HomeMy WebLinkAbout0224 04 05 Danby Sanitary Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
for
SANITARY SEWER & WWTP STUDY
TOWN OF DANB Y, T OMPKINS COUNTY, NY
NYS EFC EPG #105522
July 2023, Revised April 2024
HUNT 3378-001
HUNT ENGINEERS,ARCHITECTS,LAND SURVEYORS&LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,DP
ROCHESTER OFFICE HORSEHEADS OFFICE TOWANDA OFFICE
4 COMMERCIAL STREET,SUITE 300 100 HUNT CENTER 1 ELIZABETH STREET,SUITE 12
ROCHESTER,NY 14614 HORSEHEADS,NY 14845 TOWANDA,PA 18848
TELE:585.327.7950 TELE:607.358.1000 TELE:570.265.4868
HUNT-EAS.COM
Prelimin a ry Engineering Report
For
Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
TOWNOFDANBY
NYS EFCEPG#105522
HUNT 3378.001
July 2023, Revised April 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................I
11. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY........................................................................................2
A. Background and Purpose...............................................................................................................2
B. Site Information and Location......................................................................................................2
C. Topography&Subsurface Conditions.........................................................................................3
D. Environmental Resources..............................................................................................................4
1. Agricultural Districts................................................................................................................4
2. Waterbodies...............................................................................................................................4
3. Wetlands.....................................................................................................................................5
4. Endangered Species...................................................................................................................5
5. Archeological Sensitivity..........................................................................................................5
6. Critical Environmental Area(CEA).......................................................................................5
7. Floodplain Considerations.......................................................................................................5
8. Environmental Justice Areas....................................................................................................6
E. Ownership and Service Area..........................................................................................................6
1. Outside Users.............................................................................................................................6
2. Industrial Discharges or Hauled Waste..................................................................................6
3. Population Trends and Growth...............................................................................................6
III. EXISTING FACILITIES............................................................................................................................7
A. General Description and History..................................................................................................7
B. Water Usage Data............................................................................................................................7
C. Current or Future Projects at Site.................................................................................................7
D. Permit Conditions and Effluent Discharge Limits.....................................................................8
E. Compliance Issues...........................................................................................................................8
F. Existing Flows and Waste Loads...................................................................................................8
1. Area to Be Served.......................................................................................................................8
2. Design Sanitary Sewer Flow Rates...........................................................................................9
3. Equivalent Dwelling Units.......................................................................................................9
ii
4. Wastewater Quality Profile......................................................................................................9
G. Existing Energy Consumption................................................................................................... 10
H. Site Layout..................................................................................................................................... 10
I. History of Damage due to Storm or Flood Impacts................................................................ 11
J. Description of Unit Process Being Evaluated........................................................................... 11
IV. FINANCIAL STATUS............................................................................................................................ 12
A. Sources of Income........................................................................................................................ 12
B. Current Rate Schedule................................................................................................................. 12
C. Other Capital Improvement Projects........................................................................................ 12
D. Existing Debts and Reserve Accounts....................................................................................... 12
V. NEED FOR THE PROJECT (Definition of the Problem) ................................................................. 12
A. Health,Sanitation and Security.................................................................................................. 12
B. Aging Infrastructure.................................................................................................................... 14
C. Infiltration and Inflow................................................................................................................. 14
D. Suitability for Continued Use..................................................................................................... 14
E. Storm and Flood Resiliency........................................................................................................ 15
F. Compliance with Accepted Standards....................................................................................... 15
VI. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS................................................................................................................ 15
A. No Action...................................................................................................................................... 15
B. Green Infrastructure.................................................................................................................... 16
C. Regional Treatment...................................................................................................................... 16
D. Special District Formation.......................................................................................................... 16
E. Common Items across Collection System Alternatives.......................................................... 17
1. Site Layout/Sewer Mapping.................................................................................................. 17
2. Land Requirements................................................................................................................ 17
3. Impact on Existing Facility................................................................................................... 17
4. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures............................................................ 17
5. Discharge Permit Requirements........................................................................................... 18
6. Storm and Flood Resiliency.................................................................................................. 19
7. Constructability and Schedule.............................................................................................. 19
8. Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements....................................................................... 19
F. Gravity Sewer System with Conventional Pump Stations...................................................... 19
1. Description.............................................................................................................................. 19
2. Operation and Maintenance Considerations..................................................................... 23
Non-Monetary Considerations...................................................................................................... 23
G. Grinder Pump System................................................................................................................. 24
1. Description.............................................................................................................................. 24
2. Operation and Maintenance Considerations.....................................................................27
3. Environmental Concerns...................................................................................................... 27
4. Non-Monetary Considerations............................................................................................ 28
H. Wastewater Treatment Systems................................................................................................. 28
1. Conventional WWTP (Activated Sludge)........................................................................... 28
Non-Monetary Considerations...................................................................................................... 29
iii
2. Subsurface Treatment(Leachfield)...................................................................................... 36
Non-Monetary Considerations...................................................................................................... 38
I. Clustered,Small Community Treatment.................................................................................. 38
1. Cluster Development under a Special District................................................................... 39
Non-Monetary Considerations......................................................................................................41
2. Transportation Corporation Formation.............................................................................42
J. Capital Costs Comparison..........................................................................................................43
K. Operation and Maintenance Costs............................................................................................47
L. Short-Lived Assets........................................................................................................................48
M. Non-Monetary Factors................................................................................................................48
VII. Comparison of Alternatives...................................................................................................................48
A. Capital Costs.................................................................................................................................48
VIII.RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE.................................................................................................... 55
B. Potential Project Schedule........................................................................................................... 56
C. Next Steps...................................................................................................................................... 56
D. Funding Sources........................................................................................................................... 57
1. USDA Rural Development(RD) Water and Waste Disposal Loan&Grant Program 57
2. NYS EFC Clean Water Infrastructure Improvement Act................................................. 57
3. NYS EFC Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan........................................................... 58
IX. Conclusion:............................................................................................................................................... 58
A. Smart Growth Assessment.......................................................................................................... 58
B. Engineering Report Certification............................................................................................... 58
TABLES
Table 1:Town Historic and Estimated Population.........................................................................................6
Table 2: Use Types Within Study Area............................................................................................................8
Table 3 -Town of Danby Estimated Flows......................................................................................................9
Table 4-Anticipated Wastewater Quality.................................................................................................... 10
Table 5 - Estimated Wastewater Loadings (Startup&Build-out)............................................................. 10
Table 6:Violation Records Summary............................................................................................................ 13
Table 7-Anticipated WWTP Effluent Limits.............................................................................................. 18
Table 6- Summary of Project Costs..............................................................................................................44
Table 6- Summary of Project Costs..............................................................................................................45
Table6- Summary of Project Costs..............................................................................................................46
Table6- Summary of Project Costs.............................................................................................................. 47
Table 8 -Total Collection System Project Cost Summary......................................................................... 49
Table 8 -Total Treatment Project Cost Summary...................................................................................... 50
Table 8 -Total Collection System Project Cost Summary......................................................................... 51
Table 8 -Total Treatment Project Cost Summary...................................................................................... 52
Table 8 -Total Collection System Project Cost Summary......................................................................... 53
Table 8 -Total Treatment Project Cost Summary...................................................................................... 53
Table 8 -Total Collection System Project Cost Summary......................................................................... 54
Table 8 -Total Treatment Project Cost Summary...................................................................................... 55
iv
Table 11: Selected Project Summary.............................................................................................................. 56
FIGURES
Figure 1: County Population Trends................................................................................................................7
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Project Location Mapping
Appendix B: Soils Mapping
Appendix C: Environmental Resource Mapping
Appendix D: Community Information
Appendix E: Available Water Usage Data&Flow Calculations
Appendix F: Financial Data(Not Used)
Appendix G: Process Review(Not Used)
Appendix H: Conceptual Layouts
Appendix I: Equipment and Cost Estimates
Appendix J: Smart Growth
Appendix K: Engineering Certification
v
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Town of Danby(Town) is investigating ways to provide a sanitary collection sewer system
and one or more municipal wastewater treatment/disposal systems to serve the hamlet
neighborhood and hamlet core zones or just the Hamlet Centers of Central and West Danby.
The Town hired Hunt Engineers,Architects, Land Surveyors&Landscape Architects,DPC
(HUNT)to develop a Preliminary Engineering Report(PER)to review the feasibility of
providing sanitary service to both developed properties and properties where additional
development could be enabled as a result of system installation. The sewage flows would be
conveyed to a new treatment system within Central Danby and West Danby. The Town of
Danby includes two hamlets named Central Danby(Service Area 1) and West Danby(Service
Area 2) and that within each of these hamlets are further sub-areas called Central Danby
Hamlet Center(Service Area la) and West Danby Hamlet Center(Service Area 2a);these
naming conventions will be used throughout the report.
Presently,the existing residences and businesses utilize private,onsite septic systems for
wastewater treatment. Some property owners can incur high costs resulting from spatial issues
with replacing systems on small lots.In coordination with the Town,HUNT assisted in
developing a community survey to gauge residences opinion of their current sanitary systems
and if they would be for or against implementation of community-based treatment and
collection system(see summary in Appendix D). Many of the soils within the study area are
rated as very limited for the use of leach fields and therefore,failed,or inadequate septic systems
can adversely impact the surrounding water quality and environment.The Town's leaders
desire to maintain and expand commercial development and expand residential growth within
the service area.The lack of a centralized sanitary sewer system is a deterrent to compact
commercial and residential development.
The recommended project is to provide sanitary collection and treatment for the Hamlet
Centers (Service Areas la/2a)within the Town of Dandy(both Central and West)only. This
includes a gravity collection system and a modular,package membrane bioreactor treatment
system enclosed in fully pre-manufactured and four(4)engineered container(s)for Central
Danby(Service Area la);having separate containers sized for flows for the northern and
southern sections of Main Street/Danby Road.While West Danby(Service Area 2a) includes a
grinder collection system and a modular,package membrane bioreactor treatment system
enclosed in fully pre-manufactured would be served by two (2)larger container systems.The
total project cost for all proposed recommended improvements is estimated at$2,843,299 for
Service Area la and$3,273,071 for(Service Area 2a).
1
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
II. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
A. Background and Purpose
This Preliminary Engineering Report is being prepared to investigate and characterize the
quality of the on-site septic systems as much as possible within the study area,identify any
environmental concerns arising because of these on-site system shortcomings,describe the
need for a public sewer system,evaluate various alternative solutions,provide a
recommended solution,and develop economic impacts to the proposed users.The
information provided in this study is also intended to support an application for project
funding.
The purpose of this PER is summarized as follows:
• Identify the boundaries of the service area and establish projected wastewater flows for
existing and future users within the area.
• Research and present environmental conditions within the area and determine their
impacts on the project.
• Review the Town's financial stature to assess reserves for the project.
• Identify various alternatives for wastewater collection and conveyance. Develop cost
estimates for each alternative and establish non-monetary factors for consideration.
• Identify various alternatives for wastewater treatment.Develop cost estimate for each
alternative and establish non-monetary factors for consideration.
• Develop life cycle cost analysis for each alternative reviewed.
• Review funding options for the Town to pursue.
• Provide a recommendation of the selected project.
Surveys of the Town residents have listed the lack of a municipal wastewater system as a
priority and the installation of a public sewer system is a goal of their comprehensive plan.
The Town board has investigated the various methods to pursue this goal and develop a
viable sewer system.
B. Site Information and Location
The Town of Danby includes two hamlets named Central Danby(Service Area 1) and West
Danby(Service Area 2) and that within each of these hamlets are further sub-areas called
Central Danby Hamlet Center(Service Area Ia) and West Danby Hamlet Center(Service
Area 2a);these naming conventions will be used throughout the report. as outlined in
Appendix A.Numerous parcels within Central Danby are highly developed resulting in
more than 50%lot coverages.Additionally,the Town of Danby's population is one of the
lowest population densities in the County meaning that many commercial developers and
2
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
employers are hesitant to procure and develop businesses within the Town,likely due to the
lack of public utilities.
Development patterns and natural resources inherently divide the Town of Danby into two
(2) distinct hamlet neighborhoods: Central Danby and West Danby as shown within
Appendix A.The Central Danby Hamlet is Study Area#1 and the Hamlet located
Southwest of Central Danby is West Danby Study Area#2.While the Town desires to
provide sanitary services to both areas larger areas,each area has hamlet centers,the project
has the potential to be phased in,if funding limitations arise.This report evaluates both
study areas.
• Study Area#1 — Central Danby(includes both service areas)
Area#1 consists of the parcels located adjacent to NYS Route 96B (Danby Road).There
are parcels that are located along Bald Hill Road,Michigan Hollow Road,Daisy Lane,
Hornbrook road,Gunderman Road,White Hawk Lane,Dobson Road,Dobson Road
Extension,Pine Drive,West Miller Road,and East Miller Road.Refer to Appendix A
for parcels that are located within Study Area#1.Within the hamlet centers the parcels
are highly developed with more than 50%lot coverages.
• Study Area#2 —West Danby(includes both service areas)
Area#2 consists of the parcels located adjacent to NYS Route 34(West Danby Road/
Spencer Road),bounded by the railroad tracks on the east.Also,the area includes the
parcels along Maple Avenue,Valley View Road,Station Road,Brown Road,Short
Road,Sylvan Lane,Tupper Avenue,and Beech Hill Road.Refer to Appendix X for
these parcels that are located within Study Area#2.
C. Topography&Subsurface Conditions
Study Area 1 has a ground elevation ranging from 1220 to 1360 feet and Study Area 2 has
ground elevation ranging from 840 to 1040 feet as shown on the contour map provided in
Appendix B.
Various soils encompass both Study Areas as shown in the NRCS soils mapping. The soil
types within Study Area 1 have a 0-15%slope change.However,there are a few select
locations where there is 16-20%slope change.Within Study Area 2,the slope change is
greater,and ranges from 16-93%in scattered locations within the hamlet,while the other
locations are within a 0-16%slope change.These soils have not historically demonstrated
any notable structural issues which should be considered.
3
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Groundwater elevations within the Town of Danby are mapped by use of the NRCS-USDA
Web Soil Survey and can be found within Appendix B.The majority of the Town
experiences a poor soil rating of 0-150 cm below the ground surface,likely due to the
Town's location within a valley.West Danby experiences a poor soil rating of 0-15 cm
below ground surface as well,primarily in the northern half. The poor soli ratings are
limiting to suitability of on-site septic systems.
D. Environmental Resources
1. Agricultural Districts
There are several parcels within the proposed study area that are designated as
Agricultural Districts.These parcels are located North and South of West Danby.Most
parcels surrounding all sides of Central Danby are composed of Agricultural Districts.
Refer to Appendix C for agricultural district mapping.Agricultural District.
2. Waterbodies
According to the NYSDEC Waterbody Inventory,there are several streams adjacent to
the project area.In Study Area 2 the Cayuga Inlet flows through the northern and
central parcels of the West Danby hamlet.The Cayuga Inlet is directly connected to
Cayuga Lake and should be protected perpetually by the Town of Danby and will be
subject to the Phosphorus TMDL currently being established for the lake.Within Study
Area 1,Buttermilk Creek enters the Central Danby hamlet from the north and exits
south into Jennings Pond.
There are areas within the hamlet where the Buttermilk Creek diverges.These locations
are near White Hawk Lane extending southeast,near East Miller Road and West Miller
Road extending eastward,and near the back of Danby Town Hall extending westward.
The creek extends to the North and becomes a tributary for the Cayuga Inlet.
Willseyville Creek and minor tribs (0603-0032),which consist of streams in the
southern half of the Town,are classified as having no use impairment and aquatic life is
fully supported. Streams in the northern half of the Town are unassessed.Jennings
Pond(0705-0064) is listed as Stressed for public bathing and recreation due to
suspected pathogens.PWL fact sheets can be found in Appendix C.The project
boundary does not lie above an unconfined primary aquifer.
4
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
3. Wetlands
Review of the NYSDEC Resource Mapper identified wetlands under NYS jurisdiction
within or immediately adjacent to both Hamlet Centers of the Town of Danby. Review
of the National Wetland mapping database documented several federally protected
wetlands. See Appendix C for mapping of State and Nationally delineated wetlands.
4. Endangered Species
The Information for Planning and Consultation(IPaQ,U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
identified two threatened or endangered species.Within the extents of both Study
Areas the Northern Long-eared Bat and the Monarch Butterfly can be potentially
affected by development within this location.There are no critical habitat(s) in this
location.Sources identified several migratory birds as birds of concern. The US Fish
and Wildlife Service's(USFWS)listing of Endangered Species of Fish&Wildlife listing
of endangered species and birds are provided in Appendix C.
5. Archeological Sensitivity
The project site is not located within an archaeologically sensitive area established by
the Office of Parks,Recreation&Historic Preservation(OPRHP) and the National
Register of Historic Places. Please refer to Appendix C for an Archaeologically
Sensitive Areas Map.A no impact letter from OPRHP is not required prior to any
future improvements.
6. Critical Environmental Area (CEA)
The project site has Unique Natural Area(s) (UNA)in both Hamlet Centers,as
developed by Tompkins County;however,there are no CEAs in the study area.Within
Central Danby,there is a UNA located in a parcel on the East side of the hamlet.Refer
to Appendix C for mapping of the CEA's and UNA's.Area 2,West Danby,has a UNA
located in the Southern part of the hamlet that contains many parcels.There are no
CEAs in the Town of Danby.
7. Floodplain Considerations
According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) flood insurance
rate maps (FIRM)for the Project area,the majority of the project does not fall within
the 100-year flood hazard area. Mapping indicates that the Town of Danby limits are
not withing any identified floodplain.However,the Town of West Danby does show a
slim area in the 100-year flood zone around the creek.Please refer to Appendix C for
exhibits showing the FEMA Floodplain limits in the region.
5
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
8. Environmental Justice Areas
The NYS DEC has not identified any Potential Environmental Justice Area(PEJA)
within either Study Area.As established in DEC Commissioner Policy 29 on
Environmental Justice and Permitting,PEJA areas are identified as areas with higher-
than-average populations of minority groups or higher-than-average household
incomes which are below the federal poverty level.please refer to Appendix C for
Environmental Justice area mapping.
E. Ownership and Service Area
1. Outside Users
There are no other outside users proposed within the Town of Danby that would
connect.
2. Industrial Discharges or Hauled Waste
There are no proposed industrial users or hauled wastes accepted within the Town of
Danby that would connect.
3. Population Trends and Growth
Per US Census data,population growth in the Town of Danby has been steadily
increasing since the 1990s,as seen in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Town Historic and Estimated Population
Census
Population % Change
Year
1980 2,449 14.4%
1990 2,858 16.7%
2000 3,007 5.2%
2010 3,329 10.7%
2020 3,457 3.80%
2030(est.) 3,562 2.95%
2040(est.) 3,670 2.94%
The Cornell Program on Applied Demographics anticipates that the population of
Tompkins County will increase at a rate of approximately 0.3%per year.This value
was used to estimate the Town population increase seen in Table 1 above.This is a
conservative estimate,as the population increase in the Town of Danby has
historically been larger than in the county overall.
6
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Tompkins County
T ctai
i 12.5 k
110k
107.5k
105k
102.5k
2016 2019 2020 2025 .. 2DW 20V 2034 2036 2639 2040
Figure 1: County Population Trends
III. EXISTING FACILITIES
A. General Description and History
The existing community is currently being served by individual,privately owned,on-site
wastewater treatment systems(OWTS). There have been some Notice of Violations
(NOVs) associated with some of these systems as addressed in Section V of the report and
demonstrated in Appendix D.Although style,size,and layout of the individual OWTS may
vary between users,the general components remain the same,and are as follows:
• Sanitary lateral pipe conveying wastewater from user source to septic tank
• Septic tank for preliminary treatment of solids and anaerobic treatment
• Absorption system that distributes wastewater to granular media below for biological
treatment and ultimate disposal through infiltration
B. Water Usage Data
The Town of Central Danby is on a private well system and there are no water usage
records. The Town of West Danby is on a public water system and their residential water
consumption was not obtained,so we used 110 gpd per bedroom for a two bedroom,which
came to 220 gpd/EDU for a 2 bedroom facility.
C. Current or Future Projects at Site
There are no current or future projects that will affect this project.
7
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
D. Permit Conditions and Effluent Discharge Limits
There is no SPDES permit associated with the Town as they have no sanitary discharges
other than onsite septic systems.
E. Compliance Issues
There are no known compliance issues associated with the Town as they have no sanitary
discharges other than onsite septic systems.
F. Existing Flows and Waste Loads
1. Area to Be Served
The four(4) primary Project Area alternatives to be reviewed include all properties
within the Town of Danby(Service Area 1) and just the Hamlet Centers (Service Area
la),as well as West Dandy(Service Area 2) and just the Hamlet Centers (Service Area
2a).The Town is comprised mostly of single family residential and seasonal residential
use types,with several vacant lots,and agricultural uses.Table 2 below summarizes the
use types.For planning purposes,a proposed Sewer District Boundary has been
created. Please refer to Appendix H for mapping that identifies the proposed boundary
and potential users.Please note that the collection system accounts for connections of
existing users at startup and NOT vacant parcels and the like;and quantifies equivalent
dwelling units (EDU).
Table 2: Use Types Within Study Area
Use Type Subtotal
Residential Commercial Agricultural Recreational Storage Vacant
Central Danby
145 9 - - 1 155
Service Area 1
Central Danby
Hamlet Centers Only 8 5 - - 1 14
Service Area la
West Danby
77 3 - - - 80
Service Area 2
West Danby Hamlet
Centers Only 22 1 - - - 23
Service Area 2a
Subtotal 252 18 2 272
8
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
2. Design Sanitary Sewer Flow Rates
Based on New York State Design Standards for Intermediate Sized Wastewater
Treatment Systems("NYS Design Manual") Section B.6.b,design flows were estimated
for each property type.A single family residence was assessed at 330 gallons per day
(gpd).This flow rate was applied to all single-family residential users within the Project
Area. For parcels classified as Agricultural use,330 gallons per day was assigned where
living structures were present.For fields and vacant lots,no water usage data was
applied.All other usage rates were calculated utilizing Typical Per-Unit Hydraulic
Loading Rates as set forth within the NYS Design Manual. Please refer to Appendix E
for a table of the users and their average daily flow rate within the Project Area.
To account for future expansion and growth within the community,the Total Average
Daily Flow(ADF) rate was increased by a factor dependent on the size of the system'as
shown below.
Table 3 - Town of Danby Estimated Flows
Service Flows Expansion I Total Flours*** PHF*
ServiceAreaDesrription IGPD) {GPDJ I I&I Est**{GPDJ {GPDJ {GPDJ
Option 41-Central Danby 41,009 14,999 12,7,96 66,396 166,456
Option#2-Central DanbyHarnismOnFy 6,652 3,991 999 11,996 36,074
0ption#3-WestDanby 21,3GS 4,700 8,537 34,6W 86,345
0pti13n#4-WestDanbyHamlets0n1,( 5,9W 3,OGG 4;206 12,974 30,396
*Dry weather+expansion x PF
**Based on LF piping @ 375go film
+++Dry weath er+expansion+I&I
3. Equivalent Dwelling Units
Equivalent dwelling units(EDUs)were assigned to users based upon the 220 gallons
per day(110 gpd/bedroom)per single-family residence(220 gpd= 1 EDU),with a
minimum of one(1)EDU assigned to each user.Agricultural uses were assigned one
(1)EDU per dwelling structure,and zero (0)EDUs for crop fields. Refer to Appendix E
for tabulation of EDUs.The number of EDUs for the Danby&West Danby Project
Service Areas (SA)were calculated to be SA-1 186,SA-la 30,SA-2 97 and SA-2a 27
respectively.
4. Wastewater Quality Profile
There have been no known wastewater quality tests conducted on raw wastewater
generated by the users of either community. However,the United States
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) has established anticipated raw wastewater
quality data for residential users. It is reasonable to assume that the profile of the
wastewater to be treated by the new wastewater treatment plant will reflect that
9
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
anticipated for raw residential wastewater,therefore;an anticipated wastewater quality
profile for the community is as follows (EPA 2003):
Table 4 - Anticipated Wastewater Quality
Concentration
Avg. Conc.
Parameter (mg/L) Used (mg/L)
BOD5 155 -286 240
TSS 155 - 330 240
FOG 70- 105 -
TP 6- 12 8
NH3-N 25 -45 35
TN 26-75 -
Table 5 - Estimated Wastewater Loadings (Startup &Build-out)
240 mg/L 24C rng/L S mg/L 35 mg/L
Tctal FIc%v BOD5Load T55 Lcad TP Load NH3-N Load
Service Area Description (GPDl (Ibs/d) (bWd) fbecL) (Ibs/d)
option#1-Central Danby SeN ite Area 1 41,v 5 82 82 9 12
Option#2-Central Danby HamletsOnly ServioeArea 1 a 5,652 13 13 0 2
Option#3-West Danby Servi eArea 2 2%a5s 43 43 1 6
Option#4-West Danby H am lets Only Servire Area 2a 5,900 12 12 2
l3UfLD-OUT FLOM CONDfTYON
Option#1-Certra l Danby Sera re Area 1 68 a581 137 1571 51 20
Option#2-CerrtraI Danby Hamlets Only Servioe Area Ia 1L598 23 231 11 3
Option#3-West Danby Servire Area 2 34,602 69 69 2 10
Option##4-West Danby Ham IetsOnly ServireArea 2a 1�974 26 261 11 4
G. Existing Energy Consumption
All onsite systems are managed by homeowners/businesses,and it is difficult to assess
current energy consumption. Typical electrical costs would come from equipment such as
pumps.
H. Site Layout
While there is no specific"site layout"under investigation for the Existing Facilities study
area,the area is comprised of residential and business dwellings that are on individual
septic systems as previously stated. See Appendix A for property mapping of the study
areas under investigation. Flow from these systems will be collected and conveyed to the
new wastewater treatment system.
10
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
I. History of Damage due to Storm or Flood Impacts
There are no known damaging storm or flooding events historically catalogued within the
Town.
J. Description of Unit Process Being Evaluated
1. Existing capacity,age, conveyance, etc
While there is no public system in the areas being studied,the area under study is on
individual septic systems. It is presumed that all are the original components with little
to no improvements and only minor maintenance was implemented during its lifetime.
2. Failure history and component limitations
The study areas are all on individual onsite septic systems. It is likely that some onsite
septic systems do not meet the NYS Dept. of Health distance requirements of 100 feet
between water wells and sewage components and it is surmised (based on age and
similar projects) that many systems are probably experiencing problems and will only
become worse over time. As previously stated,there have been NOVs recorded by the
NYS Department of Health. So,this project seeks to improve the environment and
eliminate the potential adverse health effects associated with failing septic systems.
3. Ability to meet technical standards for treatment
All improvements will meet the most current design guidelines and technical standards;
including but not limited to 10 States Standards and TR-16.
4. Planned, current,or future improvements outside the project scope
There are no other planned projects outside this PER recommendations.
5. Hydraulic capacity analysis of existing sewers where expansion or increased flow is
proposed
There are no existing sewers within the Town of Danby to evaluate.
11
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
IV. FINANCIAL STATUS
A. Sources of Income
The proposed sewer system will require the establishment of a sewer rate structure to create
a sewer fund. Through this sewer fund,the Town will ensure there is a reserve account set
up with enough funds yearly to maintain the system and absorb any debt associated with
this project.
B. Current Rate Schedule
There is no current sewer rate schedule for the Town of Danby.However,if a sanitary
system were to be constructed,an appropriate schedule would be determined by the Town.
C. Other Capital Improvement Projects
There are currently no other planned projects forthcoming at the facility.
D. Existing Debts and Reserve Accounts
There are currently no debts linked to the proposed sewer service.The construction of the
new system may require the Town to take on CPLA sewer debt,EFC loans,or other forms
of financing which will need to be accounted for in the rate structure.
The Town of Danby has recently adopted their 2024 Budget.Although the Town does not
currently have any reserve account set up for a sewer service,they have shown their ability
to maintain a reserve account for their water service for West Danby.This reserve account
has proven to be sufficient to keep the system maintained without taking on more debt.
Currently,the Town has debt associated with the Highway Department,as well as a reserve
account set up for unexpected equipment repairs.The Town's yearly adopted budget has
proven their ability to absorb debt while keeping enough reserves for maintenance and
unexpected costs associated with that debt.
V. NEED FOR THE PROJECT (Definition of the Problem)
A. Health, Sanitation and Security
The proposed municipal sanitary sewer system shall create a reliable and safe measure for the
conveyance and treatment of wastewater to serve the residents and businesses of the
community. The state of the current individual on-site wastewater treatment systems (as
12
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
evidenced by the NOVs),coupled with the environmental features of the area,demand a
centralized municipal sanitary sewer system to protect the health and safety of the public.
As noted previously in this report,the communities are currently served by individual
OWTS's. The average life expectancy of a well-maintained septic system can range from
approximately 25-30 years. The failure of a standard septic system can cost the owner on
average$20,000 dollars,depending on the size and type of system required. In the case of
areas with seasonal high groundwater or spatial limitations,replacement of a septic system
may require a mound type system,which can cost up to$30,000 to install. The high up-front
costs associated with a full septic system replacement can create a significant financial burden
for the property owners. If a failed septic system goes unaddressed,there becomes an
increased risk in soil and groundwater contamination. Several properties have already
experienced failures,as can be seen in Table 6 below.For those areas currently not served by
municipal water systems,or for those users who have chosen to continue utilizing private
groundwater wells in lieu of connecting to the existing municipal water system,there is a
serious potential for health risks related to contamination of their potable water source due to
failed septic systems. Also,failed septic systems contribute to increased nutrient loads to the
headwaters of Cayuga Lake contradicting the current TMDL initiatives.
Table 6:Violation Records Summary
Date Address Agency Violation
Thompkins County
May 2003 1631 Danby Road DOH Surfacing Sewage
Thompkins County
July 2009 22 Station Road DOH Surfacing Sewage
Thompkins County
January 2014 22 Station Road DOH Surfacing Sewage
Thompkins County
June 2015 424 Troy Road DOH Surfacing Sewage
Thompkins County
February 2016 217 Muzzy Road DOH Surfacing Sewage
14 Makarainen Thompkins County
October 2017 Road DOH Surfacing Sewage
14 Makarainen Thompkins County
March 2018 Road DOH Saturated DMATS
Thompkins County
March 2018 111 Patchen Court DOH Construction without OWTS permit
Waste discharge to ground surface
Thompkins County and below surface without
May 2020 Tallow Hill Road DOH inspection
13
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
In the densely populated areas of the communities,where parcels are relatively small(<1
acre),property owners can encounter several non-monetary issues associated with the
installation of a new septic system. Regulatory agencies require separation distances between
OWTS and various physical and theoretical features (groundwater well,housing structure
property lines,etc.),and many systems do not comply with current regulations.Due to the
high groundwater elevation in certain locations,many system replacements require
upgrading from traditional absorption fields to mound-type systems in order to meet
required separation distances between the bottom of the absorption field and the high
groundwater elevation. Mound systems require larger footprints in order to meet design
requirements,which can be difficult to meet for small residential parcels.Mound systems are
pressurized treatment systems which require the installation of a pump and pump station
with controls,which adds to the capital cost and creates additional electrical cost for the user.
Construction of raised systems also requires importing select engineered fill,which can
further add to the capital costs necessary for full system replacement.
Town residents were provided a survey in order to get a clearer idea of their water supply and
the condition of on-site septic systems if they had knowledge.Hunt received a total of 30
responses back.Not all responders filled out every section.One person only returned 1 page,
but we did not contact them.Each resident/response was assigned a number(1-30) as shown
in the detailed table and summary in Appendix D.The physical responses have the
corresponding number written on them in case additional information is needed.
In general,there is support for servicing the Hamlet centers (Areas la and 2a).
B. Aging Infrastructure
Onsite septic systems are original,and it is suspected,and proven in some cases,that some or
many could be failing.See Table 6 above for a list of DOH violations related to on-site septic
systems. This proposed project will eliminate this potential adverse environmental condition
and create a better environment for the community.
C. Infiltration and Inflow
Infiltration nor inflow are applicable to this report. We do not include I&I flows to our flow
calculations as we use a very conservative value of 330 GPD per home.
D. Suitability for Continued Use
This is not applicable as the Town does not currently utilize an existing sanitary system to
diagnose.
14
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
E. Storm and Flood Resiliency
The Town of Danby has minimal flooding concerns;however,the Town of West Danby does
show a slim area in the 100-year flood zone around the creek.,but the presence of the lake
and other surface water bodies result in elevated groundwater. This higher groundwater has
an adverse impact on septic systems. As demonstrated by the mapping provided in Appendix
C, 100 year floodwaters do not inundate the site.
Regardless,storm or flood resiliency during design will be conducted. All new structures will
be designed to follow current guidelines on flood protection.The proposed West Danby
WWTP location would be near this and the outfall would discharge to this water body.The
WWTP is outside this boundary,but the hydraulics would be designed to allow the plant to
operate during the 100-year event.
F. Compliance with Accepted Standards
All proposed work will follow the latest editions of TR-16 and Ten States Standards(LOSS) or
other applicable design guidance documents and will meet NYSDEC requirements.
VI. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Review of the topography within the Town of Central Danby reveals that the entire Town area
decreases in grade from the south to the north along Danby Rd/Main Street and towards the
Danby Rd/Main Street trunk from the side roads,which makes it very favorable for a
conventional gravity sewer system.As part of our due diligence,HUNT has chosen to analyze two
(2)viable implementation options that would bring sewer to the Project Area including:
conventional gravity sewer system and a grinder pump system;we feel a simple septic tank
effluent pump(STEP) system would not be viable due to elevated groundwater and threat of I&I,
therefore,was not advanced further. These two(2) options have been evaluated below,along with
a"do nothing alternative."
A. No Action
Taking no action will only constrain growth withing the community and compound an
already failing sewage treatment system resulting in the risk of public health problems and
environmental issues. Public health and safety would still be a concern and would most likely
increase. This is not a feasible alternative.
15
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
B. Green Infrastructure
This would be a new collection system for sanitary flows only. Stormwater flows would not
be a concern and therefore the use of Green Infrastructure is not applicable nor considered
for the project due to the requirement to meet current standards. Any improvements or
green infrastructure opportunities are limited. Such things as high efficiency
motors/equipment,variable speed drives,LED lighting,etc.will be used as much as possible
in the project.
C. Regional Treatment
This alternative would include conveying all the collected sanitary flows and pumping to a
regional WWTP in lieu of the need for a Town wastewater treatment facility. It still
requires a collection system as discussed below;however,would require a very long force
main and a substantial pump station and permanent backup generator. We estimate the
closest regional facility is the City of Ithaca WWTP but likely with the Town of Ithaca
collection system which is over six(6)miles away to the north.This option is not deemed
economically reasonable as a 6-mile force main with pump station/GenSet would be
around$11.6M and would still require a collection system.
D. Special District Formation
New York State guidelines discourage the development of OWTS servicing multiple parcels
unless a municipality owns,maintains,or provides oversight of such a system.A Town
special district could be established if the Town desired to be involved with the ownership
and operation of the system or a Transportation Corporation could be established if a non-
municipally operated cluster system were to service multiple properties. The possibility of
clustered wastewater treatment is possible in the Town of Danby if the municipality is the
owner of the system(s).and a Town special district would be capable of taxation and funding
opportunities whereas a Transportation Corporation would not be.
1. Special District Formation
A special district or districts can be formed to ensure that only the property owners
within the Town that are benefited by the sanitary sewer system are responsible for
bearing its costs.Details can be found within Town law Article 12 A-C describing the
types of districts that can be formed within a Town.A special district being formed would
mean that special taxation would be applied to the residents and businesses within the
district's boundary to finance the sanitary system if benefitted and connected. The Town
could establish a Town special district for the area desired and set forth a rate structure
that allowed those connected to Town owned infrastructure to pay debt service and
Operation&Maintenance. Those outside the Hamlet Centers(Areas IA/2A)who are
16
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
not connected at startup would still reside within the District Boundary and fall under the
special district structure. The Special District would be the entire Town Areas 1 and 2
which would allow the remaining users to connect to the system in the future without any
revision to the formed"District". The Town would not be responsible for the
unconnected existing on-site septic systems that were not constructed under supervision
of the Town.
One example of a system constructed under ownership of the Town would be the Dandy
Hamlet Centers,described as the area near Bald Hill Rd/Main Street and the area near
Gunderman Rd/Main Street(south to Hornbrook Rd),as shown in Figure 1 in Appendix
H.
E. Common Items across Collection System Alternatives
The following items are provided to address all proposed alternatives outlined below.
1. Site Layout/Sewer Mapping
Proposed draft layouts and mapping of the sewer areas currently unserved were
developed and are included in Appendix H.
2. Land Requirements
As the bulk of the sewer collection system infrastructure is anticipated to be located in
roadway rights-of-way or Town property,significant land acquisition requirements is not
anticipated;however,a new WWTS will require purchase of property to accommodate
process structures and equipment. We have identified several areas for treatment
systems.See Conceptual Layouts in Appendix H.
3. Impact on Existing Facility
There would be some impact on all current properties while septic systems are
eliminated,and sewer connections are installed. The new treatment system and
collection system would be installed prior to any connections to reduce these impacts.
4. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
The proposed design will be developed to avoid adverse environmental impacts,a
complete SEQR evaluation will be conducted during the planning process.
17
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
The Town acting as Lead Agency will complete a full environmental review following
NYS State Environmental Quality Review(SEQR) guidelines.As identified in Section III
Environmental Resources Present,the design and review process will consider
agricultural lands,crossing of streams,the presence of aquifers,flood zones,natural
communities near the location,and archaeological sensitive areas.
There will be no impacts to Environmental Justice areas as none have been identified. If
anything,adding sewer expansion and WWTP capacity will improve the surrounding
area for the entire project area.
5. Discharge Permit Requirements
All the new flows will be conveyed to the new WWTS which will have an SPDES permit
and effluent limits if discharging to surface waters;a Leachfield does not require effluent
limits,but an SPDES permit is needed. No separate permit requirements are needed
other than for the construction of new processes,collection system,force mains,and
pump stations approval. The design will be developed in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part
750.
HUNT has conducted a thorough review and contacted NYSDEC on potential effluent
limits of a new facility discharging to the proposed receiving streams. Based on this
review,we anticipate the following effluent limits for the project and as such WWTS in
the PER are designed to these limits.
Table 7-Anticipated WWTP Effluent Limits
7:Paramet"erLimit
BODS I 5 mg/L Monthly Average
TSS 10 mg/L Monthly Average
Settleable Solids 0.1 mL/L Daily Maximum
Dissolved Oxygen 5.0-7.0 mg/L Daily Minimum
NH3-N Monthly Average
Summer 0.6-0.8 mg/L
Winter 1.0-1.7 mg/L
TP 1 mg/L Monthly Average
Coliform,Fecal 200/100 mL 30-day geometric mean
400/ 100 mL 7-day geometric mean
Chlorine,Total Residual j 0.03 mg/L j Daily Maximum
18
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
6. Storm and Flood Resiliency
Review of the FEMA mapping shows there are minimal portions of the project area that
are within the 100 year floodplain and therefore does not impact the proposed collection
system or potential WWTS locations.
The Town of Danby has minimal flooding concerns;however,the Town of West Danby
does show a slim area in the 100-year flood zone around the creek.,but the presence of
the lake and other surface water bodies result in elevated groundwater. This higher
groundwater has an adverse impact on septic systems. As demonstrated by the mapping
provided in Appendix C, 100 year floodwaters do not inundate the site.
Construction of the systems will follow best engineering practices as identified in
reference materials including Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities,TR-16,
NY State Stormwater Management Design Manual,New York State Design Standards for
Intermediate Sized Wastewater Treatment Systems. The proposed West Danby WWTP
location would be near the 100-year flood level and the outfall would discharge to this
water body.The WWTP is outside this boundary,but the hydraulics would be designed
to allow the plant to operate during the 100-year event.
7. Constructability and Schedule
As the collection system and treatment system are new infrastructure,it is expected that
there will be coordination issues of various items such as traffic flow,potential utility
crossings/interferences,road/driveway repairs,lawn repairs,connection to existing septic
systems,DOT road crossing(as needed),septic system abandonment requirements,
electrical service of pump stations,plant expansion coordination,etc.
8. Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements
Such things as high efficiency motors/equipment,variable speed drives,LED lighting,etc.
will be used as much as possible in the project. Water requirements are not required as
part of the project.
F. Gravity Sewer System with Conventional Pump Stations
1. Description
This alternative would include the construction of a conventional gravity sewer system to
convey wastewater from the individual users within their respective areas to the New
Treatment System.Existing septic tanks would be pumped and demolished in place or
hauled away for disposal.A new four(4) inch diameter service connection and cleanout
19
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
would be provided to connect the user to the proposed sanitary sewer system.The
existing absorption beds(or other style)OWTS would be abandoned in place or removed
and disposed of as necessary to allow for construction of the new service connection and
sewer main.The gravity sewer mains would be eight(8)inches in diameter,or larger as
required,with four(4) foot diameter manholes located at the end of each line,pipe
intersections,grade changes,changes in pipe size,changes in alignment,or no greater
than 400-feet apart(LOSS.)Stream crossings would require the installation of a pump
station and wet well,with a force main horizontally directional drilled under the river.All
construction would require restoration of surface to a condition equal to,or better than,
the original condition.
A basic preliminary layout of a conventional gravity sewer system has been completed for
the study area. This provides the municipality with a cost basis in determining the most
cost-effective solutions to protect the residents from ongoing health and safety issues.
From the layout,quantity take-offs were developed to create a cost estimate for
construction for each area. See Appendix I for the detailed cost estimates. A summary
cost table is provided in a subsequent section.
Due to its remoteness from each other,the project has been separated into two (2)main
study areas to better analyze the cost implications and offer a better view for the Town to
decide. The two areas are Central Danby and West Danby,which were further broken
into the four(4) service area options previously identified. See conceptual maps in
Appendix H.
Central Danby Service Areas (Service Area 1/Ia)
Section 1 —Danby Rd South
This area consists of sewering the properties along Danby Rd south of Bald Hill Rd with
connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 2,100 feet of 8-inch gravity
sewer with manholes and no pump stations. There are 17 properties connections
identified from the tax mapping.
Area 2—Bald Hill Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction
with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,900 feet of 8-inch
gravity sewer with manholes and one(1)pump station because of a stream crossing.
There are 31 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 3 —Main St/Danby Rd
20
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
This area consists of sewering the main Town section from Bald Hill Rd to E.Miller Rd to
the north. It would include roughly 5,825 feet of mostly 8-inch gravity sewer with
manholes and one(1)pump stations because of a stream crossing. There are an
estimated 42 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 4-Hornbrook Rd
This area consists of sewering Hornbrook Rd with connection to the main trunk line. It
would include roughly 3,500 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump
stations. There are estimated to be only 15 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 5-Gundermark Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Gundermark Rd within the Town jurisdiction
with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 2,750 feet of 8-inch
gravity sewer with manholes and one(1)pump station because of a stream crossing.
There are only 21 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 6-E.Miller Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction
with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,750 feet of 8-inch
gravity sewer with manholes and no pump station. There are only 10 properties
identified from the tax mapping.
Area 7-W.Miller Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction
with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 900 feet of 8-inch
gravity sewer with manholes and one(1)pump station and 900 feet of force main due to
the grade away from Main Street. There are only 8 properties identified from the tax
mapping.
Area 8-Danby Rd North
This area consists of sewering the north stretch of Danby Rd(above E.Miller Rd)within
the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly
1,600 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump station. There are only 11
properties identified from the tax mapping.
21
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Area 9-Michigan Hollow Rd
This area consists of sewering the Michigan Hollow Rd within the Town jurisdiction and
would require construction/connection to Area 1. It would include roughly 2,125 feet of
8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and no pump station. There are only 10 properties
identified from the tax mapping.
West Danby Service Areas(Service Area 2/2a)
Area 1 -SR 34/Spencer Rd
This area consists of sewering the properties along SR 34/Spencer Rd with connection to
the main sewer line to the proposed treatment system line.It would include roughly 2,300
feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes with 1 stream crossing and 1 pump station.
There are only 10 properties connections identified from the tax mapping.
Area 2-SR 34/Spencer Rd North
This area consists of sewering the stretch of SR 34/Spencer Rd North near Short Rd with
connection to the Short Rd/Brown Rd line. It would include roughly 1,500 feet of 8-inch
gravity sewer with manholes and no pump station or stream crossing. There are 10
properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 3 -Maple Ave/Station Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Maple Ave and Station Rd to the proposed
treatment system location and serves as the main trunk line. It would include roughly
3,600 feet of 8-inch/10-inch gravity sewer with manholes and two (2)pump stations
because of stream crossings. There are 25 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 4-Valley View Rd
This area consists of sewering Valley View Rd from north to south with connection to the
Maple Ave line. It would include roughly 1,600 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with
manholes and two(2)pump stations and a stream crossing. There are only 14 properties
identified from the tax mapping.
22
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Area 5-Brown Rd
This area consists of sewering the main stretch of Brown Rd,which will convey flows
from the north as well with connection to the main Maple Ave line. It would include
roughly 1,800 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and one(1)pump station.
There are only 8 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 6-Short Rd/Brown Rd North
This area consists of sewering Short Rd to the west and Brown Rd to the east within the
with connection to the Brown Rd section. It would include roughly 3,050 feet of 8-inch
gravity sewer with manholes and one(1)pump station. There are 11 properties identified
from the tax mapping.
Area 7-SR34 South
This area consists of sewering the small stretch of SR 34 south to pick up the Fire Station
connection. It would include roughly 1,200 feet of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes
and no pump stations. There are only 5 properties identified from the tax mapping.
2. Operation and Maintenance Considerations
The operation and maintenance include routinely scheduled maintenance of the pump
and controls,external pumping of the wet well due to pump failure,and
replacement/repair of components that are anticipated to have a useful life significantly
less than the loan repayment period(pumps,motors,electrical components,etc.)
Electrical costs for pump stations shall be borne by the Town and are included as part of
the project O&M costs.
Maintenance responsibility will likely be determined through the hiring of new staff
specifically tasked with the operation and maintenance of the entire sewer district.
Non-Monetary Considerations
The following advantages and disadvantages of a Conventional gravity collection system
have been identified:
Advantages:
• Residents don't have to maintain individual pumps and equipment.
• Residents will not have additional electrical costs.
• Less susceptible to equipment failure and sewage backup.
• May be able to be installed in backyards.
23
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Disadvantages
• Potential for I&I in future.
• Deeper construction possibly within roadways.
• May require property easements.
• Requires NYSDOT crossing and fees.
• Pump stations and collection system need continued maintenance/cleaning.
G. Grinder Pump System
1. Description
Grinder pump stations are an alternative collection system that utilizes individual grinder
pump stations to macerate solids in the influent raw sewage and then convey the
macerated wastewater via small diameter force main.These systems are beneficial in areas
of high groundwater,where existing bedrock is near the existing grade,or where
unfavorable grades prevent efficient use of conventional gravity sewers. There may also
be more economical in low density areas where open trench sewer installation is more
costly. Force mains will have air release valves and cleanouts at intervals or as required
based on hydraulics and highpoints. The following areas were assessed on a cost basis to
provide a meaningful cost/EDU basis of selection. Each property has a grinder pump
station and roughly 50 feet of small diameter force main. Owners are required to supply
power.
Central Danby Area(Service Area 1/1a)
Area 1 —Danby Rd South
This area consists of sewering the properties along Danby Rd south of Bald Hill Rd with
connection to the main trunk line.It would include roughly 2,100 feet of small diameter
force main. There are 17 properties connections identified from the tax mapping.
Area 2—Bald Hill Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction
with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,900 feet of small
diameter force main and a stream crossing. There are 31 properties identified from the
tax mapping.
Area 3 —Main St/Danby Rd
24
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
This area consists of sewering the main Town section from Bald Hill Rd to E.Miller Rd to
the north. It would include roughly 1,460 feet each of 2/3/4/6-inch force main piping
because of the flow addition along the length of run to the WWTS. There is one stream
crossing. There are 42 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 4-Hornbrook Rd
This area consists of sewering Hornbrook Rd with connection to the main trunk line. It
would include roughly 3,500 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 15
properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 5-Gundermark Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Gundermark Rd within the Town jurisdiction
with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 2,750 feet of small
diameter force main and a stream crossing. There are 21 properties identified from the
tax mapping.
Area 6-E.Miller Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction
with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 1,750 feet of small
diameter force main. There are only 10 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 7-W.Miller Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Bald Hill Rd within the Town jurisdiction
with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly 900 feet of small
diameter force main. There are only 8 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 8-Danby Rd North
This area consists of sewering the north stretch of Danby Rd(above E.Miller Rd)within
the Town jurisdiction with connection to the main trunk line. It would include roughly
1,600 feet of small diameter force main.There are only 11 properties identified from the
tax mapping.
Area 9-Michigan Hollow Rd
This area consists of sewering the Michigan Hollow Rd within the Town jurisdiction and
would require construction/connection to Area 1. It would include roughly 2,125 feet of
small diameter force main. There are only 10 properties identified from the tax mapping.
25
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
West Danby Area(Service Area 2/2a)
Area 1 -SR 34/Spencer Rd
This area consists of sewering the properties along SR 34/Spencer Rd with connection to
the main sewer line to the proposed treatment system line.It would include roughly 2,300
feet of small diameter force main with 1 stream crossing.There are only 10 properties
connections identified from the tax mapping.
Area 2-SR 34/Spencer Rd North
This area consists of sewering the stretch of SR 34/Spencer Rd North near Short Rd with
connection to the Short Rd/Brown Rd line. It would include roughly 1,500 feet of small
diameter force main with no stream crossing. There are 10 properties identified from the
tax mapping.
Area 3 -Maple Ave/Station Rd
This area consists of sewering the stretch of Maple Ave and Station Rd to the proposed
treatment system location and serves as the main trunk line. It would include roughly
2,500 feet of 6-inch force main, 1,100 feet of smaller diameter force main and two(2)
stream crossings. There are 25 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 4-Valley View Rd
This area consists of sewering Valley View Rd from north to south with connection to the
Maple Ave line. It would include roughly 1,600 feet of small diameter force main and a
stream crossing. There are only 14 properties identified from the tax mapping.
Area 5 - Brown Rd
This area consists of sewering the main stretch of Brown Rd,which will convey flows
from the north as well with connection to the main Maple Ave line. It would include
roughly 1,800 feet of small diameter force main. There are only 8 properties identified
from the tax mapping.
Area 6-Short Rd/Brown Rd North
This area consists of sewering Short Rd to the west and Brown Rd to the east within the
with connection to the Brown Rd section. It would include roughly 3,050 feet of small
diameter force main. There are 11 properties identified from the tax mapping.
26
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Area 7-SR34 South
This area consists of sewering the small stretch of SR 34 south to pick up the Fire Station
connection. It would include roughly 1,200 feet of small diameter force main. There are
only 4 properties identified from the tax mapping.
2. Operation and Maintenance Considerations
The operation and maintenance include routinely scheduled maintenance of the pumps
and controls,external pumping of the wet well due to pump failures,and
replacement/repair of components that are anticipated to have a useful life significantly
less than the loan repayment period(pumps,motors,electrical components,etc.)
Electrical costs shall be borne by the property owners and will not be included as part of
the project O&M costs. Short-lived assets have been assessed within the cost estimates
along with anticipated operation and maintenance costs;as shown in the comparison
table in a later section.
Maintenance responsibility for the grinder pumps will be borne by the Town.
3. Environmental Concerns
Construction of the grinder pump system would limit the amount of disturbance
required for the conveyance system force mains compared to that of a conventional sewer
system. This is due to shallow installations that do not require cutbacks or deep trenches.
However,there would be larger disturbances to the individual properties due to the pump
station and lateral installation. The installation of pressurized force mains for sanitary
sewer systems utilizes a fusion technique for piping connection,which eliminates pipe
joints and ultimately the potential for infiltration due to high groundwater elevations.
Construction would not take place in any identified wetland areas or any other areas of
natural or historic concern.The grinder pump systems would be owned and maintained
by a sanitary sewer authority;therefore,easements would need to be acquired from
individual owners to allow for operation and maintenance of the systems.
The installation of a grinder pump station would create no adverse environmental
impacts and would meet the needs of the community by providing a municipal sanitary
sewer system and eliminating the existing on-site wastewater treatment systems that have
inadequate separation distances from drinking water supplies,have failed,or do not meet
current state standards.
27
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
4. Non-Monetary Considerations
The following advantages and disadvantages of a grinder pump system have been
identified:
Advantages:
• Reduced potential for infiltration and inflow.
• Shallow construction eliminates excessive dewatering and reduces the need for
cutbacks or trench boxes.
• Smaller diameter piping.
Disadvantages
• Potential for blockage of pipes due to native or foreign material.
• Need for individual easements.
• Owner responsibility required for electrical costs and general system awareness.
• Required grinder pump station maintenance throughout the community in
perpetuity.
H. Wastewater Treatment Systems
For this study we evaluated conventional wastewater treatment and soil based absorption
systems.
1. Conventional WWTP (Activated Sludge)
This alternative proposes a traditional package WWTP for removal of harmful sewage
constituents,disinfection,and discharge to a nearby water body. A conventional WWTP
requires permitting,a licensed operator,effluent sampling&reporting,regular
maintenance of equipment,utility costs,sludge collection/removal,and replacement of
components as needed.
For meeting the effluent limits set forth in a previous section,we reviewed two (2)
treatment options:sequencing batch reactor(SBR) and a hybrid rotating biological
contactor(i.e.fixed film)with effluent filtration,post aeration,and disinfection as
needed.There are various locations identified for construction of a new WWTP;these are
shown in the conceptual layouts in Appendix H.
Main process components of a typical WWTP may include:
a. Influent Pump Station
b. Influent Mechanical Bar Screen
c. Flow Meter&Sampling Manhole
28
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
d. Primary Clarifiers
e. Equalization(EQ) Tanks
f. Biological Treatment System (attached growth or activated sludge)
g. Aeration System
h. Flow Splitters
i. Secondary Clarifiers
j. Chemical Feed System- Chlorination,Phosphorus removal,etc.
k. Tertiary Filter and Feed Pump Station
1. Disinfection-UV,hypochlorite,onsite generation
m. Post Aeration
n. Effluent Sampling Manhole
o. Solids processing/disposal
Non-Monetary Considerations
The following advantages and disadvantages of a Conventional WWTP have been
identified:
Advantages:
• High level of treatment
• Less surface area/land required
• Easily expandable
• Capable of handling significant flow variation
Disadvantages
• Requires a licensed operator
• Regular maintenance required
• SPDES permit required
• Requires regular sludge dewatering and removal
• High electrical costs
Option No. 1 Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)
i. Proposed Preliminary Design
This alternative is an activated sludge process that provides nitrification via an anoxic
zone. SBRs are a common activated sludge process that takes advantage of batch
treatment,as opposed to continuous flow process.This allows for a combination of
aeration and settling within a singular tank to reduce the overall number of tanks
required for treatment.Continuous monitoring of influent flow allows the operator to
adjust cycling to accommodate variability in flow rates,as is expected to occur between
wet and dry weather seasons as well as low and high-water usage periods.This inherently
29
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
allows for a level of built-in flow equalization which can mitigate impacts from peak wet
weather flow periods.
To supplement the ability to adjust cycling times,aeration may also be adjusted
appropriately to maintain oxygen levels as needed,ultimately providing a more energy-
efficient process. Digital monitoring using a programmable logic controller(PLC)linked
directly to influent flow meters and dissolved oxygen probes will be required to assist in
optimizing batch cycling.
To meet the stringent effluent nutrient limits for ammonia and phosphorus,the SBR will
be required to provide a high level of biological/chemical nutrient removal.This is
accomplished by incorporating alternating phases of anoxic/anaerobic conditions,and
providing adequate basin sizing to ensure complete nitrification,denitrification,along
with some biological phosphorus removal.Additionally,chemical phosphorus removal
will be necessary to meet a 0.5 mg/L effluent limit.Therefore,injection of metal salts
within the SBR tank will be required,along with mechanical mixers.
The SBR system will include influent valves,mechanical mixers in the Anoxic
compartment,submersible transfer pumps/valves,fine bubble aeration system with
blowers,decanter pumps,air control valves,level sensors,instrumentation,and controls.
For this alternative,the recommendation will include:
Central Danby(Service Area 1) - 68,400 gpd
A two-train system that includes two (2) reactor tanks,one (1) aerobic digester tank
(sludge holding),an inlet surge tank,a decant EQ tank with pumps,and includes steel
tankage,process pumps/piping,blowers,grating,railings,and ladders. Each train will be
roughly 60-feet long by 12-feet wide for a nominal footprint of 60-feet long by 24-feet
wide.Both will have a maximum height of 11 feet.Adding the other tankage to the
footprint results in total rough layout encompassing 85-feet long by 30-feet wide.The
volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 68,400 gpd up to peak hydraulic
flow of 3Q or 205,200 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather
influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes
this option very practical for the Town.
Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area la) - 11,500 gpd
A one-train system that includes two (2) reactor tanks,aerobic digester tank(sludge
holding),an inlet surge tank,a decant EQ tank with pumps,and includes steel tankage,
process pumps/piping,blowers,grating,railings,and ladders. The unit will be roughly
35-feet long by 12-feet wide and a maximum height of 11 feet.Adding the other tankage
30
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
to the footprint results in total rough layout encompassing 50-feet long by 12-feet wide.
The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 11,500 gpd up to peak
hydraulic flow of 3Q or 34,500 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet
weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows
makes this option very practical for the Town.
West Danby(Service Area 2) - 35,000 gpd
A two-train system that includes two (2) reactor tanks,aerobic digester tank(sludge
holding),an inlet surge tank,a decant EQ tank with pumps,and includes steel tankage,
process pumps/piping,blowers,grating,railings,and ladders. Each train will be roughly
34-feet long by 12-feet wide for a nominal footprint of 34-feet long by 24-feet wide.Both
will have a maximum height of 11 feet.Adding the other tankage to the footprint results
in total rough layout encompassing 50-feet long by 30-feet wide.The volume of the tanks
will be able to handle cycle flows of 35,000 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 3Q or
1053000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow
rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this option
very practical for the Town.
West Danby Hamlet Centers(Service Area 2a) - 13,000 gpd
A one-train system that includes two (2) reactor tanks,aerobic digester tank(sludge
holding),an inlet surge tank,a decant EQ tank with pumps,and includes steel tankage,
process pumps/piping,blowers,grating,railings,and ladders. The unit will be roughly
38-feet long by 12-feet wide and a maximum height of 11 feet.Adding the other tankage
to the footprint results in total rough layout encompassing 55-feet long by 12-feet wide.
The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 13,000 gpd up to peak
hydraulic flow of 3Q or 39,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet
weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows
makes this option very practical for the Town.
The tanks will be steel construction with influent splitter box(if needed) and effluent
collection box.All necessary influent manifolds,fixed diffusers,decanters,positive
displacement blowers,waste sludge pumps,decant pumps,valves,and process control
systems are included.
This option will be equipped with a 1/4-inch mechanical bar screen,intermediate pump
station upstream and;filters,post aeration and disinfection downstream. Sludge removal
would need to be conducted via hauling to an acceptable facility;costs have been included
in the comparison tables. Provisions for solids processing can be considered in the form
of sludge drying beds or other more affordable options,which would require additional
land space and a superstructure,i.e.,open air building.
31
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
A 50'x 50'Process Building to house the Screen room(Class I/Div 1) is proposed and
shall include a small Office,Filters,and chemical feed.
ii. Impact on Existing Facility
There are no existing facilities.
iii. Land Requirements
It is estimated about 1.0 acre of land,depending on the selected option,is
required for a new WWTP facility,which the Town would be responsible for
acquiring prior to any design/construction activities.
iv. Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements
Such things as high efficiency motors/equipment,variable speed drives,etc.will
be used as much as possible in the project. Water requirements as part of this
work include potable water service or a well for facility use.
Option No.2 Hybrid Rotating Biological Contactor System
i. Proposed Preliminary Design
This biological treatment process is a hybrid rotating biological contactor by
Algaewheel(or equal).The process utilizes a series of small(36-inch)diameter
wheels,partially submerged,to act as an impervious surface for fixed film growth.
The wheels are housed within tanks located inside of a"greenhouse"type
environment.The exterior surface of the wheels is exposed to sunlight,
promoting the growth of algae on the exterior surface of the wheels.Through
photosynthesis,algae can produce oxygen that,along with carbon,may then be
consumed by other bacteria for respiration. This biological method of oxygen
production reduces the need for significant mechanical aeration.The wheels are
of such buoyancy that duty blowers with diffusers located at each end can rotate
the wheels without the need for a shaft and motor system.
The wheels contain a hollow core,filled with media,to provide surface area for
heterotrophic bacteria that remove carbon to reduce BOD,and ammonia
oxidizing bacteria(AOBs) that consume ammonia in the presence of oxygen to
reduce overall ammonia concentrations.
For this alternative,the recommendation will include:
32
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Central Danby(Service Area 1) - 68,400 gpd
A two-train system that includes concrete reactor tanks and includes process
pumps/piping,blowers,grating,and railings as needed. Each train will be
roughly 97-feet long by 9.5-feet wide for a nominal footprint of 97-feet long by
19-feet wide.Both will have a maximum height of 4 feet.The greenhouse
building will be roughly 120-feet long by 30-feet wide with a 12-feet ceiling
height.The volume of the tanks will be able to handle cycle flows of 68,400 gpd
up to peak hydraulic flow of 131,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes
in dry and wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment
across a wide range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town.
There shall be two tanks in a parallel configuration located within the
greenhouse.Each train shall consist of 75 wheels in the CBOD section and 75
wheels in the TKN section on 30 shafts,for a total of 300 wheels in the system.
Each wheel will have a surface area of approximately 538 SF (CBOD) and 807 SF
(TKN) for a total surface area of 161,464 SF.
Additional requirements include EQ tank,secondary clarifiers,tertiary filters,UV
disinfection,and post aeration. Sludge removal would need to be conducted via
hauling to an acceptable facility. Provisions for solids processing can be
considered in the form of sludge drying beds,which would require additional
land space and a superstructure,i.e.,open air building.
We include a 50'x 50'Process Building to house the Screen room (Class I/Div I),
a small Office,Filters,and chemical feed.
Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area la) - 11,500 gpd
A one-train system that includes two (2) concrete reactor tanks and includes
process pumps/piping,blowers,grating,and railings as needed. The single train
will incorporate an EQ tank,pre-anoxic tank,RBC tank,sludge holding,final
clarifier,and a disc filter.Tanks will have various depths.The RBC unit is
covered thus eliminating the greenhouse building.The volume of the tanks will
be able to handle cycle flows of 11,500 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 23,000
gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow
rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this
option very practical for the Town.
Additional requirements include UV disinfection and post aeration. Sludge
removal would need to be conducted via hauling to an acceptable facility.
Provisions for solids processing can be considered in the form of sludge drying
33
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
beds,which would require additional land space and a superstructure,i.e.,open
air building.
We include a 20'x 20'Process Building to house the Screen room(Class I/Div I),
a small Office,Filters,and chemical feed.
West Danby(Service Area 2) — 35,000 gpd
A two-train system that includes two (2) concrete reactor tanks and includes
process pumps/piping,blowers,grating,and railings as needed. Each train will
be roughly 50-feet long by 10-feet wide for a nominal footprint of 50-feet long by
20-feet wide.Both will have a maximum height of 4 feet.The greenhouse
building will be roughly 65-feet long by 30-feet wide with a 12-feet ceiling height.
The volume of the tanks will be able to treat flows of 35,000 gpd up to peak
hydraulic flow of 70,000 gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and
wet weather influent flow rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide
range of flows makes this option very practical for the Town.
There shall be two tanks in a parallel configuration located within the
greenhouse.Each train shall consist of 75 wheels in on 15 shafts,for a total of 300
wheels in the system.
Additional requirements include EQ tank,secondary clarifiers,tertiary filters,UV
disinfection,and post aeration. Sludge removal would need to be conducted via
hauling to an acceptable facility. Provisions for solids processing can be
considered in the form of sludge drying beds,which would require additional
land space and a superstructure,i.e.,open air building.
We include a 50'x 50'Process Building to house the Screen room (Class I/Div 1),
a small Office,Filters,and chemical feed.
West Danby Hamlet Centers(Service Area 2a) — 13,000 gpd
A one-train system that includes two (2) concrete reactor tanks and includes
process pumps/piping,blowers,grating,and railings as needed. The single train
will incorporate an EQ tank,pre-anoxic tank,RBC tank,sludge holding,final
clarifier,and a disc filter.Tanks will have various depths.The RBC unit is
covered thus eliminating the greenhouse building.The volume of the tanks will
be able to handle cycle flows of 13,000 gpd up to peak hydraulic flow of 26,000
gpd as necessary to accommodate changes in dry and wet weather influent flow
rates. The ability to provide treatment across a wide range of flows makes this
option very practical for the Town.
34
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Additional requirements include UV disinfection and post aeration. Sludge
removal would need to be conducted via hauling to an acceptable facility;costs
have been included in the comparison tables. Provisions for solids processing
can be considered in the form of sludge drying beds or other more affordable
options,which would require additional land space and a superstructure,i.e.,
open air building.
We include a 20'x 20'Process Building to house the Screen room(Class I/Div I),
a small Office,Filters,and chemical feed.
➢ BOD Removal
The Process Engineers designed the Algaewheels to remove sBOD utilizing
the second order model developed by Grady and Daigger:
—1 +V 1+ (4)(0.00974)(AB1Q)sj
(2)(0.00974)(AB/Q)
➢ Ammonia(NH3-N)Removal
To account for reduction of NH3,the Process Engineers have utilized the
Pano equation for removal of ammonia in an RBC:
(Q x ICjv x C,-, —Ad x k,,.)
Q X KN
Please refer to Appendix I for Algaewheel Treatment Plant Design
Calculations as provided by Onewater®.
ii. Impact on Existing Facility
There are no existing facilities.
iii. Land Requirements
It is estimated about 1.0 acre of land,depending on the selected option,is
required for a new WWTP facility,which the Town would be responsible for
acquiring prior to any design/construction activities.
35
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
iv. Water and Energy Efficiency Requirements
Such things as high efficiency motors/equipment,variable speed drives,etc.will
be used as much as possible in the project. Water requirements as part of this
work include potable water service or a well for facility use.
2. Subsurface Treatment (Leachfield)
This alternative system eliminates surface water discharge and SPDES permitting.
This type of system requires,at a minimum,a septic tank,effluent filter,and uses a
natural biological process wherein the soil absorbs the harmful constituents in the
wastewater. The treated effluent percolates through the soil matrix back into the
groundwater supply.
Soil absorption systems can be evaluated on the following factors (2014 NYS Design
Standards...Section B.4):
a. Thickness of layers
b. Texture (USDA),consistence,and structure of soil layers
c. General color and color mottling
d. Depth to water and depth to observed seasonal high groundwater level
e. Depth to bedrock
f. Other items such as visible pores,stoniness,roots,or animal traces
Subsurface systems can be one of the following standard acceptable types:
a. Absorption Trenches/Beds
b. Shallow Absorption Trenches
c. Gravelless Absorption Systems
d. Cut-and-Fill Systems
e. Raised Systems
f. Seepage Pits
There are three methods of distributing sewage to a subsurface system:gravity,pump,
or combination. Gravity is typical for smaller systems that have less surface area for
the distribution network and can be used on level or sloped sites. Pumped or
pressure distribution offers a more uniform flow throughout the entire surface area
and is required for larger systems having distribution lateral lengths exceeding 1000
feet.
36
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Pressure distribution systems use small diameter perforated piping with 1/8"to 5/8"
holes sizing and maximum allowable spacing of 10 feet(6 feet is more common).End
cap holes should be provided for venting.
a. Central Danby(Service Area 1/1a)
There is only one site within Central Danby,located within a field,north of the
old schoolhouse,that would be suitable to place a leachfield with consideration to
environmental mapping and soil conditions which can be found in Appendices B
&C.
This location that can be utilized for a leachfield site,has soil conditions which
are somewhat limited for the formation of a leachfield,meaning that limitations
to a traditional leachfield can be overcome by special planning,design,and
installation,notably a larger percolation area.The leachfield could feasibly be fed
using a dosing siphon system and constructed by absorption bed/trenches.
Additionally,alternative 1 would require 1.34 mi of force main and around 70-
feet of elevation gain to pump effluent from the system low-point to the proposed
leachfield site.Alternative 2 would require around 0.51 mi of force main and
around 50-feet of elevation gain to pump from the Town's low elevation point to
the proposed leachfield location.
b. West Danby(Service Area 2/2a)
There is only one site within West Danby,located within a field,west of the
Northern intersection of Valley View Road and Spencer Road,that would be
suitable to place a leachfield with consideration to environmental mapping and
soil conditions which can be found in Appendices B&C.
This location that can be utilized for a leachfield site,has soil conditions which
are not limited for the formation of a leachfield,meaning that there are no
limitations to constructing a traditional leachfield and could feasibly be
pressurized using a dosing siphon fed and constructed by absorption trenches.
However,this treatment site is extremely far from West Danby's low-elevation
point and over 100-feet higher in elevation from this low-point.These conditions
would require around 7.5 mi of force main and a sewer pump station to convey
the sewer system effluent to the proposed leachfield site for alternative 3 versus
around 100-feet of elevation gain and 0.85 mi of force main for alternative 4.
This treatment option for West Danby's proposed sanitary system would include
a pump station and wet well at the lowest point in the sanitary system,which
would pump through a force main to a large holding tank/septic tank on the
37
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
leachfield site nearby to the proposed leachfield.This tank would be piped to a
large distribution box and on to a perforated piping network designed to properly
allow effluent to percolate into the soil.Below is a cost estimate for each
alternative discussed for West Danby.
The percolation rate for this site is approximated by considering the soil type for
the site,which is Arkport fine sandy loam having 2-6 percent slopes.Leachfields
constructed within this soil type can be designed assuming traditional trench type
absorption with perforated PVC buried at least 4-feet below the ground surface.
Typically,fine sandy loam can have application rates of between 0.80 and 1.0
GPD/SF,and a conservative assumption utilized an application rate of 0.80
GPD/SF for this site.
Non-Monetary Considerations
The following advantages and disadvantages of a Subsurface Treatment
(Leachfield)have been identified:
Advantages:
• Does not require a licensed operator
• Lower maintenance with less equipment
• No effluent limit requirements
• No regular sludge dewatering and removal except septic tank
• Minimal electrical costs
• Simple treatment
Disadvantages
• Lower level of treatment
• Requires maintenance of overgrowth of vegetation
• More surface area/land required
• Not easily expandable without land acquisition
I. Clustered, Small Community Treatment
The design of cluster style systems can entail many different components and types,including
subsurface treatments such as community-scalable leach fields,package plants and small
treatments servicing 2-or more properties.treatment facilities serving properties would have
to be controlled by the Town,therefore,requiring the Town to secure property or perpetual
easements that allowed for access,construction,and operation of the system along with
allowing sufficient space for creation of reserve area that would allow for adequate expansion
or replacement.
38
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
This alternative is most conducive to incorporating alternative treatment options,such as a
leachfield or modular treatment options such as the Renewage Busse GT(membrane
bioreactor,MBR)or Orenco Advantex AX-MAX system.These style systems are suitable for
relatively low flows that may be experienced from relatively few properties but allow for easy
expandability.For example,the Busse system offers single dwelling and multiple dwelling
units ranging from 250 gallons per day(gpd)-1,000 gpd,as well as larger systems up to 15,000
gpd to serve a neighborhood or truck stop or campground.Additionally,the modular nature
of these treatment options allows for fairly simple addition to treatment capacity in the
Town's future.These types of modular systems would be capable of treating to intermittent
stream standards for discharge to the surface or otherwise discharge to downstream
absorption fields.Due to the higher level of treatment associated with some of these systems,
the surface area required for subsurface effluent percolation would be smaller due to
regulatory authority"allowances".
Conventional leachfields designed to treat and dispose of the collected wastewater are less
modular in nature than traditional treatment options but are still expandable with additional
land purchases,and additional construction and installation.
1. Cluster Development under a Special District
Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area la)
Sixteen(16)users making up 30 EDUs have been identified within the Central Danby
Hamlet Centers as a potential cluster development under a special district would likely
consist of sewering the main Town section around Bald Hill Rd and Gunderman Rd to
the north. It would include roughly 1,680 feet of mostly 8-inch gravity sewer.
Additionally,if this area were to be the only area in the Town served by the proposed
sanitary system in this instance,some form of treatment of the sanitary flow would ideally
be placed on a nearby parcel such as 502200-7.-1-1.1,at least a small portion of which
would be purchased by the Town.Treatment options for an initially light flow area such
as this would likely be limited to treatment types such as a leachfield or modular
treatment options such as the Renewage Busse GT system or Orenco Advantex AX-MAX.
These Hamlet Centers have the potential to add some single family homes and
commercial spaces with limited additional piping installations. The potential future
development of this area could be easily accommodated by an initially small and modular
type of treatment system,which would be expanded upon if significant development
comes under contract.
The formation of a special district for the Hamlet Centers would be sensible in the case
that the sanitary system was to be constructed,due to future developments being located
within the original bounds of the district.The below table presents some rough budgetary
costing for the BUSSE modular MBR treatment system for various sizing. A typical
39
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
residential dwelling would be sized for 250-500 gpd depending on the number of
bedrooms;however,for this PER,we assumed 330 gpd/EDU thus requiring the 500 gpd
unit. This system would also require a contracted maintenance cost of$500-$700/year
for each individual system,whereas the larger systems would require typical O&M
associated with larger treatment plants such as an operator,maintenance staff,and
equipment upkeep and replacement costs.
Table X: BUSSE 2023 Unit Cost Chart
SIZE (GPD) TANKS INSTALL WARRANTY MISCL SALE PRICE
(yearl) BUSSE NY
250 �1 tanks 200 gal S1,500 s5w S500 $24,500
500 3 tanks 400 gal $1,5W 5()0 5500 $10,000
500 ST 2 tanks 400 gal $1,SD0 $500 $500 $27,5Do
750 4 tanks 400 gal SUM $500 $500 $37,500
10DO 4 tanks 500 gal $2,00D $1,000 $500 $45,0oa
C 1000 20 ft container $2,000 $1,DIX $1,000 $57,000
C 2000 ST 20 ft container $3,000 $1,500 $1,000 $105,6DD
C 3000 ST 40 ft container $3,0OD $1,500 $1,DM $152,ODO
C AN00 ST 40 ft container $3,ODD $2,ODN $1,D00 $175,ODD
C 6000 ST 40 ft container 3,0O1) $2,ODD $1,DDO $220,ODD
C 7500 ST 40 ft oontainer $3,DOD $2,ON0 $1,ON. $240,000
C 12ODD 5T 2* 40 ft containers $4,0001 $2,OW1 $2,WO1 $340,000
C 150O0 5T 2* 40 ft containers 4,0O0 $2,0001 $2,0001 $440,OOO
*Costs do not include sitework,building/shed(if required for smaller units),external
plumbing/electric connections,absorption field(if required),3rd Party engineering,
O&M,regular sludge removal,and/or other administrative costs.
As a baseline minimum,we would propose to use a 1,000 gpd unit per every three(3)
dwellings,which results in requiring 5-6 units for the Hamlet Centers in Central Danby at
a rough cost for just the units of$270,000. The annual contractual maintenance would be
$3,000-$4,200. Please note that the smaller"cluster"systems would require an absorption
field(no SPDES permit)for each unit and thus additional land would be required(not
included in the cost shown here).The estimated flows from the entire Central Danby
Hamlet Centers including future growth is about 12,000 gpd,which could also be served
by four 3,000 gpd units(for redundancy at a rough cost for just the units of$608,000,
wherein,we would propose a surface water discharge requiring a SPDES permit.
West Danby Hamlet Center(Service Area 2a)
Twenty-seven(27)users have been identified within the West Danby Hamlet Center as a
potential cluster development under a special district would likely consist of sewering
much of the main Town including SR 34/Spencer Rd,Maple Ave/Station Rd,Valley View
40
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Rd,and Short Rd/Brown Rd. See Figure 2 in Appendix H. It would include roughly
7,050 feet of mostly 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes and four(4)pump stations.
As a baseline minimum,we would propose to use a 1,000 gpd unit per every three(3)
dwellings,which results in requiring 14 units for the entire Hamlet Center in West Danby
at a rough cost for just the units of$630,000.The annual contractual maintenance would
be$7,000-$9,800.Please note that the smaller"cluster"systems would require an
absorption field(no SPDES permit) for each unit and thus additional land would be
required(not included in the cost shown here).The estimated flows from the entire West
Danby Hamlet Center including future growth is about 13,000 gpd,which could also be
served by a two 7,500 gpd units (for redundancy) at a rough cost for just the units of
$480,000,wherein,we would propose a surface water discharge requiring a SPDES
permit.
Non-Monetary Considerations
The following advantages and disadvantages of a modular treatment system have been
identified:
Advantages:
• High level of treatment
• Modular design allows for adding units easily for a cluster type development
• Units designed for low flows such as induvial homes or streets
• Less surface area/land required
• Easily expandable for future growth
• Mfr.provides contractual annual O&M for a fee
Disadvantages
• Requires a licensed operator if a SPDES permit needed
• Regular maintenance and oversight required
• SPDES permit required for surface water discharge
• Requires regular sludge removal
Non-Monetary Considerations
- Special districts(Town special districts,county district,or transportation districts)within
the Town can be developed based off the general interest of residents and Town
personnel and finalized after a vetting process is completed.These district boundaries
would then be finalized after the agreement of all concerned parties.
- Taxes can then be levied only to those property owners within the special district to cover
costs borne by the Town during construction,operation,and maintenance of the sanitary
sewer system.
41
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
- Any property owners that violate the taxes imposed as part of the special district would be
settled by the Internal Revenue Service(IRS),therefore removing the Town from bearing
lawyer and court fees.
- A special district can be introduced anywhere within the Town's boundaries,if all
concerned parties are able to agree upon its formation and can be introduced as an
extension to an existing district or as a newly formed district.
2. Transportation Corporation Formation
A transportation corporation would be a separate entity where the Town is the
"middleman",so to speak between the Town and the residents in this situation.Firstly,a
transportation corporation would be formed by collaboration with interested residents
and Town personnel and language built into its contract This agreement and any
mapping to go along with it would be sent to the Public Service Commission(PSC)for
approval.The PSC,if approval is given,would be responsible for overseeing the
transportation corporation and ensuring that obligations within the contract are met.
To form a sanitary system transportation corporation within the Town of Danby would
dictate that members of the transportation corporation within the Town of Danby would
be responsible for bearing all costs associated with the proposed sanitary sewer system.
Additionally,the Town of Danby would be the sole guarantor of the sanitary sewer
system.This would be required if the Transportation District went defunct,bankrupt,etc.
The Transportation District would be the official owner of the sanitary sewer system and
in the instance unless the Transportation District ceased to operated then the operation
and its costs would then fall on the Town.
A modular system would be possible under the oversight of a transportation corporation
and would be extremely similar in detail to the system described in the previous section.
A major difference would be residents immediately adjacent to the sanitary system would
have no incentive to to connect to the sanitary system because the transportation
corporation's members would likely be more decentralized.For instance,a new
development may be constructed on the land of the old car park which could apply to be
a member of the transportation corporation.This neighborhood could then form its own,
small scale,community sanitary system under ownership of the Town.In addition to this
new neighborhood,another newly constructed neighborhood near Dotson Park might
form,and this new neighborhood could also join the same transportation corporation
and form a similar,small-scale,community sanitary sewer system.
Monetary Considerations
42
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
- The Town of Danby would not be immediately responsible for bearing the capital,
operation,and maintenance costs of the sanitary sewer system.However,if a member
failed to assist in paying,the Town would be responsible for compensating this shortfall.
- It is extremely unlikely that funding agencies will be interested in awarding funds for this
type of district since operation and maintenance of the system would be the resident's
responsibility rather than the Town's.
Non-monetary considerations
- A district may not need to be formed under this option.Therefore,the introduction of
new members to the transportation corporation may be relatively straightforward.
- With any property owner within the Town being able to join the transportation
corporation,there is a likely possibility that its members would be quite spread out
throughout the Town,and this could promote cluster development and preserve open
space if coordinated with zoning regulations.
- This would not encourage densification of the Town and would make any operation and
maintenance personnel's jobs much more difficult.
- The transportation corporation allows any user to join,which can be an advantage to
those interested members.However,the Town would not be able to require property
owners to join the transportation corporation,and there are little incentives for them to.
Therefore,it is extremely likely that current residents in the Town of Danby would not
benefit directly.
- In the instance of a large development being constructed within the Town of Danby,that
new neighborhood could be directly benefited in the sense that those residents would not
need to be bothered about ownership responsibilities for their sanitary systems and rather
the Town would be the official owners of their systems.
- The members of a transportation corporation can decide on the method of treatment for
their sanitary systems.Therefore,it is possible that property owners could become
members of the corporation just so that they are not officially responsible for their aging
and potentially damaged sanitary systems.
J. Capital Costs Comparison
The table below shows the estimated capital costs for each Alternative. See Appendix H for
the conceptual layouts and Appendix I for the detailed cost estimates which include a
contingency of 30%. Additionally,an annual cost per EDU was calculated for a 30-year
period at 0%interest and 4.5%interest rates.
43
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Central Danby(Service Area 1)
Table 8-Summary of Project Costs
Conventional Gravity System
SERVICEAREA ESTCCST EDUs SERVICE 30- r ind
OUST 0%loan 4-5%Loan
Danby Rd S 5&50, 67 19 $15324 5z�-
Bald Will
.. .................................................................................................................. 1 .461pp'....... }.......pp'........$ ....... ....$L4�S
.................................................................................................................................................................11...................U.................... ......................U......................
Mangy{DanbyRd................................................................................................... 7 i ........ ....... ........$0.......ryry....$L9Z6d.. .... .5d 7-1
...
.................................................................................................................................................................II....................II....................A.......................II.......................
Flambrcok Rd............................................................................................................. 116r 16pp'........ .......pp'........ ....... .... 401
.................................................................................................................................................................At...................0.................... ......................U......................
.....C,andermaroild.........................................................................................................�15�"fi ........ .......IIII........ ....... .... 158.....IIII....
.................... ...................A....................�......................A......................
E Mika 1[d.....................................................................................................................$ 56,577 ........ii........IIII........b�....... .... L941-5..IIII....$,5757...
................................................................................................................................................................. ...................U.................... ......................U......................
WMir..Rd...................................................................................................................990.dC11 ......... ........ ........ .......yy.... 540-8.. ....$6,7dZ2...
.................................................................................................................................................................II....................II....................A.......................II.......................
.....D...a..n...b.V
....R...d....N....................................................................................................................................5. ..........2......... ..........0.......... $1.7
104
.... ...
....................................................................................................................................................... .................. ................... ..................... .....................
M�drrgarFialb►vRd $�Bfi7,511 11 $O 565.2 $4,72A5
................................................................................................................................................................. ................... .................... ...................... ......................
TotalCdechan5ystem $11 6575 186 $L97fx1 36395
Regppml Treamert to Ithaca WWTP $17%2 Sur S5 $,U442 $d 133Z
.......................
New�BAOOGPD SBR WWTP $5,676,L7A 186 SW17-2 $1,8735
New-6BAOD GPD HYBRI D R BC WATP $7,(M,977 186 $L272.4 `-M"
Grinder Pump System
SERVICE AREA E5T C{5T EDus S CO 5T¢ [3U-Yr paired}
0�6 Uhm 4-596 Loan
DarbyRd5 $799,O96 13900 $25599
Bald.M..Rd.................................................................................................................. 1,0#1395prr........5.......prr........$0.......r....$Ld43 9..prr....1.94..
.................................................................................................................................................................}1...................lA....................I......................}1......................
Man-WDm by Rd................................................................................................... 45D.43. ........47....... ........$0....... ....$L725 .. ....$317f.4...
.................................................................................................................................................................II....................II.................... .......................II.......................
Flambrcok Rd............................................................................................................. 1,0137458pp'........ .......pp'........ .......rr.... 045 ..pp'.... lffi7..
................................................................................................................................................................0...................lA....................A......................U......................
Gunderman Rd.........................................................................................................$I%a95TIIII........dri.......IIII........$0....... ....$t477-0..IIII....$
.................................................................................................................................................................At...................lA.................... ......................At......................
E M i Ila.. ..................................................................................................................... 577,175IIII........ii........II II........$0....... ....$L7 0..... III.... 143 3
...
.................................................................................................................................................................�1...................lA.................... ...................... ......................
iWj�; $ad................................................................................................................... .� ......... ....... ........ ....... .... 13.. .... ...
.................................................................................................................................................................I................... .................... ......................�......................
.................................................................................................................................................................
DanbY. .. ........................................................................................................ $SfB,Ed2 12.................... ....................
.................
.....M:rdrganFlall..nr.Rd........................................................................................ b S fiiT .........I..I $L9 46 $,55dt
................................................................................................................................................................. ................... .................... ...................... ......................
TotalColiectian4stem W591,657 186 $L539.7 $t8 &S
RegianalTreatnwM tD Ithaca WWTP $12.522557 tM W44,2 $4,f3
...
New(BADOGPD SBR WWTP $5,67-5 1 106 SLO17.2 $1,8715
New 6BADOGPD FFYBRIDRBCWWiP $7,094,977 96 Si.MA P-3434
44
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2O24
Central Danby Hamlet Centers (,Service Area la)
Table 9-Summary of Project Costs
Conventional Gravity System
SERVICE '
SERVICEAREA EST COST EDUs COST (3D-vrperiod;
0%laan 4-5%kam
Danby Rd 5 $396,f8G 15 $F8i5 5' 'S
Main 3{Danb.y Rd...............................................................................................................................�........... 7 fiTZ ........1 .......II.................... ..... BZ....pp�.... 1,5253...
........................................................................................................................................................................I............................. ....................U....................
II.......................II.......................
........................................................................................................................................................................ ............................. .................... .................... ...................... .......................
TotalColleetian5ystem $749r'Ei9 30 $85d8 $1,574.4
.......................
New Lea:hfield5)stem 30 -
.......................
New 11,500GPD SBR WWTP $.3F011A%1 Y. $4.3' 63 sf,M3-0
Neav 11-rwXGPD FFYBRIDRBCWVfrP $414f,-M $4f07-5 $6:i
Npw 11'NCO GPD Mcdu4r................W WTP{4 Urrts}............................................................... ........$�073,933........3d....... i...
............................................................ !................................................................................................... ............................. .................... .................... .......................
........................................................................................................................................................................ .............................'[7-1
Grinder Pump System
SERVICEAREA EST COST EDUs SERVICE
(30-ODST period;
0,,6 Loan 4-5:b Lom
Danby RdS $370,zM i5 #BZ�Z ti 1fi
.....Man danby.��................................................................................................................................I............ .... ...................pp' .............. . ......73fi0.... .... 1' 55..
..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................U....................II.......................II.......................
........................................................................................................................................................................ ............................. .................... .................... ...................... ...............4:5........
TotalCollectianSysLem $701,68 30 $776 $1, .8
.......................
NEwLeadtifieldSystem - 30
.................... .......................
New 11500 GPD 5BR WWTP $�,Onq%1 ........30....... V,-:tb3
New 11,5JJ0 GPD FFYBRI D R BC WKrP $414q,-M 30 $44075 $8,-0659
New 11500 GPD Modular Sys ern W WrP(4 Unks)
........................................................................................................................................................................ _r777[777n
45
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
West Danby(Service Area 2)
Table 10 - Summary of Project Costs
Conventional Gravity System
SERVICE
SERVICEAREA TEST{qTEDUs COST 30- r rind
11 0%lam 11 43X lawn
9k 34/Spencer Rd Gravity '.'T4,765 1Z $335a7 $6,171-i
234/Spencer Rd North Gravity............................................................................................. r .........$STT.0Z0 .........1 .......II......... .......p.... 1.G45-8..p....$3,031-1....
.......................................................................................................................................................................I..............................0....................�1.....................ll........................11........................
Maple AYElStatio n Rd Gran .................................................................................................. r........ 100633II........�9.......II......... .......p....s s 1... ....$4,510-0...
.......................................................................................................................................................................I..............................0....................�1.....................ll........................ll........................
Limey Mew Rd Gravity................................................................................................................. }r........�150�54G .........1�....... .........��.......pp'....�3.461.1...pp'....�5,637-7...
.....................................................................................................................................................................A..............................II.....................I�.....................U.......................U........................
..... ............................................................................................................................ ......... ...... p'......... ........
Brown Rd Gravity 1A2 ..
p........ ....... .... 3 7 x... .... 6.7dd8...
.......................................................................................................................................................................�..............................U....................lA.....................1I........................I I........................
Short Rd[Brown Rd North.G.r ........................................................................................... }r........$1. 7 .........13....... ......... .......pp'.... 1a5..pp'....$7,438.8...
av4
......................................................................................................................................................................A..............................II.....................I�.....................U.......................U........................
............... .. .... ...
S G $4d9371 $ $2*9 $4511-1
.................................a ......................................................................................................................... .............................. ..................... ........................
...................................................................................................................................................................... .............................. ..................... ..................... ....................... ........................
Total Collection System $8S331b66 97 $ 936 $54D1-1
New 34,500 GPD SBR WWTP $4,764,193 97 $1,637 $30153
........................ ........................
New 34,500 GPD HYBR D R5 5,"",T� $4,987,153 97 $1,713,8 $3,15'f4
Grinder Pump System
SERVICE
SERICEAREA ET COST EDsC05T
Fw0W3D- 'r eriod'
0;�.Lnan 4-5-.�i,Lnan
SR 34,Spencer Rd Grkider $691�d59 12 $1,971-1 $3.6W
9[34Spencer Rd North Grinder............................................................................................ r .........�510 87II.........1 ..... II ...... ...... .... 14555..p....$ 680b...
..................................................................................................................................................................I...................
...........U....................U.....................II........................II........................
Maple Ave/StationRd Gnrider&Force Main $1,217,536pp' 29 pp' ......$0..... $1'�59-1 $ 558-3
.......................................................................................................................................................................I..............................U....................U.....................I I........................I I........................
Valley Vi ................................................................................................................ .......... .................... . ...
'6pewGrier � .... 1.5
........ ....n........................................................................................................................A..............................I.....................I.....................U....................... ...
........................
..... ........................................................................................................................... ......... SZ1 34pp'......... ........
Brawn Rd Grander ..
pp'........ ....... .... 1 66d 5... ....$34Z66...
.......................................................................................................................................................................I..............................U....................U.....................I I........................I I........................
......................................................................................... $BZ ......... ....... ......... .......
Short RdfBrownRd North Grinder 5378 13
..................................................................................................................................................................... ..............................II.....................II.....................U.......................Al........................
.....9[345outlr Grinder...................................................................................................................... .........$3d3.1 4p'...................pp'........ ....... ....�1,96a9... ....$3611-4...
.......................................................................................................................................................................I..............................U....................U.....................I I........................I I........................
...................................................................................................................................................................... .............................. ..................... ..................... ....................... ........................
Total CoOe€tkm System $4,7 995
New 34,5W GPD SBR WWTP $476d 193 97 K637-2 M153
........................ ........................
New 34,5W GPD HYBRID RIICWWTP $d987,153 97 $1,7138 $315614
46
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
West Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 2a)
Table 11 —Summary of Project Costs
Conventional Gravity System
SERVICE
UYWEDU
SERVICEAREA EST COST EDUs (K)ST0- r rind
0%Laan 4-5%Loan
9[3 Speix�Rd Grar3y $87 84i 4 $d 2661 $5::7_
MapleAvel-RationRdGrarty........................................................................................................... ........ 1J01........ ........1. ......p........ ....... .... � .fi...r......................
............................................................................................................................................................................I.................... ......
. ...................U....................II.......................I......................
i......Yiav Rd Gr................................................................................................................................. .......... i.i$88�1..... ........ ....... ......... ....... ... fi7fi .. .... 19289...
........... ....................... ............................................................................................................................ ........................ .................... .................... ...................... .......................
....Sltiort Rd/Brown Rd North C,rai....................................................................................................... ........ .......... .................. ........ ....... ....#Dh+ i.... ....#DIV{91...
...................................................................Y......................................................................................................1............ .................... .................... ......................X.......................
........................................................................................................................................................................................................ ................... .................... ....................... ......................
TotalColle.�tian System $3�31.b2 27 $5»�x $9.fi217
New ti=GPD MR WVfTP $3.L14`a 27 $37tiQ1 $ 7529
New 13,000GPDHYBRIDRBCW rP $d,ldfj7 27 $51195 $78328
New EX0GPDMcdularSYstenWWTP{2Units) $UMCA4 Z7 S77d4J �3�
Grinder Pump System
SERVICE
SERVICE ARElk EST COST ED Us 30- r riod
0%Loan 4-5%Loan
SI[_1VSpen€3 Rd Grinder ' 34 '5 $ d1 5 S4443-7
Maple A ve-Rat For€eMain.............................................................................. (f ......... 53 ....... ........i .......II......... .......p...$1.,z14-7.. .... "1d5...
...l�I......Yiav Rd Grinda........................................................................................................................ ..... .......1 i....... ........ ....... .... 1.455 ... ....$ 6601...
.................................................................................................................................................... II........... ........
.... .................................................................................................. .......... 7p . ... )1 #....D......�.....i. I......................
..hart Rd/Brown Rd North Grinder 5%
. #DIVj�
............................................................................................................................................................................ .......................... 1....................I....................U..................... ........................
.......................00................................................................................................................................................................................. ................... .................... ....................... ......................
Total Cdle€tian System $ 05�3 27 $�.SZti $4fifr4A
New 13,0GPD SBR WtriTP $3.L14`a 27 ...$3,7hQ1 $ 7529
New 13,000GPD HYBRID RBCV TP $3,144�7 27 $5,1195 $78328
....................... ......................
New i3,000GPD Modular SystemWWTP12Lloits} $181$ 27 $ 15.2 $4 352
As can been seen solely from the capital costs comparison tables the grinder pump system
with an SBR treatment system are the lower cost alternatives for Central and West Danby,
while the grinder pump and modular treatment system is most economical for just the
Hamlet Centers.The capital costs include construction,contingencies,and soft costs
(engineering fees,legal fees,administrative fees,etc.)but do not consider operation&
maintenance(short-lived assets)or staffing requirements.
K. Operation and Maintenance Costs
Operation and maintenance typically associated with a sanitary collection system would
include mechanical equipment upkeep or repairs/replacement as needed; energy costs of
pumps and other electrical equipment;sewer cleaning/flushing possibly;staffing proportional
salaries;administration duties;new service connections,and the like.
It is difficult to assess these costs at a preliminary stage and it would be reasonable to expect
that costs would be insignificant for the first 5-10 years for a new system;mainly energy costs,
minor maintenance,and employee time.
47
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
There are O&M costs associated with the treatment plant addition. Items such as electrical
demand, maintenance of equipment, equipment repairs or replacement, personnel salary,
chemical costs,sludge treatment and removal.
L. Short-Lived Assets
In accordance with the NYSDEC and EFC document"Engineering Report Outline for New
York State Wastewater Infrastructure Projects (October 2021)",we considered Energy
Efficiency Best Practices and Short-Lived Assets as they may pertain to the items assessed in
the report. However,for the items we have identified for improvement or implementation
there do not appear to be many energy efficiency opportunities with perhaps the exception of
the pumps and blowers where premium efficiency motors and VFDs could be specified. Any
other additions will be relatively small,so we would investigate energy efficient lighting,
heating,ventilation,and the like,should they be required. These will be reviewed during our
design phase.
In terms of short-lived assets of the proposed upgrades,items such as pumps and
appurtenances,certain instrumentation,and some mechanical equipment can be considered
short-lived and could need replacement every 2-5 years or so. Typical equipment
components will be replaced as needed as part of the normal facility O&M program.
M. Non-Monetary Factors
Approval of this project will only improve any current and potential health&safety and/or
water quality issues of residents within the Town and enable compact growth in the
community.
VII. Comparison of Alternatives
A. Capital Costs
Two (2) sanitary collection systems and two(2) treatment plant options,along with a
packaged modular treatment system for the Hamlet Centers (Service Areas I and 2a)were
evaluated for service areas outlined earlier to ascertain practical solutions to provide the
Town with sanitary collection and treatment to meet the anticipated effluent limits stated
earlier.
The tables below summarize the collection systems and processes reviewed with their
respective capital and O&M costs for each service area;Central Danby(Service Area 1),
48
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area la),West Danby(Service Area 2),West
Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area 2a). Operational complexity and pros/cons are only
provided in the first two tables,as they are common across the service areas.
Central Danby(Service Area 1) — 186 EDUs
Table 12 — Total Collection System Project Cost Summary
Parameter ALT. NO. 1 ALT. NO. 2
M&I Gravity System Grinder Pump System
Est.Installation Cost' $11,026,575 $8,591,657
Cost/EDU(30-yr 0%) $2,124.60 $1,655.40
Cost/EDU(30-yr 4.5%) $3,912.90 $3,048.90
Expected Useful Life: - -
Collection System/Concrete 50-100 years 50-100 years
Major Equipment 10 years 10 years
Est.Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 Power-$2,614 Power-$0
(Major items) Labor(1 staff,est.4 hrs/week) - Labor(1 staff,est.8 hrs/week) -
$8,216 $15,496
Expected Annualized $7,500 $12,788
Maintenance&Replacement
Cost(25%of major items)
Total Annualized Cost
-30 years,0% $385,883 $314,673
-30 years,4.5% $695,268 $555,739
Operational Complexity Minimal/Low—pump stations Medium—many grinder pumps
maint. to maint.
Pros/Cons Pros Pros
•Residents will not need to •Potentially less deep
maintain indiv.pumps construction
•Residents will not have addl • Residents will not need
electrical costs. to maintain indiv.
•Less susceptible to equipment pumps
failure
Cons Cons
• Potentially deeper construction •Residents will have addl
electrical costs.
•More susceptible to equipment
failure
• High short lived asset cost
49
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
1. Based on Mfr.Quotes,previous bidding knowledge,engineering judgment where
applicable;actual costs could vary at the time of final design and 4%inflation over 2
years has been added.
2. Power based on$0.08/kW-hr and 6 hr/7-day collection system pumps.
3. Labor assumes hrs/wk as shown @ 1-2 employees,$35/hr maintenance,admin$18/hr,
1 hr/wk for collection system and 1 F/T employee at various times at WWTP at
$62.5/hr.
4. Costs for power,labor,and O&M are provided as information&comparison.
Table 13 — Total Treatment Project Cost Summary
Parameter ALT.NO. 1 ALT.N0. 2
SBR System Hybrid RBC System
Est.Installation Cost' $5,676,224 $7,099,977
Cost/EDU(30-yr 0%) $1,093.70 $1,368.00
Cost/EDU(30-yr 4.5%) $2,014.30 $2,519.50
Expected Useful Life: - -
Collection System/Concrete 50-100 years 50-100 years
Major Equipment 10 years 10 years
Est.Annual Operating Cost2,3,1 Power-$7,973 Power-$8,495
(Major items) Sludge Hauling(4100 gal/mo @ Sludge Hauling(4100 gal/mo @
$400/1,000 gals) - $19,700 $400/1,000 gals) - $19,700
Labor(est.20 hrs/week) - $65,000
Labor(est.40 hrs/week) -
$130,000
Expected Annualized $15,509 $10,994
Maintenance&Replacement
Cost(25%of major items)
Total Annualized Cost
-30 years,0% $297,389 $405,795
-30 years,4.5% $456,654 $605,068
Operational Complexity Medium—Requires a licensed Medium—Requires a licensed
operator operator
Pros/Cons • Batch system provides inherent • No effluent EQ basin&pumps
EQ to allow for greater flow needed
swings • Robust concrete construction
• All biological treatment& and longevity
clarification in one basin • No effluent EQ basin needed
• No greenhouse building • Requires less blowers/aeration
• Less complex site piping and for attached growth process
flow regime as it is a package • Requires less blowers/aeration
system • More complex site piping and
• Common steel wall tankage flow regime
50
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
construction • More tankage needed
• Requires effluent EQ basin& • Separate EQ is needed if peak
pumps flow dampening is needed
• Steel tankage can rust/corrode • Process requires a greenhouse
over time causing higher building
maintenance • Larger footprint
• Requires more blowers/aeration
for activated sludge process
1. Based on Mfr.Quotes,previous bidding knowledge,engineering judgment where
applicable;actual costs could vary at the time of final design and 4%inflation over 2
years has been added.
2. Power based on$0.08/kW-hr and varies for WWTP operation for 12-month operation.
3. Labor assumes hrs/wk as shown @ 1-2 employees,$35/hr maintenance,admin$18/hr,
1 hr/wk for collection system and 1 F/T employee at various times at WWTP at
$62.5/hr.
4. Costs for power,labor,and O&M are provided as information&comparison.
Central Danby Hamlet Centers (Service Area la) — 30 EDUs
Table 14 — Total Collection System Project Cost Summary
Parameter ALT. NO. 1 ALT. NO. 2
Gravity System Grinder Pump System
Est. Installation Cost' $769,359 $701,628
Cost/EDU(30-yr 0%) $1,602.80 $1,461.70
Cost/EDU(30-yr 4.5%) $2,952.00 $2,692.10
Expected Useful Life: - -
Collection System/Concrete 50-100 years 50-100 years
Major Equipment 10 years 10 years
Est.Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 Power-$0 Power-$0
(Major items) Labor(1 staff,est.4 hrs/week) - Labor(1 staff,est.8 hrs/week) -
$8,216 $15,496
Expected Annualized $0 $2,480
Maintenance&Replacement
Cost(25%of major items)
Total Annualized Cost
-30 years,0% $33,861 $41,364
-30 years,4.5% $55,448 $61,050
51
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Table 15 —Total Treatment Project Cost Summary
Parameter ALT. NO. 1 ALT. NO. 2 ALT. NO. 3
SBR System Modular Package Hybrid RBC System
System
Est.Installation Cost' $3,011,661 $2,073,933 $4,146,769
Cost/EDU(30-yr 0%) $3,346.30 $2,304.40 $4,607.50
Cost/EDU(30-yr 4.5%) $6,163.00 $4,244.10 $8,485.90
Expected Useful Life: - - -
Collection System/Concrete 50-100 years 50-100 years 50-100 years
Major Equipment 10 years 10 years 10 years
Est.Annual Operating Cost2,1A Power- $7,581 Power- $4,705 Power- $9,018
(Major items) Sludge Hauling(700 Sludge Hauling(3,000 Sludge Hauling(700
gal/mo @$400/1,000 gal/yr @$400/1,000 gal/mo @$400/1,000
gals) - $3,350 gals) -$1,200 gals) -$3,350
Labor(est.20 Labor(est.20 Labor(est.40 hrs/week)
hrs/week) - $65,000 hrs/week) - $65,000 - $130,000
Expected Annualized $9,138 $6,813 $8,625
Maintenance&Replacement
Cost(25%of major items)
Total Annualized Cost
-30 years,0% $185,458 $146,849 $289,219
-30 years,4.5% $269,960 $205,040 $405,569
52
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
West Danby(Service Area 2) —97 EDUs
Table 16 — Total Collection System Project Cost Summary
Parameter ALT. NO. 1 ALT. NO. 2
M Im � Gravity System Grinder Pump System
Est.Installation Cost' $8,533,866 $4,739,201
Cost/EDU(30-yr 0%) $2,932.60 $1,628.60
Cost/EDU(30-yr 4.5%) $5,401.10 $2,999.50
Expected Useful Life: - -
Collection System/Concrete 50-100 years 50-100 years
Major Equipment 10 years 10 years
Est.Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 Power-$4,575 Power-$0
(Major items) Labor(1 staff,est.4 hrs/week) - Labor (1 staff,est. 8 hrs/week) -
$8,216 $15,496
Expected Annualized $13,125 $6,433
Maintenance&Replacement
Cost(25%of major items)
Total Annualized Cost
-30 years,0% $310,378 $179,902
-30 years,4.5% $549,823 $312,876
Table 17— Total Treatment Project Cost Summary
7
Parameter ALT.NO. 1 ALT.NO. 2
SBR System Hybrid RBC System
Est.Installation Cost' $4,764,193 $4,987,153
Cost/EDU(30-yr 0%) $1,637.20 $1,713.80
Cost/EDU(30-yr 4.5%) $3,015.30 $3,156.40
Expected Useful Life: - -
Collection System/Concrete 50-100 years 50-100 years
Major Equipment 10 years 10 years
Est.Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 Power-$7,973 Power-$5,620
(Major items) Sludge Hauling(2,070 gal/mo @ Sludge Hauling(2,070 gal/mo @
$400/1,000 gals) -$9,930 $400/1,000 gals) - $9,930
Labor(est.20 hrs/week) - $65,000 Labor(est.40 hrs/week) -
$130,000
Expected Annualized $12,050 $6,425
Maintenance&Replacement
Cost(25%of major items)
Total Annualized Cost
-30 years,0% $253,759 $318,213
-30 years,4.5% $387,434 $458,144
53
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
West Danby Hamlet Centers(Service Area 2a) —27 EDUs
Table 18 — Total Collection System Project Cost Summary
Parameter ALT. NO. 1 ALT. NO. 2
W � Gravity System Grinder Pump System
Est.Installation Cost' $2,769,329 $1,454,427
Cost/EDU(30-yr 0%) $3,418.90 $1,795.60
Cost/EDU(30-yr 4.5%) $6,296.80 $3,307.00
Expected Useful Life: - -
Collection System/Concrete 50-100 years 50-100 years
Major Equipment 10 years 10 years
Est.Annual Operating Costz,3,4 Power-$2,614 Power- $0
(Major items) Labor(1 staff,est.4 hrs/week) - Labor(1 staff,est.8 hrs/week) -
$8,216 $15,496
Expected Annualized $7,500 $3,255
Maintenance&Replacement
Cost(25%of major items)
Total Annualized Cost
-30 years,0% $110,641 $67,231.91
-30 years,4.5% $188,343 $108,041
54
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Table 19 — Total Treatment Project Cost Summary
Parameter ALT. NO. 1 ALT.NO. 2 ALT. NO. 3
SBR System Modular Package Hybrid RBC System
System
Est.Installation Cost' $3,045,666 $1,818,644 $4,146,769
Cost/EDU(30-yr 0%) $3,760.10 $2,245.20 $5,119.50
Cost/EDU(30-yr 4.5%) $5,752.90 $3,435.20 $7,832.80
Expected Useful Life: - - -
Collection System/Concrete 50-100 years 50-100 years 50-100 years
Major Equipment 10 years 10 years 10 years
Est.Annual Operating Cost2,3,4 Power-$7,581 Power- $4,705 Power- $9,018
(Major items) Sludge Hauling(780 Sludge Hauling(3,000 Sludge Hauling(780
gal/mo @$400/1,000 gal/yr @$400/1,000 gal/mo @$400/1,000
gals) - $3,740 gals) - $1,200 gals) -$3,740
Labor(est.20 Labor(est.20 Labor(est.40
hrs/week) - $65,000 hrs/week) - $65,000 hrs/week) -$130,000
Expected Annualized $9,275 $6,813 $8,625
Maintenance&Replacement
Cost(25%of major items)
Total Annualized Cost
-30 years,0% $187,118 $138,340 $289,608
-30 years,4.5% $272,574 $189,367 $405,959
VIII. RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE
A. Basis of Selection
This Town of Danby WWTP and Sanitary System Study seeks to improve the health and
safety of the community by implementing a sanitary collection system and treatment plant
for one or more of the four(4) service areas reviewed within the Town limits.
The cost analysis along with discussions with the Town have made the alternatives for
sewering the entire Central Dandy/West Danby areas infeasible. Therefore,the
recommended project is to provide sanitary collection and treatment for the Hamlet
Centers within the Town of Dandy(Service Areas la/2a) only. This includes a grinder or
gravity collection system and a modular,package membrane bioreactor treatment system
enclosed in fully pre-manufactured and engineered container(s).
55
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Table 20: Selected Project Summary
Parameter Gravity System with Grinder System with
Modular Package System Modular Package System
(Central Danby Hamlet Centers) (West Danby Hamlet Centers)
Est.Project Cost $2,843,292 $3,273,071
Annual Debt Service(30-yr 4.5%) $174,554 $200,939
Annual O&M $85,934 $96,469
Number of EDUs 30 27
Total Annual Cost/EDU $8,683 $11,015
Monthly Cost/EDU $724 $918
B. Potential Project Schedule
The anticipated project schedule is as follows:
• Preliminary Engineering Report Approval-March 2024
• IUP Listing-June 2024
• NYSDEC WQIP Application-July 2024
• SHPO No Effect Finding-July 2024
• SEQR Neg Declaration-July 2024
• USDA Rd Application-November 2024
• Special District Formation-July 2025
• NYSEFC WIIA Grant&CWSRF Application Filed-July 2025
• Bond Res,Eng.Agrmt.,Municipal/Bond Council,Auth. Res. -July 2025
• CWSRF Short Term Loan Closing-December 2025
• CDBG funding application(if prequals. are met) -2026
• Engineering Plans,Specifications,and BODR to agency-January- May 2026
• SPDES Form 2A Application-January 2026
• Regulatory comments/responses-June-October 2026
• Advertising of Bids-November 2026
• Begin Construction-January 2027
• Substantially Complete Construction-December 2027
• Funding Close Out&Operation-Spring 2028
C. Next Steps
The community will continue to discuss the project and funding procurement with the
public at regular board meetings and continue to gain local public and private support.
SEQR review will occur during the planning for design phase.
56
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
Anticipated procurement methods and plan of contracts(e.g.,design/bid/build,energy
performance contract,Project Labor Agreement,Wicks,design/build,etc.)
The Town will develop and implement a Sewer Ordinance in accordance with the NYSDEC
Model Sewer Use Law including the mandate for all properties within 100 feet of a public
sewer to connect.
D. Funding Sources
Securing funding from the potential sources identified below can help achieve an actionable
project.The following information identifies funding opportunities that have been offered
by State and Federal sources in the recent past.The status of the funding programs and
application periods is discussed below.
1. USDA Rural Development (RD) Water and Waste Disposal Loan &Grant Program
The Town of Danby may be eligible for federal USDA RD funding based on the
population being less than 10,000.The program offers long-term low-interest loans,
and grants may be combined if funds are available.The loan rate is based on the useful
life of the facilities to be financed,the need of the project,and the median household
income. The 2021 ACS 5-Year Estimate Median Household Income for Danby is
$76,445,which is higher than the$45,506 threshold and therefore it is anticipated that
the project would not qualify for the poverty rate loan. The current market rate for 4th
Quarter FY 2022 is 3.500%.The application period for USDA loan and grant program
is open year round,the first step is to contact the local Rural Development office to
discuss the project and begin the electronic application.
2. NYS EFC Clean Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
NYSEFC provides grant funding to assist municipalities in funding water quality
infrastructure.A clean water project may be eligible for a WIIA grant of up to the lesser
of 25%of total eligible costs after deducting other grant funds awarded for the project,
or$25 million.To enable application for the WIIA grant the sewer district formation
must be complete,SEQR process must be complete,SHPO determination complete,
bond financing resolution be complete,and resolution approving application and
authorization to execute the contract be complete.The grant application period
typically closes in September each year.
57
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 July 2023,Revised February 2024,April 2024
3. NYS EFC Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan
The Clean Water State Revolving fund provides interest-free or low-interest rate
financing for wastewater and water quality improvement projects to municipalities
throughout New York State.EFC provides both short and long-term financing at zero
or low interest.Applications are received on a continuous basis;however,the annual
allocation of funds is driven by the presence of the project on the Intended Use Plan
(IUP).It is recommended that the submittal of the project be made for publication in
the 2024 IUP.The ranking on the IUP will demonstrate eligibility for hardship or
subsidized financing.
IX. Conclusion:
In summary the project is well positioned to secure grant funds and favorable low interest loan
rates.The Town will need to be pro-active to secure maximum funding by maintaining positive
communication with involved agencies,adopting a bond resolution,securing necessary permits
and approvals,and initiating design.
A. Smart Growth Assessment
A completed Smart Growth form can be found in Appendix J of this report.
B. Engineering Report Certification
Engineering Report Certification can be found in Appendix K.
58
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX A
Project Location Mapping
TCParcels
�I TC Buildings 2020
f 10 ' -
,� ■� _ Unique Natural Areas
lr 4
I I Habitat Corridor
Hamlet Center
t, 'r• , Hamlet Neighborhood
�6
� t
'asp �"�" -• � ..'_ .
00
11 �►, �� ���o�► v-70
r � �
_ 0 1 L20
�O
App
.e ♦r
132p "o
'���-- • 1� � 1340
1360
ource. E-sri, Maxar,GeoEye, Eartihs4ar Geographies,CNES�/ s D'S,U DA,
USG ,AeroGRID, IGN,and the G'I User Communit,
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:DIM West
Central Danby Hamlet Overview CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYORS Danby town Plznnarown of DATE:211120223:15 PM Page of
PROJECT NAME Tlr naf urad Add ptsd 1-4-zzwn zoning SCALE:
10. D.ql� HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Streams,Roads,P-cals provided REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY °"•"1'��° by Tompkins Couny
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 Thismap is/orplanning purposes
TOWANDA,PA 570-265-4868 onlysana eneula nee b.ueea eor
11
!1, ....
o ereceion.
PROJECT ADDRESS a„<„Re�rea„ee„��a„ee�,� PROJECTNO:
ln_a� ■ v ug1 �. 1 f
■ L:-���'rnmd���l ,��" ���1y''... ■ � ,,'�i'I, l 001
TCParcels
Wamlet Center
r ' � �I. ��`,r �� ��1�i,L��.U■''1..,'�� ��- pHamlet Neighborhood
�� �_ ��� �� ■11�� � '�it -
iiuiil m
SMIN
ANE
MEW
�f I
11■ ►� ■
Illlls� N
0 1,7003,400 6,800
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:DaM Was1
Hamlets Overview CHECKED BYM. :
HUNTSNGIVEERSIARCHITECTSISURVEYORS Da.by—nPI-ner�Wnaf DATE:21112022 3:15 PM T Page of
PROJECT NAME naa pfeidde422.nzoning
TM RN�N .aCy SCALE:
eaawar HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Streams,Roads,Parcels provided REVISION:
TOWN OF DANBY ° by Tompkins co'n
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 Thismapis for planning purposes
TOWAN DA,PA 570-265-4868 o ionly and sM1ould no[be used for
I- ion In
PROJECT ADDRESS a„<„ C1S.a„sasW PROJECT NO:
8
og`cp 20 800 k TCParcels
ETC Buildings 2020
3 —DanbyWaterlines2001
• =Hamlet Center
f '
Hamlet Neighborhood
Lo -q�iirr .v_ .ear
BUnique Natural Areas
ar ®Habitat Corridor
o
r
Ooo oo
0
o �O
Epp O ''0�0
O
1 1
cb
96
4p
9-0
poo
�so.
0
960
rn
o ao
00
a o 00
^ o wow 000
56 0 r'
0
ao Sys 0 ; SourtI5 Esri, I I r,GeoEye, EarOhstar Geographios,CNE / irbus D U ® ,
U�GS�AeroGRID, IGN,and the GI User Communit, goo
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:DaM West
West Danby Hamlet Overview CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSI AROHITEc,I SURVEYORS Danny town Plznnarown of DATE:211120223:15 PM Page Of
PROJECT NAME nrnaf ura/ naa pe.ai'e-zzwn zoning SCALE:
ezau.ar� HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Sheams,Roads,Parcels provided REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY °"•"1'��° by Tompkins
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 Thismap is/o,p'..planning purposes
TOWANDA,PA570-265-4868 onisanaano„ianoen.eaaaeor
!j, co eraceion.
PROJECT ADDRESS a„<„Re�rea„ea„��a„ee�,� PROJECT NO:
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX B
Soils Mapping
z z
a a
c, ro
N N
R R
008L89b 000L9917 OOL989b 00099W OOL99W 0089aw M 7
N w
M.OE.DE o9L M..OE,O£o9L C. O
N
M N
N �
r
m
� S
� M
�0
Z LLI
T r �
G z
O rr (n
U �a 3
m T p
y oLij
O �
CL z c
o s
( Q
I a o
Q oo a u) > ()
M > > (0
N � e Co O
(u m
c Z
I • (7
yQpQ� O � VVV
LU
71.
�0 M
M Q O
ao
o in
o
Lj
0
E
�o R
MBeechd -Q o
Q 8 Q
/ o V Q V
$c� •
m rl N > d •�
~ L U)
g� 3
cL � O
E
o o51.7
N
w C
M.,6E.ZE o9L M..6E.Z£o9L Q
0091, OD8" OOOL89b OOL989b OOKGW OO1989b 008989b
z z
v a
N N
\ {
» co Co
k $ k2 � �
, r o
/ \ \ dej \ k / § { \
2 C } 4 5 a= 2 s � w ) ¥ E
_ ; & / _ � , � E = o
\ > # E — E2 � � §
b \ § j E / ! 2@k � j ^ \ § E ¥ f
Q ® ° 7 / (n a) £ 22m .
3 / \ \ 2 2— � / \ / 2 % ` %
& g § k \ CL o � � / + m [ E / # %
O \ m = \ ` t6 \ } 20 Gf } 2 %= k2
*, — 2 G / s E �m ,
Z f 2 2 } ! # jk\ [ 2 @ ƒ & ! § E7
_ ° _ ! %
\ \ § ) mm \# � 2 \\ = E je ® =
iL 8 % j . 4 U) 0M k ) § \ k � / f\ )
] _ « ) .. < S@ § 2 ® _ $ _
« / o _
� , z = E g = au2 , ƒ a , � 7 = —
\ £ • t] 55 �p ) a % § a o :E5
Ef / a / 2 � ` ? 8 < � - m k 222E
K , 2 — ■ = m2 \ k , .
26 ƒ/ % / ) [ \ § ƒ % f \ ƒ< \\ k 0- � \
\ ° m � a) ® tC.) > » Co0 2 § 7 � =
m / mq 0 D...0 w \ ! ® 7 ƒ& % / \-
q , » G § o ME« = o
\ / � FL n4o &ea % / \ \ / \ f 3 & / 8E
»
z
\ §
to
i ?
E \ \
) \
\ w § G
/ k ( CL � \
� k
« 2 I m # g 0 %S
\ § $ ] ] i z
= a , w ] ) w — 7
\ } ! \ 0 ) f g / \ _ )
e m
2 E }
W a u
0 / 0. I !
W
� g g
iL
\ \ \
15ƒ \ \ \ CD 0/
\m) k f a\ f \ a r § \ A \
L)
2 ❑ . \ q ❑ q q ❑ . . . . § 13 El13 13 ■ ■ 2 /
g cn 3 = r-
k co § 0
\ �
) §
go
\I
Depth to Water Table-Tompkins County, New York
Depth to Water Table
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating(centimeters) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ArB Arkport fine sandy loam, >200 2.6 0.6%
2 to 6 percent slopes
ArC Arkport fine sandy loam, >200 8.1 1.8%
6 to 12 percent slopes
BgC Bath and Valois soils,5 69 26.6 5.9%
to 15 percent slopes
BgD Bath and Valois soils, 15 64 11.0 2.4%
to 25 percent slopes,
eroded
BoE Bath and Valois soils,25 69 0.7 0.2%
to 35 percent slopes
CdA Chenango gravelly >200 8.2 1.8%
loam,0 to 5 percent
slopes
CdC Chenango gravelly >200 4.8 1.1%
loam,5 to 15 percent
slopes
CdD Chenango gravelly >200 6.0 1.3%
loam, 15 to 25 percent
CnB Chenango gravelly 122 24.9 5.6%
loam,fan,0 to 8
percent slopes
Em Eel silt loam 54 11.2 2.5%
HdC Howard gravelly loam,5 >200 32.3 7.2%
to 15 percent simple
slopes
HdCK Howard gravelly loam,5 >200 7.3 1.6%
to 15 percent complex
slopes
HdD Howard gravelly loam, >200 60.1 13.4%
15 to 25 percent
slopes
HpE Howard and Palmyra >200 26.8 6.0%
soils,25 to 35 percent
slopes
HsB Hudson silty clay loam, 51 4.4 1.0%
2 to 6 percent slopes
HsC3 Hudson silty clay loam, 51 57.1 12.8%
6 to 12 percent
slopes,eroded
HsD3 Hudson silty clay loam, 51 76.6 17.1%
12 to 20 percent
slopes,eroded
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/23/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4
Depth to Water Table—Tompkins County, New York
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating(centimeters) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
HwB Hudson and Collamer 51 24.8 5.5%
silt loams,2 to 6
percent slopes
HzE Hudson and Dunkirk 51 6.8 1.5%
soils,20 to 45 percent
slopes
Mm Madalin mucky silty clay 0 3.0 0.7%
loam
Mn Madalin silty clay loam, 0 1.1 0.2%
0 to 3 percent slopes
MP Muck and Peat 0 2.6 0.6%
Ro Rock outcrop >200 0.5 0.1%
Ws yland soils complex, 0 39.7 8.9%
0 to 3 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
Totals for Area of Interest 447.2 100.0%
Description
"Water table" refers to a saturated zone in the soil. It occurs during specified
months. Estimates of the upper limit are based mainly on observations of the
water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely
grayish colors (redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for
less than a month is not considered a water table.
This attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A
low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil
component. A"representative"value indicates the expected value of this attribute
for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used.
Rating Options
Units of Measure:centimeters
Aggregation Method: Dominant Component
Component Percent Cutoff:None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Lower
Interpret Nulls as Zero: No
Beginning Month:January
Ending Month: December
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/23/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
.•11 11 11 11 : 11 :C 11 •ill
c
VVs
BgC Ha V"1lsfggCBgC :f ,e =
.BgC
g E��
_ Ab
BgC
Bg6, Em
- Em IcA
r--Em_-
.n .L-aB_ HdC
p,B ErA H'dA HdC ✓ F
d LaB LaB g Em B CN Ha HdA_ ME
EbB L B O n ER A►
��;' •'_ � �� � P�h� He
Er�A � ��HdA� Ha
�L�aB Ha RkB La'
-
LaB BgC
Y'L•aB ErA
� BgC
�Eb
� ErA
Lab
i RhA LaB rreeK
LaB E�A� �' EbB
LaB B,uA
LrC�C�3
' ., � �♦ 1�� E—b6 BgC —
ErA W BgD
UUs Ebb _ LaC�3
Cfeek
1 - 1
MIR
. 11 :.11 11 11 11 11 :v11 •i11
•111 -•• •• --
1 1 11 111 11
1 1 11 111 111 111
\ {
» co Co
k $ k2 � �
, r o
/ \ \ dej \ k / § { \
2 C } 4 5 a= 2 s � w ) ¥ E
_ ; & / _ � , � E = o
\ > # E — E2 � � §
b \ § j E / ! 2@k � j ^ \ § E ¥ f
Q ® ° 7 / (n a) £ 22m .
3 / \ \ 2 2— � / \ / 2 % ` %
& g § k \ CL o � � / + m [ E / # %
O \ m = \ ` t6 \ } 20 Gf } 2 %= k2
*, — 2 G / s E �m ,
Z f 2 2 } ! # jk\ [ 2 @ ƒ & ! § E7
_ ° _ ! %
\ \ § ) mm \# � 2 \\ = E je ® =
iL 8 % j . 4 U) 0M k ) § \ k � / f\ )
] _ « ) .. < S@ § 2 ® _ $ _
« / o _
� , z = E g = au2 , ƒ a , � 7 = —
\ £ • t] 55 �p ) a % § a o :E5
Ef / a / 2 � ` ? 8 < � - m k 222E
K , 2 — ■ = m2 \ k , .
26 ƒ/ % / ) [ \ § ƒ % f \ ƒ< \\ k 0- � \
\ ° m � a) ® tC.) > » Co0 2 § 7 � =
m / mq 0 D...0 w \ ! ® 7 ƒ& % / \-
q , » G § o ME« = o
\ / � FL n4o &ea % / \ \ / \ f 3 & / 8E
»
z
\ §
to
i ?
E \ \
) \
\ w § G
/ k ( CL � \
� k
« 2 I m # g 0 %S
\ § $ ] ] i z
= a , w ] ) w — 7
\ } ! \ 0 ) f g / \ _ )
e m
2 E }
W a u
0 / 0. I !
W
� g g
iL
\ \ \
15ƒ \ \ \ CD 0/
\m) k f a\ f \ a r § \ A \
L)
2 ❑ . \ q ❑ q q ❑ . . . . § 13 El13 13 ■ ■ 2 /
g cn 3 = r-
k co § 0
\ �
) §
go
\I
Depth to Water Table-Tompkins County, New York
Depth to Water Table
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating(centimeters) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ab Alluvial land 0 27.7 2.6%
BgC Bath and Valois soils,5 69 95.4 9.0%
to 15 percent slopes
BgC3 Bath and Valois soils,5 64 15.8 1.5%
to 15 percent slopes,
eroded
BgD Bath and Valois soils, 15 64 0.0 0.0%
to 25 percent slopes,
eroded
BoE Bath and Valois soils,25 69 0.2 0.0%
to 35 percent slopes
BvA Braceville gravelly silt 33 2.2 0.2%
loam,0 to 5 percent
slopes
CnB Chenango gravelly 122 28.2 2.7%
loam,fan,0 to 8
percent slopes
DgB Darien gravelly silt loam, 23 40.2 3.8%
2 to 8 percent slopes
EbB Erie channery silt loam, 25 176.9 16.7%
3 to 8 percent slopes
EbC3 Erie channery silt loam, 25 10.1 1.0%
8 to 15 percent
slopes,eroded
EcA Chippewa and Alden 0 11.1 1.1%
soils,0 to 8 percent
slopes
Em Eel silt loam 54 99.1 9.4%
ErA Erie-Chippewa channery 25 83.6 7.9%
silt loams,0 to 3
percent slopes
Ha Halsey silt loam 0 31.0 2.9%
He Halsey mucky silt loam 0 1.4 0.1%
HdA Howard gravelly loam,0 >200 43.4 4.1%
to 5 percent slopes
HdC Howard gravelly loam,5 >200 21.9 2.1%
to 15 percent simple
slopes
IcA Ilion silty clay loam,0 to 0 17.6 1.7%
2 percent slopes
LaB Langford channery silt 50 142.0 13.4%
loam,2 to 8 percent
slopes
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/23/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4
Depth to Water Table—Tompkins County, New York
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating(centimeters) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
LaC3 Langford channery silt 45 5.5 0.5%
loam,8 to 15 percent
slopes,eroded
PhA Phelps gravelly silt 38 42.8 4.0%
loam,0 to 3 percent
slopes
PhB Phelps gravelly silt 38 1.4 0.1%
loam,3 to 8 percent
slopes
RhA Red Hook gravelly silt 20 14.8 1.4%
loam,0 to 5 percent
slopes
RkB Rhinebeck silt loam,2 to 25 3.8 0.4%
6 percent slopes
VrD Volusia and Erie soils, 21 1.6 0.2%
15 to 25 percent
slopes
W Water >200 9.6 0.9%
Ws Wayland soils complex, 0 129.5 12.3%
0 to 3 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
Totals for Area of Interest 1,057.0 100.0%
Description
"Water table" refers to a saturated zone in the soil. It occurs during specified
months. Estimates of the upper limit are based mainly on observations of the
water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely
grayish colors (redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for
less than a month is not considered a water table.
This attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A
low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil
component. A"representative"value indicates the expected value of this attribute
for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used.
Rating Options
Units of Measure:centimeters
Aggregation Method: Dominant Component
Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Lower
Interpret Nulls as Zero: No
Beginning Month:January
Ending Month: December
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/23/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX C
Environmental Resource Mapping
--- +a •� TCParcels
Ia Hamlet Center
Hamlet Neighborhood
II 1
I
it
I 1.
I �
I
' f
f
I Feet
- 1
0 1,7003,400 6,800
NOTES: DRAWN BY:Da,id West
Tompkins County Agricultural Districts- Danby CHECKED BYIfi. :
HUNTSNGIVEERSIARCHITECTSISURVEYORS Dan by To Men'n-rowno DIE 2i1i20223:15FW Page of
PROJECT NAME Darainciun-s2'2 n ning SCALE:
� N�YonGY ft..-tl 1-d-22
eaaw.r HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Btr-ams,RoaEs,Parcala provitlatl REVISION:
TOWN OF DANBY ° "1'�'� by Tompkins Dounly
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 TM1ismapis for planning purposes
I TOWANDA,PA 570-265-4868 oni-o--c8on.yana-M1o.Id not be used ror
!1, con
PROJECT ADDRESS „„E ra.a„a�E.a„aa�. PROJECT NO:
�d
=Hamlet Center
Hamlet Neighborhood
I
_ o
Steveatow-:
Mi I1
t�
s
rm
Seyvllla�'lnak
Du tar N.ii
Gftek =_ I= olmpkins,Province f Ontario,
COun Y Ui 1Unir2K.n ia,i iU n L� Ui iuiiU,Lau�Ul i�
dl Hill Cavug'
m �
I
ram'
I � �
1 m
n � _
I y _
a�
0 1,7003,400 6,800
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:Da,id West
Archeologically Sensitive Areas CHECKED BYM. :
HUNTENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYGRS Danbyr wn riannar the �wn�' DATE:2i1i20223:15 PM Page of
PROJECT NAME Dafainciutlea Town zoning SCALE:
Atltlop[atl 1-4-22
eaau.ar HORSEHEADS,NY607358-1000 Bhi—pRoatla,Parcalaprovitlatl REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY " ^"o�° by Tompkins rpi..
draw ROCHESTER,NY585327-7950 TM1ismapisforplanningpurposas
,TOWANDA PA 570-265-4868 oni.y—sh—d not be usetl forALI
n o-ucBon.
PROJECT ADDRESS a,_ cnisscr..ncapa.a--zozz ROHEora.oRa�E.oRaa PROJECT NO:
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
WaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS)jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands)for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location �.
Tompkins County, New Yor
t
i Morn It
L -
5 '.
m
1
a III E.• ,
y
To G.4,r
J
Local office
New York Ecological Services Field Office
k. (607) 753-9334
Ili (607) 753-9699
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 1/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
3817 Luker Road
Cortland, NY 13045-9385
http://www.fws.gov/northeast/nyfo/es/section7.htm
10
-0
0
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 2/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur-at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to d❑ so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 3/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https.//ecos.fws.gov/ecpLpecies/9045
Insects
NAME STATUS 140
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found '►Wor
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. arm►
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecplspecies/9743
�.I
Critical habitatsC)0"
Potential effects to critical habitats) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acts and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 4/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gQv//program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC} list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about yoLlr migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAMF_ BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS
INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST,THE BIRD MAY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECTAREA
.,...,.. ......... ...... ..
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
...........................................................................
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH
....................................................................................................
IS AVERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE
............................................................................................
OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH
................................................................................................
THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
..................................................................................................
ENTIRE RANGE. ''BREEDS
................................................................................
ELSEWHERE'' INDICATES THAT
_................................................................................................
THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
.........................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT
_................................................................................
AREA.)
.....................
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 5/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Aug 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Breeds May 15 to Oct 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
Black-capped Chickadee Poecile atricapillus practicus Breeds Apr 10 to]u131
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the continental USA
Blue-winged Warbler Vermivora pines Breeds May 1 to Jun 30
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)only in particularI
Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the continental USA^ ►�
Bobolink Dolichanyx oryzlvarus — Breeds May 20 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis Breeds May 20 to Aug 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Breeds Apr 20 to Jul 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https,.//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/Species/2974
Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Evening Grosbeak Coccothraustes vespertinus Breeds May 15 to Aug 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 6/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Breeds Jan 1 to Aug 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Breeds May 1 tojul 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8745
Henslow's Sparrow Ammodramus henslowii Breeds May 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska. ,
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp s pecies/3941
001(
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes ,Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its .
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecpLpecies/9679
Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus acadicus Breeds Mar 1 tojul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the continental USA
' �- �
Prairie Warbler De_ndroica discolor Breeds May 1 tojul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Velanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/9480
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 7/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high. ,+M+ %e
%Mow**
How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (1)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 8/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort —no data
SPECIES JAN `` FEB MAR APR MAY JUiN }} .1UI_ AUC! 5EP II OCT 11 NOV## DEC ##Bald Eagle 1 i f f � li I II { I I II l41I I1 { I � I { I
Non-BCC
vulnerable — s
(This is not a
Bird of
-------------------
Conservation
1...... ..... ...... ..
Concern(BCC)
in this area,but
. .........................................
warrants
attention
.... ..... ...........
because of the
Eagle Act or for
.... .... .... ..... .... ...
potential
.... ...... ......
susceptibilities
in offshore
areas from
certain types of
.............. ..... ...... .......
development
.... .........................
or activities.)
Black-billed
Cuckoo ++++ ++++ ++++ tf tt +111 Jill Jill 111.1 Jill lit+ ++++ ++++
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON)(This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
........................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 9/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Black-capped Chickadee Jill 11111111 WIll iiIiiiiIiiij 1111 111111111111111111111111
BCC-BCR(This
...........................................
is a Bird of
..............................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
.......................................
only in
...................
particular Bird
.......................................
Conservation
.....................................
Regions(BCRs)
..........................................
in the
...............
continental
................................
USA) 111 1 11 11 1lll 11l Blue-winged f tt I I l-tt tftt ff t# 0000 wo sw' too s T I fT� TTTT T f I+
Warbler
BCC- BCR(This
.... ..... ..... ...... ..........
is a Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
only in
particular Bird
Conservation 001\
Regions(BCRs)
in_the
continental
USAj........
.....
Bobolink BCC Rangewide Oft t Mt-1 titt fft _ . 0 00$1 1 # tf+ Mt I -I ftj
(CON) is is a
_......._.....__....
.............
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC}
throughout its
-..... .._....._....._......w.
range in the
continental
USA and
Alaska:)
...,..�.........�Canada f tl 11 -I 1 1 T If T t
Warbler - lt tttf 400 00 0 00 O UPBCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON)(This is a
.........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
.......................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614 NYM7N FB F FDN U PIAK63J PCA/resources 10/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM I PaaC: ExploreeLocation resources
Cerulean TTTT T111 Tly TT]T +TT+ #T T T TTTT +TTT TTT+
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON)(This is a
.........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
.......................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
Eastern Whip-
poor-will ++++ ++++ ++++ f fff 1111 Jill Jill III+ ++t+ f+++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON) is is a
Bird W. - µ
Conservation
Concern(BCC}
throughout its \014
range in the
.... .._...-...
continental
USA�and �
Alaska.}
Evening
Grosbeak
BCC Rangewide
(CON_)(This is a
Bird of
Conservation CP
Concern(BCC)
.-...�......�..............
.....
throughout its
range in the 0
continental
USA and
....
Alaska.).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614 NYM7N FB F FDN U PIAK63J PCA/resources 11/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM yl�I IPaaC: Explore Location resources
Golden Eagle
Non-BCC 1 1T + ++++ Ott 44
Vulnerable
(This is not a
...................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC}
.......................................
in this area, but
............................................
warrants
........................
attention
..........................
because of the
........................................
Eagle Act or for
...........................................
potential
........................
susceptibilities
in offshore
areas from
certain types of
._...........-,,..............
_...
development
or activities.} 0
Golden-winged I t++ tit+ tti+ ffff $Ili $j�+ tf t+ T tT t*+
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) is is a
_..........................
--
Bird of
Conservation
Concern{BCC)
............................_.._..
throughout its
range in the
w............... ._.......
continental
USA.and
Alaska.}
Wenslow's
Sparrow
BCC Rangewide
(CON}(This is a
Bird„of. ... ...........
Conservation
Concern(BCC}
througho ut its
.... ......_ .... .......
range in the
.............................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614 NYM7N FB F FDN U PIAK63J PCA/resources 12/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaaC:
Explore
Location resources
Lesser -I I +++ I I + tttlillill T+++ I 1plTTTTT 4lTyy 11 -I I I tt T1
Yellowlegs
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON)(This is a
.........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
.......................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
...................... 1l1l11 11 I I 111 11 1 111 1111 1111 Northern Saw- tt++ Tt I t 1 I I I I I I + + I I ! J I +TTT 4f t f ttt TTTT TTTT
Saw-
whet Owl
BCC- BCR(This
.._..-_......._........................
is a Bird of
... .... -.W.-..-.W..
Conservation
....... ..... .. ..........
Concern(BCC}
_.. r
only in
particular Bird
....W......... .... .....
Conservation
Regions[BCRs)
in the
continental
........
�►
U5A)
Prairie Warbler 11fl _f-i -I _f_BCC Rangewide i _f_ i l- ttt# I I I I { I I 4 I I i I I } } 1 I I I TT TTTT TTT-f
(CON)(This....
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
....�...-...
..
throughout its
range in the 01
continental
USA and
Alaska.)
Red-headed 111 l 11 l j J ] ll Hit
11 l
Woodpecker I I I I T� 11 t I I + tttt } I I I I I I 1 14 I I III l III t
BCC Rangewide
...............
....._......_ ...........
(CON)(This is a
.........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
....................................
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614 NYM7N FB F FDN U PIAK63J PCA/resources 13/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM l l IPaC:Explore Location resources l 1y yyiy ylyl
Rusty Blackbird T I T� I I +++ I T� 0000 TTTT T I T I
BCC BCR(This
...........................................
is a Bird of
..............................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
........................................
only in
...................
particular Bird
........................................
Conservation
.....................................
Regions(BCRs)
..........................................
in the
...............
continental
................................
USA)Short-billed TTTT 1T1T ++++ l+f+ � 11I +T 11111111 ++11 11 1T1 ++1+ 1+1
+
❑owitcher
BCC Rangewide
(CDN}{ his is a
Birj" .........,..... ...
Conservation
Concern(BCC) ,
throughout its
...........
range in the
continental
USA and �
Alaska.) A000
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CDN}{This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC}
throughout its
...................
.... ........
range in the
continental
..._..........................
U.. and
Alaska.) '
..................
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 14/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN),,This data is derived from a growing collection} of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and {getter information.becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them,go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round),you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All
About Birds Bird Guide, or(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of
Ornithology Neotropical Birds gui e. if a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season
associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some paint
within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in
your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii,the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 15/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review.Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study_and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles,you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cells)that over#ap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black
vertical bar)and for the existence of the "no data" indicator(a red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable, In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species.This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area,when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding(which means nests might be present).The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject
to the restrictions on federal expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation
requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more
information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 16/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help
determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation
process.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN COASTAL BARRIERS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted
on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for
in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary(i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that appears as a
hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit,you may contact the Service for an official determination by following the
instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resources-V tem-p o e -documentatio
Data exclusions
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20-or 30-foot bathymetric contour(depending on the location
of the unit).The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the
offshore areas of units(e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be
subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact
CBRAPfws.gov.
44,
0\
Facilities _ )
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 17/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map service is unavailable, or
for very large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to
view wetlands at this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources.The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery.Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts,the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 18/19
5/18/22,4:12 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
-0
0
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/6614NYM7NFBFFDNUPIAK63JPCA/resources 19/19
a LaT3 ...
LaB BgC oSoils
Ha 9 Percent Slope
FdB 0-15
16-20
LaB m21 -93
CnB CnB BgC =Hamlet Center
aB Ws Em Hamlet Neighborhood
LaB BgC
b
LaB
BgD LaB Em
BgC DgB EcA LaB BgC EbB
Ab
BgC
BgC aB
b a
C
LaB HdC DgB Em CnB BgC CdA
LaB ICA
9
Em PhA
c m CnB
V a
B
DgB HdC
EbB
LaB ErA HdA
EbC
LaB LaB Em Ha HdC
LaB b Em PhB He
1
r d
EcA k PhA h Ha
LaB � Ha
LaB BgC
LaB gC
LaC aB BoE
EbB BgC LaC
BgC
EbB LaB
LaB LaB
RhA
Ws
LaB HdC
Ha
LaB E
vA
BgC
MaC BgC3 ErA BgC EbC3 EbB LaB LaB
EbB LaB LaC VrD B C
LaB BgC BgC EcA bB Bg 9 b ErA
BgC EbB LaB
r Ws
LaC3 aB
® 0 315 630 1,260
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:Da,id West NN
Central Danby Soils and Slopes CHECKED BY:
M.HUN TENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYORS D.nby Town P Crested I....r theoWn o' DATE:2i1i20223:15 PM Page of
PROJECT NAME Darainciutl..22 zoning SCALE:
eaau.ar HORSEHEADS,NY607-358-1000 Sy-p i..C.,Parcalaprovitlatl REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY "1'��° by Tompkins c..nry
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 TM1ismapis for planning purposes
I TOWANDA,PA 570-265-4868 only a.d'h..itl not be...tl br
con.o-.cnon.
PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO:
.�-
� TCParcels
jWamlet Center
C3Hamlet Neighborhood
_ -• ONational Wetlands Inventor
J
•� I FSDEC Wetlands
Streams
—Perennial
—
Intermittent
kJ
j—
�'
e
0 315 630 1,260
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:DaM West
Central Danby Hamlet Wetlands CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYORS Danby town Plznnarown or DATE:211120223:15 PM Page of
PROJECT NAME Tlr nerurad naa ptsd 1-4-22 zo1119 SCALE:
1W5.gls� HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Streams,Roads,Parcels provided REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY °"' to% by Tompkins County
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 This
mapis/orplanningparposes
TOWANDA,PA570-265-4868 onlsanaano lanoeb.eaeaeorALT
1,j co eraceion.
PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO:
TCParcels
�N
• � � 1�0 ETC Buildings 2020
■� =Unique Natural Areas
tr" 4
®Habitat Corridor
oHamlet Center
�� 'r• , Hamlet Neighborhood
1�Ir
00
11 �►, �� ���o�► �V70
r � �
�O
Apo
.e ♦r
132p "o
'ffi��-- • 1� � 1340
1360
ource. E-sri, Maxar,GeoEye, Eartihstar Geographies,CNES�/ s D'S,U DA,
USG ,AeroG II IGN,and the G'I User Communit,
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:DaM West
Central Danby Hamlet Overview CHECKED BY:
HUN TENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYORS Danl,y town PlznnaroWn o' Page of
DATE:211120223:15 PM
Tlr naf urad pt422zeningPROJECT NAME Addsd 1-- SCALE:
10.�a 1>•ql� HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Streams,Roads,Parcels provided REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY °"•"1'��° by Tompkins Coany
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 Thismepis/orplenningpadf,,
TOWANDA,PA570-265 4868 onlsana.no lanoen.e.eaeor
!1, co eraceion.
PROJECT ADDRESS a„<„Re�rea„ea„��a„ee�,� PROJECTNO:
TCParcels
_�■�ii.��.�������....... \ level
100-year flood zone
500-year flood zone
=Hamlet Center
Hamlet Neighborhood
f� il
1 i
I �
■
it
I •
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
0 1,7003,400 6,800
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN f3V:Da,id West
FEMA Flood Zones- Danby CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYGRS Danby Town P1....r theoWn of DATE:2fif20223:15 PM Page of
PROJECT NAME Dafainciutl..22 zoning SCALE:
Diwnbr eaau..r HORSEHEADS,NY607-358-1000 Sy. p i..C.,Parcalaprovitlatl REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY by Tompkins Co..
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 TM1ismapis f-pi anning purposes
TOWANDA,PA 570-265-4868 oniy antl.M1..itl not be...tl f.r
�6, c.n.o-.cemn. PROJECT NO:
PROJECT ADDRESS a,,: aR=�RE�ra.aRa��,E.aRaa��.
ln_a� ■ v ug1 �. 1 f
■ L:-���'rnmd���l ,��" ���1y''... ■ � ,,'�i'I, l 001
TCParcels
Wamlet Center
r ' � �I. ��`,r �� ��1�i,L��.U■''1..,'�� ��- pHamlet Neighborhood
�� �_ ��� �� ■11�� � '�it -
iiuiil m
SMIN
ANE
MEW
�f I
11■ ►� ■
Illlls� N
0 1,7003,400 6,800
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:DaM Was1
Hamlets Overview CHECKED BYM. :
HUNTSNGIVEERSIARCHITECTSISURVEYORS Da.by—nPI-ner�Wnaf DATE:21112022 3:15 PM T Page of
PROJECT NAME naa pfeidde422.nzoning
TM RN�N .aCy SCALE:
eaawar HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Streams,Roads,Parcels provided REVISION:
TOWN OF DANBY ° by Tompkins co'n
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 Thismapis for planning purposes
TOWAN DA,PA 570-265-4868 o ionly and sM1ould no[be used for
I- ion In
PROJECT ADDRESS a„<„ C1S.a„sasW PROJECT NO:
oPotential Environmental Justice Ar s
=Hamlet Center
Hamlet Neighborhood
i-
I
1 I I
� I I
I \ I
0 1,7003,400 6,800
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:Da,id West
Archeologically Sensitive Areas CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYGRS Danty Town Piannartheown of DATE:2I1I20223:15 PM Page of
PROJECT NAME Dafaincidtlas Town zoning SCALE:
TM RNafNYY� Atltlop[atl f-d-22
i aau u.y a� HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 By -P Roatls,Parcala provitlatl REVISION:
TOWN OF DANBY � '�'° by Tompkins Count'
'�, , e.�7y� ROCHESTER,NY585-327-7950 Thismapisforplanningpmposes
ji TOWANDA,PA570-265-4868 —yfa.dfo�o.id—bansatlfor
PROJECT ADDRESS cRisscr..ncapa.4-f-202z ROH Eora.oRa PROJECT NO:
DEC Streams
—<all other values>
Impaired
Minor Impacts
—Needs Verification
—No Known Impact
—Threatened
—UnAssessed
DEC Lakes
=<all other values>
=Impaired
=Minor Impacts
=Needs Verification
=No Known Impact
Threatened
MUnAssessed
Hamlet Center
Hamlet Neighborhood
0 1,7003,400 6,800
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:Dania west
Waterbodies Inventory/Priority Waterbodies List Map CHECKED BY
HUNTD.nb PI.nbytM1eTownof Page of
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SURVEYORS oaaby Towa Plaaaer DArE:viizozz axis ann Page I
PROJECT NAME Oat.i,.d 1-sTowa Zoning SCALE:
reNnwomey Atltlop[etl 1-C-22
n..q lmae HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Streams,Roatls,Parcels provitletl REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY by Tompkins coaary
} e.r.q,7�. ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 TM1is mapm for planning purposes
F TO WANDA,PA 570-265-4868 c my antl sM1oultl no[be usetl for
PROJECT ADDRESS oaatractioa. aA„,E rs,oAs�E oRssEgL. PROJECT NO:
lWamlet Center
Hamlet Neighborhood
OlJnique Natural Areas
II1\ r�
i
`1
� I
i
I
I I
I � I
� I I
I
I
0 1,7003,400 6,800
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:Da,id West o
UNAs and CEAs /r �. CHECKED BY:
H\�IV /FN iNFFRCIAR HiTFrTCICiTRVFV RC M:.by PI...Townof T Page Of Denby Town Planner DATE:2I1I2022 3:15 PM
PROJECT NAME Datainciutles Town zoning SCALE:
1w D t�,tl AEtlom[etl 1-d-22
eaau.wr HORSEHEADS,NY607358-1000 s'i s,Roatls,Parcalaprovitlatl REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY ^ '"�""1'��° by Tompkins rpi..
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585327-7950 TM1ismapis for planning purposes
TOWANDA,PA570-265-4868 only— houd—beusetlfor
t i .I- conso-ucemn. PROJECT NO:
PROJECT ADDRESS a,: R=RE ra.aRa E.aRaa�,.
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service
WaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS)jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands)for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section. �
Location 0
Tompkins County, New Vork,
4
4 G
44,
I
Local office
New York Ecological Services Field Office
k. (607) 753-9334
Ili (607) 753-9699
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 1/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
3817 Luker Road
Cortland, NY 13045-9385
http://www.fws.gov/northeast/nyfo/es/section7.htm
10
-0
0
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 2/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur-at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to d❑ so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 3/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https.//ecos.fws.gov/ecpLpecies/9045
Insects
NAME STATUS 140
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found '►Wor
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. arm►
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecplspecies/9743
�.I
Critical habitatsC)0"
Potential effects to critical habitats) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acts and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 4/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gQv//program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC} list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that Occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about yoLlr migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAMF_ BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS
INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON
YOUR LIST,THE BIRD MAY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECTAREA
.,...,.. ......... ...... ..
SOMETIME WITHIN THE
...........................................................................
TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH
....................................................................................................
IS AVERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE
............................................................................................
OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH
................................................................................................
THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS
..................................................................................................
ENTIRE RANGE. ''BREEDS
................................................................................
ELSEWHERE'' INDICATES THAT
_................................................................................................
THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
.........................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT
_................................................................................
AREA.)
.....................
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 5/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Aug 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Breeds May 15 to Oct 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
Black-capped Chickadee Poeciie atricapillus practicus Breeds Apr 10 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the continental USA
Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Breeds May 20 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Canada Warbler Cardellina canadensis Breeds May 20 to Aug 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Cerulean Warbler ❑endroica cerulea Breeds Apr 27 to Jul 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
hit ps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp. species/2974
Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Breeds elsewhere
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 6/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Golden-winged Warbler Vermivora chrysoptera Breeds May 1 to jul 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8745
Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus acadicus Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
4
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its \ %moo,
range in the continental USA and Alaska. < DA��
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps:
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 7/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
1 . The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( ) JAOX**
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are n❑ yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bars survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No ❑ata (--)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 8/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle II 1 1 1 mill 1111 Niel 0111 loll MI 11111111 IND 1111
Non-BCC
........................
Vulnerable
(This is not a
...................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
.......................................
in this area, but
............................................
warrants
.........................
attention
..........................
because of the
........................................
Eagle Act or for
...........................................
potential
........................
susceptibilities
in offshore. µ
__...._..-.._............
areas from
........................
certain types of
_.........__........___..._...
development
O..activities.] 0
Black-billed Ittf M1 M1 MT 411 loll lollll� . .. .•T + tT *ff
Cuckoo "fill
BCC Rangewide
.................................-....-.....
{C0.N}(This is a
_......._................._..
Bird of
Conservation
Concern{BCC}
throughout its
range in the
............................
continental
USA and------ C)O
Alaska.}
Black-capped
Chickadee
BCC- BCR(This
..... ,.
is a Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC}
only in
particular Bird
Conservation
Regions(BCRs)
..........................................
in the
...............
continental
................................
USA)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 9/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources Bobolink ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ I I I I *� I I ' ++Tyy
+ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON)(This is a
.........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
........................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
Canada ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ 1111 gill IIis 0+++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
_....._...._-.-._..-.._..
Bird of
Conservation
114
....... ..... .... .........
Concern(BCC..
throughout its 0
range in the
continental
U5A and
Alaska_)
Cerulean T T T T T T ++++ ]-tit � lll�•$ 1 TWarbler III T
TTT
BCC Rangewide
..................................
(CON)(This is a
Bi rd.of..........-...M..-
Conservation
Concern(BCC)
throughout its
range in.the
continental
USA�and
Alaska.}
Eastern Whip- I + L ++1 TT
+++t it].
i I I I I I I I` +T++ T+ +T++ +T++
poor-will I T TT T
BCC Rangewide
...m........................
(CON))(This is a
Bird of
...................
Conservation
....................................
Concern(BCC)
.......................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 10/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaa C::Explore Location resources
Golden Eagle ++++ +111 44 I Ilpl + ca+ + ++
Non-BCC TTT+
........................
Vulnerable
(This is not a
...................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
.......................................
in this area, but
............................................
warrants
.........................
attention
..........................
because of the
........................................
Eagle Act or for
...........................................
potential
........................
susceptibilities
in offshore. µ
areas from
.......................
certain types of
development
or activities.} 0
Golden-winged ++++ ++++ ++++ TTT+ ++T T . � Mt0+ ++ ++++
Warbler ..... .
BCC Rangewide
{CaN}(This...
Bird of
Conservation
Concern{BCC}
.......
.through...........out i............._..
ts
............_.........................
range in the
continental
an
Northern -
Alaska.)
Northern Saw- I f f f } I I I I } f I I } I {
whet Owl
BCC- BCR(This
is a Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC}
only in
particular Bird
Conservation
Regions(BCRs)
..........................................
in the
...............
continental
................................
USA)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 11/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM I I I I I I I 11111 yi IPaC:Explore Location resources y Prairie Warbler TTTT TTTT T I I I ��TT Noll Niel loll 0010 WT TTTT +TTT TTT+
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON)(This is a
.........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern(BCC)
........................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
Red-headed I I T TTTT TI l l l T l l
Woodpecker T IIIIIIII ■ � IIIIIIyT TI TTTT I I I I I I
+TTT TTT+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
_...... .
..............
..
Bird of
Conservation
Concern(BCC}
throughout its
_....._..........................
range in the
W..... ....,......._.......
continental
USA and
Alaska)
SPECIES RANI I I FIEBI 1 I MAR } APR { {{ MAY SUN f IJ 'L� UG EP OCT NOV DEC
Rusty Blackbird
BCC_ - BCR(This
is�a Bird of r
Conservation
...... ...... .....
Concern(BCC)
.. ............
only in
particular Bird
Conservation
Regions(BCRs)
in the
continental
.......
USA]
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)(This is a
Bird of
...................
Conservation
....................................
Concern(BCC)
........................................
throughout its
.......................................
range in the
..................................
continental
................................
USA and
........................
Alaska.)
......................
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 12/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC),and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network{AKN).The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle(Eagie Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area.To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the AKN PhenoIogy Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location? ." - N.—,.
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN}.This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasew U
Probability of presence cAata is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available.To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them,go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding,wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All
About Birds Bird Guide, or(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of
Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season
associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in
your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 13/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review.Alternately,you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Wappiog of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the 2iv g Bir tud _and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. _
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles,you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator(a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding(which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 14/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
more about conservation measures,visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject
to the restrictions on federal expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation
requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more
information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help
determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation
process.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN COASTAL BARRIERS AT THIS LOCATION.
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted
on the official CBRS maps.The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for
in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary(i.e., within the"CBRS Buffer Zone"that appears as a
hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit,you may contact the Service for an official determination by following the
instructions here: https://www.fws.goy/service/coastal-barrier-resources-system-property-documentation
Data exclusions
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20-or 30-foot bathymetric contour(depending on the location
of the unit).The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the
offshore areas of units(e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be
subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact
CBRAPfws.gov.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 15/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands inventory
Impacts to NW1 wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Carps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date:We a c rrently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to
determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
F '
FRESHWATER POND
Palustrine
RIVERINE
Riverine
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory
website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources.The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation,visible hydrology and geography.A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 16/17
5/18/22,4:54 PM IPaC:Explore Location resources
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory.There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
I?
0
O"I\
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/KYNNWBBU7ZBUJDCXQGZF5ZPU2U/resources 17/17
HsD3
60 HsC3 rHsC3 oSoils 1 Percent Slope
HrC - HzE 0-15
HsD3
1s-2o
=21 -93
HsD3 HsC3 Hamlet Center
Hamlet Neighborhood
HsD3
HrC Em
1 o_E
HsD3 WB 'H y
Mn HsC3
ArC i
ArC ArC ArC 1
ArB ■
HpE 4 HwB CdD CdC
HsC3
or ArC
1 HdD ' 1 H
WS
` HdC
BgC
BgC Mm HsC3
CdA
H4 HsD3 p
HpE CdC (9c
� HdC CdD
!BgD HdD HdC
dA
HpE
r
` .
Ro Mp 1
�
HdCK _ HpE HdD
r HsB
tF HdD h H
LnD HdD Mp ■�
LnE HsC3
Hs
He
Mp
HdCK
HdC
LnD PhB
HsD3 HdD
T
He
HdD Fm HdD
h
0 210 420 840
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:Da,m west
West Danby Soils and Slopes CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYGRS Danby Townested PiannereW�ef DATE:2f1f20223:15 FW Page of
PROJECT NAME e�lea.e Tewe zeeiey SCALE:
ar� Add-ptetl 1-d-22
eaa u.ar HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Sbeams,Roatls,Parcel.p—ided REVISION:
TOWN OF DANBY by Tompkins Coen ty
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 This map is for planning proposes
TOWANDA,PA570-265-4868 aeasheelaeetbeesedfeAll
�eesbe�tiee.eely
PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO:
;v,: sal aR=�RE�ra.aRa��,E.aRaa��.
TCParcels
\ —DanbyWaterlines2001
—Hamlet Center
\ ! Hamlet Neighborhood
I
I \
I � �
I �
� ` I
� ` I
I �
1
0 5001,000 2,000
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:Da,id West
West Danby Water System CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYGRS Dan by Town Piannar the �wn�' DATE:2i1i20223:15 PM Page Of
PROJECT NAME Daraincidtlaa Town zoning TM RNaiNYY� Atltlop[atl 1-4-22 SCALE:
l eag p.ry� HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Btreama,Roatls,Parcala provitlatl REVISION:
TOWN OF DANBY by Tompkins County
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 TM1ismapih. planni....dfs
TOWANDA,PA 570-265-4868 only antl sM1uuitl nut b.us.tl eur
.I- conso-ace PROJECT NO:
PROJECT ADDRESS a,,: aR=�RE�rs.aRs��,E.aRss��.
arce s
MTC Buildings 2020
�..�..
/ �• � � � ` � lWamlet Center
•�.
�• •�,� _ � r OHamlet Neighborhood
p +• / �•1
mNational Wetlands Inventor
,/. ♦ / '� �' CODEC Wetlands
Streams
—Perennial
Intermittent\
tom--� /• fA a �'Ir
f
VA
+ ` `i' :ram,, 'v
, J
• r�
s Q
on
IL
0 212.5 425 850
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:DaM West
West Danby Hamlet Wetlands CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSIARGHITEGTSISiJRVEYORS Danby town Plznnarown or DATE:211120223:15 PM Page of
PROJECT NAME Tlr finer■tad naa ptsd 1-4-zz-n zoning SCALE:
ezan..r HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Streams,Roads,Parcels provided REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY db"Wto% by Tompkins County
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 Thismapis/orplanningpurposes
TOWANDA,PA570-265-4868 onlsanaano„lanoeb.eaeaeor
"!I�, co eraceion.
PROJECT ADDRESS „<„Berea„ea„�a„ee� PROJECT NO:
8
og`cp 20 800 k TCParcels
ETC Buildings 2020
3 —DanbyWaterlines2001
• =Hamlet Center
f '
Hamlet Neighborhood
Lo -q�iirr .v_ .ear
BUnique Natural Areas
ar ®Habitat Corridor
o
r
Ooo oo
0
o �O
Epp O ''0�0
O
1 1
cb
96
4p
9-0
poo
�so.
0
960
rn
o ao
00
a o 00
^ o wow 000
56 0 r'
0
ao Sys 0 ; SourtI5 Esri, I I r,GeoEye, EarOhstar Geographios,CNE / irbus D U ® ,
U�GS�AeroGRID, IGN,and the GI User Communit, goo
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
NOTES: DRAWN BY:DaM West
West Danby Hamlet Overview CHECKED BY:
HUNTENGINEERSI AROHITEc,I SURVEYORS Danny town Plznnarown of DATE:211120223:15 PM Page Of
PROJECT NAME nrnaf ura/ naa pe.ai'e-zzwn zoning SCALE:
ezau.ar� HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 Sheams,Roads,Parcels provided REVISION
TOWN OF DANBY °"•"1'��° by Tompkins
draw ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 Thismap is/o,p'..planning purposes
TOWANDA,PA570-265-4868 onisanaano„ianoen.eaaaeor
!j, co eraceion.
PROJECT ADDRESS a„<„Re�rea„ea„��a„ee�,� PROJECT NO:
Willseyville Creek and minor tribs ( 0603-0032) NoKnownImpct
Waterbody Location Information Revised: 06/25/2009
Water Index No: SR- 16-4-16 Drain Basin: Susquehanna River
Hydro Unit Code: 02050103/120 Str Class: C LowSusquehanna-Owego
Waterbody Type: River (Low Flow) Reg/County: 7/Tioga Co. (54) ...
Waterbody Size: 76.3 Miles Quad Map: WILLSEYVILLE(L-15-4) ...
Seg Description: entire stream and selected tribs
Water Quality Problem/Issue Information (CAPS indicate MAJOR Use Impacts/Pollutants/Sources)
Use(s)Impacted Severity Problem Documentation
NO USE IMPAIRMNT
Type of Pollutant(s)
Known: ---
Suspected: ---
Possible: ---
Source(s)of Pollutant(s)
Known: ---
Suspected: ---
Possible: ---
Resolution/Management Information
Issue Resolvability: 8 (No Known Use Impairment)
Verification Status: (Not Applicable for Selected RESOLVABILITY)
Lead Agency/Office: n/a Resolution Potential: n/a
TMDL/303d Status: n/a
Further Details
Water Quality Sampling
A biological(macroinvertebrate)assessment of Willseyville Creek in Willseyville(at Route 96B)was conducted as part
of the RIBS biological screening effort in 2003. Sampling results indicated non-impacted conditions. Such samples are
dominated by clean-water species and are most similar to a natural community with minimal human impacts. Some
additional species,including sensitive non-native species,and additional biomass maybe present;the samples reveal no,
or only incidental, anomalies. Aquatic life community is fully supported. (DEC/DOW,BWAM/SBU, January 2009)
Biological assessment of two tribs to Willseyville Creek were also conducted as part of the RIBS biological screening
effort in 2003. Sampling results for Prospect Valley Creek in Willseyville (at Route 96B) indicated non-impacted
conditions. Such samples are dominated by clean-water species and are most similar to a natural community with
minimal human impacts. Some additional species,including sensitive non-native species,and additional biomass may
be present;the samples reveal no,or only incidental,anomalies. Aquatic life community is fully supported. A biological
assessment of Danby Creek in Willseyville (at Route 96B) also reflected non-impacted conditions. Such samples are
dominated by clean-water species and conditions that reflect a natural community with minimal,if any,human impacts.
Aquatic life community is clearly fully supported. (DEC/DOW, BWAM/SBU,January 2009)
Segment Description
This segment includes the entire stream and all tribs. The waters of this portion of the stream are Class C,C(T). Tribs
to this reach/segment,including Dry Brook(-1),Prospect Valley Creek(-2)and Danby Creek(4),are also Class C,C(T).
Jennings Pond (0705-0064) Need Verific
Waterbody Location Information Revised: 08/14/2007
Water Index No: Out 66-12-P296-75-10-P349 Drain Basin: Oswego-Seneca-Oneida
Hydro Unit Code: 04140201/080 Str Class: B Seneca/Clyde Rivers
Waterbody Type: Lake Reg/County: 7/Tompkins Co. (55)
Waterbody Size: 32.1 Acres Quad Map: WILLSEYVILLE(L-15-4)
Seg Description: entire pond
Water Quality Problem/Issue Information (CAPS indicate MAJOR Use Impacts/Pollutants/Sources)
Use(s)Impacted Severity Problem Documentation
Public Bathing Stressed Possible
Recreation Stressed Possible
Type of Pollutant(s)
Known: ---
Suspected: PATHOGENS
Possible: ---
Source(s)of Pollutant(s)
Known: ---
Suspected: UNKNOWN SOURCE
Possible: ---
Resolution/Management Information
Issue Resolvability: 1 (Needs Verification/Study(see STATUS))
Verification Status: 1 (Waterbody Nominated,Problem Not Verified)
Lead Agency/Office: DOW/Reg7 Resolution Potential: Medium
TMDL/303d Status: n/a
Further Details
Public bathing and recreational uses in Lake Treman may experience impacts from pathogens from unidentified sources.
High levels of pathogens have been reported that have restricted use of the public beach in the state park. The frequency
and magnitude of these closings need to be evaluated to determine the severity of impact.
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX D
Community Resource Data
TOWN OF DANBY NOVs
Date Address Agency Violation
February 2006 93 Hornbrook Road US EPA Injection well in violation of 40 C.F.R. 144.11
May 2003 1631 Danby Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage
July 2009 22 Station Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage
January 2014 22 Station Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage
June 2015 424 Troy Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage
February 2016 217 Muzzy Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage
October 2017 14 Makarainen Road Thompkins County DOH Surfacing Sewage
March 2018 14 Makarainen Road Thompkins County DOH Saturated DMATS
March 2018 111 Patchen Court Thompkins County DOH Construction without OWTS permit
Waste discharge to ground surface and below
May 2020 Tallow Hill Road Thompkins County DOH surface without inspection
Town of Danby Septic Disposal &Water Supply Survey Summary
Hunt received a total of 30 responses back. Not all responders filled out every section. One person only
returned 1 page, it's possible to contact them. Each resident/response was assigned a number(1-30) as
shown in the table.The physical responses have the corresponding number written on them in case
additional information is needed.
Key results
• There were a total of 11 septic system problems reported by 7 residents
• 13 residents said they believed there was other septic disposal issues in Danby, 6 said they did
not think there was other septic issues in the town
• 15 people performed at least one bacteria/coliform test over their lifetime use of their well
water. 13 have never performed a bacteria/coliform test, 6 of which use municipal water
• 3 people use disinfection for their water
• 10 residents say they use a filter for the entire household supply, 9 say they use a water
softener. Other water quality devices also used, but in smaller numbers
• Only 1 resident reported water borne illness, however,they also stated they are diagnosed with
conditions that could also explain the symptoms
• 8 households use the municipal system as their primary source of water
• 22 households use wells, 15 of which are drilled wells
• 6 residents reported a well—septic separation of 50-99 ft, 8 reported a separation of 100-200 ft,
and 5 reported a separation greater than 200 ft
• 4 households report that part or all of their drinking water is bottled
• In terms of general water quality: 2 report bad water, 15 report good water, 7 report excellent.
Hard water was reported as an issue for 16 people. Odor problems and staining problems each
had 8 reports
• Support for the town pursuing the establishment of a town run sanitary sewer district:
i. Only within the Hamlet Centers at no personal cost to those surrounding the Hamlet Centers
a. Yes: 16
b. No: 8
ii. Servicing the entirety of the Central Danby and West Danby Hamlets
a. Yes: 14
b. No: 11
iii. Along your street with an option for you and/or your family to be connected
a. Yes: 16
b. No: 9
iv. Municipal sewer service for your neighborhood but not yourself, at no personal cost?
a. Yes: 12
b. No: 12
Specific Comments
[Comments are direct quotes unless inside square brackets, which is added context]
• There were a total of 11 septic system problems reported by 7 residents
• 1 have been living with my well and septic system for nearly 50 years. I am fine with things the
way they are
• [Indicated sewers aren't a good option because it's too far].We should allow composting toilets
and graywater systems
• [Comment next to "excellent quality" under water supply rating]: thanks to filtration system.
Otherwise, all other "x" spots are true" [indicates only gets excellent quality due to filtration
system but still has the other problems]
• 1 don't want to pay more taxes for others- my taxes are way too high 6k. [comment by
"servicing the entirety of Central and West Danby] If it's paid by users only-fine. NO SUBSIDIES.
[Comment by "at no personal cost" for iv. municipal sewer] does this mean I don't ever have to
pay towards it?Then yes. If it means no personal costs to those using it&tax payers must pay,
then ABSOLUTELY NOT
• So much chlorine.Too much. It stinks and it tastes like chlorine
• [Answered "potentially"for all support questions and requested more information and
clarification]
• 1 have an artesian well.The overflow runs all the time. I believe construction of new housing has
diminished the quality of my water.That's why I had to add a filter and a water softener
• Replied no to iv. municipal service because they would want service as well
• 1 have heard rumors that the Town of Danby is trying to site a system for public sewers on
Danby Community Park lands. So disappointing and very much hope that rumor is not true
• Have many questions BEFORE supporting anything!
o r1 O lzt m ri zt r Ln ri ri
N O O O O I-
Ln O O .- bA
cI N N C
.0 •Q
� a)
v >_
ro
U UA
�-- f6 41
U � C
Lr)
S2 X r-I
O O O
N � N
Ol r-I ri ri ri Ln ri r-I ri -1 c-I ri ci ci ri ri r-I ri
r•I
a1
C (o
bjD
a)
O C
C 00
C p
Z N
00 ri cI ri N cI c ri N cI cI cI cI cI cI cI cI
ai >
bA i
a) a)
C U
r-I �
N �
O L
N 0
r-I r-I r-I ri N r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I c-I
r•I N
u
laA
C
E N C
C L O Y C
O O C (E
t
L O
aJ V) v L
0 � a) O
U N
n to L 0- V) C V) >
. 0 aJ m m
+ + O > u
0 I o
W V)
l0 ri c-I r-I c-I r-I I � r-I c-I c-I ri c-I r-I
r-I �
O
r
rn
c-I
o
C �
Q
LM r-I r-I r•i r-I o ri ri
r•I 00
ri
C C C
+� > O
u Q
L
OLn
T 7
O a1 Q
OZ5 t0
C
O U C
O o C
Ln -0 m
ri O ri ri l0 I O ri c-I ri ri c-I c-I c-I c-I O LO c-I
ri O l0 ri O
O X m N
ri � c I
C
_O
4-1 Y
C 7 O
O
C) U
M c-I p c-I r-I I c-I c-I c-I c-I r-I r-I c-I r-I r-I c-I c-I c-I
ri O
rV
� C
Q
00
m O
o
U I L
C aJ
O
U
a)
C O I O C
E C U aJ
C O Y L
U
V) >T C +'
Q U Y
r•I ri O ri ri O Lr) ri r-I r-I ri ri ri ri
r•I Ln 00
n � �
C O
O
vE
� 73
o
ro O
L� Q Q
N O D
Q ri ri r-I a) ri ri ri ri r-I r-I r-I c-I c-I c-I
r1 a)
o
ro
E L
o 3
} p > O V)
N N > t
Gl c-I O c-I c-I r-I c-I r-I c-I r-I c-I r-I r-I m N r-I
O N Ln O I — N
rq
ro a) C
T
-0I 4- O L CO V)C O aa) a) -a
a)
T >
Q) f6 '+., C V
L L ro o f r6
CL O C ao Ln - (1) t L _N
E rV
V > V v > CU
t ro O C C) C
a) t a) L
p b0 T •U o a1 'U o
O :Ec-I � �00 c-I O c-I ri c-I I r"
o O
M N
Q)
Ln
O
O
I� rI cI rI C ri M c
O
�_ n •-
O
N Q N
Q a)
E U
7 Y Q u
O C Q
+' o
+-• v v
n C
V)
a, O ro
C T E
O
o Q
CD
v o n E
o v E
0 a,
Ln O }
v 4- ro
Q M
> E N O
2 0C Q N
lG c-I O ri c-I ri ri c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I ri c-I c-I ri O ri c-I
O Y O
c-I O N
o
o
U1
N a
Q m
N E C
U � �
C +_� O
c a
� � C
b L
.� a)
i T N 2i Q
co v Q O a1
C C
Y
OCA p � L O
Q Q O O
Ln c-I r-I M Ln c-I c-I c-I r-I c-I c-I r-I
m Ln
O N
O ,
M �
� U0
C a)
C O N
O N
O O +
N ri N M
ri 00 r-I c-I M ri c-I ri ri ri c-I ri N� c-I
OI 01
r- ri
M ri c-I ri ri M ri c-I c-I ri c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I
� U
a1 �
T �
V) aJ
E U
a1 .0
L
o v '�
Cl o
a) o
E o :2 00 u
O OD a) a) CU
m
N ri O ri ri a) 00 cI cI cI cI cI cI cI cI ri
O ci
a•-I ri ri ri r-I ri � ri ri c-I ri ri
co
a-+
U
v
V)
M W N c-I M M 00 I" N n 00 m 1%0 ri 1.0 n O c-I O � 'zzJ- N Ql 'Tlzt O 00 r-I M rV M M c-I O Q1 m
yL N N ri ri ri ri c-I r-I c-I ri r-I N N ri r-I c-I
a1
O
O
� Z
E
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 ri ri Ln M 00 ri 00 r-I ri N Ln ri O l0 m lD Ln (.0 M l0 ri r-I N I- M O t ri m O Ln 00 00 N I:t N N
Ln l0 rV ri N Il- m N Ln ri N ri 't N N ri ri M N M l0 r" ri N Ln rV N r-I
0
a)
3
H
21
C.
C.
N C
L v 3
- '°
06 +�
v Ln C
C: m A E
Q O V H +° L C
Q _ v v ar C
Ln
L vL L L 0- C a) 41 O w •> O Ln u m
V i Q. v rE v ,F a1 Q r6 a L (a -a v 0 u (A 3 m
C O c0 f0 CL
v i w £ LA Q_ > C O aJ
a! "O -O � O_ aA C. Q +� O ` . H O Z, � fB a) _ ro y vL
sn u C +, �, C C. � C _ o +� 6 _ a cr
O La +, O a1 C V T �C E Y 2i L7 £ i O L T O fO C _ N 3 as+ V
N C. - Ln -0 Ln 3 M C aJ LO U Ln ++ O to C C O + — 41 _ 7 aJ N a1 � + O O O O. \ Q. a- O
y O C. m ++ ro +� C. a) C a) ro u r0 � t Q) L„ L � vL a) +' aJ p
C O Q. �, co o2S co co C Lp Q ++ �O -0 Ln C a) C• T C y coo 7 6 v) .� Q L C +' _ ra O a �, "O —�— T LOn o N
,� .Y Y Y .� LJ �? V, E '^ N O L O_ H i a) L u C u O ++ +, _U N C L _ - - — t Ln +� C
\ 0 O C C C C ? X V C +� a-•L C C _ L C 'V ate+ o •r •c m .6 a) �G O H ra ++ ? Q — +' C �_ C +� p L
C a1 +�-� +�-� +�-� O a) 2i Q• Ln (6 C. L u aJ - C to C l0 L L O +-� aJ ro a) Q v aJ C c0
O C +� v Ln C. v �, E 0 3 = �° �° , L £ C a' a) o a' 0 3 s o +�
a +' C. O N L — O C. .V O i N C. i i L - - i T + Ql N
a-•� •� •� •� V C U r0 C a--+ a) i 3 vr6 (o m O L Q m L L co a) N aJ O 3 d a) a) a Q — C m — C V a)
3 n aJ ~ a Q Q Q L Q 7 m C +' Ln V Q L +� Q m a) Ln N Ln n n L r6 Q vL Q O w a) L +' C N C — > b!) Y n Ol O i
N O O > 1I1 aJ O lD a) a1 a1 O rL O N 0 N +� +� +� ra +, O Ln LL! v O p C 'i L 7 +-1 Ln UJ C LA v C v O O O
N 41 C c C +, O c > c
H Of _ Ln In (% Ln O N > N V c D M J N O z _ _ W _ Z _ �' �' z d z z z z () i i I L O z z O G 0 0 0 O � D � > D = -i Ln ci G
N
Ql r-I c-I ri ri ri ri ri ri ri
r•I
00 ri c I c I ri c I ri
r-I
W
1� r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I ri r-I r-I ri
r-I
a)
3
en
3
L
O
U
0
C
C
O p
fa (6
f6 to
Q O
O � w
Ln
tD r-I c-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I
ri
Ln c I c I r I r I -I ri ri r-I ri ri
r•I
vi
a)
L
u
U
Q
r-I ri ri ri c-I r-I r-I ri '}
r-I O
V)
+�
O
a)
>
f6
L _
00
Vj M
v o
— -0
M cI cI cI cI cI cI ri N f6
r•I E a)
a-+
O
� C
L
v
4�
C
ai
N r I c I r-I ri r-I c I 0 c I
r•I � �
v O +>
W 4-+ -
aJ = 6 [6
O C = C
m a O
v +' i
cu
L
w O > _0 x O
4� fo O
ri r-I r-I c'I ri ri ri ri ri ri 00 i N
r•I
a) to
O a) >
0 .- Q a) a)
O '-P s
+� Q a) a)
a) -, Q (A
a 0 3
f6 Q U
a) C 4� .-
Y 0 C :_
L
O c-I r-I ri ri ri c-I c-I c-I Y i
O co L a) L
O Q- (3) L a)
W C 4- 3
a) ap+ V 0 O C
Ln a) M '+�
3 v
r6 N Q v� J O C
L O V) 'O
(6 3 3 i >,
un O L L +- a)
V)
G1 c I r-I r-I r-I r-I c I c I c I f6 Q C
W O fv
C� C 0- ffoo N
C •O M L L
a) �..i L to
C
ai
+J fo
a) Qoi O
0 a) O
C U
C U L
a) Q "
> (UO
4,1 0
O =
> v C c6
in 16 3 +,
E E L = IS >-
a) 0 -0 -0
00 r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I +� >� L f6
0 a i > C)
Q Lu (1) 0 +,
L L U Cl
t
w 0 0 >>~O -CQ 0
0 Z } O q0 'a3
W v v
J p f6
� LLJ ai L t
fN Ln
6 ^ a) O
L J zn ri 'p L C
a) a)
ON rn > o N Q U
—N m M ,� O
+, Q v 4- Q O
3 C m a0+ C a) 4-1
s w = s fo
� o a) L a)
fo —Q -0 f6 v a)
+� c +1
v v 4�
C ut L a) to >
O = m O laA
• = On O C a-- 4- U
o Ln
o v ai 3 3 ° aV)
4• Q 3 L VI 0 3 4-
a) x f6 v, : U t O
Y >
-� - to a-+ a)
+ L >
>. co f6 O NM C 4-1 LO
+'' 4 J E ai C 3 Q
fo L '6 O p Q
3 fo
4-1t N 0 f} -0 O O a)
a) (Uv " u V, en H
c6 C tv
a) O Q t v (U Q ^ -a
u t _ a, a, 3 > a)
X +J '6 -C - u L C
a) 0 c6 t +J a) + u > L
Ln 4-
i L
> 0 fo > aN- a) O = O
lf, r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I 00.0 E f° f6 C
u C +� � C Cr
L a)
0 > =O 0 c6 W
Ln a)o > C '� O c6 >
C O
U a) 0 0 E
U Q Y M p p L
f6
C E O 4-, N
C 0 L +� L _
3 ut 4- L C f6 � 3
L p O C > '� } U
v
} a)
+' co ro LA C O co +� O � Ol
+J v
}, _0 co fa O 4-13
f6ul L
O a) 0 + C a) t
N -0 p � O O i
O O t } C 3
Q -O u O 3 a1 ) O O
O a
= .c.) C aj ++ Ln a-+ v) mcr t
Q ++ Ma) a) in
lap O
Ln c I c I r-I r-I r-Ir r-I r-I r-Ii) _ O > C c Q L 4- ro
C: N 3 ate+ E O = L1 4' Q p Y
Ln 0 0 C 02S O O Z O V)i
V) C -0
> N a) M p U E N Y a) f6 Q 'O O
C mai H `� a) E m3
O O O } 0 O mvni u Ou i
r-I r-i c-I ri c-I c-I ri r-I 17�0 C T > O C
4' u f�6
0
C > a-- L = = W a�-J C L
V) a) p L V1 0 a) a) 41
L O � aj
a) C 3 Q) N E u-o
w 4' r O c O On 3 > +� '2 Ln0 41
c6 c
M a1
r� r-Ir� r-I ri r-I C 0 a) N > � O O 0
+, E v 3 = +, � L U '
+1 N O O Q +' u a1 p 0
f6 Y Y a) U O Ln '� -0 -a CL -C O w V)
C E Lna1 L a) (o a)
4-1 ai
O > -0 U >, Q w a) L a) L
C a) a) V7 s +•� v +•i L C,
>' i (o Lai 3 O O u Ln 0
ai +' C fro L N •N
a) O -C -0Q N v O a O a0
Ln v � Q a) +, LJ u — u O O m C Q v O
a) C O V) Q C N a) > +' t L fo a) E
L > 3 a) Y O L tw a) v -0 = to f6 a) 3
N r I r I r I r I r I r I r I V, L i w E Q t6 �n 'C a0 uCn N v1 Q > +' Q
3 >, _ +•� +� — U •>, L fo L) +, of V)
L
v>i u a) w E aJ +� M C = O a) •y QLn O
U a) UA 'a N cr '6 �= C q a) fo '' >� 4-1+ oO O
ri c-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I c-I Q 7 aJ Ln .i S f3o 7 +3.+ 0 .0 +�- o v v o C C
O C C L [� O L L C L N +� a••+ +, O U
(n .1 N 0 Q Y 3 c6 O Q > .• u N 3 +J N w � Ln
-
Q +� L N +, Q C p 3 C Q .- q0 ut -0 V) L V)
o °) 0 0 a 3 i 3 3 v C �, v o w 3
lD 0') 00 Ln CT M00 ri r, ri M N 0') 00 00 N M tD N N 3 O a x a) m O 0 a) = O W Ln > Q +� O
of N r-I ri ri ri N r-I r-I r-I ri -1 r-I c-I N >, m O) a�-J a� O O � 3 +�•+ O o >• a) .0 o O C a)
E + � O L = H O +' LLI 0 Q C > 0 C Q 3 '� O
L C Q X O Q O C t m 0 3 p a1 a)
O +' v E a) on E C to O O a� C � ut � N L O CO � t6 aJ
Z O O > i L L := a) N V L Q
O co bA O O Q Q aj C ri Ln O '� c I lro ccLo .� 3 v0i O
C a) 3 X aj
(A +� C .� � 3 3 = m v O L
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 O N 0 �O = >. Q L >. L 3 'L >, N a) +, M N
3 Lr) O to r-I 00 I- r- r- N IZT N N 00 C (A L t L L - - — L Vf
fn c-I c-I I- N r-I Ln N O N ri N Ln N � M -t M M � M U') a) -a C 3 fo - C U C M C C C C C O _0 C N
e -0 4-1 3 a) 413 'ra a) L t r- a) � � a) a) a) a) � >aj 'in .� a)
O u 0 E L +� Q E 3 u O E O E E E E E 0 ai U u
N O C O +J p C (>6 p > +J
" u 'u t
c� g N s c� s = cu0� cu0� cu0� cU Z F— v 3
o c E
o
41 vi
Vf 0, 3
}'
L L
fn LLL O •a O O
V) 0
O @ N @ O
3
LnCL
V1 aJ O s
a) O L O
m s C E ,0 C
t a o
C) Lh
f6 -O L. L ++ a) a) O
CC L 3 C ++ s 4- 4F
O O Y C. Q aJ C ++ C
Ln0 C � ++41 U 0 s � U
0 41
!Z
V) ~ a3i fTEa E L 3 (A o 41
C Y m f6 >• +- aJ V1 T i �Z i O i L i i O
CD 0>` o vt •L Q C 76 3 +, E � a� L D S O Q C Q C � � Q C O Q Q C E
E � c6 L 3 — fa E O = t Q Q- Cu Q Q Q Q N Q Q E
O N Q L L aJ a — E ate+ R _ w V) +=-' !n 7 U = C = O
O s �, V, s
C L L ro a) �_ f�6 3 c6 m 3 L N O 4' '- of s a N w tw N a) O O N w Q. 41 N � � c N N M � oo O c-I � Ln n 00
\ U C U L7 L a) +�•+ Q- 0 -0 0 0 > L > L T = > L '`7 f6 > L C f6 M Ln l.0 I- m ri r-I r-I r-I M M m m m M
`0 a-+ U Q L O 3 3 al N > C M on L 0 41= O. a 3 3 +, a) U w '+� a) la0
O C 3 3 L ++ > p Q L C to > ++ fo > C O fo •> C fo > O O C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
O ++ Q O O O O O O N 3 C Q o a 3 3 + i d + O v + 3 a) 0 a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) v a) a) a)
a�i Y `^ + °C o 0 a) '� a' o c fn 3 ° " ar E a`°n a a`°o f° @
3 H O C l0 O u N O L O Vf f0 � a) _ � O 3 Lj O C N ti N ut N ti N ut ut
H � _ Z = 2 00 00 = d (7 W 2 N H O OC = = H ._ N Q Z := 2 Q Z :_ Q Z > >. Q Z J O < a) a) a) a aJ aJ a) a) a) a) a aJ aJ aJ a)
U Q OC OC a: a: D' D' OC OC OC a: a:
00 o m
M O - -O
p +� v
rI L CL L
aJ co
O 2- V Q a1
O > E
14
n w L OV
oA O 4' �O O
C Q a) O
Ln
L 01 a u
r0
01 v
O_ >
H O Q L
Q t E
0
V)
� O O
> T .�
Lro
L r Ln V,
n O U +
o
N � ,� � O v
Ln cis 01 L C Q L Y E
� 4 ° +, �
00 v v :�
ra rn m O c >
> 1 -0 V) o to O Ln
1� r-I c-I rl c-I c-I ci a-I c-i c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I
M N
O
X N O
O
� O C
C O
4+
41
L
L
4+ C
N -O
O c
N r0
a� v _0
V
U \
m
O a) N rB
t L
0) C T
r6 r6 O a)
U
U- "a C Z
w O O O c I O t0 .�
en rV l0
O O O r-I
cI N N
2
O
2
Ln c I c I rl c I I rl ri rl ci c I rl ri rl
M N
O >
C , N +�
CTv
UA
O O
j 01 Ql
c I �O C C: O O O
M D •in N N
r-I c-I rl c-I M
M I
O
C
Y
M c-I rl a) c-I c-I c-I c-I rl ci c-I c-I
M L
v IL
aJ
L
O
C
v I
c
tin
L O c
v ao
o I N
Q
o � L
Y a
+, I N o
M m Ln
rl I O
Y O L
r-I o Ln I o Ln
M O Ln M
Ln Ql O uo
a O
O Y
rn O
o o rn
enLn
O
Ln
rn v — L
m o co M -1 00 _q 00 Ln �
N O r-I N
O O O
x
-� °
C �
O O
>
t m
V u
� � aJ
00 O I M
N l0
a)
I� rI rI cI 00 c rl m rI rI cI rl 00 rI cI
N O I
O O
N N
Ln
N
OA
C
o
o m L
O L a1
N iz
lD rl O rl c-I c-I 00 c-I rl i--I c-I a-I rl rl c-I c-I c-I c-I r-I
N O r- V
rl Ql )
c-I
a)
L
V)
O
C
Y
LM O
N r-I I
a1
C C �
a1
O O C
Y Y O
O
N
rl O o
N O
O
c-I
a!
v co
Q
V �
v p
J N
M cI O N c cI L cI rl cI I c� O
N Ln -O O �0
O v
ro >
c N .0 4-
0
v -
> 0 O
bA p � ,� Y v
Ln 0_ a O N
p E _
N U 73 O L rB
L
� aJ >j -O O
Vn V) to aJ 0 N
C O u C — O
� Ln O -O0 C: +�-' -O Q
V,c-I rq J m rn OU
N r-I c-I c-I M }, c-I c1 c-I c-I c-I rl ci c-I c-I
O T
OA M
a1 •C �- Q
c a c t
E O �
O Z3
O c
O O O
C C Y
Z) Z) T c T
r•I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I �-I i-I �-I �-I c-I c-I �-I c-I �-I c-I
N
T � �
aJ +� D
O
co
> `n
aJ O
C
On
C
2i > (O O
O - 'J
C aoni O �
7 C i U a''
O v La1 (1)V)
Ln rl > -r :3
rn r1iO r i t O Lf6.�
aJ
7
H
21
CL
C.
N C
L v 3
o
- °
'�S c �' 4-
a
v c
m A E
a O 2 u V H +° L C
o _ v v ar c
+' a m E -a C. � o a
L (n Q 0J C _� v 0) o v •> O a u co
U i CL v lE v ,� O 0) � Q t0 � L f6 M O O U (A �O 3 m
Q >. aq E a Q +� C `~ �, H O Z, O fB a! _ ro y � rn
H L� c +, v ++ c C. � C _ O ++ -O
O fC +, O E Y 2i O L A O m C O L V
N C. in -0 V) 3 M C y LO U Ln 41 3 to O f0 C OU +J — 41 C aJ cu > 01 + C O O C. \ rL ++ O
01 O C. f0 ++ r0 +-� C. aJ +-+ 7 a! r6 U r0 � i L Q1 N L \ rn 01 +' 0J p
C O Q. �, co 02 co co c m Q *' ? O -0 `n c O C• > C y coo C a n � Q � O L C 4' U = v a ra O 'O �, "O v T � vOi O lV
Y Y Y Y Y �? �, Y E �^ v_ O L H i v L u C u o +, _v v C L _ - - — t Ln +� c
\ 0 O c C c c ? x c +� +� c c �_ _ L }, aU+ C O •� �+ 6 a� �G O H ra ++ Q — +' C �_ c +� p
C 01 +m-� m m a) 2i C. 01 m `n (6 C, -p L 0J 0J 1� C to C l0 L L O +-• 0J r0 01 Q 0J 0J C r0
aJ ++ C. U U U V E O 14
N L — O C. .v O VI C. L - - T + al N
, •�, •�, •+-+ a C U rO C 0J �, a i 3 0J r0 rO m O L Q Q m L L ro N a N O d aJ a1 N Q — C m — C V a)
3 n 0J ~ Q Q Q Q L Q 7 m C +' N U Q L +� Q m aJ 'n N in n n L M }' Q Q O 0J 01 L +' C N � N — > w Y Y h al p i
N N O O > Ln 0J O lD a! a1 a) O rl O a1 O \ N 0 \ N +� +� +� ca a-1 O N K! O O p 'i L 7 4-1 Ln UJ c LA a1 c v 6 O O
N C C O
H _ `i cn rii va'i r°i 0 N > > N u 2 M o z _ _ LU _ > z _ � z = = a } z z = > z z = u ii ii O z D _ z a - 2 o 0 o O - - _ Ln -1 2
00 r-I r-I r-I .—I r-I r-I r-I
M
a)
I� c-I ri r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I
M
N
C
O
co
bA
O
r1
a)
a)
co
V)
(1)
V)
co
U
C
a)
O N
a �
l0 r-I c-I r-I c-I r-I c-I c-I
M
a)
a)
C
O
co
bA
Ln
C
co
a)
J
Ln r-I c-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I ri
M T
O
C
O O co
N O co N
41 O O
C
rI O
M - o
� � L
L O fo
v 3) a)
a, v �
n
OD U �
7 }
O O z m
C E
v o N
oc � � � }
ai
M r-I r-I r-I r-q r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I
M
a)
a)
C
O
co
bA
N
N c-I r-I r-I ri c-I
M
r-I ri c-I c-I ri ri ri c-I c-I c-I ri
M
O c-I c-I c-I
M
Y
a)
a)
Ov�
+h �
Ol ri c-I c-I c-I ri c-I c-I
N
00 rI cI ri cI ri cI
N
I� ri c-I ri ri c-I c-I c-I ri
N
lD ri c-I ri c-I r-I r-I r-I c-I
N
LA ri rI r-I r-I rI c rI c cI
N
a)
aJ
\
C
O
co
w
O
1-
Ln
N
M c-I c-I r-I c-I
N
N
N
r•I ri c-I r-I ri r-I c-I r-I c-I r-I
N
T _T
p � O
L
> O
}d
L cu
cu L
LnLLL O •a O O
Q ON m p
3 y, L 7
LA of cu O L
+� w 0 L v
m
00
OAS L 41 L H aI +, O
NU aJ L V a T
H • L
N C
p O L Y Q. 7 N cu C r ++
Gl0. Ln
U i 0) L O 3 QJ ++ f0
cu
Q Y T a) v x m L 4-' i v L kn i C
Ln C L 3 }' `n E � i 4J x O N O h i O vOi ?� y O h E
C p '~ (� L L (LS Y C 4- 41 0-
Q Q Q Q 7 1 Q CL N r Q Q o
Q• O +J +�•, _ (B L OL O ++ L V) t a a) N dA a) N O aJ a) v Q. ++ a) >' C V N m I� 00 O r-I � Ln I- 00
\ 0 v n3 co cLo a v n o C OQ O += > L > L C > L M > L co m Ln I� rn r-I m m m m m m
a--+ U Q L o OJ a) > C M L Q Q p 3 r +� a) V of •+-. a u O '+� C) .V 6F '+-� a) p +-+ +-� +-+ +-+ +-+ +-+ +-� +-+ +-+ +-+
p 3 L O ++ > O Q L C ro ,> ++ n3 ,> C O co ,> C co > p p c c c c c c c c c c c c c
a) ++ Q O O a) a) a) m O a) C Q O Q. 3 i LA a �. +, i aJ }, O LJ +, O aJ }, (o a) a) a) a) a) v a) a) a) a) a) a) v a) a)
a +6 Ln 4-1
� °C o o °J °*' o en E M °' E ao a C L`°w L ao R4-1
3 N l0 1� U n3 in 3 O L '} Vf '} '} 3 LJ a) V) •V) •`) •`) •`n •V) •V) •V) •V •`) •`) •`n •V) •V) •in
O aJ o . O O o O o x + n3 — — O v to v _ O v p v O (D a) a) a) a) a) a) v v v v a) aJ a) v a)
� � _ z = = m m = acDL) = v, � ooc = _ � ._ Paz := xaz := Zaz > > az � u a � � � � � � � � � � � of CC
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX E
Available Water Usage Data&Flow Calculations
O O O O O O , o o o o o o o o o o o
D O O O O N t6 O .4 O O O O O O O O O O O N
C N V G N V
N I�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
d' K
H H
z w
V V
W � W
m
Z
a o a
x
r o
a z 3 a
c z
v p
N yrj N
w
3 � r
= o
o � o
tt N ii N
O O O O O O O O O a N N 1� ti O N O M O O
D OO OO OO OO V1 V OO OO lV .-I 0 0 .-i O O n O O
GC N V
O
w
a
l7
m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O ti N O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 N O N
N N O O N N I� O O I� W 1!1 M M l0 O1 O O O a l0 N 0 0 0 0 I� N
d � � m V e-I N M O N ^ � � l0 •-I M H O Ol � m V 1p e-I V V N N l�0
U U' m ti N
F "y ti V
W W
U
m a
g z x
a a o
= o z
z a
m U F z
z W W a
c w
� r
r = o
z - -
W 4J
v d Q i Q
O _� O
m m
�t N YF N
Z Z
D D
> >
a a
p 0 0 0 O Y Z i 0 o O Z 0 0 O r Z r 0
O p 0 0 w w w O w w w OJ 0 O p 0 0 w w w O w w w o
3 s r s K r m d O w d z ?j s m m r o d J O w d
0 0 0 o o r o w w o 0 o W o o r o
m >
z z rc ac rc z rc z rc z rc z rc z rc z rc z Z Z rc rc rc rc ac z ac c ac z rc z ac c ac s
m r
0 0 0 < 0 0 0
a 0 0 0 a
of
a o 0 o vri ¢ ¢ z
of N
JI w U Q O O O JI W V
r m m m N W r m m m N Z
2 ziz o m w J' }'r' z p m
N u N D N p W N V 0 N p
x° mi aaaaw � LLiNz � ooNLLID
Q l ml °x � as aaw � zj opLL ' m'
w'C in Z WI WI WI K O O m 2 } Y r W W p j m 2 NI > Q
r l7 O a N a Z w rc v w W' W' N l7 O l a N a Z
a W W W F N a r > l a 3 a w a r > l a 3
d 0 2—d, V z z z W zl O w a w Z O a 0 l7 ¢ d 0 VI ui z z z w ZI O w a " Z O a O l7
d OC CL N N VI p 0
a N d 2 N d CL CL V1 Vf VI d O N w Q O j a N d 2 N
D O 0 6 6 O O .4 O O O O O O O O O O O N 0
K v1 U m V1 U
N h
00 O O l0
m a m m
N
0 �
d d
l7 l7
0 0 0 o rn m o . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
w
z
V H
w
W m V
Q w
x o �
N a
m W =
z w 3 0
z
C r Q
Vr w Z
W V O
3 w N
w
< r
x O
r0 r0
O j O j
R N it V1
D O 6 66 V) V O O ni .-I 6 6 e4 O e4 O 0. 6 6 M
aC
O N
O N
d
l7
m m m m O O m m 0 0 0 m O m O m m h O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 v1 m N
O m 0 0 Vf lO I� O O to ut a ut N N 7 tD O O O a V �+1 O O O O N O
p N y N n N
K
F m m m m V1 N m m e-I 'Y rl eY rl � eY � e-1 � m � V1 N l0 .-I .-i t0 e-I rl ci .-i .-I m .-I .-i .-i .-i .-i .ti m ✓1 W
u w
w Y
m a
� a x
Q z
x w
m w r z
v z O
O W V N
Q �
C r
r = O
W
u w
m m
o
�t N YF V1
It, .H N .--i O N N �H N b M M N .� M ui M M to Ol a N .� N O .-i .-� O e in M
r r
Z Z
D D
> >
H+ N ^ V V m ^ 1 � V � O � � o m ut m M m M V O V m m �in N n n n n o 0 o N o 0 0
p 0 0 0 O > z r 0 p O Z 0 0 O r z r 0
0 0 0 0 w w w O w w w OJ 0 O O O O w w w O w w w 0
3 s s m r d J O J d 3 C m m r o d J O J d
0 0 0 o o r o w W o 0 o W o o r o
> mm rrrv, m rr �nr m � � and mm rrrv, m rr �nr m
z z rc ac rc z rc z rc z rc z rc z rc z rc z Z Z rc rc rc rc ac z ac c ac z rc z ac c ac s
m r
0
a 000 a 000
of000
a of
o 0 o vri ¢ ¢ z N
JI w U Q O O O JI W V
r m m m W r m m m M Z
d xw�'C�—dd,i iUOC CL aZVI WZN aVI KV i�n llLLl i� Nz D� oNO o m } Q p
O ° w J V -
° LO
C) C) Na,
Z aIWI wW' ' O
N ar a
I mO 3 Z
0 0ZW l7 ZZ
OO a >al7
QZ d 2 VI d CL CL N N VI U O N K a O j a Vt d 2 Vf
Town of Danby Sanitary Sewer Service Areas-3378.001
Revised 4/4/2024 for DEC Comments(based on 220 gpd/homes) Population (2020)
PF(10-States): 3.39 3457
Service Flows Expansion Total Flows*** PHF*
Service Area Description (GPD) (GPD) I&I Est**(GPD) (GPD) (GPD)
Option#1-Central Danby 41,005 14,598 12,756 68,358 188,458
Option#2-Central Danby Hamlets Only 6,652 3,991 955 11,598 36,074
Option#3-West Danby 21,365 4,700 8,537 34,602 88,345
Option#4-West Danby Hamlets Only 5,900 3,068 4,006 12,974 30,396
*Dry weather+expansion x PF
**Based on LF piping @ 375 gpd/idm
***Dry weather+expansion+I&I
Town of Danby Sanitary Sewer Service Areas-3378.001
Rev. 04/05/2024
240 mg/L 240 mg/L 8 mg/L 35 mg/L
Total Flow BOD5 Load TSS Load TP Load NH3-N Load
Service Area Description (GPD) (Ibs/d) (Ibs/d) I (Ibs/d) (Ibs/d)
Option#1-Central Danby Service Area 1 41,005 82 82 3 12
Option#2-Central Danby Hamlets Only Service Area 1a 6,652 13 13 0 2
Option#3-West Danby Service Area 2 21,365 43 43 1 6
Option#4-West Danby Hamlets Only Service Area 2a 5,900 12 12 0 2
BUILD-OUT FLOWS CONDITION
Option#1-Central Danby Service Area 1 68,358 137 137 5 20
Option#2-Central Danby Hamlets Only Service Area 1a 11,598 23 23 1 3
Option#3-West Danby Service Area 2 34,602 69 69 2 10
Option#4-West Danby Hamlets Only Service Area 2a 12,9741 26 261 1 4
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX F (Not Used)
Financial Data
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX G
Process Review
(Not Used)
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX H
Conceptual Layouts
TE.MILLER RD
W.MILLER R
Ps Ps PROJECT LOCATION
1000 /1'E HAWK R(,
GUNDERMA RD
PSI H I 11v
/ I
APPROX.
LOCATION OF 111by
MODULAR UNIT;
DISCH TO � 'ps
BUTTERMILK
CREEK
F
�BY
0
x
x
U_
LEGEND:
PROPOSED COLLECTION SYSTEM
PS PUMP STATION
TOWN LIMITS N
HAMLET CENTER
SCALE : 1"= 1500'
DANBY WASTEWATER STUDY FIG, 1
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM &WWTP STUDY HU1 V TENGINEERSIARCHITECT_S_ISURVEYORS
TOWN OF DANBY - DATE
HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-1000 ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 aueusr zozz
TOWANDA,PA 570-265-4868
PROJECT NO:
DANBY,TOMPKINS COUNTY,NEW YORK 3378_001
s '
NA PS \
�Q
SHORT RD I
G_
Ps PROJECT LOCATION
G
m
PS U pp 7-AAT
°�8C7 PS L
PS
PS
�1 z
APL AV
APPROX.
LOCATION OF p
MODULAR UNIT; Lop _
DISCH TO y
UNKNOWN
CREEK �\
1
90 r
� v
LEGEND:
PROPOSED COLLECTION SYSTEM r
PS PUMP STATION N
TOWN LIMITS
HAMLET CENTER
SCALE : 1"= 1000'
WEST DANBY WASTEWATER STUDY FIG. 2
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM &WWTP STUDY � HUNT&NfilMEEASIAACHITECTSISl RVHYORS
TOWN OF DANBY - 58- 0 - - - DATE
HORSEHEADS,NY 607-358-100 ROCHESTER,NY 585-327-7950 au(,usr zozz
TOWANDA,PA 570-265-4868
PROJECT NO:
DANBY,TOMPKINS COUNTY,NEW YORK 11 3378-001
£ZOZ :lu6ijAdoo ,'IV3S S,WA3A2inS W S10311HO]V
QA 'S,2133NION343SN3011VONNV38SNHId01SNOI1140b'b0SNOliV831Td MOAM3N `AiNnoo SNlNdAOi
TM 43ZRi0H1nHNn 3N dW Ol NOS213d AN d 2iO3 My13Hl J0 NOIlV101A tf SI ll„
899t,-99Z-OL9 Vd `VGNVAAOi n
096L-LZ£-999 AN `2i31S3HOOb 0001 -29£-L09 AN `Sd`d3H3SbOH A8 N`da J O �
sxoAgAxns H � sx�s. ��i� �xaNrON9 cn J�af11S d1MM '8 W31SAS 213M�S A2�`d11N`dS — o
mmif 0 LU
w LLM
cy- = Q .l8 NOIS1A32i J0 NOIld12i�S3a 31`da # d1MM �9 S IVO I d)ki
0 U 0 cn
Y
w
W
0-1
�.• •'•.�
J LU
J w
Q Q
H
Oz
0
tu
H U
� w
w O
a H
z
Q
U)
Y z
Z Q
H U)
Z 2
O O
Of
w w
W W H
Q
CO
O
O
a
� J
ILL J
z U
H
z
w
LL
LL z
W Q
0 N
W
H
U
W
LL
Z
N
0
LU
W z
OfQ
W
J U)
LL
v
w
w ... b
v O v
m
I I z
z
O
LU
I I O
0
LO
I I X
X
ZD
C7
ui 0
� oJ0
0
Z
I N c I
W N
Of W
F- U
I LL a I
I I
..........
I I
J
z
Q
z
Z U)
W
D
J
LL
LL
W
H
Z
Q
U z
LU
0 Q z
0 U
J
Q
U w
z U)
J
V) Q
W
U
Z
O
U
z m
Q C/)
J
¢ �
U z
w
a
z ~
Q
w
W
m
Q
U
Z
X_
NVS
Y
Y Z Q
H
z `e CD
Z)<
Q H Z Z
W
w (n CD L-1 Q Q
Cl
U W ==U W Z
O
� a ¢ o w LU F-
J M W J Z
Z U) 0 co
£ZOZ :lu6ijAdoo ,'IV3S S,WA3A2inS W S10311HOIV
QA 'S,2133NION343SN3011VONNV38SNHId01SNOIl140b'b0SNOliV831Td MOAM3N `AiNnoo SNIMAOi
TM 43ZRi0H1nHNn 3N dW Ol NOS213d AN d 2iO3 My13Hl J0 NOIlV101A tf SI ll„
899t,-99Z-OL9 Vd `V(INVAAOi
096L-LZ£-999 AN `2i31S3HOOb 0001 -29£-L09 AN `Sd`d3H3SbOH J�8 N`da J 0 NMOl
CXD
sxoA9Axns I s. DAiIHDxV I MaNrON9 cn
Aaf11S d1MM '8 W�1S�S 2��M�S J�2�`d11N`dS — o
mmif � LU
w LLM
cy- = a .l8 NOIS1A32i J0 NOIld12i�S3a 31`da # d1MM 08?1 IVO I dAi
� U cn
Y
W
001,
d'
U
J LU
J LU
Q Q
r�
0
O Z
W�
U
�W
.0
Y
Z
Q
r
o Z
H Q
w �
a
r
0
0
a
a`"
r zz
r "'
z �
I I W W O
J
LL Q W
L
I I W
U
z
Z_
(7 �
aJ0 Of
LU
C7
Z
LU n J Q W� LL
j U
I W d I
I I
w /r
z _ �.
c�
0
m
z
0
Q
a
0
0
X
0
Z
w
LL
W
Z
U
W
LL
Q
J
U
Z
Z
Q
Z
Q
U)
O
W
Z
W
W
V/
>-w Z
0 W Z
Z W 'Q'^ J
W J V/ LL
to U w
L J
m Q
Q
U ^
Z LL
X W
U
Z
O
COC)
a_
(D W
ULU
U U
O
a <Lu
Z
mw m
�� a
o M
C J
a �
w
s U z
W
0 ui
Z� cn
£ZOZ :1u61aAdoo ,'IV3S S,WA3A2inS W S�10311HOIV
QA 'S,2133NION343SN3011VONNV38SNHId01SNOIl140b'b0SNOliV831Td MOAM3N `AiNnoo SNINdAOi
TM 43ZRi0H1nHNn 3N dW Ol NOS213d AN d 2iO3 My13Hl J0 NOIlV101A tf SI ll„
899t,-99Z-OL9 Vd `V(INVAAOiLO
096L-LZ£-999 AN `2i31S3HOOb 0001 -29£-L09 AN `Sd`d3H3SbOH J�8 N`da J 0 NMOl
CXD
sxoAgAxns I s. DAiIHDxV I MaNrON9 cn
Aaf11S d1MM '8 W�1S�S 2��M�S J�2�`d11N`dS — o
mmif � LU
w LLM
Q .l8 NOIS1A32i d0 NOIld12i�S3a 31`da d1MM �3 N IdlN0O IVO I dAi
U cn
Y
w
W
d'
U
`•._ .0*0•
w
U
Q
w
w
LL
CO
Q
m
� J
O Z Q
p � Z
P_ U d
O LLi
U
Z
Q
N
i
Y Z
Z Q
Q
V)
Z �
O p
L w
w w
Q U)
U) co
O
a
� J
J J
w 0
Z_ U
H
Z
w
LL
L.L Z
w Q
p N
W
C)
U
w
w
Z
p
0
w Z
LU Q
W
H N
J_
LU
:• v
w
w ...
s
}
I I �
C�
p
m
I I co
z
O
Q
I I a
O
c�
w p
o m
I
f o
z CO co
I
O CO
Of
I w d I
I I
I I
L J
Z z
Q Q
w
C/)
z <
N
w
LU U
LL
p O
LU W
W z U
w
w � 0-
Of
w
0-
Of
Of u1
w z
m
a Q
U F—
Z Z
X O
J C,�
Q H
U z
w
J
z Y cri
LLL Z p z
� cU/)
< Ma
c� cn
zW
zUw0 Nb'S
w Wok
Of O J
g w
U V~) LUC Z
0- U) U) P a
a.
a
w
0
w
20
of
w Q
z co
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX I
Equipment and Cost Estimates
HUNTENGINEERSIARCHITECTSISURVEYORS
Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study Job no: 3378.001
Summary of Costs-Conventional Gravity System Date: 1/14/23
Rev: 6/27/23
SERVICE COST/EDU
SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs 30- r eriod
COST 0%Loan 114.5%Loan
Darby Rd S I $880,967 19 $1,532.4 11 $2,822.2
Bald Hill Rd 1 $1,507,667 35 11 $0 11 $1,438.1 11 $2,648.6
Main St/Darby Rd $2,736,162 47 $0 $1,926.4 $3,547.9
Hornbrook Rd $1,218,346 17 $0 $2,401.8 $4,423.4
Gunderman Rd $1,532,688 24 $0 $2,158.2 $3,974.8
E.Miller Rd $656,577 11 $0 $1,941.5 $3,575.7
W.Miller Rd $990,401 9 $0 $3,660.8 $6,742.2
Darby Rd N 1 $636,257 12 11 $0 11 $1,710.4 11 $3,150.1
Michigan Hollow Rd 1 $867,511 11 11 $0 11 $2,565.2 11 $4,724.5
Total Collection System $11,026,575 186 $1,976.1 $3,639.5
Regional Treatment to Ithaca WWTP $12,522,581 186 $2,244.2 $4,133.2
New 68,400 GPD SBR WWTP $5,676,224 186 $1,017.2 $1,873.5
New 68,400 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $7,099,977 186 $1,272.4 $2,343.4
Summary of Costs-Grinder System
SERVICE COST/EDU
SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs (30- r period)
COST 0%Loan 114.5%Loan
Darby Rd S I $799,096 19 $1,390.0 FV,559.9
Bald Hill Rd 1 $1,094,395 35 11 $0 11 $1,043.9 1 $1,922.6
Main St/Danby Rd 1 $2,450,431 47 11 $0 11 $1,725.2 11 $3,177.4
Hornbrook Rd 1 $1,037,458 17 11 $0 11 $2,045.2 11 $3,766.7
Gunderman Rd 1 $1,048,957 24 11 $0 11 $1,477.0 1 $2,720.3
E.Miller Rd 1 $577,175 11 11 $0 11 $1,706.7 1 $3,143.3
W.Miller Rd 1 $362,885 9 11 $0 11 $1,341.3 11 $2,470.4
Darby Rd N 1 $568,642 12 11 $0 L$1,528.6 $2,815.3
Michigan Hollow Rd 1 $652,617 11 11 $0 L$1,929.8 $3,554.2
Total Collection System $8,591,657 186 $1,539.7 $2,835.8
Regional Treatment to Ithaca WWTP $12,522,581 186 $2,244.2 $4,133.2
New 68,400 GPD SBR WWTP $5,676,224 186 $1,017.2 $1,873.5
New 68,400 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $7,099,977 186 $1,272.4 $2,343.4
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the
Engineer's bestjudgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,
materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not
guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Regional Treatment to Ithaca WWTP Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 8/29/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $100,000 $100,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $105 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $7,200 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $250,000 $250,000
5 6-inch Force Main 33,000 LF $125 $4,125,000
6 Lawn Repair(assume 50%@ 8 ft w) 132,000 SF $3 $396,000
7 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 50%in road,6ft width) 11,000 SY $105 $1,155,000
8 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 5%drives @ 6ft w,10ft 1) 11,000 SY $125 $1,375,000
9 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
10 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
11 Connection to Existing System 1 EA $10,000 $10,000
12 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $75,000 $75,000
SUBTOTAL $7,486,000
13 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $224,580 $224,580
14 Inflation @ 30/o/year,1 year 1 LS $224,580 $224,580
15 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $2,245,800 $2,245,800
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $10,180,960
16 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $254,524 $254,524
17 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $254,524 $254,524
18 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $1,832,573 $1,832,573
TOTAL PROJECT COST $12,522,581
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI n Y TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: New 68,400 GPD SBR WWTP Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 2/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0
6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $140,000 $140,000
7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400
8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000
9 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 New SBR Process Tankage&Equipment Complete 1 LS $1,221,080 $1,221,080
11 Decant EQ Basin Complete 1 LS $99,443 $99,443
12 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
13 Mechanical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
14 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $77,000 $77,000
15 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $28,000 $28,000
16 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $63,000 $63,000
17 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $12,600 $25,200
18 50'x 50'Process Building(Screen,Office,Blowers,Filters etc.)Partial Class 2,500 SF $350 $875,000
I/Div 1
19 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
20 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500
21 Alum Grating for Tanks 200 SF $100 $20,000
22 Alum Stairs for Tanks 100 SF $50 $5,000
23 Alum Railing for Tanks 200 LF $60 $12,000
24 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
25 Process Yard Piping,Valves,etc.-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
26 3"Buried Galy.Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
27 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
28 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
29 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
30 Fencing and Gate 600 LF $65 $39,000
31 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
32 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
33 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
34 Electrical/Instrumentation 11 LS $178,530 $178,530
SUBTOTAL $3,267,153
35 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $98,015 $98,015
36 Inflation @ simple 4%/year,2 years 1 LS $261,372 $261,372
37 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $980,146 $980,146
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $4,606,686
38 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $115,167 $115,167
39 Land Acquistion(1 acre) 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
40 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $115,167 $115,167
41 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $829,203 $829,203
TOTAL PROJECT COSTI $5,676,224
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: New 68,400 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 1/30/23
Date: 2/8/23
Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0
6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $140,000 $140,000
7 New Influent Bypass Screen 11 LS $1,4001 $1,400
8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000
9 New Intermediate Pump Station(pumps in EQ tank) 0 LS $60,000 $0
10 EQ Basin Equipment/Tank(see Below) 0 LS $0 $0
11 New Pre-Anoxic Tank with Equipment 1 LS $180,600 $180,600
12 New RBC Tx 5'Splitter Box w/weirs 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
13 New Hybrid RBC Precast Tanks 396 CY $1,200 $474,667
14 New Hybrid RBC Process Equipment Complete 1 LS $555,800 $555,800
15 New Hybrid RBC Greenhouse Building 1 LS $179,000 $179,000
16 Miscellaneous Hybrid RBC Site Piping,Valves,etc 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
17 New Secondary Clarifiers Tx 5'Splitter Box 1 LS $28,000 $28,000
18 New Secondary Clarifier&EQ Basin&Sludge Holding&Chem.Dose MH 1 LS $539,000 $539,000
Tanks/Equip
19 New Secondary Clarifiers Equipment 1 LS $112,000 $112,000
20 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
21 Mechanical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
22 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $154,000 $154,000
23 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $28,000 $28,000
24 UV System Complete(2 units) 11 LS $63,000 $63,000
25 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $12,600 $25,200
26 50'x 50'Process Building(Screen,Office,Blowers,Filters etc.)Partial Class 2,500 SF $350 $875,000
I/Div 1
27 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
28 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500
29 Alum Grating for Tanks 200 SF $100 $20,000
30 Alum Stairs for Tanks 1001 SF $50 $5,000
31 Alum Railing for Tanks 200 LF $60 $12,000
32 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
33 Process Yard Piping-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
34 Aeration Yard Piping-2"Galy. 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
35 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
36 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
37 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
38 Fencing and Gate 600 LF $65 $39,000
39 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
40 Miscellaneous MHs,Site Piping,Valves,etc 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
41 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
42 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
43 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $143,925 $143,925
SUBTOTAL $4,088,092
44 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $122,643 $122,643
45 Inflation @ simple 40/./year,2 years 1 LS $327,047 $327,047
46 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $1,226,428 $1,226,428
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $5,764,209
47 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.51/6) 1 LS $144,105 $144,105
48 Land Acquistion(1 acre) 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
49 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $144,105 $144,105
50 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $1,037,558 $1,037,558
TOTAL PROJECT COSTI $7,099,977
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Danby Rd S Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 2,100 LF $105 $220,500
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 5 EA $7,200 $37,800
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 17 EA $7,500 $127,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 17 EA $500 $8,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 6,800 SF $3 $20,400
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 17 EA $1,400 $23,800
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 560 SY $105 $58,800
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 45 SY $125 $5,667
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $507,967
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $15,239 $15,239
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $40,637 $40,637
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $152,390 $152,390
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $716,233
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $17,906 $17,906
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $17,906 $17,906
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $128,922 $128,922
TOTAL PROJECT COST $880,967
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI Yf TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Bald Hill Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. J QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,900 LF $105 $199,500
3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $34,200
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 80 LF $125 $10,000
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 31 EA $7,500 $232,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 31 EA $500 $15,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 12,400 SF $3 $37,200
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 31 EA $1,400 $43,400
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 528 SY $105 $55,440
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 83 SY $125 $10,333
12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $26,250 $26,250
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $869,323
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $26,080 $26,080
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $69,546 $69,546
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $260,797 $260,797
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,225,746
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $30,644 $30,644
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $30,644 $30,644
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $220,634 $220,634
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,507,667
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI Yf TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Main St/Danby Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. J QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 5,825 LF $105 $611,625
3 Manhole 15 EA $7,200 $104,850
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 50 LF $125 $6,250
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 42 EA $7,500 $315,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 42 EA $500 $21,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 16,800 SF $3 $50,400
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 42 EA $1,400 $58,800
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 1,567 SY $105 $164,500
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 112 SY $125 $14,000
12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $26,250 $26,250
13 DOT/County Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $1,577,675
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $47,330 $47,330
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $126,214 $126,214
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $473,303 $473,303
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $2,224,522
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $55,613 $55,613
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $55,613 $55,613
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $400,414 $400,414
TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,736,162
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
0 Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI Yf TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Hornbrook Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. J QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 3,500 LF $105 $367,500
3 Manhole 9 EA $7,200 $63,000
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 15 EA $7,500 $112,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 15 EA $500 $7,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 6,000 SF $3 $18,000
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 15 EA $1,400 $21,000
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 933 SY $105 $98,000
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 40 SY $125 $5,000
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $702,500
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $21,075 $21,075
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $56,200 $56,200
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $210,750 $210,750
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $990,525
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $24,763 $24,763
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $24,763 $24,763
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $178,295 $178,295
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,218,346
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION
r
COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSI ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Gunderman Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. J QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 2,750 LF $105 $288,750
3 Manhole 7 EA $7,200 $49,500
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 50 LF $125 $6,250
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 21 EA $7,500 $157,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 21 EA $500 $10,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 8,400 SF $3 $25,200
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 21 EA $1,400 $29,400
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 747 SY $105 $78,400
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 56 SY $125 $7,000
12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $26,250 $26,250
13 DOT Crossing EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $883,750
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $26,513 $26,513
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $70,700 $70,700
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $265,125 $265,125
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,246,088
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $31,152 $31,152
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $31,152 $31,152
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $224,296 $224,296
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,532,688
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION
r
COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: E.Miller Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. J QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,750 LF $105 $183,750
3 Manhole 4 EA $7,200 $31,500
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 101 EA $7,500 $75,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $3 $12,000
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 467 SY $105 $49,000
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 27 SY $125 $3,333
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $378,583
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $11,358 $11,358
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $30,287 $30,287
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $113,575 $113,575
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $533,803
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $13,345 $13,345
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $13,345 $13,345
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $96,084 $96,084
TOTAL PROJECT COST $656,577
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: W.Miller Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. J QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 900 LF $105 $94,500
3 Manhole 2 EA $7,200 $16,200
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 900 LF $125 $112,500
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 81 EA $7,500 $60,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 8 EA $500 $4,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 3,200 SF $3 $9,600
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 8 EA $1,400 $11,200
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 480 SY $105 $50,400
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 21 SY $125 $2,667
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 1 EA $10,000 $10,000
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $571,067
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $17,132 $17,132
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $45,685 $45,685
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $171,320 $171,320
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $805,204
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $20,130 $20,130
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $20,130 $20,130
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $144,937 $144,937
TOTAL PROJECT COST $990,401
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSI ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Danby Rd N Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. J QNTY. MEAS. PRICE d PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut(inclds 1 Town prop) 1,600 LF $105 $168,000
3 Manhole 4 EA $7,200 $28,800
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main(to Spaulding Dr connection) 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 11 EA $7,500 $82,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 11 EA $500 $5,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,400 SF $3 $13,200
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 11 EA $1,400 $15,400
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 427 SY $105 $44,800
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 29 SY $125 $3,667
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
13 DOT Crossing EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $366,867
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $11,006 $11,006
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $29,349 $29,349
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $110,060 $110,060
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $517,282
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $12,932 $12,932
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $12,932 $12,932
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $93,111 $93,111
TOTAL PROJECT COST $636,257
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSI ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Michigan Hollow Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/11/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 2,125 LF $105 $223,125
3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $38,250
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main(to Spaulding Dr connection) 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 101 EA $7,500 $75,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $3 $12,000
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 567 SY $105 $59,500
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 27 SY $125 $3,333
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
13 DOT Crossing 1 EA $55,000 $55,000
14 Connection to Existing System 1 EA $10,000 $10,000
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $500,208
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $15,006 $15,006
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $40,017 $40,017
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $150,063 $150,063
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $705,294
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $17,632 $17,632
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $17,632 $17,632
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $126,953 $126,953
TOTAL PROJECT COST $867,511
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Danby Rd S Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM AITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE d PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 2,100 LF $80 $168,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 17 EA $8,680 $147,560
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 850 LF $60 $51,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 6,800 SF $2 $13,600
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 5,040 SF $15 $75,600
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $460,760
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $13,823 $13,823
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $36,861 $36,861
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $138,228 $138,228
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $649,672
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $16,242 $16,242
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $16,242 $16,242
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $116,941 $116,941
TOTAL PROJECT COST $799,096
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION T
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUN ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS I MUMS
Title: Bald Hill Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. JQNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,900 LF $80 $152,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 31 EA $8,680 $269,080
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 1,550 LF $60 $93,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 12,400 SF $2 $24,800
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 4,560 SF $15 $68,400
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $631,030
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $18,931 $18,931
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $50,482 $50,482
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $189,309 $189,309
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $889,752
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $22,244 $22,244
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $22,244 $22,244
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $160,155 $160,155
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,094,395
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION T
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUN ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS I BUMS
Title: Main St/Danby Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. JQNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 2-inch Force Main 1,456 LF $85 $123,781
6 3-inch Force Main 1,456 LF $90 $131,063
7 4-inch Force Main 1,456 LF $95 $138,344
8 6-inch Force Main 1,456 LF $100 $145,625
9 Low Pressure Force Main LF $80 $116,500
10 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
11 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
12 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 421 EA $8,680 $364,560
13 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 2,100 LF $60 $126,000
14 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 16,800 SF $2 $33,600
15 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 13,980 SF $15 $209,700
16 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
17 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750
18 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
19 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
20 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $1,412,923
21 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $42,388 $42,388
22 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $113,034 $113,034
23 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $423,877 $423,877
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,992,221
24 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $49,806 $49,806
25 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $49,806 $49,806
26 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $358,600 $358,600
TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,450,431
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION T
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study Job no: ENGINEERS ARCHITEM I SURVEYORS
Title: Hornbrook Rd 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. JQNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 3,500 LF $80 $280,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 15 EA $8,680 $130,200
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 750 LF $60 $45,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 6,000 SF $2 $12,000
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 8,400 SF $15 $126,000
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $598,200
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $17,946 $17,946
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $47,856 $47,856
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $179,460 $179,460
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $843,462
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $21,087 $21,087
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $21,087 $21,087
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $151,823 $151,823
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,037,458
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION T
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study A.N CpM ARCH11 E41 J I M EY06
Title: Gunderman Rd ob I I�AJ A11111L41J JU V 1lJ
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. JQNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 2,750 LF $80 $220,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 21 EA $8,680 $182,280
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 1,050 LF $60 $63,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 8,400 SF $2 $16,800
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 6,600 SF $15 $99,000
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $604,830
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $18,145 $18,145
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $48,386 $48,386
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $181,449 $181,449
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $852,810
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $21,320 $21,320
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $21,320 $21,320
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $153,506 $153,506
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,048,957
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION T
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study �R�1111�l 15 5VR4 L�OIlSTitle: E.Miller RdHU Ab ]N.NJJR� A 1111 1 J�J114L J
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. JQNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,750 LF $80 $140,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 10 EA $8,680 $86,800
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 500 LF $60 $30,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $2 $8,000
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 4,200 SF $15 $63,000
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $332,800
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $9,984 $9,984
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $26,624 $26,624
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $99,840 $99,840
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $469,248
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $11,731 $11,731
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $11,731 $11,731
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $84,465 $84,465
TOTAL PROJECT COST $577,175
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION T
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study 1iQN6iRHRCH11ECTNURVEY0b Title: W.Miller Rd HAb
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 9001 LF $80 $72,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 8 EA $8,680 $69,440
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 400 LF $60 $24,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 3,200 SF $2 $6,400
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 2,160 SF $15 $32,400
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $209,240
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $6,277 $6,277
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $16,739 $16,739
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $62,772 $62,772
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $295,028
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $7,376 $7,376
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $7,376 $7,376
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $53,105 $53,105
TOTAL PROJECT COST $362,885
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION T
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study
Title: Danby Rd N HWb JiW.NHRWMTNMVH06
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. J QNTY. MEAS. PRICE d PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,600 LF $80 $128,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 11 EA $8,680 $95,480
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 550 LF $60 $33,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,400 SF $2 $8,800
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 3,840 SF $15 $57,600
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $327,880
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $9,836 $9,836
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $26,230 $26,230
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $98,364 $98,364
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $462,311
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $11,558 $11,558
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $11,558 $11,558
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $83,216 $83,216
TOTAL PROJECT COST $568,642
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS I I
Project: Town of Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study
Title: Michigan Hollow Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 8/9/22
Checked: Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 2,125 LF $80 $170,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 10 EA $8,680 $86,800
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 500 LF $60 $30,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $2 $8,000
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 5,100 SF $15 $76,500
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $376,300
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $11,289 $11,289
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $30,104 $30,104
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $112,890 $112,890
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $530,583
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $13,265 $13,265
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $13,265 $13,265
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $95,505 $95,505
TOTAL PROJECT COST $652,617
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Town of Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study Job no: 3378.001
Summary of Costs-Conventional Gravity System Date: 3/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
SERVICE COST/EDU
SERVICE AREA EST COST EEDLIS (30- r period)
COST 0%Loan 114.5%Loan
Danby Rd S $396,686 15IF
$881.5 $1,623.5
Main St/Danby Rd 1 $372,672 15 11 11 $828.2 11 $1,525.3
Total Collection System $769,359 30 $854.8 $1,574.4
New Leachfield System - 30 -
New 11,500 GPD SBR WWTP $3,011,661 30 $3,346.3 $6,163.0
New 11,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,146,769 30 $4,607.5 $8,485.9
New 11,500 GPD Modular System WWTP(4 Units) $2,073,933 30 $2,304.4 $4,244.1
Summary of Costs-Grinder System
SERVICE COST/EDU
SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs (30- r period)
COST 1 0%Loan 114.5%Loan
Danby Rd S $370,446 15 $823.2 $1,516.2
Main St/Danby Rd 1 $331,182 15 11 11 $736.0 11 $1,355.5
Total Collection System $701,628 30 $779.6 $1,435.8
New Leachfield System - 30 -
New 11,500 GPD SBR WWTP $3,011,661 30 $3,346.3 $6,163.0
New 11,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,146,769 30 $4,607.5 $8,485.9
New 11,500 GPD Modular System WWTP(4 Units) $2,073,933 30 $2,304.4 $4,244.1
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished
by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above
Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project: Town of Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HU VA`'17
3NGINEERS ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: New 11,500 GPD SBR WWTP Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 2/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0
6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000
7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400
8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000
9 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 New SBR Process Tankage&Equipment Complete 1 LS $718,060 $718,060
11 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
12 Mechanical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
13 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $84,000 $84,000
14 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
15 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
16 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $7,000 $14,000
17 20'x 20'Process Building(Screen,Office,Blowers,Filters etc.)Partial Class I/Div 1 400 SF $350 $140,000
18 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
19 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500
20 Alum Grating for Tanks 75 SF $100 $7,500
21 Alum Stairs for Tanks 50 SF $50 $2,500
22 Alum Railing for Tanks 100 LF $60 $6,000
23 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
24 Process Yard Piping,Valves,etc.-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
25 3"Buried Galy.Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
26 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
27 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
28 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
29 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500
30 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
31 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
32 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
33 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $118,185 $118,185
SUBTOTAL $1,733,645
34 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $52,009 $52,009
35 Inflation @ simple 49/6/year,2 years 1 LS $138,692 $138,692
36 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $520,094 $520,094
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $2,444,439
37 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $61,111 $61,111
38 Land Acquistion(0.5 acre) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
39 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $61,111 $61,111
40 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $439,999 $439,999
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,011,661
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as
an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: New 11,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP Job no:3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 1/14/23
Date: 3/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0
6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000
7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400
8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000
9 New Intermediate Pump Station(pumps in EQ tank) 0 LS $60,000 $0
10 EQ Basin Equipment/Tank(included Below) 0 LS $0 $0
11 New Pre-Anoxic Tank with Equipment(included below) 0 LS $0 $0
12 New RBC 5'x 5'Splitter Box w/weirs 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
13 New Hybrid RBC Process Tanks:(included below) 0 CY $1,200 $0
New Hybrid RBC Process Equipment Complete Precast Tanks/Equip:New
14 Secondary Clarifier&Preanoxic&EQ Basin&Sludge Holding&Chem.Dose MH 1 LS $756,000 $756,000
Tanks/Equip&Disc Filter
15 New Hybrid RBC Greenhouse Building(Not needed) 0 LS $0 $0
16 Miscellaneous Hybrid RBC Site Piping,Valves,etc 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
17 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
18 Tertiary Disc Filters(included above) 0 LS $0 $0
19 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
20 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
21 Post Aeration Blowers(sludge blower included above) 2 EA $7,000 $14,000
22 50'x 50'Process Building(Screen,Office,Blowers,Filters etc.)Partial Class I/Div 1 2,500 SF $350 $875,000
23 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
24 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,5001 $21,500
25 Alum Grating for Tanks 50 SF $100 $5,000
26 Alum Stairs for Tanks 25 SF $50 $1,250
27 Alum Railing for Tanks 50 LF $60 $3,000
28 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
29 Process Yard Piping-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
30 Aeration Yard Piping-2"Galy. 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
31 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
32 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
33 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
34 Fencing and Gate 500 LF $65 $32,500
35 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
36 Miscellaneous MI-Is,Site Piping,Valves,etc 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
37 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $25,000 $25,000
38 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
39 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $103,500 $103,500
SUBTOTAL $2,388,150
40 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $71,645 $71,645
41 Inflation @ simple 49,o/year,2 years 1 LS $191,052 $191,052
42 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $716,445 $716,445
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $3,367,292
43 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $84,182 $84,182
44 Land Acquistion(0.5 acre) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
45 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $84,182 $84,182
46 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $606,112 $606,112
TOTAL PROJECTCOSTI $4,146,769
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed
the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSI ARCHITECTS ISURVEYORS
Title: New 11,500 GPD Modular System WWTP(4 Units) Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/5/23
Date:
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000
5 New BUSSE Process Tankage&Equipment Complete 1 LS $608,000 $608,000
6 Process Equipment Connections 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
7 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
8 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
9 Post Aeration Blowers 1 EA $7,000 $7,000
10 Process Yard Piping,Valves,etc.-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
11 3"Buried Galy.Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
12 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
13 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
14 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
15 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500
16 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
17 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
18 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
19 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $105,450 $105,450
SUBTOTAL $1,192,950
20 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $35,789 $35,789
21 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $95,436 $95,436
22 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $357,885 $357,885
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,682,060
23 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $42,051 $42,051
24 Land Acquistion(0.5 acre) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
25 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $42,051 $42,051
26 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $302,771 $302,771
TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,073,933
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished
by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above
Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Danby Rd S Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 1/16/23
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 830 LF $105 $87,150
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 2 EA $7,200 $14,940
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 9 EA $7,500 $67,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 9 EA $500 $4,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 3,600 SF $3 $10,800
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 9 EA $1,400 $12,600
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 221 SY $105 $23,240
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 24 SY $125 $3,000
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $228,730
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $6,862 $6,862
17 Inflation @ simple 49/o/year,2 years 1 LS $18,298 $18,298
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $68,619 $68,619
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $322,509
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $8,063 $8,063
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $8,063 $8,063
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $58,052 $58,052
TOTAL PROJECT COST $396,686
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed
the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINFERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Main St/Danby Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 1/16/23
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 850 LF $105 $89,250
3 Manhole 2 EA $7,200 $15,300
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 7 EA $7,500 $52,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 7 EA $500 $3,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 2,800 SF $3 $8,400
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 7 EA $1,400 $9,800
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 227 SY $105 $23,800
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 19 SY $125 $2,333
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $26,250 $0
13 DOT/County Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $214,883
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $6,447 $6,447
17 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $17,191 $17,191
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $64,465 $64,465
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $302,986
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $7,575 $7,575
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $7,575 $7,575
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $54,537 $54,537
TOTAL PROJECT COST $372,672
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished
by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above
Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HU V ENGINEERS
Title: Danby Rd S Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 1/16/23
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 830 LF $80 $66,400
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 9 EA $8,680 $78,120
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 450 LF $60 $27,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 3,600 SF $2 $7,200
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 1,992 SF $15 $29,880
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $213,600
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $6,408 $6,408
19 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $17,088 $17,088
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $64,080 $64,080
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $301,176
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $7,529 $7,529
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $7,529 $7,529
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $54,212 $54,212
TOTAL PROJECT COST $370,44.6
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished
by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above
Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Project: Town of Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI 1�f
ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS ISURVETOB
Title: Main St/Danby Rd Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 1/16/23
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 Low Pressure Force Main 850 LF $80 $68,000
6 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
8 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 7 EA $8,680 $60,760
9 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 350 LF $60 $21,000
10 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 2,800 SF $2 $5,600
11 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 2,040 SF $15 $30,600
12 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
13 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
14 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
15 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
16 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $190,960
17 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $5,729 $5,729
18 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $15,277 $15,277
19 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $57,288 $57,288
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $269,254
20 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $6,731 $6,731
21 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $6,731 $6,731
22 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $48,466 $48,466
TOTAL PROJECT COST $331,182
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
HUNTENGINEERSIARCHITECTSISURVEYORS
Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study Job no: 3378.001
Summary of Costs-Conventional Gravity System Date: 3/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
SERVICE COST/EDU
SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs 30 rperiod)
COST 0%Loan 114.5%Loan
SR 34/Spencer Rd Gravity I $1,174,765 12 $3,350.7 $6,171.1
SR 34/Spencer Rd North Gravity 1 $577,020 12 11 $0 1 $1,645.8 1 $3,031.1
Maple Ave/Station Rd Gravity 1 $2,160,633 29 11 $0 11 $2,465.1 11 $4,540.0
Valley View Rd Gravity 1 $1,502,506 16 11 $0 11 $3,061.1 $5,637.7
Brown Rd Gravity 1 $1,027,175 9 11 $0 11 $3,662.2 11 $6,744.8
Short Rd/Brown Rd North Gravity 1 $1,662,397 13 11 $0 11 $4,310.5 1 $7,938.8
SR 34 South Gravity 1 $429,371 6 11 $0 11 $2,449.3 $4,511.1
Total Collection System $8,533,866 97 $2,932.6 $5,401.1
New 34,500 GPD SBR WWTP $4,764,193 97 $1,637.2 $3,015.3
New 34,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,987,153 97 $1,713.8 $3,156.4
Summary of Costs-Grinder System
SERVICE COST/EDU
SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs (30 rperiod)
COST 0%Loan 114.5%Loan
SR 34/Spencer Rd Grinder I $691,059 12 $1, 771.1 $3,630.2
SR 34/Spencer Rd North Grinder 1 $510,287 12 11 $0 1 $1,455.5 1 $2,680.6
Maple Ave/Station Rd Grinder&Force Main 1 $1,217,536 29 11 $0 11 $1,389.1 11 $2,558.3
Valley View Rd Grinder 1 $629,366 16 11 $0 11 $1,282.2 11 $2,361.5
Brown Rd Grinder 1 $521,834 9 11 $0 11 $1,860.5 11 $3,426.6
Short Rd/Brown Rd North Grinder 1 $825,378 13 11 $0 11 $2,140.2 1 $3,941.6
SR 34 South Grinder 1 $343,741 6 11 $0 11 $1,960.9 11 $3,611.4
Total Collection System $4,739,201 97 $1,628.6 $2,999.5
New 34,500 GPD SBR WWTP $4,764,193 97 $1,637.2 $3,015.3
New 34,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,987,153 97 $1,713.8 $3,156.4
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: New 34,500 GPD SBR WWTP Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 2/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0
6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000
7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400
8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000
9 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 New SBR Process Tankage&Equipment Complete 1 LS $939,120 $939,120
11 Decant EQ Basin Complete 1 LS $50,885 $50,885
12 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
13 Mechnical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
14 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
15 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
16 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $49,000 $49,000
17 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $7,000 $14,000
18 50'x 50'Process Building(Screen,Office,Blowers,Filters etc.)Partial Class 2,500 SF $350 $875,000
I/Div 1
19 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
20 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500
21 Alum Grating for Tanks 100 SF $100 $10,000
22 Alum Stairs for Tanks 50 SF $50 $2,500
23 Alum Railing for Tanks 100 LF $60 $6,000
24 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
25 Process Yard Piping,Valves,etc.-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
26 3"Buried Galy.Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
27 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
28 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
29 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
30 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500
31 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
32 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
33 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
34 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $137,370 $137,370
SUBTOTAL $2,741,275
35 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $82,238 $82,238
36 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $219,302 $219,302
37 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $822,382 $822,382
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $3,865,197
38 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $96,630 $96,630
39 Land Acquistion(1 acre) 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
40 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $96,630 $96,630
41 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $695,735 $695,735
TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,764,193
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available in ormation and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's hest
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: New 34,500 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 1/14/23
Date: 3/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICES PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0
6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000
7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400
8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000
9 New Intermediate Pump Station(pumps in EQ tank) 0 LS $60,000 $0
10 EQ Basin Equipment/Tank(included Below) 0 LS $0 $0
11 New Pre-Anoxic Tank with Equipment(included below) 0 LS $0 $0
12 New RBC 5'x 5'Splitter Box w/weirs 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
13 New Hybrid RBC Process Tanks:(included below) 0 CY $1,200 $0
14 New Hybrid RBC Process Equipment Complete 1 LS $474,600 $474,600
15 New Hybrid RBC Greenhouse Building 1 LS $93,000 $93,000
16 Miscellaneous Hybrid RBC Site Piping,Valves,etc 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
17 Precast Tanks/Equip:New Secondary Clarifier&Preanoxic&EQ Basin& 1 LS $658,000 $658,000
Sludge Holding&Chem.Dose MH Tanks/Equip&Disc Filter
18 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
19 Mechanical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
20 Tertiary Disc Filters(included above) 0 LS $0 $0
21 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
22 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $49,000 $49,000
23 Post Aeration Blowers(sludge blower included above) 2 EA $7,000 $14,000
24 50'x 50'Process Building(Screen,Office,Blowers,Filters etc.)Partial Class 2,500 SF $350 $875,000
I/Div 1
25 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
26 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500
27 Alum Grating for Tanks 100 SF $100 $10,000
28 Alum Stairs for Tanks 50 SF $50 $2,500
29 Alum Railing for Tanks 100 LF $60 $6,000
30 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
31 Process Yard Piping-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
32 Aeration Yard Piping-2"Galv. 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
33 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
34 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
35 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
36 Fencing and Gate 500 LF $65 $32,500
37 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
38 Miscellaneous MI-Is,Site Piping,Valves,etc 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
39 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $25,000 $25,000
40 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
41 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $77,100 $77,100
SUBTOTAL $2,875,600
42 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $86,268 $86,268
43 Inflation @ simple 49/o/year,2 years 1 LS $230,048 $230,048
44 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $862,680 $862,680
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $4,054,596
45 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $101,365 $101,365
46 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $101,365 $101,365
47 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $729,827 $729,827
TOTAL PROJECT COSTI $4,987,153
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: SR 34/Spencer Rd Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 2,300 LF $105 $241,500
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 7 EA $7,200 $48,600
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 80 LF $125 $10,000
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 101 EA $7,500 $75,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $3 $12,000
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 635 SY $105 $66,640
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 27 SY $125 $3,333
12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $25,000 $25,000
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $706,073
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $21,182 $21,182
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $56,486 $56,486
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $211,822 $211,822
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $995,563
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $24,889 $24,889
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $24,889 $24,889
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $129,423 $129,423
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,174,765
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI Yf TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: SR 34/Spencer Rd North Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 0 LS $10,000 $0
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,525 LF $105 $160,125
3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $34,650
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 101 EA $7,500 $75,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $3 $12,000
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 407 SY $105 $42,700
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 27 SY $125 $3,333
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $346,808
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $10,404 $10,404
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $27,745 $27,745
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $104,043 $104,043
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $489,000
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $12,225 $12,225
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $12,225 $12,225
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $63,570 $63,570
TOTAL PROJECT COST $577,020
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI Yf TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Maple Ave/Station Rd Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 3,600 LF $105 $378,000
3 Manhole 10 EA $7,200 $72,000
4 Pump Station and Generator 2 EA $150,000 $300,000
5 6-inch Force Main 160 LF $125 $20,000
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 25 EA $7,500 $187,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 25 EA $500 $12,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 10,000 SF $3 $30,000
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 25 EA $1,400 $35,000
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 1,003 SY $105 $105,280
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 67 SY $125 $8,333
12 Stream Crossing 2 EA $25,000 $50,000
13 DOT/County Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $90,000 $90,000
SUBTOTAL $1,298,613
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $38,958 $38,958
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $103,889 $103,889
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $389,584 $389,584
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,831,045
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $45,776 $45,776
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $45,776 $45,776
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $238,036 $238,036
TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,160,633
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
0 Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI Yf TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Valley View Rd Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,550 LF $105 $162,750
3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $35,100
4 Pump Station and Generator 2 EA $150,000 $300,000
5 6-inch Force Main 580 LF $125 $72,500
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 14 EA $7,500 $105,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 14 EA $500 $7,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 5,600 SF $3 $16,800
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 14 EA $1,400 $19,600
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 568 SY $105 $59,640
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 37 SY $125 $4,667
12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $25,000 $25,000
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $90,000 $90,000
SUBTOTAL $903,057
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $27,092 $27,092
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $72,245 $72,245
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $270,917 $270,917
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,273,310
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $31,833 $31,833
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $31,833 $31,833
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $165,530 $165,530
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,502,506
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION
r
COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSI ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Brown Rd Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,800 LF $105 $189,000
3 Manhole 6 EA $7,200 $39,600
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 300 LF $125 $37,500
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 81 EA $7,500 $60,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 8 EA $500 $4,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 3,200 SF $3 $9,600
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 8 EA $1,400 $11,200
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 560 SY $105 $58,800
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 21 SY $125 $2,667
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0
13 DOT Crossing EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $617,367
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $18,521 $18,521
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $49,389 $49,389
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $185,210 $185,210
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $870,487
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $21,762 $21,762
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $21,762 $21,762
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $113,163 $113,163
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,027,175
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION
r
COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Short Rd/Brown Rd North Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 3,050 LF $105 $320,250
3 Manhole 9 EA $7,200 $62,100
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 1,380 LF $125 $172,500
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 11 EA $7,500 $82,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 11 EA $500 $5,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,400 SF $3 $13,200
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 11 EA $1,400 $15,400
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 1,181 SY $105 $124,040
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1 Oft 1) 29 SY $125 $3,667
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $999,157
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $29,975 $29,975
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $79,933 $79,933
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $299,747 $299,747
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,408,811
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $35,220 $35,220
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $35,220 $35,220
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $183,145 $183,145
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,662,397
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: SR 34 South Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,200 LF $105 $126,000
3 Manhole 4 EA $7,200 $28,800
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $125 $0
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 5 EA $7,500 $37,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 5 EA $500 $2,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 2,000 SF $3 $6,000
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 5 EA $1,400 $7,000
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 320 SY $105 $33,600
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 13 SY $125 $1,667
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 1 EA $10,000 $10,000
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $258,067
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $7,742 $7,742
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $20,645 $20,645
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $77,420 $77,420
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $363,874
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $9,097 $9,097
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $9,097 $9,097
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $47,304 $47,304
TOTAL PROJECT COST $429,371
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: SR 34/Spencer Rd Grinder Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 2,300 LF $80 $184,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 10 EA $8,680 $86,800
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 500 LF $60 $30,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $2 $8,000
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 5,520 SF $15 $82,800
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $415,350
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $12,461 $12,461
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $33,228 $33,228
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $124,605 $124,605
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $585,644
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $14,641 $14,641
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $14,641 $14,641
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $76,134 $76,134
TOTAL PROJECT COST $691,059
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HQNb �pN(I��F�R$ �R�HITE�T$ $URVEY�R$
Title: SR 34/S encer Rd North Grinder o: 3�37&
p
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,525 LF $80 $122,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 10 EA $8,680 $86,800
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 500 LF $60 $30,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $2 $8,000
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 3,660 SF $15 $54,900
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $306,700
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $9,201 $9,201
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $24,536 $24,536
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $92,010 $92,010
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $432,447
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $10,811 $10,811
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $10,811 $10,811
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $56,218 $56,218
TOTAL PROJECT COST $510,287
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINFERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Maple Ave/Station Rd Grinder&Force Main Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 2,520 LF $100 $252,000
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,080 LF $80 $86,400
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 25 EA $8,680 $217,000
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 1,250 LF $60 $75,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 10,000 SF $2 $20,000
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 2,592 SF $15 $38,880
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 2 EA $18,750 $37,500
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $731,780
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $21,953 $21,953
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $58,542 $58,542
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $219,534 $219,534
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,031,810
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $25,795 $25,795
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $25,795 $25,795
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $134,135 $134,135
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,217,536
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Valley View Rd Grinder Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,550 LF $80 $124,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 14 EA $8,680 $121,520
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 700 LF $60 $42,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 5,600 SF $2 $11,200
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 3,720 SF $15 $55,800
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $378,270
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $11,348 $11,348
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $30,262 $30,262
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $113,481 $113,481
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $S33,361
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $13,334 $13,334
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $13,334 $13,334
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $69,337 $69,337
TOTAL PROJECT COST $629,366
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION
r
COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Brown Rd Grinder Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. JQNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,800 LF $80 $144,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 8 EA $8,680 $69,440
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 400 LF $60 $24,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 3,200 SF $2 $6,400
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 4,320 SF $15 $64,800
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $313,640
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $9,409 $9,409
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $25,091 $25,091
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $94,092 $94,092
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $442,232
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $11,056 $11,056
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $11,056 $11,056
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $57,490 $57,490
TOTAL PROJECT COST $521,834
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION
r
COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSI ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Short Rd/Brown Rd North Grinder Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 3,050 LF $80 $244,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 11 EA $8,680 $95,480
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 550 LF $60 $33,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,400 SF $2 $8,800
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 7,320 SF $15 $109,800
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $496,080
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $14,882 $14,882
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $39,686 $39,686
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $148,824 $148,824
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $699,473
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $17,487 $17,487
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $17,487 $17,487
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $90,931 $90,931
TOTAL PROJECT COST $825,378
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUI Yf TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: SR 34 South Grinder Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI, PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,200 LF $80 $96,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 5 EA $8,680 $43,400
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 250 LF $60 $15,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 2,000 SF $2 $4,000
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 2,880 SF $15 $43,200
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,1Oft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $206,600
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $6,198 $6,198
19 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $16,528 $16,528
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $61,980 $61,980
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $291,306
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $7,283 $7,283
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $7,283 $7,283
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $37,870 $37,870
TOTAL PROJECT COST $343,741
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services
furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not
exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
HUNLNGINEERSIARCHITECTSISURVEYORS
Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study Job no: 3378.001
Summary of Costs-Conventional Gravity System Date: 1/17/23
Date: 6/27/23
SERVICE COST/EDU
SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs 30- r eriod
COST 0%Loan 114.5%Loan
SR 34/Spencer Rd Gravity $875,891 6 $4,866.1 11 $8,962.0
Maple Ave/Station Rd Gravity 1 $1,010,282 10 11 $0 11 $3,367.6 11 $6,202.3
Valley View Rd Gravity 1 $883,156 11 11 $0 11 $2,676.2 11 $4,928.9
Total Collection System $2,769,329 27 $3,418.9 $6,296.8
New 13,000 GPD SBR WWTP $3,045,666 27 $3,760.1 $5,752.9
New 13,000 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,146,769 27 $5,119.5 $7,832.8
New 13,000 GPD Modular System WWTP(2 Units) $1,818,644 27 $2,245.2 $3,435.2
Summary of Costs-Grinder System
SERVICE COST/EDU
SERVICE AREA EST COST EDUs (30- r period)
COST 0%Loan 11 4.5%Loan
SR 34/Spencer Rd Grinder $434,302 6 $2,412.8 $4,443.7
Maple Ave/Station Rd Grinder&Force Main 1 $539,903 10 il $0 11 $1,799.7 1 $3,314.5
Valley View Rd Grinder 1 $480,223 11 11 $0 11 $1,455.2 11 $2,680.1
Total Collection System $1,454,427 27 $1,795.6 $3,307.0
New 13,000 GPD SBR WWTP $3,045,666 27 $3,760.1 $5,752.9
New 13,000 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP $4,146,769 27 $5,119.5 $7,832.8
New 13,000 GPD Modular System WWTP(2 Units) $1,818,644 27 $2,245.2 $3,435.2
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as
an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: New 13,000 GPD SBR WWTP Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 2/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
Date:
ITEM AL ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
ONTY. MEAS. PRICEJL PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0
6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000
7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400
8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000
9 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000
10 New SBR Process Tankage&Equipment Complete 1 LS $735,770 $735,770
11 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
12 Mechnical Mixer 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
13 Tertiary Disc Filters 1 LS $84,000 $84,000
14 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
15 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
16 Sludge/Post Aeration Blowers 2 EA $7,000 $14,000
17 20'x 20'Process Building(Screen,Office,Blowers,Filters etc.)Partial Class I/Div 1 400 SF $350 $140,000
18 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
19 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500
20 Alum Grating for Tanks 75 SF $100 $7,500
21 Alum Stairs for Tanks 50 SF $50 $2,500
22 Alum Railing for Tanks 100 LF $60 $6,000
23 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
24 Process Yard Piping,Valves,etc.-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
25 3"Buried Galy.Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
26 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
27 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
28 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
29 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500
30 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
31 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
32 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
33 Electrical/Instrumentation(15%of equipment) 1 LS $120,083 $120,083
SUBTOTAL $1,753,253
34 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $52,598 $52,598
35 Inflation @ simple 4%/year,2 years 1 LS $140,260 $140,260
36 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $525,976 $525,976
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $2,472,086
37 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $61,802 $61,802
38 Land Acquistion(0.5 acre) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
39 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $61,802 $61,802
40 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $444,975 $444,975
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,045,666
s Estimate or Probable Project Lostis based on available in orma ion and the Engineers experience and qua i ica ions and represents the Engineer's bestjucigement as an
experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: New 13,000 GPD HYBRID RBC WWTP Job no:3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 2/2/23
Date: 3/2/23
Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 Piping and Fittings at New Screen 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
5 Influent Pump Station 0 LS $60,000 $0
6 New Open Channel Mechanical Influent Screen 1 LS $84,000 $84,000
7 New Influent Bypass Screen 1 LS $1,400 $1,400
8 Gratings at New Screen Channel 20 SF $100 $2,000
9 New Intermediate Pump Station(pumps in EQ tank) 0 LS $60,000 $0
10 EQ Basin Equipment/Tank(included Below) 0 LS $0 $0
11 New Pre-Anoxic Tank with Equipment(included below) 0 LS $0 $0
12 New RBC 5'x 5'Splitter Box w/weirs 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
13 New Hybrid RBC Process Tanks:(included below) 0 CY $1,200 $0
New Hybrid RBC Process Equipment Complete Precast Tanks/Equip:New Secondary
14 Clarifier&Preanoxic&EQ Basin&Sludge Holding&Chem.Dose MH Tanks/Equip& 1 LS $756,000 $756,000
Disc Filter
15 New Hybrid RBC Greenhouse Building(Not needed) 0 LS $0 $0
16 Miscellaneous Hybrid RBC Site Piping,Valves,etc 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
17 Chemical P-Removal Feed System 1 LS $56,000 $56,000
18 Tertiary Disc Filters(included above) 0 LS $0 $0
19 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
20 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
21 Post Aeration Blowers(sludge blower included above) 2 EA $7,000 $14,000
22 50'x 50'Process Building(Screen,Office,Blowers,Filters etc.)Partial Class I/Div 1 2,500 SF $350 $875,000
23 Portable Hoists/Sockets 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
24 Lab Equipment 1 LS $21,500 $21,500
25 Alum Grating for Tanks 50 SF $100 $5,000
26 Alum Stairs for Tanks 25 SF $50 $1,250
27 Alum Railing for Tanks 50 LF $60 $3,000
28 High Performance Coatings 1 LS $20,000 $20,000
29 Process Yard Piping-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
30 Aeration Yard Piping-2"Galy. 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
31 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
32 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
33 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
34 Fencing and Gate 500 LF $65 $32,500
35 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
36 Miscellaneous MHs,Site Piping,Valves,etc 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
37 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $25,000 $25,000
38 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
39 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $103,500 $103,500
SUBTOTAL $2,388,150
40 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $71,645 $71,645
41 Inflation @ simple 49,o/year,2 years 1 LS $191,052 $191,052
42 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $716,445 $716,445
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $3,367,292
43 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $84,182 $84,182
44 Land Acquistion(0.5 acre) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
45 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $84,182 $84,182
46 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $606,112 $606,112
TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,146,769
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as
an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT NOINEERSIARCHIIECTSISURVEYORS
Title: New 13,000 GPD Modular System WWTP(2 Units) Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/5/23
Date:
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Preparation 1 LS $40,000 $40,000
2 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
3 New Influent Sewer Line 100 LF $85 $8,500
4 New Intermediate Pump Station 1 LS $60,000 $60,000
5 New BUSSE Process Tankage&Equipment Complete(2 Units) 1 LS $480,000 $480,000
6 Process Equipment Connections 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
7 Post Aeration System and Tank 1 LS $14,000 $14,000
8 UV System Complete(2 units) 1 LS $42,000 $42,000
9 Post Aeration Blowers 1 EA $7,000 $7,000
10 Process Yard Piping,Valves,etc.-6"SDR 35 PVC 1 LS $21,000 $21,000
11 3"Buried Galy.Steel Air Piping/Fittings 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
12 New 8-inch Outfall 100 LF $85 $8,500
13 New Headwall Outfall 1 LS $8,500 $8,500
14 New GenSet 1 LS $95,000 $95,000
15 Fencing and Gate 300 LF $65 $19,500
16 Stone Drive 200 SY $45 $9,000
17 Miscellaneous Site Work 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
18 Site Lighting 1 LS $30,000 $30,000
19 Electrical/Instrumentation 1 LS $86,250 $86,250
SUBTOTAL $1,045,750
20 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $31,373 $31,373
21 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $83,660 $83,660
22 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $313,725 $313,725
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,474,508
23 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $36,863 $36,863
24 Land Acquistion(0.5 acre) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
25 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $36,863 $36,863
26 Engineering Design&CA/CO(18%) 1 LS $265,411 $265,411
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,818,644
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished
by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above
Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT RNGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: SR 34/Spencer Rd Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE L PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,400 LF $105 $147,000
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 5 EA $7,200 $32,400
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 80 LF $125 $10,000
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 6 EA $7,500 $45,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 61 EA $500 $3,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 2,400 SF $3 $7,200
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 6 EA $1,400 $8,400
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 395 SY $105 $41,440
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,10ft 1) 16 SY $125 $2,000
12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $25,000 $25,000
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 01 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $526,440
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $15,793 $15,793
17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year,2 years 1 LS $42,115 $42,115
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 11 LS $157,932 $157,932
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $742,280
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $18,557 $18,557
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $18,557 $18,557
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $96,496 $96,496
TOTAL PROJECT COST $875,891
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as
an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS f
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study NU! Y TENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Maple Ave/Station Rd Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,500 LF $105 $157,500
3 Manhole 5 EA $7,200 $34,200
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 60 LF $125 $7,500
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 10 EA $7,500 $75,000
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 10 EA $500 $5,000
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $3 $12,000
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 10 EA $1,400 $14,000
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,Eft width) 416 SY $105 $43,680
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ Eft w,10ft 1) 27 SY $125 $3,333
12 Stream Crossing 2 EA $25,000 $50,000
13 DOT/County Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $607,213
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $18,216 $18,216
17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year,2 years 1 LS $48,577 $48,577
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 11 LS $182,164 $182,164
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $856,171
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $21,404 $21,404
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $21,404 $21,404
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $111,302 $111,302
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,010,282
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as
an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
0 Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNT ENGINEERS 1 ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Valley View Rd Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 1,100 LF $105 $115,500
3 Manhole 4 EA $7,200 $27,000
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 80 LF $125 $10,000
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 11 EA $7,500 $82,500
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 11 EA $500 $5,500
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,400 SF $3 $13,200
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 11 EA $1,400 $15,400
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 315 SY $105 $33,040
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,10ft 1) 29 SY $125 $3,667
12 Stream Crossing 1 EA $25,000 $25,000
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $530,807
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $15,924 $15,924
17 Inflation @ simple 40/o/year,2 years 1 LS $42,465 $42,465
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $159,242 $159,242
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $748,437
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $18,711 $18,711
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $18,711 $18,711
L
Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $97,297 $97,297
TOTAL PROJECT COST $883,156
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as an
experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSIARCHITECTSISURVEYORS
Title: Short Rd/Brown Rd North Gravity Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/21/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 3,050 LF $105 $320,250
3 Manhole 9 EA $7,200 $62,100
4 Pump Station and Generator 1 EA $150,000 $150,000
5 6-inch Force Main 1,380 LF $125 $172,500
6 Service Connection(100 ft/ea) 0 EA $7,500 $0
7 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 01 EA $500 $0
8 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 0 SF $3 $0
9 Pump and Demo of Existing Septic Tanks 0 EA $1,400 $0
10 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 1,181 SY $105 $124,040
11 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,10ft 1) 0 SY $125 $0
12 Stream Crossing 0 EA $25,000 $0
13 DOT Crossing 0 EA $55,000 $0
14 Connection to Existing System 01 EA $10,000 $0
15 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS $45,000 $45,000
SUBTOTAL $878,890
16 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $26,367 $26,367
17 Inflation @ simple 4%/year,2 years 1 LS $70,311 $70,311
18 Construction Contingency(30%) 11 LS $263,667 $263,667
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,239,235
19 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $30,981 $30,981
20 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $30,981 $30,981
21 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $161,101 $161,101
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,462,297
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as
an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSIARCH110SISURVEYORS
Title: SR 34/Spencer Rd Grinder Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,400 LF $80 $112,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 6 EA $8,680 $52,080
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 300 LF $60 $18,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 2,400 SF $2 $4,800
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 3,360 SF $15 $50,400
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,10ft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $261,030
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $7,831 $7,831
19 Inflation @ simple 4%/year,2 years 1 LS $20,882 $20,882
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 11 LS $78,309 $78,309
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $368,052
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $9,201 $9,201
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $9,201 $9,201
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $47,847 $47,847
TOTAL PROJECT COST $434,302
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as an
experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERS I ARCHITECTS I SURVEYORS
Title: Maple Ave/Station Rd Grinder&Force Main Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 1,050 LF $100 $105,000
6 Low Pressure Force Main 450 LF $80 $36,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 10 EA $8,680 $86,800
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 500 LF $60 $30,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,000 SF $2 $8,000
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 1,080 SF $15 $16,200
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,10ft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 2 EA $18,750 $37,500
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $324,500
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $9,735 $9,735
19 Inflation @ simple 49/o/year,2 years 1 LS $25,960 $25,960
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $97,350 $97,350
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $457,545
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $11,439 $11,439
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $11,439 $11,439
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $59,481 $59,481
TOTAL PROJECT COST $539,903
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as an
experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study 1 1UI M f ENGINEERSIARCHITECTSISURVEYORS
Title: Valley View Rd Grinder Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 1,100 LF $80 $88,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 11 EA $8,680 $95,480
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 550 LF $60 $33,000
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 4,400 SF $2 $8,800
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 2,640 SF $15 $39,600
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,10ft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 1 EA $18,750 $18,750
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 11 LS 1 $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $288,630
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $8,659 $8,659
19 Inflation @ simple 41/./year,2 years 1 LS $23,090 $23,090
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $86,589 $86,589
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $406,968
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $10,174 $10,174
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $10,174 $10,174
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $52,906 $52,906
TOTAL PROJECT COST $480,223
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as an
experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Project: Town of West Danby Hamlet Centers-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study HUNTENGINEERSI ARCHITECTS ISURVEYORS
Title: Short Rd/Brown Rd North Grinder Job no: 3378.001
Made by: MARK CHIOVARELLI,PE Date: 7/25/22
Checked: Date: 6/27/23
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
2 8-inch Gravity Sewer-SDR35 PVC Open Cut 0 LF $75 $0
3 Manhole(400 ft spacing) 0 EA $3,750 $0
4 Pump Station and Generator 0 EA $150,000 $0
5 6-inch Force Main 0 LF $100 $0
6 Low Pressure Force Main 3,050 LF $80 $244,000
7 6-inch Service Laterals(50 ft/ea) 0 EA $2,800 $0
8 Lateral Cleanouts/Connections 0 EA $375 $0
9 Grinder Pump Stations(230v,control panel,curbstop) 0 EA $8,680 $0
10 Grinder Pump Force Main(50 ft/User) 0 LF $60 $0
11 Lawn Repair(per lateral @ 8 ft w) 0 SF $2 $0
12 Asphalt Road Repair(assume 40%in road,6ft width) 7,320 SF $15 $109,800
13 Asphalt Driveway Repair(assume 40%drives @ 6ft w,10ft 1) 0 SF $12 $0
14 Stream Crossing 0 EA $18,750 $0
15 DOT Crossing 0 EA $40,000 $0
16 Connection to Existing System 0 EA $10,000 $0
17 Electrical/Instrumentation(30%of equipment) 1 LS $0 $0
SUBTOTAL $358,800
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $10,764 $10,764
19 Inflation @ simple 41/./year,2 years 1 LS $28,704 $28,704
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $107,640 $107,640
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $505,908
21 Bonds,Permits,Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $12,648 $12,648
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $12,648 $12,648
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $65,768 $65,768
TOTAL PROJECT COST $596,971
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the Engineer's bestjudgement as an
experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over
competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable
Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Projec Town of Central Danby- Sanitary Sewer System &WWTP Study
Title: New Leachfield System-68,400 gpd Job no: 3378.001
Made OLIVER SUGARMAN, EIT Date:
Date:
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 Land Purchase&Easements 7 /Acre $50,000 $350,000
3 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
4 New Influent Sewer Line 50 LF $75 $3,750
5 Influent Pump Station 1 LS $100,000 $100,000
6 4" Perforate Leachfield Pipe 24,700 LF $53 $1,309,100
7 Install New Flow Meter 1 LS $2,800 $2,800
3" PVC Buried Force Main Piping to New Leach
8 7,075 LF $53 $374,986
Field
9 Distribution Box 40 EA $500 $20,000
10 New 40,000 GAL Septic Tank w/EffI Filter 2 LS $160,000 $320,000
11 Ancillary Items 1 LS $2,000 $2,000
12 Site Improvements 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
13 Fencing and Gate 2,244 LF $65 $145,860
14 Stone Drive 167 SY $45 $7,500
15 Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
16 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
17 Electrical/Instrumentation (15%of equipment) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
SUBTOTAL $2,740,496
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $82,215 $82,215
19 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $219,240 $219,240
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $822,149 $822,149
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $3,864,099
21 Bonds,Permits, Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $96,602 $96,602
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $96,602 $96,602
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $502,333 $502,333
TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,559,637
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the
Engineer's bestjudgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,
materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not
guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Projec Town of Central Danby Hamlets-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study
Title: New Leachfield System-11,600 gpd Job no: 3378.001
Made OLIVER SUGARMAN, EIT Date:
Date:
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 Land Purchase&Easements 2 /Acre $50,000 $100,000
3 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
4 New Influent Sewer Line 50 LF $75 $3,750
5 Influent Pump Station 1 LS $100,000 $100,000
6 4" Perforate Leachfield Pipe 3,800 LF $53 $201,400
7 Install New Flow Meter 1 LS $2,800 $2,800
3" PVC Buried Force Main Piping to New Leach
8 2,693 LF $53 $142,718
Field
9 Distribution Box 7 EA $500 $3,500
10 New 20,000 GAL Septic Tank w/EffI Filter 1 LS $80,000 $80,000
11 Ancillary Items 1 LS $2,000 $2,000
12 Site Improvements 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
13 Fencing and Gate 884 LF $65 $57,460
14 Stone Drive 167 SY $45 $7,500
15 Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
16 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
17 Electrical/Instrumentation (15%of equipment) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
SUBTOTAL $805,628
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $24,169 $24,169
19 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $64,450 $64,450
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $241,689 $241,689
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,135,936
21 Bonds,Permits, Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $28,398 $28,398
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $28,398 $28,398
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $147,672 $147,672
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,340,405
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the
Engineer's bestjudgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,
materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not
guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Projec Town of West Danby-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study
Title: New Leachfield System-34,500 gpd Job no: 3378.001
Made OLIVER SUGARMAN, EIT Date:
Date:
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 Land Purchase&Easements 3 /Acre $50,000 $150,000
3 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
4 New Influent Sewer Line 50 LF $75 $3,750
5 Influent Pump Station 1 LS $100,000 $100,000
6 4" Perforate Leachfield Pipe 7,000 LF $53 $371,000
7 Install New Flow Meter 1 LS $2,800 $2,800
3" PVC Buried Force Main Piping to New Leach
8 3,960 LF $53 $209,880
Field
9 Distribution Box 14 EA $500 $7,000
10 New 40,000 GAL Septic Tank w/EffI Filter 1 LS $160,000 $160,000
11 Ancillary Items 1 LS $2,000 $2,000
12 Site Improvements 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
13 Fencing and Gate 1,208 LF $65 $78,520
14 Stone Drive 167 SY $45 $7,500
15 Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
16 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
17 Electrical/Instrumentation (15%of equipment) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
SUBTOTAL $1,196,950
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $35,909 $35,909
19 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $95,756 $95,756
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $359,085 $359,085
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,687,700
21 Bonds,Permits, Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $42,192 $42,192
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $42,192 $42,192
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $219,401 $219,401
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,991,485
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the
Engineer's bestjudgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,
materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not
guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Projec Town of West Danby Hamlet-Sanitary Sewer System&WWTP Study
Title: New Leachfield System-13,000 gpd Job no: 3378.001
Made OLIVER SUGARMAN, EIT Date:
Date:
Date:
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION EST. UNIT of UNIT ITEM
NO. QNTY. MEAS. PRICE PRICE
1 Site Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
2 Land Purchase&Easements 1 /Acre $50,000 $50,000
3 New Influent Manhole 1 EA $9,500 $9,500
4 New Influent Sewer Line 50 LF $75 $3,750
5 Influent Pump Station 1 LS $100,000 $100,000
6 4" Perforate Leachfield Pipe 2,700 LF $53 $143,100
7 Install New Flow Meter 1 LS $2,800 $2,800
3" PVC Buried Force Main Piping to New Leach
8 4,752 LF $53 $251,856
Field
9 Distribution Box 6 EA $500 $3,000
10 New 20,000 GAL Septic Tank w/EffI Filter 1 LS $80,000 $80,000
11 Ancillary Items 1 LS $2,000 $2,000
12 Site Improvements 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
13 Fencing and Gate 748 LF $65 $48,620
14 Stone Drive 167 SY $45 $7,500
15 Site Restoration 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
16 Site Lighting 1 LS $45,000 $45,000
17 Electrical/Instrumentation (15%of equipment) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
SUBTOTAL $797,126
18 Mobilization(3%) 1 LS $23,914 $23,914
19 Inflation @ simple 41/o/year,2 years 1 LS $63,770 $63,770
20 Construction Contingency(30%) 1 LS $239,138 $239,138
CONSTRUCTION SUBSUMMARY $1,123,948
21 Bonds,Permits, Insurance(2.5%) 1 LS $28,099 $28,099
22 Administrative(2.5%) 1 LS $28,099 $28,099
23 Engineering Design&CA/CO(13%) 1 LS $146,113 $146,113
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,326,258
This Estimate of Probable Project Cost is based on available information and the Engineer's experience and qualifications and represents the
Engineer's bestjudgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.Since the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor,
materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,the Engineer can not and does not
guarantee that the actual total project cost will not exceed the above Estimate of Probable Project Costs.
jS m,a [[---s calp-
I P. treatment ' s Im .".,
F
w i memorane' b reactor technology
k , , Y BUS- �GT
w a t e r f o r t h e n e x t g e n e r a t i o n
■mil
rp
'
4T��1
4
kti
Waste water treatment
and recycling for Plant type GT 220,installed in a cellar
decentralized areas -W
The modular design makes our system
suitable for larger developments such us
hotels, camp grounds or office buildings
with up to 500 inhabitants.
BUSSEGT turns domestic waste water into reusable water
The BUSSEGT Domestic Sewage Treatment MBR Technology even eliminates bacteria and
System uses Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) germs. It restores waste water to a hygienic con-
Technology, currently the most advanced method dition fit for use as re-use water, for example,
of waste water treatment and is the first system watering the garden or flushing toilets. In this way
with this type of technology in the US that has the consumption of drinking water in a household
been certified by NSF International. can be reduced by at least one third.
The BUSSEGTsystem ensures that the dischar-
ged water is cleaner than the law requires.
Fig.1: Venting Thus, water treated by the BUSSEGTsystem
Complete solution for may be discharged in sensitive areas and water
single and shared
occupancy houses with protection zones.
a cellar Since MBR technology consist of biological
treatment and Membrane filtration in one process
'•• Sewage
no additional treatment processes such as sand
filters or other clarifiers are needed.
Other advantages of this new compact pro-
Percolation into the
garden or discharge duct are the small foot print and the fact that it
into a recipient body can be installed without expensive earthmoving
Fig.2: work.
Complete solution for
single and shared The BUSSEGT system which consists of safety
occupancy houses tanks can be installed in a few hours and is
without a cellar Sewage
Venting Garage/adjoining immediately ready for operation.
building
Septic tank "
Percolation into the
garden or discharge
into a recipient body w a t e r f o r t h e n e x t g e n e r a t i o n
Examples/References
moduleMBR
This system type has been developed for the
waste water treatment of bigger installations such
as hotels, restaurants, camp sites, office buildings
i
and small compounds up to 100 inhabitants.
The system consists of an MBR module which is
4 made out of polyethylene and has to be installed
partly below ground.
i A pumping station with aerated coarse matter
i
separator is part of the system. This pumping
unit has to be installed in an existing waste
_ water holding tank.
System for seminar centres
System for camping sites
F _
This System for 50 inhabitants is installed at
an automobile club and seminar center in Germany. M
The effluent from the system is used for watering h
the test driving field. The MBR stage of the system
is installed in the basement of the building.
A water holding tank next to the building is used
as a pre-cleaning chamber.
The system for 40 inhabitants treats the waste
water of a camping ground with 80 campsites.
In the winter time only the owner of the property
and his family of four live at the site.
This example demonstrates one of the most
important advantages of the MBR technology.
— Even when the capacity of waste water entering
the system varies widely because of the seasons
3 the system works without interruption and has the
same stable degradation performance throughout
the whole year.
r
Examples/References
Container plant
The modular structure makes the Busse MBR
` systems fit for installation in a container as a
mobile solution for waste water recycling at any
irk place in the world. Turn-key MBR system can be
delivered in all sizes from 4 to 100 inhabitants.
A water holding tank next to the building is used
as a pre-cleaning chamber.
r
�i
4'
i
rr -
System for hotels and resorts
r
y The high degradation performance of the
Busse membrane technology allows the system to
treat waste water even in areas with the highest
standards for environmental protection.
This example shows a Busse MBR system instal-
led at a hotel on an island in a nature reserve.
The filtrate of the system is percolated into the
_ lake surrounding the hotel resort.
System for hotels and resorts
_ � 4
This system for 65 inhabitants is installed at with aerated coarse matter is part of the system
a luxury hotel resort in Greece near the city of and is installed in an existing waste water holding
Sparta. The effluent is used for gardening and tank outside. The MBR stage of the system is
refilling the swimming pool. A pumping station installed in a basement room of the hotel.
Examples/References
Due to its compact and modular structure the
Busse MBR system can also be adapted for
installation on house boats, theatres, museums
and restaurant ships, river boats as well as larger
— yachts. The effluent of the system can be re-used
for flushing the toilets, cleaning the deck or can
be discharged directly into the surrounding waters.
T
,
-IJ
f
Historic buildings often present a challenge
when it comes to integrating waste water treat-
ment systems into the existing structure.
v, Due to its small footprint and modular structure
-,
J the Busse MBR system can be easily adapted to
•�T
fit into the existing structures and treats the
1 waste water at site with the possibility of imme-
diate re-use within the building.
1
A Busse MBR system for 25 inhabitants equi- is re-used for flushing the toilets and watering the
valents recycles the waste water of the visitors of exotic plants in the tropical hall of the center.
the Education and Demonstration Center for Solar
Energy in Germany. The effluent from the system
� r ,
4
f �
a How it works
� . f
f The BUSSEGT Small Size Sewage Treatment The BUSSEGT system was tested by NSF
System consists of two treatment steps, namely International according to standards 40 and 245
pre-treatment 0 and aeration 0. In the pretreat- and is the first system using membrane bioreac-
+ # w+ ment step, which also serves as waste water for technology that has been certified by the
storage, biologically degradable coarse material NSF. The detailed test results are shown on the
• j such as, e.g., faeces, toilet paper, are dissolved opposite page.
° and the non-degradable materials are separated The BUSSEGT system has also been tested
! from the waste water by an aerated sieve 0. by the University of Hannover and the Technical
r + A pump 0 pumps the pretreated water, from University in Berlin and the water from the
�
which the coarse material has been separated, system in regular use is significantly
- r #
' 'to the aeration section. In this step the organic better than the limits set by DIBt Berlin*
matter in the waste water is degraded biologically (Z-55.3-60) and the applicable law. In 2008
+ by microorganisms and oxygen 0. In addition to the BUSSEGT system has successfully surpassed
this, the treated waste water passes through the certification by Institute PIA in Aachen
microfiltration membranes 0 (ultra fine filter according to the EU-Norm for decentralized
o i , with 0.4 dam pore size). These membrane filters waste water treatment. The BUSSEGT fulfills all
eliminate suspended material, even bacteria and degradation classes for water treatment set by
/ germs, ensuring that only completely clear, European law, such as carbon removal, nitrificati-
' odorless, hygienically harmless water (filtrate) on, de-nitrification, phosphorous removal and
leaves the system. water hygienisation.
r
*Design qualification
-, approval of DIBT Z-55.3-60
24-h-trial run
P.
Permeate collector
Venting
Waste water Air Air
• t f
+ from bathroom,
kitchen 'toilet 4
r.
6 Collection ducts
Drainagevlies
Aerator
Membrane
17
PreliminaryMembrane carrier
Sedimentation Activation
Diagram of the4icrofiltration technology Fulict il I diagram of'the membrane module Sectional view of a membrane
1 2
Degradation Performance
o
a aoa roa ,UGGACtl
The BUSSEGT has passed the cer-
E 'F"`y`°"°`" """" E tification process of NSF International
0 10A444.......................... .. ........ .F'emlCdfamE7M1nrR ... ta000 0
Standard 40 and 245 for USA and
North America in 2008.
The test results of the NSF inter-
national certification process show
t
xrWl ado+ Aug-0 Save auiT- Ww r bac4f that the system elates over 95 % of
oar the COD and over 95 % of BOD5.
It has also been proven during the
certification process that the BUSSEGT
#--------------...............-..----.-. -cr �° system using microfiltration membranes
* + can hold back all bacteria and viruses
xo +----------; -..--,-... ....................-
safely. The filtrate is fit for re-use
.,
without further treatment.
10C --..---.-1.................................... .............
—......", tm
•
�T ilAf ,h�Q7 �4'tR Qs� lb�� do-t>?
The performance evaluation for the
NSF certification was conducted at the
Massachusetts Alternative Septic System
The production facility of company Test Center (MASSTC) located at Otis Air
Busse Innovative Systems in Leipzig Germany National Guard Base in Bourne,
has been certified by NSF International. Massachusetts.
R
r' t
w a t e r f o r t h e n e x t g e n e r a t i o n
Advantages at a glance
■ The BUSSEGT turns domestic waste water into reusable water
for irrigation or flushing toilets
■ In this way the consumption of drinking water in a household
can be reduced by at least one third
■ Water treated by the BUSSEGT system may be discharged
in sensitive areas and water protection zones
■ Since MBR technology consist of biological treatment and
Membrane filtration in one process no additional treatment
processes are needed, such as sand filters or other clarifiers
■ Small foot print and the modular design allow an installation Design qualification approval
of "Deutsches Institut fur
inside houses Bautechnik DIBT"
■ Use of the existing septic tanks would allow for other type of Z-5 5.3-6 0
installation
Tested and certified by NSF
■ The BUSSEGT system can be installed in a few hours and is International Standard 40+245
immediately ready for operation
■ No expensive earthmoving working necessary
■ The BUSSEGT requires little maintenance because the Recommended by Federal
necessity of constant sludge removal is avoided Environment Agency
■ The BUSSEGT is expandable due to its modular design U mweltbundesamt
■ Extremely quiet operation USA:■ 2 year warranty with service contract included BUSSEG■T
■ Extended service plan including lifetime membrane BUSSE Green Technologies Inc.
replacement guarantee available Ingo Schaefer
P.O. Box 1123
Oak Park, Illinois 60304
USA
Phone: +1 508 894 2125
Fax: +1 708 445 1304
Email: mail@busse-gt.com
www.busse-gt.com
Canada:
NOA13USSE
Janda Busse Treatment Systems Inc.
#301 -4733 River Road West
Ladner, BC,V41K 1R9
Canada
Phone: +1 604 940-3841
Fax: +1 604 940-3847
Email: mail@janda-busse.ca
Manufacture and Marketing:
Innoralire Syshme GmhN
v
BUSSE IS GmbH
Zaucheweg 6 -04316 Leipzig
Telefon: +49(0)341-6 59 84-25
Telefax: +49(0)341-65984-26
Email: info@busse-is.de
w a t e r f o r t h e n e x t g e n e r a t i o n www.busse-is.de
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX J
Smart Growth
N.WEOF C Department Environmental
STATE OF
OPPORTUNITY. of Health Facilities Corporation
Smart Growth Assessment Form
This form should be completed by an authorized representative of the applicant, preferably the
project engineer or other design professional.'
Section 1 — General Applicant and Project Information
Applicant: Town of Danby Project No.: EPG # 105522
Project Name:Town of Danby Sanitary Sewer and WWTP
Is project construction complete? ❑ Yes, date: ® No
Please provide a brief project summary in plain language including the location of the area the
project serves:
The Town of Danby (Town) is investigating ways to provide a sanitary collection sewer system
and one or more municipal wastewater treatment/disposal systems to serve the hamlet
neighborhood and hamlet core zones or just the Hamlet Centers of Central and West Danby.
Section 2 — Screening Questions
A. Prior Approvals
1. Has the project been previously approved for Environmental Facilities ❑ Yes ® No
Corporation (EFC) financial assistance?
2. If yes to A(1), what is the project number(s) for the Project No.:
prior approval(s)?
3. If yes to A(1), is the scope of the previously-approved project ❑ Yes ❑ No
substantially the same as the current project?
If your responses to A(1) and A(3) are both yes, please proceed to Section 5, Signature.
B. New or Expanded Infrastructure
1. Does the project involve the construction or reconstruction of new or Z Yes ❑ No
expanded infrastructure?
Examples of new or expanded infrastructure include, but are not limited to:
(i) The addition of new wastewater collection/new water mains or a new
wastewater treatment system/water treatment plant where none existed
previously;
(ii) An increase of the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(SPDES) permitted flow capacity for an existing wastewater treatment
system; and OR
' If project construction is complete and the project was not previously financed through EFC, an
authorized municipal representative may complete and sign this assessment.
Page 1
Effective October 1, 2020
(iii) An increase of the permitted water withdrawal or the permitted flow
capacity for the water treatment system such that a Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) water withdrawal permit will need to
be obtained or modified, or result in the Department of Health (DOH)
approving an increase in the capacity of the water treatment plant.
If your response to B(1) is no, please proceed to Section 5, Signature.
Section 3 —Smart Growth Criteria
Your project must be consistent will all relevant Smart Growth criteria. For each question below
please provide a response and explanation.
1. Does the project use, maintain, or improve existing infrastructure?
❑ Yes ® No
Explain your response: Presently,the existing residences and businesses utilize private,onsite septic systems for wastewater treatment.Most of the
soils within the study area are rated as very limited for the use of leach fields and therefore,failed,or inadequate septic
system have been shown to adversely impact the surrounding water quality and environment.
2. Is the project located in a (1) municipal center, (2) area adjacent to a municipal center, or (3)
area designated as a future municipal center, as such terms are defined herein (please
select one response)?
9 Yes, my project is located in a municipal center, which is an area of concentrated and
mixed land uses that serves as a center for various activities, including but not
limited to: central business districts, main streets, downtown areas, brownfield
opportunity areas (see www.dos.nV.govfor more information), downtown areas of
local waterfront revitalization program areas (see www.dos.nV.govfor more
information), areas of transit-oriented development, environmental justice areas (see
www.dec.ny.gov/pub1ic/899.htm1 for more information), and hardship areas (projects
that primarily serve census tracts or block numbering areas with a poverty rate of at
least twenty percent according to the latest census data).
❑ Yes, my project is located in an area adjacent to a municipal center which has clearly
defined borders, is designated for concentrated development in the future in a
municipal or regional comprehensive plan, and exhibits strong land use,
transportation, infrastructure, and economic connections to an existing municipal
center.
❑ Yes, my project is located in an area designated as a future municipal center in a
municipal or comprehensive plan and is appropriately zoned in a municipal zoning
ordinance
❑ No, my project is not located in a (1) municipal center, (2) area adjacent to a municipal
center, or (3) area designated as a future municipal center.
Explain your response and reference any applicable plans:
2 of 4
Effective October 1, 2020
3. Is the project located in a developed area or an area designated for concentrated infill
development in a municipally-approved comprehensive land use plan, local waterfront
revitalization plan, and/or brownfield opportunity area plan?
❑Yes ®No
Explain your response and reference any applicable plans:
4. Does the project protect, preserve, and enhance the State's resources, including surface
and groundwater, agricultural land, forests, air quality, recreation and open space, scenic
areas, and significant historic and archaeological resources?
®Yes ❑No
Explain your response:
The state of the current individual on-site wastewater treatment systems as evidenced by multiple NOVs,
coupled with the environmental features of the area, demand a centralized municipal sanitary sewer system to
protect the health and safety of the public.Jennings Pond, located just south-west of the Town borders, is
classified as stressed due to suspected pathogens.A municipal sewer system would remove the potential for
surface and groundwater contamination due to failing septic systems.
5. Does the project foster mixed land uses and compact development, downtown revitalization,
brownfield redevelopment, the enhancement of beauty in public spaces, the diversity and
affordability of housing in proximity to places of employment, recreation and commercial
development, and the integration of all income and age groups?
❑Yes ®No
Explain your response:
6. Does the project provide mobility through transportation choices including improved public
transportation and reduced automobile dependency?
❑Yes W]No Z N/A
Explain your response:
7. Does the project involve coordination between State and local government, intermunicipal
planning, or regional planning?
®Yes ❑No
Explain your response and reference any applicable plans:
This project will require approvals on the State and local level for funding and
design. Coordination with local and county planning will also be completed.
3 of 4
Effective October 1, 2020
8. Does the project involve community-based planning and collaboration?
®Yes ❑No
Explain your response and reference any applicable plans:
This project will require close coordination with the community to establish the
Town sewer district and understand site conditions.
9. Does the project support predictability in building and land use codes?
❑Yes ❑No ON/A
Explain your response:
10. Does the project promote sustainability by adopting measures such as green infrastructure
techniques, decentralized infrastructure techniques, or energy efficiency measures?
®Yes ❑No
Explain your response and reference any applicable plans:
Project will utilize energy efficient designs while looking at smaller systems versus a single regional
facility.
11. Does the project mitigate future physical climate risk due to sea-level rise, storm surges,
and/or flooding, based on available data predicting the likelihood of future extreme weather
events, including hazard risk analysis data, if applicable?
❑Yes E]No
Explain your response and reference any applicable plans:
Not Applicable
Section 4— Miscellaneous
1. Is the project expressly required by a court or administrative consent ❑ Yes 0 No
order?
If yes, and you have not previously provided the applicable order to
EFC/DOH, please submit it with this form.
Section 5 — Signature
By signing below, you agree that you are authorized to act on behalf of the applicant and that the
information contained in this Smart Growth Assessment is true, correct and complete to the best of
your knowledge and belief.
Applicant: Town of Danby Phone Number: 607-277-4788
Name and Title of Signatory: Timothy K. Steed P.E., Director of Site/Civil
Signature: Date: 3/28/2024
4 of 4
Effective October 1, 2020
Town of Danby Preliminary Engineering Report
HUNT 3378-001 Sanitary Sewer and WWTP Study
APPENDIX K
Engineering Certification
Engineering Report Certification
During the preparation of this Engineering Report, I have studied and evaluated the cost and
effectiveness of the processes, materials, techniques, and technologies for carrying out the proposed
project or activity for which assistance is being sought from the New York State Clean Water State
Revolving Fund. In my professional opinion, I have recommended for selection, to the maximum extent
practicable, a project or activity that maximizes the potential for efficient water use, reuse, recapture, and
conservation, and energy conservation, taking into account the cost of constructing the project or activity,
the cost of operating and maintaining the project or activity over the life of the project or activity, and the
cost of replacing the project and activity.
Title of Engineering Report: Sanitary Sewer and WWRP Study, Engineering Planning Grant#105522
Date of Report: July 2023, Revision February 2024
Professional Engineer's Name: Timothy. K. Steed, PE, Director of Civil Engineering
Signature: Cj7
Date: March 28, 2024