The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDSEIS-Appendix-B_Wetland-and-Stream-Delineation-Report-Update.pdf Haley & Aldrich of New York 200 Town Centre Drive, Suite 2 Rochester, NY 14623 585.359.9000 MEMORANDUM 22 February 2016 File No. 40994-100 TO: Black Oak Wind, LLC Ms. Marguerite Wells 863 Hayts Road Ithaca, New York 14850 FROM: Haley & Aldrich of New York Michael Martin SUBJECT: Wetland and Stream Delineation Report Update 1. INTRODUCTION This Wetland and Stream Delineation Report summarizes the results of field work performed by Haley and Aldrich of New York (“Haley & Aldrich”) to locate and identify wetlands and waterbodies within and adjacent to the Black Oak Wind Project (the “Project”) in Tompkins County, New York on behalf of Black Oak Wind, LLC (Black Oak). The Project is a 16.1 megawatt (“MW”) wind-powered generation facility that includes seven wind turbines and associated access roads, buried electrical collection line, a staging area, a substation, and a meteorological tower. This memorandum should be considered a supplement to the Wetland Delineation Report included in the Project’s approved Final Environmental Impact Statement (“FEIS”) (November, 2014). Subsequent to the issuance of a Findings Statement for the Project by the Town Board of the Town of Enfield, the Project layout will require modifications to the approved layout, which include relocating two turbines, the substation, and associated infrastructure. Together, these revised locations comprise what will herein be referred to as the “Study Area.” With regard to the relocated turbines, three locations are currently under consideration. All three potential turbine sites, as well as required access roads and electrical collection routes, were evaluated by Haley and Aldrich. Only two of these sites will ultimately be used for construction. The Study Area encompasses approximately 59 acres and includes areas within 200 feet radius of three potential turbine locations; a 50 foot wide corridor of potential access routes (approximately 1.6 miles) and electrical collection routes (approximately 2.4 miles); and a 3 acre proposed substation location. 2. METHODOLOGY Prior to field investigations, a desktop review of publicly available data sources was conducted. Data consulted includes, U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangle maps, NYS Department of Black Oak Wind, LLC 22 February 2016 Page 2 Environmental Conservation (“NYSDEC”) Freshwater Wetland Maps, National Wetland Inventory (“NWI”) maps, Natural Resources Conservation Service (“NRCS”) County Soil survey, Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance maps, and the National Hydrography dataset. The field delineations were performed on 18 November 2015 and 30 December 2015 within the Study Area to identify wetlands and streams. The delineations were performed in accordance with criteria set forth in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (1987) and the 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0). Hydrophytic vegetation was assessed by identifying plant species and their assigned wetland indicator rating of obligate, facultative wet, facultative, facultative upland, and upland. Hydric soil was determined by soil features such as color matrix, hue, evidence of redox features which may include indicators such as saturation, gleyed matrix, mottling, hydrogen sulfide odor, and organic/peat layers present. Hydrology was determined based on a number of indicators based on the USACE manual and Regional Supplement. Additional surface waters, including stream channels and drainage ways, were investigated and characterized. To the extent practicable, these waters were investigated to determine drainage patterns and potential connections to other Waters of the United States. 3. SITE SETTING The Study Area encompasses approximately 59 acres located in the vicinity of Harvey Hill Road, Black Oak Road, and Cayutaville Road within the Towns of Enfield and Newfield, Tompkins County, New York. The Study Area is located within the Allegheny Plateau section of the Appalachian physiographic division. Elevations in the Study Area range from approximately 1,530 feet above mean sea level (amsl) at a stream crossing near Harvey Hill Road to approximately 1,970 feet amsl near Connecticut Hill. The Study Area is located in the Seneca and Owego-Wappasening River drainage basins (USGS Hydrologic Units 04140201 and 02050103, respectively). The majority of surface hydrology on the Study Area is generated by precipitation and surface water run-off from adjacent land. Total annual precipitation (from 1971 to 2000) averaged 37.82 inches in nearby Ithaca, NY (NRCS, 2012b). Soil types mapped for the Study Area are listed in Table 1, along with approximate acreage within the Study Area. Table 1. Study Area Soils Mapping Unit Symbol Soil Series % of Study Area Drainage Hydric (Yes/ No) BaC Bath channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 13 Well drained Not hydric BaD Bath channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 15 Well drained Not hydric Black Oak Wind, LLC 22 February 2016 Page 3 Mapping Unit Symbol Soil Series % of Study Area Drainage Hydric (Yes/ No) BgC Bath and Valois gravelly silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes 7 Well drained Not hydric EbB Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes 10 Somewhat poorly drained Not hydric EbC Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 0.5 Somewhat poorly drained Not hydric Hk Holly and Papakating soils 0.5 Poorly drained Hydric LaB Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 19 Well drained Not hydric MaB Mardin channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 5 Moderately well drained Not hydric MaC Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 4 Moderately well drained Not hydric Mo Middlebury and Tioga silt loams 1 Moderately well drained Not hydric VbB Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes 12 Somewhat poorly drained Not hydric VbC Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 13 Somewhat poorly drained Not hydric 4. WETLANDS AND STREAMS According to NYSDEC freshwater wetland mapping, there are no state regulated wetlands mapped within close proximity (Study Area or situated within 100-foot buffer to the Study Area). Similarly, no NWI-mapped wetlands are present within the Study Area. Field investigation to delineate wetlands and streams within the Study Area was completed by qualified wetland scientists on 18 November 2015 and 30 December 2015. There were ten wetlands and ten streams defined within the Study Area. Delineated wetlands and streams are shown on Figure 1 and summarized in Table 2. Completed wetland determination and stream data forms are included in Appendix A and wetland and stream photos are included in Appendix B. Table 2. Delineated Wetlands and Streams Wetland/Stream ID Type Square Feet Acres JMA Forested/Scrub Shrub Wetland 27,964 0.64 JMA Intermittent Stream 280 0.01 JMB Scrub Shrub Wetland 3,590 0.08 JMC Intermittent Stream 1,154 0.03 JMD Intermittent Stream 1,112 0.03 JME Intermittent Stream 416 0.01 JME Forested Wetland 8,146 0.19 JMF Perennial Stream 4,138 0.10 JMG Intermittent Stream 322 0.01 JMH Intermittent Stream 211 0.00 Black Oak Wind, LLC 22 February 2016 Page 4 Wetland/Stream ID Type Square Feet Acres JMI Forested Wetland 3,924 0.09 JMJ Intermittent Stream 299 0.01 JR1 Intermittent Stream 292 0.01 JR2 Intermittent Stream 1,107 0.03 JRA Emergent Wetland 4,588 0.11 JRB Emergent Wetland 1,869 0.04 JRC Emergent Wetland 5,144 0.12 JRD Emergent Wetland 3,977 0.09 JRE Emergent Wetland 14,301 0.33 JRF Emergent Wetland 33,832 0.78 5. IMPACT CALCULATIONS Wetland impacts were calculated for the proposed substation location and separately for each of the three turbine locations under consideration. Assumptions for calculating impacts are listed in Table 3 below. Temporary and permanent impacts are summarized in Tables 4 and 5. Table 3. Impact Assumptions and Calculations Project Components Typical Area of Vegetation Clearing Area of Total Soil Disturbance (temporary and permanent) Area of Permanent (fill/structures) Disturbance Wind Turbines and Workspaces 200’ radius per turbine 200’ radius per turbine 0.02 acre (No Permanent Crane Pad) Access Roads 75’ wide per linear foot of road 40’ wide per linear foot of road 15’ wide per linear foot of road Buried Electrical Interconnects 15’ wide per linear foot of cable 15’ wide per linear foot of cable none Substation 3 acres 3 acres 1.75 acres Substation Impacts No wetland or stream impacts are anticipated to result from construction of the substation or the access road from Cayutaville Road. However, placement of buried electrical collection lines from Griffin Road to the substation will result in approximately 181 square feet of temporary impacts to intermittent streams (Streams JMC, JMD, JME). Placement of buried collection lines from Turbine 5 to the substation will result in approximately 113 square feet of temporary impacts to Wetland I. Collection Line Reroute Rerouting the collection line between Turbine 4 and Turbines 3 and 5 as well as between Turbine 5 and the substation will result in approximately 1,510 square feet of temporary impacts as summarized in Table 4. Black Oak Wind, LLC 22 February 2016 Page 5 Table 4. Temporary Impacts from Collection Line Reroute Wetland/Stream ID Project Component(s) Impact Area (square feet) Impact Area (acres) Wetland I Collection Line 113 0.003 Stream JMC Collection Line 62 0.002 Stream JMD Collection Line 63 0.001 Stream JME Collection Line 56 0.001 Wetland JRA Collection Line 867 0.020 Wetland JRB Collection Line 349 0.008 Total 1,510 0.035 Scenario 1(Turbines A and B) Construction of a turbine at location A would not result in any wetland impacts from either the turbine itself or the required turbine workspace. While Wetland JMA is located within the 200 foot radius of the turbine site, additional space in the immediate vicinity exists so that the turbine workspace may be situated to avoid impacts to this wetland. Construction of a turbine at location B would not result in any wetland impacts from either the turbine itself or the required turbine workspace. Placement of a buried electrical collection line from this location to Turbine 1 would result in 200 square feet of temporary impacts to Stream JMF and 165 square feet of temporary impacts to Stream B. Impacts anticipated as a result of Scenario 1 are summarized in Table 5. Table 5. Temporary Impacts from Scenario 1 Wetland/Stream ID Project Component(s) Impact Area (square feet) Impact Area (acres) Stream B Collection Line 165 0.004 Stream JMF (east) Collection Line 200 0.005 Total 365 0.009 Scenario 2 (Turbines B and C) As described above, construction of a turbine at location B would not result in any wetland impacts from either the turbine itself or the required turbine workspace. Placement of a buried electrical collection line from this location to Turbine 1 would result in 200 square feet of temporary impacts to Stream JMF. Buried electrical collection lines will be co-located with the access road to location C at the crossing of Stream B. Construction of a turbine at location C would not result in any wetland impacts from either the turbine itself or the required turbine workspace. Construction of an access road and placement of buried collection line from Turbine 1 would result in approximately 862 square feet of temporary impacts and 323 square feet of permanent impacts to intermittent streams (Streams B and JMF). Impacts anticipated as a result of Scenario 2 are summarized in Tables 6 and 7. Black Oak Wind, LLC 22 February 2016 Page 6 Table 6. Temporary Impacts from Scenario 2 Wetland/Stream ID Project Component(s) Impact Area (square feet) Impact Area (acres) Stream B Access Road, Collection Line 431 0.010 Stream JMF (east) Collection Line 200 0.005 Stream JMF (west) Access Road, Collection Line 431 0.010 Total 1,062 0.025 Table 7. Permanent Impacts from Scenario 2 Wetland/Stream ID Project Component(s) Impact Area (square feet) Impact Area (acres) Stream B Access Road (7C) 165 0.004 Stream JMF Access Road 158 0.004 Total 323 0.008 Scenario 3 (Turbines A and C) As described above, construction of a turbine at location A would not result in any wetland impacts from either the turbine itself or the required turbine workspace. While Wetland JMA is located within the 200 foot radius of the turbine site, additional space in the immediate vicinity exists so that the turbine workspace may be situated to avoid impacts to this wetland. Construction of a turbine at location C would not result in any wetland impacts from either the turbine itself or the required turbine workspace. Construction of an access road and placement of buried collection line from Turbine 1 would result in approximately 862 square feet of temporary impacts and 323 square feet of permanent impacts to intermittent streams (Streams B and JMF). Additionally, construction of an access road from Turbine 1 to site C would result in approximately 165 square feet of permanent impacts to Stream B and 158 square feet of permanent impacts to Stream JMF. Impacts anticipated as a result of Scenario 1 are summarized in Tables 8 and 9. Table 8. Temporary Impacts from Scenario 3 Wetland/Stream ID Project Component(s) Impact Area (square feet) Impact Area (acres) Stream B Access Road, Collection Line 165 0.004 Stream JMF (west) Access Road, Collection Line 431 0.010 Total 596 0.014 Table 9. Permanent Impacts from Scenario 3 Wetland/Stream ID Project Component(s) Impact Area (square feet) Impact Area (acres) Stream B Access Road (7C) 165 0.004 Stream JMF Access Road 158 0.004 Total 323 0.008 Black Oak Wind, LLC 22 February 2016 Page 7 6. CONCLUSIONS Including previously delineated wetlands and streams in areas where no layout changes are proposed, there were 5.48 acres of wetlands and streams delineated for the modified project layout. In comparison, approximately 5 acres were delineated for the layout investigated area for the FEIS (see FEIS Section 2.3.6). It should be noted that in both cases many of the delineated wetlands and streams continue past the boundary of the Study Area; therefore, their total size is larger than indicated. Including temporary impacts in portions of the layout that remain unchanged, total temporary wetland and stream impacts from the modified layout will be no greater than 0.08 acre. This compares to temporary wetland and stream impacts of 0.07 acre as described in the Findings Statement issued by the Town of Enfield on January 14, 2015. Including permanent impacts in portions of the layout that remain unchanged, total permanent wetland and stream impacts from the modified layout will be no greater than 0.008 acre. This compares to 0.02 acre of permanent wetland and stream impacts as described in the Findings Statement. Black Oak Wind, LLC 22 February 2016 Page 8 REFERENCES 1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS , 92 pp. 2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0). U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS , 162 pp. 3. National Wetlands Inventory Wetlands, Electronic Vector Quad Maps of New York, United States Geological Survey. 4. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Hydrography Network and Water bodies, NYS Hydrologic Units. 5. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) website, (http://www.dec.state.ny.us/) 6. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/) G:\40994 Black Oak Wind Farm\100 SEQRA Modification\Wetland Delineation Update\Deliverable\20160122_Wetland Delineation Memo_DF\20160222_Wetland Delineation Memo_DF.docx Wetland Delineation Figure MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS INDEX FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 750 1,500375 Feet #0 SHEET 5 SHEET 10 SHEET 4 SHEET 3 SHEET 2 SHEET 6 SHEET 7 SHEET 8 SHEET 9 SHEET 1 Connecticu tH illRdRothermich RdRumsey Hill Rd CR 183 Black Oak RdS County Line RdCayutaville Rd Harvey Hill Rd CR 136 CR 133CR133LeonardRdTower RdGriffin Rd 1 3 4 6 C A B 5 FIGURE 1 !( jmg-2 jmg-1 jmf-15 jmf-14 jmf-13 jmf-11jmf-9jmf-8 jmf-7 jmf-6 jmf-5 jmf-4 jmf-1 jmf-16 jmg-4 Stream JMG Stream JMF Harvey Hill Rd B MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 1 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. !( !( !( "Ñ© "Ñ¨ jmi-9 jmi-8 jmi-7jmi-6 jmi-5 jmi-4 jmi-2 jmi-1 jmi-wet jmi-up jmf-21 jmf-20 jmf-19 jmf-18 jmf-17 jmh-1 jmf-2 jmf-3 jmg-3 jmg-2 jmg-1 jmf-15 jmf-14 jmf-13 jmf-11jmf-9jmf-8 jmf-7 jmf-6 jmf-5 jmf-4 jmf-1 jmf-16 jmg-4jmf-22 jmi-10 Stream JMH Stream JMG Stream JMF Stream JMF Stream B Stream B Wetland JMI 1 C B MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 2 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. !( Stream A CR 136 3 MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 3 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. "Ñ©"Ñ¨"Ñ© Wetland JRA JRA WET SAMPLEPT JRA-1 JRA-2 JRA-6 JRA-5JRA-4 JRA-3 JRB WET SAMPLEPTJRB UPLAND SAMPLEPT JR1-6 JR1-5 JR1-4JR1-3 JR1-2 JR1-1 JRB-5 JRB-4JRB-3 JRB-2 JRB-1 JRA-9 JRA-8 JRA-7 Stream JR1Wetland JRB CR 136 Black Oak RdMAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 4 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. Wetland FStream E Wetland CWetland D MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 5 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. !( Wetland J Wetland IBlack Oak Rd5 MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 6 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. !( !( Wetland I 6 5 MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 7 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. "Ñ©"Ñ¨ "Ñ© jmc-1 jmc-2 jmc-3 jmc-4 jmc-5 jmc-7jmc-8 jmc-9 jmc-10 jmd-2jmd-3jmd-4 jmd-5jmd-6 jme-1 jme-2 jme-3 jme-4jme-6 jme-15 jme-14 jme-11 jme-10 jme-9 jme-8 jme-7 jme-wetjme-up jmj-3 jmj-2 jmj-1 Stream JMC jmc-11 jmd-1jmd-7 jme-16 jmj-4 JRC wet SAMPLEPT JRC-8 JRC-7 JRC-6 JRC-3 JRC-2JRC-1 Stream JMJ Stream JMD Wetland JME Wetland JRC Griffin Rd MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 8 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. !( "Ñ¨"Ñ© "Ñ¨ "Ñ© "Ñ¨"Ñ© "Ñ© "Ñ©"Ñ¨ Wetland JMB Wetland JMA jma-11 jma-15 jma-36 jma-38 jmb-13 jmb-11 jmb-10jmb-9 jmb-8 jmb-7 jmb-6 jmb-5 jmb-4 jmb-3 jmb-2 jmb-1 jma-37 jma-35 jma-34 jma-33 jma-32 jma-31 jma-30 jma-29 jma-28 jma-27 jma-26 jma-25 jma-24 jma-23 jma-22 jma-21jma-20 jma-19 jma-18 jma-17 jma-16 jma-14 jma-13 jma-12 jma-10 jma-9 jma-8 jma-7 jma-6 jma-5 jma-4 jma-3 jma-2 jma-1 jmb-wet jma-wet2 jma-wet jmb-up jma-up2 jma-up jmb-12 JRD wet SAMPLEPT JRC wet SAMPLEPT JR up SAMPLEPT JRD-8JRD-7 JRD-6 JRD-5JRD-4 JRD-3 JRD-2 JRD-1JRC-8 JRC-7 JRC-6 JRC-5 JRC-4JRC-3 JRC-2JRC-1 Wetland JMA Wetland JRC A MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 9 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. "Ñ©"Ñ¨ "Ñ© JRF Wet SAMPLEPT JRE wet SAMPLEPT JRE UPLAND SAMPLEPT JRF-16 JRF-15 JRF-14 JRF-13 JRF-12 JRF-11 JRF-10JRF-9 JRF-8JRF-7 JRF-6JRF-5 JRF-4JRF-3 JRF-2JRF-1 JRE-12 JRE-11 JRE-10 JRE-9 JRE-8 JRE-7JRE-6 JRE-5 JRE-4 JRE-3 JRE-2 JRE-1 Stream JR2 Wetland JRE Wetland JRF MAP SOURCE: ESRI BLACK OAK WIND TOWNS OF ENFIELD AND NEWFIELD TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK DELINEATED STREAMS AND WETLANDS FEBRUARY 2016 BASE MAP SERVICES Ideal scales forsite vincity figures 1 : 108,000 Scale bar = 4 miles 1 : 54,000 Scale bar = 2 miles 1 : 24,000 (default) 1 : 13,500 Scale bar = 0.5 mile 0 100 20050 Feet FIGURE 1 SHEET 10 OF 10 WETLAND FLAG "Ñ¨UPLAND POINT "Ñ©WETLAND POINT !(APPROVED TURBINE LOCATION !(MODIFIED TURBINE LOCATION WETLAND CONTINUES APPROVED COLLECTION LINE MODIFIED COLLECTION LINE APPROVED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED ACCESS ROAD MODIFIED SUBSTATION STAGING AREA DELINEATED STREAM DELINEATED WETLAND NOTES: 1. IDs A, B, C, D, E, F, I AND J WERE DELINEATED IN JUNE 2013. 2. IDs JMA, JMB, JMC, JMD, JME, JMF, JMG, JMH, JMI, AND JMJ WERE DELINEATED NOVEMBER 18, 2015. 3. IDs JR1, JR2, JRA, JRB, JRC, JRD, JRE, AND JRF WERE DELINEATED DECEMBER 30, 2015. Appendix A Wetland and Stream Data Forms US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? INTERMITTENT CHANNEL IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PSS WETLAND. CHANNEL NOT DEFINED IN MOST AREAS OF WETLAND WITH DENSE SHRUB LAYER. Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 2 TO 3Surface Water Present? FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 0 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes No WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PSS X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.38979 Hk 11/18/15 1W@JMA BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.65398 Yes NoX NoX HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) NN N NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: JMAWetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? PSS WETLAND ASSOCIATED WITH INTERMITTENT CHANNEL Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILLTOP X Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JMA 5 6 Acer rubrum Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 110 30 50 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 190 X X 90 0 200 Alnus incana Rosa multiflora Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 510 Multiply by: 220 10 40 FACUNo Yes 50 83.3% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 10 FACW Yes FACW FACWYes Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes Yes 20 =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No ) =Total Cover =Total Cover -- 80 ) Carex sp.FACW Solidago gigantea 20Aster sp.FAC Indicator Status 10 Absolute % Cover Yes FAC Dominant Species? Onoclea sensibilis 30 Lonicera japonica 2.68 No 100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)10 VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover FACU 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3)x Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 8-16 10010YR 5/8 10YR 2/1 % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-8 1W@JMASOIL Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, %Loc2 Loamy/Clayey GRAVEL/COBBLE Texture Remarks Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist) Loamy/Clayey US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONVEXLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILLTOP Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NN N NoNoX X X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.38978 Hk 11/18/15 1U@JMA BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.65381 Yes NoX No X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? NO HYDROLOGY OBSERVED. Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYes Depth (inches):X X Depth (inches):X X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Solidago canadensis 60 4.00 No Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)10 Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? FACU Aster sp. 30Dactylis glomerata FACU ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 140 ) Phleum pratense FALLOW FIELD THAT HAS REVERTED TO MEADOW. =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. X Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes Yes 40 FACU Yes FACU 0.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 560 Multiply by: 0 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 0 0 140 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 140 0 0 560 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1U@JMA 0 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist) Loamy/Clayey Loc2 Loamy/Clayey GRAVEL/COBBLE Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 1U@JMASOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-10 Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 10-16 10010YR 3/4 10YR 3/4 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) NO HYDRIC SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OBSERVED. Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONVEXLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILLTOP Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NN N NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.38973 VbC 11/18/15 2U@JMA BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.65496 Yes NoX No X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? NO HYDROLOGY OBSERVED Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYes Depth (inches):X XXDepth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Solidago canadensis 60 3.88 No Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)20 Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? FAC Aster sp. 20Dactylis glomerata FACU ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 160 ) Osmunda claytoniana OLD FIELD/MEADOW =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. X Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes No 60 FACU Yes FACU 0.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 620 Multiply by: 0 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 0 20 140 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 160 60 0 560 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 2U@JMA 0 2 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist)Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): No XDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 2U@JMASOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 10YR 3/4 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) NO HYDRIC SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OBSERVED. Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILLTOP X Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: JMAWetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NN N NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PFO X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.38978 VbC 11/18/15 2W@JMA BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.65485 Yes NoX NoX FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 0 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 1Surface Water Present? PFO WETLAND AT THE HEAD OF INTERMITTENT STREAM CHANNEL. Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Onoclea sensibilis 80 Rosa multiflora 2.38 30 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) Indicator Status 40 Absolute % Cover Yes FAC Dominant Species? Solidago gigantea ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 90 ) =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. No10 FACW Yes FACW FACWYes 75.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 40 Alnus incana Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 380 Multiply by: 220 10 FACUYes 20 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 110 40 10 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 160 X X 120 0 40 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 2W@JMA 3 4 Acer rubrum Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist)Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): No X Depth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 2W@JMASOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 10YR 2/1 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 3Surface Water Present? FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 0 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes No WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PSS X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.39010 VbC 11/18/15 1W@JMB BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.65591 Yes NoX NoX HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) NN N NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: JMBWetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILL Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JMB 5 5 Acer rubrum Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 120 10 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 170 X X 30 40 0 Alnus incana Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 310 Multiply by: 24030 100.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 10 FACW Yes FACW FACWYes Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes Yes 40 =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 130 ) Wetland grasses FACW Carex sp. 40Scirpus cyperinus OBL Indicator Status 10 Absolute % Cover Yes FAC Dominant Species? Onoclea sensibilis 40 1.82 No 30 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)10 VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) DARK MUCKY SOIL OVER GRAY/GLEYED CLAY LAYER X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) X Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) Histic Epipedon (A2) C Type1 4-16 70 302.5Y 3/1 10YR 2/1 % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-4 1W@JMBSOIL Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 10YR 5/8 Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, %Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Texture Remarks Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. M 100 Color (moist) Loamy/Clayey US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: NONELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) HILLTOP Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.39013 VbC 11/18/15 2U@JMB BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.65603 Yes No No X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? NO HYDROLOGY OBSERVED Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYes Depth (inches):X XXDepth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 3.50 10 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) Indicator Status 20 40 Absolute % Cover Yes Yes FAC FACU Dominant Species? ) =Total Cover =Total Cover ) LIMITED HERB LAYER DUE TO TIME OF YEAR =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. X Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. FACUYes 33.3% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 70 Fagus grandifolia Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 280 Multiply by: 010 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: No10 0 0 40 40 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 80 120 0 160 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 2U@JMB 1 3 Pinus strobus Acer rubrum Quercus rubra FACU Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist)Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 2U@JMBSOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 10YR 3/4 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) NO HYDRIC SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OBSERVED. Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) ENFIELD HILLSIDE Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 2-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: JMEWetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NN N NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PFO X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.39544 VbB 11/18/15 JME-WET BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.66101 Yes NoX NoX FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 5 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 0.5Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Solidago gigantea 40 Acer rubrum 2.20 30 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) Indicator Status 30 20 Absolute % Cover Yes Yes FAC FACW Dominant Species? Onoclea sensibilis ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 70 ) =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes30 FACW Yes FACW FACWYes 100.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 50 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 330 Multiply by: 240 10 FACYes 20 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 120 30 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 150 X X 90 0 0 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species JME-WET 6 6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Acer rubrum Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. M Color (moist) Loamy/Clayey Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 10YR 5/8 JME-WETSOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-6 Histic Epipedon (A2) C Type1 6-16 60 402.5Y 4/2 10YR 2/1 X Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3)X High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONVEXLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) ENFIELD HILLSIDE Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NN N NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.39544 VbB 11/18/15 1U@JME BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.66089 XYesNo No X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYes Depth (inches):X XXDepth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Solidago canadensis 25 3.76 10 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) Indicator Status 30 30 Absolute % Cover Yes Yes FACU FAC Dominant Species? Rosa multiflora 10Rubus allegheniensis FACU ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 45 ) =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. X Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes Yes 10 FACU Yes FACU FACUYes 16.7% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 70 Lonicera tatarica Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 470 Multiply by: 010 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: No10 0 0 30 95 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 125 90 0 380 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1U@JME 1 6 Acer rubrum Prunus serotina Pinus strobus FACU Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist)Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): No XDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 1U@JMESOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 10YR 3/4 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 2Surface Water Present? FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 2 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes No WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PFO X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.41660 LaB 11/18/15 1W@JMI BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.66244 Yes NoX NoX HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) NN N NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No 2 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: JMIWetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) ENFIELD HILLTOP X Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JMI 4 7 Acer rubrum Fagus grandifolia Quercus rubra FACU Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: No10 0 100 30 55 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 185 X X 90 0 220 Fagus grandifolia Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 510 Multiply by: 200 5 FACUYes 10 57.1% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 70 FACW No FACW FACUYes Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes Yes Yes 30 =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 100 ) Spiraea alba Onoclea sensibilis 20 FACW FACW Carex sp. 30Wet grasses FACW Indicator Status 30 30 Absolute % Cover Yes Yes FACU FAC Dominant Species? Solidago gigantea 10 Lonicera japonica 2.76 No 15 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)10 VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3)X Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 10YR 2/1 % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 1W@JMISOIL Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, %Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Texture Remarks Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONVEXLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) N (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) ENFIELD HILLTOP Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 2 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N N Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NN N NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42.41668 LaB 11/18/15 1U@JMI BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY -76.66259 Yes NoX No X FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYes Depth (inches):X XXDepth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Solidago canadensis 15 3.79 20 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) Indicator Status 30 30 Absolute % Cover Yes Yes FACU FACU Dominant Species? Aster sp. ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 30 ) =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. X Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes15 FACU Yes FACU FACUYes 16.7% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 90 Fagus grandifolia Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 530 Multiply by: 020 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Yes30 0 0 30 110 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 140 90 0 440 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1U@JMI 1 6 Quercus rubra Fagus grandifolia Acer rubrum FAC Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist)Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): No XDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 1U@JMISOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 10YR 3/4 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:42342-100 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): JMA Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: J. PIPPIN, M. MARTIN Date:11/18/15 State/County: New York/ TOMPKINS Weather: CLOUDY, Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) STRAIGHT PROPERTY Stream Information Stream Name: N/A Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: SOUTH Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 2 FT Water Width: 1 FT Bank to Bank: 3 FT Bankfull Width: 3 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. 1W@JMA Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: FALLOW FIELD/MEADOW Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: RED MAPLE Shrubs: SPECKLED ALDER Herbaceous: SOLIDAGO/CAREX/ALDER Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: JMA IS A Y SHAPED DRAINAGE WITH ASSOCIATED PSS/PFO WETLANDS Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): JMC Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: M. MARTIN, J. PIPPIN Date: 11/18/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: PARTLY CLOUDY, 45F Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) BURNS PROPERTY Stream Information Stream Name: N/A Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: EAST Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 5 FT Water Width: 3 FT Bank to Bank: 10 FT Bankfull Width: 6 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JMC-4 Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: UPLAND FOREST Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees:RED MAPLE, BEECH, RED OAK, ELM Shrubs: BEECH, RED MAPLE Herbaceous: CAREX SP., SOLIDAGO SP. Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: AREA HAS BEEN RECENTLY LOGGED. STREAM CHANNEL HAS BEEN DISTURBED IN PLACES BY EQUIPMENT. Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): JMD Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: M. MARTIN, J. PIPPIN Date: 11/18/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: PARTLY CLOUDY, 45F Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) Stream Information Stream Name: N/A Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: EAST Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 10 FT Water Width: 4 FT Bank to Bank: 15 FT Bankfull Width: 12 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JMD-3 Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: FOREST Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: IRONWOOD, BEECH, RED MAPLE, RED OAK Shrubs: BEECH, RED MAPLE Herbaceous: CAREX SP., SOLIDAGO SP. Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: INTERMITTENT STREAM IN FORESTED AREA THAT HAS BEEN RECENTLY LOGGED. OBSERVED DISTURBANCE DUE TO LOGGING EQUIPMENT IN STREAM Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): JME Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: M. MARTIN, J. PIPPIN Date: 11/18/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: CLOUDY 50F Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) BURNS PROPERTY Stream Information Stream Name: N/A Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: EAST Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 5 FT Water Width: 3 FT Bank to Bank: 6 FT Bankfull Width: 5 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JME-3 Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: FOREST/PFO Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: GREEN ASH, RED MAPLE, AMERICAN ELM, Shrubs: SILKY DOGWOOD Herbaceous: SOLIDAGO SP., CAREX SP., SENSITIVE FERN Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: SMALL PFO WETLAND TO THE WEST FLOWS INTO THIS SMALL INT STREAM THAT FLOWS EAST. Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s):JMF Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: M. MARTIN, J. PIPPIN Date: 11/18/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: CLOUDY, 60F Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) DISTEFANO PROPERTY Stream Information Stream Name: NA Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: EAST Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 15 FT Water Width: 8 FT Bank to Bank: 20 FT Bankfull Width: 15 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JMF-4 Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: FOREST Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: AMERICAN ELM, RED MAPLE, GREEN ASH Shrubs: RED MAPLE AND BEECH SAPLINGS Herbaceous: SOLIDAGO SP., CAREX SP., GRASSES Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: PERENNIAL STREAM WITHIN STEEP RAVINE/STREAM VALLEY. Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): JMG Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: M. MARTIN, J. PIPPIN Date: 11/18/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: Cloudy 50F Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) Stream Information Stream Name: NA Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: NORTH Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 8 FT Water Width: 4 FT Bank to Bank: 15 FT Bankfull Width: 8 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JMG Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: FOREST Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: RED OAK, HICKORY, BEECH Shrubs: OAK, BEECH Herbaceous: SOLIDAGO SP., RUBUS SP. Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: FLOWS FROM DRAIN TILE NORTH TO PERENNIAL STREAM. Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: M. MARTIN, J. PIPPIN Date: 11/18/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: CLOUDY, 50F Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) Stream Information Stream Name: NA Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: NORTH Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 5 FT Water Width: 3 FT Bank to Bank: 5 FT Bankfull Width: 5 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JMH Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: FOREST Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: OAK, RED MAPLE, ELM, BLACK CHERRY Shrubs: SAPLINGS OF OVERSTORY SPECIES Herbaceous: SOLIDAGO SP., ASTER SP., RUBUS SP. Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: SIMILAR TO STREAM G. FLOWS FROM DRAIN TILE NORTH TO PERENNIAL STREAM. Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): JMJ Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: M. MARTIN, J. PIPPIN Date: 11/18/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: 50F, CLOUDY Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) Stream Information Stream Name: N/A Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: EAST Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 1-5 FT Water Width: 2 FT Bank to Bank: UNDEFINED Bankfull Width: UNDEFINED Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JMJ Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: FOREST Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: BLACK CHERRY, RED PINE, ELM, RED MAPLE Shrubs: WILLOW Herbaceous: SOLIDAGO SP., MULTIFLORA ROSE Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: FLOWS THROUGH CULVERT UNDER EXISTING UNPAVED ROAD. Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: J. BECKER, R. LYDELL Date: 12/30/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) Connecticut Hill Rd, (136). Stream Information Stream Name: JR Stream1 Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: NORTHEAST Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 1 FT Water Width: 8 to 12 IN Bank to Bank: 1 FT Bankfull Width: 1 to 1.5 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JRSTREAM1 Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: HARDWOOD UPLAND FOREST Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: ASH, BLACK CHERRY, RED OAK. Shrubs: Herbaceous: Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: JRSTREAM1 FLOWS NORTH AND DISSIPATES INTO SHEET FLOW. Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 Stream Inventory Data Form Project Name: BLACK OAK WIND Project Number:40994 Map Sheet No.: GPS Point No(s): Associated Data Sheet No(s): Observer Name: J. BECKER, R. LYDELL Date: 12/30/15 State/County: NEW YORK/TOMPKINS Weather: Stream Location (address, nearest road, structure etc.) BETWEEN BLACK OAK RD. AND TRUMBLLS CORNERS RD. Stream Information Stream Name: JRSTREAM2 Perceptible Flow: Yes No Direction of Flow: NORTH Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Stream Width: 1 FT Water Width: 8 TO 12 INCH Bank to Bank: 1 FT Bankfull Width: 1 TO 1.5 FT Probed Stream Depth Channel Substrate Observed Water Quality 0-6” 7-12” 13-24” 25-36” >36” Shale Bedrock Cobble/Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Organic Clear Slightly Turbid Turbid Very Turbid Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (Species) Observed Use Sand Bar Sand/Gravel Beach Bar Mud Bar Overhanging Trees/Shrubs Cobble Riffles Deep Ponds/Holes Aquatic Vegetation Other Waterfowl Fish- Minnows Turtles Frogs Invertebrates Salamanders Other: Drinking Irrigation Swimming Fishing Drainage Boating Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) 0-3’ 0-20% (0-11o) 3-6’ 21-50% (12-27o) 6-+ 51-100% (28-45o) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Meander Gradient Shale Sand Bedrock Silt/Clay Cobble Organic Low Low Gentle Moderate Moderate Moderate High High Steep Page 1 of 2 Data Sheet No. JRSTREAM2 Stream Info. Continued Adjacent Community Type: FIELD Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: Shrubs: Herbaceous: NARROW LEAF CATTAIL, SENSITIVE FERN, KNOTTING SEDGE, GOLDEN RODS, TEAR THUMB, SOFT RUSH. Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? Unknown No Yes (identify) ____________________________________ Regulatory Status State Protected Corps Jurisdictional Notes: SHEET FLOW ACROSS R.O.W, FLOWING NORTH CHANNELS INTO A STREAM ACROSS THE FIELD AND INTO THE WOODS. Sketch: See Mapping Page 2 of 2 US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) DEPRESSION Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 0-5 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NoNo X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PEM X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 24 16.9052 EbB 12/30/15 1W@JRA BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 39 54.57397 Yes NoX NoX FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 1 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 2Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 1Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Epilobium 30 1.57 10 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Scirpus cyperinus 30Onoclea sensibilis FACW ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 90 ) =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes Yes 30 OBL Yes FACWYes 75.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Cornus sericea Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 110 Multiply by: 8010 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 30 40 0 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 70 X 0 30 0 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JRA 3 4 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. M 100 Color (moist) Loamy/Clayey Loc2 Loamy/Clayey ROOTS THROUGHOUT, 5% GRAVEL Prominent redox concentrations Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 7.5YR 5/8 1W@JRASOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-12 Histic Epipedon (A2) C Type1 12-16 85 152.5Y 4/4 2.5Y 3/2 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONVEXLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILLSIDE Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 5-10 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? BETWEEN 1W@JRA AND 1WJRB. Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 24 16.82631 EbB 12/30/15 1U@ JRA BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 39 53.11389 Yes NoX NoX FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYes Depth (inches):X XXDepth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Goldenrods 20 3.00 100 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) Indicator Status 5 Absolute % Cover Yes FAC Dominant Species? ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 20 ) =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes FACYes 66.7% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: 5 Cornus racemosa Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 315 Multiply by: 0100 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 0 105 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 105 X 315 0 0 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1U@ JRA 2 3 Acer rubrum Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. M 100 Color (moist)Loc2 Prominent redox concentrations Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): No XDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 10YR 6/8 1U@ JRASOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-12 Histic Epipedon (A2) C Type1 12-16 90 1010YR 5/4 10YR 5/2 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD DEPRESSIONAL Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PEM X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 24 16.75671 LaB 12/30/15 1W@JRB BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 39 51.71629 Yes NoX NoX FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 1 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 2Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Scirpus cyperinus 30 1.25 Yes Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)30 Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? OBL Epilobium 20Onoclea sensibilis FACW ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 100 ) Juncus effusus =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes Yes 20 Yes OBL 75.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 100 Multiply by: 40 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60 20 0 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 80 X X 0 60 0 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JRB 3 4 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: C Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. M PL Color (moist) Loamy/Clayey Loc2 Prominent redox concentrationsLoamy/Clayey Peat ORGANICS, ROOTS THROUGHOUT Prominent redox concentrations Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, 20 % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) ? Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 7.5YR 5/6 1W@JRBSOIL 10-16 10YR 5/2 % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) 80 Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-2 2.5YR 2.5/3 Histic Epipedon (A2) C Type1 2-10 95 510YR 4/2 X Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3)X High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ? Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X X 6Depth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes No WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PEM X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 23 34.07418 VbB 12/30/15 1W@JRC BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 39 24.38542 Yes NoX NoX HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) NoNoX Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No 20-30 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes Section, Township, Range: CONVEXLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILLSIDE Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JRC 2 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 65 0 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 85 X 0 20 0 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 150 Multiply by: 1305 66.7% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: FACW Yes FACWYes Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes No 60 =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 120 ) Onoclea sensibilis 20Typha angustifolia OBL Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Epilobium 40 1.76 5 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ? Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) X Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) Histic Epipedon (A2) C Type1 10-16 90 10 10 2.5Y 5/4 2.5Y 3/2 % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-10 1W@JRCSOIL Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 7.5YR 5/6 Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, %Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Prominent redox concentrations Texture Remarks Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. C7.5YR 5/6 M 90 Color (moist) Loamy/Clayey PL US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYes Depth (inches):X XXDepth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes No WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 23 33.52458 BaD 12/30/15 1U@JRC BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 39 22.63793 Yes NoX No X HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No 20-30 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? BETWEEN 1W@JRC AND 1WJRD Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes Section, Township, Range: CONVEXLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILLSIDE Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1U@JRC 1 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 0 10 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 10 30 0 0 Cornus racemosa Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 30 Multiply by: 010 33.3% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Yes FACYes Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes70 =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. X Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 100 ) Upland Grasses Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Goldenrods 30 3.00 10 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 6-16 1002.5Y 4/4 10YR 3/3 % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-6 1U@JRCSOIL Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): No XDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, %Loc2 Sandy Texture Remarks Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist) Sandy US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD DEPPRESSIONAL Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 5-10 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PEM X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 23 33.45375 BaD 12/30/15 1W@JRD BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 39 21.89843 Yes NoX NoX FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 1 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 2Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Typha angustifolia 20 1.62 No 5 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)5 Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? 5 OBL OBL Onoclea sensibilis 30Epilobium ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 90 ) Polygonum sagittatum Asclepias incarnata =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. No Yes Yes 30 FACW Yes OBL FACYes 75.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Cornus racemosa Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 105 Multiply by: 605 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 30 30 5 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 65 X X 15 30 0 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JRD 3 4 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. PL/M Color (moist) Loamy/Clayey Loc2 ORGANICS, ROOTS THROUGHOUT Faint redox concentrations Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 7.5YR 5/6 1W@JRDSOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-2 Histic Epipedon (A2) C Type1 2-16 70 302.5YR 5/6 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PEM X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 23 32.20826 VvB 12/30/15 1W@JRE BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 38 59.09642 Yes NoX NoX FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 1 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 2Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Onoclea sensibilis 20 1.29 Yes 5 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)20 Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Carex gynandra 10Polygonum sagittatum OBL ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 100 ) Goldenrods =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes No 50 OBL Yes FACW FACWYes 75.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Fraxinus pennsylvanica Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 110 Multiply by: 505 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60 25 0 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 85 X X 0 60 0 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JRE 3 4 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. C2.5Y 6/695 Color (moist) M Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) ? Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 1W@JRESOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 55Y 4/1 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3)X High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ? Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYes Depth (inches):X XXDepth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water Present? FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes No WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 23 32.06449 VbB 12/30/15 1U@JRE BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 38 58.54721 Yes NoX No X HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No 5-10 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? UPLAND POINT BEWEEN 1WJRE AND 1WJRF Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes Section, Township, Range: CONVEXLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD HILLSIDE Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1U@JRE 0 2 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 0 0 60 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 60 0 0 240 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 240 Multiply by: 0 0.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Yes FACU Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Yes30 =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. X Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 90 ) Golden rods Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Dactylis glomerata 60 4.00 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L)Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 2.5Y 4/4 % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 1U@JRESOIL Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): No XDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, %Loc2 Loamy/Clayey ROOTS THROUGH OUT WITH SAND AND GRAVEL Texture Remarks Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 100 Color (moist) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site:Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X X X Wetland Hydrology Present? Section, Township, Range: CONCAVELocal relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) J. BECKER, R. LYDELL LRR R (If no, explain in Remarks.) NEWFIELD Marl Deposits (B15) Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%):Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? 0-5 WGS84 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes NoNoX X Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? No HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X PEM X ONYX RENEWABLES No 42 23 29.41525 VbB 12/30/15 1W@JRF BLACK OAK WIND TOMPKINSCity/County: NY 76 38 56.92971 Yes NoX NoX FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes X 1 X No NoYes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? Yes NoSaturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) 2Surface Water Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) NoYesX Depth (inches): X 0Depth (inches):X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.(A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 1 = 1.x 2 = 2.x 3 = 3.x 4 = 4.x 5 = 5.Column Totals:(B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Typha angustifolia 10 1.19 Yes Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)50 Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? 5 OBL 10 OBL Juncus effusus 20Onoclea sensibilis FACW ) =Total Cover =Total Cover 115 ) Carex gynandra Polygonum sagittatum Goldenrods =Total Cover Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. XYes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. No No Yes Yes 20 OBL No OBL 100.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 0 125 Multiply by: 40 Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85 20 0 0 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 105 X X 0 85 0 – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species 1W@JRF 3 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: )Dominance Test worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. C2.5Y 6/695 Color (moist) M Loc2 Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Texture Remarks Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): NoDepth (inches): YesHydric Soil Present? Marl (F10) (LRR K, L)Other (Explain in Remarks) ? Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Black Histic (A3)Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) MLRA 149B) 1W@JRFSOIL % Matrix Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox FeaturesDepth (inches)Color (moist) 0-16 Histic Epipedon (A2) Type1 55Y 4/1 Type: 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3)X High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) X Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ? Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Appendix B Delineation Photo Log WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 1 of 16 Photo 1. Scrub Shrub Wetland JMA: View looking north from wetland sample point #1. Photo 2. Upland at Wetland JMA: View looking north from upland sample point #1. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 2 of 16 Photo 3. Intermittent Stream JMA: View looking southeast. Photo 4. Forested Wetland JMA: View looking north from wetland sample point #2. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 3 of 16 Photo 5. Upland at Wetland JMA: View looking north from upland sample point #2. Photo 6. Scrub Shrub Wetland JMB: View looking southwest from wetland sample point. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 4 of 16 Photo 7. Upland at Wetland JMB: View looking west from upland sample point. Photo 8. Intermittent Stream JMC: View looking west towards edge of study area. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 5 of 16 Photo 9. Intermittent Stream JMD: View looking east towards edge of study area. Photo 10. Forested Wetland JME: View looking northwest from wetland sample point. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 6 of 16 Photo 11. Upland at Wetland JME: View looking south from upland sample point. Photo 12. Intermittent Stream JME: View looking east towards edge of study area. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 7 of 16 Photo 13. Perennial Stream JMF (east): View looking southeast from flag jmf-14. Photo 14. Intermittent Stream JMG: View looking south from flag jmg-4. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 8 of 16 Photo 15. Intermittent Stream JMH: View looking north from flag jmf-1. Photo 16. Perennial Stream JMF (west): View looking west from flag jmf-20. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 9 of 16 Photo 17. Forested Wetland JMI: View looking southwest from flag jmi-9. Photo 18. Upland at Wetland JMI: View looking west from upland sample point. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 10 of 16 Photo 19. Intermittent Stream JMJ: View looking east from existing access road. Photo 20. Emergent Wetland JRA: View looking southwest from wetland sample point. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 11 of 16 Photo 21. Upland at Wetland JRA: View looking west from upland sample point. Photo 22. Emergent Wetland JRB: View looking north from wetland sample point. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 12 of 16 Photo 23. Upland at Wetland JRB: View looking east from wetland sample point. Photo 24. Ephemeral Stream JRstream1: View looking northeast from flag jr1-4. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 13 of 16 Photo 25. Emergent Wetland JRC: View looking west from wetland sample point. Photo 26. Upland at Wetland JRC: View looking southwest from wetland sample point. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 14 of 16 Photo 27. Emergent Wetland JRD: View looking northwest from wetland sample point. Photo 28. Upland at Wetland JRD: View looking east from upland sample point. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 15 of 16 Photo 29. Emergent Wetland JRE: View looking north from flag jre-7. Photo 30. Emergent Wetland JRF: View looking northwest from flag jrf-8. WETLAND & STREAM DELINEATION UPDATE PHOTO LOG BLACK OAK WIND PROJECT TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FILE NO. 40994-100 Haley & Aldrich of New York Page 16 of 16 Photo 31. Upland at Wetland JRF: View looking east from jrf-8. Photo 32. Ephemeral Stream JRstream2: View looking south from flag jrf-2.