Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0224 04 05 Danby Sanitary Study PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT for SANITARY SEWER & WWTP STUDY TOWN OF DANBY, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NY NYS EFC EPG #105522 July 2023, Revised April 2024 HUNT 3378-001 HUNT ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, LAND SURVEYORS & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, DP HORSEHEADS OFFICE 100 HUNT CENTER HORSEHEADS, NY 14845 TELE: 607.358.1000 HUNT-EAS.COM ROCHESTER OFFICE 4 COMMERCIAL STREET, SUITE 300 ROCHESTER, NY 14614 TELE: 585.327.7950 TOWANDA OFFICE 1 ELIZABETH STREET, SUITE 12 TOWANDA, PA 18848 TELE: 570.265.4868 ii Preliminary Engineering Report For Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study TOWN OF DANBY NYS EFC EPG #105522 HUNT 3378.001 July 2023, Revised April 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................1 II. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY ........................................................................................2 A. Background and Purpose ...............................................................................................................2 B. Site Information and Location ......................................................................................................2 C. Topography & Subsurface Conditions .........................................................................................3 D. Environmental Resources ..............................................................................................................4 1. Agricultural Districts ................................................................................................................4 2. Waterbodies ...............................................................................................................................4 3. Wetlands .....................................................................................................................................5 4. Endangered Species ...................................................................................................................5 5. Archeological Sensitivity ..........................................................................................................5 6. Critical Environmental Area (CEA) .......................................................................................5 7. Floodplain Considerations .......................................................................................................5 8. Environmental Justice Areas ....................................................................................................6 E. Ownership and Service Area ..........................................................................................................6 1. Outside Users .............................................................................................................................6 2. Industrial Discharges or Hauled Waste ..................................................................................6 3. Population Trends and Growth...............................................................................................6 III. EXISTING FACILITIES ............................................................................................................................7 A. General Description and History ..................................................................................................7 B. Water Usage Data ............................................................................................................................7 C. Current or Future Projects at Site .................................................................................................7 D. Permit Conditions and Effluent Discharge Limits .....................................................................8 E. Compliance Issues ...........................................................................................................................8 F. Existing Flows and Waste Loads ...................................................................................................8 1. Area to Be Served.......................................................................................................................8 2. Design Sanitary Sewer Flow Rates...........................................................................................9 3. Equivalent Dwelling Units .......................................................................................................9 iii 4. Wastewater Quality Profile ......................................................................................................9 G. Existing Energy Consumption ................................................................................................... 10 H. Site Layout ..................................................................................................................................... 10 I. History of Damage due to Storm or Flood Impacts ................................................................ 11 J. Description of Unit Process Being Evaluated ........................................................................... 11 IV. FINANCIAL STATUS ............................................................................................................................ 12 A. Sources of Income ........................................................................................................................ 12 B. Current Rate Schedule ................................................................................................................. 12 C. Other Capital Improvement Projects ........................................................................................ 12 D. Existing Debts and Reserve Accounts ....................................................................................... 12 V. NEED FOR THE PROJECT (Definition of the Problem) ................................................................. 12 A. Health, Sanitation and Security .................................................................................................. 12 B. Aging Infrastructure .................................................................................................................... 14 C. Infiltration and Inflow ................................................................................................................. 14 D. Suitability for Continued Use ..................................................................................................... 14 E. Storm and Flood Resiliency ........................................................................................................ 15 F. Compliance with Accepted Standards ....................................................................................... 15 VI. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS................................................................................................................ 15 A. No Action ...................................................................................................................................... 15 B. Green Infrastructure .................................................................................................................... 16 C. Regional Treatment ...................................................................................................................... 16 D. Special District Formation .......................................................................................................... 16 E. Common Items across Collection System Alternatives .......................................................... 17 1. Site Layout/Sewer Mapping .................................................................................................. 17 2. Land Requirements ................................................................................................................ 17 3. Impact on Existing Facility ................................................................................................... 17 4. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................................................ 17 5. Discharge Permit Requirements........................................................................................... 18 6. Storm and Flood Resiliency .................................................................................................. 19 7. Constructability and Schedule .............................................................................................. 19 8. Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements ....................................................................... 19 F. Gravity Sewer System with Conventional Pump Stations ...................................................... 19 1. Description .............................................................................................................................. 19 2. Operation and Maintenance Considerations ..................................................................... 23 Non-Monetary Considerations ...................................................................................................... 23 G. Grinder Pump System ................................................................................................................. 24 1. Description .............................................................................................................................. 24 2. Operation and Maintenance Considerations ..................................................................... 27 3. Environmental Concerns ...................................................................................................... 27 4. Non-Monetary Considerations ............................................................................................ 28 H. Wastewater Treatment Systems ................................................................................................. 28 1. Conventional WWTP (Activated Sludge) ........................................................................... 28 Non-Monetary Considerations ...................................................................................................... 29 iv 2. Subsurface Treatment (Leachfield) ...................................................................................... 36 Non-Monetary Considerations ...................................................................................................... 38 I. Clustered, Small Community Treatment .................................................................................. 38 1. Cluster Development under a Special District ................................................................... 39 Non-Monetary Considerations ...................................................................................................... 41 2. Transportation Corporation Formation ............................................................................. 42 J. Capital Costs Comparison .......................................................................................................... 43 K. Operation and Maintenance Costs ............................................................................................ 47 L. Short-Lived Assets ........................................................................................................................ 48 M. Non-Monetary Factors ................................................................................................................ 48 VII. Comparison of Alternatives ................................................................................................................... 48 A. Capital Costs ................................................................................................................................. 48 VIII. RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................... 55 B. Potential Project Schedule ........................................................................................................... 56 C. Next Steps ...................................................................................................................................... 56 D. Funding Sources ........................................................................................................................... 57 1. USDA Rural Development (RD) Water and Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program 57 2. NYS EFC Clean Water Infrastructure Improvement Act ................................................. 57 3. NYS EFC Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan........................................................... 58 IX. Conclusion: ............................................................................................................................................... 58 A. Smart Growth Assessment .......................................................................................................... 58 B. Engineering Report Certification ............................................................................................... 58 TABLES Table 1: Town Historic and Estimated Population .........................................................................................6 Table 2: Use Types Within Study Area ............................................................................................................8 Table 3 - Town of Danby Estimated Flows ......................................................................................................9 Table 4 - Anticipated Wastewater Quality .................................................................................................... 10 Table 5 - Estimated Wastewater Loadings (Startup & Build-out) ............................................................. 10 Table 6: Violation Records Summary ............................................................................................................ 13 Table 7 - Anticipated WWTP Effluent Limits .............................................................................................. 18 Table 6 – Summary of Project Costs .............................................................................................................. 44 Table 6 – Summary of Project Costs .............................................................................................................. 45 Table 6 – Summary of Project Costs .............................................................................................................. 46 Table 6 – Summary of Project Costs .............................................................................................................. 47 Table 8 – Total Collection System Project Cost Summary ......................................................................... 49 Table 8 – Total Treatment Project Cost Summary ...................................................................................... 50 Table 8 – Total Collection System Project Cost Summary ......................................................................... 51 Table 8 – Total Treatment Project Cost Summary ...................................................................................... 52 Table 8 – Total Collection System Project Cost Summary ......................................................................... 53 Table 8 – Total Treatment Project Cost Summary ...................................................................................... 53 Table 8 – Total Collection System Project Cost Summary ......................................................................... 54 Table 8 – Total Treatment Project Cost Summary ...................................................................................... 55 v Table 11: Selected Project Summary .............................................................................................................. 56 FIGURES Figure 1: County Population Trends ................................................................................................................7 APPENDICES Appendix A: Project Location Mapping Appendix B: Soils Mapping Appendix C: Environmental Resource Mapping Appendix D: Community Information Appendix E: Available Water Usage Data & Flow Calculations Appendix F: Financial Data (Not Used) Appendix G: Process Review (Not Used) Appendix H: Conceptual Layouts Appendix I: Equipment and Cost Estimates Appendix J: Smart Growth Appendix K: Engineering Certification Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Town of Danby (Town) is investigating ways to provide a sanitary collection sewer system and one or more municipal wastewater treatment/disposal systems to serve the hamlet neighborhood and hamlet core zones or just the Hamlet Centers of Central and West Danby. The Town hired Hunt Engineers, Architects, Land Surveyors & Landscape Architects, DPC (HUNT) to develop a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) to review the feasibility of providing sanitary service to both developed properties and properties where additional development could be enabled as a result of system installation. The sewage flows would be conveyed to a new treatment system within Central Danby and West Danby. The Town of Danby includes two hamlets named Central Danby (Service Area 1) and West Danby (Service Area 2) and that within each of these hamlets are further sub-areas called Central Danby Hamlet Center (Service Area 1a) and West Danby Hamlet Center (Service Area 2a); these naming conventions will be used throughout the report. Presently, the existing residences and businesses utilize private, onsite septic systems for wastewater treatment. Some property owners can incur high costs resulting from spatial issues with replacing systems on small lots. In coordination with the Town, HUNT assisted in developing a community survey to gauge residences opinion of their current sanitary systems and if they would be for or against implementation of community-based treatment and collection system (see summary in Appendix D). Many of the soils within the study area are rated as very limited for the use of leach fields and therefore, failed, or inadequate septic systems can adversely impact the surrounding water quality and environment. The Town’s leaders desire to maintain and expand commercial development and expand residential growth within the service area. The lack of a centralized sanitary sewer system is a deterrent to compact commercial and residential development. The recommended project is to provide sanitary collection and treatment for the Hamlet Centers (Service Areas 1a/2a) within the Town of Dandy (both Central and West) only. This includes a gravity collection system and a modular, package membrane bioreactor treatment system enclosed in fully pre-manufactured and four (4) engineered container(s) for Central Danby (Service Area 1a); having separate containers sized for flows for the northern and southern sections of Main Street/Danby Road. While West Danby (Service Area 2a) includes a grinder collection system and a modular, package membrane bioreactor treatment system enclosed in fully pre-manufactured would be served by two (2) larger container systems. The total project cost for all proposed recommended improvements is estimated at $2,843,299 for Service Area 1a and $3,273,071 for (Service Area 2a). Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 2 II. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY A. Background and Purpose This Preliminary Engineering Report is being prepared to investigate and characterize the quality of the on-site septic systems as much as possible within the study area, identify any environmental concerns arising because of these on-site system shortcomings, describe the need for a public sewer system, evaluate various alternative solutions, provide a recommended solution, and develop economic impacts to the proposed users. The information provided in this study is also intended to support an application for project funding. The purpose of this PER is summarized as follows: • Identify the boundaries of the service area and establish projected wastewater flows for existing and future users within the area. • Research and present environmental conditions within the area and determine their impacts on the project. • Review the Town’s financial stature to assess reserves for the project. • Identify various alternatives for wastewater collection and conveyance. Develop cost estimates for each alternative and establish non-monetary factors for consideration. • Identify various alternatives for wastewater treatment. Develop cost estimate for each alternative and establish non-monetary factors for consideration. • Develop life cycle cost analysis for each alternative reviewed. • Review funding options for the Town to pursue. • Provide a recommendation of the selected project. Surveys of the Town residents have listed the lack of a municipal wastewater system as a priority and the installation of a public sewer system is a goal of their comprehensive plan. The Town board has investigated the various methods to pursue this goal and develop a viable sewer system. B. Site Information and Location The Town of Danby includes two hamlets named Central Danby (Service Area 1) and West Danby (Service Area 2) and that within each of these hamlets are further sub-areas called Central Danby Hamlet Center (Service Area 1a) and West Danby Hamlet Center (Service Area 2a); these naming conventions will be used throughout the report. as outlined in Appendix A. Numerous parcels within Central Danby are highly developed resulting in more than 50% lot coverages. Additionally, the Town of Danby’s population is one of the lowest population densities in the County meaning that many commercial developers and Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 3 employers are hesitant to procure and develop businesses within the Town, likely due to the lack of public utilities. Development patterns and natural resources inherently divide the Town of Danby into two (2) distinct hamlet neighborhoods: Central Danby and West Danby as shown within Appendix A. The Central Danby Hamlet is Study Area #1 and the Hamlet located Southwest of Central Danby is West Danby Study Area #2. While the Town desires to provide sanitary services to both areas larger areas, each area has hamlet centers, the project has the potential to be phased in, if funding limitations arise. This report evaluates both study areas. • Study Area #1 – Central Danby (includes both service areas) Area #1 consists of the parcels located adjacent to NYS Route 96B (Danby Road). There are parcels that are located along Bald Hill Road, Michigan Hollow Road, Daisy Lane, Hornbrook road, Gunderman Road, White Hawk Lane, Dobson Road, Dobson Road Extension, Pine Drive, West Miller Road, and East Miller Road. Refer to Appendix A for parcels that are located within Study Area #1. Within the hamlet centers the parcels are highly developed with more than 50% lot coverages. • Study Area #2 – West Danby (includes both service areas) Area #2 consists of the parcels located adjacent to NYS Route 34 (West Danby Road / Spencer Road), bounded by the railroad tracks on the east. Also, the area includes the parcels along Maple Avenue, Valley View Road, Station Road, Brown Road, Short Road, Sylvan Lane, Tupper Avenue, and Beech Hill Road. Refer to Appendix X for these parcels that are located within Study Area #2. C. Topography & Subsurface Conditions Study Area 1 has a ground elevation ranging from 1220 to 1360 feet and Study Area 2 has ground elevation ranging from 840 to 1040 feet as shown on the contour map provided in Appendix B. Various soils encompass both Study Areas as shown in the NRCS soils mapping. The soil types within Study Area 1 have a 0-15% slope change. However, there are a few select locations where there is 16-20% slope change. Within Study Area 2, the slope change is greater, and ranges from 16-93% in scattered locations within the hamlet, while the other locations are within a 0-16% slope change. These soils have not historically demonstrated any notable structural issues which should be considered. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 4 Groundwater elevations within the Town of Danby are mapped by use of the NRCS-USDA Web Soil Survey and can be found within Appendix B. The majority of the Town experiences a poor soil rating of 0-150 cm below the ground surface, likely due to the Town’s location within a valley. West Danby experiences a poor soil rating of 0-15 cm below ground surface as well, primarily in the northern half. The poor soli ratings are limiting to suitability of on-site septic systems. D. Environmental Resources 1. Agricultural Districts There are several parcels within the proposed study area that are designated as Agricultural Districts. These parcels are located North and South of West Danby. Most parcels surrounding all sides of Central Danby are composed of Agricultural Districts. Refer to Appendix C for agricultural district mapping. Agricultural District. 2. Waterbodies According to the NYSDEC Waterbody Inventory, there are several streams adjacent to the project area. In Study Area 2 the Cayuga Inlet flows through the northern and central parcels of the West Danby hamlet. The Cayuga Inlet is directly connected to Cayuga Lake and should be protected perpetually by the Town of Danby and will be subject to the Phosphorus TMDL currently being established for the lake. Within Study Area 1, Buttermilk Creek enters the Central Danby hamlet from the north and exits south into Jennings Pond. There are areas within the hamlet where the Buttermilk Creek diverges. These locations are near White Hawk Lane extending southeast, near East Miller Road and West Miller Road extending eastward, and near the back of Danby Town Hall extending westward. The creek extends to the North and becomes a tributary for the Cayuga Inlet. Willseyville Creek and minor tribs (0603-0032), which consist of streams in the southern half of the Town, are classified as having no use impairment and aquatic life is fully supported. Streams in the northern half of the Town are unassessed. Jennings Pond (0705-0064) is listed as Stressed for public bathing and recreation due to suspected pathogens. PWL fact sheets can be found in Appendix C. The project boundary does not lie above an unconfined primary aquifer. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 5 3. Wetlands Review of the NYSDEC Resource Mapper identified wetlands under NYS jurisdiction within or immediately adjacent to both Hamlet Centers of the Town of Danby. Review of the National Wetland mapping database documented several federally protected wetlands. See Appendix C for mapping of State and Nationally delineated wetlands. 4. Endangered Species The Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, identified two threatened or endangered species. Within the extents of both Study Areas the Northern Long-eared Bat and the Monarch Butterfly can be potentially affected by development within this location. There are no critical habitat(s) in this location. Sources identified several migratory birds as birds of concern. The US Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) listing of Endangered Species of Fish & Wildlife listing of endangered species and birds are provided in Appendix C. 5. Archeological Sensitivity The project site is not located within an archaeologically sensitive area established by the Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation (OPRHP) and the National Register of Historic Places. Please refer to Appendix C for an Archaeologically Sensitive Areas Map. A no impact letter from OPRHP is not required prior to any future improvements. 6. Critical Environmental Area (CEA) The project site has Unique Natural Area(s) (UNA) in both Hamlet Centers, as developed by Tompkins County; however, there are no CEAs in the study area. Within Central Danby, there is a UNA located in a parcel on the East side of the hamlet. Refer to Appendix C for mapping of the CEA’s and UNA’s. Area 2, West Danby, has a UNA located in the Southern part of the hamlet that contains many parcels. There are no CEAs in the Town of Danby. 7. Floodplain Considerations According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance rate maps (FIRM) for the Project area, the majority of the project does not fall within the 100-year flood hazard area. Mapping indicates that the Town of Danby limits are not withing any identified floodplain. However, the Town of West Danby does show a slim area in the 100-year flood zone around the creek. Please refer to Appendix C for exhibits showing the FEMA Floodplain limits in the region. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 6 8. Environmental Justice Areas The NYS DEC has not identified any Potential Environmental Justice Area (PEJA) within either Study Area. As established in DEC Commissioner Policy 29 on Environmental Justice and Permitting, PEJA areas are identified as areas with higher- than-average populations of minority groups or higher-than-average household incomes which are below the federal poverty level. please refer to Appendix C for Environmental Justice area mapping. E. Ownership and Service Area 1. Outside Users There are no other outside users proposed within the Town of Danby that would connect. 2. Industrial Discharges or Hauled Waste There are no proposed industrial users or hauled wastes accepted within the Town of Danby that would connect. 3. Population Trends and Growth Per US Census data, population growth in the Town of Danby has been steadily increasing since the 1990s, as seen in Table 1 below. Table 1: Town Historic and Estimated Population Census Year Population % Change 1980 2,449 14.4% 1990 2,858 16.7% 2000 3,007 5.2% 2010 3,329 10.7% 2020 3,457 3.80% 2030 (est.) 3,562 2.95% 2040 (est.) 3,670 2.94% The Cornell Program on Applied Demographics anticipates that the population of Tompkins County will increase at a rate of approximately 0.3% per year. This value was used to estimate the Town population increase seen in Table 1 above. This is a conservative estimate, as the population increase in the Town of Danby has historically been larger than in the county overall. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 7 Figure 1: County Population Trends III. EXISTING FACILITIES A. General Description and History The existing community is currently being served by individual, privately owned, on-site wastewater treatment systems (OWTS). There have been some Notice of Violations (NOVs) associated with some of these systems as addressed in Section V of the report and demonstrated in Appendix D. Although style, size, and layout of the individual OWTS may vary between users, the general components remain the same, and are as follows: • Sanitary lateral pipe conveying wastewater from user source to septic tank • Septic tank for preliminary treatment of solids and anaerobic treatment • Absorption system that distributes wastewater to granular media below for biological treatment and ultimate disposal through infiltration B. Water Usage Data The Town of Central Danby is on a private well system and there are no water usage records. The Town of West Danby is on a public water system and their residential water consumption was not obtained, so we used 110 gpd per bedroom for a two bedroom, which came to 220 gpd/EDU for a 2 bedroom facility. C. Current or Future Projects at Site There are no current or future projects that will affect this project. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 8 D. Permit Conditions and Effluent Discharge Limits There is no SPDES permit associated with the Town as they have no sanitary discharges other than onsite septic systems. E. Compliance Issues There are no known compliance issues associated with the Town as they have no sanitary discharges other than onsite septic systems. F. Existing Flows and Waste Loads 1. Area to Be Served The four (4) primary Project Area alternatives to be reviewed include all properties within the Town of Danby (Service Area 1) and just the Hamlet Centers (Service Area 1a), as well as West Dandy (Service Area 2) and just the Hamlet Centers (Service Area 2a). The Town is comprised mostly of single family residential and seasonal residential use types, with several vacant lots, and agricultural uses. Table 2 below summarizes the use types. For planning purposes, a proposed Sewer District Boundary has been created. Please refer to Appendix H for mapping that identifies the proposed boundary and potential users. Please note that the collection system accounts for connections of existing users at startup and NOT vacant parcels and the like; and quantifies equivalent dwelling units (EDU). Table 2: Use Types Within Study Area Area Use Type Subtotal Residential Commercial Agricultural Recreational Storage Vacant Central Danby Service Area 1 145 9 - - 1 155 Central Danby Hamlet Centers Only Service Area 1a 8 5 - - 1 14 West Danby Service Area 2 77 3 - - - 80 West Danby Hamlet Centers Only Service Area 2a 22 1 - - - 23 Subtotal 252 18 2 272 Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 9 2. Design Sanitary Sewer Flow Rates Based on New York State Design Standards for Intermediate Sized Wastewater Treatment Systems (“NYS Design Manual”) Section B.6.b, design flows were estimated for each property type. A single family residence was assessed at 330 gallons per day (gpd). This flow rate was applied to all single-family residential users within the Project Area. For parcels classified as Agricultural use, 330 gallons per day was assigned where living structures were present. For fields and vacant lots, no water usage data was applied. All other usage rates were calculated utilizing Typical Per-Unit Hydraulic Loading Rates as set forth within the NYS Design Manual. Please refer to Appendix E for a table of the users and their average daily flow rate within the Project Area. To account for future expansion and growth within the community, the Total Average Daily Flow (ADF) rate was increased by a factor dependent on the size of the system’ as shown below. Table 3 - Town of Danby Estimated Flows 3. Equivalent Dwelling Units Equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) were assigned to users based upon the 220 gallons per day (110 gpd/bedroom) per single-family residence (220 gpd = 1 EDU), with a minimum of one (1) EDU assigned to each user. Agricultural uses were assigned one (1) EDU per dwelling structure, and zero (0) EDUs for crop fields. Refer to Appendix E for tabulation of EDUs. The number of EDUs for the Danby & West Danby Project Service Areas (SA) were calculated to be SA-1 186, SA-1a 30, SA-2 97 and SA-2a 27 respectively. 4. Wastewater Quality Profile There have been no known wastewater quality tests conducted on raw wastewater generated by the users of either community. However, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established anticipated raw wastewater quality data for residential users. It is reasonable to assume that the profile of the wastewater to be treated by the new wastewater treatment plant will reflect that Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 10 anticipated for raw residential wastewater, therefore; an anticipated wastewater quality profile for the community is as follows (EPA 2003): Table 4 - Anticipated Wastewater Quality Parameter Concentration (mg/L) Avg. Conc. Used (mg/L) BOD5 155 – 286 240 TSS 155 – 330 240 FOG 70 – 105 - TP 6 – 12 8 NH3 -N 25 – 45 35 TN 26-75 - Table 5 - Estimated Wastewater Loadings (Startup & Build-out) G. Existing Energy Consumption All onsite systems are managed by homeowners/businesses, and it is difficult to assess current energy consumption. Typical electrical costs would come from equipment such as pumps. H. Site Layout While there is no specific “site layout” under investigation for the Existing Facilities study area, the area is comprised of residential and business dwellings that are on individual septic systems as previously stated. See Appendix A for property mapping of the study areas under investigation. Flow from these systems will be collected and conveyed to the new wastewater treatment system. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 11 I. History of Damage due to Storm or Flood Impacts There are no known damaging storm or flooding events historically catalogued within the Town. J. Description of Unit Process Being Evaluated 1. Existing capacity, age, conveyance, etc While there is no public system in the areas being studied, the area under study is on individual septic systems. It is presumed that all are the original components with little to no improvements and only minor maintenance was implemented during its lifetime. 2. Failure history and component limitations The study areas are all on individual onsite septic systems. It is likely that some onsite septic systems do not meet the NYS Dept. of Health distance requirements of 100 feet between water wells and sewage components and it is surmised (based on age and similar projects) that many systems are probably experiencing problems and will only become worse over time. As previously stated, there have been NOVs recorded by the NYS Department of Health. So, this project seeks to improve the environment and eliminate the potential adverse health effects associated with failing septic systems. 3. Ability to meet technical standards for treatment All improvements will meet the most current design guidelines and technical standards; including but not limited to 10 States Standards and TR-16. 4. Planned, current, or future improvements outside the project scope There are no other planned projects outside this PER recommendations. 5. Hydraulic capacity analysis of existing sewers where expansion or increased flow is proposed There are no existing sewers within the Town of Danby to evaluate. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 12 IV. FINANCIAL STATUS A. Sources of Income The proposed sewer system will require the establishment of a sewer rate structure to create a sewer fund. Through this sewer fund, the Town will ensure there is a reserve account set up with enough funds yearly to maintain the system and absorb any debt associated with this project. B. Current Rate Schedule There is no current sewer rate schedule for the Town of Danby. However, if a sanitary system were to be constructed, an appropriate schedule would be determined by the Town. C. Other Capital Improvement Projects There are currently no other planned projects forthcoming at the facility. D. Existing Debts and Reserve Accounts There are currently no debts linked to the proposed sewer service. The construction of the new system may require the Town to take on CPLA sewer debt, EFC loans, or other forms of financing which will need to be accounted for in the rate structure. The Town of Danby has recently adopted their 2024 Budget. Although the Town does not currently have any reserve account set up for a sewer service, they have shown their ability to maintain a reserve account for their water service for West Danby. This reserve account has proven to be sufficient to keep the system maintained without taking on more debt. Currently, the Town has debt associated with the Highway Department, as well as a reserve account set up for unexpected equipment repairs. The Town’s yearly adopted budget has proven their ability to absorb debt while keeping enough reserves for maintenance and unexpected costs associated with that debt. V. NEED FOR THE PROJECT (Definition of the Problem) A. Health, Sanitation and Security The proposed municipal sanitary sewer system shall create a reliable and safe measure for the conveyance and treatment of wastewater to serve the residents and businesses of the community. The state of the current individual on-site wastewater treatment systems (as Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 13 evidenced by the NOVs), coupled with the environmental features of the area, demand a centralized municipal sanitary sewer system to protect the health and safety of the public. As noted previously in this report, the communities are currently served by individual OWTS’s. The average life expectancy of a well-maintained septic system can range from approximately 25-30 years. The failure of a standard septic system can cost the owner on average $20,000 dollars, depending on the size and type of system required. In the case of areas with seasonal high groundwater or spatial limitations, replacement of a septic system may require a mound type system, which can cost up to $30,000 to install. The high up-front costs associated with a full septic system replacement can create a significant financial burden for the property owners. If a failed septic system goes unaddressed, there becomes an increased risk in soil and groundwater contamination. Several properties have already experienced failures, as can be seen in Table 6 below. For those areas currently not served by municipal water systems, or for those users who have chosen to continue utilizing private groundwater wells in lieu of connecting to the existing municipal water system, there is a serious potential for health risks related to contamination of their potable water source due to failed septic systems. Also, failed septic systems contribute to increased nutrient loads to the headwaters of Cayuga Lake contradicting the current TMDL initiatives. Table 6: Violation Records Summary Date Address Agency Violation May 2003 1631 Danby Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage July 2009 22 Station Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage January 2014 22 Station Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage June 2015 424 Troy Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage February 2016 217 Muzzy Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage October 2017 14 Makarainen Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage March 2018 14 Makarainen Road Thompkins County DOH Saturated DMATS March 2018 111 Patchen Court Thompkins County DOH Construction without OWTS permit May 2020 Tallow Hill Road Thompkins County DOH Waste discharge to ground surface and below surface without inspection Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 14 In the densely populated areas of the communities, where parcels are relatively small (<1 acre), property owners can encounter several non-monetary issues associated with the installation of a new septic system. Regulatory agencies require separation distances between OWTS and various physical and theoretical features (groundwater well, housing structure property lines, etc.), and many systems do not comply with current regulations. Due to the high groundwater elevation in certain locations, many system replacements require upgrading from traditional absorption fields to mound-type systems in order to meet required separation distances between the bottom of the absorption field and the high groundwater elevation. Mound systems require larger footprints in order to meet design requirements, which can be difficult to meet for small residential parcels. Mound systems are pressurized treatment systems which require the installation of a pump and pump station with controls, which adds to the capital cost and creates additional electrical cost for the user. Construction of raised systems also requires importing select engineered fill, which can further add to the capital costs necessary for full system replacement. Town residents were provided a survey in order to get a clearer idea of their water supply and the condition of on-site septic systems if they had knowledge. Hunt received a total of 30 responses back. Not all responders filled out every section. One person only returned 1 page, but we did not contact them. Each resident/response was assigned a number (1-30) as shown in the detailed table and summary in Appendix D. The physical responses have the corresponding number written on them in case additional information is needed. In general, there is support for servicing the Hamlet centers (Areas 1a and 2a). B. Aging Infrastructure Onsite septic systems are original, and it is suspected, and proven in some cases, that some or many could be failing. See Table 6 above for a list of DOH violations related to on-site septic systems. This proposed project will eliminate this potential adverse environmental condition and create a better environment for the community. C. Infiltration and Inflow Infiltration nor inflow are applicable to this report. We do not include I&I flows to our flow calculations as we use a very conservative value of 330 GPD per home. D. Suitability for Continued Use This is not applicable as the Town does not currently utilize an existing sanitary system to diagnose. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 15 E. Storm and Flood Resiliency The Town of Danby has minimal flooding concerns; however, the Town of West Danby does show a slim area in the 100-year flood zone around the creek., but the presence of the lake and other surface water bodies result in elevated groundwater. This higher groundwater has an adverse impact on septic systems. As demonstrated by the mapping provided in Appendix C, 100 year floodwaters do not inundate the site. Regardless, storm or flood resiliency during design will be conducted. All new structures will be designed to follow current guidelines on flood protection. The proposed West Danby WWTP location would be near this and the outfall would discharge to this water body. The WWTP is outside this boundary, but the hydraulics would be designed to allow the plant to operate during the 100-year event. F. Compliance with Accepted Standards All proposed work will follow the latest editions of TR-16 and Ten States Standards (10SS) or other applicable design guidance documents and will meet NYSDEC requirements. VI. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Review of the topography within the Town of Central Danby reveals that the entire Town area decreases in grade from the south to the north along Danby Rd/Main Street and towards the Danby Rd/Main Street trunk from the side roads, which makes it very favorable for a conventional gravity sewer system. As part of our due diligence, HUNT has chosen to analyze two (2) viable implementation options that would bring sewer to the Project Area including: conventional gravity sewer system and a grinder pump system; we feel a simple septic tank effluent pump (STEP) system would not be viable due to elevated groundwater and threat of I&I, therefore, was not advanced further. These two (2) options have been evaluated below, along with a “do nothing alternative.” A. No Action Taking no action will only constrain growth withing the community and compound an already failing sewage treatment system resulting in the risk of public health problems and environmental issues. Public health and safety would still be a concern and would most likely increase. This is not a feasible alternative. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 16 B. Green Infrastructure This would be a new collection system for sanitary flows only. Stormwater flows would not be a concern and therefore the use of Green Infrastructure is not applicable nor considered for the project due to the requirement to meet current standards. Any improvements or green infrastructure opportunities are limited. Such things as high efficiency motors/equipment, variable speed drives, LED lighting, etc. will be used as much as possible in the project. C. Regional Treatment This alternative would include conveying all the collected sanitary flows and pumping to a regional WWTP in lieu of the need for a Town wastewater treatment facility. It still requires a collection system as discussed below; however, would require a very long force main and a substantial pump station and permanent backup generator. We estimate the closest regional facility is the City of Ithaca WWTP but likely with the Town of Ithaca collection system which is over six (6) miles away to the north. This option is not deemed economically reasonable as a 6-mile force main with pump station/GenSet would be around $11.6M and would still require a collection system. D. Special District Formation New York State guidelines discourage the development of OWTS servicing multiple parcels unless a municipality owns, maintains, or provides oversight of such a system. A Town special district could be established if the Town desired to be involved with the ownership and operation of the system or a Transportation Corporation could be established if a non- municipally operated cluster system were to service multiple properties. The possibility of clustered wastewater treatment is possible in the Town of Danby if the municipality is the owner of the system(s). and a Town special district would be capable of taxation and funding opportunities whereas a Transportation Corporation would not be. 1. Special District Formation A special district or districts can be formed to ensure that only the property owners within the Town that are benefited by the sanitary sewer system are responsible for bearing its costs. Details can be found within Town law Article 12 A-C describing the types of districts that can be formed within a Town. A special district being formed would mean that special taxation would be applied to the residents and businesses within the district’s boundary to finance the sanitary system if benefitted and connected. The Town could establish a Town special district for the area desired and set forth a rate structure that allowed those connected to Town owned infrastructure to pay debt service and Operation & Maintenance. Those outside the Hamlet Centers (Areas 1A/2A) who are Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 17 not connected at startup would still reside within the District Boundary and fall under the special district structure. The Special District would be the entire Town Areas 1 and 2 which would allow the remaining users to connect to the system in the future without any revision to the formed “District”. The Town would not be responsible for the unconnected existing on-site septic systems that were not constructed under supervision of the Town. One example of a system constructed under ownership of the Town would be the Dandy Hamlet Centers, described as the area near Bald Hill Rd/Main Street and the area near Gunderman Rd/Main Street (south to Hornbrook Rd), as shown in Figure 1 in Appendix H. E. Common Items across Collection System Alternatives The following items are provided to address all proposed alternatives outlined below. 1. Site Layout/Sewer Mapping Proposed draft layouts and mapping of the sewer areas currently unserved were developed and are included in Appendix H. 2. Land Requirements As the bulk of the sewer collection system infrastructure is anticipated to be located in roadway rights-of-way or Town property, significant land acquisition requirements is not anticipated; however, a new WWTS will require purchase of property to accommodate process structures and equipment. We have identified several areas for treatment systems. See Conceptual Layouts in Appendix H. 3. Impact on Existing Facility There would be some impact on all current properties while septic systems are eliminated, and sewer connections are installed. The new treatment system and collection system would be installed prior to any connections to reduce these impacts. 4. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures The proposed design will be developed to avoid adverse environmental impacts, a complete SEQR evaluation will be conducted during the planning process. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 18 The Town acting as Lead Agency will complete a full environmental review following NYS State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) guidelines. As identified in Section III Environmental Resources Present, the design and review process will consider agricultural lands, crossing of streams, the presence of aquifers, flood zones, natural communities near the location, and archaeological sensitive areas. There will be no impacts to Environmental Justice areas as none have been identified. If anything, adding sewer expansion and WWTP capacity will improve the surrounding area for the entire project area. 5. Discharge Permit Requirements All the new flows will be conveyed to the new WWTS which will have an SPDES permit and effluent limits if discharging to surface waters; a Leachfield does not require effluent limits, but an SPDES permit is needed. No separate permit requirements are needed other than for the construction of new processes, collection system, force mains, and pump stations approval. The design will be developed in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 750. HUNT has conducted a thorough review and contacted NYSDEC on potential effluent limits of a new facility discharging to the proposed receiving streams. Based on this review, we anticipate the following effluent limits for the project and as such WWTS in the PER are designed to these limits. Table 7 - Anticipated WWTP Effluent Limits Parameter Limit Type BOD5 5 mg/L Monthly Average TSS 10 mg/L Monthly Average Settleable Solids 0.1 mL/L Daily Maximum Dissolved Oxygen 5.0-7.0 mg/L Daily Minimum NH3 -N Summer Winter 0.6-0.8 mg/L 1.0-1.7 mg/L Monthly Average TP 1 mg/L Monthly Average Coliform, Fecal 200/100 mL 400/ 100 mL 30-day geometric mean 7-day geometric mean Chlorine, Total Residual 0.03 mg/L Daily Maximum Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 19 6. Storm and Flood Resiliency Review of the FEMA mapping shows there are minimal portions of the project area that are within the 100 year floodplain and therefore does not impact the proposed collection system or potential WWTS locations. The Town of Danby has minimal flooding concerns; however, the Town of West Danby does show a slim area in the 100-year flood zone around the creek., but the presence of the lake and other surface water bodies result in elevated groundwater. This higher groundwater has an adverse impact on septic systems. As demonstrated by the mapping provided in Appendix C, 100 year floodwaters do not inundate the site. Construction of the systems will follow best engineering practices as identified in reference materials including Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, TR-16, NY State Stormwater Management Design Manual, New York State Design Standards for Intermediate Sized Wastewater Treatment Systems. The proposed West Danby WWTP location would be near the 100-year flood level and the outfall would discharge to this water body. The WWTP is outside this boundary, but the hydraulics would be designed to allow the plant to operate during the 100-year event. 7. Constructability and Schedule As the collection system and treatment system are new infrastructure, it is expected that there will be coordination issues of various items such as traffic flow, potential utility crossings/interferences, road/driveway repairs, lawn repairs, connection to existing septic systems, DOT road crossing (as needed), septic system abandonment requirements, electrical service of pump stations, plant expansion coordination, etc. 8. Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements Such things as high efficiency motors/equipment, variable speed drives, LED lighting, etc. will be used as much as possible in the project. Water requirements are not required as part of the project. F. Gravity Sewer System with Conventional Pump Stations 1. Description This alternative would include the construction of a conventional gravity sewer system to convey wastewater from the individual users within their respective areas to the New Treatment System. Existing septic tanks would be pumped and demolished in place or hauled away for disposal. A new four (4) inch diameter service connection and cleanout Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 20 would be provided to connect the user to the proposed sanitary sewer system. The existing absorption beds (or other style) OWTS would be abandoned in place or removed and disposed of as necessary to allow for construction of the new service connection and sewer main. The gravity sewer mains would be eight (8) inches in diameter, or larger as required, with four (4) foot diameter manholes located at the end of each line, pipe intersections, grade changes, changes in pipe size, changes in alignment, or no greater than 400-feet apart (10SS.) Stream crossings would require the installation of a pump station and wet well, with a force main horizontally directional drilled under the river. All construction would require restoration of surface to a condition equal to, or better than, the original condition. A basic preliminary layout of a conventional gravity sewer system has been completed for the study area. This provides the municipality with a cost basis in determining the most cost-effective solutions to protect the residents from ongoing health and safety issues. From the layout, quantity take-offs were developed to create a cost estimate for construction for each area. See Appendix I for the detailed cost estimates. A summary cost table is provided in a subsequent section. Due to its remoteness from each other, the project has been separated into two (2) main study areas to better analyze the cost implications and offer a better view for the Town to decide. The two areas are Central Danby and West Danby, which were further broken into the four (4) service area options previously identified. See conceptual maps in Appendix H. Central Danby Service Areas (Service Area 1/1a) Section 1 – Danby Rd South This area consists of sewering the properties along Danby Rd south of Bald Hill Rd with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 2,100 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump stations. There are 17 properties connections identified from the tax mapping. Area 2 – Bald Hill Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,900 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and one (1) pump station because of a stream crossing. There are 31 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 3 – Main St/Danby Rd Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 21 This area consists of sewering the main Town section from Bald Hill Rd to E. Miller Rd to the north. It would include roughly 5,825 feet of mostly 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and one (1) pump stations because of a stream crossing. There are an estimated 42 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 4 – Hornbrook Rd This area consists of sewering Hornbrook Rd with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 3,500 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump stations. There are estimated to be only 15 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 5 – Gundermark Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Gundermark Rd within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 2,750 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and one (1) pump station because of a stream crossing. There are only 21 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 6 – E. Miller Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,750 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump station. There are only 10 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 7 – W. Miller Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 900 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and one (1) pump station and 900 feet of force main due to the grade away from Main Street. There are only 8 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 8 – Danby Rd North This area consists of sewering the north stretch of Danby Rd (above E. Miller Rd) within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,600 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump station. There are only 11 properties identified from the tax mapping. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 22 Area 9 – Michigan Hollow Rd This area consists of sewering the Michigan Hollow Rd within the Town jurisdiction and would require construction/connection to Area 1. It would include roughly 2,125 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump station. There are only 10 properties identified from the tax mapping. West Danby Service Areas (Service Area 2/2a) Area 1 – SR 34/Spencer Rd This area consists of sewering the properties along SR 34/Spencer Rd with connection to the main sewer line to the proposed treatment system line. It would include roughly 2,300 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes with 1 stream crossing and 1 pump station. There are only 10 properties connections identified from the tax mapping. Area 2 – SR 34/Spencer Rd North This area consists of sewering the stretch of SR 34/Spencer Rd North near Short Rd with connection to the Short Rd/Brown Rd line. It would include roughly 1,500 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump station or stream crossing. There are 10 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 3 – Maple Ave/Station Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Maple Ave and Station Rd to the proposed treatment system location and serves as the main trunk line. It would include roughly 3,600 feet of 8-inch/10-inch gravity sewer with manholes and two (2) pump stations because of stream crossings. There are 25 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 4 – Valley View Rd This area consists of sewering Valley View Rd from north to south with connection to the Maple Ave line. It would include roughly 1,600 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and two (2) pump stations and a stream crossing. There are only 14 properties identified from the tax mapping. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 23 Area 5 – Brown Rd This area consists of sewering the main stretch of Brown Rd, which will convey flows from the north as well with connection to the main Maple Ave line. It would include roughly 1,800 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and one (1) pump station. There are only 8 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 6 – Short Rd/Brown Rd North This area consists of sewering Short Rd to the west and Brown Rd to the east within the with connection to the Brown Rd section. It would include roughly 3,050 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and one (1) pump station. There are 11 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 7 – SR34 South This area consists of sewering the small stretch of SR 34 south to pick up the Fire Station connection. It would include roughly 1,200 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump stations. There are only 5 properties identified from the tax mapping. 2. Operation and Maintenance Considerations The operation and maintenance include routinely scheduled maintenance of the pump and controls, external pumping of the wet well due to pump failure, and replacement/repair of components that are anticipated to have a useful life significantly less than the loan repayment period (pumps, motors, electrical components, etc.) Electrical costs for pump stations shall be borne by the Town and are included as part of the project O&M costs. Maintenance responsibility will likely be determined through the hiring of new staff specifically tasked with the operation and maintenance of the entire sewer district. Non-Monetary Considerations The following advantages and disadvantages of a Conventional gravity collection system have been identified: Advantages: • Residents don’t have to maintain individual pumps and equipment. • Residents will not have additional electrical costs. • Less susceptible to equipment failure and sewage backup. • May be able to be installed in backyards. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 24 Disadvantages • Potential for I&I in future. • Deeper construction possibly within roadways. • May require property easements. • Requires NYSDOT crossing and fees. • Pump stations and collection system need continued maintenance/cleaning. G. Grinder Pump System 1. Description Grinder pump stations are an alternative collection system that utilizes individual grinder pump stations to macerate solids in the influent raw sewage and then convey the macerated wastewater via small diameter force main. These systems are beneficial in areas of high groundwater, where existing bedrock is near the existing grade, or where unfavorable grades prevent efficient use of conventional gravity sewers. There may also be more economical in low density areas where open trench sewer installation is more costly. Force mains will have air release valves and cleanouts at intervals or as required based on hydraulics and highpoints. The following areas were assessed on a cost basis to provide a meaningful cost/EDU basis of selection. Each property has a grinder pump station and roughly 50 feet of small diameter force main. Owners are required to supply power. Central Danby Area (Service Area 1/1a) Area 1 – Danby Rd South This area consists of sewering the properties along Danby Rd south of Bald Hill Rd with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 2,100 feet of small diameter force main. There are 17 properties connections identified from the tax mapping. Area 2 – Bald Hill Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,900 feet of small diameter force main and a stream crossing. There are 31 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 3 – Main St/Danby Rd Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 25 This area consists of sewering the main Town section from Bald Hill Rd to E. Miller Rd to the north. It would include roughly 1,460 feet each of 2/3/4/6-inch force main piping because of the flow addition along the length of run to the WWTS. There is one stream crossing. There are 42 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 4 – Hornbrook Rd This area consists of sewering Hornbrook Rd with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 3,500 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 15 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 5 – Gundermark Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Gundermark Rd within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 2,750 feet of small diameter force main and a stream crossing. There are 21 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 6 – E. Miller Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,750 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 10 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 7 – W. Miller Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 900 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 8 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 8 – Danby Rd North This area consists of sewering the north stretch of Danby Rd (above E. Miller Rd) within the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,600 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 11 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 9 – Michigan Hollow Rd This area consists of sewering the Michigan Hollow Rd within the Town jurisdiction and would require construction/connection to Area 1. It would include roughly 2,125 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 10 properties identified from the tax mapping. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 26 West Danby Area (Service Area 2/2a) Area 1 – SR 34/Spencer Rd This area consists of sewering the properties along SR 34/Spencer Rd with connection to the main sewer line to the proposed treatment system line. It would include roughly 2,300 feet of small diameter force main with 1 stream crossing. There are only 10 properties connections identified from the tax mapping. Area 2 – SR 34/Spencer Rd North This area consists of sewering the stretch of SR 34/Spencer Rd North near Short Rd with connection to the Short Rd/Brown Rd line. It would include roughly 1,500 feet of small diameter force main with no stream crossing. There are 10 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 3 – Maple Ave/Station Rd This area consists of sewering the stretch of Maple Ave and Station Rd to the proposed treatment system location and serves as the main trunk line. It would include roughly 2,500 feet of 6-inch force main, 1,100 feet of smaller diameter force main and two (2) stream crossings. There are 25 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 4 – Valley View Rd This area consists of sewering Valley View Rd from north to south with connection to the Maple Ave line. It would include roughly 1,600 feet of small diameter force main and a stream crossing. There are only 14 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 5 – Brown Rd This area consists of sewering the main stretch of Brown Rd, which will convey flows from the north as well with connection to the main Maple Ave line. It would include roughly 1,800 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 8 properties identified from the tax mapping. Area 6 – Short Rd/Brown Rd North This area consists of sewering Short Rd to the west and Brown Rd to the east within the with connection to the Brown Rd section. It would include roughly 3,050 feet of small diameter force main. There are 11 properties identified from the tax mapping. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 27 Area 7 – SR34 South This area consists of sewering the small stretch of SR 34 south to pick up the Fire Station connection. It would include roughly 1,200 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 4 properties identified from the tax mapping. 2. Operation and Maintenance Considerations The operation and maintenance include routinely scheduled maintenance of the pumps and controls, external pumping of the wet well due to pump failures, and replacement/repair of components that are anticipated to have a useful life significantly less than the loan repayment period (pumps, motors, electrical components, etc.) Electrical costs shall be borne by the property owners and will not be included as part of the project O&M costs. Short-lived assets have been assessed within the cost estimates along with anticipated operation and maintenance costs; as shown in the comparison table in a later section. Maintenance responsibility for the grinder pumps will be borne by the Town. 3. Environmental Concerns Construction of the grinder pump system would limit the amount of disturbance required for the conveyance system force mains compared to that of a conventional sewer system. This is due to shallow installations that do not require cutbacks or deep trenches. However, there would be larger disturbances to the individual properties due to the pump station and lateral installation. The installation of pressurized force mains for sanitary sewer systems utilizes a fusion technique for piping connection, which eliminates pipe joints and ultimately the potential for infiltration due to high groundwater elevations. Construction would not take place in any identified wetland areas or any other areas of natural or historic concern. The grinder pump systems would be owned and maintained by a sanitary sewer authority; therefore, easements would need to be acquired from individual owners to allow for operation and maintenance of the systems. The installation of a grinder pump station would create no adverse environmental impacts and would meet the needs of the community by providing a municipal sanitary sewer system and eliminating the existing on-site wastewater treatment systems that have inadequate separation distances from drinking water supplies, have failed, or do not meet current state standards. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 28 4. Non-Monetary Considerations The following advantages and disadvantages of a grinder pump system have been identified: Advantages: • Reduced potential for infiltration and inflow. • Shallow construction eliminates excessive dewatering and reduces the need for cutbacks or trench boxes. • Smaller diameter piping. Disadvantages • Potential for blockage of pipes due to native or foreign material. • Need for individual easements. • Owner responsibility required for electrical costs and general system awareness. • Required grinder pump station maintenance throughout the community in perpetuity. H. Wastewater Treatment Systems For this study we evaluated conventional wastewater treatment and soil based absorption systems. 1. Conventional WWTP (Activated Sludge) This alternative proposes a traditional package WWTP for removal of harmful sewage constituents, disinfection, and discharge to a nearby water body. A conventional WWTP requires permitting, a licensed operator, effluent sampling & reporting, regular maintenance of equipment, utility costs, sludge collection/removal, and replacement of components as needed. For meeting the effluent limits set forth in a previous section, we reviewed two (2) treatment options: sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and a hybrid rotating biological contactor (i.e. fixed film) with effluent filtration, post aeration, and disinfection as needed. There are various locations identified for construction of a new WWTP; these are shown in the conceptual layouts in Appendix H. Main process components of a typical WWTP may include: a. Influent Pump Station b. Influent Mechanical Bar Screen c. Flow Meter & Sampling Manhole Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 29 d. Primary Clarifiers e. Equalization (EQ) Tanks f. Biological Treatment System (attached growth or activated sludge) g. Aeration System h. Flow Splitters i. Secondary Clarifiers j. Chemical Feed System – Chlorination, Phosphorus removal, etc. k. Tertiary Filter and Feed Pump Station l. Disinfection – UV, hypochlorite, onsite generation m. Post Aeration n. Effluent Sampling Manhole o. Solids processing/disposal Non-Monetary Considerations The following advantages and disadvantages of a Conventional WWTP have been identified: Advantages: • High level of treatment • Less surface area/land required • Easily expandable • Capable of handling significant flow variation Disadvantages • Requires a licensed operator • Regular maintenance required • SPDES permit required • Requires regular sludge dewatering and removal • High electrical costs Option No. 1 Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) i. Proposed Preliminary Design This alternative is an activated sludge process that provides nitrification via an anoxic zone. SBRs are a common activated sludge process that takes advantage of batch treatment, as opposed to continuous flow process. This allows for a combination of aeration and settling within a singular tank to reduce the overall number of tanks required for treatment. Continuous monitoring of influent flow allows the operator to adjust cycling to accommodate variability in flow rates, as is expected to occur between wet and dry weather seasons as well as low and high-water usage periods. This inherently Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 30 allows for a level of built-in flow equalization which can mitigate impacts from peak wet weather flow periods. To supplement the ability to adjust cycling times, aeration may also be adjusted appropriately to maintain oxygen levels as needed, ultimately providing a more energy- efficient process. Digital monitoring using a programmable logic controller (PLC) linked directly to influent flow meters and dissolved oxygen probes will be required to assist in optimizing batch cycling. To meet the stringent effluent nutrient limits for ammonia and phosphorus, the SBR will be required to provide a high level of biological/chemical nutrient removal. This is accomplished by incorporating alternating phases of anoxic/anaerobic conditions, and providing adequate basin sizing to ensure complete nitrification, denitrification, along with some biological phosphorus removal. Additionally, chemical phosphorus removal will be necessary to meet a 0.5 mg/L effluent limit. Therefore, injection of metal salts within the SBR tank will be required, along with mechanical mixers. The SBR system will include influent valves, mechanical mixers in the Anoxic compartment, submersible transfer pumps/valves, fine bubble aeration system with blowers, decanter pumps, air control valves, level sensors, instrumentation, and controls. For this alternative, the recommendation will include: Central Danby (Service Area 1) – 68,400 gpd A two-train system that includes two (2) reactor tanks, one (1) aerobic digester tank (sludge holding), an inlet surge tank, a decant EQ tank with pumps, and includes steel tankage, process pumps/piping, blowers, grating, railings, and ladders. Each train will be roughly 60-feet long by 12-feet wide for a nominal footprint of 60-feet long by 24-feet wide. Both will have a maximum height of 11 feet. Adding the other tankage to the footprint results in total rough layout encompassing 85-feet long by 30-feet wide. The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 68,400 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 3Q or 205,200 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town. Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 1a) – 11,500 gpd A one-train system that includes two (2) reactor tanks, aerobic digester tank (sludge holding), an inlet surge tank, a decant EQ tank with pumps, and includes steel tankage, process pumps/piping, blowers, grating, railings, and ladders. The unit will be roughly 35-feet long by 12-feet wide and a maximum height of 11 feet. Adding the other tankage Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 31 to the footprint results in total rough layout encompassing 50-feet long by 12-feet wide. The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 11,500 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 3Q or 34,500 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town. West Danby (Service Area 2) – 35,000 gpd A two-train system that includes two (2) reactor tanks, aerobic digester tank (sludge holding), an inlet surge tank, a decant EQ tank with pumps, and includes steel tankage, process pumps/piping, blowers, grating, railings, and ladders. Each train will be roughly 34-feet long by 12-feet wide for a nominal footprint of 34-feet long by 24-feet wide. Both will have a maximum height of 11 feet. Adding the other tankage to the footprint results in total rough layout encompassing 50-feet long by 30-feet wide. The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 35,000 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 3Q or 105,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town. West Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 2a) – 13,000 gpd A one-train system that includes two (2) reactor tanks, aerobic digester tank (sludge holding), an inlet surge tank, a decant EQ tank with pumps, and includes steel tankage, process pumps/piping, blowers, grating, railings, and ladders. The unit will be roughly 38-feet long by 12-feet wide and a maximum height of 11 feet. Adding the other tankage to the footprint results in total rough layout encompassing 55-feet long by 12-feet wide. The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 13,000 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 3Q or 39,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town. The tanks will be steel construction with influent splitter box (if needed) and effluent collection box. All necessary influent manifolds, fixed diffusers, decanters, positive displacement blowers, waste sludge pumps, decant pumps, valves, and process control systems are included. This option will be equipped with a 1/4-inch mechanical bar screen, intermediate pump station upstream and; filters, post aeration and disinfection downstream. Sludge removal would need to be conducted via hauling to an acceptable facility; costs have been included in the comparison tables. Provisions for solids processing can be considered in the form of sludge drying beds or other more affordable options, which would require additional land space and a superstructure, i.e., open air building. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 32 A 50' x 50' Process Building to house the Screen room (Class I/Div I) is proposed and shall include a small Office, Filters, and chemical feed. ii. Impact on Existing Facility There are no existing facilities. iii. Land Requirements It is estimated about 1.0 acre of land, depending on the selected option, is required for a new WWTP facility, which the Town would be responsible for acquiring prior to any design/construction activities. iv. Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements Such things as high efficiency motors/equipment, variable speed drives, etc. will be used as much as possible in the project. Water requirements as part of this work include potable water service or a well for facility use. Option No.2 Hybrid Rotating Biological Contactor System i. Proposed Preliminary Design This biological treatment process is a hybrid rotating biological contactor by Algaewheel (or equal). The process utilizes a series of small (36-inch) diameter wheels, partially submerged, to act as an impervious surface for fixed film growth. The wheels are housed within tanks located inside of a “greenhouse” type environment. The exterior surface of the wheels is exposed to sunlight, promoting the growth of algae on the exterior surface of the wheels. Through photosynthesis, algae can produce oxygen that, along with carbon, may then be consumed by other bacteria for respiration. This biological method of oxygen production reduces the need for significant mechanical aeration. The wheels are of such buoyancy that duty blowers with diffusers located at each end can rotate the wheels without the need for a shaft and motor system. The wheels contain a hollow core, filled with media, to provide surface area for heterotrophic bacteria that remove carbon to reduce BOD, and ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOBs) that consume ammonia in the presence of oxygen to reduce overall ammonia concentrations. For this alternative, the recommendation will include: Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 33 Central Danby (Service Area 1) – 68,400 gpd A two-train system that includes concrete reactor tanks and includes process pumps/piping, blowers, grating, and railings as needed. Each train will be roughly 97-feet long by 9.5-feet wide for a nominal footprint of 97-feet long by 19-feet wide. Both will have a maximum height of 4 feet. The greenhouse building will be roughly 120-feet long by 30-feet wide with a 12-feet ceiling height. The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 68,400 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 131,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town. There shall be two tanks in a parallel configuration located within the greenhouse. Each train shall consist of 75 wheels in the CBOD section and 75 wheels in the TKN section on 30 shafts, for a total of 300 wheels in the system. Each wheel will have a surface area of approximately 538 SF (CBOD) and 807 SF (TKN) for a total surface area of 161,464 SF. Additional requirements include EQ tank, secondary clarifiers, tertiary filters, UV disinfection, and post aeration. Sludge removal would need to be conducted via hauling to an acceptable facility. Provisions for solids processing can be considered in the form of sludge drying beds, which would require additional land space and a superstructure, i.e., open air building. We include a 50' x 50' Process Building to house the Screen room (Class I/Div I), a small Office, Filters, and chemical feed. Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 1a) – 11,500 gpd A one-train system that includes two (2) concrete reactor tanks and includes process pumps/piping, blowers, grating, and railings as needed. The single train will incorporate an EQ tank, pre-anoxic tank, RBC tank, sludge holding, final clarifier, and a disc filter. Tanks will have various depths. The RBC unit is covered thus eliminating the greenhouse building. The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 11,500 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 23,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town. Additional requirements include UV disinfection and post aeration. Sludge removal would need to be conducted via hauling to an acceptable facility. Provisions for solids processing can be considered in the form of sludge drying Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 34 beds, which would require additional land space and a superstructure, i.e., open air building. We include a 20' x 20' Process Building to house the Screen room (Class I/Div I), a small Office, Filters, and chemical feed. West Danby (Service Area 2) – 35,000 gpd A two-train system that includes two (2) concrete reactor tanks and includes process pumps/piping, blowers, grating, and railings as needed. Each train will be roughly 50-feet long by 10-feet wide for a nominal footprint of 50-feet long by 20-feet wide. Both will have a maximum height of 4 feet. The greenhouse building will be roughly 65-feet long by 30-feet wide with a 12-feet ceiling height. The volume of the tanks will be able to treat flows of 35,000 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 70,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town. There shall be two tanks in a parallel configuration located within the greenhouse. Each train shall consist of 75 wheels in on 15 shafts, for a total of 300 wheels in the system. Additional requirements include EQ tank, secondary clarifiers, tertiary filters, UV disinfection, and post aeration. Sludge removal would need to be conducted via hauling to an acceptable facility. Provisions for solids processing can be considered in the form of sludge drying beds, which would require additional land space and a superstructure, i.e., open air building. We include a 50' x 50' Process Building to house the Screen room (Class I/Div I), a small Office, Filters, and chemical feed. West Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 2a) – 13,000 gpd A one-train system that includes two (2) concrete reactor tanks and includes process pumps/piping, blowers, grating, and railings as needed. The single train will incorporate an EQ tank, pre-anoxic tank, RBC tank, sludge holding, final clarifier, and a disc filter. Tanks will have various depths. The RBC unit is covered thus eliminating the greenhouse building. The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 13,000 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 26,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 35 Additional requirements include UV disinfection and post aeration. Sludge removal would need to be conducted via hauling to an acceptable facility; costs have been included in the comparison tables. Provisions for solids processing can be considered in the form of sludge drying beds or other more affordable options, which would require additional land space and a superstructure, i.e., open air building. We include a 20' x 20' Process Building to house the Screen room (Class I/Div I), a small Office, Filters, and chemical feed.  BOD Removal The Process Engineers designed the Algaewheels to remove sBOD utilizing the second order model developed by Grady and Daigger:  Ammonia (NH3-N) Removal To account for reduction of NH3, the Process Engineers have utilized the Pano equation for removal of ammonia in an RBC: Please refer to Appendix I for Algaewheel Treatment Plant Design Calculations as provided by Onewater®. ii. Impact on Existing Facility There are no existing facilities. iii. Land Requirements It is estimated about 1.0 acre of land, depending on the selected option, is required for a new WWTP facility, which the Town would be responsible for acquiring prior to any design/construction activities. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 36 iv. Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements Such things as high efficiency motors/equipment, variable speed drives, etc. will be used as much as possible in the project. Water requirements as part of this work include potable water service or a well for facility use. 2. Subsurface Treatment (Leachfield) This alternative system eliminates surface water discharge and SPDES permitting. This type of system requires, at a minimum, a septic tank, effluent filter, and uses a natural biological process wherein the soil absorbs the harmful constituents in the wastewater. The treated effluent percolates through the soil matrix back into the groundwater supply. Soil absorption systems can be evaluated on the following factors (2014 NYS Design Standards…Section B.4): a. Thickness of layers b. Texture (USDA), consistence, and structure of soil layers c. General color and color mottling d. Depth to water and depth to observed seasonal high groundwater level e. Depth to bedrock f. Other items such as visible pores, stoniness, roots, or animal traces Subsurface systems can be one of the following standard acceptable types: a. Absorption Trenches/Beds b. Shallow Absorption Trenches c. Gravelless Absorption Systems d. Cut-and-Fill Systems e. Raised Systems f. Seepage Pits There are three methods of distributing sewage to a subsurface system: gravity, pump, or combination. Gravity is typical for smaller systems that have less surface area for the distribution network and can be used on level or sloped sites. Pumped or pressure distribution offers a more uniform flow throughout the entire surface area and is required for larger systems having distribution lateral lengths exceeding 1000 feet. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 37 Pressure distribution systems use small diameter perforated piping with 1/8” to 5/8” holes sizing and maximum allowable spacing of 10 feet (6 feet is more common). End cap holes should be provided for venting. a. Central Danby (Service Area 1/1a) There is only one site within Central Danby, located within a field, north of the old schoolhouse, that would be suitable to place a leachfield with consideration to environmental mapping and soil conditions which can be found in Appendices B & C. This location that can be utilized for a leachfield site, has soil conditions which are somewhat limited for the formation of a leachfield, meaning that limitations to a traditional leachfield can be overcome by special planning, design, and installation, notably a larger percolation area. The leachfield could feasibly be fed using a dosing siphon system and constructed by absorption bed/trenches. Additionally, alternative 1 would require 1.34 mi of force main and around 70- feet of elevation gain to pump effluent from the system low-point to the proposed leachfield site. Alternative 2 would require around 0.51 mi of force main and around 50-feet of elevation gain to pump from the Town’s low elevation point to the proposed leachfield location. b. West Danby (Service Area 2/2a) There is only one site within West Danby, located within a field, west of the Northern intersection of Valley View Road and Spencer Road, that would be suitable to place a leachfield with consideration to environmental mapping and soil conditions which can be found in Appendices B & C. This location that can be utilized for a leachfield site, has soil conditions which are not limited for the formation of a leachfield, meaning that there are no limitations to constructing a traditional leachfield and could feasibly be pressurized using a dosing siphon fed and constructed by absorption trenches. However, this treatment site is extremely far from West Danby’s low-elevation point and over 100-feet higher in elevation from this low-point. These conditions would require around 7.5 mi of force main and a sewer pump station to convey the sewer system effluent to the proposed leachfield site for alternative 3 versus around 100-feet of elevation gain and 0.85 mi of force main for alternative 4. This treatment option for West Danby’s proposed sanitary system would include a pump station and wet well at the lowest point in the sanitary system, which would pump through a force main to a large holding tank/septic tank on the Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 38 leachfield site nearby to the proposed leachfield. This tank would be piped to a large distribution box and on to a perforated piping network designed to properly allow effluent to percolate into the soil. Below is a cost estimate for each alternative discussed for West Danby. The percolation rate for this site is approximated by considering the soil type for the site, which is Arkport fine sandy loam having 2-6 percent slopes. Leachfields constructed within this soil type can be designed assuming traditional trench type absorption with perforated PVC buried at least 4-feet below the ground surface. Typically, fine sandy loam can have application rates of between 0.80 and 1.0 GPD/SF, and a conservative assumption utilized an application rate of 0.80 GPD/SF for this site. Non-Monetary Considerations The following advantages and disadvantages of a Subsurface Treatment (Leachfield) have been identified: Advantages: • Does not require a licensed operator • Lower maintenance with less equipment • No effluent limit requirements • No regular sludge dewatering and removal except septic tank • Minimal electrical costs • Simple treatment Disadvantages • Lower level of treatment • Requires maintenance of overgrowth of vegetation • More surface area/land required • Not easily expandable without land acquisition I. Clustered, Small Community Treatment The design of cluster style systems can entail many different components and types, including subsurface treatments such as community-scalable leach fields, package plants and small treatments servicing 2-or more properties. treatment facilities serving properties would have to be controlled by the Town, therefore, requiring the Town to secure property or perpetual easements that allowed for access, construction, and operation of the system along with allowing sufficient space for creation of reserve area that would allow for adequate expansion or replacement. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 39 This alternative is most conducive to incorporating alternative treatment options, such as a leachfield or modular treatment options such as the Renewage Busse GT (membrane bioreactor, MBR) or Orenco Advantex AX-MAX system. These style systems are suitable for relatively low flows that may be experienced from relatively few properties but allow for easy expandability. For example, the Busse system offers single dwelling and multiple dwelling units ranging from 250 gallons per day (gpd)-1,000 gpd, as well as larger systems up to 15,000 gpd to serve a neighborhood or truck stop or campground. Additionally, the modular nature of these treatment options allows for fairly simple addition to treatment capacity in the Town’s future. These types of modular systems would be capable of treating to intermittent stream standards for discharge to the surface or otherwise discharge to downstream absorption fields. Due to the higher level of treatment associated with some of these systems, the surface area required for subsurface effluent percolation would be smaller due to regulatory authority “allowances”. Conventional leachfields designed to treat and dispose of the collected wastewater are less modular in nature than traditional treatment options but are still expandable with additional land purchases, and additional construction and installation. 1. Cluster Development under a Special District Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 1a) Sixteen (16) users making up 30 EDUs have been identified within the Central Danby Hamlet Centers as a potential cluster development under a special district would likely consist of sewering the main Town section around Bald Hill Rd and Gunderman Rd to the north. It would include roughly 1,680 feet of mostly 8-inch gravity sewer. Additionally, if this area were to be the only area in the Town served by the proposed sanitary system in this instance, some form of treatment of the sanitary flow would ideally be placed on a nearby parcel such as 502200-7.-1-1.1, at least a small portion of which would be purchased by the Town. Treatment options for an initially light flow area such as this would likely be limited to treatment types such as a leachfield or modular treatment options such as the Renewage Busse GT system or Orenco Advantex AX-MAX. These Hamlet Centers have the potential to add some single family homes and commercial spaces with limited additional piping installations. The potential future development of this area could be easily accommodated by an initially small and modular type of treatment system, which would be expanded upon if significant development comes under contract. The formation of a special district for the Hamlet Centers would be sensible in the case that the sanitary system was to be constructed, due to future developments being located within the original bounds of the district. The below table presents some rough budgetary costing for the BUSSE modular MBR treatment system for various sizing. A typical Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 40 residential dwelling would be sized for 250-500 gpd depending on the number of bedrooms; however, for this PER, we assumed 330 gpd/EDU thus requiring the 500 gpd unit. This system would also require a contracted maintenance cost of $500-$700/year for each individual system, whereas the larger systems would require typical O&M associated with larger treatment plants such as an operator, maintenance staff, and equipment upkeep and replacement costs. Table X: BUSSE 2023 Unit Cost Chart *Costs do not include sitework, building/shed (if required for smaller units), external plumbing/electric connections, absorption field (if required), 3rd Party engineering, O&M, regular sludge removal, and/or other administrative costs. As a baseline minimum, we would propose to use a 1,000 gpd unit per every three (3) dwellings, which results in requiring 5-6 units for the Hamlet Centers in Central Danby at a rough cost for just the units of $270,000. The annual contractual maintenance would be $3,000-$4,200. Please note that the smaller “cluster” systems would require an absorption field (no SPDES permit) for each unit and thus additional land would be required (not included in the cost shown here). The estimated flows from the entire Central Danby Hamlet Centers including future growth is about 12,000 gpd, which could also be served by four 3,000 gpd units (for redundancy at a rough cost for just the units of $608,000, wherein, we would propose a surface water discharge requiring a SPDES permit. West Danby Hamlet Center (Service Area 2a) Twenty-seven (27) users have been identified within the West Danby Hamlet Center as a potential cluster development under a special district would likely consist of sewering much of the main Town including SR 34/Spencer Rd, Maple Ave/Station Rd, Valley View Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 41 Rd, and Short Rd/Brown Rd. See Figure 2 in Appendix H. It would include roughly 7,050 feet of mostly 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and four (4) pump stations. As a baseline minimum, we would propose to use a 1,000 gpd unit per every three (3) dwellings, which results in requiring 14 units for the entire Hamlet Center in West Danby at a rough cost for just the units of $630,000. The annual contractual maintenance would be $7,000-$9,800. Please note that the smaller “cluster” systems would require an absorption field (no SPDES permit) for each unit and thus additional land would be required (not included in the cost shown here). The estimated flows from the entire West Danby Hamlet Center including future growth is about 13,000 gpd, which could also be served by a two 7,500 gpd units (for redundancy) at a rough cost for just the units of $480,000, wherein, we would propose a surface water discharge requiring a SPDES permit. Non-Monetary Considerations The following advantages and disadvantages of a modular treatment system have been identified: Advantages: • High level of treatment • Modular design allows for adding units easily for a cluster type development • Units designed for low flows such as induvial homes or streets • Less surface area/land required • Easily expandable for future growth • Mfr. provides contractual annual O&M for a fee Disadvantages • Requires a licensed operator if a SPDES permit needed • Regular maintenance and oversight required • SPDES permit required for surface water discharge • Requires regular sludge removal Non-Monetary Considerations - - Special districts (Town special districts, county district, or transportation districts) within the Town can be developed based off the general interest of residents and Town personnel and finalized after a vetting process is completed. These district boundaries would then be finalized after the agreement of all concerned parties. - Taxes can then be levied only to those property owners within the special district to cover costs borne by the Town during construction, operation, and maintenance of the sanitary sewer system. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 42 - Any property owners that violate the taxes imposed as part of the special district would be settled by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), therefore removing the Town from bearing lawyer and court fees. - A special district can be introduced anywhere within the Town’s boundaries, if all concerned parties are able to agree upon its formation and can be introduced as an extension to an existing district or as a newly formed district. 2. Transportation Corporation Formation A transportation corporation would be a separate entity where the Town is the “middleman”, so to speak between the Town and the residents in this situation. Firstly, a transportation corporation would be formed by collaboration with interested residents and Town personnel and language built into its contract This agreement and any mapping to go along with it would be sent to the Public Service Commission (PSC) for approval. The PSC, if approval is given, would be responsible for overseeing the transportation corporation and ensuring that obligations within the contract are met. To form a sanitary system transportation corporation within the Town of Danby would dictate that members of the transportation corporation within the Town of Danby would be responsible for bearing all costs associated with the proposed sanitary sewer system. Additionally, the Town of Danby would be the sole guarantor of the sanitary sewer system. This would be required if the Transportation District went defunct, bankrupt, etc. The Transportation District would be the official owner of the sanitary sewer system and in the instance unless the Transportation District ceased to operated then the operation and its costs would then fall on the Town. A modular system would be possible under the oversight of a transportation corporation and would be extremely similar in detail to the system described in the previous section. A major difference would be residents immediately adjacent to the sanitary system would have no incentive to to connect to the sanitary system because the transportation corporation’s members would likely be more decentralized. For instance, a new development may be constructed on the land of the old car park which could apply to be a member of the transportation corporation. This neighborhood could then form its own, small scale, community sanitary system under ownership of the Town. In addition to this new neighborhood, another newly constructed neighborhood near Dotson Park might form, and this new neighborhood could also join the same transportation corporation and form a similar, small-scale, community sanitary sewer system. Monetary Considerations Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 43 - The Town of Danby would not be immediately responsible for bearing the capital, operation, and maintenance costs of the sanitary sewer system. However, if a member failed to assist in paying, the Town would be responsible for compensating this shortfall. - It is extremely unlikely that funding agencies will be interested in awarding funds for this type of district since operation and maintenance of the system would be the resident’s responsibility rather than the Town’s. Non-monetary considerations - A district may not need to be formed under this option. Therefore, the introduction of new members to the transportation corporation may be relatively straightforward. - With any property owner within the Town being able to join the transportation corporation, there is a likely possibility that its members would be quite spread out throughout the Town, and this could promote cluster development and preserve open space if coordinated with zoning regulations. - This would not encourage densification of the Town and would make any operation and maintenance personnel’s jobs much more difficult. - The transportation corporation allows any user to join, which can be an advantage to those interested members. However, the Town would not be able to require property owners to join the transportation corporation, and there are little incentives for them to. Therefore, it is extremely likely that current residents in the Town of Danby would not benefit directly. - In the instance of a large development being constructed within the Town of Danby, that new neighborhood could be directly benefited in the sense that those residents would not need to be bothered about ownership responsibilities for their sanitary systems and rather the Town would be the official owners of their systems. - The members of a transportation corporation can decide on the method of treatment for their sanitary systems. Therefore, it is possible that property owners could become members of the corporation just so that they are not officially responsible for their aging and potentially damaged sanitary systems. J. Capital Costs Comparison The table below shows the estimated capital costs for each Alternative. See Appendix H for the conceptual layouts and Appendix I for the detailed cost estimates which include a contingency of 30%. Additionally, an annual cost per EDU was calculated for a 30-year period at 0% interest and 4.5% interest rates. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 44 Central Danby (Service Area 1) Table 8 – Summary of Project Costs Conventional Gravity System Grinder Pump System Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 45 Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 1a) Table 9 – Summary of Project Costs Conventional Gravity System Grinder Pump System Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 46 West Danby (Service Area 2) Table 10 – Summary of Project Costs Conventional Gravity System Grinder Pump System Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 47 West Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 2a) Table 11 – Summary of Project Costs Conventional Gravity System Grinder Pump System As can been seen solely from the capital costs comparison tables the grinder pump system with an SBR treatment system are the lower cost alternatives for Central and West Danby, while the grinder pump and modular treatment system is most economical for just the Hamlet Centers. The capital costs include construction, contingencies, and soft costs (engineering fees, legal fees, administrative fees, etc.) but do not consider operation & maintenance (short-lived assets) or staffing requirements. K. Operation and Maintenance Costs Operation and maintenance typically associated with a sanitary collection system would include mechanical equipment upkeep or repairs/replacement as needed; energy costs of pumps and other electrical equipment; sewer cleaning/flushing possibly; staffing proportional salaries; administration duties; new service connections, and the like. It is difficult to assess these costs at a preliminary stage and it would be reasonable to expect that costs would be insignificant for the first 5-10 years for a new system; mainly energy costs, minor maintenance, and employee time. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 48 There are O&M costs associated with the treatment plant addition. Items such as electrical demand, maintenance of equipment, equipment repairs or replacement, personnel salary, chemical costs, sludge treatment and removal. L. Short-Lived Assets In accordance with the NYSDEC and EFC document “Engineering Report Outline for New York State Wastewater Infrastructure Projects (October 2021)”, we considered Energy Efficiency Best Practices and Short-Lived Assets as they may pertain to the items assessed in the report. However, for the items we have identified for improvement or implementation there do not appear to be many energy efficiency opportunities with perhaps the exception of the pumps and blowers where premium efficiency motors and VFDs could be specified. Any other additions will be relatively small, so we would investigate energy efficient lighting, heating, ventilation, and the like, should they be required. These will be reviewed during our design phase. In terms of short-lived assets of the proposed upgrades, items such as pumps and appurtenances, certain instrumentation, and some mechanical equipment can be considered short-lived and could need replacement every 2-5 years or so. Typical equipment components will be replaced as needed as part of the normal facility O&M program. M. Non-Monetary Factors Approval of this project will only improve any current and potential health & safety and/or water quality issues of residents within the Town and enable compact growth in the community. VII. Comparison of Alternatives A. Capital Costs Two (2) sanitary collection systems and two (2) treatment plant options, along with a packaged modular treatment system for the Hamlet Centers (Service Areas 1a and 2a) were evaluated for service areas outlined earlier to ascertain practical solutions to provide the Town with sanitary collection and treatment to meet the anticipated effluent limits stated earlier. The tables below summarize the collection systems and processes reviewed with their respective capital and O&M costs for each service area; Central Danby (Service Area 1), Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 49 Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 1a), West Danby (Service Area 2), West Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 2a). Operational complexity and pros/cons are only provided in the first two tables, as they are common across the service areas. Central Danby (Service Area 1) – 186 EDUs Table 12 – Total Collection System Project Cost Summary Parameter ALT. NO. 1 Gravity System ALT. NO. 2 Grinder Pump System Est. Installation Cost1 Cost/EDU (30-yr 0%) Cost/EDU (30-yr 4.5%) $11,026,575 $2,124.60 $3,912.90 $8,591,657 $1,655.40 $3,048.90 Expected Useful Life: Collection System/Concrete Major Equipment - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years Est. Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 (Major items) Power - $2,614 Labor (1 staff, est. 4 hrs/week) - $8,216 Power - $0 Labor (1 staff, est. 8 hrs/week) - $15,496 Expected Annualized Maintenance & Replacement Cost (25% of major items) $7,500 $12,788 Total Annualized Cost -30 years, 0% -30 years, 4.5% $385,883 $695,268 $314,673 $555,739 Operational Complexity Minimal/Low – pump stations maint. Medium – many grinder pumps to maint. Pros/Cons Pros • Residents will not need to maintain indiv. pumps • Residents will not have addl electrical costs. • Less susceptible to equipment failure Cons • Potentially deeper construction Pros • Potentially less deep construction • Residents will not need to maintain indiv. pumps Cons • Residents will have addl electrical costs. • More susceptible to equipment failure • High short lived asset cost Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 50 1. Based on Mfr. Quotes, previous bidding knowledge, engineering judgment where applicable; actual costs could vary at the time of final design and 4% inflation over 2 years has been added. 2. Power based on $0.08/kW-hr and 6 hr/7-day collection system pumps. 3. Labor assumes hrs/wk as shown @ 1-2 employees, $35/hr maintenance, admin $18/hr, 1 hr/wk for collection system and 1 F/T employee at various times at WWTP at $62.5/hr. 4. Costs for power, labor, and O&M are provided as information & comparison. Table 13 – Total Treatment Project Cost Summary Parameter ALT. NO. 1 SBR System ALT. NO. 2 Hybrid RBC System Est. Installation Cost1 Cost/EDU (30-yr 0%) Cost/EDU (30-yr 4.5%) $5,676,224 $1,093.70 $2,014.30 $7,099,977 $1,368.00 $2,519.50 Expected Useful Life: Collection System/Concrete Major Equipment - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years Est. Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 (Major items) Power - $7,973 Sludge Hauling (4100 gal/mo @ $400/1,000 gals) - $19,700 Labor (est. 20 hrs/week) - $65,000 Power - $8,495 Sludge Hauling (4100 gal/mo @ $400/1,000 gals) - $19,700 Labor (est. 40 hrs/week) - $130,000 Expected Annualized Maintenance & Replacement Cost (25% of major items) $15,509 $10,994 Total Annualized Cost -30 years, 0% -30 years, 4.5% $297,389 $456,654 $405,795 $605,068 Operational Complexity Medium – Requires a licensed operator Medium – Requires a licensed operator Pros/Cons • Batch system provides inherent EQ to allow for greater flow swings • All biological treatment & clarification in one basin • No greenhouse building • Less complex site piping and flow regime as it is a package system • Common steel wall tankage • No effluent EQ basin & pumps needed • Robust concrete construction and longevity • No effluent EQ basin needed • Requires less blowers/aeration for attached growth process • Requires less blowers/aeration • More complex site piping and flow regime Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 51 construction • Requires effluent EQ basin & pumps • Steel tankage can rust/corrode over time causing higher maintenance • Requires more blowers/aeration for activated sludge process • More tankage needed • Separate EQ is needed if peak flow dampening is needed • Process requires a greenhouse building • Larger footprint 1. Based on Mfr. Quotes, previous bidding knowledge, engineering judgment where applicable; actual costs could vary at the time of final design and 4% inflation over 2 years has been added. 2. Power based on $0.08/kW-hr and varies for WWTP operation for 12-month operation. 3. Labor assumes hrs/wk as shown @ 1-2 employees, $35/hr maintenance, admin $18/hr, 1 hr/wk for collection system and 1 F/T employee at various times at WWTP at $62.5/hr. 4. Costs for power, labor, and O&M are provided as information & comparison. Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 1a) – 30 EDUs Table 14 – Total Collection System Project Cost Summary Parameter ALT. NO. 1 Gravity System ALT. NO. 2 Grinder Pump System Est. Installation Cost1 Cost/EDU (30-yr 0%) Cost/EDU (30-yr 4.5%) $769,359 $1,602.80 $2,952.00 $701,628 $1,461.70 $2,692.10 Expected Useful Life: Collection System/Concrete Major Equipment - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years Est. Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 (Major items) Power - $0 Labor (1 staff, est. 4 hrs/week) - $8,216 Power - $0 Labor (1 staff, est. 8 hrs/week) - $15,496 Expected Annualized Maintenance & Replacement Cost (25% of major items) $0 $2,480 Total Annualized Cost -30 years, 0% -30 years, 4.5% $33,861 $55,448 $41,364 $61,050 Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 52 Table 15 – Total Treatment Project Cost Summary Parameter ALT. NO. 1 SBR System ALT. NO. 2 Modular Package System ALT. NO. 3 Hybrid RBC System Est. Installation Cost1 Cost/EDU (30-yr 0%) Cost/EDU (30-yr 4.5%) $3,011,661 $3,346.30 $6,163.00 $2,073,933 $2,304.40 $4,244.10 $4,146,769 $4,607.50 $8,485.90 Expected Useful Life: Collection System/Concrete Major Equipment - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years Est. Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 (Major items) Power - $7,581 Sludge Hauling (700 gal/mo @ $400/1,000 gals) - $3,350 Labor (est. 20 hrs/week) - $65,000 Power - $4,705 Sludge Hauling (3,000 gal/yr @ $400/1,000 gals) - $1,200 Labor (est. 20 hrs/week) - $65,000 Power - $9,018 Sludge Hauling (700 gal/mo @ $400/1,000 gals) - $3,350 Labor (est. 40 hrs/week) - $130,000 Expected Annualized Maintenance & Replacement Cost (25% of major items) $9,138 $6,813 $8,625 Total Annualized Cost -30 years, 0% -30 years, 4.5% $185,458 $269,960 $146,849 $205,040 $289,219 $405,569 Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 53 West Danby (Service Area 2) – 97 EDUs Table 16 – Total Collection System Project Cost Summary Parameter ALT. NO. 1 Gravity System ALT. NO. 2 Grinder Pump System Est. Installation Cost1 Cost/EDU (30-yr 0%) Cost/EDU (30-yr 4.5%) $8,533,866 $2,932.60 $5,401.10 $4,739,201 $1,628.60 $2,999.50 Expected Useful Life: Collection System/Concrete Major Equipment - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years Est. Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 (Major items) Power - $4,575 Labor (1 staff, est. 4 hrs/week) - $8,216 Power - $0 Labor (1 staff, est. 8 hrs/week) - $15,496 Expected Annualized Maintenance & Replacement Cost (25% of major items) $13,125 $6,433 Total Annualized Cost -30 years, 0% -30 years, 4.5% $310,378 $549,823 $179,902 $312,876 Table 17 – Total Treatment Project Cost Summary Parameter ALT. NO. 1 SBR System ALT. NO. 2 Hybrid RBC System Est. Installation Cost1 Cost/EDU (30-yr 0%) Cost/EDU (30-yr 4.5%) $4,764,193 $1,637.20 $3,015.30 $4,987,153 $1,713.80 $3,156.40 Expected Useful Life: Collection System/Concrete Major Equipment - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years Est. Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 (Major items) Power - $7,973 Sludge Hauling (2,070 gal/mo @ $400/1,000 gals) - $9,930 Labor (est. 20 hrs/week) - $65,000 Power - $5,620 Sludge Hauling (2,070 gal/mo @ $400/1,000 gals) - $9,930 Labor (est. 40 hrs/week) - $130,000 Expected Annualized Maintenance & Replacement Cost (25% of major items) $12,050 $6,425 Total Annualized Cost -30 years, 0% -30 years, 4.5% $253,759 $387,434 $318,213 $458,144 Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 54 West Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 2a) – 27 EDUs Table 18 – Total Collection System Project Cost Summary Parameter ALT. NO. 1 Gravity System ALT. NO. 2 Grinder Pump System Est. Installation Cost1 Cost/EDU (30-yr 0%) Cost/EDU (30-yr 4.5%) $2,769,329 $3,418.90 $6,296.80 $1,454,427 $1,795.60 $3,307.00 Expected Useful Life: Collection System/Concrete Major Equipment - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years Est. Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 (Major items) Power - $2,614 Labor (1 staff, est. 4 hrs/week) - $8,216 Power - $0 Labor (1 staff, est. 8 hrs/week) - $15,496 Expected Annualized Maintenance & Replacement Cost (25% of major items) $7,500 $3,255 Total Annualized Cost -30 years, 0% -30 years, 4.5% $110,641 $188,343 $67,231.91 $108,041 Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 55 Table 19 – Total Treatment Project Cost Summary Parameter ALT. NO. 1 SBR System ALT. NO. 2 Modular Package System ALT. NO. 3 Hybrid RBC System Est. Installation Cost1 Cost/EDU (30-yr 0%) Cost/EDU (30-yr 4.5%) $3,045,666 $3,760.10 $5,752.90 $1,818,644 $2,245.20 $3,435.20 $4,146,769 $5,119.50 $7,832.80 Expected Useful Life: Collection System/Concrete Major Equipment - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years - 50-100 years 10 years Est. Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 (Major items) Power - $7,581 Sludge Hauling (780 gal/mo @ $400/1,000 gals) - $3,740 Labor (est. 20 hrs/week) - $65,000 Power - $4,705 Sludge Hauling (3,000 gal/yr @ $400/1,000 gals) - $1,200 Labor (est. 20 hrs/week) - $65,000 Power - $9,018 Sludge Hauling (780 gal/mo @ $400/1,000 gals) - $3,740 Labor (est. 40 hrs/week) - $130,000 Expected Annualized Maintenance & Replacement Cost (25% of major items) $9,275 $6,813 $8,625 Total Annualized Cost -30 years, 0% -30 years, 4.5% $187,118 $272,574 $138,340 $189,367 $289,608 $405,959 VIII. RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE A. Basis of Selection This Town of Danby WWTP and Sanitary System Study seeks to improve the health and safety of the community by implementing a sanitary collection system and treatment plant for one or more of the four (4) service areas reviewed within the Town limits. The cost analysis along with discussions with the Town have made the alternatives for sewering the entire Central Dandy/West Danby areas infeasible. Therefore, the recommended project is to provide sanitary collection and treatment for the Hamlet Centers within the Town of Dandy (Service Areas 1a/2a) only. This includes a grinder or gravity collection system and a modular, package membrane bioreactor treatment system enclosed in fully pre-manufactured and engineered container(s). Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 56 Table 20: Selected Project Summary Parameter Gravity System with Modular Package System (Central Danby Hamlet Centers) Grinder System with Modular Package System (West Danby Hamlet Centers) Est. Project Cost Annual Debt Service (30-yr 4.5%) Annual O&M $2,843,292 $174,554 $85,934 $3,273,071 $200,939 $96,469 Number of EDUs 30 27 Total Annual Cost/EDU Monthly Cost/EDU $8,683 $724 $11,015 $918 B. Potential Project Schedule The anticipated project schedule is as follows: • Preliminary Engineering Report Approval– March 2024 • IUP Listing - June 2024 • NYSDEC WQIP Application - July 2024 • SHPO No Effect Finding - July 2024 • SEQR Neg Declaration - July 2024 • USDA Rd Application – November 2024 • Special District Formation – July 2025 • NYSEFC WIIA Grant & CWSRF Application Filed – July 2025 • Bond Res, Eng. Agrmt., Municipal/Bond Council, Auth. Res. – July 2025 • CWSRF Short Term Loan Closing - December 2025 • CDBG funding application (if prequals. are met) - 2026 • Engineering Plans, Specifications, and BODR to agency – January- May 2026 • SPDES Form 2A Application – January 2026 • Regulatory comments/responses – June -October 2026 • Advertising of Bids – November 2026 • Begin Construction – January 2027 • Substantially Complete Construction – December 2027 • Funding Close Out & Operation – Spring 2028 C. Next Steps The community will continue to discuss the project and funding procurement with the public at regular board meetings and continue to gain local public and private support. SEQR review will occur during the planning for design phase. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 57 Anticipated procurement methods and plan of contracts (e.g., design/bid/build, energy performance contract, Project Labor Agreement, Wicks, design/build, etc.) The Town will develop and implement a Sewer Ordinance in accordance with the NYSDEC Model Sewer Use Law including the mandate for all properties within 100 feet of a public sewer to connect. D. Funding Sources Securing funding from the potential sources identified below can help achieve an actionable project. The following information identifies funding opportunities that have been offered by State and Federal sources in the recent past. The status of the funding programs and application periods is discussed below. 1. USDA Rural Development (RD) Water and Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program The Town of Danby may be eligible for federal USDA RD funding based on the population being less than 10,000. The program offers long-term low-interest loans, and grants may be combined if funds are available. The loan rate is based on the useful life of the facilities to be financed, the need of the project, and the median household income. The 2021 ACS 5 – Year Estimate Median Household Income for Danby is $76,445, which is higher than the $45,506 threshold and therefore it is anticipated that the project would not qualify for the poverty rate loan. The current market rate for 4th Quarter FY 2022 is 3.500%. The application period for USDA loan and grant program is open year round, the first step is to contact the local Rural Development office to discuss the project and begin the electronic application. 2. NYS EFC Clean Water Infrastructure Improvement Act NYSEFC provides grant funding to assist municipalities in funding water quality infrastructure. A clean water project may be eligible for a WIIA grant of up to the lesser of 25% of total eligible costs after deducting other grant funds awarded for the project, or $25 million. To enable application for the WIIA grant the sewer district formation must be complete, SEQR process must be complete, SHPO determination complete, bond financing resolution be complete, and resolution approving application and authorization to execute the contract be complete. The grant application period typically closes in September each year. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 July 2023, Revised February 2024, April 2024 58 3. NYS EFC Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan The Clean Water State Revolving fund provides interest-free or low-interest rate financing for wastewater and water quality improvement projects to municipalities throughout New York State. EFC provides both short and long-term financing at zero or low interest. Applications are received on a continuous basis; however, the annual allocation of funds is driven by the presence of the project on the Intended Use Plan (IUP). It is recommended that the submittal of the project be made for publication in the 2024 IUP. The ranking on the IUP will demonstrate eligibility for hardship or subsidized financing. IX. Conclusion: In summary the project is well positioned to secure grant funds and favorable low interest loan rates. The Town will need to be pro-active to secure maximum funding by maintaining positive communication with involved agencies, adopting a bond resolution, securing necessary permits and approvals, and initiating design. A. Smart Growth Assessment A completed Smart Growth form can be found in Appendix J of this report. B. Engineering Report Certification Engineering Report Certification can be found in Appendix K. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX A Project Location Mapping 1 2 4 0 12 6 0 1 2 8 0 1220 1 3 0 0 1 2 00 1 3 2 0 1 3 4 0 1 1 80 1 3 6 0 1 3 80 1 160 1 40 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 4 6 0 1 4 8 0 1 2 4 0 1380 1220 1 3 20 13 0 0 14 2 0 1 3 4 0 1 340 1 280 1220 1220 1360 1400 1220 1 2 20 13 6 0 1300 1 3 20 1 2 6 0 1220 1 380 Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 500 1,000250Feet Central Danby Hamlet Overview PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels TC Buildings 2020 Unique Natural Areas Habitat Corridor Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 3,400 6,8001,700 Feet Hamlets Overview PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood 960 9 8 0 94 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 40 9 2 0 10 6 0 1080 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 900 880 8 6 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 8 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 4 0 1 2 6 0 1 2 8 0 8 4 0 1 3 0 0 82 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 8 0 13 6 0 13 4 0 14 0 0 1 4 2 0 14 4 0 1 4 6 0 800 14 8 0 1 5 0 0 1 5 2 0 154 0 1 5 6 0 1 5 8 0 9 60 8 60 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 940 10 0 0 1180 1 000 1 00 0 960 9 6 0 96 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 8 0 1 4 6 0 1 3 6 0 9 6 0 1 3 8 0 1 4 20 1 1 6 0 920 840 92 0 9 80 960 1 0 8 0 980 1 4 0 0 8 8 0 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 00 98 0 9 8 0 1 2 6 0 1 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 9 40 9 4 0 960 96 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 8 8 0 10 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 0 9 8 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 4 0 Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 500 1,000250Feet West Danby Hamlet Overview PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels TC Buildings 2020 DanbyWaterlines2001 Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Unique Natural Areas Habitat Corridor Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX B Soils Mapping Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX C Environmental Resource Mapping Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 3,400 6,8001,700 Feet Tompkins County Agricultural Districts - Danby PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels 1 Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. CRIS Screen Capture 4-1-2022 ¸0 3,400 6,8001,700 Feet Archeologically Sensitive Areas PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood EbB BoE ErA Ws Ab BgC Em EbC EbB DgB LaB CnB PhA Em BgC DgB Em LaB IcA LaB Ha LaB LaB EbB BgC EbB LaB EbB EbB FdB LaB RhA Ws LaB LaB BgCCnB HdC BgC3 LaB Ha DgB LaB MaC BgC BgC ErA LaB Em ErA BgC Em BgCBgC Ha BgC BgC HdA EbC3 LaB LaB HdC LaB BgC LaB Ha LaBLaC LaB LaC CnB LaB LaB LaB BgC BgC BgD Em LaB EbB EcABgC EcA BgC BgC CnB LaB LaC3 HdC LaB BgC BgC EcA CdA LaB Ws Hc LaB ErAVrD Ha HdC MaB BgC Ws LaBEbB BgD EbB Em RkB PhA DgB EbB LaB Ws BgC ErA Ws BvA BgCWs LaB Ws EbB ErA BgC BgC LaC3 BoE BgD BgC LaB EbB LaB PhB PhA LaB3 EcA LaB HdA BgC EbB LaB LaB BgC LaB LaB MaC LaB VbB Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 630 1,260315Feet Central Danby Soils and Slopes PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: Soils Percent Slope 0 - 15 16 - 20 21 - 93 Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\\ \ \\ \\\ \ \ \\\\\ \\\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 630 1,260315Feet Central Danby Hamlet Wetlands PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood \National Wetlands Inventory \\\\DEC Wetlands Streams Perennial Intermittent 1 2 4 0 12 6 0 1 2 8 0 1220 1 3 0 0 1 2 00 1 3 2 0 1 3 4 0 1 1 80 1 3 6 0 1 3 80 1 160 1 40 0 1 4 2 0 1 4 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 4 6 0 1 4 8 0 1 2 4 0 1380 1220 1 3 20 13 0 0 14 2 0 1 3 4 0 1 340 1 280 1220 1220 1360 1400 1220 1 2 20 13 6 0 1300 1 3 20 1 2 6 0 1220 1 380 Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 500 1,000250Feet Central Danby Hamlet Overview PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels TC Buildings 2020 Unique Natural Areas Habitat Corridor Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 3,400 6,8001,700 Feet FEMA Flood Zones - Danby PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels level 100-year flood zone 500-year flood zone Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 3,400 6,8001,700 Feet Hamlets Overview PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. CRIS Screen Capture 4-1-2022 ¸0 3,400 6,8001,700 Feet Archeologically Sensitive Areas PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: Potential Environmental Justice AreasHamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 3,400 6,8001,700 Feet Waterbodies Inventory/Priority Waterbodies List Map PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: DEC Streams <all other values> Impaired Minor Impacts Needs Verification No Known Impact Threatened UnAssessed DEC Lakes <all other values> Impaired Minor Impacts Needs Verification No Known Impact Threatened UnAssessed Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 3,400 6,8001,700 Feet UNAs and CEAs PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Unique Natural Areas HdD Ws Mp LoF HsD3 BoE BoE CdC HsD3 BgC BgC LnE HsC3 Hc HwB BgD HpE BgD HsD3 Em HsD3 HdC HdC HzE Hc HdD HsC3 LnD HsC3 HsD3 HpE HdD HsC3 HdC HdC HsC3 LnD Ro HdD LnE CdD PhB CdA HsD3 HdCK HdCK HsD3 HrC HsB HdD Fm HdD HsC3 HdC HdD Mm HwB HdD ArB ArC Mp HrC HzE CdD HsD3 Mp HpE Mn ArC CdC HsC3 ArC HdD ArC ArC CdA HpE HpE BtF BgC PhB LoFHwB HpE Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 420 840210Feet West Danby Soils and Slopes PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: Soils Percent Slope 0 - 15 16 - 20 21 - 93 Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 1,000 2,000500Feet West Danby Water System PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels DanbyWaterlines2001 Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \\\ \ \\ \ \\\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \\\ \\ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 425 850212.5 Feet West Danby Hamlet Wetlands PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels TC Buildings 2020 Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood \National Wetlands Inventory \\\\DEC Wetlands Streams Perennial Intermittent 960 9 8 0 94 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 40 9 2 0 10 6 0 1080 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 900 880 8 6 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 8 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 4 0 1 2 6 0 1 2 8 0 8 4 0 1 3 0 0 82 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 8 0 13 6 0 13 4 0 14 0 0 1 4 2 0 14 4 0 1 4 6 0 800 14 8 0 1 5 0 0 1 5 2 0 154 0 1 5 6 0 1 5 8 0 9 60 8 60 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 940 10 0 0 1180 1 000 1 00 0 960 9 6 0 96 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 8 0 1 4 6 0 1 3 6 0 9 6 0 1 3 8 0 1 4 20 1 1 6 0 920 840 92 0 9 80 960 1 0 8 0 980 1 4 0 0 8 8 0 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 00 98 0 9 8 0 1 2 6 0 1 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 9 40 9 4 0 960 96 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 8 8 0 10 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 0 9 8 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 4 0 Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Map Created by the Town of Danby Town Planner Data includes Town Zoning Addopted 1-4-22 Streams, Roads, Parcels provided by Tompkins County This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used for construction. ¸0 500 1,000250Feet West Danby Hamlet Overview PROJECT NAME TOWN OF DANBY PROJECT ADDRESS HORSEHEADS, NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585-327-7950 TOWANDA, PA 570-265-4868 NOTES:DRAWN BY: David West "IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S, ARCHITECT'S, OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." REVISION : SCALE: CHECKED BY : DATE: 2/1/2022 3:15 PM Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 Page of PROJECT NO: TCParcels TC Buildings 2020 DanbyWaterlines2001 Hamlet Center Hamlet Neighborhood Unique Natural Areas Habitat Corridor Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX D Community Resource Data TOWN OF DANBY NOVs Date Address Agency Violation February 2006 93 Hornbrook Road US EPA Injection well in violation of 40 C.F.R. 144.11 May 2003 1631 Danby Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage July 2009 22 Station Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage January 2014 22 Station Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage June 2015 424 Troy Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage February 2016 217 Muzzy Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage October 2017 14 Makarainen Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage March 2018 14 Makarainen Road Thompkins County DOH Saturated DMATS March 2018 111 Patchen Court Thompkins County DOH Construction without OWTS permit May 2020 Tallow Hill Road Thompkins County DOH Waste discharge to ground surface and below surface without inspection Town of Danby Septic Disposal & Water Supply Survey Summary Hunt received a total of 30 responses back. Not all responders filled out every section. One person only returned 1 page, it’s possible to contact them. Each resident/response was assigned a number (1-30) as shown in the table. The physical responses have the corresponding number written on them in case additional information is needed. Key results • There were a total of 11 septic system problems reported by 7 residents • 13 residents said they believed there was other septic disposal issues in Danby, 6 said they did not think there was other septic issues in the town • 15 people performed at least one bacteria/coliform test over their lifetime use of their well water. 13 have never performed a bacteria/coliform test, 6 of which use municipal water • 3 people use disinfection for their water • 10 residents say they use a filter for the entire household supply, 9 say they use a water softener. Other water quality devices also used, but in smaller numbers • Only 1 resident reported water borne illness, however, they also stated they are diagnosed with conditions that could also explain the symptoms • 8 households use the municipal system as their primary source of water • 22 households use wells, 15 of which are drilled wells • 6 residents reported a well – septic separation of 50-99 ft, 8 reported a separation of 100-200 ft, and 5 reported a separation greater than 200 ft • 4 households report that part or all of their drinking water is bottled • In terms of general water quality: 2 report bad water, 15 report good water, 7 report excellent. Hard water was reported as an issue for 16 people. Odor problems and staining problems each had 8 reports • Support for the town pursuing the establishment of a town run sanitary sewer district: i. Only within the Hamlet Centers at no personal cost to those surrounding the Hamlet Centers a. Yes: 16 b. No: 8 ii. Servicing the entirety of the Central Danby and West Danby Hamlets a. Yes: 14 b. No: 11 iii. Along your street with an option for you and/or your family to be connected a. Yes: 16 b. No: 9 iv. Municipal sewer service for your neighborhood but not yourself, at no personal cost? a. Yes: 12 b. No: 12 Specific Comments [Comments are direct quotes unless inside square brackets, which is added context] • There were a total of 11 septic system problems reported by 7 residents • I have been living with my well and septic system for nearly 50 years. I am fine with things the way they are • [Indicated sewers aren't a good option because it's too far]. We should allow composting toilets and graywater systems • [Comment next to "excellent quality" under water supply rating]: thanks to filtration system. Otherwise, all other "x" spots are true" [indicates only gets excellent quality due to filtration system but still has the other problems] • I don't want to pay more taxes for others - my taxes are way too high 6k. [comment by "servicing the entirety of Central and West Danby] If it's paid by users only - fine. NO SUBSIDIES. [Comment by "at no personal cost" for iv. municipal sewer] does this mean I don't ever have to pay towards it? Then yes. If it means no personal costs to those using it & tax payers must pay, then ABSOLUTELY NOT • So much chlorine. Too much. It stinks and it tastes like chlorine • [Answered "potentially" for all support questions and requested more information and clarification] • I have an artesian well. The overflow runs all the time. I believe construction of new housing has diminished the quality of my water. That's why I had to add a filter and a water softener • Replied no to iv. municipal service because they would want service as well • I have heard rumors that the Town of Danby is trying to site a system for public sewers on Danby Community Park lands. So disappointing and very much hope that rumor is not true • Have many questions BEFORE supporting anything! To w n o f D a n b y S e p t i c D i s p o s a l & W a t e r S u p p l y S u r v e y Re s i d e n t / h o m e o w n e r / r e s p o n d e r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 I. S e p t i c D i s p o s a l % No o f R e s I. 1 T y p e o f s e p t i c d i s p o s a l Se p t i c t a n k & l e a c h f i e l d 61 % 23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Se p t i c t a n k & s a n d f i l t e r 21 % 8 1 1 1 Se p t i c t a n k & b o t h l e a c h f i e l d & s a n d f i l t e r 5% 2 1 Se p t i c t a n k & s e e p a g e p i t 3% 1 Ot h e r / U n k n o w n 8% 3 1 I. 2 . A M a x c a p a c i t y o f s e p t i c t a n k 2 t a n k s Vo l u m e c a p a c i t y ( g a l l o n s ) 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 a n d 3 0 0 10 0 0 30 0 0 10 0 0 75 0 12 0 0 10 0 0 40 0 t o 5 0 0 15 0 0 Un k n o w n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. 2 . B S e p t i c t a n k m a t e r i a l Co n c r e t e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Me t a l Un k n o w n As s u m e d c o n c r e t e by o w n e r I. 3 S e p t i c s y s t e m p r o b l e m s Le a c h f i e l d o d o r 11 % 4 1 1 Se p t i c t a n k b a c k u p 8% 3 1 1 Ot h e r 21 % 8 So m e p r o b l e m s y e a r s ag o , n o n e s i n c e l e a c h fi e l d r e p a i r s Re g u l a r m a i n t e n a n c e r e q u i r e d t o w o r k pr o p e r l y . S u m p p i t p u m p n e e d e d t o pu m p 2 n d t a n k t o d r a i n a g e f i e l d Ha v e a n a b o v e g r o u n d s e p t i c " m o u n d " f i e l d . Re q u i r e s a s e c o n d a r y e f f l u e n t t a n k w i t h pu m p t o p u m p i n t o m o u n d , t h a t p u m p h a s fa i l e d a f e w t i m e s . A h a s s l e t o r e p l a c e , e s p i n Di s t r i b u t i o n b o x cl o g g e d So l v e d s e p t i c t a n k ba c k u p b y h a v i n g an n u a l p u m p o u t El e c t r i c a l p r o b l e m s w i t h p u m p , so m e t i m e s t h e c i r c u i t s h o r t s a n d w e ha v e t o m a k e s u r e i t s t a y s o n No p r o b l e m s 71 % 27 1 1 1 1 1 1 W e p u m p r e g u l a r l y & a r e to l d t h e 2 0 y e a r o l d t a n k i s in g r e a t c o n d i t i o n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 To t a l r e s i d e n t s w i t h p r o b l e m s 32 % 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. 4 . A Y e a r s e p t i c i n s t a l l e d 19 7 9 19 8 0 s ( ? ) 19 7 1 19 9 3 Un k n o w n 20 0 3 20 0 1 20 0 1 19 9 9 19 8 0 Un k n o w n 19 6 6 19 8 0 Un k n o w n , pr o b a b l y 1 9 7 0 s Un k n o w n Un k n o w n 20 0 4 I. 4 . B S e p t i c p u m p f r e q u e n c y Ev e r y _ _ _ _ y e a r s 8 3 3 5 1 2 t o 3 7 1 2 t o 3 5 3 3 t o 4 10 1 4 2 2 5 3 I. 5 S u s p i c i o n o f o t h e r s e p t i c i s s u e s i n t o w n Ye s 45 % 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 No 21 % 8 1 1 1 1 I. 6 S e p t i c r e p a i r Ye s 1 1 1 1 1 Re p a i r d a t e 20 2 1 20 0 4 Re p a i r e d p a r t Se p t i c t a n k Le a c h f i e l d Ot h e r p i p i n g Ot h e r p i p i n g Se p t i c t a n k , d i s t r i b u t i o n bo x , l e a c h f i e l d , p i p i n g No 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II . W a t e r S u p p l y S i t u a t i o n II . 1 B a c t e r i a / c o l i f o r m t e s t Pe r f o r m e d 50 % 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ye a r a n d r e s u l t 20 2 2 n e g a t i v e 20 y e a r s a g o , n e g a t i v e 20 1 2 n o r m a l 19 7 8 s a f e 19 9 9 o k Po s i t i v e f o r c o l i f o r m 20 2 1 , n e g a t i v e fo r b a c t e r i a 20 1 8 n e g a t i v e 20 1 5 n e g a t i v e No t p e r f o r m e d 16 % 6 1 1 1 N/ A M u n i c i p a l 29 % 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 II . 2 . A D i s i n f e c t i o n Ye s 16 % 6 1 1 1 No 45 % 17 1 1 1 1 1 w e h a v e s h o c k e d o u r w e l l tw i c e o v e r t h e y e a r s w i t h ch l o r i n e b l e a c h 1 1 1 1 N/ A M u n i c i p a l 26 % 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 II . 2 . B W a t e r q u a l i t y d e v i c e s Ch l o r i n a t i o n 3% 1 1 Fi l t e r f o r e n t i r e h o u s e h o l d 26 % 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fi l t e r f o r k i t c h e n t a p o n l y 11 % 4 1 Ul t r a v i o l e t ( U V ) 11 % 4 1 1 Wa t e r s o f t e n e r 32 % 12 1 1 1 1 1 Ot h e r 24 % 9 Oz o n e f i l t e r Os m o s i s s y s t e m We h a v e s h o c k e d o u r w e l l tw i c e o v e r t h e y e a r s w i t h ch l o r i n e b l e a c h Pa p e r f i l t e r re p l a c e d m o n t h l y [f o r h o u s e h o l d su p p l y ] Ch a r c o a l f i l t e r o n ki t c h e n t a p No n e i n d i c a t e d 37 % 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Us e o f a t l e a s t 1 d e v i c e 63 % 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II . 3 W a t e r b o r n e i l l n e s e s Ye s 0% 0 No 74 % 28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( b e c a u s e t h e y d o n ' t d r i n k t h e w a t e r ) 1 1 1 Po s s i b l y a n d / o r f e a r o f c o n t a m i n a t i o n 11 % 4 1 II . 4 P r i m a r y s o u r c e o f w a t e r Mu n i c i p a l 29 % 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dr i l l e d w e l l 50 % 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dr i v e n w e l l 5% 2 1 Du g w e l l 8% 3 1 Ot h e r 8% 3 We l l - u n s u r e o f ho w i t w a s in s t a l l e d Th e y h a v e 2 d r i l l e d w e l l s a n d 1 d u g w e l l II . 5 . A W e l l d e p t h We l l d e p t h ( f t ) 42 50 10 0 23 20 0 75 Un k n o w n 1 1 1 1 1 II . 5 . B W e l l y i e l d We l l y i e l d ( g a l / m i n ) 15 3+ 2 5 Un k n o w n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II . 5 . C W e l l - s e p t i c s e p a r a t i o n Le s s t h a n 5 0 f t 2% 1 50 - 9 9 f t 24 % 10 1 1 1 1 1 10 0 - 2 0 0 f t 22 % 9 1 1 1 1 Mo r e t h a n 2 0 0 f t 12 % 5 1 1 Su m m a r y To w n o f D a n b y S e p t i c D i s p o s a l & W a t e r S u p p l y S u r v e y Re s i d e n t / h o m e o w n e r / r e s p o n d e r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 I. S e p t i c D i s p o s a l % No o f R e s Su m m a r y No t a p p l i c a b l e 15 % 6 1 1 1 Un k n o w n 10 % 4 1 (s e p a r a t i o n i n d i c a t e d f o r d u g w e l l ) II . 6 S o u r c e o f d r i n k i n g w a t e r Ho u s e h o l d t a p 76 % 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Bo t t l e d w a t e r 21 % 8 1 1 Bo t t l e d w a t e r p u r c h a s e s / w k le s s t h a n 5 ga l l o n s / w e e k 5- 1 0 g a l l o n s II . 7 R a t e c u r r e n t w a t e r s u p p l y Po o r o v e r a l l q u a l i t y 13 % 5 1 1 Go o d o v e r a l l q u a l i t y 50 % 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ex c e l l e n t q u a l i t y 24 % 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ha r d w a t e r 47 % 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 St a i n i n g p r o b l e m s 29 % 11 1 1 1 1 1 Ta s t e p r o b l e m s 18 % 7 1 1 1 1 Od o r p r o b l e m s 29 % 11 1 1 1 1 1 Ru n s o u t s o m e t i m e s 8% 3 1 II I . S u p p o r t II I . 1 S u p p o r t f o r t h e T o w n p u r s u i n g t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f a To w n - r u n s a n i t a r y s e w e r d i s t r i c t : i. O n l y w i t h i n t h e H a m l e t C e n t e r s a t n o p e r s o n a l c o s t t o t h o s e su r r o u n d i n g t h e H a m l e t C e n t e r s Af f i r m a t i v e s u p p o r t 58 % 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ne g a t i v e r e s p o n s e 24 % 9 1 1 1 1 1 ii . S e r v i c i n g t h e e n t i r e t y o f t h e C e n t r a l D a n b y a n d W e s t D a n b y Ha m l e t s Af f i r m a t i v e s u p p o r t 47 % 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ne g a t i v e r e s p o n s e 37 % 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ii i . A l o n g y o u r s t r e e t w i t h a n o p t i o n f o r y o u a n d / o r y o u r f a m i l y to b e c o n n e c t e d Af f i r m a t i v e s u p p o r t 47 % 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ne g a t i v e r e s p o n s e 32 % 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iv . M u n i c i p a l s e w e r s e r v i c e f o r y o u r n e i g h b o r h o o d b u t n o t yo u r s e l f , a t n o p e r s o n a l c o s t Af f i r m a t i v e s u p p o r t 34 % 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ne g a t i v e r e s p o n s e 42 % 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lo c a t i o n We s t D a n b y 32 % 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ce n t r a l D a n b y 58 % 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ad d i t i o n a l c o m m e n t s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Re s i d e n t 3 I h a v e b e e n l i v i n g w i t h m y w e l l a n d s e p t i c s y s t e m f o r n e a r l y 5 0 y e a r s . I a m f i n e w i t h t h i n g s t h e w a y t h e y a r e Re s i d e n t 5 [I n d i c a t e d s e w e r s a r e n ' t a g o o d o p t i o n b e c a u s e i t ' s t o o f a r ] We s h o u l d a l l o w c o m p o s t i n g t o i l e t s a n d g r a y w a t e r s y s t e m s Re s i d e n t 6 [C o m m e n t n e x t t o " e x c e l l e n t q u a l i t y " u n d e r w a t e r s u p p l y r a t i n g ] : t h a n k s t o f i l t r a t i o n s y s t e m . O t h e r w i s e , a l l o t h e r " x " s p o t s a r e t r u e " [ i n d i c a t e s o n l y g e t s e x c e l l e n t q u a l i t y d u e t o f i l t r a t i o n s y s t e m b u t s t i l l h a s t h e o t h e r p r o b l e m s ] Re s i d e n t 7 [O n l y r e t u r n e d 1 p a g e ] Re s i d e n t 9 I d o n ' t w a n t t o p a y m o r e t a x e s f o r o t h e r s - m y t a x e s a r e w a y t o o h i g h 6 k If i t ' s p a i d b y u s e r s o n l y - f i n e . N O S U B S I D I E S [ c o m m e n t b y " s e r v i c i n g t h e e n t i r i t y o f C e n t r a l a n d W e s t D a n b y ] [C o m m e n t b y " a t n o p e r s o n a l c o s t " f o r i v . m u n i c i p a l s e w e r ] d o e s t h i s m e a n I d o n ' t ev e r h a v e t o p a y t o w a r d s i t ? T h e n y e s . I f i t m e a n s n o p e r s o n a l c o s t s t o t h o s e u s i n g i t & t a x p a y e r s m u s t p a y , t h e n A B S O L U T E L Y N O T Re s i d e n t 1 2 [A n s w e r e d " p o t e n t i a l l y " f o r a l l s u p p o r t q u e s t i o n s a n d r e q u e s t e d m o r e i n f o r m a t i o n a n d c l a r i f i c a t i o n ] So m u c h c h l o r i n e . T o o m u c h . I t s t i n k s a n d i t t a s t e s l i k e c h l o r i n e Re s i d e n t 1 3 I h a v e a n a r t e s i a n w e l l . T h e o v e r f l o w r u n s a l l t h e t i m e . I b e l i e v e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f n e w h o u s i n g h a s d i m i n i s h e d t h e q u a l i t y o f m y w a t e r . T h a t ' s w h y I h a d t o a d d a f i l t e r a n d a w a t e r s o f t e n e r Re s i d e n t 1 7 [C o m m e n t b y i i i . 1 . i v ] : n o , I w o u l d w a n t m u n i c i p a l s e r v i c e , t o o Re s i d e n t 1 8 I h a v e h e a r d r u m o r s t h a t t h e T o w n o f D a n b y i s t r y i n g t o s i t e a s y s t e m f o r p u b l i c s e w e r s o n D a n b y C o m m u n i t y P a r k l a n d s . S o d i s a p p o i n t i n g a n d v e r y m u c h h o p e t h a t r u m o r i s no t t r u e Re s i d e n t 3 0 Ha v e m a n y q u e s t i o n s BE F O R E s u p p o r t i n g a n y t h i n g ! Re s i d e n t 3 1 [C o m m e n t w r i t t e n b y " d o y o u b e l i e v e t h e r e m i g h t b e s e p t i c d i s p o s a l i s s u e s e l s e w h e r e " ] y e s t o o s m a l l l o t s f o r s e p t i c Re s i d e n t 3 4 [C o m m e n t i n w a t e r s u p p l y t e s t i n g ] : I t [ w a t e r t e s t i n g ] h a s n ' t b e e n d o n e i n t h e 2 5 y e a r s I ' v e b e e n h e r e & m y h u s b a n d h a s d e m e n t i a [C o m m e n t i n w a t e r b o r n e i l l n e s s s e c t i o n ] : H a v e n e v e r d r a n k t h e w a t e r b e c a u s e i t c o m e s o u t b l a c k o r b r o w n a l l t h e t i m e ! Re s i d e n t 3 5 [C o m m e n t b y I I I . 1 . i i . S e r v i c i n g t h e e n t i r e t y o f C e n t r a l a n d W e s t D a n b y ] : W e l i v e w i t h i n t h e h a m l e t & w o u l d n ' t w a n t t o c h o o s e f o r t h o s e w h o l i v e o u t s i d e t h e h a m l e t [N o t e : t w o s e p a r a t e r e s p o n s e s b y t w o d i f f e r e n t r e s i d e n t s w e r e r e c e i v e d f o r t h e s a m e a d d r e s s . T h e t w o r e s p o n s e s s t a t e d t h e s a m e i n f o r m a t i o n , a n d h a v e b e e n c o m b i n e d a n d r e p r e s e n t e d a s " R e s i d e n t 3 5 " ] Re s i d e n t 3 7 We m o v e d h e r e i n 2 0 1 6 n e v e r h a d i t [ s e p t i c t a n k ] p u m p e d u n t i l w e h a d p r o b l e m s . F a i l e d l e a c h f i e l d [ N o t e : r e s i d e n t c i r c l e d t h a t t h e y h a d a s a n d f i l t e r , n o t a l e a c h f i e l d ] . [ I n d i c a t e d i n I I . 3 a n d I I . 7 t h a t t h e y b e l i e v e d t h e i r w a t e r m a y h a v e m a d e t h e m s i c k ] . O u r t a p w a t e r l o o k s l i k e b u d l i g h t 9 0 % o f t h e t i m e . W e g e t b r o w n w a t e r s o m e t i m e s . I h a v e l o t s o f p i c t u r e s . Re s i d e n t 3 8 [T h i s r e s i d e n t o w n s 3 - 4 p r o p e r t i e s e n c o m p a s s i n g 4 s t r e e t a d d r e s s e s . T h e y a r e a l a n d l o r d w i t h t e n a n t s . A l t h o u g h t h i s r e s p o n s e c o n t a i n s s o m e i n f o f o r 4 o c c u p i e d b u i l d i n g s , t h i s w i l l b e o v e r a l l c o u n t e d a s 1 r e s i d e n t , E X C E P T f o r w e l l - s e p t i c s e p a r a t i o n . E a c h w e l l - s e p t i c s e p a r a t i o n w i l l b e t a l l i e d a n d a v e r a g e d o u t o f 4 1 r e s i d e n t s i n s t e a d o f 3 8 ] [I n s e c t i o n I I . 3 r e g a r d i n g w a t e r b o r n e i l l n e s s e s , t h e y a n s w e r n o , b u t t h a t o n e o f t h e i r t e n a n t s c o m p l a i n e d o f s k i n r a s h b e f o r e t h e y i n s t a l l e d a s o f t e n e r a n d U V s y s t e m . O w n e r k n o w s t h e w e l l d e p t h a n d y i e l d f o r o n e p r o p e r t y , b u t n o t f o r t h e o t h e r 3 p r o p e r t i e s . L a n d o w n e r s t a t e d t h a t 1 p r o p e r t y h a d a w e l l a n d se p t i c l e a c h f i e l d s e p a r a t i o n o f l e s s t h a n 5 0 f t , a n d t h e o t h e r 3 p r o p e r t i e s ( i n c l u d i n g t h e i r h o m e a d d r e s s ) h a d a s e p a r a t i o n o f 5 0 - 9 9 f t . I n t h e w a t e r q u a l i t y r a t i n g s e c t i o n , t h e y w r o t e t h a t t h e i r h o m e p r o p e r t y h a d g o o d o v e r a l l q u a l i t y w i t h s o f t e n e r a g a i n s t r u s t , o n e o f t h e i r r e n t e d p r o p e r t i e s h a d e x c e l l e n t q u a l i t y wi t h U V s y s t e m , o n e p r o p e r t y w e l l i s n ' t h o o k e d u p b u t t e s t i n g i n d i c a t e s l o w i r o n , a n d t h a t t h e y w o u l d l i k e t o t e s t t h e f o u r t h w e l l b e c a u s e t h e y a r e c o n c e r n e d . T h e y a p p r o v e o f s e r v i c i n g t h e e n t i r e t y o f C e n t r a l a n d W e s t D a n b y " i f o t h e r s c o u l d a g r e e " . T h e y d i d n ' t a n s w e r I I I . 1 . i i i b e c a u s e t h e y s a y t h e i r p e r s o n a l To w n o f D a n b y S e p t i c D i s p o s a l & W a t e r S u p p l y S u r v e y Re s i d e n t / h o m e o w n e r / r e s p o n d e r I. S e p t i c D i s p o s a l I. 1 T y p e o f s e p t i c d i s p o s a l Se p t i c t a n k & l e a c h f i e l d Se p t i c t a n k & s a n d f i l t e r Se p t i c t a n k & b o t h l e a c h f i e l d & s a n d f i l t e r Se p t i c t a n k & s e e p a g e p i t Ot h e r / U n k n o w n I. 2 . A M a x c a p a c i t y o f s e p t i c t a n k Vo l u m e c a p a c i t y ( g a l l o n s ) Un k n o w n I. 2 . B S e p t i c t a n k m a t e r i a l Co n c r e t e Me t a l Un k n o w n I. 3 S e p t i c s y s t e m p r o b l e m s Le a c h f i e l d o d o r Se p t i c t a n k b a c k u p Ot h e r No p r o b l e m s To t a l r e s i d e n t s w i t h p r o b l e m s I. 4 . A Y e a r s e p t i c i n s t a l l e d I. 4 . B S e p t i c p u m p f r e q u e n c y Ev e r y _ _ _ _ y e a r s I. 5 S u s p i c i o n o f o t h e r s e p t i c i s s u e s i n t o w n Ye s No I. 6 S e p t i c r e p a i r Ye s Re p a i r d a t e Re p a i r e d p a r t No II . W a t e r S u p p l y S i t u a t i o n II . 1 B a c t e r i a / c o l i f o r m t e s t Pe r f o r m e d Ye a r a n d r e s u l t No t p e r f o r m e d N/ A M u n i c i p a l II . 2 . A D i s i n f e c t i o n Ye s No N/ A M u n i c i p a l II . 2 . B W a t e r q u a l i t y d e v i c e s Ch l o r i n a t i o n Fi l t e r f o r e n t i r e h o u s e h o l d Fi l t e r f o r k i t c h e n t a p o n l y Ul t r a v i o l e t ( U V ) Wa t e r s o f t e n e r Ot h e r No n e i n d i c a t e d Us e o f a t l e a s t 1 d e v i c e II . 3 W a t e r b o r n e i l l n e s e s Ye s No Po s s i b l y a n d / o r f e a r o f c o n t a m i n a t i o n II . 4 P r i m a r y s o u r c e o f w a t e r Mu n i c i p a l Dr i l l e d w e l l Dr i v e n w e l l Du g w e l l Ot h e r II . 5 . A W e l l d e p t h We l l d e p t h ( f t ) Un k n o w n II . 5 . B W e l l y i e l d We l l y i e l d ( g a l / m i n ) Un k n o w n II . 5 . C W e l l - s e p t i c s e p a r a t i o n Le s s t h a n 5 0 f t 50 - 9 9 f t 10 0 - 2 0 0 f t Mo r e t h a n 2 0 0 f t 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 75 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 U n s u r e 10 0 0 75 0 50 0 50 0 ? 10 0 0 10 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, u n s u r e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Gr a y w a t e r l i n e s , n o t s u r e w h e r e th e y g o Fa i l e d l e a c h f i e l d . D i s t r i b u t i o n b o x da m a g e d / d e t e r i o r a t i n g . I t ' s a l l n e w no w 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 5 0 u n k n o w n Un k n o w n 19 5 0 s Un k n o w n 19 7 8 20 0 8 19 6 0 20 1 8 19 7 5 a b o u t 19 5 5 19 8 7 Un k n o w n Un k n o w n Un k n o w n 20 1 0 19 9 6 , r e p l a c e d 2 0 2 1 1 Un k n o w n ( o w n e d f o r 3 ye a r s , n o p u m p i n g y e t ) 2 3 10 1 2 o r 3 3 3 3 3 t o 4 1 2 y e a r s a g o 3 3 t o 4 1 Va r i e s ( 4 s i t e s , l a s t p u m p r a n g e s f r o m 19 8 0 s - 2 0 0 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 0 4 a n d 2 0 1 5 20 1 8 20 1 0 20 2 1 Le a c h f i e l d c h a n g e d i n 2 0 0 4 an d n e w p u m p o v e r s y s t e m in s t a l l e d t o " a b s o r p t i o n be d " , o t h e r p i p i n g r e p l a c e d Le a c h f i e l d Le a c h f i e l d a n d di s t r i b u t i o n b o x Ot h e r p i p i n g Ot h e r p i p i n g Ne w l e a c h f i e l d a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n b o x 1 1 U n k n o w n , o n l y 3 ye a r s o w n e r s h i p Un k n o w n 1 1 1 1 Un k n o w n 1 1 Un k n o w n ( n o t si n c e t h e y ' v e mo v e d h e r e i n 20 1 9 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 1 7 n e g a t i v e Se p t 2 0 1 8 a l l o k n e g a t i v e f o r co l i f o r m a n d e . c o l i 20 1 7 p a s s e d 20 0 6 n e g a t i v e 20 1 9 Ne g a t i v e ? 20 1 9 n e g a t i v e 20 2 0 [T e s t e d 1 p r o p e r t y ] T e s t e d p o s i t i v e f o r ba c t e r i a . C h l o r i n e s h o c k e d b u t f i n a l l y p u t i n so f t e n e r + U V s y s t e m ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Un k n o w n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fi l t e r o n f r i d g e Ze r o w a t e r (f i l t e r br a n d ) Be r k e y os m o s i s fi l t e r HO H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, d i a r r h e a , h o w e v e r , t h e y ha v e b e e n d i a g n o s e d w i t h ot h e r c o n d i t i o n s t h a t c o u l d ca u s e t h i s Ma y b e On e p r o p e r t y t e s t e d p o s i t i v e f o r b a c t e r i a , an d t h e t e n a n t a t t h i s l o c a t i o n c o m p l a i n e d of a s k i n r a s h b e f o r e U V a n d s o f t e n e r sy s t e m w a s i n s t a l l e d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 We l l , n o t s u r e w h i c h ki n d 16 0 40 18 28 35 16 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 To w n o f D a n b y S e p t i c D i s p o s a l & W a t e r S u p p l y S u r v e y Re s i d e n t / h o m e o w n e r / r e s p o n d e r I. S e p t i c D i s p o s a l No t a p p l i c a b l e Un k n o w n II . 6 S o u r c e o f d r i n k i n g w a t e r Ho u s e h o l d t a p Bo t t l e d w a t e r Bo t t l e d w a t e r p u r c h a s e s / w k II . 7 R a t e c u r r e n t w a t e r s u p p l y Po o r o v e r a l l q u a l i t y Go o d o v e r a l l q u a l i t y Ex c e l l e n t q u a l i t y Ha r d w a t e r St a i n i n g p r o b l e m s Ta s t e p r o b l e m s Od o r p r o b l e m s Ru n s o u t s o m e t i m e s II I . S u p p o r t II I . 1 S u p p o r t f o r t h e T o w n p u r s u i n g t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f a To w n - r u n s a n i t a r y s e w e r d i s t r i c t : i. O n l y w i t h i n t h e H a m l e t C e n t e r s a t n o p e r s o n a l c o s t t o t h o s e su r r o u n d i n g t h e H a m l e t C e n t e r s Af f i r m a t i v e s u p p o r t Ne g a t i v e r e s p o n s e ii . S e r v i c i n g t h e e n t i r e t y o f t h e C e n t r a l D a n b y a n d W e s t D a n b y Ha m l e t s Af f i r m a t i v e s u p p o r t Ne g a t i v e r e s p o n s e ii i . A l o n g y o u r s t r e e t w i t h a n o p t i o n f o r y o u a n d / o r y o u r f a m i l y to b e c o n n e c t e d Af f i r m a t i v e s u p p o r t Ne g a t i v e r e s p o n s e iv . M u n i c i p a l s e w e r s e r v i c e f o r y o u r n e i g h b o r h o o d b u t n o t yo u r s e l f , a t n o p e r s o n a l c o s t Af f i r m a t i v e s u p p o r t Ne g a t i v e r e s p o n s e Lo c a t i o n We s t D a n b y Ce n t r a l D a n b y Ad d i t i o n a l c o m m e n t s Re s i d e n t 3 Re s i d e n t 5 Re s i d e n t 6 Re s i d e n t 7 Re s i d e n t 9 Re s i d e n t 1 2 Re s i d e n t 1 3 Re s i d e n t 1 7 Re s i d e n t 1 8 Re s i d e n t 3 0 Re s i d e n t 3 1 Re s i d e n t 3 4 Re s i d e n t 3 5 Re s i d e n t 3 7 Re s i d e n t 3 8 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 1 1 1 1 [R e s p o n s e s t a t e d a s "u n k n o w n " , d e t e r m i n e d to b e N / A a s r e s p o n d e n t us e s m u n i c i p a l w a t e r n o t we l l w a t e r ] 1 ( b e l i e v e d t o be 1 0 0 + f t ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5- 1 0 g a l l o n s / w e e k $1 0 / w e e k 2 g a l l o n s / w e e k Le s s t h a n 5 g a l l o n s / w e e k A l o t , t e n c a s e s a w e e k , 5 - 1 0 g a l l o n s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Un c l e a r ( s o u t h of W e s t D a n b y ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Ye s Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX E Available Water Usage Data & Flow Calculations TY P E UN I T S AV G U N I T S # O F " T Y P E " GP D GP D / E D U ED U s # O F " T Y P E " GP D ED U s MO B I L E _ H O M E S SI N G L E - W I D E 27 5 1 0 0 33 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 PR I M A R Y _ R E S I D E N T I A L & A G PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 3 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 RE C _ U S E PE R V I S I T O R 5 5 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 RE S I D E N T I A L PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 3 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 3 B E D R O O M S PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 3 5 16 5 0 5. 0 19 62 7 0 19 . 0 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 6 B E D R O O M S 11 0 6 2 13 2 0 4. 0 3 19 8 0 6. 0 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 9 B E D R O O M S 11 0 9 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 CE M E T E R I E S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 0 0 0. 0 1 40 0 1. 2 ON E _ S T O R Y _ S M A L L _ S T R U C T U R E PE R T O I L E T 40 0 2 1 80 0 2. 4 0 0 0. 0 ST O R A G E _ F A C I L I T I E S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 1. 2 0 0 0. 0 RE L I G I O U S PE R S E A T 3 50 1 15 0 0. 5 0 0 0. 0 AP A R T M E N T S PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 2 1 22 0 0. 7 0 0 22 R 0. 0 OF F I C E _ B U I L D I N G PE R E M P L O Y E E 15 25 1 37 5 1. 1 0 0 0. 0 JU N K Y A R D S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 AU T O _ S H O P S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 1. 2 0 0 0. 0 SP E C I A L _ S C H O O L S PE R S T U D E N T 10 20 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 PO L I C E _ F I R E _ B L D G S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 6 1 24 0 0 7. 3 0 0 0 S 0. 0 HI G H W A Y G A R A G E PE R E M P L O Y E E 15 5 0 0 0. 0 0 0 1 C 0. 0 SE A S O N A L _ R E S I D E N C E PE R B E D R O O M 65 3 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 14 SU B T O T A L - ( H A M L E T C E N T E R ) 77 1 5 23 . 4 SU B T O T A L - ( H A M L E T C E N T E R ) 86 5 0 26 . 2 TY P E UN I T S AV G U N I T S # O F " T Y P E " GP D # O F " T Y P E " GP D ED U s MO B I L E _ H O M E S SI N G L E - W I D E 27 5 1 5 13 7 5 4 4 PR I M A R Y _ R E S I D E N T I A L & A G PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 3 2 66 0 5 5 RE C _ U S E PE R P E R S O N 5 5 6 15 0 6 6 RE S I D E N T I A L PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 3 1 33 0 1 1 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 3 B E D R O O M S PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 3 11 1 36 6 3 0 53 53 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 6 B E D R O O M S 11 0 6 16 10 5 6 0 7 7 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 9 B E D R O O M S 11 0 9 1 99 0 0 0 CE M E T E R I E S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 4 1 16 0 0 2 2 ON E _ S T O R Y _ S M A L L _ S T R U C T U R E PE R T O I L E T 40 0 2 1 80 0 0 0 ST O R A G E _ F A C I L I T I E S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 0 0 RE L I G I O U S PE R S E A T 3 15 1 45 0 0 AP A R T M E N T S PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 2 3 66 0 14 5 R 0 0 77 R OF F I C E _ B U I L D I N G PE R E M P L O Y E E 15 10 1 15 0 0 0 JU N K Y A R D S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 0 0 AU T O _ S H O P S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 0 0 SP E C I A L _ S C H O O L S PE R S T U D E N T 10 20 1 20 0 0 0 PO L I C E _ F I R E _ B L D G S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 6 1 24 0 0 1 S 1 1 0 S HI G H W A Y G A R A G E PE R E M P L O Y E E 15 5 1 75 9 C 0 0 3 C SE A S O N A L _ R E S I D E N C E PE R B E D R O O M 65 3 0 0 1 1 15 5 SU B T O T A L - ( O U T E R Z O N E A N D H A M L E T C E N T E R ) 56 9 5 5 17 2 . 6 SU B T O T A L - ( O U T E R Z O N E A N D H A M L E T C E N T E R ) 28 7 3 5 87 . 1 WE S T D A N B Y - H A M L E T C E N T E R CE N T R A L D A N B Y - H A M L E T C E N T E R CE N T R A L D A N B Y WE S T D A N B Y TY P E UN I T S AV G U N I T S # O F " T Y P E " GP D GP D / E D U ED U s # O F " T Y P E " GP D ED U s MO B I L E _ H O M E S SI N G L E - W I D E 27 5 1 0 0 22 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 PR I M A R Y _ R E S I D E N T I A L & A G PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 3 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 RE C _ U S E PE R V I S I T O R 5 5 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 RE S I D E N T I A L PE R B E D R O O M 11 0 3 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 3 B E D R O O M S PE R B E D R O O M 73 3 5 11 0 0 5. 0 19 41 8 0 19 . 0 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 6 B E D R O O M S 73 6 2 88 0 4. 0 3 13 2 0 6. 0 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 9 B E D R O O M S 11 0 9 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 CE M E T E R I E S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 0 0 0. 0 1 40 0 1. 8 ON E _ S T O R Y _ S M A L L _ S T R U C T U R E PE R T O I L E T 40 0 2 1 80 0 3. 6 0 0 0. 0 ST O R A G E _ F A C I L I T I E S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 1. 8 0 0 0. 0 RE L I G I O U S PE R S E A T 3 50 1 15 0 0. 7 0 0 0. 0 AP A R T M E N T S PE R B E D R O O M 73 2 1 14 6 . 6 6 6 7 0. 7 0 0 22 R 0. 0 OF F I C E _ B U I L D I N G PE R E M P L O Y E E 15 25 1 37 5 1. 7 0 0 0. 0 JU N K Y A R D S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 AU T O _ S H O P S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 1. 8 0 0 0. 0 SP E C I A L _ S C H O O L S PE R S T U D E N T 10 20 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 PO L I C E _ F I R E _ B L D G S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 6 1 24 0 0 10 . 9 0 0 0 S 0. 0 HI G H W A Y G A R A G E PE R E M P L O Y E E 15 5 0 0 0. 0 0 0 1 C 0. 0 SE A S O N A L _ R E S I D E N C E PE R B E D R O O M 65 3 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 14 23 SU B T O T A L - ( H A M L E T C E N T E R ) 66 5 1 . 6 6 7 30 . 2 SU B T O T A L - ( H A M L E T C E N T E R ) 59 0 0 26 . 8 TY P E UN I T S AV G U N I T S # O F " T Y P E " GP D # O F " T Y P E " GP D ED U s MO B I L E _ H O M E S SI N G L E - W I D E 15 0 1 5 75 0 4 4 PR I M A R Y _ R E S I D E N T I A L & A G PE R B E D R O O M 73 3 2 44 0 5 5 RE C _ U S E PE R P E R S O N 5 5 6 15 0 6 6 RE S I D E N T I A L PE R B E D R O O M 73 3 1 22 0 1 1 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 3 B E D R O O M S PE R B E D R O O M 73 3 11 1 24 4 2 0 53 53 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 6 B E D R O O M S 73 6 16 70 4 0 7 7 SI N G L E _ F A M I L Y _ 9 B E D R O O M S 73 9 1 66 0 0 0 CE M E T E R I E S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 4 1 16 0 0 2 2 ON E _ S T O R Y _ S M A L L _ S T R U C T U R E PE R T O I L E T 40 0 2 1 80 0 0 0 ST O R A G E _ F A C I L I T I E S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 0 0 RE L I G I O U S PE R S E A T 3 15 1 45 0 0 AP A R T M E N T S PE R B E D R O O M 73 2 3 44 0 14 5 R 0 0 77 R OF F I C E _ B U I L D I N G PE R E M P L O Y E E 15 10 1 15 0 0 0 JU N K Y A R D S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 0 0 AU T O _ S H O P S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 1 1 40 0 0 0 SP E C I A L _ S C H O O L S PE R S T U D E N T 10 20 1 20 0 0 0 PO L I C E _ F I R E _ B L D G S PE R T O I L E T 40 0 6 1 24 0 0 1 S 1 1 0 S HI G H W A Y G A R A G E PE R E M P L O Y E E 15 5 1 75 9 C 0 0 3 C SE A S O N A L _ R E S I D E N C E PE R B E D R O O M 65 3 0 0 1 1 15 5 SU B T O T A L - ( O U T E R Z O N E A N D H A M L E T C E N T E R ) 41 0 0 5 18 6 . 4 SU B T O T A L - ( O U T E R Z O N E A N D H A M L E T C E N T E R ) 21 3 6 5 97 . 1 WE S T D A N B Y - H A M L E T C E N T E R CE N T R A L D A N B Y - H A M L E T C E N T E R CE N T R A L D A N B Y WE S T D A N B Y Town of Danby Sanitary Sewer Service Areas - 3378.001 Revised 4/4/2024 for DEC Comments (based on 220 gpd/homes)Population (2020) PF (10-States):3.39 3457 Service Area Description Service Flows (GPD) Expansion (GPD)I&I Est** (GPD) Total Flows*** (GPD) PHF* (GPD) Option #1 - Central Danby 41,005 14,598 12,756 68,358 188,458 Option #2 - Central Danby Hamlets Only 6,652 3,991 955 11,598 36,074 Option #3 - West Danby 21,365 4,700 8,537 34,602 88,345 Option #4 - West Danby Hamlets Only 5,900 3,068 4,006 12,974 30,396 *Dry weather + expansion x PF **Based on LF piping @ 375 gpd/idm ***Dry weather + expansion + I&I Town of Danby Sanitary Sewer Service Areas - 3378.001 Rev. 04/05/2024 240 mg/L 240 mg/L 8 mg/L 35 mg/L Service Area Description Total Flow (GPD) BOD5 Load (lbs/d) TSS Load (lbs/d) TP Load (lbs/d) NH3-N Load (lbs/d) Option #1 - Central Danby Service Area 1 41,005 82 82 3 12 Option #2 - Central Danby Hamlets Only Service Area 1a 6,652 13 13 0 2 Option #3 - West Danby Service Area 2 21,365 43 43 1 6 Option #4 - West Danby Hamlets Only Service Area 2a 5,900 12 12 0 2 BUILD-OUT FLOWS CONDITION Option #1 - Central Danby Service Area 1 68,358 137 137 5 20 Option #2 - Central Danby Hamlets Only Service Area 1a 11,598 23 23 1 3 Option #3 - West Danby Service Area 2 34,602 69 69 2 10 Option #4 - West Danby Hamlets Only Service Area 2a 12,974 26 26 1 4 Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX F (Not Used) Financial Data Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX G Process Review (Not Used) Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX H Conceptual Layouts PSPS PS E. MILLER RD D A N B Y R D N HORN B R O O K R D DA N B Y R D S MI C H I G A N H O L L O W R D BAL D H I L L R D GUNDERMAN RD D A N B Y R D PS W. MILLER RD LEGEND: PROPOSED COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP STATION TOWN LIMITS HAMLET CENTER PS PROJECT NO: DATE: Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 HORSEHEADS, NY 607 - 358 - 1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585 - 327 - 7950 TOWANDA, PA 570 - 265 - 4868 3378-001 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM & WWTP STUDY TOWN OF DANBY DANBY, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FIG. 1DANBY WASTEWATER STUDY AUGUST 2022 SCALE : 1" = 1500' PROJECT LOCATION APPROX. LOCATION OF MODULAR UNIT; DISCH TO BUTTERMILK CREEK PS PS PS PS PS PS MAPLE AVE S P E N C E R R D N O R T H STAT I O N R D BROWN R D SHORT RD V A L L E Y V I E W R D S R 3 4 S O U T H PS LEGEND: PROPOSED COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMP STATION TOWN LIMITS HAMLET CENTER PS PROJECT NO: DATE: Co p y r i g h t : 2 0 2 2 HORSEHEADS, NY 607 - 358 - 1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585 - 327 - 7950 TOWANDA, PA 570 - 265 - 4868 3378-001 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM & WWTP STUDY TOWN OF DANBY DANBY, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK FIG. 2WEST DANBY WASTEWATER STUDY AUGUST 2022 SCALE : 1" = 1000' PROJECT LOCATION APPROX. LOCATION OF MODULAR UNIT; DISCH TO UNKNOWN CREEK 50 ' X 5 0 ' O P E R A T I O N S B L D G PO S T A E R A T I O N T A N K IN T E R M E D I A T E P U M P ST A T I O N IN L E T S U R G E T A N K , SB R P R O C E S S T A N K S , DE C A N T E Q T A N K A N D SL U D G E H O L D I N G T A N K GE N E R A T O R FU T U R E S L U D G E PR O C E S S I N G B L D G IN F L U E N T S E W A G E F R O M CO L L E C T I O N S Y S T E M SC R E E N E D W W CL A R I F I E D D E C A N T E F F L U E N T FI L T E R E D / D I S I N F E C T E D E F F L U E N T PE R M I T T E D O U T F A L L TO R E C E I V I N G W A T E R CR E E K MI X I N G C H A M B E R SC A L E : TY P I C A L S B R W W T P C O N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N 1 N. T . S . FI G 3 TYPICAL SBR WWTP JU L Y 2 0 2 3 PR O J E C T N O : Copyright: BY:DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : DA T E : SC A L E : DESCRIPTION OF REVISION:#DATE: HORSEHEADS, NY 607 - 358 - 1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585 - 327 - 7950 TOWANDA, PA 570 - 265 - 4868"IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S,ARCHITECT'S OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM & WWTP STUDY VILLAGE OF DANBY TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK 33 7 8 . 0 0 1 2023 20 2 3 50 ' X 5 0 ' O P E R A T I O N S B L D G PO S T A E R A T I O N T A N K IN T E R M E D I A T E P U M P ST A T I O N RB C P R O C E S S & GR E E N H O U S E B L D G GE N E R A T O R FU T U R E S L U D G E PR O C E S S I N G B L D G IN F L U E N T S E W A G E F R O M CO L L E C T I O N S Y S T E M SC R E E N E D W W CL A R I F I E D D E C A N T E F F L U E N T FI L T E R E D / D I S I N F E C T E D E F F L U E N T PE R M I T T E D O U T F A L L TO R E C E I V I N G W A T E R CR E E K MI X I N G C H A M B E R PR I M A R Y C L A R I F I E R S SE C O N D A R Y CL A R I F I E R S SC A L E : TY P I C A L R B C W W T P C O N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N 1 N. T . S . FI G 4 TYPICAL RBC WWTP JU L Y 2 0 2 3 PR O J E C T N O : Copyright: BY:DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : DA T E : SC A L E : DESCRIPTION OF REVISION:#DATE: HORSEHEADS, NY 607 - 358 - 1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585 - 327 - 7950 TOWANDA, PA 570 - 265 - 4868"IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S,ARCHITECT'S OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM & WWTP STUDY TOWN OF DANBY TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK 33 7 8 . 0 0 1 2023 20 2 3 OP E R A T I O N S B L D G ( T Y P ) PO S T A E R A T I O N T A N K IN T E R M E D I A T E P U M P ST A T I O N PA C K A G E T R E A T M E N T SY S T E M (P R E C L E A N I N G T A N K S , MB R P R O C E S S U N I T S , AI R B L O W E R S , A N D SL U D G E H O L D I N G TA N K S ) GE N E R A T O R FU T U R E S L U D G E PR O C E S S I N G B L D G IN F L U E N T S E W A G E F R O M CO L L E C T I O N S Y S T E M SC R E E N E D W W MB R P E R M E A T E E F F L U E N T FI L T E R E D / D I S I N F E C T E D E F F L U E N T PE R M I T T E D O U T F A L L TO R E C E I V I N G W A T E R (O R O P T I O N A L S U B S U R F A C E SY S T E M ) CR E E K MI X I N G C H A M B E R SC A L E : TY P I C A L C O N T A I N E R W W T P C O N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N 1 N. T . S . FI G 5 TYPICAL CONTAINER WWTP JU L Y 2 0 2 3 PR O J E C T N O : Copyright: BY:DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : DA T E : SC A L E : DESCRIPTION OF REVISION:#DATE: HORSEHEADS, NY 607 - 358 - 1000 ROCHESTER, NY 585 - 327 - 7950 TOWANDA, PA 570 - 265 - 4868"IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW FOR ANY PERSON TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO PLANS BEARING A LICENSED ENGINEER'S,ARCHITECT'S OR SURVEYOR'S SEAL." SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM & WWTP STUDY TOWN OF DANBY TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK 33 7 8 . 0 0 1 2023 20 2 3 Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX I Equipment and Cost Estimates Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Job no:3378.001 Summary of Costs - Conventional Gravity System Date:1/14/23 Rev:6/27/23 0% Loan 4.5% Loan Danby Rd S $880,967 19 $1,532.4 $2,822.2 Bald Hill Rd $1,507,667 35 $0 $1,438.1 $2,648.6 Main St/Danby Rd $2,736,162 47 $0 $1,926.4 $3,547.9 Hornbrook Rd $1,218,346 17 $0 $2,401.8 $4,423.4 Gunderman Rd $1,532,688 24 $0 $2,158.2 $3,974.8 E. Miller Rd $656,577 11 $0 $1,941.5 $3,575.7 W. Miller Rd $990,401 9 $0 $3,660.8 $6,742.2 Danby Rd N $636,257 12 $0 $1,710.4 $3,150.1 Michigan Hollow Rd $867,511 11 $0 $2,565.2 $4,724.5 Total Collection System $11,026,575 186 $1,976.1 $3,639.5 Regional Treatment to Ithaca WWTP $12,522,581 186 $2,244.2 $4,133.2 New 68,400 GPD SBR WWTP $5,676,224 186 $1,017.2 $1,873.5 New 68,400 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $7,099,977 186 $1,272.4 $2,343.4 Summary of Costs - Grinder System 0% Loan 4.5% Loan Danby Rd S $799,096 19 $1,390.0 $2,559.9 Bald Hill Rd $1,094,395 35 $0 $1,043.9 $1,922.6 Main St/Danby Rd $2,450,431 47 $0 $1,725.2 $3,177.4 Hornbrook Rd $1,037,458 17 $0 $2,045.2 $3,766.7 Gunderman Rd $1,048,957 24 $0 $1,477.0 $2,720.3 E. Miller Rd $577,175 11 $0 $1,706.7 $3,143.3 W. Miller Rd $362,885 9 $0 $1,341.3 $2,470.4 Danby Rd N $568,642 12 $0 $1,528.6 $2,815.3 Michigan Hollow Rd $652,617 11 $0 $1,929.8 $3,554.2 Total Collection System $8,591,657 186 $1,539.7 $2,835.8 Regional Treatment to Ithaca WWTP $12,522,581 186 $2,244.2 $4,133.2 New 68,400 GPD SBR WWTP $5,676,224 186 $1,017.2 $1,873.5 New 68,400 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $7,099,977 186 $1,272.4 $2,343.4 COST/EDU (30-yr period) SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs SERVICE COST COST/EDU (30-yr period) EDUsEST COSTSERVICE AREA SERVICE COST This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Regional Treatment to Ithaca WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/29/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $105 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $7,200 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $250,000 $250,000 5 6-inch Force Main 33,000 LF $125 $4,125,000 6 Lawn Repair (assume 50% @ 8 ft w)132,000 SF $3 $396,000 7 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 50% in road, 6ft width)11,000 SY $105 $1,155,000 8 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 5% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)11,000 SY $125 $1,375,000 9 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 10 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 11 Connection to Existing System 1 EA $10,000 $10,000 12 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $75,000 $75,000 SUBTOTAL $7,486,000 13 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $224,580 $224,580 14 Inflation @ 3%/year, 1 year 1 LS $224,580 $224,580 15 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $2,245,800 $2,245,800 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $10,180,960 16 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $254,524 $254,524 17 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $254,524 $254,524 18 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $1,832,573 $1,832,573 TOTAL PROJECT COST $12,522,581 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 68,400 GPD SBR WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:2/2/23 Date:6/27/23 Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0 6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $140,000 $140,000 7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400 8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000 9 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 10 New SBR Process Tankage & Equipment Complete 1 LS $1,221,080 $1,221,080 11 Decant EQ Basin Complete 1 LS $99,443 $99,443 12 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 13 Mechanical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 14 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $77,000 $77,000 15 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $28,000 $28,000 16 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $63,000 $63,000 17 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $12,600 $25,200 18 50' x 50' Process Building (Screen, Office, Blowers, Filters etc.) Partial Class I/Div I 2,500 SF $350 $875,000 19 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 20 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500 21 Alum Grating for Tanks 200 SF $100 $20,000 22 Alum Stairs for Tanks 100 SF $50 $5,000 23 Alum Railing for Tanks 200 LF $60 $12,000 24 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 25 Process Yard Piping, Valves, etc. - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 26 3" Buried Galv. Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000 27 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 28 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 29 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 30 Fencing and Gate 600 LF $65 $39,000 31 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 32 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 33 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 34 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $178,530 $178,530 SUBTOTAL $3,267,153 35 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $98,015 $98,015 36 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $261,372 $261,372 37 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $980,146 $980,146 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $4,606,686 38 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $115,167 $115,167 39 Land Acquistion (1 acre)1 LS $10,000 $10,000 40 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $115,167 $115,167 41 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $829,203 $829,203 TOTAL PROJECT COST $5,676,224 ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 68,400 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:1/30/23 Date:2/8/23 Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0 6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $140,000 $140,000 7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400 8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000 9 New Intermediate Pump Station (pumps in EQ tank)0 LS $60,000 $0 10 EQ Basin Equipment/Tank (see Below)0 LS $0 $0 11 New Pre-Anoxic Tank with Equipment 1 LS $180,600 $180,600 12 New RBC 5' x 5' Splitter Box w/ weirs 1 LS $42,000 $42,000 13 New Hybrid RBC Precast Tanks 396 CY $1,200 $474,667 14 New Hybrid RBC Process Equipment Complete 1 LS $555,800 $555,800 15 New Hybrid RBC Greenhouse Building 1 LS $179,000 $179,000 16 Miscellaneous Hybrid RBC Site Piping, Valves, etc 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 17 New Secondary Clarifiers 5' x 5' Splitter Box 1 LS $28,000 $28,000 18 New Secondary Clarifier & EQ Basin & Sludge Holding & Chem. Dose MH Tanks/Equip 1 LS $539,000 $539,000 19 New Secondary Clarifiers Equipment 1 LS $112,000 $112,000 20 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 21 Mechanical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 22 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $154,000 $154,000 23 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $28,000 $28,000 24 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $63,000 $63,000 25 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $12,600 $25,200 26 50' x 50' Process Building (Screen, Office, Blowers, Filters etc.) Partial Class I/Div I 2,500 SF $350 $875,000 27 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 28 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500 29 Alum Grating for Tanks 200 SF $100 $20,000 30 Alum Stairs for Tanks 100 SF $50 $5,000 31 Alum Railing for Tanks 200 LF $60 $12,000 32 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 33 Process Yard Piping - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 34 Aeration Yard Piping - 2" Galv.1 LS $7,000 $7,000 35 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 36 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 37 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 38 Fencing and Gate 600 LF $65 $39,000 39 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 40 Miscellaneous MHs, Site Piping, Valves, etc 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 41 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 42 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 43 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $143,925 $143,925 SUBTOTAL $4,088,092 44 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $122,643 $122,643 45 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $327,047 $327,047 46 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $1,226,428 $1,226,428 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $5,764,209 47 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $144,105 $144,105 48 Land Acquistion (1 acre)1 LS $10,000 $10,000 49 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $144,105 $144,105 50 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $1,037,558 $1,037,558 TOTAL PROJECT COST $7,099,977 This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Danby Rd S Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 2,100 LF $105 $220,500 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)5 EA $7,200 $37,800 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)17 EA $7,500 $127,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 17 EA $500 $8,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)6,800 SF $3 $20,400 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 17 EA $1,400 $23,800 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)560 SY $105 $58,800 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)45 SY $125 $5,667 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $507,967 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $15,239 $15,239 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $40,637 $40,637 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $152,390 $152,390 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $716,233 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $17,906 $17,906 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $17,906 $17,906 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $128,922 $128,922 TOTAL PROJECT COST $880,967 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Bald Hill Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,900 LF $105 $199,500 3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $34,200 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 80 LF $125 $10,000 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)31 EA $7,500 $232,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 31 EA $500 $15,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)12,400 SF $3 $37,200 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 31 EA $1,400 $43,400 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)528 SY $105 $55,440 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)83 SY $125 $10,333 12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $26,250 $26,250 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $869,323 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $26,080 $26,080 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $69,546 $69,546 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $260,797 $260,797 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,225,746 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $30,644 $30,644 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $30,644 $30,644 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $220,634 $220,634 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,507,667 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Main St/Danby Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 5,825 LF $105 $611,625 3 Manhole 15 EA $7,200 $104,850 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 50 LF $125 $6,250 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)42 EA $7,500 $315,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 42 EA $500 $21,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)16,800 SF $3 $50,400 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 42 EA $1,400 $58,800 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)1,567 SY $105 $164,500 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)112 SY $125 $14,000 12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $26,250 $26,250 13 DOT/County Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $1,577,675 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $47,330 $47,330 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $126,214 $126,214 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $473,303 $473,303 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $2,224,522 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $55,613 $55,613 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $55,613 $55,613 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $400,414 $400,414 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,736,162 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. 0 Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Hornbrook Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 3,500 LF $105 $367,500 3 Manhole 9 EA $7,200 $63,000 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)15 EA $7,500 $112,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 15 EA $500 $7,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)6,000 SF $3 $18,000 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 15 EA $1,400 $21,000 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)933 SY $105 $98,000 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)40 SY $125 $5,000 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $702,500 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $21,075 $21,075 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $56,200 $56,200 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $210,750 $210,750 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $990,525 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $24,763 $24,763 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $24,763 $24,763 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $178,295 $178,295 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,218,346 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Gunderman Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 2,750 LF $105 $288,750 3 Manhole 7 EA $7,200 $49,500 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 50 LF $125 $6,250 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)21 EA $7,500 $157,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 21 EA $500 $10,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)8,400 SF $3 $25,200 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 21 EA $1,400 $29,400 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)747 SY $105 $78,400 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)56 SY $125 $7,000 12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $26,250 $26,250 13 DOT Crossing EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $883,750 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $26,513 $26,513 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $70,700 $70,700 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $265,125 $265,125 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,246,088 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $31,152 $31,152 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $31,152 $31,152 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $224,296 $224,296 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,532,688 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:E. Miller Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,750 LF $105 $183,750 3 Manhole 4 EA $7,200 $31,500 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)10 EA $7,500 $75,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $3 $12,000 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)467 SY $105 $49,000 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)27 SY $125 $3,333 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $378,583 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $11,358 $11,358 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $30,287 $30,287 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $113,575 $113,575 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $533,803 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $13,345 $13,345 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $13,345 $13,345 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $96,084 $96,084 TOTAL PROJECT COST $656,577 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:W. Miller Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 900 LF $105 $94,500 3 Manhole 2 EA $7,200 $16,200 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 900 LF $125 $112,500 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)8 EA $7,500 $60,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 8 EA $500 $4,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)3,200 SF $3 $9,600 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 8 EA $1,400 $11,200 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)480 SY $105 $50,400 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)21 SY $125 $2,667 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 1 EA $10,000 $10,000 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $571,067 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $17,132 $17,132 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $45,685 $45,685 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $171,320 $171,320 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $805,204 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $20,130 $20,130 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $20,130 $20,130 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $144,937 $144,937 TOTAL PROJECT COST $990,401 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Danby Rd N Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut (inclds 1 Town prop)1,600 LF $105 $168,000 3 Manhole 4 EA $7,200 $28,800 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main (to Spaulding Dr connection)0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)11 EA $7,500 $82,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 11 EA $500 $5,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,400 SF $3 $13,200 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 11 EA $1,400 $15,400 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)427 SY $105 $44,800 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)29 SY $125 $3,667 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 13 DOT Crossing EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $366,867 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $11,006 $11,006 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $29,349 $29,349 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $110,060 $110,060 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $517,282 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $12,932 $12,932 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $12,932 $12,932 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $93,111 $93,111 TOTAL PROJECT COST $636,257 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Michigan Hollow Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/11/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 2,125 LF $105 $223,125 3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $38,250 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main (to Spaulding Dr connection)0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)10 EA $7,500 $75,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $3 $12,000 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)567 SY $105 $59,500 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)27 SY $125 $3,333 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 13 DOT Crossing 1 EA $55,000 $55,000 14 Connection to Existing System 1 EA $10,000 $10,000 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $500,208 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $15,006 $15,006 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $40,017 $40,017 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $150,063 $150,063 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $705,294 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $17,632 $17,632 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $17,632 $17,632 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $126,953 $126,953 TOTAL PROJECT COST $867,511 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Danby Rd S Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 2,100 LF $80 $168,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)17 EA $8,680 $147,560 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)850 LF $60 $51,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)6,800 SF $2 $13,600 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)5,040 SF $15 $75,600 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $460,760 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $13,823 $13,823 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $36,861 $36,861 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $138,228 $138,228 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $649,672 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $16,242 $16,242 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $16,242 $16,242 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $116,941 $116,941 TOTAL PROJECT COST $799,096 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Bald Hill Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,900 LF $80 $152,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)31 EA $8,680 $269,080 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)1,550 LF $60 $93,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)12,400 SF $2 $24,800 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)4,560 SF $15 $68,400 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $631,030 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $18,931 $18,931 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $50,482 $50,482 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $189,309 $189,309 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $889,752 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $22,244 $22,244 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $22,244 $22,244 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $160,155 $160,155 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,094,395 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Main St/Danby Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 2-inch Force Main 1,456 LF $85 $123,781 6 3-inch Force Main 1,456 LF $90 $131,063 7 4-inch Force Main 1,456 LF $95 $138,344 8 6-inch Force Main 1,456 LF $100 $145,625 9 Low Pressure Force Main LF $80 $116,500 10 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 11 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 12 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)42 EA $8,680 $364,560 13 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)2,100 LF $60 $126,000 14 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)16,800 SF $2 $33,600 15 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)13,980 SF $15 $209,700 16 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 17 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750 18 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 19 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 20 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $1,412,923 21 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $42,388 $42,388 22 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $113,034 $113,034 23 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $423,877 $423,877 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,992,221 24 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $49,806 $49,806 25 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $49,806 $49,806 26 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $358,600 $358,600 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,450,431 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Hornbrook Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 3,500 LF $80 $280,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)15 EA $8,680 $130,200 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)750 LF $60 $45,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)6,000 SF $2 $12,000 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)8,400 SF $15 $126,000 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $598,200 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $17,946 $17,946 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $47,856 $47,856 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $179,460 $179,460 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $843,462 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $21,087 $21,087 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $21,087 $21,087 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $151,823 $151,823 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,037,458 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Gunderman Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 2,750 LF $80 $220,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)21 EA $8,680 $182,280 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)1,050 LF $60 $63,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)8,400 SF $2 $16,800 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)6,600 SF $15 $99,000 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $604,830 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $18,145 $18,145 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $48,386 $48,386 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $181,449 $181,449 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $852,810 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $21,320 $21,320 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $21,320 $21,320 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $153,506 $153,506 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,048,957 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:E. Miller Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,750 LF $80 $140,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)10 EA $8,680 $86,800 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)500 LF $60 $30,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $2 $8,000 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)4,200 SF $15 $63,000 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $332,800 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $9,984 $9,984 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $26,624 $26,624 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $99,840 $99,840 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $469,248 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $11,731 $11,731 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $11,731 $11,731 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $84,465 $84,465 TOTAL PROJECT COST $577,175 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:W. Miller Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 900 LF $80 $72,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)8 EA $8,680 $69,440 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)400 LF $60 $24,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)3,200 SF $2 $6,400 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)2,160 SF $15 $32,400 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $209,240 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $6,277 $6,277 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $16,739 $16,739 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $62,772 $62,772 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $295,028 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $7,376 $7,376 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $7,376 $7,376 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $53,105 $53,105 TOTAL PROJECT COST $362,885 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Danby Rd N Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,600 LF $80 $128,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)11 EA $8,680 $95,480 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)550 LF $60 $33,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,400 SF $2 $8,800 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)3,840 SF $15 $57,600 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $327,880 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $9,836 $9,836 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $26,230 $26,230 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $98,364 $98,364 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $462,311 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $11,558 $11,558 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $11,558 $11,558 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $83,216 $83,216 TOTAL PROJECT COST $568,642 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Michigan Hollow Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:8/9/22 Checked:Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 2,125 LF $80 $170,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)10 EA $8,680 $86,800 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)500 LF $60 $30,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $2 $8,000 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)5,100 SF $15 $76,500 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $376,300 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $11,289 $11,289 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $30,104 $30,104 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $112,890 $112,890 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $530,583 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $13,265 $13,265 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $13,265 $13,265 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $95,505 $95,505 TOTAL PROJECT COST $652,617 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Town of Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Job no:3378.001 Summary of Costs - Conventional Gravity System Date:3/2/23 Date:6/27/23 0% Loan 4.5% Loan Danby Rd S $396,686 15 $881.5 $1,623.5 Main St/Danby Rd $372,672 15 $828.2 $1,525.3 Total Collection System $769,359 30 $854.8 $1,574.4 New Leachfield System -30 -- New 11,500 GPD SBR WWTP $3,011,661 30 $3,346.3 $6,163.0 New 11,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,146,769 30 $4,607.5 $8,485.9 New 11,500 GPD Modular System WWTP (4 Units)$2,073,933 30 $2,304.4 $4,244.1 Summary of Costs - Grinder System 0% Loan 4.5% Loan Danby Rd S $370,446 15 $823.2 $1,516.2 Main St/Danby Rd $331,182 15 $736.0 $1,355.5 Total Collection System $701,628 30 $779.6 $1,435.8 New Leachfield System -30 -- New 11,500 GPD SBR WWTP $3,011,661 30 $3,346.3 $6,163.0 New 11,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,146,769 30 $4,607.5 $8,485.9 New 11,500 GPD Modular System WWTP (4 Units)$2,073,933 30 $2,304.4 $4,244.1 SERVICE AREA SERVICE COST This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. COST/EDU (30-yr period) SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs SERVICE COST COST/EDU (30-yr period) EDUsEST COST Project:Town of Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 11,500 GPD SBR WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:2/2/23 Date:6/27/23 Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0 6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000 7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400 8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000 9 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 10 New SBR Process Tankage & Equipment Complete 1 LS $718,060 $718,060 11 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 12 Mechanical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 13 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $84,000 $84,000 14 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 15 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $42,000 $42,000 16 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $7,000 $14,000 17 20' x 20' Process Building (Screen, Office, Blowers, Filters etc.) Partial Class I/Div I 400 SF $350 $140,000 18 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 19 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500 20 Alum Grating for Tanks 75 SF $100 $7,500 21 Alum Stairs for Tanks 50 SF $50 $2,500 22 Alum Railing for Tanks 100 LF $60 $6,000 23 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 24 Process Yard Piping, Valves, etc. - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 25 3" Buried Galv. Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000 26 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 27 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 28 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 29 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500 30 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 31 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 32 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 33 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $118,185 $118,185 SUBTOTAL $1,733,645 34 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $52,009 $52,009 35 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $138,692 $138,692 36 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $520,094 $520,094 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $2,444,439 37 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $61,111 $61,111 38 Land Acquistion (0.5 acre)1 LS $5,000 $5,000 39 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $61,111 $61,111 40 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $439,999 $439,999 TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,011,661 ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 11,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:1/14/23 Date:3/2/23 Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0 6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000 7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400 8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000 9 New Intermediate Pump Station (pumps in EQ tank)0 LS $60,000 $0 10 EQ Basin Equipment/Tank (included Below)0 LS $0 $0 11 New Pre-Anoxic Tank with Equipment (included below)0 LS $0 $0 12 New RBC 5' x 5' Splitter Box w/ weirs 1 LS $42,000 $42,000 13 New Hybrid RBC Process Tanks: (included below)0 CY $1,200 $0 14 New Hybrid RBC Process Equipment Complete Precast Tanks/Equip: New Secondary Clarifier & Preanoxic & EQ Basin & Sludge Holding & Chem. Dose MH Tanks/Equip & Disc Filter 1 LS $756,000 $756,000 15 New Hybrid RBC Greenhouse Building (Not needed)0 LS $0 $0 16 Miscellaneous Hybrid RBC Site Piping, Valves, etc 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 17 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 18 Tertiary Disc Filters (included above)0 LS $0 $0 19 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 20 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $42,000 $42,000 21 Post Aeration Blowers (sludge blower included above)2 EA $7,000 $14,000 22 50' x 50' Process Building (Screen, Office, Blowers, Filters etc.) Partial Class I/Div I 2,500 SF $350 $875,000 23 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 24 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500 25 Alum Grating for Tanks 50 SF $100 $5,000 26 Alum Stairs for Tanks 25 SF $50 $1,250 27 Alum Railing for Tanks 50 LF $60 $3,000 28 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 29 Process Yard Piping - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 30 Aeration Yard Piping - 2" Galv.1 LS $7,000 $7,000 31 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 32 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 33 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 34 Fencing and Gate 500 LF $65 $32,500 35 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 36 Miscellaneous MHs, Site Piping, Valves, etc 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 37 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 38 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 39 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $103,500 $103,500 SUBTOTAL $2,388,150 40 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $71,645 $71,645 41 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $191,052 $191,052 42 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $716,445 $716,445 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $3,367,292 43 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $84,182 $84,182 44 Land Acquistion (0.5 acre)1 LS $5,000 $5,000 45 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $84,182 $84,182 46 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $606,112 $606,112 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,146,769 This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. Project:Town of Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 11,500 GPD Modular System WWTP (4 Units)Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/5/23 Date: Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 5 New BUSSE Process Tankage & Equipment Complete 1 LS $608,000 $608,000 6 Process Equipment Connections 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 7 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 8 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $42,000 $42,000 9 Post Aeration Blowers 1 EA $7,000 $7,000 10 Process Yard Piping, Valves, etc. - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 11 3" Buried Galv. Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000 12 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 13 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 14 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 15 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500 16 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 17 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 18 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 19 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $105,450 $105,450 SUBTOTAL $1,192,950 20 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $35,789 $35,789 21 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $95,436 $95,436 22 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $357,885 $357,885 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,682,060 23 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $42,051 $42,051 24 Land Acquistion (0.5 acre)1 LS $5,000 $5,000 25 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $42,051 $42,051 26 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $302,771 $302,771 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,073,933 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Danby Rd S Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:1/16/23 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 830 LF $105 $87,150 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)2 EA $7,200 $14,940 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)9 EA $7,500 $67,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 9 EA $500 $4,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)3,600 SF $3 $10,800 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 9 EA $1,400 $12,600 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)221 SY $105 $23,240 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)24 SY $125 $3,000 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $228,730 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $6,862 $6,862 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $18,298 $18,298 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $68,619 $68,619 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $322,509 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $8,063 $8,063 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $8,063 $8,063 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $58,052 $58,052 TOTAL PROJECT COST $396,686 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Main St/Danby Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:1/16/23 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 850 LF $105 $89,250 3 Manhole 2 EA $7,200 $15,300 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)7 EA $7,500 $52,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 7 EA $500 $3,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)2,800 SF $3 $8,400 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 7 EA $1,400 $9,800 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)227 SY $105 $23,800 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)19 SY $125 $2,333 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0 13 DOT/County Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $214,883 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $6,447 $6,447 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $17,191 $17,191 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $64,465 $64,465 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $302,986 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $7,575 $7,575 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $7,575 $7,575 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $54,537 $54,537 TOTAL PROJECT COST $372,672 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Danby Rd S Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:1/16/23 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 830 LF $80 $66,400 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)9 EA $8,680 $78,120 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)450 LF $60 $27,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)3,600 SF $2 $7,200 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)1,992 SF $15 $29,880 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $213,600 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $6,408 $6,408 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $17,088 $17,088 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $64,080 $64,080 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $301,176 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $7,529 $7,529 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $7,529 $7,529 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $54,212 $54,212 TOTAL PROJECT COST $370,446 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Main St/Danby Rd Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:1/16/23 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 Low Pressure Force Main 850 LF $80 $68,000 6 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 8 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)7 EA $8,680 $60,760 9 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)350 LF $60 $21,000 10 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)2,800 SF $2 $5,600 11 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)2,040 SF $15 $30,600 12 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 13 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 14 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 15 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 16 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $190,960 17 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $5,729 $5,729 18 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $15,277 $15,277 19 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $57,288 $57,288 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $269,254 20 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $6,731 $6,731 21 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $6,731 $6,731 22 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $48,466 $48,466 TOTAL PROJECT COST $331,182 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Job no:3378.001 Summary of Costs - Conventional Gravity System Date:3/2/23 Date:6/27/23 0% Loan 4.5% Loan SR 34/Spencer Rd Gravity $1,174,765 12 $3,350.7 $6,171.1 SR 34/Spencer Rd North Gravity $577,020 12 $0 $1,645.8 $3,031.1 Maple Ave/Station Rd Gravity $2,160,633 29 $0 $2,465.1 $4,540.0 Valley View Rd Gravity $1,502,506 16 $0 $3,061.1 $5,637.7 Brown Rd Gravity $1,027,175 9 $0 $3,662.2 $6,744.8 Short Rd/Brown Rd North Gravity $1,662,397 13 $0 $4,310.5 $7,938.8 SR 34 South Gravity $429,371 6 $0 $2,449.3 $4,511.1 Total Collection System $8,533,866 97 $2,932.6 $5,401.1 New 34,500 GPD SBR WWTP $4,764,193 97 $1,637.2 $3,015.3 New 34,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,987,153 97 $1,713.8 $3,156.4 Summary of Costs - Grinder System 0% Loan 4.5% Loan SR 34/Spencer Rd Grinder $691,059 12 $1,971.1 $3,630.2 SR 34/Spencer Rd North Grinder $510,287 12 $0 $1,455.5 $2,680.6 Maple Ave/Station Rd Grinder & Force Main $1,217,536 29 $0 $1,389.1 $2,558.3 Valley View Rd Grinder $629,366 16 $0 $1,282.2 $2,361.5 Brown Rd Grinder $521,834 9 $0 $1,860.5 $3,426.6 Short Rd/Brown Rd North Grinder $825,378 13 $0 $2,140.2 $3,941.6 SR 34 South Grinder $343,741 6 $0 $1,960.9 $3,611.4 Total Collection System $4,739,201 97 $1,628.6 $2,999.5 New 34,500 GPD SBR WWTP $4,764,193 97 $1,637.2 $3,015.3 New 34,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,987,153 97 $1,713.8 $3,156.4 This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. EDUsEST COST SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs SERVICE COST COST/EDU (30-yr period) SERVICE AREA SERVICE COST COST/EDU (30-yr period) Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 34,500 GPD SBR WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:2/2/23 Date:6/27/23 Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0 6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000 7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400 8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000 9 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 10 New SBR Process Tankage & Equipment Complete 1 LS $939,120 $939,120 11 Decant EQ Basin Complete 1 LS $50,885 $50,885 12 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 13 Mechnical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 14 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 15 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 16 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $49,000 $49,000 17 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $7,000 $14,000 18 50' x 50' Process Building (Screen, Office, Blowers, Filters etc.) Partial Class I/Div I 2,500 SF $350 $875,000 19 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 20 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500 21 Alum Grating for Tanks 100 SF $100 $10,000 22 Alum Stairs for Tanks 50 SF $50 $2,500 23 Alum Railing for Tanks 100 LF $60 $6,000 24 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 25 Process Yard Piping, Valves, etc. - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 26 3" Buried Galv. Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000 27 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 28 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 29 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 30 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500 31 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 32 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 33 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 34 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $137,370 $137,370 SUBTOTAL $2,741,275 35 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $82,238 $82,238 36 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $219,302 $219,302 37 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $822,382 $822,382 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $3,865,197 38 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $96,630 $96,630 39 Land Acquistion (1 acre)1 LS $10,000 $10,000 40 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $96,630 $96,630 41 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $695,735 $695,735 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,764,193 ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 34,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:1/14/23 Date:3/2/23 Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0 6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000 7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400 8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000 9 New Intermediate Pump Station (pumps in EQ tank)0 LS $60,000 $0 10 EQ Basin Equipment/Tank (included Below)0 LS $0 $0 11 New Pre-Anoxic Tank with Equipment (included below)0 LS $0 $0 12 New RBC 5' x 5' Splitter Box w/ weirs 1 LS $42,000 $42,000 13 New Hybrid RBC Process Tanks: (included below)0 CY $1,200 $0 14 New Hybrid RBC Process Equipment Complete 1 LS $474,600 $474,600 15 New Hybrid RBC Greenhouse Building 1 LS $93,000 $93,000 16 Miscellaneous Hybrid RBC Site Piping, Valves, etc 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 17 Precast Tanks/Equip: New Secondary Clarifier & Preanoxic & EQ Basin & Sludge Holding & Chem. Dose MH Tanks/Equip & Disc Filter 1 LS $658,000 $658,000 18 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 19 Mechanical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 20 Tertiary Disc Filters (included above)0 LS $0 $0 21 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 22 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $49,000 $49,000 23 Post Aeration Blowers (sludge blower included above)2 EA $7,000 $14,000 24 50' x 50' Process Building (Screen, Office, Blowers, Filters etc.) Partial Class I/Div I 2,500 SF $350 $875,000 25 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 26 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500 27 Alum Grating for Tanks 100 SF $100 $10,000 28 Alum Stairs for Tanks 50 SF $50 $2,500 29 Alum Railing for Tanks 100 LF $60 $6,000 30 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 31 Process Yard Piping - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 32 Aeration Yard Piping - 2" Galv.1 LS $7,000 $7,000 33 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 34 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 35 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 36 Fencing and Gate 500 LF $65 $32,500 37 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 38 Miscellaneous MHs, Site Piping, Valves, etc 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 39 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 40 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 41 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $77,100 $77,100 SUBTOTAL $2,875,600 42 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $86,268 $86,268 43 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $230,048 $230,048 44 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $862,680 $862,680 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $4,054,596 45 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $101,365 $101,365 46 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $101,365 $101,365 47 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $729,827 $729,827 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,987,153 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:SR 34/Spencer Rd Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 2,300 LF $105 $241,500 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)7 EA $7,200 $48,600 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 80 LF $125 $10,000 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)10 EA $7,500 $75,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $3 $12,000 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)635 SY $105 $66,640 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)27 SY $125 $3,333 12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $25,000 $25,000 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $706,073 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $21,182 $21,182 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $56,486 $56,486 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $211,822 $211,822 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $995,563 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $24,889 $24,889 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $24,889 $24,889 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $129,423 $129,423 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,174,765 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:SR 34/Spencer Rd North Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 0 LS $10,000 $0 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,525 LF $105 $160,125 3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $34,650 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)10 EA $7,500 $75,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $3 $12,000 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)407 SY $105 $42,700 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)27 SY $125 $3,333 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $346,808 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $10,404 $10,404 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $27,745 $27,745 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $104,043 $104,043 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $489,000 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $12,225 $12,225 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $12,225 $12,225 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $63,570 $63,570 TOTAL PROJECT COST $577,020 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Maple Ave/Station Rd Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 3,600 LF $105 $378,000 3 Manhole 10 EA $7,200 $72,000 4 Pump Station and Generator 2 EA $150,000 $300,000 5 6-inch Force Main 160 LF $125 $20,000 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)25 EA $7,500 $187,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 25 EA $500 $12,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)10,000 SF $3 $30,000 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 25 EA $1,400 $35,000 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)1,003 SY $105 $105,280 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)67 SY $125 $8,333 12 Stream Crossing 2 EA $25,000 $50,000 13 DOT/County Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $90,000 $90,000 SUBTOTAL $1,298,613 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $38,958 $38,958 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $103,889 $103,889 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $389,584 $389,584 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,831,045 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $45,776 $45,776 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $45,776 $45,776 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $238,036 $238,036 TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,160,633 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. 0 Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Valley View Rd Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,550 LF $105 $162,750 3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $35,100 4 Pump Station and Generator 2 EA $150,000 $300,000 5 6-inch Force Main 580 LF $125 $72,500 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)14 EA $7,500 $105,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 14 EA $500 $7,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)5,600 SF $3 $16,800 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 14 EA $1,400 $19,600 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)568 SY $105 $59,640 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)37 SY $125 $4,667 12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $25,000 $25,000 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $90,000 $90,000 SUBTOTAL $903,057 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $27,092 $27,092 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $72,245 $72,245 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $270,917 $270,917 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,273,310 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $31,833 $31,833 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $31,833 $31,833 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $165,530 $165,530 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,502,506 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Brown Rd Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,800 LF $105 $189,000 3 Manhole 6 EA $7,200 $39,600 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 300 LF $125 $37,500 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)8 EA $7,500 $60,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 8 EA $500 $4,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)3,200 SF $3 $9,600 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 8 EA $1,400 $11,200 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)560 SY $105 $58,800 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)21 SY $125 $2,667 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0 13 DOT Crossing EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $617,367 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $18,521 $18,521 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $49,389 $49,389 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $185,210 $185,210 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $870,487 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $21,762 $21,762 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $21,762 $21,762 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $113,163 $113,163 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,027,175 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Short Rd/Brown Rd North Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 3,050 LF $105 $320,250 3 Manhole 9 EA $7,200 $62,100 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 1,380 LF $125 $172,500 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)11 EA $7,500 $82,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 11 EA $500 $5,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,400 SF $3 $13,200 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 11 EA $1,400 $15,400 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)1,181 SY $105 $124,040 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)29 SY $125 $3,667 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $999,157 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $29,975 $29,975 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $79,933 $79,933 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $299,747 $299,747 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,408,811 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $35,220 $35,220 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $35,220 $35,220 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $183,145 $183,145 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,662,397 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:SR 34 South Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,200 LF $105 $126,000 3 Manhole 4 EA $7,200 $28,800 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)5 EA $7,500 $37,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 5 EA $500 $2,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)2,000 SF $3 $6,000 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 5 EA $1,400 $7,000 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)320 SY $105 $33,600 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)13 SY $125 $1,667 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 1 EA $10,000 $10,000 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $258,067 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $7,742 $7,742 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $20,645 $20,645 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $77,420 $77,420 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $363,874 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $9,097 $9,097 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $9,097 $9,097 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $47,304 $47,304 TOTAL PROJECT COST $429,371 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:SR 34/Spencer Rd Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 2,300 LF $80 $184,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)10 EA $8,680 $86,800 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)500 LF $60 $30,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $2 $8,000 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)5,520 SF $15 $82,800 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $415,350 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $12,461 $12,461 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $33,228 $33,228 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $124,605 $124,605 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $585,644 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $14,641 $14,641 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $14,641 $14,641 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $76,134 $76,134 TOTAL PROJECT COST $691,059 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:SR 34/Spencer Rd North Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,525 LF $80 $122,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)10 EA $8,680 $86,800 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)500 LF $60 $30,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $2 $8,000 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)3,660 SF $15 $54,900 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $306,700 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $9,201 $9,201 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $24,536 $24,536 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $92,010 $92,010 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $432,447 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $10,811 $10,811 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $10,811 $10,811 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $56,218 $56,218 TOTAL PROJECT COST $510,287 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Maple Ave/Station Rd Grinder & Force Main Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 2,520 LF $100 $252,000 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,080 LF $80 $86,400 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)25 EA $8,680 $217,000 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)1,250 LF $60 $75,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)10,000 SF $2 $20,000 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)2,592 SF $15 $38,880 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 2 EA $18,750 $37,500 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $731,780 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $21,953 $21,953 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $58,542 $58,542 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $219,534 $219,534 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,031,810 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $25,795 $25,795 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $25,795 $25,795 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $134,135 $134,135 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,217,536 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Valley View Rd Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,550 LF $80 $124,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)14 EA $8,680 $121,520 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)700 LF $60 $42,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)5,600 SF $2 $11,200 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)3,720 SF $15 $55,800 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $378,270 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $11,348 $11,348 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $30,262 $30,262 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $113,481 $113,481 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $533,361 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $13,334 $13,334 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $13,334 $13,334 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $69,337 $69,337 TOTAL PROJECT COST $629,366 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Brown Rd Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,800 LF $80 $144,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)8 EA $8,680 $69,440 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)400 LF $60 $24,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)3,200 SF $2 $6,400 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)4,320 SF $15 $64,800 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $313,640 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $9,409 $9,409 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $25,091 $25,091 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $94,092 $94,092 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $442,232 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $11,056 $11,056 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $11,056 $11,056 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $57,490 $57,490 TOTAL PROJECT COST $521,834 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Short Rd/Brown Rd North Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 3,050 LF $80 $244,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)11 EA $8,680 $95,480 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)550 LF $60 $33,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,400 SF $2 $8,800 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)7,320 SF $15 $109,800 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $496,080 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $14,882 $14,882 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $39,686 $39,686 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $148,824 $148,824 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $699,473 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $17,487 $17,487 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $17,487 $17,487 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $90,931 $90,931 TOTAL PROJECT COST $825,378 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:SR 34 South Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,200 LF $80 $96,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)5 EA $8,680 $43,400 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)250 LF $60 $15,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)2,000 SF $2 $4,000 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)2,880 SF $15 $43,200 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $206,600 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $6,198 $6,198 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $16,528 $16,528 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $61,980 $61,980 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $291,306 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $7,283 $7,283 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $7,283 $7,283 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $37,870 $37,870 TOTAL PROJECT COST $343,741 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Job no:3378.001 Summary of Costs - Conventional Gravity System Date:1/17/23 Date:6/27/23 0% Loan 4.5% Loan SR 34/Spencer Rd Gravity $875,891 6 $4,866.1 $8,962.0 Maple Ave/Station Rd Gravity $1,010,282 10 $0 $3,367.6 $6,202.3 Valley View Rd Gravity $883,156 11 $0 $2,676.2 $4,928.9 Total Collection System $2,769,329 27 $3,418.9 $6,296.8 New 13,000 GPD SBR WWTP $3,045,666 27 $3,760.1 $5,752.9 New 13,000 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,146,769 27 $5,119.5 $7,832.8 New 13,000 GPD Modular System WWTP (2 Units)$1,818,644 27 $2,245.2 $3,435.2 Summary of Costs - Grinder System 0% Loan 4.5% Loan SR 34/Spencer Rd Grinder $434,302 6 $2,412.8 $4,443.7 Maple Ave/Station Rd Grinder & Force Main $539,903 10 $0 $1,799.7 $3,314.5 Valley View Rd Grinder $480,223 11 $0 $1,455.2 $2,680.1 Total Collection System $1,454,427 27 $1,795.6 $3,307.0 New 13,000 GPD SBR WWTP $3,045,666 27 $3,760.1 $5,752.9 New 13,000 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,146,769 27 $5,119.5 $7,832.8 New 13,000 GPD Modular System WWTP (2 Units)$1,818,644 27 $2,245.2 $3,435.2 SERVICE AREA SERVICE COST COST/EDU (30-yr period) This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. EDUsEST COST SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs SERVICE COST COST/EDU (30-yr period) Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 13,000 GPD SBR WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:2/2/23 Date:6/27/23 Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0 6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000 7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400 8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000 9 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 10 New SBR Process Tankage & Equipment Complete 1 LS $735,770 $735,770 11 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 12 Mechnical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 13 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $84,000 $84,000 14 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 15 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $42,000 $42,000 16 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $7,000 $14,000 17 20' x 20' Process Building (Screen, Office, Blowers, Filters etc.) Partial Class I/Div I 400 SF $350 $140,000 18 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 19 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500 20 Alum Grating for Tanks 75 SF $100 $7,500 21 Alum Stairs for Tanks 50 SF $50 $2,500 22 Alum Railing for Tanks 100 LF $60 $6,000 23 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 24 Process Yard Piping, Valves, etc. - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 25 3" Buried Galv. Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000 26 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 27 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 28 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 29 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500 30 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 31 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 32 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 33 Electrical/Instrumentation (15% of equipment)1 LS $120,083 $120,083 SUBTOTAL $1,753,253 34 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $52,598 $52,598 35 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $140,260 $140,260 36 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $525,976 $525,976 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $2,472,086 37 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $61,802 $61,802 38 Land Acquistion (0.5 acre)1 LS $5,000 $5,000 39 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $61,802 $61,802 40 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $444,975 $444,975 TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,045,666 This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 13,000 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:2/2/23 Date:3/2/23 Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0 6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000 7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400 8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000 9 New Intermediate Pump Station (pumps in EQ tank)0 LS $60,000 $0 10 EQ Basin Equipment/Tank (included Below)0 LS $0 $0 11 New Pre-Anoxic Tank with Equipment (included below)0 LS $0 $0 12 New RBC 5' x 5' Splitter Box w/ weirs 1 LS $42,000 $42,000 13 New Hybrid RBC Process Tanks: (included below)0 CY $1,200 $0 14 New Hybrid RBC Process Equipment Complete Precast Tanks/Equip: New Secondary Clarifier & Preanoxic & EQ Basin & Sludge Holding & Chem. Dose MH Tanks/Equip & Disc Filter 1 LS $756,000 $756,000 15 New Hybrid RBC Greenhouse Building (Not needed)0 LS $0 $0 16 Miscellaneous Hybrid RBC Site Piping, Valves, etc 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 17 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000 18 Tertiary Disc Filters (included above)0 LS $0 $0 19 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 20 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $42,000 $42,000 21 Post Aeration Blowers (sludge blower included above)2 EA $7,000 $14,000 22 50' x 50' Process Building (Screen, Office, Blowers, Filters etc.) Partial Class I/Div I 2,500 SF $350 $875,000 23 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 24 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500 25 Alum Grating for Tanks 50 SF $100 $5,000 26 Alum Stairs for Tanks 25 SF $50 $1,250 27 Alum Railing for Tanks 50 LF $60 $3,000 28 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 29 Process Yard Piping - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 30 Aeration Yard Piping - 2" Galv.1 LS $7,000 $7,000 31 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 32 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 33 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 34 Fencing and Gate 500 LF $65 $32,500 35 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 36 Miscellaneous MHs, Site Piping, Valves, etc 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 37 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 38 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 39 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $103,500 $103,500 SUBTOTAL $2,388,150 40 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $71,645 $71,645 41 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $191,052 $191,052 42 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $716,445 $716,445 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $3,367,292 43 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $84,182 $84,182 44 Land Acquistion (0.5 acre)1 LS $5,000 $5,000 45 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $84,182 $84,182 46 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $606,112 $606,112 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,146,769 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New 13,000 GPD Modular System WWTP (2 Units)Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/5/23 Date: Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500 4 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 5 New BUSSE Process Tankage & Equipment Complete (2 Units)1 LS $480,000 $480,000 6 Process Equipment Connections 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 7 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000 8 UV System Complete (2 units)1 LS $42,000 $42,000 9 Post Aeration Blowers 1 EA $7,000 $7,000 10 Process Yard Piping, Valves, etc. - 6" SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000 11 3" Buried Galv. Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000 12 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500 13 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500 14 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000 15 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500 16 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000 17 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 18 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 19 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $86,250 $86,250 SUBTOTAL $1,045,750 20 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $31,373 $31,373 21 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $83,660 $83,660 22 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $313,725 $313,725 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,474,508 23 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $36,863 $36,863 24 Land Acquistion (0.5 acre)1 LS $5,000 $5,000 25 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $36,863 $36,863 26 Engineering Design & CA/CO (18%)1 LS $265,411 $265,411 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,818,644 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:SR 34/Spencer Rd Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,400 LF $105 $147,000 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)5 EA $7,200 $32,400 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 80 LF $125 $10,000 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)6 EA $7,500 $45,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 6 EA $500 $3,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)2,400 SF $3 $7,200 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 6 EA $1,400 $8,400 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)395 SY $105 $41,440 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)16 SY $125 $2,000 12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $25,000 $25,000 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $526,440 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $15,793 $15,793 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $42,115 $42,115 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $157,932 $157,932 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $742,280 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $18,557 $18,557 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $18,557 $18,557 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $96,496 $96,496 TOTAL PROJECT COST $875,891 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Maple Ave/Station Rd Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,500 LF $105 $157,500 3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $34,200 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 60 LF $125 $7,500 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)10 EA $7,500 $75,000 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $3 $12,000 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)416 SY $105 $43,680 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)27 SY $125 $3,333 12 Stream Crossing 2 EA $25,000 $50,000 13 DOT/County Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $607,213 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $18,216 $18,216 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $48,577 $48,577 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $182,164 $182,164 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $856,171 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $21,404 $21,404 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $21,404 $21,404 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $111,302 $111,302 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,010,282 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. 0 Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Valley View Rd Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,100 LF $105 $115,500 3 Manhole 4 EA $7,200 $27,000 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 80 LF $125 $10,000 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)11 EA $7,500 $82,500 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 11 EA $500 $5,500 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,400 SF $3 $13,200 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 11 EA $1,400 $15,400 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)315 SY $105 $33,040 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)29 SY $125 $3,667 12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $25,000 $25,000 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $530,807 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $15,924 $15,924 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $42,465 $42,465 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $159,242 $159,242 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $748,437 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $18,711 $18,711 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $18,711 $18,711 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $97,297 $97,297 TOTAL PROJECT COST $883,156 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Short Rd/Brown Rd North Gravity Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/21/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 3,050 LF $105 $320,250 3 Manhole 9 EA $7,200 $62,100 4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000 5 6-inch Force Main 1,380 LF $125 $172,500 6 Service Connection (100 ft/ea)0 EA $7,500 $0 7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $500 $0 8 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)0 SF $3 $0 9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 0 EA $1,400 $0 10 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)1,181 SY $105 $124,040 11 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SY $125 $0 12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0 13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0 14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 15 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $45,000 $45,000 SUBTOTAL $878,890 16 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $26,367 $26,367 17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $70,311 $70,311 18 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $263,667 $263,667 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,239,235 19 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $30,981 $30,981 20 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $30,981 $30,981 21 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $161,101 $161,101 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,462,297 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:SR 34/Spencer Rd Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,400 LF $80 $112,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)6 EA $8,680 $52,080 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)300 LF $60 $18,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)2,400 SF $2 $4,800 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)3,360 SF $15 $50,400 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $261,030 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $7,831 $7,831 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $20,882 $20,882 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $78,309 $78,309 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $368,052 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $9,201 $9,201 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $9,201 $9,201 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $47,847 $47,847 TOTAL PROJECT COST $434,302 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Maple Ave/Station Rd Grinder & Force Main Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 1,050 LF $100 $105,000 6 Low Pressure Force Main 450 LF $80 $36,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)10 EA $8,680 $86,800 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)500 LF $60 $30,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,000 SF $2 $8,000 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)1,080 SF $15 $16,200 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 2 EA $18,750 $37,500 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $324,500 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $9,735 $9,735 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $25,960 $25,960 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $97,350 $97,350 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $457,545 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $11,439 $11,439 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $11,439 $11,439 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $59,481 $59,481 TOTAL PROJECT COST $539,903 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Valley View Rd Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,100 LF $80 $88,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)11 EA $8,680 $95,480 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)550 LF $60 $33,000 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)4,400 SF $2 $8,800 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)2,640 SF $15 $39,600 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $288,630 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $8,659 $8,659 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $23,090 $23,090 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $86,589 $86,589 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $406,968 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $10,174 $10,174 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $10,174 $10,174 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $52,906 $52,906 TOTAL PROJECT COST $480,223 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:Short Rd/Brown Rd North Grinder Job no:3378.001 Made by:MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date:7/25/22 Checked:Date:6/27/23 ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2 8-inch Gravity Sewer - SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0 3 Manhole (400 ft spacing)0 EA $3,750 $0 4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0 5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0 6 Low Pressure Force Main 3,050 LF $80 $244,000 7 6-inch Service Laterals (50 ft/ea)0 EA $2,800 $0 8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0 9 Grinder Pump Stations (230v, control panel, curbstop)0 EA $8,680 $0 10 Grinder Pump Force Main (50 ft/User)0 LF $60 $0 11 Lawn Repair (per lateral @ 8 ft w)0 SF $2 $0 12 Asphalt Road Repair (assume 40% in road, 6ft width)7,320 SF $15 $109,800 13 Asphalt Driveway Repair (assume 40% drives @ 6ft w, 10ft l)0 SF $12 $0 14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0 15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0 16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (30% of equipment)1 LS $0 $0 SUBTOTAL $358,800 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $10,764 $10,764 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $28,704 $28,704 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $107,640 $107,640 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $505,908 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $12,648 $12,648 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $12,648 $12,648 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $65,768 $65,768 TOTAL PROJECT COST $596,971 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of Central Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New Leachfield System-68,400 gpd Job no:3378.001 Made by:OLIVER SUGARMAN, EIT Date: Date: Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Land Purchase & Easements 7 /Acre $50,000 $350,000 3 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 4 New Influent Sewer Line 50 LF $75 $3,750 5 Influent Pump Station 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 6 4" Perforate Leachfield Pipe 24,700 LF $53 $1,309,100 7 Install New Flow Meter 1 LS $2,800 $2,800 8 3" PVC Buried Force Main Piping to New Leach Field 7,075 LF $53 $374,986 9 Distribution Box 40 EA $500 $20,000 10 New 40,000 GAL Septic Tank w/ Effl Filter 2 LS $160,000 $320,000 11 Ancillary Items 1 LS $2,000 $2,000 12 Site Improvements 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 13 Fencing and Gate 2,244 LF $65 $145,860 14 Stone Drive 167 SY $45 $7,500 15 Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 16 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (15% of equipment)1 LS $15,000 $15,000 SUBTOTAL $2,740,496 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $82,215 $82,215 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $219,240 $219,240 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $822,149 $822,149 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $3,864,099 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $96,602 $96,602 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $96,602 $96,602 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $502,333 $502,333 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,559,637 This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. Project:Town of Central Danby Hamlets- Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New Leachfield System-11,600 gpd Job no:3378.001 Made by:OLIVER SUGARMAN, EIT Date: Date: Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Land Purchase & Easements 2 /Acre $50,000 $100,000 3 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 4 New Influent Sewer Line 50 LF $75 $3,750 5 Influent Pump Station 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 6 4" Perforate Leachfield Pipe 3,800 LF $53 $201,400 7 Install New Flow Meter 1 LS $2,800 $2,800 8 3" PVC Buried Force Main Piping to New Leach Field 2,693 LF $53 $142,718 9 Distribution Box 7 EA $500 $3,500 10 New 20,000 GAL Septic Tank w/ Effl Filter 1 LS $80,000 $80,000 11 Ancillary Items 1 LS $2,000 $2,000 12 Site Improvements 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 13 Fencing and Gate 884 LF $65 $57,460 14 Stone Drive 167 SY $45 $7,500 15 Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 16 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (15% of equipment)1 LS $15,000 $15,000 SUBTOTAL $805,628 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $24,169 $24,169 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $64,450 $64,450 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $241,689 $241,689 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,135,936 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $28,398 $28,398 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $28,398 $28,398 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $147,672 $147,672 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,340,405 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New Leachfield System-34,500 gpd Job no:3378.001 Made by:OLIVER SUGARMAN, EIT Date: Date: Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Land Purchase & Easements 3 /Acre $50,000 $150,000 3 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 4 New Influent Sewer Line 50 LF $75 $3,750 5 Influent Pump Station 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 6 4" Perforate Leachfield Pipe 7,000 LF $53 $371,000 7 Install New Flow Meter 1 LS $2,800 $2,800 8 3" PVC Buried Force Main Piping to New Leach Field 3,960 LF $53 $209,880 9 Distribution Box 14 EA $500 $7,000 10 New 40,000 GAL Septic Tank w/ Effl Filter 1 LS $160,000 $160,000 11 Ancillary Items 1 LS $2,000 $2,000 12 Site Improvements 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 13 Fencing and Gate 1,208 LF $65 $78,520 14 Stone Drive 167 SY $45 $7,500 15 Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 16 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (15% of equipment)1 LS $15,000 $15,000 SUBTOTAL $1,196,950 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $35,909 $35,909 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $95,756 $95,756 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $359,085 $359,085 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,687,700 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $42,192 $42,192 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $42,192 $42,192 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $219,401 $219,401 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,991,485 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. Project:Town of West Danby Hamlet - Sanitary Sewer System & WWTP Study Title:New Leachfield System-13,000 gpd Job no:3378.001 Made by:OLIVER SUGARMAN, EIT Date: Date: Date: ITEM UNIT ITEM NO.PRICE PRICE 1 Site Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Land Purchase & Easements 1 /Acre $50,000 $50,000 3 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500 4 New Influent Sewer Line 50 LF $75 $3,750 5 Influent Pump Station 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 6 4" Perforate Leachfield Pipe 2,700 LF $53 $143,100 7 Install New Flow Meter 1 LS $2,800 $2,800 8 3" PVC Buried Force Main Piping to New Leach Field 4,752 LF $53 $251,856 9 Distribution Box 6 EA $500 $3,000 10 New 20,000 GAL Septic Tank w/ Effl Filter 1 LS $80,000 $80,000 11 Ancillary Items 1 LS $2,000 $2,000 12 Site Improvements 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 13 Fencing and Gate 748 LF $65 $48,620 14 Stone Drive 167 SY $45 $7,500 15 Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 16 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000 17 Electrical/Instrumentation (15% of equipment)1 LS $15,000 $15,000 SUBTOTAL $797,126 18 Mobilization (3%)1 LS $23,914 $23,914 19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year, 2 years 1 LS $63,770 $63,770 20 Construction Contingency (30%)1 LS $239,138 $239,138 CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,123,948 21 Bonds, Permits, Insurance (2.5%)1 LS $28,099 $28,099 22 Administrative (2.5%)1 LS $28,099 $28,099 23 Engineering Design & CA/CO (13%)1 LS $146,113 $146,113 TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,326,258 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. QNTY. UNIT of MEAS. This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer. Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs. water for the next generation Small scale sewage treatment system with membrane bioreactor technology Plant type GT 220, installed in a cellar Fig. 1: Complete solution for single and shared occupancy houses with a cellar Percolation into the garden or discharge into a recipient body Venting Sewage Sewage Percolation into the garden or discharge into a recipient body Venting Septic tank Garage/adjoining building Fig. 2: Complete solution for single and shared occupancy houses without a cellar Waste water treatment and recycling for decentralized areas The modular design makes our system suitable for larger developments such us hotels, camp grounds or office buildings with up to 500 inhabitants. water for the next generation MBR Technology even eliminates bacteria and germs. It restores waste water to a hygienic con- dition fit for use as re-use water, for example, watering the garden or flushing toilets. In this way the consumption of drinking water in a household can be reduced by at least one third. The system ensures that the dischar- ged water is cleaner than the law requires. Thus, water treated by the system may be discharged in sensitive areas and water protection zones. Since MBR technology consist of biological treatment and Membrane filtration in one process no additional treatment processes such as sand filters or other clarifiers are needed. Other advantages of this new compact pro- duct are the small foot print and the fact that it can be installed without expensive earthmoving work. The system which consists of safety tanks can be installed in a few hours and is immediately ready for operation. turns domestic waste water into reusable water The Domestic Sewage Treatment System uses Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology, currently the most advanced method of waste water treatment and is the first system with this type of technology in the US that has been certified by NSF International. Examples/References This system type has been developed for the waste water treatment of bigger installations such as hotels, restaurants, camp sites, office buildings and small compounds up to 100 inhabitants. The system consists of an MBR module which is made out of polyethylene and has to be installed partly below ground. A pumping station with aerated coarse matter separator is part of the system. This pumping unit has to be installed in an existing waste water holding tank. This System for 50 inhabitants is installed at an automobile club and seminar center in Germany. The effluent from the system is used for watering the test driving field. The MBR stage of the system is installed in the basement of the building. A water holding tank next to the building is used as a pre-cleaning chamber. The system for 40 inhabitants treats the waste water of a camping ground with 80 campsites. In the winter time only the owner of the property and his family of four live at the site. This example demonstrates one of the most important advantages of the MBR technology. Even when the capacity of waste water entering the system varies widely because of the seasons the system works without interruption and has the same stable degradation performance throughout the whole year. MBR module for underground installation System for seminar centres System for camping sites Examples/References The modular structure makes the Busse MBR systems fit for installation in a container as a mobile solution for waste water recycling at any place in the world. Turn-key MBR system can be delivered in all sizes from 4 to 100 inhabitants. A water holding tank next to the building is used as a pre-cleaning chamber. The high degradation performance of the Busse membrane technology allows the system to treat waste water even in areas with the highest standards for environmental protection. This example shows a Busse MBR system instal- led at a hotel on an island in a nature reserve. The filtrate of the system is percolated into the lake surrounding the hotel resort. This system for 65 inhabitants is installed at a luxury hotel resort in Greece near the city of Sparta. The effluent is used for gardening and refilling the swimming pool. A pumping station with aerated coarse matter is part of the system and is installed in an existing waste water holding tank outside. The MBR stage of the system is installed in a basement room of the hotel. Container plant System for hotels and resorts System for hotels and resorts Due to its compact and modular structure the Busse MBR system can also be adapted for installation on house boats, theatres, museums and restaurant ships, river boats as well as larger yachts. The effluent of the system can be re-used for flushing the toilets, cleaning the deck or can be discharged directly into the surrounding waters. Historic buildings often present a challenge when it comes to integrating waste water treat- ment systems into the existing structure. Due to its small footprint and modular structure the Busse MBR system can be easily adapted to fit into the existing structures and treats the waste water at site with the possibility of imme- diate re-use within the building. A Busse MBR system for 25 inhabitants equi- valents recycles the waste water of the visitors of the Education and Demonstration Center for Solar Energy in Germany. The effluent from the system Examples/References is re-used for flushing the toilets and watering the exotic plants in the tropical hall of the center. System for ships and floating homes System for historic buildings System for demonstration centres How it works The Small Size Sewage Treatment System consists of two treatment steps, namely pre-treatment and aeration . In the pretreat- ment step, which also serves as waste water storage, biologically degradable coarse material such as, e.g., faeces, toilet paper, are dissolved and the non-degradable materials are separated from the waste water by an aerated sieve . A pump pumps the pretreated water, from which the coarse material has been separated, to the aeration section. In this step the organic matter in the waste water is degraded biologically by microorganisms and oxygen . In addition to this, the treated waste water passes through microfiltration membranes (ultra fine filter with 0.4 µm pore size). These membrane filters eliminate suspended material, even bacteria and germs, ensuring that only completely clear, odorless, hygienically harmless water (filtrate) leaves the system. The system was tested by NSF International according to standards 40 and 245 and is the first system using membrane bioreac- tor technology that has been certified by the NSF. The detailed test results are shown on the opposite page. The system has also been tested by the University of Hannover and the Technical University in Berlin and the water from the system in regular use is significantly better than the limits set by DIBt Berlin* (Z-55.3-60) and the applicable law. In 2008 the system has successfully surpassed the certification by Institute PIA in Aachen according to the EU-Norm for decentralized waste water treatment. The fulfills all degradation classes for water treatment set by European law, such as carbon removal, nitrificati- on, de-nitrification, phosphorous removal and water hygienisation. Air Venting Waste water from bathroom, kitchen and toilet Preliminary Sedimentation Activation Permeate Permeate collector Membrane Membrane carrier Drainagevlies Collection ducts Suction nozzle Aerator Riser duct Membrane Permeate Fig. 3: Diagram of the microfiltration technology Fig. 4: Functional diagram of the membrane module Air Fig. 5: Sectional view of a membrane COD –<75 mg/l B0D5 –<15 mg/l NH4-N –<10 mg/l *Design qualification approval of DIBT Z-55.3-60 24-h-trial run The performance evaluation for the NSF certification was conducted at the Massachusetts Alternative Septic System Test Center (MASSTC) located at Otis Air National Guard Base in Bourne, Massachusetts. Degradation Performance The has passed the cer- tification process of NSF International Standard 40 and 245 for USA and North America in 2008. The test results of the NSF inter- national certification process show that the system elates over 95 % of the COD und over 95 % of BOD5. It has also been proven during the certification process that the system using microfiltration membranes can hold back all bacteria and viruses safely. The filtrate is fit for re-use without further treatment. water for the next generation [m g / l ] [m g / l ] FC [ # / 1 0 0 m l ] FC [ # / 1 0 0 m l ] The production facility of company Busse Innovative Systems in Leipzig Germany has been certified by NSF International. water for the next generation Advantages at a glance Canada: Recommended by Federal Environment Agency Design qualification approval of “Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik DIBT” Umweltbundesamt Z-55.3-60 Tested and certified by NSF International Standard 40 + 245 The turns domestic waste water into reusable water for irrigation or flushing toilets In this way the consumption of drinking water in a household can be reduced by at least one third Water treated by the system may be discharged in sensitive areas and water protection zones Since MBR technology consist of biological treatment and Membrane filtration in one process no additional treatment processes are needed, such as sand filters or other clarifiers Small foot print and the modular design allow an installation inside houses Use of the existing septic tanks would allow for other type of installation The system can be installed in a few hours and is immediately ready for operation No expensive earthmoving working necessary The requires little maintenance because the necessity of constant sludge removal is avoided The is expandable due to its modular design Extremely quiet operation 2 year warranty with service contract included Extended service plan including lifetime membrane replacement guarantee available BUSSE Green Technologies Inc. Ingo Schaefer P.O. Box 1123 Oak Park, Illinois 60304 USA Phone: +1 508 894 2125 Fax: +1 708 445 1304 Email: mail@busse-gt.com www.busse-gt.com Janda Busse Treatment Systems Inc. #301 - 4733 River Road West Ladner, BC, V4K 1R9 Canada Phone: +1 604 940-3841 Fax: +1 604 940-3847 Email: mail@janda-busse.ca BUSSE IS GmbH Zaucheweg 6 · 04316 Leipzig Telefon: +49 (0)341-65984-25 Telefax: +49 (0)341-65984-26 Email: info@busse-is.de www.busse-is.de Manufacture and Marketing: USA: Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX J Smart Growth Page 1 Effective October 1, 2020 Smart Growth Assessment Form This form should be completed by an authorized representative of the applicant, preferably the project engineer or other design professional.1 Section 1 – General Applicant and Project Information Applicant: Project No.: Project Name: Is project construction complete? ☐ Yes, date: ☐ No Please provide a brief project summary in plain language including the location of the area the project serves: Section 2 – Screening Questions A. Prior Approvals 1. Has the project been previously approved for Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC) financial assistance? 2. If yes to A(1), what is the project number(s) for the prior approval(s)? ☐ Yes ☐ No Project No.: 3. If yes to A(1), is the scope of the previously-approved project substantially the same as the current project?☐ Yes ☐ No If your responses to A(1) and A(3) are both yes, please proceed to Section 5, Signature. B. New or Expanded Infrastructure 1. Does the project involve the construction or reconstruction of new or expanded infrastructure? Examples of new or expanded infrastructure include, but are not limited to: (i) The addition of new wastewater collection/new water mains or a new wastewater treatment system/water treatment plant where none existed previously; (ii) An increase of the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permitted flow capacity for an existing wastewater treatment system; and OR ☐ Yes ☐ No 1 If project construction is complete and the project was not previously financed through EFC, an authorized municipal representative may complete and sign this assessment. 4 4 4 Town of Danby EPG # 105522 The Town of Danby (Town) is investigating ways to provide a sanitary collection sewer system and one or more municipal wastewater treatment/disposal systems to serve the hamlet neighborhood and hamlet core zones or just the Hamlet Centers of Central and West Danby. Town of Danby Sanitary Sewer and WWTP (iii) An increase of the permitted water withdrawal or the permitted flow capacity for the water treatment system such that a Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) water withdrawal permit will need to be obtained or modified, or result in the Department of Health (DOH) approving an increase in the capacity of the water treatment plant. If your response to B(1) is no, please proceed to Section 5, Signature. 2 of 4 Effective October 1, 2020 Section 3 –Smart Growth Criteria Your project must be consistent will all relevant Smart Growth criteria. For each question below please provide a response and explanation. 1. Does the project use, maintain, or improve existing infrastructure? ☐Yes ☐ No Explain your response: 2. Is the project located in a (1) municipal center, (2) area adjacent to a municipal center, or (3) area designated as a future municipal center, as such terms are defined herein (please select one response)? ☐Yes, my project is located in a municipal center, which is an area of concentrated and mixed land uses that serves as a center for various activities, including but not limited to: central business districts, main streets, downtown areas, brownfield opportunity areas (see www.dos.ny.gov for more information), downtown areas of local waterfront revitalization program areas (see www.dos.ny.gov for more information), areas of transit-oriented development, environmental justice areas (see www.dec.ny.gov/public/899.html for more information), and hardship areas (projects that primarily serve census tracts or block numbering areas with a poverty rate of at least twenty percent according to the latest census data). ☐Yes, my project is located in an area adjacent to a municipal center which has clearly defined borders, is designated for concentrated development in the future in a municipal or regional comprehensive plan, and exhibits strong land use, transportation, infrastructure, and economic connections to an existing municipal center. ☐Yes, my project is located in an area designated as a future municipal center in a municipal or comprehensive plan and is appropriately zoned in a municipal zoning ordinance ☐No, my project is not located in a (1) municipal center, (2) area adjacent to a municipal center, or (3) area designated as a future municipal center. Explain your response and reference any applicable plans: 4 4 Presently, the existing residences and businesses utilize private, onsite septic systems for wastewater treatment. Most of the soils within the study area are rated as very limited for the use of leach fields and therefore, failed, or inadequate septic system have been shown to adversely impact the surrounding water quality and environment. 3. Is the project located in a developed area or an area designated for concentrated infill development in a municipally-approved comprehensive land use plan, local waterfront revitalization plan, and/or brownfield opportunity area plan? ☐Yes ☐No Explain your response and reference any applicable plans: 4. Does the project protect, preserve, and enhance the State’s resources, including surface and groundwater, agricultural land, forests, air quality, recreation and open space, scenic areas, and significant historic and archaeological resources? ☐Yes ☐No Explain your response: 5. Does the project foster mixed land uses and compact development, downtown revitalization, brownfield redevelopment, the enhancement of beauty in public spaces, the diversity and affordability of housing in proximity to places of employment, recreation and commercial development, and the integration of all income and age groups? ☐Yes ☐No Explain your response: 6. Does the project provide mobility through transportation choices including improved public transportation and reduced automobile dependency? ☐Yes ☐No ☐N/A Explain your response: 7. Does the project involve coordination between State and local government, intermunicipal planning, or regional planning? ☐Yes ☐No Explain your response and reference any applicable plans: 3 of 4 Effective October 1, 2020 4 4 4 4 4 The state of the current individual on-site wastewater treatment systems as evidenced by multiple NOVs, coupled with the environmental features of the area, demand a centralized municipal sanitary sewer system to protect the health and safety of the public. Jennings Pond, located just south-west of the Town borders, is classified as stressed due to suspected pathogens. A municipal sewer system would remove the potential for surface and groundwater contamination due to failing septic systems. This project will require approvals on the State and local level for funding and design. Coordination with local and county planning will also be completed. 8. Does the project involve community-based planning and collaboration? ☐Yes ☐No Explain your response and reference any applicable plans: 9. Does the project support predictability in building and land use codes? ☐Yes ☐No ☐N/A Explain your response: 10. Does the project promote sustainability by adopting measures such as green infrastructure techniques, decentralized infrastructure techniques, or energy efficiency measures? ☐Yes ☐No Explain your response and reference any applicable plans: 11. Does the project mitigate future physical climate risk due to sea-level rise, storm surges, and/or flooding, based on available data predicting the likelihood of future extreme weather events, including hazard risk analysis data, if applicable? ☐Yes ☐No Explain your response and reference any applicable plans: 4 of 4 Effective October 1, 2020 Section 4 –Miscellaneous 1. Is the project expressly required by a court or administrative consent order? If yes, and you have not previously provided the applicable order to EFC/DOH, please submit it with this form. Section 5 – Signature ☐Yes ☐ No By signing below, you agree that you are authorized to act on behalf of the applicant and that the information contained in this Smart Growth Assessment is true, correct and complete to the best of your knowledge and belief. Applicant:Phone Number: Name and Title of Signatory: Signature:Date: Town of Danby 607-277-4788 Timothy K. Steed P.E., Director of Site/Civil 3/28/2024 Not Applicable Project will utilize energy efficient designs while looking at smaller systems versus a single regional facility. This project will require close coordination with the community to establish the Town sewer district and understand site conditions. Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study APPENDIX K Engineering Certification Engineering Report Certification During the preparation of this Engineering Report, I have studied and evaluated the cost and effectiveness of the processes, materials, techniques, and technologies for carrying out the proposed project or activity for which assistance is being sought from the New York State Clean Water State Revolving Fund. In my professional opinion, I have recommended for selection, to the maximum extent practicable, a project or activity that maximizes the potential for efficient water use, reuse, recapture, and conservation, and energy conservation, taking into account the cost of constructing the project or activity, the cost of operating and maintaining the project or activity over the life of the project or activity, and the cost of replacing the project and activity. Title of Engineering Report: Sanitary Sewer and WWRP Study, Engineering Planning Grant #105522 Date of Report: July 2023, Revision February 2024 Professional Engineer’s Name: Timothy. K. Steed, PE, Director of Civil Engineering Signature: Date: March 28, 2024