Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-10-08-CAC-minutesTown of Danby Conservation Advisory Council (CAC) Notes from In-person Meeting in Town Hall, and Via Videoconferencing Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2024 Council Members Present: Joel Gagnon, Katharine Hunter, Don Schaufler, Jonathan Zisk Council Members Absent: Margaret Corbit, Anne Klingensmith, Brittany Lagaly, Renee Owens Others Present: Kristin McCarthy (staff), Ronda Roaring (Danby resident, via Zoom) Meeting was called to order at 7:20pm. Due to lack of a quorum, official business could not be conducted. Deletions or Additions to Agenda: None. There was no formal agenda distributed, but attendees were familiar with the discussion topics. Privilege of the Floor: Roaring expressed concern about the lack of attendance from members, stating that it was disrespectful to those who did attend, including the staff person taking minutes. Approval of Minutes: Previous meeting minutes could not be approved due to lack of a quorum. Reports and Updates 1. Status of Conservation Easement Tax Abatement: The group confirmed that this matter is on hold until after the election. 2. Status of Timber Harvesting Law: Schaufler updated the group on the timber harvesting law, which aims to safeguard local roads from potential damage caused by logging operations. The draft, reviewed by Steve Cortright, code enforcement officer, and Jack Shawley, deputy highway superintendent, is nearly complete after years of development involving input from DEC officials, local residents, and various stakeholders. In response to Kristin's query, the group provided additional background on the initiative's history and revisions. To finalize the law, the next steps include ensuring the inclusion of provisions for timely intervention, permit requirements, and clear guidelines for sustainable logging practices. Once completed, the draft will then be reviewed by the town attorney to ensure legal compliance and presented to the town board for consideration, including a public hearing. 3. Updates on Ongoing Easements: a. Altman -- Zisk provided an update on the Altman easement, discussing the proposed zones for the property. Altman has expressed a desire to incorporate Indigenous land use practices, specifically referencing traditional maple sugaring and the potential for an educational facility. The group discussed the complexities of easement agreements, particularly regarding the balance between restrictive and permissive uses. A key concern raised was the difficulty of enforcingrestrictions on future property owners. Zisk and Schaufler have plans to do a walkthrough of the Altman property, and others are invited to join as well. Participants shared anecdotes about easement monitoring, invasive species, and boundary disputes. b. Gladstone – Zisk provided an update on the Gladstone easement, noting that the owner's intentions to create a wildlife habitat may not align with the town’s ability to ensure implementation. The group is working to balance protecting natural features while accommodating Gladstone's vision. Next steps include integrating photographs and a zonal map into the documentation and finalizing the wording for her review before sharing with the broader group. c. Kartman – Gagnon reported that the Danby Town Board approved the Kartman easement the previous evening. The finalized document will be signed, notarized, and mailed to the recipient for countersignature. The group briefly discussed the town board's review process for such documents. d. Sherman – It was reported that the Sherman easement should be ready to move forward. Next, the group provided context for Kristin, the new staff member taking minutes, about key topics in Danby's conservation easement program development. They explained past discussions on easement length, with debates between shorter terms to encourage participation versus long-term conservation goals. Regarding tax implications, while state law provided relief for easements with the town, it excluded pre-existing easements, and the town is exploring legislative amendments to address this. Status of Easement Monitoring: It was relayed that Brittany would submit a baseline report for the prospective Sherman easement. Members discussed technical difficulties with uploading monitoring reports and converting paper documents to digital formats. The group touched on monitoring frequency, noting the goal of annual checks while acknowledging challenges of traditional methods, and discussed using drones and satellite imagery for hard-to-reach areas. The conversation then shifted to land ownership in Danby, including a case of inherited land being sold due to tax burdens. The group debated the definition of "rural character," considering wildlife preservation, development, and aesthetics, concluding that perspectives vary widely on this topic. Status of Checklist to Trigger CAC Involvement in Town Planning of Land Use: Zisk provided an update on the ongoing development of a checklist to determine when the CAC should be involved in town planning decisions. His report touched on the importance of establishing clear criteria for CAC involvement, balancing environmental protection with development needs, and considering the expertise of town staff and officials. The group plans to further discuss the checklist, including specific examples of triggering events and the role of the CAC in the planning process. Executive Session -- None. Wrap -up -- The gathering concluded with a few remarks on the upcoming year and the role of the chair. The importance of goal setting was mentioned, though CAC's priorities are often driven by specific issues. Before parting ways for the evening, the group also touched on invasive species management, zoning regulations, logging operations, and the challenges of balancing conservation goals with practical needs. The gathering ended at 9:04pm. Submitted by Kristin McCarthy, Secretary