HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-06-05 TOWN OF DRYUFN
Zoning Board of Appeals
.Tune 5 , 2012
Members Present: Mark Maybury, Acting- Chair, Deborah Shigley, Nelson Flogg
• Absent : Thomas Quinn , Flint Brinnn
Others Present: David Sprout, Code Enforcement; Joy foster, Recording Secretary
Applicants : Timothy Frost
Town Residents : Bruno Schickel , Brian Magee
Meeting celled to order at 7 : 36PM ,
Agenda *
Timothy Frost, Area Variance 1174 Harford-Slaterville Road
Timothy Frost, Area Variance :
Chair Maybury reads the public notice :
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Zoning Board of Appeals for the Town of Dryden
• will hold a Public Hearing to consider the application of Timothy Frost who is
requesting an Area Variance for relief of Dryden Zoning Ordinance Sections
804 . 1 and 804. 2 corner lot setback and rear yard setback; to enlarge existing
garage at 1174 Harford-Slaterville Road
iSAID HEARING will be held on Tuesday June 5 , 2012 , at 7: 30 PM prevailing time at
the Dryden Town Hall , 93 East Main St. Dryden NY , at which time all interested
persons will be given an opportunity to be heard .
Individuals with visual , hearing or manual impairments and requiring assistance
should contact the Town of Dryden at 607- 844 - 8888 x 2 .16 at least 48 hours prior to
the time; of the public hearing.
Maybury : to 11'1r. Frost is there arrvthing else you tvould like to add?
Frost: Want to be able to get firewood under cover and vehicles under cover, so things don 't
have to be tinder a blue tarp, this tivould make it look better.
Maybury : anyone else have anything they ►vould like to add? 0 t
u
Magee : 1%ine with me. It is, closer to the road than alloived, but that 's fine.
� I
Schickel : I have a couple of questions about the setback,, the setback is 50?
' Dave Sprout : its a corner lot and it is supposed to he 7l) rom the cet t � c 'I ,/ 7 u side can be reiluec.cl to
25 o which makes it 52. 5 feet.
s
I
Schickel : Well Fm .fine with that and 1 just wanted to point out that if this was an Ag. building he
• could do whatever he wanted to , Brian who lives next store and is a farmer could build a
building as big as he Wants with no said control, and in ray mind I find it interesting that its out
in the country and you should be allowed to do With it what you want. So I'm totally supportive of
It1hal Mi . Frost wants to do.
• Sprout : County Planning replied and they have no issues with this.
1-logo : curious, the existing building is not set bock far enough, is that because it was put tip
be ore zoning?
Frost : Yeah the house was put up in the mid-sixties and the garage shortly gfterWard
Maybury : ivell if there is nothing else then this ii) ill close the public part of this hearit�g.
A. IN CONSIDERING WHETHER AN UNDESIRABLE CHANGE WOULD BE PRODUCED IN
THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR DETRIMENT TO NEARBY
PROPERTIES WILL BE CREATED BY GRANTING OF THE AREA VARIANCE THE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Granting; of the variance will improve the neighborhood by permitting the storage of
material that is currently outside, and the neighbors are to favor.
Motion made by : Nelson liogg
® Second : Mark Maybitry
All in favor
Be IN CONSIDERING WHETHER THE BENEFITS SOUGHT BY THE APPLICANT CAN BE
® ACHIEVED BY SOME OTHER METHOD, FEASIBLE FOR THE APPLICANT TO PURSUE,
OTHER THAN AN AREA VARIANCE, THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FINDS AS
FOLLOWS :
It ►could be possible to build a separate structure conforming to zoning but it ivould be
an inefficient use of the property caul only add to the clutter.
Motion made by : flog;
Second : Shigley
All in favor
C. IN CONSIDERING WHETHER THE REQUESTED AREA VARIANCE IS SUBSTANTIAL.
THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Yes
Motion made by : Shigley
Second : Hogg
All in favor
• D. IN CONSIDERING WHETHER THE PROPOSED VARIANCE WALL HAVE AN ADVERSE
EFFECT OR IMPACT ON THE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD OR DISTRICT. THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
• ad adverse effects, this will improve the area and both neighbors shoii6 support for the
additions.
Motion made by : Shigley
Second : Hogg
All in favor
E. IN CONSIDERING WHETHER THE ALLEGED DIFFICULTY WAS SELF-CREATED . THE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FINDS AS FOLLOWS :
Yes!
Motion made by : Maybury
Second : Shigley
All in favor
® Maybury snakes a rnolion that we grant the Area I1ariance with no conditions.
Shigley : second
All in favor.
Maybury reads that this is 1, & M 239 SE OR exem t type II action part 617. 5-c 12 .
Motion made by: Maybury to adjourn this meeting
Second : Shigley
All in favor
Meeting adjourned at 7 : 45 PM
Respectfully submitted ,
.Joy Foster
Recording Secretary
•