HomeMy WebLinkAboutAWHC 2024-05-01Dryden Affordable and Workforce Housing Committee
Approved Minutes for May 1, 2024 Meeting Via Zoom
Making Dryden hospitable & affordable
for working families
Attendance: Martha Robertson; Ray Burger; Craig Anderson; Christina Dravis; Chuck Geisler; and
Miles McCarty; Mike Murphy could not attend.
Agenda Items:
1. Approval of April minutes
2. Impromptu: DRYC reply to Leonardo’s request
3. Committee recommendations for the consultant’s study of Zoning regulations.
4. Update re CCE funding
5. NYS funding opportunities
1. Approval of April minutes
Martha offered several corrections; minutes unanimously approved and sent to Cassie.
2. Impromptu item: DRYC reply to Leonardo as represent Housing representative
No response received to Leonardo’s request and our committees revised version of Town
Lands RFP. Leonardo will reach out again to Leslie Debo. Neither Leonardo nor Ray could
attend. At last week’s Planning Board meeting, Dan Lamb mentioned how pleased he was
that we might be able to fit both housing and rec uses on the land. Leonardo will ask Leslie
for an update and see whether DRYC revised the RFP in accordance with our suggestions.
Again, our committee should be involved as peers in the full RFP process. Ray has not
talked further to Marty Conger. DRYC meets on fourth Wednesday of the month.
3. Committee recommendations for the consultant’s study of zoning regulations.
Town has hired Nan Stolzenburg to perform a two-stage review. In stage one she is meeting
with town committees for input along with her own inspection of our law; once done, there
will be open hearings on possible zoning changes.
We reviewed suggestions Dillon compiled in January. Chuck sent these and his own
thoughts on how to insure our zoning doesn’t undermine affordable housing. Craig had
already participated in the Planning Board’s session with Nan and points out that there is
current mention of affordability in the context of diversifying our population. Greater
emphasis needed on multi-family housing (versus single-family, the traditional zoning
preference). Multi-family housing requires more water and sewer infrastructure but also
more frequent water testing.
Our current zoning law has been effect for 12 years and is likely to be revised again in
another 10 years. Zoning cannot specify ownership vs. rental tenure, but incentive zoning, if
used, invites more affordable units from builder/developers. Martha and Chuck will be on
call to meet with Nan and represent Housing. We should review p. 34 of the comp plan
(“Goals and Objectives”).
Nan has problems with using “nodal” despite its repeated appearance in DRYDEN2045.
Regardless of terminology, cluster development in the town will depend on available S&W,
a prerequisite to density. The NYSEG area is a foremost example. Need to incorporate
results of County’s S&W 2010 study which showed that S&W were sufficient to meet
housing needs. Other key factors in location and type of housing are neighborhood
preferences/push-back and school district boundaries.
Varna: by the end of 2024 most of the sewer and water upgrades will be completed. The
new system can handle around 500 additional beds. The border will be Freeze Road for this
upgrade but there’s unused capacity all the way out to NYSEG along Dryden Road.
Given this capacity (and the T.C. report), we should be proactive with developers so they
know there is already sewer and water capacity for expansion.
Section 183; earlier this year we said we wanted the zoning review to include this current
mobile home law. We invited Trumansburg officials to discuss their strategy – – no special
mobile home zoning because of superseding state law as of 2015. Unclear what’s best in
Dryden, but simplification seems desirable. Section 183 is rarely if ever used and largely
ignored.
4. Update on CCE Weatherization Pilot
Chuck and Ray have spoken with Karim Beers (Southern Tier HUB located at CCE) and Ben
Carver (Director of Mobile Homes, INHS) and encouraged them to speak directly about INHS
administering the MH weatherization pilot and being remunerated for this service:
Background:
• Early this year, Karim expressed much interest in a Dryden MH weatherization pilot project
for ~50 MHs with a soft commitment oof $50,000 (NYSERDA funds).
• NYSERDA's EmPower+ program is currently available to MH owners in Dryden and CCE
provides applicant review and help, and overall program administration. It will tailer-make
an Empower+ flier aimed at Dryden MH residents for our pilot.
• Though CCE is the local liaison to NYSERDA programs, it needs help reaching out to MH
owners and renters in Dryden (weatherization assistance awareness and promotion,
contractor trouble-shooting, follow-through, and record-keeping).
a. INHS/Ben has offered to assist in compiling MH mailings in Dryden likely to include lists
from Tompkins County Assessment.
• Dryden can undertake pilot promotion through newsletter, website, and perhaps piggyback
on outreach activities by Dryden Fiber.
• In April Karim confirmed that the $50,000 in question can be used for personnel (part or full-
time project manager), keeping in mind that payment is on a “Milestone” basis spread over
the pilot’s 2-year lifespan.
Foreground:
Following consultation with Ray, Chuck asked Ben to consider adding staff at INHS to
provide the pilot’s program management or to top off the CDBG position provided by the
$500,000 funding arrangement that now exists between INHS and our town. (The CDBG
funds will go to rehabilitating seven housing units in Dryden, of which $65,000 is set aside
for additional HIS staffing.) Ben needs to confer with Delia Yarrow INHS, the point person on
the CDBG contract with us. Chuck and Ray are waiting to hear back from Ben.
5. NYS Housing Funding Opportunities:
a. Pro-Housing Community status. Dillon S. began this NYS documentation before leaving the
planning department. Lots of work, but the data he compiled, which Ray distributed
following today’s meeting, are a valuable retrospective of housing growth in recent years.
NYS requires one percent and we achieved that. NYS also asks for ~ 40 health indicators;
Dillon completed 10. As with the village of Dryden, the committee agreed that the town
board should pass a Pro-Housing resolution instead of completing Dillon’s work. Ray will
reword the model resolution and take it to the town board for a vote.
b. State budget has $150 million to create the New York Housing for the Future Program, a
new program to provide affordable homeownership and rental opportunities, and allows the
program to utilize state- or municipal-owned sites to develop housing (Appendix A shows
portion of April 29 newsletter from Anna Kelles on this matter). May be of assistance in
putting affordable housing on our town land? Get more information.
6. Additional items:
TC3 Dorm Conversion: Next meeting of conversion task force is May 17. TC3 president Kremeneck
told Martha that she’s discussing next steps with the TC3 Foundation.
New INHS Director connection: Martha met with Kate de la Garza and shared potential
development sites ideas. De la Garza showed much interest in the NYSEG building, the Leonardo
and Atkins parcels, and the town land opportunities.
Freeville Sewer capacity: Miles notes that Freeville may be looking to add additional sewer
capacity; he will know more next month.
NYSHCR: Martha will check with Lenny Skrill to see if he’s coming to Ithaca for the Asteri ribbon-
cutting. If so, she will see if he has time to visit possible sites in Dryden.
Next meeting June 5, 1:30.
Minutes by Martha Robertson, transcribed by Chuck Geisler.
Appendix A:
While many housing budget actions were focused on New York City, Upstate and statewide
highlights include:
• $150 million to create the New York Housing for the Future Program, a new statewide
program to provide affordable homeownership and rental opportunities for low and middle
income families, and allows the program to utilize state- or municipal-owned sites to
develop housing
• A municipal opt-in program for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) that will provide up to 5
years of real property tax exemptions for one to two ADUs on an existing residential
property
• Reinstated $40 million for the Homeowner Protection Program (HOPP) that was removed
in the initial executive proposal, continuing the same level of funding from last year, a
restoration from the executive proposed budget