HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-08-28Dryden Conservation Board
August 28, 2018
Dryden Conservation Board
August 28, 2018
Members Present: Peter Davies (Chair), Steve Bissen, Mike Richmond, Craig Schutt, Gian
Dodici, Tim Woods, Bob Beck and (at 8:15) Nancy Munkenbeck
Liaisons: David Weinstein (Planning Board), and (at 7:39) Dan Lamb (Town Board)
Absent: Jeanne Grace
The meeting was called to order at 7:03 PM
Review and approval of minutes from May 29, 2018 and June 26,2018
C. Schutt made a motion to approve the May 29, 2018 minutes, seconded by M Richmond, and
unanimously approved.
M. Richmond reviewed June 26, 2018 minutes. Motion was made by C. Schutt to accept
minutes with minor insertion regarding discussion that took place, seconded by G. Dodici and
approved 5-0 with S. Bissen and P Davies abstaining due to absence.
Reports and updates:
Environmental Management Council: S Bissen
No meeting in August
Agricultural Advisory Committee- C. Schutt
See attached report
Planning Board: D. Weinstein
See attached report
P. Davies- Did the Planning Board come to any further recommendations to the Town Board
(apart from the fact that Trinitas doesn't fit with the Varna Plan)?
D. Weinstein — Planning Board listed recommendations regarding issues that must be
addressed.
P. Davies — If developer answers those concerns, will the objections of the Planning Board
evaporate?
D. Weinstein- It depends on the response. The Town Board decided only after Trinitas deals
with TG Miller's analyses and things they identified as problems would it come back to either
the Planning Board or the Conservation Board. Since the Town Board expressed the plan must
be significantly altered, it does not make sense for any board to weigh-in until they get an
answer back from Trinitas. Discussion ensued regarding the full site plan review, the sketch
plan, and that our zoning lays out what needs to be covered.
Page 1 of 5
Dryden Conservation Board
August 28, 2018
Rail Trail — Bob Beck
We are proceeding with the AARP grant that requires the installation of 3 kiosk and 7 benches
in the section between Dryden and Freeville. B. Schickel has designed the kiosks with
informational display panels that would include maps and other interesting information for the
area. These will be located at many of the road intersections and would include a map
indicating the current location, directions to the next intersection in each direction, and a map
of the whole trail. To meet AARP's requirements, these items must be installed by the end of
October. We will gather people from the community to assist in the assembly and installation
of the benches and kiosks. Work will be documented by photos and/or videos that will be sent
to AARP. Our hope is to have a public celebration officially opening the trail between Freeville
and Dryden.
The following 5 easements were approved at the last town board meeting:
1. The last of the Cornell easements;
2. Peter Sarkus-east of Mount Pleasant Road;
3. Pro -Lawn (Bellisario) -Hall Road;
4. Bruno Schickel —railbed property in Etna; and,
5. The Finger Lakes Land Trust's nature preserve in Etna.
The easements will go to the County Clerk's Office for recording. After the official recorded
easement is received back, I will deliver it to the landowner with our thanks.
We just submitted a grant proposal for a Transportation Alternatives Program Grant through
NYS DOT. This is federal money that would be used to do the stone dust surface from Game
Farm Road to Pinckney Road; and to potentially do a pedestrian bridge over Route 13. We had
an engineering firm do a study of both pedestrian bridge and tunnel options, and the results
indicated the tunnel would be over $4,000,000 whereas a bridge would be around $1,800,000.
Due to the incredible work of Todd Bittner (Cornell Botanical Gardens), Alice Green, and Dan
Lamb to minimize the cost to town taxpayers, using the remaining portion of the State Park
Grant that we already have, it could result in no cost to taxpayers. We have also requested
multi -modal funds through Barbara Lifton. Barbara had offered money towards this project.
We discovered neither the TAP Grant money, nor the multi -modal funds would cover the
relocation of sewer and water utilities that go under route 13. It will be several months before
we will know if we are successful in obtaining the funding. The goal is to do 10.4 miles all the
way from Ithaca to Main Street in Dryden, added to the 4 miles of the Jim Schug trail it will be
14.5 miles. It connects on the western end with East Ithaca Recreation, which gets you right
into Ithaca. We continue to work on other easements.
Town of Dryden finally owns the FH Fox bridge in Varna and are proceeding with the permit and
the work we need to do. We are still waiting for the veterinary college alumni to decide if they
can contribute to our project. Discussion ensued regarding the "message" that will be painted
on the bridge.
Page 2 of 5
Dryden Conservation Board
August 28, 2018
New business
Revision of the Dryden Town Wind Generation Law, with regards to small scale wind energv
conversion systems, as requested by the town board at their June meeting:
P. Davies- Can you tell us the background of this Dan? Why has the town asked us for a
revision?
T. Woods — In the early 2000's they wanted the conservation board to put together a suggested
ordinance concerning all alternative energy. We spent several months putting that together
and MaryAnn Sumner took the document for review and when she brought it back it was an
entirely different document. She and Mahlon Perkins had put together an alternative plan and
that was the one that was presented to the town board.
D. Lamb — My main concern is the height restriction that appears in our renewable energy law.
As per the 2017 amendment to this law, you must obtain a Special Use Permit for mechanical
wind turbines over 50' in height. We do not want to have an unnecessary review process that
could dissuade people from renewable energy. The height restriction was there to prevent the
gigantic wind turbines.
P. Davies went to the county website and industry websites to gather information regarding
kilowatts, height and clearance from the bottom of the blade to the highest object. He
gathered data and came up with a proposed new town wind ordinance section 17 (attached);
his changes are indicated by the highlighted sections.
Discussion ensued regarding height, kilowatts, setbacks for small (residential type) turbines;
166' radius (2 acres) free of human occupied structures and property lines, the noise (hum) of
the turbine, and neighbors would be consulted if a special use permit is applied for.
D. Lamb -I am very open to a discussion about dropping the special use permit requirement on
towers under 140' or 150'. 1 would like your advice on that. It seems cumbersome. My
understanding of what happened with Weaver Wind in Freeville, is they wanted to put up a
100' or 120' tower and the Village of Freeville used the Town of Dryden's law as a rationale.
Should we raise the 50' limit?
Discussion ensued regarding the special use permit, zoning districts, tower heights and the
effect these wind turbines have on the environment due to the vibration and temperature at
ground level. Proposal to drop the requirement for a special use permit assuming the person
met the regulations of a tower no higher than 150' for a 25 kilowatt in an appropriate zone.
Requirement to obtain a building permit would remain. P. Davies will compose guidelines and
revised proposal of change to the law for the conservation board's review for discussion next
month.
Park and Recreation impact fees:
The town board has requested that we consider the Park & Recreation Impact Fees that are
proposed to be placed on all new residential buildings.
D. Lamb — My understanding of the law is that it must be commercial residential and cannot be
individual houses. We must show that the recreational needs of the residents of the facility
would not be met by accommodations on premises. It would be a one-time fee. This is
Page 3 of 5
Dryden Conservation Board
August 28, 2018
important to the town with respect to replenishing our recreational reserve fund and makes
sense.
P. Davies -Included in this would be all our trails and natural areas and obviously, the Rail to
Trail is a very important part of this. Some of the impact fee monies could be used for the
natural areas of the trail creation and maintenance.
Discussion ensued regarding the wording, exactly what type of homes would be impacted, who
would be responsible for the fee (the builder or the occupant), the fee schedule, and what
would be required for the fee to be waived.
It was determined that the concept is acceptable; however, revisions would need to be made
before the conservation board could offer their support. N. Munkenbeck will work on a revised
version. It was agreed that P. Davies will advise D. Lamb that we like the concept but not the
execution.
Trinitas development proposal at the iunction of Drvden Road and Mount Pleasant Road in
Varna:
P. Davies — I personally feel the site has quite a steep slope on part of it and if you remove the
trees you will get erosion galore. Also, there is a huge area of parking that should be permeable
so the water soaks in instead of running off.
D. Weinstein — The new plan has a 3 -level parking garage where that slope is located.
Discussion ensued regarding the parking garage resulting in a considerable decrease of paved
parking areas, erosion, and stormwater concerns. The Conservation Board is concerned about
the steep slope and erosion.
N. Munkenbeck made a motion to pass the following resolution:
Resolution #6 for 2018 from the Dryden Conservation Board to the Dryden Town Board with
regard to the Trinitas development in Varna
WHEREAS the proposed location includes a steep slope subject to erosion
WHEREAS extensive blacktop will lead to high volume run-off, further causing land erosion
Be it resolved that the Conservation board recommends that the Town board reject the Trinitas
proposal UNLESS
1) The trees and other large vegetation be left on slopes exceeding 10% both during
construction and in the final development; and,
2) Appropriate storm water pollution prevention be a prominent part of the project.
Motion was seconded by S. Bissen and passed unanimously.
Page 4 of 5
Dryden Conservation Board
August 28, 2018
A motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:55 was made by S. Bissen and seconded by T. Woods. It
was unanimously approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Chrystle Terwilliger
Deputy Town Clerk
Page 5 of 5
Report to the CB on the Ag Committee meetings 7 -11-18 and 8 — 08 - 2018
Prepared by Craig Schutt liaison from the CB to the Ag Committee
1. The regular scheduled meeting of Ag Committee was held on 7— 11— 2018. Much of
the meeting was spent discussing by-laws for the committee. Much of the discussion
was based on the document for operations developed by the CB. Reviewing this
document the AC realized that much of that could be adapted for the AC's use. Work
will continue on a document specific to the AC.
2. The regular scheduled meeting of the Ag Committee was held on 8 — 08 - 2018. This
meeting focused mainly on discussion of the town's oversight and jurisdiction affecting
direct farm marketing activities as it relates to Ag and Markets law. Discussions began
on creating a document that could be used by the Planning Department to evaluate
proposed projects that may fall under its jurisdiction. There are differing views on the
intent of Ag and Markets law and how it may be applied. All agreed this will be an
ongoing discussion and will take time to develop something acceptable to all concerned
parties.
Report from the Planning Board meeting of July 26, 2018 (there was no meeting in August
because of a lack of a quarum). (David Weinstein)
1. The Board continues to hear from citizens of Mineah Road, who report major problems in
getting out on to Route 13 and significant water shortages. They continue to seek potential
changes in zoning that could limit the amount of new construction on Mineah Rd., given that
many believe the road is already beyond its carry capacity for both traffic and water availability.
2. Approved sketch plan and waved site plan review for two modular homes at 231 Groton
Road.
3. Discussed potential zoning amendments recommended by the Agriculture Committee to
bring our zoning into agreement with Ag and Markets concerns. Began consideration of
creating an Agriculture -specific Site Plan review.
4. Recommended hiring a consultant to help with a major updating of the Dryden
Comprehensive Plan next year.
5. Approved a sketch plan and waved site plan review for 121 Sweetland Road, to put a second
home on a 3 -acre lot.
6. Approved a Site Plan Review for Grass Masters Landscaping at 2025 Dryden Road.
7. Reviewed the Trinitas townhome project in Varna at 959 Dryden Road, and provided
recommendations to the Town Board about issues that must be addressed by the developer
before moving forward with this project's consideration. Many members expressed significant
concern about the discrepancy between the proposal and the Varna Plan.
8. The Board was informed that the ownership of the project to be built at 802 Dryden Rd has
changed hands, and reviewed small changes in the design that will be implemented.
9. Reviewed the idea of instituting impact fees, with several members expressing deep concern
over the idea.
10. Reaffirmed the board's support of the Rail to Trail project.
Resolution from the Conservation Board to the Dryden Board with regard to revised rules for Small
Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS) updating the rules of 8/30/2006
Section 17 Development Standards
All Small WECS shall comply with the following standards. Such systems shall also comply with all the
requirements established by other sections of this Article that are not in conflict with the requirements
contained in this section
[1)_ Appropriate Locations_. Small -Scale Wind Energy Systems consisting of a single turbine"
should be a permitted as -of -right accessory use throughout the community. This ma�l
include agricultural, residential, commercial/industrial, and public property class,----
designations.
lassdesignations. Parcels should -be at least a 2 acre circle free of hum_ an occupied structures
4nd pr pertylines.
�) Areas deemed inappropriate include Unique natural areas (DNAs), slopes >15%, Importan
�ird Areas, Publicly owned open space, Critical Environmental Areas - --
Airport approach and
clear zones, and Cornell natural-areasl
3) Setbacks. Setbacks for Small -Scale Wind Energy Systems from lot lines should be the
,otal height of the installation plus 10 feet, unless the affected adjoining property owner
agrees -otherwise in writing_ -This setback should be measured' from the center -of the
`,ower,
4) Location on a Property. In residential zoning districts, Small -Scale Wind Energy Sy_stems�
should be located in the side or rear yards, to the extent practical
5) Only one Small WECS (or, where authorized, a temporary wind measurement tower) per lot shall
be allowed. Adjoining lots shall be treated as one lot for purposes of this limitation. More than
one Small WECS per lot may be allowed if the applicant adequately demonstrates that the
electrical or mechanical power needs of the individual user exceed the power generation
capability of one WECS.
5 Small WECS shall be used primarily to reduce the on-site consumption of public utility -
provided electricity, or as a primary source of electricity when the applicant is not connected to
the electricity grid.
6 The maximum turbine power output is limited to unless the applicant demonstrates to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Town Board that a larger turbine is necessary to meet the historical
and/or projected energy needs of the applicant. The applicant shall submit documentation
supporting the increased turbine size including copies of electrical bills, an energy audit or
electrical power requirements of any new or proposed equipment.
[7 Tower Height: A tall tower is the single most important factor in the economic viability of
,mall wind system. Tall towers enable .turbines to access faster in better quality winds, and ever
small increases in wind speed translate to exponentially more energy the turbine can generate. Ira
ether words, a taller tower means far more — and cheaper — energy. It, is recommended but noC
.equired that the bottom of the turbine rotor should clear the highest wind obstacle (rooftop, mature
:ree, etc.) within a 500 foot radius s b_y_at least 30_feet. Tower heights_ shallbe limited to q
maximum_of-150 feet J
SOO feat
10�kllowatt
400 -watt
,-
)WI --
� ! r^! ` #
0,7_ M tower
ON
x iy t
Ilk
� .
8 The allowed height shall be reduced if necessary to comply with all applicable Federal Aviation
Requirements, including Subpart B (commencing with Section 77.11) of Part 77 of Title 14 of the
Code of Federal Regulations regarding installations c 1 o s e to airports.
>>At the end of the Small Wind Energy Conversion Systems could be added:
Medium -Scale Wind Energy Systems shall follow the county recommendations of 10/15/2015 as
below.
Medium -Scale Wind Energy Systems
Appropriate Locations. Communities should conduct a thorough review of all their zoning districts to
determine in which Medium -Scale Wind Energy Systems would be appropriate. As a general rule
of thumb, Industrial Zoning Districts and Agricultural Zoning Districts would be appropriate, as
would some Rural Zoning Districts and some Commercial Zoning Districts. Other Zoning Districts
may also be suited for such energy systems.
(b) Where the municipality's comprehensive plan does not address renewable energy systems, add
language indicating the critical nature of these systems to our energy future and identify the types
of areas where they are appropriate.
Approval Process. Medium -Scale Wind Energy Systems should be permitted through a site plan review
process in order to ensure that proposed installations comply with the standards established by the
community.
Setbacks. (a) Setbacks for Medium -Scale Wind Energy Systems from lot lines should be 1.5 times the
total height of the installation.
(b) Setbacks from neighboring residences, schools, churches, and libraries should be 2 times
the total height of the installation, unless the affected adjoining property owner agrees otherwise
in writing.
Height. Medium -Scale Wind Energy Systems should be allowed to exceed otherwise -established
maximum height requirements.
Natural Resources. Medium -Scale Wind Energy Systems should avoid Critical Environmental Areas,
Unique Natural Areas, slopes in excess of 15%, and clearing extensive areas of forest. Any systems
located in these areas should be required to take appropriate mitigation measures.
Scenic Resources. Medium -Scale Wind Energy Systems located in previously -identified distinctive or
noteworthy viewsheds should be required to prepare a visual impact analysis.