HomeMy WebLinkAboutNSF-Danby-Site-Plan-and-Wetland-Update-12-06-21 R B U T
SOLAR FARMS
1241 University Avenue • Rochester,NY • 14607
December 6,2021
Town of Danby
c/o David West(Town Planner)
and Joel Gagnon(Town Supervisor)
1830 Danby Rd
Ithaca,NY 14850
RE: Bald Hill Road,LLC;NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2,LLC;NSF Danby Site 3,LLC
Dear Mr.West&Mr. Gagnon,
It is with great excitement that Norbut Solar Farms submits the new design for its Solar Energy Facility. You will note two major
changes:
First,the site plan has been redesigned with respect to a new wetlands delineation based on the recent change at the United States
Army Corps of Engineers(USACE).The policy change in how the USACE delineates jurisdictional wetlands occurred in September
of 2021 and consisted of the reversion from the 2020 New Water Rule to the previous 2015 Water Rule.Please keep in mind that our
original design and wetlands delineation was compliant with the USACE Policy in place at the time of our submission(08/31/2021).
Norbut Solar Farms retained BME Associates,PC to perform a new wetland delineation incorporating the USACE reversion to the
2015 Water Rule. This new site plan employs an extremely conservative design approach regarding wetlands and now includes
significantly more water features than the originally submitted plan. BME's wetlands delineation map and report have been included
in this submittal.
Second,our team has listened to the concerns of the Town and subsequently worked with NYSEG and the relevant landowner to shift
the point of interconnection off Danby Road. Shifting the point of interconnection has resulted in a tremendous degree of additional
cost that has jeopardized the project's financing; should the project indeed be rendered unfmanceable,the project will not be
constructed. Nevertheless,at this time we would like to purse the PD Rezone and,subsequently, Site Plan and Subdivision approvals.
Thank you very much for the opportunity to work with the Town of Danby and its people to bring green energy to the local
community.
Sincerely,
Dave Norbut
Owner
(585)504-2208
dave@norbutsolarfarrns.com
HORIZONTAL SCALE
200 0 100 200 400
SITE PLANS F R I
SCALE: 1"=200'
PASSERO ASSOCIATES
-NORBUT SOLAR DANBYengineering architecture
TOWN OF
DANBY ., TOMPKINS COUNTY,
NEW YORK
P . Ne 2021312900001
GUNDERMAN ROAD
0
a
z
O
PROJECT o
LOCATION
Town of Danby
N/F BALL
INSTRUMENT#2510-4234 LOCATION SKETCH
Client:
NORBUT SOLAR
1241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
••• Q NY 14607
SHEET C 110 ROCHESTER-
T/A 10- 1 12\
;::::.`: T N/F RR
_ LIBER 6100F pASSERO ASSOCIATES
T/A 10-1-19.12 .:::::.::::::::::::::::.:::::: 242 west Main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
N/F ROE I Rochester,New York 14614 Fax:(585)325-1691
LIBER 610 OF DEEDS,PAGE 852 I ;
— — .'.,.. ::: I Principal-in-Charge Jess Sudol, PE
T/A 10-1 19.2 T/A 10-1-19.12 '''''' ' Project Manager David Cox, PE
N/F ROEN/F ROE r
I Designed b Austin Goodwin, EIT.
LIBER 880 OF DEEDS,PAGE 25 LIBER 610 OF DEEDS,PAGE 852 \ g y
EW
kr—
T/A9 1-11.22 ---- _ — ----------- -- — ,K I �� OPN
T/N/F
� y4
N/F BRUCE/AUGE O 4
I `P �Q N S
LIBER 859 OF DEEDS, PAGE 67 N/FSTI FEL
T/A 10-1-23 R
INSTRUMENT#2018-07355 I N/F TOWN OF DANBY
I I LIBER 245 OF DEEDS, r
PAGE 484
SHEET C 103 SHEET C 105 .SHEET C 109 I I F�SS�o
SHEET C 107 Y
T/A 10-1-21.15 I
Q T/A 9-1-11.42 N/F BEENERS I
N/F BRUCE/AUGE INSTRUMENT#450507-001 I I Revisions
LIBER 859 OF DEEDS,PAGE 67 I I
CL No. Date By Description
I 1 08/30/21 ABG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
Ni i 2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
o — — I I 3 10/6/21 ABG PER TG MILLER COMMENTS
04
10 4 11/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
N ——— I 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
6 11/30/21 ABG PER POI REVISIONS
Q / •'\ �~ �I �i� 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
I
(U rc
UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
>- \ \ I�� VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
`o T/A 9-1-13.22 ':•' �^< ::�: ®® \ \ ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
o N/F NITCHMAN ..
JINSTRUMENT#2020-12573 �,% \ / ti�0l2�
,�� o '\t- ov COVER
w P � �
�<"r� A NORBUT SOLAR
- - ::::: : :: 104 ,11oe��� DANBY SITE
SHEET C 102 " ... .....
- SHEET C SHEET C 106 SHEET C 108 stis
:::.:.;:.;:.; ..::.
,.
o �:.:.. ::.:.;: ::. i e F
/
i Town/City: ITHACA
® :::i:: ?Y. = :i :::: '`';: :: T/A 10-1-21.124 �`ti1 J��O « '`
o T/A 9 1-13.23 = �;y N F MONTGOMERY O �� ��
a, N/F MASTROBERTI L� '�' o / � P� �� �• "w County: TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
INSTRUMENT#2018-10051
G Q �O �� �� Project No.
M
o #2018-06188 -4�J� ��P �������� 20213129.0001 4 �,� Q��J �� i
lzr OJ��t y Drawing No. Sheet No.
CN
- - - - - - �`°° �b� DRAWING INDEX
/ �J S�g1q
C'4 T
��� ���� C 101 1
0
(V
i T i Scale:
z T/A 10 1-57.1 1 T/A 10-1-57 T/A 10-1-56 _ 1
N/F SHALLOWAY T/A 10-1-57.32 N/F RADIN REAL ESTATE LLC N/F MONTGOMERY \ �Lj� /y C 102 - 1 10 SITE PLANS 1 — 200
U INSTRUMENT#590094-001 N/F RADIN REAL ESTATE LLC INSTRUMENT#591007-003 INSTRUMENT#2018-10051
I �INSTRUMENT#2015-06571 Date
O ° OCTOBER 2021
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE C 103 — -- MATCH LINE C 103\ \ \ ^ \ 1 I \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \
DISTURBANCE AREAS HORIZONTAL SCALE \\ \�, \\ \ N 0 I I I I I I / \ \ \\ \ `\ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\
\ \ \ ,-I W I I�� I I \ \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ I \-\ \1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\
40 0 20 40 80 \ \ O W I 1 / ( \ I I \ r p \ I \ \ \ 1 \ \ \I \ \ \ \ \
CONCRETE PAD 6 PADS(15.5'X 13'PAD) =1,209 SF \ \\ \\ �I � 0 `/i / / \ '� \ I I I \ \ I 1 I \ \+ \ `\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\
FENCELINE 14,317 LF�V=14,317 SF \ \ \ 70' \ \ I I \ \ I I I I I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \
PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE 96,717 SF SCALE: 1"=40' \ \ \ \ \ , W \ // \ \ \ I \ + I I \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ W .. \ \ \/ \\ \ I I 1 I I I III 1 1 I \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ `
TOTAL SF 112,243 SF \ \ \ \ \ \ _ � \ \ \ I k I I \ \\ EXISTING SLOPES>15%(TYP.) I 1 i \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \
TOTAL AC 2.58AC , \ \ \\ \ `\ � N \\ `\ ► I� \ ,b' 1 I I � , \\ \ , �\ I , 1+111 \ `\ 11 ;)/A
\ \ \ \ ` \ \\ `\ PASSERO ASSOCIATES
\ 1 O / ) _ N \\ 1 I� I I I I \ 1 I I III \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \
NOTE: \ \\ \ \ ( - ,r I \\ \ I I \ \ \\ \ I 1 I I . . \ \ \\ \ `\ \ \\ `\ \ engineering architecture
TOWN OF DANBY REQUIRES<25%SITE COVERAGE(DISTURBANCE AREAS+PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE+SOLAR ARRAYS) \ \ \ \ O � \ H I ` \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \
112,243 SF DISTURBANCE AREAS+1,0935306 SF SOLAR ARRAYS=152055549 SF=27.68 AC \ \ \\ \ \ \ .-I Z \ I \ \\ \T I \\ \\ \ \ \ \ II *I \I \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ I I LEGEND.
27.68 AC/111.59 PARCEL SIZE=(24.80%)COVERAGE \ \ \ \ \ \ Z / I I 1 I \ \ \ \ ) \ \ I I I+ `\ \ \ \ ` \\ \ \ I PROPERTY BOUNDARY
NOTE: 1 \\ \ \ \\ \ \ I I 11 I \ \\ \\ \\ / \ I I I \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ I R.O.W. - - R.O.W.
FTHE SITE IS NOT WITHIN A LOODPLAIN PER FIRM MAP 0-YEAR \ \ \ \ ) I I I \ \\ \\ / I I I I \\ \ \ ` \ H \\ \\ I - -
I TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) ` I I / / I I \ \ I
EXISTING CENTER
I \ \ \ I \ I \ _\ / / I-� \ \ \ \ I LINE ROAD
360845 B DATED 6/25/1976. \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I _____ EXISTING MAJOR
I \. II 11 \ \\ \ \ ) \ \ \ `\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ ' /' / / / / / / / / \\ ` \\ \ \ \ I -------- 520--- CONTOUR
I PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT \ \ \ /
/ / \ ) 1 1 -- 521 - EXISTING MINOR
I \ \ \ \ / / 1 \ \ \
I I I 1 I \ ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \-- \\ // / / / / / 1 / / \\ \ \ \ I I I CONTOUR
I I I 1 \ \ \ I / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ I 1 PROPOSED FENCE
/ ,/ / / I / ) ` \ \ \ `v \ `\ \\ \\ \\ (/ / / / ,/ / / ,' \ \ \\ \ 1 I Sp PROPOSED SILT FENCE
/ PROPOSED SILT FENCE \ \ \ I \ \ \ I ' �/ / ` \ \ \ \
11b/ // // / / / / / / , I \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \I I I I/ / / / �\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ I I EXISTING TREE LINE
/11 / ��)tk ��h� �yR' ��/ // /' // /' 1 I \I \\I \ \\ `\ \\ \\ \ 23' \ \ I / / i / , / / L/� // \,- \ \ \ \\ \ \ i i -PROPOSED TREE LINE
// // ,/ /^ ^a �,50 �/ / / I �__/ I I 1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ I \ / / I4 // / \ I\ \ \ \\ \ \ REMOVE TREES
(,\\ // // // // // / �,� ,,, N / I I I \ \ \ \ \ \\ 1 1 / / I I I \\-I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1
1.11 / / / - N �, I J H \ \ \ \ I \ \ / I \ _ -/ �-I \ \ \ \ \ I \ \
/ / // / / / / / '� v I �' \ \ \ \ / I SLOPES>15%
/ - / / / / I I � _
/ J --/ ,/' / , I I / / / /1`__^ati N \� \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ II I \\ \\ (\ \+-_ _ /' I i \\ \\ I \\ 1\ I\ m PROPOSED SOLAR
/ / , / / 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH b" / / N I \ \ \ I I \ \ _ \ / / \ \ \ PANELS
/ WOODEN POLES SET 10'O.C.SEE / I r' > � \ \ I - I- I I \ \ \ \ \
I / -J / / DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 1 1 >� >v \ \ ` \ I \ \ \ ��/ / I I \ \\ \ \ 1 \
/� I / �/ / / / I I \ > \ \ ' I \ \ \\ / I
/' / i / T/A 9-1 -1 3. 2 2 / / /\ _ 1 I \ \ R' *, \\ \\ \ \\ I\ I \\ `\ - - - `\\ \\ / I 1 \ \ \ \ 1
/ I I / / --- I \ \ A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / I I \ \ \ I 1
-r / /' 1 i 1 N�F N TCHMAN / / / 1 �' I ` \ \\ N > � 1 \ `\ `\ \ \ / 1 I I 1 I \ \
-- I I , / / l l ' \ / � ' 1 / / I T I `\ \\ \ \ \ T1. \\ \ \ -- \ \ 1 / I I I 1 I \ \
' \\�\ I i i i I i i // PROPOSEDTREELINE / / ' ` � ��' /// /' INSTRUMENT #2020- 12573 / / `� I \ \,\ I \ �\ �� I \� _ - \ \ \ \ 1 i i i I\ \\ GUNOERMANROAD 12�
\ I 1 I / / l / �' I -/ // / \\ \\ \ I \I \ \ Ao x \\ \\ 1
/ \\\\ I I I I I I I 1 / / I / / / /I I I \ \ \ \ s _ \; \ I 1 1 I \
/ \\V I I I I I I I / / / / / / / / // / / / ( 1 \__// I \ I I \ o > \
11 \\\\ I I / p �� / , / FOUNDD RE-BAR I �\ I I \\ 1 \ \� W \> \ II I 1 I 1 \ �.
/ �\\ I , I I i , i I I I / N89 17 09 ,,/' 466A -'( _J/ �,/ J/ / / I N-0.2' ' ' I I 1 \ \ \ ` � , I I I I \^
/ / \\\\ I FLAGGED OAK TREE FOUND AT N I I ( / / o /» <1 / / I N / 1 / / / 1 I \ \ 1 I I '' c° I • '
// ,/ \\\\\\\ CORNER I I I I i I -_ o I ;S80 2r8- E J�-QED) / / - -\ E-0.2' / / I / I \ I I I w � I . 1 � . A
\\\\\ \\ I I I / \ I \ / I / ) \ \ I \ N 00 I a o
// // \\ \�\\� j I dS d dS �S �S dS S d \ �� / / I / / \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ � �� PROJECT o
\I \ \ \ \ ) - \ // I / / // 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ I I - I LOCATION
// / \\�\�` I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 \ \ \ \ a \ \ \ \ 1 \ \\ I / / /' / / \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I Z
/' / \\`\\\\ \ \ I I I I I 1 1 I 1 \ _ \ I I \ \ L- \ —�—� -��- \ ' // / / 1 \ \ I I m
�� - / / 1 \ 1 \ I I I I
\ \ \ \ - / / I \ 1 \ \ I
/ // \\\\\ \\ I I I I 1 1 / ( 1 I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 , / / // / 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 n
\ I I I \ \ I i / / 1 1 \ I \ 1 \
/ / / \\ \\\\ I 1 I I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / / 1 I 1 \ \ \ I I 1 ��-
/ / / \�� \ \\ I I I / / / I 1 \ \ \ \ \ I \ / / - / /
/ / )11� \\\\\ I / I 1 \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ ` I\ I / /I / - / / \ \ 1 I \ ,O Town of Danby
I I / I I I \ / / / 1 \ \
/�/,/1 jam'\ 1 / / ( I 1. �, I I I \� \ \\ \ \ \\ I / / - � I 1 \ \\ \\ \ 1 I I/
/,i;'/, IIi►► +�/ / i I 1 I �' 1 I I \ ' \ I I / ' ' / I \ 1 \ I I �c ~/� client. LOCATION SKETCH
\ 1 \ \\ \\ I I i , /
1 \ 1 - / I I \ \ \ 1 \ I / \ \
//'/�''�' /)II \` 1 II 111 111 1 111 I \\ \ \ `\ \ \\ 11 1 1 I ''/ / ' /'/ / /',Eu / // / ' I ) I \\ \\ \\ \ 11 1\ �, )'\\\\\
' ' \ \ 1 1 1 / ' / i \I \\ \ i , \ \ NORBUT SOLAR
// //// I I \ ` \ \ I 1 / / / / / I / /' / / / I / \ \ 1 , �\
- ////////,/ TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) I \ I I -\, \ \ I I I / / / / , , / I / - / / /
/�> %'�*' 1 1 'I I \ I I I 1 ` ` \ 1 I I / / / / I I ' /' - - ' / / I I I I I 1 �1\ \� 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
' ' ( I 1 \ \ \ I I \ \ / ' ' ' / / I I I ROCHESTER NY 14607
///// I 1 \ 1 \ I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , / / / / W \W W W\ W W W•W W W W W W W W W\ �' / / / 1 / I 1 I � \\ \
* I 1 ! 1 I 1 1 \ \ l / / / / / \ / / / I 1 \
\ PROPOSED SILT FENCE I \ \ ) \ / / / / /W W/ W N N\.Y N W N� \ / I I / / \
/CAP D RE—BAR 1 \ / / / W \ \ W W\W W W \ W W W ./ / ( ( ^( / \ \
1 TO BE INSTALLED I \ I 1 \ / \ / / / / / / / W/ W W /W W / ../ _ / / / / /� \ \
FOUND \ 1 I \ / EE1 W W W W W W W W\W W W W W W ) 1 / I I / G —
/ / ALONG CONTOUR I I \ ) / / / W W/w W W W N W * W W W W W W W W / \ \
/ I \ \ 1 I / / / / / `� � \/ / I EPH\ N.[AIERAL
/ E-0.9' TYP. I \ �\ \ I I / / W W W W Y . y i \ W W W W \ / 1 11 / \
\ 11 ; I 1 ( I ) \I 1 1\ , i \\ /� \ / / / , / / I ✓ W W \ \ \ W \ ' ( ' RAII�TATA�E PASSERO ASSOCIATES
\ -1 fi I I I \ \ 1 M \ 1 / I \ \ \\ / I I ' I l \ I \ \ / �/� yW� WW yW IWy y y(WW W Why y W \\WW \� Wy W �� W .._ \ \ _ 111 1 (" .L,_ _�\\P-\, ,_ \\\.
\ W W W W W W W W W W W W W ` W W W W W W �-}�
\ �p 1 1 I \ \ I \ ) ` J 1 I I I I \ \ \ \ / /W W W/ . W . W W W \W W W W\ W W W W W W W W \W W W W W\ W W W \W ,( ` I W �� \ \ 242 West Main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
\ c'`I m I I I \ \ \ \ / \ I II \� \ , 1 \ \ \ \\ / W WWWWW L WW W W W W W \ WW \� W W W W \� W wlW\VV// �I�I \ \ , \ 1 I i' '1' .Y .Y .Y . .W .Y W Y W Y W Y W N W Y W Y N Y Y . Y . Y W - Y W Y` — _ \uy I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `-1/ \ `—_ \ I Rochester,New York 14614 Fax: 585 325-1691
w III 1 , I I \ , I1 \ \ ,-\ \ \\ \ \ \ /1�1
WWI� W I \. W \ /LII I IW W W WWWWWW ` WWWW WWWWWWWWW WWWW WWWWi �` d I I 1 '�+ 1 I \ \ � \ ` I I \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W W I� W I WETLAND AREA \ W\ W 11 \ \ I I Principal-in-Charge Jess Sudol PE
W • W .Y W W .V W W W \W W W I W W W W W W W \ W W sty � W W 1 W 4" \ N J /
/ .Y .Y .Y W .Y W W N W W .Y W .Y N .Y W - •Y .Y W - W
, I \ 1 I ) \ \ \ ) \ : C W W 1. \ W W W W W W \ Project Manager David Cox, PE
I I I I I ` \ \ \ \ 1 I �1 L "l \* . * . * \ I I WI I I I I I I Designed by Austin Goodwin, EIT.
\ I / / I 1 \ I \ \ \ \ \ / W W W •Y W W W W\ W W W W W W V W W W W W W
/ I I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ W W W W y W I W y W WI W 0.67 AC W\ W W W W W W W W W W W W WI W I
I I / �J / / / I I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ 1 7/ "A-�/A \ 1 �` \ 1 I 1 I
AA / I 1 \ \ \ ` \ \ .Y\ .Y .Y W .Y W 1W .Y W .Y IW .Y W .Y .Y W .Y W � W .Y \W .Y W` .Y .Y .Y W .Y .Y W .Y W .Y W Y J I I 1 1
I /^ / / / / 1 \ 1 ; \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / I 1 W W W .Y \ W W .Y W W .Y W .Y W .Y W I .Y W .Y .Y .Y W .Y �Y .Y W W W .Y .Y .Y 1.Y '1
/ I I - / CN / / / 1 1 1 \ �� I �\\ \ \ I I I / / I 1 W \W W \W W W \ W W W W w W W W 1 W W W W W W I I I -/ / 1 1
W W W W W . W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
/ I I I r N/ / / / 16 / 1 `� ��� 23' / / I I \ WWy\ WWyWaWy . . I . WWy WyW . . y . . . )• WyWy \ WWyWWWyWWW W I I I I / /
/ / / �3' \ I / I \ 1 I b 1 �' ./. I I I I ' ' OF NSW
/ I I 7`� " / / I I / \ I C I / I / / / F, Y
// I I �- / / / / 02= / / \ - ` \\ \ I � W WI W l t W �\ W W 1 W T �I �... \ I I 1 I I / / , P� QpNIEL S Q
/ / \ \ \ \ \ \[I� \ I / W W W W W I W . W I W W W W � W W W W W . W � W W IL W l I
I I / O p / / /, y / / \ \ \ \ 1 �;� \ • \ \ \ I W WI W W W W \W W W W \W W W W I W W W W W W W �_ 1 I I I 1 I /
I I I O /O / / / �+/ / ) ,\ _= >", 'x 7 ; \ \ \ \ \ \ I I� 1 4I \ \ W W �( I 1 I I I I I I I \ ,�R
/ I I ' ' / / / / / \\ Z\ \ \ � s �� N j f >+j \ \ .Y .Y I .Y .Y J .Y W .Y W .Y W .Y W W I .Y W — I I I I I I I I I \ 1
W •Y W .Y W .Y W .Y .Y W .Y W .Y I . W .Y ,. //' I I /' / / / ' \_ \\ \\ �` \\ ,\ . 0 ! •Y\ W WIW W W W W W W W W W W \W W W W W W W \W W W W �' I I � \ \\ \ �\ I \I 1 \\ l/
\ .. .. ..... ...
/ I I / / / / / / / \- _ L__ \ ,� A . W y\ W . \ \ _
/ I I i PROPOSED TREELINE / / , - _ \\ \ L i 11 \ \ \ \\ \ \ 1\ \ \ v - \ \ °� ,A \ \ 23' \ \ O 23 4.
$ / / I / / / / / / \ +\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ - \ \\ \ A \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ p NPv�
I / / / \ \ \ \ \ Ao , \ I \ \ FESSlO
/ I / / / \ __ — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ s A
00 I I I / � / / / / \ \ /' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ) \ \ \\ \\ \ \ A°� o / \ L I \ \
Q IN I I I I / / / /' / / \. / /' / \ \ +\ \ \+ \\ + , \\ / \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ 0 \ \\
Cfl 1 / / / / _ / \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ \
/ - [E \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ I Revisions
Q I I 3' / / \ / / — __ \ \ \ I+\ \\ � \ T\ \\ / \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ I I I "'m No. Date By Description
I � I 1 I I I / PROPOSED SOLAR / / - \�/ - - - ' \ I I I r \ \ \ \ \, \ \ I I I I I ) "�
/• N L-L� 00 ,/ I I 1 ARRAY LAYOUT / / / \ /- /I- // 1 \ 1 1 I ++ I I I\ + \ \�\\ `'�\ \ �^ `\ / \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ e` ` I I I I I \ / / ) / 1 08/30/21 ABG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
m I I I / / , / -/ \ __/ _ _ \ \\ \ I I I I I I \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ \ I 1 / 2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
No O O I I I ,/ / / / / / / ,/ // / / � \' / --' _ _ - \ \ I I \ \ I I I / / 3 10/6/21 ABG PER TG MILLER COMMENTS
� I I 1 / / - -- -- - - _ \ I I I I I 1 ) \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I / 4 11/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
� I m N " 1 / / / / / / / - \'/ - -/ I ) ��J I I }� I I I 1 ' / I I I \ \ \ I \ \ \ ` I I I I 1 / / 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
z4z ItI I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ I I 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH b"WOODEN POLES SET / /
N ~ a �� a o o/ ' /' - I ' '%/ J I I II/J I I I \ \ t \ \ \ I I / 10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 / /
^mow ^�"� �^� �A^ �oea a // -�\ // - -- - -- G // J I I I I I / 1 \ \ / 6 11/30/21 ABG PER P01 REVISIONS
Q / / ^ a „ - / + / *_ �t I T l+ j I I 1 / \ \ \ \ \ \ I I 1 1 / / /
3 0� / I I I ( / / / / ,� � 43N- // -/ I / / / -J I I / I \ \ \ \ 1 / I I I / 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
q ' z ' I I / / / / / / -, - -S ' I I ( // �,' / / �+I I I �- / I� I I / \ \ \\ \ I 1 / / / � 1 I / / / /
(U Ld I I / / / / / / TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) -- /- - ----_- -/ /' I 1 / //// , J I > / , I I \ \ \ \ I � \ / I I / / / / `' / I / / / / / /
as Q I I I / / / , / / / 4.50- -/ --/ // -/ I I 1 /+ / / / --� /' l I \ \ \\ \\ I \ \ I I I //� // / // / / / / / \ 1 ( / / /
W \ L� / / / / / , / / / / / / — —1 �rLC)�// —/ /' —— — ———__ I I I I I / // / , — \ I I \ I I / / \ \ \ I UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
>_ ---�� / / / / / / / / / �, - _, - - / / - - I I I I f / // / / --___ / - \ ) \ I I \ -- / PROPOSED SILT FENCE / / / / / / / / VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
z I l /+/ t I / / , --' - , a,- -_ _______ / / -/ I I I 1 I I I / / /� -: -�___ / / / I ( /\ \ \ I -/ TO BE INSTALLED / / / \ \ I I / / / ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
Q z m / I / l ( ( / - - �h- -- - - I I I I I I I / / / / /- - - / / \ ( \ \ / ALONG CONTOUR / / / ( \ \ I I I / /
o � ( +\ \ � \+ \\+\,\ + \ )+ \ '' /' i- / "I' ? -- III III 1 I I �'// /�}-/ / ---+� -+--+-- 1 \ - (TYP.) / / \\ \ 1 I I I / /
\ () - \ \ \� \ \ \ �� � - - - I I / / - ------ - ' I / / s ' / I I /
i 1 \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\\ \\ �\ r� - - / PROPOSED SILT FENCE I I / / / / - _ _ / �- / / \ 1 /
\ \ \ \ , - -1426- - / -_ - TO BE INSTALLED I I 1 I / / I / / / \ I I I I I /
114, z - \ \�\\ -Ire\- _+_- _1±\ \*\ \`+ \+\ \ \-\� r/� ,�\ �- ,�426' -/' --' --' - -- ALONG CONTOUR ----_ I I I I I I I / / /�/ /- -- --- - �--�j'\+'- / ---__-- // / / \ \ I I
U �� \ \ \ \ �\ �\ \\ \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ I \ , / �— /— /— — N // / (TYP. I I I I I I - , �— _ _ — , / _ — / _ _ _ , , / / \ I I I I / SITE PLAN
/ 4$0 _ - \� \\'�\ � \ \ � \�'- - - \ \,+\\ \+ I-+_ � �4V a? - ) I I I I III I - + �__�-- - - * - \J / / \ I
w s1, \ \ \ \ \ \ - \\ \ \� _-_ \ - a- III II II III I III / - __ \ I I I
o \ \ \ ,,�2 - -/ ---__ I III I I 1 1 I ( / ' / - - \ /� / / / / / / / / / I I I I
\ \ + + -+ \ �_-_ _�-\\ \ \'�--�--'� f�f � I I 1+ / /+ �- _-�- �- 1- ,- \ / / / I
O \ \ \ \ �� \ \ \ - _ \\\ \\ \-_-\ - \ \ ,,�29, I I I I , 1 , , 1 I I I / , ,-- - ---- - \-- , , , / , / I ' / NORBUT SOLAR
`�\ \\�\ �� � \ \ +__-f--__ \ \\ \ \ __ ,,, - ,+ _ - - - - _ Ill '* '
I IJItI I I W I I I� I INN I '+ / - --'�--'+ -� - :: '--- _+ - +��+ / I I / / // / / / / I
\\\ \\ \ \\\ \ \ \\ _ - \�\\� \ \ \ /,,�3° - , - --- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / / / - '' -- -- _ __ -- \--- / / / / / / / / I
o \ \ \ \ \ , \ \�;- _- -_ ----1\\\\\; `�-_-\�- 1 \ z-' - _------_ ► I III ' 11 I I I I ' I I Ill I ' I I I I I I ► I I � / ,-- I�� � ----_ _ _ \_-------- ---- - - DANBY SITE
Q \\ \ \�- �\ \ \+ -� - __ --+\ \�'__ -, + \\ \ - ,,�3 ---- III III I I 1 I I -`� + - / +� + +_ \ + --�-- - - - -'/ ( ( \
\ \ \ _-__ \ \\ \, ,- \ - I I 1 # III I - / __ \ \- - - - - - - - -- - - ----- ' \ \ \
_ _ \ ` \\ \\ \ ��3 1 1 1�1 I I 1 I III 1 \ _ -- \ I� r I 1 /� /
I 1 \
\ \ ' �-\ �\ \ \+_- _- - _f - \`�\ \ \ \+ +\ \ - I I I I I I I I I I I I \ < i \ i \ \ \
\\\ \ \ \ _ \ _ __ _ \ \\ _ \ \ \ A, ----- I I III \ \ \ \
/ \\ \ _ _ - \ - \ \ \_ \\ \\ \ - I III I I I I I I I� 1 I I I I \\ \\ \ \ _ �� 1 \ ------------ / \ \ `� / / / / I \
o \ \ \ \ \\� \ \ \ \ \ '1 I 1 I I I 1 I I II ff I I \ \\ \ -- \\ \ — ---------!� \\ I r`/) / 1
PIPE W/ELBOW ` \ �� \ \� __ __ --- \ \ _\ ¢ \ \ \ \ - �35 - 19 46 W 1005.62 �T I I + I I `� I I \ +\ \� '� --+ = \+ \�\ \+ 1 ---F--�—_� — \ \ I I / / \ Town/City: ITHACA
\ \ \ \ \ — _ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ \ \\ \ \ \ /1 __ I I I I I I \ \ \ — _ \ \ ---- _ / \ \ \ I / ( / —
N FOUND \\ - \ \�\ \ \\ \ \ -- ��36 ---- I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1�\\�\\��\\ \� _ _ - - \\ \ \ \ 1 I _ _ -------- \ \ \ I I 1 \ \ County: TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
\ _ _ \\�\ \ \�\ \ \\ \ -5�� -- 9�rS TDEEDI I I I I I I I IIl I I I \ \ �1 \ \ I+I - _ � \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ \
N _ _E-0.11' _ ` J I I I I III 1 I 1 1 III \ � \ -,\-- �� +- + __��� +\ , +1 I I -1 - + ------ /\ \ \\ \\\ I I ` \ ` \ \ + I+ Project No.
o _ \ \ --_— --___ ___ —_ _ \ ti \ \ \ 1
a. — \ \ \ — e---- I \ \ -- ■ ■ _p ��
- \ \� ` - _ - - \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ I I I \\ � --_\ \ \ \ I I I I I I I I / �-------�,\ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ I
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ — \ \ I I \ \ PIPE FOUND I
°' - �__�- ___--I--=�---_ -- ---I�� � \ _ _ _ T A 10- 1 - 57 1 + � `\ ��� �� � � -�� : � �-,+--_+ + I I+I I + I \\ _ / \ I +� I I g
\ -_ \ - _ _ -__ � \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ - r_--
o _ _ _ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ / —1440- — I \ I- \ �� � � , �� \ ,- \ \ I I I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ I / I / Drawing No. Sheet No.
\ _ _ _ \ \ \ _ \ \ \ - \ -, -, � \ I 1 I \
' \ \\ \\ �\ - - _ � � \ \ - N/F SHAL-LOWAY+ +�� � `-��� �� ����� \* � \\ \ � � � i �i i i� � ��\ I\ �+\ \ �+\ I\ I � � \`\ `\ `\ \ \ \\ ,�\ '' /' /' �� � ' ' ' C 102 2
_+-_ \ ` � �\ I � \ \ \ /-- INSTRUMENT 590 4--G011 ;, �� �^ � _ \ +� \ +\ + /
\ \ \ \ 1 / \ \^ / / Scale:
z — / / l I / \ \�\ \ 1-1 \ \ -- I i I I I I I 1 1 / 1 I I 1 / \ \ \` \ \\ \ II ' / \ \ \ \ / / / // = 40
- - I � /I / � / � / I T\ �\\\\ \ \\ \\ I I I 1 1 I I I I l I 1 I l l I l I l I I l 1 I / l 4-�\ \ � \ \� ��\\ \ \�\\ \\\+\\ \ 1 1 - / / \\ \\ \\ \\ � __ _ ///11.11
/// /// %/,/, ��
� - \/ / / / / / I / / \�\ \�\ \ \+\ \ \ / I I / 1 / l I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I + \\ 4,\\ \ - \ + \+ \ \+\ \ +I I 1 \ / \ \ \_/- / / / �9-j / /
Ill / / / \ I I I I I I / I I I I
-'� -'- / / / I / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ EXISTING SLOPES>15%(TYP.) / I I / I I I l 1 / / \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ III \ \ I / \ \ \ // // / // / / / Date
o -- -- / / I +\ I I I I I I I I I 1 1 / I 1 <\ \ '� \ \ \\ \ \ ,A \+\ \ \ --
\\ / / / / I / / \ \ \\ C\\\ \ \ \ \ / l I l I I I I I / 1 I I I I / I / c� \ \ \ \ � I I \ \ \/ -,_-` I / ' '
/ / l / \ \ \ \ / / / I I / I / I 1 1 I I I 1 / 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ II 1 \ \ "\ \/ / \ \ // // /;/ /' /' OCTOBER 2021
r 1, ^ \\ / l I / / / l I I / // \ \ \ 'I \ \ �k \ / / I I 1 I I i I I i 1 1 1 1 i I i I I i i `.\ �\\\+\`�\4\`\\t\l \, \\ \\ I'I I \��r\"\ \, l \ `— — I--/ �/' // //I`�/ /
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1"=40'
PASSERO ASSOCIATES
engineering architecture
\ \ \ \ I \ LEGEND:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TJA J 0—���'\9. `\ \ \ \ \ \ Row - -
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ EXISTING CENTER
\\N/1- �O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - LINE ROAD
CAPPED\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ EXISTING MAJOR
t \ \ \ `RE-BAR \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �J,BEF� O 0 . IEE�QS I�7�\\� \2�\ \ \ -------- 520--- CONTOUR
FOUND \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ /�� \ \ �\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ �\ ` \ -----
\ I S-0.0' \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ - -- 521 - CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR
E-0i3'\\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED FENCE
I \ \ \ \ \ \� \� \`-- \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE
1\ \ \ \ 0 \� PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT — \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \` \\ \ \ \ M \ \
\—��— L \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6"WOODEN POLES SET \ TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ EXISTING TREE LINE
1 \ \ \ r�' \ \ \ \ o\ \ \ \ \ M 10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \
o ) 1 i/ (fl \ \ \ ( \ \ PROPOSED TREELINE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ `— ) _ 7 I L` \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED TREE LINE
L -I \�-� \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ REMOVE TREES
Q (Y� �� \ \ \ \ \ ` �� / �� \ T \ SLOPES>15%
\ I > LLJ \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ l I a I + + + + + +
CN C �- \ -/ \ \ \ \ \\ 1 \ \\ \------� \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ I I I 1 1 r�
I \ \\�1 1 F C\I \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `\ \ I I I m PROPOSED SOLAR
\\ \ \ 1 `I \ PANELS
\ 7
Q 0 . °� \ \ \ \ ` / \ \ \` ^� / / / GUNOERMAN ROAD \2J
\ \
\ /
�•\ \__-_. 00 \ \ \ �� \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ ( / \ \ ass
� \ I I I I ) \ z
\ M
LLJ
\ _ CID
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / I 1 \ \ I I i�} 1 \ \
l\ \ -J ' \ \ \ \ \ \ I / 1 \� � \ I I \J� PROJECT o
\ \ 1 I I I 1 \ LOCATION
/ L
\ \ \ \ RE-BAR M
FOUND \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I o'
(LAYING OV \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I
\ \ \ \,S-0.0' \ \� \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ M I I I I I 1 I / \\ \\\ I
\ I \ - I I 1 I Town of Danby
EXISTING SLOPES>15%(TYP.) \\ \\ \� / \ \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` I J 1 I I I 1 I ` LOCATION SKETCH
7-7
\`� , II Client:
N O R B U T SOLAR
�j
\Lr LLJ\ \ \ \ \I \ \ \ \ \ I I / , / / / 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
\ ` ` \ M > > I �/ / / ` ROCHESTER, NY 14607
_ \
\\ \ I \f I I / I 1LLA
I \\
\ t �-\ \ \ ` I ' ` I \ PASSERO ASSOCIATES
I \ \ I 1 i I I I I \ \ \ I \ 242 West Main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
Rochester,New York 14614 Fax:(585)325-1691
9 \ \ \ \ \ 6 \ \ \ \ \ \ I /� I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \
/ \ \ \ o \ \\ \ 1 ( \ \ \ r Princi al in Char a Jess Sudol, PE
CO \1 \ \ \ \ i \ \ ) \ P g
/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Project Manager David Cox, PE
+ Lt �I \ \ \ \ \ ( \ \ \� Z
\ \ Designed b Austin Goodwin,
Li
d- OF NEW
��
/ \ C Q \ �� �, \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 NIEL YQ
\ \ ( 1 1 � \ +`\ I I \\ \ \ \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ ��\ �P �oP s
\ \ \ )\ \\ I \W \
Li
\ \ \\ \ \ \ 5 4 0+\ \+ + \ 1 \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ n
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r^
c \ \ \ C� o \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ -
\ \ \ w \+ + I \ \ \ \ \ \ s
�t Q ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \\
o \ \\ \ \ \ l\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \ALL �, \�\ \ + \ \ \ + \ I \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ p FESSIONP�
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ Ln +\ \ \ + \+ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
Q \ \\\\ \ \ \\ \\ \ +z ��` I 1\\\ \+ \\ + \ \\\ +
\ \ \\ \\ \ a +� \ \ \7k\ \\+\\ \ \ \ +1 1 \ _ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ Revisions
tL \ \ \ LJ_I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \\ \ _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ No. Date By Description
Lr) \ \\ 74j4 u \ II\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ h \ _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 08/30/21 AEG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
04 00 I \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ +\ 3 10/6/21 ABG PER TO MILLER COMMENTS
,a \ \ \ \, \ \ \ \ \ \—/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 11/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
I \ \ 7 \ \ \ \ _ ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
— 6 11/30/21 ABG PER POI REVISIONS
1 \ \�— / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
N \
\ \ \ ` UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
l C1 \\ \ \ \ \ VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
m
ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
PIPE �+ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \
\\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\\\\ \\ \ \ \`✓ I \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\v \_ UND \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \
\ \ \ `N- .2' t \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ SITE PLAN
LU
\ 1 ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
o \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ NORBUT SOLAR
PROPOSED TREELINE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\\ I \
\ \ l \ \ \ I ► DANBY SITE
\��\ \\ \\ \\ \\
1 l TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) \ \ \ ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ 1 I I I \ \ \
3 \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 1 -4
\ \
\ / 1 (� \ ) / / \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ / ( \ \ / a\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \
\ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ I \ \ I I I I \ \ Town/City: ITHACA
I \ \ \ IA \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED SILT FENCE \ \ 1 1 \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I 1 \\ \\ \ \ County: TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
N \ \\ \ \ \\
o I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ I I \ \ \ \ PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT \ \ \ ^\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 20213129.0001
M 1 \ \ I I \ \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ EXISTING SLOPES>15%(TYP.) \ \
\ \ \\ \\ \ I 1 I 1 I I \ \\ \ Drawing No. Sheet No.
\ \ \ 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6"WOODEN POLES SET \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \
o \ l I I I I I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ 8' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I 1 1 I \ \ \ \
10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 \ \ \ \ \ \
1 , \ I I I 1 \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ = \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 , \ \ \\ \ \ \\� \\ �\ I ► I I I I 1 I \ \ \ C 1 03 3
\ \\ I I I II I 1 I I I I I \\ I \ �� \� \ \` - \\ \\ \ \ ,\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ II �, \ \\ \ \\ '` \�, \\+ \ I / I 1 I I \\ \\ \ \\ \ \
Lam\ \ _) \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ IIT \�k \ \ I ( \ \ Scale:
40
1 \
I I I \ \ \ \ \ \
' MATCH LINE C 102 \ - 1 - - ' MATCH LINE C 102 1 1 \ ' I Date
f-- _ OCTOBER 2021
r \ \\ ,/ I I ) I ✓� \� \I l I\ I I i \\ \\ I I \\. \\ \\ \, �� \ \ 1� IFi� EP
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
IM Md� i4 MN ■■M Mi am'
_— —IME
-
-N !M MN NM ■■E MM MM MM NM MN • •
I'm MM am !M ■■N MM Nil M�3il . • . MM =a MM
MN MlM ME
M KIN ■■I MN Mil Miii _
#M M►7 IMIM \f•M ME NN mm-r MN ' ' • • • • :•
I■N Mom# MM i7 Mi Mons MMR, =` • F MM NM\ M_M_
�M MN On Mt•I ['lN MM MM. MM MM Mi In MM NM is ClM MM MM �
MN �1M MN NM ■■IiE Mil MM ' MM NM MM :•
AN NN IRS!N iN •■-IEN MM Mi ME ME Si�7 �! •
■lIN MN IMIN MN ■■M MM MM f1 —�` • `w`
Mi \7N \M \>•�l ■■N Ni .Mi NM' Ni MM MM N1� ISM IL_T.. • y ' '.�.!` Mi ••
�a ME NM �\i ■■M ■#M am ��' MN MM MN li\� MM Mi Nil Mi '�►� ��:i �
MN MM MNIMEM MM ■■MI NM MM 1 MM iM Mi !N ■#i4 MN MN MM
MM M\� no MM \■! MM Mi �" �,� MM ME MN NM ■LI■r ME NM MN NM
MM !i Mom\ NM Ii■i MN IMIM Mi i►7 MM Mil =am NM MM MM MM •
ME III Mil Ma MM \■M —N Mi MM NISO MN 1■\in MM MOM MM MM Ml•
MN MIM ■■M M•M Mi iM iN NM\ NM 1iM MM MM ■ � ■ • � • �
M� �7M MM Mi ME =a Ni MN MM M■# MM �
MM NM ill MM ■1■M MM NimIENNIff . �� nM =� MM �� •
��■ NM MN iN vwm■ NiiM MM • MN l�M ,am MN �lN MM MM MM MM v •p • • •
MM MM N\� l�N rr2IM ME i1M; MN MM Mi MM (►
ii M►N ri Mal MN
MY NM MN MM\ E71M M■M! NN ` MW MN NN \#N iN
MN Mom\ MM NM R'N MM MUM wrkw IrN ON Ni1 N1i
Mom■ MM !M\ Nil ■■i MM MPS an gniiI MM\ \N Mi MM =M mi U
MM MN iN ilil ■■N Nil il�1 iiMNi1 NN \N \�■>■
MN MN MM MM ■■IM iM 1.7r`l MM MM ��� �•� �� ��• MM MM MN s
��• ■#N ME iM ■■1� MM lL pM NMM AM Ni ii WINE =■M MM MN MN ; 1 �� • :•
MINIMEi 1■Ilaal 1!■M MM N! iN NM MM I=M MM
MM MN NN NN ■■M MM MMI MN Mi1N V MM MJM N■# MM NN i1M MM MINE iM U •
MM M\M NN NM ■■rM MM aNE i1M G•ial■+ MM !JN NN �Irt7 ►!N MN N■■ MM MM U 1 � , •
MM MN M\MI M! ■■M MM �M\MI iN rill MMa L!]N NM11 !M Ni M'N MM MM MM■
MM NN MN MM ■■!� MM MM NM UISr� MM \17M Mi l�M MM MM NM MM MM U • i
■\M Ni MY Mi ■■W MM 'i MM UFAM MN MM liN MM MOM Ni NM MM \�M U 11 • •
MIM MN EMI
iMIM ■■0 ► MM NR ��.�WAM NN ME MN M\M MN MM MM iM MN U •
MM NM\ MM MM ►IMM MM MMT_ • • • • �a'Sm am MI>• \#M M►i MM NM MM MI! MN • •
MM Mil NM \#■# r•iN MM NMI I IV!M M�7 MI>■ MN NN !\� MM iM MM Mi U
MII iM MN NY [��N MM ►iE �:.`I NM MI>■ M1M MY NN 1iM MM Mli MM U • �� _ •'
MIM MM M\M YM\ Vli MM NMe MM t9M M MM M! MM►1 \#M Mom\ ii Mi NM ,
MENM NM \i ■■M MM M_i_ MM M%m t1i M■i MM MM Nam\ vM MM M�� MM • •
MEN! M E M\� Mil ■■mil MM M— MN MGM iN iam i■# \MN �\i BE iM MM MM U �
MIM MN MN iN ■■EL" MN NM MGM NM M■I MM \N MM MM MM i■1■ Mi • • • • • •
MIM NM MY N! II■M Ni MM N! M.!\� MM M■■ MM MM iN NM MM MM Mi M!M .� MM MM MM • • •
MIi M\� Nil MM' ■1■M M\� MM !\M It!M IMIN Mil MM MM M! Ni IMIM MY iM i1N � MM MN MM
iM MM MN 1MIE+M ■►\M MM � MM 1MIM My ME Emil MM NM NN MM MM MM Mi MM f
iM iN NM IiMw ■\1N MM MM IMIN \MM \M M�1t Ali MM i\� i\1• MM MM iM !M
MM MM _
ii ME Raw III NM ■■M MM MM Mi MM ME Mil MN MM MM \�i MM MM NM Lai
MM MM Ri w■■ ■■►i v� MM ■■M 6"M iM ill am MM ■#�1 NM MM MM MM i1�
iM MM MM iM ■■N MM Nil MIIL9 NV N�7 MM l�M NMl1 Yil MM MM IMIM Mid MM • • •
iM MM M►! MM ■■M MM MM NM NM NM Mil itl MN MGM M,IN Mli MM MM MM! MM
MM IMN NLm MM ►■M MM M■M Ma MMVI MM17 MN ■M MN NM MM MM MM MY MM ••• • • •
iM NN iN NM R1►M MN Mil on NM\ Mil NM MM MM iN i■# MM MM M■■ •
iM NM NM' IMIM MN NM M■M MM NN Nil MM MJM MM MN lMli MM MM MM • • • • • • •
\M MN Nil MM MM �■il i■# no Mil \�i =IM MM iM Mil Mi ■#N MM MM • •
iM MM MN l�M MIME Nip MM MM MM MN Yi MN MM ME
nM MM NN• �7N LIM MM MM MM • • • ' •
iM NM MN NM ■L`N MM ■N Mil MM MMF NM MM MN Ni tIN MM !M MM
�! ME Nei■ MlM ■■M NM MM �•i m■M MMi i1N iM NN 1MIN NM MM i1M MMI _ MN MM iM
iM NM '��' `� m mom MN MM MOM MN NM ii1 NN NM MIi MM\ Mi MM MN iM MM MM MM NM i1M MM NM ii MM • • • •
iM M■■ 01M a■M MM MN MM i1M MM Mi1 i1i i\# NM NN am MM M! M�1 Mi MM MM MM MM i■# MM ill MM MM
iMN NN ■►7M MM MM■ NM MN Mi MM M\� Mi MI!• M\M !N MM MM Nil MM NM MM MM MM MM MM iM MM MM
�� �� MEN NM ■'M MM MM MM N1M1 MM MR, NN MM NI1 MN 17•�• MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MN MM MM MM
MN MM MM My ■■M MM MM Nn MM MM NM:1 MM Mi1 MM M! \MM MM M\� Mil MM ISM MN MM MM MM MM MM MM
MN nM► ■■N Q MM MM !N ��N MM Mil ME NN N01• MIMI NM MM MM NM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MN
f#M MM NM MN llt■Ml MM MM \�i NM► MM Mil MM NM ME NM a ME MM MM !MEMN' MM iM MM MM MM ME MM MN MM
YM MM iM■ N! ■■M MM\ �� l� �� Mai �� �� ��• ��� s ��■ MN MM MM m MM MM MM
mom MM MIMI ■7i MM MN MINE MM MINE MM. klfaM MM Mil IMM. MM M! MM _ __ __
MM MM MM lMN \M MN MM MM NM ISM y ■�M NM MM_ ME MN MM
iM MM MM M■7 MML` MM �•M MM NN l'i ■■i7 Ni MM NM_ MM' �•■M MM MM IMIM NM MM MM MM MM MM
iM MM NM ■#M Mil, MM MM MM NM L E MM MM MM M MEN M RN �v MM MM MIa MM MN MM MM MM MINIM
MM MM MM MM
iM MM MM M_i_ N\�. MM NM MM NN MGM MM _
1 �M MM N! N�1 MM MN MM NV M EN ■MMI MM Mi MM NM MM MM NM MN NM MM MM MM MM NM __ __ __
V.PAy
MM MN ML■ MN MOM MMI NV MM i1M MM MM MM MM NIA MINE MM MM
=v MN NM NM '= �•� NIMI ME iM I�\!al IMM M■■ MIS MM MM ME MM MM M! = � M IMINIMMM M M MM MM MM � - -� �
MM MN iMl Ma Mtn MM NM MM MM MM \M MM MM MM Mtl MM MM mm MM MM
i�= MINIM MN ISM M\N MM MM Mom■ M■M MM MM MM Earns Ni i/M NM! MN MM MM MM MMME
�� MM iMl NN MM mm IMI MM MM MN MM iN MM MM MM N■■ Mm- MM MM MM MM
MM MM
MN• MM 11•M tlM M►i MMA MM MN M■■ Mil MM M! ■#M Mi1 MM MM MIME MM MM NM MN M mm ME
iM MM IMIM MM MN MM-1 liM MMI MN NM MIMI NN NM MM ■■M MM M�'7 MM MM MM MM
MM MM
iM am MM MM MM MM MI9 MM NM IMM MM MM No MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM iM _ _ _
_ I MMf M■� MM MM ilM /M■� MINE MM MM �M MM MM MM
N■■ MM ■�M MM MGM /M■# MM
!i MM MM s s s
i! MM ZU MM MM MM MM M�IE vM MM7 iN MN MM NM MM MM Mi MM MM IMM MM
iN M� NM Mi MM MIM N/p7 MM MN MIS MIa■ MM M■� NM MM MM Mil MM M■■i MM MM MM MM MM NM
NM MN iM ME
MM NM N! MM Nib MN NM MM MM ISM NM MM BE MM MM MM MM MM M� MM MN
i— EZ7M BE ME MM NN NM i'N MM MN N! MM MM MM MM/ NM NN M■1 MM MM MM MN JET MY' iM
MM MM MM NN M/M LIMN i■■ MaM MM AIM MM MM NA No NM MM MM NM MM •a—C! MM MM MM MM
iM v� M!; MM MM MII ISM \iN MN MMI, t/M /MN MM MM MM MM MM L■M MM MM MM MM MN MM iN NM
iN ■b1a MMtr IiM Mil MM MN iM M■■ MM /EN NM MM NIM NN NY NM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MN --•
MM NN MM/ Ni MM MM NN MM MM MV NMI MN MaM NM MN MIE MM NM MN MM MM MM MM NM MM MM
MN ll■M 'L"PJIM MN MM MM Elm MM/ ilM MM Ni NII MN ni MM NM M►M iM■ MM MN MM MN iN MM MM MM MM • •
i1N ■■[� ■CICi'I NfM MM NM■ MM Mn MN MM■ M7N NN MWI NM Nli MII NM MN MM MM MM MM M■■ MM NAIf� MM MM ►
NM ■■>♦ MM MM MM MN Mi MN MN MM R■N NN MIS ISM Mi NM MIN M■■ Mi MM MM MM MN iM ii MM MM
NN ■■IM NM M!M MM Mfg MM M\M iIM MM iia M/M NM Mi MM zMIl MM MN MM NM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM
N1MI ■■i MI/N ME NM MN NM NS'� MN MM MII IMM MN iM Mi i1N MM M■■ MM MN MM MM M■� MM MM MM MM
MM A■■1 MM M■M ■■M iM Ni Mid■ ME MM N/E MN MM ME aa- MM ■■M MM MM MM MM MM MN MM MM MM MM
NM ■■IM ■N MN NM MM MM Mil■ MM M■■ iN NII MM Mand YIM AIM ME MIE!1 MM MM MM MM MaM iM MM MM MM
MN ■■N I1M M/M MM M■M NM M•■■ MM MN NM MIi iIM iM MINE Ni ■M arAn MM MM MM MM MM MIi MM MM MN
NM ■■M OMIT • NN MM Mi MMIM ►MM MM MM I_-IIINE !i■Y MM MMa ilM MIIMI Mi M►IMi MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM
MIN ■pN MM MM NM MM NM MM MM MN 1YM ii MM MM MM MIM MM rdi ME ME
MM MM M�� MM MM MM MM
NM ■■M MMI IMM ■■M MM MM I!M MM MM IM MM NM MM MM MM M11M iMM NM MM NM MN i m MM MM MM NM
MY L�■* N NM MM MM NAM �!■� MM MIMI ISM MM MM MMII MIMI MMII MM Mi M►lM MM no MM rM iM M� MM MN • • ■• •
ISM /MI/ MIS iM1, MM M■i MN Il7M MM MM MM MM MM M! MM MN NM MM MM MM Ni MM MM■ iIM MM MM MM
REM NM ME
Mi•• ■■M MM NIM llli iIM MM ■MM MM MM MM iN ilil 1��■M \MM MM MN MN MN MN MM MN MM MM • • •
NM "M NM MN NM MM MN INM MN am MM MM MM MM NM ilM IEM MM Mu NM M11M Ili�`i Mil !N MIM MN MM
M� MM ■IN MIN MII ■■M MM N\l■ I!i MM NM MN MM MN NM MN Nil f'.�\� iM MM► �M MM ISM MM MIi MN MII -
N �� MM ME ■IIM NN MM MM MM MM\ I!M MM NM M■M MM MM IMM MM i1M11 v! MM MM 1_N MM MM MM MN MM M/1
M NMI MEE ■IM ■I■N iiN MfMI NM M■M NM IMM• ii MM MM MM MM NM iIN ilM MN MM MM NM MM MM MM MEN! MN Mi
N MM MM MM ■■0 MMA MN /IM MM NM INN MM MMa MM MM MM MM NM P-MJMII Mil MM MM MM MM MM MM MINE M■■ MINE
M iM MM MIME
II■M MM MM MM MM MM RM iM\ MIN i1N MM MM MM iIM LaIM:. MN MM Mi M►\M MM i�M MM NM MM MM
N L7N NM IMIN ■■MI Nu tM MM MM MM L�■M ■MM Mil MM MM MM MM NN L%M! MM MM MM MM iM MM MM MY !i
ME AM MM am,IN M■■ MN ME MM MN 110" MN MM MN MM MM ■■M ME M/lM NN MN MM =m MM MM MM MN MM M■M
M MA MM M\i1 ■■il NN NM MM MM NM L•JM ■■M MN NM MM MM Ni MaN �JM ME MM MM .MM NM MN MM MN MM • ■ • ♦ ■
■I =I MM MN MM iN MM Mi M\N �N INN MM MM MINE Mi ISM nM MM MM MM MM MM MM iN MN ilM
Lam ■uM MM • NIMI ■■M MM MM Mi NM NM IMIM MM MM MM Nil Ntal MM MM MM MM MOO MM MM MM11 • I ■
M►M NM\\ NIM ■nN IMIM MIM Ni MM MN Mli MIIM MaN MUM MM MM MM ■aN EilFI ■■i MN MM Wi MEN MM MM MM Mil MM
MN MM
N =� am �� i um Mi N■aL` Mi MM MM MM MN MN ■MM MM MM MM Il■■I NIS iN MM MM Mi ME MM MM MM MMI ME
■ ■
N NM M.\N N■# NM ■MM am MM MM MM ML# =IN Yi/ M■# MM MM MM MM MM N■•: IiM MM MM ME MN NM MM iN MM • I • ,
a�lo NM N■\. NM MM MM ML•J MM ■IN NN MM MN MM MM IME M MINE MM / MM M/i ■fN MM MM MM an MaN
�� ��� V�� =MM ■■M ELM ■■M MM/ MM MM ME
Nu ■■Y ME MM M■■ I■■M! N■■ MM NM MM MM NiM MM MM MN iN MM
N uu MM\ MIN n■\M MM MMa MM MM ME MM M! MN NM■ MM MM iil■II Wi+1 MM MM IMIM Mi �—M MM MM MM iM MN
u MN :MM MIM ■■M MM ME MM Mi MM MM ►i:n!1 1iM /MIM MIM M. M■1■ il1 MM MM ME MM MN MN NM MM MM MM
i NN NN NM ■■Y MM MM■ ■■M iM MM MM MM IRlI�M MM A71lf +■N MI•■ MN IMM MM l!■I1M M! Mi MM MM MM \MM IM�13I
N ����� MM NM
NN iM MN RENT Mi MM MM MM MM i/M Mil IMY+ r+�+ NM MM M•M i�#1t MM MM MR MM MM\ MM MM MM
� ■ MMl MM MN MM MM MM MM NM
-M up M►>• NL• ■1■N NN MM NM M■M MM MN MM MIi WINE MM 1iM NI■. a`il M■■ . MM MM MM MM MM
MlIN \MM MN ■nN NM MM MM iM MM i o N! MM MM MN MM ■al[II MG1-I • • . iIM
MM MY ■I■# ■■a MII MN NM MN MM !N MIMI IMIM ME no MN MIA■ Mil■ MIL MM MM MM MM MM NM i1■iii ■ � ■ • � • �
M N1M1 M]M1 MN ■■! NMl1 NM MM NM MM MCI MM MN iM iN mum Im lam Nfa1 MMr MN MM MM MM MM �� • • ����
M NM ii M! ■■1MI no Mi N■a MM MM NM MY MIi M■M MM MN IM! IEIL•7 MIS NN MM MM MM MM MM MM MM MIrN
M !\# !M i'MI ■■N M\\M .7L7 MM MM MM MJN N/M MM NM MM' MM M1M MEE MIM M■■ NI■1 MM MM MM MM MM MM N' •• •••
M MM IMIM IMIM II■v MN LAM\ fill NM MMI NN MN MM M■I IMIM MI1M tlM Ni !■�# MM t!M NM MM MN MM MM MM NN
MM MN N■# Mi fl■M\ MM M1M Mi MM MM iE! !N MM NM MN Mi M•M/ MM Mb MM MiiM MM MM MM MM MM MM MM
MN ■ME MlM \M(• M MM� • iIM: M.\N MIIM MM MINIM ME MM MM ■MM MM I<•N MM IiN MMa MM MM MM MM �I:� MM MIi NN
Mil NM11 NM MN 1iM on, MINE MM MN N/M MM MM MMa NN iM /MCA Nli MN MM MM MM MM MM MM■ MM MM NM
MM ■■M Mi N\M ISM L#N NR. M17• Mli I/N NM /IN ME MM ON NM MIL NM INN Mil iM MM MM MN MM MN MM iiN •• • •- .•
M� �� ii rY vN NN i�N MM MM !N ili MM M■M M\M M! MM 1MM Mi MM iM\ am • - • ••- �. . •
iM MN NM MM! RIM NII NM Mi' MM NM MN NM MN MM MN NM MM
MM MN ME M E Mli NM\ M1>• MN /LM MM M/M IMIi NM MN M/M Mau NN NM MM !N MM •- • -• • ••.
IMIM NN 1MIM Nri MM Nfa■ NN ME Elm N/E MN M■■ M E MN NN .•. . . . MM MM
NO M MMa Mail MM MM MM MM mE Mi MM MN NM iM MM ME iLN NM MN
�I\QM ME
N■■ NM MN NM MN ME iIM N! ■MM iM MM MM INN MM NN
-N ■■N M11MY MN Mi MIa MM MIN IMM MM MM MIi MMII Mil MM NM MM� M\M Mi
• • • • • ■a MM M\L� NN MM! MM\ MM IIM Mt■ liM MM MM ■IN MM MM M■!i Elp"
__ M MEN � Ebl �■� Mail NN MM MN IiN MM Ili Nli NM IMM M\M ILM MiM MM MM
I/M M/M NM \M\i MM MM fill MM MM !■■ MM NM MM NM MM MM MGM M/.1rJ NN MGM '
�M a= �= NN MN MM MN MM MM7 MM MM MM MM ■■M Mi MN liM Ir:N MM iM
MMl NfM !N NM MM MY MM MM ISM MM MM iM MM ME
K•IY MM M■■
�m MN NM I7N iN NN NM MM MM MIL N■M MM MM MM MM MM MN ME SiM\ MM l\\IVJ. •
N\M Mli NN i,MIIM:- IMM MIi Ni MM MN NM iN 'MM MN MM MM ME M■?• �i IM MM i�►Y
MN NM MEE M\11! NI■ lIMI RIM MM MM MIMI MM MM iM NM MINIM! MM IMM: Mil MM of 4�� : ►_
ME ��a ��� �� MM�. ■■N MM MM MM M/N NM MM MM MM I■M MM NM Ni IMMJ
Mi NM !N dMM IMI■M NM MM ON
MM NM MM iIM MM MM Mil ■MN NN
MN ME MM ON NN MM NM MM NM =a MM NM •' M��
• • • • 1 am" N■■ MM Elm MJIM MM MM NM M■M
MM no
NIMMI M MM►l �,_114r1
• • •• � iM\ \MM\ MM litl M,IM M1M NM i1N NM MIi MM YN MN
ME
MN MM MM MM MM M\M MM MM M11i MM MM MN M■M
• MM M►N MINI Ni •, WINE !N Mi no NM MY L7M N\MI MN MIi MMII ■■M MM •' '
• Mi NlM N■ll �= ♦n? MN MOM !M MGM MM iM\ M►\M ON NN MM MM MM MM 1
• NN MN �■� �r� .��■ �•� ��� ww� �■� kw� ��� �•� ��. min
nmMM7 liN M►lN iM M►M NM\ M►i NM iN N►1• MMI% N■■ MM MM MN MM u
MN MN ME Ni7 IMIN NN NM NN a=, NM MM\ NM !N iM MM iM i1M r '"
NM MN NM MM►1 MI■ IMIN MM
M! ii MN NM M\\N MM MM MM NM iN /� • . • •
MN MM _►7 == 1 �. III
NM► MM \MM [MIi NlM ►IS NN MM MM MM ME iIM
.,,, LnM M\N NM ME
NM MN MM Mi MlN MM Mil NM MN
M►i MM \�Y MM M\M Nil M►lM M\� NM MM Mi M■M NM
== =� == '� ; mm ME NM►l Mi NM ME ME iM NN NM MM NM MN
SMl_\ Nn MN MM iM MM MN \MI MI N_►M iM MM iIM_ NM
■ =i as M� �v MM MM MlM Im UNIM �EN �M MM NN •_
cy NM MN N! Mi MM\ MM MM NM M■■ MM MM MM Ni •
<��w. >■1!M11 MIM M■I ■■N NN MN ME
MM IMIM MM iM MM •-
I •J �// !>!Y. i7M. uiM NN ■#N NM IMM MM MM■ IM■■ MM MM NM
rlyl iM rl♦Sm ME iM MM MM MM ■MM INN M E MM MM •: • •- •
• MM MA AMM M*0 ME MM ■MM MM NN Nil Ni iN NIM •• • - • •
IMlli MM N■IM M. MEN am. !�M MM ■■M ��M Mi MM NN
MM iIM IMI■■ NM Mi MMG, ■m Mil wM MM M\M MM MINE • •
••• • • • • • • MM MM MM M! MM Mil t17M MM liMN NM MM MM MN
n MiM NN IMM■ NM M\MI MM Mi NM IiIIMG on !i•il i■1■ M! • •• •
• • MM NiM NMI MINI NM ■MN MM MM MM Ram riL+1 MM MM
■l■I NM ■IN NM !Y NN MM Mli MM' MN IMIMM i■i Dili •: • • •
MM Mn■ Nil M■■ IMIM\ YN MN Mi iM iM\ Mi IMIM rill • •• •
• • • •
�••�'F;�� ���'�� _ _ ... - -- - _< . ..- .:. _ �.. - .•a ��. +r - �■ r. <
WEE
< < w--. ��v.- �.. � �•��#��'" •�. Vic. U ♦•�1 ��I--• �TI
`� � ••� A. � � • • < �O � ••�<.A � <••�►�Aw•A. A. <•v•��� ...• • . . •• v �•�. A. • <••N����`���A <'v 1 �•� .A�v�. • ,�► <�v���i� �<•v�� ■. � � < � <••���,�• • : � ��yA�v��.�!. <u•�.>A < ���v����v�.A. �._<••�1.A � < - • <••u���•�<, •. v •q�•���A. . •• , <•v �A�v��.A. < �, �•O�A� N. � <••��A�v�,• <• .A. <
�. <• W� �,. A �.A. < < �'��<�•. y�•�<•��y. <,A���!��A•.�•����A �t'1��A�� N,�A��•ty1�i`' • �A �_�,1�9i��<��A���t'A��A, A<;iv•y11.�N1<911 HY_<00�A.�. �%d•�\v�L<�a��•,'l�•Y uI���•�.n_A� v�. A. •��A�.,A�. , t •O.•A•. /1�•�•A� �►�.M <•• �yA
�•• n�c�, •��v1�
NINE
Nil son
• �Aa �.A •��� �. A. !► ���. �Z��A�
}� ��. .��L•�4111�U��•�._._�.��d•�••1�_ �
•
i
I I
• • ■ 1 , 1 ■ 1 1
I ,
•
I few
1 Nm mvi' m1i LA= mr Qom mm mm mm mN Nm ■L�i mm mi mm , im ■gym i■■ ins im mi �7m ins mi nsm mm m.m mi I ■NI •
1 mm. •'im im ttii fir• mm mN Ni mm iN mm im !!� mi ■Mm mm NBC mom\ im as ins mm iii lam ins i■[7 I ■lam
MMr maw m\>■ I'm nsyl is NN mm mm mm mm mm mm i■►• ►iCa mmi MO-M mi mM mi mm it` mi mN iii mi NN mm1 I ■m
■�fi5 ins iN Ni mil iN ilia Ni im mm mm f►7m mm mm ions■ it■1Nl uum Iwfi i[■i ■71i mi Imm mi mm mN illm ■'■i ins oil • • • •
'iii i■• �� MOM
Sml mi N■t■ is mm mm mm Ni mm MOM mi me life MII, am mN mm Ni im LAN i■►1 am
im \ins ■m mm
G Y�I MN mi ■■i iii ins mm m` .Mons mm im ins mm tim AN i1i llwm mm ice\ IL1�7 mN iN ►7i ins mi mi mi mm ■i
A ■■i m■■ iii ON= iml iN mm mm 17■Im mm mm ins mN im mlt� im milli mi mm1 L�■li mm \i•� i■w Nv �7N ins MN Mm us
mGl Nm mm mm ni\ mm m m mN Nm mi i:i' ins Y/i Imm mm mm mm ins ins mm mlm mi mm mm I ■iri
11 Nm ■■Y1 ir7 ■■ • s R, �� ins ins iN ins !Ins ins ins lam■►\ MOM iii �Lli ins ins 7i 'i ilil ins ins ins ins ins ins I ■i1
■gym iYi itl ■■i iml mI mm Ni mi im mlm mN Nm ■7i mm1 ltm mm mm mm ME ►im mm mm mm ill• mi mm mm MOM
■ mi iri mi ■Nato Nil mm mm MN Mill N/m mm Nm mN mm imlm :a\m mL mm ■im mm t■>• iii ins i�7 MM ins ins ins OEM
mm mm mm ■■�\ inl mm mm mm mm mi mm mN Nm ml►7 im ions il�i■ mm mN Lim st!11 m■>• mm iii tit■ mm Nm mN .m
■ im 1>•m lam ■►\m mml mm mm mm ills mm mm mm mN mil NI\t m1\u ilAl■ mllm im mIm N�a ■►•Mm im 111■m il■■ mm mN im ■i
■ mi sum mm■lam mm mum mil mN mm Fsm iN im Nm mm mm ins YSIi —\:.• i\tl ins ■•m milt mm,Mft-A mm ai i3i Ni ins ins 1ti ■i
■ mm m=_ mm Mlal mN mm mm im mN Nm mm mN mm mm awa imY\ iN mm mm mm mm, iRIMns Mi ism m�1 Nm mN lti ■N
■ mm mm mi �� m� mm ��• ��� ��� iii mi ins mm mil MOM ■mME� mi mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mN Nm mm ■m
■ N! ii.7 mY\ mi am MOM mm mm R�Iw mm mFM mm ins ins mm mm iri mm msumm
mm mm mm ■m
■ im mm Mi ■■i Nmm MOM i Zi ins iN Ni mm Ni mil ■Yi 1.1■>■ ins ins mil mm iN ■► mNO! ix■ ins mm ins ins ins ■i
■ ins i_i_ - tins mi mm iv mm mm la\i 'INl■ im mm mm ►7i mm iN mlm N■i Ni ins iN Ni ■i
Nam no= iti im ins m mm mm mm mm i■i\ \i'i:i mi mm mm i\i ins ins mm Vi mm iN ins ins ■i
■ No MN mm ■■m mm mm mm mm ins• i■1• MNLI iQ im mm mm mm mml mm i\i ins ins iN ins ■i
im ins im Nm mm mm im mi mm i\tl Iii mi mm mm mm ins i■►\ Ni mi m1m mm mm ■m
■ �•� �� •�� OEM im'i mm mm mN mN im i m im mm mN mr1• mm NIi■ mi milt mmi m►7 mm mi ■m
■ mm mN im ■■OEM N im N'NOim v� mi mm lmi ins mm mi im mi mi mm m■1• ■■li .`7m i•7 mi mm im mm mm ■N
ins Mi mM ■■i • ■■m Ni 7N iN iN i.Z� NN iri Nli MOM iN ■\1N Ni i■■ NN i7i it• NN NN NN iN Ni ■N
■ MA mN m'� ��= ins mm li7m f.77m mm ins Y7N im mi iI1Vi mm MN tins mN mm aM Nil m.M tons mi mm mm ■m ������������������������/ .
■ Iii mm mm/ mm i1N iii mi mm mN NN mN mm im1N mm im mm m■■ m■■ Ni mm ME im Lim mm mm ■m /
■■■■ mm t/il ■■i mm Mm m�Z mm mN mm mi mm mlim 71■■ mm mm mm mm mi m`7 Ni NMOMi mli ins mm mm ■N
OEM
mm v Y= mm im i■■7 mm mm mm mm mm MEN ins mm Nit ins Nri mN m`� mm MOM N■Z im mm mm ■i1
M n mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mli ions rN■1 MN MOM mm itl •ti mm mm mm Mm M■�1 Mi Ni ■i _
II Nml mm Imm MOM mm mm mm Nm nsi mm �iutl ■>■m mm �m mm MOM mm mm mm mm mm► Nm mN tN •
17 Nm Mi ifm �m - • Nm iN mm mm mm mm mllm IiN mm mm Vi i17N mm ■�Im iii mm ■gym mN ME
Mom ■N
mm mm mm mm mom ■■M m1m rallm mm Ni \m MIFAM mm mm Ni mm ins mm mm mm • •
11 ME,mmm ON �I� ■Ni7M mm mm mm mm im mm I== MN iN iN mm Ism mm mm tins mm im mm mm mm
x Nm mi i11• ■lm • • mN iN my mm mom mN Mink% iZN Nm Nei mm mtm mm mm mm mm ins mm illti\ ■N
11 mm1 im mm ■■m mm Z a im mm mm Imm mm I■II = mm ins my mow mm i!G7• mm mm im mm Ni ■i
A My MV MM ii� �m ins ins im mm mN mN rilY7 mm ■■m mmm mm mm mm mm mlm mm mm mm mm mom
mm
u V im mf ► m mm mN mm N� �m ■\\i im mi mm mm MOM mmm MOM MM mm mM 1■m
II Moo mm \7■m ■■■>• m7 ai Ni �m Nlm mm m■■1 MN im ins mm mm mm lwtf •ti mm mm mm mm ti
• mm mm ■►•i ■■'M • iv7 iN iN iM mm IiN mN m►7 i7m mlm mm '■m mm L!i mN mm mm mm mm mm
�R Mm �� iii Mid iN mm mm mli immi idw mi Nm `i Nm mm mm mm mm ti
■ =� m= �= M MI 1i mm mm M_N_ ME m'm IiN_ mm mi ins im mN mm im Mm i►7 mm mN mm mm mm tN_
11 im mm mm mm mi iN maw MOM ni Nv mm iA im NM Mil mm mN mm mm N[li tN • • ■• •
n imQ Ni mi ■■m Y1i m11R1 im illllii mm mm Nm ■■N ins NN 111/J� mm Iwm mm mm mm mm Ni mm mm mm tN
v ll■m mm iv MN mm it►7 MOM mi mi mm mN ME iN NN m;i mm mow mm mm i■■ mm miI Ni mm mm ti
■ NN Nli mi Yi mm mi mm im mm MN mm mN mil mlm my mm 11•i1 iN mi Nm mN mm mm mm mm mm -
■ im mm iN gnm MOM it mm mm mm mm mm ■■i mm mm mN mm Mi ilm iN mN Nm mm mi mm mm mom
■ mm mi ►7i F M iv! \�i iN yM NN NN NN iN MN ■■i Ni iN iN NN NN ME NN NN Mt/ Ni NN iN
■ MILM ME M%M ■■m mm Nil mm I■>ti mm Nm mm ■■i ins im mm Ni im MN am
mm mm m■■ mm mm mN ins
■ mi L\■■I 1i�7 ■■M ins Nlil iN iN NN iN Ni ■■m kmm tins Ni NN 1N\�1 NN N>• Nil iN N■■ iN Ni iN iN
■ im :•lz on ■■M Am !iVl mi •'
■ iwn N■l■ mi ■■i7 mm ri■•I iN �7 mN my im mm owns im im mm mmll mm i\i mm mm ins mm mm i1i im
■ Nm mm► lti mom mm rail mm mm mm ■■m mm mra mm mm ■17i1 mm
mt! mm �mm iN mm mm mm iN • ■ ■ • � ■
•1 m►i im mi OEM10
N NlN full im mm mm iIm Nm Y1i mm mi mm t1m mm mill mm L■1N i■►• mm mm ollm im ■
V im �7i Nit ■rm mN Iiml mi mm mi ins ■■m iri \iN mrw im mi i■, mm mm Liam mtl im mN Mom iN
■ iIl■ mi mill ■■m mm r�•ii t1N Nm N mm mm mm mi Nri •7N mm as Cam mm iii mi mN Nm mi im ■
■ ins Nn mm ■■\� mN ri■ml mi mm ilt tom Nm mm mm mm IiN mot t■!i •iN mi mlw mm im iN mm im
Imm mm mm ■■m mm rm ins �= mm m11I■ mm mm Ni mia im1 IIL1i im milt IIIL■i im tl■:•1 Ni iN mm mm wm
mi im mm loom mm • rilml mm o■Im mN mm IiN mm mm mm ME MZu Ni mm ■itt■1 7m mm im Na mN Nm im im mm ■ • ■ � • ,
am
vi iN v■i mm rail mm mm mm mm im im Ni ME mm as lwm mi Ntl vi 'm am ins Nm im mm m\>• mm
m�7 iN mm i\7m mm tins mN mm Mi mm MIm Lim mm mm NN imm mm m\� Nm MOM MOM mm Nm mm m■1.� mm in mm
► Ni Nv MN Toni mm rim mm mm im mm `lm mm Nil ins ai N■li Ni ins NN iN mm Ni mm NN Ni Ni iN i
im mm [Liam mm ■ir mi •im mi mm mm mM mm mlm mm Iii mm mm Nm mi ins Nt\ mm mm mm mm Mm m
L\N Ai iN MOM mm ■7i. Ni Ni mN NN i`7 ins Mil ■!N mm ■ti itl ins t1N NN mN Ni mm Ni �7i Ni ins t
mm mm im ■oi Nm ■Mil mm ■•m mm mm mti, mm m.71 mli mm iv mm mm mm mi ilm Nil mm mm im mm t\N t
i■l■ mN mN ■■m mN ■Mil Nm t\N iN_ N_N mN iN i mm NIi ■J•m YEN vN N�7 NN im ai ions mm mm mN Nm ► t
on ME a= rMM ME _==I o mum Mm mN mN mm mm MOM mm ■■m it\ Ni ns mi iN mm mm
Nm mil m
mi im ins\ ■1■m mm ttml ■■N mN Il■i �� � O ��0 �� �.� �� �i s� M.N.■ �� ��• �� Mm �� ��•
\gym \Mons mi ■■M mm ■wil im Ni im mm mm iJi ■■N im Nm mm maw ■■Ins mi iN mm i■L• mm mm i ■ ♦ ■ • ♦ •
Ni m`rm mm ■■m mm ■til i\N __ NN Nm aN mm im i■■ mi MOM mm mm mm mm mi MOM ■tm mm ■7m i
in mM mi ■Ions mm ■oil i1m Nm im mm mm mm iIm mm iN im Ns! ■■It m■.t Iii iz�m Ni mm mm i
im im mm ■■m mm ■oil Nm mN iL7i Nm !m mm im Nm N\i mi mN im i■' mm
im ■■m mm mi i •• •••
Nm i7 mN mm mm Mm Mm im \iN mm mow mm mm mtw mm mi iN ►7
Nm mN _
ME
am ins ■■m mN ■omi mom mN Nm im
mm mm mN ■■N mi toil mm �� �� �� mm m■!: im mm mm im NM ■1■m mi miI ■■m my mm m< mm •�L� mm m
mm ■7i mm ■■i ■tN womI mm mN Nm im mm am mm ME im MN Nm am i►m mN mm Ni mN im mN mil mi mm m
mm nsm mm ■■N ins � MIMI im mm mm mi mm mm mm i►7 Np miM mi im V i am mm mm mil mm Nm m •• • •- ••
ME
iN mm1 ■■M mN ii■!il mm mm mm mm mm mm !gym mim m■■ mm im mi ME ME mm mm mm mi 1►�tli■ i
im m►t lmN LJN i\i t�i1 mil Nm MOM mm mm mm Imm Nm mm maw mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mlm tttl�tt�\ v • - • ••- �. • •
mm iN Mi i'L7■w ins tiL mil == �= �= i m mm loins mm ins owns mot mm 1mM mm mm mm Nm •10m am
m
mlm rains im mN Nl7 mN \1■m Imm ram m■ol mi ram ins mil mm mm Nm mm m■7 m
MEmm mlm 1 fY ram mom mN ram Mm im mi: Nm Nm IiIZm ram ■■■■ im mi ram mm mm mm ■elm mi Ipm m •- • -• • ••.
►Ions mi mm N■m ii m'iml Nm Imm ram mN ME • .• Ni mN Am Am mm NN mil mm mm ins mm mm ram mm mi m
•tm MOM mm ■Ions mlml Nml ram mm mm mm ram mN Ni ■Mons ■1i ram m■■ mi mN ins ram Ni ram mi mm mm m
i mIm mi mm ■oil am Nil mm mm mm mm mm Ni mm mm ZM ram mi mm Ni N►m im ram ram +ram mi•t• mm m
Ni toil ram ME ME ram Nil mm mm mN mm mm ram mil mm MOM mm mm Nm iN iN mm mm mm L7N ram mi 'm
i\7 tins i1i ■Ai m■►\ mil im mm mm mm mm • • ram iL7m mm MIMI MOM mm mm mm mm mm mm mm Siam mi im i
mN im mi ■•li iN Nil mi mi mtl mm mm ram mmJ mm Mi /im ins mm mm ram ram mm mm iA ins mN a •
■ im Milo \mil ■■m mli mil i■1■ mN ram mN ram ram m■I' ram iIt• mN mlml mm 'm m Mm ram mm mm ml•■ iN
■ ram iii nN ■■M ■ E Nil mL7 Nm ram ram ram ram mm� ram mILYA ram im mi Mi ram ram ram ram m<�l ■7m mN m •
■ mN ►7m ins ■■11 mi mil mi mm ram im im ram ram mN im ram r/m 1wi Imm iN ram ram ram ins rim mi ►7 `
■ ram mi mm ■■EI i�7 mil lwlm mm ram im ram mm ram m■1� ram ram ram Nil mN ram mN Nm mi mm ai 1f■
■ mN im m�7 ■llm ram mil ■■i Ni Nm ram \im mm ram ir• ram mi ins ram im m/i mm ram ins ►�1m mid 17i '
■ Nm ml■L■ im OEM mm tins+ i1N mm ram mi• Ni mm mm mm ram im ■wN ■■m ■wN ■■i ram ram im ram ins t\i p 4�� • ►
mm Ni ram Mi nsm mN ram ilm ram mm mi mm mi ■ions ram ram ram ram mN ram �e �''
i1i Iln■\>■ ■ OM � mhi mm mm ►lf■m mN Ni mN ram m7 mlm ram ram =I■■ mN Ni ram
■ mm mil ram ram mi
■1 mm ram mm IL7t\ ins m7i
m■■ ram !im ram ins Nm mm ■■i i\m i■l\ iJi mi im mN Nm mN mi +l.r a
■ ram ram mi Elt� i\i iii mi ram ram ram ram m■Z• I'•m im mN Ni ram mi ram Nm ram ram NiI mN Ni ram
■ ram ram it7 ■Ym mi i�ml ins mm mm ram im -
■ ram mN mi• ■■M ins ilml j� ram mi mm nsm im mm mm mm ram i•m im MOM mm ions ram ram Nm mN ram .. ,
• ■ ME
ME ■ti ■■li mi i9m1 m mm MOM mm �� `� mm mN Ni nsm ram mi mm
Ni mm mm mm mm ram •� ` !!
• m mN mm \■m mN Y9m1 m■7 mm ram mN iii! mi mtil ins mm mi mi mm mm mim Mi Nm mm 7m ramm
m ml■1
• ■ ram Mi mm ■►\ml i\i a9il mil ram tlm Nm mmi ram mi vm mN mm mm mm mm iQ� miles m.' m_i_ mil■
■ mm mm mm ■■li ins a■GI mi mN im mN ram � ■O M mm mN mm NN mi ram mm mm mm • • . • •
■ mi ram m■■ ■■m ram mil ram ram �� mN ram •' ■olm ram ram ram i_m_ mmm m m_m_ m mm �mm mm mm mm MEM
__ •
■ mm MOM mm ■■1t iv lmI•
i mi mN ins Ni mi ram ram ram mN im ram Z ans ram ME ram mi
■ mN ■[■i mm, ■■N Mi im! mN ram 1% mi ram im mm
Nm ■■m mN � O � O ram mN Ni mm
■ Nm mli um Il■i [ins vm1 mtl im ram mm nN im mm mN mN Nm mN Nm mN im ram ram mi ram' ram ram mi
■ iN ME ni ■oil ins ilml mN mlm ram mil ins im ram ram Nm ram Nm mN Nm mN ram Ilim im ram ram Nm m■■
ram mMOM�� im ■■m tam mil ins ml\� ram mm mm mm ram ram ram mm iN Nm iN mi ram ins am ram ram mN m■■
1■ im im ins rll\m iN iilL^ mm mm ram im mm mm mm mm MOM mm mm mm Nm ins ram mi in mm mm Nm NN •-
■1 ram ram mi I■■m mm MIME mm miles mm �m mm mm ram ram ■•]m ram mN mm ram sum ram im Ilia mm mm ram m■I •
1■ ME ins mm "M it• i■I� ram mtiw im ram Nm mm mm ram mt7 mm mm mm mm ram' ram T.i mlil Ni mN Nm ins .®� .-
■1 ram ram moo ttmm mi ma-1 MIM mm mm mm mV ��= == =� i`7 mm ram ram mN mi mm mll►7 mm im mm mN 1001111111
m■1
�■� ■�� •�� •��; �■� ��� �� ��i �� __ __ ram ram �� �� �� �� �.�i �■� �� �� ram mm
t im mm mil ■■\i mm mm1 N\m m■1■ mm ram m —m mm mm mm mm mm ram iN Nm Elm mM im i\i mm mm mm m■1 •: • •- •
• ■1 ram ram im ■■i mm ■1il L•Ji ml1'n ram ram mi __ MN Nm mN mi mN ram ram ram mi mi mm mm MI■I •• • - •• •
t ram ram ins \1■m ins i\ml WIM mm mlm MOM mm ram mN mm mm mm mm
ram ram l7i Ni mm mm mi
i mm mm Mimi ■\m mm iml m[t\ ram ilm ram ram mi Nm mN mN ram mm mm mm mm ram ram m1t1 mN mm mm ins • •
i ram ram mm ■■li mm m■lll MEW lira Nm m■J• mm m1i mm mm m■7 IG77 Ni Mm ram mm ram ram mm mm mm mm it
I■ Mi mm mm ■■m ■ m mil il■ im m\t mm mm � �im■■ IIm mm ram ram ins mm mm i1t mN Nm mN rat • -• •
i mm mm ins 11■l■ iCm mm1 lit■ ram ins ram l7m �i ��� s im ins mi mm mm m■>t mN mm mm mi mN ram it
i mm mm N\M ■Era N\M �m1 iti im mm im Mm ram mN Ni mm im mm ram mm mm ram iN no iN mm mm m� •: • • •
i Nm mN ins ■\li OEM mml mli, mm mm IiN mm mm mm iN mi mm
i mN mm mm ■■m ��mc ram! mm mm mm mm mm mm i o mm ram mm � 1 m mm ram \tm ram ram mim mm im mm i • -• - •
i mm mm �m ■■�7 im \�ml ins ram mm mm mm mm ram mN ram mm ram Mi ram Nil NE alp MM mm m�i mm MIN
\\ mm mm Mi MY\ mllw ins mi NIi mN Ni mm Ni ram Nm mtl Nm . , , • , • mi im mN ins mN ins mi ram mYil ram rat • • • •
i mm mm mm Vi N■7 ram mlm i■t ram ram tins mN ram mN mi mN ram mN Nm ■■m Nm mN im on
iii ram rat
i mm mm m►m R7m nN mm ins + ram ram ram ram mm mm mm mN mm mm mm mm mm mN mm mm OEM mri ram rat
i mm ram it\ GYIm mm mN iIi ram ins ram ram ram ■■m mm mm ■■m ■ ME mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mri mm rat
i ram Mi mi ■■m iN Nil Iii im im m■■ ram mi ■■m mm mm mm • ♦ `i mN mm mm mm ram mm mm mm mi mm
N■
ram ram im ■■.� m.. mil im ram IIi mm mm ram i\i im Nm ram •■ mm im mm mm mm mm mm mi Irma am m■
mm mm mm mm ram ram ram mlwl I■■m mN N■ •• . . • •• •.. • • .•.
n im ram �ti Mons ram mil ■t■■ . lmi im i■■I am mN Ni ram mN ram ,l o • • Nm mm mm mi mm mm mm \tN IiN Nil m■ • • • • • �• • .
i MN mm Ni ■\ml nsi • • • Mi ram moo mN ins im mm Ni im • • '� • _ mN N■■ mm mm ram ram my n■,• imm mm N■ • •. • . p
m mm mm mm ■■m mm mlm mm ME am va ins mi ram ■■i Ni mm ram m■■ ram Nm ran im IiN mi m■
i Ilwi Nm ME ■■N mm mm mm ■tml mm mi am mlm ram Nm • 1 � lam mm mm am am iN am mi Imm i�� MIN
m ■7m mm ins ■oi MM i\ill mm mi mm mi ram im mm 1mm ram mm /am m/i mm mm mN Nm m■I im Imm mi N■
w mil ram im ■■m mi iml mi NII►7 m0 i� mm im old mN ram ins lam ram Nm ilm mm mm mm ram
m iN ram I►7m ■■m mi mild lalm +mm mm mi mm mm mil ram mm mm . . lam mm NN Nm mm mi M■i
■► mall■ ram mi ■■�1 i►7 mul NII�1 7i mi MOM mm ens mm tom mm ■■m - .am ram Nm_ mm_ mint • • • • ME ram_
m iml ram iM mom MOM ■IEMI rri■1 `7m mm mill ram NI•Z t71i ram ram mm �_� == Mi mm Ira ' MM i N ■
m ins ram mN ■■m IIIMIS� iN ilil mlm mi mot mm mN im tlm mm ram
m film ram tmv rll■m ■►�i ir' ins ins Ai mi mN mi ml►m im mm iIi • rim ram ram mi ram mN it■ ■■m,
• m Ni mN 'iYm I■■N ins .��a i1>• m[m mm 7i ram mN iN ram mN Nm rim ram ram ram ram Nm mlm mm
till mm am mm [Liam mm Ilwtlt MILD il■ iv mm mN mi mi i1m mi mli _ _ _
m mm am ■>•m "M it7 mlll>F Il\i L>•L mm m■Z ram ram no ram '•� �� rim Nm ram tlloi Ni iN MOM ■■i
m m■1 m:w Yam IL-AM■■i mi � ilYll Mom Gam mm im m\` mlit mi mm iI■i Nlm • • ■�� won �� _�� mM mm MOM
■iii
m im ri■I, 1/Jm ■■m Mm iii mm vN iN Ni .7m ins mm rat■ mm mli G7m mm ram m►I
m ins im Mi ■■m mi mil MISS MIN tons mi i= m.m► ile■ as lam ■tN ram `iwN_ mm ram nsm_ == MM MM MM • ■ i • ♦ ■
m Nm� im ram ■■m i1m NI►t1 il• MN 111f\m mm iv mm MOM mm, ram mlmi =M == == MM mN mV mm ilrl•
m mi liit►i ai ■■m mm mm1 mm ii7 mil mm 111■m mm mli m►i ■iM tM
■\\ ilm iii im ■■m ►am mill mil mfi1, mm mi mill■ �7i im MO mN ram i■■ ram ram ins Nm ME am MM M= •
m mm my so ■■m mi MINI Ni ►7■•7 mm mi ins ml' mm mM MM == im ram ram im m� ram . ♦ ■
m mm ins ii7 ■■m mi mlml Nim Y\i im mm m111C Mira mm
m mi ram mi ■■m ME ► Z NYl NN ME mm MOM mm Not 1=M == MM ••• ins ram i •
• i il■ mm1 ins ■■m maw m■►ll MINE mm m■\ ram !Ji ilil• ram • . • �mm mm •
n am ram mil ON
■m NN MK ME Mill mm mm mm ml■■ m■■ �= =� =�1 , ram Ni
m \ram lam mN ■■oil mN mi im nsi ram mm mlwl mm ins •A �_ __ ram mm •
• N mil Nm ME ME am MME mm im mm ► OM m■7■ mm mm , ` ' MM mm mm
m ill ill mm ins mm ►M11I Mm lm■i■ ram i\m• mill mm 1wm1 � _ __ •
mm -mm mm rL�� ��•. a•� ��� ��i ZZ �a�• �� ��•• �� im m■I mil ram mm ram
\i mm laws mME F7N ram MEW, mm im mm mt1 mm WE' mm Dons rat\ mm �� ■ 1m_ m1N_ i_m_ ME • • • - •'
m i\i vim am Am Imml MIMI Y\i mm ram mY1 mm l■11I ■oN im Nm mm mm
m mi r■uml mm ■■M mm mil MOM mm [ram mN m\m m/i ram nsi ram ram _ _
• m mm + W►a ism ■■m ■>■i mil im lml■ ■w= Nil im MM tom m1m am ■tm mN ram mN Nm
m ni r Ii`t im ■■N Ail iMil MN ins twi mm mm mm mm mi mm it1 • - •
v im t Mi i�� ■■m mm MOM mm m1m ■moll ■iN mm mllm mm Nil -an lmm mM im /am ram mN ram ram ram
N mi mm' mm ■■M ram NY\I L tm im mm mm im mil MOM ram Nm mm mm mm mm MOM mlm
m ►am mJd� nm ■■M ram t1m im m1m NLM1 mm ram mm mm mN im iii
m my WAr mm ■■m mm mlmi ins on mL9 ram mm
mm mm Nm Nm tom --
• ■■M mm mil ilm laifil`� MOLI im iii mi ram == / • • • ram MM +NM
ram ■■m • • • • •
Mi hM� m■7 ■■m mm MOM ram Nmi• mN m Nm mim iN
m ins [I■r/ im ■■m mN m\t \mI• mi lam iN ■!7i ins 17m mN • . == ram Ilam
• m mN [•N'i ions MN Nm mom mm\ i"m molt mm ram mitt ME ��
m My `s�i mm Ym mm ni moons Mm imll ram ins mm iir• • • • ram r■I�li ,
►1♦ mi ism MOM =IN mm ins'' i\f:a ■fAm raw i■l• im mm ■1i __ � mN
�� mCm ins ins Om ram i\in ■•Jm mi N.�I • im mi m■►I im •'■tllZ mM�l'Srm
im
m mm Ni 7m ■■N Nm mlml fins milt ■rfi MOM mm mN LMM ` ills ram rim
im mi ■■m mil mil ins mill G■i mm MOM mi ins __ � M 0 • i_�_�rlM_ • -
im _
�m ram im ■■m mN O im1 a ■77i M■i■ mi tons im ins im ■IIYN ram i:i
v ins imN mi ■■m ram mmi ins' im Ili\ ilm mN mt1 Nm • I ,
is am !Sli ml■ ■■m ram ilwl ilet7 mm ■►%m MIN Nm mi mi ram , • • Om ram r'l•m
• ��1. Kom MM MEN NONE
—�ffil
ramOEM
Ira i� m4 mNMENEM
ism ,
�m ram mm~ MOM ■■ Nm iml ram ram ram 11 ■ ,
ram m■�' i/li3il . • ram mN ram
_ MATCH L I N E C 107 HORIZONTAL SCALE
\ '' AT CH LINE C 107 /' ,/ , I • / , � ••,/ �\ /
4.66' I 7LL- 7\
1 ^ ` 40 0 20 40 80
2 12" CPP \ \ 1 III I I 1 � � , > \ \ 1275 -
IN 3.20' SCALE: 1"-40'NV.=1286.64' \ \\TREESTOBEREOVED(TYP.) I / I ! i 1 1 PROPOSED TREELINE \ \ \ \\ /I 15 L.F. 18" C \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\' \\\ \ PASSERO ASSOCIATES
TWO PAD MOUNTED SWITCHBOARDS W/XFMR& I I \ \ / L \ \ \ �. _ \ \ engineering architecture
PV EQUIPMENT(TYP.) I I I \ \ \ ✓I \ /.INV.\286.4 \ \\ \ 1 G \\ _ \ \ \ LEGEND.
PROPOSED
O E INSTALLED \\ \\ \/� I ' I \ _ i \\ \ \ \\\ \ \
I I ALONG CONTOUR / ) I t7� _ / \ \ `_ - \ \ \ PROPERTY BOUNDARY
\ 1 \ \ \ 7 \
— PROPOSED SILT FENCE / / / / I 1 1 1 ti I \\ \ \ ?80\ \\ \\ \ _ R.O.W. _ _ R.O.W.
\ TO BE INSTALLED
ALONG CONTOUR EXISTING CENTER
\ \-- - - -
' LINE ROAD
• _ — _ \ \ EXISTING MAJOR
\\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\\ 1✓/ \ n _ \\ \\ \\\ \\\ \—�\ \ \ \ \ `\ \\ \ -------- 520--- CONTOUR
\ 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6"WOODEN POLES SET \
•` \ 10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 / I I I \ \ ) I I L ) \ \ \ \ \\ -------- 521 - EXISTING MINOR
_ / \ 1 _ \ \ \ CONTOUR
\\ --,.-- �/ / / i I I \ \\ \ L 1 \ 1 \ /��� h —\. \\ '2 \\ \ PROPOSED FENCE
_\ \ I _ 1 \ \\ SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE
GATE
ACCESS �\ I .�TQ/e 1 S I �\ � I �' �^/ \ \ \\ \\ � -.; \� \\` \ \ \
U/1 \
\ \ \ EXISTING TREE LINE
INTERMITTE /TRIBUTARY FF� C / )J �i \\ \\ \�� �286 \ \\ \\ \ \\\ PROPOSED TREE LINE
/ /•• T,q/e quo / \ — \\\ \\\ \\ \ I\\ \✓\\ \ REMOVE TREES
\ / /' / / / vl / / // / I �'\I �� YB F / \ \ \ \ \ \ + + + + + + SLOPES>15%
I �
PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT \ I I \ \ l FIE]
� PROPOSED SOLAR
/ PROPOSED SILT \
C `` J ( 8;p l /1•/ l l l ' / / v FENCE \\ \ I \ I \ \ � m PANELS
\ \ 1 \ •\\ —\ \\ \�\ / I 39 LF 65"X40"CMP ARCH " -`i� / / /� /' //40
STM.@ 3.31% / / \\ \\ \\ \\ —
I D-3
I I \ / h0 a�J� •\\ \\ _ I I // \ \ GUNDFA ROAD
65"X40"END / \ \ \ \ \./ \
.,i .INV=1295.10 i \ \ \
D 2 / / _ _ �// \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ (/ \\\ \\ 1
/ I \ / �J1 •••� \•�_--' /' i INV=129640 /v/ I �� �-�.� l. t --
\
PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT \ '
64"X40"END \ \ 9 \ \ Z
, D 1 m
I 1 \ INV=1304.35 \ •i . �V:• 65"X40"END i� �i� /,/ / \\ i/ � J ° \/ / A�
�, \ I \ o
INV=1303.10 /� �� •/ , \ / / ' � ` \ o
�/ \ N \�—_
�! --- —'� Off` _ \ \ \ \ \ \_ \ \ \ \ � \ \�- ��-
/' / \ \ —� --�8�p - 1� ---- \ \ ' \ \ _'\\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ - -- \\ LOCATION
/ / 1 39 LF 65"X40"CMP ARCH
/ STM.@ 3.20% \ _J / l / / / —�' / SF R
SF SF SF —SF SF'9s SF \ \S \ SF ` �\ ' /SF ( SF
S LE o PROPOSED THE LI E \
C \
1 \ \ ! \ \ • \\. / _ \ �� \ \ \ \ \ PRo os R E I Town of Danby
RE— — \ `\ `\ '\ \ `� 1 x—fix \\ ��x�) x \\ `" LOCATION SKETCH
\ \ \ col 1 S 1' N —\ _ O ti t \ Client:
O \ \ \ W \,, I— — — �1893 18 34 W 1049 08 \ \\ \ I I \
i \ W 1' 1 .2 \C\1 / PROPOSED SILT FENCE `J —� \\ \ '` 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6"WOODEN POLES SET
�' \ \ � �• \ TO BE INSTALLED � / \ \ e >' » \ 9 I I
\ \ \ \ F ALONG CONTOUR- /I /' PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED SILT \ - N 79 04 25 W (DEED) \ \ \ I I \ \\ \_ 10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201
\�\_ \\ _ �' FENCE �3 I \ i
a \\ ,/ — �L �� TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) \\ \ I I \� &NCROACHMERT AGREEMENII I I I I I N O R B UT SOLAR
I \ �+ CA i \ \ I I PASTURE FENCE PEf� I I \ 1 \
W y \\ ) cyw \ \ \ 1 Ci /' \ \ / NATURAL SCREENING AREA OF HONEYSUCKLE I I 1 "� I \ \ I\ r J' D 1 241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
Z \ \ i z / / SHRUB AND NATURAL VEGETATION TO REMAIN I �INST. # 201�-10053 I \ \ \
I � \\ LL \ I \ \ \ \ \ \
Z W i a \ \ \ _ —\ / \ / < UNDISTURBED.MAINTAIN TO A HEIGHT OF NO I I I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ /1 ROC H ESTER, NY 14607
W \ j H\ \ 1 g FNC. i �' \\�// \ /_/�\ \\\ MORE THAN 25" I I I NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY \ \ \ \ \ \ \ J
\ I C I I I z \ \ / "` \ j __ �o I TRC ENGINEERS.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I
=y W ( lI II LW`
\ \ \ PASSERO ASSOCIATES
\ Ld
\ 242 West main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
Rochester,New York 14614 Fax:(585)325-1691
Princi al-in-Char a Jess Sudol PE
L-- � n 1 \ \ \\II \ �/-- / I L / \ \ \ \ I I I I I I I I 1 \\ \\ \ � p g ,
\ ( I ) \ I I I \ \ O Project Manager David Cox, PE
Co Designed by Austin Goodwin, EIT.
PROPOSED SILT \\\\ \\\\ \\\ \\ \\
/ x FENCE \ / — \� ./ 1 \ \ \
�/ \ � \\ \\ \\ \\ \ F, OF NFW Y
� yWyWyyW��WWy . / /rL / O
W W W W yl W y W W yi N /x OI/ \I \ \\ \\ \ R
y y W p W • / / / \ •' 0 \ / \ I \ o / 11 1 l \ \ \ \ \ l \ \ \ \
W
y i W J W J N W N W N W
WWWWWWWWWIW W IWyW\ I C i / .\\ LLJ
0 /J
-a W i W W W y W W y W W W W W W W WI W W W W W W WI\ to / / ! / / �/
o W I.Y W .Y W .Y N W N W T A I / I
a i—W W W W W W IW J-... / T/A 10�J=21 . 124 / 1 1 I \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ p F NPR
W c i / � � \ / /� \ / 1
h i co I I \ / /� , ) N/F MOf�'rGOMERY
�n I `` \ ,/ \\\,\ /' // INSTRUMENT\\#2 018 1&51 II I \\\ \\\ 1\ \\ \\ \\ Revisions
\ \
No. Date By Description
I I I I ! I O 1 08/30/21 ABG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
\ \ `_
2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
\ \ 1 H Cn / l \ \ \ l l I \ \ I \ \\
\ \ \ \ I I I c\ ) \ \ \ ( / 1 1 \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ 3 10/6/21 ABG PER TG MILLER COMMENTS
10
\\I \✓ \\\ \\\ 4 11/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
r \ \ \\ 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY /' / I I/ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6 11 30 21 ABG PER P01 REVISIONS
\ \ \ \ / I I / ,/ x TRC ENGINEERS.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 / I L 3( � \ \ \ \ \\ \ \_--- \\ \ \\ \\ \\ / /
�`�� > IS
°' r tp / / `� u // I p� \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\\ 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
o aM \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \N �'' � \\ \ UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
r 1 1 I ~6O'TO PROPOSE —_ / 14 I (—_ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
m / I I ,/ \ \ \ �, \ \ \\\ \ \\ \\ ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
CLEARING LIMIT
\\ \\ ,29 �s\ \\ SITE PLAN
LU
\ ► ; I , _ ; , \\ 1/ �I \ \,/ 1 NORBUT SOLAR
DANBY SITE
Q PRO OSED SILT NEF cE �4/ 1 \ I \ \ \ I
O �TO BE INSTALLED \\ \ \ \ CAPPED RE—BAR o�i r---J I / �� 1--� \\ \ / \ I"
ALONG CONTOUR I \ \ \
\ FOUND
o I (TYP.) 1 \\ \ \ \ \S-o.1' 11 /' 1 —�� ` \\ \ / ) / / \ \,,_. Imo/ / / 11 I I \ I
\
o \ I I I \ I \\ \\ \ W-0.3' ,�\/ \ \ Town/City: ITHACA
I \� \ I I / \ \ I ( I County: TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
o2 \ \ \ Project No.
N \ I I I \ \ I \ \ \ I I I \\
04
1 \ , \ I ► I 'lip� 11 \,3p2 120213129.0001
C14
—
j \\ \\ \\ \\ I\ \\ \\ \\ //' / \\ \\\ \ Drawing No. Sheet No.
N C 106 6
�13 �� \ I / / \
i \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \/ //13p1'' \ \\\ Scale:
—\ \, \ �! \ /' N /F RADON REAL ESTA�`E\ LLC I\ \ 1 = 40
U I I \ \•� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ) / ,/ \ / � `I' - - �� � Date
o —
0
T BER 2021
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1"=40'
PASSERO ASSOCIATES
engineering architecture
\ I \ \ , i \\ \ _� \ LEGEND:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
n \ \ \ \ \ \ R.O.W.
T/,� 10-1\�J.�1 2 \\\� � \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ — — — — —\ i - - EXISTING CENTER
\ \\\ \\— — — — — — — — — — \\ \�\ ��\J \\ \\ \\\ \\\ \\ \ I - - - LINE ROAD
1 —I -- \ \ \ / I
�- N�F ROE \ / EXISTING MAJOR
\
S89 51'�3\"E 3573.55� \\ \ _ \ \ I I -------- 52D---
\ \ \ O \ — _ \ \\ \\ \ \ —_ r� \ / / / \ I CONTOUR
TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) \ \\ \ \ \� \ e �� PROPOSED SILT 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6"WOODEN POLES SET - — \ \ \\ \ \ I B E R 610 G� DEEDS, �P Q G E 8�L PROPOSED TREELINE , / / / \
PROPOSED TREELINE \ \S79 37 4 E DEED FENCE
10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 \ \ \ \ \ I -------- 521 - EXISTING MINOR
\ �� \ \ \ / / \ \ I I CONTOUR
PROPOSED FENCE
\ \\ \ \ \ SF
\ \ \ I I PROPOSED SILT FENCE\
\ I I
EXISTING TREE LINE
E \ \ \ S F SF\\ \ F SF �— SF SF SF \ SF --�;-' — F �S F ' / \ PROPOSED TREE LINE
\\mm \ ` `y'4^V ` \ IIG �� 1�6 E\ _ LLG E \ l�6 E 4-�Gle G '�E G / G G g / 1 REMOVE TREES
\ UG't V V
\ \ \ —�\ +
Ir
PROPOSED SOLAR
_ T 10—1 . 12 2 m PANELS
NIT A N
STR T # 746-
` OSS ND TO
� \ \\ 4 892 . FT \\
\\ \a \ I^\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ c— \� \\ 1 91 ± E S GUNDERMAN ROAD �2�J
( NT DS)
PROJECT o
LOCATION
\\ \\ I L \\ \\\ I '1 1 \ \\ \\ 23, 1 11 11 23 \
\ \ I 1 I \
\ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 I Town of Danby
/ 1� ✓� `\ �\ `\ \\\ \\\ ` \I \� \ \ �_ ` \ \\ ,� I LOCATION SKETCH
1 1 7 Client:
NORBUT SOLAR
\ \\ \ \` I - ► 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
\\ \\\ \\\ I\ �' ROCHESTER, NY 14607
PASSERO ASSOCIATES
D \ \ \ \ I
\\ \ \ \ — \ \ \ \ \ \� \\ \ 1 I 242 West Main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
^ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ I / ^ Rochester,New York 14614 Fax:(585)325-1691
\ \\ \\ N N� ti�a/ '\ /1 `_, Principal in Charge Jess Sudol, PE
\ \\ \ %,� \ // /' / Project Manager David Cox, PE
\ \ \ \ m '� Designed by Austin Goodwin, EIT.
Z\\ 'IPA'
EL
\ \ \ \ \ I
I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT
\ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ 1 I I ESSlO
o
I \ \ \ 6•
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
\ \ -—,I \ I 1 \\ 1 1 \ \ \\ w \ \ I I I I 1 \ \ I
I \ \ \ \ \ \ TO BE INSTALLED
\ \ \ \ I \ \ N \ I /
\ \ \ \ \ I I / I I ALONG CONTOUR
Q \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ 1
CL
I \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ _ �o \ '\ \ ' I I I / I I I I I I / / I I t\ \
I \ \ \ \ I \ % \ 1 1 I Revisions
\ I / J PROPOSED SILT FENCE
TO BE INSTALLED _—\ \ No. Date By Description
10
I I ( \ \ \ \ \ n \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I / / I I / I I / ALONG CONTOUR 1 08/30/21 AEG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
I I \ \ \ \ \ \✓ \ \ \ ` 2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
o I \ \ \ \ I I I 3 10 N \ \ \,� \ \ \ \ \ I / , / I •X /6/21 ABG PER TG MILLER COMMENTS
\° I \ \ \ \ 1 \\ \ \ \ \\ \ ' 1 I I I \ / I I \� / •\ 4 11/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
N 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6"WOODEN POLES SET 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
(� 10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 6 11/30/21 ABG PER POI REVISIONS
I \ \ \ �••• \\ \ TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) \ 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
`_42
PROPOSED TREELINE \ \
UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
} I \ �� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 I I I / \ \ \ /•• \\ `\ \\ '' \`./ — \ VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \\ 1 I I I I /.i �i \ \ \, / •• \\ \ \ —' \ \ ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
Ilk A—
\\ \`\ \I 1 � I ' / � I II I / /• 'I II ��-� /••• \ \\�� / �• — — -- /-- --- SITE PLAN
\ I I PROPOSED SILT FENCE I ^` o• PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT
\ \ \ \ / I
J \ 23 \ \ 1 \ 1 I I I TO BE INSTALLED I
o \ \ I \ \ \ \ I 1 I I / / ALONG CONTOUR I I /,/I I I �• `\ \----- / / —
I
NORBUT SOLAR
' \\ \` \\ \\ ' ' II \\ - -- - DANBY SITE
\ \ ) \ \ \ —
o W y/ } \\ \ \\ 'I ' \ ' I I I / \\ \\ \ \ /\• \ \\\�� \\ � _ \ Town/City: ITHACA
\ I \ \ \ \ I \ \ I �\ \ �' \
C? s \\ 5 ` \\ \ \ \\ I I I \ \ LL PROPOSED SILT FENCE / \ `\ \ \ �• \ \\ County: TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
`� W\W \ \ ( \ I 1 \ TO BE INSTALLED \ \ \ \ �\ \ --
`' J \ 1 \ I ALONG CONTOUR \ \ \ •• \ \ \ Project No.
o W \. \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I \\ 1 /' \\ \ \• \ \ \ PROPOSED SILT \
N y , W W �.�� \\ `\ \, , `\\ `\ \\ `\ '► I ► 1 \ \ ' 1 ' ,. \\ \\ `\ , 20213129.0001
FENCE \
c 1 \ \ I I 1 / \ \ \ / / \ INTERMITTENT TRIBUTARY \\ I \ Drawing No. Sheet No.
W \\ \ \ \ ���\ \\\ \ \ I I \ \ \ I I 1 \ `\ \ �� '••• \\ \\ \\ `\ \ I \\
\ \ I I \ I I 1 / \\ \ \ \ \ \\ I \
o \ \ \. \ I \ \ \ I I \ I I \ \ ji \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I C 107 7
\\\ \ \\ / \ \ \ \ I I I \ I\ I I 1 \I \ `\ •%•' ,�04
PROPOSED SILT
w FENCE
\ \ \ 1 1
It 40'
CC
I I ' ' Datepff
MATCHLINE C 108 MATCH LINE C 108
OCTOBER 2021
Eli
.tip
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SFROPOSFENCE ; \ - \ MATCH LINE C 109 \, `, \ \' , _ HORIZONTAL SCALE
\\ 40 0 20 40 80
8'R SIP
\ I I 44
:N88 .? R \ \
O �`' 1 •! � � <� \, 48' \ ��- NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS
89 - \ \ S \ \ DRIVE PER DETAIL. PERVIOUS ACCESS y \- » DRIVE ENDS AT PROPOSED GATE
1263-- 1PROP
_- -1-- -
— \ N78 29 29 W DEED s '10 \
(-� \- - \ \ S 3�i \\ - -- FENCOSEDSILT --�- --\�--- ---- ---
iA A V o _
,21 ,J'�� PROPOSED 20'DOUBLE SWING BARRIER GATE WITH LOCK AND
// PASSERO ASSOCIATES
s \ \ ` l� \ 2 ,, ` OPTIONAL ARM GATE&POST SAFETY TAPE KIT.PRODUCED BY \ \ ' � \
WNW W / / RE-BAR I \ \ \\ \ S 2 __
W W W W �7 BARRIER GATE BRANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL. engineering architecture
• / � / / W-0.3' \ - \\ \ 6 - 1 O F�[' GAS MARKER
Iy W W W W W W W W W W W / /' / S-0.3' \\ \\ ~ \\\ \ I F`O EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE FOR#54 BALD , \\ \ \ -- _ - - / �\ LEG EN D:
W W W / / / �3 \ \ l 1 \� i \ "� �. \ HILL ROAD TO MAINTAIN EXISTING \ \` \ ---- - - - - _ O
\ W W W W W W I CHARACTERISTICS. _ - - PROPERTY BOUNDARY
/' \ J
�- R.O.W. - - R.O.W.
-- TO BE REMOVED
\\ \\ \ \
INV.=1258.32' \ �\ \ `� EXISTING CENTER
\ \ \ PROPOSED SILT t - ^\\ \ ____ - - -
\ \ - \ \ \ ` `. '`�;� 1 \ \ - LINE ROAD
\ \ FENCE TO BE \ \ ETLAND AREA / / ( - \ D-5 \ \ � -\
\\ / / / / 15' GHT OF AY PER / ` r \ \� \\� \\ - -- -----��_ {� -------- 520----
-EXISTING MAJOR
INSTALLED \ B" \ / / / \� 12"END 1 \- \ ----- \ C
\ \ / / M \ I \ J \ \ CONTOUR
ALONG p ' \ \ �� / / / / INSTRUMEN P R LI ER 985 1 I ; �/ INV=1258.3�21
RE-BAR I \ \ _----\
CONTOUR \2 (FLAGGED) \ \\ y / / / OF DE DS, PA E 51 & I �,�0 �.I \ FOUND \ \ \ - \ �� QQ -------- 521 - EXISTING MINOR
\ \ \ 0.095 AC I \ y \ CONTOUR
\ \ \ \ +\ INSTRUMENT # 5 7907-1 1 ` /V ��� %� \ \ \\ 1 ` '�\ \ \ \
\ EXISTING SLOPES>15 . TYP. \ \ �\ / / _ - I / . ' \ PROPOSED FENCE
/ ( \ \\ APART OF 60' IRIG T �F WAY) 1 i sJ 33 \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ a ��
\ O � \ \ �\ \ \ `\ ___ \ SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE
\\.•' #54 BALD HILL ROAD St 2 \ \ 4 7 \ \\ \ \ \� \�J �� \ \
L \ / \ i _ ,�c \ �� \ \ \� \ EXISTING TREE LINE
J \ \ i \ \ •PROPOSED TREE LINE
\ PROPOSED TREELINE \ \ /' / / \ I \ L L)• \ c- \
I \ \�- POLE LINE EAS MENT TO NYSEG PER LIBER \\
REMOVE TREES
635 OF DEEDS, PAGE 635 _ ----- >
\�� \� \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ / // ` \ I \•- \ 1 ( l r / ` 12"END \ \ \\ \ \\I �� \ /
1 \ \ \ �\\ / INV=1258.82 \ \ \ C \ \ `1 \ / \ SLOPES>15%
\ \\ L=70.93 , \�L\ \c \ \ \ I +
r> l/ \ )\ 23 LF 12"HDPE \ \ \ ��\\ \ \ \ \ I ^= S 9 / \ \ PROPOSED SOLAR
R= 150.00' \\ i/'` ^\� STM.c2.2o% 1 \ \ `\
�\ \ 1 \� \ \ \\\\ F \ INV.12" CPP=1257.55' I(// ��j "/� ,Q\ ��� \\\ PANELS
\ \ / O \ / 21 L.F. 12" CPP \ \ \
TREES TO BE \ J i =27 05 34 / TO BE REMOVED
\ + \
REMOVED(TYP.) J\ \\ \
INV.=1258.33' \ �\
\ \ \ PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE / ` --_ice / t % y I TO BE REMO�(ED ✓\ \\ \ �l' \ / \ , ` I \\ \
INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR(TYP.) / / \ / v 1 ti \\ \ \ \ \\ / \ /-Q \ \�
& �� \
O GUNDERMAN ROAD 123
\ \ I \ c o\ 1
'\
171'TOCLEARI
7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" \ \\\ \\ I\ ` �C PROPOSED ARRAY LAYOUT SOLAR \\ l/ \\\ �// \\ _ 0/ ,\\� ��O // --� \ \\\ \\\ \\\ \` \\\ �9�T / -_------�� ass\ PROJECT a
\ ^ WOODEN POLES SET 10 O.C. \ \ \ \ \ 1— \ ) -lf '\ e` 'v� C1 \ -ter G I \ \\ \ \ \ \ ` �O
SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 \ > \ "�' \
( 1 I (_ \ / I / \ \ \ > LOCATION
\ I O
P �j \ \ \ \ \ C \ \ \
I S7 \ \ \ \\ �l \ -------
SF SF °° \ SF \ \ \ \ \ / ' \_ \ \ \ ��— \ I // I / s0 /,-
�j��\� Town of Danby
00
\ \ \\ LOCATION SKETCH
CAPPED RE-BAR \ \\ \ \ r- / \^ Q� a' Q\ `\ NTS
FOUND \ �\ \ I �� d, '`� /�1 \ \ --\ 1 I I J J '!/ \ \ \ \ \ — \\ 45 EASEMENT TO NYSEG PER Client.
0 \ \ I \— \\ 1 \ v \ ��` \ INST. # 2018 11659
NATURAL SCREENING AREA OF HONEYSUCKLE S-0.2' \ \ \ ( �/ \ �� \ 1
\ \ \
SHRUB AND NATURAL VEGETATION TO REMAIN \ E-0.0' \ \ \ , •-I LyJ \ \ \� I \ \ \ u / II J/ \ \ \ \ 60' COMMON RIGHT OF WAY
V UNDISTURBED.MAINTAIN TO A HEIGHT OF NO \ '\ \ \ NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS \ ,1 \ \ \ \ I / \ \ I I O /� / Sl'� \ \
ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. '\ o \/ ~ u \ ) \ \ 1 ( l ��/ /,, Sly \ \ \ \ \ , PROPOSED SILT FENCE / / / N O R B U T SOLAR
MORE THAN25" \ \ \ \ \ / / \ (_\ \\ \ I' \- \�\ C \\ \ \ \ \ 15' EASEMENT TO
W i I \ \\ \\ \\ \I SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 \ C �\ / \\ \ I \\ ,\\ I / �� �j� \ \\ \\ \, \ \ /� L` NYSEG PER LIBER 675 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
/ I \ \ \�_ � � \ �- 1 \ I \ ,\,� ( / �l/ /'� Q Q \ \ \ \ � \ � �� � OF DEEDS, PAGE 1 /
Z / I , \ \ \ I \ _ n APP OXIMATE AREA V�A KING EASEMEN-T \ \ \� 1 \\ \ ROCHESTER, NY 14607
\ PER I ST. 2018-11659�\\ \\ \ \� � / � ' 0 / \ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \\ �/ NYSEGj7A
Q , \ \ \ \ \ M I / \ \ 1\ , \\ I� PASSERO ASSOCIATES
1 / / / I \ I I I \ \✓1 \ \ I / \ > r / \ �� l INV.=1256.88'
/ 242 West Main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
�0' \ \ EXISTING 12"CPP TO BE \` \
� \ h / Rochester,New York 14614 Fax:(585)325-1691
1 I \ \ \ EXTENDED BY 11'.INV=1256.68 \ /
r \ / I \ �\ \ >rs \\ / ^ \ \\ 30 L.F. 12" CPP \\ \\ <Z \ Principal-in-Charge Jess Sudol, PE
I I I
\ s \ 1 I� I I L \ — \ \ — \ \ \ \ \ \\
Project Manager David Cox, PE
INV.=1257.42' Designed by Austin Goodwin, EIT.
Q 75 c\ j / !/ / \\ �v ` \c Vl r I \ I / I J
\ \ \ \ 1 GAS MARKED / i F NEW
LLJLy
LL co
0 \
3 \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ I \ I 1 1 1 \ '\ \ I / \ / \ POLE LINE EASEMENT TO NYSEG PER LIBER \ I �/ \ \ �� F��O. FO O \1 F 5
l I.1 1 �\ \ I _ / \ \ P O 23 �.
o \, \ \ \ 1 \\ \ w \ \� / \ P \ \ 1 \ �^ \ \ P �,
o I \ \ \ 1 W \ '� N N)� N� N� N� / \ '\ -� \ , / _ 1 I \ \\ Illy FP �- FESSIONP
wt rn \ .P w N I \ \• � ,\C1 \ \\ \ / 218 OF DEEDS, PAGE 386 1) I � / \� �b
\ 1 \ I \� '�� \\ I I \ ) \ \ I \ \� \ / \ II \ — / I �I / \ \ '�h'h�doe° ��� '\ \
O ,\/ O \ /(�\ \ �, �1 \\ / \ I \\
Revisions
\\ ` \ \\ 1 I \ ® VO \ ( . \ \\ I -- _\\ /) /� J ) I \I No. Date By Description
c� _ \ \ \ \ I i a� z , // // ) ( \\ \ \ I \\ I �` \ I \ \ ) \ \/// li / /// ( i I I 1 08/30/21 ABG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
\ \ I I I I a \ \ \ ` (\�1. \ I I I I 2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
o \\ \\ I 1 I I N I \ ( \\ \ \\ \ / \, \\ �\ �\ I C/� `\ / _�/ \ `\ \\ \ 11 I �) \ (\ 3 10/6/21 ABG PER TG MILLER COMMENTS
I ,!
,o \ \ I I \ \ \ I / \ \ / /�-_-\ o \ \ / /// `� \ 4 11/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
N \\ \ \ \ I m ) 1 \ 1\ \ \ \\ \ `\ \\ \ `\ \\ Q� \� \1 // \ \ \ / I "j' >c/ \ ` �-J I I 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
\ \ I m \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ �\ 1 c� \�\\ )\ --__\ \ \ O�t\ \\ \ \ // \\ ` ` I I I 6 11/30/21 ABG PER POI REVISIONS
\ N I 1 \ \ \ \ \ �' — \ / !/ \ \ I
Co / / ) \ \ \ I \ \oo J \ l \ \ / L \ i 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
N CAPPED RE-BAR \ \ \� \\\ / \ \ \� I I r i
i \ \
\/ i I I I I I _ �— �� \� \� `\ I \\ \ FOUND \ \ / _ \ / _ \\\\� /N
W ; \ I I I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ 1n/-0.3' \ \ / —\ \ V O \ / /,� \ ` �-/ \ \ \ \ UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
}� I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / ` I. 1 I / \ / \ `�v \ \ VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
Z , 1 \ I I I \ \ I \ \ \ I \ \ I I \ \ \ \ O O VVV 1 I / —/ ` \ \ \ \ ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
o
1 I SITE PLAN
I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ► \ \ \ I \ \ �\ �/ ► I I / / / \ \ \ \
o
NORBUT SOLAR
I , / DANBY SITE
/
I I \ \ \ 1
I ( \ \ \ \ \ r \ \ \ \ = I \ \ \ Town/City: ITHACA
o \ / \ \ \ \ \ ( \ \ I / l \
a \ /- 1 PIPE FOUND I I \ \ �' \ 1/l_ \\ \\ \ \ / \ \ \ County: TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
M \ I \ \CAPPED RE-BAR \ I / 1- I \ / / / \\ \ \ \ S-0.1' ` �\ \ �> I / �// \\ ` _ — / / Project No.
\ ' 1 �189021'34"W/' 250.w c= E-0.1' \ ` - �\ ' I \ 20213129.0001
o \ \ �\ \ FOUND \\ \\�� 1 �� — 7 , \ \ v / \ \ \ \ / / I
N \\ \\ \` s-o.i' �\ \\ /,I N79°07'25"W (DEED) �\ \ (� / \\ \ \� \ \ , / `\ /� 1
`r' \ \ \ ` I \ ` \ / \\, �- `\ \ \ \ / Drawing No. Sheet No.
oCO�
PIPE FOUND \ \ \ \ / I/\ ` \\ /// \
s-0.2' \ \ / �_
\ \ T A 10 1 �56� \ ` > �__ I \
\ \ / Scale:
Z \ \\ \ \ \\ \ N Y F \ 0 N\\G 0 E R Y' \I \ \ \\ I \ `\ \\ VI c 1 i O/ C� O\ / / //I I I \ 1 = 40'
\ \ \ ` c '\
O Date
\ \J
i �� OCTOBER 2021
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1"=40'
PASSERO ASSOCIATES
engineering architecture
LEGEND:
\ \ \ \ I I — T I \ R.O.W. PROPERTY BOUNDARY
\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ ___ -�� ---��—rt---7 ---- \S \ \ I UG UGIE
\ \ \ \ \ \ ---- — ----- —r— -��—I-- I — - - R.O.W.
--� 89°05'5R"W \ \ I I I I I I
I I \ \ \ ---- \�--- L \ \ \ \ C `c U E UG E G E EXISTING CENTER
I PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6"WOODEN POLES SET \ w \ \\ \ \ I \ \ U E U E UG E UG E - - - LINE ROAD
10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 \ \ UG E UG E UG E\ �c-�c—UG E UG E UG E UG �' E
I \\ \\ \\ \ \ io UG E UG E G E UG E UG E UG E —TUG -z UGU� E �LI E UG E -I I UG E UGIE
I \ TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) v I UG E \ UG E UG UG E UG E UG E G E ) I EXISTING MAJOR
\ ``' UG E JG E E UG E\ UG E G E UG E ��� BUG E� -UG E UG E \ \ I I I I I I I I �--1 I -------- 520---- CONTOUR
PROPOSED / PROPOSED SILT \ Ilcn w \\ `\ \ \\ Q �—�� ---- — EXISTING
TREELINE / 1 FENCE \ II C9 ---- — ��---- ----��---- — — N8 5'50"E` / —�\ --- ----- / / \ \ \ r I \ -------- 521 ---- CONTOUR MINOR
--- �\ \\874.40' \\ \\ �'
w O �� \ MATCH LINE C 110 PROPOSED FENCE
I I \ \ \ > N 89 51 5 5 W /� EXISTING SLOPES>15%(TYP.) / / / / \ \ SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE
° w S1 55'11"E \ \ - --- �--- i - ---'\ --- --
1 I o I \\ \ \ \ --_ 5.10' \\ \\ 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) ' -- __ -- 7- __� i—x� * — ��)( T \� \\ �\ \\ I EXISTING TREE LINE
1 �(�--ter 4 \� ' / X \ X
\ \�\ � \ \ / / / � / ) \ \ \ \ / �� �i �i / // � / X / X/ X -PROPOSED TREE LINE
E \ 1 . 4� / / / / / PlROPER'fY LIN� PER DES IN � o-7= _ / / / / / /
\ I FNC. / / / / / / / /\ /\\\ _
\\ _\ _ i / / / / 1 REMOVE TREES
/ / / / / I I / // / \ �/ / / / / I / + + + + + SLOPES>15%
\\\ \\ \\ / 1 PROPOSED SOLAR
/ PANELS
RE-BAR FOUND
S-18.35'
\\ \\ \\ \\ \\\ \ 23 (S-18.05' REF.1)
\ \\ \�
23' GUNDERMAN ROAD
12
/ �\ / /
N
\ \
/
i/ / � l l j l D
/ ( PROJECT o
LOCATION
PROPOSED SILT FENCE � \ / / / / /
SHED 1 / /— / i l I I / l
\ i TO BE INSTALLED /�— i / \ /\J
\ \ I `-- \ / / / ALONG CONTOUR
40
///' •//�� � \ �/W -----_ LOCATION SKETCH
Town of Danby
LLJ
z - \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / \ \ I \ ` \ Client:
' AREA
!-ALd
". (FLAGGED) \�' � W W � �� W y y�� ^ W ------/ \\v \\\ \\\\ \\\ \\\ \ \\ \\\\\\ \\\ \\ \\\I\✓ \\ \mil L \\ 1 \\\-'� \\\ \\\ //
0.280 AC _ NORBUT SOLAR
/ / \ _ _ \ / /-- \ \ \ \ \\\_ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \^\ l \ \ \ �� \ \\; /\/=z \ _ 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
ROCHESTER, NY 14607
/ / -/ / �/ \ �l'� W W W W W W W W \�I ---\ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � 1 \ /
I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
1'
I I / / Q• W\W\ W W W W W W W W -- - v \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 I
EXISTING SLOPES>15%(TYP.)
W W W W W W W W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PASSERO ASSOCIATES
I I \ \ \ 1 // / / / (O � J•/ W W W W W\ W W W W W W W W / \ // \\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ I \ `\\ \ \\ \\ I C \ ) I I ///
242 West Main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
\ \ / , / / W W W W IW W W W \\/ T Rochester,New York 14614 Fax:(585)325-1691
/ \ / / / •/•• W\�'� W W W W W W W W W W W W W W / \ \ \ \\ \\ \
/ \ I I I I 0.98' / / / WIli W\ V W W W W W W W W W , \ \ \___ -\ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I\ \ \ \ / // /
/ \ \ I I •/� \ W H N W N W \ v \ \ \ ) _ \ \ \ o \ / Principal in Charge Jess Sudol, PE
14 L.F. 18" CPP \ ••/ \ \ W _W7W W W � � W W /// , \\\ \\\ \\ \\ \ I I I / \\,i �\ /�/ \\ \ \v 1 1 \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ —— Project Manager David Cox, PE
Designed by Austin Goodwin, EIT.
23 1 � � INV.=12 •.03' \ �/ / \— , _ _ —\ \\ \` / FNC. \\
I /; � \ _ - -
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
TO BE INSTALLEDN�T BEENER/_S____\
/ / / ' — — \\ '—� /—\ \ ` \ I \ \ I I I I \\ N \ )
ALONG CONTOUR I I s / — \ \ \� \ \ / I \ INSTRUMENT-���C��C��� \ \ I I 1
NN N / 1 1 --_/�"\ , �; >.�-�_-�-_- \- ' _-- --� '� 1
\ 1 I I 1 1 \ \
� � � — --- �/�\',, :�.�•___—=-�—\------\, _ \\ ./• 1 1 ' —1 \\ ��/I �� r \ � I / /� `\ % , \ I I � � \\ may/ -. � .
- -------�. \\
__----- \ FNC.
\ / / / / I � / \�• I �'' /i•�/\ __ \\ !� \1 Ol 1 \\ \\ \ I/\ \\ \\ I � \\ `---~ 1 I I I I I rl I 1 1 1 I / \� ' �
CD L
o -� c._ j' / \,,/ �/ \\\ \\ \\ 0 \ \ \\ \�/ \\ \ \ \ j i� I I I I I \ i tn0
= LL��' ��� / / \ //' � ��' ��' _- \\\ \\ \\ 0 \\\- \ \ t \lam I\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\ v \ I I I I I \ \`&s I J \-/^\_-\-/ FESSION
/ \ `\ \ \ 1 \ \ \ I I I li 1 \ >� 1 Ul
Z INTERMITTENT TRIBUTARY /' / \_ _ - / / �� /� �� \\ \\ _ / (_ 1 \ \ \ \\ �� I I I I I \ \ Revisions
`-p \ No. Date By Description
y•• Ln 1 \ \ I I \ I N \ \ -
c? Ln N U \ (\ \ \ I\ 1 08/30/21 ABG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
z \— \ \ \ \ \ \\ 2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
o mot` •• \ // / /' �' �/ / — --- -\ \ \ \ ;� w \ \/ /) .1 7 \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I a L I / ( \ \ ( I \ / / "\`----L_---- \ 3 10/6/21 ABG PER TO MILLER COMMENTS
cv i \ \ 1 ( / \ n,�
\\ / / / / / i _ \ \ . \ \ J \ ( \ \ 1 N I I \ \ 4 11/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
\ \ \ \ o W ( \ \ \v/\ \ \ \ I a I \ / I /^ /
r \ \ \ \ \ �s 1 I I \ I \ \ \ 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
/ ' / \ (n \ I \ / r\ \ �/ ✓ \____ 6 11/30/21 ABG PER POI REVISIONS
w \ / / / \ \ \ I ) t \ /, / \ I \ 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
o \ \ \\ \ \ N>- TREES TO BE REMOVED(TYP.) i l / / / /-- \ \ \ \
\ PROPOSED SOLAR \ PROPOSED SILT i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ > \ )
N \ \\ - 7'TALL WIRE FENCE WITH b"WOODEN POLES SET
ARRAY LAYOUT\ ca FENCE 10'O.C.SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 / PROPOSED SILT FENCE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
}� \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ / TO BE INSTALLED \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \— \V ` N `sl, VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
Z \ \ \ \ + —\\ �-�� / ALONG CONTOUR. \ \ \ \ \ I \ \\ \\ \ \\ N \ \ \ \ 1 ( I 1 ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
Q —\— L —. — . — DOUBLE SILT FENCE IN
\'—' \ r PROPOSED TRUCK/CONCRETE' ) \ \ \ \ 1 \ I
\ PROXIMITY TO I / \ \ 2S I \ \ \
WASHOUT AREA.AREA TO BE / \ --- \ \\ \ \ 3\ / \ 1 \ NOTE:A 10 MIL LINER IS REQUIRED ALONG
TRUCK/CONCRETE I
\ INSTALLED PER DETAILS AND \ / \ \ ( \ \_ \ ��2 \ / \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ WASHOUT AREA. / ) 1 \ \ sg \ \ \ 1 \ THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF CONCRETE
\\ \ \ \ \ REMOVED WHEN \ N �,, \
> \ \ \
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED. \ \ / I I \ 1 / I � / ass \ \� � \ \ I \ \ 1 ) ( WASHDOWN AREA.WASHDOWN AREA SITE PLAN
AREA TO BE RETURNED TO TO BE CLEANED OUT AT 75%CAPACITY.
w \\ \\ \\\ --- \\\\ \ \ \\ EXISTING CONDITIONS. N
_
00
\\ \ \ \ 1 \ \
48'R \ \ / N \ \ \ I 3' DEEP
\ \ 1 �` / / \ � \ \ \ I
`\ \\ - \\ � NORBUT SOLAR
\ \ \ \ \ \ I \ N I \\ \\ \ \ 1 \
28'R \ 1 L/ \� '\\ \\ 1\ \\ ` I = - DANBY SITE
'1S I \ \ �> \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ^ I III-III-I 11= - - I_ 8'WIDE I-
o \ \ _—_ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 315'TO PROPOSED CLEARING LIMIT \ \ I I \) \\ \ \ \ `7 \ \ \\/� /' I ( I MIN. _I Town/City: ITHACA
\\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ `�► —1261- \\ \\ \\ \ \I ( I 1 1 1 \\ PROVIDE 12"THICK County: TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
r, \ --- \ \ J \ \ ✓ 1 I i 1 ` ( \ \ \ \ - Project No.
N \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ 1 \ \\ �\ \ \ \ 1 J \ \ \ I 1 1 \ STONE BASE WITH
\ \1 11 \ \ \ \\\ I \ (\ \\ \\ 2%MIN.CROSS SLOPE I = _ _ _ _ _ - 1
/ fib' I \ PROPOSED TREELINE / \ \� \\ \ \\ I_ /— \ \ \ `, \ \\ \ \\ \ 20213129.0001
M _ \ \ I �` ` s� ?�------- \ \ `, `� I 1 \ I\ \ ` \ \ \ TRUCK WASHDOWN AREA Drawing No. Sheet No.
� w. \ \ \ \ \
\ \ —
LU
i 1 / // \ \ \ WETLAND AREA (� (�
o I / \ b C>. =W \ \ RE-BAR FOUND \I % \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ / C 109 7
O Cn (FLAGGED) ` W �� \ \\ \ W-0.1' \\ O 1 1� L I I \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ / Scale:
0.027 AC W. _-__ I \ FNC. N-6.18' \ S88 44 09 E 12 . 16 \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ „ -
U // 23' // C9 \\ -\\\� /�--- A PER INSTRUMENT PER LIBER 985 OF \ , \ (N-6.21' REF.1) S78'30'00"E DEED \ \\ # a5T 0 WAl\\ER 'MST.
- 40
w a \` \. W y W -/ // GE 51 & INSTRUMENT # 517907-1 \1 .1 \ --- \ `'J\ C� \ (DEED)
Date
_ ---- MATCH LINE C 108 ---- OCTOBER 2021
° MATCH LINE C 108 -- ---- \
\ PROPOSED SILT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
HORIZONTAL SCALE
4 / 0 20 40 80
/ \I 11 / / / / / / / \ / a SCALE: 1"=40'
o \1 S
G)
zx
6\ ► PASSERO ASSOCIATES
I
/ engineering architecture
i (IJ! I l \ 1 //// I I , q s ' �,, �i LEGEND:
e\ C\ \\ \ \\ \T \\ ll\\\ I\1 0 _i ` / // / I I /' �m ( �cc� R`\ / PROPERTY BOUNDARY
\ T/A\ 10�1 —\I 9•� 1 \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \\\ \�l / \ \\ \ ) l / / /' ( \ 2 \F �I m �\ R.O.W. _ R.O.W.
\ N � B\ALL\ \ \ \ \\ / \ \,\�\�^/ , ,, \ ) III I I ,
\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \\ \��\/ / \ \✓ // I 1 \ \ \ \\ \ \ I / \\ / I / — — — EXISTING
ENTER
\ LINEROAD
N'S\TR U N T \� 2\51 O� 42 3 4 \J\ , \ / \ / C EXISTING MAJOR
\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \J \ \ \ \ \\ CONTOUR
--—————— 521 ----' EXISTING MINOR
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ APPROXIMATE LOCATION Iq CONTOUR
\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ BUTTERMILK CK
\ \ I \ PROPOSED FENCE
$p PROPOSED SILT FENCE
WWW l
EXISTING TREE LINE
rr
•PROPOSED TREE LINE
55S
REMOVE TREES
-3 1
+ + + + + + SLOPES>15%
\ I I I I I \ \ \ PROPOSED SOLAR
PANELS
/\� \ I I \ I \ NYSEG L-314/ 1 1 I If I 1 1 \\ NYT 186
I I
GUNDERMAN ROAD \2�
�/ r/ by
�ByO/\�AR �NQt W"`y J/ \\ , � \ \�•• \\\\ \ � / / / / 11 I \I � \\
,
I I / / / / / W W W W W N W .Y W V• `\+'/1�// \J \ \ \ / / ) / -1'/ I / I / / /1//
II / / l // �/ fWW � WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW � PROJECT a
LOCATION
I / / / / / \ W V• W\ �W i W .Y W W y W W i �V• W W\,\\N � \ \� 1 / / / / //- -`\ I J Z
03
l l l I I I �\yWW yWWWyWyWWWyWW �• yWW �• yWW✓✓�• yWW �• yl \\\�\ __ I I 111 \r•� \\\\\ \\ I III \ �O
I\///\/\ /\\/, \\1 (\/\\ LI WW W.Y WWW W.WY iWW W.Y\WWl W.WY�WW WWW WiW WVW• WWW WVW• WW_WVW/ WWW_Wi`_WW WiW WWW-WW 1 \ \ \---/7 II I• III II I I I I 1I 1 I I I I I I\( \\`II \\\I I I (J2 \ \\ I
Town of Danby
y LOCATION SKET
CH
. W . W W W W W W W
Y Y Y Y Y W \. Y . W V W i = r -7 Client:
WyWyWyWWWyWWWyWWWyWWWyWyWyWyWWWyWWWyW \\ \ I• I I I , I \ \ \ \ I I \ NORBUT SOLAR
1241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
\
I /", fC\ ROCHESTER, NY 14607
mo
v-N
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W I \ \
^ (I �\W\y•lt\W IV WW W W W .Y W_YW W- W W W W W W W W W i W W WWW WW iWW W WWW W iW WW yW
WETLAND AREA I
H y \I I 1 /BUTTERMIL�C \ \ \� I I I I PASSERO ASSOCIATES
\\\I (FLAGGED) W W \ I I i 1 / CREEK / \ \\ I I I I 3� \ 242 West Main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
\ I W 2.00 AC \W W \W W W W. \ I I I / \ \ I \ Rochester,New York 14614 Fax:(585)325-1691
W . y i W W W i W W .Y .Y W . .Y N W . y i y W .Y\\ W V• / / I W W W W W W W W W W W y W y W W W W W \ THREE OVERHEAD Principal-in-Charge Jess Sudol, PE
/ 1
,\ WIRE CONNECTIONS Project Manager David Cox, PE
W .Y W .Y W .Y W W .Y .Y .Y W .Y W W �. � � \\ /, \\\ \ I I � I/ // / 1 � I � I TO PUBLIC GRID Designed by Austin Goodwin, EIT.
, -_�=W W W W W-V`� V• W V/ W i W .Y W W W W W W .Y \
W .Y W W W •Y W V• W i W W W .Y .Y W W V. .Y .Y W W�. i W\W-Ws �� T'/A/ 1/0-J - 1 92
YN . W Y W Y N R
YL I01 l I
i \
NEW y
y .YW Wy .YyWy .YyWW .YyWW .Y y .YW Wy .YW Wy .YyWW .Y�J. \\W WyWI \\ / /�\\\ ^(�\ ILIgER /&10 OF DE'EDS/,/
W W W WWW WWW WWW WWW WWW W WWW WWW W THREE ARRAY POWER LINES \ )\\10l( \ ,r-, n 8 /� CO 0:
�W. CARRIED BY ONE POLE \ // ( // y9 \ D-7 \ / , S87°161 0511 W q
\\ W W W W W .Y W W W .Y W W W .Y W W W .Y W i W W W .Y W W W .Y W W W .Y W W W .Y W W W W / \ f f aoI \ , 65"X40"END \ \ C / 356.78'
.Y
r'o .\ I I INV=1207.85\
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 4' BOX WIRE FENCE �o _L`_M-- I /
TO REMAIN —2! _\ W W y W W W y W W y W W y W W y v APPROXIMATE EASEMENT 7 W \ — 1 �� � ,p
o -W-W /WyyytW y .YW WyiWWy WJ v ' •�P,Q O� �� V
FOR ELECTRIC LINES AND y ^� \ ry0 Ln - F
\ INTERCONNECTION` 11
U W WWW WWW WWW W WW WW W ACCESS(TYP) WW \\ i.121 / o II
V1( ( � 36 LF 65"x40"CMP ARCH STM.@ 0.42% r �SS10 P
.W .Y .Y W .Y .Y .Y .Y W .Y W .Y W W W .Y •A-V\= W W .Y I V \\ � �Y `i I �r � � , / O I �\
Q \\ W W W W W W PROPOSED NINE(9)NYSEG OWNED POWER POLES,3 PER " �� ��� Val ` 121
\ 4 W W W W W W W SITE CONNECTION. \ iI 120 0' Revisions
\ I \ �v C
i
\\ \\�� yWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWy � WVW � WWWWWWWWWWWWW Wco \\ > \ \l a \ I I IN$7°16'05"E, No. Date By Description
M \ \ . W W W W W W W W W W . W . W W W W W W W W \ ( 2>0 \� �� O 1 I I I I 1 \ 1 08/30/21 ABG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
J W W W W W W W W W W y y y (• o \ a I -—121 !2� \ 1 I I I I I 234i 33 \ 2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
W,�Y W i W Y . Y Y Y W Y V � 201V n �\ I9
\ I I I I 3 10/6/21 ABG PER TG MILLER COMMENTS
CN
\ \ \ PROPOSED20'DOUBLE 1/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
04
\ \ PROPERTY LINE I SWING BARRIER GATE WITH \ 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
�\ \ \ \ \ I \ I I LOCK AND OPTIONAL ARM 6 11/30/21 ABG PER P01 REVISIONS
3 \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W W WWW W W W W W W W W W I W W\ D-6 \ \ \ I I 1 RUNS ALONG
GATE&POST SAFETY TAPE
\ \ \ \ / \ \ r W W W W I I r \ 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
IW 65"X40"END I I CENTERLINE OF \ KIT. PRODUCED BY BARRIER
y y W PROPOSED NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS y W y y y. INV=1208.00 I II I CREEK \ GATE BRANDS OR \
DRIVE PER DETAIL. y ( I I 1 APPROVED EQUAL.W \ \ \\ AT
_ UNAUTHORIZED ALTERIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
} \ \_ / \ \ VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
\ .Y .Y .Y .Y W .Y W .Y .Y W W W
m \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ I \ \—/ , J / / \ \ \ W W W W W W W W W W W I I I / / / / / ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
Z \ l \ /� \ \ \ % \ _ �� I I I In
o I \ \\ \ l_ ) \ \ \ 1 L/\ \ /\\ \ 1 \ \ \\ //� !� \ \ \__) I ` WW � rz _�� WWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWW O A I I -
( I I III
W .Y W .Y W .Y W .Y W
W Y<
/ T//,/ /A
//
1
0—/1 / 2 3\L W WWA W '/ /W /. W � W . �
T/� 1 - 1 19.12 �- % % % %
y � / , /
\
SITE PLAN
/N // F/ 10k/ OF DANBY
Y . Y J Y W W Y Y Y W Y Y Y W W � 5 5 5 0' cn
w W N /FR0E W W W PROPOSED SIX(6)CUSTOMER OWNED V F/R /2/45/ 0F D DS, PAGEo POWER POLES,2 PER SITE CONNECTION.
\ W W W W N W W W W W W Wg6O Q � LL \ o 484 NORBUT SOLA
RZig � o
L u, ,
I DANBY SITEM V . W W .y .Y W N . . W y .y y .y y .Y W �I Z �/ //
\ \\ \ \ I \ 1 1 \ \\_\ \ _ ---- ----192.96' +k. W N W W I I I \ / I
Q \ \ I I \ I I , f �I ` \ \ \ .Y W W W O 1 11 W W W .Y\ .Y W •Y .Y W ` Town/City: ITHACA
o I �- \ \ \ I I ( \ \ I ( ( ( I , \- S55 1616E W _� W W I \ I �� \\\\\ 1/ I I Count TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
N (- // \ \ \ \ I I \ I I I I \\ \ \ \ \W W 1 W W W WNO°00'00"E W v:
ch \ \ \ \ \ \ I l \\ \ \ \ 1 I I I G E / UG E UGE \ ` \ \ W 133.69 W Y W W W , _ - _- \ I 1 N 11\�� I 1_ /
\ \ \ I I I I I E UGE UGE �G C \ 86.29 Project No.
\ \\ \\ \\ \, \) \I 11 1 I I I I 1 Io; - �JGE UGE UGE / \ c��F \ \\ \�WWW �' WWW �' W �' WWWWWWW �' WWW �' WW - - I \---\ Ip o \
20213129.0001
N \\ \ \\ N \ W W . . W . W . W y W \ I I_ \ 1 W •1 \\I I\ I /
\ \ \ \ 1 O 11I11 I / Drawing No. Sheet No.
M
,MATCH LI N E C 109 � 153.58' , \� y /
o / / \\\ \ \ \ \ 1 I I / / / / \\ \ \\ ��WWWWWWWWWWWWWW I \ 0 I /IIII
c \\ \ I / I /\ / �/ \ ° 1 11 \ POST /
1 / / 1 \ I �' W W� I I(/J11 /
\ \\ \ I I I / / / -_ �� l , \ VCC / S89 53 58 E W W W I \ \ W/WIRE
/ I I 83.28' . W I \ \ \ I III / \- C 110 10
__ —)--T�—�-- I \ r W vG E REMAINS
N —� 89°05'5R'W —� r \ ) I I I 1 1 (� �/W W�\W_ / APPROXIMATE \ �. I ) \ �\
w \ \ J E \ \ UGE G E I UG EI UGIE-` ' \ 1 SO°00'00"E W \ / UNDERGROUND \— (TYPICAL) I \ /I I / (---- Scale:
^ /—\ I \ I \ // // APPROXIMATE LOCATION 11 — 1
\ UG E g UG _ BUG Up E U E UGE UG E I-� l u \ W �\ \ / / W \ \ / \
\T — I UG E UGIE I 52.24 W W W W W W \/ ELECTRIC LINES / \ V�'"�`\\_�/ -- \ \ ///// — �O
U� E I I UG E I I UG E / I O = I �1 W (TYP.)16'16" G�
\— I ? BUTTERMILK CREEK
__ -- r / / I 1 39' \ �c\ �- o o N90°0000"W' / /y/l/tv
\ Date
-- - �, 7 W \. W W \
APPI�OXIMAT \ G UGE UGE SO 00 00 E
O / -- — ----T�-- \ I I 1 / W W W W �W' y 30 FT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT G�� E U$ E ° „ 1 OCTOBER 2021
Z / \ I W W W / \ / F\ UGE UGE 1 106.40' 1 / 1 /\ \ \ \
m-_J- \ I IW W W W l W Wr // _ 27.- _-_-- I✓
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NYSDAM DECOMISSIONING NOTES: 10.• LESS THAN 48-INCHES:ALL UNDERGROUND DIRECT BURIED ELECTRIC SEEDING NOTE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES. WOVEN WIRE FENCE
CONDUCTORS AND CONDUCTORS IN CONDUIT AND
I(.ASSOCIATED CONDUIT WITH LESS THAN 48-INCHES OF COVER MUST BE 50'MIN. EXISTING (MIN. 14 GAUGE
1. DECOMMISSIONING TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING SEED MIXTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION: PAVEMENT W/MAX.6"MESH
REMOVED, BY MEANS OF CAUSING THE LEAST TEMPORARY SEEDING: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN INCLUDED IN THE 3.. S• 10'MAX. TO SPACING)
2. IF THE OPERATION OF THE GENERATION FACILITY IS PERMANENTLY 12.AMOUNT OF DISTURBANCE AS POSSIBLE. RYEGRASS ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL @ 30LBS. PER ACRE OR 0.7 LBS.PER
( ) CONTRACT DOCUMENTS,AND IF NECESSARY,MODIFY THE PLAN WITH THE CONTRACTOR'S 12"MIN.
DISCONTINUED, REMOVE ALL ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES 13.ACCESS ROADS IN AGRICULTURAL AREAS MUST BE REMOVED,UNLESS 1000 SQUARE FEET.
INTENDED SEQUENCE AND TYPES OF OPERATIONS.THE CONTRACTOR'S MODIFIED EROSION AND FILTER �� MOUNTABLE BERM /\ 36"MIN. LENGTH FENCE
3. (INCLUDING PANELS, RACKING,SIGNAGE, EQUIPMENT PAD,SECURITY OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE LANDOWNER.IF ACCESS IS TO PERMANENT SEEDING: EXISTING �� POSTS DRIVEN MIN. 16"
FENCING)AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IF LESS THAN 48- SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL,ALONG WITH GROUND CLOTH PROFILE (OPTIONAL) '; :. ; _. „• ; , INTO GROUND.
14.BE REMOVED,TOPSOIL WILL HAVE TO BE RETURNED FROM RECORDED 65%KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLEND @ 85LBS. PER ACRES OR 2.0-2.6 LBS. PER A PROGRESS SCHEDULE THAT ADDRESSES THIS WORK. _•' . •,; ;,.; �� " ...
4. INCHES DEEP.ALL CONCRETE PIERS, FOOTERS,OR OTHER SUPPORTS MUST BE PROJECT EXCESS NATIVE TOPSOIL DISPOSAL AREAS, IF 1000 SQUARE FEET 50'MIN.
REMOVED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 48-INCHES 15.PRESENT,OR IMPORTED TOPSOIL FREE OF INVASIVE SPECIES THAT IS 20%PERENNIAL RYEGRASS @ 26-35 LBS. PER ACRE OR 0.6-0.8 LBS.PER 1000 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE AN"EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR"FOR .` " ` HEIGHT OF FILTER
5. BELOW THE SOIL SURFACE.THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO CONSISTENT WITH THE QUALITY OF TOPSOIL ON THE AFFECTED SQUARE FEET THE PROJECT.THE SUPERVISOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE EROSION AND •r.:�, . ,, = 16"MIN.
ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS LOCATED AT THE RESPECTIVE RANGE 16.SITE. RESTORE ALL AREAS INTENDED FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, 15%FINE FESCUE @ 19-26 LBS.PER ACRE OR 0.4-0.6 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND FOR INSPECTING AND MAINTAINING THE CONTROL MEASURES. O'MIN. y r •; PASS E R O ASSOCIATES
6. - 4 ACCORDING TO RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE CURRENT FEET THE NAME AND QUALIFICATIONS(TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE)OF THIS INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE GROUNDEXISTING
8"MIN. engineering architecture
DEPTH BELOW THE SURFACE: �� W pp�W v W p� v v
7. 8 INCHES PLUS:ALL UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS AND DIRECT ACCORDING
OR LEASING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCER,AND AS REQUIRED BY FOR ALL SEEDING&STABILIZATION MEASURES IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO STARTING EARTHWORK. ✓
BURIED CONDUCTORS MAY BE ABANDONED IN ANY APPLICABLE PERMIT,THE SOIL AND WATER OWNER& DEVELOPER TO ENSURE THAT FINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS AS 15'MIN. 12 MIN' EXISTING
8. PLACE.APPLICABLE CONDUIT RISERS MUST BE REMOVED,AND ABANDONED 18.CONSERVATION DISTRICT,AND NYSDAM. REQUIRED BY THE NYSDEC.AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 3. THE DESIGNATED"EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR"SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER / PAVEMENT PERSPECTIVE VIEW
CONDUIT MUST BE SEALED OR CAPPED TO IN ADVANCE OF ANY FIELD CHANGES TO THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ��\���`/
19.MONITORING AND RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE TO THE TEMPORARILY CEASES FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A 36"MIN. FENCE PO
9. AVOID A POTENTIAL TO DIRECT SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE ONTO PRIOR SECTIONS OF THESE GUIDELINES,WILL BE REQUIRED TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE. INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.THE ENGINEER MAY REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO PLAN VIEW WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN. 14
NEIGHBORING LAND USES. 20.FOR THE DECOMMISSION ONCE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CEASES PERMANENTLY IN AN AREA,THAT SUBMIT A MODIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO O'MIN. GAUGE W/MAX.6"MESH
AREA WILL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT SEED AND MULCH.AFTER THE IMPLEMENTING ANY FIELD CHANGES. SPACING)WITH FILTER CLOTH 20"MIN.
4. THE SITE SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE GRADED AND MAINTAINED SUCH THAT ALL STORM WATER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
ENTIRE SITE IS STABILIZED,THE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED F� UNDISTURBED
FROM THE SEDIMENT BASIN(s). RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS IS DIVERTED TO SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
CLASS 5 WOODEN POLE.MINIMUM SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE OR DOUGLAS FIR. DEVICES BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE. 1.STONE SIZE- USE 2"STONE,OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. COMPACTED LOW
SOI GROUND
SET 10.0'O.C.ALL POLES TO BE SET PLUMB. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR 5. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SOIL 2 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH WOULD ENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET(EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE A 30 EMBED A MIN OF 6R CLOTH N GROUNDI
16"MIN.
SOLIDLOCK PRO 20 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: DISTURBANCE FOR WHICH THEY ARE INTENDED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL SOILS ARE 3.THICKNESS- NOT LESS THAN TWELVE(12)INCHES. If
PROFESSIONAL STRENGTH FIXED KNOT FENCE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 4.WIDTH - FIFTEEN(15)FOOT MINIMUM,BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS SECTION VIEW
OR APPROVED EQUAL
1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 6. UNDER NO CONDITION SHALL DISCONTINUED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN AREAS WITH SOIL WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS.TWENTY-FOUR(24)FOOT IF SINGLE ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
K/ 2. CONSTRUCT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. DISTURBANCES BE LEFT FOR A PERIOD OF GREATER THAN 7 DAYS WITHOUT TEMPORARILY TO SITE.
5. FILTER CLOTH -WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE.
3. GRADE IMPROVEMENTS AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE.AREAS WHERE STABILIZING THOSE AREAS WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH.MAINTENANCE OF THOSE b.SURFACE WATER-ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD 1.WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY CEASES FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS AREAS SHALL INCLUDE RESEEDING AND REMULCHING AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS OR STAPLES. POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER"T"OR"U"TYPE OR HARDWOOD.
WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 7 DAYS SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS.THERE SHALL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR RESEEDING IMPRACTICAL,A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE
OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE. AND REMULCHING. 7.MAINTENANCE-THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24"AT TOP AND MID SECTION.
4. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 10 DAYS AFTER FINAL GRADING, PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY,ALL FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 14 GAUGE,6"MAXIMUM MESH OPENING.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RESEED IF GRADING IS NO WET OR FRESH CONCRETE, LEACHATE,MATERIAL,OR DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ESCAPE SEDIMENT SPILLED,DROPPED,WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY 3.WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER-
UNSATISFACTORY. INTO A WATER BODY OR WETLAND, NOR SHALL WASHINGS FROM CONCRETE TRUCKS,MIXERS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X,
5. UPON APPROVAL OF THE TOWN, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION OR OTHER DEVICES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER A WATER BODY OR WETLAND.ANY MATERIAL OR 8.WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED,IT SHALL BE DONE ON A AREA STABILIZED WITH STONE MIRAFI IOOX,STABILINKA T140N,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
CONTROLS. DEBRIS ACCIDENTALLY DROPPED INTO THE CHANNEL SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY AND COMPLETELY AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB,ENVIROFENCE,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.
6. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED BASED REMOVED AND DEPOSITED IN AN UPLAND AREA. 9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH
UPON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AOBE.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RAIN 5.MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN
FOR THIS COST IN HIS CONTRACT. 7. AT THE VERY MINIMUM, EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. EROSION "BULGES"DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SILTATION AND CONTROL MAY CONSIST OF SEDIMENT TRAPS AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL FENCES. THE
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FROM INSTALLATION THROUGH CONTRACTOR AND THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INTEGRITY,MAINTENANCE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT FENCE DETAIL
MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL AFTER REVEGETATION HAS BEEN AND REMOVAL OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL NO LONGER DEEMED NECESSARY BY
ESTABLISHED. THE TOWN OR IT'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM SEWER N.T.S. N.T.S. GUNDERMAN ROAD 12�
8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL METHODS WILL BE DESIGNED AND SYSTEM UNTIL THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN AND OWNER.
INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NEW YORK
STATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL o
a
z
m
0
PROJECT o
LOCATION
Town of Danby
irk LOCATION SKETCH
Client:
GENERAL NOTES: N O R L.J U T SOLAR
1. USE OF THIS DETAIL/CRITERION IS LIMITED TO ACCESS ROADS USED ON AN OCCASIONAL BASIS
ONLY(I.E. PROVIDE ACCESS FOR MOWING, EQUIPMENT REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE, ETC.). 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE.
2. LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD IS LIMITED TO LOW IMPACT IRREGULAR MAINTENANCE VARIES(24'MAX.)
ACCESS ASSOCIATED WITH RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS IN NEW YORK STATE. R O C H ES T E R, NY 14607
3. REMOVE STUMPS, ROCKS AND DEBRIS AS NECESSARY. FILL VOIDS TO MATCH EXISTING NATIVE
SOILS AND COMPACTION LEVEL .v w
4. REMOVED TOPSOIL MAY BE SPREAD IN ADJACENT AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT 'I'
ENGINEER. COMPACT TO THE DEGREE OF THE NATIVE INSITU SOIL. DO NOT PLACE IN AN AREA �, �, GRAVEL MATERIAL EXISTING GRADE
THAT IMPEDES STORMWATER DRAINAGE. CUT LINE EXISTING
VARIES(24'MAX.) GRADE
5. GRADE ROADWAY, WHERE NECESSARY, TO NATIVE SOIL AND DESIRED ELEVATION.MINOR
GRADING FOR CROSS SLOPE CUT AND FILL MAY BE REQUIRED. W W FILL CUT AREA WITH PA S S E RO ASSOCIATES
W W GRAVEL MATERIAL
6. REMOVE REFUSE SOILS AS DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. DO NOT PLACE IN AN AREA io
FENCE SUPPORT POLE INSTALLATION DETAIL THAT IMPEDES ST 7. ROADWAY WIDTH TO BE TO
DER DRAINAGE. 2$SLOPE -
DETERMINED BY CLIENT. W MAX. = p /\�j% 242 West Main Street Suite 100 (585)325-1000
W W 1 ` 1 _ - \\ \\ RESTORE EXPOSED Rochester,New York 14614 Fax:(585)325-1691
N.T.S. 8. THE LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2%IN MOST CASES AND GEOGRID MATERIAL SOILS. INSTALL
SHOULD NOT EXCEED 6M THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF THE ACCESS DRIVE SHOULD NOT \ � I \��\��\��\�� \\�\ j\ EROSION CONTROL
EXCEED 15Y> - r- W W / / / / �' .//� /�/�/�
/ / �/� REMOVE EXISTING / /� MATTING AS REQUIRED. Principal-in-Charge J255 SUd01, PE
W W ,\\/\\��\
9. LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD S NOT INTENDED TO BE UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION SOILS AS NEEDED Project Manager David Cox, PE
WHICH MAY SUBJECT THE ACCESS TO SEDIMENT TRACKING. THIS SPECIFICATION IS TO BE W W FILL MATH REMOVED I g
DEVELOPED FOR POST CONSTRUCTION USE. SOIL RESTORATION PRACTICES MAY BE APPLICABLE NATIVE SOIL, COMPACTED EXISTING INSTALL CHECK DAMS OR
TO RESTORE CONSTRUCTION RELATED COMPACTION TO PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SHOULD 'I' TO MATCH EXISTING SOILS SUBGRADE GEOGRID UNDER ANCHORED STABILIZATION Designed b Austin Goodwin, EIT.
BE VERIFIED BY SOIL PENETROMETER READINGS. THE PENETROMETER READINGS SHALL BE „ AND STABILIZED WITH GEOWEB
GEOWEB SYSTEM. MATERIAL IN DRAINAGE g y
COMPARED TO THE RESPECTIVE RECORDED READINGS TAKEN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,EVERY LIMITED USE ACCESS ROAD GEOTEXTLE FABRIC TO CHANNEL
100 LINEAR FEET ALONG THE PROPOSED ROADWAY. TO BE FLUSH WITH ANCHORED MATTING BE USED IN PLACID
ENTRANCE AND MATCH SECTION SOIL AREAS ONLY
10.TO ENSURE THAT SOIL IS NOT TRACKED ONTO THE LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD,IT EXISTING ELEVATION
SHALL NOT BE USED BY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES TRANSPORTING SOIL,FILL MATERIAL, ETC. IF PLAN NOTE:
THE LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS IS COMPLETED DURING THE INITIAL PHASES OF
1. THE ROADSIDE DITCH SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW
CONSTRUCTION, A STANDARD NEW YORE STATE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS SHALL BE VARIES(24'MAX.) STATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND
O rc
�/ II
CONSTRUCTED AND UTILIZED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES AND EXISTING SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR GRASSED AND VEGETATED WATERWAYS. ADDITIONALAL DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED SPECIFIC TO THE SITE DESIGN. /
EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO ENTERING THE LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD FROM ANY LOCATION EXISTING GRADE GRADE NW EL D
ON,OR OFF SITE. MAINTENANCE OF THE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD WILL BE REQUIRED IF z CUT LINE - LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD - 10% AND GREATER SLOPES WITH DITCH rr.�`.,Y_ O S
SEDIMENT IS OBSERVED WITHIN THE CLEAN STONE. O0 ` SCALE:N.T.S. vJ
C 11. THE LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED OR USED UNTIL ALL
3 AREAS SUBJECT TO RUNOFF ONTO THE PERVIOUS ACCESS HAVE ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION.
p 12.PROJECTS SHOULD AVOID INSTALLATION OF THE LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD IN i�j� / j/�\�\��/\\�j\�j\�j\ �\ \\/ r
O POORLY DRAINED AREAS, HOWEVER IF NO ALTERNATIVE LOCATION IS AVAILABLE, THE PROJECT ,(\
0 SHALL UTILIZE WOVEN GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL AS DETAILED IN FOLLOWING NOTES. FILL CUT AREA WITH EXISTING � J
C 13. THE DRAINAGE DITCH IS OFFERED IN THE DETAIL FOR CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN CONCENTRATED
GRAVEL MATERIAL SUBGRADE GEOGRID MATERIAL
FLOW COULD NOT BE AVOIDED. THE INTENTION OF THIS DESIGN IS TO MINIMIZE ALTERATIONS TO LP G
D HYDROLOGY,HOWEVER WHEN DEALING WITH 5%-15R GRADES NOT PARALLEL TO THE CONTOUR, FO 23"J
Q A ROADSIDE DITCH MAY BE REQUIRED. THE NYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS AND VEGETATED WATERWAYS ARE
APPLICABLE FOR SIZING AND STABILIZATION. DIMENSIONS FOR THE GRASSED WATERWAY LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD - 0% TO 10% SLOPES F �"
SPECIFICATION WOULD BE DESIGNED FOR PROJECT SPECIFIC HYDROLOGIC RUNOFF CALCULATIONS, 1
d AND A SEPARATE DETAIL FOR THE SPECIFIC GRASSED WATERWAY WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THIS SCALE:N.T.S.
00 PRACTICE. RUNOFF DISCHARGES WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE OUTLET REQUIREMENTS OF THE
M REFERENCED STANDARD. INCREASED POST-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF FROM THE ASSOCIATED
ROADSIDE DITCH MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES TO ATTENUATE RUNOFF TO
PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS.
14.IF A ROADSIDE DITCH IS NOT UTILIZED TO CAPTURE RUNOFF FROM THE ACCESS ROAD,THE Revisions
PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD WILL HAVE A WELL-ESTABLISHED PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER,N No. Date By Description
WHICH SHALL CONSIST OF UNIFORM VEGETATION (I.E. BUFFER),20 FEET WIDE AND PARALLEL TO
10 THE DOWN GRADIENT SIDE OF THE ACCESS ROAD. POST-CONSTRUCTION OPERATION AND
N MAINTENANCE PRACTICES WILL MAINTAIN THIS VEGETATIVE COVER TO ENSURE FINAL 1 08/30/21 ABG ACCESS DRIVE MOVE PER CLIENT
STABILIZATION FOR THE LIFE OF THE ACCESS ROAD.
2 09/24/21 ABG PER TOMPKINS COUNTY SOIL & WATER
15.THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MUST ACCOUNT FOR THE LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD IN 21 ABG PER TG MILLER COMMENTS6
THEIR SITE ASSESSMENT/HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS. IF THE HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT THE 3 10/ /
HYDROLOGY HAS BEEN ALTERED FROM PRE- TO POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS(SEE 4 11/01/21 ABG PER SHPO COMMENTS
G APPENDIX A OF GP-0-15-002 FOR THE DEFINITION OF"ALTER THE HYDROLOGY..."), THE ISOMETRIC
J DESIGN MUST INCLUDE THE NECESSARY DETENTION/RETENTION PRACTICES TO ATTENUATE THE n 5 11/08/21 ABG PER BME WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
RATES(10 AND 100 YEAR EVENTS)TO PRE-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS.
6 11/30/21 ABG PER POI REVISIONS
GEOGRID MATERIAL NOTES:
08 1. THE GEOGRID, OR COMPARABLE PRODUCT, IS INTENDED FOR USE FOR ALL CONDITIONS, IN
VARIES(24'MAX.) 7 12/01/21 ABG PER INCLUSION OF TCSW WETLANDS
IiJ ORDER TO ASSIST IN MATERIAL SEPARATION FROM NATIVE SOILS AND PRESERVE ACCESS LOADS. ISOMETRIC
0 2. GRAVEL FILL MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF 1-4"CLEAN,DURABLE, SHARP-ANGLED CRUSHED o �,.
STONE OF UNIFORM QUALITY, MEETING THE SPECIFICATIONS OF NYSDOT ITEM 703-02, SIZE _ \� �. `V 7y UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN
DESIGNATION 3-5 OF TABLE 703-4. STONE MAY BE PLACED IN FRONT OF, AND SPREAD WITH,
co A TRACKED VEHICLE. GRAVEL SHALL NOT BE COMPACTED. �, 8 VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND
'� /`� �' �'
Z m / m GRAVEL MATERIAL (Js ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307.THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED
Q 3. GEOGRID SHALL BE MIRAFI BXG110 OR APPROVED EQUAL. GEOGRID SHALL BE DESIGNED BASED �'<\ j�,' m ISSUED AS FINAL os/zo/zoie
G ON EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED HAUL ROAD SLOPES. O} No. REVISION DATE
COLLAPSED
N 4. IF MORE THAN ONE ROLL`WIDTH IS REQUIRED, ROLLS SHOULD OVERLAP A MINIMUM OF SIX
INCHES.
5. REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION FOR PROPER TYING AND CONNECTIONS. NOTES R lJC DETAILS
v- u
`i 6. LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE TOP DRESSED AS REQUIRED WITH ONLY 1-4" PLAN
fN CRUSHED STONE MEETING NYSDOT ITEM 703-02 SPECIFICATIONS. W W GEOWEB SYSTEM
LU W
0 BASIS OF DESIGN: TENCATE MIRAR BXG110 GEOGRIDS; 365 SOUTH HOLLAND DRIVE, PENDERGRASS, y W W
O GA;800-685-9990 OR 706-693-2226; WWW.MIRAFI.COM
GEOWEB MATERIAL NOTES: W W W W TRC N O R B U T SOLAR
1. THE GEOWEB, OR COMPARABLE PRODUCT, IS SUGGESTED FOR USE ON ROAD PROFILES .v N G� TRC Engineers,Inc.
EXCEEDING 1OX THE GEOWEB PRODUCT IS INTENDED TO LIMIT SHIFTING STONE MATERIAL 0 215 Greenfield Parkway
m DURING USE. PERVIOUS ROAD BE �V�, Liverpool,NY 13088 D A N B Y SITE
FLUSH MATH ENTRANCE AND
p 2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION -trcwmpanies.com
Q
L) 3. WHERE REQUIRED, A NATIVE SOIL WEDGE SHALL BE PLACED TO ACCOMMODATE ROAD CROSS PLAN
SLOPE OF 2X NATIVE SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MATCH EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS. -
�j 4. GRAVEL FILL MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF 1-4"CLEAN,DURABLE, SHARP-ANGLED CRUSHED w
STONE OF UNIFORM QUALITY, MEETING THE SPECIFICATIONS OF NYSDOT ITEM 703-02, SIZE VARIES(24'MAX.) EXISTING o 00 Town/City: ITHACA DESIGNATION 3-5 OF TABLE 703-4. STONE MAY BE PLACED IN FRONT OF, AND SPREAD WITH, GRADE
A TRACKED VEHICLE. GRAVEL SHALL NOT BE COMPACTED.
O EXISTING GRADE ?V
0` 5. GEOWEB SYSTEM SHALL BE PRESTO GEOSYSTEM GEOWEB OR APPROVED EQUAL. GEOWEB SHALL CUT LINE County: TOMPKINS State: NEW YORK
N BE DESIGNED BASED ON EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED HAUL ROAD SLOPES. cD I�
=y 2%SLOPE QP Project No.
6. LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE TOP DRESSED AS REQUIRED WITH ONLY 1-4" ���� RESTORE EXPOSED }
N 1 CRUSHED STONE, SIZE 3A, MEETING NYSDOT ITEM 703-02 SPECIFICATIONS. MAX' _ _ SOILS.\\ \ `\ EROSION CONTROL
ekpgN
7. THE TOP EDGES OF ADJACENT CELL WALLS SHALL BE FLUSH WHEN CONNECTING. ALIGN THE - C \\ MATTING AS REQUIRED. CFO 20213129.0001
0. I-SLOTS FOR AND PANELS SHLL BE
CONNECTED WITH ATRAFKEYS ATDEACCHE ND NTERLEADCAND END TO END THE GEOWECONNECTIONSA REFER TO //�\/�\/�\ \/��/��//�\/�\\.\/�\\/�\�•�\//� / GEOGRID UNDER GEOWES
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION FOR PROPER INSTALLATION, TYING AND CONNECTIONS. \\ ��\�\\ SYSTEM. GEOTEXTILE
M GEOWEB SYSTEM FABRIC TO BE USED IN DrawingNo. Sheet No.
N BASIS OF DESIGN: PRESTO GEOSYSTEMS GEOWEB; 670 NORTH PERKINS STREET, APPLETON, WI; FILL CUT AREA REMOVE PLACID SOIL AREAS
p 800-548-3424 OR 920-738-1222; INFOOPRESTOGEO.COM; FILL WITH REMOVED WITH GRAVEL EXISTING SOILS ONLY DRAWING TITLE
N WWW.PRESTOGEO.COM NATIVE SOIL, COMPACTED EXISTING MATERIAL AS NEEDED
TO MATCH EXISTING SOILS SUBGRADE AND STABILIZED WITH PERFORATED STRIP WITHISLOT LIMITED USE PERVIOUS C 201 I 11
p WOVEN GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL NOTES: ANCHORED MATTING SECTION EXPANDED PERSEPECTIVE ACCESS ROAD DETAIL
N
1. SPECIFIED GEOTEXTILE WILL ONLY BE UTILIZED IN PLACID SOILS. PLACID SOILS CONSIST OF Scale:
3 POORLY DRAINED SOILS COMPOSED OF FINELY TEXTURED PARTICLES AND ARE PRONE TO LIMITED USE PERVIOUS ACCESS ROAD - 10% AND GREATER SLOPES GEOWEB SYSTEM SCALE: N.T.S.
W RUTTING. PLACID SOILS ARE TYPICALLY PRESENT IN LOW-LYING AREAS WITH HYDROLOGIC SOILS w DATE: 05/17/2019
I\VI /, 1/
Z GROUP(HSG)OF C OR D, OR AS sponED FROM AN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST, SOIL J SCALE:N.T.S. •r SCALE:N.T.S. �,\
N SCIENTIST, OR GEOTECHNICAL DATA. DRAWN BY: CAK
H
(U 2. THE CONCERN FOR POTENTIAL REDUCTION OF NATIVE INFILTRATION RATES DUE TO THE CHECKED BY: SML
W GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL WOULD NOT BE A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN IN POORLY DRAINED SOILS
PROJECT: Date
WHERE SEGREGATION OF PERVIOUS STONE AND NATIVE MATERIALS IS CRUCIAL FOR LONG TERM
0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. DRAWING NO.:
IL BASIS OF DESIGN: TENCATE MN DER RS S,SERIES WOVEN 9990GEOSYNTHETICS; 365 SOUTH W.MIRAD
OCTOBER 2021
} DRIVE, PENDERGRASS, GA;800-685-9990 OR 706-693-2226; WWW.MIRAFI.COM
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Federal Wetland Delineation Report
for
Norbut Solar Danby Site
Town of Danby Tompkins County New York
Prepared for:
Norbut Solar Farms
1241 University Avenue
Rochester,NY 14607
Prepared by:
' 1 ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS • -SUPWEYORS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
10 Lift Bridge Lane East
Fairport,NY 14450
(585) 377-7360
BME Project No. 2089-104
November 2021
Danby Site Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction...................................................................................................................................................I
AgencyResource Information......................................................................................................................I
Methodology.................................................................................................................................................2
SiteEcology..................................................................................................................................................4
WaterResource Descriptions........................................................................................................................5
Conclusions.................................................................................................................................................12
References...................................................................................................................................................13
Appendices
Appendix A Exhibits
Exhibits I — Aerial Site Location Map
Exhibits 2— USGS Quadrangle
Exhibits 3— USFWS National Wetlands Inventory
Exhibits 4— NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper
Exhibits 5— NRCS Soil Survey
Exhibits 6— Aerial Wetland Delineation Map
Exhibits 7— Photo Location Map
Appendix B Site Photographs
Appendix C Data Forms
Danby Site Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
INTRODUCTION
Norbut Solar Farms contracted BME Associates (BME) to examine and delineate wetlands on a
± 125-acre area of interest located west of Danby Rd in the Town of Danby, Tompkins County,
New York (Appendix A, Exhibit 1). The site includes tax parcel number 10-1-21.122 and a
portion of 10-1-19.12. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination is requested for the
subject site.
The presence and location of wetlands and streams were determined using methods established
in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, 2012 Northeast Regional
Supplement, 2018 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, and other appropriate
guidelines. The results of the delineation study are contained in this report.
AGENCY RESOURCE INFORMATION
Prior to initiating the field wetland delineation study, BME reviewed the following background
information:
• GIS Aerial Photo of the Site (Exhibit 1)—The site consists of undeveloped land including
natural forest cover, successional shrubland, grassland, and areas of food plots. The site is
located west of Danby Rd and northwest of Bald Hill Rd. Surrounding land use is mainly
agricultural and residential.
• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Quadrangle 7.5-minute topographic series was used to
determine possible drainage patterns and the presence of streams and other water bodies
(see Exhibit 2). The USGS map indicates that the site is sloped in the eastern direction.
The USGS topographic map shows wetland symbols in the northern parcel within the
area of interest. A stream is shown in the eastern portion of the site within the larger
parcel as well as a stream at the southwest corner of the property and a perennial stream
(Buttermilk Creek) is shown running through the east portion of the parcel parallel to
Danby Rd as well.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map was used to
locate any mapped Federal wetlands on the site. The NWI map shows two wetlands, both
Norbut Solar Danby Site 1 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
classified as PEM1C. A small freshwater pond is also shown within the area of interest.
Additionally, three streams are shown within the site boundaries.
• New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Environmental
Resource Mapper was used to determine the presence of any mapped NYSDEC wetlands
on the project site (see Exhibit 4). The resource mapper does not show any mapped state
wetlands on site, however it does show streams in the northeastern portion of the area of
interest as well as in the southwest corner.
• The Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey was used to locate any
hydric soils, or soils with potential hydric inclusions (see Exhibit 5). The soils map
indicates the presence of the following soils within the site (Area of Interest):
Summary by Map Unit—Tompkins County,New York(NY109)
Collapse Summary by Map Unit Tompkins County,New York(NY109)
Map unit Map unit name Acres in Percent of
symbol Rig AOI AOI
BgC Bath and Valois soils, 5 to 15 percent slopes 0 6.2 5.0%
EbB Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes 5 42.1 33.7%
EcA Chippewa and Alden soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes 90 0.7 0.6%
ErA Erie-Chippewa channery silt loams, 0 to 3 percent 35 1.8 1.4%
slopes
HdC Howard gravelly loam, 5 to 15 percent simple 0 0.1 0.1%
slopes
LaB Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent 0 58.7 46.9%
slopes
LaB3 Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent 0 3.1 2.5%
slopes, eroded
MaC Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 0 0.2 0.1%
RhA Red Hook gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes 0 9.2 7.4%
Ws Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, 90 3.0 2.4%
frequently flooded
Totals for Area of Interest 125.2 100.0%
Norbut Solar Danby Site 2 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
METHODOLOGY
BME conducted the federal wetland delineation for the site according to methods described in
the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, and the 2012 North
Central and Northeast Region Supplement. Atypical Situation methods were not utilized. The
2018 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Wetland Plant List was utilized for wetland
indicator status while the USDA, NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States was
utilized for hydric soil identification. A general survey of the site was conducted to determine the
presence of waters of the U.S. and potential wetland areas. Where potential wetlands were found,
pairs of sample points were established to document soil and hydrological conditions in both the
upland and wetland communities. A pair of sample points were taken at the wetlands, along with
additional upland sampling points to support the location and extent of any wetlands. Site
hydrology was evaluated by looking for and noting wetland hydrology indicators. Soils were
evaluated by comparing soils taken from the sample sites with the Munsell Soil Color Charts (X-
Rite Incorporated, Revised 2009), as well as evaluating additional hydric soil indicators. Soils
were tested along wetland boundaries to aid in determining accurate wetland limits.
At each data sampling location, a list of dominant plants was documented and the percent cover
for each species was estimated. Generally, a 5-foot radius from the sampling point was used to
define herbaceous plants within the plant community, a 30-foot radius was used to define trees
and woody vines, and a 15-foot radius to define shrubs and saplings. The "dominance measure
methods" outlined in the 1987 Federal Delineation Manual (Federal Interagency Committee for
Wetland Delineation 1987) and the 2012 Northcentral and Northeast Region Supplement were
used to determine the presence of wetland vegetation while the 2018 U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers National Wetland Plant List was utilized for plant identification and determination of
wetland plant indicator status.
Sample point locations and wetland boundaries were marked in the field by flags for
identification by GPS equipment. The field survey of wetland points was completed by BME
Associates. All delineated wetland boundaries and sample point locations are shown on Exhibits
6 and 7, and site photograph locations are shown on Exhibit 8 in Appendix A. Site photographs
can be found in Appendix B, and data forms can be found in Appendix C.
Norbut Solar Danby Site 3 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
SITE ECOLOGY
General upland plant communities on the site include primarily mature wooded upland (rich
mesophytic forest), successional shrubland, and successional field. General wetland plant
communities consist of emergent wetland (shallow emergent marsh), and shrub swamp (Shrub
Carr).
Rich mesophytic forest
The forested areas on site are dominated primarily by mature hardwoods, saplings, and shrubs
with some understory herbs. Common tree species within these areas include mature trees such
as silver maple (Acer saccharinum), red maple (Acer rubrum), white ash (Fraxinus americana),
American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red oak (Quercus rubra), black cherry (Prunus serotina),
and common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica). Understory shrubs and herbs include multiflora
rose (Rosa multiflora), honeysuckles (Lonicera spp.), white avens (Geum canadense), Canada
goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), and dandelion(Taraxacum officinale).
Successional Shrubland
Shrubby upland areas on site are co-dominantly vegetated by grasses, forbs, and upland shrub
species. Common shrub species within these areas include multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartia), and honeysuckles (Lonicera spp.). Grasses and forbs
that dominate these areas include big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), Canada goldenrod
(Solidago canadensis), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), spotted knapweed (Centaurea
stoebe), and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale).
Successional Field
The open field areas on site are dominated primarily by grasses and forbs with some upland
shrub species. Common shrub species within these areas include multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora) and honeysuckles (Lonicera spp.). Grasses and forbs that dominate these areas
include big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), grass-
leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia), and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale).
Shrub Swamp (Shrub Carr.)
Shrubby wetland areas on site are dominated by willows (Salix spp.) and shrub species such as
red-osier dogwood (Corpus sericea) and silky dogwood (Cornus amomum). Dominant herbs
Norbut Solar Danby Site 4 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
include emergent species such as sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), wool grass (Scirpus
cyperinus), and Joe-pye weed(Eutrochium purpureum).
Shallow Emergent Marsh
The western portion of Wetland `B" consists of shallow emergent marsh comprised of mucky
soils that are vegetated primarily by narrow-leaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), sensitive fern
(Onoclea sensibilis), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia
graminifolia), common rush (Juncus effusus), and sedges (Carex spp.).
WATER RESOURCE DESCRIPTIONS
The site includes fourteen(14) delineated wetlands and five (5) streams (see exhibit 6).
Table 1. Water Resource Summary
Name Identification Size OHWM Flow Regime Lat. and Long.
(within site) Dimensions
Wetland"A" PEM 0.27 AC - - 42.3531
-76.4871
Wetland "B" PEM 0.09 AC - - 42.3517,
-76.4879
Wetland"C" PEM 0.04 AC - - 42.3520,
-76.4880
Wetland"D" PFO 0.06 AC - - 42.3538,
-76.4844
Wetland"E" PSS/PEM 2.00 AC - - 42.3546,
-76.4836
Wetland"F" PEM 0.62 AC - - 42.3506,
-76.4943
Wetland"G" PEM 0.07 AC - - 42.3508,
-76.4935
Wetland"H" PEM 0.69 AC - - 42.3508,
-76.4990
Norbut Solar Danby Site 5 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
Wetland"I" PEM 0.03 AC _ _ 42.3518,
-76.4965
Wetland"J" PEM 0.18 AC - - 42.3516,
-76.4946
Wetland"K" PEM 0.14 AC _ - 42.3522,
-76.4935
Wetland"L" PEM 0.07 AC _ - 42.3524,
-76.4953
Wetland PEM 0.07 AC _ _ 42.3529,
"M" -76.4959
Wetland"N" PEM 0.10 AC - _ 42.3534,
-76.4969
620 LF
Stream"A" - 2,810 LF
5-10' wide ephemeral, 42.3510,
1-3' deep ±2,190 LF -76.4919
intermittent
Stream "B" - 555 LF * 1-2' deep 3-5' widep 42.3547 perennial -76.4827
* 18"wide, 42.3518
Stream "C" - 750 LF OHWM not Ephemeral -76.4966
detectable
Stream"D" - 100 LF 3' wide� 1' deep 42.3503 Ephemeral -76.4994
Stream"E" - 930 LF 6-12" deep 4-6' widep 42.3499 Ephemeral _76.4997
SITE WETLANDS:
Wetland"A" (Area=± 0.27 AC)
Wetland"A" is an emergent floodplain wetland located in the eastern portion of the site. This
wetland is shown on the National Wetlands Inventory and classified as PEM IC. Soils are
mapped as Wayland Soils Complex with a hydric rating of 90. Hydrology originates from
Norbut Solar Danby Site 6 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
surface runoff as well as water from Stream A. There was± 8" of standing water at times of site
visits in October and November. Wetland hydrology included saturation and standing water. The
dominant vegetation in this wetland includes willows (Salix spp.), dogwoods (Cornus spp.),
sensitive fern(Onoclea sensibilis) and narrow-leaf cattail (Typha angustifolia).
Wetland`B" (Area=f 0.09 AC)
Wetland `B" is an emergent wetland pocket located south of a road path in the eastern portion of
the area of interest. This wetland is separated from Wetland C through a culvert at the north end,
which conveys water between the two in the northern direction. This wetland is shown on the
National Wetlands Inventory as a freshwater pond. This was a man-made farm pond which has
not been maintained and therefore has overgrown with hydrophytic vegetation including rice-cut
grass (Leersia oryzoides), grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia), and willows (Salix
spp.). There was standing water in this wetland during site visits. Soils in this wetland are
mapped as Langord channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes with a hydric rating of 0. There was
± 10" of standing water at times of site visits in November.
Wetland"C" (Area=± 0.04 AC)
Wetland "C" is a small emergent wetland pocket located north of a path in the eastern portion of
the area of interest. This wetland is connected to Wetland `B" via a culvert located at its south
end. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Langord channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes with a
hydric rating of 0. There was ± 6" of standing water at times of site visits in November.
Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), narrow-leaf
cattail (Typha angustifolia), and rice-cut grass (Leersia oryzoides).
Wetland"D" (Area=± 0.06 AC)
Wetland"D" is a small emergent/shrub swamp wetland pocket located in the northeastern parcel
of the area of interest adjacent to the southern boundary line of the parcel. Soils in this wetland
are mapped as Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes with a hydric rating of 0. There
was ± 8" of standing water at times of site visits in November. Dominant vegetation in this
wetland includes dogwoods (Cornus spp.) and sensitive fern(Onoclea sensibilis).
Norbut Solar Danby Site 7 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
Wetland"E" (Area=±2.00 AC)
Wetland "E" is located in the northeastern parcel in the area of interest. Soils in this wetland are
mapped as Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes with a hydric rating of 0, Erie
channery silt loam with a hydric rating of 5, and Wayland Soils Complex with a hydric rating of
90. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas. There
was ± 3" of standing water at times of site visits. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes
dogwoods (Corpus spp.), buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), pussy willow (Salix discolor), red-
top grass (Agrostis gigantea), and joe-pye weed (Eutrochium purpureum). This wetland is
classified as emergent/scrub shrub.
Wetland"F" (Area=± 0.62 AC)
Wetland "F" is in the southern portion of the site. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie
channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a hydric rating of 5. Hydrology of this wetland
originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas. There was ± 6" of standing water at
times of site visits. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sedges (Carex spp.), narrowleaf
cattail (Typha angustifolia), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), and common rush (Juncus effusus).
Based on field observations, this wetland appears to be isolated and may not be jurisdictional,
subject to USACE final determination.
Wetland"G" (Area=± 0.07 AC)
Wetland "G" is a small wetland pocket (former farm pond) located in the southern portion of the
site. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a
hydric rating of 5. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding
upland areas. This wetland was a man-made farm pond which has overgrown over the years with
hydrophytic vegetation. There was ± 2" of standing water at times of site visits. Dominant
vegetation in this wetland includes wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), reed canary (Phalaris
arundinacea), and common rush (Juncus effusus). Based on field observations, this wetland
appears to be isolated and may not be jurisdictional, subject to USACE final determination.
Wetland"H" (Area=± 0.69 AC)
Wetland "H" is an emergent wetland (wetland meadow) located in the western portion of the
site. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a
Norbut Solar Danby Site 8 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
hydric rating of 5. There was no standing water at times of site visits. However, soils were
saturated. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas.
There is a small ephemeral stream located south of the wetland which carries water and
contributes to its hydrology (Stream D). Wetland H drains northeast by overland flow which is
then culverted into an ephemeral stream. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sensitive
fern(Onoclea sensibilis), narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus),
and Hairy willow-herb (Epilobium hirsutum).
Wetland"I" (Area=± 0.03 AC)
Wetland "I" is a small emergent wetland pocket located in the center portion of the area of
interest. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a
hydric rating of 5. There was ± 6" of standing water at times of site visits. Hydrology of this
wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas as well as overflow/drainage
from ephemeral Stream C during rain events. This wetland is an old farm pond which has since
overgrown with hydrophytic vegetation due to lack of maintenance. Dominant vegetation in this
wetland includes sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), and
grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia).
Wetland"J" (Area=± 0.18 AC)
Wetland "J" is a wetland pocket located in the center portion of the area of interest. Soils in this
wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a hydric rating of 5.
Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas. There was
± 12" of standing water at times of site visits. This wetland is an old man-made farm pond which
was not maintained and has since grown an abundance of hydrophytic vegetation. There is a
culvert directing pond overflow to Stream "A". Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes
willows (Salix spp.), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia),
and grass-leaved goldenrod(Euthamia graminifolia).
Wetland"K" (Area=± 0.14 AC)
Wetland "K" is an old man-made farm pond which has overgrown with emergent vegetation.
Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a hydric
rating of 5. There was± 4-20" of standing water at times of site visits. Hydrology of this wetland
originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas to the west. Dominant vegetation in
Norbut Solar Danby Site 9 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
this wetland includes willows (Salix spp.), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), reed canary
(Phalaris arundinacea), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), and grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia
graminifolia). This wetland appears to be isolated and may be non jurisdictional, subject to
USACE final determination.
Wetland"L" (Area=± 0.07 AC)
Wetland "L" is a wetland pocket located at the conjunction of Stream C and Stream A in the
center portion of the area of interest. There was ± 3" of standing water at times of site visits in
November. Hydrology of this wetland originates from the adjacent stream as well as
runoff/drainage from surrounding upland and wetland areas to the northwest. This wetland drains
to the southeast through Stream "A." Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes willows
(Salix spp.) and sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis).
Wetland"M" (Area=± 0.07 AC)
Wetland "M" is a wetland pocket located in the northern portion of the area of interest. There
was ± 2" of standing water at times of site visits in November. Hydrology of this wetland
originates from runoff/drainage from surrounding upland and wetland areas to the north and
northwest. This wetland drains to the southeast through the ephemeral portion of Stream "A."
Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), reed canary
(Phalaris arundinacea), calico aster (Symphyotrichum lateriflorum), and moneywort
(Lysimachia nummularia).
Wetland"N" (Area=± 0.10 ACC
Wetland"N" is a wetland pocket located in the northern portion of the area of interest. There was
± 3" of standing water at times of site visits in November. Hydrology of this wetland originates
from runoff/drainage from surrounding upland to the north and west. This wetland drains
southeast through the ephemeral portion of Stream "A" to Wetland "M." Dominant vegetation
in this wetland includes reed canary (Phalaris arundinacea), joe-pye weed (Eutrochium
purpureum), and green ash (Fraxinus pensylvanica).
Norbut Solar Danby Site 10 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
STREAMS IN AREA OF INTEREST:
Stream"A" (±2,810 LF)
Stream "A" runs through a large portion of the area of interest. This stream runs through
Wetlands "M" and "L" in the southeast direction, starting from the southeast corner of Wetland
"N." The stream has an ephemeral flow regime from the northeast corner until approximately
120 feet southeast of Wetland "L" where the stream becomes more defined and has more of an
intermittent flow regime. This stream continues southeast and then bends and flows in the
northeast direction into Wetland "A" in the northeastern portion of the site. Stream "A" is f 620
LF ephemeral stream and ± 2,190 LF of intermittent stream. This stream varies in dimension
from± 5-10 feet wide, to ± 1-3 feet deep.
Stream"B" (± 555 LF)
Stream `B" is a perennial stream which runs through the northeastern parcel within the area of
interest. This stream runs in the northern direction. This stream varies in dimension from ± 3-5
feet wide and f 1-2 feet deep at OHWM.
Stream"C" ( 750 LF)
Stream "C" is located in the center portion of the area of interest. This stream has an ephemeral
flow regime. It is approximately 18 inches wide and OHWM is not detectable. This stream
collects overland flow from a drainage swale to the southwest and carries water to Stream"A."
Stream"D" (± 100 LF)
Stream "D" is an ephemeral stream (man-made ditch) approximately 100 feet in length located
near the southern boundary of the area of interest. This stream runs in the northern direction and
carries water to the small pocket of Wetland "H" during storm events, which is connected to the
larger portion of the wetland through a culvert. This stream receives runoff of surrounding
upland areas to the west and south.
Stream"E" (±930 LF)
Stream "E" is in the southwestern portion of the area of interest. This stream appears to have an
ephemeral flow regime. The stream collects surface runoff and flows southeast off the project
site.
Norbut Solar Danby Site 11 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
CONCLUSIONS
Within the area of interest, fourteen(14)wetlands (Wetlands "A"through"N")were identified
and field delineated by BME Associates based on the presence of all three parameters for federal
jurisdictional wetlands (Appendix A, Exhibits 6, & 7). Furthermore, five (5) streams were
observed, and their flow regimes evaluated (Streams "A"through"E"). Based on our field
observations, Wetlands B, C, D, G, F, H, and K appear to be isolated and may be non-
jurisdictional, subject to USACE final determination. On behalf of Norbut Solar Farms, BME
Associates is requesting an Approved Jurisdictional Determination for the subject site.
Norbut Solar Danby Site 12 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
REFERENCES
• Department of the Army. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical
Report Y-87-1. Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi.
• Edinger, G.J., D.J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T.G. Howard, D.M. Hunt, and A.M. Olivero (editors). 2014.
Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of
Carol Reschke's Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage
Program,New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany,NY.
• Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Identifying and Delineating
Jurisdictional Wetlands. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conversation Service, Washington, DC.
Cooperative Technical Publication.
• Munsell Color. (Revised) 2009. Munsell Soil Color Charts. X-Rite Incorporated. Grand Rapids,
Michigan USA.
• National Wetland Inventory Maps, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service,
National Wetland Inventory, St. Petersburg, FL.
• Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb's Wildflower Guide. Hachette Book Group, Inc.New York,NY.
• New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Freshwater Wetlands Maps,
NYSDEC,New York.
• Ogden, E.C. 1981. Field Guide to Northeastern Ferns. Contributions to a Flora of New York State
III, R.S. Mitchell (Ed.), Bull. 444,New York State Museum, Albany,NY 122 pp.
• Reed, P.B., Jr. 1995. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northeast(Region 1).
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.1). St. Petersburg, FL.
• Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and
Northeast Region, January 2012, Volume 2.0.
• U.S.D.A. Soil Conversation Service. 1986. Soil Survey of Monroe County,New York. USDA
SCS. Washington, DC.
• U.S.D.A. Soil Conversation Service. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. Miscellaneous
Publication No. 1491. Washington, DC.
• U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. 2017, V. 8.1. National Hydric Soils List. Lincoln,NE.
• Williams, A.E. 1992. Clarification and Interpretation of the 1987 Manual. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers March 6, 1992 Memorandum. USACE. Washington, DC.
• U.S Army Corps of Engineers 2018. National Wetland Plant List,Version 3.4
BME Wetland Field Delineators
Martin Janda, Abigail Lanterman, Jenna Lynch
Norbut Solar Danby Site 13 Project#2089-104
BME Associates November 2021
APPENDIX A
Exhibits 1 — 7
Exhibit 1 — Aerial Site Location Map
Exhibit 2 — USGS Quadrangle
Exhibit 3 — USFWS National Wetlands Inventory
Exhibit 4 — NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper
Exhibit 5 — NRCS Soil Survey
Exhibit 6 — Aerial Wetland Delineation Map
Exhibit 7 — Photo Location Map
71
01
- - _ �T•* - +� - { -- ?it "�_-_ .l R ---'-1.,'�Y - '-►k -30
if 1. � ff � y- _ I '• F -� N
s �e � 4�� � • � �• �'ct-- �` - lbs.- _y� �� ,d -- o
jK
Gunderman Rd x
low
n o
^O
o
49
00
4-1
41
qF
co _Ile
,ypr f,+ a, ru; ly�i - $ �'' . ,�,+r -ems. .F+1 { -f"}s: - r• �' 1
01i, d'.f�{.IC�11�v.-�� y.'rS �Y�.,+_fir �_� h s• � _ -'v'.:co-r S I f z
` I I/� I 'r 'S, ►'�l' ^ 7 -r- '- - -,tf #' r ,.fiJ -E��- + f { �' #- f •,S r -$• J' �� `
i
-` � �- i:rGYF��' � �' •.r sx'. .s �' -- .• S� ���3�r+�.�s IIVC/.+�Y.�►r a
� f, '" 7k fyi�",� ,r�ry��,4��, ;�.,�'�:!'�A•i!k�^7� � .�, x`�``' ^�,- �'. 'y�y( � - (n c�
't 1 I I�' r�Y r •� } - {f+ + a�# � ��,�-��f '��•�� f�f A`� - _ ryi�.��L� � �+��• y'i + �� � �( cc� Q
,w. J yY ^'.r,r i i t,';J!Y rf:, .I. `�,' ,., it - r,•.- -t �.+ 'r ,i'�.«� y - . + L fo >`
*IT ¢�.�I�'/}'4 ' •�" .,'�'b�'' x "�.5. .�: a' +. - 't� � . � •a , Yl, #.� � R 11� � � V
75 O O
fo
r �.�h�!"' ,il• rr b�' .tir h r -.+f r�Y- � �,� �� a.�yj,` •fin .� ry. �
ev O f O
,f • �` a ',r• `t 7O •�
LO
ryr
F-
-r
+ t%1�. `+ f real x ', .y1, yrr ¢ �4`r�ft� _• _ i"' - . W w
(14
" r' !- i• �� s � r i i � ��
"� r!� raj �,• �',a '*3 # �i#r �}' � -•. - !•r�{f,: _ �' '�. ', p U � z =
774`�• $ µ• �- Q
- -
- - + �'�* - 4 _ � f •4. � O �.mod.
1 CD
✓► r a z
❑z
3 l L5 ti o+
fir � L `i 5 i 'k '••
ql
TL
Yvv
I
It - -
1 w
dA + O ICC cS-
I
00 ,�_ISo
z Ql
ro
L 15 + T 1 _ O,
-�, � -� - •�,, � .-J �I� ���•� . • . � '�_�_� � �_ ' - ` � �, . . Gunderman Rd00
Ct-
II 5 +
3 I I J ' �5 ' 'l l 5 •� 3L '+ ,
U
U) cn
� Q
E
I � (>3
fu
- - S ca 0
I � (Yo
C/)
Lklh
di
N O
' n
LO
cn w
LO
LO ~
_ _ x
to
cn Z
pr
-..rj;W� k6 �4 con
01
I o z 29
+ �.• '
3
# Y + F ol
if
ltll
# • f A k
w
Gunderman Rd - * ',�. _ o
Pan IfZA
00
1. r_ a--+ 00
�4 �1-fad • t m � �--� O
cl
iao
rn
y� O
r
0
�I— CO
j O
N
Z
0
-
{ � �
•rpp-
_f' � -p C
' r cB E
� f - � ► i ca
75O C
+ # } 0 LL O
i.. I .3 } r a N O
S! • \ 1 r Ln
\� r oLO
w w
O r
r� N NCf)
U zCD z
" 1 • ❑Z
x ter,A } mf
o y
O
�J
3
ino
ol
Gunder
man Rd
-04
Ln
r #J`• 513 s# * ' x f `}J , { { y O O z Ql
CD
V
cl
N164 N rn
y � s i ,r •� - - -�- 4..'�� ". - - -it - c
VL
oo
P PIP
fo
* +�
(31
KAPP
. i :F._- _ ��f • �' � �•� .'�i,f•,y - _ . � *• - � .ate-+ O p
UO) N cn
.. a +-J �-
} �
0 E
Ui
At-
ro
IP
N O
* + , �� • FU III
LO
O x
� U m
0
+ Cf)LI
CD U z�
rW T 1 LO
U
y
t JA 0,
.57
de I
, �Jti 1 1 wy} a w
-241 N ..
IkNh
00
OL
0 O
C a
co �
�F' ll ' o 0
>>
z
tAMLN
a--+ O
RIO
R&ap unlit syReba4 Map unit name Raurlg w- '4 �?_ti' ,� }� - _ � lieru
Bath G Valois sails, 5 ti. _ 'p
1 �� L L 4 O
(!)
6c 1 penceni slopes " - r_. 1 fo
Ere asnney sdt l l= F a ' w-
3 Lc a pint s�ape's x` O
SZA Cawppewa and.Aken 3 7 r +� LQ u 3:
s AFF.0io?pesoe f z Q� O
Slopes. z ~
SrA Ene-Chippewa L'annere K-
slit toarr.,13 to 3
Pef—ceni sk qR es
• o
aj o
-ac Hnwara gmelly roam. •5 ra Ln
b 15 pe*LL ,vmple _ (uSIDPeS II
0
_aE LanGfom<.n3nnery sA -3 . Iikdric (#0L1%� o ,--1
loam 2 w 3 percent W w
$lapel m Ayrdrin(615 to VD%)
0 r
aB 3 Langford-k anriery silt - N
Ica 1 3 kv 8 peiu-nc Hyrdnr,(33 to 65%� ° —•
slapEs,zraaea o O z
Mac MaTdin tar-rFery silt G � Hydiir (t ln:3.2'96)
laa:rn-dta 1E percent a cn
Q N"s!cpes Nor HVdric l0%) °
CD
w Y
P. Ree Mask g7av s.,A Q
F+� 3
-S t ` 0 Nol rated or nOL available
0 0
_ o
11 Z
s 1ylarrd sack correr � y
0 to i percent napes.
ii-equentie Mxdeo
4 a m
Gunderman Rd
i F
LLJ
lt
ail O
R:► : ► - 4 Q) C E o
' - iPl i , i
i('. is Q�
y, i s - '' 41 + +' a'-i
L
a� a) i c a
E
TWO L-
v) N N c
x + a) °� o
0
c
O >_
11 11 +1 a
O N
' aVf
Z
N ,f
�i y n° ' -oP 1 1• X O
v [,. — w U
I }I •rN 1 1 U) v i C (n
ro
' L•c + �Qfo Q
o
11 u'
o
Ln
(14
- - �r-, r - �•-�} - _ • `]P t� - , �- + �` � it--•lI � N m
Cf) U v z
'• F �.r. a E � `. O U Z a
un
CD
❑z
m
O d
Fr 0 Z o
q3 I
-ram'. •�4. ,wb;
01
Ld
f/ r _
00
—
••
1-4
�' •
4-1
y i .
.`I ... • I�f • f
Clie
—
Y � _
'�' .1 r ✓'�+ ,���., I - L\ 12 11 1
r� ky .�
*` '/,Ir 'fr. 1' L r ,�'` ��`J.. I- ,]► `^1314
131 135 - - - - -Ssl• .. '� - P ' •/�
.138(�3136 1" 154151- • • CEIlD
- - 13 \132 137 142 140 146143 144 147 153 J y`
L r ' } .4 133\``�� 141 -0+148 _ 1 1641�162 ti '�h�'�y���^ /5 • � • •
r, tJ� {7! ♦ 123 149 157/59,
1 •
.'f,1 ' ' - r ~ 1263♦124 -L ' - ��IlS 1` ; Y -
1 - - 130 128"X 113 1 10 SOB G 1 •
r
129 ♦116E�114 109
/ 2 I', f r p '�Yt✓` 'IF � � - - - ,Ills 99
.39 J. _ 1 ,� ., • =
.. �M., 120E 18 /-302+100 - y� r� f
,4- j° •�'F l -kL. �r9\ \ P03101 •
33 -'.) ,/_. •=.f " �^ i
105
• F1� Irt A°. rM .r MFr/ 73 S�Jp GOa'�•�' 1p� -74 - T-.y,'`L\ - Y 'tT fy -'I •
• R r r -. 'SY I •J.'P" Y�'M'' .. 76�,74 /��8�53./id`, 5d y92 95 32+30 r _ ��'- \ /'T� •
} 5� �dy9 90E2-38�9 y8' / 31 '= -
97 _ .+ • •
Y / a /o '� rr ��t $ _ i� •
69 �
71 i d -�_ - _
42 25 1
i49.`C 27
64+6h\ 57 x/ `-45 _ �_ •
•, '1� '; 63 \ 60E�358 � - 53 `48E�96 'K#f
ig
1 f- 59 �Sf'� -_-_- 'S 56��G`°54 __, fl 4�- �f� - s - ._# 'e�"-`� I• _ Y�. •
aU4r ,, y �� •IS r f� ♦ •
,. p,�y •` F IY', � has�4'�.� r �"'� f`7}�Jr, r�;4"� sl ; q �'�a. � �e r� •. , :i y5 ..
= �
'f i s rah f
x
,t
I
CD
-
",
APPENDIX B
Site Photographs
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
r .
Photo 1: Upland,facing north
j
Odd
'.�,�':4' .��`�.� �' �,.ice:. �.' :"yi' ,:.. �:'���� Y� ��Y:�..1 'p' �'�Y. ... 1�•
•1•t "I.r�f�.p '. 'J1� lJ f•'r'1W,•'� r?4.. _ _ -F."Ti
r�p1:.•.:F _
Photo 2:Upland,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGIN E E R5•SMEYORS+1 V+P rrnl'I dIlc.w I b+•
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
imp
IL
Photo 3: Upland,facing south
s
Photo 4: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5•SMEYORS-I3,vpw'nl'k%RC.H I:H I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
I' fyf {fi .
;�' j t'� :•�,yr v�i. I r =,l•• ._ l1 r'r..�; _ !1'.r ! }_IY. .,{ '+i
AMA
4= 's. - !. 'I-. •,I 4�; t ',.' I :,,�.ij`x lid. {
.�,• ,,gig�� �'.�� �. �_° � _ �
y 6, �}�� Pay i�`• ri;�...
Photo 5: Boundary of Wetland E,facing north
I
_ ;I• ;; ` t � y _ y � ;
rN r 5 Y
=L
d ,� .,Y. � 'qrl j. 1;,'�{I �.• 'Ty,} - 1� �'. �'�•�. . S'.+ _ i,'
r
y�R;7 7
Photo 6: Facing upland east of Wetland E
�IASSOCJATES
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$•11:+P rrnl'f�Ul�.HI I b+.
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
i 1f if
�•, $��i .>^T,t ��.;��� :j�E '�. 'F' 1 � iI.!� •'�r .r t � ���.. jf��'r�s=I vs�Ititi
.7F�• A �•r ��� ..y....ri 1 a.. .]� �:�.. �1.'„!� y'� J t-..i•..
Photo 7: Facing south, boundary of Wetland E
NOR
7�i�k iF•• 1 f3
,4 �'� .1 ...,r�..• _ .;�;....•: •'ram •y'R�•1 . �j-�1,
46
�
sR� °�'���v �. r f•w't��,�,r�+.,• •�r.
r� �i{. 1' �i'Y.i> ,'.s1� • 1t` 4► Ii'.•1✓'
Photo 8: Facing west into Wetland E
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS-I S.v pw'nl'k%RC.HI lb I
tl'• �' i'' �¢,.r "IF." $yam Rol
ill �� I� I�. '� f 7
5,
f- f � S f 'f' 1�f'�,��• II
I"
>, G" �� •�a �r sir
y� � i�`-�b•a.'§. �rY •�,Ci � �� �' •.l��jif•-" � -� .� >• � �{ '� QW Gar;
vq
. .... ail
,.... .. •' .
L , +
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
Y4 r
i ]: ` s.
Photo 11: Wetland E,facing south
i t
Epp.• .°� + :..`. �� c C'' ,•. _'� :r M.F
�;. ,� .� � �'.d.ti • � �'.fir `e.'
moAL
Photo 12: Wetland E,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGIN E E R5•SURVEYORS•I v:rnN.%I i uI I I
le
r'
,rw.lQ=� ;4:>�'�j.Q.T'•'t 7i Y•• ��� �r rv'' zf M1:/1• -S -
'Y r ! -�.•,• 1,:. Y _• .
_ ;ate•-�;.'^ ► � � - ,,
,�5,, a:.,.i• � � �, :1
A
� 'Fr'= ,••� tin., +. .:�'
I,.- '.tS� �` ,�.'� ,yam•h � h Vti,. -y ''
" - !'
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
Ai
�•n Y
F __
Photo 15: Wetland D, facing south
IF R-�,
.- _,� �••�,� .��, �..yr% .,Zi��x, 1. ��_. %.:
r- �• • � s�.", ••. � .� i., �' ran s.?�'°a-
Photo 16: Wetland D, facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS-13,vp),u'nl'i dRUM I Ii[,
� �..ti��� ram• � �• '
� �I�w•k-i. .. ■(y�p asp, -
?gip•' .ir... � .. ^• � .. _f.
4 �
� I �'
�:•,,.;ter. .�- +�''- . ., .. . ��� -3sr��;.�
R
f .
if
y � y
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
L
4
n�i;..^.'!✓�.�".G'i�a3'.E-'%[. 4 IEfi�l _. ..�^��'. �f..In�'.. A:I_n.�r�. .1�rc.7/1'i..
Photo 21: Culvert between Wetlands B and C,facing north
4
rsEu.
F - 'A$„ 'fir � 'r.r: ••,•.•� •^w;�'�:w;�.•`'i;r �; - ;y'•` �' �i � .•„7-;:,._` -
Photo 22:At culvert between wetlands B and C,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5-SURVEYORS-I3,vpu'nl'k%RC.HI 1H I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
tij 1
per_
G'i'C - yy j:•e JNP .�+a`:�r -�Y� s�"y- ��. .1�_
rc`y > ��i�.ems yy� -. 'S f : ,'�-a:.--,�' -. •
Photo 23:At culvert between wetlands B and C,facing south
lIle
Jt-
c y-1?ram,�.:y�?4.•`„�ir.-k+!j_ �;.d_s �
Photo 24:At culvert between wetlands B and C,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$•11:+P rrnl'}.vu iil I I.�.
`r7
•,i� y , `I,. rr.r
, � y
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
t
1
v .r.. n .•'.i•: il.iF•^ �,�f•4:�i.ifJ _+c .tiw:s.i•:.:s'.^�.�.'.i...����.
Photo 27: Upland,facing south
F
or
Ai
1 d 1 }
•/ I!N ♦�� y.F .}{gy Y. 1'1. N T. �'wwgv r.Ru-
r'+��.. � ..�.,'p+. � +� ��.fix.n`_:':t >3.�w" '.�" •./'•
�.. �s1.'.;;-,n.•..,�„�--. ice.•- 'f�,:: ._
i '8��t� ur ;�.. � �f r•
Photo 28: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCJATES
ENGINE ER5•SURVEYORS+1 1 4jlr;Al'i %IkC.HI 1 0+.
Norbut SolarDanby Site Photos
F
'LP
• • 29: Upland field,facing north
• • 30: Upland field,
>t
S+:`a�ti�M�� -'� _':ram'-swi�?:�Gr k- ����.�•� __��'��^ti�� i't.r2 •, r•-iy�-1.+t:'�.E:••..
. ., .�6'✓-'� -. �:?�i�� "�-'.t-�',y�;�,�-:tail'-�<>n�_.:`.�,,.'9
.. � ,_x .:]"�" '.�� ��r� -':3`• ���'�"yea-.=.
y • y
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
J•� �* � Y
ilk
Fait' ':�.. t:- �. :i�'�':� •Y�_i.�. „ti::.., ,rll.,,,� 'nr,• � .�� �,^
L '
Photo 33: At Stream A,facing north
1 � •%as y " f.-I• ,e .5'. 3idy', rwj .it. g
- � .i�Y'b•' § igi. .t �r' �,rt•`y`.van
r F"'
•• .dry• '�'.�"_..: 'M:� "..
.4bj - - •y[,p.jF"'- - C ]"'1� ,x'j - 1•^. Ala
vv
Irj
=►� �., "yam
Ik
Photo 34:At Stream A,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS•1 V4PY;M'1,U i 041 1 -r,
i
r •A p' Orr Xp�`;�R�� .����-�- �Y+tl
•fir.;•# - .+...4
At"
._ .JI F
F:
Norbut SolarDanby Site Photos
I �
WOW
-•6. �� '�`s 1: k� _ fin. S 'J F} 4 ��. !_:.� k-r� -
• • Upland,facing north
•1
f
-_
• • 38: Upland,facing eastlil
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
f 's
41.
`=� 1 , ram^" •�� -
Photo 39: Upland,facing south
u.y
�+ ..i � f r7 A��11fs... ,A •�, ic.
Photo 40: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS•I v:P Wl.%Ki uI I I-,
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
Photo 41: Wetland G border,facing north
Photo 42:Wetland G border,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5•SURVEYORS•I vqP Wl.%Ki uI I I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
r,.
P V'
Photo 43: Wetland G border,facing south
r !�
'ti._it:.-��.~._ 'i�� S•r � �y.. i
d i v�,��•I S'y, i i
1,Ile
� :; say.,• � I��'�n1G� � �/{�I���
�. ..� N11�q)1I4
Photo 44:Wetland G border,facing west(toward wetland)
�IASSOCIATFS
ENGINE ER5-SURVEYORS-I3,vpw'nl'k%RC.HI 1H I
`=�'.. .ter?...y,. .,j. :`�•'�r .,{�� ,3 .�� V�y�::;.. .yq�.'
;j
v
S +
� ,i , ��� i i ,,r�• !p2 fit$' I�
IFt•'
. - �.' '� :Y?•"�� ��, � �'' ~� f� � ','�. '� �U � I��.,i��i't' �a �ti �'. . 1.
Arl
��` - .ir rti 1'��"r L..,-r���` 'ti�•it�� .f•�-=„�f ✓�.�� i 4
,1
d _
�![:.} ��may• x •L- � r�., � r r { �:�
_•'� '�P i rn�Y:. -ids• ��h{'.:�',1.�� ! -'�,{1 �L^•" � `iV�'i
..� �'. !1�; :� �;.`�..:'..�•'fir.;;•'
:�i;'9."�'�•1 �.fY�'jL. +� �y� �_i . '�-G:�y'' �i'`+�.��� ��p��,- s �.•,�a.��r��,;:.e.r..,k:':'':�_ .'rn f.
:•�'-auk,�`.S.�;.fF ,��� � r.--'�vlk'f f`'� '��'����I�r�, '•!�r"1..' �.�,5r'F`.���;.��.i�. - 'f`,;.
,� _ �.�.��Ki+;{�• '.fati����4.. :]�a�li�:K�� ����{5q, 11�,`'�"y, ;!Mr�r I��::, ::�N''`'I r'•'. '�j.'.:X,�.•.iy'�'f�lr';r- `�A �.�+2.,s
`�:�- ,,��u�;;�! r': •y7'r, d ] sf �a: ��.,.�a'3��k y 5 7:�•'n. :�L.,
L • +
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
Iv
Xv
r �Y:
ce '`Ei' ,•5
3
Photo 49: Wetland F,facing north
r AMA
1
1
Photo 50:Wetland F,facing east
�IASSOCIATFS
ENGINE ER5-SURVEYORS-I3,vpu'nl'k%RC.HI Ib I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
r
PP -
k +-
v
Photo 51: Wetland F,facing south
,I
' r r
p, I'll
r+ I
i
�I
f
l
i
Photo 52:Wetland F,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS-I3,vpv'nl'k ARC.H1I0!.
,1 .• it,y.., P _.. I.
d �
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
ye
e yip
• 1' ti — ..39" ` ..T .5• e. F kit. } ui�f.�''~ ... - a 'NI
Photo 55: Upland,facing south
L l
Of
Photo 56: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5•Sl1RVEYORS+11:+Prrnl-I�Ulc.liI I I-r,
i t ��•.•• A y• ry •'try �� 1
•i; � -,r��`�j''•'!`�.::a�j _ ��-'v�'y M ""�'r` =eR+..7,r�.{y y^'.l- -
��:'.�Txa.�:'�•ats.�
� �l'' `
Win.. �d '�y 1'.4�},V� •i�, �y M y�.'••.rl - � .:'. :.lr- '?=._��,
`y�:.,"�•�1y"'•,��Y: � �A�...� y,._ti .rtSt� i.� r.�i.���'�� ''�",3�:t-''9`�� .'�7���,��a�ayy�'
�;AF. _.�---r
�� ���-yw- ice.:. - -.;«_;f-.h,������f'..�.�•,rirx��.! ::t`t ��i- �4-.]. �::•'•..�.
�� - �-
=�:'
' • • � • •
�s�3
.:=r.
�.�.
.4� _ �.•�.�4•
_ ��� *�..
.- '.1�',
„I � ".-.
S _ d, 1
�. - _... -� �'� �.. _try -"'�:':- �.�� .0.�. �� -.
..�' _- t.... -'_
�.. _
� • • • •
� . +
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
i
M
....�. M.•�-tea µ-�f �• � =�.. �yH. '� ��.. �. .1j... � .:
• a ,� -'tlf ���s:,�•
10
Photo 59: Upland,facing south
t.
pit-�-��.•�� '=i.'•- - - _ _.w':.
y y y I
,• '�- :+M.'=�.` a ••I.—��ya •��,tjF, ��['::'' r r•
sews �!�c�:'�N'�..;�'.. �,.y��'r .��'.•:.�:,��_
;r, _ i.:�e� �iR•_3•ju., i:.Jyg' l�.pr •sSF Ir_.Y7{-'.�'..: y� �: '3F..'n•' ti'PG+. 1..'^�y���z.;�.'.�sq`-.
•ky
.. '1r11 '�.�.^ry..�,."t..i� .'�eYr .,�''Alar,•'•� r ::�• �i A - l.�z'...
Photo 60: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5•SMEYORS•I vqP Wl.%Ki uI I I i!'.
Yy�•
•,�11�
` p
3 :a
•-2;w,. I� '.ice' ".� i, i � .•S �.n' .I I� �'.��
�R-
i
e y
'._�,• ,. .. .+: i.. :fie r�' .��
Ir
Oel
xvs r'�• �r"! r f'iy* �:' !�. , `.
wAir
..t:;ram r- .r - "r::u�•: .1.
Al
1
i
,:i 9'. ���I.: i __ `•;~l•�.ir.�'•�', g�,�� S '`1 it•i ��.;;
�, =� +� � ,�F;t "���; � R�� 'fir � ���� `a. `:s,�.�.F• � f�
a.y � 3_ ��i .t:i'�'�'�.fi 1•-FRS'- `' .!'� I �" '� :1��; f
I
Y i
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
•„ � Y .r,." !jr'.. '.'fib. ::Z::�,g' A, ��e'% .:
i'4 f. .1,•1' t'{4';d',,'��E' =7�' 1 4'' '�'�'�f - •�' n-.$."'ems
Photo 69: Upland,facing north
4
AN
Al
Oil,
Photo 70: Upland,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5-SURVEYORS-13,vp1v'nl'i%RC.ifI I li 4,
a
•�F r[ � 'sip' ��'� �.�•:3e. .��
'��.� -��� f3•':�.!e'.1`r•�1�y{ti�-..:1�`.n: .,i.� yyam,,...,•m.�:',.`ti.�- '��ti.i. v.;I � rSr��
i 1
L +
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
gyp' i� }�� '�`} •, 1'4!l' ,+ A
Photo 73: Upland,facing north
ti
Photo 74: Upland,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS•I vqP WI Ali uI I I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
0.
1
J
'I :I✓GFA i �F�'r.���LI7
7
Photo 75: Upland,facing south
f;
I.
,1r
Photo 76: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5•SURVEYORS•I vqP Wl.%Ki uI I I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
,,,
RV
t 77`rg..i:v-'1 .�•� _Y-'��•�r�•� �]94'.. •'.S'•• .'� rY..� ���-'.
:;T: o.. �;4..•.4.�.,:;1, :.in°!' t�4 ':a:.> .�+:'fit_ i .d !',� r
Y.i.!'?f�i. '�?P9.!' ` _ n i; � _ J� a•F.)-! Y'�Y -'ice
l,3
, . _
{y
Ly I•. �.6•.�'•�' .:.cs :7 ���'.fi�a[� ni _ � :!!•�.Zry �i�:n'-�-•�1�.� � swy;\'�-:
Is� eg!?a.:�i:'�4i ✓'eft._.stf�..Y:[ -:ii�!!a'ti � - �1�:.. •4 p•-y�:�':�• „R[:��lk' v`7,s:�'�::k��';,,:['..� k�
Photo 77: Culvert,facing downstream of Stream C
,k t
1 � -
l�
•�Y� k t
�a.• �:%�� is v.) �:i.;;..ti :� S � .� - .!� .�:r.4
�' '_;�.:t.: A•9��:�- :-f.JF:�;.." .�� Wy- - i•+�^ate
-+4�T,��7: Y. '��^[`�••. 'I7t�, �M1'" F� may_
'EIIII tt
R�
+y� ��; 51
:;ice; .yr �'r � ? �,r13'•: �;�
. :,"f.i , ,. � '.`.H�R is �d.•i.�� ;r^:] � •�''. •. .`.',�.:'.'� ._ .. �!`-5.!"�i.
Photo 78: Facing upstream/culvert of overland flow into Stream C
�IASSOCIATES
ENGIN E E R5•SURVEYORS+1 V+P rrnl-I Ulc.lu I b 4.•
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
.. •'1'�•,�• AR.
,�`��'��
k �1tR.
'':.�,..��,';• •. is '.1i:".
p'�r; ;' '.e°.. e`�� ,,?s: y:.:..��'�r� iii i�T''• F.+: 'C• �;:rr`L�..I
Photo 79: Facing downstream of Stream C
1 .j' !i![) [• Ly j,: �, !u T j �1 y� TS I� 1 .II- �''�"•
14
Y�
-
•
l �
R�'S• 1 'VY r `Y L
Photo 80: Facing upstream of Stream C
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS- 1:+Prrnl'f dIkC.HIIb 4,
r^r.,.ei',4�''7'�s�•..^ 3.i�'.-d.�ig�'` �]:. ;�����4 1 �+.. � }' y 1 �1•� .�4.�� F ��
rAl
.r� t' h
i
0.1
� .- �i � +� 'Sid �r`i .L, .•'j''�P ` + !1'�1:: � c�. ,}� G,ik:;:'..e:: r
�y'�.F,k�.-� � ri. C �":���.'I,'� �• +'� cif ; ,14''��jl..'•.4 .. �.•!I•.j;'
J;''�. tip.• f _ F r!Xr;�_ v j .
Y +
1 _ .�}, �I, 5;:��� ;:.�;� ;',,:; �, �' fir• �.f 4.
if
10'0
-�?F .'r �' �171j '� .1 ��•`.5,3�: �4�f' I';.� ,'tii •�r�', Y'` '.L' `="f
i ,y. ��� � . of '. ,�r.;r-.,. .[� �•p;y- f
it,tl
h� �� :�'•'•sa,n''.y,f.Sr,�,�'•k�'�`�..J�d.
�y
� � y
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
a � ':1 ��'�-. +F.• I -- � `''ti�.•V r�,Yh'_-�"'`:���i� �:.'�i�sl.�!� '`�: {.. s
SW KR
3s' 41.
U
I t.�
r %Y" k. Swy.• I �i ¢fir �l;ty5'I`�i�r
•',Air+.;: by -i ':lllc :;x� 4�N rl rI��'p-����
.�.j ,� �_ �•A gam' .! {II }
Photo 85: Facing downstream of Stream C
} ..�. � S$y,`I r�S�+�'.k ��S v � }1 `7' !��_Y I �:r I'� •r
•-t+�'' '+'' ,TJnri lf�.:fy rn
�f• i
_�c '{�,qy�� 'fi�•'gR**p is .i-• 3.
a... •,�Jra •_ >. •.. `'Y.FR :I�' ••JNi ,
• • S' -_'fin t'=
V.
NR
�; • 1;'•'ne,h, _ •��7�-'' �i'i�Li�. 'd2�.ra-'.� _ 69 ''.� i"'nn n' ..,.k
o> `
d�Yif.k-. .fib. � a iY'^Nw`:v'•�i:a"�'� - Ftt
UA
ANQ
Photo 86: Facing upstream of Stream C
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$•11:+P rrnl'}.vu iil I I �'.
tY'x
-� `` �y fi$j'� � i l■g � � r f'� Q r
,.i A si,S?;�+.",•v-•! ay�,. '1,�J -p� ;� '�1'� r !,� �. ,,��L� �.�Y��. r tf��.
mWIN
r
1 �`(�aY� 'Y.... 1�h " n mt1 i.i' i'z`�'•+G.`'FY:]': f �
-,T
€ . yfY
r �w
1rr •`I�v��`•� �'�'T:yr:�. r, .U.l;"-. '9}y����'V rl' ':.1 i:S.
fir: ... '�i j r. fin,. .k'•. �-
4l 51 S9,�y
yf 1,� �..�;'d'..C1ff •t�E��' r.,�.r.• :��Yic��`J�:� �'
.S , ],v: Jdl.'j+y7..�ii� :fr�• .}3:Y '�'lP .L.
- I V � �� ��' ��'J'.�L �.i;7%i'r 1+"75��j It '�� .'{.'�::::" •, y,_
pa
Lk
Oil ,",
t' s r
1. .:•� .11 ..� �, '�^. ^`�' '-.�.li� .�,r.y1� :�z�.
Jr•}r'
:v
4 i
- _ r, 1 ref .• ,.,�
i .
�4a
_ It
i�Sri �• Jar II i47 ...,. ..
AM
f.. - �-•�•} w' ;• �J'•"�E... 4 '�Tm
1 x , � �'7Y�'��tali,. .��•:
s,
f
�•.t '�� C .\� '." . .. fir', �Sf '>F�. . '.• IS'P' ..� 1
� C
�.� 5.f •�. •• . _�� M1. + — _ •�Wit—_
Al
kl;
y•!. rF i'•':. :'" — f '.er.. ...F'-. e.i. 4! hy...Sk•
1.4JP—
�:� ��'•�: ��� '3 � � fir' •� �.. ,
Y +
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
..f
•k
- fly
I-
y
Photo 97: At stream A, facing south
OW
add
r
- +3
Photo 98:At stream A,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5•SURVEYORS•I�;.rn.,ILI.VL,uI 1 I.4'.
1 1 _
VA
..,fir:-i.## �.t. .•}f�� ;�+t r G_ -+�,�: ,,�,��, .. •v,�'<..
PF
- �
�_.�,>� *�'�*;�;:� i _ 'ram• ��.��:�, ..
�` Y� � '..� may.. � � .•�Y� ���
Y� •;ill� i,�,�. �; � �f F � Z J L����^��.•r
oR �� a
fOr
aa y
u., ! Ya•
I !i► d iAA�ll � � i a�'; � n ,04
r5
POP5s. ',.
'IT
p
tick .-�- - ,, E i�,.''I� �� •'
d ,� .��'. ,� !SS�.� �� ,�`�'�'.,���� Pr ar 3A,�� S:a9►A.F�,�'.� ".+T` ..
� y3�g�: .',tip ��� -•�?c;^ .'?•' .wo
M ,
Am WE
FA
•T� �x .L _ 7779�.�.
•;.gip'._�� �: •''�,y,s � �.
Norbut SolarDanby Site Photos
r
f s
y
"r
• • 1 • K,facing north
�.- o y`• ice.'^�1 �� v� r4 Fp .,�,.
• • 14 • K,facing east
•ls;
NMI
'�'.�.SS'4 �'� r, "5 i .k T^.'.,• •�"v '�°� •:' •C7:.,1^;'A' 1'i' �,. �y, 5']rks�i"" YVI
it
A 4' #T
E
kl'zi.y r:,1• �N&' ,,,� - ,i:'
IF
r
�'.1 � •�'f '��'• _ ...ire �..'. .. �-_- ���.�r.
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
�,.. �` 14,
id
''
1s
�:��•.. � =:r. ��.�� yti�•�..; �i�"��.'tr� n.:':._ '::ti:a'.-`'` — -.ate
' - _ .�\�„ � 1�n�~.:.p•.:b�n;..fix �C'��:y- ..1�4.'.N.0 .��a•�F �.!*,,..
�"� � y�w��_��. �c'scai�;�..• fir:•, '4 .e
':3.:� �±�+r�'-�r.-�•;, - :JE'..r;�_ .•Z�; _ ./.,��'�S_ .:� ;..'�,o-..� r�;.^C'.?�5..� .�.r'�Y.j�/yPy..'.���,. •� '�.:��. E� ,;t„. -"7� :�.:.� w�T`-�:%'IY.9ri.'��':--�r':..,'`'A. b •���'��'.
.z_" h,•�. �..• .� y_ ]rr7;1.:.. ..Rey•.� ia.re.��,�.
Photo 109: Upland,facing south
All
JL
# i
+ •''vAi. i:i�a,fli'o] r??r?! S rt`.�. -
Photo 110: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$•I\,vpu'nl'k dR�.Hl�b�\
} fit►y. �� � �• ��s• '� *1,., `'
y r
i
`i
ifr-
i �
• ,Ip �. fl
. .. � yr' ..�._Y��� .r.f.•��' �.
v,7: as
`S I
.I "FY IIZ'. �. ��'t�f•� - vl+'"L� •y.,.r {..••r' S�` a
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
S 4 p....
Y � �3 ,�'�,� •_ _'Ash _CCC///FFF k h � ��4;.
Photo 115: Upland,facing south
Wr
12
4
Photo 116: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS•I vqP Wl.%I i uI I I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
.4 r.
71
N
21.
Photo 117: Wetland L,facing north
� r r
• ' � .aril(.j' .~J! +v..' 1C; ..{ ��� ti• .� l:
'3 jw
kn `l �i` �I !�{. � 1 i ].is � �'���'' � _ �{;�.• � t: '�r�;
- _•q`����r'�''S - irk a'� Fa rR=ati''n� C � ,s��:f
�
;�y,+.:•i':: t°� Y:�. •..a•. y. ii b•;4'�.:=<';-i:F;^�r.,�f�!' }Y s`x;. -
Tv K
.A yye�--°�l -a f'•,• .i�:.s :. "f •. 11V�
` �..f7
4 y �. 11
NI
Photo 118:Wetland L,facing easr
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$+15,vpu'nl'k dR�.HI I I.�.
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
iti
i�Y• r. ti.. 1.�.7., r. 1 .� -
•+�� •'►A i tip_ ,, � _ �' � '4;. f, is . ,
r:t �� ,�� •�i 1`r R �
Photo 119: Wetland L.facing south
� r.�� :: st., - .3�-ems �;t. �,e•�-�_ �".:. ':t�'�`�i,�•.��.\� - � -''E
iA
3t .i�yY. ':.�^ fir, •�� � {� � � �r� -
�
Photo 120: Wetland L,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGIN E E R5•SURVEYORS•I S,v p.v'nl'k%RC.I:I I Ii!.
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
■■
•3f -
Photo 121: Ephemeral Stream A,. downstream
,� _ � ohs �� - �•
I.WM
- yf� •� .;:j,. .�. -ter
�1�'r'
r`t•
r 1 -
Photo 122: Ephemeral Stream A, upstream
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-13,vp,v'nl'k dRC.HI,H Ii
• • • . 0 . • - ' 0 •
w:;'. _ ..� ��' ' •c� Say ,'.•, r�Lll��- � - --
y`.JI' OTI ti
' �t }�- 5 y,.; e cif. �:•r x_ y` ,
}* s. +
'� / ,•�,, •-_•'v< me,•µ �'£• '�.
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
i
ti
r
y ZA
--. T'' .tip
�. ��i 5�ii/��73��k'.t�'.•a�Jl���: 1� �`f •S` s' 4 � Rr e,'K _
Photo 125: Wetland M,facing south
Photo 126: Wetland M,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS•SVRV EI'OR$+15,vpu'nl'k dR�.HI ib I,
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
. .� y
Photo 127: Upland,facing north toward Wetland M
' :fin'.. ' _ '-`�' t.-i�e� L.'�•I - 'f .t �••
ZA
►Y"i` i
Photo 128: Upland,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SMEYORS•I vgP,r N AR011 I I r!'.
ti- ItAM
ilk
' �
_r• q�,,y`..;.e—. ',:`�••'i.� .;5'f;;� +°�;s4.41�x r �� Fir � �� �' ,•��'�l�t..
eC
j.�' ' (R'f.r.l;�.�"•„r, - gF�� '''� j�,i��j,..p a�- .,9�.`�a'y:.
06 •.o
AM
- ''��.'_-s.. -_ ... _•:�� ..fie _- •'`y"_= : -,� ti.
� ��R• 1 1 r .f•
ol
Al
r"
r
yAF
.j� tii •x•• t "--
.F
f -
Y
".f.• -��r x -. '..'�� -- .." 1.c:;� ��xF .Jl':;��',-44.-� ��r.: �:::.,�..�.�• �:'i';'� V'=.�"�'�t �
'�.�"•;��,�rr T�"! � w F ''� `�ti,: rI '•.�.�i�,." F. �.R.' - .� � •:•ti'�. '��:;i.r_ �.�...-.FFF�..
f � ,
wml
MS
,gp �rti. _ ,C .t
kR
Aga, C * \ � •! f 3 '�
.� � r .. '�5 � 1� i4 �' �I •��F'�R �� � �y�l.� F 1ffiF
t� +
i
fry,---
r � � �- - :.j• a .._:.r .�.d�,v.r '�-s., .:. ,_1�,..:d:d :
54
f .
�M1'-V.. --f:
3
kA
"�A��x..nn';^fti�`rd,�L r••�, i: �fh °.Ii+,�' .r,r '�;. r�-
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
p:��'. 3�1•'{.,`_.',. :..� _.tom.- _ � '.
r.
1
r
Photo 137: Upland,facing south
Wt 17 e o v
M _
IV
Y'
-,. s:
�..1.;e•` t.�{ :;�. ;s'",sip I � •�' �'�:: �s-•�• � �` _n�i'��::. }• ° vi:r}:� :,'" . ;�J. r,.
k
5" � rir..-1 - '1. r:.]r.• ":�;.,;, i,[;_r3-'' :y� � w.,, ,r.i:. fir ',F,.r;'
g .;r. '� sJ,+ •'y.. :¢:. Y• f t I :1 �"' 1. S-r, i '�
Yk k'_rr��" ��i'. 'g �e" iT9 fn:;y:i.�'{•! ;!{ S• - ,� ( sue -
g�!E iif� •.Z;��°{ "�• .,iHulrq'M1ro..E ,.� �.. ,,�;• ��. � `s'..�i:;;..'-�: .�, lv•
• iY: I -"jay t;•.S ,. ?�;.: ..':;I�-;.-.•.
�i J.. '�4"'A�.�•Y, ..�1 �� r. :is'ii' il'<'•.' n:L � -fir;; . E 'W, , e
Photo 138: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SMEYORS+11:+Prrnl-I�Ulc.1rl I I-r
��t,i �' i s ���^si�y'�•�� I Its■{ � ,f - ��'Y is� t
ol
Y � I r'•.. .,^���,,r ^el In. � � �y 4� ��. i� �,� "rsn''..Elltt •:r � � _
wl
_-
r r.
i
r"
---'�•I'n '. -��.der. _ ��a�.i.� ���.� _
r '
Norbut SolarDanby Site Photos
Photo 141: Upland,facing south
_t
ram' =T
Photo 142: Upland,facing west
Y.
MIASSOCIATES
,,�'� yet ' r•
If
f 6
- ��. f � d.R�`fey •I �Y—S If1 �-_ P - :'G._
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
Or
sf.
r
k
r'
-
s i.... - �'�• ice; :f�� -'
r ti_ •� J i.
aie..��-a..•- �fir.• _ �.��. .`Y -_ r �-. s
• xy�•: Tea .
41
•. ,... ..a.._ _�� f�.!. ... ..� .. .1 •�NR-.�Yn\��Jf. ...•w'i104z iM '
Photo 145: Upland,facing south
l r l
7
1
. ':-f. �.� r aF.":rL:.j-�j:: .•��.>:�V�i. �•IFL. i.c`{ ,''�r •R`ter, � Y'4i.'�.-..J ' '.��,�� .•z}'�f.:'7 .7� .5��
' 3•,3_�•��a'-`..S _ L'`�-J, `-�:'Y'�''•A..PrS'Y F tel:-�:'. l
_
' •� �x n J q �� A
lam• W �
Photo 146: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5-SURVEYORS-I l,vplv'nl'k%RC.H I,H I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
�4
3 I
y�
�} r ,I �•�.' .r•.;Vf•'I,-. •'-• :j��i�R�' i�, d1'.k:iE, �`;7•''r: ��}� ai:--: �,� :!!k, V
,a :i�. •:,� �2r.' r�, 31��.••:s� •.•$a5 ':•�'i•,�fl`i-�e•��.,+.�:�,1'•� +.17-
er+ �
Ik
`pWIer.' '�rr i•• � :! ! il'•..i 1 ,:4 ��� �. �l vj 1.f. z�, `C t?�t ,1�
-k..: n1. .,,.-L. �.F' I ��'•' �u, .6. I '�, ,I�. IY � rS� ��yE'41l:,1
�lCi;� .•!� �'':>:�Y r a;' .I 'ri' �' a AI:�a�r i � k Itil'ir 4 i ����,�
Photo 147: Upland,facing north
Photo 148: Upland,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$•11:+P rrnl'}�Ulc.iu I b+�.
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
r•
IV
+ s _
1. t��,y,l1l"�'-' •f,per- 13.
Photo 149: Upland,facing south
xr
,L• �'fr �.�Y. �v •k:.�;ih.ry: f .i�.':.,' �N• 'VI,O•' .1 W'�
Photo 150: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS-13,vpw'nl'k dRC.HI f H I i
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
.!� .r .. i li� .iL.l i y, �k'�!..�'•1'Y i.
�/
1' "I � ] ��� i�r •���� � & ,{� SJ��. - 1� Y yh y,41`IIf�74-, .j„I �. - '} .
g'� �� 1,k /� g, �4 PP;�'+} ��'{ 1 L ��' I�'" '�����411�•'`[ �`• �' ,L
rfa. -Ftii.,J+I A" # .
� d •f` I� e�' '�;,•�'y Orr. :. t �'.'.:'.
'IYI
Photo 151: Upland,facing north
k
f
Photo 152: Upland,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5-SURVEYORS-I Y,vp,v'nl'k%RC.HI iH I,
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
7
Photo 153: Upland,facing south
I J
ly
� I}
: ih.O
Photo 154: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5-SURVEYORS-I3,vpw'nl'k%RC.HI Sb I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
.:.
al- .-.—:.....
y':i`�}
:. �r•. : 'i4��- 1. ��!`� ..f �. �`
dr
•Ir..: .���: Y -.. , YSYe'}•f///, .A'F �3R. -.q�. �g;� T- �� �� ��
Photo 155: Intermittent Stream A,facing downstream
•.�'. ten... -"�,, ''ry:�A fi
A A.
Photo 156: Intermittent Stream A,facing upstream
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$•I�;:n��el'1���u ul n��'.
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
.rr
� ��•_�Ar EN�+
k
', Q.r;•.�? ...i� 1,w�.•.jy. 'y 5. .•.'t. .n r�,�•..�' :Lr b .�'x`� �.�i'�`x' '� �
Oltam.
r - d
v '�• � .:� a ,:• r.. .-F,;���
0:6 .-
Photo 157: Wetland A, facing north
r•
•gal.
'�� Jr�fl! � • '-"'t -+rpp :T� � � '�¢ ram_ -
;� � .=s.x.:.;. �1 ., fit,: :� ��„ •� _
prye. 1 i
Photo 158: Wetland A,facing east
�IASSOCIATFS
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$+15,vpu'nl'k dR�.HI rb!i
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
4.6
MW
PAMO
E4
- ` .� aka.._ 4'.:�-r��•` ��
Photo 159: Wetland A, facing south
I••
r ,
r;
3�fit, vl
' I�,�ik}��p. fir: }�.:�- � '• .. `.
,e e..�;�":' =�. Fes• � �,
,�' ' ,>.���� ,•.• 4/;�' ,.�sy^'���'�r'��'7;�;��vy. �.• is :
'�r��.• ,l:Y,I+iL��' ., /�� ,- ef �:;#'arv=h��!.t:.r.ill a�./.wln�.n Ik. -
Photo 160: Wetland A,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS•SVRVEI'OR$+15,vpu'nl'k dR�.HI I I.�,
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
�I
Pam` ' Err '
t~ f
Photo 161: Wetland A, facing north
A
7l 1 � �� ;li :��. 'J I "1 ' SI _ ^� L�y' —,� II 1 J I d:•�
:1 A ll �.�I I •
I 1
Photo 162: Wetland A,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SURVEYORS-I,,v ptv'nl'k%RC.HI l b I,
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
+real ,'
AF
Photo 163: Wetland A, facing south
f{.
r'
e
Photo 164:Wetland A,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5•SURVEYORS-I i,vp,v'nl'i%RC.H I,H I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
' p�, ' �� ��. Ic� ,fib •1
iYfye � f �� f i� ++ I � r.•,1� ��
I I' -�v -s
A �
AVI�' V.�I4S 4070.rF.'�,:;.L�r�jl:�'. r�•�v.�lS.�. ��i�?ri'ki�f � . .. .h'.'.. ...���f���5-` .. ......._. :�.,-
Photo 165: Upland,facing north
71
_ •�+`~`z�4. ��C j�-..• �yy_��-. r'7'.r..eE'a \�', t•_ �4.h�`.�• �'•• .ipa= �.:•.�
Photo 166: Upland,facing east
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINEER5•SMEYORS-I S,v pw'nl'k%RC.H I,b I
Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos
F.
Photo 167: Upland,facing south
AWN
•Fr..f'rY': :.� ":'.fir:" c, V
;iy >:. y�y�es � 'S�'�:�', p;.. �Yk•s_i�::.�!''�- �/p r i° �•.
A' t N 'e9-'Y�'�+1..��,. .. .-•�.�rl�: fr F✓ ,/..:.r.,.,'�.:FY'�'�f a<•-
' ��i:-�",it �,.�/... 3y'7f1 •�F, :��P''� � ..i�
MRy
OR
.+1�ik!:1
Photo 168: Upland,facing west
�IASSOCIATES
ENGINE ER5•SIJRVEYORS-I3,vp,v'nl'k%RC.HI SH I
APPENDIX C
Data Forms
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM--Northcentral and Northeast Region
ProjecUSite: Danby City/County: Ithaca!Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: A-UP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.3532 Long: -76,4872 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
Successional old field,former croplands
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators i1minimurn of two re uir d
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re utred�check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(96)
_Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(910)
High Water Table(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(915) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_.._Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)_Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
._...Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: A-UP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Number of Dominant Species
2, That Are OBL, FACW,or FAG: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (8)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 33.3% (AIB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Rubus affegheniensis 10 Yes FACU FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. FAC species 110 x 3= 330
1 FACU species 100 x 4= 400
4, UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 210 (A) 730 (a)
6, Prevalence Index =BIA= 3.48
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
10 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Solidago rugosa 20 No FAC —3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Solidago canadensis 60 Yes FACU 4-Morphological Adaptations;(Provide supporting
3. Euthamia gramnifolia 30 No FAC data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Apocynum cannabinum 60 Yes FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. Dactylis glomerate 30 No FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree--Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g, diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
200 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tali.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15` ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1, height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3, Vegetation
4, Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Paint A-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % IyL Locz Texture Remarks
0.9 10YR 313 100 Sandy
9-18 2.5YR 414 100 Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) —Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
~_Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) —Coast Prairie Redox(Al6)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) ____,.Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(84) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland h drology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.gov/lnterneUFSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2-05l293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentrai and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: A-WET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range:Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.3532 Long: -76.4871 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wayland Soils Complex NWI classification: PEM1C
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology_significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required:check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(139) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
x High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
x Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(815) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(61) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Sediment Deposits(132) ^_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Algal Mat or Crust(64) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 8
Water Table Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 8
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous Inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: A-WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Number of Dominant Species
2 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4 Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (PJB)
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Totat Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sa lin (Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 30 x 1 = 30
1, Comus amomum 30 Yes FACW FACW species 130 x 2= 260
2 FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
51 Column Totals: 160 (A) 290 (B)
6 Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.81
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
30 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5` ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Onoclea sensibilis 100 Yes FACW X 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Typha angustifolia 30 Yes OBL 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
4 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6 be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9 diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplingishrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11 and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb--All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
130 =Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4 Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
U5 Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
i
SOIL Sampling Point A-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 311 70 10YR 314 30 C M LoamylClayey Distinct redox concentrations
16-24 10YR 311 70 10YR 314 30 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocatiow PL=Pare Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
_Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 14913) x Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Poiyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 1498)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) x Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(36) —Mail(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentrai and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www.nres.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentrai and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby _ City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: C-UP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,AbbX Lantenman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R, MLRA 140 Lat: 42,3520 Long: -76.4878 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Langford Channery Silt Loam,2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re uired•check all that apply), _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(69) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(1313) —Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(B15) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(1132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) .Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aq ultard(D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)'Other(Explain in Remarks) _Mlcrotopographic Relief(D4)
_.� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: C-UP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30- ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3' Total Number of Dominant
4, Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (AIB)
7, Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Saplinn/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: is, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. FACW species 10 x 2= 20
2. FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3. FACU species 170 x 4= 680
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 180 (A) 700 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =B1A= 3.89
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5- ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Dichanthelium clandestinum 10 No FACW 3-Prevalence Index is�53.0'
2. Solidago canadensis 80 Yes FACU 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Ranunculus acris 20 No FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Dactylis glomerata 30 Yes FACU Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. Vicia americans 10 No FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. Phleum pratense 30 Yes FACU be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8.
Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9, diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10' Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 It(1 m)tail.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
180 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15` ) Woody vines—Alt woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1, height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4, Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point C-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to documentthe indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
10-18 10YR 513 70 10YR 514 30 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface IS8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 1498)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 14913) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
_,_...Black Histic(A3) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(Si I)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) 'Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) —Depleted Matrix(F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,1498)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) —Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Stripped Matrix(S6) ____Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
'Indicators of hydroph tic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or roblemallc.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Solis,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.gov/lnterneUFSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County! Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms Stale: NY Sampling Point: C-WET
Investigator(s): Marlin Janda,Abby Lante€man Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): slight depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 LaL 42.3519 Long: -76.4879 Datum: NA083
Soil Map Unit Name: Langford channery silt loam NWI classification: Emergent
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re uirede check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) —Moss Trim Lines(1316)
x Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(1315) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B1) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) —Crayfish Burrows(C8)
—Water
Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(131)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)_Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microlopographic Relief(134)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth(inches): 8
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: C-WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3,
Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksteet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
SaolinalShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 15 x 1 W 15
1, FACW species 80 x 2= 160
2. FAC species 60 x 3= 180
3. FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4, UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5, Column Totals: 155 (A) 355 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.29
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Onoclea sensibilis 80 Yes FACW X 3-Prevalence Index is 2.3.01
2. Typha angustifolia 15 No OBL 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Euthamnia gramnlfolia 60 Yes FAC data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree--Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10, Saplinglshrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
155 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1, height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4_ Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point C-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type, Loc' Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 411 60 10YR 4/4 40 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
10-18 10YR 411 60 10YR 414 40 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. kocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric So€Is3:
_Histosol(Al) �Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) x Coast Prairie Redox(A1(3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) �5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K.L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) x Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) ~_Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Mari(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
'Indicators of hydrophyfic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.gov/internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_O5i293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithacal Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: D-UP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.353828 Long: -76.484696 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two r uired
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re uired•check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) Moss Trim Lines(1316)
x Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(1315) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
—Water Marks(131) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
—Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) �_Geomorphic Position(132)
Iron Deposits(65) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)_Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: D-UP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1' Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
SaollnoiShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Lonicera tatarica 50 Yes FACU FACW species 10 x 2= 20
2. Rosa multiRora 20 Yes FACU FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3. Comus amomum 10 No FACW FACU species 155 x 4= 620
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 155 (A) 540 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =B1A= 3,88
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
80 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) _2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Solidago canadensis 45 Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Festuca pratensis 30 Yes FACU 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Taraxacum oHicinale 10 No FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8' Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplingishrub-Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
85 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
1. height.
2.
3 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
4. Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point D-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-17 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
17-18 10YR 413 90 10YR 618 10 C M —Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains, ZLocation: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(Al0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 14913) Coast Prairie Redox(Al6)(LRR K,L,R)
.Black Hislic(A3) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) —Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
__..Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149S)
—_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) —Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) —Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) _._...Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of hydrophytic ve e#ation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic,
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators or Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:l/www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_O5l293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca!Tompkins Sampling Date: 11117I21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: D-WET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range:Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc,): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.353893 Long: -76.484439 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Welland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two re uired
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _ ._Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Moss Trim Lines(516)
x Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(1315) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B1) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(01)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(02)
—Iron Deposits(B5) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)_Other(Explain in Remarks) —Microtopographic Relief(04)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) X FAG-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations;
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 8
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
E
i
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: D-WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30, ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (AIB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheets
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. comus amomum 60 Yes FACW FACW species 160 x 2= 320
2. Comus sericea 20 Yes FACW FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3. FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5, Column Totals: 160 (A) 320 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.00
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
80 =Total Cover 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Onoclea sensibil'is 80 Yes FACW X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5' 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8' Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplinglshrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
80 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum {Plot size: 15` ) Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
3 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
4. Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point D-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % _..Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 311 70 10YR 618 30 C PUM LoamylClayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 311 50 10YR 618 50 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(Al0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
—Black Histic(A3) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chrome Sands(SII)(LRR K,L) �Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
—Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Iron-Manganese Masses(1712)(LRR K,L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(31) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(34) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(35) _Redox Depressions(FS) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Stripped Matrix(36) Marl(1710)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(37)
3Indicators of h drophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Norlhcentfal and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7A,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.u5da.govllntemeUFSE_DOCUMENTSInresl42p2_051293.docx)
E I
E
f
F
{
F
{rI:
f
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithacal Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: EUP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range:Town of Denby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: b
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Let: 42.354006 Long: -76.483250 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB NWI classificatlon: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(86)
_Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Moss Trim Lines(816)
_Saturation(A3) Mari Deposits(1315) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(81) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) �Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
—Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) Other(Explain in Remarks) �Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: EUP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5,
Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 33.3% (AIB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/ShrubStratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1, FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. FAC species 60 x 3= 180
3. FACU species 125 x 4= 500
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 185 (A) 680 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =B1A= 3.68
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Eutrochium purpureum 15 No FAG �3-Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
2. Solidago canadensis 55 Yes FACU 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Euthamia graminilolia 40 Yes FAC data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Phieum pratense 40 Yes FACU Problematic Hydro phytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. Dactylis glomerata 30 No FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. Ranunculus rapens 5 No FAC be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8• Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g, diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplingishrub-Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
185 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
4. Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point EUP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to documentthe Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
14-26 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis3:
iiistosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, —2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 1498)
iiistic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
—Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,IWILRA 149B) —5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —high Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
...Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 1498)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,1498)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Mari(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.govlintemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_d51293.doex)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: EWET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.354065 Long: -76.483527 Datum: NA083
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB NWI classification: none
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apptYL _ _ —Surface Soil Cracks(86)
^X Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(89) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
_High Water Table(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
X Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(B15) —Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(61) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: EWET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
q Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A1B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Rhamnus cathartica 20 Yes FAC FACW species 100 x 2= 200
2. Comus amomum 15 Yes FACW FAC species 65 x 3= 195
3. Comus sericea 15 Yes FACW FACU species 0 x 4= 0
q. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 165 (A) 395 (B)
5 Prevalence Index =B!A= 2.39
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Eutrochium pufpureum 45 Yes FAC X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
2. Agrostis gigantea 70 Yes FACW —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
g be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9 diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplingishrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11 and greater than or equal to 3.28 9(1 m)tali.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
115 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
q Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Norlhcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point EWET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Typel_ Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 412 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-18 10YR 412 SO 10YR 516 30 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10YR 5/2 20 C M Faint redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Sol]Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(Al0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1496) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K, L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(311)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(AS) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) �Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _._Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
—Sandy Redox(35) X Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) —Other(Explain In Remarks)
.Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of hydro tl tic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www.nres.usda,govllnternet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293,docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: FUP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform.(hiliside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.350643 Long: -76.493880 Datum: NAD83
Sail Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology naturally problematic? (It needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS--Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators minimum of two re uired
PrimaEy Indicators minimum of one is re uired&check all that a I _ .__Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(139) Drainage Patterns(1310)
_High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Mass Trim Lines(1316)
Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(B —
15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
~_Water Marks(131) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(B2) ^—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Saturation
or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(135) Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ShallowAquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)_Other(Explain in Remarks) Microlopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No—X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FUP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 33.3% (AIB)
7. Prevalence index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sa lin !Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1• FACW species 20 x 2= 40
2. FAC species 45 x 3= 135
3 FACU species 125 x 4= 500
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 190 (A) 675 (B)
6• Prevalence Index =B1A W 3.55
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators.
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is n50%
1. Andropogon gerardii 70 Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Solidago canadensis 55 Yes FACU 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Euthamia graminifolia 40 Yes FAC data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Dichanthelium clandestinum 20 No FACW Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. Ranunculus reperas 5 No FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6• be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8 Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapiingishruh—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11, and greater than or equal to 3,28 ft(1 m)tall.
12, Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
190 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1• height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
4 Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point FUP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
12-18 10YR 413 85 10YR 618 15 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=fore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) _.Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Poiyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
——Depleted Below Dark Surface(Ali) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) 'Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) —Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 14913)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Mart(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of h dro h tic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.gov/lnternet]FSE—DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby CitylCounty: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: FWET
Investigalor(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42,350492 Long: -76.493759 Datum: NADB3
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators minimum of two re wired
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(99) Drainage Patterns(1310)
_High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Moss Trim Lines(1316)
X Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(1315) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(61) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ShallowAquitard(D3)
_._.Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: FWET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4 Species Across Ali Strata: 2 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
g That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (AIB)
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sa lin /Shrub Stratum {Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 90 x 1 = 90
1 FACW species 35 x 2= 70
2 FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 125 (A) 160 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 1.28
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
=Total Cover _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Typha latifolia 40 Yes OBL X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. Alisrrma subcordatum 10 No OBL —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Carex grayi 35 Yes FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Juncus effusus 20 No OBL Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. Scirpus cyperinus 20 No OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
g be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8• Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9 diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapiinglshrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11 and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12, Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
125 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4 Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Engineers
Corps of En ineers
Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point FWET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) °%o Type Lop Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 4/2 80 10YR 6/8 20 C PLIM —Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 412 30 10YR 618 70 C Pt.1M —Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sotls3:
_Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 14913)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) _._ Mesic Spodic(TAB)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _Mari(F10)(LRR K, L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of h drophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soli Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:/lwww.nres.usda.gov/lnte€net/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM--Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: GUP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.350643 Long: -76.493880 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Weiland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required'check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(139) Drainage Patterns(1310)
High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Moss Trim Lines(1316)
Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(1315) —Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(131) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(02)
Iron Deposits(135) ~_Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Shallow Aquitard(133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)�Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographlc Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: GUP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30` ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1' Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (13)
5' Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 33.3% (A1B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Saulin4lShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. FACW species 20 x 2= 40
2. FAC species 45 x 3= 135
3. FACU specieq 125 x 4= 500
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 190 (A) 675 A
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 3.55
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Andropogon gerardii 70 Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Solidago canadensis 55 Yes FACU 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Euthamia graminifolia 40 Yes FAC data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Dichanthelium clandestinum 20 No FACW Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. Ranunculus repens 5 No FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8' Tree--Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9, diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 It(1 m)tall.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
190 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
1. height.
2.
3, Hydrophytic
Vegetation
4. Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point GUP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Lac Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
12-18 10YR 413 85 10YR 6/8 15 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocatiow PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) �Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(Si 1)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
~_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
3Indicators of hydro h tic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(If observed):
Type:
Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www,nres.usda.govllntemetiFSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM--Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: GWET
Invesligato€(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range:Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 0
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.350802 Long: -76.493470 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wettand? Yes X No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Weiland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re uiredE check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Drainage Patterns(1310)
_High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Moss Trim Lines(1316)
X Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(515) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(131) !Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) —Oxidized Rhizoapheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(02)
. ...Iron Deposits(135) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Shallow Aquilard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(04)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: GWET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
p That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4 Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (AIB)
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) 06L species 80 x 1 = 80
1. Comus sericea 15 Yes FACW FACW species 40 x 2= 80
2 FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 120 (A) 160 (B)
6 Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.33
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
15 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Scirpus cyperinus 60 Yes 013L X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
2. Phalaris arundinacea 25 Yes FACW —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Juncus e/fusus 20 No OBL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6 be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8 Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11 and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
105 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
4 Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point GWET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 412 80 10YR 618 20 C PUM Loamy/Cl ayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 4/2 30 10YR 6/8 70 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soli Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosoi(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
�Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 14913) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
~Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) �5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
_
Depleted Below Dark Surface(All 1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Depleted Matrix(F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(SS)
Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
[ 3Indicators of hydroph tic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(hftp:l/www.nres.usda.goylintemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_051293.docx)
US Army Carps of Engineers Northcenlral and Northeast Region--Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: HUP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range:Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): bottom of hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 4
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.351006 Long: -76,499364 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS--Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
ors( ,in two€eouired)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum�f
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re uired:check all that agglyl Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(B15) ._Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(131) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) �FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: HUP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30, ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Number of Dominant Species
2 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAG: 2 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4 Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 50.0% (AIB)
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1 FACW species 40 x 2= 80
2 FAC species 60 x 3= 180
3 FACU species 95 x 4= 380
4 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 195 (A) 640 (B)
6 Prevalence Index =BIA= 3.28
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5` ) _2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Andropagon gerardii 40 Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.01
2. Solidago canadensis 55 Yes FACU —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3. Euthamia graminifalia 40 Yes FAC
4. Dichanthelium clandestinum 40 Yes FACW Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. Apocynum cannabinum 20 No FAG 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6 be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
I� 9 diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
` 10, Saptingishrub—Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11 and greater than or equal to 3,28 ft(1 m)tall.
12, Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
195 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
1 height.
2' Hydrophytic
E 3. Vegetation
[.
4 Present? Yes No X
i` =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point HUP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) _Color(moist) % Color(moist) 46 Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-18 19YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,l7=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls':
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, —2 cm Muck(Al0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) —5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3){LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) 'Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Mesic Spodlc(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) .Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Stripped Matrix(S6) Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of h drophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2415 Errata.(http:l/www.nres.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE_DOCUMENTSlnresl42p2_D51293.docx)
Il
` US Army Carps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
i
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
ProjectlSlte: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: HWET
investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range:Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): bottom of hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.350923 Long: -76.499324 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two re_uired
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(89) Drainage Patterns(1310)
_High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(1313) Moss Trim Lines(1316)
X Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(B15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_..__Water Marks(131) _.._..Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(CS)
Sediment Deposits(B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) -Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
—Iron Deposits(B5) -Thin Muck Surface(C7) -Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)—Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BS) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: HWET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Salix discolor 15 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4 Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
ti That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (AIB)
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
15 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) OBL species 50 x 1 = 50
1 FACW species 110 x 2= 220
2 FAC species 10 x 3= 30
3 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 170 (A) 300 (B)
6 Prevalence Index =BIA= 1.76
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Scirpus cyperinus 20 No OBL X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. Epilobium hirsutum 40 Yes FACW —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. 7ypha angustifolia 30 No OBL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Onoclea sensibilis 55 Yes FACW Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. Euthamia gramirallolia 10 No FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6 be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
y diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. 5aplinglshrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11 and greater than or equal to 3.28 it(1 m)tap.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
155 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 16, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4 Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
E
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point HWET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 311 90 10YR 518 10 C PUM —Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 312 60 10YR 518 40 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
Histosol(Al) PClyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(All0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 14913)
_—Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Thin
Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Solis(F19)(MLRA 14913)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(Fa) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Stripped Matrix(S6) Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndic3tors of hydmpbytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Norlhcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.gov/lnterneUFSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_(151293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM--Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithacal Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Nor but Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: IUP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman _Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landfofm(hillside,terrace,etc.): bottom of hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 4
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.351674 Long: -76.496535 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondaty Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is€e uired'check all that apply) ____ —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(139) Drainage Patterns(1310)
_High Water Table(A2) ~_Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Moss Trim Lines(1316)
Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(B15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(131) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iran(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iran Deposits(85) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)�Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if avallabW
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: IUP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum {Plot size: 30' } %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1' Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAG: 0 (A)
3' Total Number of Dominant
4, Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3. FACU species 95 x 4= 380
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 95 (A) 380 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =B!A= 4.00
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Andropogon gerardii 40 Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. Solidago canadensis 55 Yes FACU —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5' 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8' Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height,
10. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
95 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
3 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
4. Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet,)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point IUP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to documentthe indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sails':
_Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface($8)(LRR R, 2 cm Muck(Al0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 14913) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
_Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(Sg)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvaiue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) ^—Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) —Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 14913)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(1722)
Stripped Matrix(S6) —Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of hydroph tic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.gov/lnternetIFSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_O5l293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithacal Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: IWET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): concave Slope%: 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.351769 Long: -76.496575 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required
Primant Indicators minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(139) Drainage Patterns(1310)
High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _W._.Moss Trim Lines(1316)
X Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(1315) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(131) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_.._._Sediment Deposits(B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Saturation Visible an Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposits(133) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(135) TThin Muck Surface(C7) _ShailowAquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)iOther(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographlc Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) X FAG-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Norlhcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2,0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: IWET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. 5altx discolor 15 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A!B)
7, Prevalence Index worksheet:
15 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sagling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 75 x 1 = 75
1, FACW species 40 x 2= 80
2. FAC species 20 x 3= 60
3, FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4, UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 135 (A) 215 (B)
6, Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.59
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Scirpus cyperinus 5 No OBL X 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Schoenoplectus tabemaemontani 15 No OBL —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Typha angustffolia 55 Yes OBL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Onoclea sensibilis 25 Yes FACW Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. Euthamia graminifolia 20 No FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree--Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g, diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10.
Sapiinglshrub—Woody plants Less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 R(1 m)tali.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
120 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3,28 f€in
1, height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
4. Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point IWET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 311 90 10YR 518 10 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 312 60 10YR 518 40 C PLUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
_.__.Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(W)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) .,Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
T Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Stripped Matrix(S6) —Mad(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:l/www.nres,usda.govilntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
ProjectJSite: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: JUP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danb
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): bottom of hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.351765 Long: -76.494794 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is reouired•check all that apply) ____ _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(139) Drainage Patterns(B10)
High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(I313) _Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(815) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(Bi) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) —Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Sediment Deposits(132) Oxidized Rhizospheres on living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
~Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)�Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
E
€€f
fE
F
E
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcenlrai and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
(
E
[i
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: JUP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAG: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAG: 25.0% (A1B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of, Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Lonicera maackii 35 Yes UPI. FACW species 20 x 2= 40
2. FAG species 0 x 3= 0
3. FACU species 70 x 4= 280
4• UPL species 35 x 5= 175
5. Column Totals: 125 (A) 495 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 3.96
7• Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
35 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2 Dominance Test is>50%
1. Andropogon gerardii 30 Yes FACU 3 Prevalence index is 53.0'
2. Solidago canadensis 40 Yes FACU —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Bidens frondosa 20 Yes FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6• be present,unless disturbed or problematic,
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8.
Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
90 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
t height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
4, Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point JUP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soiis3:
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) Coast Prairie Redox(A15)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) ^Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 14913)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) �Mesic Spod€c(TAB)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(FB) -Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Stripped Matrix(S6) .Mart(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nrr-s.usda.gov/lnterneUFSE—DOCUMENTSInresl42p2_O5l293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: JWET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danb
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope%: 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.351715 Long: -76.494743 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is reauireds check all that apply) _ _ _Surface Soil Cracks(86)
X Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(89) Drainage Pattems(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(1313) Moss Trim Lines(816)
X Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(1315) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(131) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(85) Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquilard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)_Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 8
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: JWET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plat size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. 5alix discolor 25 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4 Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
B. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
25 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sa ling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, } OBL species 25 x 1 = 25
1 FACW species 70 x 2= 140
2 FAC species 20 x 3= 60
3 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 115 (A) 225 (B)
61 Prevalence Index =B1A= 1,96
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. scirpus cyperinus 5 No OBL X 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Typha angustifolia 20 Yes OBL �4-Morphological Adaptations(Provide supporting
3. Onoclea sensibilis 45 Yes FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. l=uthamia graminifolia 20 Yes FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6 be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9 diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in. DISH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
90 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1 height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
4. Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point JWET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Lac Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 311 90 10YR 518 10 C PLIM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10-18 10YR 312 60 10YR 518 40 C PLIM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocatiom PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(Al0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 14913) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Biack Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
^_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) �Polyvalue Below Surface(88)(LRR K,L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) -Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,1498)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ...._ Red Parent Material(F21)
-Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(86) _Marl(F10)(LRR K, L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.govllnternet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby —_ City/County: Ithacal Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point' KUP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Denby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.352336 Long: -76.493400 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report,)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply.)_ _ _Surface Soil Cracks(66)
_Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(B15) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(132)
Iron Deposits(65) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)_Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well, aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: KUP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Poputus tremutoides 40 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Carya ovate 25 Yes FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3. Quercus rubra 30 Yes FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5' Percent of Dominant Species
6, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (A1B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
95 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by;
Saplirig/Shrub Stratum (Plat size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Lonicera maackli 25 Yes UPL FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3. FACU species 95 x 4 W 380
4. UPL species 25 x 5= 125
5. Column Totals: 120 (A) 505 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 4.21
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
25 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5. ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. _3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2, 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophyile Vegetation' (Explain)
5. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8.
Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3,28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
=Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4. Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Carps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point KUP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) % _Color(moist)_ % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pare Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_H€stosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(Se)(LRR R, 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
~_Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(SB)(LRR K,L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 14913)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Mesic Spodic(TAB)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
3Indicators of hydrophyfic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(€f observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7,0,2015 Errata.(http:Itwww.nres,usda.gov/lnternetJFSE_DOCUMENTS/nresi42p2_051293,docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca!Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: KWET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc,): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope%: 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.352296 Long: -76.493486 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 'Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required*check all that a I _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(All) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(1313) Moss Trim Lines(B16)
X Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(1315) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(131) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(CB)
Sediment Deposits(132) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(63) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
._Iron Deposits(135) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)�Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) X FAC-Neulral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Norlheast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: KWET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Salix discolor 35 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species
2, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
q Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
35 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
SapiinolShrub Stratum (Plat size: 15' ) OBL species 35 x 1 = 35
1 FACW species 90 x 2= 180
2 FAC species 25 x 3= 75
3. FACU species 0 x 4= 0
q UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 150 (A) 290 (B)
8 Prevalence Index =BIA= 1.93
7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Scirpus cyperinus 35 Yes OBL X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
2. Phalaris arundinacea 35 Yes FACW 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Onoclea sensibllis 20 No FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4, l=uthamia graminifolla 25 Yes FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. 'Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must
6 be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9 diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplinglshrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11 and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
115 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1 height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
q Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
E
I
f
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point KWET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) °k Type' Lac Texture Remarks
0.9 14YR 311 70 10YR 618 30 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 311 50 14YR 618 50 C PUM —Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric 5oils3:
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(39)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) Loamy Gleyed Mairix(172) —Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(1719)(MLRA 149S)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) X Redox Dark Surface(176) Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(34) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(1=8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(36) _Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Dark Surface(S7)
alndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(h€tp:llwww.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithacal Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: L-UP
Investigalor(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danb
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.3523 Long: -76.4950 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification! none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required:check all that a I _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(89) _Drainage Pattems(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Moss Trim Lines(B16)
x Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(815) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(131) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Sediment Deposits(1132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Algal Mal or Crust(134) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(CB) Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(B5) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)_Other(Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief(04)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(1138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)__
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well, aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: L-UP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
g• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 20.0% (AIB)
7• Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Lonicera tatarica 75 Yes FACU FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. Rosa multiRora 20 Yes FACU FAC species 20 x 3= 60
3. FACU species 125 x 4= 500
4, UPL species 25 x 5= 125
5. Column Totals: 170 (A) 685 (B)
g. Prevalence Index =B1A= 4.03
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
95 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophyfic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Apocynum cannabinum 20 Yes FAC �3-Prevalence Index is s3.01
2. Fragana vesca 15 Yes UPL 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Taraxacum officinale 10 No FACU data in Remarks or an a separate sheet)
4. Sofidago canadensis 20 Yes FACU Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. Daucus carota 10 No UPL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
g, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8 Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplingishrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.D13H
11• and greater than or equal to 3,28 R(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
75 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—Al woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1 height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3.
Vegetation
4• Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point L-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-17 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
17-18 10YR 413 80 10YR 618 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocatiom PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, —2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
~Black Histic(A3) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K, L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(39)(LRR K,L)
_
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) �Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
—Sandy Redox(35) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Stripped Matrix(S6) Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_.�.Dark Surface(37)
3Indicators of h drophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcent€al and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:!lwww.nres.usda.govllnternetlFSE_DOCUMENTSinresl42p2_O51293.doGx)
f
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentrai and Northeast Region--Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: L-WET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lai: 42.3522 Long: -76.4961 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic!hydrologic conditions an the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required:check all that_apptyl_ _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(1913) Moss Trim Lines(B16)
x Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(B15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(191) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Crayfish Burrows(CB)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(01)
_Algal Mat or Crust(194) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C5) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) —Thin Muck Surface(07) —Shallow Aquitard(03)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137)_Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) X FAC-Neutral Test(05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: L-WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30, ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1- Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
6. Percent of Dominant Species
6, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (AlB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
SaolinalShrub Stratum (Plot size: 16, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Salix discolor 80 Yes FACW FACW species 180 x 2= 360
21 FAC species 5 x 3= 15
3. FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 185 (A) 375 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 2.03
7, Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
80 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5- ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Onoclea sensibilis 90 Yes FACW X 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Symphyotrichum lateri/forum 5 No FAC 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Lysimachia nummularfa 10 No FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8• Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g• diameter at breast height(D61-1),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
105 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines--All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
4. Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentrai and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point L-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) "/o Type Loe Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 311 70 10YR 618 30 C PUM LoamylClayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 3/1 50 10YR 618 50 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
—Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
—Black Histic(A3) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
—Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(Ft)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) �Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(FS) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _�._.Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) —Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
'Indicators of hydra hytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.govlinternel/FSE_DOCUMENTSInres142p2_051293.docx)
j
i
€ I
f
t
1
41
k
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
c
i'
I
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM--Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: M-UP
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landfonn(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): none Slope%: 3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.3528 Long: -76,4960 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(B10)
High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(1313) Moss Trim Lines(BIB)
Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(B15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(131) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(CB)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _._._.Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(131)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(CB) _Geomorphic Position(02)
.�Iron Deposits(135) Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well, aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: M-UP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size! 30` ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus strobus 65 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Quercus rubra 30 Yes FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAG: 1 (A)
3• Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
g• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 20.0% (Ali3)
7• Prevalence Index worksheet:
95 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15` ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Lonicera tatarica 70 Yes FACU FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. Rubus idaeus 10 No FACU FAC species 15 x 3= 45
3• FACU species 175 x 4= 700
4• UPL species 20 x 5= 100
5. Column Totals: 210 (A) 845 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.02
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
80 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size, 5` ) _2-Dominance Test is>50%
I, Euthamia graminifolia 15 Yes FAC 3-Prevalence Index is s3.01
2. Fragana vesca 20 Yes UPL 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5• 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
8, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7• Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more In
9, diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub--Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
35 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15` ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1_ height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4• Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point M-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soli Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils*':
Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 1498)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
_Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(Sg)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) —Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Red Parent Material(F21)
Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_..._..Stripped Matrix(S6) —Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
...Dark Surface(S7)
3Indicators of h drophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:I/www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293,doex)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
ApplicantlOwner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: M-WET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landfarm(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope%: 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lai: 42.3529 Long: -76.4959 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: SecondarV Indicators minimum of two required)
Primary,Indicators minimum of one is required-,check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) Drainage Patterns(810)
_High Water Table(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Drainage
Trim Lines(B16)
X Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(1315) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(Bi) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(84) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(02)
Iron Deposits(B5) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ShallowAquitard(D3)
.Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)_Other(Explain in Remarks) —Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcent€al and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: M-WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2• That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4 Species Across All Strata: 2 (0)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of-. Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. FACW species 85 x 2= 170
2 FAC species 20 x 3= 60
3• FACU species 10 x 4= 40
4 UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5 Column Totals: 115 (A) 270 (B)
g Prevalence Index =B1A= 2.35
7• Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Solidago canadensis 10 No FACU X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. Phalaris arundinacea 20 No FACW 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Onoclea sensibilis 40 Yes FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Lysimachia nummularia 25 Yes FACW Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. Symphyotrichum lateriflorum 20 No FAC 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
g be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7 Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8• Tree--Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g diameter at breast height(DOH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub--Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
115 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3• Vegetation
4 Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet•)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point M-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 311 70 10YR 6/8 30 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 3/1 50 10YR 618 50 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Po€e Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 14913) X Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(Sg)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
.�Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(Si 1)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 14913)
T Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TAG)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.govllnterneUFSE_DOCUMENTS[nresl42p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
ProjectJSite: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
ApplicantJOwner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: N-UP
Investigator(s): Marlin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.3529 Long: -76.4957 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS--Attach site map snowing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re uired check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) —Water-Stained Leaves(B9) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
High Water Table(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(B13) Moss Trim Lines(1316)
_Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(B15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(81) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
—Sediment Deposits(B2) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ShallowAquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)_Other(Explain in Remarks) —Microto pograp hic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: N-UP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4, Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5' Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (A1B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Lonicera fatarica 45 Yes FACU FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. Rosa muffiflora 20 Yes FACU FAC species 10 x 3= 30
3. FACU species 210 x 4= 840
4. UPL species 25 x 5= 125
5. Column Totals: 245 (A) 995 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 4.06
7, Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
65 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Fvthamia graminifolla 10 No FAC ^3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. Fragaria vesca 15 No UPL �4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Festuca pratensis 60 Yes FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. 5ofidago canadensis 55 Yes FACU Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. Daucus carota 10 No UPL 'indicators of hydfic soil and wetland hydrology must
6. Taraxacum officinale 20 No FACU be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Gallum aparine 10 No FACU Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8' Tree--Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10' Saplingish rub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
it. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12' Herb--All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
180 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
i. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3' Vegetation
4. Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Carps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point N-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) °r6 Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-17 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
17-18 10YR 413 80 10YR 618 20 C M —Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis3:
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, i2 cm Muck(At0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Hislic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 1498) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
—Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chrome Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ....Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) —Depleted Matrix(F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) —Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Dark Surface(S7)
3indicators of h drophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Re m a rks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:l/www.nres.usda.gov/lnterneUFSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: N-WET
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.3529 Long: -76.4957 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reguired)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
X Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(139) Drainage Patterns(1310)
High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(1313) —Moss Trim Lines(B16)
x Saturation(A3) _Mari Deposits(B15) ____ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(131) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(CB)
Sediment Deposits(B2) �_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) iGeomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) Thin Muck Surface(C7) ^_Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Mic€otopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth(inches): 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: N-WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 301 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 25 Yes FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
3' Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5' Percent of Dominant Species
g, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A1B)
7, Prevalence Index worksheet:
25 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, } OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1, FACW species 115 x 2= 230
2. FAC species 30 x 3= 90
3, FACU species 0 x 4= 0
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 145 (A) 320 (B)
g, Prevalence Index =BlA= 2.21
7, Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Phalaris arundinacea 90 Yes FACW X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2. Eutrochium purpureum 30 Yes FAC 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetations(Explain)
5' 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
g, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8.
Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplingishrub—Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12.
Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
120 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
Woody vines—All woody vines greater Than 3.28 ft in
1, height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3, Vegetation
4. Present? Yes X No
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point N-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches)__ Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type LoP Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 311 70 10YR 618 30 C PLIM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18 10YR 311 50 10YR 618 50 C PLIM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Qepletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains, 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, 2 cm Muck(All0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) X Coast Prairie RedOX(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) ^5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
_depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) —Piedmont Floodplain Solis(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) X Redox Dark Surface(176) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(1722)
Stripped Matrix(S6) —Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
__ Dark Surface(S7)
"Indicators of h drophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Sal]Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres,usda.govllnternet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_051293.doex)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM--Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: UP-1
Investigator(s): Marlin.ianda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range:Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 3
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42,350678 Long: -76.488088 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB NWI classification: none
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances'present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS--Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wettand? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum,of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(89) Drainage Patterns(B10)
_—High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
—Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(B15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(B1) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(82) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) ..__..Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Aigal Mat or Crust(B4) __._Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) ShallowAquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)—Other(Explain in Remarks) —Shallow
Relief(04)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UP-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3' Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (AIB)
7. prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum {Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1, Lonicera morrowli FACU FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. FAC species 10 x 3= 30
3. FACU species 120 x 4= 480
4. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
5, Column Totals: 130 (A) 510 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 3.92
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) _2 Dominance Test is>50%
1. Festuca pratensis 55 Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Solidago canadensis 60 Yes FACU W 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Taraxacum oHicinale 5 No FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Ranunculus repens 10 No FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6, he present, unless disturbed or problematic,
7, Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8.
Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub--Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb--All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
130 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1, height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4, present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point UP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) ; Color(moist) °/a Tie LocZ Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. aLocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
_Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 1496)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
—Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(Sg)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) ^Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) —Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) —Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
T Dark Surface(S7)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www.nres.usda,goviinterneUFSE_DOCUMENTS/nresi42p2—O5l2g3.doex)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentrai and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY I Sampling Point: UP-2
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none I Slope%: 1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.352177 Long: -76.497564 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetiand Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary.Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Drainage Patterns(1310)
High Water Tattle(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(B13) Moss Trim Lines(616)
.Saturation(A3) —Marl Deposits(1315) —Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(131) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) ..,..Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Drift Deposils(B3) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
�_Iron Deposits(135) Thin Muck Surface(C7) —Shallow Aquilard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7)^_Other(Explain in Remarks) M icrotopograp hie Relief(D4)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) .—FAC-Neulral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UP-2
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1' Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3,
Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5' Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (AIB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Lonicera maackii 40 Yes UPL FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. Rosa mullitiore 10 Yes FACU FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3. FACU species 90 x 4= 360
4. UPL species 75 x 5= 375
5. Column Totals: 165 (A) 735 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 4.45
7. Hydrophytic.Vegetation Indicators:
50 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Trifolium pretense 50 Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
2. Solidago canadensis 30 Yes FACU -4 Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3. Centaurea stoebe 35 Yes UPL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
S. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
a.
Tree--Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
g. diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplinglshrub-Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
115 =Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tail.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines--Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
Hydrophytic
3. Vegetation
4. Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentra€and Northeast Region-Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point UP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tye Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 413 100 Loamy/Clayey
8-18 10YR 4/3 97 10YR 618 3 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix,
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil53:
Histosol(Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, —2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
—Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 1498) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) Polyvatue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L} _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
—Stratified
Below Dark Surface(A11) Loamy Gieyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) _Piedmont Floodplain Solis(F19)(MLRA 1496)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Dark Surface(F6) T Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,1498)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ._._ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _Red Parent Material(F21)
—Sandy Redox(S5) Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293,docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
ProjecUSite: Danby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: UP-3
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township, Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.3533 Long: -76.4931 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report,)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ____ _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) Drainage Patterns(B10)
_High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(1313) Moss Trim Lines(1316)
Saturation(A3) Marl Deposits(B15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —_Crayfish Burrows(CB)
Sediment Deposits(B2) �_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(DI)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION W Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UP-3
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status dominance Test worksheet:
1. Carya ovata 30 Yes FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2. Fagus grandifolia 40 Yes FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6, That Are OgL,FACW,or FAC: 12.5% (AIB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
1❑❑ =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
SaolinolShrub Stratum (Plot size: 16 ) OBL species 0 x 1 = ❑
1. Lonicera rnaackii 25 Yes UPL FACW species ❑ x 2= 0
2. Fagus grandifo&a 45 Yes FACU FAC species 30 x 3= 90
3. Rosa muldflora 20 Yes FACU FACU species 215 x 4= 860
4• UPL species 25 x 5= 125
5. Column Totals: 270 (A) 1075 (B)
6, Prevalence Index =BIA= 3.98
7, Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
90 =Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 51 ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Taraxacum officinale 50 Yes FACU 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Sofidago canadensis 30 Yes FACU —4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Fxplain)
5. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6, be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
7, definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8.
Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9, diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Saplingishrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb--All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
80 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height,
2.
Hydrophytic
3 Vegetation
4, Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentrai and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Paint UP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 513 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K,L,MLRA 14913)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149B) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,6IILRA 1498) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) —Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _._..Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Matrix(F3) —Piedmont Floodptain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B)
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) —Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) —Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stripped Matrix(S6) —Marl(F10)(LRR K, L) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
31ndicators of h drophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:llwww.nres.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2—O5l293.docx)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentrai and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Northcentral and Northeast Region
Project/Site: Denby City/County: Ithaca/Tompkins Sampling Date: 11/17/21
Applicant/Owner: Norbut Solar Farms State: NY Sampling Point: UP-4
Investigator(s): Martin Janda,Abby Lanterman Section,Township,Range: Town of Danby
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope%: 2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR R,MLRA 140 Lat: 42.3534 Long: -76.4898 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: EbB NWI classification: none
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes,optional Wetland Site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply/ _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(Al) _Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(B10)
High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(B13) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Saturation(A3) _Marl Deposits(B15) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Water Marks(B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Crayfish Burrows(CB)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits (135) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) —ShalfowAquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) ._.__Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0
VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: UP-4
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1' Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3' Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (AIB)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of'. Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. FACW species 0 x 2= 0
2. FAC species 0 x 3= 0
3. FACU species 95 x 4= 380
4. UP species 0 x 5= 0
5. Column Totals: 95 (A) 380 (B)
6. Prevalence Index =BIA= 4.00
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
=Total Cover 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) 2-Dominance Test is>50%
1. Andropogon gerardii 80 Yes FACU _3-Prevalence Index is s3.01
2. Solidago canadensis 15 No FACU 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
5' 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present,unless disturbed or problematic,
7. Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
8.
Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in
9, diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of height.
10. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH
11. and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
12. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
95 =Total Cover of size,and woody plants less than 3,28 ft tall.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15, ) Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
1. height.
2.
3 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
4. Present? Yes No X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point UP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/3 100 LoamylClayey
Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sotls3:
Histosol(Al) �Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, �2 cm Muck(Al0)(LRR K,L,MLRA 149B)
Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 14913) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
_Black Histic(A3) —Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) —5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —High Chroma Sands(S11)(LRR K,L) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K,L)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K,L) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K,L)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al1) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Matrix(F3) Piedmont Floodplain Sails(F19)(MLRA 149B)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145,149B)
_Sandy Gieyed Matrix(S4) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Marl(F10)(LRR K,L) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface(S7)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic,
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the MRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Sails,
Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http:/Avww.nrca.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTSlnresl42p2_051293.docx)
US Army Carps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0