No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-08-03 r is Supv Cotterill said that he will send out information to the fire companies before the budget is worked on . r1 : . . : 0 tA0 ) RESOLUTION # 97 AUDIT HIGHWAY BILLS Clm Metger offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the highway bills be paid as audited . 2nd Clm Webb Roll call vote - all voting YES RESOLUTION # 98 AUDIT GENERAL FUND BILLS Clm Jordan offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the general fund bills be paid as audited . 2nd Clm Tarr Roll call vote - all voting YES The Town Board members decided to postphone to make a decision on the request from Mr Clinton Cotterill with regard to Orion Rd until next months board meeting and the • town attorney is present . Adjourned : 8 : 40 PM a ... 5LA-10 Susanne Lloyd Town Clerk t SPECIAL MEETING August 3 , 1981 Present : Supv Cotterill , Clm Tarr , Clm Webb and Atty Perkins . Minutes of the special meeting held on August 3 , at 5 : 00 PM Atty Perkins reported on Werninckville and George Junior Republic . The cost figures for the total maximum amount proposed to be expended on both of these districts are improper . The annual cost per user doesn ' t change , but the figure that was in the resolution ; copies of which went to Vrooman Engineers were to low . They only take into consideration part of the cost of either constructing the improvement or the sewer extensions . We have new orders for the board members to adopt if it so wishes ordering another public hearing . The dollars and cents are not going to change . Atty Perkins said that at the end of the legal notice we should publish , that this is to correct a technical error in the prior resolutions . The cost per user per year does not effect it because those figures were correct . The only way ,that we can correct this resolution is to do it all over again , which has been confirmed by our bond council in New York . Vrooman is of the opinion that it is a typographical error . Atty Perkins said that it was not a typographical error . It cannot be corrected by erasingiit and putting it in right , because a bond council will not certify it This is important that it is not going to effect anything what anybody is going to pay . This should be stressed if anyone asks . It is just technical corrections to cover the maximum amount proposed to be expended . All of the annual debt service figures are correct based upon the new corrected amounts . The procedure is that we adopt an order setting a public hearing . If we adopt the order today we • could schedule a public hearing on Monday Aug 17th and it can be scheduled for any - time of the day that you want . If you want to schedule it for 5 : 00 PM you can keep it open for a few minutes , close the hearing , adopt the resolution and you can start the 30 days for the permissive referendum . The critical point as it was explained to Atty Perkins for grant applications is to get everything filed within this . federal fiscal year which ends Sept 30th . Atty Perkins said tha"t .. Morrell Vrooman Engineers had the copy of this for 50 days before they had called him . f ORDER - WERNINCKVILLE PROPOSED SEWER DISTRICT C1m Tarr made a motion to adopt the following order : ' WheReasbhe . Town Board , of the Town of Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , has duly caused to be prepared a map - showing the boundaries of a proposed sewer district - in . said Town , to be , known as werninckville Sewer District , and a general plan to serve said District , and a report of the proposed method . of . operations thereof ; and WHEREAS , said map , plan and report were prepared by a competent engineer , duly licensed by the State of New York , and , have been filed O in the office of the. Town Clerk of said Town , where the same are available during regular office hours for examination by any persons interested in the subject matter thereof ; and WHEREAS , said District shall be bounded and described as set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and made a part hereof ; and WHEREAS , the improvements proposed for said District consist of the construction of a sanitary sewer system , including an undivided ✓ eal property interest having a certain term of at least forty years in the sewage treatment plant owned and operated by the Village of Freeville , New York , and buildings , land or rights in land , and o riginal furnishings , equipment , machinery or apparatus required in connection therewith , all as more fully described in the map , , plan and report hereinbefore described ; . and . WHEREAS , the . maximum cost of such improvements . .is , estimated , to be $ 260 , 300 ; and • . . WH Tf EI% S , the proposed method of financing the . cost . of said improvements cbns.ists of the issuance of $ 260 , 300 serial bonds ( to be ✓ educed to the extent of any moneys received from the State and / or . Federal governments . as grants - in - aid therefor ) oft said Town maturing in annual installments over a period not exceeding forty years , payable in the first - instance • from a levy on the taxable real 40 property in said Sewer District .which the Town Board - of such Town shah determine and specify to • be especially ;benefited _ thereby in the manner provided by law , but if not paid from such source , all the taxable real property in said Town shall be subject to the levy of ad valorem taxes , without limitation as to rate or amount , sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on said bonds as the same become due and payable , and by the appropriation and expenditure of moneys anticipated to be received from the Federal and /or state governments as grants - in - aid for said improvements ; and WHEREAS , it is now desired to call a public hearing upon the q uestion of the establishment of said District and the construction • of the improvements proposed therefor , all pursuant to Section 209 - d of the Town Law ; NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT ORDERED , by the Town Board of the Town of Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , as follows : Section 1 . A meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , shall be held at the Dryden Town Hall , 65 E ast Main Street , in Dryden , New York , in said Town , on the 17th day of August , 1981 , at 5 o ' clock P . M . , Prevailing Time , for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider the establishment o f a proposed sanitary sewer district in said Town as described in the preambles hereof , to be known as Werninckville Sewer District , and the improvements proposed therefor , and to consider the map , plan and report filed in relation thereto , and to hear all persons interested in the subject matter thereof concerning the same , and for such other action on the part of said Town Board as may be required by law or shall te proper in the premises . Section 2 . The Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a copy of this order to be published once in the The Ithaca Journal , the official newspaper of said Town , the first publication thereot to be not less than ten nor more than twenty days before the day set herein for the hearing as aforesaid , and said Town Clerk • shall also cause a copy thereof to be posted on the sign - board of the Town maintained pursuant to subdivision 6 of Section 30 of the Town Taw not less than ten nor more than twenty days before the day set for the hearing as aforesaid . Section 3 . This order shall take effect immediately . - - - - 2nd Clm Webb Roll call vote - all voting YES ORDER- GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC PROPOSED SEWER DISTRICT Clm Webb made a motion to adopt the following order : WHEREAS , the Town Board of the Town of Dryden , Tompkins County , N ew York , has duly caused to be prepared a map showing the boundaries of a proposed sewer district in said Town , to be known as George J unior Republic Sewer District , and a general plan to serve said D istrict , and a report of the proposed method of operations thereof ; and WHEREAS , said map , plan and report were prepared by a competent engineer , duly licensed by the State of New York , and have been filed, in the office of the Town Clerk of said Town , where the same are available during regular' office hours for examination by any persons interested in the subject matter thereof ; and WHEREAS , said District shall be bounded and described as set _/ 0 forth in Appendix A attached hereto and made a part hereof ; and WHEREAS , the improvements proposed for said District consist of the construction of a sanitary sewer system , and buildings , land or rights in land , and original furnishings , equipment , machinery or apparatus required in connection therewith , all as more fully described in the map , plan and report hereinbefore described ; and WHEREAS , the maximum cost of suchimprovements . is estimated to be $ 204 , 400 ; and WHEREAS , the proposed method of financing the , cost of said improvements consists of the issuance of $ 204 , 400 serial bonds ( to be reduced to the extent of any moneys received from the State and / or Federal governments as grants - in - aid therefor ) of said Town maturing in annual installments over a period not exceeding forty years , payable in the first instance from a levy on the taxable real property in said Sewer District which the Town Board of such Town shall determine and specify to be especially benefited thereby in the manner provided by law , but if not paid from such source , all the taxable real property in said Town shall be subject to the levy of ad valorem taxes , without limitation as to rate or amount , sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on said bonds as the same become due and payable , and by the appropriation and expenditure of moneys 3 ........ anticipated to be received from the Federal and / or state governments as grants - in - aid for said improvements ; and WHEREAS , it is now desired to call a public hearing upon the question of the establishment of said District and the construction o f the improvements proposed therefor , all pursuant : o Section 209 - d o f the Town Law ; NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT ORDERED , by the Town Board of the - Town of Dryden , Tompkins • County , New York , as follows : Section 1 . A meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , shall be held at the Dryden Town Hall , 65 E ast Main Street , in Dryden , New York , in said Town , on the 17th d ay of August , 1981 , at 5 : 30 o ' clock P . M . , Prevailing Time , for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider the establishment o f a proposed sanitary sewer district in said Town as described in the preambles hereof , to be known as George Junior Republic Sewer D istrict , and the improvements proposed therefor , and to consider the map , plan and report filed in relation thereto , and to hear all persons interested in the subject matter thereof concerning the same , and for such other action on the part of said Town Board as may be ✓ equired by law or shall be proper in the premises . Section 2 . The Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a . copy of this order to be published once in the The Ithaca J ournal , the official newspaper of said Town , the first publication thereof to be . not less than ten nor more than twenty days before the day set herein for the hearing as aforesaid , and said Town Clerk shall also cause a copy thereof to be posted on the sign - board of the Town maintained pursuant to subdivision 6 of Section 30 of the Town Law not less than ten nor more than twenty days before the day set • for the hearing as aforesaid . . Section 3 . This order shall take effect immediately . 2nd Clm Tarr - - Roll call vote - all voting YES Adjourned : . 5 : 30 PM Susanne Lloyd l Town Clerk 7 TOWN BOARD MEETING August 11 , 1981 Minutes of the Town Board meeting held on the 11th of August .. Supv Cotterill called the meeting to order at 7 : 30 PM Members and guests participated in the Pledge of Allegiance Roll call was by the Town Clerk : Present : Supv Cotterill , Clm Jordan , Clm Webb , Clm Tarr , Atty Perkins and Z . O . Stewart Absent : Clm Metzger Supv Cotterill appointed Clm Jordan to audit Highway bills CITIZEN PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR Charles Erxleben from Kirk Rd in Etna presented the Town Board with a petition , O and would appreciate the board looking into this ' matter and do something for them . Mr Erxleben said that he was talking about the length of Kirk Rd . There are between 2 and 3 hundred people living on a road in less than a mile . The road is all broken up because of Cornelius ' trucks using the road as a short cut . He has lived on this road every since it was a dirt road . It has never been blacktoped . It has been greased and stoned . We also , have a one- lane bridge there , the town calls it a bridge but we call it a crossing which is disintegrating . Just about the time that it goes will be when a school bus is crossing it . You can ' t run 18 or 10 wheelers loaded with tons of gravel over that road . You can ' t get on the road now from Rt 366 without having to go on the shoulder to get up on the road . We would like the board to look into it to see if there is something that can be done about it . We have 1000 kids on the road and the trucks are traveling it night and day . The town does come up and patch the holes which does not do any good , it is just a terrible road . The patching doesn ' t last because there is not a permanent base on the road and the big 18 wheelers use it every day . Supv Cotterill said that he will give this information to the Hwy Supt . Mr Vrooman wanted to give the Town Board a major word of encouragement . There were some words that were passed around which came out of Albany to the effect that you didn ' t get the paper work done in time and this is not true . Mr Vrooman said that they have had good cooperation from everybody , which you all know because you have worked on this together with the Village Boards of Dryden and Freeville . Everybody is very cooperative . Also , they have had excellent cooperation from DEC , Cliff VanGiler in Albany which they have been closest to . They just came from Syracuse today after meeting with Bob Torba , who is an environmentalist , and Steve Lackey , the engineer and co- ordinator with them . They have been working hard with you all . One thing that came to be somewhat of an upset , is the change of the plant location in Freeville , which came in last Wednesday and has caused a lot of confusion . The picture now , after a conversation this afternoon from Steve and Bob in Syracuse is that there may be a delay , but there are funds coming your way that will be available . We are talking about 75 per cent funds including those for the laterals of the sewer which are quite important to you for your street sewers in the Village of Dryden and in the Village of Freeville . Mr Vrooman went through the amendment to the Facilities Plan , which is because of the change of the plant site in Freeville . One thing that is hard to realize that the state with all of their rules and regulations and their ideas for a study of an area have created this tremendous complicated factor which really isn ' t logical . All of a sudden now we are taking care of the Village of Dryden as the Village of Dryden ; the Town as a seperate entity and there being tie- ins to the two villages and the Village of Freeville as the Village of Freeville . In the process as you know this has .- led from one study to another study to another study . This represents the amendment which is the basic engineering document of the 3 grant applications which have to be submitted as far as the engineering is concerned . On Aug 5th Supv Cotterille met along with Mike Lane , Carol Burgess , Mr Frank Speno from George Junior Republic along with Steve Lackey the engineer , Bob Torba the environmentalist from Syracuse in Region 7 , there were 2 from our office Lee Mitchel and Rick Shearer , 2 archeologist , John Anderson from the Tomp Co Health Dept . , and Harris Dayton owner of the area for the treatment plant sites . The original one and the new one that was preferred by him and was agreed upon by all concerned . Mr Vrooman handed copies of the plan to the board members and covered the highlights . The following changes were made with a mutual agreement from all of the parties . The Village of Freeville , which deals basically with the village because the town hasn ' t changed but only bring you up to date because you are all a part of it . The previous recommended treatment plant site is now unacceptable to the property owner . The site suggested is acceptable to the property owner and is fully acceptable to all concerned ( all of the people is has just mentioned ) . We have on the third page in the report a comparison of the relative merits of the 2 sites . The basic differential - the item current land use - the original site was past active agriculture second growth wet land , and the new site is abandoned field with some brush growing up . The comparison value of the land estimated $ 300 to $ 600 an acre of the original and the new site $ 1000 to $ 2000 an acre . The other items which show the new site to be of an 77. advantage access , distance to the nearest home , prevailing winds no change , soil is better for the point of view that they are less desireable from the agricultural point of view . The poorer the soil the better for the treatment plant , development potential flow of the new site . Environmental effects no change , effects on wet lands none , effect on flood plains none ; effect on wildlife minimum . The question came up that we are now in a new ag district and people start to get concerned about that . Since he didn ' t know anything about it he was advised to call Frank Liguori , County Planner . Mr Vrooman said that he asked Mr Liguori if this new site in the ag district would create a problem? Mr Liguori said that it would not because you have a cooperative property owner and if he has taken no tax advantage of . beingpin the ag district he is perfectly free to do whatever he pleases with the land . There is no hold on it . If he had taken some tax advantage which appears to be unlikely according to Carol Burgess , then he would have to pay back a proportionate share . Mr Liguori said that because of the tax abatement law tie him and he is free to do as he pleases . The location was selected in the field by ourselves and by environmentalist Bob Torba . As far as the environmental point of view and the engineering point of view it was • satisfactory to all . A word of comment is the reclassification of the stream . Here is some news as of this afternoon and reading from this report is if the Village of Dryden is unsuccessful in its application to obtain reclassification of Virgil Creek from CT which is intermittent to C ( this would down grade it to the point where you don ' t have to treat it , a requirement that you would have to if it continues as it is now ) than the treated affluent from Dryden Waste Water Facilities would also utilize the Freeville Treatment Plant outfall discharge to Fall Creek connecting just down stream with the Freeville Waste Water Treatment Plant chlorine content tank . George Junior Republic affluent will be conveyed to Fall Creek via the Dryden outfall to the Freeville Waste Water Treatment Plant outfall . This will furnish the dissolution which it would be unneccessary for Dryden to put in a very expens Ne high degree of treatment if they go into the present point of discharge . Mr Vrooman said that the best understanding he has of George Junior Republic is that their affluent is going offf into some sort of a marsh . Supv Cotterill said that now it is going through 2 culverts and into a swamp and then seeping into the creek . Mr Vrooman said that at the point of discharge it is unacceptable , but thanks to the swamp it is some type of lagoon treatment at the point of coming into the stream . Supv Cotterill wanted to know if they have been ruled that they are eligible for aid ? Mr Vrooman said that they were eligible to the extent that they have an intercepter and the connections into the line would be eligible . As far as the sewer within their streets there seems to be some kind of a complicating factor . It is his impression that they would go into the pipeline if the pipeline has to be required for Dryden . A further comment on that which has come as sort of a shock this afternoon according to Steve Lackey is that the state has cut back in its encon budget to the extent that it has eliminated the wet water quality section that was headed by Jerry Bresner , which now he has no staff or money . Mr Vrooman said he finds this hard to comprehend . The comment is because of that they can ' t consider the reevaluation o f the classification which doesn ' t make sense just because they donut have money in the budget . He would think that one way or the other they would have to consider it if they had to put somebody on it special . The indication was , there was no staff there is no stream quality section anymore , therefore you and the Village of Dryden will have to put in the pipeline , which this doesn ' t make sense . You cannot put anything through wet lands . Environmental effects of the relocated Freeville Treatment Plant , a new western site proposed as overall lesser environmental impacts in construction on the original or eastern site . There is a page and a half story that t ells you why in detail item by item in the report I have given you . The ag lands , production , woodlands , soil , wildlife and the remotness of human habitation . Clm Webb wanted to know if Mr Liguori said there wouldn ' t be aL Y problem with the ag • district ? Mr Vrooman said that if the property owner hasn ' t taken any advantage of the tax ✓ eduction there would be no problem . It would be as if the ag district didn ' t exist . Clm Webb said _ . that if you take $ 100 an acre land and give a person $ 1500 an acre for it or $ 1000 he all of a sudden has 10 times better land than when it was in an ag district . The problem would be his because the assessors can come back and tell him that it is $ 100 an acre land and you are selling it at $ 1000 an acre . That is an advantage isn ' t it ; if you are selling $ 100 an acre land for $ 1000 an acre ? Mr Vrooman said that it sounded good . Clm Webb thought that maybe he wouldn ' t have a problem and he can get away with it , but felt that they could come in on him if they wanted to . Mr Vrooman said that the next several pages of the report there is the Freeville gravity sewer to the Freeville treatment plant , intercepters sewer cost estimate is broken down in 3 pages . One question that was raised which seems to be of concern o f Steve Lackey , is that you can ' t put in 18 inch sewer pipe for any $ 33 per foot , so we returned by stating a little over less than a year ago in the Village of Dannemora we took bids on over 5 , 000 feet of 18 inch sewer pipe , 6 ,to 8 foot cut (21) \ . . and their low bid was $ 23 , 6 to 8 foot excavation , 18 inch sewer page in the ground . Our estimate that they were questioning ; $ 13 for the excavation and $ 20 for the pipe for a total of $ 33 . Our proof of bidding was $ 23 . 00 and we are way to the good . The actual length by virtue of this change approximately 18 , 500 feet , there is about 300 feet in the ground already , so we are that much to the good . The footage turned out to be almost the same at either plant site , and the number of manholes , thanks to the planning and acquiring the abandoned railroad property means that we will go straight , because of that we go from 42 manholes to 35 manholes . We saved 12 manholes and they are being bid at around $ 900 each . So money wise as far as that line is concerned you are in . As far as bidding is concerned and our estimates are concerned ; We were at a Village Board in HighFalls , Orange County and received bids on part of a major project . We have a grant there that totals about $ 7 million . There were bids on contract on all sewers , 11 bids and they ranged from low bid of $ 912 , 000 to a high bid of $ 1 , 700 , 000 . That $ 912 , 000 compares with our estimate of $ 1 , 300 , 000 which is almost $ 400 , 000 under our estimate . The other point to finish would be the cost estimates which he just mentioned and this is the Freeville gravity sewer to the Freeville treatment plant intercepters sewer cost estimate . There are two others that he doesn ' t have with him . This does not effect the Village of Dryden because by sharing costs with O the Village of Freeville on a few hundred feet and the line being basically the same it . With the relocation of the Freeville treatment plant , the Dryden half will also have to be relocated to minimize impacts on the active agricultural land . The line uses the former railroad bed , and Virgil Creek valley is easily crossed , utilizing the existing railroad fills either side of the existing railroad bridge plus a suspended crossing at the bridge itself . This was of concern which was easily solved as far as the environmentalist was concerned . The relocated line has minimum environmental impact as no wet lands or flood plains or other sensitive areas are disturbed . For the Village of Dryden they have revised construction cost estimates in the report . As the estimated costs are the same as previously estimated for the Dryden outfall no change occurs ; in annual costs projections or overall : project costs . This also has less impacts on local homes , businesses , or farms so it is an improvement to the project plan is the end of the amendment of the facilities report . This will have to be in Albany tomorrow morning and there are 2 copies in Syracuse now . They ✓ eviewed it this afternoon and they wanted the wet lands put on a special tax map and this is their ultimate request . There is one factor that is important and that is the archeological report . He had a telephone conservation with the archeologist to the effect that she has basically completed .everything , except some minor additional work that she is going to pick up in Etna and Yellow Barn Rd sub- division . She has covered Etna within the streets and tomorrow we will have flagged out some of the r- o -w in Etna and Yellow Barn Rd area which she has to look at . Apparently she isn ' t finding very much and the price will be about $ 5 , 000 . She said she will have her basic report to DEC by the end of this week . She is coming back from some work she is doing in Elbridge on Wednesday night and she hopes to wrap up the rest o f it on Thursday and Friday make sure the bulk of everything is to DEC on Fri . before the 15th on Sat . The other part of the picture is that you have this amendment to the facilities report and you have a requirement to put it on file ( file of the commission ) which he has the copies . It is on file for 30 days and then you have a hearing which is advertised , and this is a routine thing . It doesn ' t matter whether people come and have a problem or don ' t have a problem . You go through the hearing and make your finding and there should be no problem because the amendment is advantageous all around . A resolution is then adopted and there is a 30 day period , but that 30 days this week or next week still, swings you through September which is in the federal fiscal year . The comment this afternoon was to the effect that there seemed to be projects that are dropping out to the point that they couldn ' t make it . We have the material , with you passing your resolutions to submit the grant applications . They anticipate ' that they will have the funds available for December . As to the availability of funds we found that people sitting in Albany can ' t arbitrarily , verbally. -- set a date and say after that date you are through , you have had it and this is an opinion , but he thinks its an act . You and the Village o f Dryden and the Village of Freeville and ourselves have never received any written 411 notice to the effect that you have had to have certain things in by a certain date o r else you lose your grant opportunity . Mr Vrooman wanted to know if he was correct in that the town has never received a written notice ? Supv Cotterill said that we have never received any written notice but it was made quite clear last Tuesday that the deadline had gone by and the material wasn ' t there . No one has given him any assurance other than your statement that anything has changed . Mr VanGiler called the Mayor and told him it was all over . Mr Vrooman said he knew and then everyone loses heart . Supv Cotterill said = thht it : would.:Tb &' the =_last aoid if we don ' t get DEC approval , because you can ' t very well get grants if DEC hasn ' t approved the feasibilty study that has to be approved even before you can talk about grants and he has no information in his hands that they are even close to getting a feasibility study approved . You make it sound good , but when they talk to us they don ' t make it sound so good . Supv Cottetill said that he wasn ' t disputing his word , but he has heard nothing from anyone , that anything has been changed in the last week . 2i Mr Vrooman said that he was going in there fighting and going in with a very positive point of view because they have done this before . We had the Town of Highland Falls , south of West Point and they had a grant request for a little over 4 million dollars and they had complication after complication to the point where they finally contacted the assemblyman and the assemblyman contacted the senator and they got busy and pretty soon it got smoothed over . He went to their meeting last week Mon and the Town Board passed the resolution to sign the grant application and they are on the road . Our engineer took it the next morning and said you know we have been talking about giving you the Step # 2 , which is planning only , but now as the picture is money wise , so many projects have been dropping out to the point that we can assure you with reasonable assurance they will get Step # 2 and # 3 which means planning and construction which is the works of all that they can give you . Mr Vrooman read from a newspaper that was printed in the Highlands " in view of an August 15th deadline for filing application - deadline" - Mr Vrooman said this is made up by individuals saying well 411 we like to push them along so that we will have more time to review them . It is a personal thing it is not a legal thing set up by DEC . Supv Cotterill said that at the meeting last week Torbas said that it would take him more than a week to do his job and he only had a week to go . If you are just getting him this material today , the week is already gone by . Supv Cotterill wanted to know if something has changed since then? Mr Vrooman said that he thought that something has advanced by an individual who is in the department , who was told what to say because they wanted to push them along on a schedule since they didn ' t want to get loaded in a certain period . Supv Cotterill said that he would like to hear something from Mr VanGilder and Mr Torbas in writting that says they are considering . Mr Vrooman said that they were with Mr Torbas today . Rick Shearer said that funds were available this fall and to plug away because there are other jobs dropping out . Suvp Cotterill said that he has no objection but it is a little discouraging that we have gotten in this condition . • Mr Vrooman said that the whole thing is frustrating and it is to them . As far as this project has moved they have been 10 years of studies . They have spent over $ 400 , 000 . 00 , most of it federal money that was forced upon them to combine with the Village of Highland Falls , don ' t combine with the Village of . Highland Falls , . environmental assessment study , environmental impact study called a piggy-back . When we started , the town went and bought the plant site about 10 years ago and now they have gone all the way around through $ 400 , 000 . 09 not of their selection , and they are back to the same plant site and the same basic area to be served . Supv Cotterill said that he wasn ' t interested in a study they would like to see some of that money spent to do some good . ' He wanted to know what we had to do or what had to be done because he had assumed that ' we have done everything we have had to do ? Mr Vrooman said that one thing is that you have received the change of plant site in Freeville which is the amendment that you have to adopt a resolution for . Atty Perkins wanted to know if this resoltuion would tie the town into going to construction ? Mr Vrooman said no , that it is an application for a grant and if you get the grant then you have to accept or reject the grant . In other words , it is asking for a grant offer , it is not asking for a commitment to proceed . Atty Perkins said that it states the applicant agrees that it will fund its portion of cost of said water quality improvement project , it doesn ' t say anything about accepting or rejecting a grant . Apparently if you get the grant you have to go ahead . • Mr Vrooman said that the way it was explained to them was that you are going to get the grant offer and you have so many days in which to accept the grant offer . He thought it was 45 days to accept or reject it . Atty Perkins wanted to know if this resolution would tie the town into any engineering agreement contained in these documents which were delivered to his office last Fri ? Mr Vrooman asked if he met the resolution itself , because he would have to read it to know it ? He said he didn ' t know . . . Rick Shearer said that it was a seperate engineering agreement . Atty Perkins said that if we the town agrees to go along with Step # 2 and Step # 3 , in other words werare applying for a grant of Step # 2 construction plans and Step # 3 construction . Does that tie us into any particular engineering agreement ? Mr Vrooman said yes : if you accept the grant . Atty Perkins wanted to know which engineering agreement is what ? is Mr Vrooman said that it/contained ih the resolution . Atty Perkins said then it does tie us to you . Mr Vrooman said yes . He read from the newspaper " the town could accept the grant offer when it is made or it could reject all bids for construction if they exceeded the grant amount " . This is in answer to your question does the resolution tie you into going ahead with construction , would be no it does not . Atty Perkins said that if we decided to go to construction we are tied into this engineering agreement . Mr Vrooman said yes , which is prepared according to what is now a new set of requirements of the federal and the limitation actually is a basic copy that was approved from the Village of Dannemora . They have what they call a 5700- 41 form which is attached to your agreement and sets forth the costs in detail . Supv Cotterill said if these are seperate grants for each district they should not be one grant . Rick Shearer said that has been changed , one grant for all 3 districts . Supv Cotterill said that he didn ' t see how we could tie them together , because there is always the possibility that one district will proceed and one will not . Our work has to be to a strict district and our bookkeeping and auditing has to be for one district . There is no way that we can get involved, with a lateral thing . It very definitely has to have everything seperate . Mr Vrooman said that somebody in DEC- had an idea to combine them . Supv Cotterill said that they might be able to do that in the village but the town couldn ' t do it . Mr Vrooman agreed but that was , the way they were presented . In other words they want assurance that if they make you a grant offer you , are going to give them the assurance that you intend to finance your part of it . Atty Perkins said that the question is where it says Step # 3 construction plans and specifications and Step # 3 construction form , the Cortland Rd . , Werninckville and George Junior Republic Sewer Districts , plural and that seems to tie all 3 districts is this resolution . Mr Vrooman said you can do them in 3 seperate resolutions . • Atty Perkins said that he thought that it was what they were talking about earlier . Mr Vrooman said we were , but the way this is worded all 3 are together , so you can do them in 3 seperate resolutions . Atty Perkins asked if these 3 resolutions presume formation of 3 seperate sewer districts which have not been accomplished ? Mr Vrooman said yes the way he understands it . Atty Perkins wanted to know if it was going to cause any problems the fact that the sewer districts are still in the formation stage ? Mr Vrooman said he didn ' t know . His thinking is to get the application in because they have to have some examination time in Albany . By the time they come to that type of question to be asked he thought that you could provide them with that answer . You are proceeding as he understands it satisfactorily on Cortland Rd as there are no complications there . Atty Perkins said that the other question which still hasn ' t been resolved in his mind satisfactorily is , if we establish the Cortland Rd Sewer District , we do so on the presumption that the Village of Dryden will accept the affluent if we can get it that far , transport it , treat it and so forth at a reasonable _ rate which they have been unwilling to enter into any kind of negotiation . It seems to him , that assume the Village of Dryden has to pump its affluent to Freeville , that -is our property . He felt that now is the time to have some kind of understanding with the village , about how a decision is going to be reached upon charges for the people in the district before we agree to anything . We owe it to the people in the district who are going to be paying the bills to protect them as much as possible . Mr Vrooman read a letter from the Village of Dryden in reference . to Cortland Rd Sewer District . " Please be advised that the Village of Dryden will accept and treat sanitary waste from the Cortland Rd Sewer District in accordance with the Dryden- Freeville Joint Waste Water Facilities report dated May 1 , 1981 . A service agreement between the town and village will be executed to the satisfaction of both in the near future . " Atty Perkins said that it isn ' t worth the paper it was written on . Mr Vrooman said he agreed but , it was sent in with the application . Atty Perkins said he didn ' t care about the application , but he did care about what the people in the district are going to pay and what this town board on behalf of the district has to negotiate . That says nothing as far as he is concerned it is an agreement to agree . Mr Vrooman agreed . Atty Perkins said he would be surprised if the village signs it . We are not concerned about the grant , lets assume that we get the grant and pass these resolutions . What about the agreement that is mentioned in there , when does it get agreed on by all of the people ? Mr Vrooman said that .you have to agree before you commit yourself to anything in that district . Atty Perkins said that the time is now . Mr Vrooman said to pull the page out and send the application in without that page . Atty Perkins said that doesn ' t solve the problem . Mr Vrooman said it doesn ' t solve the problem , the problem has to be solved hopefully with you the town and they the village . Atty Perkins said that we have made overtures to the Village of Dryden and offered them two alternatives and they rejected both of them and came back without an alternative of their own . It is his concern on behalf of the people in this district . The town board is going to have to negotiate with the village and now is the time to breach some kind of basic framework agreement with the village . Something has got to/ made clear to them that they don ' t own the land between Dryden and Freeville and that we- are willing to enter into discussion about their prospective use of that and the way charges willlbe determined in the Cortland Rd Sewer District . He knows • how unbearable the pressure is going to be for the town to agree to that if you let it go until the last minute and that is not the time to negotiate . Supv Cotterill said we sent the village a letter stating that the town would like some indication from them as to how we are going to agree on the charge and gave them an alternative . If we couldn ' t agree there would be a type of possibility that there be a third party to agree and they rejected any part of deven discussing it . They: said that it would not be acceptable to a third party negotiation . Mr Vrooman said nobody can fool around with this to long or there will not be anything to agree to , and he knows it is to their advantage . Supv Cotterill said as late as even the last 2 weeks they have made an indication that they have a resolution on their books that they will not let anyone outside the village even come in . Mr Vrooman said that he would be available if they can be of any help in getting the village and town together and answer any questions or making any suggestions based upon their experience with setting rates elsewhere , for what it is worth . The applications should be inat is week , the commitment to the feasibility study is in the archeological report / s could be in by the end of this week . Supv Cotterill wanted to know if a resolution was made to accept this amendment who does it go to ? Mr Vrooman said that you are operating with your commission and he would think that you would put them together with what Hike Lane would send in with the other 2 , and Freeville meets Thrusday . You could send a copy to Mike Lane and a certified copy of the resolution to us and will photo copy it and make sure that it gets to DEC at its office in Region 7 in the central office . COUNCILMAN PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR Clm Webb proposed that the Town Board postphone making a decision on Orion Rd since Clm Metzger was absent . ATTORNEY Atty Perkins said that one of the things that have to be done tonight is to have a resolution to have a special meeting after the hearings on Mon Aug 17th . What the special meeting is for is to act after we have had the - 2 public hearings on . Werninckville and George Jr Republic sewer districts . Those were necessitated by the fact that we did not have a high enough figure in the resolution calling for a public hearing and the notice that was published for the public hearing did not have enough .:money . This was discovered by the engineers the last week in July some 50 days after we had sent them a copy of the resolution . It was confirmed with our bond council in New York with respect to those 2 districts , that if we were ever going to go to bonding we would have to start all over again or else be bound by the o riginal amount that was published in the newspaper . Consequently we are starting all over again with those 2 districts . The map) plan and report have already been filed and all we have to do is hold a public hearing . The projected user charge , the annual charge which was disclosed by the engineers do not change . There was some question about the break down of costs for the . system . The amount that should have been in the resolution was a total of 2 other sums . The reason they are on the agenda tonight is that by resolution you should set a special meeting at 5 : 45 PM on Aug 17th in o rder to adopt an order establishing the districts . The other sewer district that you see . On the agenda has to do with Cortland Rd Sewer District and the board should pass a resolution authorizing the supervisor to send the application to audit and control establishing the district . Upon receipt of their approval you would place it on the agenda for the next board meeting to enter a final order into the records e stablishing the district . The contemplated time for that would be sometime in Sept . at our regular meeting . Those are the 2 things on the agenda . The other half is what they are asking you to do is adopt a resolution to apply for funding for the Step # 2 construction plans for Cortland Rd and Step # 3 construction for the Cortland Rd Sewer District . Presumably , according to the engineers , the grant application being approved you will get an offer for the grant which you will have to accept or reject , as he understands it from the engineers . If you accept the grant you will bind yourself to the engineering agreement which is in the packet of documents who is Morrell Vrooman Engineers , and the total for Step # 2 is $ 23 , 850 . 00 and the total for Step # 3 is $ 222 , 200 . 00 . The $ 23 , 850 . 00 is additional engineering costs . The $ 222 , 200 : 00 is projected construction costs of the Cortland Rd Sewer Dist . Presumably , 872% of that will be federally funded that would leave you 12%% funding for the district . In the . resolution you agree that you. will fund your portion of the improvement . They are asking you to adopt this resolution . tonight to . approve - the engineering agreement , to give assurance . that you will not discriminate against anybody , that . you will comply with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , and that you will file the appropriate reports . Atty Perkins felt that the Town Board should examine the documents including the grant application and the engineering agreement before they are adopted . He thought that it was incredible that you were asked without a chance to review them to adopt those kinds of resolutions , because we have been placed in some time restraints . The Town Board should take time and review these , documents even if we adopt them . on the 17th and that would be appropriate . He couldn ' t give the board his assurance that he understands ` everythingthat is in . there from these engineers . As. you saw there was some confusion : on their part and they prepared the documents tying all 3 districts together . This is not his 411) • understanding at all . . - Supv Cotterill said this is common because they brought the joint sewer people a feasibility study at 8 o ' clock at night and it was supposed to. be in Albany at 9 o ' clock the next morning . and they wanted it adopted in 5 minutes . This was - something that was to have been done last November . The first night that they agreed to come , when we gave - them a . months notice , to have it there to look at it they came without it , they said it wasn ' t done so we had a special meeting a week later and not one person from the town , village or George Junior Republic has seen anything . They saw it at 8 o ' clock at night when it was supposed to be in Albany the next morning , . a book real thick and they said to adopt it because it has to be filed . This is' the same feasibility study that I was asking the engineers tonight what DEC ' s reaction is , because as late as last week DEC has said that they have not, had a feasibility study filed that they can accept . - This archeologist study has been pending for 8 months and they are now trying to decide where to do something in Yellow Barn Rd and Etna that hasn ' t changed in . 7 months . Tonight he ' is talking about getting it done by the end of the week and they haven ' t done anything in 7 months . Supv Cotterill wanted to . know what has . to go . to audit and control and if anything is gained , by delaying it ? Atty Perkins said that audit =.and control was of the opinion that the thing would come to pass sometime. in December and encouraged us to plug ahead and form the districts . All thee board needs to do is authorize the supervisor to sign the appropriate application to audit . and control and the town clerk and supervisor would forward the necessary documents for approval by them .. If the . documents are received back here or if word is received back approving it from audit and control the matter can be placed on the agenda for the Sept meeting . RESOLUTION # 99 APPROVAL FOR SUPERVISOR TO SIGN• • THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATION TO AUDIT AND CONTROL Clm Jordan offered the following resolution . and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that this Town Board authoriz_ ed . the Supervisor . to sign the appropriate application to audit and control with respect to the establishment of the- Cortland Road Sewer District and forward the appropriate documents for approval to audit and control . • 2nd Clm Webb r . Carried Supv Cotterill appointed Clm Jordan and himself to schedule a meeting with the Village of Dryden with regard to the Cortland Rd . Sewer Dist . . . RESOLUTION x` 100 SPECIAL MEETING - - - August 17th Clm Webb offered , the following resolution and asked for its adoption : • RESOLVED , that this Town Board schedule a special meeting at 5 : 45 PM on August 17th at the Town Hall . • 2nd Clm Jordan Roll call .vote . - . all voting . YES Atty Perkins reported that . the .Town Board will have to pass a resolution for a- proposed Local Law # 4= 1981 to - .be know- as . the Electrical Code of the .Town . of Dryden . It was returned to us by . the. Secretary of . State because there were 2 minor corrections - changing . the • word ordinance to local las in 2 places and in his opinion we• do not have to hav'e :another public hearing , but you must readopt it with a roll call vote if you are so inclined . .. . a e•• . . � . r • • • ` . • • v RESOLUTION # 101 READOPT PROPOSED LOCAL LAW # 4 - 1981 C) The Electrical Code of the Town of Dryden Clm Tarr offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption . , . , Section 1 - - TITLE . This local law shall be known as The Electrical Code of the Town of Dryden . Section 2 - - STATEMENT OF PURPOSE . Since there is danger to life and property inherent in the use of electrical energy , this local law is enacted to regulate the installation , alteration of wiring for electric light , heat or power and signal sysiems operating on fifty ( 50 ) volts or more , in or on all real property - within the Town of Dryden , exclusive of the Villages of .Qr. yden and FIReevi J It. . • Section 3 - - NATIONAL CODE ADOPTED . All electrical installations heretofore mentioned shall be made in conformity with the requirements of the National Electrical Code except where the provisions of this local law or any other local ordinance. or building Code of the Town of Dryden shall differently prescribe , in which event compliance with the provisions of such local law . Ordinance or Building Code shall • be recognized as proper compliance with this local law . The requirements of the National Electrical Code shall be those known as National Fire Association Parr.phlet # 70 , as approved and adopted by the American Standards Association . Section 4 - - ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR . The Chief Inspector , and each of the duly . appointed Inspectors of The New York Board of Fire Underwriters are hereby authorized and deputized as agents of the Town of Dryden to make inspections and reinspections of all electrical installations heretofore and hereafter described , and to approve or disapprove the same . In no event , however , will the cost or expense of such inspections and reinspections be a charge against the Town of Dryden . Section 5 . - - DUTIES OF THE ELECTRICAL INSPECTORS . (a ) It- shall be the dutcj of the Inspector to report in writing to the Building Inspector or Zoning Enforcement Officer , whose duty it shall be to enforce all the provisions of this Iota & lay: , all violations of or deviations from or omissions of the electrical provisions Of the National Electrical Code , and of all local laws , local Ordinances , and Cuildin.q Codes as referred to in this local law insofar as any of the same apply re electrical wiring . The Inspector shall make inspections and reinspections of electrical installations in and on properties in the Town of Dryden upon the written request of an authorized official of the Town of Dryden or as herein provided . The inspector is authorized to make inspections and reinspections of electrical wirin9 installations ; devices , appliances , and equipment , in and on properties within the Town of Dryden where he deems it necessary for the protection of life and property . In the event of an emergency it is the duty of the Inspector to make electrical inspections upon she oral request of an official or officer of the Town of Dryden . . (b) It shall be the duty of the Inspector to furnish written reports t:q the proper officials of the Town of Dryden and owners and/or lessees of property where defective electrical installations and equipment are found upon inspection . Ne shall authorize the issuing of a certificate of compliance when electrical install - ations and equipment are in conformity with this local law . He shg311 direct. that a copy of the certificate of compliance be sent to the Town of Dryden to the attention of the Building Inspector or Zoning Enforcement Officer . Section 6 - - VIOLATIONS OF THE LOCAL LAW . It shall be a violation of this local law for any person , firm or corporation to install or cause to be insta ) led. , or to alter electrical wiring for light , heat or power in or on properties in the • Town of Dryden until an application for inspection has been filed with The New York hoard of Fire Underwriters . It shall be a violation of this local Jaw For a person , firm or corporation to connect or cause to be connected electrical wiring , in or on properties for light , heat or power , to any source of electrical eivergy supply , prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate , or a certificate of compliance , by The New York Board of Fire Underwriters . 1111 Section 7 - - PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS . Any person , firm or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of this local law or any rule or regulation made pursuant thereto shall be guilty of a violation , and upon conviction thereof may be punished by a fine of- not more than one hundred ( $ 100 . 00) dollars , and each day on which such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense . Section 8 -- LOCAL LAW NOT APPLICABLE IN CERTAIN CASES : The provisions of this Local Law- shall not apply to the electrical installations in mines , ships , railway cars , automotive equipment , or the installations or egviprrent employed by a railway , electrical or communication utility in the exercize of its function as a utility , and located out doors or in buildings used exclusively for that purpose . This Local Law shall not apply to any work involved in the manufacture , assembly , test or repair of electrical machinery , apparatus , materials and equipment by a person , firm or corporation engaged in electrical manufacturing as their principal business . It shall not apply to any building which is owned or leased in it entirety by the Government of the United States or the State of New York . It shall not applti to any construction unless a building permit is required by the Town of Dryden . • _ ZyjG� Section 9 - - NO WAIVER OR ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITY . This local Jaw shall not be construed to relieve from or lessen the responsibility of any person owning operating , controlling or installing any electrical wiring , devices , appliances , or equipment for loss of life or damage to person or property caused by any defect therein , nor shall the Town of Dryden or The New York Board of Fire under-writers be deee.ied to have assumed any such liability by reason of any inspection mode powsuaht to this Ordinance . Section 10 - - SEPARABILITY CLAUSE . If any part or provision of this local Jam' or the application t ereof to any person or circumstance be adjudged inval4d 159 any court of competent jurisdiction , such judgment shall be confined in its operation to the part or provision or application directly involved in the controversy in wh.ic:h: such judgment shall have been rendered and shall not affect or impair nhe validity of the remainder of this local law or the application thereof to other persons or circumstances and the Town Board of the Town of Dryden hereby declares thPt it would have passed this local law or the remainder thereof had such invalid application or invalid provision been al:parent . Section 11 - - REPEALING PROVISIONS . All local law and parts of local Jaws or local Ordinances inconsistent with this local law are hereby repealed . Section 12 - - EFFECTIVE DATE . This local law shall take effect imm-adiateky upon its approval and filing in the manner so provided by law . .2nd Cum Webb ' Roll call vote = all voting YES . • Atty Perkins reported that Edward Clement , who is apparently owner and in charge of _ . _a_p.r.inciple of a corporation Or otherwise responsible for the premises at 1725 Dryden Rd . , tax parcel _ l46- 1- 14 . 31 . Mr Clement was noticed by the building inspector to correct certain alleged violations of the mulitple residence law' and was noticed for his failure to comply within 30 days is a misdemeanor , punishable by ' a fine not to exceed $ 500 . 00 or 'by imprisonment for a period of 1 year or by both . To his knowledge he has not contacted the ' Zoning Officer or corrected the problems . Zoning Officer Stewart said that he may have corrected them , but he has not contacted . him . Atty Perkins said that he had a proposed resolution that the Zoning Enforcement Officer and Town Attorney are authorized to prosecute Edward Clement in the Town of Dryden Justice Court for the violation of the New York mulitple residence law . Clm Tarr wanted to know what happens if he has corrected them ? Is he in any way required to notify us of the correction ? Atty Perkins said that presumably , that to his knowledge he has not allowed the Zoning Officer into the apartment in question to inspect it at anytime . Zoning Officer Stewart said that he had been in only one apartment that a tennant had let him in . He has never been in any of the other apartments . The only reason he went there was because a tennant had . requested him to go there . Atty Perkins wanted to know . if the Zoning Officer knew if the door was now of solid Core ? Z . O . Stewart said that he did not know . Atty • Perkins wanted to know if the stairs were 3 feet 8 inches or more in width ? Z . O . Stewart said thathand rails had to be installed because the stairs are over 3 feet 8 inches in width . \ Atty Perkins said that there are certain things which are easily checked before the process is handed out . • • Clm Tarr felt that these should be checked out before a resolution is made . Atty Perkins said that he -was notified in May , to remove the violations . Clm Tarr said that for - all we know he has . Atty Perkins said that we don ' t know that he hasn ' t . • Supv 'totterill said that ' he should notify the inspector and allow him to check it . Clm• Tarr wanted to know where is says that ,. It just says to correct them it doesn ' t say correct them and tell me . He wanted to know is Z . O . Stewart had been back there to check and if he would let ' him in . Z . O . Stewart said that he hasn ' t been back since the letter was written . He made a couple of appointments to start with and he would never meet him . There are 3 apartments that . he has never been in . Supv ' Cotterill wanted to know if something happened ' if there was a fire or a disaster , does the 'town have liability ? Atty Perkins said that we do not . Clm Tarr agreed with what Mahtlin i. was saying , but felt that Sib should go out there and make a check . If there is one of the problems ' that hasn ' t been fixed then okay that would be it . • al Atty Perkins said that you could made a motion in the resolution that in the event that an inspection has been made by the zoning enforcementi:officer reveals that some o f the conditions are in violation you can then bring appropriate criminal proceedings . Supv . Cotterill said that in refusal to let him inspect it is as much as saying that it hasn ' t been corrected . Clm Tarr wanted to know what authority Sib had to go in ? Atty Perkins said under the multiple residence law . RESOLUTION # 102 VIOLATION OF THE NEW YORK MULITPLE RESIDENT LAW - Edward Clement Clm Webb offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the town proceed and have the Zoning Enforcement Officer check the premises at 1725 Dryden Rd within the next several days and if he finds that it is still in violation that the Zoning Officer and Town Attorney are authorized to prosecute Edward Clement in the Town of Dryden Justice Court for violation of the • New York mulitple residence law . 2nd Clm Jordan Roll call vote - all voting YES Atty Perkins reported on HAMM. Investors , purchaser of the former Elstram Developers Inc . property in care of Frank Robinson . They also , have been notified of a violation . Their.. response was that they have the property on the market for sale . , The foundation presently existing could very well be of an economic value to the future buyer . The corporation has not been satisfied with the present brokers effort in selling the property . When the listing expires a new broker will be secured and may show a little more effort . This letter was dated Jan . 1981 . The violation that they have been charged with is that construction has not been completed within a year from that date o f application for a building permit . They have done nothing except tell us that the property is for sale . Atty Perkins said that there are several -ways that you can proceed . One would be to grant a criminal proceeding against the corporation . Second would be to bring a civil proceeding by nature of an injunction to compel the removal o f the foundation for violation of the zoning ordinance . RESOLUTION # 103 VIOLATION OF TOWN OF DRYDEN ZONING ORDINANCE - HAMY INVESTORS INC . Clm Jordan offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the Zoning Officer bring a Criminal Proceeding against HAMY Investors Inc . in the Town of Dryden Justice Court for their violation of the Town of Dryden Zoning Ordinance and that the Zoning Officer and the Town Attorney are authorized to prosecute the same . 2nd Clm Tarr Carried Atty Perkins reported on the LVRR option . The town should empower Atty Perkins to purchase any of the real property and in the event any expense or finances that enhold from monies appropriated from the surplus fund . This can be done without a permissive ✓ eferendum . There being no need for a permissive referendum all is needed is a ✓ esolution . The town can convey property to sell it or whatever by resolution subject to a permissive referendum . We are talking about 118 acres of abandoned LVRR property in Dryden that was established at $ 250 . 00 per acre . We have (meaning myself and other individuals ) contract purchasers for over half of that which is east of Ithaca to Freeville . We have in large part , agreements from adjacent property owners from the Village of Dryden to the Village of Freeville , and in large part adjacent property owners from the Village of Freeville north to the Town of Groton line to purchase the property . The net figure to the Town of Dryden is $ 7585 . 00 . This is subject to being- ✓ educed by 2 factors , which the town has already made a down payment to obtain the option . We -have computed the acreage to be about 100 acres , and they have computed it to be about 118 acres . Atty Perkins said that it seems to him that the acreage is going to be split somewhere in the middle . In addition to the balance of $ 4635 . 00 the purchase price ; the town will have its proportionate share of the attorneys fees and • other expenses which have gone into negotiating the deal with the railroad and recording expenses etc . including prorating of any taxes if that is necessary . The town will not be responsible for any back taxes . The only prorating will be current taxes . The intent of the town and town purpose is to obtain a right- of -way on the property to place water , sewer , utility or whatever lines necessary . You are going to end up owning , as it is set up right now , at least the property from the Village of Dryden south to the center line of West Lake Rd . The concept as it is _ set up is not for the t own to O any of the other properties . There would be 3 different parcels , Dryden to Freeville ; north of Freeville to the Groton Town Line ; and East Ithaca to Freeville . To acquire an interest in that being an easement for r- o -w to place your water , sewer , o r utility lines . The way to do it would be for the town to sign its rights of the option to purchase the property to Atty Perkins as an individual . The consideration being that if he obtains title to the property he will turn around and grant the town these easements so that it will not be sold to any purchaser without being sold subject to those easements . In other words , the right of the town on behalf of itself for any sewer district or whatever to install and maintain the property for these mains . That grant will be exclusive to the town . It will not be a general grant to anybody to use the property , but the grant will be exclusive to the Town of Dryden . The Village of ag Dryden cannot say if you grant an easement anybody can use the property including us . The town would end up owning the 3 areas he just identified and would not have to have a permissive referendum to get rid of them because you never owned them . All you are buying is south of the Village of Dryden . As he understands it no decision has been made right now with what to do with that property , but for the time being the town will at least hold the property . Atty Perkins said that they have been successful in purchasing the property from the center line of Fall Creek Rd northeasterly to the Cortland County line at $ 100 an acre . They have ben unsuccessful in purchasing the property in the Town of Groton at $ 400 an acre and unsuccessful in the Village of Dryden for purchasing the property at $ 475 an acre although we had commitments from the railroad at one time for those prices . The railroad has subsequently backed out , so the price for $ 200 an acre seems a good price . Supv Cotterill wanted to know if there was any cost to the town as far as getting the easements or transfering the property ? Atty Perkins said that the town would be buying some of the property . Supv Cotterill said that we really don ' t have anything invested , but we will end up II/ with the r-o -w . Atty Perkins said that is correct , in the consideration of signing the option to him is that he agrees to grant you those easements . * He is there as a title holder for the purpose of holding title and then conveying it out to the individuals . Before it is conveyed it is subject to the right of the town to use the property . What the town has ' to agree to do is to buy the property between the south line from the Village o f Dryden and said center line of West Lake Rd and to pay its proportionate share of cost . He would like the resolution to indicate with respect to any property between the Village of Dryden and the Village of Freeville and the Village of Freeville to - the Town of Groton Town Line , and any property which can not be contracted for prior to the expiration."of• ,the.'option that the town will buy that at the figure of $ 250 . 00 an acre . The reason being for that is you have most of the property owners lined up . Between the Village of Dryden and the Village of Freeville George Junior Republic is r.. , , :a large owner , and they are ready to purchase the property . Now ' that this is in the final stages and about to become a reality , all of the rest of , the people that so far have been uncominited will fall in line . In order for everything to go you will have to have all of the property owners . What he would like the town to do since there will probably be a sewer line there is to agree to purchase any land that he cannot contract out . There is nothing that says that you can ' t sell it later and you would have to sell it subject to a permissive referendum . The only apparent expense there would be is the cost of publishing a notice that you had adopted a resolution to sell it subject to a permissive referendum . Presumably we can get all this done with the few remaining property owners . Clm Tarr wanted to know what liabilities the town has in the short time that. we own this property ? Atty Perkins said that you are not going to own any property for a short time , except some , but you would have the same liability as any land owner has . Presumably any ✓ isk that anyone is exposed to. ,you will be covered by general liability insurance with , which you should notify your carrier . Clm Tarr wanted to know about culverts and fencing ? Atty Perkins said all your responsibility for that is to be relieved of everyone . In other words the town would be in the same position anyone else would be in to the extent that there, is a natural water course or an established water course the town is under responsibility as anyone else , you can ' t change that . As far as the fencing goes he couldn ' t answer that but you aren ' t going to maintain them any more than the railroad has . Clm Tarr said that as he understands it , a lot of people have been after the railroad and now they are waiting for some new property owner and that is what he is afraid of . He wanted to know if there was anyway for us to protect ourselves from this ? Atty Perkins said that the situation where that may be way back in a deed , that might have been a requirement for the railroad to build a fence , but the reason for that was to keep the cows off the track . Atty Perkins said the next step is for him t o contact all of the purchasers that he has signed up and tell them that pursuant to the terms of the contract he intends to close the railroad on or about October 15th and please see that the following sums are delivered to his office prior to that time . RESOLUTION # 104 PURCHASE LVRR ABANDONED PROPERTY Clm Tarr offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that this Town Board assign the Town of Dryden ' s rights and option to Attorney Mahlon :Perkins for the consideration it being that he will grant to the Town of Dryden easement rights for water , sewer or utility lines or for whatever utility purposes the town will require , such easement to be exclusive to the Town of Dryden . 2nd Clm Jordan Roll call vote - all voting YES To CLERK RESOLUTION ## 105 PAY POLLING PLACES Clm Webb offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the following polling places receive $ 75 . 00 each for the year 1981 for the use of their facilities : Varna , Etna ( Houtz Hall ) , Etna Fire Station , Bethel _ Grove , Ellis Hollow Community Center , Freeville Fire Station and Dryden Fire Station . 2nd Clm Jordan Roll call vote - all voting YES RESOLUTION # 106 APPOINT CUSTODIANS Clm Webb offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , thatTthis Town Board appoint John Morey , Democrat and Joseph Petersen , Republican as Custodians of the voting machines at a fee of $ 350 . 00 each . • 2nd Clm Jordan Roll call vote - all voting YES Reported that the Sec . of State has received Local Law # 2- 1981 regarding collapsed buildings and is filed . RESOLUTION # 107 TO CORRECT MINUTES OF MARCH 10 , 1981 BOARD MEETING Clm Jordan offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the last line on page 16 of the March 10th 1981 board meeting to read as follows : Clm Metzger said that he would make a motion to nitro-duce a local law for an electrical inspection code , when it was ready . 2nd Clm Tarr Carried RESOLUTION # 108 TO CORRECT MINUTES OF APRIL 14 , 1981 BOARD MEETING . Clm Tarr offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , to strike out line 5 and 6 from the bottom of page 28 of the April 14th , 1981 , board meeting . Clm Metzger introduced a proposed local law for the Defense of Town Officers and employees . Supv Cotterill scheduled a public hearing on May 12th at 7 : 30 PM . Clm Jordan introduced a proposed local law for an electrical inspection code for the Town of Dryden . Supv Cotterill scheduled a public hearing on May 12th at 7 : 45 PM . 2nd Clm Jordan Carried ZONING OFFICER 17 building permits were issued for the month of July . 7 one- family dwellings ; 2 mobile homes ; 2 additions to homes ; 1 garage ; 3 storage buildings ; 2 swimming pools and 1 concrete batch plant which was granted by ZBOA last month . ZBOA held 3 hearings : 1 Freeman area variance for Old Mill Apts because he wanted 5 more apartments . 2- Alexander Kraft wanted a modular home at the Corner of Baker Hill Rd and ,Rt 366 , which fapily. dwelhings are not allowed in that area . 3- Eric Nielsen wanted to build a house on Midline Rd . He only had 100 foot road frontage but had about 30 acres in back of the 100 foot strip . ZBOA granted all 3 variances . HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT Supv Cotterill said that he has a petition from the people on Kirk Rd . complaining about Cornelius ' trucks breaking up the road and requesting that the road be posted against trucks . Hwy Supt Humphrey thought that the board had to make a resolution before a road can be posted . Clm Tarr said that they were very concerned about their bridge and wanted to know if it • was in bad shape ? Hwy Supt Humphrey said that the bridge itself isn ' t bad it is just a one- lane bridge . - He would eventually like to take the bridge out and put a big pipe in tQ replace it . Supv Cotterill wanted to know if it was advisable to post it against truck traffic and what happens if buses use it ? Hwy Supt Humphrey said you could post it like the one in Malloryville • to exclude buses and emergency vehicles . There is a bad intersection at the corner of Rt 13 and Kirk Rd anyway . Clm Webb said he has no objection to the trucks , but it is that our roads aren ' t built for their weight . Clm Tarr thought that there might be alternatives . Their biggest complaint was the road itself and the condition to the approach on to the bridge . He wanted to know if Hwy Supt Humphrey was going to be working on the road ? Hwy Supt Humphrey said he had planned on it next .week , but there isn ' t much you can do with the approach . 1'® Supv Cotterill felt that the Hwy Supt should have the authority to use his best judgement whether it is advisable or not to post the road . He didn ' t feel that the board would have to make a resolution to post the road to keep heavy trucks off . He wasn ' t sure about the town law . Clm Tarr said he thought you would have to have a resolution according to town law . Atty Perkins wasn ' t sure and wanted to know what the town did before . Hwy Supt Humphrey thought that there was a resolution when Malloryville was posted . He said if you post one road you are going to be flooded with requests to post certain roads . Decision was tabled . CORRESPONDENCE Supv Cotterill reported that the town had hired a dog warden and he -only lasted one day after the state man told him all the rules and regulations . Right now the SPCA has gone back to answering calls in the town . The SPCA has tentatively agreed to start with the 1982 dog licenses which start the 1st of Nov that the town would be able to keep $ 1 . 50 per license in the town with no designation to what it would be used for . It would be tip to the town . They are going to have a stipulation in the contract that the town has to do an enumeration at least every 2 years . Ambulance report . Supt/ Cotterill said that he has written to all of the fire companies for information and has only received information back from Brooktondale and Etna . Supv Cotterill reported on . the City of Ithaca , Town of Ithaca and Town of Dryden sewer district . Supv Desch told him that it is at a point where they were going to form the sewer commission and there will be 3 town representatives . We will have two choices . One is that we can be a joint owner like we are with Bolton Point . We would be a joint member with one person on the commission along with 2 other town ` representatives . Ours would have to be an elected official , the Town of Ithaca would also have an elected official . The third person would be appointed jointly and could be from either area and would not necessarily have to be an elected official . The Town of Ithaca has said that if we don ' t want to spend the time on this commission we could contract through them and they would be the owner and would sign a contact with us . We could be a contractor and they would guarantee us the same rate that they choose with no extra charge . The only advantage being is that we wouldn ' t have to spend a lot of time . Supv Cotterill said that he has talked with Jon and he felt that we should be an owner . He wanted the boards opinion and would like Jon to be our representative . Clm Webb wanted to know when this was going to take place ? Supv Cotterill said that it is in the formation stage right now because they are applying for federal money . Clm Webb said that it will no longer be the City of Ithaca Sewer Dist . Supv Cotterill said that was correct , it will be a joint deal . As it was explained to him the City of Ithaca will have 4 people on this commission and the towns 3 . The Town will have veto charge for certain types of things in the fact that there must always be 4 votes to carry . One must be a town vote and one must be a city vote . This will not give them full control . Supv Cotterill reported that Empire Livestock has notified us that they have accepted our offer - for the land . Their attorney and our attorney will finalize the agreement . RESOLUTION # 109 ACCEPT . BID FROM CREDLE EQUIP . INC . FOR 1 USED 1978 DYNAPAC ROLLER Clm Tarr offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : O RESOLVED , that this Town Baord accept the bid from Credle Equipment Inc . for one used 1978 DYNAPAC roller for a price of $ 33 , 200 . 00 2nd Clm Jordan Roll call vote - all voting YES RESOLUTION # 110 AUTHORIZE HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT TO SELL 1 USED ROLLER Clm Jordan offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that this Town Board authorize the Highway Superintendent to sell one used 1968 Galion roller 2nd Clm Webb Carried RESOLUTION # 111 ACCEPT AMENDMENT TO THE DRYDEN-FREEVILLE JOINT WASTEWATER FACILITIES REPORT Clm Jordan offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the Town of Dryden accept the amendment to the Dryden-Freeville Joint Wastewater Facilities Report dated August 8 , 1981 . 2nd Clm Webb Carried ti ft RESOLUTION # 112 AUDIT HIGHWAY BILLS Clm Webb offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the highway bills be paid as audited . 2nd Clm Jordan Roll call vote - all voting YES RESOLUTION # 113 AUDIT GENERAL FUND BILLS Clm Jordan offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that the general fund bills be paid as audited . • 2nd Clm Tarr Roll call vote - all voting YES JUSTICE REPORTS- Judge Newhart - $ 1 , 544 . 00 Judge Sweetland - 42 , 248 . 00 FINANCIAL REPORT REVENUES . EXPENSES General Fund A ' $ 26625 . 71 $ 15756 . 28 General Fund B 15604 . 38 868 . 95 • Fire Protection District 527 . 27 - 0 - FederalRevenue Sharing 15133 . 58 18262 . 77 Hight4dy 14191 . 13 53876 . 33 OLD BUSINESS Clm Jordan wanted to know if a meeting had been scheduled yet to met with Ceracche TV ? Supv Cotterill said that they were going to send us some kind of a report on some of the things that the town has requested and they have also changed managers . Sec McFall said that she had received a letter from them stating that they would be out of town this month and they would send us a report on Bone Plain Rd . Adjourned : 10 : 45 PM &L ' 6'-e Susanne Lloyd Town Clerk • • • • • • • Lgi PUBLIC HEARING # 1 August 17 , 1981 proposed Werninckville Sewer District Minutes of the public hearing # 1 held on August 17th . Present - Supv Cotterill , Clm Jordan , Clm Webb , Clm Metzger and Atty Perkins Supv Cotterill read the notice that was published in the newspaper concerning the proposed Werninckville Sewer District . QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS Atty Perkins said for the record and the Town Clerks minutes the reason for the second public hearing was that this board did adopt an order calling a public hearing for the proposed Werninckville Sewer District . The appropriate . notice was published and a hearing was held at which time it was disclosed what the annual yearly user costs would be . The order calling the meeting and the resolution establishing the district incorrectly stated the maximum proposed amount to be expended . The maximum proposed amount to be expended was a combination of two factors . 1 - the districts share of the Freeville Sewage Treatment Plant and 2 - the cost of the collectors sewers in the 110 district . In the resolution the only amount that was set forth was the cost of the collectors sewers and it should have been the sum of those two figures . The actual user costs as set forth in the public notice and as disclosed at the public hearing as set forth in the report of the engineer are correct . There wouldn ' t be any different cost to anyone . This is just a technical correction in order to create the district with the proper bonding authority . This is the only reason for this public hearing . This meeting was set up at a special August meeting of the Town Board which was held August 3rd . Notice was published the 7th and posted the 7th on the Town signboard and the 10 days are up today . The public law requires at least 2 days notice for the supervisor to call a special meeting and this did not happen because until 4 o ' clock August 3rd we didn ' t know whether we could get 3 board members to attend . What the bonding attorneys have asked us to do is to obtain a waiver from all of the Town Board members waiving any notice that they would otherwise have been entitled to attend that meeting . There were 2 board members out of town . Atty Perkins said that he would prepare the waiver and get it to the board members to sign . The procedure today will be to adopt a resolution subject to a permissive referendum establishing the districts . Our minutes should reflect clearly when we get to the special meeting that we having adopted the resolutions` - authorizing the supervisor to sign the grant applications even though the districts are not formally formed Assumimg, that the 30 days go by and no one files% the supervisor be authorized to send the appropriate application to audit and control . We have been informed by the engineer that we should go ahead and apply for the grant applications in anticipatiion of the districts being formed . Atty Perkins said this is also the same advice he received from DEC in Albany . One other thing that you should be aware of and this would pertain to all 3 sewer districts . The procedure as he understands it is that if and when the application is accepted as complete and a , decision is made an offer of grant is made to the town for the district . At that time the town board will have to make a decision as to whether to accept or reject the offer . Assuming you accept the offer of a grant , it is contemplated the grant will be for Step # 2 and Step # 3 grant that would be the construction working drawings and the actual construction . It is contemplated that then the engineering agreement would be through Morrell Vrooman Engineers . Atty Perkins felt that you would have to make that determination at this time as to whether or not you want to continue with them . There is no reason that you cannot make your grant applications without signing the engineering agreement at this time . The grant application to procede to Step # 2 and Step # 3 , the working drawings , the requirement for bidders and the letting out of bids , letting of contracts for actual construction . There is no reason that you can ' t go ahead and reserve your rights to whatever engineer you want . If that is so he thought it should be clear in the form of a resolution tohight what position you desire to take . If you desire to go ahead with Morrell Vrooman all well and good and authorize the supervisor to sign engineering agreements with whatever additions or deletions you want . If uou don ' t want to make a decision at this time indicate that . Clm Metzger wanted to know what happens if we sign the application using Vrooman and in the interim between the application whether it is granted or not , we decide not to use Vrooman do we have to start all over again ? Atty Perkins said no ,„, as he understands it the joint wastewater study and Vroomans offer with respect - to the 3 districts , he agreed to perform certain engineering services and functions with respect to Step # 1 grant application . We have received Step # 1 grant , this is the application which it was to be the by-product or the product of Step # 1 . With respect, to the districts we are only in for an amount of . $ 500 . 00 for the 3 districts . Vrooman offered to do the Cortland Rd District for $ 500 . 00 and we adopted a resolution authorizing him to proceed in a cost not to exceed $ 500 . 00 . As he understands it we owed Vrooman $ 500 . 00 for Cortland Rd and as a gift Werninckville and George Junior Republic which was his decision to include those two in with Cortland Rd . He thought that part of his problem was that time was so late at that time and they didn ' t want to wait another 30 days to go - by for approval of more money . Clm Jordan wanted to know what happens if the Village of Dryden and the Village of Freeville adopt Morrell Vrooman and the town goes with someone else 'and wanted to know what happened when Vrooman met with the Village of Dryden ? Atty Perkins said he had a copy of the resolution from the Village and believed that they made their application for Step # 2 and Step # 3 intentionally not making their determination with respect to the engineering agreement . Atty Perkins said that he has been compensated for the work that he was to perform up to this point from two sources . 1 - is the $ 500 . 00 appropriated for by this town board with respect to the Cortland Rd Sewer Dist . and 2 - the towns share , contribution and other monies in the Joint Wastewater Facilities Study Commission . From a technical point of view your financial obligation to him is satisfied upon payment from the funds of those two sources . Atty Perkins said he would encourage the board members to look over the engineering agreements because they are open-ended . 1111 All 3 sewer districts are seperate entities and all 3 sewer districts contemplate seperate engineering agreements , seperate grant applications and so forth . The resolutions that Morrell Vrooman Engineers furnished the board members with the other night do not contemplate that , although he told us that was the intent . The documents he actually presented to us combined Werninckville , George Junior Republic and Cortland Rd Sewer district . Since the application is being made for 3 grants and for 3 districts we have to have 3 seperate resolutions . If you are so inclined to adopt these resolutions we cannot adopt them as the form that they are in tonight . Closed public hearing 5 : 30 PM PUBLIC HEARING # 2 • August 17 , 1981 - Proposed Sewer Diet . George Jr . Republic Minutes of public hearing # 2 held on August 17th at 5 : 30 PM Supv Cotterill read the notice that was published in the newspaper concerning the proposed George Junior Republic Sewer Dist . QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS Atty Perkins reported that there was some question as to whether George Junior Republic as a sewer district would be eligible as a recipient for any grants because it is a union free school district . He said that would be the Republic ' s problem since we are only an agent and not a principle here . It will be up to them to work it out and we will do whatever is required of us . Atty Perkins reported on the Cortland Rd Sewer Distr. that if has been pointed out to Vrooman , and has been pointed out to the village that assuming we establish the district we don ' t have any commitment from the village to accept the sewage . The implication from the joint study report and from their letter saying that they look favorable upon the creation of the district . We had written to the village requesting some kind of a formula for determining user charges and they have not wanted to discuss either how that formula would be set up let alone what they would be . It still seems that we are in the same situation because we don ' t have any commitment from them . We offered them a couple of alternatives about how that rate would be determined if the town and village couldn ' t agree and they rejected both alternatives and we still do not have an agreement that they will even accept the sewage . Supv Cotterill said that Clm Jordan and himself have been appointed to meet with two village members . He had talked with Mike Lane to have the village choose two people so they can discuss this and come up with some type of negotiation plan and each group take it back to their board . Mike said that they would be meeting in the next week and they would pick two members . John Chapman wanted to know if George Junior and Werninckville project could not • afford to pay for the tax would the township have to pay for the taxes due ? The Town Board didn ' t understand his question so he read from the public notice " that the Town Board of such town shall determine by the specific any essential benefits thereof in the manner provided by law if not paid for by such source all - taxable real property in the Town of Dryden shall be subject to the levy . Mr Chapman wanted to know what valorem meant:? He thought that if they couldn ' t afford to pay for it the rest of the town would have to pay for it . Supv Cotterill said that only the people living in the district will pay for the sewer . Atty Perkins said that what it says is the Town Board will determine those properties within the district which are benefited by the establishment of the district and the construction therein , and they would be responsible in the first instance for the payment of the principle and interest . If the district is not formed than the cost of all proceedings up to the formation of the district are a general town charge . After the formation of the district the properties within the district are benefited . In the event that the district is formed , the first step is to have a map , plan and report ; the second is for the town board to adopt an order calling a public hearing . You then have the public hearing and adopt a resolution subject to a permissive referendum to establish the district . Assuming the 30 days go by someone files a petition , they vote down the proposition in that case the only expenses for the formation of the district up to that point will only be a general town charge since there is no district . In the event that there is no permissive referendum or if there is a permissive referendum and the question is answered affirmatively than the cost of the entire formation process is charged against the district . John Chapman said that he misinterpreted what he had read in ' the paper then . Closed public hearing 5 : 40PM SPECIAL MEETING August 17 , 1981 Minutes of the special meeting on August 17th at 5 : 45 PM Atty Perkins said that your resolution has two parts . One is that you make the findings as set forth in these forms and secondly that we establish the district making the findings that the notice of the public hearing was published and posted as required by law . All of the property and property owners benefited are included within the limits of the proposed district . The establishment of the proposed district is within the public interest . These are the findings that should be made and also that the district be established as set forth in this resolution . Atty Perkins said with respect to each grant application there has to be a seperate resolution . If you want to simply refer to the grant application for . the Cortland Rd Sewer District together with the supporting documents authorizing the supervisor to sign the application , the assurance , and all the documents required therein except for the engineering agreement . , than that is what your resolution should so state . In other words you are going to make your grant application , but you are not going to sign the engineering agreement . The supervisor and town ' clerk be authorized and directed to sign the grant applications in all of the appropriate places , make all of the assurances necessary except for the signing of the engineering agreement . Atty Perkins said that when you get the offer for the grant you have 30 days to make a decision . When you get the offer for the grant there is going to be tremendous pressure on the board to make a decision and will be pressure to go along with Vrooman if you haven ' t made other arrangements . There will be pressure to go ahead and accept the grant even if you don ' t have an agreement with the Village of Dryden . qcf . o - r 20127- 3032 t At a _ Special _ _ meeting of the Tcwn Pcard cf the Town of • Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , held at the Tcwn Nall , 65 East Main Street , in Dryden , New York , in said Tcwn , cn Auoust 17 , 19E1 , at .5 : • 00 o ' clock P . M . , Prevailing Time . The meeting was called to order by Supervisor Clinton E Cotterill • and upon roll being called , there were PRESENT : Supervisor Cotterill Councilman Webb Councilman Metzger Councilman Jordan • ABSENT : • Councilman Tarr 1 • The following resolution was offered by Councilman Metzger • who moved its adoption , seconded by councilman Jordan to - wit : • • • . (�yu.: � r .va ..ax s .o .�.-. .wc.. .. as �..e✓ .u. �_+Y,.. A..... . . . ...+r. an> . ... ��.r i', .A l < n ns....., ....., _. ._. .. .. .. >..n _�. _ _ li - 2 - RESOLUTION DATED AUGUST 17 , 1981 . A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS IN FELATION TO THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEWER DISTRICT IN THE TOWN OF DRYDEN , TOMPKINS COUNTY , NEW YORK , TO RE KNOWN AS WERNINCKVILLE SEWER DISTRICT . WHEREAS , the Town Board of the Tcwn cf Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , has heretofore duly caused a rap , plan and report tc be prepared and filed in the office cf the Clerk of said Town in relation to the establishment of a proposed sewer district in said ' Town , to be known as W' erninckville Sewer District ; and WHEREAS , an order was duly adopted by said Tcwn Fcard cn August 3 , 1981 , reciting a description cf the tcundaries cf said proposed district , the improvements proposed , the maximum: amount proposed to be expended for said improvements , the proposed method of - financing to be erple ;' ed , the fact that said map , plan and report were Cl file '_ n the Town Clerk ' s office for public inspection and specifying August 17 , 1981 , at 5 : 00 o ' clock F . M . , Prevailing Time , at the Tcwn Hall , 65 East Main Street , in Dryden , New York , in said Tcwn , as the time when and the place where said Tour. *Board would meet for the purpose of holding a public hearing tc hear all persons interested in the subject thereof concerning the same ; and WHEREAS , such order , was duly published and posted in the manner and within the time prescribed by Section 209 - 8 of the Town Law , and proof of saj: d publication and posting has teen duly presented to said Town Board ; and WHEREAS , said public hearing was duly held at the time and place set forth in said order , as aforesaid , at which all persons desiring to be heard were duly heard ; and • S I • • . • • • - 3 - WHEREAS , said . Town Board has duly considered said map and clan and the evidence given at said public hearing ; NOW , THEREFORE , PE IT RESOLVED , by the Town Board of the Town . c ' : Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , as follows : . SecSion __ 1s Upon the evidence given at the aforesaid Fntlic • hearing , it is hereby fcund and determined as follows : a ) The notice of the aforesaid public hearing was putlished and posted as required by law and is otherwise sufficient ; b ) All the property ' and property owners within said prcpcsed district are benefited thereby ; c ) All the property and property owners benefited are included within the limits of said proposed district ; and d ) The establishment of said prcpcsed district is in the public interest . SecSS r 2 _ This resolution shall take effect immediately . The question of the adoption of the foregoing rescluticn was duly put to a vote on roll call , which resulted as follows : • SuRervisor Cotterill _ �_ — VOTIN G _ Abe _ __ Councilman Meter _ _ _-_ VOTING __ Aye . . . Councilman Webb VOTING Aye Councilman Jordan VOTING Aye VOTING The resolution was thereupon declared duly adopted . * . o e • o . The following resolution was offered by Councilman Metzger • 411 who moved its adoption , ' seconded by councilman Jordan , to - wit : • • _ q _ �. [ RESOLUTION DATED AUGUST 17 , 1981 . A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE . ESTABLISHMENT CF A FROFOSEC SEWER DISTRICT IN THE TOWN OF DRYLEN , 7O ! FKINS COUNTY , NEW YORK , TO BE KNOWN AS WERNINCKVIILE SEWER DISTRICT , AND FURTHER APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION CF THE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED THEREFOR . WHEREAS , the Town Board of the Town cf Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , has heretofore duly caused a rap , plan and report tc prepared and filed in the office of the Town Clerk cf said Town in relation to the establishment of a proposed sewer district in said Town , to be known as Werninckville Sewer District ; and WHEREAS , an order was duly adopted by said Town Ecard cn August 3 , 1981 , reciting a description cf the boundaries cf said proposed district , the improvements proposed , the maximum amount proposed to be expended for said improvements , the proposed method of financing to be employed , the fact that said reap , plan were cn file in the Town Clerk ' s office for public inspection , and specifying August 17 , 1981 , at 5 : 00 o ' clock P . M, . , Prevailing Time , at the Town Hall , 65 East Mai Street , in Dryden , New York , in said Town , as the time when and the place where said Tovn Board would meet fcr the purpose of holding a public hearing to hear all persons interested in the subject thereof concerning the same ; and WHEREAS , such order was duly published and posted in the manner and within the time prescribed by Section 209 - d cf the Town Law , and proof of said publication and posting has teen duly presented to said Town Board ; and • WHEREAS , said public hearing was duly held at the time and place set forth . in said order , as aforesaid , at which all persons desirin . to be heard were duly heard ; and • • • • • • A . • / - 5 - WHEREAS , fcllowing said public hearing , and based upcn the evidence given thereat , said Town Fcard duly adcpted a resolution determining in the affirmative all cf the questions set forth in subdivision 1 of Section 209 - e of the Tcwn Law ; and WHEREAS , it is now desired to adopt a further resolution pursuant to subdivision 3 cf - Section 209 - e cf the Tcwn Law apercvinq the • establishment of said district , and the construction cf the improvements proposed therefor ; NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED , by the Town Board cf the Town cf Dryden , Tcmrkins Ccunty , New York , as follows : Section 1 . The establishment of a sewer district in the Town cf Dryden , Tompkins Ccunty , New Iork , to be known as Wernir) ckville Setter District , to be bounded and described es set forth in . Appendix A attached hereto and made a part hereof , and the construction cf a sanitary sewer system to serve said District , including necessary buildings , and the acquisition of land cr rights in land , vrich includes real property interest having a ce -rtain term cf at least forty years in the sewage treatment plant owned and operated by the Village cf Freeville , New York , and original furnishings , equipment , machinery or apparatus required in connection therewith , all as rcre fully described in the map , plan and repert hereinbefcre described , at a maximum estimated ' cost of $ 260 , 300 , is hereby arprcved and authorized . ' The method of financing the cost cf said iuprcvem € nts shall be by the issuance of not more than $ 260 , 300 serial bonds of said Town ( to be reduced to the extent cf any moneys received . frcm the State cf New York and / cr the Federal Ccvernmer. t as grantc - in - aid • therefor ) maturing in annual installments over a pericd nct Exceedir, c • . 4 . 4 • - } -/ `av� . - 6 - .forty years , payable in the first instance from a levy cn the taxable real property in said Sewer District which the • tcwn beard of said Town shall determine and specify to be especially benefited thereby in the manner prescribed by subdivision 2 of Secticn 2C. 2 cf the Tcwn Law . Secticn 2 . Within ten days after the adcpticn • cf this resolution , the Town Clerk cf . said Tcwn is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution , in duplicate , in the office cf the State • Department cf Audit and Ccntrcl , in Albany , '; cw York , tcgether with an application , in duplicate , for peruassicn to establish the aforesaid Sever District , in the manner required by the previsions of subdivision 3 of Section 209 - f of the Town Law . Secticn 3 . This resolution is adcptcd subject to permissive referendum . • • 41) • w.- • • • • . d I I/ ; Deputy Supv Metzger took over the special meeting and a decision was made on Orion Drive . Deputy Metzger said that after a discussion with the Town Attorney , the owner must comply with 3 different areas . 1 - is that the road must meet town specifications , and there is a letter from the Highway Superintendent dated August 14th stating that it does meet town specifications . 2- do other people plan to live on the road , and there already are people living on it and there is another house proposed . 3 - he must comply to no lots smaller than 10 acres , which if this stipulation is metnthe owner will not have to apply for a sub- division . These are the 3 areas and the owner said that he is not going to have any lot smaller than 10 acres so he sees no reason why we don ' t make this stipulation in our resolution and make it a condition of the acceptance . George Clay wanted to know with that stipulation is that going to make the existing lot of 4 acres a nonconforming use and that create a problem with development or improvement in the future ? Atty Perkins wanted to know which existing lot ? George Clay said that there is one lot that a man has bought 4 acres . IP Atty Perkins said that it is on an existing road . George Clay said he was not arguing or challenging but was wondering if that would create a problem for that one particular person ? Atty Perkins said no because he has always had sufficient road frontage on Virgil Rd . George Clay said that his driveway comes out onto Orion Drive and was not sure if that was then classified on that road . What you are saying is a restriction of 10 acres which he would not have and make it a nonconforming use . Atty Perkins wanted to know what couldn ' t he do with it ? George Clay said that he may want to put a garage or barn on it . Atty Perkins said that owner is not sub- dividing , that is where the restriction is . Clm Webb couldn ' t see any legal grounds for the town board to turn it down . If the town tells a person to build a road and it is built to the specifications in the general ordinance than it should be accepted as a town road . It wouldn ' t make any difference who built the road . He felt the ordinance should be changed to the fact that you can ' t build a road , if he does everything the town asks for and then tell him he can ' t have a road . This should not have anything to do with Clint) it is the way our ordinance is set up . He could not see any grounds where he could not vote against having the road , because he has done everything the town has asked him to do . Clm Jordan wanted to know what would happen if it was voted down and the town taken to court ? Atty Perkins said that he would have to show that your decision was arbitrary or capricious or views of discretion were not founded on substantial evidence . If he brought a suit against you , those would be the grounds that he could overturn the decision of the board . RESOLUTION # 115 . ACCEPT ORION DRIVE AS A TOWN ROAD Clm Jordan offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that this Town Board accept Orion??Drive as a town road since it has met highway and state specifications and the lot size be 10 acres or more . 2nd Clm Webb Roll call vote - all voting YES Adjourned : 6 : 00 PM A Susanne Lloyd ei* Town Clerk 0 / 1 ! . : : ta5 :. .: iiOn. 11114 Clm Metzger offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : Resolution Authorizing the Filing of an Application -Vor a Federal and State Grant cop the Constro.c•-tic of Necessary Sewage Treatment Wnlorkst Under the AvPropria-te Laves cc New York State and the Unite Stars of America . ` , � the - Town of Dryden , Tompkins County , key. Y �lr • 'r. herein called :be Legal V1 ., i " :' -'. oil (. ,' . r _- - - — — - - - - . . p yc, n ,nt , r thorough conSiCCr ., : : (: ( ; 01 the v2r - O'u .> aS C: h oo i study of available •- . .� . his her ont de. ! lr 'p ` , • L � el' l � �l.11 � �C VI � 1L 1. 1 C < : : : : c . . c rtaln 5 . rEgued a t r ° ' . - en : of se ^.\• a ' _ enera [ly Cesc asSt ; n 11 Construction ► l . : nr... c. n - 1 Specifications and Step III Construction for the Corti (: tl ", : rt ! r,' , 1. ,. y S' ;tw - ; '"N "� - 44 w= rzrr'* 2r, a , �{� �, � °s :,^}';, gy .i,/ ._ , y ,, J ._. .-------- 1 t i ----:-- -- ---- - -- - - - ... . III _—_____ __— A �4 . E—rk w ..i. � i sy ifff 4- „ s4 a, 'V�!S,'�D"�vt Nfrai" "may ° "4`�•' ,' �:' (: 1' {� t ` __ _ r - t D -SC iption Oi Di 0 ;se : ! . . .. - 57dU32) ( ,t ssig nmt nt { ) e .rrding ) a. : d identified ` c of �it.li '�l � ' ^ ' ` _ , . i ^ • ' - - • 3 - _ 1 herein called tne ' rProjec-c. c - n = . e nchlic ; G ' . . : and it ig Ytecessar -that actual pr-et in mar -t `IS d�, st �- ablr. :. aid ? - oiec - - e a:' en iii': t;fet'. in : niv ; n • y � the cvn _tracctan o� • :ice ; : AS . ;ncer : ` e Federal l ',tiz : er DGi1utiorf c ' , r. trot II. ct as Amended) the 1tntted States off' A Flier K l 'S °_ uti; Gr : zc' C the ITIakinz of granr.s lo .aid in..corks to prevent financing Ire cost r3c ccnStru. cttar, oc nece5S8ri -treath': ewt : he discharge of untreated or • :a c. ::. 0 • , i • waters `nc for : he ' • - � treated sewage or other tctBSte . p " . .Dose J � reports . : { ans . ar,, c i ►t '� a� `� s� . . : : c . . . ,. s J, f ccr. : ; ectt . ttf ¢re. wiLh : and c nst .-'.1C : ion of Water Cit alt t-' ri—nt) rove : n en � ' • York pi`Uticy 1NanClal C') td �cXr • � ' _ d coi: :; i -the Water P I t, on Control AoY1 -LIS ` _ ' ndet- and l__ z _ LL . :7Jc Gt : he Ld \\' S if i ^ ill G IU ce in . e public : merest ! e � , ° `' ' Stat . ' : or' k and the appritcnnt deems it to _ ^_ ti et :be ; ` n ^ : Y • e ( Dene . . t to file an ,-ioctiitinIi .: u uncle : mate taws and to authorize In . . . I. : O ` T . _ =_ 7 -". nR _ P. "c ' L ' - 3 2 -_ t h e Town Board O f the Town (, I l ! , ' V C:: I That : lie : flint- Of t? pOli � a ! — --- -- - . ion . . . t `� e : or ?f : "CuI:- ed J`.' : he : ate of ` • „ • . and in conicr �: ; l ; � _ york and the United States i � ..vi h : e mater Pollution L.. �• r; trai As Amended and !. a ';: s _ ? 7 ^ : he S o ; Chagt� F 65 . -- t State New York is ereb , • author / tea inducting dd `� and I ati �. erscandtvf S and ° SSur ? f Ce :i contained :PI i ? iC c? C i1C :1 : : = : iS . ., That the Supervisor of the Town of Dryden . designated A I`i t ^ . . ' ..: rep - J] is directed and aut horized as the official re .lrese : : r tivi, et - appticanz -to act in ozrnectacn with the applications and to provide such z3 .: ci tiono. .1 in : ., - :. . r.. . : c : as rnaci Pe rep/used: That , to e pLrposes of New York St4 : e ; ., , ,.; c IrViStr n . . . , , e the ,0 ' . +•• f -t_he Tway') ■ 7-'- t: e or . . :: pl . (. . 5 r.scal icer ) of Dryden be ri esi nn : ,: .:i as ftSca1 OrKicer off% id Pr.R1iean•ttoreceve. and cis . - - ute _ i _ c.s as :he author •: :: ed Fiscal Officer oc- the A.ncCart in ccnnect:lcn -with Sa \ a Project ; •I . That the applicant agrees that :Yi ! 1 : unc its 'portion t4 the cost said Wares= Quality improvement Project ; I ._ - - -- _ • 5 . That five ( 5 ) certified copies of his Resolution be praoared and sent to the New ti' s • Department of Environmental Conservation , ` 1 York State application ; - tiOn , 1i� 8nJ , E = c? '.Y York together with the Federal 1 . That this Resolution take effect immediately . 2nd Clm Webb Roll call vote - all voting YES I limm • . b _ 6 _ ) ewslaper andLor cfher news media Date Given The Ithaca Journal and that I further duly caused public notice of the time and place c . said meeting to . be conspicuously posted in the fcllcwing designatEdl, public location ( s ) on the following dates : Designated Location ( s ) 4f pgzted notice _ Date of posting Sign Board . Dryden Town Hall August 18 , 1981 65 East Main Street Dryden , New York 13053 IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my viand and affixed the seal of said Town 4: n August , 1961 . • N Town Clerk . - - - - - ( CORPORATE SEAL ) • • • • • • _ _ _ _ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • / 07 • - 7 - The question of the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly put to a • vote on roll call , which resulted az follevs : t Amer vigar_ cgttczjf ___ . _ VOTING „a �� - - __ _ Councilman Le ___ __ _ VCTIN G Councilman Egt VOTING _ _ 461,1.C, _ _ __ Councilman Jorda_n _ VC G • � �� VOTING The resolution was thereupon declared duly adopted . STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss . : COUNTY OF TOMPKINS ) . , I , the undersigned Clerk of the . Tcwn cf Dryden , Tompkins Ccunty , New York , DO HEREBY CERTIFY : That I have ' compared the foregoing copy cf the minutes of the meeting cf the Town Board of said Town , including the resolutions contained therein , held on August 17 , 19E1 , with the original thereof o n file in my office , and that the same is e true and correct copy of said original and cf the whole cf said original se far as the same ✓ elates to the subject natters therein referred tc . I FURTHER CERTIFY that all members of said Beard had due nctice o f said meeting, and that , pursuant to Section 99 of the Public Officers law ( Cpen Meetings Law ) , said meeting was open tc the g eneral public , and that I duly caused a public notice cf the time and place ' cf . said meeting to be given tc the following newspapers and / or other news media as follows : • 411 . I • _ _ • • • • • • . . ) a . - G - specify to be especially benefited thereiy in the marr, er prescribed by subdivision 2 of Section 2C2 of the Town law . SecIA ,cn __ 2 . Within ten days after the adoption cf this resolution , . the Town Clerk of said Town is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution , in duplicate , fn the office of the State Department of Audit and Control , in Albary , New York , together with . an application , • 1n duplicate , fcr cerrissicn to establish the afe'resaid Sewer District , in the manner required ty the prcvi = ions of subdivision 3 of Section 209 - f of the Tcwn Law . Section 3 . This resolution is adopted subject to • permissive referendum . • • L t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t . . ld / - 5 - WHEREAS , following said public hearing , and based upon the evidence � ' °ien thereat , said Town Pcard duly adopted a resolution determining in , the _ affirmative all of the questions set forth . in subdivision 1 of Section 209 - e of the Tcwn Law ; and . 1 1 WHEREAS , it £s ' nov desired to adopt a further re -Solution pursuant to subdivision 3 of Section 209 - e cf the Tcwn Law approving the establishment of said district , and the construction of the • improvements proposed therefor ; NOW , THEREFORE , RE I7 RESOLVED , by the Town Board of the Town cf Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , as follows : Section __ 1.4, The establishment cf a sewer district in the Town of Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , to to known as George Junior Republic Sewer District , to be bounded and described as set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and made a part hereof , and the construction of a sanitary sewer system to serve said District , including necessary buildings , and the aceuisiticn of land cr rights in land , and original furnishings , equipment , nach: inery cr apparatus required in connection therewrith , all as acre fully described in the map , plan and report hereinbefore described , at a maximum estimated cost of 5204 , 400 , is hereby approved and authorized . The method of financing the ' cost of said improvements shall be by the issuance of not more than $ 204 , 400 serial bcnds cf said Town ( tc be reduced tc the extent of any moneys received from the State of New York and / 'or the Federal Government as grants - in - aid therefor ) maturing in annual installments over a period not exceeding forty years , Fayeble in the first instance from a levy cn the taxable real property in said Sewer District which the Town Board of said Town shall determine and . . Pi ‘ : • • • • • — U - • RESOLUTION DATED AUGUST 17 , 1981 . A 'RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FRCFCSED SEWER DISTRICT IN THE TOWN OF DRYDEN , TOMPKINS COUNTY , NEW YORK , TO BE KNOWN AS GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC SEWER DISTRICT , AND FURTHER APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION - OF THE IMPFCVEKENTS PROPOSED .inEREFOR . WHEREAS , the Tcwn Board of the Tcwn cf Dryden , Tcmpkins County , _ New York , has heretofore duly caused a rap , plan and repert tc be prepared and filed in the office of the Town Clerk cf said Town in relation to the establishment of a proposed sewer district in said Town , to Le known as George Junior Republic Sewer District ; . and • WHEREAS , an order was duly adcpted by said Tcwn Pcard cn August 3 , 1981 , reciting a description cf the tcundaries cf said proposed district , - the improvements proposed , the maximum amount trcpcsed tc be expended for said improvements , the proposed method of financing to be employed , the fact . that said map , plan were cn file in the Tcwn Clerk ' s office for public inspection , and specifying August 17 , 1SP1 , at 5 : 30 o ' clock P . M . , Prevailing Time , at the Tcwn hall , 65 East Main Street , in Dryden , New York , in said Town , as the time when and the place where said Toun Board would meet for the Fnrpcse of bolding a public hearing to hear all persons interested in the subject thereof concerning the sage ; and WHEREAS , such order was duly published and posted in the manner and within the ' time prescribed by Section 209 - d cf the Town Law , and proof of said publication and posting has teen duly presented to said Town Board ; and WHEREAS , said . public hearing was duly held at the time and place set forth in said order , as aforesaid , at which all persons desiring to be heard were duly heard ; and • • • • • //f l 1 WHEREAS , said Town Board has duly considered said map and Flan and the evidence given at said public hearing ; NOW , THEREFCRE , BE I1 . • _ + . , RESOLVED , by the Town Board of the Town cf Dryden , Tompkins County , New York , as follows : Section —_ 1 . Upon the evidence given at the aforesaid public • hearing , it is hereby f oond and determined as follows : a ) The notice of the aforesaid public hearing was published and posted as required by law and is otherwise sufficient ; b ) All the property . and property owners within said proposed district are benefited thereby ; c ) All the property and property owners benefited are included within the limits of said proposed district ; and d ) The establishment cf said proposed district is in the public interest . . SecIjcn 2 . This resolution shall take effect immediately . The question of the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly put to a vote on roll ' call , which resulted - as follows : Supervisor Cotterill VOTING Aye Councilman Metzger VOTING Aye Councilman Webb VOTING Aye Councilman Jordan • VCTIN G Aye • VCTING The resolution was thereupon declared duly adopted . • a • • • The following resolution was offered by . .caurigilmvt.jacapx. who moved its adoption , seconded by — cp Q ,zjz, jie zgcr , tc - wit : I . a - • • • / w • • • • • • • Y 1 10 ? _ -_ _ - 2 - RESOLUTION DATED AUGUST 17 , 1981 . C� i1 A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEWER DISTRICT IN THE TOWN OF DRYDEN , TOMPKINS COUNTY , NEW YORK , TO BE KNOWN AS GEORGE JUNIOR REPU 'IJLIC SEWER DISTRICT . WHEREAS , the Town Board of the Tcwn cf Dryden , Tompkins County , ` New York , has heretofore duly caused a nap , plan and repert tc be prepared and filed in the office of the Clerk of said Town it. relation to the establishment of a proposed sewer district in said Town , to be known as George Junior Republic Eewer District ; and WHEREAS , an order was ' duly adopted by said Tcwn Pcard cn August 3 , 1981 , reciting a description cf the hcundaries cf said proposed district , the improvements proposed , the maximum amount prcpcsed to be expended for said improvements , the ' prcposed method cf financing to be employed , the fact that said map , plan and repert we're on file in the Town Clerk ' s office for public inspection and specifying August 17 , 1981 , at 5 : 30 o ' clock P . F . , Prevailing Time , at the Tcwn Ball , 65 East Main Street , in Dryden , Few York , in said Tcwn , as the . time when and the place where said Town Board would meet for the purpose . of holding a public hearing tc hear all persons interested in the subject thereof concerning the same ; and WHEREAS , such order was duly published and posted in the manner and within the time prescribed by Section 209 - d cf . the Town Law , and proof of said publication and posting has teen duly presented to said • Town Board ; and WHEREAS , said public hearing was duly held at the time and place . set forth in said order , as aforesaid , at which all persons desiring to be heard were duly heard .; . and e • • • • • • • • • 1 1 . w / 03 20127 - 302F At a _ Special meeting of the Town Board cf the Town cf Dryden , Tospkins Ccunty , New York , held at the Town Hall , 65 East Hain Street , in Dryden , New York , in said Town , cn August 17 , 19E1 , at 5 : 30 o ' clock P . M . , Prevailing Time . The meeting was called to order by Supervisor Clinton E Cotterill and upon roll being called , there were PRESENT : Supervisor Cotterill Councilman Webb Councilman Metzger Councilman Jordan • • ABSENT : Councilman Tarr The f cl lowing resolution was of f ered ' by _ Councilman Jordan who moved its adoption , seconded by Councilman Metzger , to - wit : • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • r /e '& _ 8 _ • fevspapnr and / or _ otket_ news _ media Date __ 21ven The Ithaca Journal and that I fu .° Cher duly caused public notice of the time and place of said meeting to be conspicuously posted in the following designatedr; public location ( s ) on the following dates : Designated Location ( s ) 410 of posted notice ._ Date _ of _ Fosting .. _ . . .Sign Board Dryden Town Hall August 18 , 1981 65 East Main Street Dryden , New York 13053 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Town on August _ 1 ; 1981 . tr Town Clerk _ ( CORPORATE SEAL ) • 41) • tt - • ate, . , • • t ' 4 • • • • • • • • - 7 - / 0/ The question of the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly put to a vote on Loll call , which resulted as follows : I( rI VOTING _ - AYe - - __ CoLrlcilman Metzger CT IN G _councilman Webb _ _ _ VOTING _ Aye _ _ Councilman Jordan VOTING Av.. VOTING • The resolution was thereupon declared duly adopted . STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss . : COUNTY OF TOMPKINS ) I , the undersigned Clerk of the Tcwn cf Dryden , Tompkins County , Nev York , DC HEREBY CERTIFY : That I have compared the foregoing ccpy . of the minutes of the meeting of the Town Board of said Tcwn , including the resolutions contained therein , held cn August 17 , 1981 , with the original thereof on file in my office , and that the same is a true and correct copy cf said original and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters therein referred tc . I FURTHER CERTIFY that all members of said Fcard had due notice of said meeting , and that , pursuant to Section , . 99 of the Public Officers Law ( Open Beetings Law ) , said meeting was open tc the general public , and that I duly caused a public notice cf the time and place cf said meeting to be given tc the following newspapers and / or other news media as follows : 410 • • • • • L . • •