HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-02-21Town of Dryden
Planning Board
February 21,
The Planning Board met on February 21, 1985 at 8;05 P.M. with
members R. l,a.mpila, J. Hunt, B. Lavine, H. Slater, Chr. B. Caldwell,
r3. Chase, R. Beck, and representative from the Town Board, M. Webb.
• The minutes of the January 1.7th meeting were read. Question as
to wording - "site" or "plan" review process - decided to leave a.s
written, "plan" review process - B. Lavine made motion to approve
minutes, seconded by R. La.mpila - carried.
The minutes of the January 22nd mapping session were read. J. Hunt
suggested the dimensions of the industrial zone be checked on the tax
before approving the minutes.
Proposal #2 further clarification - M A zone near the airport
boundries will include tax map numbers as follows;
Southern boundry as far West and including lot r# 43 -1 -21.2 along
the West bord f l
er of d 43 -1 -21.2 and�East along the North border
up to and including lot /# 42- 1-9.2 and lot /# 42 -1 -11 and the Southern
portion of lot f# 42 -1 -30 extending the Southern border border line of
lot E# 42 -29 -2.66 across to meet abandoned Stevens Rd., down Stevens
Rd. to Lower Creek Rd. (discussion - town map says Schwan Dr. does
not mention Abandoned Stevens Rd. - decided to go by tax map)
Motion made by J. Hunt, seconded. by B. Lavine to approve minutes
with the above clarification - carried,
Discussion - Site Review Process - M A zone- Trying to clarify
what is meant by site review and when to use and when not necessary.
•The only area the Town Board does not quite o along with is the
site plan review board as it is set up now. Their general idea. of
M A zone is to get it so there would be no public hearing necessary
If at all possible. (for Town or Planning Boards) Set it up ahead
of time so it is commercial to start with and work could go ahead
with building engineer for drainage questions etc, and zoning officer
or site review committee made up of whoever needed- rather than having
a public hearing - Town Board would like to have set standards for
M A with no complications- or delays so a commercial builder could begin
right away.
J. Hunt - Need to set up buffer zones in criteria for protection
with those individuals who abut the zone.
M. Webb - No qualms there - Just wondering if can be spelled but
so no public hearing necessary.
J. Hunt - Once you have first public hearing to designate an ICI A
zone,.then set up site review criteria.
Discussion - Proposal of rezoning of M A has been presented to the
Town Board for a hearing on March 5th,
J. Hunt - This should
site review requirements
This is essential part of
R. Lampila - The way t
spelled out that anything
review
a
take care of the seeker - but should have
nailed down to discuss at public hearing.
the process,
his proposal is written - very specifically
that happens in an M A goes before site ;plan
0
-2-
.;: ,7.
Town Board has lots of concern about being able to do things
expedientially. The members of the development committee also
feel this is of the utmost importance.
If
there is
going
to be a plan
review process,
it is important
that
•
it be available
what
on a day to
day basis because
things change so
rapidly.
the same way every
time for
every one.
set up, Seeker
requires public
hearing on an
original change on
zoning
code
- then if set up as
administrative
R.
Lampila
- I'm
not objectin)g
to a plan being
reviewed if there
Is a
problem -
what
is important
is the immediate
availability of
such
a review
process
on a day to
day basis to review
changes.
B.
Caldwell -
We need
a
list
of requirements so
everyone
knows
what
is what and
that it
is
done
the same way every
time for
every one.
Site plan review board is same as title from state - deligated
to planning board- May have to use site "committee" instead of "board"
B. Lavine:_-- No site plan review board on M A zone proposals then?
What about other zones?
R. Lampila - Haven't looked at other zones yet.
Very different situation
M. Webb -
with
other zones
- M A
zone very small
percentage of town
- Other
zones
get into residential
into
areas.
J. Hunt - I think we need to retain site plan review for any good
size development.
B. Caldwell - still be Seeker process on any individual building
permit or use permit.
R. Beck - Buffer each residential area anyway - Then come up with
recomendation that is of a nature to get the job done without having
to have a public hearing and that will still protect the residents -
if you have a natural boundry you may not need much, but if there is
nothing there we need to set up minimum standards for buffers no
matter what moves in M A.
Made one copy of Proposal for Public Hearing for B. Caldwell. She
will make more copies and give them to those who need them before the
Feb. 28th meeting.
J. Hunt suggested we set a. schedule for getting rest of zones so
• we can present town board with revised zoning code.
* Feb. 28th 7:30 P.M. Planning & Town Board. Mtg.(reword Proposal)
Working session March 14 at 7:30 to revise zones and codes.
Motion made by Hunt to adjourn meeting, seconded by Lavine.
Meeting adjourned 9:30 P.M. 0 '
Secretary
N
M. Webb -
I agree - Principal
and procedure.
•
J. Hunt -
Need to get list on
paper - Want to
turn site plan review
into
administrative
process rather
than review
board, Once you have
It
set up, Seeker
requires public
hearing on an
original change on
zoning
code
- then if set up as
administrative
process the seeker
is
not as involved.
Administrative
officer must
justify decisions
on
basis of
criteria given them
by planning board.
Zoning officer
still
needs
environmental impact
statement, short
form from beginning
of
this, to
make his decision if
Type 1 or Type
2.
B. Caldwell - still be Seeker process on any individual building
permit or use permit.
R. Beck - Buffer each residential area anyway - Then come up with
recomendation that is of a nature to get the job done without having
to have a public hearing and that will still protect the residents -
if you have a natural boundry you may not need much, but if there is
nothing there we need to set up minimum standards for buffers no
matter what moves in M A.
Made one copy of Proposal for Public Hearing for B. Caldwell. She
will make more copies and give them to those who need them before the
Feb. 28th meeting.
J. Hunt suggested we set a. schedule for getting rest of zones so
• we can present town board with revised zoning code.
* Feb. 28th 7:30 P.M. Planning & Town Board. Mtg.(reword Proposal)
Working session March 14 at 7:30 to revise zones and codes.
Motion made by Hunt to adjourn meeting, seconded by Lavine.
Meeting adjourned 9:30 P.M. 0 '
Secretary
N