HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-04-28 TOWN OF DRYDEN
PLANNING BOARD MEETING
April 28, 2022
Hybrid /Zoom
Approved 5-26-22
Present: John Kiefer (Chair),Tony Salerno,Joe Wilson, Diane Tessaglia-Hymes, Simon St
Laurent (alternate), Craig Anderson
Zoom — Dan Bussmann, Alice Green (alternate)
Absent: Linda Wagenet
Staff: Ray Burger, Planning Director, (Zoom -Joy Foster, Recording Secretary)
Liaisons: D. Lamb (TB)
Others: Paul Simonet, Gary Sloan, Steven Hugo, Sam Gordon
Chair J. Kiefer called the meeting to order at 6:02 pm
J. Kiefer activated the Alternate S. St. Laurent in place of L. Wagenet to be able to vote tonight.
Approve the minutes: of 3-24-22 Planning Board Meeting Motion J. Wilson, 2nd S. St. Laurent all
in favor, yes.
of 4-13-22 Steering Committee Meeting Motion J. Wilson, 2nd T. Salerno
all in favor, D.Tessaglia-Hymes abstains, she was not present.
Sam Gordon from EDR gives update on the Comp. Plan
I am attaching the latest version of the Public Review Draft for your review. I am waiting on Dan
Lamb for updates to the Broadband section. We also need to update the Census data. I will
have that completed before the meeting on the 28t". I will also send out the updated
Appendices with table of contents with these other items.
As you know we had received multiple comments regarding the accuracy of the maps in the
document. While I was reviewing the Future Land Use Map (#15), 1 realized that there was a
significant and glaring error in the Wetlands and Floodplains Map (#3). The map scale for Map 3
was incorrect. We have fixed Map 3, and that has influenced changes to Map 15. Map 15 has
been updated to reflect the significant ecological corridors within the town that relate to
streams and significant wetland areas. This further led to some tweaks to the Conservation
Character Area.
1
Below is a list of the changes that have been incorporated into this draft (changes within the
draft are marked by a pink box):
Page i. updated the formatting of the dedication
Page v. page numbering updated
Page vii. page numbering updated
Page 13. Updated project milestones
Page 24. Added sentence about Appendix A
Page 32. Corrected budget figures per correspondence with Dan Lamb
Page 33. Added note re: town revenue sources and sales tax offset per discussion with Dan
Lamb
Page 36. Updated formatting of vision statement per discussion with Dan Lamb
Page 40. Updated formatting of asterisk explanation to make it more prominent
Page 42. Updated affordability and housing diversity language
Page 46. Added language re: shared equity programs at INHS per Charles Geisler
Page 48. Swapped out image for habitat for humanity photo from Ray Burger
Page 53. This entire section has been reorganized, Map 3 updated due to mapping error
Page 54. Narrative on this page is new, adapted narrative from the 2005 Plan and added new
context
Page 58. Added language re: farmers proactive restoration of riparian areas
Page 59. New photo
Page 62. New photo
Page 65. Added new actions related to protection of riparian areas
Page 92-93. Waiting for broadband info
Page 101. Added municipal reduction target language and Figure 23
Page 103. Added community reduction target language and Figure 28
Page 109. New photo
Page 110. Added clarifying language related to zoning updates and challenges
2
Page 111. Added challenges narrative section related to SUPS and the development process
Page 112. Updated action LU 1.2.1 added clarifying language
Page 113. Update Future Land Use Map, influenced by changes to Map 3 as outlined in my
message above.
Page 123. Updated narrative to accommodate changes to Future Land Use Map also as outlined
in my message above
I am sending an updated version of the public review draft dated 4/25 which incorporates the
municipal broadband input from Dan Lamb as well as updated Census data, and a few other
items (including sheep farms) as outlined below (changes within the draft are marked by a pink
box):
Page vii. added Figure 22 (to correspond with updates to page 92) to the list, updated figure
numbers accordingly
Page 6. Updated likely recommendations to the town board section
Page 28. Updated figures and narrative to correspond with 2020 Census data
Page 58. Update figure 11 w/sheep farm data and updated narrative accordingly
Page 78. Updated narrative and graphics to incorporate 2020 Census data
Page 92. Updates to broadband narrative and added figure 22.
Updated Appendices (with tables of contents) to follow
Discussion with Planning Board Members asking for their comments. The Resolution was edited
during the discussion.
RESOLUTION 202241 RECOMMENDING THAT THE TOWN BOARD ADOPT
DRYDEN2045 AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2005 TOWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, in 2019 the Town Board asked the Planning Board to make a recommendation on
whether the town should update its 2005 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board recognizes that 2005 Comprehensive Plan will continue to
provide useful and relevant guidance on topics such as recreational resources, agricultural
protection, and residential development,based on principles of natural resource conservation and
smart growth and,
3
WHEREAS, during a review of the 2005 Plan, The Planning Board concluded the 2005 Plan
lacks guidance on critical topics such as climate change, transportation, and diverse/affordable
housing choices, and
WHEREAS, in 2019 the Planning Board recommended to the Town Board that the 2005 Plan be
updated and offered to manage the work; and
WHEREAS, in Resolution#84 of 2019 the Town Board charged the Planning Board to "manage
and execute a general update to the Town Comprehensive Plan"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board agreed to serve as Steering Committee for the work. The
Committee also included Dan Lamb, representing the Town Board, and Ray Burger, representing
the Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the Committee chose Environmental Design and Research, using a competitive
selection process, to prepare the update; and
WHEREAS, the update was named Dryden2045 in recognition that it is a 25 year plan for the
town; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board conducted a public hearing on Dryden2045 on March 24, 2022;
and
WHEREAS, the Steering Committee has completed its work on Dydren2045; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board recommends that the Town
Board adopt Dryden2045 as an amendment to the Town 2005 Comprehensive Plan; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as the Town Board considers implementation of the many
recommendations in Dryden2045, that it place emphasis on critical needs associated with climate
change, transportation, and affordable housing choices in the town; and
4
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board recommends that the town's Recreation
Master Plan be updated and formally adopted; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board wishes to formally thank members of
the public for their participation in development of Dryden2045; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board wishes to formally thank members of
Dryden's volunteer committees and boards for their reviews and comments on Dryden2045.
4/21/22 jak draft#1
4/27/22 jak/ca draft#2
Motion to approve, C. Anderson
Second:T. Salerno
All in favor 6-Yes, Simon No
Ray reports,
1. 1061 Dryden Road -Evergreen Townhomes was a PUD approved in 2017 for 36 dwellings comprising
108 bedrooms.The six buildings were about 149x62 ft. each. The PUD was amended in 2018 to be
36 units and 84 bedrooms with buildings 149x52 ft. Now M&R Entities is proposing to build 42 units
with 90 bedrooms with buildings 144x47 ft.
The PB is to review this pursuant to Town of Dryden Code Section 270-
10 See https://ecode360.com/34362776 As I see it the Concept Plan is still valid and this
application is for a modification to the Development Plan. Therefore the PB can make a
"...recommendation to the Town Board that the development plan be approved as submitted,
approved with modifications, changes or conditions, or rejected.Any modifications, changes or
conditions, and reasons for rejection shall be detailed in the recommendation." Code Section
270-10.4 D.4. The TB will hold a public hearing at their May meeting.
Gary Sloan and Steven Hugo talk about the 1061 Dryden Rd. — Evergreen Townhomes and shows
Board sketches.
*Sketch Plans as Attachment
*2016 Traffic Study as Attachment
5
Board thoughts
• Biggest concern is the traffic study. Bad corner, poor driveway views, crosswalk and bus
stop needed.
• Suggested that Town Board members go and spend some time looking at these concerns.
• Suggested that the units be Affordable housing, with affordable utilities, making units be all
electric no fossil fuels. Electric car charger be in place for all units.
• G. Slone confirmed no fossil fuel, air source heat pumps will be used for heating and hot
water.
RESOLUTION 202242 The Planning Board recommends to the Town Board to adopt this
plan and to take a careful look at the traffic issue and also to confirm that the Stretch Code is
applied.
Motion to approve: C. Anderson
Second: D. Bussmann
All in favor—Yes - 6
Opposed—J. Wilson Recommendation Passed
Next up is 366 Virgil Rd. SUP Application for a Home occupation Level II
Ray reports,
2. 366 Virgil Road is an SUP application for a Home Occupation Level 2 business. Second Knob
Gifts and Antiques, LLC (which includes Shots by Shana Photography) is closing down their
storefront at 129 North Street. The owner proposes to relocate the business to a 1500 sq ft
building behind their residence at 366 Virgil Road. The TB would welcome
recommendations relative to the site plan (application and SEAF attached). The TB will hold
a public hearing at their May meeting.
Applicant Shana Karn answers Boards questions.
• No public in store, occasional person picking up their order at the door.
• Parking, 3-spaces off McClintock Rd.
• Deliveries, mostly USPS, rarely UPS maybe once every 2 weeks.
• No items on lawn for sale, has a few of larger Antiques from father to get rid of will be on
side of garage in the back.
• Employees, has one will be full time.
6
RESOLUTION 202243 recommends that the Town Board approve the Site Plan for this
project.
Motion to approve: S. St Laurent
Second: J. Wilson
All in favor-Yes
Next, we have The Outdoor sign discussion,
Ray reports,
Paul Simonet from Park Outdoor (owner of most of the billboards along Route 13) would like to
make a presentation to the PB about the new electronic signs used in this industry. Our sign law
Code Section 270-9.4 (https:Hecode360.com/34362721 ) does not presently allow electronic signs,
but maybe there are some benefits that make amendments to our sign law worth exploring. Having
one LED billboard along Route 13 may allow us to consolidate/eliminate a few of the existing larger
billboards. It would also allow for Town of Dryden messaging (such as when we have comp plan
meetings to advertise) and other PSAs. I've attached a draft PowerPoint that Paul may use
*Park Outdoor Sign Presentation as attachment
Board thoughts, lots of discussion on if Dryden needs these types of signs, lots of questions on size,
lighting, placement, quantity. Most feel if done correctly and maybe only 1 or 2 in Dryden would
look nice. Board wants to take 30 days to poll residents to see what thoughts are. Asked for more
details and specifications from Owner. Will meet again on this.
Planning Dept. reports they are getting more projects in to review.
Town Board reports we are making progress on the Rail Trail underground, laying conduit for the
Broadband.
Next regular Planning Board Meeting will be June 23, 2022
Meeting adjourned 8:45 pm
Respectfully submitted,
Joy Foster
7
3495 Winton Place
SRF Building E, Suite 1 10
Rochester, NY 14623
• ASSOCIATES
phone 585.272.4660
W W W. S R P A .N ET fax 585.272.4662
Transportation Engineering&Planning Consultants
May 17, 2016
Mr. Gary Sloan
1 17 Horton Drive
Ithaca, New York 14850
RE: Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes, Town of Dryden, NY
Traffic Impact Assessment
Dear Mr. Sloan:
The purpose of this technical letter is to provide an assessment of potential traffic impacts and mitigation
needs, if any, related to development of the proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes along NYS Route 366
(Dryden Road) in the Town of Dryden, Tompkins County, New York. The following outlines the results of
the study.
Existing Conditions
The study area consists of the intersection of Dryden Road and the Pineridge Residences driveway in the
Town of Dryden, New York, as referenced above. The site location is depicted in Figure I — Site Location
and Study Area (all figures are included at the end of this letter).
Dryden Road (NYS Route 366) is owned and maintained by the New York State Department of
Transportation (NYSDOT). The highway is functionally classified as an urban minor arterial type highway
with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour(MPH)with the immediate study area. Dryden Road is generally
an east-west highway with one travel lane in each direction.According to the most recent traffic volume data
collected by the NYSDOT in 2013, the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) along Dryden Road in the
vicinity of the site is 7,126 vehicles per day (vpd).
Existing AADT information was obtained from the NYSDOT Traffic Data Viewer. The lane geometry at the
study intersection and the AADT are depicted in Figure 2.
Peak hour traffic volumes were collected by SRF & Associates on Monday, May 9, 2016 for the weekday
commuter PM peak hour between 3:45-4:45 PM at the study intersection of Dryden Road/Pineridge
Residences. Peak hour volumes for the weekday commuter AM period were obtained from NYSDOT hourly
traffic volume data along Dryden Road. Historical AADT traffic volumes were reviewed to determine if
adjustments to the volumes were needed to establish 2016 existing base conditions. Based on a slight increase
in AADT between 2010 and 2013 according to the Historical Traffic Count Trends in Tompkins County, NY
report (Ithaca-Tompkins County Transportation Council, 2015) a 0.5% growth rate per year over the last
three years was applied to the 2013 traffic volumes to establish 2016 existing base conditions. The peak hour
traffic periods generally occurred between 8:00-9:00 AM and 3:45-4:45 PM.The 2016 existing base peak hour
volumes are depicted in Figure 3.
Traffic Assessment Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden, NY
Background Conditions
Construction of the proposed development is expected to be completed in approximately one year. The
Town of Dryden was contacted to discuss current projects within the project study area that are currently
under construction and/or approved. There are no identified projects. To account for normal increases in
background traffic growth, including any unforeseen developments in the project study area, a growth rate
of 0.5% per year based on historical traffic volumes on Dryden Road has been applied to the existing traffic
volumes in the study area for the one-year build-out period. The background traffic volumes are depicted in
Figure 4.
Proposed Development
The proposed development consists of constructing 36 residential townhomes with access onto Dryden
Road via a single driveway. The proposed concept site plan is shown on Figure S.
The next step in the evaluation is to determine the additional traffic attributable to the development as
defined, vehicle trips entering and exiting the site. The Trip Generation, 9th Edition as published by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used as a reference for obtaining this information. The trip
rate for the peak hour of the generator may or may not coincide in time or volume with the trip rate for the
peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Volumes generated during the peak hour of adjacent street traffic, in this
case, the weekday AM and PM peaks, represent a more critical volume when analyzing the capacity of the
system; those intervals will provide the basis of this analysis.
The volume of site-generated traffic has been estimated based on ITE Land Use Code 230, as shown in Table
1. All trip generation calculations are included in the attachment to this letter.
TABLE 1 - SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
AM Peak PM Peak
Description Units Enter Exit Enter Exit
Townhomes 36 1 4 19 17 9
The proposed development is anticipated to generate 4 entering/19 exiting vehicle trips during the AM peak
hour and 17 entering/9 exiting vehicle trips during the PM peak hour.
The cumulative effect of site-generated traffic on the transportation network is dependent on the origins and
destinations of that traffic and the location of the access drive serving the site.The proposed arrival/departure
distribution of traffic generated at this site is considered a function of several parameters, including:
• Employment centers in the area;
• Proximity to Cornell University and the City of Ithaca;
• Existing traffic patterns; and
• Existing traffic conditions and controls
Based on these parameters, Figure 6 shows the anticipated trip distribution patterns for the proposed
development. Figure 7 illustrates the peak hour site-generated traffic based on those percentages. Figure
8 combines the background conditions (Figure 4) and the site-generated trips (Figure 7) to establish the
anticipated future traffic volume under full development conditions during the AM and PM peak hours.
�� SRF 2 May 17, 2016
taiw ASSOCIATE'S
Traffic Assessment Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden, NY
Capacity Analysis
Capacity analysis is a technique used for determining a measure of effectiveness for a section of roadway
and/or intersection based on the number of vehicles during a specific time period. The measure of
effectiveness used for the capacity analysis is referred to as a Level of Service (LOS). Levels of Service are
calculated to provide an indication of the amount of delay that a motorist experiences while traveling along
a roadway or through an intersection. Since the most amount of delay to motorists usually occurs at
intersections, the capacity analysis specifically focuses on intersections.
Six Levels of Service are defined for analysis purposes. They are assigned letter designations,from "A" to "P,
with LOS "A" representing the best conditions and LOS T" the worst. Suggested ranges of service capacity
and an explanation of Levels of Service are included in the attachments.
The standard procedure for capacity analysis of signalized and un-signalized intersections is outlined in the
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) published by the Transportation Research Board. Traffic analysis
software, Synchro 8, which is based on procedures and methodologies contained in the HCM, was used to
analyze operating conditions at the study area intersections. The procedure yields a Level of Service (LOS)
based on the HCM as an indicator of how well intersections operate.
Existing and background operating conditions during the peak study periods are evaluated to determine a
basis for comparison with the projected future conditions. The future traffic conditions generated by the
proposed development were analyzed to assess the operations of the study area intersections. Capacity
results for existing, background, and full build-out conditions are listed in Table II. The discussion following
the table summarizes capacity conditions. All capacity analysis calculations are included in the attachments.
TABLE II - CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Existing Background Full
Intersection Conditions Conditions Development
Conditions
AM PM AM PM AM PM
Dryden Road/Pineridge Residences
Eastbound-Dryden Road A(8.7) A(7.7) A(8.7) A(7.7) A(8.7) JB(122.2)
Westbound-Dryden Road A(0.0) A(0.0) A(0.0) A(0.0) A(0.0)
Northbound- Driveway C(17.9) A(0.0) C(18.0) A(0.0) C(18.2)
Southbound-Pineridge Residences B(I 3.7) B(I 2.1) B(13.7) B(12.1) B(13.8)Dryden Road/Proposed Driveway
Eastbound-Dryden Road A(0.0) A(7.7) A(0.0) A(7.7) A(0.0)Westbound-Dryden Road A(7.7)Northbound-Proposed Driveway NA NA C(15.9)Southbound-Apartments Driveway B(I 2.3) A(9.4) B(12.4) A(9.4) B(12.4)
Notes:
A(8.7) = LOS(Delay in seconds per vehicle)
NA= Approach does not exist and/or was not analyzed during this condition
The capacity analysis results show that all approaches operate at LOS "C" or better during both peak hours
under all conditions. An LOS of "C" is projected for the northbound approach at the proposed driveway
location during both peak hours; however, this condition is acceptable. No significant adverse impacts are
S RF 3 May 17, 2016
taiw ASSOCIATES
0
Traffic Assessment Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden, NY
projected as a result of the proposed development. A detailed discussion regarding the Sight Distance
Evaluation at the proposed driveway is described in the following section. Based on the capacity analysis
results, no mitigation is warranted or recommended.
Sight Distance Evaluation
Sight distance was investigated at the proposed driveway location along Dryden Road. Sight distance is
provided at intersections to allow drivers to perceive the presence of potentially conflicting vehicles. This
should occur in sufficient time for a motorist to stop or adjust their speed, as appropriate,to avoid a collision
at the intersection. Sight distance is also provided at intersections to allow the drivers of stopped vehicles a
sufficient view of the intersecting highway to anticipate and avoid potential incidents. If the available sight
distance for an entering or crossing vehicle is at least equal to the appropriate stopping sight distance for the
major road, then drivers have sufficient sight distance to anticipate and avoid collisions. To enhance traffic
operations, intersection sight distances that exceed stopping sight distances are desirable along the major
road.
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets published by the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2011, was used as a reference to establish the required
stopping sight distance and desirable intersection sight distance for the proposed site access driveway
location.
Required stopping distances and desirable intersection sight distances are based on the design speed for a
given section of roadway; generally, the design speed is the posted speed limit plus 5 MPH. In this case, the
posted speed limit along Dryden Road in the vicinity of the site is 45 MPH. Hence a design speed of 50 MPH
was used. The required stopping sight distance and desirable intersection sight distance based on the design
speed is shown in Table III.
TABLE 111—SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENT AND MEASUREMENTS
Posted Required Available Sight Distance
Design Desirable Intersection Stopping
Intersection Speed it Speed Sight Distance (ISD) for Sight ( ) to the:
(MPH) (MPH) Left Turn from Stop (ft) Distance Left Right
(SSD) (ft)
Dryden Road/ 45 50 555, 425' 780' 523'
Proposed Driveway
The available sight distance along Dryden Road exceeds the required SSD and desirable ISD at the proposed
driveway location to the left (westerly direction). To the right (easterly direction), the required SSD is met,
but the desirable ISD is not met. Given that the required SSD is met and the proposed driveway is located
immediately adjacent a posted bus stop (advanced warning signage posted for westbound traffic prior to the
stop, at Pineridge Residences) with the likely understanding this is a known "slow down" area, and the
condition is borderline for the desirable ISD, no mitigation is recommended. Any brush and foliage along the
sight lines should be maintained to ensure maximum visibility.
� S RF 4 May 17, 2016
tiw ASSOCIATE'S
Traffic Assessment Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes Town of Dryden, NY
Conclusions and Recommendations
This study evaluates the potential traffic impacts resulting from full build-out of the proposed 1061 Dryden
Road Townhome Development. Based upon this analysis, the results indicate that the proposed development
will not have significant adverse traffic impacts to the existing roadway network. The following sets forth
conclusions and recommendations based upon the results of the analyses:
I. The proposed development is anticipated to generate 4 entering/19 exiting vehicle trips during the
AM peak hour and 17 entering/9 exiting vehicle trips during the PM peak hour.
2. The capacity analysis results show that all approaches operate at LOS"C"or better during both peak
hours under all conditions.An LOS of"C" is projected for the northbound approach at the proposed
driveway location during both peak hours; however, this condition is acceptable.
3. The available sight distance along Dryden Road exceeds the required SSD and desirable ISD at the
proposed driveway location to the left (westerly direction). To the right (easterly direction), the
required SSD is met, but the desirable ISD is not met. Given that the required SSD is met and the
proposed driveway is located immediately adjacent a posted bus stop (advanced warning signage
posted for westbound traffic prior to the stop, at Pineridge Residences) with the likely understanding
this is a known "slow down"area, and the condition is borderline for the desirable ISD, no mitigation
is recommended.Any brush and foliage along the sight lines should be maintained to ensure maximum
visibility.
4. No significant adverse impacts are projected as a result of the proposed development with the
potential left-turn lane mitigation in place.
If you have any questions or are in need of additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
SRF &Associates
J04;ellto�_
Stephen R. Ferranti, P.E., PTOE
Principal
SAProjects\2016\36030 1061 Dryden Rd\Report\1061 Dryden Road Townhomes TIA 051716.docx
� SRF 5 May 17, 2016
tiw ASSOCIATE'S
FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREA
"k �' '
r
rl
' 7
' -f'tr � q•�.y „ i�1 � fF'Y: -S w�/..+ �.,, �� Yy��- fir.
..�•' kL
.l it c �4 +III, * ..•' a. _�
LA
• • PROPOSED
Study • • • RF
0 Proposed Intersection
YASSOCTATFS
■
Site Location
dStuy Area 0 100 200 400
Q
O
p`NER�EGE RES\DEN�ES� ` � (� O °p
0� Q
10�3�� rn
LLJ
w O W CA
p�OppSE��� I—I O Z O
Ppp,R1MEN�5 G� � � p" W
2�>>� o d. Q Z
rn W NO w Q
wz Q
o px
P,C4z p Q
z a — o O
0 o aw o
Q
� o
Q
0
EX�STWAG 0
p`NER\DGE RES\DENGES f �l
� w U
N � L
C: o �i h
N
w � H
a�i AppR1M ¢, d o
� w u
C W
z � x
o ° Az o
o -• z • o
O a o
zd > a
Z � �
� � a
W N w II
o
IQI O
1 I RES\DENGES R 0p
P\NER\pGE
o z
� o
W CA
�a
tA
-70% p/OpO5E0 p%Y Q O
ApAR1MEN�5 0�
o O W
Iwo O
0A a0 O Q
aC.00
0 of
Q
� O
Q
o
.� ��-
�O(0) EX\ST\NG p�
\DGE RES\DENGES
p\NER
C O W -
� N C) Z U
0
W o ° z o
> Q
N Q F
o� x �
LLJ
Y—I
P- pa L H 4
Ap 1MENT5 pW H w
0(0� rn w u
Lo
a Z O
o a q to
`° w
o -• z • o
a
� w �
4
O
w
a
FIGURE 5 - CONCEPT SITE PLAN
-- -
11
+ � 1
g � 1
7 76
V
1
i
� � s
i
`,
1
Q Rg 8 s _
1 7 {r'l1Bf1t q
y g=$ 1061 DRYDEN ROAD TOWNHOUSESCD
Town of Dryden,New York � _�, �■
o �
Q
JIS) G Y II
0 EX\5�WA D o
� O
\DGE RES\DENOES �-\ � (� O Op
OC 0
CA
> Z w
13�6�\,—Ro E0 D O O
PppR1MEN�5 D� �� � a Q
o
o : Q W
0�0) M
-It En
xz
a � 0 p Q
z a - o O
0 o aw o
Q
C
a � Q
0
w
EX\ST\NG D�
I I IQI
1 I p\NER\DGE RES\DENOES R per..,
W Q zo
�3(6� p'OpOSE�D%Y �I
W
Ppp,R1MENTS D� 1 d d
Lo
0 � 0
a a Z o
o a A o
oc O `° w
Z a p E- M
o -• z • o
a
� w �
0 h
O
CL
a
ATTACHMENT
May 17, 2016
Letter to Mr. Gary Sloan
Proposed 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes
Town of Dryden
Tompkins County, New York
0�
SRF
ressocihres
3495 Winton Place
Building E, Suite 1 10
Rochester, NY 14623
COLLECTED
TRAFFIC VOLUME
DATA
d s" nn�m MM00000
0-O
Q 0- O�NtrO ^�00000
�V aDV�
00
M 0 N <
Q>
O Lf)N a o0 000000000
o MM�nu7Mn o0 0000
NC 0y7 eaJ u1
C m pOj W Out h Tot01
m00Z L_W2 �Nvnm vno00000 458 64 622
Z U N
N r nm„ O
m t M o N M o0 0 458 64 622
LL Cn fn d
o 0000 00000000 0 760 0 0
0 0 o a
0 0 0 0
0 164 0 0
000000000000o Rlphl T" I'll
P",
9 0 0 4'I
�c a
e 3 O
0� 0000000000000
ZYJ o
o
azF o000 000000000aoo �o
0 o O00000000o a 0
NNQ0ta0 WcaD00000 _ O c O �p'� �Oc o �Q
r� _ 4_2 ¢
C o
ca o0 000000000 -o'�
3
.% o00000000000
uaJ
M� o
2`o vNiraM�000�00000 ,-4
F� 1
O -W o o n o 0 0 0 o Hal N41 140Id -Pad
LS4 E 0
�aao 000 0 0 0 0
y � 0 0 0 0
2 a N'Ft
.ONN NN 000000 L L94 E 0
to) 0 0
L11 c 4E9 L94 L9L
..0008.000..
0 0 0 0 a g m 0 0 0
4E9 L94 L8L
d� �aCvaio �oO�oo�oo 0000 10101 u� 100
RmM ZQQ� cy
N W y N 2 E y
O A� a F27E ee NNE' o00
a Wd
Q CZ t!:. oo MwIMOO0000
O W Wod. N
O Y W a W E o 2 N m N N
d F O O YJ 00 N o F d s c c c
{�L/OL L..22C > N xmmmm
LL? U NWW00000 ms o 0
f/�M 0 a a
10 CLO
Q O O
O O O o0 000000000000
C,j O N a
F O Q5
af 00 55oo MM�ru��n oo 0000
CN N� o �Nnmm
G-0 ((S O f0 M 2 N N O O O
Z oC)z fLu
O.T.
m `
iinrnac
00000 0
a
y m o OOOOo 0
N d
O C J
Y -
c a
m Z� 2o0 000000-0-000
G o
z
a0M t00 00000000.000
9
W
y N O O O O O O O O O O O O 00
L �
a
v v�oo 0.0000000000
c J
- o
a` a �NN MvoMvoo
W�y �Nu) NVMro0ujro0 O
Of
0 0000 O o
O
yt.. OOOOo O
3 d
N
LLl y 00 -00-0NO-000000
IT J
c ao
(n a pt 2 00 0O--ON-00 0000
4) N p
R3
m M y y F
ellt-
•u V:
Q t NN OO�MONM 000000
O a
Q z
C
�tl o aaa of-s=z axxy
c,d„ ink o�no�o3--
LL�L Hv 0 .M nFwwmmmm
ro SSS�¢
� u m G
c M K
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC DATA
AND CALCULATIONS
0
A a
xo W
O NO
,L0011 7 M r N A r A A
Ecl
° W
W N 00 �O kn �O
b U Pr W W N N
U A O H N 00 00o ro o r-CA
a
W Fi Q� W x u V1 N H kn Ply H M Vzy]
N
N H OM1 00
O' Ncq
CD en
V1 M
kn kn M 7 y;
xoc,
N 01 rl 00 r �, N �00 in r C r �y Q
po M M M O M Ny U
O
Q E' cn o0 M r M
r.
y, cn pkn GTr W O Fi4
ti � kn
A Z kn kn Rn
v Q
sue. H W
00 kn
w
o x � u 04
0 y
U A F4 N �O kn CU7 0000 O� D! O O
Syr O w W U A W m en enen a O d M
�+ O k � o E•
cq M M M
w
en M Q M �0A r Z
H b
M H >" N x L
x M M
w
p GC p e4 �o W m
c� O kn 00 N W 1n
4) N W V `p O �z �z \O �O x
M
E• cn N 7 0 W N O
W O N 00
M N �'
O
r/1 W W M M M M 9 M cw O
O Gr. A WW�11 UQ O �o rl all 7 00 O H O
O M
C.
C 7 -V kn kn O
M M M M w O
E�
d
O H N H R:
C
p I.Oy O r C V
p y N r r N
� N ❑ cd O M N N N
M Z o o W E- r a a a rn a�i a p
M O 7 M N M C M O N
w
A A ui
O w O A A v z H H w
A Ca E� Ew- Ew- H °�
rj A A awi z z H A o 0 0 0
y
x o
CA
CA
Cq
A �+
x0 W
,L" a M M O A M A cl
y A
en
E� W
pay _
N a O
W W W x p CA e4 kn t-
U V1 CAOC 01 O� M Vzy]
N
N rl rl O eq
N
� � M
ON M kn M
_ x o0
N N N O N �y U
O
�r G E� M 00 l- in M '•�'
O r A r kne4 M i 004.0
►� *" C7
� Q ''7', [� N W ram+„ O FW4
it �l O kn � N N
O � O `O � O A `O d W W c
IZ
in w �z C kn
y Z M M M O Men z z kn
a�io
" 4 N enN 00 x
A A A
'v c 00 o rn o 0
OW U A W N rr H Grr N p O� d M •�
O rA
r l Vj O O CC a 00
Ar in N V] O
>4
z%1 H x c d �
o O d
sue. W o kn ago �
aac Z0 kn 0000 w 00 w for,
CAw NV rl r-I r-I x
M
A O A E" A O CA ^o
o r- 00 t- x
9
U U o x M R o
O [= A �w1 O
ww a 3 a a c ago N
O M
o r k 0° A
O
o O
c
H
CM N N ON .-• rn
dCIA
V] F
m O C O C v
O „ N U�O �O ,� 7 xi O M
O7 N fy' cd O �--I �--I rl �••I cc
�O N O as a E O w M
w E- 00Chi
N ellN C M O N
O Q� C CO O O
w O
w
A A ui
O w O A A v z H H w
A Ca E� Ew- Ew- H °�
r! A A awi z z H A o 0 0 0
0 0
xx o o � M o
A �+
x � W
NO
CA ,L" M M � A M A y A
cl
F W
N N M �'
Z A OU �O vn Vn kn O
c��77 ^vy7 ¢ AW N a O
W W W x OU cP.
n
N
N Q\ r 00CA
a7 O
O e H
o °; o ON o 3
_ x
N 01 r M 7 �, Do V1
� � rr rr � o `" ►"C'i U
0
0 F m 00 E N O
Or.
el eq A r N N N el
N +� U
Na o a S en 3 r. O Fi4
140 N N N Q N W W C
00 O\ G s kn
0) A N
O\ �O 00 'b 0000 d x
Li G UUz 00
U A F4 E"' r oo r CU7
N .fir H
Qr V ai x p
_ N
A U N r o�0 0000 r
en kn
en
N N N
v m o t- 0000 � W W xo
y N v oo o G7
m 00
E-� 00 cn � kn N W 7 O
0~ � Q W kA iA kn V)
A Cf���x�'CCj a A Z A O d CA ,O
• cn W �p N N N el M y 0
O w A W O O o F o v
w w a 3 a a as a r 00 U o
O m
In e4 IT e4
C.
C -V -V 7 7 O
O N 00 N N W 0
E�
cn
m r a0 IJD r a d
C
N rl rl rl U O M
N 00 01, 01, d �i
s
o A o M F o c c
w
A A ui
O w O A ACIO v z H H w
A Ca F� Ew N H
r! A A A awi OZ OZ A o 0 0 0
Project Information
Project Name: 1061 Dryden Road Townhomes
No: 36030
Date: 5/13/2016
City: Dryden
State/Province: New York
Zip/Postal Code:
Country: United States
Client Name: Sloan
Analyst's Name: DLK
Edition: ITE-TGM 9th Edition
Land Use Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Entry Exit Entry Exit
230-Residential Condominium/Townhouse 36 Dwelling Units 4 19 17 9
N
N
J E O O co N CO V
3 3 M (D co O N N I CO M O)
LL m p
W w Ul
O
— (fl CO M co
H
O � M M M
Q
H
N
N
EZ
0 Q� M
C 'C
3 �
O
m o
N X o C 0
CC)
Q O O
co Cl)
L
IL
c y O C� o
w Q M M I�
W N
5
O Lo E o O N N 'ITY 7 O Cl) LO Cl) O N N f— 0')
= E Co 0 o LO
Z z
y
O N O CO O) CM
f6 M � Cl) O) N N ( M
N m O
Q
T
z co
0 3
Z a : o >
W U w 3
� Z v� o �
LL z X N J �' H J H J �' H J
Z o acncncn � � � zzzwwwQ cncncn � � � zzzwww
_ a
a)
w a�i o 0
0 >- cn a a
c
T
� z IL
N Y - o
a Z W oW
IL O a. O Z N
J
N
N
J � E O N 00 NO
3 3 M r- M (o Il- CO LO CO (O �
LL m p
la i N
C
fn co M (O N
H
D
O
N O M M (O
Q
H
N
G7
EZ
0 fl N
C 'C
3 �
0
X
CCD
Q CD CD
IL
0
c y o 0 0
LUCl) co
U)
W N
2 0 E
O -0E o Ln 00
Y 3 Ln ') 0)M (O Cl)M Ln Ih (O (O
= E m Oo
Z Z
3.1 M N
C
•_L r E
(D 1D 1D
r CD N V)3 M � CO M Ln f� CO (O �
N 'K O
Q w >
Q
O
o c
Z a >LU o ,
Z � w3
Q w o Q) a) >
w/ o �
I.f N 0' H J �' H J �' J �' H J d' H J d' H J
Z � 0 n Q N � � � zzzwww
Q Z LD 0
o � .� � � � zzzwww 0 � cn �n
_ a
CO Q w o o 0
c Ofa
T � �
Q Q z
LV LL
Cl)
a Z W o W
Oda a00 N
O UOD
IL a JZ
LEVEL OF SERVICE:
CRITERIA/DEFINITIONS
Level of Service Criteria
Highway Capacity Manual 2010
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level of Service is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic
stream, based on service measures such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic
interruptions, comfort, and convenience. Level of Service for signalized intersections is defined
in terms of delay specifically, average total delay per vehicle for a 15 minute analysis period. The
ranges are as follows:
Level Control Delay
of per vehicle
Service (seconds)
A < 10
B 10 - 20
C 20 - 35
D 35 — 55
E 55 - 80
F >80
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level of Service for unsignalized intersections is also defined in terms of delay. However, the
delay criteria are different from a signalized intersection. The primary reason for this is driver
expectation that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher volumes than an
unsignalized intersection. The total delay threshold for any given Level of Service is less for an
unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection. The ranges are as follows:
Level Control Delay
of per vehicle
Service (seconds)
A < 10
B 10 — 15
C 15 - 25
D 25 - 35
E 35 - 50
F >50
LEVEL OF SERVICE:
CALCULATIONS
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2016 Existing Base Conditions - AM Peak Hour
1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Vol,veh/h 2 191 0 0 556 1 3 0 0 3 0 10
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None None None
Storage Length - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 93 93 93 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 220 0 0 598 1 4 0 0 4 0 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 599 0 0 220 0 0 829 823 220 822 822 598
Stage 1 - - - - - - 224 224 - 598 598 -
Stage 2 - - - 605 599 - 224 224 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 978 1349 290 309 820 293 309 502
Stage 1 - - - 779 718 - 489 491 -
Stage 2 - - 485 490 - 779 718 -
Platoon blocked,% -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 978 1349 - 282 308 820 293 308 502
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 282 308 - 293 308 -
Stage 1 777 717 488 491 -
Stage 2 - - - 473 490 - 777 717 -
Approach EB WB NB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 17.9 13.7
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 282 978 1349 431
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.002 - - 0.038
HCM Control Delay(s) 17.9 8.7 0 0 13.7
HCM Lane LOS C A A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 0 - 0.1
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 1
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2016 Existing Base Conditions - AM Peak Hour
2: Dryen Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Vol,veh/h 0 193 569 0 0 2
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None - None
Storage Length - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 93 93 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 222 612 0 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 612 0 0 834 612
Stage 1 - - - 612 -
Stage 2 - - 222 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 967 - 338 493
Stage 1 - - 541 -
Stage 2 - - 815 -
Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 967 - 338 493
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 338 -
Stage 1 541
Stage 2 - - 815
Approach EB WB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 12.3
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 967 493
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.005
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 12.3
HCM Lane LOS A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 2
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2016 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour
1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Vol,veh/h 7 457 3 0 164 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None None None
Storage Length - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 79 79 79 92 92 92 62 62 62
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 525 3 0 208 0 0 0 0 2 2 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 208 0 0 529 0 0 754 751 527 751 753 208
Stage 1 - - - - - - 543 543 - 208 208 -
Stage 2 - - - 211 208 - 543 545 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1363 1038 326 340 551 327 339 832
Stage 1 - - - 524 520 - 794 730 -
Stage 2 - - 791 730 - 524 519 -
Platoon blocked,% -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1363 1038 - 321 337 551 325 336 832
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 321 337 - 325 336 -
Stage 1 - 520 516 - 788 730 -
Stage 2 - - - 785 730 - 520 515 -
Approach EB WB NB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 0 12.1
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 1363 1038 518
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.016
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 7.7 0 0 12.1
HCM Lane LOS A A A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 - 0
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 1
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2016 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour
2: Dryen Road & Apartments Driveway 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Vol,veh/h 1 469 168 0 0 1
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None - None
Storage Length - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 79 79 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 539 213 0 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 213 0 0 754 213
Stage 1 - - - - 213 -
Stage 2 - - 541 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 377 827
Stage 1 - - 823 -
Stage 2 - 583 -
Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 377 827
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 377 -
Stage 1 823
Stage 2 - - 582
Approach EB WB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 9.4
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 1357 827
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.7 0 - 9.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 2
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2017 Background Conditions - AM Peak Hour
1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Vol,veh/h 2 192 0 0 559 1 3 0 0 3 0 10
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None None None
Storage Length - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 93 93 93 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 221 0 0 601 1 4 0 0 4 0 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 602 0 0 221 0 0 833 827 221 827 827 602
Stage 1 - - - - - - 225 225 - 602 602 -
Stage 2 - - - 608 602 - 225 225 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 975 1348 288 307 819 291 307 500
Stage 1 - - - 778 718 - 486 489 -
Stage 2 - - 483 489 - 778 718 -
Platoon blocked,% -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 975 1348 280 306 819 291 306 500
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 280 306 - 291 306 -
Stage 1 776 717 485 489 -
Stage 2 - - - 471 489 - 776 717 -
Approach EB WB NB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 18 13.7
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 280 975 1348 429
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.002 - - 0.038
HCM Control Delay(s) 18 8.7 0 0 13.7
HCM Lane LOS C A A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 0 - 0.1
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 1
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2017 Background Conditions - AM Peak Hour
2: Dryen Road & Apartments Driveway 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Vol,veh/h 0 194 572 0 0 2
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None - None
Storage Length - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 93 93 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 223 615 0 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 615 0 0 838 615
Stage 1 - - - 615 -
Stage 2 - - 223 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - 336 491
Stage 1 - - 539 -
Stage 2 - - 814 -
Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 965 336 491
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 336 -
Stage 1 539
Stage 2 - - 814
Approach EB WB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 12.4
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 965 491
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.005
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 12.4
HCM Lane LOS A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 2
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2017 Background Conditions - PM Peak Hour
1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Vol,veh/h 7 459 3 0 165 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None None None
Storage Length - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 79 79 79 92 92 92 62 62 62
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 528 3 0 209 0 0 0 0 2 2 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 209 0 0 531 0 0 757 754 529 754 756 209
Stage 1 - - - - - - 545 545 - 209 209 -
Stage 2 - - - 212 209 - 545 547 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1362 1036 324 338 550 326 337 831
Stage 1 - - - 523 519 - 793 729 -
Stage 2 - - 790 729 - 523 517 -
Platoon blocked,% -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1362 1036 319 335 550 324 334 831
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 319 335 - 324 334 -
Stage 1 519 515 787 729 -
Stage 2 - - - 784 729 - 519 513 -
Approach EB WB NB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 0 12.1
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 1362 1036 516
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.016
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 7.7 0 0 12.1
HCM Lane LOS A A A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 - 0
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 1
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes 2017 Background Conditions - PM Peak Hour
2: Dryen Road & Apartments Driveway 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Vol,veh/h 1 469 168 0 0 1
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None - None
Storage Length - - - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 79 79 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 539 213 0 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 213 0 0 754 213
Stage 1 - - - - 213 -
Stage 2 - - 541 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 377 827
Stage 1 - - 823 -
Stage 2 - 583 -
Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 377 827
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 377 -
Stage 1 823
Stage 2 - - 582
Approach EB WB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 9.4
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 1357 827
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.7 0 - 9.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 2
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes Full Development Conditions - AM Peak Hour
1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s✓veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL V\BT V\BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Vol,veh/h 2 198 0 0 560 1 3 0 0 3 0 10
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 93 93 93 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 228 0 0 602 1 4 0 0 4 0 12
Major/Mnor Majorl Major2 Mnorl Mnor2
Conflicting Flow Al 603 0 0 228 0 0 841 835 228 835 835 603
Stage 1 - - - - - - 232 232 - 603 603 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 609 603 - 232 232 -
Oitical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Oitical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 975 - - 1340 - - 284 304 811 287 304 499
Stage 1 - - - - - - 771 713 - 486 488 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 482 488 - 771 713 -
Platoon blocked,% - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 975 - - 1340 - - 276 303 811 287 303 499
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 276 303 - 287 303 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 769 712 - 485 488 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 470 488 - 769 712 -
Approach EB WB NB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 18.2 13.8
HCM LOS C B
Mnor Lane/Major Mvrrt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL V\BT V\BRSBLnl
Capacity(veh/h) 276 975 - - 1340 - - 426
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.002 - - - - - 0.038
HCM Control Delay(s) 18.2 8.7 0 - 0 - - 13.8
HCM Lane LOS C A A - A - - B
HCM 95th°/atile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.1
HCM 2010 TV\SC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 1
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes Full Development Conditions - AM Peak Hour
2: Proposed Driveway/Apartments Driveway & Dryen Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s✓veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL V\BT V\BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Vol,veh/h 0 194 3 1 572 0 13 0 6 0 0 2
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 93 93 93 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 223 3 1 615 0 16 0 8 0 0 2
Major/Mnor Majorl Major2 Mnorl Mnor2
Conflicting Flow Al 615 0 0 226 0 0 843 842 225 845 843 615
Stage 1 - - - - - - 225 225 - 617 617 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 618 617 - 228 226 -
Oitical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Oitical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - - 1342 - - 284 301 814 283 300 491
Stage 1 - - - - - - 778 718 - 477 481 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 477 481 - 775 717 -
Platoon blocked,% - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 965 - - 1342 - - 282 301 814 280 300 491
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 282 301 - 280 300 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 778 718 - 477 481 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 474 481 - 768 717 -
Approach EB WB NB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 15.9 12.4
HCM LOS C B
Mnor Lane/Major Mvrrt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL V\BT V\BRSBLnl
Capacity(veh/h) 355 965 - - 1342 - - 491
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 - - - 0.001 - - 0.005
HCM Control Delay(s) 15.9 0 - - 7.7 0 - 12.4
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A A - B
HCM 95th°/atile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0
HCM 2010 TV\SC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 2
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes Full Development Conditions - PM Peak Hour
1: Driveway/Pineridge Residences & Dryen Road/Dryden Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Vol,veh/h 7 462 3 0 170 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None None None
Storage Length - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 79 79 79 80 80 80 62 62 62
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 531 3 0 215 0 0 0 0 2 2 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 215 0 0 534 0 0 767 764 533 764 766 215
Stage 1 - - - - - - 549 549 - 215 215 -
Stage 2 - - - 218 215 - 549 551 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1355 1034 319 334 547 321 333 825
Stage 1 - - - 520 516 - 787 725 -
Stage 2 - - 784 725 - 520 515 -
Platoon blocked,% -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1355 1034 314 331 547 319 330 825
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 314 331 - 319 330 -
Stage 1 516 512 - 781 725 -
Stage 2 - - - 778 725 - 516 511 -
Approach EB WB NB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 0 12.2
HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 1355 1034 510
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.016
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 7.7 0 0 12.2
HCM Lane LOS A A A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 - 0
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 1
Proposed 1601 Dryden Road Townhomes Full Development Conditions - PM Peak Hour
2: Proposed Driveway & Dryen Road 5/16/2016
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Vol,veh/h 1 469 12 5 168 0 6 0 3 0 0 1
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
RT Channelized None None None None
Storage Length - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 79 79 79 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 539 14 6 213 0 8 0 4 0 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 213 0 0 553 0 0 774 773 546 775 780 213
Stage 1 - - - - - - 548 548 - 225 225 -
Stage 2 - - - 226 225 - 550 555 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 1017 316 330 538 315 327 827
Stage 1 - - - 521 517 - 778 718 -
Stage 2 - - 777 718 - 519 513 -
Platoon blocked,% -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1357 1017 314 327 538 311 324 827
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 314 327 - 311 324 -
Stage 1 520 516 777 713 -
Stage 2 - - - 770 713 - 515 512 -
Approach EB WB NB SIB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.2 15.2 9.4
HCM LOS C A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity(veh/h) 365 1357 1017 827
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 0.001 - 0.006 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay(s) 15.2 7.7 0 8.6 0 9.4
HCM Lane LOS C A A A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 0
HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report
SRF&Associates Page 2
t9 a w O u in C
AN'N3aA21a'GVOM N3aAda 6906
Mill�1 S31111N3&RVY 0 5 m O
S3WOHNMOi N33UDU3n3 3 5 a -j
1 u6lsaa o4ewa40S/Ueld and;daouoa 3
F k gG E
a
e
r
E)
40, E
y$ ` 9, ® �
ol
\ X
PRO
Y `al
1 m.,.. ..e. ...u.. ...s as ., a
(� u w U m ¢
AN N3(]AN(]'(IVON N3OANG ML � z �
o [ a psi@8i; a S3M3(IO8 M3b0d N O
SAHNMOl 3/�021J)I�I N
Vd WO w¢ g" Q
%05 u61sa0 opeweyoS /ideouoO a g o o LL
� 3
i E 3 W $ g12
6 ILL
I I I I I I I I
I I I o I
� I
J�
IIII 1W
0
I �
r:
ALa
o
f J I ,
—O
N � L
I I I I 1
I 1
s I n n 1 5
I 1 0. 1
I I
I
a-JIB 1 I I JII�A�JI� JIB JIB a ih JIB
C� w w U U m ¢
Wd
MM4 ZZOZ/8Z/b
C� LL I w ❑ U m ¢
AN N30,kNa'OVON NMANG ML mz
S3M3008M3NCIN`d °O p
W !P' '; ��' 4 �g S3WOHNMOi 3AO�10 M`dd G , W JN
am Q
%p8 uftoC]of;eweLpS /ideouoo a s w
lo Qz b a
IA_ Olb rl$ %� O°' Uo �' 0 F�° °b �I' ZI
I I I I I I I I
m I I I I W
I I I I a-6 xc a, I I I I I
I I I I 1 I
I I I I I I
I I ! 1
II I I I
L I „
1.
o
I
Ila
I
�
g I
�
® _ I
I I
E,
I I
L.I. 03 , I I I I }4
,
EE
I I I
r� ri O O
h
I I N LL
EIE
I, I I I I I l Ir I
ED
93
I I I
l l l w ® w
a Ell i a
N ( I I I I
wb N
I I I I I I I I
(� u- w ❑ U m ¢
Wd
49:££:17 ZZOZ/8Z/4
C� LL W U m Q
wy �: v � nzs':gaD� w AN NIGA. 1a'OVOH N90), ] L90L z
QrY syy E =� w� ueolS ee
m z a a wO
t�p p 3 vUu e i]g a�= Z•.E E� 4 K p r
aLLy= Wy 20 �g �g Eg IN S3WOHNM01 N33HOH3A3 gN Q
fill. NO � � � UNSa4 OlIEWE)PS/Ueld and)daouoZ) sLL
_ } g
I I I I I I I I I
b
1- - I I cl F - oC '� •
_ -—-—--
di
17
I I 1
N b I N
o o i3
r
I I I
I I I I
b
M M
I I
I
I I I I
9 LL W U m Q
Wd
90:£Z•O l 8 L OZ/6/Z
li 0 a w m ¢
uj AN N34AH(I'GVOa N34AdG 6901 �z _
��o3y nab � E .,£3Lp$'Y ° UBOlSAIeO m �0m O
2 a: ' _ $ co s s3e aj5 a S3WOHNM01 N33b10 3OA3 W Q
¢ =` =F ; g < .':€ $ u6isa4 oilewa4oS/Ueld 4(Id ldeouoO a w w
o �
nlm LLI°, LLIS QI� �I'8 it
�- om °Ia
ol� ql� LLI �I � o 0= �I of
I I I I n) I I
I I I N
I I I tea:- I a• �I x � I
I II
I ® N
I
EM �
I I
I ® I I I �
lu
I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I
I OC I
I
I
Ed �
I p I I I
q
ti
..•1 u I I I I
C9 a w O U m ¢
AV
61:£Z:OL 9LOZ/6/Z
U LL w 0 U m Q
rn v �fr9 •`�'= a= ; AN N30A2AG'GVOH N34Aba M9 t-Cw
CO`: €; E ?agKe gg8 ueolg Alec) w m O
jE a= W' = �g "` 1-n §� s „ o S3WOHNM01 N332�J2��n3 s$ N a
.y
u6lsaa oilewaps/Ueld C]nd;deouo0 Q;B w
aaa`s a
0 0
rn rn
m m
i 1
1 L
0
N � N
s
N
1 o
ry N
C� LL w O U m Q
INV
8S•£ZA6 MZ/6/Z
I
Town of Dryden
March, 2022 '
About Park Outdoor
CNY based Company
► Family based ownership, VERY involved with the Community
► Headquarters is in Ithaca
► Four Divisions (Syracuse/Utica/Binghamton/Finger Lakes)
60+ employees
95% of our sign inventory is in CNY
We value our locations in Dryden
Locations along Route 13
Mostly local businesses advertise on this inventory
We are sympathetic to issues regarding signs near trail
Current Trends in the Industr
Industry is requiring more digital offerings:
This direction is being forced on the Outdoor Sign Industry and POA
Advertising Agencies are integrating outdoor signs with other digital strategies
Government entities are migrating to digital technology
Public Service announcements
Amber alerts
Weather or hazards can be communicated immediately
More advanced companies require more dynamic messaging
More advertising per location
More than 7 times that of a static board
Client can change messages daily to highlight different offerings
Breakfast, lunch and dinner specials on a daily basis
Digital can be integrated to other forms of media
Fascinating realities associated with the change in direction in advertising
FHWA / NYSDOT Sign SafetyRequirements
FHWA has vetted technologies and safeguards:
$ Millions spent by FHWA on studies and field trials to identify best practices
NYSDOT permit required: In the unlikely event the sign does cause statistical
increase in accidents, the DOT can require the sign's immediate removal
Technology rivals redundancy found on USN ships!
Our signs are monitored by NYSDOT. Requirements include:
Brightness and self dimming; ongoing monitoring by POA
► A minimum of 8 seconds per turn, no motion whatsoever, instant display changes
► Distance from each other along highway is 2500 feet
NOT what you see at "the local drug store" or "on-premise signs"
Recent Digital Sign Locations Nearby
Cortland area Binghamton Area
Tompkins Street City of Binghamton
Route 281 Cortlandville Town of Union
Route 13 Gutchess Sports Complex Town of Vestal
Elmira Area Village of Endicott
► City of Elmira Town of Norwich
► Town of Horseheads Anticipated future activities:
► Town of Big Flats . Village of Johnson City
► Town of Barton ► Owego
► Town of Watkins Glen ► Fenton
Anticipated Future Activities:
Corning
Hornell
Painted Post
Intrinsic Values of Signs
Advertising
Integrates digital technologies...much more flexible, dynamic
Public Service Announcements
Charities
Municipal notices/emergency messages
Amber alert
Property owner revenue
Solid income for minimal space
Local Business brand development
A presence "just works"
Possible locations egen
� f
We would request one location for a back to back digital signi '`
Antlers
Cayuga Climbs
Feature 1
f _ J Hop
�ftayuga-Cflimds
' ��-rew i's Cafe&Taproom 4
r
Antlers -
Google Earth
4000 ft
Example Location alon Route 13 behind
�
Finger Lakes Library
60ff
ryden Location Legend
the pavement a significant distance a`b 300 ft
0 Feature 1
Finger Lakes Library
^.- NIPI-R4. S Central Regional Library
Schuler Haas Electric Corporation
r-'
Sign location
_ - - - _��L.i'S• ��. ![•r•,rf --_ fir_ -_•�•. _ _
- � *:•..-+�Chi Iis�CC??.:�•.�_7=15�' _ - -
DrydenExample location
Rt. 13 • South
A-- Ad
-
�
��'4 •5a y�
� 1 ^
YF_
Example location
Rt. 13 Dryden Facing North
Our Final Proposal will address :
Sign structure specifics
► Type of structure
► Size of face
► Aesthetics associated with immediate property
Protocol for emergencies and occasional Town PSAs
Requires creating realistic protocols
We are all for safety!
Cap and Replace candidates
Any concerns raised by the Town