No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-02-15t .It U v! DRYDEN TOWN PLANNING BOARD FEBRUARY 159 1996 AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING FOR PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION AT 120 SWEETLAND ROAD - DEL VECCHIO SKETCH CONFERENCE - 4 LOT SUBDIVISION - GLORIA AND LEE KNUPPENBURG - 1920 HANSHAW ROAD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell, Joseph Lalley, Erica Evans and Robert Fletcher. AMONG THOSE PRESENT: Henry Slater, John Del Vecchio and Lee Knuppenburg. The Meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell. PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT APPROVAL THREE LOT SUBDIVISION - 120 SWEETLAND ROAD Tax Map 25 -1 -24.2 A PUBLIC HEARING for the above was held on February 109 1996 at 8:00 PM- Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell noted that the lot lines have been adjusted in accordance with the Boards recommendation of January 18, 19960 SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM JOSEPH LALLEY - REVIEW OFFICER Amendments to the document were: INVOLVE R (FEDERAL, STATE ULTIMATELY ULT LOCAL) ? ` YES TOMPKINS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND US ARMY CORP. OF ENGINEERS AND NYS DEC REVIEW OF PART 11: ALL ANSWERS WERE PART 111: THE PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. NO RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT Signed by Barbara Caldwell - Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Joseph M. Lalley - Preparer 2/15/96 rt U 1f QA JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED FOR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE SHORT FORM EAF. SECOND BY ERICA EVANS* DISCUSSION: VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) a• a•• a a••••• a a a a a a• a• a a a w a a■■ a•■••• a•• a a a a a JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND BY ROBERT FLETCHER. DISCUSSIONa VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) ■ . • . a ■ . . . . . . . . . a . a a . . . . . . . • . . • a . . . . ■ JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED THE BOARD GRANT PRELIMINARY AND FINAL APPROVAL TO THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONSTRAINT: THAT THE FINAL PLAT CLEARLY STATE A SITE PLAN REVIEW IS REQUIRED BY THE APPROPRIATE TOWN OF DRYDEN AGENCY FOR LOT N0. 3 PRIOR TO ALL CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT. SECOND BY ERICA EVANS. DISCUSSIONa VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) 1J PB 2 -15 -96 PG. 4 The minutes of January 18, 1996 were unanimously approved as corrected by a motion from J. Lalley and a Second from E. Evans. . . . . . . . SKETCH CONFERENCE - KNUPPENBURG SUBDIVISION FACTS, FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 1. LABEL LOTS AS 1,293 AND 49 SHOWING ONLY THE 4 LOT RECTANGLE ON THE SURVEY. 2. THERE ARE NO WET LAND ISSUES CONCERNING THIS SUBDIVISION. 3. DETERMINED HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISSUES SHOULD BE SATISFIED AS DESIGNED. JWR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MEETING ADJOURNED 9:00 PM 1 J 44 1 • +. 14 -16 -4 (2187)—Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617,21 SEOR Appendix C State Environmental Ouality Review . SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I— PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) • 1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR 2. PR JECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: County Municipality 190— 7 //f'/i 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) nE > -f> 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: Iff New ❑ Expansion ❑ Modllleatlonlatteratlon – 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: i'X Z C /1 �• s 7. — AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: / Initially acres Ultimately acres A. WrrrILyyyL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? WylYes ❑ No II No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? 11�Residential U Industrial ❑ Commercial Agriculture El Park /ForestlOpen space 0 Other Fcrlbe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, on FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? t Yes 17" It yes, list agency(s) and perm it /}a royals p( 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT ;'rl HAVE A RRENTL VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? El Yes N1 N- If yca.,'ist ar. ency name and permlttapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑ Yes iiNo I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE • /� Date: ` Applicant/sponsor name: Signature: u I If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you area state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II— ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. El Yes 60 / No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW.AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another Involved agency. F] Yes LNo C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: Y vo C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: NO C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: P Y C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly N ) C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. O� J C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not Identified In Cl -057 Explain briefly. a v C7. Other impacts (Including changes In use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? 17 Yes D(No If Yes, explain briefly PART III— DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it Is substantial, large, Important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with Its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse Impacts have been Identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL (Check this box If you have determined, documentation, that the proposed action AND provide on attachments as necessar or more potentially large or significant adverse Impacts which MAY EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. based on the information and analysis above and any supporting WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental Impams y, the reasons supporting this determination: ., • t ► [III El e 'y DRYDEN TOWN PLANNING BOARD FEBRUARY 15, 1996 AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING FOR PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION AT 120 SWEETLAND ROAD - DEL VECCHIO SKETCH CONFERENCE - 4 LOT SUBDIVISION - GLORIA AND LEE KNUPPENBURG - 1920 HANSHAW ROAD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell, Joseph Lalley, Erica Evans and Robert Fletcher. AMONG THOSE PRESENT: Henry Slater, John Del Vecchio and Lee Knuppenburg. The Meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell. PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT APPROVAL THREE LOT SUBDIVISION - 120 SWEETLAND ROAD Tax Map 25 -1 -24.2 A PUBLIC HEARING for the above was-held on February 10, 1996 at 80800 PM. Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell noted that the lot lines have been adjusted in accordance with the Boards recommendation of January 18, 1996. SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM JOSEPH LALLEY - REVIEW OFFICER Amendments to the document were: #10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? YES TOMPKINS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND US ARMY CORP. OF ENGINEERS AND NYS DEC REVIEW OF PART Ilan ALL ANSWERS WERE NO PART Ills" THE PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. Signed by Barbara Caldwell - Responsible Officer in Lead Agency -% Joseph M. Lalley - Preparer 2/15/96 El ., (2) JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED FOR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE SHORT FORM EAF. SECOND BY ERICA EVANS. DISCUSSION: VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND BY ROBERT FLETCHER. DISCUSSION: VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED THE BOARD GRANT PRELIMINARY AND FINAL APPROVAL TO THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONSTRAINT: THAT THE FINAL PLAT CLEARLY STATE A SITE PLAN REVIEW IS REQUIRED BY THE APPROPRIATE TOWN OF DRYDEN AGENCY FOR LOT N0. 3 PRIOR TO ALL CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT. BY ERICA EVANS, DISCUSSION: VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) ................... ............................... • is • 14 -16 -4 (2187) —Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I— PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEAR 1. APPLICANT ISPON/SOR ' (I I I L 2. PR /p/ JECT NAME (1\ `1 1\ C`I . ' V i 1 r��V V' / V `J / _ +l /'• 1 vi. C�`�Ly 1 �J� ✓"A4 J ✓ / r 3. PROJECT LOCATION: n Poe County Municipality )ryf^ L' 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, e1c., or provide map/) ry _ 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: New ❑ Expansion ❑ Modification /alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: le IR7� to -e, s _ 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: / Initially '' U acres Ultimately acres R. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? t�'(((��' Yes ❑ No 11 No, describe brlefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? VResidentlal ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial Agriculture ❑ Park/Forest/Open space ❑ Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE On LOCAL►? � l Yes , It yes, list agency(s) and permitla royals pt a{ v () (Tam -pl l' .. C � 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT; 'ri HAVE A RRENTL VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?I ; If ye^, list ac ?nay name and permitlapproval IJ Yes PO N; 12. AS A RESULT OF,,PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑ Yes 1 No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE / � ' ! / �j 4 � � l 'C' Dale: Applicant1sponenr name: _. _ _._� 11 -� - — — Signature: l; If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you area state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 l N PART 11— ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? 11 yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. ❑ Yes N No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? It No, a negative declarallon may be superseded by another Involved agency. —_— F1 Yes NNo C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solld waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: Y vo C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: 4 v 0 C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: / " c, C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain bile N 'j C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. 4 C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not Identified In C1 -05? Explain briefly. ^'f V v C7. Other Impacts (Including changes In use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ❑Yes XNo If Yes, explain briefly PART III — DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect Identified above, determine whether it Is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed In connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (1) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure drat explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse Impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box occur. Then pro (Check this box documentation, AND provide on If you have identified one m.eed directly to the FULL if you have determined, that the proposed action attachments as necessar G orta (31 - -Print or Type - - -Aff! M or more potentially large or significant adverse Impacts which MAY EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. based on the information and analysis above and any supporting WILL NOT result In any significant adverse environmental Imps tt; y, the reasons supporting this determination: envy Name Y t er L r7 • w PB 2 -15 -96 PG. 4 The minutes of January 18, 1996 were unanimously approved as corrected by a motion from J. Lalley and a Second from E. Evans. . . . . . . ■ SKETCH CONFERENCE — KNUPPENBURG SUBDIVISION 1920 HANSHAW ROAD FACTS, FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 1. LABEL LOTS AS 19293 AND 4, SHOWING ONLY THE 4 LOT RECTANGLE ON THE SURVEY. 2. THERE ARE NO WET LAND ISSUES CONCERNING THIS SUBDIVISION. 3. DETERMINED HEALTH DEPARTMENT ISSUES SHOULD BE SATISFIED AS DESIGNED. JWR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MEETING ADJOURNED 9:00 PM • • • DRYDEN TOWN PLANNING BOARD � FEBRUARY 15, 1996 Z r� AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING FOR PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION AT 120 SWEETLAND ENGINEERS ROAD - DEL NYS VECCHIO DEC SKETCH CONFERENCE - 4 LOT SUBDIVISION - GLORIA AND LEE "KNUPPENBURG - 1920 HANSHAW ROAD MEMBERS PRESENT: AMONG THOSE PRESENT: Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell, Joseph Lalley, Erica Evans and Robert Fletcher. 1 Henry Slater, John Del Vecchio and Lee Knuppenburg. The Meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell. PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT APPROVAL THREE LOT SUBDIVISION - 120 SWEETLAND ROAD Tax Map 25 -1 -24.2 A PUBLIC HEARING for the above was held on February 10, 1996 at 8:00 PM. Chairwoman Barbara Caldwell noted that the lot lines have been adjusted in accordance with the Boards recommendation of January 18, 1996. SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM JOSEPH LALLEY - REVIEW OFFICER Amendments to the document were: #10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? YES TOMPKINS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND US ARMY CORP. OF ENGINEERS AND NYS DEC REVIEW OF PART Ilan ALL ANSWERS WERE NO PART 111: THE PROPOSED ACTION WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. Signed by Barbara Caldwell - Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Joseph M. Lalley - Preparer 2/15/96 • (2) JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED FOR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE SHORT FORM EAF. SECOND BY ERICA EVANS. DISCUSSION: VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) S a a a a a a a a a a a a a. a a a a a a a 0 a a a a a a a a. a a a a a a a a a a JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND BY ROBERT FLETCHER. DISCUSSION: • VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) a . . a . . . . a . . . . a a a . ■ . . . . . a . a . . a a a . a . . . . . . a a . . . . JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED THE BOARD GRANT APPROVAL TO THE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT THAT THE FINAL PLAT CLEARLY STATE A BY THE APPROPRIATE TOWN OF DRYDEN A ALL CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT, SECOND BY ERICA EVANS. DISCUSSION: ' PRELIMINARY AND FINAL TO THE FOLLOWING CONSTRAINT: SITE PLAN REVIEW IS REQUIRED GENCY FOR LOT NO. 3 PRIOR TO VOTE YES (4) Be CALDWELL, J. LALLEY, E. EVANS AND R. FLETCHER. NO (0) ABSTAINED (0) ................... ...............................