No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-05-12 • 3 0 TOWN BOARD MEETING Public Hearing #1 Oriole Drive Water & Sewer District May 12 , 1981 Rocco Lucente Minutes of the public hearing held on the 12th of May Supv Cotterill called the hearing to order at 7 : 00 PM Supv Cotterill read the notice that was published in . the .newspaper concerning the request from Rocco P Lucente to establish a Water & Sewer Dist . on Oriole Drive . QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS Mr Fabbroni presented the Town Board with maps of the proposed water and sewer dist . Atty Perkins stated that the Town Board would have to answer in the affirmative 4 questions under Section 194 of Town Law . If you so choose , by resolution approve the establishment of the district as the boundaries are finally determined to be . A copy of the plans are to be sent to the Health Dept . The approval of the State Comptroller .is not necessary since there will be not indebtedness by the town . - .. . . . Closed public hearing 7 : 10 PM PUBLIC HEARING # 2 PROPOSED LOCAL LAW #1 - 1981 Defense of Town Officers May 12 , 1981 and Employees Minutes of the public hearing held on the 12th of May Supv Cotterill called the hearing to order at 7 : 15 PM Supv Cotterill read the notice that was published in the newspaper concerning a proposed Local Law providing for the Defense of Town Officers and Employees . QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS - none Closed public hearing 7 : 20 PM PUBLIC HEARING # 3 PROPOSED LOCAL LAW # 2 - 1981 Electrical Code for May 12 ,. 1981 the Town of Dryden Minutes of the public hearing held on the 12th of May Supv Cotterill called the hearing to order at 7 : 30 PM Supv Cotterill read the notice that was published in the newspaper concerning a proposed Local Law adopting an Electrical Inspection Code for the Town of Dryden . QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS Mr Russell Hendrick , Branch Manager ; Mr Mussi , Ass ' t Branch Manager and Mr Floyd Ferris , Dist . Inspector were present to answer any questions . Supv Cotterill was wondering if anyone putting an addition on their own house and wanted to do the wiring himself would the Underwriters inspect the job or would a licensed electrician have to do the work to get an inspection ? Mr Hendrick said that anyone can do the wiring as long as it passes the code . Mr Watros wanted to know if this code would be over and above the regulations that are now applied to the Underwriters requirements ? Supv Cotterill said that the town does not have any code right now . If there is a new house or addition NYSE&G will not do a hook- up until an Underwriter does the inspection , but a person can add 2 rooms on their house and the Underwriters may never know it . Mr Hendrick said that under Section 8 stating that this local law would not be applicable in certain cases ; that it shall not apply to any construction unless a building permit is required by the town . Whenever a building permit is required j . an electrical inspection would be required . Supv Cotterill said that any change of use or any addition that requires a building permit would require an inspection . This electrical code will only apply to the town and does not include of Village of Dryden and Freeville . Mr Hendrick said that if the building inspector has a building in the town that he would like a reinspection , under this local law they will do it free of charge to the town . The building inspector will request it on a certain form that they provide him and they in turn will furnish a copy of their finding . Closed public hearing : 7 : 40 PM .. 4 J . .� / PUBLIC HEARING # 4 Special Permit - Ithaca Intersystems May 12 , 1981 1650 Hanshaw Rd . Ithaca , NY Minutes of the public hearing held on the 12th of May Supv Cotterill called the hearing to order at 7 : 45 PM Supv Cotterill read the notice that was published in the newspaper for the application to build an executive Administrative & Engineering facility at 1650 Hanshaw Rd . QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS Supv Cotterill said that a special permit was issued to Ithaca Intersystems for this same building on Nov 3rd 1980 . However , they decided that they would like a building 100 ft by 200 ft rather than the 60 ft by 150 ft that was originally applied for . Mr Claude Mathews , Vice President for Ithaca Intersystems said that it will be the same general structure as before , but just larger . Right now their personnel is in 4 different locations . This will provide space for them in one building . Right now they have crone from 40 employees to 100 employees . Their expansion has grown a lot faster than they had anticipated and they felt that they would need a larger building than they had originally applied for . The new building would be used for office and engineering . Clm Webb wanted to know if they have upgraded the sewer study since they are doubling the size of their building and employees ? Mr Mathews said that there will be a seperate sewage facility for the new building . They have had a.:-special - study done " in the current assembly 6rea and it was determined that since it was a public facility at one time it was adequate for the building that they now have . It will be a seperate system for the new building with the Health Dept approval . . Closed public hearing 7 : 55 PM TOWN BOARD MEETING May 12 , 1981 . Minutes of the Town Board meeting held on the 12th of May Supv Cotterill called the meeting to order at 8 : 00 PM Members and guests participated to the Pledge of Allegiance ' . . • Roll call was by the Town Clerk : Present : Supv Cotterill , Clm Tarr , Clm Webb , Clm Jordan , Clm Metzger , Atty Perkins and Z . O . Stewart Approval of the minutes : Motion was made by Clm Metzger and seconded by Clm Jordan that the minutes of the Special Permit Hearing and Board Meeting held on April 14th be approved as submitted . COUNTY BRIEFING Co Rep Tillapaugh reported on the proposed crosstown arterial highway . Reported that the Open Container law has been discussed at the county committee meeting and he voted in favor of it . Also reported on the construction of an elevator in the Court House . . Supv Cotterill wanted to know if the County had discussed the TC 3 foundation acquisition ? Co Rep Tillapaugh said that the County would have some kind of decision , but he was not on the committee . Clm Webb reported that he and Supv Cotterill had attended a telephone meeting concerning the residents in the -northern part of the town . The problem is they can not call the county seat without . making a toll call . They are going to ask the County about getting some type of facility so they can call the sheriff and other important phone calls without making a toll call . Co Rep Tillapaugh said that nothing has been received at the County level at this time but is sure they will , and he will look into the matter . CITIZEN PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR Atty John Stevens , representing Clinton E Cotterill , presented the Town Board with a map for a proposed town road . Atty Stevens stated that Mr Cotterill has requested that the town dedicate this road , pursuant to Section 273 of Town Law . This proposed road should be referred to the Town Planning Board for their comments . Mr Cotterill has stated that he will put down a coat of oil or stone to the specifications of the Hwy Supt for certification for this road . The utility lines have been buried beneath the road . This does not need sub- division approval under Section 3 Sub-Division C of the Town Sub- Division regulations as any lots made will be over 10 acres in size . Atty Stevens requested a public hearing for this proposal on the dedication for this road at the regular Town Board meeting in July . The Town Planning Board will receive the proposal for their comments . Atty Perkins said that the Town Board should refer this proposal to the Town Planning Board and they have 30 days in which to comment . The June Town Board meeting is less than 30 days so a public hearing could be scheduled at that time for the July Board Meeting . The Town Board gave the proposed map to Mrs Barbara Caldwell , Planning Board Chairman . Mrs Caldwell reported that she had attended a draft meeting concerning the East Ithaca Circulation Study . They are looking for approval of concept but not necessarily approval of details nor committments from the different municipalities involved . She had a draft copy and it ! was subject to changes . This is about a 7 year time table and with limited access . The County Planning Dept said they would come to a board meeting if requested to ; explain it in more detail . Supv Cotterill felt that the Planning Board should look at it and then make any comments to the Town Board . ATTORNEY Atty Perkins reported that the SPCA contract is tabled until a special meeting to be held on May 18th . Reported on George Rd that GJR does have the deed that he had sent and Mr Speno will follow up on it . Atty Perkins suggested that the Town Board not take any action at this time . Reported that the town would be considering 3 proposed sewer districts . The town will be receiving from Vrooman Engineers after the time for the permissive referendum on the resolution is up . The procedure is for this Board to enter an order reciting the 'proposed description for the district , that the map , and plans have been filed with the Town Clerk , and set up a public hearing . Since we don ' t have the plans yet and will not receive them until next week , after the 30 days are up , he suggested — that the Town Board schedule a special meeting pending the receipt of the plans , and enter that order and schedule a public hearing . This will have to be worked in with the other 2 public hearings which will need to be held for the other 2 districts . One of which proposed district encompasses all of the area near GJR . The other district includes some area outside of the Village of Freeville in Werninckville . along Rt 366 . If the Town Board chooses , pending the receipt of plans , maps and reports you may enter an order into the minutes and schedule a public hearing for those 2 districts or you can waitiuntil after you have had a chance to review those documents . The hearings probably should be held on 2 different nights . The town cannot form a district within ! the Village of Freeville or include any part without the villages ( ` consent . If the district is to include area within the Village . of Freeville , the Village will have to adopt a resolution subject to a permissive referendum to be t ` included in the proposed district . The Town Board decided to look at the plans and make their decision at the May 18th special meetingjand schedule a public hearing at that time . Atty Perkins reported on the status of the abandoned LVRR property . The Town has the option to purchase all of the abandoned property r- o- w in the Town of Dryden . The total purchase price is $ 2950 . 00 of which the town has paid 10 per cent . The town would end up with easements or a right to install water , sewer or other utility lines in that r- o- w . Between the Village of Dryden on the south and the center line on West Lake Rd there are approximately 12 . 68 acres , no approach has been made to the property owners ; along the r- o- w . This has been discussed before and felt that this property would be the most developable for any public use . ._ There is no reason if the town :. wishes to retain title to this property . Between the Village of Dryden north to the Village of Freevillg there are approximately . 16 acres which borders mostly GJR . This will probably be marketed to GJR . All of the property will be marketed .= north of the Village of Freeville to the Groton Town Line . All of the property- between East Ithaca and the Village of Freeville has been contracted to be sold . - At the present time the Town of Dryden will end up with about 13 acres for a temporary period of time . The town will be able to sell the rest of the property and would have the easement within the r- o- w for the installation of water , sewer and utility lines . Atty Perkins said that if the town is willing , arrangements should be worked out so that a resolution can be adopted at the June meeting . Clm Metzger wanted to know when the option time was over? Atty Perkins said that the option time was 18 months which would be up October 24th 1981 . He felt that the time to act would be now . The town would be investing about $ 3300 or $ 3400 of town funds , of which $ 2950 . 00 has already been paid . The Village of Dryden has bought all of the property within the village limits and the Village of Freeville has bought all of the property within their village limits . All the town would end up owning would be the land south of the Village of Dryden to West Lake Rd . Atty Perkins said that he would have a formal written proposal for the June meeting . 5.3 Supv Cotterill reported that he had asked the Health Dept for a report of their survey on the septic systems involving the Yellow Barn Rd area that they took several years ago . The Health Dept felt that there are some bad situations in that area and the people that live there do not think that there is . Supv Cotterill said that he did receive the report of the bad systems of 2 years ago and none of these have been upgraded . He thought that this report should be given to the Planning Board for them to review and see what their recommendations are . Mrs Caldwell stated that this was one of the areas of their concern and they only had a preliminary chart which showed percentages of systems with problems in different areas . There was some suggestion that part of this area could be done as a cluster system . TOWN CLERK • The Town Board delegated Town Clerk Lloyd as licensing officer for Games of Chance in the Town of Dryden . Effective date of appointment is from May 12 , 1981 to Dec . 31 , 1981 . Reported that the Tomp . Co Municipal meeting will be held May 21st at The Livery at 6 : 00PM . Clm Jordan introduced a proposed Local Law providing for the repair or removal of unsafe buildings and, coilapsed structures . . Supv Cotterill scheduled a public hearing for June 9th at 7 ;,15 PM ZONING OFFICER Issued 9 building permits for the month of Arpil . 1 one- family ; 1 replacement for a mobile home ; 4 storage buildings ; 2 additions to houses and Ithaca Intersystems special permit . CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Ellis Hollow Community Assoc . regarding zoning in Ellis Hollow area . The Town Board gave the letter to Mrs Caldwell , for the Planning Board consideration . There was also a petition of 110 signatures against multiple housing in that area . Received a letter from John Marcham of the Intergovernmental Relations Committee with regard to the acquisition of the land for the foundation fund at TC3 . Supv Cotterill said that the Village of Dryden has sent a letter stating that they are strongly opposed to taking the land off the tax roll , since the college has stated that they do not need the land for college use . RESOLUTION # 70 TAKING PARCEL # 37- 1 - 10 OF TAX ROLL BY TC 3 FOUNDATION,` ' Clm Webb offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption . RESOLVED , that this Town Board disapprove of TC 3 Foundation taking over parcel # 37- 1 - 10 , thereby eliminating it from the tax roll . 2nd Clm Metzger Carried Public information meeting will be held at NYSE&G , May 19th at 7 : 30PM discussing plans for Wilson Synchrontron Lab . Received report from SPCA Received report from Dryden Village Police Dept requesting the State to lower the speed limit on Springhouse Rd . RESOLUTION # 71 REDUCE SPEED LIMIT ON SPRINGHOUSE ROAD Clm Tarr offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption . RESOLVED , that this Town Board request the State to lower the speed limit to 30 MPH on Springhouse Road . 2nd Clm Metzger Carried Dryden Ambulance report for the month of April Letter from Varna Fire Dept regarding Community Day on June 6th . JUSTICE REPORTS - Judge Sweetland - $ 3062 . 00 Judge Newhart - $ 1632 . 00 FINANCIAL REPORTS REVENUES EXPENSES General Fund A $ 34681 . 50 $15691 . 16 General Fund B 591 . 26 . 1384 . 76 Fire Protection District 337 . 27 - 0 - Federal. Revenue Sharing 14962 . 68 60 . 00 Highway. 24820 . 35 41296 . 89 I I 1 ' • • • OLD BUSINESS Mr C J Drost presented the Town Board with. a revised application to his original building permit ., Atty. Perkins said that the revised application is significantly modified to include 8 units instead of . the 9 original units . 4 - two . bedrooms and 4 - one bedroom -, with an increase in the sq footage of floor area . . Atty Perkins opinion was that since the request has been so modified as to change its original application that this board should require another public hearing . The sq footage area has gone from 5700 sq ft to 6800 sq ft , and they are to be owner occupied • rather than a rental unit . Mr Drost said that he called the attorney since the last hearing and he tried to make some adjustments after he had feed back from the residents . He tried to adjust the plans to make it more in line with what they would like . As. it was set up as a single bedroom unit it would attract more single people and now it will . ° • have 1 extra room in each unit and will attract families . Supv Cotterill said that - the Town Board held a public hearing for a certain proposal and that is what they . have to act on . Mr Drost said that - he called the attorney about the new proposal and ' . the - feed back • he received on the phone : was that. this wouldn ' t change anything : Atty Perkins said that the application has been changed a lot from what was asked about on the phone . You discussed about changing it from 9 to 8 units and said nothing about changing it , from 1 bedroom units to 2 bedroom units ; and discussed changing it ' to condominiums at . which time I told you another public hearing would have to be held . It • was his opinion that the modifications of your application for a special permit is an explicit withdrawal . of - the first application ; . therefore a second application will have to have another public hearing . The purpose of . a special permit is to :create an opportunity for the public to hear and -receive their comments on the proposal . If you significantly change that proposal the public has the right to be notified and come back to be heard . , Mrs Caldwell wanted to know if the town had ; any regulations oh condominiums ? ' Atty Perkins said that there were not any regulations unless it comes under our planned unit development regulations . This is not a - condominium proposal as he understands it as modified right now . The question was asked , if he changed it from rental units to condominiumunits would a public hearing be required and he advised Mr Drost that another public hearing would be required . Supv Cotterill said that the town has received a petition from the Ellis Hollow residents with 110 signatures opposing this 9 unit apartment house . . The Town Board will have to disregard the original proposal and another public heating will have to be held for the revised proposal . If Mr Drost would like to come back for another public hearing properly scheduled and advertised the Town Board will gladly look at whatever proposal he would like to make . This is not . legal for the Town Board . to take action on since the application . has been revised . . . Atty Perkins reported that the Town Board must determine by resolution : 1 -whether the petition was signed and acknowledged and approved. as required by law and is otherwise sufficient according to Town Law; 2- determine whether all of the property and the property owners within the proposed district are benefited thereby ; 3 - determine whether all the property and property owners benefited are included within the proposed limits or extension ; 4- determine whether it is in the public interest to grant in whole or in part the relief .' sought , which would be the creation of the districts . If the Town Board answers • all of these • conditions iii the affirmative the resolution approving the establishment of the district should set forth the boundaries and the limits as finally determined . I RESOLUTION # 72 ESTABLISHMENT OF ORIOLE DRIVE j . WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT Clm Webb offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption . . RESOLVED , that this Town Board determines with respect to the petition of Rocco P . Lucente for the Oriole Drive Water and Sewer District that (a ) the petition is • signed and acknowledged or approved as required by law and is otherwise sufficient , (b) all of the property and property owners within the proposed district or extension are benefited thereby , (c ) all of the property and property owners benefited are included within the limits of the proposed` district or extension , (d ) it is in the public interest to grant the relief sought in the petition . AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED , that the establishment or extension of the district that the boundaries be , as set forth in Exhibit C in the petition as filed with the Town Clerk . That those boundaries be set forth at length in the minutes of this board meeting . 2nd C1m Jordan Roll call vote - all voting YES 0 • EXHIBIT C v DESCRIPTION FOR ADDITION TO WATER AND SEWER DISTRICTS , TOWN OF DRYDEIy , TOMPKINS COUNTY , STATE OF NEW YORK That Tract or Parcel of Land situate in the Town of Dryden , County of Tompkins , and State of New York and being a part of Military Lot No . 51 in said town bounded and described as follows : Beginning at a point at the northwesterly corner of premises conveyed to Rocco Lucente by deed of Donna K Stewart (executrix of Doris G Kanagas ) dated July 28 , 1965 , recorded in the Tompkins County Clerk ' s Office July 28 , 1965 in Book 457 of Deeds at Page 983 , also being at the northeasterly corner of premises conveyed to Rocco Lucente by deed of Elizabeth G Bailey dated May 2 , 1977 , recorded in the Tompkins County Clerk ' s Office May 2 , 1977 in Book 557 of Deeds at Page 174 , which point is reputedly in the northerly line of Military Lot No . 51 ; thence running southerly and along an old fence and hedge marking ' the westerly line of said Lucente ( Kangas ) parcel 400 feet to a pipe , said pipe being at the northwesterly corner of premises conveyed to Paul J and Roberta H Ludgate by deed - of Donna K Stewart (executrix of Doris G Kangas ) dated October 28 , 1964 , recorded in the Tompkins County Clerk ' s Office November 4 , 1964 in Book 453 of Deeds at Page 965 ; thence easterly 152 feet to a point in a pond , said point being at the northeasterly corner of the aforesaid Ludgate premises ; thence South 52 degrees 50 minutes East along the northeasterly boundary of aforesaid Ludgate premises 130 feet to a point ; thence North 39 degrees 36 . 2 minutes East 195 . 16 feet to a point ; thence North 328 . 17 feet to a point in the northerly line of Military Lot No . 51 ; thence West 380 feet along the northerly line of Military It No . 51 to the point of beginning , the above described area being apart of tax parcel 43- 1 - 18 (former Kangas parcel ) within the Town of Dryden . RESOLUTION # 73 PROPOSED LOCAL LAW # 1 - 1981 PROVIDING FOR THE DEFENSE OF TOWN OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Clm Metzger offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption . BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Dryden As follows : SECTION 1 . As used in this local law , unless the context otherwise requires : (a ) the term " employees " shall mean any person holding a position by election , appointment or employment in the service of the Town , but shall not include a volunteer , any . person not compensated for his services or an independent contractor . The term " employee " shall include a former employee , his estate or judicially appointed personal representative . (b ) The term " Town " shall mean the Town of Dryden . SECTION 2 . (a ) Upoii compliance by the employee with the provisions of section 3 • of this local law , the Town shall provide for the defense of the employee in any civil action or proceeding in any state or federal court arising out of any alleged act or omission which occurred or is alleged in the complaint to have occurred while the employee was acting or in good faith purporting to act within the scope of his public employment or duties . Such defense shall not be provided where such civil action or proceeding is brought by or on behalf of the Town , (b ) Subject to the conditions set forth in this local law , the employee shall be represented by the Town Attorney or an attorney employed or retained by the Town for the defense of the employee . The Town Board shall employ or retain an attorney for the defense of the employee whenever ( 1 ) the Town does not have a Town Attorney , ( 2 ) the Town Board determines based upon its investigation and review of the facts and circumstances of the case that representation by the Town Attorney would be inappropriate or ( 3 ) a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a conflict of interest exists and that the employee cannot be represented by the Town Attorney . Reasonable attorney ' s fees and litigation expenses shall be paid by the Town to such attorney employed or retained , from time to time , during the pendency of the civil action or proceeding subject to certification by the Town Supervisor that the employee is entitled to representation under the terms and conditions of this local law . Payment of such fees and expenses shall be made in the same manner as payment of other claims and expenses of the Town . Any dispute with respect to representation of multiple employees by the Town Attorney or by an attorney employed or retained for such purposes or with respect to the amount of the fees or expenses shall he resolved by the court . . . . „ 1 3 : ,• • • , (c ) Where the employee delivers process and a request for a defense to the : Town Attorney or , the Town Supervisor as required by section 3 of this - local . law , thes :Town • Attorney or the Supervisor , as the case may be , shall take the - . necessary steps including the retention of an attorney under the terms and • . = . conditions provided in paragraph (b ) of this section on behalf of the employee • • to avoid entry of a default - judgment , pending resolution of any question • relating to the obligation of the Town to provide a defense . . . SECTION 3 . The duties to defend provided in this local law shall be contingent . upon (a ) • delivery to the Town Attorney or , if none , to the Town Supervisor of _. the original or a copy of any summons , complaint , process , notice , demand or pleading within five days after he is served with such document and (b ) the full _ cooperation of • the employee in the defense of such action or proceeding and defense of any action or - proceeding against the Town based upon the same act or omission , and in the prosecution of any appeal . Such delivery shall be deemed a request by the employee that the Town provide for his defense pursuant to this local law , unless the employee shall state in writing that a ;. defense is not. requested . SECTION 4 . The benefits Of this local law will inure only to employees as defined herein and • shall not enlarge or diminish the rights of any other party nor shall any provision of - this local law be construed to affect , alter or repeal any provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law . . SECTION 5 . The provisions of this local law shall not be construed to impair , . alter , limit or modify the rights and obligations of any insurer under •any policy of insurance . .. . SECTION 6 . As otherwise specifically provided in this local law , the provisions of this local law sha11 not be construed in any way to impair , alter , limit ,. modify , abrogate or restrict any° immunity available to or conferred upon any unit , entity , officer or employed by ; in accordance with , or by reason , any other provision of . state or . federal statutory . or common. law . . SECTION 7 . The provisions of this local law shall apply to all actions ' and proceedings specified herein which have been commenced , instituted or brought on or after the effective date of this local law . ' SECTION 8 . This local law shall take effect immediately upon adoption and the compliance with the provisions of the Town Law and the Municipal Home Rule Law as they pertain to the adoption of local laws . - 2nd C1m Jordan ' Roll call vote - all voting YES . RESOLUTION # 74 PROPOSED LOCAL LAW • # 2 - 1981 • ' THE ELECTRICAL - CODE OF THE • TOWN OF ;: . DRYDEN . S • . Clm Metzger offered 'the following resolution and . asked for its adoption . BE---IT-ENAC-TED_by—the_Town Board__of . the__Town__of -Dryden_ as__ follows : Sect.i 1, = - TITLE . This local . law shall be known as The Electrical Code of the Town of Dryden . It • Section 2 - - STATEMENT OF . PURPOSE . Since there is danger to life and { property inherent in the use of electrical energy , this local law is enacted to : regulate the installation , alteration of wiring for electric light , heat or = - : power and signal i systems operating on tufty 150J volts or more , in or on all` real ? property within the Town of Dryden , exclusive of the Village } ' of Dryden . : - - - : .`r Section 3 - - NATIONAL CODE ADOPTED . All electrical installations heretofore mentioned shall be made in conformity with the requirements of the National Electrical • wI Code except where the provisions of this local law or any other local ordinance or •building Code of the Town of Dryden shall differentl y prescribe , in which event i I . compliance• with the provisions of such local law , Ordinance- or Building Code shall ( be recognized as proper compliance with this Ordinance . The requirements of the l National Electrical Code shall be those known as National Fire Association Pamphlet r .# 70 , as approved and adopted by the American Standards Association . : ' , Section 4 -- ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR . The Chief Inspector , and each of the duly , i appointed Inspectors of The New York Board of Fire Underwriters are hereby authorized and deputized as agents Of the Town of Dryden to make inspections and reinspections J of all electrical installations heretofore and hereafter described , and to approve , . . or disapprove the same . In no event , however , will the cost or expense of such . { ' inspections and reinspections be a charge against the Town of Dryden . 7 ' _. _ . :k" an:wie::twwi er. - _ a,, s R - G:Rxii6- iAft:P=sfcT.iT'.�,' .. F ...^.,Jib?:,t"2'At'>i:.w-S.t7isY.'nik: .=a a_._,& .w..: -.. . I;'f tf a 71 { � " ' /• + n Spa . `Y',"• •• ! x t_4 IS �5�ti C i*c. ki' !i 1; t -., Yr 1 _ l , j . ` 1 7^;#1) t 4,11...:...`e th LAI.,1■�..+late.�_3 ` .: _!_ ......_. ...... . . .._...._..a.w._L...i.:_...___ .._,._.�. . ...�__•__..�._.._Y....�_ v-- __..__.. .......... �. . " Section' ` 5" " °'DUTIES OF THE ELECTRICAL INSPECTORS . .._.. (a ) It shall be the duty of the Inspector to report in writing to the Building Inspector or. Zoning Enforcement Officer , whose duty it shall be to enforce all the provisions of this local law , all violations of or deviations from or omissions of the electrical provisions of the National Electrical Code , and of all local laws , local Ordinances , and Building Codes as referred - to in this local law insofar as any of the same apply to electrical wiring. : The Inspector shall make inspections and reinspections of electrical installations in andcon properties in the Town of Dryden dporinthe written request of an authorized; official of the Town of Dryden or as herein provided . The inspector is authorized to make inspections and reinspections of electrical wiring installations , devices , appliances , and equipment , in , a.nd oh properties within the Town of Dryden where he deems it necessary for the protection of life and property . In the event of an emergency it is the duty of the Inspector to make electrical inspections upon the oral .request of an official or officer of the Town of Dryden . , OuYCA.. ., . • , , .. . • _ . • - . . . _ _ . _ _ • • (b) It shall be the duty of the Inspector to furnish written reports , to the proper officials of the Town of Dryden and owners and%or lessees of property where defective electrical installations and equipment are found upon inspection . He shall authorize the issuing of a certificate of compliance when electrical install - • ations and equipment are in conformity with this local law . He shall direct that a copy of the certificate of compliance be sent to the Town of Dryden to the attention of the Building Inspector or Zoning Enforcement Officer . Section . 6 - VIOLATIONS OF THE LOCAL LAW. It shall be a violation of this local law for any person , firm or corporation to install or . cause to be installed , or to alter electrical wiring for light , heat or . power in or ' on properties in the Town of . Dryden until an application for inspection has been filed with The New • York Board of Fire Underwriters . It shall be a violation of this local law for a person , fi ±m or corporation to connect or cause to be connected electrical wiring , in or on .properties for light , heat or power , to any source of electrical energy supply , prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate , or a certificate of compliance , by The New York Board of Fire Underwriters . Section 7 -- PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS . Any person , firm or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of this local law or any rule or regulation made pursuant thereto shall be guilty of a *violation , and upon conviction thereof Oilmay be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred ( $100 . 00) . dollars , and each day on which such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense . Section 8 - - LOCAL LAW NOT APPLICABLE IN CERTAIN CASES . The provisions of this Local gaol. shall not apply to the electrical installations in mines , ships , railway cars , automotive equipment , or the installations or equipment employed by a railway , electrical or communication utility in the exersize of its function as a utility , and located out doors or in buildings used exclusively for that purpose . This Local Law shall not apply to any work involved in the manufacture , assembly , test or repair of electrical machinery , apparatus , materials and - equipment by a person , firm or corporation engaged in electrical manufacturing as their principal . business . It shall not apply to any building which is owned or leased in it entirety by the Government of the United States or the State of New York . It shall not apply to any construction unless a building permit is required by the Town of Dryden . Section 9 - - NO WAIVER OR ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITY . This local law shall not be construed to relieve from or lessen the responsibility of any person owning , operating , controlling or installing any electrical wiring , devices , appliances , or equipment for loss of life or damage to person or property caused by any defect therein , nor shall the Town of Dryden or The New York Board of Fire Underwriters be deemed to have .-assumed any such liability by reason of -any inspection made pursuant to this Ordinance . ® Section 10 - - SEPARABILITY :CLAUSE . If any part or provision of this local law or the application: thereof to - any person orccircumstance be adjudged invalid by any , . court of competent jurisdiction , such judgment shall be confined in its operation IIto the part or provision or application directly involved in the controversy in which such judg men_ t :,• shall have been rendered and shall not affect or impair the validity of the remainder of this local law or the application thereof to other persons or circumstances and the Town Board of the Town of. Dryden hereby declares that it would have passed this local law or the remainder thereof had such invalid application or invalid provision been apparent . . . Section111 ' -- REPEALING 'PROVISIONS . All local law. and parts of local laws or local Ordinances inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed . Section 12 -- ' EFFECTIVE DATE . This local law shall take effect immediately upon its approval and filing in the manner so provided by law . 2nd Clm Webb Roll call vote - all voting YES 3 � 4 RESOLUTION # 75 GRANT SPECIAL PERMIT ITHACA INTERSYSTEMS Clm Tarr offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption : RESOLVED , that this Town Board grant a special permit to Ithaca Intersystems to construct a new building that is seperate from the present building for research and development and administrative offices as designed on the application and comply with Ariticle XIII of the Zoning Ordinance . 2nd Clm Metzger Roll call vote - all voting YES RESOLUTION # 76 AUDIT GENERAL FUND BILLS Clm Jordan offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption . RESOLVED , that the general fund bills be paid as audited . 2nd Clm Tarr Roll call vote - all voting YES RESOLUTION # 77 AUDIT HIGHWAY FUND BILLS Clm Metzger offered the following resolution and asked for its adoption . 1) RESOLVED , that the highway bills be paid as audited . 2nd Clm Webb Roll call vote - all voting YES NEW BUSINESS Schedule public ' hearing June 9th - re : unsafe and collapsed buildings 7 : 15 PM Schedule special meeting May 18th - 7 : 00 PM tN- ,(.91(k Adjourned : 9 : 50 PM T OCAi�--v.a. Susanne Lloyd Town Clerk . . SPECIAL MEETING May 18 , 1981 ■3C? Supv Cotterill called the special meeting to order at 7 : 00 PM Present : Supv Cotterill , CIm Webb , C1m Metzger and Atty Perkins • Supv Cotterill reported that he had received a letter from the SPCA with regard to the SPCA/ TOWN/COUNTY liaison committe . Their porposal was that the SPCA not do any dog enumeration and it would be the towns responsibility . The county would reimburse the towns up to 75 cents per dog to h .ppay the cost . The proposal is that the SPCA now or in the future no do the dog enumeration in any form . Carol Hunter was present from the SPCA and stated that the dog enumeration was basically the discussion at the meeting . The consensus was that it was easier for the towns to hire their own enumerator since that person in the township is familiar with the area and can work with the Town Clerk . . They really had problems hiring qualified people . Supv Cotterill said that was the towns reason . for the dog control officer to do the enumeration because he had more . of a chance to keep track of the dogs more than what we do . Carol Hunter said that it was decided that the dog enumerator would go from door- to- door and find out how many dogs there were licensed and unlicensed . The unlicensed dogs would be given a promise to license form which gives them 5 days with which to license the dog . If they do not comply within that 5 days than the Town Clerk would let us know and we would then issue them a summons , and the Judge can pursue it from there . Supv Cotterill felt that the SPCA should already issue them a violation notice and have them into court . He felt that the only way we are going to get dogs licensed is to send them to the Judge and fine them the first time they are caught with an unlicensed dog . If you give them 5 days to license a dog there is no reason for anyone to license their dog until they are caught . Within a year or so you will find that half of the dogs in the town will be unlicensed unless you get tough and start fining the people . What is the incentive for people to license their dogs if when you find them you give them 5 days to license the dog with no fine . Carol Hunter said that they did try to issue summons , but it w& s hard to find adults at home . They have to be delivered in person and was impossible to find them . Suvp Cotterill said that he assumed that the SPCA was asking the tcun to sign a county contract in the next month . Carol Hunter said that it would make it a lot easier to have a county contract then to have about 10 different contracts . Supv Cotterill felt that the most important part is to get all unlicensed dogs and secondly to answer complaints . He would say that more than 50 per cent of the cost_ is getting the unlicensed dogs . To him the majority of the money should be spent on dog enumeration . He felt that the . town should not be taking the responsibility of finding the unlicensed dogs and just hiring someone to answer a few complaints . He felt that the deg warden who has the authority should be checking for the unlicensed dogs and write a ticket on every unlicensed dog that they find right then . We would soon not have a problem of people not licensing their dogs . ' Atty Perkins wanted to know who ' s function it was to follow up on the summons once it has been issued ? Carol Hunter said that it would be up to the Judge . 14 dr Atty Perkins said that it would not be the Judge because he i thejprosecutor . This is one of the real fundamental problems of the SPCA because they are not willing to do the job that ' they are supposed to . Carol Hunter said that the summons do not come from them . • Atty Perkins said that the SPCA can issue appearance tickets because they are peace officers , but the problem is the SPCA does not want to do that . Carol Hunter said that the problem with appearance tickets is that it might take them 10 days to find about 25 people to personally give that person an appearance ticket . because it has to be issued in person . With the summons they can write them up within less than an hour and have the Judge sign , date and send them. out . Atty Perkins said that the SPCA is making the Justice do their job . You are making him the one responsible for following up and getting these people into his court . You are making him the prosecutor , judge and jury . Carol Hunter said that when they first started to do the summons , which has been over a year , they contacted every town justice in the county and that is the way that they wanted it done , because the SPCA was having trouble getting appearance tickets delivered . , • (.� , Supv Cotterill did not know what the board wanted to do but was disappointed that the town couldn ' t hire just one person to take care of the complaints and find the unlicensed dogs . Carol Hunter said that within the next 2 weeks a letter will be written as to how • many unlicensed dogs they have found . Supv Cotterill said that between now and the next board meeting they will have to decide whether or not they are going to sign with the SPCA or look for a new dog control officer . . Atty Perkins reported that the Town Board will have to hold another public hearing regarding the Local Law for the Electrical Code in the Town of Dryden because it should be exclusive of the Villages of Dryden and Freeville in Sect . 2 . CIm Metzger introduced Local Law # 2 1981 with regard to an Electrical Code in. . the ! Town of Dryden . • Suvp Cotterill scheduled a public hearing for June 9th at 7 : 00 PM for the electrical code . . Atty Perkins stated that the procedure , since all of the Board Members have received fr the report , plans and map from Morrell Vrooman Engineers with regard to the sewer districts is for this Board to enter an order into the minutes setting forth five different items ; 1 - is the description of the boundaries of the proposed district ; 2- the maximum about to be expended ; 37 the proposed method of financing; 4 - a statement that the map , plan and report are filed in the Town Clerk ' s Office and they are there for public inspection ; 5- the time , date ,. and place`°for the public hearing in which any interested person will be heard in connection with the establishment of the district . Once this is done an order can be entered and can be moved and adopted by this board by a consensus of a vote . There was some discussion and decided to hold the public hearing on June 3rd at 7 : 30PM for Cortland Rd and on June 4th at 7 : 15 PM for George Junior Republic and 7 : 30 PM for Werninckville . ORDER - GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC PROPOSED SEWER DISTRICT p1m Metzger made amotion- - to adopt the following Order and entitled the same in its minutes as follows : 1 ) That the description of the proposed George Junior Republic Sewer District will be as set forth 0 EXHIBIT 1 which is filed with the Town Clerk and as set forth at length in the minutes of its meeting ; 2 ) The maximum amount proposed to be expended is the sum of $ 90 , 000 . 00 ; 3 ) The proposed method of financing of said district if conventional financing is sought will be meet a thirty ( 30 ) year term with an anticipated interest rate of 8 pet cent yearly payment of principal and interest $ 8 , 733 . 00 . If Farmers Home Administration financing is available the cost will be amortized over a forty ( 40 ) year period with an anticipated interest rate of 5 per cent and yearly payments of principal and interest of $ 6 , 488 . 00 ; 4 ) That the map , plan and report are filed with the Town Clerk , 65 E . Main St . , Drdyen , NY , pursuant to Section 209- c *of the Town Law and are open for public inspection during the clerk ' s regular hours for any interested person ; 5 ) That a public hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Dryden , County of Tompkins , New York on June 4th , 1981 , at 7 : 15 PM at the Dryden Town Hall , 65 East Main Street , Dryden , New York at which time any interested person may be heard with respect to the creation of said sewer. district . EXHIBIT 1 - . -- - I GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC SEWER DISTRICT I. Town of Dryden Tompkins County , New York Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Johnson Road with th.e southerly corporation line of the Village of Freeville. ; Thence easterly , on and along said line of the Village of Freeville , one thousand nine hundred fifty feet ( 1 , 950 ' ) , to a point ; Thence northerly , on and along a line perpendicular to said C` line of the Village of Freeville , about three hundred seventy feet ( 370 ' ) , more or less , to a point , said point being the intersection of said line with the westerly line of the lands now or formerly of the Lehigh Valley Railroad ; Thence northwesterly , on and along said line of lands , now or formerly of said railroad , about one thousand eight hundred feet ( 1 , 800 ' ) , more or less , to a point , which is a north - westerly corner . of lands of George Junior Republic ; I Thence easterly about one thousand three hundred thirty feet .� 30 ' ) . ht ;1ro or iACS , to a () flint : Thence northerly about four hundred sixty feet ( 460 ' ) , more or less , to a point , said point being in the centerline of l New York State Route 38 and also known as Railroad Street in the said Village of Freeville ; Thence easterly , on and along said centerline of said highway , two hundred feet ( 200 ' ) to a point ; Thence northerly two' hundred fifty feet ( 250 ' ) to a point ; Thence easterly , tawp . huRdr, ed. feet . ( 2. 00 ' ) to a point ; Thence southerly two hundred fifty feet ( 250 ' ) to a point ; said point being in the aforesaid centerline of New York State Route 38 ; Thence easterly , on and along said centerline of said highway , threehundr.ed feet ( 300 ' ) to a point ; Thence northerly two hundred nine fe`•et ( 209 ' ) to a point ; I Thence easterly two hundred nine feet ( 209 ' ) toa point , said point being in the centerline of South George Street , said centerline being the easterly corporation line of the Village of Freeville ; Thence southerly , on and along said centerline , about thirty feet ( 30 ' ) to a point , said point being the intersection of said ,centerline of South George Street with the centerline of Mott Road ; Thence easterly , on and along said centerline of Mott Road , about one thousand seven hundred feet ( 1 , 700 ' ) , more or less , to a point ; Thence southerly about seven hundred fifty feet ( 750 ' ) , more or less , to a point ; Thence easterly about six hundred fifty feet ( 650 ' ) more or less , to a point ' Thence southerly about ten feet ( 10 ' ) , more or less , to a point ; Thence easterly about eight hundred fifty feet ( 850 ' ) more or less , to a point , said point being in the centerline of Hart Road ; Thence southerly , on and along said centerline of Hart Road , about seven hundred twenty feet ( 720 ' ) , more or less , to a point ; Thence easterly about one thousand three hundred fifty - five feet ( 1 , 355 ' ) , more or less , to a point. on the Lot line between Lot No . 27 and Lot No . 28 ; Thence southerly along said Lot line to a point marking the southeast corner of Lot No . 27 ; . 'Thence westerly , on and along the Lot line between Lot No . 27 dud Lot No . 37 , about three hundred feet ( 300 ' ) , more or less , to a point ; Thence southerly , on and along the easterly. line of lands of George Junior Republic , formerly known as the Dedrick Farm , tb a point ; said point being . the southeasterly corner of said lands ; 'Thence westerly , on and along the southerly line of said lands to a p;'oint ; said point being the centerline of George Road ; Thence northerly , on and along said centerline of George Road • about two hundred feet. ( 200 ' ) , more or less , to a point: ; Thence northwesterly , westerly , northwesterly , southerly , and westerly , on and along the southerly lines of lands of George minior Republic , to a point , said point being in the centerline of the aforesaid ' Johnsur; = \ Ro 'ad ; Lia Thence northerly , westerly , northerly , northwesterly , south - westerly , and northwesterly , generally on and along said center- line of Johnson Road but following the westerly lines of lands oc George Junior Republic where said lines leave the center - line (94 Johnson Road , to the point and place of beginning . The foregoing boundary description is to include only lands owned by George Junior Republic . . 2nd Clm Webb Roll call vote - al .rr, Yot.inq WES ORDtR rz "WERNINCLIWI.LU ftgo'PoSt See DiSTRic Clan Webb 'made a notion to adopt • Order and entitled the same to Ito minutes as follows : 1 ) That 'the. tte„ sc ii,t- f N of the proposed werninafirelf die Sayer District ui it be 3S 5ef %od'th in EXHIBIT t which is filed wittlel the Town Clerk and as set faith at length in the minutes of its mtntt' 2) The oludnlysizwno4Tprop47.w8 to be expended in this fisisteAct 1. 5 the Sum rr P ISO, boo . Oa and-tree if Sir as Stare of the sewage plant for the treatment of the sewage in the district is -apptroMimately $ 110 , 300 . 00 ; 3) The prcpoted shod of said district it C:e:aNEtrTional financing g is sought over a thirty ( 30 ) year term with an antic jpated iarre'Resr e1M.: cf 4R Per cent for a single family equivalent unit that chnuaJ cost w6 1d be. $ 3$S. 4&• if Farmers ironic Administration financing is available tlig cost will be amortized over a forty ( 40) year period with an interest tate of S' per corir and the single family equivalent ufJt annual cost of $280 . 70i 4 ) That the map , plan and report are filled k'it'h the Town Clerk , 66 g Main St . , Dryden , NY pursuant to Section 209- e of the Town Law and are opoll for public inspection during the clerk ' s regular hours for any interested person ; 5 ) That a public hearing will be . , held by the Town Board of the Town of Dryden , County of Tompkins , Nee ., York on Jane 02t hi 1981 at 7 : 30 Pm • it the Dryden Tok'n stall , 65 East Mail ) Street , Dryden , New 'fork at which time any interested person may be heard with r spec1 to the Creation of said sewer district . EXHIBIT 2 • WERNINCKVILIE SEWER DISTRICT Town of Dryden Tompkins County , New York Oeginitijng at the point of intersection of the centerline of Mill Stfe'et with the westerly corporation line of the Village of Frear , lle ; Thence northerly , on and along said westerly line of the Village of Freeville , to the point of intersection of said line with the centerline of Fall Creek ; • Thence westerly , on and along said centerline of Fall Creek ; to the point of intersection of . said centerline with the aforesaid centerline of Mill Street ; Thence southwesterly about three thousand six hundred feet ( 3 , 600 ' ) , Irnore or less , to a point , said point being located six hundred fifty feet ( 650 ' ) northwesterly of the centerline of New York State Route 366 measured perpendicular to said centerline ; Thence southeasterly to a point , said point being located in the centerline of said New York State Route 366 at a distance of one thousand one hundred feet ( 1 , 100 ' ) , measured along said centerline , From the point of intersection of said centerline with the centerline of Sherbore Drive ; Thence continuing southeasterly , along the aforesaid line to its intersection with the centerline of Fall Creek Thence northeasterly and northerly , on and along the centerline . of Fall Creek , to the point ,of intersection of said centerline of Fall (*eel with the centerline of Virgil Creek ; Thence northeasterly , on and along . the centerline of Virgil Cry, to the most southerly point o4 intersection of said centerline with the aforesaid westerly corporation line of the Village of FY'e; eville ; ^Tnenc2 northerly , on and along said Village line , to the point and pace of beginning . 214 - cram Ro t cal " bsrt — au Y a 'nq des • If a . . • a . t. h \ ORDER - CORTLAND ROAD PROPOSED SEWER DISTRICT 1 @1m Metzger made a motion to adopt the following Order and entitled the same in its minutes as follows : 1 ) That the description of the proposed Cortland Road Sewer District will be as set forth in EXHIBIT 3 which is filed with the. Town Clerk id as set forth at Iength in the minutes of its meeting ; 2 ) The maximum amount proposed to be expended in this district is the sum of $ 250 , 000 . 00 ; 3 ) The proposed • method of financing of said district if conventional financing is sought • will be over a thirty ( 30 ) year term with An anticipated interest rate of 3 per cent with a single family equivalent unit paying the sum of $ 124 . 41 per year . If Farmers Home Administration financing is available the cost will be amortized over a forty ( 40 ) year period with an anticipated interest rate of 5 per cent with an annual single family equivalent unit cost of $ 105 . 72 ; 4 ) That the map , plan and report are filed with the Town Clerk , 65 E Main St . , Dryden , NY , pursuant to Section 209- c of the Town Law and are open for public inspection during the clerk ' s regular hours for ' any interested person ; 5 ) That a public hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Dryden , County of Tompkins , New York , on .June 3rd 1981 , at 7 : 30 PM at the Dryden Town Hall , 65 East Main Street , Dryden , New York at which time any interested person may be heard with respect to the creation of said sewer district . - EXHIBIT 3 . _ — - _ " Cortland Road Sewer District " 4nd shall be bounded and described as follows : • Beginning at the point of intersection of the center - lime o. f North Road and New York State Route 13 with the centerline of Freeville Road and New York State Route 38 ; Thence , westerly about three thousand seven hundred twenty - eight feet ( 3 , 728 ' ) along the centerline of Freeville Road , • to the point of intersection of said centerline with the property line between the lands of Dryden Central School District No . 1 on the east and the lands now or formerly of Charles Miller on the west ; Thence , northerly along said property line about two thousand two hundred twenty - three feet ( 2 , 223 ' ) , . to . a point on the line between Lot No . 38 and Lot No . 28 ; • Thence , easterly along said lot line about one hundred fifty feet ( 150 ' ) to a ' point , said point beingils, o . the most southerly southeast corner of the lands * of • Ray , Irene , and Bruce Dedrick ; Thence , northerly along the property line between the said lands of :Dedrick on the west and the aforesaid School District on the east about ' one thousand five hundred eighty feet ( 1 . , 580 ' ) to a point , said point being also the intersection of said line with the centerline of Town Route 19 and Mott Road ; Thence , southeasterly along' the centerline of said Mott Road about two thousand five hundred eighty feet ( 2 , 580 ' ) , to a point , said point being also the inter - section of said centerline with the westerly property line of the lands of Ronald E . Palmer ; A . #(# 9 • . Thence , northerly along the line between said lands of Palmer on the east and the lands of Rosella B . Crossgrove o n the west about three hundred feet ( 300 ' ) , to a point , said point being four hundred fifty feet ( 450 ' ) northerly o f the aforesaid lot ? ine between Lots No . 38 and 28 ; Mt • Thence , easterly along a line parallel with and four hundred fifty feet ( 450 ' ) northerly of said lot line to a point , said point being also the intersection of said line with the aforesaid centerline of North Road at a poi c four hundred fifty feet ( 450 ' ) northerly of the southeast corner of said Lot No . 28 ; Thence , easterly along the extension of the 10 aforesaid line parallel with and four hundred fifty feet ( 450 ' ) northerly of the line between Lot No . 2 ? and Lot No . 37 , about nine, hundred forty feet ( 940 ' ) to a point , said point being also the intersection of said line with . the centerline of section of New York State Route 13 and Cortland Road ; Thence , southwesterly along said centerline of Cortland Road , about six hundred feet ( 600 ' ) to a point , said point being also the intersection of said centerline w ith the line between Lot No . 29 and Lot No . 39 ; Thence , easterly along said lot line about four thousand six hundred ninety feet ( 4 , 690 ' ) to a point , said point being also the northeast corner of said Lot No . 39 ; Thence , southerly along the line between Lot No . 39 and Lot No . 40 , about two thousand seven hundred fifty feet ( 2 , 750 ' ) to a point , said point being also the intersection of said lot line with the extension easterly of the n ortherly line of the Village of Dryden ; Thence , westerly along said easterly extension of said Village line • • about five thousand one hundred eighty - turn feet- ( 5 , 1831 ) to a point , said point being also the intersection of said line with the aforesaid centerline of North Road ; Thence , southerly along said centerline and said Village line about one hundred fifty feet ( 150 ' ) to the point and place of beginning , and • Containing five hundred forty - three acres ( 543AC ) , more or less , 2nd Clm Webb Roll call vote - all voting YES Atty Perkins said that the engineers study and plan is based upon the average number of people per household or sewer lateral . The charges would be adjusted accordingly . If you have a multiple resident they will not pay just one lateral charge . Ailaundromat may have a 10 unit equivalent charge. 4$ Supv Cotterill said that the board members should be thinking about how the district should be set up . It could go on a unit basis or assessed value . He did not approve of the front -footage basis because people change properties and roads are being changed and is very hard to keep up to date . He felt the best assessed value and unit basis . Adjourned . 7 : 45 PM Q - • ' - - G? ` . . - J Susanne Lloyd • Town Clerk • •