No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-08-19• u • DRYDEN TOWN PLANNING BOARD AUGUST 19, 1993 AGENDA: ROBERT & EDITH SPAULDING: PUBLIC HEARING deeding of .16 acres of a nonconforming lot - Ringwood Court West. STEPHEN WHICHER: SKETCH CONFERENCE to modify boundary Moore Woods Subdivision at Hunt Hill Road. LUCENTE: MA ZONING DISTRICT - Review MEMBERS PRESENTS Chair Barbara Caldwell, Claudia Brenner, John Davis, Robert Fletcher and Joseph Lalley. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a. a... a The meeting and noted the fi Edith Spaulding lot at the end o an existing appr unbuiltable, it therefore has to was called to order rst item was a publ to propose deeding f Ringwood Court We oved subdivision, e becomes a modificat come back before t i 5 v i h by Chair Barba c hearing for 16 acres of a t. Since this en though the on of the subd e Board. ra Caldwell Robert and nonconforming is a part of lot is ivision and PUBLIC HEARING - ROBERT & EDITH SPAULDING Robert and Edith Spaulding were present for the hearing. The Chair requested that Henry Slater brief everyone on the road situation. Mr. Slater stated that the Town looked at proposal and saw an opportunity to correct an Town's way of thinking. It is a cul -de -sac an hoping you would deed, sell, or otherwise turn amount of that land to make a "T" turn around. request on their part as the trucks have a pro would require 180 feet of length by 60 feet of the Spaulding error in the d the the Town was over a sufficient This is only a blem there, it width. Mr. Spaulding stated that he assumed the individual that they were going to deed this to is where the additional "T" would be and 60 feet is almost the entire width of the lot. John Davis wanted to know if it would be beneficial to make it an "L ". Mr. Spaulding said It is an "L ", the trucks pull ahead then back in along the side of our yard, and hasn't seen them have any problems. C i At John Davis request t lot? Mr. Spaulding stated miscalculation when subdivi and let it go for tax sale. who later found out he coul at preserving a small piece the yard which we had used to loose that so we paid $5 land. Now we are paying to Mr. Spaulding stated he was to the neighbors. PB 8 -19 -93 PG. 2 o know why this was an unbuiltable that they thought it was a ding and then failed to pay the taxes It was purchased by an individual dn't build on it. They were looking of land that's down at the level of as a picnic area and we didn't want 00.00 for a very small piece of give a part of it to someone else. honoring a commitment his wife made Mr. Spaulding stated that the Morse property behind his drops off very steep on the ravine side. The road conditions /development in the subdivision was discussed. The Chair stated that the subdivision went into preliminary before the Town had subdivision regulations. The roads at that point were shared, they did not meet Town specks, and are nothing more then private driveways. When it came to the point of meeting Town specks, it is her understanding, they formed a special improvement district to pay for the cost of the road. The road was brought up to basic specks but due to the location of septic, etc.. the road was built without shoulders and therefore is accentually still an immediate neighborhood access. •Joseph Lalle moved to close the p y public hearing. Second by Roert Fletcher VOTE YES (5) B. Caldwell, J. Davis, R. Fletcher, C. Brenner and J. Lalley. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED SHORT FORM EAF - REVIEW OFFICE JOSEPH LALLEY Adjacent to #14 West - tax map #65 -3 -4.3 modify lot line parcel of lot between 12 & 13. Amount of land affected .16. • a a PB 8 -19 -93 PG. 3 JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED FOR A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE SHORT FORM EAF. SECOND TO THE MOTION BY CLAUDIA BRENNER VOTE YES (5) R. Caldwell, J. Davis, R. Fletcher, C. Brenner and J. Lalley. JOSEPH LALLEY MOVED TO APPROVE THE CHANGE AS PROPOSED. SECOND BY ROBERT FLETCHER VOTE YES (5) B. Caldwell, J. Davis, R. Fletcher, C. Brenner and J. Lalley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Barbara Caldwell draft environmental O was concerned with t requirement /obligati Chair this morning t Attorney Mahlon Perk reviewing it and his Attorney Perkins con extension, stated that the board had received the impact statement for Peregrine Hollow and he timing. Mr. Varn has satisfied the Town on. Engineer George Schlecht notified the hat he will not be reviewing this. Town ins stated that Mr. Herrick will be report is due September 10, 1993 and that tacted the developers concerning this A meeting date was scheduled for September 9, 1993 at 8:00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SKETCH CONFERENCE - STEPHEN WHICHER MODIFY BOUNDARY MORE WOODS SUBDIVISION AT HUNT HILL ROAD Stephen Whicher stated that the reason they were considering the boundary change is due to the fact they would like to build near the pond and the drive way from the original site would be 950 feet long. They have spoke with the Moors and they are willing to make this swap to give a more direct access of about O500 feet. It requires sliding lots 2 & 3 down, modifying the size of lot 2 from 2.49 acres to 2.20 and lot 3 increases from 2.09 to 2.20 acres. a • • PB 8 -19 -93 PG. 4 The lots as building proposed site they is are behind #2, hoping someone and by grouping will these two buy both lots and keep the development down as much as possible. Mr. Whicher stated that the run off problem is on the other side of the road and this side is flat and has good quality soil. Everything meets County and Town specks. There is a creek feeding the pond and comes in at the direct top of the pond and exits the southwest corner of the pond continuing down and through lot 5 Discussion ensued to house /homes would conform Town and County for the 1 required before the final scheduling a preliminary/ the adjustment of lot lin make wit ots hea fina es t h b r 1 0 sure septic, well, placement of the regulations specified by the eing modified. A survey would be ing date. Mr. Whicher requested public hearing for next month for the three parcels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . STEVE LUCENTE UPDATING Mr. Lucente stated he had a public meeting (sketch hearing) with the Town of Ithaca Planning Board Tuesday night. Mr. Lucente has discussed a it is not finalized, however ant happens with the Planning Board. Lucentes present property as out transferred from Mrs. Levin to " discussions with Cornell concern t i 1 M i ransfer of land with M cipates it will depend The request is to rez ined, including the pi A ". He has had positi ng obtaining a right -o rs. Levin ing what one Roco ece ve f -way. Mr. Fabbroni stated that the Lucente's were exploring placing an extended care facility on the front lands that they had originally requested become a part of the "MA" zone. The neighbors were more comfortable with something more residential" w#.ka a ter day. There would be access in from this area (Hanshaw) to the light industrial area and would be more compatible with the higher density. They have in mind two or three buildings at the end and not a loading up of the area. The access to the property would be from 139 approx. 55 feet. Mr. Lucente stated he met with a representative for the Agriculture School, also the Bird Sanctuary has shown interest, and was in the process of writing an agreement with Cornell where he would build the entire road. He would build the curb cut on the South side of Route 13 and they would like to have a curb cut on the North side of 13 which they would pay for. As soon as the agreement is in writing with Cornell they will request the Town approach DOT. They hope to have this done by September. 1 . r FHB 8 -19 -93 FAG. 5 B. Caldwell stated the Route 13 access was critical and Mr. Lucente said he plans to build the road as soon as they have DOT approval. The development of the project would /may still begin from Hanshaw Road due to sewer and water. B. Caldwell suggested that they apply for a special permit concerning the senior housing project and if that is not possible a rezoning of the area. Noted that the Planning Board had submitted a zoning change to the Town Board and they are still holding to that recommendation until or unless they hear otherwise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r: ci . 6 10� • The board considered the zone for senior housing being RBI with special permit. That way if the senior housing were not built /remained would conform with the wishes of the present residence in the area. Different zones and their definitions were reviewed. B. Caldwell suggested that they apply for a special permit concerning the senior housing project and if that is not possible a rezoning of the area. Noted that the Planning Board had submitted a zoning change to the Town Board and they are still holding to that recommendation until or unless they hear otherwise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r: ci . 6 10� • 14.18.4 (2187) —Text 12 PRO.)ECT I.D. NUMBER 017,21 Appendix C State Environmental Ouality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I— PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. A PLICANT /SPONSOnR� PROD T NAME 6ri r U l oA 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality � County nr. . 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections, Prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑ New ❑ Expansion rgModlficatlonlalteratlon 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: foo 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially _ acres Ultimately (O acres S. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [Ayes ❑ No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? N Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial Describe: ❑ Agriculture o ❑ Park/Forest/Open space ❑ Other SEQR 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FFIOM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ?c� 11 Yes L�l No It yes, list agency(s) and permit /approvals I UUts ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT; �fI HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Byes ❑ NO II yes, list acency name and permitlapproval I �"101-zj�vyzk s'k,u. ft y p 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL I:EUUIRE MODIFICATION? El Wo I CERTIFY THAT THA1T THE INFORMATIO14 PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant /sponsor name: Date: Signature: • '. If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 i I