a mobile home that
was not well insulated, and every week the applicant visited him and took him meals for the week.
Ms. O’Bannion had asked her father to come live with her and they would construct a bedroom
addition for him. The father agreed and also offered to pay for the addition. CEO Coats stated he had
measured the distance to the front property line and it was about 24 feet, where 30 feet is required.
The home is already non-conforming, having existed before there was zoning in the Town. The
proposed 12’ by 16’ bedroom addition, to be placed on the north side of the home, as shown in the
attachment to the application, would be no closer to the road than the front of the home. CEO Coats
also reported he had checked with the Tompkins County Department of Health regarding the
addition of the bedroom, and an okay had been received from them stating the addition would have
no affect on the present septic system.
In response to Member Geri Rapp’s questions, the applicant stated that there were presently three
bedrooms in her home, with six people residing there. They had lived in the home for three years,
but purchased it last year.
Chairman Raymond asked the applicant if she had considered any alternatives that would not
require a variance, e.g. ECHO housing which is allowed in the Town’s Code. CEO Coats stated that
this was not an active process anymore, especially since the previously allowed tax credits had been
eliminated; therefore, there were not many applications for ECHO units anymore. In addition, he
stated, the applicant could always use the extra bedroom when the father no longer needed it. The
alternative of constructing the addition off the home on another side was discussed. Jerry Dennis
stated that the only way to have access to the proposed bedroom would be where it was planned and
showed the Board a sketch which demonstrated this. The rear of the home was where the back door
Page 1 of 3
Town of Groton ZBA Public Hearing/Meeting Minutes 18 October 2005
was and this could not be blocked as it was the only rear ingress/egress for the occupants. Then
there was the consideration of the location of the home’s leach field, etc. The result of the
discussion was that there was only one place where the addition could be constructed. Mr. Dennis
also stated he had talked with all of the neighbors, and none had any objection to the proposed
addition. He also stated that the addition would have a block foundation, and would be constructed
as directed by the Code Enforcement Officer to conform to all Code requirements.
With everyone being heard who wished to be heard, Chairman Raymond
closed the Public Hearing at 7:53 p.m.
D/D
ISCUSSIONECISION
Chairman Raymond proceeded with the required questions (balancing test), with the responses being
given by the ZBA members, after a brief discussion of each, as follows:
1. Can the benefit be achieved by other means feasible to the applicant without
requiring a variance? Response: No, given the situation, this would be the
best way to go.
2. Will it cause an undesirable change in neighborhood character or nearby
properties? Response: No, there would be no change in neighborhood
character, and may even enhance the property values.
3. Is the request substantial? Response: No, it appears it’s about 6 feet, which is
not a substantial increase—only about 20%.
4. Will it have physical or environmental affects? Response: As shown on Part II
of the Short Environmental Assessment form, completed by the Code
Enforcement Officer, the proposed action will not cause any adverse physical or
environmental impact if built as requested. There was also ample parking
space.
5. Is it self-created? Response: No.
Member Rapp commented that “this is a positive thing.” In addition, the proposed bedroom would
keep the same line as the existing structure, and it’s a good use of the space. Chairman Raymond
and Board Member Steve Thane agreed.
A motion was made by Member Thane that, based on the Board’s findings, the Zoning Board of
Appeals grants the area variance for the bedroom addition too close to the front property line, as
requested. The motion was seconded by Member Rapp, with the vote recorded as follows:
Ayes: Chairman Raymond Nays: None
Member Rapp
Member Thane Absent: Member Gaines
Member Tylutki
Motion carried
This becomes Action #3 of 2005.
Adjournment
Chairman Raymond adjourned the meeting at 8:03 p.m.
Page 2 of 3
Town of Groton ZBA Public Hearing/Meeting Minutes 18 October 2005
Joan E. Fitch
Recording Secretary
E-mailed on10/19/05
Originals mailed; tape mailed separately.
Page 3 of 3