Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-06-25 BZA Minutes FINAL
Town of Danby
Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2024
FINAL MINUTES
PRESENT :
Lew Billington
Tobias Dean
Ted Jones (Zoom)
Earl Hicks (Chair)
OTHER ATTENDEES:
Town Planner Greg Hutnik
Recording Secretary Cindy Katz
Public (Zoom) Marika Briggs
Public (in -person) Leslie Connors (Town Board member), Zachary Larkins,
Heather Coffey, Katharine Hunter
This meeting was conducted in person with virtual access on the Zoom platform
The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m.
AGENDA REVIEW
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.
Chair Hicks explained the requirements for quorum for the BZA, and pointed out to the applicants that one
person was not present. The applicants elected to continue.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES (April 2024)
Many members stated they had not read the minutes yet. Therefore, they elected to vote on them at the
next BZA meeting.
Town of Danby
Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2024
NEW BUSINESS
Planner Hutnik updated the BZA about town policy on email use, which is potentially changing. In the
proposed change, only chairs of boards will be required to have a town email. All others can elect to use
their personal email address. If BZA members would like to switch to your personal email, please provide
the information to the planner. If BZA members would like a town email address, please contact the town
clerk. They discussed the continued efforts and concerns as the town navigates their new em ail system.
Chair Hicks mentioned that he hopes to connect with BZA member Betsy Lamb soon regarding site plans,
since she previously missed that discussion.
VAR 2024-05 1914 Danby Road Parcel: 14.-1-10.2
Applicant: Zachary Larkins
Anticipated Action: Declare Lead Agency for SEQRA; SEQRA Determination; Review application;
Public Hearing, Consider variance
SEQR: Unlisted Action
Applicant Request: The applicant is seeking relief from Section 604(5)(b) of the Zoning Law that
only allows restaurant uses on corner lots in the Hamlet Neighborhood Zone District.
Chair Hicks reviewed the request. This is an unlisted action and requires a determination of environmental
impact. He verified that there were no conflicts of interests on the board.
Chair Hicks requested a map be shared of the hamlet neighborhood zone. He expressed curiosity on the
regulation's intention, which requires restaurants only on corners . Planner Hutnik explained he had
recently asked this to previous Danby planner David West. West explained that from a new urbanist
perspective, because the hamlet is bigger than a typical hamlet it could result in a fragmented affect which
may negatively impact the neighborhood. Therefore, this regulation will encourage focus on the corner lots
present (two of which are very encumbered and difficult to build on). Planner Hutnik wondered if requir ing
restaurants to be only on 96b rather than corner lots would also address this concern.
Chair Hicks confirmed that once this variance is given, the applicants will still need a site plan review from
the Planning Board. He wondered why the BZA is therefore doing SEQRA and not the Plan ning Board .
Planner Hutnik explained that the SEQR is required for the variance, but not for the site plan review. Chair
Hicks requested an overview of the types of SEQRA.
Town of Danby
Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2024
MOTION To Pass Resolution 5 of 2024
DECLARING LEAD AGENCY, AREA VARIANCE, 1914 DANBY ROAD, TAX PARCEL #14.-1-10.2
Whereas an application has been submitted for review and approval by the Town of Danby Board of
Zoning Appeals for an Area Variance for Town of Danby Tax Parcel No. 14.-1-10.2, by Zachary Larkins,
Owner; and
Whereas the property is in the Hamlet Neighborhood Zone District, which allows “Restaurants, bars and
other places for serving food and beverages, and provided that there is no drive -through window” as a
principal use permitted only by site plan approval and only allowed on corner lots (Section 604(5)(b) of the
Danby Zoning Law); and
Whereas the Owner requests relief from Section 604(5)(b) of the Zoning Law to allow “Restaurants, bars
and other places for serving food and beverages, and provided that there is no drive -through window” as a
principal use permitted only by site plan approval ; and
Whereas this is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to
environmental review; and
Whereas State Law specifies that, for actions governed by local environmental review, the Lead Agency
shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the
action;
Now Therefore, be it
Resolved that the Town of Danby Board of Zoning Appeals does hereby declare itself Lead Agency for the
environmental review for the action of Area Variance approval for Town of Danby tax parcel No 14.-1-10.2
by Zachary Larkins, owner.
Moved by Dean, seconded by Jones.
The motion passed.
In favor: Billing ton , Dean, Jones, Hicks
SEQR
Chair Hicks requested Planner Hutnik walk them through the next steps. First , they will go through the
Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF, Part 1) which was provided by the applicant in February.
Next, they will fill out the Short Enviromental Assessment Form parts 2 and 3.
Planner Hutnik clarified to the BZA that often variances are “type 2” in which case the state has
determined that no further environmental review is necessary (and therefore the BZA does not have to
conduct SEQR). However, this variance is “unlisted” and therefore requires review by the BZA.
Town of Danby
Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2024
The applicant approached the screen where a map was shared. They reviewed various infrastructure and
other features of the land. They discussed the wetlands and the plan for managing the water in both wet
spots.
Planner Hutnik explained that the use (commercial restaurant ) is triggering site plan approval by the
Planning Board. That, along with a public hearing, is scheduled for next month. He informed the board that
he felt the SEAF part 1 was satisfactory, and the board agreed that it was complete.
They moved onto review SEAF part 2, which Planner Hutnik had preliminarily filled out. He reviewed his
analysis and reasoning .
MOTION To Pass Resolution 6 of 2024
DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE, AREA VARIANCE, 1914 DANBY ROAD, TAX
PARCEL #14.-1-10.2
Whereas an application has been submitted for review and approval by the Town of Danby Board of
Zoning Appeals for an Area Variance for Town of Danby Tax Parcel No. 14.-1-10.2, by Zachary Larkins,
Owner; and
Whereas the property is in the Hamlet Neighborhood Zone District, which allows “Restaurants, bars and
other places for serving food and beverages, and provided that there is no drive -through window” as a
principal use permitted only by site plan approval and only allowed on corner lots (Section 604(5)(b) of the
Danby Zoning Law); and
Whereas the Owner requests relief from Section 604(5)(b) of the Zoning Law to allow “Restaurants, bars
and other places for serving food and beverages, and provided that there is no drive -through window” as a
principal use permitted only by site plan approval ; and
Whereas this is an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and is subject to
environmental review; and
Whereas this Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review accepts as adequate: a Short
Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF), Part 1, submitted by the Owner, and Part 2, prepared by the
Planning Administrator; and an Area Variance Appeal Application;
Now Therefore, be it
Resolved that the Town of Danby Board of Zoning Appeals, based on careful consideration of the
application materials, determines the proposed Area Variance will result in no significant impact on the
environment and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Artic le 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law be filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
Town of Danby
Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2024
Moved by Dean, seconded by Billington
The motion passed.
In favor: Billington, Dean, Jones, Hicks
Public Comment
The public hearing opened at 8:11 p.m
The applicants spoke about their short -term plans to offer a coffee trailer while restoring and protecting
the ecosystem present . They discussed their long -term plan to build a brick-and-mortar store and a guest
house. They confirmed that they will not need another variance for the coffee shop but might need to
come back for another purpose.
Marika Briggs spoke in support of the project. She is excited about it.
Planner Hutnik confirmed that t wo emails were received, one by Marika Briggs and one from Friede
Sander. Both emails were in support of the variance.
The applicants stated that they reached out to their neighbors, including the Smiths as well as “Nora,” and
everyone had been supportive.
Katharine Hunter , town board member, has been keeping track of the project and sees it as a positive
impact on Danby. She thinks she would have spoken up against the corner lot provision in the past had she
known that it would cause these issues. She supports making things simple for people to do what they
want .
Public hearing closed at 8:25 p .m.
Chair Hicks asked about posting physical notifications and why those have not happened recently .
Planner Hutnik replied they are not required but he can put them up if the board would like. Connors added
it is helpful in a town without full internet coverage , and Planner Hutnik agreed that he would do it going
forward.
Area Variance Findings and Decision
Town of Danby
Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2024
The Board of Zoning Appeals considered the appeal of Zachary Larkins and Heather Coffey regarding the
property at 1914 Danby Road (14.-1-10.2) for an Area Variance from Section 604(5)(b) of the Zoning Law
which only allows restaurant uses on corner lots in the Hamlet Neighborhood Zone District .
Balancing Questions:
1. The Board agreed no undesirable change would be produced in the character of the
neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties.
a. They agreed this will be an improvement
2. The Board agreed that the benefit sought by the applicant could not be achieved by a feasible
alternative of the variance.
a. There is no alternative because it is not a corner lot. The applicant did generate many
alternatives, but none were feasible or desirable.
3. The Board agreed the requested variance was not substantial.
a. Planner Hutnik provided framing asking the BZA to consider if the impacts were
substantial. In this sense, with the variance, seven lots now would have the potential
to host a restaurant as opposed to six previously.
4. The Board agreed that the variance would not have an adverse impact on the physical or
environmental conditions of the neighborhood.
a. Not anymore than if it were located on the corner; and an improved impact on the
environmental and physical conditions of the property.
5. The Board agreed that the alleged difficulty was not self -created.
a. The owner has not invested any improvements that would generate a self -created
difficulty
Chair Hicks asked about the survey and the mistake in the parcel number .
The BZA found that an area variance of one lot from the corner from Section 604(5)(b) of the Zoning Law
which only allows restaurant uses on corner lots in the Hamlet Neighborhood Zone District is the
minimum variance that should be granted in order to pre serve and protect the character of the
neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community because impacts to granting the
variance would produce net positive results to the community.
MOTION To Pass Resolution 7 of 2024 that the benefit to the applicant does outweigh the detriment to
the neighborhood or community.
Moved by Billington, seconded by Jones
Town of Danby
Board of Zoning Appeals
June 25, 2024
The motion passed.
In favor: Billington, Dean, Jones, Hicks
The BZA and the planner discussed amendments to the current zoning law which the town board is
currently working on. They may still remove the requirement for corner lots, but getting this variance was
faster for the applicants.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned 8:51 p.m.
Recording Secretary -- Cindy Katz