Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-NSF-Danby-Consolidated-Submission-Package-012522 January 25, 2022 Town of Danby Attn: Mr. West 1830 Danby Road Danby, NY Re: NSF Danby Response Package – 01/25/22 Dear Mr. West: On Behalf of our client, Norbut Solar Farms, LLC. Attached to this letter is the consolidated application package for the Norbut Solar Danby Project. Below are any revisions made to the materials since their original submission dates: SECTION 2: Long Environmental Assessment Form – Revised 12/06/21 Revisions to D.2.b, D.2.e.III & E.1.b are to match the new site design, avoiding all wetlands described in the BME Wetlands Report, as well as Wetlands generally described by Tompkins County Online Wetland Mapper. (11/05/21)Revisions are to various sections of the form due to satisfy the comments from the Tompkins County Soils and Water, Tompkins County Planning, TG Miller, P.C. comments, as well as town board members from previous meetings. SECTION 3: Solar Array Civil Design Plans – Revised 01/04/22 Revisions are to address comments from the NYSDEC (those comments were provided to the town on 01/10/22). (12/06/21)Revisions are for new solar array layout to avoid wetlands described in BME Wetlands report. Array layout stays within setbacks & regulated stream buffers set previously. The design also incorporates a new POI location that is set away from Danby Road and away from the ROE Family Barn. (11/05/21)Revisions are across the plan set to satisfy the comments received from the Tompkins County Soils and Water, Tompkins County Planning, TG Miller, P.C. comments, as well as town board members from previous meetings. SECTION 3a: Solar Array Additional Screening Plans – Revised 12/08/21 The screening plans have been revised to show the location of the most up to date proposed access drive. The driveway is farther west from the closest residence at 54 Bald Hill, maintaining a strip of existing vegetation compared to the original road location. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 4: Subdivision Plan – Revised 12/10/21 The subdivision plan was revised to show the new driveway location. The plan was also updated to match the new solar array layout so all parcels have 5MW generative capacity or less; meeting the NYSERDA NY-Sun community solar program requirements. SECTION 5: Electrical Agregate Map – 12/06/21 The Agregate map was revised to match the new site layout described in sections 2 & 3 of this submission iteration above. SECTION 6: Tax Map – Revised 12/08/21 The Tax map in the submission package was not of the project location. The proper tax map of Danby has been placed in the package. (06/30/21) The Tax map of the site has been placed in this package to satisfy application requirement “g” showing actual access to the project site. The parcel is directly connected to Bald Hill Road. SECTION 8: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan – Revised 01/04/22 Revisions are to address comments from the NYSDEC (those comments were provided to the town on 01/10/22). (12/06/22) Revisions are to match the described new solar array layout. The SWPPP makes notice of existing and not to be disturbed ephemeral drainage patterns to prevent alteration to existing drainage patterns. The SHPO Effect Finding Letter has been added to Appendix H of the SWPPP. (09/27/21) Revisions are to provide hydrological calculations and provide a diversion structure to protect the creek to satisfy the comments received from the Tompkins County Soils and Water, Tompkins County Planning, TG Miller, P.C. comments. SECTION 9: Contractor Information & Proof of Liability Insurance – To be Submitted Applicant will provide Name, address and contact information for the professional system installation company prior to start of construction. A system installer has not yet been selected for this project. NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; NSF Danby Site 3, LLC of the Solar Energy facility shall provide the Town Clerk with liability insurance coverage prior to the start of construction and operation. Industry standards are that insurance certificates are generated and provided, to the authority having jurisdiction, prior to, but within reasonable proximity to the start of onsite construction or system operations. Insurances are specific to each project and location and are not typically carried in formal policy until just prior to the start of operations. APPENDIX D: Noise Study – Revised 12/17/21 Revisions are to reflect the new solar array layout that avoids wetlands. Page 3 of 3 APPENDIX E: Visualizations – Revised 12/07/21 Revisions include removing the visualizations for the POI location next to the ROE barn, these visuals are replaced with new ones showing the new proposed driveway & POI location. The visualizations also include showing the POI behind the Town Hall. (11/02/21)Revisions are to show the height of the panels from 16.5’ to 18’ to make sure all panels are still un-visible from all areas previously discussed. APPENDIX H: Wetland Delineation Report – 12/06/21 A Northern Harrier Evaluation Letter by Environmental Resources, LLC is provided in this submission, the letter describes that the site does not currently provide a habitat used by the Northern Harrier. (09/02/21)At the request of the Town, a second wetland delineation map and report is being created by a third party team and will be submitted when completed. The original wetland delineation report by Gene Pellet with Environmental Resources, LLC is included. The additional report will be added to the submission package shortly. Ultimately, the US Army Corps of Engineers is the authority or governing body on the boundaries of the wetlands. The USACE has responded to the request for a site visit. The USACE will provide a Jurisdictional Determination Letter (JD Letter) providing the final say on wetland boundaries for the project area. We have received the following communication from June Lathrop, Administrative Support, at the US Army Corps of Engineers – Your jurisdictional determination request has been received by the Buffalo District Regulatory Branch and assigned Department of the Army File No. LRB-2021-01396 (Norbut Solar Farms, Environmental Resources, LLC – Danby). You will be notified by email when a project manager has been assigned. Sincerely, David L. Cox, PE MBA Associate|Civil Department Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Application Letter from Nixon Peabody – 6/30/21 SECTION 1a: Development Review Application – 6/30/21 SECTION 1b: Agricultural Data Statement – 6/30/21 SECTION 2: Long Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 (Revised) – 12/06/21 SECTION 3: Solar Array Civil Design Plans (Revised) – 01/04/22 SECTION 3a: Solar Array Additional Screening Plans (Revised) – 12/08/21 SECTION 4: Subdivision Plan (Revised) – 12/10/21 SECTION 5: Electrical Aggregate Plans (Revised) – 12/06/21 SECTION 5a: Solar Panel & Inverter Specifications – 06/30/21 SECTION 5b: Photovoltaic Simulation Report – 06/30/21 SECTION 6: Tax Map of Parcel Showing Direct Access to Site – 12/08/21 SECTION 7: Operation, Maintenance & Emergency Response Plan – 06/30/21 SECTION 8: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Revised) – 01/04/22 *SHPO Effect Finding Letter included in Appendix H of the SWPPP report. SECTION 9: Contractor & Proof of Liability Insurance (To be submitted at a later date) SECTION 10: Decommissioning Plan – 06/30/21 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A: Sample of Proposed Fence – 06/30/21 APPENDIX B: SHPO Historic Resources Report – 11/01/21 APPENDIX C: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment – 07/15/21 APPENDIX D: Noise Study (Revised) – 12/17/21 APPENDIX E: Visualizations (Revised) – 11/02/21 APPENDIX F: Response Letters to Tompkins County – 09/27/21 APPENDIX G: Response Letter to TG Miller – 09/20/21 APPENDIX H: Wetland Delineation Report by BME Associates & Northern Harrier Evaluation Letter – 12/06/21 Nathan E. Vander Wal, Esq. T 585-263-1312 nvanderwal@nixonpeabody.com 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604-1792 585-263-1000 4822-9466-6992.1 June 30, 2021 Town Board Planning Board Town of Danby 1830 Danby Road Ithaca, NY 14850 RE: Application to the Town of Danby Town Board and Planning Board for the Establishment of a Planned Development Zone for Property Located at No Number Bald Hill Road, Town of Danby, Tompkins County, New York, Tax Parcel No. 10.-1-21.122, to Accommodate the Development and Operation of a Solar Energy Generation Facility Dear Members of the Town Board and the Planning Board: Norbut Solar Farm, LLC; NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; and NSF Danby Site 3, LLC (the “Applicant”) proposes to construct three 5-MW(AC) ground-mounted photovoltaic (PV) electricity generation facilities (the “Project”) on certain undeveloped land located at No Number Bald Hill Road in the Town of Danby, Tax Parcel No. 10.-1-21.122 (the “Site”). The Project includes the construction of three (3) immediately adjacent PV facilities at the Site, with related improvements to include pad-mounted electrical equipment, overhead electrical interconnection to existing public utilities, a gravel access drive, perimeter security fencing, limited land grading, and stormwater management improvements. The Property is located in the Medium Density Residential (MD) Zoning District. The Project, a “Solar Energy Facility” under the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Danby (the “Code”), is not a permitted use in the MD district. However, pursuant to the Code, and following discussions with the Town Planner, David West, Section 604 of the Code provides for the establishment of a Planned Development Zone (“PD Zone”) to accommodate certain development of land within the Town, including a Solar Energy Facility, and to establish appropriate standards pursuant to which such development shall occur. Accordingly, the following enclosures are submitted for the Town’s review connection with the establishment of a PD Zone at the Property for the Project (collectively, the “Application”): • Town Development Application Form for Establishment of PD Zone, Site Plan and Subdivision Approvals for Project • Project Site Plan in compliance with Code Sections 800 (Rezoning) and 808 (Solar Energy Facility) 4822-9466-6992.1 Town of Danby Town Board and Planning Board June 30, 2021 Page 2 • Long Environmental Assessment Form • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan • Project Operation and Maintenance Plan • Project Decommissioning Plan • Landscape Screening Plan • Agricultural Data Statement • Emergency Response Plan • PV Array Layout and Design Drawing • Three line Diagrams • Project Equipment Specifications As reflected in the above-referenced enclosures, the proposed PD Zone meets the regulations set out for a PD Zone under Section 604 of the Code, except as reflected in the Project Site Plan, for which regulations the Applicant will seek a waiver or alteration from the Town Board pursuant to Section 604(2) of the Code. Given the Site’s location within 500 feet of a farm operation in the TOMP002 Agricultural District, the Project must be referred to the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability, as required under New York General Municipal Law Section 239-m, and the Applicant has submitted an Agricultural Data Statement (with adjoiner exhibit) pursuant to Town Law Section 283-a. The Applicant respectfully requests that the Town make the required GML 239-m referral and mail the written notice to the landowners identified in the adjoiner exhibit to the Ag Data Statement. Upon receipt and review of the enclosed materials, please place this Application on the next available meeting agenda for the Town Planning Board pursuant to Section 800 of the Code. If the Town requires any additional information or materials to deem this Application preliminarily complete, please let us know. We look forward to working with the Town in connection with this exciting opportunity. Thank you. Sincerely, Nathan E. Vander Wal 06/29/2021 Rev. June 27, 2019 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT Town of Danby Tax Parcel No. _______________ Tompkins County Agricultural District No. 1 or 2 NOTE: Section 283-a of the Town Law (effective July 1, 1993) requires that any application for a Special Permit, Site Plan Approval, Use Variance or Subdivision Approval on property within an Agricultural District containing a farm operation, OR on property with boundaries within five hundred (500) feet of a farm operation that is located in an Agricultural District, include an Agricultural Data Statement. ALL applications requiring an Agricultural Data Statement must be referred to the Tompkins County Planning Board in accordance with amended section 239-m and 239-n of the General Municipal Law (effective July 1, 1993). Part I: Agricultural Data Statement Name of Applicant __________________________________________________________________ Mailing Address __________________________________________________________________ Description of Project________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Names and addresses of those owners of land within Tompkins County Agricultural District #1 or #2 that contain farm operations AND are located within five hundred (500) feet of the project property: 1. ________________________________________________________________ 2. ________________________________________________________________ 3. ________________________________________________________________ 4. ________________________________________________________________ 5._________________________________________________________________ Attach to this form a copy of a tax map showing the site of the proposed project relative to the locations of farm operations identified above. Farm Operations are defined as “...the land used in agricultural production, farm buildings, equipment and farm residential buildings” according to Section 301, Article 25 AA of the Agricultural and Markets Law. Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Agricultural District Review 2019 Ü 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30.25 Miles TOWN OF DANBY Removals Additions Agricultural District 1 Agricultural District 2 Municipal Boundaries Page 1 of 13 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A.Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State: Zip Code: Page 2 of 13 B. Government Approvals B.Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Required Application Date (Actual or projected) a.City Counsel, Town Board, 9 Yes 9 No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village 9 Yes 9 No Planning Board or Commission c.City, Town or 9 Yes 9 No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies 9 Yes 9 No e. County agencies 9 Yes 9 No f. Regional agencies 9 Yes 9 No g. State agencies 9 Yes 9 No h. Federal agencies 9 Yes 9 No i. Coastal Resources. i.Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?9 Yes 9 No ii.Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? 9 Yes 9 No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?9 Yes 9 No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the 9 Yes 9 No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? •If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. •If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site 9 Yes 9 No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes 9 No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; 9 Yes 9 No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance.9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit?9 Yes 9 No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i.What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action?_____________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed?_____________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?_____________ acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i.Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? 9 Yes 9 No iii.Number of lots proposed? ________ iv.Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ 9 Yes 9 No _____ months _____ _____ month _____ year e.Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? i.If No, anticipated period of construction: ii.If Yes: •Total number of phases anticipated •Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) •Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year •Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 f. Does the project include new residential uses?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii.Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii.Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes 9 No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i.Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii.If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams 9 Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v.Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi.Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? 9 Yes 9 No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii.How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? •Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ •Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii.Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? 9 Yes 9 No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v.What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi.What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii.What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii.Will the excavation require blasting?9 Yes 9 No ix.Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes 9 No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i.Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 13 ii. iii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: ___________________________________________________________ •expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:________________________________________ •purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ •if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v.Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/day ii.Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ •Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? 9 Yes 9 No •Is the project site in the existing district? 9 Yes 9 No •Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes 9 No •Do existing lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No iii.Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv.Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If, Yes: •Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ •Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ •Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v.If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi.If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/day ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ •Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ •Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project?9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district?9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed?9 Yes 9 No Page 6 of 13 9 Yes 9 No •Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? •Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ •Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ •What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v.If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi.Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes 9 No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i.How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii.Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ •If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties?9 Yes 9 No iv.Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater?9 Yes 9 No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 Yes 9 No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,9 Yes 9 No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i.Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet 9 Yes 9 No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii.In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 7 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,9 Yes 9 No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i.Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes 9 No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i.When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): † Morning † Evening †Weekend † Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii.For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): _____________ iii. iv. v. Parking spaces: Existing ___________________ Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________________ Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No 9 Yes 9 No vi.Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing 9 Yes 9 No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 Yes 9 No for energy? If Yes: i.Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation?9 Yes 9 No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction:ii.During Operations: •Monday - Friday: _________________________•Monday - Friday: ____________________________ •Saturday: ________________________________•Saturday: ___________________________________ •Sunday: _________________________________•Sunday: ____________________________________ •Holidays: ________________________________•Holidays: ___________________________________ If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction,9 Yes 9 No operation, or both? If yes: i.Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen?9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n. W th ill prop e os actio ed hav n e outd ligh oor ting? 9 Yes 9 No If yes: i.Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen?9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o.Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p.9 Yes 9 No Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i.Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) iii.Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides,9 Yes 9 No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i.Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices?9 Yes 9 No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal 9 Yes 9 No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i.Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: •Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) •Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: •Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: •Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: •________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or •________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii.If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes 9 No waste? If Yes: i.Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v.Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i.Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. 9 Urban 9 Industrial 9 Commercial 9 Residential (suburban) 9 Rural (non-farm) 9 Forest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic 9 Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii.If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Covertype Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change (Acres +/-) •Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces •Forested •Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) •Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) •Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) •Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) •Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) •Other Describe: _______________________________ ________________________________________ Page 10 of 13 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes 9 No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i.Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: •Dam height: _________________________________ feet •Dam length: _________________________________ feet •Surface area: _________________________________ acres •Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii.Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii.Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility,9 Yes 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed?9 Yes 9 No •If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii.Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i.Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i.Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: 9 Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Neither database ii.If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database?9 Yes 9 No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv.If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 v.Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses?9 Yes 9 No •If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ •Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ •Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ •Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ •Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place?9 Yes 9 No •Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ __________% ___________________________ __________% ____________________________ __________% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: 9 Well Drained:_____% of site 9 Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site 9 Poorly Drained _____% of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 9 0-10%:_____% of site 9 10-15%: _____% of site 9 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i.Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers,9 Yes 9 No ponds or lakes)? ii.Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii.Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal,9 Yes 9 No state or local agency? iv.For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: •Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ •Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________•Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ Approximate Size ___________________ •Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v.Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 9 Yes 9 No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i.Is the project site in a designated Floo dway?9 Yes 9 No j.Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain?9 Yes 9 No k.Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain?9 Yes 9 No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii.Extent of community/habitat: •Currently: ______________________ acres •Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres •Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as 9 Yes 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of 9 Yes 9 No special concern? q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing?9 Yes 9 No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes 9 No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii.Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes 9 No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i.Nature of the natural landmark: 9 Biological Community 9 Geological Feature ii.Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ If Yes: i.Species and listing (endangered or threatened):______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If Yes: i.Species and listing:____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 13 of 13 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district 9 Yes 9 No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: 9 Archaeological Site 9 Historic Building or District ii.Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for 9 Yes 9 No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii.Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h.9 Yes 9 No Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i.Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9 Yes 9 No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i.Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii.Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666?9 Yes 9 No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Date_______________________________________ Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ EAF Mapper Summary Report Saturday, June 26, 2021 10:30 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area]No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area]No C.2.b. [Special Planning District]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Potential Contamination History] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Listed] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Environmental Site Remediation Database] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site] No E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features]No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features]Yes E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features]Yes E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features]Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Name] 898-339, 898-338 E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Classification] B, C E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Name] Federal Waters E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies]No E.2.i. [Floodway]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. 1Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.l. [Aquifers]Yes E.2.l. [Aquifer Names]Principal Aquifer E.2.n. [Natural Communities]Yes E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Name]Rich Hemlock-Hardwood Peat Swamp E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Acres]0.0 E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species]Yes E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species - Name] Northern Harrier E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals]No E.3.a. [Agricultural District]Yes E.3.a. [Agricultural District]TOMP002 E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark]No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area]No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites]No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor]No 2Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report ED G E O F P A V E M E N T E D G E O F P A V E M E N T SH O U L D E R SH O U L D E R W H I T E D A S H E D L I N E WH I T E S O L I D L I N E RO A D ℄ & D O U B L E Y E L L O W S O L I D L I N E ED G E O F P A V E M E N T E D G E O F P A V E M E N T SH O U L D E R SH O U L D E R W H I T E D A S H E D L I N E WH I T E S O L I D L I N E RO A D ℄ & D O U B L E Y E L L O W S O L I D L I N E x HP:1211.912 1 1 12 1 1 12101209 12101209120 8 No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 200100 400 SCALE: 1"=200' HORIZONTAL SCALE 200 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 1 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n COVER C 101 1 1" = 200' SITE PLANS FOR NORBUT SOLAR DANBY TOWN OF DANBY, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK P.N. 20213129.0001 SHEET C 105SHEET C 103 SHEET C 102 SHEET C 104 SHEET C 106 SHEET C 107 SHEET C 109 SHEET C 108 DRAWING INDEX C 101 COVER C 102 - 110 SITE PLANS C 201- 202 NOTES & DETAILS T/A 10-1-57 N/F RADIN REAL ESTATE LLC INSTRUMENT #591007-003 T/A 10-1-56 N/F MONTGOMERY INSTRUMENT #2018-10051 T/ A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 5 5 N / F W E A V E R I N S T R U M E N T # 2 0 1 4 - 0 3 2 5 5 T/A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 1 N/F MC G R A T H / V I N E Y A R D IN S T R U M E N T #20 2 0 - 1 2 8 8 1 T/A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 3 1 N/F M C G R A T H / V I N E Y A R D IN S T R U M E N T # 2 0 2 0 - 1 2 8 8 1 T / A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 3 2 N / F H O L L Y D A Y / B E N S O N LI B E R 7 0 8 O F D E E D S , P A G E 5 T/A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 8 N/F E A S T M A N / R Y C R O F T INS T R U M E N T # 4 2 9 2 0 5 - 0 0 1 T/ A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 2 3 N / F D E Y O U N G I N S T R U M E N T # 2 0 1 7 - 0 9 1 5 4 T/ A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 6 N / F O A T E S I N S T R U M E N T # 5 2 4 5 8 8 - 0 0 2 T/A 1 0 - 1 - 5 4 . 2 N/F R U D D / C O U L O M B E INS T R U M E N T #20 1 9 - 1 1 6 8 6 T/A 10-1-21.15 N/F BEENERS INSTRUMENT #450507-001 T/A 10-1-21.14 N/F STIEFEL INSTRUMENT #2018-07355 T/A 10-1-19.12 N/F ROE LIBER 610 OF DEEDS, PAGE 852 T/A 10-1-23 N/F TOWN OF DANBY LIBER 245 OF DEEDS, PAGE 484 T/A 10-1-19.12 N/F ROE LIBER 610 OF DEEDS, PAGE 852 T/A 10-1-19.11 N/F BALL INSTRUMENT # 2510-4234 T/A 10-1-19.12 N/F ROE LIBER 610 OF DEEDS, PAGE 852 T/A 10-1-19.2 N/F ROE LIBER 880 OF DEEDS, PAGE 25 T/A 9-1-11.22 N/F BRUCE/AUGE LIBER 859 OF DEEDS, PAGE 67 T/A 9-1-11.42 N/F BRUCE/AUGE LIBER 859 OF DEEDS, PAGE 67 T/A 9-1-13.22 N/F NITCHMAN INSTRUMENT #2020-12573 T/A 9-1-13.23 N/F MASTROBERTI INSTRUMENT #2018-06188 T/A 10-1-57.11 N/F SHALLOWAY INSTRUMENT #590094-001 T/A 10-1-57.32 N/F RADIN REAL ESTATE LLC INSTRUMENT #2015-06571 T/A 10-1-21.124 N/F MONTGOMERY INSTRUMENT #2018-10051 SHEET C 110 N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62' N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62' SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16' 16' 16 ' 16' 16 ' 23'23' 23' 23'23'15' 15'15' 50 ' 75' 50 ' 15 8 ' 17 4 ' PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE SFSF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) 70' 27 ' 26 ' 83' 14 4 ' EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) SF SF S F S F PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 1 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 102 2 1" = 40' DISTURBANCE AREAS CONCRETE PAD TOTAL SF TOTAL AC 2.58 AC 112,243 SF 6 PADS (15.5' X 13' PAD) = 1,209 SF NOTE: THE SITE IS NOT WITHIN A 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN PER FIRM MAP 360845 B DATED 6/25/1976. FENCELINE 14,317 LF * 1' = 14,317 SF PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES MATCH LINE C 103 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 4 NOTE: TOWN OF DANBY REQUIRES <25% SITE COVERAGE (DISTURBANCE AREAS + PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE + SOLAR ARRAYS) 112,243 SF DISTURBANCE AREAS + 1,093,306 SF SOLAR ARRAYS = 1,205,549 SF = 27.68 AC 27.68 AC / 111.59 PARCEL SIZE = (24.80%) COVERAGE MATCH LINE C 103 96,717 SFPERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16 ' 16' 16' 23' 23' 23' 23' 15' 15' 75' 50 ' 50 ' PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE 35 ' 40 ' 49' 68' EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 1 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 103 3 1" = 40' MATCH LINE C 102 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 5 MATCH LINE C 102 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS N89°49'58"W 1532.08'N89°49'58"W 1532.08' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 16 15' 16 16'16' 16 ' 50 ' 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50' TRIBUTARYBU F F E R TWO PAD MOUNTED SWITCHBOARDS W/ XFMR & PV EQUIPMENT (TYP.) 20 ' PROPOSED ACCESS GATE 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 14 9 ' NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR S F SF S F S F S F SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) SF SF 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 SF SF S F S F 20 ' 20'20' 28'R 2 8 ' R 28'R 2 8 ' R 16 ' 16 ' S F S F PROPOSED SEED MIX 40' STRIP DOWN SLOPE OF PROPOSED PADS. SEE SEEDING NOTE ON SHEET C201. 40' 40' 40' 40' SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) S F S F PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) S F SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) S F MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 6 No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 1 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 104 4 1" = 40' MATCH LINE C 105 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 2 MATCH LINE C 105 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFPROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16' 16' 16 ' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 15' 15' 50 ' 50 ' PROPOSED TREELINE 33 ' 16' 16' 16 ' 16' 16 ' 23'15' PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR S F S F SF S F SF SF SF S F S F S F PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) S F S F SF S F SF S F S F SF S F S F S F PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) SF S F SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) S F S F MATCH LINE C 104 No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 2 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 105 5 1" = 40' MATCH LINE C 104 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 7 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 3 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' SF S F SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 965' 16 ' 16 ' 23' 23' 23' 16' 16 15' 50 ' 75' 50' TRI B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50' TRI B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50 ' TWO PAD MOUNTED SWITCHBOARDS W/ XFMR & PV EQUIPMENT (TYP.) 20 ' 20' 90 ' 20 ' 20 ' 20' 90 ' 10' R 1 0 ' R 28'R 48' R 28'R 2 8 ' R 28'R 48' R 28'R 48'R 28 ' R 48 ' R 28'R 48'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED ACCESS GATE D 64"X40" END INV=1304.35 D-1 65"X40" END INV=1303.10 39 LF 65"X40" CMP ARCH STM.@ 3.20% D-2 65"X40" END INV=1296.40 D-3 65"X40" END INV=1295.10 39 LF 65"X40" CMP ARCH STM.@ 3.31% 50' TRI B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50' TRI B U T A R Y B U F F E R 30 ' 30 ' SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF NATURAL SCREENING AREA OF HONEYSUCKLE SHRUB AND NATURAL VEGETATION TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. MAINTAIN TO A HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 25" PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE PR O P O S E D T R E E L I N E PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR S F SF S F 60' TO PROPOSED CLEARING LIMIT 19 ' 19 ' 20 ' PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) 16 ' 23'16' PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SEED MIX 40' STRIP DOWN SLOPE OF PROPOSED PADS. SEE SEEDING NOTE ON SHEET C201. 40' 40' SF SF SF No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 2 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 106 6 1" = 40' MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 8 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 4 MATCH LINE C 107MATCH LINE C 107 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS S89°51'55"E 3573.55'S89°51'55"E 3573.55'7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 965' 16 ' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23'23'16 16 16 50 ' 50 ' PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE 5 0 ' T R I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 5 0 ' T R I B U T A R Y B U F F E R SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF S F SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR 25 ' PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) MATCH LINE C 108 No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 2 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 107 7 1" = 40' MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 9 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 5 MATCH LINE C 108 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16 ' 23'16' 50 ' A R R A Y B U F F E R 20 ' 75' 75' 50 ' 43 ' 20 ' 1 0 0 ' S O L A R A R R A Y T O A D J A C E N T S T R U C T U R E S B U F F E R 28'R 48'R 28'R 48'R 2 8 ' R 4 8 ' R 28'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED 20' DOUBLE SWING BARRIER GATE WITH LOCK AND OPTIONAL ARM GATE & POST SAFETY TAPE KIT. PRODUCED BY BARRIER GATE BRANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL. SF SF SF NATURAL SCREENING AREA OF HONEYSUCKLE SHRUB AND NATURAL VEGETATION TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. MAINTAIN TO A HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 25" 73 ' 87 ' 30 ' 48 ' R 28 ' R SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE EXISTING 12" CPP TO BE EXTENDED BY 11'. INV=1256.68 NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE PER DETAIL. PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE ENDS AT PROPOSED GATE EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE FOR #54 BALD HILL ROAD TO MAINTAIN EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS. #54 BALD HILL ROAD TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED D-5 12" END INV=1258.32 D-4 12" END INV=1258.82 23 LF 12" HDPE STM.@ 2.20% 171' TO CLEARING LIMI T S 18 ' 20' PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 2 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 108 8 1" = 40' MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 6 MATCH LINE C 109MATCH LINE C 109 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) N89°07'38"W 30.04' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E S1 ° 5 5 ' 1 1 " E 34 . 1 6 ' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S1°55'11"E 5.10' N89°05'50"E 874.40' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 23' 23' 23' 23'16' 16' 16' 50 ' 50 ' 75' 75' 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 28'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE SF SF SF PR O P O S E D T R E E L I N E 48'R 48' R 28'R 28' R 2 0 ' S F S F S F S F SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR. DOUBLE SILT FENCE IN PROXIMITY TO TRUCK/CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED TRUCK/CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. AREA TO BE INSTALLED PER DETAILS AND REMOVED WHEN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED. AREA TO BE RETURNED TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. S F 22 ' 315' TO PROPOSED CLEARING LIMITS PROPOSED SILT FENCE SF SF S F SF SF SF SF 16 ' 16 ' 16' No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 3 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 109 9 1" = 40' TRUCK WASHDOWN AREA N.T.S. PROVIDE 12" THICK STONE BASE WITH 2% MIN. CROSS SLOPE 8' WIDE MIN. 3' DEEP MIN. NOTE: A 10 MIL LINER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WASHDOWN AREA. WASHDOWN AREA TO BE CLEANED OUT AT 75% CAPACITY. MATCH LINE C 108 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 7 MATCH LINE C 108 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS MATCH LINE C 110 D A N B Y R O A D S T A T E R O U T E 9 6 B ( R . O . W . V A R I E S ) C H M E A S . = N 8 ° 5 4 ' 2 1 " W 2 7 0 . 3 0 ' E D G E O F P A V E M E N T E D G E O F P A V E M E N T S H O U L D E R S H O U L D E R W H I T E D A S H E D L I N E W H I T E S O L I D L I N E R O A D ℄ & D O U B L E Y E L L O W S O L I D L I N E D A N B Y R O A D S T A T E R O U T E 9 6 B ( R . O . W . V A R I E S ) C H M E A S . = N 8 ° 5 4 ' 2 1 " W 2 7 0 . 3 0 ' E D G E O F P A V E M E N T E D G E O F P A V E M E N T S H O U L D E R S H O U L D E R W H I T E D A S H E D L I N E W H I T E S O L I D L I N E R O A D ℄ & D O U B L E Y E L L O W S O L I D L I N E N90°00'00"W 192.96' S55°16'16"E 133.69' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 52 . 7 5 ' N0°00'00"E 86.29' N5 ° 0 5 ' 5 5 " E 18 6 . 2 8 ' S87°16'05"W 356.78' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S0°00'00"E 52.24' N90°00'00"E 153.58' S55°16'16"E 128.39' S0°00'00"E 27.86' N90°00'00"W 106.40' N3 ° 3 0 ' 3 7 " E 23 7 . 9 5 ' N87°16'05"E 234.33' S89°53'58"E 83.28' S 1 7 ° 4 0 ' 5 5 " E 4 1 . 4 0 ' EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) APPROXIMATE 30-FT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT APPROXIMATE EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC LINES AND INTERCONNECTION ACCESS (TYP) APPROXIMATE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES (TYP.) PROPOSED NINE (9) NYSEG OWNED POWER POLES, 3 PER SITE CONNECTION. TO REMAIN 33.4' 3 0 2 . 1 ' 82.3' 1 5 9 . 3 ' 65 . 5 ' PROPOSED NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE PER DETAIL. THREE ARRAY POWER LINES CARRIED BY ONE POLE THREE OVERHEAD WIRE CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC GRID 40 ' 20 ' 50 ' 20'20' 15' 39 ' 15'15'15' PROPOSED SIX (6) CUSTOMER OWNED POWER POLES, 2 PER SITE CONNECTION. 20' D-7 65"X40" END INV=1207.85 D-6 65"X40" END INV=1208.00 1211 1 2 1 0 12 0 9 1 2 0 8 1 2 1 0 1 2 0 9 1 2 0 8 1 2 0 7 12 0 7 1 2 0 8 1 2 0 9 1 2 0 9 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 36 LF 65"x40" CMP ARCH STM.@ 0.42% x HP:1211.91 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 12101209 12101209120 8 PROPOSED 20' DOUBLE SWING BARRIER GATE WITH LOCK AND OPTIONAL ARM GATE & POST SAFETY TAPE KIT. PRODUCED BY BARRIER GATE BRANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL. 50' SF S F SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 3 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 110 10 1" = 40' MATCH LINE C 109 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 9 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y N O T E S & D E T A I L S . D W G 1/ 4 / 2 0 2 2 9 : 5 3 A M Au s t i n G o o d w i n NOTES & DETAILS C 201 11 N/A EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, AND IF NECESSARY, MODIFY THE PLAN WITH THE CONTRACTOR'S INTENDED SEQUENCE AND TYPES OF OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR'S MODIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL, ALONG WITH A PROGRESS SCHEDULE THAT ADDRESSES THIS WORK. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE AN "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR" FOR THE PROJECT. THE SUPERVISOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND FOR INSPECTING AND MAINTAINING THE CONTROL MEASURES. THE NAME AND QUALIFICATIONS (TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE) OF THIS INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO STARTING EARTHWORK. 3.THE DESIGNATED "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR" SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN ADVANCE OF ANY FIELD CHANGES TO THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE ENGINEER MAY REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT A MODIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING ANY FIELD CHANGES. 4.THE SITE SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE GRADED AND MAINTAINED SUCH THAT ALL STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS IS DIVERTED TO SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE. 5.EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SOIL DISTURBANCE FOR WHICH THEY ARE INTENDED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL SOILS ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 6.UNDER NO CONDITION SHALL DISCONTINUED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN AREAS WITH SOIL DISTURBANCES BE LEFT FOR A PERIOD OF GREATER THAN 7 DAYS WITHOUT TEMPORARILY STABILIZING THOSE AREAS WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH. MAINTENANCE OF THOSE AREAS SHALL INCLUDE RESEEDING AND REMULCHING AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS. THERE SHALL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR RESEEDING AND REMULCHING. NO WET OR FRESH CONCRETE, LEACHATE, MATERIAL, OR DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ESCAPE INTO A WATER BODY OR WETLAND, NOR SHALL WASHINGS FROM CONCRETE TRUCKS, MIXERS OR OTHER DEVICES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER A WATER BODY OR WETLAND. ANY MATERIAL OR DEBRIS ACCIDENTALLY DROPPED INTO THE CHANNEL SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY AND COMPLETELY REMOVED AND DEPOSITED IN AN UPLAND AREA. 7.AT THE VERY MINIMUM, EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. EROSION CONTROL MAY CONSIST OF SEDIMENT TRAPS AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL FENCES. THE CONTRACTOR AND THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INTEGRITY, MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL NO LONGER DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE TOWN OR IT'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM UNTIL THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN AND OWNER. SEEDING NOTE TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING SEED MIXTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION: TEMPORARY SEEDING: RYEGRASS (ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL) @ 30LBS. PER ACRE OR 0.7 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET. PERMANENT SEEDING: 65% KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLEND @ 85LBS. PER ACRES OR 2.0-2.6 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET 20% PERENNIAL RYEGRASS @ 26-35 LBS. PER ACRE OR 0.6-0.8 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET 15% FINE FESCUE @ 19-26 LBS. PER ACRE OR 0.4-0.6 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET FOR ALL SEEDING & STABILIZATION MEASURES IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER & DEVELOPER TO ENSURE THAT FINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS AS REQUIRED BY THE NYSDEC. AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY CEASES FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE. ONCE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CEASES PERMANENTLY IN AN AREA, THAT AREA WILL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT SEED AND MULCH. AFTER THE ENTIRE SITE IS STABILIZED, THE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT BASIN(s). CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: 1.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 2.CONSTRUCT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 3.GRADE IMPROVEMENTS AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY CEASES FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE. 4.SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 10 DAYS AFTER FINAL GRADING, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RESEED IF GRADING IS UNSATISFACTORY. 5.UPON APPROVAL OF THE TOWN, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROLS. 6.ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED BASED UPON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AOBE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR THIS COST IN HIS CONTRACT. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FROM INSTALLATION THROUGH MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL AFTER REVEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 8.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL METHODS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NEW YORK STATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" MESH SPACING) 36" MIN. LENGTH FENCE POSTS DRIVEN MIN. 16" INTO GROUND. HEIGHT OF FILTER = 16" MIN. 8" MIN.FLO W FLO W 10' MAX. C. TO C. 5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION. FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 14 GAUGE, 6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER- LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, OR STAPLES. POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER "T" OR "U" TYPE OR HARDWOOD. 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. MIRAFI 100X, STABILINKA T140N, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. EMBED FILTER CLOTH A MIN. OF 6" IN GROUND. 4" 16"MIN. WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" MESH SPACING) WITH FILTER CLOTH 36" MIN. FENCE POST FLOW COMPACTED SOIL 20"MIN. PERSPECTIVE VIEW SECTION VIEW L L SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. UNDISTURBED GROUND NYSDAM DECOMISSIONING NOTES: 1.DECOMMISSIONING 2.IF THE OPERATION OF THE GENERATION FACILITY IS PERMANENTLY DISCONTINUED, REMOVE ALL ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES 3.(INCLUDING PANELS, RACKING, SIGNAGE, EQUIPMENT PAD, SECURITY FENCING) AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IF LESS THAN 48- 4.INCHES DEEP. ALL CONCRETE PIERS, FOOTERS, OR OTHER SUPPORTS MUST BE REMOVED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 48-INCHES 5.BELOW THE SOIL SURFACE. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS LOCATED AT THE RESPECTIVE RANGE 6.OF DEPTH BELOW THE SURFACE: 7.• 48-INCHES PLUS: ALL UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS AND DIRECT BURIED CONDUCTORS MAY BE ABANDONED IN 8.PLACE. APPLICABLE CONDUIT RISERS MUST BE REMOVED, AND ABANDONED CONDUIT MUST BE SEALED OR CAPPED TO 9.AVOID A POTENTIAL TO DIRECT SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE ONTO NEIGHBORING LAND USES. 10.• LESS THAN 48-INCHES: ALL UNDERGROUND DIRECT BURIED ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS AND CONDUCTORS IN CONDUIT AND 11.ASSOCIATED CONDUIT WITH LESS THAN 48-INCHES OF COVER MUST BE REMOVED, BY MEANS OF CAUSING THE LEAST 12.AMOUNT OF DISTURBANCE AS POSSIBLE. 13.ACCESS ROADS IN AGRICULTURAL AREAS MUST BE REMOVED, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE LANDOWNER. IF ACCESS IS TO 14.BE REMOVED, TOPSOIL WILL HAVE TO BE RETURNED FROM RECORDED PROJECT EXCESS NATIVE TOPSOIL DISPOSAL AREAS, IF 15.PRESENT, OR IMPORTED TOPSOIL FREE OF INVASIVE SPECIES THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE QUALITY OF TOPSOIL ON THE AFFECTED 16.SITE. RESTORE ALL AREAS INTENDED FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, ACCORDING TO RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE CURRENT 17.LANDOWNER OR LEASING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCER, AND AS REQUIRED BY ANY APPLICABLE PERMIT, THE SOIL AND WATER 18.CONSERVATION DISTRICT, AND NYSDAM. 19.MONITORING AND RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE TO THE PRIOR SECTIONS OF THESE GUIDELINES, WILL BE REQUIRED 20.FOR THE DECOMMISSION CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 3'5:1 PLAN VIEW PROFILE EXISTING GROUND FILTER CLOTH EXISTING PAVEMENT MOUNTABLE BERM (OPTIONAL) EXISTING PAVEMENT 10'MIN. 10'MIN. 15'MIN. 50'MIN. 12"MIN. EXISTING GROUND 50'MIN. 12'MIN. 1. STONE SIZE - USE 2" STONE, OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. 2. LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET (EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE A 30 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH WOULD APPLY). 3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES. 4. WIDTH - FIFTEEN (15) FOOT MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS. TWENTY-FOUR (24) FOOT IF SINGLE ENTRANCE TO SITE. 5. FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE. 6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. 7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 8. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON A AREA STABILIZED WITH STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. 9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. FENCE SUPPORT POLE INSTALLATION DETAIL N.T.S. 5' 7' SOLIDLOCK PRO 20 PROFESSIONAL STRENGTH FIXED KNOT FENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL CLASS 5 WOODEN POLE. MINIMUM SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE OR DOUGLAS FIR. SET 10.0' O.C. ALL POLES TO BE SET PLUMB. N.T.S. 4' MIN. (TYP.) SELECT GRANULAR FILL NYSDOT ITEM 203.07 PAVEMENT SECTION 65" 40" SEE PLANS 6"2' 18" PROPOSED RIP RAP SCOUR PROTECTION NYSDEC CLASS III, FROM TABLE 5B.3 FROM NYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (TYP) ALUMINUM BASE CHANNEL 115 16" CONCRETE FOUNDATION (4,000 PSI) 12" 33 8" N.T.S. ARCH TO FOUNDATION CONNECTION DETAIL 9"x2-1/2" ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE ARCH (THICKNESS 0.125") BY LANE ENTERPRISES OR APPROVED EQUAL 2' STRUCTURAL PLATE ISOMETRIC DETAIL N.T.S. #4 BARS @ 24" O.C. (TYP) #4 BARS (TYP) 3 4"Ø x 1-3 4" 3 4"Ø x 3-12" 1"x37 8" KNOCKOUT ANCHORS (BEND DOWN AND TWIST) NOTE: PROVIDE ANCHORS EVERY 12" PER DETAIL BELOW LENGTH OF ARCH PLACE LARGE STONES SIDE BY SIDE ON THE BEDDING MATERIAL WITH SMOOTH SURFACES FACING UP. 18" MIN 1.SLOPE SHALL BE GRADED TO 2:1 OR FLATTER PRIOR TO PLACING RIP RAP. 2.PLACE THE FABRIC DIRECTLY ON THE PREPARED FOUNDATION. OVERLAP THE EDGES BY AT LEAST 2 FEET. BURY THE UPPER AND LOWER ENDS OF THE FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES BELOW GROUND. TAKE PRECAUTIONS NOT TO DAMAGE THE FABRIC BY DROPPING THE RIPRAP. IF DAMAGE OCCURS, REMOVE THE RIPRAP AND REPAIR THE SHEET BY ADDING ANOTHER LAYER OF FILTER FABRIC WITH A MINIMUM OVERLAP OF 12 INCHES AROUND THE DAMAGED AREA. 3.PLACEMENT OF THE RIPRAP SHOULD FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE FILTER FABRIC. PLACE RIPRAP SO THAT IT FORMS DENSE, WELL-GRADED MASS OF STONE WITH A MINIMUM OF VOIDS. THE DESIRED DISTRIBUTION OF STONES THROUGHOUT THE MASS MAY BE OBTAINED BY SELECTIVE LOADING AT THE QUARRY AND CONTROLLED DUMPING DURING FINAL PLACEMENT. PLACE RIPRAP TO ITS FULL THICKNESS IN ONE OPERATION. DO NOT PLACE RIPRAP BY DUMPING THROUGH CHUTES OR OTHER METHODS THAT CAUSE SEGREGATION OF STONE SIZES. BE CAREFUL NOT TO DISLODGE THE UNDERLYING BASE OR FILTER WHEN PLACING THE STONES. 4.ENDS OF THE RIP RAP SHALL BE KEYED INTO A STABLE BANK. WHEN TYING INTO OTHER STRUCTURES, LARGER RIPRAP CAN BE LAID IN STEPS OR STACKED AS NEEDED TO FIT. STONES LARGER THAN THOSE DESIGNATED FOR FLOW (12") SHALL BE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTES: N.T.S. RIP-RAP INSTALLATION DETAIL CLASS III RIP-RAP PER TABLE 5B.3 FROM THE NYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL TENCATE MIRAFI H2Ri OR APPROVED EQUAL EXTEND RIP RAP END TREATMENT 2' ABOVE THE TOP OF ARCH NYSDEC CLASS III, FROM TABLE 5B.3 FROM NYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (TYP) 18"CREEK BOTTOM PLATE ARCH GAUGE = 0.125 T-II RIBS @ 9" SPACING ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE BOX CULVERT DETAILS 2' - 33 8" RIP-RAP SCOUR PROTECTION CONCRETE FOUNDATION FOUNDATION SUB-BASE No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION NOTES & DETAILS C 202 12 N/A NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD N.T.S. BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16 ' 23'16' 50 ' A R R A Y B U F F E R 20 ' 75' 75' 50 ' 43 ' 20 ' 1 0 0 ' S O L A R A R R A Y T O A D J A C E N T S T R U C T U R E S B U F F E R 28'R 48'R 28'R 48'R 2 8 ' R 4 8 ' R 28'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED 20' DOUBLE SWING BARRIER GATE WITH LOCK AND OPTIONAL ARM GATE & POST SAFETY TAPE KIT. PRODUCED BY BARRIER GATE BRANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL. SF SF SF NATURAL SCREENING AREA OF HONEYSUCKLE SHRUB AND NATURAL VEGETATION TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. MAINTAIN TO A HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 25" 73 ' 87 ' 30 ' 48 ' R 28 ' R SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE EXISTING 12" CPP TO BE EXTENDED BY 11'. INV=1256.68 NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE PER DETAIL. PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE ENDS AT PROPOSED GATE EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE FOR #54 BALD HILL ROAD TO MAINTAIN EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS. #54 BALD HILL ROAD TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED D-5 12" END INV=1258.32 D-4 12" END INV=1258.82 23 LF 12" HDPE STM.@ 2.20% 171' TO CLEARING LIMI T S 18 ' 20' No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y P L A N T I N G P L A N S 1 2 0 7 2 1 . D W G 12 / 8 / 2 0 2 1 4 : 4 5 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 108 8 1" = 40' MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 6 MATCH LINE C 109MATCH LINE C 109 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS PLANT LIST SYMBOL CC SC-W TO SCIENTIFIC NAME CARPINUS CAROLINIANA SALIX CAPREA (WETLAND) THUJA OCCIDENTALIS ʻTECHNYʼ alt. ʻEMERALDʼ alt. ʻNIGRAʼ COMMON NAME AMERICAN HORNBEAM PUSSY WILLOW AMERICAN ARBORVITAE MATURE HEIGHT X WIDTH 20-25 x 20 15-25 x 12-15 10-15 x 8 10-15 x 4 20 x 5-10 NOTES: 1. NUMBER AND POSITION OF PLANTS IS INDICATIVE AND WILL BE BASED ON GAPS IN EXISTING VEGETATION, FENCE LOCATION, AS WELL AS SIGHT LINES FROM NEARBY RESIDENCES. 2. SALIX CAPREA TO BE LOCATED IN WETLAND BUFFER IF PERMITTED. 3. ARBORVITAE SPECIES ARE VARIED AND NAMES NOT CONSISTENT ACROSS SOURCES. TARGET HEIGHT TO BE VERIFIED WITH SUPPLIER NOT TO EXCEED 25 FT. (3) CC (3) CC (3) CC (3) TO-T (3) TO-T (3) TO-T pebble stream LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1010 Highland AvenueRochester, NY 14620 tel: 585-760-994 NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE SCREEN PLANTING PLAN ITHACA, NY DRAWING DATE:12-08-2021 REVISED: www.pebble-stream.com TOMPKINS COUNTY S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) N89°07'38"W 30.04' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E S1 ° 5 5 ' 1 1 " E 34 . 1 6 ' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S1°55'11"E 5.10' N89°05'50"E 874.40' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 23' 23' 23' 23'16' 16' 16' 50 ' 50 ' 75' 75' 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 28'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE SF SF SF PR O P O S E D T R E E L I N E 48'R 48' R 28'R 28' R 2 0 ' S F S F S F S F SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR. DOUBLE SILT FENCE IN PROXIMITY TO TRUCK/CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED TRUCK/CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. AREA TO BE INSTALLED PER DETAILS AND REMOVED WHEN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED. AREA TO BE RETURNED TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. S F 22 ' 315' TO PROPOSED CLEARING LIMITS PROPOSED SILT FENCE SF SF S F SF SF SF SF 16 ' 16 ' 16' No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y P L A N T I N G P L A N S 1 2 0 7 2 1 . D W G 12 / 8 / 2 0 2 1 4 : 4 5 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 109 9 1" = 40' TRUCK WASHDOWN AREA N.T.S. PROVIDE 12" THICK STONE BASE WITH 2% MIN. CROSS SLOPE 8' WIDE MIN. 3' DEEP MIN. NOTE: A 10 MIL LINER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WASHDOWN AREA. WASHDOWN AREA TO BE CLEANED OUT AT 75% CAPACITY. MATCH LINE C 108 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 7 MATCH LINE C 108 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS MATCH LINE C 110 PLANT LIST SYMBOL CC SC-W TO SCIENTIFIC NAME CARPINUS CAROLINIANA SALIX CAPREA (WETLAND) THUJA OCCIDENTALIS ʻTECHNYʼ alt. ʻEMERALDʼ alt. ʻNIGRAʼ COMMON NAME AMERICAN HORNBEAM PUSSY WILLOW AMERICAN ARBORVITAE MATURE HEIGHT X WIDTH 20-25 x 20 15-25 x 12-15 10-15 x 8 10-15 x 4 20 x 5-10 NOTES: 1. NUMBER AND POSITION OF PLANTS IS INDICATIVE AND WILL BE BASED ON GAPS IN EXISTING VEGETATION, FENCE LOCATION, AS WELL AS SIGHT LINES FROM NEARBY RESIDENCES. 2. SALIX CAPREA TO BE LOCATED IN WETLAND BUFFER IF PERMITTED. 3. ARBORVITAE SPECIES ARE VARIED AND NAMES NOT CONSISTENT ACROSS SOURCES. TARGET HEIGHT TO BE VERIFIED WITH SUPPLIER NOT TO EXCEED 25 FT. (3) CC (3) TO-T (3) TO-T (3) SC-W (3) SC-W (3) TO-T (3) CC (3) CC (3) CC (3) TO-T (3) TO-T pebble stream LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1010 Highland AvenueRochester, NY 14620 tel: 585-760-994 NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE SCREEN PLANTING PLAN ITHACA, NY DRAWING DATE:12-08-2021 REVISED: www.pebble-stream.com TOMPKINS COUNTY N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' S89°51'55"E 3573.55' (OVERALL) S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' C H M E A S . = N 8 ° 5 4 ' 2 1 " W 2 7 0 . 3 0 ' N0 ° 3 0 ' 1 1 " W 3 2 5 . 0 6 ' LOT 1 LOT 2 LO T 1 LO T 2 LOT 3 N89°30'11"E 1380.63' S89°30'11"W 1240.36' LO T 2 LO T 3 LO T 2 N0 ° 2 9 ' 4 7 " W 8 6 1 . 6 9 ' LO T 1 LO T 3 BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N89°18'34"W 1049.08' N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' C H M E A S . = N 8 ° 5 4 ' 2 1 " W 2 7 0 . 3 0 ' 1714.63' LOT 3 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 N89°30'11"E 1386.78' S89°30'11"W 1240.36' LOT 3 1,588,427± SQ.FT. 36.465± ACRES L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 2 5 4 . 5 6 ' N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 2 6 8 . 6 9 ' LO T 1 LO T 2 LO T 3 N88°44'08"W 141.34' S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 1,2 AND 3 PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 1,2 AND 3 PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 1,2 AND 3 LO T 3 N6 0 ° 4 4 ' 2 5 " W 2 3 7 . 2 3 ' S89°30'11"W 1240.36' Rochester, NY - Fernandina Beach, FL Passero Associates www.passero.com No. Date By Description Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Sheet No. 242 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 100 (585) 325-1000 Passero Associates ROCHESTER, NY 14614 Fax: (585) 760-8580 SITE ABBREVIATION TABLE BLDG.BUILDING C.L.F.CHAIN LINK FENCE CNC.CONCRETE MEAS.MEASURES R.O.W.RIGHT OF WAY STKF.STOCKADE FENCE E.O.P.EDGE OF PAVEMENT Drafted by Alan J. Snyder, PLS Project Manager Robert A. Vento, PLS Principal-in-Charge David L. Cox, PE MA T C H L I N E S H E E T 2 GRAPHIC SCALE 80 0 40 80 160 1" = 80' NA D - 8 3 DE E D (M A G N E T I C N O R T H 1 9 8 4 ) Client: NORBUT SOLAR FARM, LLC 1241 UNIVERSITY AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY, 14614 ATTN: CURTIS RAYMOND CURTIS@NORBUTSOLARFARMS.COM (585) 504-2200 1 of 3 1" = 80' JUNE 2021 SUB-1 20213129.0001 "NSF DANBY SUBDIVISION PLAT" BEING A SUBDIVISION OF: TAX ACCT. NO. 10-1-21.122 LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF RUSSELL H. AND KIM B. NITCHMAN SITUATED ON THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDE OF BALD HILL ROAD, TOWN OF DANBY, COUNTY OF TOMPKINS, NEW YORK STATE BEING PART OF LOT 28 AND A PART OF LOT 35 IN THE NORTHWEST SECTION OF TOWNSHIP 7 OF THE WATKINS AND FLINTS PURCHASE GUNDERMAN RD. LEIB RD. BAL D H I L L R D . C O M F O R T R D . D A N B Y R D . ROBERT A. VENTO N.Y.S.P.L.S. NO. 049701 DATE bvento@passero.com SEE FRONTAGE DETAIL PAGE 3 OF 3 1 12.9.21 AS DRIVEWAY RE-ALIGNED N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62'N89°49'58"W 1532.08' N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' S89°51'55"E 3573.55' (OVERALL) LOT 1 1,809,965± SQ.FT. 41.551± ACRES 841.62' LOT 1 1017.30' LOT 2 S0 ° 3 0 ' 1 2 " E 1 3 3 3 . 0 8 ' S89°49'57"E 1104.89' N0 ° 3 0 ' 1 1 " W 3 2 5 . 0 6 ' LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 1 LOT 2 LO T 1 LO T 2 LOT 3 LO T 2 LO T 1 N89°30'11"E 1380.63' S89°30'11"W 1240.36' LO T 2 LO T 3 LO T 2 N0 ° 2 9 ' 4 7 " W 8 6 1 . 6 9 ' LOT 2 1,462,450± SQ.FT. 33.573± ACRES N89°18'34"W 1049.08' 1714.63' LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 N89°30'11"E 1386.78' S89°30'11"W 1240.36' LOT 3 1,588,427± SQ.FT. 36.465± ACRES PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 1,2 AND 3 PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 1,2 AND 3 LO T 3 N6 0 ° 4 4 ' 2 5 " W 2 3 7 . 2 3 ' S89°30'11"W 1240.36' Rochester, NY - Fernandina Beach, FL Passero Associates www.passero.com No. Date By Description Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Sheet No. 242 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 100 (585) 325-1000 Passero Associates ROCHESTER, NY 14614 Fax: (585) 760-8580 Client: NORBUT SOLAR FARM, LLC 1241 UNIVERSITY AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY, 14614 ATTN: CURTIS RAYMOND CURTIS@NORBUTSOLARFARMS.COM (585) 504-2200 ABBREVIATION TABLE BLDG.BUILDING C.L.F.CHAIN LINK FENCE CNC.CONCRETE MEAS.MEASURES R.O.W.RIGHT OF WAY STKF.STOCKADE FENCE E.O.P.EDGE OF PAVEMENT Drafted by Alan J. Snyder, PLS Project Manager Robert A. Vento, PLS Principal-in-Charge David L. Cox, PE 2 of 3 1" = 80' JUNE 2021 SUB-1 20213129.0001 MA T C H L I N E S H E E T 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 80 0 40 80 160 1" = 80' NA D - 8 3 DE E D (M A G N E T I C N O R T H 1 9 8 4 ) SITE GUNDERMAN RD. LEIB RD. BAL D H I L L R D . C O M F O R T R D . D A N B Y R D . ROBERT A. VENTO N.Y.S.P.L.S. NO. 049701 DATE bvento@passero.com "NSF DANBY SUBDIVISION PLAT" BEING A SUBDIVISION OF: TAX ACCT. NO. 10-1-21.122 LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF RUSSELL H. AND KIM B. NITCHMAN SITUATED ON THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDE OF BALD HILL ROAD, TOWN OF DANBY, COUNTY OF TOMPKINS, NEW YORK STATE BEING PART OF LOT 28 AND A PART OF LOT 35 IN THE NORTHWEST SECTION OF TOWNSHIP 7 OF THE WATKINS AND FLINTS PURCHASE BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 2 5 4 . 5 6 ' N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 2 6 8 . 6 9 ' LO T 1 LO T 2 LO T 3 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 N88°44'08"W 243.78' S88°44'08"E 210.63' LO T 2 LO T 3 LO T 1 N88°44'08"W 141.34' N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 6 3 . 2 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 5 7 . 5 3 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 4 4 . 2 3 ' T O ℄ N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 6 . 0 5 ' T O ℄ L O T 2 L O T 3 L O T 1 L O T 2 L O T 3 L O T 1 2 4 . 7 5 ' 15.00' 15.00' 15.01' PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 1,2 AND 3 PROPOSED CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 1,2 AND 3 Rochester, NY - Fernandina Beach, FL Passero Associates www.passero.com No. Date By Description Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Sheet No. 242 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 100 (585) 325-1000 Passero Associates ROCHESTER, NY 14614 Fax: (585) 760-8580 SITE ABBREVIATION TABLE BLDG.BUILDING C.L.F.CHAIN LINK FENCE CNC.CONCRETE MEAS.MEASURES R.O.W.RIGHT OF WAY STKF.STOCKADE FENCE E.O.P.EDGE OF PAVEMENT Drafted by Alan J. Snyder, PLS Project Manager Robert A. Vento, PLS Principal-in-Charge David L. Cox, PE NA D - 8 3 DE E D (M A G N E T I C N O R T H 1 9 8 4 ) Client: NORBUT SOLAR FARM, LLC 1241 UNIVERSITY AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY, 14614 ATTN: CURTIS RAYMOND CURTIS@NORBUTSOLARFARMS.COM (585) 504-2200 3 of 3 1" = 40' JUNE 2021 SUB-1 20213129.0001 GUNDERMAN RD. LEIB RD. BAL D H I L L R D . C O M F O R T R D . D A N B Y R D . ROBERT A. VENTO N.Y.S.P.L.S. NO. 049701 DATE bvento@passero.com GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 20 40 80 1" = 40' FRONTAGE DETAIL "NSF DANBY SUBDIVISION PLAT" BEING A SUBDIVISION OF: TAX ACCT. NO. 10-1-21.122 LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF RUSSELL H. AND KIM B. NITCHMAN SITUATED ON THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDE OF BALD HILL ROAD, TOWN OF DANBY, COUNTY OF TOMPKINS, NEW YORK STATE BEING PART OF LOT 28 AND A PART OF LOT 35 IN THE NORTHWEST SECTION OF TOWNSHIP 7 OF THE WATKINS AND FLINTS PURCHASE FRONTAGE DETAIL 6707 Winchester Cir, Boulder, CO 80301 888 Federal Blvd, Denver, CO 80204 www.NamasteSolar.com · 303.447.0300 CL I E N T : PR O J E C T : SI T E A D D R E S S : DRAWING SET ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DE S C R I P T I O N : RE V . DA T E NO T E S A B C D E F G H I J K A B C D E F G H I J K 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY: NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N OR P E R M I T APP L I C A T I O N 20 2 1 / 0 3 / 3 1 ST A R T -- NO R B U T S O L A R S. A . T . G R O U N D M O U N T 54 B A L D H I L L R D , IT H A C A , NY 14 8 5 0 0.2 TH HT A101 AGGREGATE SITE PLAN SCALE: 0 200100 400 1" = 200' Note: Aerial image provided for context only BAL D H I L L R O A D SYSTEM SUMMARY: ITEM DETAIL SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 TOTAL SYSTEM SIZE, DC:kW-DC 6,697.50 6,697.50 6,697.50 20092.50 SYSTEM SIZE, AC:kW-AC 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 15000.00 MODULE:TRINA SOLAR, TSM-DEG15VC.20(II), 475W 14,100 14,100 14,100 42 INVERTER:CPS SCA125KTL-DO/US-600, 125kW 40 40 40 120 STRINGS:30 MODULES IN SERIES 470 470 470 1410 ORIENTATION:TILT AND AZIMUTH +/- 60° TILT, 0° AXIS AZ +/- 60° TILT, 0° AXIS AZ +/- 60° TILT, 0° AXIS AZ --- RACKING:TERRA SMART, SINGLE AXIS TRACKER, GROUND-MOUNT 40% GCR 40% GCR 40% GCR --- SITE FENCE, TYPICAL PROPERTY LINE, TYPICAL PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD SITE 2 SITE 3 SITE 1 100' RESIDENTIAL SETBACK, TYPICAL INVERTERS DISTRIBUTED IN ARRAY, TYPICAL PAD MOUNTED SWITCHBOARD W/ XFMR AND PV EQUIPMENT, TYPICAL NOTES: 1) POLE #1: NYSEG RECLOSER WITH SCADA CONTROL 2) POLE #2: NYSEG BI-DIRECTIONAL UTILITY METER, POINT OF COMMON COUPLING 3) POLE #3: SURGE ARRESTORS AND GOAB 4) CUSTOMER RISER POLE #4: CUSTOMER OWNED RECLOSER D A N B Y R O A D PARCEL ID: 10.1-21.122 (EAST) 75' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE TO MODULES, TYPICAL(WEST) 75' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE TO MODULES, TYPICAL (SOUTH) 50' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE TO MODULES, TYPICAL 20 2 1 / 0 3 / 3 1 HU M P H R E Y R E V I S I O N 01 (NORTH) 50' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE TO MODULES, TYPICAL WETLAND, TYPICAL 16' SETBACK FROM FENCE 475W PV MODULE, TYPICAL SITE 3 20 2 1 / 0 6 / 2 5 MO D A N D R A C K I N G C H A N G E 02 INTERMITTENT STREAM, TYPICAL 50' INTERMITTENT STREAM SETBACK, TYPICAL NS F D A N B Y A L L S I T E S SITE 2 20 2 1 / 1 1 / 2 2 WE T L A N D S A D D E D 03 EPHEMERAL STREAM, TYPICAL 252 LAYOUT Mono Multi Solutions 465-485W 20.6% Management System TSM-DEG15VC.20(II)465-485W MONOCRYSTALLINE MODULE POWER OUTPUT RANGE POSITIVE POWER TOLERANCE MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY 0~+ 5W PRODUCTS POWER RANGE Founded in 1997, Trina Solar is the world's leading total solution provider for solar energy. With local presence around the globe, Trina Solar is able to provide exceptional service to each customer in each market and deliver our innovative, reliable products with the backing of Trina as a strong, bankable brand. Trina Solar now distributes its PV products to over 100 countries all over the world. We are committed to building strategic, mutually beneÿcial collaborations with installers, developers, distributors and other partners in driving smart energy together. Comprehensive Products • Up to 485W front power and 20.6% module efficiency with 1/3-cut and MBB (Multi Busbar) technology enable higher BOS savings • Lower resistance and good reflection effect of MBB ensure higher power High power High energy generation • Up to 25% additional power gain from back side depending on the albedo • Excellent IAM and low light performance validated by 3rd party with cell process and module material optimization • Better anti-shading performance and lower operating temperature Easy to install • Frame design makes module compatible with all racking and installation methods • Easy to handle during transportation and install as normal framed module • Improved PID resistance through cell process and module material control • Resistant to salt, acid, and ammonia • Proven to be reliable in high temperature and humidity areas • Mechanical performance: Up to 5400 Pa positive load and 2400 Pa negative load High reliability EU-28 WEEECOMPLIANTRECYCLABLEPACKAGING THE BIFACIAL DUAL GLASS 252 LAYOUT MODULE Trina’s DUOMAX Warranty 85.0% 90% 100%98.0% Years 5 10 15 20 25 30 Gu a r a n t e e d P o w e r Trina Solar’s DUOMAX Performance Warranty and System Certificates IEC61215/IEC61730/IEC61701/IEC62716/UL61730 ISO 9001: Quality Management System ISO 14001: Environmental Management System ISO14064: Greenhouse Gases Emissions Verification ISO45001: Occupation Health and Safety I-V CURVES OF PV MODULE(480W) P-V CURVES OF PV MODULE(480W) *Measuring tolerance: ±3%. 30 year Power Warranty (Please refer to product warranty for details) 12 year Product Workmanship Warranty Modules per box: 31 pieces Modules per 40’ Solar Cells Cell Orientation Module Dimensions Weight Front Glass Back Glass J-Box Cables Connector 475 20.2 Frame Encapsulant Material DIMENSIONS OF PV MODULE(mm)ELECTRICAL DATA (STC) ELECTRICAL DATA (NOCT) MECHANICAL DATA PACKAGING CONFIGUREATION WARRANTY container: 589 pieces Peak Power Watts-PMAX (Wp)* Maximum Power Voltage-VMPP (V) Maximum Power Current-IMPP (A) Open Circuit Voltage-VOC (V) Short Circuit Current-ISC (A) Module Efficiency m (%) STC: Irradiance 1000W/m2, Cell Temperature 25°C, Air Mass AM1.5. NOCT: Irradiance at 800W/m2, Ambient Temperature 20°C, Wind Speed 1m/s. Maximum Power-PMAX (Wp) Maximum Power Voltage-VMPP (V) Maximum Power Current-IMPP (A) Open Circuit Voltage-VOC (V) Short Circuit Current-ISC (A) (Do not connect Fuse in Combiner Box with two or more strings in parallel connection) 36.0 13.19 43.2 13.80 358 33.8 10.59 40.7 11.12 470 20.0 35.9 13.09 43.1 13.68 354 33.7 10.49 40.6 11.02 465 20.0 35.8 12.99 43.0 13.58 350 33.6 10.41 40.5 10.94 480 20.4 36.1 13.29 43.3 13.92 361 33.8 10.68 40.8 11.22 485 20.6 36.2 13.39 43.4 13.97 365 34.1 10.69 40.8 11.26 Cu r r e n t (A ) Po w e r (W ) Voltage(V) Voltage(V) 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 1000W/m˙ 800W/m˙ 600W/m˙ 400W/m˙ 200W/m˙ 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 10 20 30 40 50 200W/m˙ 400W/m˙ 1000W/m˙ 800W/m˙ 600W/m˙ Back View Front View 1016 23 1 5 35 35 16.0 0 ~ +5Power Tolerance-PMAX (W) 1016 977 23 1 5 14 0 0 40 0 6-Grounding Hole 12-Drain Hole 4-7×10Installing Hole 4-9×14Installing HoleAA B B Electrical characteristics with dierent rear side power gain (reference to 485 Wp front) Maximum Power-PMAX (Wp) Maximum Power Voltage-VMPP (V) Maximum Power Current-IMPP (A) Open Circuit Voltage-VOC (V) Short Circuit Current-ISC (A) Pmax gain Power Bifaciality 70±5% 509 43.4 14.67 36.2 14.06 5% 534 43.4 15.37 36.2 14.73 10% 558 43.4 16.07 36.2 15.40 15% 582 43.4 16.76 36.2 16.07 20% 606 43.4 17.46 36.2 16.74 25% BIFACIAL DUAL GLASS 252 LAYOUT MODULE www.trinasolar.com CAUTION: READ SAFETY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE USING THE PRODUCT. Version number: TSM_DEG15VC.20(II)_2021_B TEMPERATURE RATINGS 43°C (±2°C) - 0.34 %/°C - 0.25 %/°C MAXIMUM RATINGS Operational Temperature Maximum SystemVoltage Max Series Fuse Rating -40~+85°C 1500V DC (IEC) 1500V DC (UL) 25A ** Back-side power gain varies depending upon the specific project albedo NOCT(Nominal Operating Cell Temperature) Temperature Coefficient of P MAX Temperature Coefficient of V OC Temperature Coefficient of I SC 0.04 %/°C A-A 11.5 35 30 35 20 B-B Laminate Silicon Sealant Frame Laminate Silicon Sealant Frame 11.5 Monocrystalline PERC 252 cells (12 × 21) 2315 × 1016 × 35 mm (91.14 × 40 × 1.38 inches) 30.0 kg ( 66.1 lb) 2.0 mm (0.08 inches), High Transmission, AR Coated Heat Strengthened Glass POE/EVA 2.0 mm (0.08 inches), Heat Strengthened Glass (White Grid Glass) 35 mm (1.38 inches) Anodized Aluminium Alloy IP 68 rated Photovoltaic Technology Cable 4.0mm2 (0.006 inches2), Portrait: N 450 mm/P 450 mm (17.72/17.72 inches) Landscape: N 1400/P 1400 mm (55.12/55.12 inches) MC4 EVO2 / TS4 Technical Data 100/125kW, 1500Vdc String Inverters for North America The 100 & 125kW high power CPS three phase string inverters are designed for ground mount applications. The units are high performance, advanced and reliable inverters designed specifically for the North American environment and grid. High efficiency at 99.1% peak and 98.5% CEC, wide operating voltages, broad temperature ranges and a NEMA Type 4X enclosure enable this inverter platform to operate at high performance across many applications. The CPS 100/125kW products ship with the Standard or Centralized Wire-box, each fully integrated and separable with AC and DC disconnect switches. The Standard Wire-box inlcudes touch safe fusing for up to 20 strings. The CPS Flex Gateway enables communication, controls and remote product upgrades. NFPA 70, NEC 2014 and 2017 compliant Touch safe DC Fuse holders adds convenience and safety CPS Flex Gateway enables remote FW upgrades Integrated AC & DC disconnect switches 1 MPPT with 20 fused inputs for maximum flexibility Copper and Aluminum compatible AC connections Key Features Datasheet CPS SCH100/125KTL-DO/US-600 100/125KTL Centralized Wire-box CHINT POWER SYSTEMS AMERICA 2020/01-MKT NA Chint Power Systems America 6800 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 235 Pleasanton, CA 94566Tel: 855-584-7168 Mail: AmericaSales@chintpower.com Web: www.chintpowersystems.com NEMA Type 4X outdoor rated, tough tested enclosure Advanced Smart-Grid features (CA Rule 21 certified) kVA Headroom yields 100kW @ 0.9PF and 125kW @ 0.95PF Generous 1.87 and 1.5 DC/AC Inverter Load Ratios Separable wire-box design for fast service Standard 5 year warranty with extensions to 20 years 100/125KTL Standard Wire-box Technical Data Model Name CPS SCH100KTL-DO/US-600 CPS SCH125KTL-DO/US-600 Max. PV Power Max. DC Input Voltage Operating DC Input Voltage Range Start-up DC Input Voltage / Power Number of MPP Trackers MPPT Voltage Range1 Max. PV Input Current (Isc x1.25) Number of DC Inputs DC Disconnection Type DC Surge Protection Rated AC Output Power 100kW 125kW Max. AC Output Power2 100kVA (111KVA @ PF>0.9)125kVA (132KVA @ PF>0.95) Rated Output Voltage Output Voltage Range3 Grid Connection Type4 Max. AC Output Current @600Vac 96.2/106.8A 120.3/127.2A Rated Output Frequency Output Frequency Range3 Power Factor >0.99 (±0.8 adjustable)>0.99 (±0.8 adjustable) Current THD Max. Fault Current Contribution (1-cycle RMS) Max. OCPD Rating 150A 175A AC Disconnection Type AC Surge Protection Topology Max. Efficiency CEC Efficiency Stand-by / Night Consumption Enclosure Protection Degree Cooling Method Operating Temperature Range Non-Operating Temperature Range5 Operating Humidity Operating Altitude Audible Noise User Interface and Display Inverter Monitoring Site Level Monitoring Modbus Data Mapping Remote Diagnostics / FW Upgrade Functions Dimensions (WxHxD) Weight Mounting / Installation Angle AC Termination DC Termination Fused String Inputs Safety and EMC Standard Selectable Grid Standard Smart-Grid Features Standard6 Extended Terms 1) See user manual for further information regarding MPPT Voltage Range when operating at non-unity PF 2) "Max. AC Apparent Power" rating valid within MPPT voltage range and temperature range of -30°C to +40°C (-22°F to +104°F) for 100KW PF >0.9 and 125KW PF >0.95 3) The "Output Voltage Range" and "Output Frequency Range" may differ according to the specific grid standard. 4) Wye neutral-grounded, Delta may not be corner-grounded. 5) See user manual for further requirements regarding non-operating conditions. 6) 5 year warranty effective for units purchased after October 1st, 2019. 20 PV source circuits, pos. & neg. fused (Standard Wire-box) 1 PV output circuit, 1-2 terminations per pole, non-fused (Centralized Wire-box) DC Input 15 - 90 degrees from horizontal (vertical or angled) 1500V 860-1450Vdc 900V / 250W 1 LED Indicators, WiFi + APP 870-1300Vdc <65dBA@1m and 25°C CPS Flex Gateway (1 per 32 inverters) SunSpec/CPS Standard / (with Flex Gateway) Modbus RS485 8202ft / 2500m (no derating) 0-100% -22°F to +140°F / -30°C to +60°C (derating from +113°F / +45°C) AC Output System Environment <4W 60Hz 57-63Hz Type II MOV (with indicator/remote signaling), Up=2.5kV, In=20kA (8/20uS) 600Vac 528-660Vac 3Φ / PE / N (Neutral optional) 98.5% NEMA Type 4X Variable speed cooling fans 41.47A Load-rated DC switch Type II MOV (with indicator/remote signaling), Up=2.5kV, In=20kA (8/20uS) 10, 15 and 20 years 5 years Safety IEEE 1547a-2014, CA Rule 21, ISO-NE Volt-RideThru, Freq-RideThru, Ramp-Rate, Specified-PF, Volt-VAr, Freq-Watt, Volt-Watt 187.5kW 275A UL1741-SA-2016, CSA-C22.2 NO.107.1-01, IEEE1547a-2014; FCC PART15 Warranty 45.28x24.25x9.84in (1150x616x250mm) with Standard Wire-box 39.37x24.25x9.84in (1000x616x250mm) with Centralized Wire-box Inverter: 121lbs / 55kg; Wire-box: 55lbs / 25kg (Standard Wire-box); 33lbs / 15kg (Centralized Wire-box) Screw Clamp Fuse Holder (Wire range: #12 - #6AWG CU) - Standard Wire-box Busbar, M8 PEMserts (Wire range: #1AWG - 250kcmil CU/AL, Lugs not supplied) - Centralized Wire-box 15A or 20A fuses provided (Determined by product SKU) Display and Communication Mechanical M10 Stud Type Terminal Block [3Φ] (Wire range: 1/0AWG - 500kcmil CU/AL, Lugs not supplied) Screw Clamp Terminal Block [N] (#12 - 1/0AWG CU/AL) -40°F to +158°F / -40°C to +70°C maximum <3% Load-rated AC switch Transformerless 99.1% o o o o oooo o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooo o o o o o o o o o o o oooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooo o o o o ooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooo o o o o o ooooooooooooooo o o o o oooooooooo o o o o o oooooooo o o o o o oooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooo o o ooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o ooooooooo o o o o o ooooooooooooo o o o ooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooo o o o o o o o o oooooooo o o o o o o oooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooo o o ooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooo o o o o o o o o ooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o ooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooooooo o o o o o o o oooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o ooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o ooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooo o o o ooooooooooooo o o o o o o oooooooo o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 19.37 Ac 7.55 Ac 5.12 Ac C 2.70 Ac C 7 Ac C 1.14 Ac C 27.25 Ac C 3.80 Ac 1.10 Ac C 3.71 Ac C 6.38 Ac C 4.94 Ac C 6 Ac C 1.86 Ac C 12.80 Ac 16.02 Ac 9.46 Ac 45.10 Ac C 11.09 Ac C 4.3 Ac 4.06 Ac 2 Ac4.13 Ac 1.7 6 A c 1.66 Ac C 1.22 Ac 1.70 Ac 1.44 Ac 1.94 Ac 2.12 Ac 1.89 Ac C 1.03 Ac 1.33 Ac 2.48 Ac C 46.00 Ac C 1 A c 1 A c 1.93 Ac 1.41 Ac C 1.19 Ac 1 Ac 1 . 9 3 A c C 7.21 Ac C 5 Ac 23.49 Ac 1.84 Ac 2.11 Ac 4.53 Ac 1.86 Ac 23.26 Ac 10.1 Ac C 3.78 Ac C 2.01 Ac 1.18 Ac C 10 Ac 82.2 Ac 22.12 Ac 2.06 Ac C 2.43 Ac C 25.11 Ac 15.97 Ac 1.13 Ac 3 Ac C 21.27 Ac C 108.89 Ac C 92.09 Ac 1 Ac 4.81 Ac 13.14 Ac C1.37 Ac C 2.56 Ac 1.26Ac C 1.6 A c 7.84 Ac 51.82 Ac C 111.58 Ac 25.56 Ac 3.15 Ac 1.70 Ac 6.14 Ac 2.84 Ac C 1.39 Ac 2.06 Ac 4.49 Ac3.09 Ac C 3.07 Ac2.10 Ac 3.51 Ac 1.78 Ac 1.08 Ac 3.05 Ac C 1.79 Ac O1 1 8 5 7 1 s 1 4 2 s462.99 240 s856 s 360 s 1 6 0 s 1 1 4 s 809 s 1 0 4 1 . 8 1 5 6 9 s 298.56 1797s 4 5 4 . 9 208.5 240 s400 s 658 207.69 1 1 0 s 1 5 0 .2 0 2 2 6 . 5 150 150 1033 s 159 s242 s400 s199 s 199 s 199 s 202 s 203 s 553.65 536 s 339 s 1 9 6 s 446 s 446.64 2 1 5 s 317 s 158 s 3 5 0 s 2 5 6 .4 2 s 1 7 5 s 1004.21 185 s189 s 188 s 6 7 5 .4 0 203 s 193.8 207 s 246 s 299.88239 s301 s194 s 199. 45 240 s 200 s 201 s 2 0 2 . 5 376 s 505 s 354 s 201 s 1 6 2 s 752 s 154 s286.93 328 s 349. 51 335 s 537 s 102 s 154.56 517 s 344 s 298 s 580 s 346 s 1133.88 1 7 1.8 421.3 s 144.2 2 0 6 . 9 5 266.62 98 566.26 434.84 1036.32 1 9 2 .7 1 109.25 8 4 6 s 858.26 2 7 0 . 9 0 407.84 2 9 7 .7 4 5 8 . 3 5 7 5 .2 145 s 3 4 6 230 465 s 258.40 566.92 1 4 1 .8 1 2 6 s 285 s 1 1 5 .3 9 1 3 0 .3 0 1 6 0 .2 6 9 7 . 9 7 6 1 . 2 5 1 8 0 s 9 1 s 144 s 1 1 1 . 5 0 1 5 9 .2 8 193.7 201.7 344.29 182.21 33 s 8 2 s 3 4 s 9 9 s 1 0 1 s 2 4 s 68 s 1 7 1 s 2 6 6 s 8 7 s222s 167 s 1 1 9 s 216 1 5 5 s1 8 s76 s 1 8 4 s 2 0 0 s 869 s 2 1 2 s 3 3 s174 s 3 0 5 s 2 4 2 s 149 s 153 s 1 6 0 s 2 8 2 . 7 0 3 1 0 . 6 5 47 5.26 2 5 4 s 1 4 1 s 6 3 s 8 6 s9 7 s 145 s 1 2 8 s 1 4 8 s 2 0 5 s 1 1 8 s 593 s 83 s 252 s 1049.08 416 249s 321 s 399 1 7 9.7 3 459.77 5 0 6 . 4 4 206 s 182.40 d 4 5 s 150 s 198.44 2 8 9 224.45 431.17 44 7. 1 220 s566 s 256 s 1 6 0 s 216 s 23 s 193 s 20 0 305.33 d 230 s 355.7 178 s 198 s 1 6 1 s 1 9 3 s 335 2079.62 2087 s 140.9 1 5 5 s 1 7 6 s 1122 s 290 s 2 1 3 s 229 s 93 s 40 s76 s 1 8 0 s 483 s 214 s420 s 62 0 127 1 0 2 11 0 1 5 6 8 . 7 5 7 7 0 s 175 s 225 s 49 s 487s 5 1 2 s 2 0 4 s 176 s 158s 22 0 s 529 s 143 s 1 0 4 s 173 s 182 s 190 198.46 155 s 441 s 146 s 334 s 963.78 158.01 169 s 414.37 15 3 2 s 329 s 1183 244 s 212 s 189.85 189 s 335 283 s 257 s 466 s 162 918.99 37.487.8 46 8. 2 111.2 1069 s 200.41 3 8 6.04 150.2 250 1 9 0 339.94 150 2 9 534 175 22.55 539 s 280.2 1 8 2 1 1 4 s 2 0 0 300 s 300.05 285.57 282 s 213.8 79 s 154.8 1 3 5 . 3 120 s 502 s 250 s 201 s 63 s 51 s 198 s 190 s 200 s 639 s 1 0 0 .7 6 230 24 8 s 79 s 31 5 s509 s 1250.28 125 14 2 909 s 3 1 2 s 114.7 216.13 4 5 7 .1 182.63 1 6 0 . 1 9 2 2 6 1 4 41 5 0 s 3 4 1 . 1 9 1 6 8 .5 1 1 2 9 .6 0 116 s 9 7 . 1 1 14 s 1 2 7 s152 s 1 2 3 s 5 4 0 s 725 s 1 0 1 s 9 0 s 2 1 2 s 105 s 179 s 1049.08 3 1 0 . 6 8 83 s 42 s 156 s 482 199 183.18 218.78 d 181.95 1 2 8 . 0 6 159 s 2073.74 149.46 275 s 1 2 4 s 486 s 449 s 198 s 175 s 377 s 1175 s 225 s 196 s 1 7 5 s 551.21 198.46 191 s 525 525 774.85 34 6.98 215.20 142.2 774.13 150 10 2. 5 282.5 538 s 5 0 9 s 1 9 6 7 s 1 1 3 . 6 5 1 1 3 .6 5 4 0 7 s 137 17 6.1 125 3 0 1 s 1 4 7 .5 0 1 4 8 s2 0 2 .2 8 3 6 2 . 5 4 2 1 3 1 6 3 .7 6 2 6 9 .3 8 171.23 1 9 7.3 6 223 s 134.87 98.55 3966.70 64.14 1 5 3 s 7 7 9 .7 9 645.26 100 1 1 8. 5 4 190.66133 177.68 684.16 79.99 460 2537.7 416 4 4 2.4 3 127.69 290 s 279.27 252.14 4 4 8. 2 3 1121 s 3573.55 699.09 1012 s 2011 s 1809.05 2 8 0 s 2736.85 280.47 316.00 188.7 6 0 3 4 9 .0 8 1 5 0 25 2 4 8 . 8 3 1 9 3 s 3 6 7 . 8 7 3 5 2 .5 1 5 0 1 8 s 7 2 s 8 0 s 1 7 9 s 1 7 1 .1 1 1 8 6 s 1 0 6 s 1 4 5 A L O N G C R E E K 137.88 300 300 175 162 498.60 110.05 12 1 2 6 . 3 5 314 s 316.76 3 1 37 7 s 1 0 4 s 3687.3 948.74 3 5 9 . 8 2 1 6 6 s 1 4 0 s 1 8 4 . 2 1 755 s 400.83 500.97 4 5 1 6 0 s 7 9 .0 0 67 4 s 15 2 s 3 4 s 196 s 1 5 4 .5 1 5 0 . 4 3 1 0 6 s 609.45 154.8 175 498.60 5 8 s 1 3 1 s 8 3 . 8 0 158.01 2 3 6 s 429.7 415.29 276.38 225 1 9 0 .7 7 1 3 3.4 3 123.33 415 s 828 S 185 478.26 668.91 403.45 546.49 200194.92 308 s 162 s 313 s 261.48 4 9 7 . 5 2 532.6 248.85 201 s 156 s 622 s 560.06 9 4 . 1 7 350.36 150 250 s 321 s 155 s 202 s 201 s 248 s 23.22 50.07 299.87 535 s 250 s 152 s 258 s 152 s ___ ITHACA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT D A N B Y F I R E D I S T . _____ _________ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ DANBY FEDERATED CHURCH TOWN OF DANBY DANBY TOWN HALL DANBY CONG. CHURCH DANBY COMMUNITY PARK T/O DANBY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT DANBY VILLAGE CEMETERY _ _ _ _ _ _ BUTTERMILK FALLS STATE PARK 84 56 5 7.4 1 2 5 7.4 1 1 21.3 66 49.2 85.1 57.44 42 77.1 16 82.1 21.17 32 355033 34 45 44 47 38 36 48 46 75 37 21.42 39 68.167 4 22 23 24 57.12 57.11 79.21.18 79.1 80 21.122 21.123 21.18 54.2 52 2 1 .4 1 57.43 21.131 21.11 53 55 P/O 11.-1-6.102 82.2 5 82.31.192 1.2 1.36 20 19.2 1.281.25 1.271.17 1.222 1.9 1.221 21.15 74 57.32 57.2 59 5857.31 11 12 62 1.41 1.31.81.5 1.12 1.20 1.26 17.2 18 21.21 21.22 10 15 14 13 1.42 1.14 1.161.10 1.34 1.13 57.5 21.124 19.12 19.11 1.191 83.12 83.2 85.3 85.2 83.11 65.23 65.24 81 65.25 76.2 49.1 78 57.42 5 7.4 1 4 57.413 41.3 8640 41.2 41.122 41.121 41.123 41.5 51 69 70 72 68.2 71 73 41.4 82.4 76.1 21.121 7 8 9 61 65.22 60.1 60.2 2521.14 31 30 27 2 8 2 9 65.1 65.216463 21.242 21.16 21.132 32 1.29 1.32 1.1 1.35 1.6 1.7 1.31 D A N B Y R O A D S T A T E R O U T E 9 6 B J E N N I N G S POND R OA D MICHIGANHOLLOWROAD DANBY ROAD STATE ROUTE 96B H O R N B R O O K R O A D COUNTY ROUTE 123 H O R N B R O O K R O A D C O U N T Y R O U T E 1 2 3 LIEB ROAD GUNDERMAN ROAD B AL D HIL L R O A D 9 8 7.1 7 7 11 11 14 1415 15 6 0 1 2 4 21.241 9.46 Ac 125.15 495.79 1019 s 2 3 0 2 2 2 .9 8 79 1. 02 6 0 82.6 82.5 3.69 Ac 2175 s 2 4 4 . 5 3 10 1" = 800' FOR TAX PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USED FOR CONVEYANCE All tax maps are referenced to the New York State Plane Central CoordinateSystem using the 1983 North American Datum. Property lines have beenregistered to 1991-92 Tompkins County Digital Planimetric Base Map,and, as a result, dimensions and acreages may vary from legal descriptions.For complete legal descriptions or conveyances, please refer to the appropriatedeeds and surveys. SP E C IA L DI S TR I C T I N FO R M AT IO N TOWN OF DANBY43.1 3 12 A 3 5.6 Ac 2.11 Ac C 18.50 Ac G 100s 100d Parcel Lot NumberPrevious Lot NumberSubdivision Lot NumberDeed/Survey AcreageComputed AcreageGrouped (Total) AcreageScaled (Calculated) AcreageDeed Dimension LEGEND TOMPKINS COUNTY, N.Y. North MAP: SCALE: MAP REVISED: 1-JULY-2021MAP PRINTED: 1-JULY-2021 (When plotted on Arch D Media) Main Map Second Map 91 6-1-3 1 " = 400 ' 11 x 17" (47%), scale is 200 0 200 400Feet 1 Parcel ConnectorProperty LineFormer Property LineCurrent Year ChangesBlock LimitExternal Tax MapBlock Number NOTICE OF DISCLAIMER This map represents a compilation of graphical and textualinformation from deeds and surveys, a digital planimetric basemap, and digital conversion of hand-drawn mylar maps. Errorsand omissions can occur from each of these sources; each sourcerepresents a large number of records and originators ofinformation. As a practical matter, the County does not warrantthe accuracy or completeness of the information portrayed. Theend user of these maps agrees to accept the data "as is" with thefull knowledge that errors and omissions may exist, and to holdharmless the County for any damages that may result from aninappropriate use of these maps.Military Tract/Watkins & Flint Lot Number HydrographyRailroadCurb/Pavement LineBuilding Footprint (1991-2021) Special DistrictsMunicipality Ithaca City School DistrictDanby Fire District 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 1 NSF Danby Emergency Response Plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Emergency Response Plan is to establish responsibility and guidelines for taking action in the event of an emergency occurring at the NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC, and NSF Danby Site 3, LLC (Project Site) during operation of the Project. The Emergency Response Plan emphasizes Norbut Solar Farms’ dedication to providing a safe and healthy work environment. Norbut Solar Farms employees and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) staff working at the Project Site shall familiarize themselves with the content of this Emergency Response Plan so they can understand and comply with instructions and procedures outlined herein. 1.0 General Responsibilities Norbut Solar Farms is accountable for the safety of employees working under their supervision and are required to enforce the instructions and procedures outlined herein. All on-site personnel must take an active part in protecting themselves, fellow workers, and the general public. They are further required to participate in safety meetings and notify supervisors of any unsafe conditions that may exist at the Project Site. The following is a list of the general responsibilities of on-site personnel. Operations and Safety Managers More than any other employee, Superintendents and Supervisors carry the greatest burden of implementing, maintaining, and enforcing the Emergency Response Plan at the Project Site. Their responsibilities include: ▪ Ensure job specific emergency and evacuation procedures are provided at the Project Site. ▪ Evaluate workers qualifications and abilities. ▪ Ensure that workers have proper clothing and personal protective equipment. ▪ Provide all personnel and Norbut Solar Farms vehicles with equipment necessary to respond to first aid, health and safety issues, fire or other emergency needs including equipping Norbut Solar Farms vehicles with fire extinguishers, first aid kits and AED equipment. ▪ Provide first aid and ensure employees have access to medical treatment. ▪ Conduct safety meetings that emphasize the importance of safety and address specific jobsite safety issues. ▪ Plan and anticipate potential hazards of upcoming work. ▪ Conduct workplace safety inspections and be alert for possible accident producing conditions. ▪ Follow-up to ensure compliance with safety recommendations made by Norbut Solar Farms, ▪ Tompkins County, the Local Fire Marshal, the Police Department, and regulatory agencies. ▪ Provide training to Local first responders that provides a solar facility functional overview (location, ingress/egress, equipment, site operation), evaluates operation activities and best practices in responding to emergencies at the facility, and reviews operation emergency response plans. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 2 Worker Responsibilities Each and every worker is responsible for the safety of themselves and their fellow workers. In addition to observing safe practices and exercising common sense, worker responsibilities include: ▪ Adhere to all instructions and procedures contained herein and established by Supervisors. ▪ Be constantly vigilant for unsafe activities or conditions around work activities and make the needed corrections. ▪ Set a good example for fellow workers. ▪ Consistently deliver work of high quality. ▪ Cooperate with Supervisors in preventing accidents. ▪ Make safety suggestions and/or report safety concerns to Supervisors. Jobsite Visitors On occasion, Norbut Solar Farms will receive requests from Municipal staff, emergency services, project sponsors, public organizations, or others to visit the Project Site. Jobsite visitors shall undergo site safety orientation prior to entering the Project Site. 1.1 General Guidelines On-site personnel will have to take actions as their judgment dictates based upon the conditions that arise for each emergency. These guidelines are intended to assist them in making timely decisions and taking appropriate actions. On-site personnel shall call for assistance, based on the significance of the emergency. All work -related injuries/illnesses MUST be reported IMMEDIATELY to Norbut Solar Farms. ▪ If the emergency requires external emergency responders to arrive on the Project Site, the initial responder must coordinate the response. For emergencies of a significant nature, such as fire or ambulance for major medical emergency, the initial responder shall call 911, and then use the Calling Tree. ▪ Subcontractor Management are responsible for getting injured parties to the hospital and emergency treatment at the nearest heath care facilities in the most efficient manner possible based on perceived injuries, using ambulance, paramedic units, or Air Evacuation as needed. ▪ For all first aid medical incidents, use the Calling Tree to notify Site Response Personnel to help provide support. For non-emergency situations like a minor injury, the initial responder shall use the Calling Tree. ▪ Subcontractor Safety Personnel shall accompany the injured party and use the local occupational medical clinic or hospital nearest the Project Site. ▪ Subcontractors must establish their own First Aid stations. They shall be made available to their workforce and provided in each trailer and in all trucks on the Project Site. Alarm Descriptions Emergency Description Medical 1 air horn blast with simultaneous cell phone notification Fire 2 air horn blasts with simultaneous cell phone notification Evacuation 3 air horn blasts with simultaneous cell phone notification Seek Shelter 4 air horn blasts with simultaneous cell phone notification 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 3 2.0 MEDICAL EMERGENCY 2.1 Serious Injury The following procedures apply for serious medical injuries such as loss of consciousness, heart attack, bone fractures, neck trauma, or severe burns. 1. One (1) air horn blast with simultaneous cell phone notification. 2. Broadcast “May-Day, May-Day” on radio. 3. Notify Operations and/or Safety Managers. 4. If life threatening, call 9-1-1. 5. Provide name, exact location, number of injured persons, and brief description of incident 6. On-site personnel to meet EMS responders at site entrance and direct them to location of incident. 7. Do not leave or move the injured unless directed to by Safety Managers or EMS responders. 8. Administer first aid if necessary. 9. Document incident and keep on file. 2.2 Minor Injury The following procedures apply for minor medical injuries. 1. One (1) air horn blast with simultaneous cell phone notification. 2. Initiate first aid if necessary. 3. Notify Operations and/or Safety Managers. 4. Call 9-1-1 if necessary. 5. Arrange for visit to medical facility as needed. 2.3 Attending an Incident When attending an incident, the following procedures apply: 1. Clear a path to the injured person for Operations and/or Safety Managers and assign personnel to assist with signaling EMS responders to the location of the incident. 2. Identify location of Project Site entrance nearest to the incident and notify EMS responders. 3. Operations and/or Safety Managers shall meet EMS responders at site entrance. 4. Direct and accompany EMS responders to location of incident. 5. Follow all directions of EMS responders 6. Contact management staff of Norbut Solar Farms and/or subcontractors. 7. Document incident and keep on file. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 4 2.4 Medical Facilities The nearest medical facilities to the Project Site are: WellNow Urgent Care (9.8 miles) 740 S Meadow Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Phone: 607-319-4563 Directions Head east toward NY-96B S Continue on NY-96B N/Danby Rd to South Hill 11 min (7.2 mi) Take Stone Quarry Rd to S Meadow St in Ithaca 5 min (2.4 mi) Turn right onto S Meadow St 22 s (433 ft) Drive to your destination 1 min (0.1 mi) Cayuga Medical Center (12.7 miles) 2333 N Triphammer Rd # 302 Ithaca, NY 14850 Phone: 607-257-1126 Directions Danby Town Hall 1830 Danby Rd, Ithaca, NY 14850 Head east toward NY-96B S Turn right onto NY-96B S 2 min (1.1 mi) Continue on Steam Mill Rd. Take Nelson Rd, Updike Rd and Burns Rd to NY-79 W/Slaterville Rd in Ithaca 11 min (5.8 mi) Follow NY-79 W/Slaterville Rd and Pine Tree Rd to Judd Falls Rd 5 min (2.5 mi) Follow Judd Falls Rd and Pleasant Grove Rd to Hanshaw Rd in Cayuga Heights 5 min (1.9 mi) Drive from N Triphammer Rd to Lansing 3 min (1.2 mi) Drive to your destination 38 s (443 ft) 3.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SPILL The hazardous materials that may be on the Project Site during operations include those usually associated with the operation and maintenance of vehicles and machinery, including diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluid, brake fluid, antifreeze, and lubricants. Other materials considered hazardous are chemicals used in portable toilets and the associated human waste. In the unlikely event of a hazardous materials spill into a Resource Protection Area (RPA), wetland, or stream, Local EMS and the Zoning Department shall be notified immediately. 3.1 Spill Prevention The best defense against hazardous material spills is prevention. The following measures shall be implemented at the Project Site for spill prevention: ▪ All on-site personnel shall be trained to maintain and inspect their vehicles and equipment. ▪ All machinery found to be a potential source of a future spill shall be removed from the Project Site and repaired. Vehicles with chronic or continuous leaks must be removed from the Project Site and repaired before returning to operations. No leaking of any material from equipment or vehicles will be tolerated on the Project Site. ▪ On-site personnel shall make every effort to ensure compliance prior to an incident. On- site personnel are solely responsible for any spills of hazardous materials and the subsequent cleanup, disposal of waste, and restoration of any contaminated areas. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 5 ▪ Restrictions will be placed on all equipment refueling, servicing, and maintenance supplies and activities. All maintenance materials, oils, grease, lubricants, antifreeze, etc. shall be stored off-site. If they are required during field operations, they shall be placed in a designated area away from site activities and in an approved storage container. ▪ No refueling, storage, servicing, or maintenance of equipment shall take place within 100 feet of a drainage or sensitive environmental resources to reduce the potential of contamination by spills. ▪ No refueling or servicing shall be done without absorbent material or drip pans properly placed to contain spilled fuel. ▪ Any fluids drained from the machinery during servicing shall be collected in leak-proof containers and taken to an appropriate disposal or recycling facility. If these activities result in damage or accumulation of product on the soil, it must be disposed of as hazardous waste. ▪ Under no circumstances shall contaminated soil be added to a spoils pile and transported to a regular disposal site. ▪ During operations, all vehicles and equipment required on-site shall be parked or stored at least 100 feet away from rivers, streams, wetlands, known archaeological sites, and any other sensitive resource areas. All wash down activities must be accomplished away from sensitive environmental resources. 3.2 Spill Containment Equipment The following equipment shall be at the Project Site with each construction crew in the event a spill occurs. 1. Emergency Spill Kit that includes at a minimum: a. Sorbent socks b. Disposal bags and ties c. Safety glasses d. Rubber gloves e. Sorbent drip pillow f. Sorbent pads, 18” x 18” g. Sorbent spill pillows, 24” x 18” h. Hazardous labels i. Bag of Lite-Dri Absorbent (or equal) j. Shovel and broom 2. Absorbent Pads - These pads (18" x 18") are 100% polypropylene fabrics that absorb 11 times their weight in liquids. Pads absorb 10 gallons of liquid per bale of 100 pads. 3. Absorbent Skimmers Booms - Skimmers will float indefinitely before or after saturation with oils. Skimmers are made of 100% meltdown polypropylene fill that repels water. They absorb ten times their weight and can be used in lakes, streams, or on the ground. Each skimmer has a harness kit attached that is made of yellow polypropylene rope with grommets that are used to connect skimmers. Each boom is 8-feet x 10-feet. 4. 55-gallon clean drums, lined with polypropylene material (over pack). The drum can be used to store spill response materials until needed. When a spill occurs, all soiled pads, pillows, skimmers, contaminated soil, etc. shall be placed in the drum for disposal after the cleanup is accomplished. It is the Norbut Solar Farms responsibility to make sure these materials are on-site at all times and personnel are trained in their use and disposal prior to spill response. 3.3 Spill Response Procedures A formal notification process shall be initiated when a spill or potential spill is first observed. Immediate actions are necessary. The first individual who discovers a spill (spill observer) will be responsible for initiating notification and response procedures. All personnel responsible for responding to spills must have completed training in recognition and response to spills of hazardous materials. Norbut Solar Farms is responsible for providing spill recognition and response training for all Norbut Solar Farms project personnel. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 6 Spill Observer The first person to witness the spill shall follow these procedures: 1. Make an assessment of the incident as observed. 2. If the incident can be safely controlled, take steps to do so (e.g., turn off source of spill). 3. Notify Norbut Solar Farms Management Team and provide as much information as possible. 4. Begin to fill out Spill Notification Checklist Norbut Solar Farms Operations and/or Safety Management Operations and/or Safety Managers shall follow these procedures in the event of a spill: 1. Notify Supervisors 2. Make sure all personnel are removed from the spill area. 3. Take immediate actions to minimize any threat to public safety (verify the spill area has been cordoned off). 4. Secure the source of the spill, if safely possible to do so. 5. Maintain close observation of the spill. 3.4 Vehicle and Machinery Spills Incidents of loss of a petroleum product from equipment or vehicles shall be considered a spill. After the spill has been flagged to warn people to stay away, the volume and extent of the spill estimated, and initial notification procedures accomplished, the spill must be confined. Do not handle materials without wearing protective clothing. Generally, follow the procedures listed below: 1. When the spill is discovered begin making notations on the Spill Notification Checklist. 2. Determine if the Spill Team Response is needed to complete cleanup. a. If the answer is NO, submit incident reports to Operations and/or Safety Managers b. If the answer is YES, go to step 3. 3. Activate the local spill response team. 4. Determine if additional cleanup contractors are necessary for a major incident. a. If the answer is NO and the incident is determined to be a minor spill, conduct internal cleanup, review and evaluate the cleanup, determine if the cleanup is beyond the local response team ability or equipment; if the answer is NO, complete the cleanup, restore the damaged areas, properly dispose of all waste, and submit incident reports to Operations and/or Safety Managers. If during cleanup, the incident is determined to be beyond the abilities of the local response team, hire additional contractors to help with the cleanup. b. If the answer is YES, hire additional contractors to help with the cleanup. 5. Arrange for proper testing and disposal of all waste if substance is unknown. 6. Closely monitor all cleanup activities. 7. Ensure proper disposal of absorbent materials, containers, and soils, as required. 8. Complete the cleanup and restore damaged areas. 9. Submit incident reports to Operations and/or Safety Managers. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 7 Cleanup may range from very simple removal of minor spills, to installation of skimmers around large spills or between sensitive areas and spills for longer, prolonged cleanups. Cleanups can be on pavement or on soil surfaces. On-site personnel shall be trained in the proper use of the cleanup materials. All spills on pavement shall be thoroughly removed with absorbent socks, pillows, or pads and Lite-Dri (or equal) granules. After absorption, the granules shall also be removed. All materials used in cleanup, shall then become hazardous waste. Place all materials in a 55-gallon lined drum, seal it, and label the contents. The drum must then be sent to a designated disposal site. A chain of custody form must accompany the drum (provided by Disposal Company). It is strongly recommended that all contractors determine a disposal site in advance of a spill incident. All spills on soil require the same treatment as on pavement, with the exception that contaminated soil is also part of the generated hazardous waste and must be handled as such and removed from the site. 3.5 Chemical Toilet Spill Chemical toilets are self-contained and pose little threat to the construction site. Chemicals used in portable toilets are biodegradable and generally non-toxic to humans. However, they can pose a danger to wildlife and sensitive habitats by virtue of heavy concentration of chemical and human waste. They shall be pumped out at least one time per week. Toilets shall never be placed in or near an environmentally sensitive area. In the unlikely event that a portable toilet spills during transport or relocation, the same procedures for other hazardous material spills shall be used. Disposal of absorbent materials shall be handled the same as other spills, with proper disposal by the toilet supply company. 3.6 Reporting of Major Spills Upon recognition of a major spill, notification is critical to immediate response. The first notification shall be given to the nearest Operations and/or Safety Managers so that appropriate spill response can begin immediately. After initial spill response has begun, notification and reporting to agency personnel shall occur. The following procedures should be followed when reporting major spills: 1. Never include information that has not been verified. 2. Never speculate as to the cause of the incident or make any acknowledgment of liability. 3. Do not delay reporting because of incomplete information. 4. Notify persons/agencies and document notification and the content of the message. 5. For spills of federal reportable quantities, in conformance with the requirements in 40 CFR parts 110,119, and 302, O&M staff shall notify the National Response Center at (800) 424- 8802. 6. Complete the Spill Notification Checklist as information is confirmed. Other agencies which may need to be consulted include, but are not limited to, the Local Fire Department, Public Works Department, Highway Patrol, Local Police Department, Department of Toxic Subst ances, OSHA, RWQCB, DEQ, and or DGIF. 3.7 Disposal of Waste Following the cleanup of a spill, the waste, absorbent materials, protective clothing, and any soil that has been contaminated must be removed to a designated hazardous waste disposal area. All contaminated materials shall be sealed in 55-gallon drums and labeled with the contents. If the contaminant is unknown, a sample of the material must be collected and analyzed before disposal. A permit or approval in writing must be obtained prior to disposal of the drum. A copy of the permit and a chain-of-custody form (obtained from the disposal contractor or testing laboratory) must accompany the material and copies must be attached to the Spill Notification Checklist submitted to Operations and/or Safety Managers. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 8 It is advisable for contractors to establish a relationship with a disposal facility before an incident occurs. Local landfills may be able to receive some petroleum products. However, it is up to the contractor to perform sampling, testing, and coordination with landfills or a disposal company. Transporting hazardous waste is regulated by federal and state agencies under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and other statutes. The contractor is responsible for the proper disposal of all waste and understanding the responsibilities under federal and state statutes. 3.8 Final Reporting Spill incidents that require cleanup must be reported on the Spill Notification Checklist. Notification must begin as soon as the incident occurs. The checklist shall be submitted to Operations and/or Safety Managers as soon as it is complete. Forms must be submitted no longer than five days after an incident is closed. A copy of the permit or disposal approval and the chain- of custody for the disposal must be attached to the Spill Notification Checklist. The forms shall be reviewed and filed in the contractor’s file. No exceptions will be tolerated. If a situation arises involving an unknown hazardous material, the Spill Notification Checklist can be used to report the incident. This incident may require a very different approach to removing the hazard and the contractor may be required to remove the material. The incident must still be reported by the contractor. 3.9 Follow-Up Investigation A critique following a spill response is beneficial to evaluate the actions taken or omitted. Recommendations and suggested modifications will be made to prepare for the possibility of future spills. 3.10 Spill Notification Checklist Spill Notification Checklists shall be provided at all construction trailers. At a minimum, the Spill Notification Checklists shall require the following information: ▪ Date ▪ Time ▪ Location ▪ Description of Spill (color, length, width, type) ▪ Type of Product ▪ Estimated Quantity ▪ Source of Spill (vehicle, machine, etc.) ▪ Describe initial containment procedures ▪ Weather conditions ▪ Note if spill reached any body of water ▪ Individuals notified of spill (include name, company, date, time, and response) 4.0 NATURAL DISASTERS The Operations and/or Safety Managers will be monitoring weather daily via met stations located at the Project Site. 4.1 Flooding and Flash Floods Flash flooding is a result of heavy localized rainfall such as that from slow moving, intense thunderstorms. Flash floods often result from small creeks and streams overflowing during heavy rainfall. These floods often become raging torrents of water which rip through river beds, or canyons, sweeping everything with them. Flash flooding can occur within 30-minutes and within six hours of a heavy rain event. In hilly terrain, flash floods can strike with little or no advance warning. Distant rain may be channeled into gullies and ravines causing flash flooding in minutes. In the event of a flash flood, the following procedures shall apply. 1. During periods of thunderstorms, always remain alert to heavy rains in your immediate area or upstream from your location. It does not have to be raining at your location for flash flooding to occur. 2. Do not drive through flooded areas. Even if it looks shallow enough to cross. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 9 3. Do not cross flowing streams on foot where water is above your ankles. 4. Be especially cautious at night. It is harder to recognize water danger then. 5. Do not attempt to outrace a flood on foot. If you see or hear it coming, move to higher ground immediately. 6. Be familiar with the land features where you work. It may be in a low area, near a drainage ditch, or small stream. 7. Stay tuned to weather forecasts and updates for the latest statements, watches, and warnings concerning heavy rain and flash flooding in the Project Area. 8. Waiting 15 to 30 minutes, or until high water recedes, is a simple safety measure. 4.2 Tornado Upon the issuance of a tornado warning, O&M staff will evacuate the Project Site and report to the predesignated shelter area, to be determined prior to O&M staff arrival. In the event O&M staff are outside and unable to evacuate to the shelter, the following procedure will be followed: Lie flat in a nearby ditch or depression, covering the head with the hands. Be aware of the potential for flooding 1. O&M staff are safest in a low, flat location and will be instructed to not get under an overpass or bridge. 2. O&M staff will be instructed to never try to outrun a tornado in congested areas in a vehicle. It is safest to leave the vehicle for safe shelter. 3. O&M Staff are instructed to beware of flying debris. Following tornado or high wind events, the site facility will be evaluated by O&M personnel for dam age. All repairs will be performed under standard operational procedures. 4.3 High Wind Event In the event of a high wind advisory, all land clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation and burning activities shall cease during periods when: ▪ Winds are greater than 25 mph (averaged over one hour); ▪ Disturbed material is easily windblown; or ▪ Dust plumes of greater than 20% or greater opacity impact public roads, occupied structures, or neighboring properties. Refer to the following table for procedures during varying wind speeds: Wind Speed (averaged over one hour) Action 0 – 15 mph Normal Work > 15 mph Warning 25 mph 1. Civil/Mechanical work causing dust at property lines is stopped 2. Increase dust control measures 3. Increase personal protection equipment (e.g., goggles instead of standard safety glasses) 30 mph 1. Panel installation is stopped 2. Aerial lift activities are stopped 35 mph 1. All construction and maintenance activities are stopped 2. Crews evacuate from the Project Site 40 mph 1. Operational solar panels will automatically stow into the wind. Solar panels are controlled by on-site controllers and wind sensors, and Norbut Solar Farms. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 10 4.4 Lighting Storm In the event a lightning storm is within 10-30 miles and approaching the Project Site, the following procedures shall apply. 1. Notify Operations and/or Safety Manager, and all on-site employees. 2. Stop work safely and head to staging and laydown yards in vehicles. 3. Remain at staging and laydown yards, get update on weather conditions. 4. If storm/lighting is still approaching the Project Site, get in and stay in company or personal vehicles that have rubber tires only. 5. If safe enough to do so, take cover in on-site designated shelters. 6. Once storm passes, remain in cars/trucks for at least 30 minutes depending on passing storm severity, and wait for an “OK” from Construction Supervisors or Safety Managers in charge of monitoring the storm 5.0 FIRE PREVENTION PLAN 5.1 Purpose and Need of Fire Prevention Plan The purpose of this Fire Prevention Plan (FPP) is to: ▪ Eliminate the potential risks and/or causes of fires ▪ Prevent loss of life and property by fire ▪ Educate employees to promote a safe environment ▪ Be prepared should a fire occur ▪ Outline a procedure to follow for the safety of the individuals at the Project Site at the time of the occurrence ▪ Identify risk factors and hazards ▪ Set up proper storage procedures, training, and identification of personnel responsible for maintaining and servicing the equipment and systems at the Project Site that are used to prevent and/or control a fire. 5.2 Responsibilities and Procedures Safety is everyone’s responsibility at the Project Site. All O&M staff working at the Project Site are to be trained and should know how to prevent and respond to a fire emergency. All on-site staff shall: ▪ Complete an on-site training program identifying the fire risks at the Project Site ▪ Understand the protocol and follow emergency procedures should an event occur ▪ Review and report potential fire hazards to the Operations and/or Safety Managers 5.3 Conditions Associated with PV Solar Arrays While the PV panels that will be installed for the Project are not flammable, PV solar arrays present a unique challenge for fire fighters. Unlike a typical electrical or gas utility, a PV array does not have a single point of disconnect. Whereas there are disconnects that will de-energize select parts of the system. As long as the PV panels are illuminated, the individual strings of PV panels are energized and capable of producing up to 1,500 volts. This is not just limited to PV panels being illuminated by the sun; illumination by artificial light sources, such as fire department lights, or the light for the fire itself are capable of producing electrical power sufficient to cause a lock-on hazard. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 11 Below is a summary of hazards associated with firefighting activities in PV solar arrays: ▪ Shock hazard due to the presence of water and PV power during suppression activities o Outdoor related electrical enclosures may not resist water intrusion from the high-pressure stream of a fire hose o PV panels damaged in the fire may not resist water intrusion o Damaged conductors may not resist water intrusion ▪ Shock hazard due to direct contact with energized components o No means of complete electrical disconnect Due to the hazards described above, it is not typical to practice fire suppression by means of water inundation within PV solar arrays. 5.4 Types of Fires and Procedures In the event of a fire at the Project Site, the general procedure is as follows: ▪ Person discovering the fire shall immediately dispatch to the Operations and/or Safety Managers. ▪ Attempt to extinguish the fire if safe and possible to do so. ▪ DO NOT attempt to extinguish fire near electrical equipment (e.g., PV solar arrays or inverters) with water or other chemicals as an electric shock or arc could occur. ▪ Call 9-1-1 and report the following: o “I am reporting a fire at NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; and NSF Danby Site 3, LLC.” o Provide address and exact Project Site entrance. o Provide location (ex: The fire is at Block H1) o Injuries if any and need for ambulance. ▪ A designated O&M employee shall meet fire fighters at the Project Site entrance and direct them to the location of the fire. ▪ Prepare a summary of the incident as soon as possible and no later than 24 hours after the incident. 5.4.1 Small Stage Fires Fires that are in the beginning stage and can be controlled with a fire extinguisher. An example would be a small trash can fire. In the event of a small stage fire at the Project Site: ▪ The person discovering the fire should immediately dispatch to the Operations and/or Safety Managers and O&M staff. ▪ Call 9-1-1 and report the following: o “I am reporting a fire at the NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; and NSF Danby Site 3, LLC.” o Provide address and exact Project Site entrance. o Provide location (ex: The fire is at Block H1) o Injuries if any and need for ambulance. ▪ All non-essential personnel should be removed from the hazard area. ▪ All on-site vehicles are required to carry fire extinguishers. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 12 ▪ Fire extinguishment with a fire extinguisher or other means should be attempted if the person has been trained in the use of fire extinguishers and can do so without placing themselves in danger. ▪ The Operations and/or Safety Managers shall respond to the scene and determine if external resources or an evacuation is necessary. In the event of an evacuation, Operations and/or Safety Managers will recruit/dispatch employees to assist with the evacuation and, have the Operations and/or Safety Managers issue the following statement over the radio: “Attention, there is a fire emergency at (location name). Please evacuate (the affected area) and report to (designated meeting area).” ▪ At this point, O&M staff in the affected area will stop work immediately, take steps to safely shut down equipment, exit the evacuation area, and report to the designated meeting area. ▪ The Operations and/or Safety Managers will then take steps to ensure that no employee re- enters the evacuated area until the Fire Department arrives and assumes command. ▪ The Operations and/or Safety Managers will issue an “All Clear” only when the Fire Department informs them that it is safe to do so. 5.4.2 Large Stage Fires In the event of a large stage fire at the Project Site: ▪ The person discovering the fire should immediately contact the Operations and/or Safety Managers. The Safety Manager shall call 9-1-1 to report the fire. ▪ Call 9-1-1 and report the following: o “I am reporting a fire at NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; and NSF Danby Site 3, LLC.” o Provide address and exact Project Site entrance. o Provide location (ex: The fire is at Block H1) o Injuries if any and need for ambulance. ▪ O&M staff should be removed from the immediate danger area in anticipation of an evacuation. ▪ The Operations and/or Safety Managers shall respond to the scene and ensure that the fire department has been dispatched. Local Fire, Rescue and Emergency Management will be responding to 9-1-1 calls during operations. They will then determine evacuation needs, recruit/dispatch employees to assist with the evacuation and, have the Operations and/or Safety Managers issue the following statement over the radio: “Attention, there is a fire emergency at (location name). Please evacuate (the affected area) and report to (designated meeting area). ▪ At this point, O&M staff in the affected area shall stop work immediately, take steps to safely shut do wn equipment, exit the evacuation area, and report to the designated meeting area. ▪ In this scenario, fire extinguishers are to be used for escape purposes only. ▪ The Operations and/or Safety Managers will take the necessary steps to ensure that no O&M staff re- enters the evacuated area until the Fire Department arrives and assumes command. ▪ No employee is required or permitted to place themselves in harm’s way in order to facilitate extinguishment, evacuation, or rescue. All rescue operations will be performed by trained professionals upon their arrival. ▪ The Operations and/or Safety Managers will issue an “All Clear” only when the Fire Department informs them that it is safe to do so. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 13 5.4.3 Vegetation Fires Most likely to be caused by a spark from a nearby piece of equipment or flying ember from off- site. While combustible materials (e.g., mulch and low-lying vegetation) will be managed at the Project Site by Norbut Solar Farms O&M staff, ignition of the ground cover could result in a fast moving, but lower intensity fire that burns in a patchy manner beneath the PV solar arrays. Vegetation fires would be relatively short in duration as vegetative fuels are consumed rapidly. There would not be a sustained source of heat and or flame as there would be with surrounding wildfires. In the event of a vegetation fire near the PV solar arrays, the following procedures apply: ▪ Person discovering the fire shall immediately dispatch to the Operations and/or Safety Managers. ▪ DO NOT attempt to extinguish fire near electrical equipment with water or other chemicals as an electric shock or arc could occur. ▪ If possible, safely attempt to shut down power at the inverter using the DC disconnect. ▪ Let the fire burn vegetation and self-extinguish. ▪ If the fire continues away from the PV solar arrays or inverters, attempt to extinguish flames. ▪ Call 9-1-1 and report the following: o “I am reporting a fire at NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; and NSF Danby Site 3, LLC.” o Provide address and exact Project Site entrance. o Provide location (ex: The fire is at Block H1) o Injuries if any and need for ambulance. ▪ A designated O&M employee shall meet fire fighters at the Project Site entrance and direct them to the location of the fire. 5.4.4 Inverter Fires In the event of an inverter fire at the Project Site: ▪ Person discovering the fire shall immediately dispatch to the Operations and/or Safety Managers. ▪ Immediately contact Norbut Solar Farms to notify them of the fire and instruct them to open the circuit with the inverter in it to isolate it from the grid. ▪ DO NOT attempt to extinguish fire near electrical equipment with water or other chemicals as an electric shock or arc could occur. ▪ Call 9-1-1 and report the following: o “I am reporting a fire at the NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; and NSF Danby Site 3, LLC.” o Provide address and exact Project Site entrance. o Provide location (ex: The fire is at Block H1) o Injuries if any and need for ambulance. ▪ A designated O&M employee shall meet fire fighters at the Project Site entrance and direct them to the location of the fire. ▪ If possible, O&M staff shall safely attempt to shut down power at the inverter using the DC disconnect. ▪ O&M staff protect surrounding areas from flying embers with fire extinguishers. ▪ Provide Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for the skid if needed. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 14 5.5 Fire Department Access Access for Local Fire, Rescue, and Emergency Management will be provided at all Project Site entrances punch code key boxes. If a fire occurs while Norbut Solar Farms O&M staff are present at the Project Site, the O&M staff shall provide emergency dispatchers with the exact address and location of the nearest site access point and meet fire fighters at the entrance to escort them to the fire. Internal site access roads will consist of compacted dirt roads. These access roads will provide direct access to each of the Project’s inverters and transformers. Access to all areas of the Project Site are provided via access aisles. Access aisles are the cleared areas located between individual rows of the PV solar arrays. Access aisles consists of unimproved native material and are not suitable for all emergency services vehicles. However, access aisles do provide emergency responders with access routes to all areas of the P roject Site via walking from a nearby access road or by use of 4x4 vehicles. 5.6 Minimizing Fire Risks Norbut Solar Farms O&M staff shall be responsible for implementing the following preventative measures for Class A, B, and C combustibles: Class A Combustibles – Consist of common material (wood, paper, cloth, rubber, and plastic) that can act as fuel and are found on most work sites. o Dispose of waste daily. o Use trash receptacles with covers. o Keep work areas clean and free of combustible materials. o Store materials in the proper storage containers. o Conduct periodic checks of the Project Site to make sure combustibles are being handled correctly. o Water and multi-purpose dry chemicals (ABC) are approved fire extinguishing agents for Class A Combustibles. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 15 Class B Combustibles – Consist of flammable and combustible liquids (oil, grease, tar, oil- based paints and lacquers), flammable gases, and flammable aerosols. o Only use approved pumps (with suction from the top) to dispense liquids from tanks, drums, barrels, or similar containers (or use approved self-closing valves or faucets). o Do not dispense Class B flammable liquids into a container unless the nozzle and container are electrically interconnected by contact or bonding wire. Either the tank or container must be grounded. o Store, handle, and use Class B combustibles only in approved locations where vapors are prevented from reaching ignition sources such as heating or electric equipment, open flames, or mechanical or electric sparks. o Do not use a flammable liquid as a cleaning agent inside a building (the only exception is in a closed machine approved for cleaning with flammable liquids). o Do not use, handle, or store Class B combustibles near exits, stairs, or any other areas normally used as exits. o Do not weld, cut, grind, or use unsafe electrical appliances or equipment near Class B combustibles. o Do not generate heat, allow an open flame, or smoke near Class B combustibles. o Know the location of and how to use the nearest portable fire extinguisher rated for Class B fire. o Water should not be used to extinguish Class B fires caused by flammable liquids, as it can cause the burning liquid to spread, making the fire worse. To extinguish a fire caused by flammable liquids, exclude the air around the burning liquid. o Carbon dioxide and multi-purpose dry chemicals (ABC) are approved fire extinguishing agents for Class B Combustibles. Class C Combustibles – Consist of energized electrical equipment. o ALWAYS de-energize the circuit supplying the fire, and then use a non- conductive extinguishing agent such as carbon dioxide or multi-purpose dry chemicals (ABC). o DO NOT use water, form, or other conductive agents when fighting Class C Combustibles. o Once the electricity is shut down to the equipment involved, the fire generally becomes a standard combustible fire. o Use only appropriately rated fuses per manufacture’s specifications. o Check all electrical equipment to ensure it is properly grounded and insulated. o Ensure adequate spacing while performing maintenance. o Check wiring to ensure no damage to cables or connections. 5.7 Employee Training and Education Fire procedures are to be posted at the Project Site on a bulletin board along with the OSHA compliance postings, first aid, and site-specific project information. The bulletin board is to be located at the O&M Building located on-site. O&M staff shall be trained in the practices of the FPP relevant to their duties. O&M staff shall be trained and equipped to extinguish small fires to prevent them from growing into more serious threats. Confirm all O&M staff understand the function and elements of the FPP, including potential emergencies, reporting procedures, evacuation plans, and shutdown procedures. Review any special hazards that might occur at the Project Site, such as flammable materials, fuel storage, toxic chemicals, and water reactive substances. Fire safety training will occur during the site safety training. O&M staff are required to undergo training prior to starting work. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 16 Training shall include: ▪ Employee roles and responsibilities. ▪ Recognition of potential fire hazards. ▪ Alarm system and evacuation routes. ▪ Location and operation of manually operated equipment (fire extinguishers). ▪ Emergency response procedures. ▪ Emergency shutdown procedures. ▪ Information regarding specific materials to which employees may be exposed. ▪ Review OSHA requirements contained in 29 CFR 19010.38, Emergency Action Plans. ▪ Review OSHA requirements contained in 29 CFR 1910.39, Fire Prevention Plans. ▪ The location of the company FPP and how it can be accessed. ▪ Good fire-prevention housekeeping practices and equipment maintenance. The Operations and/or Safety Managers are responsible for fire safety training. Written documentation of the training received by each employee must be maintained. 5.8 Site Maintenance and Housekeeping ▪ Fire extinguishers shall be inspected monthly. ▪ Fire extinguishers shall not be obstructed and should be in conspicuous locations. ▪ Combustible material shall not be stored in mechanical rooms, electrical equipment rooms, or the SCADA buildings. ▪ Outside dumpsters shall be kept at least five (5) feet away from combustible materials and the lid should be kept closed. ▪ Storage is not allowed in electrical equipment rooms, or near electrical panels. ▪ Electrical panel openings must be covered. ▪ Power strips must be plugged directly into an outlet and not daisy-chained and should be for temporary use only. ▪ Extension cords and flexible cords should not be substituted for permanent. 5.9 Equipment Fire Safety ▪ All internal combustion engines, both stationary and mobile, shall be equipped with spark arresters. Spark arresters shall be in good working order. ▪ Light trucks and cars with factory-installed (type) mufflers shall be used only on roads where the roadway is cleared of vegetation. These vehicle types shall maintain their factory-installed (type) mufflers in good condition. ▪ Equipment parking areas and small stationary engine sites shall be cleared of all extraneous flammable materials. ▪ The project proponent shall make an effort to restrict the use of chainsaws, chippers, vegetation masticators, grinders, drill rigs, tractors, torches, and explosives to periods outside of the official fire season. When the above tools are used, water tanks equipped with hoses, fire rakes, and axes shall be easily accessible to personnel. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 17 6.0 HEAT ILLNESS PREVENTION PLAN These procedures provide steps applicable to most outdoor work settings and are essential to reducing the incidence of heat related illnesses. In working environments with a higher risk for heat illness (e.g., during a heat wave, hot summer months exceeding 95 degrees Fahrenheit, or other severe working or environmental conditions), it is Norbut Solar Farms duty to exercise greater caution and ensure these procedures are implemented, including additional protective measures beyond what is listed in this document, as needed to protect employees affected by high heat conditions. When the temperature exceeds 95 degrees, high heat procedures begin, the Operations and/or Safety Managers will hold short tailgate meetings to review the weather report, reinforce heat illness prevention with all workers and provide reminders to drink water frequently, to be on the lookout for signs and symptoms of heat illness, and inform them that shade can be made available upon request. 6.1 Definitions "Acclimatization" means temporary adaptation of the body to work in the heat that occurs gradually when a person is exposed to it. Acclimatization peaks in most people within four to fourteen days of regular work for at least two hours per day in the heat. "Heat Illness" means a serious medical condition resulting from the body's inability to cope with a particular heat load, and includes heat cramps, heat exhaustion, heat syncope, and heat stroke. "Environmental risk factors for heat illness" means working conditions that create the possibility that heat illness could occur, including air temperature, relative humidity, radiant heat from the sun and other sources, conductive heat sources such as the ground, air movement, workload severity and duration, protective clothing and personal protective equipment worn by employees. "Personal risk factors for heat illness" means factors such as an individual's age, degree of acclimatization, health, water consumption, alcohol consumption, caffeine consumption, and use of prescription medications that affect the body's water retention or other physiological responses to heat. "Shade" means blockage of direct sunlight. One indicator that blockage is sufficient is when objects do not cast a shadow in the area of blocked sunlight. Shade is not adequate when heat in the area of shade defeats the purpose of shade, which is to allow the body to cool. For example, a car sitting in the sun does not provi de acceptable shade to a person inside it, unless the car is running with air conditioning. Shade may be provided by any natural or artificial means that does not expose employees to unsafe or unhealthy conditions, and that does not deter or discourage access or use. "Temperature" means the temperature in degrees Fahrenheit obtainable by using a thermometer to measure the outdoor temperature in an area where there is no shade. While the temperature measurement must be taken in an area with full sunlight, the thermometer should be shielded while taking the measurement, e.g., with the hand or some other object, from direct contact by sunlight. "Provision of water" Employees shall have access to potable drinking water. The water will be fresh, pure, suitably cool, and provided to employees free of charge. The water shall be located as close as practicable to the areas where employees are working. Where drinking water is not plumbed or otherwise continuously supplied, it shall be provided in sufficient quantity at the beginning of the work shift to provide one quart per employee per hour for drinking for the entire shift. Employers may begin the shift with smaller quantities of water if they have effective procedures for replenishment during the shift as needed to allow employees to drink one quart or more per hour. The frequent drinking of water shall be encouraged. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 18 6.2 Provisions of Water (Water Distribution Plan) Bottled water is provided for all on-site personnel. All Norbut Solar Farms sub-contractors are required to provide a written Heat Illness and Water Distribution Plan, as well as the required potable water and ice for their personnel on site daily. Means and Methods for Providing Drinking Water to All Employees: 1. The on-site manager will ensure that there is a minimum of two quarts per employee per hour in the work area at all times during the shift. This can be achieved by having bottled water chilled in coolers or using 5 to 10-gallon jugs. 2. If water jugs or bottled water is unavailable, all employees will be furnished a camelback for drinking water purposes prior to going to work. 3. When the temperature exceeds 90 degrees the employees will ensure an ample supply of water is readily available. 4. The on-site manager must ensure that the drinking water moves as the work does. 5. The on-site manager is responsible for properly cleaning water jugs at a minimum every shift. Cleaning must be in accordance with the water jug cleaning procedure. If camelbacks are in use, the employee is responsible for care and cleaning. 6. The on-site manager will announce all drinking water locations in the daily toolbox meeting. When the temperature is expected to be over 90 degrees the supervisor will discuss signs and symptoms, hydration, and other pertinent heat illness topics. 7. When the temperature is 95 degrees or more, the on-site manager or designee will increase the number of mandatory water-drinking breaks. 8. During the site-specific safety orientation, the importance of frequently drinking water will be stressed. 6.3 Accessing Shade 1. The on-site manager will be given enough shade tents to cover 75 percent of their employees at the same time. 2. The on-site manager will also be given picnic tables, chairs, or benches so the employees will have a place to sit under the shade tent. 3. The interior of a vehicle may only be considered a shaded area if the air conditioning is both on and works properly. 4. The on-site manager will make the employees aware of the shaded locations in the daily toolbox meeting. They will also make sure that the shade areas move with the workforce. 6.4 Handling a Heat Wave During a heat wave or heat spike (increase in afternoon temperature of more than 10 degrees) the Project Site will be closed, and the work will need to be rescheduled or done at different hours. If the work can’t be completed at a different time, the on-site manager will hold an emergency tailgate meeting to inform all employees of the heat conditions, emergency response procedures, and mitigation techniques. 6.4.1 High Heat Procedures 1. The on-site manager will ensure effective communication by voice, observation, or electronic means is maintained so that employees can contact a supervisor when necessary. 2. Employees will monitor other employees for alertness and signs and symptoms of heat illness. 3. Fellow employees will police each other to ensure their co-workers are drinking water frequently throughout the shift. New employee will be assigned a “buddy” or experienced coworker for the first 14 days of the employment. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 19 6.4.2 Acclimatization Acclimatization is the temporary and gradual physiological change in the body that occurs when the environmentally induced heat load to which the body is accustomed is significantly and suddenly exceeded by sudden environmental changes. In more common terms, the body needs time to adapt when temperatures rise suddenly, and an employee risks heat illness by not taking it easy when a heat wave strikes or when starting a new job that exposes the employee to heat to which the employee’s body hasn’t yet adjusted. Inadequate acclimatization can imperil anyone exposed to conditions of heat and physical stress significantly more intense than what they are used to. Employers are responsible for the working conditions of their employees, and they must act effectively when conditions result in sudden exposure to heat their employees are not used to. 1. Norbut Solar Farms Team will monitor the weather and in particular be on the lookout for sudden heat wave(s) or increases in temperatures to which employees haven’t been exposed to for several weeks or longer. 2. During the hot summer months, the work shift will start at first light. 3. For new employees, on-site managers will try to find ways to lessen the intensity of the employees work during a two-week break-in period (such as scheduling slower paced, less physically demanding work during the hot parts of the day and the heaviest work activities during the cooler parts of the day (early - morning or evening). Steps taken to lessen the intensity of the workload for new employees will be documented. 4. New employees will remain vigilant and alert for the presence of heat related symptoms. 5. New employees will be assigned a “buddy” or experienced coworker to watch each other closely for discomfort or symptoms of heat illness. 6. O&M teams will observe closely (or maintain frequent communication via phone or radio) and be on the lookout for possible symptoms of heat illness. 7. Norbut Solar Farms site orientation for employees and supervisors will include the importance of acclimatization, how it is developed and how these company procedures address it. 6.4.3 Alternative High Heat Work Schedule When ambient temperatures remain at and exceed 95 degrees the Operations and/or Safety Managers shall discuss revisions to the work schedule (start time, end-of-shift time, multiple shifts with varying start times). When the alternate high heat schedule is in effect, personnel will meet each morning to go over the following items: 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 20 Heat Index 1 Heavy physical work with acclimated worker RESPONSE Heat Index 2 Moderate or lite physical work with unacclimated worker 89 – 95°F • Supply water to workers on an “as needed basis” 77 – 84°F 96 – 102°F • Post Heat Stress Alert Notice • Encourage workers to drink extra water • Start recording hourly temperature and relative humidity 85 – 93°F 103 – 108°F • High Heat Procedures in effect notice • Notify workers to consume more water • Ensure workers are trained to recognize symptoms 94 – 99°F 109 – 111°F • Provide 15 minutes relief per hour • Provide adequate cool water (50 -59°F) • At least 1 cup (240 ml) water every 20 minutes • Workers with symptoms should seek medical attention 100 – 102°F 112 – 115°F • Provide 30 minutes relief per hour in addition to the provisions listed previously. 103 – 108°F 116 – 120°F • If feasible, provide 45 minutes relief per hour in addition to the provisions listed previously • If a 75% relief period is not feasible then stop work until the Heat Index is 107°F or less 109 – 111°F 121°F+ • Stop work until the Heat Index is 107°F or less 112°F+ 6.4.4 Handling a Sick Employee 1. When an employee displays possible signs or symptoms of heat illness, the Norbut Solar Farms Operations Manager will be notified. An employee trained in first aid will check the sick employee and determine whether resting in the shade and drinking cool water will suffice or if emergency service providers will need to be called. 2. Do not leave a sick worker alone in the shade, as he or she can take a turn for the worse! 3. Call emergency service providers immediately if an employee displays signs or symptoms of heat illness (loss of consciousness, incoherent speech, convulsions, red and hot face), does not look OK or does not get better after drinking cool water and resting in the shade. 4. While the ambulance is in route, initiate first aid (cool the worker: place in the shade, remove excess layers of clothing, place ice pack in the armpits and join area and fan the victim). 5. Do not let a sick worker leave the site, as they can get lost or die (when not being transported by ambulance and treatment has not been started by paramedics) before reaching a hospital. 6. If an employee does not look OK and displays signs or symptoms of severe heat illness (loss of consciousness, incoherent speech, convulsions, red and hot face), and the worksite is located more than 20 min away from a hospital, call emergency service providers, communicate the signs and symptoms of the victim and request Air Ambulance. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 21 6.4.5 Procedures for Employee and Supervisory Training 1. Norbut Solar Farms will ensure that all supervisors are trained prior to being assigned to supervise other workers. Training will include this company’s written procedures and what steps supervisors will follow when employees’ exhibit symptoms consistent with heat illness. 2. Norbut Solar Farms will ensure that all employees and supervisors are trained prior to working outside. Training will include the site-specific orientations, lunch and learns, and toolbox topics. 3. Norbut Solar Farms Safety Manager will train employees on the steps that will be followed for contacting emergency medical services, including how they are to proceed when there are non-English speaking workers, how clear and precise directions to the site will be provided as well as stress the need to make visual contact with emergency responders at the nearest road or landmark to direct them to the worksite. 6.4.6 Procedures for Emergency Response 1. Prior to assigning a crew to a particular worksite, the Operations Manager will ensure that a qualified, appropriately trained and equipped person will be available at the Project Site to render first aid if necessary. 2. All on-site personnel will carry cell phones or other means of communication, to ensure that emergency medical services can be called and check that these are functional at the worksite prior to each shift. 3. When an employee is showing symptoms of possible heat illness, the supervisor will take immediate steps to keep the stricken employee cool and comfortable once emergency service responders have been called (to reduce the progression to more serious illness). 4. During a heat wave or hot temperatures, workers will be reminded and encouraged to immediately report to their supervisor any signs or symptoms they are experiencing. Norbut Solar Farms site specific orientation for employees and supervisors will include every detail of these written emergency procedures. 1241 University Avenue | Rochester, NY 14607 | 585 -504-2200 | www.norbutsolarfarms.com | Page 22 Appendix A Emergency Contact Information The following table lists the Local Fire and Rescue Stations that are nearest to the Project Site. Local Fire and Rescue Station Address Phone Number Distance from Project Site Danby Fire Station 1780 Danby Road Ithaca, NY 14850 Fire/Rescue: 607-272-8114 Unmanned station; call 9-1-1 0.2 miles West Danby Fire Station 47 Sylvan Lane Spencer, NY 14883 Fire/Rescue: 607-564-7303 5.2 miles The following table lists the Medical Facilities that are nearest to the Project Site. Medical Facility Address Phone Number Available Services Distance from Project Site WellNow Urgent Care 740 S Meadow Street Ithaca, NY 14850 607-319-4563 Emergency Services 9.8 miles Cayuga Medical Center (East) 2333 N Triphammer Rd # 302 Ithaca, NY 14850 607-257-1126 Emergency Services 12.7 miles Cayuga Medical Center (West) 101 Dates Drive Ithaca, NY 14850 607-274-4011 Emergency Services 13.0 miles The following table lists the local Police Departments and Animal Control Facilities contacts for the Project. Local Police and Sheriff Station Address Phone Number Distance from Project Site Danby Fire Station: Fire Police (Peace Officers) 1780 Danby Road Ithaca, NY 14850 Fire/Rescue: 607-272-8114 Unmanned station; call 9-1-1 0.2 miles Tompkins County Sheriff 779 Warren Road Ithaca, NY 14850 607-272-2444 15.6 miles New York State Police Troop E, Zone 3 600 S College Avenue Montour Falls, NY 14865 607-535-7731 27.3 miles The following table lists the Norbut Solar Farms contacts for the Project. Description Name Phone Number Norbut Solar Farms Safety Manager TBD TBD Norbut Solar Farms Operations and Maintenance TBD TBD Norbut Solar Farms Operations Manager TBD TBD Norbut Solar Farms 24-Hour Control Room TBD TBD 1 TBD contacts will be provided prior to construction. Passero Associates | 242 West Main Street, Suite 100 | Rochester, NY 14614 | 585.325.1000 | www.passero.com Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) NORBUT SOLAR-SOLAR FIELD DANBY, NEW YORK January 2022 Prepared for: NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 P.N. 20213129.0001  Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York ii January 2022 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 1  2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 2  3.0 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 6  4.0 CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES/INSPECTIONS .. 6  5.0 POST CONSTRUCTION .......................................................................................... 9  6.0 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 9  APPENDICES APPENDIX A. SWPPP Practices, Procedures and Certifications  APPENDIX B. Aerial Photograph  APPENDIX C. Site as Depicted by the USGS Quadrangle Map  APPENDIX D. NYS Environmental Resource Mapping  Federal Wetland Mapping APPENDIX E.    APPENDIX F. Soils Map  APPENDIX G. FEMA Mapping  APPENDIX H. Archeological Sensitive Areas & IPAC Long Eared Bat Consistency Letters  APPENDIX I. Curve Number Worksheets  APPENDIX J. extreme percipitation, time of concentration worksheets and storm hydrographs  APPENDIX K. NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activity (Permit No. GP-0-20-001)  APPENDIX L. SWPPP Inspection Form & Winter Shutdown Request Form  APPENDIX M. Notice Of Intent  APPENDIX N. Notice Of Termination (BLANK)  APPENDIX O. Erosion Control Details  APPENDIX P. Maintenance Inspection Checklist  Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 1 January 2022 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prepared to support the new construction of three new solar fields (24.0, 24.1, & 26.7 acres in size) in an open farm field along the west side of Bald Hill Road (County Route 126) in the Town of Danby, NY. The property is currently zoned MD at 54 Bald Hill Road (Tax ID 10.0-1-21.18). The NYSDEC does not recognize solar panels on post foundations as impervious surfaces (due to the grass underneath them) nor as a disturbing action. The project proposed no changes to the grading or drainage characteristics of the site. The access road is to be the NYSDEC approved pervious access drive by TRC Engineers. The provided Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) materials adhere to the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit (GP-0-20-01) for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity. The guidelines specified by the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, January 2015 (SWDM) were used to analyze the proposed stormwater management facilities for this project. Erosion and Sediment controls were designed in conformance with New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Controls. A copy of this SWPPP and associated inspection logs will be kept on site in the proposed office space and job trailer/SWPPP mailbox. Owner/Operator SWPPP Preparer Norbut Solar Farms, LLC Passero Associates 1241 University Ave. 242 West Main Street. Suite 100 Rochester, NY 14607 Rochester, NY 14614 (585) 426-4200 (585) 325-1000 Contact: Jon Stone Contact: David Cox Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 2 January 2022 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Topography/ Drainage The existing drainage characteristics of the project location can be described with five drainage areas. The stormwater analysis considers all the soils and impervious access drive within the proposed disturbance area of the project. All these drainage areas and analysis points eventually leave the site, following their existing drainage paths. Existing Drainage Area #1: This drainage area encompasses the central core ±84.9 acre portion of the site. The area is comprised of vacant & mowed/maintained meadowlands, as well as woodlands. The area generally flows eastward to the intermittent tributary and flagged wetlands. Existing Drainage Area #2: This drainage area encompasses the North ±21.3 acre portion of the site. The area is comprised of mowed/maintained meadowlands, as well as woodlands. The area generally flows north-easterly and gradually drains northward off-site. Existing Drainage Area #3: This drainage area encompasses a Southwestern ±1.65 acre portion of the site. The area is comprised of mainly woodlands. The area generally flows southerly to a point on the edge of the property line that drains to an adjacent parcel to the south. Existing Drainage Area #4: This drainage area encompasses a Southeastern ±2.74 acre portion of the site. The area is comprised of woodlands & generally flows northeasterly to a point on the edge of the property line that drains to an adjacent parcel. Existing Drainage Area #5: This drainage area encompasses the Eastern ±1.01 acre leg portion of the site. The area is comprised of an existing stone driveway used for a residential property. The area generally flows northerly to a point on the edge of the property line that drains to an adjacent parcel. See the following existing drainage map that graphically shows the drainage areas listed above, as well as the other hydraulic characteristics: N90°00'00"W 192.96' N89°07'38"W 30.04' S55°16'16"E 133.69' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 52 . 7 5 ' N0°00'00"E 86.29' S1 ° 5 5 ' 1 1 " E 34 . 1 6 ' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S1°55'11"E 5.10' S0°00'00"E 52.24' N90°00'00"E 153.58'S55°16'16"E 128.39' N89°05'50"E 874.40' S89°53'58"E 83.28' BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62' N89°49'58"W 1532.08' N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S89°51'55"E 3573.55' S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S61 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) N90°00'00"W 192.96' N89°07'38"W 30.04' S55°16'16"E 133.69' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 52 . 7 5 ' N0°00'00"E 86.29' S1 ° 5 5 ' 1 1 " E 34 . 1 6 ' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S1°55'11"E 5.10' S0°00'00"E 52.24' N90°00'00"E 153.58'S55°16'16"E 128.39' N89°05'50"E 874.40' S89°53'58"E 83.28' LaB (D) EbB (D) LaB3 (D) MaC (D) LaB (D) EbB (D) EcA (D) LaB (D) EbB (D) RhA (B/D) LaB (D) EbB (D) BgC (C) EbB (D) Ws (B/D) ErA (D) HdC (A) EbB (D) ANALYSIS POINT 2 ANALYSIS POINT 1 ANALYSIS POINT 3 ANALYSIS POINT 4 ANALYSIS POINT 5 100' SHEET FLOW WOODLANDS (7.0%) 813' CHANNEL FLOW EPHEMERAL (5.7%)871' CHANNEL FLOW EPHEMERAL (5.0%) 2359' CHANNEL FLOW STREAM (3.1%) 100' SHEET FLOW BRUSH (2.0%) 772' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW BRUSH (3.5%) 483' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW BRUSH (4.8%) 1336' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW BRUSH (3.2%) 100' SHEET FLOW BRUSH (12.0%) 314' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW WOODLANDS (7.3%) 100' SHEET FLOW DENSE GRASS (5.7%) 254' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW DENSE GRASS (3.3%) 100' SHEET FLOW DENSE GRASS (2.5%) 102' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW DENSE GRASS (4.0%) 597' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW BRUSH (5.7%) 00 200100 400 SCALE: 1"=200' HORIZONTAL SCALE 200 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y D R A I N A G E M A P S . D W G 1/ 3 / 2 0 2 2 4 : 5 7 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n DANBY, NY DECEMBER, 2021 20213129.0001 EXDA #1 Ub (C/D) SOIL ABBREVIATION SOIL RATING SOIL BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE EXDA #2 EXDA #3 EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP NORBUT SOLAR-DANBY EXDA #4 EXDA #5 Tc PATH Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 3 January 2022 B. Soils Soils within the project boundary and within the offsite drainage area were reviewed for their hydrologic soil group in accordance with the USDA's NRCS Soil Survey. The soils are summarized below, and the soils report can be found in Appendix F. C. Wetlands The site was reviewed for the existence of federal and state regulated wetlands within the property boundaries. Federal wetlands were researched using the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) using an online U.S. Fish and Wildlife website search. State regulated wetlands were researched using the NYSDEC's online Environmental Resource Mapper website. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 4 January 2022 State & Federal wetlands recognize the intermittent tributary located in the central core of the property, flowing eastward to the flagged wetlands (REG # 898-338 Class C). The project does not propose any disturbance to the proposed wetlands. Environmental Resources & BME Associates provided two separate wetland delineation studies at the request of the Town during project reviews. This studies provided delineated wetland boundaries across the site, as well as along the tributary and are incorporated into the latest plan set. Refer to Appendix D and E for the federal and state regulated wetlands mapping. D. Floodplain Floodplains were researched using the online Firmette tools found at FEMA Map Service Center. Review of the floodplain mapping indicates there are no floodplains located on the site according to FEMA map 360845B, dated June 25, 1976. Refer to Appendix G for the FEMA Firmette map. E. NYSDEC Environmental Resources The NYSDEC has an Environmental Resource Mapper on its website. The Environmental Resource Mapper is an interactive mapping application that can be used to identify some of New York State's natural resources and environmental features that are state protected, or of conservation concern. It displays the following:  Animals and plants that are rare in New York, including those listed as Endangered or Threatened (generalized locations). [Updated May 2008]  Significant natural communities, such as rare or high-quality forests, wetlands, and other habitat types.  New York's streams, rivers, lakes, and ponds; water quality classifications are also displayed According to this database, the endangered Long Eared Bat may in the vicinity of the project. Refer to Appendix D for the NYSDEC's Environmental Resource Mapping. The US Department of the Interior has provided IPAC Consistency Letters for the project’s potential impact to the Long Eared Bat. These Letters determined the threat to the Long Eared Bat is minimal, as the limits of work are located outside any known breeding habitats. Refer to Appendix D for the IPAC consistency Letters. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 5 January 2022 F. State Historic Preservation Office Review The site was reviewed for the presence of an archeological sensitive area within the property boundary. The archeo-sensitive areas were located using online GIS tools found at the NYS Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). At the request of SHPO, a Zone of Visual Impact Report (ZVI) has been developed and reviewed by SHPO. The effect finding letter describes no believed impacts to local historic, or potentially historic resources in the area. The effect finding letter from SHPO is included in Appendix H of this report. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 6 January 2022 3.0 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS In NYS, proposed Solar Farms are to be designed under the guidelines set forth in the April 5th, 2018, Memorandum from the NYSDEC, Division of Water. The memorandum outlies six (6) criteria that register Solar Fields “…to be a “land clearing and grading for the purposes of creating vegetated open space (i.e., recreational parks, lawns, meadows, fields) type project as listed in Table 1, Appendix B of the VGP. As previously mentioned, this SWPPP is being created solely at the request for the Town of Danby. 1. Solar Panels are constructed on post or rack systems and elevated off the ground surface. 2. The panels are spaced apart so that rainwater can flow off the down gradient side of the panel and continue as sheet flow across the ground surface. 3. For solar panels constructed on slopes, the individual rows of solar panels are generally installed along the contour, so rainwater sheet flows down slope. NOTE: This generally applies to slopes that are >5%, this project places the rows of panels in a north-south configuration, adhering to guideline #3 as the water flows eastward. 4. The ground surface below the panels consists of a well-established vegetative cover. 5. The project does not include the construction of any traditional impervious areas (i.e. buildings, large substation pads, etc.) 6. Construction of the solar panels will not alter the hydrology from pre-post development conditions. The solar fields are designed with gaps between rows to allow proper/unrestrictive flows. The proposed gravel access road is to be the NYSDEC approved pervious access drive by TRC engineers. See the following proposed drainage map that graphically shows the drainage areas listed above, as well as the other hydraulic characteristics: BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62' N89°49'58"W 1532.08' N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S89°51'55"E 3573.55' S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S61 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) N90°00'00"W 192.96' N89°07'38"W 30.04' S55°16'16"E 133.69' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 52 . 7 5 ' N0°00'00"E 86.29' S1 ° 5 5 ' 1 1 " E 34 . 1 6 ' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S1°55'11"E 5.10' S0°00'00"E 52.24' N90°00'00"E 153.58'S55°16'16"E 128.39' N89°05'50"E 874.40' S89°53'58"E 83.28' BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62' N89°49'58"W 1532.08' N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S89°51'55"E 3573.55' S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S61 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62' N89°49'58"W 1532.08' N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S89°51'55"E 3573.55' S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S61 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) N90°00'00"W 192.96' N89°07'38"W 30.04' S55°16'16"E 133.69' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 52 . 7 5 ' N0°00'00"E 86.29' S1 ° 5 5 ' 1 1 " E 34 . 1 6 ' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S1°55'11"E 5.10' S0°00'00"E 52.24' N90°00'00"E 153.58'S55°16'16"E 128.39' N89°05'50"E 874.40' S89°53'58"E 83.28' LaB (D) EbB (D) LaB3 (D) MaC (D) LaB (D) EbB (D) EcA (D) LaB (D) EbB (D) RhA (B/D) LaB (D) EbB (D) BgC (C) EbB (D) Ws (B/D) ErA (D) HdC (A) EbB (D) ANALYSIS POINT 2 ANALYSIS POINT 1 ANALYSIS POINT 3 ANALYSIS POINT 4 ANALYSIS POINT 5 100' SHEET FLOW WOODLANDS (7.0%) 100' SHEET FLOW BRUSH (2.0%) 772' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW BRUSH (3.5%) 483' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW BRUSH (4.8%) 1336' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW BRUSH (3.2%) 2359' CHANNEL FLOW STREAM (3.1%) 100' SHEET FLOW BRUSH (12.0%) 314' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW WOODLANDS (7.3%) 100' SHEET FLOW DENSE GRASS (5.7%) 254' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW DENSE GRASS (3.3%) 40' SHEET FLOW DENSE GRASS (2.5%) 102' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW DENSE GRASS (4.0%) 813' CHANNEL FLOW EPHEMERAL (5.7%) 871' CHANNEL FLOW EPHEMERAL (5.0%) 597' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW BRUSH (5.7%) PROPOSED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED ARCH PIPE OVER TRIBUTARY. BED NOT DISTURBED. 20' SHEET FLOW PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE (2.5%) 40' SHEET FLOW DENSE GRASS (2.5%) 00 200100 400 SCALE: 1"=200' HORIZONTAL SCALE 200 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y D R A I N A G E M A P S . D W G 1/ 3 / 2 0 2 2 4 : 5 8 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n DANBY, NY DECEMBER, 2021 20213129.0001PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP NORBUT SOLAR-DANBY PRDA #1 Ub (C/D) SOIL ABBREVIATION SOIL RATING SOIL BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE PRDA #2 PRDA #3 PRDA #4 PRDA #5 Tc PATH Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 7 January 2022 4.0 WATER QUANTITY The proposed development will not create any impactful increase impervious area on site, which increases the rate of stormwater runoff from the site. The site will contain a minute amount of concrete to support transformer pads. The proposed access drive is the only NYSDEC approved pervious access drive and will be installed utilizing tracked dump trucks to mitigate any significant compaction of soils during installation. This runoff must match or be reduced to a rate that is less than the offsite flow rate during existing conditions. The project does not propose the removal of stumps in the existing wooded areas, as well as no grubbing of the shrubbed areas. This prevents alteration of existing drainage paths or time of concentration. The site currently gets seasonal “mowing”, typical for large open fields. The solar arrays receive annual trimming / panel cleaning to prevent shrubs from growing up over the panels. See the comparison table below for the sites analysis points under existing and proposed conditions: 1 year 10 year 100 year TOTAL EXISTING 34.12 119.40 299.57 TOTAL PROPOSED 34.12 119.40 299.57 PERCENT REDUCTION 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Stormwater Runoff Runoff Comparison Table Condition:Runoff (cfs) Norbut Solar Danby As shown above, the proposed design meets the requirements of stormwater management by releasing the water utilizing the same ephemeral drainage paths, with unaltered ground coverage and unaltered grading of the slopes along the paths. Leading to runoff release at the same rate that does not lead to erosion or high levels or pollution. Refer to Appendix J for the Hydraflow analysis and the breakdown of each hydrograph. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 8 January 2022 5.0 CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES/INSPECTIONS Several erosion control practices will be utilized during construction by the contractor under direct supervision by the owner and a qualified SWPPP inspector (S.W.T.). These practices are explained below and shown in detail in the Appendices of this report and the construction plans.  Silt Fence  Silt fencing shall be installed at the toe of all slopes along the perimeter of the disturbed areas and at the toe of slope for any soil stockpile areas. Also, a row of silt fence will be installed around the perimeter of all wetlands in an effort to delineate its boundary. The fencing will be installed in accordance with the NYSDEC construction standards and at the instruction of this plan. The silt fencing shall be buried in the ground at least 6 inches. The contractor shall provide continued monitoring to ensure the silt fencing remains intact and shall repair as needed. When the silt accumulates to greater than 1/3 the height of the fence the contractor shall remove and dispose of the silt.  Stabilized Construction Entrance  The project entrance shall serve as the construction entrance to the project and shall be installed according to the details of this plan. The contractor shall ensure that mud is not tracked onto the adjacent roadways and that the stone entrance properly removes mud and debris from construction vehicles.  Seeding and Stabilization  The contractor shall seed and stabilize all disturbed areas not to be worked for 7 days within 7 days of the last disturbance. Stabilization measures may include but are not limited to straw mulching, wood chip mulching, jute mesh and hydroseeding. The SMA and adjacent areas shall be stabilized immediately following their shaping and installation.  Truck Washdown area  a truck washdown area will be provided adjacent to the construction entrance. This area will be constructed such that it drains to a sediment basin immediately adjacent prior to discharging offsite. Additional measures may be required during construction at the guidance of the owner or certified SWPPP Inspector. The contractor shall begin to make all adjustments to the erosion control within 24 hours of receipt of any deficiencies. The owner will be responsible for providing weekly reports when the site disturbance totals less than 5 acres. If the site acres of disturbance becomes greater than 5 at any given time, a 5 acre waiver must be submitted to the NYSDEC. Inspections are to be completed by a qualified inspector in accordance with the GP-0-20-001, during construction to the Town of Danby. Any modifications to the SWPPP will be reported to the Town in writing prior to implementation. See Appendix A for additional SWPPP information. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York 9 January 2022 The owner is responsible for having a qualified operator on site at all times who has at least 4 hours of erosion control training in accordance with the GP-0-20-001. Once the site has achieved 80% stabilization and ground cover, the Town shall be required to sign off on the Notice of Termination prior to submission to the NYSDEC. Removal of all temporary erosion and sediment control practices is required prior to demobilization. 6.0 POST CONSTRUCTION The owner of the subject project will be responsible for all post construction maintenance inspections. The contact information for the owner is illustrated on the cover of this plan as well as the design plans for the project. The post construction maintenance shall include performing monthly inspections of the existing wetlands on site to ensure no encroachment or erosion is taking place. Any silt removal from silt fences will be disposed either off site or on site and immediately stabilized in accordance with the practices of this plan. See Appendix P for the maintenance inspection checklist, bolded maintenance items 7&8 apply, bolded items 1-6 are not applicable to this project. 7.0 SUMMARY The proposed project requires stormwater management practices which conform to NYSDEC regulations. The proposed erosion control practices will meet the NYSDEC requirements. The project will have no significant effect on run off. Continued monitoring of the practices included in this plan will be provided by the owner and a designated SWPPP Inspector. The following appendices of this report illustrate the additional requirements and specifications for stormwater pollution prevention. All practices included in this report and incorporated in the proposed project have been designed in compliance with the NYS Storm Water Design Manual and NYS Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX A. SWPPP PRACTICES, PROCEDURES AND CERTIFICATIONS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SITE DESCRIPTION Project Name and Location: (Latitude, Longitude, or Address) Owner Name and Address: Norbut Solar 1241 University Ave. Rochester, NY 14607 Description: (Purpose and Types of Soil Disturbing Activities) Runoff Coefficient/Soils Conditions: The runoff coefficient impervious area is 0.9 and 0.2 for the grass areas. The soils on-site consist of hydrologic soil class of A, B, C and D. Site Area: Sequence of Major Activities The order of activities will be as follows: Name of Receiving Waters: Norbut Solar-Danby 42°21'07.0"N 76°29'31.1"W ±111.5 acres of solar panels for renewable energy generation on open farmland & woodlands 1.Delineate all wetlands and any other areas to be protected. 2.Install silt fences, stabilized construction entrance/ access drive and all other erosion control measures. 3.Protect vegetation to remain. 4.Strip and stockpile topsoil as necessary 5.Install utilities for solar arrays 6.Install solar arrays and concrete pads, install filter strips 7.Install fences, continue monitoring of erosion control. 8.Stabilize disturbed areas and stockpiles within 7 days of last construction activity in all areas. 9.Final grading, seeding, and mulching of all disturbed areas. 10.Areas along access road with heavy sedimentation and/or poor drainage are to be cleaned/relayed. . Complete all required town inspection events. .Removal of erosion and sediment controls should not occur until after all disturbed areas have achieved final stabilization CONTROLS Erosion and Sediment Controls Stabilization Practices Temporary Stabilization - Topsoil will be replaced onsite or removed from the site. Disturbed portions of the site where construction activity temporarily ceases for at least 7 days will be stabilized with temporary seed and mulch no later than 7 days from the last construction activity in that area. The temporary seed shall be Rye (grain) applied at the rate of 120 pounds per acre. Prior to seeding, 2,000 pounds per acre of ground agricultural limestone and 1,000 pounds per acre of 10-10-10 fertilizer shall be applied. Permanent Stabilization - Disturbed portions of the site where construction activities permanently cease shall be stabilized with permanent seed no later than 7 days after the last construction activity. The permanent seed mix shall be as indicated on the plans and specifications. Stormwater Management The proposed project is a solar field, the NYSDEC recognizes solar panel installation as construction activity that requires preparation of a SWPPP that either only includes erosion and sediment controls, or that includes post-construction stormwater management practices. The project proposes to meet all requirements in accordance with the NYSDEC & Town of Danby Post Construction Stormwater Management/Maintenance Procedures Per the statement above, this section will instead cover solely the green infrastructure practices placed on site. A visual inspection of the filter stripes along the gravel access drives and removal of any sedimentation buildup or garbage. OTHER CONTROLS Waste Disposal: Waste Material - All waste material will be collected and stored in a metal dumpster rented from a NYSDEC approved hauler, which is a licensed solid waste management company. The dumpster will meet all local and state solid waste management regulations. All trash and construction debris from the site will be deposited in the dumpster. The dumpster will be emptied a minimum of once per week or more often if necessary, and the trash will be hauled to a NYSDEC approved dump. No construction waste material will be buried on site. All personnel will be instructed regarding the correct procedures for waste disposal. Notices stating these practices will be posted in the office trailer and the individual who manages the day-to-day operations will be responsible for seeing that these procedures are followed. Hazardous Waste – All hazardous waste materials will be disposed of in a manner specified by local and state regulations or by the manufacturer. Site personnel will be instructed in these practices and the individual who manages the day-to-day operations will be responsible for seeing that these practices are followed. Sanitary Waste – If portable units are used, all sanitary waste will be collected from the portable units a minimum of three times per week by a licensed sanitary waste management contractor, as required by local regulation. Offsite Vehicle Tracking: The paved streets adjacent to the site will be swept daily to remove any excess mud, dirt, or rock tracked from the site. Dump trucks hauling material from the construction site will be covered with a tarpaulin. 3 TIMING OF CONTROLS/MEASURES As indicated in the Sequence of Major Activities, the erosion and sedimentation control measures, including silt fence, will be constructed prior to clearing or grading of any other portions of the site. Areas where construction activity temporarily ceases for more than 7 days will be stabilized with a temporary seed and mulch within 7 days of the last disturbance. Once construction activity ceases permanently in an area, that area will be stabilized with permanent seed and mulch. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS The stormwater collection and discharge complies with the NYSDEC requirements of the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual. MAINTENANCE/INSPECTION PROCEDURES Erosion and Sediment Control Inspection and Maintenance Practices These are the inspection and maintenance practices that will be used to maintain erosion and sediment controls: All control measures will be inspected at least once each week if there is 5 acres or less of disturbance. Twice a week if more than 5 acres is disturbed. All measures will be maintained in good working order; if a repair is necessary; it will be initiated within 24 hours or report. Built-up sediment will be removed from silt fence when it has reached one-third the height of the fence. Temporary and permanent seeding and planting will be inspected for bare spots, washouts, and health of growth. A maintenance inspection report will be made after each inspection. A copy of the report form to be completed by the inspector is attached. The site superintendent will select individuals who will be responsible for inspections, maintenance and repair activities, and filling out the inspection and maintenance report. Personnel selected for inspection and maintenance responsibilities will receive training from the site superintendent. They will be trained in all the inspection and maintenance practices necessary for keeping the erosion and sediment controls used on-site in good working order. Non-Stormwater Discharges No non-stormwater discharges will occur from the site during the period, except the following: It is expected that the following non-storm water discharges will occur from the site during the construction period: Pavement wash waters (where no spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have occurred). 4 INVENTORY FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN The materials or substances listed below are expected to be present on-site during construction: HDPE Pipe Construction Signs Sign Panels & Sign Supports Metal fences Select Granular Fill Concrete (Minimal) Seed Steel Conduit Subbase Course Topsoil Mulch Joint Sealant Electric Cable SPILL PREVENTION Material Management Practices The following are the material management practices that will be used to reduce the risk of spills or other accidental exposure of materials and substances to stormwater runoff. Good Housekeeping: The following good housekeeping practices will be followed on-site during the construction project: An effort will be made to store only enough product required to do the job. All materials stored on-site will be stored in a neat, orderly manner in their appropriate containers and, if possible, under a roof or other enclosure. Products will be kept in their original containers with the original manufacturer's label. Substances will not be mixed with one another unless recommended by the manufacturer. Whenever possible, all of a product will be used up before disposing of the container. Manufacturers' recommendations for proper use and disposal will be followed. The site superintendent will inspect daily to ensure proper use and disposal of materials on-site. Hazardous Products: These practices are used to reduce the risks associated with hazardous materials: Products will be kept in original containers unless they are not re-sealable. Original labels and material safety data will be retained; they contain important product information. If surplus product must be disposed of, manufacturers' or local and state recommended methods of proper disposal will be followed. 5 SPILL PREVENTION (Continued) Product Specific Practices The following product specific practices will be followed on-site: Petroleum Products: All on-site vehicles will be monitored for leaks and receive regular preventive maintenance to reduce the chance of leakage. Fuel oil for construction machinery will be stored in an above-ground tank with a suitable containment system. Material safety data sheets will be filed in the site superintendent's trailer. Any asphalt substances used on-site will be applied according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Fertilizers: Fertilizers used will be applied only in the minimum amounts recommended by the manufacturer. Once applied, fertilizer will be worked into the soil to limit exposure to stormwater. The contents of any partially used bags of fertilizer will be transferred to resealable plastic bags to avoid spills. Paints: All containers will be tightly sealed and stored when not required for use. Excess paint will not be discharged to the storm sewer system, but will be properly disposed of according to manufacturers’ instructions or state and local regulations. Concrete Trucks: Concrete trucks will be allowed to wash out or discharge surplus concrete or drum wash water to the concrete washout area. Spill Control Practices In addition to the good housekeeping and material management practices discussed in the previous sections of this plan, the following practices will be followed for spill prevention and cleanup: Manufacturers' recommended methods for spill cleanup will be clearly posted and site personnel will be made aware of the procedures and the location of the information and cleanup supplies. Materials and equipment necessary for spill cleanup will be kept in the material storage area on-site. Equipment and materials will include but not be limited to brooms, dust pans, mops, rags, gloves, kitty litter, sand, sawdust, and plastic and metal trash containers specifically for this purpose. All spills will be cleaned up immediately after discovery. The spill area will be kept well ventilated and personnel will wear appropriate protective clothing to prevent injury from contact with hazardous substance. Reportable spills of any petroleum-based material will be reported to the appropriate state or local government agency. The spill prevention plan will be adjusted to include measures to prevent this type of spill from reoccurring and how to clean up the spill if there is another one. A description of the spill, what caused it, and the cleanup measures will also be included. The site superintendent responsible for the day-to-day operations will be the spill prevention and cleanup coordinator. He will designate at least three other site personnel who will receive spill prevention and cleanup training. These individuals will each become responsible for a particular phase of prevention and cleanup. The names of responsible spill personnel will be posted in the material storage area and in the office trailer on-site. 6 POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CERTIFICATION I certify under penalty of law that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP for the construction site identified in such SWPPP as a condition of authorization to discharge stormwater. I also understand that the operator must comply with the terms and conditions of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“SPDES”) general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Signed: Owner Date: CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. I also understand that the owner or operator must comply with the terms and conditions of the most current version of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES") general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings.” Signature For Responsible for Trained Contractor Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: 7 Signature For Responsible for Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX B. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH January 2022 PROJECT LOCATION Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX C. SITE AS DEPICTED BY THE USGS QUADRANGLE MAP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX D. NYS ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPPING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MAPPER January 2022 PROJECT LOCATION Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX E. FEDERAL WETLAND MAPPING WETLAND MAP January 2022 PROJECT LOCATION Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX F. SOILS MAP SOILS MAP January 2022 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX G. FEMA MAPPING FEMA MAP January 2022 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX H. ARCHEOLOGICAL SENSITIVE AREAS & IPAC LONG EARED BAT CONSISTENCY LETTERS ARCHEOLOGICAL SENSITIVE AREAS MAP January 2022 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Division for Historic Preservation, Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 (518) 237-8643 • https://parks.ny.gov/shpo KATHY HOCHUL ERIK KULLESEID Governor Commissioner December 1, 2021 Austin Goodwin Civil Engineer: Passero Associates 242 W. Main Street, Suite 100 Rochester, NY 14614 Re: DEC Norbut Solar Danby/15 MW/80 of 111 Acres 54 Bald Hill Rd, Ithaca 21PR03383 Dear Austin Goodwin: Thank you for requesting the comments of the Division for Historic Preservation of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). We have reviewed the submitted materials in accordance with the New York State Historic Preservation Act of 1980 (section 14.09 of the New York Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law). These comments are those of the Division for Historic Preservation and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that may be involved in or near your project. Such impacts must be considered as part of the environmental review of the project pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 8) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR Part 617). We have reviewed the submitted Historic Resources Survey Report and Zone of Visual Impact (ZVI) map for the proposed 15mw, 74.8-acre photovoltaic solar energy generation facility located within the Town of Danby on the north side of Bald Hill Road. We note that nine already identified and newly identified properties that are eligible to be listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places (S/NR) are located within the identified one-mile ZVI, with the Roe Barn noted as the only property with a direct visual impact. We note the majority of the proposed solar facility is currently surrounded by dense vegetation and low hills, providing natural screening. A 7-foot-tall fence is planned to surround the entire facility, and the access road is utilizing an existing road. Based on our review of the submitted documents and existing conditions, it is the opinion of the OPRFP that the proposed project will have No Adverse Impact to on historic and archaeological resources, provided the following condition is met: 1. Provide year-round vegetative screening around the perimeter of the proposed poles and Point of Interconnection to reduce visibility of the poles located adjacent and north of the Roe Barn. This will be in addition to the planned temporary construction fence described in the provided report. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out via email. Sincerely, Sara McIvor Historic Preservation Technical Specialist E-mail: sara.mcivor@parks.ny.gov cc: D. Cox – Passero K. Stuck – Preservation Studios June 29, 2021 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE New York Ecological Services Field Office 3817 Luker Road Cortland, NY 13045-9385 Phone: (607) 753-9334 Fax: (607) 753-9699 http://www.fws.gov/northeast/nyfo/es/section7.htm In Reply Refer To: Consultation Code: 05E1NY00-2021-SLI-3241 Event Code: 05E1NY00-2021-E-09981 Project Name: Norbut Solar Danby Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). This list can also be used to determine whether listed species may be present for projects without federal agency involvement. New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the ESA, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC site at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. If listed, proposed, or candidate species were identified as potentially occurring in the project area, coordination with our office is encouraged. Information on the steps involved with assessing potential impacts from projects can be found at: http:// www.fws.gov/northeast/nyfo/es/section7.htm Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the Services wind 06/29/2021 Event Code: 05E1NY00-2021-E-09981   2    ▪ energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http:// www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http:// www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/ comtow.html. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the ESA. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment(s): Official Species List 06/29/2021 Event Code: 05E1NY00-2021-E-09981   1    Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: New York Ecological Services Field Office 3817 Luker Road Cortland, NY 13045-9385 (607) 753-9334 06/29/2021 Event Code: 05E1NY00-2021-E-09981   2    Project Summary Consultation Code:05E1NY00-2021-SLI-3241 Event Code:05E1NY00-2021-E-09981 Project Name:Norbut Solar Danby Project Type:POWER GENERATION Project Description:The project is the development of three solar fields (21.0, 21.1 & 24.7 AC respectively) over ±111.67 acres of empty farmlands / woodlands in the Town of Danby, NY. The project will utilize a pervious access drive approved by NYSDEC and avoid all encroachment to the intermittent tributary and flagged wetlands on site. The project is set to begin late 2021-2022. Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@42.35180285,-76.49344022451143,14z Counties:Tompkins County, New York 06/29/2021 Event Code: 05E1NY00-2021-E-09981   3    1. Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 1 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME STATUS Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 Threatened Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. 1 June 29, 2021 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE New York Ecological Services Field Office 3817 Luker Road Cortland, NY 13045-9385 Phone: (607) 753-9334 Fax: (607) 753-9699 http://www.fws.gov/northeast/nyfo/es/section7.htm IPaC Record Locator: 772-103425684 Subject:Consistency letter for the 'Norbut Solar Danby' project indicating that any take of the northern long-eared bat that may occur as a result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at 50 CFR §17.40(o). Dear Austin Goodwin: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received on June 29, 2021 your effects determination for the 'Norbut Solar Danby' (the Action) using the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) key within the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system. You indicated that no Federal agencies are involved in funding or authorizing this Action. This IPaC key assists users in determining whether a non-Federal action may cause “take”[1] of the northern long-eared bat that is prohibited under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat.884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Based upon your IPaC submission, any take of the northern long-eared bat that may occur as a result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at 50 CFR §17.40(o). Unless the Service advises you within 30 days of the date of this letter that your IPaC-assisted determination was incorrect, this letter verifies that the Action is not likely to result in unauthorized take of the northern long-eared bat. Please report to our office any changes to the information about the Action that you entered into IPaC, the results of any bat surveys conducted in the Action area, and any dead, injured, or sick northern long-eared bats that are found during Action implementation. If your Action proceeds as described and no additional information about the Action’s effects on species protected under the ESA becomes available, no further coordination with the Service is required with respect to the northern long-eared bat. ________________________________________________ [1]Take means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct [ESA Section 3(19)]. 06/29/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 772-103425684   2    Action Description You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action. 1. Name Norbut Solar Danby 2. Description The following description was provided for the project 'Norbut Solar Danby': The project is the development of three solar fields (21.0, 21.1 & 24.7 AC respectively) over ±111.67 acres of empty farmlands / woodlands in the Town of Danby, NY. The project will utilize a pervious access drive approved by NYSDEC and avoid all encroachment to the intermittent tributary and flagged wetlands on site. The project is set to begin late 2021-2022. Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://www.google.com/ maps/@42.35180285,-76.49344022451143,14z Determination Key Result This non-Federal Action may affect the northern long-eared bat; however, any take of this species that may occur incidental to this Action is not prohibited under the final 4(d) rule at 50 CFR §17.40(o). Determination Key Description: Northern Long-eared Bat 4(d) Rule This key was last updated in IPaC on May 15, 2017. Keys are subject to periodic revision. This key is intended for actions that may affect the threatened northern long-eared bat. The purpose of the key for non-Federal actions is to assist determinations as to whether proposed actions are excepted from take prohibitions under the northern long-eared bat 4(d) rule. If a non-Federal action may cause prohibited take of northern long-eared bats or other ESA-listed animal species, we recommend that you coordinate with the Service. 06/29/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 772-103425684   3    1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Determination Key Result Based upon your IPaC submission, any take of the northern long-eared bat that may occur as a result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at 50 CFR §17.40(o). Qualification Interview Is the action authorized, funded, or being carried out by a Federal agency? No Will your activity purposefully Take northern long-eared bats? No [Semantic] Is the project action area located wholly outside the White-nose Syndrome Zone? Automatically answered No Have you contacted the appropriate agency to determine if your project is near a known hibernaculum or maternity roost tree? Location information for northern long-eared bat hibernacula is generally kept in state Natural Heritage Inventory databases – the availability of this data varies state-by-state. Many states provide online access to their data, either directly by providing maps or by providing the opportunity to make a data request. In some cases, to protect those resources, access to the information may be limited. A web page with links to state Natural Heritage Inventory databases and other sources of information on the locations of northern long- eared bat roost trees and hibernacula is available at www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/ mammals/nleb/nhisites.html. Yes Will the action affect a cave or mine where northern long-eared bats are known to hibernate (i.e., hibernaculum) or could it alter the entrance or the environment (physical or other alteration) of a hibernaculum? No Will the action involve Tree Removal? Yes Will the action only remove hazardous trees for the protection of human life or property? No Will the action remove trees within 0.25 miles of a known northern long-eared bat hibernaculum at any time of year? No 06/29/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 772-103425684   4    9.Will the action remove a known occupied northern long-eared bat maternity roost tree or any trees within 150 feet of a known occupied maternity roost tree from June 1 through July 31? No 06/29/2021 IPaC Record Locator: 772-103425684   5    Project Questionnaire If the project includes forest conversion, report the appropriate acreages below. Otherwise, type ‘0’ in questions 1-3. 1. Estimated total acres of forest conversion: 33 2. If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from April 1 to October 31 33 3. If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from June 1 to July 31 0 If the project includes timber harvest, report the appropriate acreages below. Otherwise, type ‘0’ in questions 4-6. 4. Estimated total acres of timber harvest 0 5. If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from April 1 to October 31 0 6. If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from June 1 to July 31 0 If the project includes prescribed fire, report the appropriate acreages below. Otherwise, type ‘0’ in questions 7-9. 7. Estimated total acres of prescribed fire 0 8. If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from April 1 to October 31 0 9. If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from June 1 to July 31 0 If the project includes new wind turbines, report the megawatts of wind capacity below. Otherwise, type ‘0’ in question 10. 10. What is the estimated wind capacity (in megawatts) of the new turbine(s)? 0 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar – Danby New York April 2021 APPENDIX I. CURVE NUMBER WORKSHEETS Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 6605 84.93 77.8 Soil Name Land Use Detail LaB, LaB3, EbB,  EcA, RhA, BgC,  Ws  Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition D 78 35.9 2800 LaB, LaB3, EbB,  EcA, RhA, BgC,  Ws  Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition D 78 46.24 3607 BgC Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition C 71 2.79 198 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129.0001 1/3/2022 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 1 Weighted CN Total Area x Cn Total Area Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 1640 21.29 77.1 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 2 Soil Name Land Use Detail EbB, LaB, EbB Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition D 78 11.58 903 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129.0001 1/3/2022 BgC Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition C 70 0.41 29 EbB, LaB, EbB Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition D 78 6.89 537 BgC Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition C 71 2.41 171 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 129 1.66 78.0 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 3 Soil Name Land Use Detail MaC, EbB, LaB3,  LaB Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition D 78 1.02 80 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129.0001 1/3/2022 MaC, EbB, LaB3,  LaB Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition D 78 0.64 50 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 214 2.74 78.0 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 4 Soil Name Land Use Detail ErA, LaB Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition D 78 2.74 214 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129.0001 1/3/2022 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 83 1.2 71.79 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA 5 Soil Name Land Use Detail LaB Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition D 78 1.01 79 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129 HdC Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition A 30 0.15 5 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 6605 84.93 77.8 Pervious Access Drive approved by NYSDEC Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA 1 Soil Name Land Use Detail LaB, LaB3, EbB,  EcA, RhA, BgC,  Ws  Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition D 78 12.32 961 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129.0001 1/3/2022 LaB, LaB3, EbB,  EcA, RhA, BgC,  Ws  Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition D 78 67.97 5302 BgC Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition C 71 2.79 198 Pervious Access Drive Approved by NYSDEC LaB, EbB, EcA,  RhA Paved Parking Roofs Driveways Etc Standard D 78 1.85 144 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 1640 21.29 77.1 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA 2 Soil Name Land Use Detail EbB, LaB, EbB Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition D 78 3.2 250 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129.0001 1/3/2022 BgC Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition C 70 0.41 29 EbB, LaB, EbB Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition D 78 15.27 1191 BgC Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition C 71 2.41 171 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 129 1.66 78.0 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA 3 Soil Name Land Use Detail MaC, EbB, LaB3,  LaB Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition D 78 1.02 80 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129.0001 1/3/2022 MaC, EbB, LaB3,  LaB Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition D 78 0.64 50 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area 214 2.74 78.0 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA 4 Soil Name Land Use Detail ErA, LaB Woods Or Forest Land Woods‐Fair condition D 78 2.74 214 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129.0001 1/3/2022 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Soil Type Cn Area (Acre) Cn*Area Pervious Access Drive Approved by NYSDEC 83 1.2 71.79 Weighted Cn Chart Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA 5 Soil Name Land Use Detail LaB Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition D 78 0.7 55 Norbut Solar Danby Solar Array 20213129 1/3/2022 HdC Meadow Meadow‐Good Condition A 30 0.09 3 LaB Paved Parking Roofs Driveways Etc Standard D 78 0.31 24 Pervious Access Drive Approved by NYSDEC HdC Paved Parking Roofs Driveways Etc Standard A 30 0.06 2 Total Area x Cn Total Area Weighted CN Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX J. EXTREME PERCIPITATION, TIME OF CONCENTRATION WORKSHEETS AND STORM HYDROGRAPHS 6/28/2021 Extreme Precipitation Tables: 42.458°N, 76.549°W precip.eas.cornell.edu/data.php?1624900192245 1/1 Extreme Precipitation Tables Northeast Regional Climate Center Data represents point estimates calculated from partial duration series. All precipitation amounts are displayed in inches. Smoothing Yes State New York Location Longitude 76.549 degrees West Latitude 42.458 degrees North Elevation 0 feet Date/Time Mon, 28 Jun 2021 13:09:53 -0400 Extreme Precipitation Estimates 5min 10min 15min 30min 60min 120min 1hr 2hr 3hr 6hr 12hr 24hr 48hr 1day 2day 4day 7day 10day 1yr 0.28 0.43 0.53 0.70 0.87 1.07 1yr 0.75 0.95 1.21 1.44 1.70 1.99 2.25 1yr 1.76 2.16 2.56 3.09 3.55 1yr 2yr 0.32 0.50 0.62 0.82 1.03 1.26 2yr 0.89 1.13 1.43 1.70 2.00 2.34 2.60 2yr 2.07 2.50 2.94 3.48 3.98 2yr 5yr 0.38 0.59 0.74 0.99 1.27 1.57 5yr 1.09 1.40 1.78 2.12 2.49 2.90 3.24 5yr 2.56 3.11 3.63 4.21 4.80 5yr 10yr 0.42 0.67 0.84 1.14 1.49 1.86 10yr 1.29 1.64 2.11 2.52 2.95 3.41 3.82 10yr 3.02 3.68 4.26 4.86 5.53 10yr 25yr 0.50 0.79 1.01 1.39 1.85 2.32 25yr 1.59 2.04 2.64 3.15 3.68 4.23 4.76 25yr 3.75 4.58 5.26 5.88 6.68 25yr 50yr 0.56 0.90 1.16 1.62 2.17 2.75 50yr 1.88 2.40 3.13 3.73 4.35 4.98 5.62 50yr 4.41 5.41 6.18 6.79 7.71 50yr 100yr 0.63 1.02 1.32 1.87 2.56 3.25 100yr 2.21 2.84 3.72 4.43 5.14 5.87 6.65 100yr 5.20 6.39 7.26 7.84 8.89 100yr 200yr 0.72 1.18 1.53 2.19 3.02 3.85 200yr 2.60 3.35 4.40 5.24 6.08 6.92 7.86 200yr 6.13 7.55 8.53 9.07 10.26 200yr 500yr 0.86 1.41 1.84 2.67 3.75 4.81 500yr 3.23 4.18 5.51 6.55 7.58 8.60 9.81 500yr 7.62 9.43 10.57 10.99 12.41 500yr Lower Confidence Limits 5min 10min 15min 30min 60min 120min 1hr 2hr 3hr 6hr 12hr 24hr 48hr 1day 2day 4day 7day 10day 1yr 0.25 0.39 0.47 0.63 0.78 0.82 1yr 0.67 0.81 0.91 1.10 1.51 1.80 2.05 1yr 1.60 1.97 2.40 2.90 3.22 1yr 2yr 0.32 0.49 0.60 0.82 1.01 1.12 2yr 0.87 1.09 1.24 1.53 1.87 2.26 2.52 2yr 2.00 2.42 2.84 3.39 3.88 2yr 5yr 0.36 0.55 0.69 0.94 1.20 1.32 5yr 1.04 1.30 1.45 1.78 2.18 2.65 2.98 5yr 2.35 2.87 3.36 3.91 4.48 5yr 10yr 0.40 0.61 0.76 1.06 1.37 1.51 10yr 1.18 1.47 1.63 1.99 2.47 3.01 3.36 10yr 2.66 3.23 3.75 4.36 5.01 10yr 25yr 0.46 0.69 0.86 1.23 1.62 1.78 25yr 1.40 1.74 1.91 2.29 2.88 3.51 3.89 25yr 3.10 3.74 4.35 5.00 5.79 25yr 50yr 0.50 0.77 0.96 1.37 1.85 2.02 50yr 1.60 1.98 2.15 2.56 3.25 3.96 4.32 50yr 3.51 4.16 4.84 5.55 6.45 50yr 100yr 0.56 0.84 1.06 1.53 2.09 2.31 100yr 1.81 2.26 2.42 2.86 3.67 4.46 4.79 100yr 3.94 4.61 5.38 6.16 7.18 100yr 200yr 0.62 0.93 1.18 1.72 2.39 2.63 200yr 2.06 2.57 2.74 3.20 4.14 5.00 5.29 200yr 4.43 5.09 5.95 6.79 7.97 200yr 500yr 0.72 1.07 1.38 2.00 2.85 3.14 500yr 2.46 3.07 3.22 3.71 4.86 5.82 5.97 500yr 5.15 5.74 6.73 7.71 9.15 500yr Upper Confidence Limits 5min 10min 15min 30min 60min 120min 1hr 2hr 3hr 6hr 12hr 24hr 48hr 1day 2day 4day 7day 10day 1yr 0.30 0.47 0.57 0.77 0.94 1.04 1yr 0.81 1.02 1.17 1.44 1.77 2.16 2.39 1yr 1.91 2.30 2.72 3.27 3.75 1yr 2yr 0.34 0.52 0.64 0.87 1.07 1.19 2yr 0.92 1.16 1.32 1.63 1.99 2.43 2.71 2yr 2.15 2.61 3.05 3.60 4.11 2yr 5yr 0.40 0.62 0.77 1.06 1.35 1.53 5yr 1.16 1.49 1.68 2.05 2.52 3.15 3.50 5yr 2.79 3.37 3.90 4.54 5.17 5yr 10yr 0.47 0.72 0.89 1.25 1.61 1.85 10yr 1.39 1.81 2.03 2.46 3.04 3.86 4.27 10yr 3.42 4.11 4.79 5.42 6.16 10yr 25yr 0.58 0.88 1.09 1.56 2.05 2.41 25yr 1.77 2.36 2.60 3.14 3.90 5.04 5.58 25yr 4.46 5.37 6.23 6.87 7.79 25yr 50yr 0.68 1.03 1.28 1.84 2.48 2.93 50yr 2.14 2.86 3.14 3.77 4.71 6.18 6.84 50yr 5.47 6.58 7.61 8.22 9.31 50yr 100yr 0.79 1.20 1.50 2.17 2.98 3.56 100yr 2.57 3.48 3.79 4.54 5.67 7.58 8.40 100yr 6.71 8.07 9.35 9.87 11.14 100yr 200yr 0.93 1.40 1.77 2.56 3.58 4.35 200yr 3.09 4.25 4.58 5.46 6.84 9.30 10.33 200yr 8.23 9.93 11.50 11.84 13.34 200yr 500yr 1.15 1.72 2.21 3.21 4.57 5.64 500yr 3.94 5.51 5.88 6.95 8.79 12.21 13.62 500yr 10.80 13.09 15.17 15.13 16.95 500yr 1 2 3 4 5 1112131415 31 32 1 Watershed Model Schematic Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Project: HYDROGRAPH_DANBY.gpw Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd.Origin Description Legend 1 SCS Runoff EX-1 2 SCS Runoff EX-2 3 SCS Runoff EX-3 4 SCS Runoff EX-4 5 SCS Runoff EX-5 11 SCS Runoff PR-1 12 SCS Runoff PR-2 13 SCS Runoff PR-3 14 SCS Runoff PR-4 15 SCS Runoff PR-5 31 Combine TOTAL EX 32 Combine TOTAL PR Hydraflow Table of Contents HYDROGRAPH_DANBY.gpw Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Watershed Model Schematic...................................................................................... 1 Hydrograph Return Period Recap............................................................................. 2 1 - Year Summary Report......................................................................................................................... 3 Hydrograph Reports................................................................................................................... 4 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, EX-1...................................................................................... 4 TR-55 Tc Worksheet............................................................................................................5 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, EX-2...................................................................................... 6 TR-55 Tc Worksheet............................................................................................................7 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, EX-3...................................................................................... 8 TR-55 Tc Worksheet............................................................................................................9 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, EX-4.................................................................................... 10 TR-55 Tc Worksheet.......................................................................................................... 11 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, EX-5.................................................................................... 12 TR-55 Tc Worksheet.......................................................................................................... 13 Hydrograph No. 11, SCS Runoff, PR-1.................................................................................. 14 TR-55 Tc Worksheet.......................................................................................................... 15 Hydrograph No. 12, SCS Runoff, PR-2.................................................................................. 16 TR-55 Tc Worksheet.......................................................................................................... 17 Hydrograph No. 13, SCS Runoff, PR-3.................................................................................. 18 TR-55 Tc Worksheet.......................................................................................................... 19 Hydrograph No. 14, SCS Runoff, PR-4.................................................................................. 20 TR-55 Tc Worksheet.......................................................................................................... 21 Hydrograph No. 15, SCS Runoff, PR-5.................................................................................. 22 TR-55 Tc Worksheet.......................................................................................................... 23 Hydrograph No. 31, Combine, TOTAL EX.............................................................................. 24 Hydrograph No. 32, Combine, TOTAL PR............................................................................. 25 10 - Year Summary Report....................................................................................................................... 26 Hydrograph Reports................................................................................................................. 27 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, EX-1.................................................................................... 27 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, EX-2.................................................................................... 28 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, EX-3.................................................................................... 29 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, EX-4.................................................................................... 30 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, EX-5.................................................................................... 31 Hydrograph No. 11, SCS Runoff, PR-1.................................................................................. 32 Hydrograph No. 12, SCS Runoff, PR-2.................................................................................. 33 Hydrograph No. 13, SCS Runoff, PR-3.................................................................................. 34 Hydrograph No. 14, SCS Runoff, PR-4.................................................................................. 35 Hydrograph No. 15, SCS Runoff, PR-5.................................................................................. 36 Hydrograph No. 31, Combine, TOTAL EX.............................................................................. 37 Hydrograph No. 32, Combine, TOTAL PR............................................................................. 38 100 - Year Summary Report....................................................................................................................... 39 Contents continued...HYDROGRAPH_DANBY.gpw Hydrograph Reports................................................................................................................. 40 Hydrograph No. 1, SCS Runoff, EX-1.................................................................................... 40 Hydrograph No. 2, SCS Runoff, EX-2.................................................................................... 41 Hydrograph No. 3, SCS Runoff, EX-3.................................................................................... 42 Hydrograph No. 4, SCS Runoff, EX-4.................................................................................... 43 Hydrograph No. 5, SCS Runoff, EX-5.................................................................................... 44 Hydrograph No. 11, SCS Runoff, PR-1.................................................................................. 45 Hydrograph No. 12, SCS Runoff, PR-2.................................................................................. 46 Hydrograph No. 13, SCS Runoff, PR-3.................................................................................. 47 Hydrograph No. 14, SCS Runoff, PR-4.................................................................................. 48 Hydrograph No. 15, SCS Runoff, PR-5.................................................................................. 49 Hydrograph No. 31, Combine, TOTAL EX.............................................................................. 50 Hydrograph No. 32, Combine, TOTAL PR............................................................................. 51 Hydrograph Return Period Recap 2 Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph No. type hyd(s)Description (origin) 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 1 SCS Runoff ------ 26.65 ------- ------- ------- 92.86 ------- ------- 231.77 EX-1 2 SCS Runoff ------ 6.645 ------- ------- ------- 24.11 ------- ------- 61.10 EX-2 3 SCS Runoff ------ 1.195 ------- ------- ------- 3.763 ------- ------- 9.080 EX-3 4 SCS Runoff ------ 1.736 ------- ------- ------- 5.599 ------- ------- 13.68 EX-4 5 SCS Runoff ------ 0.297 ------- ------- ------- 1.514 ------- ------- 4.338 EX-5 11 SCS Runoff ------ 26.65 ------- ------- ------- 92.86 ------- -------231.77 PR-1 12 SCS Runoff ------ 6.645 ------- ------- ------- 24.11 ------- -------61.10 PR-2 13 SCS Runoff ------ 1.195 ------- ------- ------- 3.763 ------- -------9.080 PR-3 14 SCS Runoff ------ 1.736 ------- ------- ------- 5.599 ------- -------13.68 PR-4 15 SCS Runoff ------ 0.297 ------- ------- ------- 1.514 ------- -------4.338 PR-5 31 Combine 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 34.12 ------- ------- ------- 119.40 ------- ------- 299.57 TOTAL EX 32 Combine 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 34.12 ------- ------- ------- 119.40 ------- ------- 299.57 TOTAL PR Proj. file: HYDROGRAPH_DANBY.gpw Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hydrograph Summary Report 3 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 26.65 2 736 143,696 ------ ------ ------ EX-1 2 SCS Runoff 6.645 2 734 34,924 ------ ------ ------ EX-2 3 SCS Runoff 1.195 2 720 2,885 ------ ------ ------ EX-3 4 SCS Runoff 1.736 2 722 4,911 ------ ------ ------ EX-4 5 SCS Runoff 0.297 2 726 1,201 ------ ------ ------ EX-5 11 SCS Runoff 26.65 2 736 143,696 ------ ------ ------ PR-1 12 SCS Runoff 6.645 2 734 34,924 ------ ------ ------ PR-2 13 SCS Runoff 1.195 2 720 2,885 ------ ------ ------ PR-3 14 SCS Runoff 1.736 2 722 4,911 ------ ------ ------ PR-4 15 SCS Runoff 0.297 2 726 1,201 ------ ------ ------ PR-5 31 Combine 34.12 2 736 187,616 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ------ ------ TOTAL EX 32 Combine 34.12 2 736 187,616 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, ------ ------ TOTAL PR HYDROGRAPH_DANBY.gpw Return Period: 1 Year Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 1 EX-1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 26.65 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 736 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 143,696 cuft Drainage area = 84.930 ac Curve number = 77.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 35.40 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 4 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 16.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 24.00 24.00 28.00 28.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-1 Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 1 TR55 Tc Worksheet 5 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 1 EX-1 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.400 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 7.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 15.84 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 15.84 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 597.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 5.70 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Unpaved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =3.85 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 2.58 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 2.58 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 4.00 4.00 8.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 2.00 2.00 4.00 Channel slope (%) = 5.70 5.00 3.10 Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.240 0.050 Velocity (ft/s) =2.36 2.21 8.35 Flow length (ft) ({0})813.0 871.0 2359.0 Travel Time (min) = 5.75 + 6.57 + 4.71 = 17.03 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 35.40 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 2 EX-2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 6.645 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 34,924 cuft Drainage area = 21.290 ac Curve number = 77.1 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 31.60 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 6 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-2 Hyd. No. 2 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 2 TR55 Tc Worksheet 7 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 2 EX-2 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 17.37 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 17.37 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 772.00 483.00 1336.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 3.50 4.80 3.20 Surface description = Unpaved Unpaved Unpaved Average velocity (ft/s) =3.02 3.53 2.89 Travel Time (min) = 4.26 + 2.28 + 7.71 = 14.25 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 31.60 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 3 EX-3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.195 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 2,885 cuft Drainage area = 1.660 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.70 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 8 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-3 Hyd. No. 3 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 3 TR55 Tc Worksheet 9 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 3 EX-3 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 12.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 8.48 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 8.48 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 314.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 7.30 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =4.36 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 1.20 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 1.20 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 9.70 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 4 EX-4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.736 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 722 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,911 cuft Drainage area = 2.740 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.90 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 10 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-4 Hyd. No. 4 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 4 TR55 Tc Worksheet 11 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 4 EX-4 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 5.70 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 11.42 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 11.42 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 254.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 3.30 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =2.93 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 1.44 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 1.44 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 12.90 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 5 EX-5 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.297 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 726 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,201 cuft Drainage area = 1.200 ac Curve number = 71.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 16.40 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 12 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.50 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-5 Hyd. No. 5 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 5 TR55 Tc Worksheet 13 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 5 EX-5 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 15.89 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 15.89 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 102.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 4.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =3.23 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 0.53 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.53 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 16.40 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 11 PR-1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 26.65 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 736 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 143,696 cuft Drainage area = 84.930 ac Curve number = 77.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 35.40 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 14 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 16.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 24.00 24.00 28.00 28.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-1 Hyd. No. 11 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 11 TR55 Tc Worksheet 15 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 11 PR-1 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.400 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 7.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 15.84 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 15.84 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 597.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 5.70 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Unpaved Unpaved Average velocity (ft/s) =3.85 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 2.58 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 2.58 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 4.00 4.00 8.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 2.00 2.00 4.00 Channel slope (%) = 5.70 5.00 3.10 Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.240 0.050 Velocity (ft/s) =2.36 2.21 8.35 Flow length (ft) ({0})813.0 871.0 2359.0 Travel Time (min) = 5.75 + 6.57 + 4.71 = 17.03 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 35.40 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 12 PR-2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 6.645 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 34,924 cuft Drainage area = 21.290 ac Curve number = 77.1 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 31.60 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 16 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-2 Hyd. No. 12 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 12 TR55 Tc Worksheet 17 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 12 PR-2 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 17.37 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 17.37 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 772.00 483.00 1336.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 3.50 4.80 3.20 Surface description = Unpaved Unpaved Unpaved Average velocity (ft/s) =3.02 3.53 2.89 Travel Time (min) = 4.26 + 2.28 + 7.71 = 14.25 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 31.60 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 13 PR-3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.195 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 2,885 cuft Drainage area = 1.660 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.70 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 18 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-3 Hyd. No. 13 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 13 TR55 Tc Worksheet 19 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 13 PR-3 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 12.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 8.48 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 8.48 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 314.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 7.30 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =4.36 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 1.20 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 1.20 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 9.70 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 14 PR-4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.736 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 722 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,911 cuft Drainage area = 2.740 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.90 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 20 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-4 Hyd. No. 14 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 14 TR55 Tc Worksheet 21 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 14 PR-4 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 5.70 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 11.42 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 11.42 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 254.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 3.30 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =2.93 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 1.44 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 1.44 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 12.90 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 15 PR-5 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.297 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 726 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,201 cuft Drainage area = 1.200 ac Curve number = 71.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 16.40 min Total precip. = 1.99 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 22 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.50 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-5 Hyd. No. 15 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 15 TR55 Tc Worksheet 23 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hyd. No. 15 PR-5 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.16 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 15.89 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 15.89 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 102.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 4.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =3.23 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 0.53 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.53 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 16.40 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 31 TOTAL EX Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 34.12 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 736 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 187,616 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Contrib. drain. area = 111.820 ac 24 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 35.00 35.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) TOTAL EX Hyd. No. 31 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 31 Hyd No. 1 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 32 TOTAL PR Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 34.12 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 736 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 187,616 cuft Inflow hyds. = 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Contrib. drain. area = 111.820 ac 25 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 30.00 35.00 35.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) TOTAL PR Hyd. No. 32 -- 1 Year Hyd No. 32 Hyd No. 11 Hyd No. 12 Hyd No. 13 Hyd No. 14 Hyd No. 15 Hydrograph Summary Report 26 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 92.86 2 736 431,623 ------ ------ ------ EX-1 2 SCS Runoff 24.11 2 734 107,237 ------ ------ ------ EX-2 3 SCS Runoff 3.763 2 720 8,613 ------ ------ ------ EX-3 4 SCS Runoff 5.599 2 722 14,661 ------ ------ ------ EX-4 5 SCS Runoff 1.514 2 724 4,465 ------ ------ ------ EX-5 11 SCS Runoff 92.86 2 736 431,623 ------ ------ ------ PR-1 12 SCS Runoff 24.11 2 734 107,237 ------ ------ ------ PR-2 13 SCS Runoff 3.763 2 720 8,613 ------ ------ ------ PR-3 14 SCS Runoff 5.599 2 722 14,661 ------ ------ ------ PR-4 15 SCS Runoff 1.514 2 724 4,465 ------ ------ ------ PR-5 31 Combine 119.40 2 734 566,598 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ------ ------ TOTAL EX 32 Combine 119.40 2 734 566,598 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, ------ ------ TOTAL PR HYDROGRAPH_DANBY.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 1 EX-1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 92.86 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 736 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 431,623 cuft Drainage area = 84.930 ac Curve number = 77.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 35.40 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 27 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-1 Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 1 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 2 EX-2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 24.11 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 107,237 cuft Drainage area = 21.290 ac Curve number = 77.1 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 31.60 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 28 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 16.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 24.00 24.00 28.00 28.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-2 Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 3 EX-3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 3.763 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 8,613 cuft Drainage area = 1.660 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.70 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 29 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-3 Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 3 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 4 EX-4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 5.599 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 722 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 14,661 cuft Drainage area = 2.740 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.90 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 30 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-4 Hyd. No. 4 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 5 EX-5 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.514 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,465 cuft Drainage area = 1.200 ac Curve number = 71.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 16.40 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 31 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-5 Hyd. No. 5 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 11 PR-1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 92.86 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 736 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 431,623 cuft Drainage area = 84.930 ac Curve number = 77.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 35.40 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 32 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 80.00 80.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 100.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-1 Hyd. No. 11 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 11 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 12 PR-2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 24.11 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 107,237 cuft Drainage area = 21.290 ac Curve number = 77.1 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 31.60 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 33 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 16.00 16.00 20.00 20.00 24.00 24.00 28.00 28.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-2 Hyd. No. 12 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 12 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 13 PR-3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 3.763 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 8,613 cuft Drainage area = 1.660 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.70 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 34 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-3 Hyd. No. 13 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 13 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 14 PR-4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 5.599 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 722 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 14,661 cuft Drainage area = 2.740 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.90 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 35 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-4 Hyd. No. 14 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 14 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 15 PR-5 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 1.514 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 724 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,465 cuft Drainage area = 1.200 ac Curve number = 71.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 16.40 min Total precip. = 3.41 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 36 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-5 Hyd. No. 15 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 15 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 31 TOTAL EX Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 119.40 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 566,598 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Contrib. drain. area = 111.820 ac 37 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 60.00 60.00 80.00 80.00 100.00 100.00 120.00 120.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) TOTAL EX Hyd. No. 31 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 31 Hyd No. 1 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 32 TOTAL PR Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 119.40 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 566,598 cuft Inflow hyds. = 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Contrib. drain. area = 111.820 ac 38 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 40.00 60.00 60.00 80.00 80.00 100.00 100.00 120.00 120.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) TOTAL PR Hyd. No. 32 -- 10 Year Hyd No. 32 Hyd No. 11 Hyd No. 12 Hyd No. 13 Hyd No. 14 Hyd No. 15 Hydrograph Summary Report 39 Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph No. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft) 1 SCS Runoff 231.77 2 734 1,049,873 ------ ------ ------ EX-1 2 SCS Runoff 61.10 2 732 264,138 ------ ------ ------ EX-2 3 SCS Runoff 9.080 2 718 20,875 ------ ------ ------ EX-3 4 SCS Runoff 13.68 2 720 35,534 ------ ------ ------ EX-4 5 SCS Runoff 4.338 2 722 12,183 ------ ------ ------ EX-5 11 SCS Runoff 231.77 2 734 1,049,873 ------ ------ ------ PR-1 12 SCS Runoff 61.10 2 732 264,138 ------ ------ ------ PR-2 13 SCS Runoff 9.080 2 718 20,875 ------ ------ ------ PR-3 14 SCS Runoff 13.68 2 720 35,534 ------ ------ ------ PR-4 15 SCS Runoff 4.338 2 722 12,183 ------ ------ ------ PR-5 31 Combine 299.57 2 734 1,382,602 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ------ ------ TOTAL EX 32 Combine 299.57 2 734 1,382,602 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, ------ ------ TOTAL PR HYDROGRAPH_DANBY.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 1 EX-1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 231.77 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,049,873 cuft Drainage area = 84.930 ac Curve number = 77.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 35.40 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 40 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 60.00 90.00 90.00 120.00 120.00 150.00 150.00 180.00 180.00 210.00 210.00 240.00 240.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-1 Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 1 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 2 EX-2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 61.10 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 732 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 264,138 cuft Drainage area = 21.290 ac Curve number = 77.1 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 31.60 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 41 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-2 Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 3 EX-3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 9.080 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 20,875 cuft Drainage area = 1.660 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.70 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 42 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-3 Hyd. No. 3 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 3 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 4 EX-4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 13.68 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 35,534 cuft Drainage area = 2.740 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.90 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 43 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 14.00 14.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-4 Hyd. No. 4 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 5 EX-5 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 4.338 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 722 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 12,183 cuft Drainage area = 1.200 ac Curve number = 71.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 16.40 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 44 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) EX-5 Hyd. No. 5 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 11 PR-1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 231.77 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,049,873 cuft Drainage area = 84.930 ac Curve number = 77.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 35.40 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 45 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 60.00 60.00 90.00 90.00 120.00 120.00 150.00 150.00 180.00 180.00 210.00 210.00 240.00 240.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-1 Hyd. No. 11 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 11 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 12 PR-2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 61.10 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 732 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 264,138 cuft Drainage area = 21.290 ac Curve number = 77.1 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 31.60 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 46 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 70.00 70.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-2 Hyd. No. 12 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 12 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 13 PR-3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 9.080 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 20,875 cuft Drainage area = 1.660 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 9.70 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 47 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-3 Hyd. No. 13 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 13 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 14 PR-4 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 13.68 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 35,534 cuft Drainage area = 2.740 ac Curve number = 78 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 12.90 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 48 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 12.00 12.00 14.00 14.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-4 Hyd. No. 14 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 14 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 15 PR-5 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 4.338 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 722 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 12,183 cuft Drainage area = 1.200 ac Curve number = 71.8 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 16.40 min Total precip. = 5.87 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 49 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) PR-5 Hyd. No. 15 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 15 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 31 TOTAL EX Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 299.57 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,382,602 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Contrib. drain. area = 111.820 ac 50 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 40.00 40.00 80.00 80.00 120.00 120.00 160.00 160.00 200.00 200.00 240.00 240.00 280.00 280.00 320.00 320.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) TOTAL EX Hyd. No. 31 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 31 Hyd No. 1 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 4 Hyd No. 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2021 Monday, 12 / 6 / 2021 Hyd. No. 32 TOTAL PR Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 299.57 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 734 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,382,602 cuft Inflow hyds. = 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Contrib. drain. area = 111.820 ac 51 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Q (cfs) 0.00 0.00 40.00 40.00 80.00 80.00 120.00 120.00 160.00 160.00 200.00 200.00 240.00 240.00 280.00 280.00 320.00 320.00 Q (cfs) Time (min) TOTAL PR Hyd. No. 32 -- 100 Year Hyd No. 32 Hyd No. 11 Hyd No. 12 Hyd No. 13 Hyd No. 14 Hyd No. 15 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX K. NYSDEC SPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (PERMIT NO. GP-0-20-001) þ{ËìûtYsËK $TÅTåOT TPPO&TIJNITY Ðepartnnent *f Hnvlranmantat tsnseruatiðn NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVI RONMENTAL CONSERVATION SPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER D¡SCHARGES From CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Permit No. GP- 0-20-001 lssued Pursuant to Article 17, Titles 7, I and Article 70 of the Environmental Conservation Law Effective Date: January 29,2020 Expiration Date: January 28,2025 John J. Ferguson Chief Permit Administrator /^ zZ -Z-ö uthorized Signature Date Address: NYS DEC Division of Environmental Permits 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany, N.Y. 12233-1750 I PREFACE Pursuant to Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), stormwater discharges from certain construction activities are unlawful unless they are authorized by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit or by a state permit program. New York administers the approved State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) program with permits issued in accordance with the New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) Article 17, Titles 7, 8 and Article 70. An owner or operator of a construction activity that is eligible for coverage under this permit must obtain coverage prior to the commencement of construction activity. Activities that fit the definition of “construction activity”, as defined under 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(x), (15)(i), and (15)(ii), constitute construction of a point source and therefore, pursuant to ECL section 17-0505 and 17-0701, the owner or operator must have coverage under a SPDES permit prior to commencing construction activity. The owner or operator cannot wait until there is an actual discharge from the construction site to obtain permit coverage. *Note: The italicized words/phrases within this permit are defined in Appendix A. I NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Table of Contents Part 1. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS ............................................................. 1 A. Permit Application ................................................................................................. 1 B. Effluent Limitations Applicable to Discharges from Construction Activities ........... 1 C. Post-construction Stormwater Management Practice Requirements .................... 4 D. Maintaining Water Quality ..................................................................................... 8 E. Eligibility Under This General Permit ..................................................................... 9 F. Activities Which Are Ineligible for Coverage Under This General Permit .............. 9 Part II. PERMIT COVERAGE ........................................................................................... 12 A. How to Obtain Coverage ..................................................................................... 12 B. Notice of Intent (NOI) Submittal .......................................................................... 13 C. Permit Authorization ............................................................................................ 13 D. General Requirements For Owners or Operators With Permit Coverage ........... 15 E. Permit Coverage for Discharges Authorized Under GP-0-15-002 ....................... 17 F. Change of Owner or Operator ............................................................................. 17 Part III. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) ........................... 18 A. General SWPPP Requirements .......................................................................... 18 B. Required SWPPP Contents ................................................................................ 20 C. Required SWPPP Components by Project Type ................................................. 24 Part IV. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS ..................................... 24 A. General Construction Site Inspection and Maintenance Requirements .............. 24 B. Contractor Maintenance Inspection Requirements ............................................. 24 C. Qualified Inspector Inspection Requirements ...................................................... 25 Part V. TERMINATION OF PERMIT COVERAGE ........................................................... 29 A. Termination of Permit Coverage ......................................................................... 29 Part VI. REPORTING AND RETENTION RECORDS ...................................................... 31 A. Record Retention ................................................................................................ 31 B. Addresses ........................................................................................................... 31 Part VII. STANDARD PERMIT CONDITIONS .................................................................. 31 A. Duty to Comply .................................................................................................... 31 B. Continuation of the Expired General Permit ........................................................ 32 C. Enforcement ........................................................................................................ 32 D. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity Not a Defense................................................... 32 E. Duty to Mitigate ................................................................................................... 33 F. Duty to Provide Information ................................................................................. 33 G. Other Information ................................................................................................ 33 H. Signatory Requirements ...................................................................................... 33 I. Property Rights ................................................................................................... 35 J. Severability.......................................................................................................... 35 K. Requirement to Obtain Coverage Under an Alternative Permit ........................... 35 L. Proper Operation and Maintenance .................................................................... 36 M. Inspection and Entry ........................................................................................... 36 N. Permit Actions ..................................................................................................... 37 O. Definitions ........................................................................................................... 37 P. Re-Opener Clause .............................................................................................. 37 Q. Penalties for Falsification of Forms and Reports ................................................. 37 R. Other Permits ...................................................................................................... 38 APPENDIX A – Acronyms and Definitions ....................................................................... 39 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... 39 Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 40 APPENDIX B – Required SWPPP Components by Project Type .................................... 48 Table 1.......................................................................................................................... 48 Table 2.......................................................................................................................... 50 APPENDIX C – Watersheds Requiring Enhanced Phosphorus Removal ........................ 52 APPENDIX D – Watersheds with Lower Disturbance Threshold ..................................... 58 APPENDIX E – 303(d) Segments Impaired by Construction Related Pollutant(s) ........... 59 APPENDIX F – List of NYS DEC Regional Offices .......................................................... 65 (Part I) 1 Part 1. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS A. Permit Application This permit authorizes stormwater discharges to surface waters of the State from the following construction activities identified within 40 CFR Parts 122.26(b)(14)(x), 122.26(b)(15)(i) and 122.26(b)(15)(ii), provided all of the eligibility provisions of this permit are met: 1. Construction activities involving soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres; including disturbances of less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land; excluding routine maintenance activity that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity or original purpose of a facility; 2. Construction activities involving soil disturbances of less than one (1) acre where the Department has determined that a SPDES permit is required for stormwater discharges based on the potential for contribution to a violation of a water quality standard or for significant contribution of pollutants to surface waters of the State. 3. Construction activities located in the watershed(s) identified in Appendix D that involve soil disturbances between five thousand (5,000) square feet and one (1) acre of land. B. Effluent Limitations Applicable to Discharges from Construction Activities Discharges authorized by this permit must achieve, at a minimum, the effluent limitations in Part I.B.1. (a) – (f) of this permit. These limitations represent the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of best practicable technology currently available. 1. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements - The owner or operator must select, design, install, implement and maintain control measures to minimize the discharge of pollutants and prevent a violation of the water quality standards. The selection, design, installation, implementation, and maintenance of these control measures must meet the non-numeric effluent limitations in Part I.B.1.(a) – (f) of this permit and be in accordance with the New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, dated November 2016, using sound engineering judgment. Where control measures are not designed in conformance with the design criteria included in the technical standard, the owner or operator must include in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”) the reason(s) for the (Part I.B.1) 2 deviation or alternative design and provide information which demonstrates that the deviation or alternative design is equivalent to the technical standard. a. Erosion and Sediment Controls. Design, install and maintain effective erosion and sediment controls to minimize the discharge of pollutants and prevent a violation of the water quality standards. At a minimum, such controls must be designed, installed and maintained to: (i) Minimize soil erosion through application of runoff control and soil stabilization control measure to minimize pollutant discharges; (ii) Control stormwater discharges, including both peak flowrates and total stormwater volume, to minimize channel and streambank erosion and scour in the immediate vicinity of the discharge points; (iii) Minimize the amount of soil exposed during construction activity; (iv) Minimize the disturbance of steep slopes; (v) Minimize sediment discharges from the site; (vi) Provide and maintain natural buffers around surface waters, direct stormwater to vegetated areas and maximize stormwater infiltration to reduce pollutant discharges, unless infeasible; (vii) Minimize soil compaction. Minimizing soil compaction is not required where the intended function of a specific area of the site dictates that it be compacted; (viii) Unless infeasible, preserve a sufficient amount of topsoil to complete soil restoration and establish a uniform, dense vegetative cover; and (ix) Minimize dust. On areas of exposed soil, minimize dust through the appropriate application of water or other dust suppression techniques to control the generation of pollutants that could be discharged from the site. b. Soil Stabilization. In areas where soil disturbance activity has temporarily or permanently ceased, the application of soil stabilization measures must be initiated by the end of the next business day and completed within fourteen (14) days from the date the current soil disturbance activity ceased. For construction sites that directly discharge to one of the 303(d) segments (Part I.B.1.b) 3 listed in Appendix E or is located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C, the application of soil stabilization measures must be initiated by the end of the next business day and completed within seven (7) days from the date the current soil disturbance activity ceased. See Appendix A for definition of Temporarily Ceased. c. Dewatering. Discharges from dewatering activities, including discharges from dewatering of trenches and excavations, must be managed by appropriate control measures. d. Pollution Prevention Measures. Design, install, implement, and maintain effective pollution prevention measures to minimize the discharge of pollutants and prevent a violation of the water quality standards. At a minimum, such measures must be designed, installed, implemented and maintained to: (i) Minimize the discharge of pollutants from equipment and vehicle washing, wheel wash water, and other wash waters. This applies to washing operations that use clean water only. Soaps, detergents and solvents cannot be used; (ii) Minimize the exposure of building materials, building products, construction wastes, trash, landscape materials, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, detergents, sanitary waste, hazardous and toxic waste, and other materials present on the site to precipitation and to stormwater. Minimization of exposure is not required in cases where the exposure to precipitation and to stormwater will not result in a discharge of pollutants, or where exposure of a specific material or product poses little risk of stormwater contamination (such as final products and materials intended for outdoor use) ; and (iii) Prevent the discharge of pollutants from spills and leaks and implement chemical spill and leak prevention and response procedures. e. Prohibited Discharges. The following discharges are prohibited: (i) Wastewater from washout of concrete; (ii) Wastewater from washout and cleanout of stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials; (Part I.B.1.e.iii) 4 (iii) Fuels, oils, or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment operation and maintenance; (iv) Soaps or solvents used in vehicle and equipment washing; and (v) Toxic or hazardous substances from a spill or other release. f. Surface Outlets. When discharging from basins and impoundments, the outlets shall be designed, constructed and maintained in such a manner that sediment does not leave the basin or impoundment and that erosion at or below the outlet does not occur. C. Post-construction Stormwater Management Practice Requirements 1. The owner or operator of a construction activity that requires post-construction stormwater management practices pursuant to Part III.C. of this permit must select, design, install, and maintain the practices to meet the performance criteria in the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (“Design Manual”), dated January 2015, using sound engineering judgment. Where post-construction stormwater management practices (“SMPs”) are not designed in conformance with the performance criteria in the Design Manual, the owner or operator must include in the SWPPP the reason(s) for the deviation or alternative design and provide information which demonstrates that the deviation or alternative design is equivalent to the technical standard. 2. The owner or operator of a construction activity that requires post-construction stormwater management practices pursuant to Part III.C. of this permit must design the practices to meet the applicable sizing criteria in Part I.C.2.a., b., c. or d. of this permit. a. Sizing Criteria for New Development (i) Runoff Reduction Volume (“RRv”): Reduce the total Water Quality Volume (“WQv”) by application of RR techniques and standard SMPs with RRv capacity. The total WQv shall be calculated in accordance with the criteria in Section 4.2 of the Design Manual. (ii) Minimum RRv and Treatment of Remaining Total WQv: Construction activities that cannot meet the criteria in Part I.C.2.a.(i) of this permit due to site limitations shall direct runoff from all newly constructed impervious areas to a RR technique or standard SMP with RRv capacity unless infeasible. The specific site limitations that prevent the reduction of 100% of the WQv shall be documented in the SWPPP. (Part I.C.2.a.ii) 5 For each impervious area that is not directed to a RR technique or standard SMP with RRv capacity, the SWPPP must include documentation which demonstrates that all options were considered and for each option explains why it is considered infeasible. In no case shall the runoff reduction achieved from the newly constructed impervious areas be less than the Minimum RRv as calculated using the criteria in Section 4.3 of the Design Manual. The remaining portion of the total WQv that cannot be reduced shal l be treated by application of standard SMPs. (iii) Channel Protection Volume (“Cpv”): Provide 24 hour extended detention of the post-developed 1-year, 24-hour storm event; remaining after runoff reduction. The Cpv requirement does not apply when: (1) Reduction of the entire Cpv is achieved by application of runoff reduction techniques or infiltration systems, or (2) The site discharges directly to tidal waters, or fifth order or larger streams. (iv) Overbank Flood Control Criteria (“Qp”): Requires storage to attenuate the post-development 10-year, 24-hour peak discharge rate (Qp) to predevelopment rates. The Qp requirement does not apply when: (1) the site discharges directly to tidal waters or fifth order or larger streams, or (2) A downstream analysis reveals that overbank control is not required. (v) Extreme Flood Control Criteria (“Qf”): Requires storage to attenuate the post-development 100-year, 24-hour peak discharge rate (Qf) to predevelopment rates. The Qf requirement does not apply when: (1) the site discharges directly to tidal waters or fifth order or larger streams, or (2) A downstream analysis reveals that overbank control is not required. b. Sizing Criteria for New Development in Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Watershed (i) Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv): Reduce the total Water Quality Volume (WQv) by application of RR techniques and standard SMPs with RRv capacity. The total WQv is the runoff volume from the 1 -year, 24 hour design storm over the post-developed watershed and shall be (Part I.C.2.b.i) 6 calculated in accordance with the criteria in Section 10.3 of the Design Manual. (ii) Minimum RRv and Treatment of Remaining Total WQv: Construction activities that cannot meet the criteria in Part I.C.2.b.(i) of this permit due to site limitations shall direct runoff from all newly constructed impervious areas to a RR technique or standard SMP with RRv capacity unless infeasible. The specific site limitations that prevent the reduction of 100% of the WQv shall be documented in the SWPPP. For each impervious area that is not directed to a RR technique or standard SMP with RRv capacity, the SWPPP must include documentation which demonstrates that all options were considered and for each option explains why it is considered infeasible. In no case shall the runoff reduction achieved from the newly constructed impervious areas be less than the Minimum RRv as calculated using the criteria in Section 10.3 of the Design Manual. The remaining portion of the total WQv that cannot be reduced shall be treated by application of standard SMPs. (iii) Channel Protection Volume (Cpv): Provide 24 hour extended detention of the post-developed 1-year, 24-hour storm event; remaining after runoff reduction. The Cpv requirement does not apply when: (1) Reduction of the entire Cpv is achieved by application of runoff reduction techniques or infiltration systems, or (2) The site discharges directly to tidal waters, or fifth order or larger streams. (iv) Overbank Flood Control Criteria (Qp): Requires storage to attenuate the post-development 10-year, 24-hour peak discharge rate (Qp) to predevelopment rates. The Qp requirement does not apply when: (1) the site discharges directly to tidal waters or fifth order or larger streams, or (2) A downstream analysis reveals that overbank control is not required. (v) Extreme Flood Control Criteria (Qf): Requires storage to attenuate the post-development 100-year, 24-hour peak discharge rate (Qf) to predevelopment rates. The Qf requirement does not apply when: (1) the site discharges directly to tidal waters or fifth order or larger streams, or (2) A downstream analysis reveals that overbank control is not required. (Part I.C.2.c) 7 c. Sizing Criteria for Redevelopment Activity (i) Water Quality Volume (WQv): The WQv treatment objective for redevelopment activity shall be addressed by one of the following options. Redevelopment activities located in an Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Watershed (see Part III.B.3. and Appendix C of this permit) shall calculate the WQv in accordance with Section 10.3 of the Design Manual. All other redevelopment activities shall calculate the WQv in accordance with Section 4.2 of the Design Manual. (1) Reduce the existing impervious cover by a minimum of 25% of the total disturbed, impervious area. The Soil Restoration criteria in Section 5.1.6 of the Design Manual must be applied to all newly created pervious areas, or (2) Capture and treat a minimum of 25% of the WQv from the disturbed, impervious area by the application of standard SMPs; or reduce 25% of the WQv from the disturbed, impervious area by the application of RR techniques or standard SMPs with RRv capacity., or (3) Capture and treat a minimum of 75% of the WQv from the disturbed, impervious area as well as any additional runoff from tributary areas by application of the alternative practices discussed in Sections 9.3 and 9.4 of the Design Manual., or (4) Application of a combination of 1, 2 and 3 above that provide a weighted average of at least two of the above methods. Application of this method shall be in accordance with the criteria in Section 9.2.1(B) (IV) of the Design Manual. If there is an existing post-construction stormwater management practice located on the site that captures and treats runoff from the impervious area that is being disturbed, the WQv treatment option selected must, at a minimum, provide treatment equal to the treatment that was being provided by the existing practice(s) if that treatment is greater than the treatment required by options 1 – 4 above. (ii) Channel Protection Volume (Cpv): Not required if there are n o changes to hydrology that increase the discharge rate from the project site. (iii) Overbank Flood Control Criteria (Qp): Not required if there are no changes to hydrology that increase the discharge rate from the project site. (iv) Extreme Flood Control Criteria (Qf): Not required if there are no changes to hydrology that increase the discharge rate from the project site (Part I.C.2.d) 8 d. Sizing Criteria for Combination of Redevelopment Activity and New Development Construction projects that include both New Development and Redevelopment Activity shall provide post-construction stormwater management controls that meet the sizing criteria calculated as an aggregate of the Sizing Criteria in Part I.C.2.a. or b. of this permit for the New Development portion of the project and Part I.C.2.c of this permit for Redevelopment Activity portion of the project. D. Maintaining Water Quality The Department expects that compliance with the conditions of this permit will control discharges necessary to meet applicable water quality standards. It shall be a violation of the ECL for any discharge to either cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards as contained in Parts 700 through 705 of Title 6 of the Official Comp ilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York, such as: 1. There shall be no increase in turbidity that will cause a substantial visible contrast to natural conditions; 2. There shall be no increase in suspended, colloidal or settleable solids that will cause deposition or impair the waters for their best usages; and 3. There shall be no residue from oil and floating substances, nor visible oil film, nor globules of grease. If there is evidence indicating that the stormwater discharges authorized by this permit are causing, have the reasonable potential to cause, or are contributing to a violation of the water quality standards; the owner or operator must take appropriate corrective action in accordance with Part IV.C.5. of this general permit and document in accordance with Part IV.C.4. of this general permit. To address the water quality standard violation the owner or operator may need to provide additional information, include and implement appropriate controls in the SWPPP to correct the problem, or obtain an individual SPDES permit. If there is evidence indicating that despite compliance with the terms and conditions of this general permit it is demonstrated that the stormwater discharges authorized by this permit are causing or contributing to a violation of water quality standards, or if the Department determines that a modification of the permit is necessary to prevent a violation of water quality standards, the authorized discharges will no longer be eligible for coverage under this permit. The Department may require the owner or operator to obtain an individual SPDES permit to continue discharging. (Part I.E) 9 E. Eligibility Under This General Permit 1. This permit may authorize all discharges of stormwater from construction activity to surface waters of the State and groundwaters except for ineligible discharges identified under subparagraph F. of this Part. 2. Except for non-stormwater discharges explicitly listed in the next paragraph, this permit only authorizes stormwater discharges; including stormwater runoff, snowmelt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage, from construction activities. 3. Notwithstanding paragraphs E.1 and E.2 above, the following non-stormwater discharges are authorized by this permit: those listed in 6 NYCRR 750- 1.2(a)(29)(vi), with the following exception: “Discharges from firefighting activities are authorized only when the firefighting activities are emergencies/unplanned”; waters to which other components have not been added that are used to control dust in accordance with the SWPPP ; and uncontaminated discharges from construction site de-watering operations. All non-stormwater discharges must be identified in the SWPPP. Under all circumstances, the owner or operator must still comply with water quality standards in Part I.D of this permit. 4. The owner or operator must maintain permit eligibility to discharge under this permit. Any discharges that are not compliant with the eligibility conditions of this permit are not authorized by the permit and the owner or operator must either apply for a separate permit to cover those ineligible discharges or take steps necessary to make the discharge eligible for coverage. F. Activities Which Are Ineligible for Coverage Under This General Permit All of the following are not authorized by this permit: 1. Discharges after construction activities have been completed and the site has undergone final stabilization; 2. Discharges that are mixed with sources of non-stormwater other than those expressly authorized under subsection E.3. of this Part and identified in the SWPPP required by this permit; 3. Discharges that are required to obtain an individual SPDES permit or another SPDES general permit pursuant to Part VII.K. of this permit; 4. Construction activities or discharges from construction activities that may adversely affect an endangered or threatened species unless the owner or (Part I.F.4) 10 operator has obtained a permit issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 182 for the project or the Department has issued a letter of non -jurisdiction for the project. All documentation necessary to demonstrate eligibility shall be maintained on site in accordance with Part II.D.2 of this permit; 5. Discharges which either cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards adopted pursuant to the ECL and its accompanying regulations; 6. Construction activities for residential, commercial and institutional projects: a. Where the discharges from the construction activities are tributary to waters of the state classified as AA or AA-s; and b. Which are undertaken on land with no existing impervious cover; and c. Which disturb one (1) or more acres of land designated on the current United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) Soil Survey as Soil Slope Phase “D”, (provided the map unit name is inclusive of slopes greater than 25%), or Soil Slope Phase “E” or “F” (regardless of the map unit name), or a combination of the three designations. 7. Construction activities for linear transportation projects and linear utility projects: a. Where the discharges from the construction activities are tributary to waters of the state classified as AA or AA-s; and b. Which are undertaken on land with no existing impervious cover; and c. Which disturb two (2) or more acres of land designated on the current USDA Soil Survey as Soil Slope Phase “D” (provided the map unit name is inclusive of slopes greater than 25%), or Soil Slope Phase “E” or “F” (regardless of the map unit name), or a combination of the three designations. (Part I.F.8) 11 8. Construction activities that have the potential to affect an historic property, unless there is documentation that such impacts have been resolved. The following documentation necessary to demonstrate eligibility with this requirement shall be maintained on site in accordance with Part II.D.2 of this permit and made available to the Department in accordance with Part VII.F of this permit: a. Documentation that the construction activity is not within an archeologically sensitive area indicated on the sensitivity map, and that the construction activity is not located on or immediately adjacent to a property listed or determined to be eligible for listing on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and that there is no new permanent building on the construction site within the following distances from a building, structure, or object that is more than 50 years old, or if there is such a new permanent building on the construction site within those parameters that NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP), a Historic Preservation Commission of a Certified Local Government, or a qualified preservation professional has determined that the building, structure, or object more than 50 years old is not historically/archeologically significant. ▪ 1-5 acres of disturbance - 20 feet ▪ 5-20 acres of disturbance - 50 feet ▪ 20+ acres of disturbance - 100 feet, or b. DEC consultation form sent to OPRHP, and copied to the NYS DEC Agency Historic Preservation Officer (APO), and (i) the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) with a negative declaration or the Findings Statement, with documentation of OPRHP’s agreement with the resolution; or (ii) documentation from OPRHP that the construction activity will result in No Impact; or (iii) documentation from OPRHP providing a determination of No Adverse Impact; or (iv) a Letter of Resolution signed by the owner/operator, OPRHP and the DEC APO which allows for this construction activity to be eligible for coverage under the general permit in terms of the State Historic Preservation Act (SHPA); or c. Documentation of satisfactory compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for a coterminous project area: (Part I.F.8.c) 12 (i) No Affect (ii) No Adverse Affect (iii) Executed Memorandum of Agreement, or d. Documentation that: (i) SHPA Section 14.09 has been completed by NYS DEC or another state agency. 9. Discharges from construction activities that are subject to an existing SPDES individual or general permit where a SPDES permit for construction activity has been terminated or denied; or where the owner or operator has failed to renew an expired individual permit. Part II. PERMIT COVERAGE A. How to Obtain Coverage 1. An owner or operator of a construction activity that is not subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4 must first prepare a SWPPP in accordance with all applicable requirements of this permit and then submit a completed Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Department to be authorized to discharge under this permit. 2. An owner or operator of a construction activity that is subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4 must first prepare a SWPPP in accordance with all applicable requirements of this permit and then have the SWPPP reviewed and accepted by the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 prior to submitting the NOI to the Department. The owner or operator shall have the “MS4 SWPPP Acceptance” form signed in accordance with Part VII.H., and then submit that form along with a completed NOI to the Department. 3. The requirement for an owner or operator to have its SWPPP reviewed and accepted by the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 prior to submitting the NOI to the Department does not apply to an owner or operator that is obtaining permit coverage in accordance with the requirements in Part II.F. (Change of Owner or Operator) or where the owner or operator of the construction activity is the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 . This exemption does not apply to construction activities subject to the New York City Administrative Code. (Part II.B) 13 B. Notice of Intent (NOI) Submittal 1. Prior to December 21, 2020, an owner or operator shall use either the electronic (eNOI) or paper version of the NOI that the Department prepared. Both versions of the NOI are located on the Department’s website (http://www.dec.ny.gov/ ). The paper version of the NOI shall be signed in accordance with Part VII.H. of this permit and submitted to the following address: NOTICE OF INTENT NYS DEC, Bureau of Water Permits 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany, New York 12233-3505 2. Beginning December 21, 2020 and in accordance with EPA’s 2015 NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 127), the owner or operator must submit the NOI electronically using the Department’s online NOI. 3. The owner or operator shall have the SWPPP preparer sign the “SWPPP Preparer Certification” statement on the NOI prior to submitting the form to the Department. 4. As of the date the NOI is submitted to the Department, the owner or operator shall make the NOI and SWPPP available for review and copying in accordance with the requirements in Part VII.F. of this permit. C. Permit Authorization 1. An owner or operator shall not commence construction activity until their authorization to discharge under this permit goes into effect. 2. Authorization to discharge under this permit will be effective when the owner or operator has satisfied all of the following criteria: a. project review pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) have been satisfied, when SEQRA is applicable. See the Department’s website (http://www.dec.ny.gov/) for more information, b. where required, all necessary Department permits subject to the Uniform Procedures Act (“UPA”) (see 6 NYCRR Part 621), or the equivalent from another New York State agency, have been obtained, unless otherwise notified by the Department pursuant to 6 NYCRR 621.3(a)(4). Owners or operators of construction activities that are required to obtain UPA permits (Part II.C.2.b) 14 must submit a preliminary SWPPP to the appropriate DEC Permit Administrator at the Regional Office listed in Appendix F at the time all other necessary UPA permit applications are submitted. The preliminary SWPPP must include sufficient information to demonstrate that the construction activity qualifies for authorization under this permit, c. the final SWPPP has been prepared, and d. a complete NOI has been submitted to the Department in accordance with the requirements of this permit. 3. An owner or operator that has satisfied the requirements of Part II.C.2 above will be authorized to discharge stormwater from their construction activity in accordance with the following schedule: a. For construction activities that are not subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4: (i) Five (5) business days from the date the Department receives a complete electronic version of the NOI (eNOI) for construction activities with a SWPPP that has been prepared in conformance with the design criteria in the technical standard referenced in Part III.B.1 and the performance criteria in the technical standard referenced in Parts III.B., 2 or 3, for construction activities that require post-construction stormwater management practices pursuant to Part III.C.; or (ii) Sixty (60) business days from the date the Department receives a complete NOI (electronic or paper version) for construction activities with a SWPPP that has not been prepared in conformance with the design criteria in technical standard referenced in Part III.B.1. or, for construction activities that require post-construction stormwater management practices pursuant to Part III.C., the performance criteria in the technical standard referenced in Parts III.B., 2 or 3, or; (iii) Ten (10) business days from the date the Department receives a complete paper version of the NOI for construction activities with a SWPPP that has been prepared in conformance with the design criteria in the technical standard referenced in Part III.B.1 and the performance criteria in the technical standard referenced in Parts III.B., 2 or 3, for construction activities that require post-construction stormwater management practices pursuant to Part III.C. (Part II.C.3.b) 15 b. For construction activities that are subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4: (i) Five (5) business days from the date the Department receives both a complete electronic version of the NOI (eNOI) and signed “MS4 SWPPP Acceptance” form, or (ii) Ten (10) business days from the date the Department receives both a complete paper version of the NOI and signed “MS4 SWPPP Acceptance” form. 4. Coverage under this permit authorizes stormwater discharges from only those areas of disturbance that are identified in the NOI. If an owner or operator wishes to have stormwater discharges from future or additional areas of disturbance authorized, they must submit a new NOI that addresses that phase of the development, unless otherwise notified by the Department. The owner or operator shall not commence construction activity on the future or additional areas until their authorization to discharge under this permit goes into effect in accordance with Part II.C. of this permit. D. General Requirements For Owners or Operators With Permit Coverage 1. The owner or operator shall ensure that the provisions of the SWPPP are implemented from the commencement of construction activity until all areas of disturbance have achieved final stabilization and the Notice of Termination (“NOT”) has been submitted to the Department in accordance with Part V. of this permit. This includes any changes made to the SWPPP pursuant to Part III.A.4. of this permit. 2. The owner or operator shall maintain a copy of the General Permit (GP-0-20- 001), NOI, NOI Acknowledgment Letter, SWPPP, MS4 SWPPP Acceptance form, inspection reports, responsible contractor’s or subcontractor’s certification statement (see Part III.A.6.), and all documentation necessary to demonstrate eligibility with this permit at the construction site until all disturbed areas have achieved final stabilization and the NOT has been submitted to the Department. The documents must be maintained in a secure location, such as a job trailer, on-site construction office, or mailbox with lock. The secure location must be accessible during normal business hours to an individual performing a compliance inspection. 3. The owner or operator of a construction activity shall not disturb greater than five (5) acres of soil at any one time without prior written authorization from the Department or, in areas under the jurisdiction of a regulated, traditional land (Part II.D.3) 16 use control MS4, the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 (provided the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 is not the owner or operator of the construction activity). At a minimum, the owner or operator must comply with the following requirements in order to be authorized to disturb greater than fi ve (5) acres of soil at any one time: a. The owner or operator shall have a qualified inspector conduct at least two (2) site inspections in accordance with Part IV.C. of this permit every seven (7) calendar days, for as long as greater than five (5) acres of soil remain disturbed. The two (2) inspections shall be separated by a minimum of two (2) full calendar days. b. In areas where soil disturbance activity has temporarily or permanently ceased, the application of soil stabilization measures must be initiated by the end of the next business day and completed within seven (7) days from the date the current soil disturbance activity ceased. The soil stabilization measures selected shall be in conformance with the technical standard, New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, dated November 2016. c. The owner or operator shall prepare a phasing plan that defines maximum disturbed area per phase and shows required cuts and fills. d. The owner or operator shall install any additional site-specific practices needed to protect water quality. e. The owner or operator shall include the requirements above in their SWPPP. 4. In accordance with statute, regulations, and the terms and conditions of this permit, the Department may suspend or revoke an owner’s or operator’s coverage under this permit at any time if the Department determines that the SWPPP does not meet the permit requirements or consistent with Part VII.K.. 5. Upon a finding of significant non-compliance with the practices described in the SWPPP or violation of this permit, the Department may order an immediate stop to all activity at the site until the non-compliance is remedied. The stop work order shall be in writing, describe the non-compliance in detail, and be sent to the owner or operator. 6. For construction activities that are subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4, the owner or operator shall notify the (Part II.D.6) 17 regulated, traditional land use control MS4 in writing of any planned amendments or modifications to the post-construction stormwater management practice component of the SWPPP required by Part III.A. 4. and 5. of this permit. Unless otherwise notified by the regulated, traditional land use control MS4, the owner or operator shall have the SWPPP amendments or modifications reviewed and accepted by the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 prior to commencing construction of the post-construction stormwater management practice. E. Permit Coverage for Discharges Authorized Under GP-0-15-002 1. Upon renewal of SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity (Permit No. GP-0-15-002), an owner or operator of a construction activity with coverage under GP-0-15-002, as of the effective date of GP- 0-20-001, shall be authorized to discharge in accordance with GP- 0-20- 001, unless otherwise notified by the Department. An owner or operator may continue to implement the technical/design components of the post-construction stormwater management controls provided that such design was done in conformance with the technical standards in place at the time of initial project authorization. However, they must comply with the other, non-design provisions of GP-0-20-001. F. Change of Owner or Operator 1. When property ownership changes or when there is a change in operational control over the construction plans and specifications, the original owner or operator must notify the new owner or operator, in writing, of the requirement to obtain permit coverage by submitting a NOI with the Department. For construction activities subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4, the original owner or operator must also notify the MS4, in writing, of the change in ownership at least 30 calendar days prior to the change in ownership. 2. Once the new owner or operator obtains permit coverage, the original owner or operator shall then submit a completed NOT with the name and permit identification number of the new owner or operator to the Department at the address in Part II.B.1. of this permit. If the original owner or operator maintains ownership of a portion of the construction activity and will disturb soil, they must maintain their coverage under the permit. 3. Permit coverage for the new owner or operator will be effective as of the date the Department receives a complete NOI, provided the original owner or (Part II.F.3) 18 operator was not subject to a sixty (60) business day authorization period that has not expired as of the date the Department receives the NOI from the new owner or operator. Part III. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) A. General SWPPP Requirements 1. A SWPPP shall be prepared and implemented by the owner or operator of each construction activity covered by this permit. The SWPPP must document the selection, design, installation, implementation and maintenance of the control measures and practices that will be used to meet the effluent limitations in Part I.B. of this permit and where applicable, the post-construction stormwater management practice requirements in Part I.C. of this permit. The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the NOI. The NOI shall be submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. A copy of the completed, final NOI shall be included in the SWPPP. 2. The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where required, post-construction stormwater management practices that will be used and/or constructed to reduce the pollutants in stormwater discharges and to assure compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. In addition, the SWPPP shall identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges. 3. All SWPPPs that require the post-construction stormwater management practice component shall be prepared by a qualified professional that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of stormwater management and treatment. 4. The owner or operator must keep the SWPPP current so that it at all times accurately documents the erosion and sediment controls practices that are being used or will be used during construction, and all post-construction stormwater management practices that will be constructed on the site. At a minimum, the owner or operator shall amend the SWPPP, including construction drawings: a. whenever the current provisions prove to be ineffective in minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site; (Part III.A.4.b) 19 b. whenever there is a change in design, construction, or operation at the construction site that has or could have an effect on the discharge of pollutants; c. to address issues or deficiencies identified during an inspection by the qualified inspector, the Department or other regulatory authority; and d. to document the final construction conditions. 5. The Department may notify the owner or operator at any time that the SWPPP does not meet one or more of the minimum requirements of this permit. The notification shall be in writing and identify the provisions of the SWPPP that require modification. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of such notificati on, or as otherwise indicated by the Department, the owner or operator shall make the required changes to the SWPPP and submit written notification to the Department that the changes have been made. If the owner or operator does not respond to the Department’s comments in the specified time frame, the Department may suspend the owner’s or operator’s coverage under this permit or require the owner or operator to obtain coverage under an individual SPDES permit in accordance with Part II.D.4. of this permit. 6. Prior to the commencement of construction activity, the owner or operator must identify the contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) that will be responsible for installing, constructing, repairing, replacing, inspecting and maintaining the erosion and sediment control practices included in the SWPPP; and the contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) that will be responsible for constructing the post-construction stormwater management practices included in the SWPPP. The owner or operator shall have each of the contractors and subcontractors identify at least one person from their company that will be responsible for implementation of the SWPPP. This person shall be known as the trained contractor. The owner or operator shall ensure that at least one trained contractor is on site on a daily basis when soil disturbance activities are being performed. The owner or operator shall have each of the contractors and subcontractors identified above sign a copy of the following certification statement below before they commence any construction activity: "I hereby certify under penalty of law that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. I also understand that the owner or operator must comply with (Part III.A.6) 20 the terms and conditions of the most current version of the New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES") general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, that I do not believe to be true, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations" In addition to providing the certification statement above, the certification page must also identify the specific elements of the SWPPP that each contractor and subcontractor will be responsible for and include the name and title of the person providing the signature; the name and title of the trained contractor responsible for SWPPP implementation; the name, address and telephone number of the contracting firm; the address (or other identifying description) of the site; and the date the certification statement is signed. The owner or operator shall attach the certification statement(s) to the copy of the SWPPP that is maintained at the construction site. If new or additional contractors are hired to implement measures identified in the SWPPP after construction has commenced, they must also sign the certification statement and provide the information listed above. 7. For projects where the Department requests a copy of the SWPPP or inspection reports, the owner or operator shall submit the documents in both electronic (PDF only) and paper format within five (5) business days, unless otherwise notified by the Department. B. Required SWPPP Contents 1. Erosion and sediment control component - All SWPPPs prepared pursuant to this permit shall include erosion and sediment control practices designed in conformance with the technical standard, New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, dated November 2016. Where erosion and sediment control practices are not designed in conformance with the design criteria included in the technical standard, the owner or operator must demonstrate equivalence to the technical standard. At a minimum, the erosion and sediment control component of the SWPPP shall include the following: a. Background information about the scope of the project, including the location, type and size of project (Part III.B.1.b) 21 b. A site map/construction drawing(s) for the project, including a general location map. At a minimum, the site map shall show the total site area; all improvements; areas of disturbance; areas that will not be disturbed; existing vegetation; on-site and adjacent off-site surface water(s); floodplain/floodway boundaries; wetlands and drainage patterns that could be affected by the construction activity; existing and final contours ; locations of different soil types with boundaries; material, waste, borrow or equipment storage areas located on adjacent properties; and location(s) of the stormwater discharge(s); c. A description of the soil(s) present at the site, including an identification of the Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG); d. A construction phasing plan and sequence of operations describing the intended order of construction activities, including clearing and grubbing, excavation and grading, utility and infrastructure installation and any other activity at the site that results in soil disturbance; e. A description of the minimum erosion and sediment control practices to be installed or implemented for each construction activity that will result in soil disturbance. Include a schedule that identifies the timing of initial placement or implementation of each erosion and sediment control practice and the minimum time frames that each practice should remain in place or be implemented; f. A temporary and permanent soil stabilization plan that meets the requirements of this general permit and the technical standard, New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, dated November 2016, for each stage of the project, including initial land clearing and grubbing to project completion and achievement of final stabilization; g. A site map/construction drawing(s) showing the specific location(s), size(s), and length(s) of each erosion and sediment control practice; h. The dimensions, material specifications, installation details, and operation and maintenance requirements for all erosion and sediment control practices. Include the location and sizing of any temporary sediment basins and structural practices that will be used to divert flows from exposed soils; i. A maintenance inspection schedule for the contractor(s) identified in Part III.A.6. of this permit, to ensure continuous and effective operation of the erosion and sediment control practices. The maintenance inspection (Part III.B.1.i) 22 schedule shall be in accordance with the requirements in the technical standard, New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, dated November 2016; j. A description of the pollution prevention measures that will be used to control litter, construction chemicals and construction debris from becoming a pollutant source in the stormwater discharges; k. A description and location of any stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity other than construction at the site, including, but not limited to, stormwater discharges from asphalt plants and concrete plants located on the construction site; and l. Identification of any elements of the design that are not in conformance with the design criteria in the technical standard, New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, dated November 2016. Include the reason for the deviation or alternative design and provide information which demonstrates that the deviation or alternative design is equivalent to the technical standard. 2. Post-construction stormwater management practice component – The owner or operator of any construction project identified in Table 2 of Appendix B as needing post-construction stormwater management practices shall prepare a SWPPP that includes practices designed in conformance with the applicable sizing criteria in Part I.C.2.a., c. or d. of this permit and the performance criteria in the technical standard, New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual dated January 2015 Where post-construction stormwater management practices are not designed in conformance with the performance criteria in the technical standard, the owner or operator must include in the SWPPP the reason(s) for the deviation or alternative design and provide information which demonstrates that the deviation or alternative design is equivalent to the technical standard. The post-construction stormwater management practice component of the SWPPP shall include the following: a. Identification of all post-construction stormwater management practices to be constructed as part of the project. Include the dimensions, material specifications and installation details for each post-construction stormwater management practice; (Part III.B.2.b) 23 b. A site map/construction drawing(s) showing the specific location and size of each post-construction stormwater management practice; c. A Stormwater Modeling and Analysis Report that includes: (i) Map(s) showing pre-development conditions, including watershed/subcatchments boundaries, flow paths/routing, and design points; (ii) Map(s) showing post-development conditions, including watershed/subcatchments boundaries, flow paths/routing, design points and post-construction stormwater management practices; (iii) Results of stormwater modeling (i.e. hydrology and hydraulic analysis) for the required storm events. Include supporting calculations (model runs), methodology, and a summary table that compares pre and post - development runoff rates and volumes for the different storm events; (iv) Summary table, with supporting calculations, which demonstrates that each post-construction stormwater management practice has been designed in conformance with the sizing criteria included in the Design Manual; (v) Identification of any sizing criteria that is not required based on the requirements included in Part I.C. of this permit; and (vi) Identification of any elements of the design that are not in conformance with the performance criteria in the Design Manual. Include the reason(s) for the deviation or alternative design and provide information which demonstrates that the deviation or alt ernative design is equivalent to the Design Manual; d. Soil testing results and locations (test pits, borings); e. Infiltration test results, when required; and f. An operations and maintenance plan that includes inspection and maintenance schedules and actions to ensure continuous and effective operation of each post-construction stormwater management practice. The plan shall identify the entity that will be responsible for the long term operation and maintenance of each practice. (Part III.B.3) 24 3. Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Standards - All construction projects identified in Table 2 of Appendix B that are located in the watersheds identified in Appendix C shall prepare a SWPPP that includes post -construction stormwater management practices designed in conformance with the applicable sizing criteria in Part I.C.2. b., c. or d. of this permit and the performance criteria, Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Standards included in the Design Manual. At a minimum, the post-construction stormwater management practice component of the SWPPP shall include items 2.a - 2.f. above. C. Required SWPPP Components by Project Type Unless otherwise notified by the Department, owners or operators of construction activities identified in Table 1 of Appendix B are required to prepare a SWPPP that only includes erosion and sediment control practices designed in conformance with Part III.B.1 of this permit. Owners or operators of the construction activities identified in Table 2 of Appendix B shall prepare a SWPPP that also includes post-construction stormwater management practices designed in conformance with Part III.B.2 or 3 of this permit. Part IV. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS A. General Construction Site Inspection and Maintenance Requirements 1. The owner or operator must ensure that all erosion and sediment control practices (including pollution prevention measures) and all post-construction stormwater management practices identified in the SWPPP are inspected and maintained in accordance with Part IV.B. and C. of this permit. 2. The terms of this permit shall not be construed to prohibit the State of New York from exercising any authority pursuant to the ECL, common law or federal law, or prohibit New York State from taking any measures, whether civil or criminal, to prevent violations of the laws of the State of New York or protect the public health and safety and/or the environment. B. Contractor Maintenance Inspection Requirements 1. The owner or operator of each construction activity identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Appendix B shall have a trained contractor inspect the erosion and sediment control practices and pollution prevention measures being implemented within the active work area daily to ensure that they are being maintained in effective operating condition at all times. If deficiencies are identified, the contractor shall (Part IV.B.1) 25 begin implementing corrective actions within one business day and shall complete the corrective actions in a reasonable time frame. 2. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities have been temporarily suspended (e.g. winter shutdown) and temporary stabilization measures have been applied to all disturbed areas, the trained contractor can stop conducting the maintenance inspections. The trained contractor shall begin conducting the maintenance inspections in accordance with Part IV.B.1. of this permit as soon as soil disturbance activities resume. 3. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities have been shut down with partial project completion, the trained contractor can stop conducting the maintenance inspections if all areas disturbed as of the project shutdown date have achieved final stabilization and all post-construction stormwater management practices required for the completed portion of the project have been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP and are operational. C. Qualified Inspector Inspection Requirements The owner or operator shall have a qualified inspector conduct site inspections in conformance with the following requirements: [Note: The trained contractor identified in Part III.A.6. and IV.B. of this permit cannot conduct the qualified inspector site inspections unless they meet the qualified inspector qualifications included in Appendix A. In order to perform these inspections, the trained contractor would have to be a: ▪ licensed Professional Engineer, ▪ Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), ▪ New York State Erosion and Sediment Control Certificate Program holder ▪ Registered Landscape Architect, or ▪ someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as, the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided they have received four (4) hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity]. 1. A qualified inspector shall conduct site inspections for all construction activities identified in Tables 1 and 2 of Appendix B, with the exception of: a. the construction of a single family residential subdivision with 25% or less impervious cover at total site build-out that involves a soil disturbance of one (1) or more acres of land but less than five (5) acres and is not located (Part IV.C.1.a) 26 in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C and not directly discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E; b. the construction of a single family home that involves a soil disturbance of one (1) or more acres of land but less than five (5) acres and is not located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C and not directly discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E; c. construction on agricultural property that involves a soil disturbance of one (1) or more acres of land but less than five (5) acres; and d. construction activities located in the watersheds identified in Appendix D that involve soil disturbances between five thousand (5,000) square feet and one (1) acre of land. 2. Unless otherwise notified by the Department, the qualified inspector shall conduct site inspections in accordance with the following timetable: a. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities are on-going, the qualified inspector shall conduct a site inspection at least once every seven (7) calendar days. b. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities are on-going and the owner or operator has received authorization in accordance with Part II.D.3 to disturb greater than five (5) acres of soil at any one time, the qualified inspector shall conduct at least two (2) site inspections every seven (7) calendar days. The two (2) inspections shall be separated by a minimum of two (2) full calendar days. c. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities have been temporarily suspended (e.g. winter shutdown) and temporary stabilization measures have been applied to all disturbed areas, the qualified inspector shall conduct a site inspection at least once every thirty (30) calendar days. The owner or operator shall notify the DOW Water (SPDES) Program contact at the Regional Office (see contact information in Appendix F) or, in areas under the jurisdiction of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4, the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 (provided the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 is not the owner or operator of the construction activity) in writing prior to reducing the frequency of inspections. (Part IV.C.2.d) 27 d. For construction sites where soil disturbance activities have been shut down with partial project completion, the qualified inspector can stop conducting inspections if all areas disturbed as of the project shutdown date have achieved final stabilization and all post-construction stormwater management practices required for the completed portion of the project have been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP and are operational. The owner or operator shall notify the DOW Water (SPDES) Program contact at the Regional Office (see contact information in Appendix F) or, in areas under the jurisdiction of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4, the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 (provided the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 is not the owner or operator of the construction activity) in writing prior to the shutdown. If soil disturbance activities are not resumed within 2 years from the date of shutdown, the owner or operator shall have the qualified inspector perform a final inspection and certify that all disturbed areas have achieved final stabilization, and all temporary, structural erosion and sediment control measures have been removed; and that all post-construction stormwater management practices have been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP by signing the “Final Stabilization” and “Post-Construction Stormwater Management Practice” certification statements on the NOT. The owner or operator shall then submit the completed NOT form to the address in Part II.B.1 of this permit. e. For construction sites that directly discharge to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E or is located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C, the qualified inspector shall conduct at least two (2) site inspections every seven (7) calendar days. The two (2) inspections shall be separated by a minimum of two (2) full calendar days. 3. At a minimum, the qualified inspector shall inspect all erosion and sediment control practices and pollution prevention measures to ensure integrity and effectiveness, all post-construction stormwater management practices under construction to ensure that they are constructed in conformance with the SWPPP, all areas of disturbance that have not achieved final stabilization, all points of discharge to natural surface waterbodies located within, or immediately adjacent to, the property boundaries of the construction site, and all points of discharge from the construction site. 4. The qualified inspector shall prepare an inspection report subsequent to each and every inspection. At a minimum, the inspection report shall includ e and/or address the following: (Part IV.C.4.a) 28 a. Date and time of inspection; b. Name and title of person(s) performing inspection; c. A description of the weather and soil conditions (e.g. dry, wet, saturated) at the time of the inspection; d. A description of the condition of the runoff at all points of discharge from the construction site. This shall include identification of any discharges of sediment from the construction site. Include discharges from conveyance systems (i.e. pipes, culverts, ditches, etc.) and overland flow; e. A description of the condition of all natural surface waterbodies located within, or immediately adjacent to, the property boundaries of the construction site which receive runoff from disturbed areas. This shall include identification of any discharges of sediment to the surface waterbody; f. Identification of all erosion and sediment control practices and pollution prevention measures that need repair or maintenance; g. Identification of all erosion and sediment control practices and pollution prevention measures that were not installed properly or are not functioning as designed and need to be reinstalled or replaced; h. Description and sketch of areas with active soil disturbance activity, areas that have been disturbed but are inactive at the time of the inspection, and areas that have been stabilized (temporary and/or final) since the last inspection; i. Current phase of construction of all post-construction stormwater management practices and identification of all construction that is not in conformance with the SWPPP and technical standards; j. Corrective action(s) that must be taken to install, repair, replace or maintain erosion and sediment control practices and pollution prevention measures; and to correct deficiencies identified with the construction of the post- construction stormwater management practice(s); k. Identification and status of all corrective actions that were required by previous inspection; and (Part IV.C.4.l) 29 l. Digital photographs, with date stamp, that clearly show the condition of all practices that have been identified as needing corrective actions. The qualified inspector shall attach paper color copies of the digital photographs to the inspection report being maintained onsite within seven (7) calendar days of the date of the inspection. The qualified inspector shall also take digital photographs, with date stamp, that clearly show the condition of the practice(s) after the corrective action has been completed. The qualified inspector shall attach paper color copies of the digital photographs to the inspection report that documents the completion of the corrective action work within seven (7) calendar days of that inspection. 5. Within one business day of the completion of an inspection, the qualified inspector shall notify the owner or operator and appropriate contractor or subcontractor identified in Part III.A.6. of this permit of any corrective actions that need to be taken. The contractor or subcontractor shall begin implementing the corrective actions within one business day of this notification and shall complete the corrective actions in a reasonable time frame. 6. All inspection reports shall be signed by the qualified inspector. Pursuant to Part II.D.2. of this permit, the inspection reports shall be maintained on site with the SWPPP. Part V. TERMINATION OF PERMIT COVERAGE A. Termination of Permit Coverage 1. An owner or operator that is eligible to terminate coverage under this permit must submit a completed NOT form to the address in Part II.B.1 of this permit. The NOT form shall be one which is associated with this permit, signed in accordance with Part VII.H of this permit. 2. An owner or operator may terminate coverage when one or more the following conditions have been met: a. Total project completion - All construction activity identified in the SWPPP has been completed; and all areas of disturbance have achieved final stabilization; and all temporary, structural erosion and sediment control measures have been removed; and all post-construction stormwater management practices have been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP and are operational; (Part V.A.2.b) 30 b. Planned shutdown with partial project completion - All soil disturbance activities have ceased; and all areas disturbed as of the project shutdown date have achieved final stabilization; and all temporary, structural erosion and sediment control measures have been removed; and all post- construction stormwater management practices required for the completed portion of the project have been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP and are operational; c. A new owner or operator has obtained coverage under this permit in accordance with Part II.F. of this permit. d. The owner or operator obtains coverage under an alternative SPDES general permit or an individual SPDES permit. 3. For construction activities meeting subdivision 2a. or 2b. of this Part, the owner or operator shall have the qualified inspector perform a final site inspection prior to submitting the NOT. The qualified inspector shall, by signing the “Final Stabilization” and “Post-Construction Stormwater Management Practice certification statements on the NOT, certify that all the requirements in Part V.A.2.a. or b. of this permit have been achieved. 4. For construction activities that are subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4 and meet subdivision 2a. or 2b. of this Part, the owner or operator shall have the regulated, traditional land use control MS4 sign the “MS4 Acceptance” statement on the NOT in accordance with the requirements in Part VII.H. of this permit. The regulated, traditional land use control MS4 official, by signing this statement, has determined that it is acceptable for the owner or operator to submit the NOT in accordance with the requirements of this Part. The regulated, traditional land use control MS4 can make this determination by performing a final site inspection themselves or by accepting the qualified inspector’s final site inspection certification(s) required in Part V.A.3. of this permit. 5. For construction activities that require post-construction stormwater management practices and meet subdivision 2a. of this Part, the owner or operator must, prior to submitting the NOT, ensure one of the following: a. the post-construction stormwater management practice(s) and any right-of- way(s) needed to maintain such practice(s) have been deeded to the municipality in which the practice(s) is located, (Part V.A.5.b) 31 b. an executed maintenance agreement is in place with the municipality that will maintain the post-construction stormwater management practice(s), c. for post-construction stormwater management practices that are privately owned, the owner or operator has a mechanism in place that requires operation and maintenance of the practice(s) in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan, such as a deed covenant in the owner or operator’s deed of record, d. for post-construction stormwater management practices that are owned by a public or private institution (e.g. school, university, hospital), government agency or authority, or public utility; the owner or operator has policy and procedures in place that ensures operation and maintenance of the practices in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan. Part VI. REPORTING AND RETENTION RECORDS A. Record Retention The owner or operator shall retain a copy of the NOI, NOI Acknowledgment Letter, SWPPP, MS4 SWPPP Acceptance form and any inspection reports that were prepared in conjunction with this permit for a period of at least five (5) years from the date that the Department receives a complete NOT sub mitted in accordance with Part V. of this general permit. B. Addresses With the exception of the NOI, NOT, and MS4 SWPPP Acceptance form (which must be submitted to the address referenced in Part II.B.1 of this permit), all written correspondence requested by the Department, including individual permit applications, shall be sent to the address of the appropriate DOW Water (SPDES) Program contact at the Regional Office listed in Appendix F. Part VII. STANDARD PERMIT CONDITIONS A. Duty to Comply The owner or operator must comply with all conditions of this permit. All contractors and subcontractors associated with the project must comply with the terms of the SWPPP. Any non-compliance with this permit constitutes a violation of the Clean Water (Part VII.A) 32 Act (CWA) and the ECL and is grounds for an enforcement action against the owner or operator and/or the contractor/subcontractor; permit revocation, suspension or modification; or denial of a permit renewal application. Upon a finding of significant non - compliance with this permit or the applicable SWPPP, the Department may order an immediate stop to all construction activity at the site until the non-compliance is remedied. The stop work order shall be in writing, shall describe the non -compliance in detail, and shall be sent to the owner or operator. If any human remains or archaeological remains are encountered during excavation, the owner or operator must immediately cease, or cause to cease, all construction activity in the area of the remains and notify the appropriate Reg ional Water Engineer (RWE). Construction activity shall not resume until written permission to do so has been received from the RWE. B. Continuation of the Expired General Permit This permit expires five (5) years from the effective date. If a new general permit is not issued prior to the expiration of this general permit, an owner or operator with coverage under this permit may continue to operate and discharge in accordance with the terms and conditions of this general permit, if it is extended pursuant to the State Administrative Procedure Act and 6 NYCRR Part 621, until a new general permit is issued. C. Enforcement Failure of the owner or operator, its contractors, subcontractors, agents and/or assigns to strictly adhere to any of the permit requirements contained herein shall constitute a violation of this permit. There are substantial criminal, civil, and administrative penalties associated with violating the provisions of this permit. Fines of up to $37,500 per day for each violation and imprisonment for up to fifteen (15) years may be assessed depending upon the nature and degree of the offense. D. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity Not a Defense It shall not be a defense for an owner or operator in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the construction activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. (Part VII.E) 33 E. Duty to Mitigate The owner or operator and its contractors and subcontractors shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. F. Duty to Provide Information The owner or operator shall furnish to the Department, within a reasonable specified time period of a written request, all documentation necessary to demonstrate eligibility and any information to determine compliance with this permit or to determine whether cause exists for modifying or revoking this permit, or suspending or denying coverage under this permit, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit. The NOI, SWPPP and inspection reports required by this permit are public documents that the owner or operator must make available for review and copying by any person within five (5) business days of the owner or operator receiving a written request by any such person to review these documents. Copying of documents will be done at the requester’s expense. G. Other Information When the owner or operator becomes aware that they failed to submit any relevant facts, or submitted incorrect information in the NOI or in any of the documents required by this permit , or have made substantive revisions to the SWPPP (e.g. th e scope of the project changes significantly, the type of post-construction stormwater management practice(s) changes, there is a reduction in the sizing of the post-construction stormwater management practice, or there is an increase in the disturbance ar ea or impervious area), which were not reflected in the original NOI submitted to the Department, they shall promptly submit such facts or information to the Department using the contact information in Part II.A. of this permit. Failure of the owner or operator to correct or supplement any relevant facts within five (5) business days of becoming aware of the deficiency shall constitute a violation of this permit. H. Signatory Requirements 1. All NOIs and NOTs shall be signed as follows: a. For a corporation these forms shall be signed by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this section, a responsible corporate officer means: (Part VII.H.1.a) 34 (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation; or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production or operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures; b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship these forms shall be signed by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or c. For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency these forms shall be signed by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency includes: (i) the chief executive officer of the agency, or (ii) a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g., Regional Administrators of EPA). 2. The SWPPP and other information requested by the Department shall be signed by a person described in Part VII.H.1. of this permit or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described in Part VII.H.1. of this permit; b. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, (Part VII.H.2.b) 35 superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position) and, c. The written authorization shall include the name, title and signature of the authorized representative and be attached to the SWPPP. 3. All inspection reports shall be signed by the qualified inspector that performs the inspection. 4. The MS4 SWPPP Acceptance form shall be signed by the principal executive officer or ranking elected official from the regulated, traditional land use control MS4, or by a duly authorized representative of that person. It shall constitute a permit violation if an incorrect and/or improper signatory authorizes any required forms, SWPPP and/or inspection reports. I. Property Rights The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, nor any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property nor any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of Federal, State or local laws or reg ulations. Owners or operators must obtain any applicable conveyances, easements, licenses and/or access to real property prior to commencing construction activity. J. Severability The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit shall not be affected thereby. K. Requirement to Obtain Coverage Under an Alternative Permit 1. The Department may require any owner or operator authorized by this permit to apply for and/or obtain either an individual SPDES permit or another SPDES general permit. When the Department requires any discharger authorized by a general permit to apply for an individual SPDES permit, it shall notify the discharger in writing that a permit application is required. This notice shall (Part VII.K.1) 36 include a brief statement of the reasons for this decision, an application form, a statement setting a time frame for the owner or operator to file the application for an individual SPDES permit, and a deadline, not sooner than 180 days from owner or operator receipt of the notification letter, whereby the authorization to discharge under this general permit shall be terminated. Applications must be submitted to the appropriate Permit Administrator at the Regional Office. The Department may grant additional time upon demonstration, to the satisfaction of the Department, that additional time to apply for an alternative authorization is necessary or where the Department has not provided a permit determination in accordance with Part 621 of this Title. 2. When an individual SPDES permit is issued to a discharger authorized to discharge under a general SPDES permit for the same discharge(s), the general permit authorization for outfalls authorized under the individual SPDES permit is automatically terminated on the effective date of the individual permit unless termination is earlier in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 750. L. Proper Operation and Maintenance The owner or operator shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the owner or operator to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit and with the requirements of the SW PPP. M. Inspection and Entry The owner or operator shall allow an authorized representative of the Department, EPA, applicable county health department, or, in the case of a construction site which discharges through an MS4, an authorized representative of the MS4 receiving the discharge, upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: 1. Enter upon the owner’s or operator's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted or where records must be k ept under the conditions of this permit; 2. Have access to and copy at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; and (Part VII.M.3) 37 3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities or equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices or operations regulated or required by this permit. 4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Act or ECL, any substances or parameters at any location. N. Permit Actions This permit may, at any time, be modified, suspended, revoked, or renewed by the Department in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 621. The filing of a request by the owner or operator for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, termination, a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not limit, diminish and/or stay compliance with any terms of this permit. O. Definitions Definitions of key terms are included in Appendix A of this permit. P. Re-Opener Clause 1. If there is evidence indicating potential or realized impacts on water quality due to any stormwater discharge associated with construction activity covered by this permit, the owner or operator of such discharge may be required to obtain an individual permit or alternative general permit in accordance with Part VII.K. of this permit or the permit may be modified to include different limitations and/or requirements. 2. Any Department initiated permit modification, suspension or revocation will be conducted in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 621, 6 NYCRR 750 -1.18, and 6 NYCRR 750-1.20. Q. Penalties for Falsification of Forms and Reports In accordance with 6NYCRR Part 750-2.4 and 750-2.5, any person who knowingly makes any false material statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report or other document filed or required to be maintained under this permit, including reports of compliance or noncompliance shall, upon conviction, be punished in accordance with ECL §71-1933 and or Articles 175 and 210 of the New York State Penal Law. (Part VII.R) 38 R. Other Permits Nothing in this permit relieves the owner or operator from a requirement to obtain any other permits required by law. 39 APPENDIX A – Acronyms and Definitions Acronyms APO – Agency Preservation Officer BMP – Best Management Practice CPESC – Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control Cpv – Channel Protection Volume CWA – Clean Water Act (or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq) DOW – Division of Water EAF – Environmental Assessment Form ECL - Environmental Conservation Law EPA – U. S. Environmental Protection Agency HSG – Hydrologic Soil Group MS4 – Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System NOI – Notice of Intent NOT – Notice of Termination NPDES – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System OPRHP – Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Places Qf – Extreme Flood Qp – Overbank Flood RRv – Runoff Reduction Volume RWE – Regional Water Engineer SEQR – State Environmental Quality Review SEQRA - State Environmental Quality Review Act SHPA – State Historic Preservation Act SPDES – State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System SWPPP – Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan TMDL – Total Maximum Daily Load UPA – Uniform Procedures Act USDA – United States Department of Agriculture WQv – Water Quality Volume Appendix A 40 Definitions All definitions in this section are solely for the purposes of this permit. Agricultural Building – a structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay, grain, poultry, livestock or other horticultural products; excluding any structure designed, constructed or used, in whole or in part, for human habitation, as a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated or packaged, or as a place used by the public. Agricultural Property –means the land for construction of a barn, agricultural building, silo, stockyard, pen or other structural practices identified in Table II in the “Agricultural Management Practices Catalog for Nonpoint Source Pollution in New York State” prepared by the Department in cooperation with agencies of New York Nonpoint Source Coordinating Committee (dated June 2007). Alter Hydrology from Pre to Post-Development Conditions - means the post- development peak flow rate(s) has increased by more than 5% of the pre-developed condition for the design storm of interest (e.g. 10 yr and 100 yr). Combined Sewer - means a sewer that is designed to collect and convey both “sewage” and “stormwater”. Commence (Commencement of) Construction Activities - means the initial disturbance of soils associated with clearing, grading or excavation activit ies; or other construction related activities that disturb or expose soils such as demolition, stockpiling of fill material, and the initial installation of erosion and sediment control practices required in the SWPPP. See definition for “Construction Activity(ies)” also. Construction Activity(ies) - means any clearing, grading, excavation, filling, demolition or stockpiling activities that result in soil disturbance. Clearing activities can include, but are not limited to, logging equipment operation, the cutting and skidding of trees, stump removal and/or brush root removal. Construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of a facility. Construction Site – means the land area where construction activity(ies) will occur. See definition for “Commence (Commencement of) Construction Activities” and “Larger Common Plan of Development or Sale” also. Dewatering – means the act of draining rainwater and/or groundwater from building foundations, vaults or excavations/trenches. Direct Discharge (to a specific surface waterbody) - means that runoff flows from a construction site by overland flow and the first point of discharge is the specific surface waterbody, or runoff flows from a construction site to a separate storm sewer system Appendix A 41 and the first point of discharge from the separate storm sewer system is the specific surface waterbody. Discharge(s) - means any addition of any pollutant to waters of the State through an outlet or point source. Embankment –means an earthen or rock slope that supports a road/highway. Endangered or Threatened Species – see 6 NYCRR Part 182 of the Department’s rules and regulations for definition of terms and requirements. Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) - means chapter 43-B of the Consolidated Laws of the State of New York, entitled the Environmental Conservation Law. Equivalent (Equivalence) – means that the practice or measure meets all the performance, longevity, maintenance, and safety objectives of the technical standard and will provide an equal or greater degree of water quality protection. Final Stabilization - means that all soil disturbance activities have ceased and a uniform, perennial vegetative cover with a density of eighty (80) percent over the entire pervious surface has been established; or other equivalent stabilization measures, such as permanent landscape mulches, rock rip-rap or washed/crushed stone have been applied on all disturbed areas that are not covered by permanent structures, concrete or pavement. General SPDES permit - means a SPDES permit issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 750-1.21 and Section 70-0117 of the ECL authorizing a category of discharges. Groundwater(s) - means waters in the saturated zone. The saturated zone is a subsurface zone in which all the interstices are filled with water under pressure greater than that of the atmosphere. Although the zone may contain gas-filled interstices or interstices filled with fluids other than water, it is still considered saturated. Historic Property – means any building, structure, site, object or district that is listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places or is determined to be eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places. Impervious Area (Cover) - means all impermeable surfaces that cannot effectively infiltrate rainfall. This includes paved, concrete and gravel surfaces (i.e. parking lots, driveways, roads, runways and sidewalks); building rooftops and miscellaneous impermeable structures such as patios, pools, and sheds. Infeasible – means not technologically possible, or not economically practicable and achievable in light of best industry practices. Appendix A 42 Larger Common Plan of Development or Sale - means a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct construction activities are occurring, or will occur, under one plan. The term “plan” in “larger common plan of development or sale” is broadly defined as any announcement or piece of documentation (including a sign, public notice or hearing, marketing plan, advertisement, drawing, permit application, State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) environmental assessment form or other documents, zoning request, computer design, etc.) or physical demarcation (including boundary signs, lot stakes, surveyor markings, etc.) indicating that construction activities may occur on a specific plot. For discrete construction projects that are located within a larger common plan of development or sale that are at least 1/4 mile apart, each project can be treated as a separate plan of development or sale provided any interconnecting road, pipeline or utility project that is part of the same “common plan” is not concurrently being disturbed. Minimize – means reduce and/or eliminate to the extent achievable using control measures (including best management practices) that are technologically available and economically practicable and achievable in light of best industry practices. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) - a conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains): (i) Owned or operated by a State, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public body (created by or pursuant to State law) having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, stormwater, or other wastes, including special districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian tribal organization, or a designated and approved management agency under section 208 of the CWA that discharges to surface waters of the State; (ii) Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater; (iii) Which is not a combined sewer; and (iv) Which is not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) as defined at 40 CFR 122.2. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) - means the national system for the issuance of wastewater and stormwater permits under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act). Natural Buffer –means an undisturbed area with natural cover running along a surface water (e.g. wetland, stream, river, lake, etc.). New Development – means any land disturbance that does not meet the definition of Redevelopment Activity included in this appendix. Appendix A 43 New York State Erosion and Sediment Control Certificate Program – a certificate program that establishes and maintains a process to identify and recognize individuals who are capable of developing, designing, inspecting and maintaining erosion and sediment control plans on projects that disturb soils in New York State. The certificate program is administered by the New York State Conservation District Employees Association. NOI Acknowledgment Letter - means the letter that the Department sends to an owner or operator to acknowledge the Department’s receipt and acceptance of a complete Notice of Intent. This letter documents the owner’s or operator’s authorization to discharge in accordance with the general permit for stormwater discharges from construction activity. Nonpoint Source - means any source of water pollution or pollutants which is not a discrete conveyance or point source permitted pursuant to Title 7 or 8 of Article 17 of the Environmental Conservation Law (see ECL Section 17-1403). Overbank –means flow events that exceed the capacity of the stream channel and spill out into the adjacent floodplain. Owner or Operator - means the person, persons or legal entity which owns or leases the property on which the construction activity is occurring; an entity that has operational control over the construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make modifications to the plans and specifications; and/or an entity that has day-to-day operational control of those activities at a project that are necessary to ensure compliance with the permit conditions. Performance Criteria – means the design criteria listed under the “Required Elements” sections in Chapters 5, 6 and 10 of the technical standard, New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, dated January 2015. It does not include the Sizing Criteria (i.e. WQv, RRv, Cpv, Qp and Qf ) in Part I.C.2. of the permit. Point Source - means any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, vessel or other floating craft, or landfill leachate collection system from which pollutants are or may be discharged. Pollutant - means dredged spoil, filter backwash, solid waste, incinerator residue, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, radioactive materials, heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand and industrial, municipal, agricultural waste and ballast discharged into water; which may cause or might reasonably be expected to cause pollution of the waters of the state in contravention of the standards or guidance values adopted as provided in 6 NYCRR Parts 700 et seq . Appendix A 44 Qualified Inspector - means a person that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control, such as a licensed Professional Engineer, Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), Registered Landscape Architect, New York State Erosion and Sediment Control Certificate Program holder or other Department endorsed individual(s). It can also mean someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as, the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided that person has training in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control. Training in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control means that the individual working under the direct supervision of the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect has received four (4) hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department en dorsed entity. After receiving the initial training, the individual working under the direct supervision of the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect shall receive four (4) hours of training every three (3) years. It can also mean a person that meets the Qualified Professional qualifications in addition to the Qualified Inspector qualifications. Note: Inspections of any post-construction stormwater management practices that include structural components, such as a dam for an impoundment, shall be performed by a licensed Professional Engineer. Qualified Professional - means a person that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of stormwater management and treatment, such as a licensed Professional Engineer, Registered Landscape Architect or other Department endorsed individual(s). Individuals preparing SWPPPs that require the post-construction stormwater management practice component must have an understanding of the principles of hydrology, water quality management practice design, water quantity control design, and, in many cases, the principles of hydraulics. All components of the SWPPP that involve the practice of engineering, as defined by the NYS Education Law (see Article 145), shall be prepared by, or under the direct supervision of, a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of New York. Redevelopment Activity(ies) – means the disturbance and reconstruction of existing impervious area, including impervious areas that were removed from a project site within five (5) years of preliminary project plan submission to the local government (i.e. site plan, subdivision, etc.). Regulated, Traditional Land Use Control MS4 - means a city, town or village with land use control authority that is authorized to discharge under New York State DEC’s Appendix A 45 SPDES General Permit For Stormwater Discharges from Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer Systems (MS4s) or the City of New York’s Individual SPDES Permit for their Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (NY-0287890). Routine Maintenance Activity - means construction activity that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of a facility, including, but not limited to: ▪ Re-grading of gravel roads or parking lots, ▪ Cleaning and shaping of existing roadside ditches and culverts that maintains the approximate original line and grade, and hydraulic capacity of the ditch, ▪ Cleaning and shaping of existing roadside ditches that does not maintain the approximate original grade, hydraulic capacity and purpose of the ditch if the changes to the line and grade, hydraulic capacity or purpose of the ditch are installed to improve water quality and quantity controls (e.g. installing grass lined ditch), ▪ Placement of aggregate shoulder backing that stabilizes the transition between the road shoulder and the ditch or embankment, ▪ Full depth milling and filling of existing asphalt pavements, replacement of concrete pavement slabs, and similar work that does not expose soil or disturb the bottom six (6) inches of subbase material, ▪ Long-term use of equipment storage areas at or near highway maintenance facilities, ▪ Removal of sediment from the edge of the highway to restore a previously existing sheet-flow drainage connection from the highway surface to the highway ditch or embankment, ▪ Existing use of Canal Corp owned upland disposal sites for the canal, and ▪ Replacement of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and guide rail posts. Site limitations – means site conditions that prevent the use of an infiltration technique and or infiltration of the total WQv. Typical site limitations include: seasonal high groundwater, shallow depth to bedrock, and soils with an infiltration rate less than 0.5 inches/hour. The existence of site limitations shall be confirmed and documented using actual field testing (i.e. test pits, soil borings, and infiltration test) or using information from the most current United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey for the County where the project is located. Sizing Criteria – means the criteria included in Part I.C.2 of the permit that are used to size post-construction stormwater management control practices. The criteria include; Water Quality Volume (WQv), Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv), Channel Protection Volume (Cpv), Overbank Flood (Qp), and Extreme Flood (Qf). State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) - means the system established pursuant to Article 17 of the ECL and 6 NYCRR Part 750 for issuance of permits authorizing discharges to the waters of the state. Appendix A 46 Steep Slope – means land area designated on the current United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) Soil Survey as Soil Slope Phase “D”, (provided the map unit name is inclusive of slopes greater than 25%) , or Soil Slope Phase E or F, (regardless of the map unit name), or a combination of the three designations. Streambank – as used in this permit, means the terrain alongside the bed of a creek or stream. The bank consists of the sides of the channel, between which the flow is confined. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) – means a project specific report, including construction drawings, that among other things: describes the construction activity(ies), identifies the potential sources of pollution at the construction site; describes and shows the stormwater controls that will be used to control the pollutants (i.e. erosion and sediment controls; for many projects, includes post-construction stormwater management controls); and identifies procedures the owner or operator will implement to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit. See Part III of the permit for a complete description of the information that must be included in the SWPPP. Surface Waters of the State - shall be construed to include lakes, bays, sounds, ponds, impounding reservoirs, springs, rivers, streams, creeks, estuaries, marshes, inlets, canals, the Atlantic ocean within the territorial seas of the state of New York and all other bodies of surface water, natural or artificial, inland or coastal, fresh or salt, public or private (except those private waters that do not combine or effect a junction with natural surface waters), which are wholly or partially within or bordering the state or within its jurisdiction. Waters of the state are further defined in 6 NYCRR Parts 800 to 941. Temporarily Ceased – means that an existing disturbed area will not be disturbed again within 14 calendar days of the previous soil disturbance. Temporary Stabilization - means that exposed soil has been covered with material(s) as set forth in the technical standard, New York Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, to prevent the exposed soil from eroding. The materials can include, but are not limited to, mulch, seed and mulch, and erosion control mats (e.g. jute twisted yarn, excelsior wood fiber mats). Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) - A TMDL is the sum of the allowable loads of a single pollutant from all contributing point and nonpoint sources. It is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive on a daily basis and still meet water quality standards, and an allocation of that amount to the pollutant's sources. A TMDL stipulates wasteload allocations (WLAs) for point source discharges, load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources, and a margin of safety (MOS). Trained Contractor - means an employee from the contracting (construction) company, identified in Part III.A.6., that has received four (4) hours of Department endorsed Appendix A 47 training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity. After receiving the initial training, the trained contractor shall receive four (4) hours of training every three (3) years. It can also mean an employee from the contracting (construction) company, identified in Part III.A.6., that meets the qualified inspector qualifications (e.g. licensed Professional Engineer, Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), Registered Landscape Architect, New York State Erosion and Sediment Control Certificate Program holder, or someone working under the direct supervision of, and at the same company as, the licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Landscape Architect, provided they have received four (4) hours of Department endorsed training in proper erosion and sediment control principles from a Soil and Water Conservation District, or other Department endorsed entity). The trained contractor is responsible for the day to day implementation of the SWPPP. Uniform Procedures Act (UPA) Permit - means a permit required under 6 NYCRR Part 621 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL), Article 70. Water Quality Standard - means such measures of purity or quality for any waters in relation to their reasonable and necessary use as promulgated in 6 NYCRR Part 700 et seq. 48 APPENDIX B – Required SWPPP Components by Project Type Table 1 Construction Activities that Require the Preparation of a SWPPP That Only Includes Erosion and Sediment Controls The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres of land, but less than five (5) acres: • Single family home not located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C or not directly discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E • Single family residential subdivisions with 25% or less impervious cover at total site build-out and not located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C and not directly discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E • Construction of a barn or other agricultural building, silo, stock yard or pen. The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances between five thousand (5000) square feet and one (1) acre of land: All construction activities located in the watersheds identified in Appendix D that involve soil disturbances between five thousand (5,000) square feet and one (1) acre of land. The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres of land: • Installation of underground, linear utilities; such as gas lines, fiber -optic cable, cable TV, electric, telephone, sewer mains, and water mains • Environmental enhancement projects, such as wetland mitigation projects, stormwater retrofits and stream restoration projects • Pond construction • Linear bike paths running through areas with vegetative cover, including bike paths surfaced with an impervious cover • Cross-country ski trails and walking/hiking trails • Sidewalk, bike path or walking path projects, surfaced with an impervious cover, that are not part of residential, commercial or institutional development; • Sidewalk, bike path or walking path projects, surfaced with an impervious cover, that include incidental shoulder or curb work along an existing highway to support construction of the sidewalk, bike path or walking path. • Slope stabilization projects • Slope flattening that changes the grade of the site, but does not significantly change the runoff characteristics Appendix B 49 Table 1 (Continued) CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT REQUIRE THE PREPARATION OF A SWPPP THAT ONLY INCLUDES EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres of land: • Spoil areas that will be covered with vegetation • Vegetated open space projects (i.e. recreational parks, lawns, meadows, fields, downhill ski trails) excluding projects that alter hydrology from pre to post development conditions, • Athletic fields (natural grass) that do not include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area and do not alter hydrology from pre to post development conditions • Demolition project where vegetation will be established, and no redevelopment is planned • Overhead electric transmission line project that does not include the construction of permanent access roads or parking areas surfaced with impervious cover • Structural practices as identified in Table II in the “Agricultural Management Practices Catalog f or Nonpoint Source Pollution in New York State”, excluding projects that involve soil disturbances of greater than five acres and construction activities that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area • Temporary access roads, median crossovers, detour roads, lanes, or other temporary impervious areas that will be restored to pre-construction conditions once the construction activit y is complete Appendix B 50 Table 2 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT REQUIRE THE PREPARATION OF A SWPPP THAT INCLUDES POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres of land: • Single family home located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C or directly discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E • Single family home that disturbs five (5) or more acres of land • Single family residential subdivisions located in one of the watersheds listed in Appendix C or directly discharging to one of the 303(d) segments listed in Appendix E • Single family residential subdivisions that involve soil disturbances of between one (1) and five (5) acres of land with greater than 25% impervious cover at total site build-out • Single family residential subdivisions that involve soil disturbances of five (5) or more acres of land, and single family residential subdivisions that involve soil disturbances of less than five (5) acres that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb five or more acres of land • Multi-family residential developments; includes duplexes, townhomes, condominiums, senior housing complexes, apartment complexes, and mobile home parks • Airports • Amusement parks • Breweries, cideries, and wineries, including establishments constructed on agricultural land • Campgrounds • Cemeteries that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area (>5% of disturbed area) or alter the hydrology from pre to post development conditions • Commercial developments • Churches and other places of worship • Construction of a barn or other agricultural building (e.g. silo) and structural practices as identified in Table II in the “Agricultural Management Practices Catalog for Nonpoint Source Pollution in New York State” that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area, excluding projects that involve soil disturbances of less than five acres. • Golf courses • Institutional development; includes hospitals, prisons, schools and colleges • Industrial facilities; includes industrial parks • Landfills • Municipal facilities; includes highway garages, transfer stations, office buildings, POTW’s, water treatment plants, and water storage tanks • Office complexes • Playgrounds that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area • Sports complexes • Racetracks; includes racetracks with earthen (dirt) surface • Road construction or reconstruction, including roads constructed as part of the construction activities listed in Table 1 Appendix B 51 Table 2 (Continued) CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THAT REQUIRE THE PREPARATION OF A SWPPP THAT INCLUDES POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES The following construction activities that involve soil disturbances of one (1) or more acres of land: • Parking lot construction or reconstruction, including parking lots constructed as part of the construction activities listed in Table 1 • Athletic fields (natural grass) that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area (>5% of disturbed area) or alter the hydrology from pre to post development conditions • Athletic fields with artificial turf • Permanent access roads, parking areas, substations, compressor stations and well drilling pads, surfaced with impervious cover, and constructed as part of an over-head electric transmission line project, wind-power project, cell tower project, oil or gas well drilling project, sewer or water main project or other linear utility project • Sidewalk, bike path or walking path projects, surfaced with an impervious cover, that are part of a residential, commercial or institutional development • Sidewalk, bike path or walking path projects, surfaced with an impervious cover, that are part of a highway construction or reconstruction project • All other construction activities that include the construction or reconstruction of impervious area or alter the hydrology from pre to post development conditions, and are not listed in Table 1 52 APPENDIX C – Watersheds Requiring Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Watersheds where owners or operators of construction activities identified in Table 2 of Appendix B must prepare a SWPPP that includes post-construction stormwater management practices designed in conformance with the Enhanced Phosphorus Removal Standards included in the technical standard, New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (“Design Manual”). • Entire New York City Watershed located east of the Hudson River - Figure 1 • Onondaga Lake Watershed - Figure 2 • Greenwood Lake Watershed -Figure 3 • Oscawana Lake Watershed – Figure 4 • Kinderhook Lake Watershed – Figure 5 Appendix C 53 Figure 1 - New York City Watershed East of the Hudson Appendix C 54 Figure 2 - Onondaga Lake Watershed Appendix C 55 Figure 3 - Greenwood Lake Watershed Appendix C 56 Figure 4 - Oscawana Lake Watershed Appendix C 57 Figure 5 - Kinderhook Lake Watershed 58 APPENDIX D – Watersheds with Lower Disturbance Threshold Watersheds where owners or operators of construction activities that involve soil disturbances between five thousand (5000) square feet and one (1) acre of land must obtain coverage under this permit. Entire New York City Watershed that is located east of the Hudson River - See Figure 1 in Appendix C 59 APPENDIX E – 303(d) Segments Impaired by Construction Related Pollutant(s) List of 303(d) segments impaired by pollutants related to construction activity (e.g. silt, sediment or nutrients). The list was developed using ”The Final New York State 2016 Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters Requiring a TMDL/Other Strategy” dated November 2016. Owners or operators of single family home and single family residential subdivisions with 25% or less total impervious cover at total site build-out that involve soil disturbances of one or more acres of land, but less than 5 acres, and directly discharge to one of the listed segments below shall prepare a SWPPP that includes post-construction stormwater management practices designed in conformance with the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual (“Design Manual”), dated January 2015. COUNTY WATERBODY POLLUTANT Albany Ann Lee (Shakers) Pond, Stump Pond Nutrients Albany Basic Creek Reservoir Nutrients Allegany Amity Lake, Saunders Pond Nutrients Bronx Long Island Sound, Bronx Nutrients Bronx Van Cortlandt Lake Nutrients Broome Fly Pond, Deer Lake, Sky Lake Nutrients Broome Minor Tribs to Lower Susquehanna (north) Nutrients Broome Whitney Point Lake/Reservoir Nutrients Cattaraugus Allegheny River/Reservoir Nutrients Cattaraugus Beaver (Alma) Lake Nutrients Cattaraugus Case Lake Nutrients Cattaraugus Linlyco/Club Pond Nutrients Cayuga Duck Lake Nutrients Cayuga Little Sodus Bay Nutrients Chautauqua Bear Lake Nutrients Chautauqua Chadakoin River and tribs Nutrients Chautauqua Chautauqua Lake, North Nutrients Chautauqua Chautauqua Lake, South Nutrients Chautauqua Findley Lake Nutrients Chautauqua Hulburt/Clymer Pond Nutrients Clinton Great Chazy River, Lower, Main Stem Silt/Sediment Clinton Lake Champlain, Main Lake, Middle Nutrients Clinton Lake Champlain, Main Lake, North Nutrients Columbia Kinderhook Lake Nutrients Columbia Robinson Pond Nutrients Cortland Dean Pond Nutrients 303(d) Segments Impaired by Construction Related Pollutant(s) 60 Dutchess Fall Kill and tribs Nutrients Dutchess Hillside Lake Nutrients Dutchess Wappingers Lake Nutrients Dutchess Wappingers Lake Silt/Sediment Erie Beeman Creek and tribs Nutrients Erie Ellicott Creek, Lower, and tribs Silt/Sediment Erie Ellicott Creek, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Erie Green Lake Nutrients Erie Little Sister Creek, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Erie Murder Creek, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Erie Rush Creek and tribs Nutrients Erie Scajaquada Creek, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Erie Scajaquada Creek, Middle, and tribs Nutrients Erie Scajaquada Creek, Upper, and tribs Nutrients Erie South Branch Smoke Cr, Lower, and tribs Silt/Sediment Erie South Branch Smoke Cr, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Essex Lake Champlain, Main Lake, South Nutrients Essex Lake Champlain, South Lake Nutrients Essex Willsboro Bay Nutrients Genesee Bigelow Creek and tribs Nutrients Genesee Black Creek, Middle, and minor tribs Nutrients Genesee Black Creek, Upper, and minor tribs Nutrients Genesee Bowen Brook and tribs Nutrients Genesee LeRoy Reservoir Nutrients Genesee Oak Orchard Cr, Upper, and tribs Nutrients Genesee Tonawanda Creek, Middle, Main Stem Nutrients Greene Schoharie Reservoir Silt/Sediment Greene Sleepy Hollow Lake Silt/Sediment Herkimer Steele Creek tribs Silt/Sediment Herkimer Steele Creek tribs Nutrients Jefferson Moon Lake Nutrients Kings Hendrix Creek Nutrients Kings Prospect Park Lake Nutrients Lewis Mill Creek/South Branch, and tribs Nutrients Livingston Christie Creek and tribs Nutrients Livingston Conesus Lake Nutrients Livingston Mill Creek and minor tribs Silt/Sediment Monroe Black Creek, Lower, and minor tribs Nutrients Monroe Buck Pond Nutrients Monroe Cranberry Pond Nutrients 303(d) Segments Impaired by Construction Related Pollutant(s) 61 Monroe Lake Ontario Shoreline, Western Nutrients Monroe Long Pond Nutrients Monroe Mill Creek and tribs Nutrients Monroe Mill Creek/Blue Pond Outlet and tribs Nutrients Monroe Minor Tribs to Irondequoit Bay Nutrients Monroe Rochester Embayment - East Nutrients Monroe Rochester Embayment - West Nutrients Monroe Shipbuilders Creek and tribs Nutrients Monroe Thomas Creek/White Brook and tribs Nutrients Nassau Beaver Lake Nutrients Nassau Camaans Pond Nutrients Nassau East Meadow Brook, Upper, and tribs Silt/Sediment Nassau East Rockaway Channel Nutrients Nassau Grant Park Pond Nutrients Nassau Hempstead Bay Nutrients Nassau Hempstead Lake Nutrients Nassau Hewlett Bay Nutrients Nassau Hog Island Channel Nutrients Nassau Long Island Sound, Nassau County Waters Nutrients Nassau Massapequa Creek and tribs Nutrients Nassau Milburn/Parsonage Creeks, Upp, and tribs Nutrients Nassau Reynolds Channel, west Nutrients Nassau Tidal Tribs to Hempstead Bay Nutrients Nassau Tribs (fresh) to East Bay Nutrients Nassau Tribs (fresh) to East Bay Silt/Sediment Nassau Tribs to Smith/Halls Ponds Nutrients Nassau Woodmere Channel Nutrients New York Harlem Meer Nutrients New York The Lake in Central Park Nutrients Niagara Bergholtz Creek and tribs Nutrients Niagara Hyde Park Lake Nutrients Niagara Lake Ontario Shoreline, Western Nutrients Niagara Lake Ontario Shoreline, Western Nutrients Oneida Ballou, Nail Creeks and tribs Nutrients Onondaga Harbor Brook, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Onondaga Ley Creek and tribs Nutrients Onondaga Minor Tribs to Onondaga Lake Nutrients Onondaga Ninemile Creek, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Onondaga Onondaga Creek, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Onondaga Onondaga Creek, Middle, and tribs Nutrients 303(d) Segments Impaired by Construction Related Pollutant(s) 62 Onondaga Onondaga Lake, northern end Nutrients Onondaga Onondaga Lake, southern end Nutrients Ontario Great Brook and minor tribs Silt/Sediment Ontario Great Brook and minor tribs Nutrients Ontario Hemlock Lake Outlet and minor tribs Nutrients Ontario Honeoye Lake Nutrients Orange Greenwood Lake Nutrients Orange Monhagen Brook and tribs Nutrients Orange Orange Lake Nutrients Orleans Lake Ontario Shoreline, Western Nutrients Orleans Lake Ontario Shoreline, Western Nutrients Oswego Lake Neatahwanta Nutrients Oswego Pleasant Lake Nutrients Putnam Bog Brook Reservoir Nutrients Putnam Boyd Corners Reservoir Nutrients Putnam Croton Falls Reservoir Nutrients Putnam Diverting Reservoir Nutrients Putnam East Branch Reservoir Nutrients Putnam Lake Carmel Nutrients Putnam Middle Branch Reservoir Nutrients Putnam Oscawana Lake Nutrients Putnam Palmer Lake Nutrients Putnam West Branch Reservoir Nutrients Queens Bergen Basin Nutrients Queens Flushing Creek/Bay Nutrients Queens Jamaica Bay, Eastern, and tribs (Queens) Nutrients Queens Kissena Lake Nutrients Queens Meadow Lake Nutrients Queens Willow Lake Nutrients Rensselaer Nassau Lake Nutrients Rensselaer Snyders Lake Nutrients Richmond Grasmere Lake/Bradys Pond Nutrients Rockland Congers Lake, Swartout Lake Nutrients Rockland Rockland Lake Nutrients Saratoga Ballston Lake Nutrients Saratoga Dwaas Kill and tribs Silt/Sediment Saratoga Dwaas Kill and tribs Nutrients Saratoga Lake Lonely Nutrients Saratoga Round Lake Nutrients Saratoga Tribs to Lake Lonely Nutrients 303(d) Segments Impaired by Construction Related Pollutant(s) 63 Schenectady Collins Lake Nutrients Schenectady Duane Lake Nutrients Schenectady Mariaville Lake Nutrients Schoharie Engleville Pond Nutrients Schoharie Summit Lake Nutrients Seneca Reeder Creek and tribs Nutrients St.Lawrence Black Lake Outlet/Black Lake Nutrients St.Lawrence Fish Creek and minor tribs Nutrients Steuben Smith Pond Nutrients Suffolk Agawam Lake Nutrients Suffolk Big/Little Fresh Ponds Nutrients Suffolk Canaan Lake Silt/Sediment Suffolk Canaan Lake Nutrients Suffolk Flanders Bay, West/Lower Sawmill Creek Nutrients Suffolk Fresh Pond Nutrients Suffolk Great South Bay, East Nutrients Suffolk Great South Bay, Middle Nutrients Suffolk Great South Bay, West Nutrients Suffolk Lake Ronkonkoma Nutrients Suffolk Long Island Sound, Suffolk County, West Nutrients Suffolk Mattituck (Marratooka) Pond Nutrients Suffolk Meetinghouse/Terrys Creeks and tribs Nutrients Suffolk Mill and Seven Ponds Nutrients Suffolk Millers Pond Nutrients Suffolk Moriches Bay, East Nutrients Suffolk Moriches Bay, West Nutrients Suffolk Peconic River, Lower, and tidal tribs Nutrients Suffolk Quantuck Bay Nutrients Suffolk Shinnecock Bay and Inlet Nutrients Suffolk Tidal tribs to West Moriches Bay Nutrients Sullivan Bodine, Montgomery Lakes Nutrients Sullivan Davies Lake Nutrients Sullivan Evens Lake Nutrients Sullivan Pleasure Lake Nutrients Tompkins Cayuga Lake, Southern End Nutrients Tompkins Cayuga Lake, Southern End Silt/Sediment Tompkins Owasco Inlet, Upper, and tribs Nutrients Ulster Ashokan Reservoir Silt/Sediment Ulster Esopus Creek, Upper, and minor tribs Silt/Sediment Warren Hague Brook and tribs Silt/Sediment 303(d) Segments Impaired by Construction Related Pollutant(s) 64 Warren Huddle/Finkle Brooks and tribs Silt/Sediment Warren Indian Brook and tribs Silt/Sediment Warren Lake George Silt/Sediment Warren Tribs to L.George, Village of L George Silt/Sediment Washington Cossayuna Lake Nutrients Washington Lake Champlain, South Bay Nutrients Washington Tribs to L.George, East Shore Silt/Sediment Washington Wood Cr/Champlain Canal and minor tribs Nutrients Wayne Port Bay Nutrients Westchester Amawalk Reservoir Nutrients Westchester Blind Brook, Upper, and tribs Silt/Sediment Westchester Cross River Reservoir Nutrients Westchester Lake Katonah Nutrients Westchester Lake Lincolndale Nutrients Westchester Lake Meahagh Nutrients Westchester Lake Mohegan Nutrients Westchester Lake Shenorock Nutrients Westchester Long Island Sound, Westchester (East) Nutrients Westchester Mamaroneck River, Lower Silt/Sediment Westchester Mamaroneck River, Upper, and minor tribs Silt/Sediment Westchester Muscoot/Upper New Croton Reservoir Nutrients Westchester New Croton Reservoir Nutrients Westchester Peach Lake Nutrients Westchester Reservoir No.1 (Lake Isle) Nutrients Westchester Saw Mill River, Lower, and tribs Nutrients Westchester Saw Mill River, Middle, and tribs Nutrients Westchester Sheldrake River and tribs Silt/Sediment Westchester Sheldrake River and tribs Nutrients Westchester Silver Lake Nutrients Westchester Teatown Lake Nutrients Westchester Titicus Reservoir Nutrients Westchester Truesdale Lake Nutrients Westchester Wallace Pond Nutrients Wyoming Java Lake Nutrients Wyoming Silver Lake Nutrients 65 APPENDIX F – List of NYS DEC Regional Offices Region COVERING THE FOLLOWING COUNTIES: DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS (DEP) PERMIT ADMINISTRATORS DIVISION OF WATER (DOW) WATER (SPDES) PROGRAM 1 NASSAU AND SUFFOLK 50 CIRCLE ROAD STONY BROOK, NY 11790 TEL. (631) 444-0365 50 CIRCLE ROAD STONY BROOK, NY 11790-3409 TEL. (631) 444-0405 2 BRONX, KINGS, NEW YORK, QUEENS AND RICHMOND 1 HUNTERS POINT PLAZA, 47-40 21ST ST. LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101-5407 TEL. (718) 482-4997 1 HUNTERS POINT PLAZA, 47-40 21ST ST. LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101-5407 TEL. (718) 482-4933 3 DUTCHESS, ORANGE, PUTNAM, ROCKLAND, SULLIVAN, ULSTER AND WESTCHESTER 21 SOUTH PUTT CORNERS ROAD NEW PALTZ, NY 12561-1696 TEL. (845) 256-3059 100 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SUITE 1W WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603 TEL. (914) 428 - 2505 4 ALBANY, COLUMBIA, DELAWARE, GREENE, MONTGOMERY, OTSEGO, RENSSELAER, SCHENECTADY AND SCHOHARIE 1150 NORTH WESTCOTT ROAD SCHENECTADY, NY 12306-2014 TEL. (518) 357-2069 1130 NORTH WESTCOTT ROAD SCHENECTADY, NY 12306-2014 TEL. (518) 357-2045 5 CLINTON, ESSEX, FRANKLIN, FULTON, HAMILTON, SARATOGA, WARREN AND WASHINGTON 1115 STATE ROUTE 86, PO BOX 296 RAY BROOK, NY 12977-0296 TEL. (518) 897-1234 232 GOLF COURSE ROAD WARRENSBURG, NY 12885-1172 TEL. (518) 623-1200 6 HERKIMER, JEFFERSON, LEWIS, ONEIDA AND ST. LAWRENCE STATE OFFICE BUILDING 317 WASHINGTON STREET WATERTOWN, NY 13601-3787 TEL. (315) 785-2245 STATE OFFICE BUILDING 207 GENESEE STREET UTICA, NY 13501-2885 TEL. (315) 793-2554 7 BROOME, CAYUGA, CHENANGO, CORTLAND, MADISON, ONONDAGA, OSWEGO, TIOGA AND TOMPKINS 615 ERIE BLVD. WEST SYRACUSE, NY 13204-2400 TEL. (315) 426-7438 615 ERIE BLVD. WEST SYRACUSE, NY 13204-2400 TEL. (315) 426-7500 8 CHEMUNG, GENESEE, LIVINGSTON, MONROE, ONTARIO, ORLEANS, SCHUYLER, SENECA, STEUBEN, WAYNE AND YATES 6274 EAST AVON-LIMA ROADAVON, NY 14414-9519 TEL. (585) 226-2466 6274 EAST AVON-LIMA RD. AVON, NY 14414-9519 TEL. (585) 226-2466 9 ALLEGANY, CATTARAUGUS, CHAUTAUQUA, ERIE, NIAGARA AND WYOMING 270 MICHIGAN AVENUE BUFFALO, NY 14203-2999 TEL. (716) 851-7165 270 MICHIGAN AVENUE BUFFALO, NY 14203-2999 TEL. (716) 851-7070 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX L. SWPPP INSPECTION FORM & WINTER SHUTDOWN REQUEST FORM STATE POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Standardized Qualified Inspector Form Revised 4-27-2010 1 Qualified Inspector's Credentials & Certification Qualified Inspector (QI) means a person that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control (ESC). A person is considered qualified under the following conditions: 1. A licensed Professional Engineer; licensed Landscape Architect with documented training and education in the principles and practices of ESC; 2. An individual certified in ESC by CPESC, Incorporated or any other agency endorsed by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Office of Water Resources; 3. An individual working under the direct supervision of a qualified licensed Professional Engineer or qualified licensed Landscape Architect with documented training and education in the principles and practices of ESC and has completed the four (4) hour training program in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control from either a Soil and Water Conservation District, CPESC or any other agency endorsed by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Office of Water Resources. This initial training must be completed no later than May 1, 2010. After receiving the initial training, an individual working under the direct supervision of a qualified licensed Professional Engineer or qualified licensed Landscape Architect must complete four (4) hours of training every three (3) years. 4.Any other individual endorsed by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation by written documentation. 5.Inspections of any post-construction stormwater management practices that include structural components, such as a dam for an impoundment, shall be performed by a licensed Professional Engineer.1 Project Name and Location of Project: ______________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Municipality:___________________________________________________________ County: ______________________________________________________________ Qualified Inspector: _____________________________________________________ Qualified Inspector Title:________________________________________________ Date: Weather: Permit #: NYR10 Entry Time: Exit Time: 5 Acre Waiver: Yes No Name of SPDES Permittee:__________________________________________________________________________________ Phone: ______________________________________Fax:________________________________________________________ Name of Representative on Site: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ STATE POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Standardized Qualified Inspector Form Revised 4-27-2010 2 Part I. CONSTRUCTION DURATION INSPECTIONS Page 2 of _______ a. SITE PLAN/SKETCH OF AREAS DISTURBED AT TIME OF INSPECTION AND AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN STABILIZED (TEMPORARY OR FINAL) SINCE LAST INSPECTION: Part I. CONSTRUCTION DURATION INSPECTIONS Page 3 of ______ STATE POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Standardized Qualified Inspector Form Revised 4-27-2010 3 b. Other Permit Required Reporting Maintaining Water Quality - Attach Color Photographs of the site documenting discharge points and site conditions. Describe the condition of runoff at all points of discharge. Is there an increase in turbidity causing a substantial visible contrast to natural conditions? ____________ Is there residue from oil and floating substances, visible oil film, or globules or grease? _______________ Is there evidence of silt deposition from project in a stream, wetland, or other water body? ____________ If yes, where? _________________________________remedial measure needed? __________________ Provide a description of the conditions of all natural water bodies within or immediately adjacent to the project. ______________________________________________________________________________ Area of Disturbance Total area of disturbance (as shown on sketch plan and not including areas that have temporary or permanent stabilization measures applied) _____________________________________________________________ Are all disturbances within the limits of the SWPPP? ____________________________________________ Weather Conditions A description of the weather and soil conditions (e.g. dry, wet, saturated) at the time of the inspection; _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ General Housekeeping Are facilities and equipment necessary for implementation of erosion and sediment control in working order and/or properly maintained?________________________________________________________________ Is construction impacting the adjacent property? ________________________________________________ Is dust adequately controlled?_______________________________________________________________ Describe corrective action(s): _______________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ c. Runoff Controls Direct runoff away from exposed soil surfaces and control water that falls onto the site Runoff conveyance systems  N A Are all runoff conveyance systems called for in the SWPPP installed, stabilized and working? _________ If not, what specific areas need detailing?___________________________________________________ With minimum side slopes 2H:1V or flatter? _______ Stabilized by geotextile fabric, seed, or mulch with no erosion occurring? _______Sediment-laden runoff directed to sediment trapping structure? ___________ Describe corrective action(s): _______________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ Runoff Control Structures  N A Have all required runoff control structures (rock outlets and aprons) been installed and constructed per plan and according to the Blue Book?____________ Installed concurrently with pipe installation? ____________ Describe corrective action(s): _______________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ STATE POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Standardized Qualified Inspector Form Revised 4-27-2010 4 Page 4 of ______ Temporary Stream or Channel Crossing  N A Have construction crossings at concentrated flow areas been culverted?____________________________ Describe corrective action(s): _____________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ Stone Check Dam  N A Installed per standards? __________ channel stable (flow is not eroding soil underneath or around the structure). ________does sediment need to be removed? _________________________________________ Describe corrective action(s): _______________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ Excavation Dewatering  N A 1. Flowing water  N A – Upstream berm (sandbags, inflatable dams, etc. with one-foot minimum freeboard) and downstream berms are installed per plan? _______and functioning? (clean water from upstream pool is being pumped to the downstream pool)? ______________________________________________________ 2. Sediment laden water from work area  N A - Is being discharged to a silt-trapping device? ___________ 3. Groundwater from excavations  N A - is being managed properly (sumps and sediment control)? ______ Describe corrective action(s): _______________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ d. Soil Stabilization Basic erosion control is achieved by covering all bare ground areas. Topsoil and Spoil Stockpiles  N A Stabilized - sediment controls at downhill slope? ________________________________________________ Describe corrective action(s): _______________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ Revegetation/Stabilization  N A Has temporary or permanent seeding and mulch (as shown on site sketch plan) been applied to areas that have been inactive for 14 days or less (or, inactive for 7 days if over 5 acres disturbed)?_____________________ Has soil preparation been applied as specified in the SWPPP and in accordance with the Blue Book (Assure that all the necessary soil testing/fertilizer/lime, topsoil, decompaction has been applied)? ________________ Have rolled erosion control products specified for steep slopes or channels been installed? _______________ Describe corrective action(s): _______________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ e. Sediment Controls Stabilized Construction Entrance  N A Stone is clean and all access areas covered (entrances, construction routes, materials storage areas, equipment parking)?_________________ Tracking onto public streets is minimized and cleaned daily? _____________ Describe:_______________________________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ STATE POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Standardized Qualified Inspector Form Revised 4-27-2010 5 Page 5 of ______ Silt Fence N A Installed on contour? not across conveyance channels?__________ At least 10 feet from toe of slope?_____________At appropriate spacing intervals based on slope?________Wrapped ends for continuous support?___________Fabric is tight, without rips or frayed areas?__________Posts are stable?____________ buried 6 inches minimum?_________Any “bulges”?____________________________ Describe:_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ Temporary Sediment Trap  N A Is outlet structure constructed properly?__________geotextile fabric has been placed beneath rock fill?_____________Maintenance – depth of sediment in basin? ____________ 50% capacity? ____________ Describe:_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ Temporary Sediment Basin  N A Is basin and outlet structure constructed per the approved plan? ____________________________________ Are basin side slopes stabilized with seed/mulch? ________________________________________________ Maintenance – depth of sediment in basin? ____________ 50% capacity? ____________________________ Describe:_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ Drop Inlet Protection  N A Type(s) of inlet control? ___________________________________________________________________ Installed per Blue Book specifications: drainage area (typically 1 acre)? ______________________________ Appropriate for location? __________________________________________________________________ Describe:_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Date correction needed: __________________________________________________________________ f. Digital Color Photographs of Deficient BMPs The qualified inspector shall attach paper color copies of the digital photographs to this inspection report of deficient BMPs with date stamp, that clearly show the condition of all practices that have been identified as needing corrective actions. g. Digital Color Photographs of BMPs that have been Corrected The qualified inspector shall attach paper color copies of the digital photographs to this inspection report of corrected BMPs with date stamp, that clearly show the condition of the practice(s) after the corrective actions has been completed. STATE POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Standardized Qualified Inspector Form Revised 4-27-2010 6 Page 6 of ______ h. Post-Construction Stormwater Management Report of any corrective action(s) that must be taken to install, correct, repair, replace or maintain any deficiencies identified with the construction of the post-construction stormwater management practice(s). Report the current phase of construction of all post-construction stormwater management practice(s) and whether the installation appears to be geometrically consistent with the approved hydraulic design (e.g. the pond, the outlet structure, orifice, pipe sizing and slope is geometrically consistent with the SWPPP):____________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ i. Revisions to SWPPP When the owner or operator becomes aware that they failed to submit any relevant facts, or submitted incorrect information in the NOI or in any other report, or have made substantive revisions to the SWPPP (e.g. the scope of the project changes significantly, the type of post-construction stormwater management practice(s) changes, there is a reduction in the sizing of the post-construction stormwater management practice, or there is an increase in the disturbance area or impervious area) which were not reflected in the original NOI submitted to the Department and/or the MS4, they shall promptly submit such facts or information. Failure of the owner or operator to correct or supplement any relevant facts within five (5) business days of becoming aware of the deficiency shall constitute a permit violation (GP-0-10-001 PartVII.G) _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ j. Inspection Notes and Signature Inspection Notes: _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ STATE POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Standardized Qualified Inspector Form Revised 4-27-2010 7 Page 7 of ______ PART I. j. Signature GP-0-10-001 Part VII.Q Articles 175 and 210 of the New York State Penal Law provide for Criminal penalty of a fine and/or imprisonment for falsifying forms and reports required by this permit. ______________________________________________ ____________________________________ Qualified Inspector (print name) Date of Inspection ______________________________________________ Signature The above signed acknowledges that, to the best of his/her knowledge, all information provided on the forms is accurate and complete. Title: _________________________________ Address: ______________________________ Phone: ______________________ Email: _________________________________________ CPESC#: __________________________________ Stormwater Training Number for Trained Individuals: __________________________________ P.E. or L.A. Supervisor Name for Trained Individuals:_____________________________________ Compliance certification: Received and reviewed by___________________________________Title:___________________________ The above signed acknowledges receipt of this inspection report NOTICE TO REDUCE FREQUENCY OF SPDES SITE INSPECTIONS SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity HC 210 (1/21) In accordance with Part IV.C.2.c of the SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity, the New York State Department of Transportation hereby notifies the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that work on this Contract will be temporarily suspended and temporary stabilization measures have been applied to all disturbed areas. A Qualified Inspector will conduct a site inspection at least once every 30 calendar days during this period. The standard site inspection frequency will resume when construction activities re- commence. Contract No.: SPDES Permit ID #: Town, Village,City: Description: PIN: County: Reason for temporary suspension of work: Winter Shutdown Other Approximate date work will be suspended: Approximate date work will resume: Name: Title: E-Mail: Phone: Date Submitted to NYSDEC: Signature: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX M. NOTICE OF INTENT Fax (Owner/Operator) -- Page 1 of 14 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany, New York 12233-3505 NOTICE OF INTENT -IMPORTANT- RETURN THIS FORM TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE OWNER/OPERATOR MUST SIGN FORM Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity Under State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) General Permit # GP-0-20-001 All sections must be completed unless otherwise noted. Failure to complete all items may result in this form being returned to you, thereby delaying your coverage under this General Permit. Applicants must read and understand the conditions of the permit and prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prior to submitting this NOI. Applicants are responsible for identifying and obtaining other DEC permits that may be required. Owner/Operator Information Owner/Operator Contact Person Last Name (NOT CONSULTANT) Owner/Operator Contact Person First Name Owner/Operator Mailing Address City State Zip - Phone (Owner/Operator) -- Email (Owner/Operator) Owner/Operator (Company Name/Private Owner Name/Municipality Name) NYR (for DEC use only) FED TAX ID -(not required for individuals) 0644089821 1.Provide the Geographic Coordinates for the project site. To do this, go to the NYSDEC Stormwater Interactive Map on the DEC website at: https://gisservices.dec.ny.gov/gis/stormwater/ Zoom into your Project Location such that you can accurately click on the centroid of your site. Once you have located the centroid of your project site, go to the bottom right hand corner of the map for the X, Y coordinates. Enter the coordinates into the boxes below. For problems with the interactive map use the help function. X Coordinates (Easting)Y Coordinates (Northing) Project Site Information Project/Site Name Street Address (NOT P.O. BOX) City/Town/Village (THAT ISSUES BUILDING PERMIT) State Zip - County Name of Nearest Cross Street Distance to Nearest Cross Street (Feet)Project In Relation to Cross Street North South East West Page 2 of 14 2. What is the nature of this construction project? New Construction Redevelopment with increase in impervious area Redevelopment with no increase in impervious area Section-Block-ParcelTax Map Numbers Side of Street North South East West DEC Region Tax Map Numbers 6401089828 Ex. -73.749 Ex. 42.652 -7 3.Select the predominant land use for both pre and post development conditions. SELECT ONLY ONE CHOICE FOR EACH Page 3 of 14 Existing Land Use FOREST PASTURE/OPEN LAND CULTIVATED LAND SINGLE FAMILY HOME SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION TOWN HOME RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL/SCHOOL INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ROAD/HIGHWAY RECREATIONAL/SPORTS FIELD BIKE PATH/TRAIL LINEAR UTILITY PARKING LOT OTHER Future Land Use SINGLE FAMILY HOME SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION TOWN HOME RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONAL/SCHOOL INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL MUNICIPAL ROAD/HIGHWAY RECREATIONAL/SPORTS FIELD BIKE PATH/TRAIL LINEAR UTILITY (water, sewer, gas, etc.) PARKING LOT CLEARING/GRADING ONLY DEMOLITION, NO REDEVELOPMENT WELL DRILLING ACTIVITY *(Oil, Gas, etc.) OTHER Pre-Development Post-Development 4.In accordance with the larger common plan of development or sale, enter the total project site area; the total area to be disturbed; existing impervious area to be disturbed (for redevelopment activities); and the future impervious area constructed within the disturbed area. (Round to the nearest tenth of an acre.) Number of Lots *Note: for gas well drilling, non-high volume hydraulic fractured wells only Total Site Area . Total Area To Be Disturbed . Existing Impervious Area To Be Disturbed . Future Impervious Area Within Disturbed Area . 5. Do you plan to disturb more than 5 acres of soil at any one time?Yes No 6. Indicate the percentage of each Hydrologic Soil Group(HSG) at the site. A B C D %%%% 7. Is this a phased project?Yes No 8. Enter the planned start and end dates of the disturbance activities. - Start Date // End Date // 4107089829 Page 4 of 14 Name 9. Identify the nearest surface waterbody(ies) to which construction site runoff will discharge. 9a.Type of waterbody identified in Question 9? Wetland / State Jurisdiction On Site (Answer 9b) Wetland / State Jurisdiction Off Site Wetland / Federal Jurisdiction On Site (Answer 9b) Wetland / Federal Jurisdiction Off Site Stream / Creek On Site Stream / Creek Off Site River On Site River Off Site Lake On Site Lake Off Site Other Type On Site Other Type Off Site 9b.How was the wetland identified? Regulatory Map Delineated by Consultant Delineated by Army Corps of Engineers Other (identify) Yes No Yes No Yes No 10.Has the surface waterbody(ies) in question 9 been identified as a 303(d) segment in Appendix E of GP-0-20-001? 11.Is this project located in one of the Watersheds identified in Appendix C of GP-0-20-001? 12.Is the project located in one of the watershed areas associated with AA and AA-S classified waters? If no, skip question 13. 13.Does this construction activity disturb land with no existing impervious cover and where the Soil Slope Phase is identified as an E or F on the USDA Soil Survey? If Yes, what is the acreage to be disturbed? Yes No . 14.Will the project disturb soils within a State regulated wetland or the protected 100 foot adjacent area? Yes No 8600089821 15.Does the site runoff enter a separate storm sewer system (including roadside drains, swales, ditches, culverts, etc)? 16.What is the name of the municipality/entity that owns the separate storm sewer system? Yes No Unknown 17.Does any runoff from the site enter a sewer classified as a Combined Sewer?Yes No Unknown 21.Has the required Erosion and Sediment Control component of the SWPPP been developed in conformance with the current NYS Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (aka Blue Book)? 22.Does this construction activity require the development of a SWPPP that includes the post-construction stormwater management practice component (i.e. Runoff Reduction, Water Quality and Quantity Control practices/techniques)? If No, skip questions 23 and 27-39. 23.Has the post-construction stormwater management practice component of the SWPPP been developed in conformance with the current NYS Stormwater Management Design Manual? Yes No Yes No Yes No Page 5 of 14 18.Will future use of this site be an agricultural property as defined by the NYS Agriculture and Markets Law?Yes No Yes No 20.Is this a remediation project being done under a Department approved work plan? (i.e. CERCLA, RCRA, Voluntary Cleanup Agreement, etc.) Yes No19.Is this property owned by a state authority, state agency, federal government or local government? 6403089820 Page 6 of 14 SWPPP Preparer Contact Name (Last, Space, First) Mailing Address City State Zip - Phone -- Fax -- Email Signature Date // First Name Last Name MI SWPPP Preparer Certification 24.The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was prepared by: Professional Engineer (P.E.) Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) Registered Landscape Architect (R.L.A) Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC) Owner/Operator Other I hereby certify that the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for this project has been prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of the GP-0-20-001. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of this permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings. 0251089825 26.Select all of the erosion and sediment control practices that will be employed on the project site: Page 7 of 14 Biotechnical Brush Matting Wattling Other 25.Has a construction sequence schedule for the planned management practices been prepared?Yes No Brush Matting Dune Stabilization Grassed Waterway Mulching Protecting Vegetation Recreation Area Improvement Seeding Sodding Straw/Hay Bale Dike Streambank Protection Temporary Swale Topsoiling Vegetating Waterways Vegetative Measures Check Dams Construction Road Stabilization Dust Control Earth Dike Level Spreader Perimeter Dike/Swale Pipe Slope Drain Portable Sediment Tank Rock Dam Sediment Basin Sediment Traps Silt Fence Stabilized Construction Entrance Storm Drain Inlet Protection Straw/Hay Bale Dike Temporary Access Waterway Crossing Temporary Stormdrain Diversion Temporary Swale Turbidity Curtain Water bars Temporary Structural Debris Basin Diversion Grade Stabilization Structure Land Grading Lined Waterway (Rock) Paved Channel (Concrete) Paved Flume Retaining Wall Riprap Slope Protection Rock Outlet Protection Streambank Protection Permanent Structural 0005089822 Page 8 of 14 Post-construction Stormwater Management Practice (SMP) Requirements Important: Completion of Questions 27-39 is not required if response to Question 22 is No. 27.Identify all site planning practices that were used to prepare the final site plan/layout for the project. Preservation of Undisturbed Areas Preservation of Buffers Reduction of Clearing and Grading Locating Development in Less Sensitive Areas Roadway Reduction Sidewalk Reduction Driveway Reduction Cul-de-sac Reduction Building Footprint Reduction Parking Reduction 28.Provide the total Water Quality Volume (WQv) required for this project (based on final site plan/layout). Total WQv Required .acre-feet 29.Identify the RR techniques (Area Reduction), RR techniques(Volume Reduction) and Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity in Table 1 (See Page 9) that were used to reduce the Total WQv Required(#28). Also, provide in Table 1 the total impervious area that contributes runoff to each technique/practice selected. For the Area Reduction Techniques, provide the total contributing area (includes pervious area) and, if applicable, the total impervious area that contributes runoff to the technique/practice. Note:Redevelopment projects shall use Tables 1 and 2 to identify the SMPs used to treat and/or reduce the WQv required. If runoff reduction techniques will not be used to reduce the required WQv, skip to question 33a after identifying the SMPs. 27a.Indicate which of the following soil restoration criteria was used to address the requirements in Section 5.1.6("Soil Restoration") of the Design Manual (2010 version). All disturbed areas Compacted areas will be restored in accordance with the Soil Restoration requirements in Table 5.3 of the Design Manual (see page 5-22). were considered as impervious cover when calculating the WQv Required,and the compacted areas were assigned a post-construction Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) designation that is one level less permeable than existing conditions for the hydrology analysis. 0182089828 and/or and/or and/or and/or Conservation of Natural Areas (RR-1) Sheetflow to Riparian Tree Planting/Tree Pit (RR-3) Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff (RR-4) Vegetated Swale (RR-5) Rain Garden (RR-6) Stormwater Planter (RR-7) Rain Barrel/Cistern (RR-8) Porous Pavement (RR-9) Green Roof (RR-10) Infiltration Trench (I-1) Infiltration Basin (I-2) Dry Well (I-3) Underground Infiltration System (I-4) Bioretention (F-5) Dry Swale (O-1) Micropool Extended Detention (P-1) Wet Pond (P-2) Wet Extended Detention (P-3) Multiple Pond System (P-4) Pocket Pond (P-5) Surface Sand Filter (F-1) Underground Sand Filter (F-2) Perimeter Sand Filter (F-3) Organic Filter (F-4) Shallow Wetland (W-1) Extended Detention Wetland (W-2) Pond/Wetland System (W-3) Pocket Wetland (W-4) Wet Swale (O-2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................ .................................. .................................... ............................................. ..................................... ................................ ................................... ......................................... ......................................... ............................. .................................................. .......................................... ............................................... ................................................ RR Techniques (Area Reduction) Total Contributing Impervious Area(acres) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .......... .......... .. ......................................... ............................................ ..................................... .................................... ........................................ ..................................... ...................................... ................................................ ........................ ............................................ ............................................... Table 1 -Runoff Reduction (RR) Techniques and Standard Stormwater Management Practices (SMPs) RR Techniques (Volume Reduction) Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity Standard SMPs Page 9 of 14 Total Contributing Area (acres) . . . . Buffers/Filters Strips (RR-2) ............................................. 7738089822 . 31.Is the Total RRv provided (#30) greater than or equal to the total WQv required (#28). If Yes, go to question 36. If No, go to question 32. Yes No Total RRv provided 32.Provide the Minimum RRv required based on HSG. [Minimum RRv Required = (P)(0.95)(Ai)/12,Ai=(S)(Aic)] Minimum RRv Required .acre-feet 30.Indicate the Total RRv provided by the RR techniques (Area/Volume Reduction) and Standard SMPs with RRv capacity identified in question 29. acre-feet 32a.Is the Total RRv provided (#30) greater than or equal to the Minimum RRv Required (#32)? If Yes, go to question 33. Note:Use the space provided in question #39 to summarize the specific site limitations and justification for not reducing 100% of WQv required (#28). A detailed evaluation of the specific site limitations and justification for not reducing 100% of the WQv required (#28) must also be included in the SWPPP. If No, sizing criteria has not been met, so NOI can not be processed. SWPPP preparer must modify design to meet sizing criteria. Yes No Page 10 of 14 Hydrodynamic Wet Vault Media Filter Other Alternative SMP . . . . ............................................... .................................................. ............................................... .................. Table 2 -Alternative SMPs (DO NOT INCLUDE PRACTICES BEING USED FOR PRETREATMENT ONLY) Note:Redevelopment projects which do not use RR techniques, shall use questions 28, 29, 33 and 33a to provide SMPs used, total WQv required and total WQv provided for the project. Total Contributing Impervious Area(acres) Provide the name and manufacturer of the Alternative SMPs (i.e. proprietary practice(s)) being used for WQv treatment. Name Manufacturer 0762089822 .acre-feet CPv Provided acre-feet. CPv Required 36.Provide the total Channel Protection Storage Volume (CPv) required and provided or select waiver (36a), if applicable. Page 11 of 14 35.Is the sum of the RRv provided (#30) and the WQv provided (#33a) greater than or equal to the total WQv required (#28)? If Yes, go to question 36. If No, sizing criteria has not been met, so NOI can not be processed. SWPPP preparer must modify design to meet sizing criteria. .34.Provide the sum of the Total RRv provided (#30) and the WQv provided (#33a). Yes No 33a.Indicate the Total WQv provided (i.e. WQv treated) by the SMPs identified in question #33 and Standard SMPs with RRv Capacity identified in question 29. . WQv Provided acre-feet Note:For the standard SMPs with RRv capacity, the WQv provided by each practice = the WQv calculated using the contributing drainage area to the practice - RRv provided by the practice. (See Table 3.5 in Design Manual) 33.Identify the Standard SMPs in Table 1 and, if applicable, the Alternative SMPs in Table 2 that were used to treat the remaining total WQv(=Total WQv Required in 28 - Total RRv Provided in 30). Also, provide in Table 1 and 2 the total impervious area that contributes runoff to each practice selected. Note: Use Tables 1 and 2 to identify the SMPs used on Redevelopment projects. Site discharges directly to tidal waters Reduction of the total CPv is achieved on site 36a. The need to provide channel protection has been waived because: or a fifth order or larger stream. through runoff reduction techniques or infiltration systems. .CFS CFS. Post-developmentPre-Development Total Extreme Flood Control Criteria (Qf) .CFS .CFS Post-developmentPre-Development Total Overbank Flood Control Criteria (Qp) 37.Provide the Overbank Flood (Qp) and Extreme Flood (Qf) control criteria or select waiver (37a), if applicable. 1766089827 Page 12 of 14 39.Use this space to summarize the specific site limitations and justification for not reducing 100% of WQv required(#28). (See question 32a) This space can also be used for other pertinent project information. 38.Has a long term Operation and Maintenance Plan for the post-construction stormwater management practice(s) been developed? If Yes, Identify the entity responsible for the long term Operation and Maintenance Yes No 37a.The need to meet the Qp and Qf criteria has been waived because: Site discharges directly to tidal waters Downstream analysis reveals that the Qp and Qf controls are not required or a fifth order or larger stream. 1310089822 Air Pollution Control Coastal Erosion Hazardous Waste Long Island Wells Mined Land Reclamation Solid Waste Navigable Waters Protection / Article 15 Water Quality Certificate Dam Safety Water Supply Freshwater Wetlands/Article 24 Tidal Wetlands Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers Stream Bed or Bank Protection / Article 15 Endangered or Threatened Species(Incidental Take Permit) Individual SPDES SPDES Multi-Sector GP Other None 44.If this NOI is being submitted for the purpose of continuing or transferring coverage under a general permit for stormwater runoff from construction activities, please indicate the former SPDES number assigned. 42.Is this project subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4? (If No, skip question 43) Yes No 43.Has the "MS4 SWPPP Acceptance" form been signed by the principal executive officer or ranking elected official and submitted along with this NOI? Yes No 41.Does this project require a US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Permit? If Yes, Indicate Size of Impact. Yes No . Page 13 of 14 40.Identify other DEC permits, existing and new, that are required for this project/facility. 4285089826 Owner/Operator Certification I have read or been advised of the permit conditions and believe that I understand them. I also understand that, under the terms of the permit, there may be reporting requirements. I hereby certify that this document and the corresponding documents were prepared under my direction or supervision. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. I further understand that coverage under the general permit will be identified in the acknowledgment that I will receive as a result of submitting this NOI and can be as long as sixty (60) business days as provided for in the general permit. I also understand that, by submitting this NOI, I am acknowledging that the SWPPP has been developed and will be implemented as the first element of construction, and agreeing to comply with all the terms and conditions of the general permit for which this NOI is being submitted. Owner/Operator Signature Date // Print First Name Print Last Name MI Page 14 of 14 3547089826 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX N. NOTICE OF TERMINATION (BLANK) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany, New York 12233-3505 *(NOTE: Submit completed form to address above)* NOTICE OF TERMINATION for Storm Water Discharges Authorized under the SPDES General Permit for Construction Activity Please indicate your permit identification number: NYR 11G063 I. Owner or Operator Information 1. Owner/Operator Name: 2. Street Address: 3. City/State/Zip: 4. Contact Person:4a.Telephone: 4b. Contact Person E-Mail: II. Project Site Information 5. Project/Site Name: 6. Street Address: 7. City/Zip: 8. County: III. Reason for Termination 9a. □ All disturbed areas have achieved final stabilization in accordance with the general permit and SWPPP. *Date final stabilization completed (month/year): 9b. □ Permit coverage has been transferred to new owner/operator. Indicate new owner/operator’s permit identification number: NYR ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ (Note: Permit coverage can not be terminated by owner identified in I.1. above until new owner/operator obtains coverage under the general permit) 9c. □ Other (Explain on Page 2) IV. Final Site Information: 10a. Did this construction activity require the development of a SWPPP that includes post-construction stormwater management practices? □ yes □ no ( If no, go to question 10f.) 10b. Have all post-construction stormwater management practices included in the final SWPPP been constructed? □ yes □ no (If no, explain on Page 2) 10c. Identify the entity responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of practice(s)? Page 1 of 3 Daniele Family Comapnies, LLC 2851 Monroe Avenue Rochester, NY 14618 Anthony Daniele (585) 271-1111 ajd@Daniele family.com Bellagio Apartments 1384 Empire Blvd 14424 Monroe NOTICE OF TERMINATION for Storm Water Discharges Authorized under the SPDES General Permit for Construction Activity - continued 10d. Has the entity responsible for long-term operation and maintenance been given a copy of the operation and maintenance plan required by the general permit? □ yes □ no 10e. Indicate the method used to ensure long-term operation and maintenance of the post-construction stormwater management practice(s): □ Post-construction stormwater management practice(s) and any right-of-way(s) needed to maintain practice(s) have been deeded to the municipality. □ Executed maintenance agreement is in place with the municipality that will maintain the post-construction stormwater management practice(s). □ For post-construction stormwater management practices that are privately owned, a mechanism is in place that requires operation and maintenance of the practice(s) in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan, such as a deed covenant in the owner or operator’s deed of record. □ For post-construction stormwater management practices that are owned by a public or private institution (e.g. school, university or hospital), government agency or authority, or public utility; policy and procedures are in place that ensures operation and maintenance of the practice(s) in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan. 10f. Provide the total area of impervious surface (i.e. roof, pavement, concrete, gravel, etc.) constructed within the disturbance area? (acres) 11. Is this project subject to the requirements of a regulated, traditional land use control MS4? □ yes □ no (If Yes, complete section VI - “MS4 Acceptance” statement V. Additional Information/Explanation: (Use this section to answer questions 9c. and 10b., if applicable) VI. MS4 Acceptance - MS4 Official (principal executive officer or ranking elected official) or Duly Authorized Representative (Note: Not required when 9b. is checked -transfer of coverage) I have determined that it is acceptable for the owner or operator of the construction project identified in question 5 to submit the Notice of Termination at this time. Printed Name: Title/Position: Signature: Date: Page 2 of 3 2.07 acres NOTICE OF TERMINATION for Storm Water Discharges Authorized under the SPDES General Permit for Construction Activity - continued VII. Qualified Inspector Certification - Final Stabilization: I hereby certify that all disturbed areas have achieved final stabilization as defined in the current version of the general permit, and that all temporary, structural erosion and sediment control measures have been removed. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings. Printed Name: Title/Position: Signature: Date: VIII. Qualified Inspector Certification - Post-construction Stormwater Management Practice(s): I hereby certify that all post-construction stormwater management practices have been constructed in conformance with the SWPPP. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings. Printed Name: Title/Position: Signature: Date: IX. Owner or Operator Certification I hereby certify that this document was prepared by me or under my direction or supervision. My determination, based upon my inquiry of the person(s) who managed the construction activity, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, is that the information provided in this document is true, accurate and complete. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings. Printed Name: Title/Position: Signature: Date: (NYS DEC Notice of Termination - January 2015) Page 3 of 3 David Cox, PE Project Manager David Cox Project Manager Anthony Daniele Owner/Operator Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX O. EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Norbut Solar - Danby, New York January 2022 APPENDIX P. MAINTENANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST Appendix G: Maintenance Inspection Checklists Stormwater Pond/Wetland Operation, Maintenance and Management Inspection Checklist Project ___________________________________________________________________________ Location: ___________________________________________________________________________ Site Status: ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________________________________________________ Time: ___________________________________________________________________________ Inspector: ___________________________________________________________________________ Maintenance Item Satisfactory/ Unsatisfactory Comments 1. Embankment and emergency spillway (Annual, After Major Storms) 1. Vegetation and ground cover adequate 2. Embankment erosion 3. Animal burrows 4. Unauthorized planting 5. Cracking, bulging, or sliding of dam a. Upstream face b. Downstream face c. At or beyond toe downstream upstream d. Emergency spillway 6.Pond, toe & chimney drains clear and functioning 7.Seeps/leaks on downstream face 8.Slope protection or riprap failure 9. Vertical/horizontal alignment of top of dam “As-Built” G-1 New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual Appendix G Maintenance Item Satisfactory/ Unsatisfactory Comments 10. Emergency spillway clear of obstructions and debris 11. Other (specify) 2. Riser and principal spillway (Annual) Type: Reinforced concrete ______ Corrugated pipe _______ Masonry _______ 1. Low flow orifice obstructed 2. Low flow trash rack. a. Debris removal necessary b. Corrosion control 3. Weir trash rack maintenance a. Debris removal necessary b. corrosion control 4. Excessive sediment accumulation insider riser 5. Concrete/masonry condition riser and barrels a. cracks or displacement b. Minor spalling (<1" ) c. Major spalling (rebars exposed) d. Joint failures e. Water tightness 6. Metal pipe condition 7. Control valve a. Operational/exercised b. Chained and locked 8. Pond drain valve a. Operational/exercised b. Chained and locked 9. Outfall channels functioning 10. Other (specify) G-2 New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual Appendix G Maintenance Item Satisfactory/ Unsatisfactory Comments 3. Permanent Pool (Wet Ponds) (monthly) 1. Undesirable vegetative growth 2. Floating or floatable debris removal required 3. Visible pollution 4. Shoreline problem 5. Other (specify) 4. Sediment Forebays 1.Sedimentation noted 2. Sediment cleanout when depth < 50% design depth 5. Dry Pond Areas 1. Vegetation adequate 2. Undesirable vegetative growth 3. Undesirable woody vegetation 4. Low flow channels clear of obstructions 5. Standing water or wet spots 6. Sediment and / or trash accumulation 7. Other (specify) 6. Condition of Outfalls (Annual , After Major Storms) 1. Riprap failures 2. Slope erosion 3. Storm drain pipes 4.Endwalls / Headwalls 5. Other (specify) 7. Other ( Monthly) 1. Encroachment on pond, wetland or easement area G-3 New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual Appendix G Maintenance Item Satisfactory/ Unsatisfactory Comments 2. Complaints from residents 3.Aesthetics a. Grass growing required b. Graffiti removal needed c. Other (specify) 4. Conditions of maintenance access routes. 5. Signs of hydrocarbon build-up 6. Any public hazards (specify) 8. Wetland Vegetation (Annual) 1. Vegetation healthy and growing Wetland maintaining 50% surface area coverage of wetland plants after the second growing season. (If unsatisfactory, reinforcement plantings needed) 2. Dominant wetland plants: Survival of desired wetland plant species Distribution according to landscaping plan? 3. Evidence of invasive species 4. Maintenance of adequate water depths for desired wetland plant species 5. Harvesting of emergent plantings needed 6. Have sediment accumulations reduced pool volume significantly or are plants “choked” with sediment 7. Eutrophication level of the wetland. 8. Other (specify) Comments: G-4 New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual Appendix G Actions to be Taken: G-5 1 Solar System Decommissioning Plan Without Scrap Value Decommissioning costs are equal for all three sites listed below: ▪ NSF Danby Site 1, LLC ▪ NSF Danby Site 2, LLC ▪ NSF Danby Site 3, LLC Synopsis A. Solar System Lifespan B. Cost of Decommissioning C. Ensuring Funds For Decommissioning and Site Restoration D. Solar System Decommissioning Description D.1. Removal of Electrical Components, Racks & Rack Wiring D.2. PV Module Dismantling & Panel Removal D.3. Breakup and Remove Concrete Pads or Ballast D.4. Remove Cables D.5. Remove Fence D.6. Grading and Road Removal D.7. Seed Disturbed Area A. Solar System Lifespan Owner of Sites located at 00 Bald Hill Road, Danby, NY 14850 (“Project”), to be subdivided, is responsible for decommissioning the Project. Commercial-scale solar fields are designed for a minimum expected operational life of 25 years but may operate for 40 years or more. As the solar field approaches the end of its operational life, it is expected that technological advances will make more efficient and cost-effective solar arrays that will economically drive the replacement of the existing solar arrays. The decommissioning plan provides financial assurance that there will be sufficient funds available for decommissioning and site restoration when the solar arrays have reached the end of their useful life. B. Cost of Decommissioning The cost of decommissioning a solar array more than 20 years into the future cannot be known with exact certainty. 2 NSF Danby Decommissioning Costs Per 5 MW System # Task Estimated Cost D1 Remove Electrical Components, Racks & Rack Wiring $ 35,000 D2 PV Module Dismantling Removing Panels $ 45,000 D3 Breakup and Remove Concrete Pad $ 25,000 D4 Remove Cable $ 30,000 D5 Remove Fence $ 37,500 D6 Grading/Roadway $ 10,000 D7 Seed Disturbed Area $ 5,000 Cost: Labor and Equipment to Decommission $ 187,500 Total After 20 Years (2% Inflation Rate) $ 278,615 Three 5 MW systems, each with a Current Net Cost of $187,500 per system, totaling $562,500. C. Ensuring Funds for Decommissioning and Site Restoration The estimated cost of decommissioning as provided above will be updated upon commencement of commercial operations. On or prior to December 31 of each calendar year beginning with the calendar year in which the Project commences commercial operations through and including calendar year 10, an amount based on the estimate provided herein, if any, to be updated upon commencement of commercial operations, shall be reserved for decommissioning and site restoration. Such annual amounts may be in the form of a performance bond, surety bond, letter of credit, parental guaranty, or other form of financial assurance acceptable to the Siting Council (the “Financial Assurance”). On or prior to the end of calendar year 15 of the Project’s operation, the estimated costs of decommissioning will be reassessed and an amount equal to the balance of such updated estimated cost of decommissioning less the amounts reserved, if any, will be reserved for decommissioning and site restoration. The Financial Assurance shall be kept in place until such time as the decommissioning work has been completed, provided, however, to the extent available as liquid funds, the Financial Assurance may be used to offset the costs of the decommissioning. D. Solar System Decommissioning Description Decommissioning and restoration activities will adhere to the requirements of appropriate governing authorities, and will be in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local permits. The decommissioning and restoration process comprise removal of above-ground structures; grading, to the extent necessary; restoration of topsoil (if needed) and seeding. The process of removing structures involves evaluating and categorizing all components and materials into categories of recondition and reuse, salvage, recycling, and disposal. 3 The above-ground structures and below-ground structures are collectively referred to herein as the “Project Components.” Temporary erosion and sedimentation control best management practices will be used during the decommissioning phase of the Project. Control features will be regularly inspected during the decommissioning phase and removed at the end at the process. D.1. Removal of Electrical Components, Racks & Rack Wiring Control cabinets, electronic components, and internal cables will be removed. The panels, racks and inverters will be lowered to the ground where they may be transported whole for reconditioning and reuse or disassembled/cut into more easily transportable sections for salvageable, recyclable, or disposable components. D.2. PV Module Dismantling & Panel Removal Solar photovoltaic modules used in the Project are manufactured within regulatory requirements for toxicity based on Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). The solar panels are not considered hazardous waste. The panels used in the Project will contain silicon, glass, and aluminum which have value for recycling. Modules will be dismantled and packaged per manufacturer or approved recyclers specifications and shipped to an approved off-site approved recycler. D.3. Breakup and Remove Concrete Pads or Ballast Pads will be excavated to a depth sufficient to remove all anchor bolts, rebar, conduits, cable, and concrete to a depth of 24 inches below grade. The remaining excavation will be filled with clear sub- grade material of quality comparable to the immediate surrounding area. The sub-grade material will be compacted to a density similar to surrounding subgrade material. All unexcavated areas compacted by equipment used in decommissioning shall be de-compacted in a manner to adequately restore the topsoil and sub-grade material to the proper density consistent and compatible with the surrounding area. Concrete slabs used as equipment pads will be broken and removed to a depth of two feet below grade. Clean concrete will be crushed and disposed of off-site and/or recycled and reused either on or off-site. D.4. Electrical Cable Removal Electric wire made from copper or aluminum has value for recycling. DC wiring can be removed manually from the panels to the inverter. Underground wire in the area of the array will be pulled and removed from the ground. Overhead cabling for the interconnection will be removed from poles. All wire will be sent to an approved recycling facility. D.5. Fencing and Racking Removal All racking and fencing material will be broken down into manageable units and removed from facility and sent to an approved recycler. All racking posts driven into the ground will be pulled and removed. D.6. Grading and Road Removal During decommissioning, the processed stone access roads will be maintained for access and future use. 4 D.7. Seed Disturbed Areas Following decommissioning activities, the sub-grade material and topsoil from affected areas may need to be de-compacted and restored to a density and depth consistent with the surrounding areas. If the subsequent use for the Project site will involve agriculture, a deep till of the Project site may be undertaken. The affected areas will be inspected, thoroughly cleaned, and all construction-related debris removed. Disturbed areas will be reseeded to promote re-vegetation of the area unless the area is to be immediately redeveloped. In all areas, restoration shall include, as reasonably required, leveling, terracing, mulching, and other necessary steps to prevent soil erosion, to ensure establishment of suitable grasses and forbs, and to control noxious weeds and pests. Decommissioning and Restoration Terms The Project shall be decommissioned within 360 days of the end of the Project’s operational life. Areas disturbed during the decommissioning phase will be with seeded with a drought-tolerant grass seed mix appropriate for the area unless such areas are being immediately redeveloped for other uses. The gravel access road will remain intact. 1 SAMPLE DECOMMISSIONING AGREEMENT This DECOMMISSIONING AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) dated as of [DATE] (the “Effective Date”) is made by and among the Town of Danby , a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of New York with offices at 1830 Danby Road, Ithaca, New York 14850 (the "Town") and NSF Danby Site 1, LLC, a limited liability corporation with principal offices at 1241 University Avenue, Rochester, New York 14607, (the “Owner”); (the Town and Owner, collectively the "Parties"). WHEREAS, Owner intends to permit, construct, operate and maintain solar energy facilities with an aggregate size of approximately 5 Megawatts of alternating-current nameplate capacity that will generate electric power (the "Project") on a portion of property, more particularly identified hereto, and commonly known as a portion of Bald Hill Road, LLC (Tax Parcel ID Number 10.-1-21.122 (the "property"), such parcels being located within the Town of Danby, Tompkins County, New York (the then current owner(s) of the Property are referred to under this Agreement as the "Landowner"); and WHEREAS, the Town of Danby Planning Board conducted reviews as required under the Town Site Plan Review Local Law and gave its approval in respect of the Project at a meeting on [DATE] on condition that, among other things, the applicant submit a final decommissioning plan and Decommissioning Bond (as defined below) providing the Town with access to funds for the Decommissioning (as defined below) of the Project on the terms and conditions set forth under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to enter into this Agreement as required by the Town and to agree upon terms and conditions of the financial surety provided to the Town for the purpose of Decommissioning the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. At the start of physical construction of the Project following issuance of a building permit from the Town (the "Start Date"), the Owner shall post a Decommissioning Bond (the "Decommissioning Bond") in the amount of $150,565.00 (the "Initial Bond Amount") for the benefit of the Town upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. At the end of each one-year period following the Start Date (the "Anniversary Date"), Owner shall renew the Decommissioning Bond at a value of the Initial Bond Amount, together with an additional 2% annual escalation amount. Upon posting of the Decommissioning Bond, the Owner will provide the Town a copy of the related Decommissioning Bond policy with contact information for the financial provider. Owner or its successor in title to the Project shall be responsible for renewing such Decommissioning Bond as long as the Project remains in commercial operation, which is expected to be for a period of thirty-five (35) years. The Parties agree that the Bond shall be used solely to pay for any Decommissioning costs of the Project pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Owner shall have no further payment obligations in connection with Decommissioning during the operation of the Project provided that Owner complies with posting the Decommissioning Bond in accordance with this Agreement. Nonetheless, in the event the actual Decommissioning costs exceed the amount covered by the Decommissioning Bond, Owner or its successor in title to this Project shall be responsible for 2 any such excess costs, provided such excess costs are not as a result of the Town using any amount covered by the Bond for any reason other than to pay for Decommissioning costs of the Project, which action by the Town will be deemed a default under this Agreement entitling the Owner to damages and injunctive relief. The Town will have no right to use any amount from the Decommissioning Bond for any reason other than to pay for Decommissioning costs related to the Project pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and any breach by the Town of the foregoing will be deemed a default under this Agreement entitling the Owner to damages and injunctive relief, and the Town shall be responsible to pay for such amount used and shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner and Landowner of the Project from any claim, loss, damage, liability or costs (including any reasonable attorney costs) arising from the Town's use of the funds. 2. Decommissioning as used in this Agreement shall mean the removal and disposal of all structures, equipment and accessories, including subsurface foundations and all other material, concrete, or debris, that were installed in connection with the Project and the reasonable restoration of the parcel of land on which the Project is built to either of the following, at the Owner’s and the Landowner's option ("Decommissioning"): (i) the condition such lands were in prior to the development, construction and operation of the Project, including restoration, regrading, and reseeding, or (ii) the condition designed by Owner or its successor and as agreed upon with the Landowner and the Town. Costs of Decommissioning under this Agreement include labor, professional services and any other costs reasonably associated with such restoration. 3. The Parties agree that the Decommissioning process of the Project may commence (and the funds to pay for the cost of any such Decommissioning from the Decommissioning Bond may be called on) by Owner for the following reasons, (each, a "Triggering Event"): a. Owner provides written notice to the Town of its intent to retire or decommission the Project (the "Owner Decommissioning Notice"); b. Commercial operation of the Project has not started within twelve (12) months of the completion of construction; c. The Project "ceases to be operational" (as defined below) in its entirety for more than twelve (12) consecutive months; or d. Failure to keep in effect the Decommissioning Bond meeting the requirements of this Agreement (including escalation in amount pursuant to paragraph 1) as required under this Agreement. In the event the Owner fails to initiate Decommissioning of the Project within one-hundred eighty (180) days after any Triggering Event, or Owner fails to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay or cessation of operation of the Project, then the Town will have the right to give Owner written notice of its intent to Decommission the Project through use of the Decommissioning Bond (the "Town Decommissioning Notice"), and if Owner does not cure the Triggering Event or initiate Decommissioning of the Project or provide a reasonable explanation for the delay or cessation of operation of the Project within thirty (30) days following receipt of such notice, then the Town may commence Decommissioning of the Project through use of the Bond. 3 For the purposes of this Agreement, "ceases to be operational" shall mean that the Project is no longer generating any electricity, other than due to repairs to the Project or causes beyond the reasonable control of Owner. Any one of the Triggering Events outlined in this Section 3 shall be deemed a Triggering Event based upon which the Town shall have the right to demand Decommissioning pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4. In the event the Town has the right to perform the Decommissioning itself pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in Section 3 above, Owner (or its successors or assigns) and Landowner (or any of Landowner's heirs or assigns) agrees to give the Town right of reasonable access on Landowner's property to decommission the Project an d shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Town for any and all claims, liability, loss or damage arising out of its exercise of its right to Decommission the Project as provided for herein, except in cases of negligence or willful misconduct by the T own or any of its employees, contractors, or agents. For clarity, nothing in this Section 4 or this Agreement shall infer any obligation or responsibility, financial or otherwise, to Landowner (or any of Landowner's assigns) for any costs of Decommissioning the Project. 5. Upon Decommissioning of the Project, the Owner shall have no further obligation to the Town and the Decommissioning Bond will be promptly returned and released to the Owner. 6. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by written instrument signed and delivered by the Parties. This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective administrators, successors and assigns, including a successor Owner of the Project. 7. Owner shall provide the Town with proof that it either carries sufficient Workers' Compensation insurance coverage for its employees in New York or that it is exempt from such requirement. 8. The Parties agree to execute and deliver any additional documents or take any further action as reasonably requested by another Party to effectuate the purpose of this Agreement. 9. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the laws of New York. 10. This Agreement may be executed through separate signature pages or in any number of counterparts, and each of such counterparts shall, for all purposes, constitute one agreement binding on all parties. 11. Any and all notices required to be sent by the parties shall be addressed as follows: By certified mail or mail courier service, To the Town: Town of Danby Attention: Danby Town Supervisor To Owner: NSF Danby Site 1, LLC [Signature Page Follows] 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound hereby, have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. TOWN: Town of Danby By: _____________________ Name: Joel Gagnon Title: Town Supervisor OWNER: NSF Danby Site 1, LLC By: _____________________ Name: David Norbut Title: Manager 039653.00039 Litigation 15343419v1 NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report Town of Danby, Tompkins County, New York SHPO Project Review Number: 21PR03383 November 2021 Prepared for: Prepared by: Passero Associates Preservation Studios, LLC 242 West Main Street, Suite 100 170 Florida Street Rochester, NY 14614 Buffalo, NY 14208 Norbut Solar Farms, LLC 1241 University Avenue Rochester, New York 14607 NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report i MANAGEMENT SUMMARY SHPO Project Review Number: 21PR03383 Involved State and Federal Agencies (DEC, CORPS, FHWA, etc.): NYS Energy Research and Development Authority Phase of Survey: Phase I Historic Resources Survey Location Information Location: Southwest corner of Garfield Road and South Main Street Extension Minor Civil Division: Town of Danby County: Tompkins Survey Area (Metric and English): Number of Acres Surveyed: Not applicable USGS 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Map: Willseyville, NY 1969 and West Danby, NY 1969 Results of Architectural Survey: Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries within project area: 0 Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area: 9 Number of previously determined NR listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: 2 Number of identified eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: 7 Report Author(s): Katy N. Stuck, M.S. and Joseph Duggan, B.A. Date of Report: November 2021 Principal Investigator: Katy N. Stuck, M.S. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Definition of the Zone of Visual Impact ........................................................................................................ 5 2.0 INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 6 3.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Previously Identified Resources ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Site File Research ................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2.2 Map and Document Review and Brief Historical Narrative ................................................................ 8 4.0 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 15 5.0 REFERENCES REVIEWED .......................................................................................................................... 18 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Previously Identified Historic Resources within the Zone of Visual Impact ............................................. 7 Table 2: Potentially Eligible Properties on Historic Mapping ................................................................................ 10 Table 3: Summary of Historic Resources and Recommendations .......................................................................... 15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Facility Location (Topographic Map) ....................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Facility Location (Aerial Photograph) ...................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3. Survey Buffer and Zone of Visual Impact ................................................................................................ 5 Figure 4. Project Area in 1853 ................................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 5. Project Area in 1866 ................................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 6. Project Area in 1900 ................................................................................................................................ 13 Figure 7. Project Area in 1949 ................................................................................................................................ 14 Figure 8. Map of Identified Resources ................................................................................................................... 17 ATTACHMENT A: Photographic Record NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 1 Preservation Studios was contracted by Passero Associates on behalf of Norbut Solar Farms, LLC to complete a Phase I Historic Resources Survey of the proposed NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project (the Project). The Project is proposed on 74.8 acres located on the north side of Bald Hill Road (County Road 126) within the Town of Danby, Tompkins County, New York (Figures 1 and 2). Preservation Studios completed a visual assessment and photo-documentation on October 25, 2021. The Phase I Historic Resources Survey was conducted in accordance with cultural resource management practices as required on the federal and state level, specifically the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended; Executive Order 11593; the regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 800); Section 14.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law of 1980; and the New York State Historic Preservation Office’s (NYSHPO’s) Guidelines for Solar Facility Development Cultural Resources Survey Work (2020). The Project is 74.8 acres in size and therefore falls under Category 3 within the Guidelines for Solar Facility Development Cultural Resources Survey Work (2020). Solar projects within this category require GIS analysis of areas that will have positive visibility of the solar field based upon topography, without regard to vegetation, and a survey of all properties 50-years old or older within one mile of the solar array Zone of Visual Impact (ZVI) by a 36 CRF 61 qualified consultant. The qualified consultant is required to document only those properties that in their professional opinion may meet the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) criteria. The purpose of this Historic Resources Survey is to identify historic properties that may be impacted by the proposed Project and assess the potential eligibility of these properties for listing in the NRHP. The study included a reconnaissance survey (composed of a visual assessment, site walkover, and photo- documentation), background research, and historic properties site file searches. Katy Stuck and Joey Duggan of Preservation Studios conducted the field reconnaissance and report preparation. Ms. Stuck meets or exceeds the NYSHPO standards for architectural historians (36 CFR 61), as well as the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards (48 FR 44738- 9). 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Norbut Solar Farms is proposing to construct a 74.8-acre photovoltaic solar energy generation facility at an un- numbered 111.6-acre parcel on the north side of Bald Hill Road (CR-126) within the Town of Danby, Tompkins County, New York. The facility will consist of three adjacent solar array systems and ancillary features, such as access roads. The facility’s interconnection to the utility grid will fall under the jurisdiction of New York State Electric and Gas (NYSEG), but NYSEG’s customary aboveground interconnection methodology has been considered in this report, at the instruction of Norbut Solar. The Project will be located entirely on private land. Although still in the development phase, the Project will also include the following:  Concrete pad-mounted transformers;  A New York State Department of Environmental Conservation-approved pervious access drive;  Seven-foot-tall perimeter security fencing as required by the 2017 National Electrical Code; and  Stormwater diversion structures to control flow into the regulated Buttermilk Creek located on site. The solar fields will be equipped with direct pole bury panel foundations that provide minimal disturbance to the soil beneath them, as well as allow natural vegetation to remain. The pervious access drive will begin at a perimeter swing gate placed on the shared existing driveway between the facility site and 54 Bald Hill Road, set back a 1.0 INTRODUCTION NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 2 distance from the main road. The Project will provide power to the public electrical grid via a Point of Interconnection (POI) to be located east of the arrays along Danby Road (State Route 96B). Power generated from the solar arrays will travel through underground cables to the aboveground POI, the location of which has been approved by NYSEG. As the local utility provider, NYSEG will construct, own, operate, and maintain this POI. The POI will include two (2) pervious access drives for NYSEG to access the POI. The project has been designed to incorporate responsible protective screening in its design of the solar arrays. Protective vegetative buffers have been left untouched along the perimeter of the site and additional screening is proposed in less vegetated areas. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 3 Figure 1. Project Location NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 4 Figure 2. Project Location NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 5 1.2 DEFINITION OF THE ZONE OF VISUAL IMPACT The purpose of the study was to assess the potential impact of the proposed Project on historic resources within a Zone of Visual Impact (ZVI). According to Guidelines for Solar Facility Development Cultural Resources Survey Work (2020), the ZVI for projects between fifty and one hundred acres in size is determined using GIS analysis of areas that will have positive visibility of the solar field based upon topography, without regard to vegetation, within one mile of the solar arrays. Development of the ZVI was conducted in consultation with the New York State Historic Preservation Office (NYSHPO) and is depicted in Figure 3. Due to rolling topography in the Project area, the ZVI ranges from five hundred feet from the Project on the south and east sides to 0.6 miles from the Project to the north and west. The ZVI includes the Area of Potential Effects (APE) which is defined as “the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause changes in the character of or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist” (36 CFR §800.16(d)). Any direct and indirect impacts to historic buildings, structures, or districts as a result of the Project were considered in the preparation of this report, including where historic properties may be damaged or permanently disturbed; where the character of the property’s use, or of physical features within the property’s setting that contribute to its historic significance, may be changed; where the property is removed from its historical location; and where the introduction of visual, atmospheric, or audible elements diminish the integrity of the property’s significant historic features. Figure 3. Map showing the one-mile survey buffer around the Project area in yellow and the ZVI in purple, as determined by topographical analysis. OUTSIDE OF ZVI; NOT SURVEYED OUTSIDE OF ZVI; NOT SURVEYED OUTSIDE OF ZVI; NOT SURVEYED NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 6 For a building or structure to be considered eligible for listing in the NRHP, it must be evaluated within its historic context and demonstrated to be significant under one or more of the four Criteria of Evaluation (36 CFR 60) as outlined in the National Park Service (NPS) Publication, Guidelines for Completing National Register of Historic Places Forms (NPS 2002). Any buildings examined as part of this investigation were identified and evaluated in the field with reference to these criteria: Criterion A: (Event) Properties that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or Criterion B: (Person) Properties that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or Criterion C: (Design/Construction) Properties that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or Criterion D: (Information Potential) Properties that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history (NPS Bulletin 15, referencing 36 CFR 60). A property is not eligible if it cannot be related to a particular time period or cultural group and thereby lacks any historic context in which to evaluate the importance of the cultural resource (NPS 2002). The cultural property (e.g., historic buildings or landscape) must also retain the historic integrity of those features necessary to convey its significance. Seven aspects or qualities of integrity recognized by the NRHP are location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association (NPS 2002). Preservation Studios utilized a phased approach to screening and evaluating properties within the ZVI to determine approximate age, which included archival and documentary research, desktop analysis, and fieldwork. Preservation Studios consulted the NYSHPO inventory files in order to identify previously recorded historic and architectural resources within the ZVI, and to review reports from previous cultural resource surveys conducted near the proposed Project. Additional archival and documentary research, including examination of historical maps, tax records, and other documents was conducted to develop a brief historical context for the architecture within the survey area, to ascertain historical settlement patterns for the region, and to identify both remaining evidence of those settlement patterns and major changes to the landscape over time. Preservation Studios utilized GIS applications and aerial photography to locate buildings within the ZVI and to develop a list of properties to be investigated in the field by identifying historic resources constructed prior to 1972 and resources where the construction date of the buildings or structures could not be verified during desktop research. Those resources that appeared to meet NRHP criteria of significance and integrity were recorded in the field utilizing the Trekker mobile survey application and submitted to the NYSHPO for review. An Annotated Properties List was also submitted to the NYSHPO Cultural Resources Information System (CRIS) independently from this report. 2.0 INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 7 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Project is located in a sparsely settled area of woodland and agricultural fields seven miles south of the densely populated city of Ithaca, New York. The area is characterized by moderately steep rolling topography, with gently sloped valleys between the hills transected by streams and/or wetlands. The Project is located within one of these low, gently sloped fields and is bound to the south, west, and north by rolling woodland and to the east by residential lots within and adjacent to the center of Danby. Houses and farmsteads on large lots with grassy yards and decorative trees line Bald Hill and Danby roads. Properties situated on these roads to the east and southeast of the Project are at roughly the same elevation as the Project, or slightly below, however, properties to the south, west, and north are located past the crests of the hills that encircle the proposed facility and therefore do not have visibility of the Project location, regardless of the abundant screening vegetation. An unnamed tributary to Buttermilk Creek passes east through the Project towards Danby Road. Buttermilk Creek runs behind the properties on the west side of downtown Danby and drains to Jennings Pond, a manmade waterbody south of the Project at the intersection of Lieb and Bald Hill roads. Existing land use in the Project vicinity includes a mix of agricultural production, rural residential development, and deciduous forest. 3.2 PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED RESOURCES 3.2.1 Site File Research Site file research for the Project was conducted using the NYSHPO Cultural Resources Information System (CRIS). Preservation Studios also conducted a review of the New York State Inventory and Register, the NRHP, and the NRHP-eligible and State/NRHP-proposed lists. As directed by the NYSHPO, a site file search was conducted within the approved ZVI, identifying eight previously recorded historic properties (Table 1). Two of the properties have been determined eligible for listing in the NRHP: Danby Town Hall (Unique Site Number [USN] 10902.000001) and First Federated Church (USN 10902.000002). The eligibility of five properties have not yet been determined. The Robert Larry residence at 1781 Danby Road (USN 10902.000047) has been determined not eligible for listing (NYSHPO-CRIS 2021). Table 1: Previously Identified Historic Resources within the Zone of Visual Impact NYSHPO USN Name Distance from Project Construction Date* Resource Type NRHP Determination 10902.000001 Danby Town Hall (1830 Danby Rd.) 0.2 mi E 1826 Town Hall (Formerly First Baptist Church); Civil War Memorial Eligible 10902.000002 First Federated Church (1859 Danby Rd.) 0.3 mi E 1813 Church Eligible 10902.000011 1866 Danby Rd. 0.2 mi E 1850 Residence Undetermined 10902.000012 1820 Danby Rd. Adjacent to POI 1850 Barn and Residence (residence demolished ca. 2012) Undetermined 3.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 8 NYSHPO USN Name Distance from Project Construction Date* Resource Type NRHP Determination 10902.000019 94 Bald Hill Rd. 0.2 mi S 1860 Residence Undetermined 10902.000020 20 Bald Hill Rd. 500 ft E 1850 Farmstead: Residence, Barn, Springhouse, Cemetery, Fire Station Undetermined 10902.000037 Bartos Residence (107 Gunderman Rd.) 0.4 mi NW 1965 Residence Undetermined 10902.000047 Robert Larry (1781 Danby Rd.) 0.4 mi NE 1988 Residence Not Eligible (*dates listed are taken from inventory forms and may not be accurate. Source: NYSHPO-CRIS 2021) 3.2.2 Map and Document Review and Brief Historical Narrative Background literature and historic maps, atlases, and aerial photographs were reviewed to assess the age of properties within the ZVI and place them in their historical context. This review identified nine properties 50 years or older in age within or adjacent to the Project that are eligible or potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP: First Baptist Church/Danby Town Hall (USN 10902.000001), First Federated Church (10902.000002), 1866 Danby Road (10902.000011), 1820 Danby Road (10902.000012), 94 Bald Hill Road (10902.000019), 20 Bald Hill Road (10902.000020), 1792 Danby Road, 1815 Danby Road, and 740 Comfort Road, all of which were constructed during the early- and mid-nineteenth century. Euro-American settlement began in Danby in the last decade of the eighteenth century. The first permanent settlers arrived in the area in 1795, when Isaac and John Dumond and Jacob and John Yaple moved together from Ulster County, New York, establishing farms and the first saw and grist mills on Buttermilk Creek in 1797 and 1799 respectively.1 The Dumonds and Yaples were followed by Dr. Lewis Beers and his brother Jabez Beers, who arrived from Stratford, Connecticut in 1797 and settled southeast of the Project in what became known as the Beers Settlement. The brothers opened the first inn and store, and Dr. Beers later played an important role in the development of Danby when he served as the director of the Owego and Ithaca Turnpike Company, which resulted in the completion of Danby Road (Route 96) in 1810.2 Settlement along the roads adjacent to the Project proceeded quickly after the arrival of the Beers family. Joseph Judson, who at the age of fifteen accompanied the Beers as an indentured servant, later managed his own farmstead with his wife Abigail at 94 Bald Hill Road (USN 10902.000019), across from Jennings Pond. Benjamin Jennings arrived from Cornwall, Connecticut in 1802, and settled on the property at 20 Bald Hill Road (USN 10902.000020).3 He served as town supervisor for eleven years.4 The farm was later owned by William Buckland. It is unclear who erected the present house. The Town of Danby was incorporated in 1811 from the town of Spencer in Tioga County and became part of the newly formed Tomkins County in 1822. The population grew quickly from the earliest years of settlement, and by 1820, over 2,000 people lived in Danby. Residents largely engaged in agriculture, raising both grain and livestock, 1 John H. Selkreg, Landmarks of Tompkins County, New York (Syracuse: D. Mason & Co., 1894), 298-299. 2 H. B. Peirce and D. Hamilton Hurd, History of Tioga, Chemung, Tompkins, and Schuyler Counties, New York, with Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of Some of Its Prominent Men and Pioneers (Philadelphia: Everts and Ensign, 1879), 467; Tresa Cortright, Danby Historical Sketches (Ithaca: DeWitt Historical Society of Tompkins County, 1968), 2. 3 Peirce and Hurd, History of Tioga, Chemung, Tompkins, and Schuyler Counties, New York, 467. 4 Cortright, Danby Historical Sketches, 61. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 9 however Buttermilk Creek provided ample waterpower for mills, which were established along Danby and Bald Hill roads.5 Joseph Judson dammed the creek to form Jennings Pond south of the Project, which long provided ice to the community, and as the village grew, shops, public houses, and skilled services proliferated.6 During the 1820s, two congregations erected church buildings along Danby Road, both of which are previously- identified NR-eligible properties within the ZVI. In 1813, a Presbyterian congregation erected the first church in the town at 1859 Danby Road (USN 10902.000002). In 1867, the church adopted Congregationalism, and after merging with a Methodist congregation in 1954, the church became the Danby Federated Church. It is the oldest extant church building in Tompkins County.7 The building at 1825 Danby Road (USN 10902.000002) served as a Baptist house of worship upon its construction in 1826, until the congregation dissolved in 1866. 8 The last remaining trustee sold the property to the town in 1867, and within a few years, a twenty-nine-foot marble obelisk memorial to the forty-five Danby soldiers who died in the Civil War was erected out front.9 The building became the Danby Town Hall in 1895, eventually housing the town court and library as well.10 The earliest map identified that depicts individual buildings in Danby is the 1853 Smith map published by Horace & Charles T. Smith (Figure 4). In addition to the Judson House (94 Bald Hill Road), the Jennings/Buckland Farm (20 Bald Hill Road), and the two churches on Danby Road, four of the five newly-identified and potentially eligible properties within the ZVI are present on this map. The house at 740 Comfort Road belonged to Charles Roper, a carpenter from nearby Ithaca, and his wife Sarah.11 The resident of the house at 1815 Danby Road is listed as “Widow Pierce.” Both Pierce and Bierce were common surnames in the Tompkins County, and it is unclear which of the families was occupying the home. The house at 1792 Danby Road belonged to William H. McPherson and the house at 1866 Danby Road may have been in the possession of the descendants of Amos Hall, who arrived in Danby with his sons Leonard and Silas in 1807.12 The 1866 Stone & Stewart Map (Figure 5) also depicts property owners, however, few of the buildings in the densely populated village center are labeled. The surnames of Judson, Roper, and McPherson reappear, but residents’ names are absent from 1815 and 1866 Danby Road, and 20 Bald Hill Road was occupied by William Buckland. The 1900 USGS map (Figure 6) also depicts all of the eligible or potentially-eligible properties in the ZVI, with the exception of the Roe Farm at 1820 Danby Road (USN 10902.000012). This property is missing from the earlier maps as well, however the Carpenter Gothic house and associated barn with Italianate-style cornice indicates that its absence from the 1900 map is an error. The house was demolished around 2012, but the barn stands today.13 The area remained rural in character throughout the nineteenth century, and the population of Danby reached a low ebb in the early twentieth century. In the second half of the twentieth century, exurban residential development proceeded within the ZVI, notably along Gunderman Road, Leib Road, and Bald Hill Road. Despite this development and the gradual disappearance of many historic buildings in the village center, the area retains its 5 Selkreg, Landmarks of Tompkins County, New York, 298-299; United States Census Bureau. 1820 U.S. Census, Census Place: Danby, Tioga, New York, Page: 152-161; NARA Roll: M33_79; Image: 445. 6 Selkreg, Landmarks of Tompkins County, New York, 298-299 7 Joan Grant, Destination: Danby, (Ithaca: Municipal Historians of Tompkins County, 2007). 8 Peirce and Hurd, History of Tioga, Chemung, Tompkins, and Schuyler Counties, 471; Grant, Destination: Danby. 9 Selkreg, Landmarks of Tompkins County, New York, 299. 10 Peirce and Hurd, History of Tioga, Chemung, Tompkins, and Schuyler Counties, 471; Grant, Destination: Danby. 11 United States Census Bureau. 1870 U.S. Census, Census Place: Danby, Tompkins, New York, Page: 209A; NARA Roll: M593_1104. 12 Robert Pearsall Smith, Map of Tompkins County, New York: From Actual Surveys (Philadelphia: Horace & Charles T. Smith, 1853); Selkreg, Landmarks of Tompkins County, New York, 298-300; United States Census Bureau, 1850 U.S. Census, Census Place: Danby, Tompkins, New York, Page: 152-161; NARA Roll: M33_79; Image: 445. 13 Historic Ithaca and the New York State Barn Coalition, "Barns of Tompkins County: Self-Guided Driving Tour," 2008. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 10 historical rural character, with active farm fields, ponds, and large residential lots with outbuildings and deep setbacks. See Figures 4 through 7 for historic mapping. Table 2 summarizes eligible and potentially-eligible historic resources within and adjacent to the Project area as they appear on historic mapping. Table 2: NRHP-Eligible and Potentially Eligible Properties on Historic Mapping Name/Address (USN) Distance from Project 1853 1866 1900 1949 First Baptist Church/ Danby Town Hall 1830 Danby Rd. (10902.000001) 0.2 mi E Baptist Church + + + First Federated Church 1859 Danby Rd. (10902.000002) 0.3 mi E Presbyterian Church Presbyterian Church + + 1866 Danby Rd. (10902.000011) 0.2 mi E Maybe G.W. Hall + + + Roe Barn 1820 Danby Rd. (10902.000012) Adjacent to POI * + Judson House 94 Bald Hill Rd. (10902.000019) 0.2 mi S J. Judson S.B. Judson + + Jennings/Buckland Farm 20 Bald Hill Rd. (10902.000020) 500 ft E + Mrs. Buckland + + McPherson House 1792 Danby Rd. 0.3 mi NE W. McPherson W. McPherson + + Pierce House 1815 Danby Rd. 0.3 mi NE Widow Pierce + + + Charles Roper House 740 Comfort Rd. 0.2 mi W C. Roper C. Roper + + (+: Property is present on mapping, but unnamed. *Property is not present on mapping, but certainly existed by this date based on architectural style. Sources: Smith 1853; Stone & Stewart 1866; USGS 1900; USGS 1949; NYSHPO-CRIS 2021) NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 11 Figure 4. Project Area in 1853 (Smith 1853) C. Roper House 740 Comfort Rd. Judson House 10902.000019 Jennings/Buckland Farm 10902.000020 McPherson House 1792 Danby Rd. Baptist Church/ Town Hall 10902.000001 Pierce House 1815 Danby Rd. 1866 Danby Rd. 10902.000011 Federated Church 10902.000002 PROJECT BOUNDARY NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 12 Figure 5. Project Area in 1866 (Stone & Stewart 1866). Properties in the village of Danby are present, but not individually identified. McPherson House 1792 Danby Rd. Federated Church 10902.000002 Jennings/Buckland Farm 10902.000020 Judson House 10902.000019 C. Roper House 740 Comfort Rd. PROJECT BOUNDARY Baptist Church/ Town Hall 10902.000001 1866 Danby Rd. 10902.000011 Pierce House 1815 Danby Rd. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 13 Figure 6. Project Area in 1900 (USGS 1900) McPherson House 1792 Danby Rd. Pierce House 1815 Danby Rd. Federated Church 10902.000002 Jennings/Buckland Farm 10902.000020 Judson House 10902.000019 C. Roper House 740 Comfort Rd. 1866 Danby Rd. 10902.000011 PROJECT BOUNDARY Baptist Church/ Town Hall 10902.000001 NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 14 Figure 7. Project Area in 1949 (USGS 1949) Pierce House 1815 Danby Rd. McPherson House 1792 Danby Rd. Federated Church 10902.000002 Jennings/Buckland Farm 10902.000020 Judson House 10902.000019 C. Roper House 740 Comfort Rd. 1866 Danby Rd. 10902.000011 PROJECT BOUNDARY Baptist Church/ Town Hall 10902.000001 Roe Barn 10902.000012 NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 15 Preservation Studios performed a Phase I Historic Resources Survey for the proposed Norbut Solar Farms Danby Solar Array Construction Project, Town of Danby, Tompkins County, New York, on October 25, 2021. The Phase I reconnaissance survey involved a site visit, visual assessment, and photographic documentation of properties within the ZVI and included an evaluation of potential direct and indirect impacts to historic properties as a result of the proposed Project. Six previously-recorded and three newly-identified historic properties 50 years of age or older were documented within the ZVI. Two of the previously-recorded properties, Danby Town Hall (USN 10902.000001) and First Federated Church (USN 10902.000001), have been determined NRHP-eligible and Preservation Studios recommends that the other seven historic properties are eligible under Criteria B and/or C, as the residences of Danby’s earliest founders and/or as good representative examples of nineteenth-century Adam, Greek Revival, Gothic Revival, and Italianate architectural styles. These nine properties were evaluated for potential impacts. Table 3 includes a summary of the properties and Preservation Studios’ recommendations. Figure 8 depicts all the identified resources on a recent aerial. No direct impacts to historic properties are anticipated, however, the closest property to the Project, the Roe Barn (USN 10902.00012), is approximately fifty feet south of the Point of Interconnect (POI), where new power poles will be installed adjacent to existing utility lines. Due to the proximity of this historic resource, a minimum twenty-five- foot buffer delineated by orange safety fencing is recommended during construction to avoid unintentional direct impacts to the building. Indirect impacts are not anticipated for the other eight properties due to rolling topography and abundant stands of forest that will be maintained between the properties and the facility by the Project design. With the preservation of screening vegetation and the implementation of a construction buffer at 1820 Danby Road, Preservation Studios recommends a finding of no adverse effects on historic properties identified within the ZVI. Table 3: Summary of Historic Resources and Recommendations Name (USN) Date of Construction Type Potential Impacts Assessment Recommendations First Baptist Church/ Danby Town Hall 1830 Danby Rd. (10902.000001) 1826 Church/ Town Hall No direct or indirect effects anticipated None First Federated Church 1859 Danby Rd. (10902.000002) 1813 Church No direct or indirect effects anticipated None 1866 Danby Rd. (10902.000011) ca. 1820 Residence No direct or indirect effects anticipated NRHP-eligible Roe Barn 1820 Danby Rd. (10902.000012) ca. 1870 Barn Minimal viewshed changes anticipated on the north side due to installation of POI NRHP-eligible; Preservation Studios recommends a 25 ft buffer of orange fencing during construction 4.0 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 16 Name (USN) Date of Construction Type Potential Impacts Assessment Recommendations Judson House 94 Bald Hill Rd. (10902.000019) ca. 1820 Residence No direct or indirect effects anticipated NRHP-eligible Jennings/Buckland Farm 20 Bald Hill Rd. (10902.000020) ca. 1850 Farmstead No direct or indirect effects anticipated NRHP-eligible McPherson House 1792 Danby Rd. ca. 1850 Residence No direct or indirect effects anticipated NRHP-eligible Pierce House 1815 Danby Rd. ca. 1850 Residence No direct or indirect effects anticipated NRHP-eligible C. Roper House 740 Comfort Rd. ca. 1850 Residence No direct or indirect effects anticipated NRHP-eligible NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report 17 Figure 8. Map of Historic Resources Within the ZVI Pierce House 1815 Danby Rd. McPherson House 1792 Danby Rd. Federated Church 10902.000002 1866 Danby Rd. 10902.000011 Judson House 10902.000019 Jennings/Buckland Farm 10902.000020 C. Roper House 740 Comfort Rd. Roe Barn 10902.000012 Baptist Church/ Town Hall 10902.000001 NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report Burr, David H. Map of the County of Tompkins. New York: Surveyor General, 1829. Cortright, Tresa. Danby Historical Sketches. Ithaca: DeWitt Historical Society of Tompkins County, 1968. Grant, Joan. Destination: Danby. Ithaca: Municipal Historians of Tompkins County, 2007. Historic Ithaca and the New York State Barn Coalition. "Barns of Tompkins County: Self-Guided Driving Tour." Historic Ithaca, 2008. Peirce, H. B., and D. Hamilton Hurd. History of Tioga, Chemung, Tompkins, and Schuyler Counties, New York, with Illustrations and Biographical Sketches of Some of Its Prominent Men and Pioneers. Philadelphia: Everts and Ensign, 1879. Selkreg, John H. Landmarks of Tompkins County, New York. Syracuse: D. Mason & Co., 1894. Smith, Robert Pearsall. Map of Tompkins County, New York: From Actual Surveys. Philadelphia: Horace & Charles T. Smith, 1853. Stone & Stewart. New Topographical Atlas of Tompkins County, New York. Philadelphia: Stone & Stewart, 1866. United States Census Bureau. 1820 U.S. Census. Census Place: Danby, Tioga, New York. Page: 152-161; NARA Roll: M33_79. United States Census Bureau. 1850 U.S. Census, Census Place: Danby, Tompkins, New York. Page: 32-61; NARA Roll: 605. United States Census Bureau. 1870 U.S. Census, Census Place: Danby, Tompkins, New York. Page: 209A; NARA Roll: M593_1104. United States Geological Survey. Dryden, NY Quadrangle [map]. 1:62,500. 15 Minute Series. Washington D.C.: USGS, 1900. United States Geological Survey. Watkins Glen, NY Quadrangle [map]. 1:125,000. 30 Minute Series. Washington D.C.: USGS, 1905. United States Geological Survey. Willseyville, NY Quadrangle [map]. 1:24,000. 15 Minute Series. Washington D.C.: USGS, 1949. United States Geological Survey. West Danby, NY Quadrangle [map]. 1:24,000. 15 Minute Series. Washington D.C.: USGS, 1950. 5.0 REFERENCES NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report ATTACHMENT A Photographic Record NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report Photograph 1. First Baptist Church/Town Hall (USN 10902.000001) at 1830 Danby Road. Facing northwest. Photograph 2. First Federated Church (USN 10902.000002) at 1859 Danby Road. Facing southeast. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report Photograph 3. Residence at 1866 Danby Road (USN 10902.000011). Facing west. Photograph 4. Roe Barn (USN 10902.000012) at 1820 Danby Road. Facing northwest. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report Photograph 5. Joseph Judson House (USN 10902.000019) at 94 Bald Hill Road. Facing northwest. Photograph 6. Residence of the Jennings/Buckland Farm (USN10902.000020) at 20 Bald Hill Road. Facing northwest. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report Photograph 7. Barn and springhouse of the Jennings/Buckland Farm (USN10902.000020) at 20 Bald Hill Road. Facing northwest. Photograph 8. The McPherson House at 1792 Danby Road. Facing southwest. NSF Danby Solar Array Construction Project Historic Resources Survey Report Photograph 9. Pierce House at 1815 Danby Road. Facing southeast. Photograph 10. Charles Roper House at 740 Comfort Road. Facing northwest. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Location: Unaddressed parcel on Bald Hill Road Danby,New York 14883 Prepared for: Mr. David Cox Passero Associates 242 West Main Street Rochester,New York 14614 LaBella Project No. 2211481 July 15, 2021 300 State Street |Rochester,New York 14614 | p 585-454-6110 | f 585-454-3066 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Report Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Additional Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.4 Data Failures and Data Gaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2 Scope of Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.0 Site Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1 Site Location and Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2 Current Use of the Adjacent Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.0 User Provided information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.1 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.0 Records Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5.1 Regulatory Report Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.3 Historical Resources Reviewed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6.0 Site Reconnaissance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6.1 Interior and Exterior Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 7.0 Interviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7.1 Site Representative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7.2 Local Government Official . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.3 Tribal Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.4 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.5 Tompkins County Health Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8.0 Assumptions, Limitations, Terms and Reliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8.1 Significant Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8.2 Limitations and Exceptions of Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8.3 Special Terms and Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8.4 User Reliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 8.5 Subsurface Risks/Unanticipated Hazardous Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9.0 Additional Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 10.0 Signatures of Environmental Professionals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Privileged and Confidential Table of Appendices Figures Photographs Appendix 1 Regulatory Records Appendix 2 Historical information Appendix 3 Aerial Photographs Appendix 4 Site Reconnaissance Worksheet Appendix 5 Site Representative Interview Appendix 6 FOIL and Real Property Information Appendix 7 User Interview Appendix 8 Previous Reports Appendix 9 Additional Services Appendix 10 Reference of Published Sources Appendix 11 Qualifications Privileged and Confidential LaBella Associates, D.P.C. (LaBella) has been contracted by Passero Associates to perform an All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for Unaddressed parcel on Bald Hill Road,Town of Danby,Tompkins County, New York, 14883, (Tax ID:10.-1-21.122) hereinafter referred to as the “Site”. The findings of this report are based upon a preliminary assessment of the condition of the Site within the Scope of Work and objective described below as of the date of our Site observations and documentation review.This assessment was prepared according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E1527-13 to satisfy the due diligence requirements set for Passero Associates.The information contained in this report is considered privileged and confidential and is intended solely for the use of Passero Associates,as it applies to the Site. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Report Findings Based on the results of this assessment, no apparent Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) have been identified in association with the Site at this time. 1.2 Additional Findings Based on the results of this assessment, no apparent Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs), Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs), or de minimis conditions have been identified in association with the Site at this time. 1.3 Conclusions Based on the findings of this assessment,no further investigation appears warranted at this time. 1.4 Data Failures and Data Gaps 1.4.1 Data Failures ASTM E1527-13 defines a data failure as a failure to achieve the historical research objectives of AAI even after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful.Specifically, the historical research objectives include identifying all obvious uses of the Site from the present, back to the Site’s first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier.A data failure was not encountered within the Scope of Work of this assessment. Privileged and Confidential 1 1.4.2 Data Gaps ASTM E1527-13 defines a data gap as a lack of or an inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the Environmental Professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice, including, but not limited to site reconnaissance, interviews, data failure, or lack of a User Questionnaire.Data gaps were not encountered within the Scope of Work of this assessment. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose This investigation was requested to identify, to the extent feasible, Recognized Environmental Conditions in connection with the Site, including the identification of conditions indicative of releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances on, or in the vicinity of, the Site.This AAI Phase I ESA report was conducted in general conformance with the Scope and Limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. The performance of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs (defined below) and the potential liability for contamination to be present in connection with the Site recognizing reasonable limits of time and cost.It is also intended to add protection from Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) liability for innocent landowner defense, bona fide prospective purchaser, contiguous property owners and grantors who meet certain statutory requirements. The objective of this AAI Phase I ESA was to determine the following, using our professional judgment, by means of the Scope of Work hereafter described. 1.A general description of the Site. 2.The current and historical use of the Site and adjacent properties. 3.Whether RECs exist or have the potential to exist at the Site. 4.Whether Site conditions suggest further evaluation based on the presence or probable presence of such RECs. 5.Provide information which may assist Passero Associates in evaluating the fair market value of the Site. The term “Recognized Environmental Condition” is defined by ASTM as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances (as currently defined by the CERCLA including pollutants and contaminants) or petroleum products (excluded from the definition of hazardous substance and controlled substances; or the presence of petroleum products as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, and the Clean Water Act) in, on, or at a Privileged and Confidential 2 property due to release to the environment, under conditions indicative of a release to the environment, or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The term “Historical Recognized Environmental Condition” is defined by ASTM as a past release of any hazardous substance or petroleum product that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. The term “Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition” is defined by ASTM as resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The term “REC” is not intended to include “de minimis”conditions, which generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.Conditions determined to be de minimis conditions are not RECs or CRECs. The term “data gap” means lack or inability to obtain information required by the standards and practices as defined in ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 despite good faith efforts by the Environmental Professional and Environmental Analyst. The term “Environmental Professional” is defined by ASTM as a person who possesses sufficient specific education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional judgement to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases on, at, in, or to a property, sufficient to meet the objectives and performance factors defined in the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and §312.20 of 40 CFR §312. 2.2 Scope of Work The major components of an AAI Phase I ESA report in conformance with ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 include a visual inspection of the Site and adjacent properties; interviews and review of documents from past and present owners, occupants, managers, representatives and neighbors to the extent necessary; interviews with tribal and local government agency representatives; review of tribal, local, and state records relative to the Site; and a review of tribal, local, state, and federal standard environmental record sources relative to the Site.The findings and conclusions presented in this report are based on information gathered and limitations set forth in this report. The Scope of Work performed in this assessment is limited to the areas described as follows: Privileged and Confidential 3 1.Interview with Russell Nitchman, Owner, to evaluate for potential environmental contamination to be present at the Site.Russell Nitchman has reportedly been associated with the Site for approximately ten years. 2.Interviews with and/or record reviews of each of the following to obtain information directly regarding environmental concerns at, or in the immediate vicinity of, the Site, which is available directly by file or through general knowledge of the individual being interviewed. Information sources include: a.United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) b.New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), Region 7 c.Tompkins County Health Department (TCHD) d.Tompkins County online resources e.Town of Danby municipal offices 3.Review of the following federal, state,and local environmental records and databases to aid in the identification of conditions at or related to the Site and properties adjacent to, or in the immediate vicinity of, the Site, including: a.USEPA National Priority List (NPL) – 1.0 mile b.USEPA Delisted NPL – 0.5 mile c.USEPA Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) and SEMS Archived Sites – 0.5 mile d.USEPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) – 0.5 mile e.USEPA CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) – 0.5 mile f.USEPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action Sites (CORRACTS) – 1.0 mile g.USEPA RCRA non-CORRACTS Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility List (TSD) Facilities – 0.5 mile h.USEPA RCRA Large Quantity Generator (LQG), Small Quantity Generator (SQG), and Very Small Quantity Generator (VSQG)Listings – Site and adjacent properties i.National Response Center (NRC) Emergency Response and Notification System Listing (ERNS) – Site only j.Federal, state,and local Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls and Land Use Restrictions – Site only k.NYSDEC Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites (SHWS) (state equivalent of NPL Sites) – 1.0 mile l.NYSDEC Registry of Brownfield Cleanup Program (BROWNFIELDS), Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP), and Environmental Restoration Program (ERP)Sites – 0.5 miles m.NYSDEC Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Sites (HSWDS) (state equivalent of SEMS Sites) – 0.5 mile n.NYSDEC Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills (SWF/LF) – 0.5 mile o.NYSDEC Inventory of Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Sites – 0.5 mile p.NYSDEC Listing of Spills and Leaking Storage Tanks (LST) – 0.5 miles Privileged and Confidential 4 q.NYSDEC Listing of Registered Petroleum Bulk Storage Facilities (PBS), Chemical Bulk Storage Facilities (CBS), and Major Oil Storage Facilities (MOSF) – Site and adjacent properties r.United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Quadrangle Map West Danby and Willseyville, New York s.United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Tompkins County Soil Survey t.Aerial photographs of the area u.Historical topographic maps v.Local street directories 4.Site visit on June 29, 2021 by Mr.Michael Delaney of LaBella to photograph the Site and to visually identify areas of concern as defined in the agreement. 5.Completion of LaBella’s AAI Phase I ESA Site Reconnaissance Report. 6.Completion of a User Questionnaire by Mr. David Cox, of Passero Associates. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The Site consists of one tax parcel (10.-1-21.122) totaling 111.58 acres located west of Bald Hill Road. The Site consists of undeveloped and wooded land, and small agricultural plots.The Site is located in a rural area; adjacent properties are utilized for commercial, residential, and undeveloped purposes. 3.1 Site Location and Description The parcel that comprises the Site is outlined in the table below.Property boundaries for the purpose of this assessment were obtained from the Tompkins County GIS website.A map depicting the tax parcel that comprises the Site is located in the Figures Appendix of this report. Property Summary Property Acreage (approximate):111.58 Tax ID:10.-1-21.122 Present Ownership:Nitchman Russell H Property Use Code:322 - Residential Vacant Land Over Ten Acres Current Site Use:Undeveloped Land Public Thoroughfares and Access/Egress:Bald Hill Road to the east Exterior Areas:Vegetated land and wooded land Privileged and Confidential 5 Site Vicinity Characteristics Surrounding Areas Rural Topography Slightly sloping to the east Nearest Water Body Unnamed tributary of Buttermilk Creek on the eastern portion of the Site Apparent Groundwater Flow East/northeast Soil Characteristics Bath and Valois soils -The Bath series consists of very deep, well drained soils formed in till. They are nearly level to steep soils on glaciated uplands. A fragipan is at a depth of 66 to 97 cm (26 to 38 in) below the soil surface. Slope ranges from 0 to 60 percent.The Valois series consists of very deep, well drained soils on nearly level to steep lateral moraines along lower valley sides. They formed in till dominated by sandstone, siltstone, or shale. Slope ranges from 0 to 60 percent. Erie channery silt loam -The Erie series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils formed in loamy till. They have a fragipan at depths of 25 to 53 cm (10 to 21 in) below the soil surface. These soils are of uniform slope, and are on footslopes and broad divides in uplands. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is moderately high above the fragipan, and moderately low in the fragipan and substratum. Slope ranges from 0 to 25 percent. Chippewa and Alden soils -The Chippewa series consists of very deep, poorly drained and very poorly drained soils formed in till deposits with dominantly sandstone, siltstone, and shale rock fragments. These soils are in upland depressions. A fragipan is at a depth of 20 to 51 cm (8 to 20 in) below the soil surface. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is moderately high or high in the mineral soil above the fragipan and moderately low or low in the fragipan and substratum. Slope ranges from 0 to 8 percent.The Alden series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils in depressions and low areas on upland till Plains. They formed in a silty local depositional mantle overlying till. Slope ranges from 0 to 8 percent. Langford channery silt loam -The Langford series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils formed in loamy till. These soils are in glaciated upland areas. They have a fragipan starting between 38 and 71 cm (15 and 28 inches) below the soil surface. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is moderately high above the fragipan and moderately low in the fragipan and substratum. Slope ranges from 0 to 50 percent. Red Hook gravelly silt loam -The Red Hook series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils formed in Wisconsinan age glaciofluvial deposits on outwash plains and terraces, stream terraces, and moraines. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is moderately high through high in the mineral solum and substratum. Slope ranges from 0 through 8 percent. Refer to Figure 1 for a copy of the Site Location Map.A copy of the soil map is included in the Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) Physical Setting Report (PSR) included in Appendix 6.Groundwater flow was determined based on interpretation of the USGS topographic map. Privileged and Confidential 6 3.2 Current Use of the Adjacent Properties Direction Occupant (address) North Rural vacant (Gunderman Road), and residential (1820 Danby Road) East Rural residential and recreational (22 Bald Hill Road), residential homes (52 and 54 Bald Hill Road), and residential vacant land (Bald Hill Road) South Residential homes (80 and 94 Bald Hill Road), rural residential and recreational (104 Bald Hill Road and 90 Lieb Road), David Radin (56 Lieb Road) West Rural vacant (Comfort Road), residential home (747 Comfort Road) 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION In accordance with the ASTM E1527-13, a “User” is defined as the party seeking to complete an environmental site assessment of the property.If the user is aware of any specialized knowledge or experience that is material to RECs in connection with the Site, it is the user's responsibility to communicate any information based on such specialized knowledge or experience to the Environmental Professional.The User Questionnaire was completed by David Cox,of Passero Associates.A copy of the User Questionnaire is included in Appendix 7. ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 User Questionnaire Questions Reported by User Land Title Records Are land title records available for review?The User is unaware if land title records are available for review. Environmental Liens or Activity Use Limitations Did a search of recorded land title records identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? The User did not report environmental liens currently recorded against or relating to the property. In addition, the User did not report any activity or use limitations currently recorded against or relating to the property. Did a search of recorded land title records identify any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? The User is not aware of any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restriction, or institutional controls that are in place at the Site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state, or local law. Privileged and Confidential 7 ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 User Questionnaire Questions Reported by User Specialized Knowledge Does the User of this ESA have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties?For example, is the User involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjacent property so that the User would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? The User does not have any specialized knowledge or experiences related to the property or nearby properties. Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Is the User aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? The User is aware that the Site was historically used for farming. Based on the User’s knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the property? Based on the User’s knowledge and experiences related to the Site, the User of this ESA is not aware of obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the Site. Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues Does the purchase price being paid for the property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? The User did not report a below fair market value. If the User concluded that there is a difference, has the User considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? The User did not report a below fair market value. 4.1 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA According to ASTM E1527-13, either the User shall make known to the Environmental Professional the reason why the User wants to have the Phase I ESA performed or, if the User does not identify the purpose of the Phase I ESA, the Environmental Professional shall assume the purpose is to qualify for the Landowner Liability Protections under the Brownfields Amendments.The User indicated that the Phase I ESA is being conducted as part of a potential purchase. Privileged and Confidential 8 5.0 RECORDS REVIEW 5.1 Regulatory Report Summary ERIS, an independent research firm, was contracted to perform an ASTM compliant regulatory records search.The ERIS report is included in Appendix 1.Below is summary of the positive responses to the regulatory database search. Regulatory Report Summary Database Search Radius Target Property Within 0.12mi 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total LST 0.5 0 0 2 2 -4 NY SPILLS 0.5 0 1 2 4 -7 SWF/LF 0.5 0 0 0 1 -1 5.1.1 ASTM Standard Regulatory Database Listings Surrounding Properties Summary Database Site Name Address Dist. (mi)/ Dir. Elev. diff. (ft)Comments NY SPILLS 0165105 (closed) SURDELL RESIDENCE 60 BALD HILL ROAD, DANBY, NY, 0.06/ ESE -58.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance and status. NY SPILLS 9310105 (closed) 741 COMFORT RD. - DANBY 741 COMFORT RD, DANBY, NY, 0.18/ W 163.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. LST 9610827 (inactive) BENJAMIN ONE STOP 1860 DANDY ROAD, ITHACA, NY, 0.23/ E -83.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. LST 0065136 (inactive) BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP 1860 DANBY ROAD, ITHACA, NY, 0.23/ E -83.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. NY SPILLS 8911795 (closed) BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP RT 96B & BALD HILL RD, DANBY, NY, 0.24/ E -86.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. Privileged and Confidential 9 Database Site Name Address Dist. (mi)/ Dir. Elev. diff. (ft)Comments SWF/LF [55R14] Tompkins Co Food Scrap Drop Spot - Danby Rd 1830 Danby Road, Danby, NY, 14850 0.27/ E -102. 0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. NY SPILLS 1511087 (closed) NIKI ALLING @ 1894 DANBY ROAD 1894 DANBY ROAD, DANBY, NY, 0.27/ E -58.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. NY SPILLS 1406648 (inactive) ROADWAY MICHIGAN HOLLOW RD AND ROUTE 96B, DANBY, NY, 0.30/ E -59.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. LST 9904500 (inactive) DANBY MARKET 1774 DANBY RD, ITHACA, NY, 0.37/ ENE -130. 0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. LST 9708923 (inactive) DANBY FACILITY 54 GUNDERMAN RD, DANBY, NY, 0.37/ NNE -88.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. NY SPILLS 9004948 (closed) ABC CLEANING 1754 DANBY RD, DANBY, NY, 0.39/ ESE -43.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. NY SPILLS 0712232 (inactive) ROADSIDE DITCH GUNDERMAN/ COMFORT, DANBY, NY, 0.45/ WN W 89.0 This listing does not appear to be an environmental concern based on distance. 5.1.2 Site Listings No regulatory listings were identified in association with the Site. 5.1.3 Adjacent Property Listings No regulatory listings were identified in association with adjacent properties. 5.1.4 Unplottable Listings A total of 11 unmapped facilities from various databases, of which nine were attributed to closed and inactive spills are potentially located within a 0.5-mile radius of the Site.These listings are considered “unmapped” as such have an incomplete or inaccurate address; therefore, the specific location of the listings could not be determined.Based on the limited address information available for the listings, they do not appear to be located on the Site or adjacent properties. Privileged and Confidential 10 5.1.5 Assessment of the Potential for Soil Vapor Intrusion Vapor intrusion is the entry of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to indoor air from underlying contamination in soil and groundwater.Based on the results of this assessment, no information was obtained suggesting the presence of a soil vapor intrusion concern at the Site at this time.It should be noted that LaBella’s scope of work does not include an ASTM E2600 Vapor Encroachment Screening. 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources 5.2.1 Review of Previous Environmental Reports No previous Phase I ESA, Transaction Screen report, or other previous environmental reports were obtained or were reasonably ascertainable for review. 5.2.2 Other Records No other records were obtained or were reasonably ascertainable for review. 5.3 Historical Resources Reviewed LaBella attempted to review reasonably ascertainable and readily available standard sources of historical information as defined by the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 in order to identify all obvious uses of the Site back to the first developed use or 1940, whichever is earlier (i.e., the historical research objective according to ASTM).Uses of the properties adjacent to the Site are identified in this report only to the extent that this information is revealed in the course of researching the Site itself and were determined at the discretion of the Environmental Analyst.As such, LaBella reviewed only as many of these sources as necessary to achieve the historical research objective.It should be noted that the lack of availability of reasonably ascertainable and readily available standard ASTM required sources have the potential to affect the findings of this assessment and can impact the ability of the Environmental Professional or Analyst to identify RECs and may result in a data failure (defined in Section 1.4.1 of this report).A data failure may represent a significant data gap. Data failures and data gaps are identified, defined, and evaluated for their significance in Section 1.4 of this report.Standard historical sources LaBella attempted to review are outlined in the table below. Privileged and Confidential 11 Historical Source Years Reviewed Source /Comments Fire Insurance Maps Not consulted Not available for review Aerial Photographs 1938, 1944, 1954, 1957, 1960, 1965, 1968, 1974, 1980, 1991, 1995, 2002, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 ERIS City Directories 1925, 1930, 1935, 1940, 1946, 1951, 1956, 1960, 1998, 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2018 ERIS Municipal Records Not applicable Tompkins County GIS website Topographic Maps 1895, 1900, 1906, and 1949 USGS online resources Recorded Land Title Records Not applicable Not available for review 5.3.1 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Sanborn Fire Insurance maps do not appear to provide coverage to the Site and surrounding properties.As such, Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were not reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA.A copy of the “No Coverage” letter obtained from ERIS is included in Appendix 2. 5.3.2 Aerial Photography The table below outlines observations of the Site obtained from the review of aerial photographs. Copies of aerial photographs are included in Appendix 3. Date Observation 1938, 1944, 1954, and 1957 The Site consisted of wooded and agricultural land. 1960 The north portion of the Site consisted of agricultural land. The south portion of the Site was not depicted on this image. 1965, 1968, 1974, 1980, 1991, 1995, 2002, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 The Site consisted of wooded and agricultural land. According to aerial photographs, the adjacent properties were historically utilized for residential, agricultural, and undeveloped purposes. 5.3.3 Local City Directories The Site is not listed in the available ERIS street directories.Review of the street directories indicated that properties surrounding the Site were historically utilized for commercial purposes.Copies of street directories are included in Appendix 2. Privileged and Confidential 12 5.3.4 Municipal Records LaBella obtained limited municipal records from the Town of Danby and the Tompkins County GIS website.The following information was obtained from these records. •The Site, Tax ID# 10.-1-21.122, measures 111.58 acres and is undeveloped. •The current owner of the Site is listed as Nitchman Russell H. •Former owners are listed as a private individual. In addition, limited assessment information was obtained from the Landmax Data Systems, Inc. website.This information is outlined in Sections 3.1.Copies of records obtained from the Town of Danby are included in Appendix 6. 5.3.5 Historical Topographic Maps The table below outlines observations of the Site and adjacent properties obtained from the review of available historical topographic maps.Copies of historical topographic maps are included in Appendix 2. Date Observation 1895 The western portion of the Site was undeveloped.The eastern and central portions of the Site were not depicted on the map.The western adjacent properties were undeveloped.The northern, eastern, and southern adjacent properties were not depicted on the map. 1900, 1906, and 1949 The Site was undeveloped.A small portion of the western portion of the Site was not depicted on the map.The northern, eastern, and southern adjacent properties were undeveloped.The western adjacent properties were not depicted on the map. 5.3.6 Recorded Land Title Records According to the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, “the user should either engage a title company or title professional to undertake a review of reasonably ascertainable land title records and lien records for environmental liens or activity and use limitations currently recorded against or relating to the property or to negotiate such an engagement of a title company or title professional as an addition to the Scope of Work to be performed by the Environmental Professional.” Title records were not provided to LaBella for review.As such, title records were not reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA report. Privileged and Confidential 13 5.3.7 Summary of Historical Use Based on the historical records reviewed, •In at least 1895, the western portion of the Site was undeveloped.The eastern portion of the Site was not depicted on the map. •Between at least 1900 and 1906, the Site was undeveloped.A small portion of the western portion of the Site was not depicted on the map. •Between at least 1938 and the present day, the Site consisted of wooded and agricultural land. Based on the historical records reviewed, it appears the adjacent properties were historically utilized for commercial, residential, agricultural, and undeveloped purposes. 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE Conducted by:Michael Delaney ,Environmental Analyst Date of site visit:June 29, 2021 Representative photographs from the site visit are included in the Photographs Appendix.In addition, observations discussed in this Section are outlined on Figure 3.Copies of the field notes taken during the site visit are included in Appendix 4. At the time of the site visit, a representative portion of the Site was visually inspected.In addition, visual observations were limited at the time of the site visit due to size and vegetative growth. Additional site visit limitations are discussed in Section 8.2 below. 6.1 Interior and Exterior Observations Observation Noted Site Historical Use No No apparent indicators (i.e., signs, equipment, etc.) were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit that would indicate historical uses of the Site. Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products No No apparent hazardous substances or petroleum products were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Storage Tanks No No apparent indications of aboveground or underground storage tanks (i.e. fill ports, vent pipes, access ways) were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Odors No No apparent strong, pungent, or noxious odors were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Privileged and Confidential 14 Observation Noted Site Pools of Liquid No No apparent pools, sumps, or standing water containing liquids likely to be hazardous substances or petroleum products were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Unidentified Substance Containers No No apparent unidentified substance containers were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Heating and Cooling No The Site is not developed. Stains and Corrosion No No apparent staining was observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Drains and Sumps No No apparent drains or sumps were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Polychlorinated Bi-phenyls (PCBs)-Containing Equipment Yes A pole-mounted transformer was observed on the eastern portion of the Site. The pole-mounted transformer did not appear to be leaking at the time of the site visit. Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons No No apparent pits, ponds, or lagoons were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Stained Soil or Pavement No No apparent stained soils or pavement were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Stressed Vegetation No No apparent stressed vegetation was observed at the time of the site visit. Solid Waste No No apparent solid waste disposal areas were observed at the Site at the time of the site visit. Wastewater No Non-sanitary wastewater does not appear to be generated or discharged at the Site. Wells No No apparent wells were observed on the exterior of the Site at the time of the site visit or reported to be located on the Site. Septic Systems No No apparent indications of on-Site septic systems or cesspools were observed on the Site at the time of the site visit. 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 Site Representative Russell Nitchman, Owner, was interviewed as part of this assessment.According to information obtained through the interview, the Site is utilized for whitetail deer hunting with some farm food plots for wildlife.The Site does not include public utilities.The Owner reported that title records are available for review; however, copies of the records have not been obtained as of the date of this report.The notes from the interview are included in Appendix 5. Privileged and Confidential 15 7.2 Local Government Official A FOIL request was submitted to the Town of Danby Clerk, Janice Adelman on April 8, 2021 requesting copies of building department, assessment, and fire marshal records on file for the Site.Records were received from the Town of Danby on May 6, 2021 noted the Town of Danby had received Labella’s FOIL request.Copies of the FOIL request and the records obtained from the Town of Danby are included in Appendix 6. 7.3 Tribal Records There do not appear to be any Native American Sovereign Territories on or within one mile of the Site. In accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, tribal records will only be reviewed if the subject Site falls on or within one mile of Native American Sovereign Territory. Therefore, tribal government representatives were not contacted as part of this AAI Phase I ESA report. 7.4 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation A FOIL request was submitted to the NYSDEC on April 8, 2021.A response was received from the NYSDEC on April 19, 2021.According to the NYSDEC,after a diligent search, no records could be located for the names and addresses provided.A copy of the FOIL request and response is included in Appendix 6. 7.5 Tompkins County Health Department A FOIL request was submitted to the TCHD on April 8, 2021.A response was received from the TCHD on May 4, 2021.According to the TCHD,no records could be located for the names and addresses provided.A copy of the FOIL request and response is included in Appendix 6. 8.0 ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITATIONS, TERMS AND RELIANCE 8.1 Significant Assumptions No significant assumptions were made within the scope of this assessment. 8.2 Limitations and Exceptions of Assessment ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 expressly recognized the fact that no ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property.LaBella’s work is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with the Site, and its Scope of Work reflects recognition of the reasonable limits of time and cost. The actual presence of radon, lead-based paint, contaminants in drinking water [e.g., lead, VOCs, “perfluorinated” compounds (PFCs), etc.], mold-related issues, electromagnetic frequencies, Privileged and Confidential 16 asbestos-containing building materials, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) caulk, soil vapor intrusion (SVI), wetlands, cultural and historic resources, ecological resources, and endangered species are not included in the Scope of Work of this assessment.Additionally, regulatory compliance, industrial hygiene, health and safety, indoor air quality, and drinking water quality are not included in the Scope of Work of this assessment.Should Passero Associates want these services, LaBella can complete them; however, they are not included in the Scope of Work of the Phase I ESA.In addition, NYSDEC Part 360 Regulations indicate that fill material is defined as “soil and similar material excavated for the purpose of construction or maintenance”.The user should be aware that this Phase I ESA has not assessed the Site for fill materials.Any fill material generated as part of a construction project is subject to NYSDEC Part 360 Regulations, which could include chemical testing. It is further noted that due to post 9/11 terrorist-related concerns, the NYSDEC has limited the availability of PBS, CBS, and MOSF details, and detailed spill information to the public.However, LaBella does have access to the addresses of current PBS, CBS, and MOSF locations accessed from the database from the NYSDEC website.In addition, this information can usually be acquired by a FOIL to the regulating agency to attempt to obtain this relevant and reasonably ascertainable environmental information for AAI Phase I ESA reports. If this information is not obtainable, then it will be discussed as a data gap in Section 1.4.2. The site visit was limited to visual observations of accessible areas only.No attempt was made to observe conditions in spaces not generally accessible, including but not limited to: 1.Crawlspaces 2.Attics and roofs 3.Pipe chases or plenums 4.Spaces concealed by walls, floors, or ceilings 5.Materials concealed by paneling, carpeting, or wallpaper The site visit was also limited to visual observations within the perimeter of the Site and other accessible areas only.Visual observations were limited at the time of the site visit due to size and vegetative growth.At the time of the site visit, a representative portion of the Site was visually inspected.Areas of the Site that were inaccessible were left to the judgment and discretion of the Environmental Analyst conducting the site visit. 8.3 Special Terms and Conditions Passero Associates and LaBella have agreed that the Scope of Work described in Section 2.2,and the Limitations and Exceptions described in Section 8.2 above, are acceptable to you and that to the fullest extent permitted by law, LaBella shall not be liable to you for limiting its investigation to the Scope of Work described. Based on the engagement and Scope of Work agreed upon, our evaluation of the Site is as presented herein. Privileged and Confidential 17 8.4 User Reliance Passero Associates may rely upon the findings of this report and should be aware of the agreed upon Scope of Work and the limitations associated with this Scope of Work. 8.5 Subsurface Risks/Unanticipated Hazardous Materials The work for this report has been performed in accordance with generally accepted environmental engineering practices for the applicable region.The conclusion and recommendations of this report are based upon the opinion and judgment of an Environmental Professional (EP), and are dependent upon LaBella’s knowledge, information supplied by the present owner and managers of the Site, and data and information solicited from governmental agencies.LaBella makes no other warranty or representation, either expressed or implied, nor is one intended to be included as part of its services, proposals, contracts, or reports. In addition, LaBella cannot provide guarantees, certifications, or warranties that the property is or is not free of environmental impairment without a subsurface investigation involving drilling, vapor analysis, laboratory soil analysis, groundwater monitoring well installation, and laboratory groundwater analysis.Even with such a program, the data and samples from any given soil boring or monitoring well will indicate conditions that apply only at that particular location, and such conditions may not necessarily apply to the general Site as a whole. 9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES No additional services were provided or agreed upon as part of this assessment. 10.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS We declare that, to our knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and §312.20 of 40 CFR §312.We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting at the subject property. We have developed and performed the Scope of Work for this assessment in conformance with the standards, practices, and limitations set forth in ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. Privileged and Confidential 18 Rhiannon Leonhardt Phase I Technical Manager Environmental Professional Michael Delaney Environmental Analyst Privileged and Confidential 19 Figures Privileged and Confidential Photographs Privileged and Confidential Representative view of eastern portion of Site Representative view of western portion of Site Representative view of central portion of Site Representative tree stand utilized for hunting Pole-mounted transformer on eastern portion of Site Northern adjacent property Unaddressed parcel on Bald Hill Road Danby, New York 14883 Eastern adjacent property Southern adjacent property Southern adjacent property Western adjacent property Unaddressed parcel on Bald Hill Road Danby, New York 14883 Appendix 1 Regulatory Records Privileged and Confidential Project Property:2211481 Bald Hill Road Ithaca NY 14850 Project No: Report Type:Database Report Order No: 21040800589 Requested by:LaBella Associates Date Completed: April 9, 2021 2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Table of Contents Notice:IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report:This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report:No page of this report can be used without this cover page,this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s)may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse:Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use,including damages caused to third parties,and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS:The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc.("ERIS")using various sources of information,including information provided by Federal and State government departments.The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report,and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report.This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice.Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate,ERIS disclaims,any and all liability for any errors,omissions,or inaccuracies in such information and data,whether attributable to inadvertence,negligence or otherwise,and for any consequences arising therefrom.Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright:You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above.This Service and Report (s)are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc.Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s)(the "Data")is owned by ERIS or its licensors.The Service,Report(s)and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Table of Contents Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................8 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................9 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.......................................................................................................11 Map...............................................................................................................14 Aerial.............................................................................................................17 Topographic Map..........................................................................................18 Detail Report.................................................................................................19 Unplottable Summary...................................................................................39 Unplottable Report........................................................................................40 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................49 Definitions.....................................................................................................61 3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property:2211481 Bald Hill Road Ithaca NY 14850 Project No: Coordinates: Latitude:42.35197464 Longitude:-76.4942487 UTM Northing:4,689,938.00 UTM Easting:376,932.86 UTM Zone:UTM Zone 18T Elevation:1,321 FT Order Information: Order No:21040800589 Date Requested:April 8, 2021 Requested by:LaBella Associates Report Type:Database Report Historicals/Products: Aerial Photographs Historical Aerials Photographs City Directory Search CD - 2 Street Search ERIS Xplorer ERIS Xplorer Excel Add-On Excel Add-On Fire Insurance Maps US Fire Insurance Maps Physical Setting Report (PSR) Physical Setting Report (PSR) Executive Summary 4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total Standard Environmental Records Federal rr-DOE FUSRAP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-IODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA VSQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y 0.25 0 0 1 -- 1 rr-FED ENG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FED INST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-LUCIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FEMA UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 DOE FUSRAP NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS ODI SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA VSQG RCRA NON GEN FED ENG FED INST LUCIS ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST FRP HIST GAS STATIONS Executive Summary: Report Summary 5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-REFN-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-BULK TERMINAL-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SEMS LIEN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 State rr-SHWS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-DSHW-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-VAPOR-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-SWF/LF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 rr-LANDFILL INACTIVE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HSWDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-LST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 2 2 - 4 rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED LST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 1 -- 1 rr-AST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED TANKS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-TANKS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-CBS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-MOSF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ENG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-INST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-VCP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ERP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-BROWNFIELDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Tribal rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED ILST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DELISTED IUST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 County No County databases were selected to be included in the search. Additional Environmental Records Federal REFN BULK TERMINAL SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD SHWS DSHW VAPOR SWF/LF LANDFILL INACTIVE HSWDS LST DELISTED COUNTY DELISTED LST UST AST DELISTED TANKS TANKS CBS MOSF ENG INST VCP ERP BROWNFIELDS INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST 6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-PFAS NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-PFAS TRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS WATER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-HMIRS-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-NCDL-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-FORMER NIKE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 ---- 0 rr-MINES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SMCRA-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-MRDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-URANIUM-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-SSTS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-PCB-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 State rr-MGP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 rr-NY SPILLS-aa Y 0.5 0 1 2 4 - 7 rr-PFAS CONTAM-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-PFAS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 rr-PFAS LANDFILL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 PFAS NPL FINDS/FRS TRIS PFAS TRI PFAS WATER HMIRS NCDL TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS FORMER NIKE PIPELINE INCIDENT MLTS HIST MLTS MINES SMCRA MRDS URANIUM ALT FUELS SSTS PCB MGP NY SPILLS PFAS CONTAM PFAS PFAS LANDFILL DRYCLEANERS 7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Database Searched Search Radius Project Property Within 0.12mi 0.125mi to 0.25mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi 0.50mi to 1.00mi Total rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-NY MANIFEST-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-REC MANIFEST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 rr-GEN MANIFEST-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-E DESIGNATION-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-TIER 2-aa Y 0.125 0 0 --- 0 rr-PROJECTS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 -- 0 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County No County additional environmental record sources available for this State. Total:0 1 6 8 0 15 * PO – Property Only * 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. DELISTED DRYCLEANERS NY MANIFEST REC MANIFEST GEN MANIFEST E DESIGNATION TIER 2 PROJECTS 8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number No records found in the selected databases for the project property. Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m1d dd-NY SPILLS-813869670-aa SURDELL RESIDENCE 60 BALD HILL ROAD DANBY NY ESE 0.06 / 323.27 -58 p1p-19-813869670-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 0165105 | 2002-02-01 00:00:00 m2d dd-NY SPILLS-813717482-aa 741 COMFORT RD. - DANBY 741 COMFORT RD DANBY NY W 0.18 / 935.59 163 p1p-20-813717482-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 9310105 | 1995-02-02 00:00:00 m3d dd-RCRA NON GEN-810367896-aa SERVICE STATION 1860 DANBY RD ITHACA NY 14850-9419 E 0.23 / 1,238.12 -83 p1p-20-810367896-x1x EPA Handler ID: NYD000703868 m3d dd-UST-810956644-aa BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP, INC. 1860 DANBY RD. ITHACA NY 14850 E 0.23 / 1,238.12 -83 p1p-22-810956644-x1x Site ID | Site Status: 45667 | Unregulated/Closed m3d dd-LST-814012197-aa BENJAMIN ONE STOP 1860 DANDY ROAD ITHACA NY E 0.23 / 1,238.12 -83 p1p-30-814012197-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 9610827 | 1996-12-05 00:00:00 m3d dd-LST-814037205-aa BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP 1860 DANBY ROAD ITHACA NY E 0.23 / 1,238.12 -83 p1p-31-814037205-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 0065136 | 2007-07-10 00:00:00 m4d dd-NY SPILLS-813964959-aa BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP RT 96B & BALD HILL RD DANBY NY E 0.24 / 1,264.53 -86 p1p-32-813964959-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 8911795 | 1990-06-20 00:00:00 m5d dd-SWF/LF-881496400-aa Tompkins Co Food Scrap Drop Spot - Danby Rd 1830 Danby Road Danby NY 14850 E 0.27 / 1,402.30 -102 p1p-33-881496400-x1x m6d dd-NY SPILLS-845358127-aa NIKI ALLING @ 1894 DANBY ROAD 1894 DANBY ROAD DANBY NY E 0.27 / 1,431.89 -58 p1p-33-845358127-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 1511087 | 2016-08-17 00:00:00 m7d dd-NY SPILLS-821357113-aa ROADWAY MICHIGAN HOLLOW RD AND ROUTE 96B DANBY NY E 0.30 / 1,605.54 -59 p1p-34-821357113-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 1406648 | 2014-09-23 00:00:00 m8d dd-PFAS-875974646-aa Danby Fire Co 1780 Danby Rd Ithaca NY ENE 0.32 / 1,701.21 -126 p1p-35-875974646-x1x m9d dd-LST-814019248-aa DANBY MARKET 1774 DANBY RD ITHACA NY ENE 0.37 / 1,930.75 -130 p1p-35-814019248-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 9904500 | 1999-10-13 00:00:00 19 20 20 22 30 31 32 33 33 34 35 35 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NY SPILLS NY SPILLS RCRA NON GEN UST LST LST NY SPILLS SWF/LF NY SPILLS NY SPILLS PFAS LST Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 10 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev Diff (ft) Page Number m10d dd-LST-814023920-aa DANBY FACILITY 54 GUNDERMAN RD DANBY NY NNE 0.37 / 1,977.70 -88 p1p-36-814023920-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 9708923 | 2004-05-05 00:00:00 m11d dd-NY SPILLS-813646817-aa ABC CLEANING 1754 DANBY RD DANBY NY ESE 0.39 / 2,046.85 -43 p1p-36-813646817-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 9004948 | 1995-06-06 00:00:00 m12d dd-NY SPILLS-813637581-aa ROADSIDE DITCH GUNDERMAN/ COMFORT DANBY NY WNW 0.45 / 2,356.77 89 p1p-37-813637581-x1x Spill No | Close Date: 0712232 | 2008-03-07 00:00:00 36 36 37 10 11 12 LST NY SPILLS NY SPILLS 11 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard Federal RCRA NON GEN - RCRA Non-Generators A search of the RCRA NON GEN database, dated Jan 22, 2021 has found that there are 1 RCRA NON GEN site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key SERVICE STATION 1860 DANBY RD ITHACA NY 14850-9419 E 0.23 / 1,238.12 m-3-810367896-a EPA Handler ID: NYD000703868 State SWF/LF - Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills A search of the SWF/LF database, dated Dec 31, 2020 has found that there are 1 SWF/LF site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key Tompkins Co Food Scrap Drop Spot - Danby Rd 1830 Danby Road Danby NY 14850 E 0.27 / 1,402.30 m-5-881496400-a LST - Leaking Storage Tanks A search of the LST database, dated Mar 9, 2021 has found that there are 4 LST site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key BENJAMIN ONE STOP 1860 DANDY ROAD ITHACA NY E 0.23 / 1,238.12 m-3-814012197-a Spill No | Close Date: 9610827 | 1996-12-05 00:00:00 BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP 1860 DANBY ROAD ITHACA NY E 0.23 / 1,238.12 m-3-814037205-a Spill No | Close Date: 0065136 | 2007-07-10 00:00:00 DANBY MARKET 1774 DANBY RD ITHACA NY ENE 0.37 / 1,930.75 m-9-814019248-a Spill No | Close Date: 9904500 | 1999-10-13 00:00:00 DANBY FACILITY 54 GUNDERMAN RD DANBY NY NNE 0.37 / 1,977.70 m-10-814023920-a Spill No | Close Date: 9708923 | 2004-05-05 00:00:00 UST - Underground Storage Tanks- UST-Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) 3 5 3 3 9 10 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source 12 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 A search of the UST database, dated Mar 9, 2021 has found that there are 1 UST site(s) within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP, INC. 1860 DANBY RD. ITHACA NY 14850 E 0.23 / 1,238.12 m-3-810956644-a Site ID | Site Status: 45667 | Unregulated/Closed Non Standard State NY SPILLS - Spill Incidents Database A search of the NY SPILLS database, dated Mar 9, 2021 has found that there are 7 NY SPILLS site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key 741 COMFORT RD. - DANBY 741 COMFORT RD DANBY NY W 0.18 / 935.59 m-2-813717482-a Spill No | Close Date: 9310105 | 1995-02-02 00:00:00 ROADSIDE DITCH GUNDERMAN/ COMFORT DANBY NY WNW 0.45 / 2,356.77 m-12-813637581-a Spill No | Close Date: 0712232 | 2008-03-07 00:00:00 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key SURDELL RESIDENCE 60 BALD HILL ROAD DANBY NY ESE 0.06 / 323.27 m-1-813869670-a Spill No | Close Date: 0165105 | 2002-02-01 00:00:00 BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP RT 96B & BALD HILL RD DANBY NY E 0.24 / 1,264.53 m-4-813964959-a Spill No | Close Date: 8911795 | 1990-06-20 00:00:00 NIKI ALLING @ 1894 DANBY ROAD 1894 DANBY ROAD DANBY NY E 0.27 / 1,431.89 m-6-845358127-a Spill No | Close Date: 1511087 | 2016-08-17 00:00:00 ROADWAY MICHIGAN HOLLOW RD AND ROUTE 96B DANBY NY E 0.30 / 1,605.54 m-7-821357113-a Spill No | Close Date: 1406648 | 2014-09-23 00:00:00 ABC CLEANING 1754 DANBY RD DANBY NY ESE 0.39 / 2,046.85 m-11-813646817-a Spill No | Close Date: 9004948 | 1995-06-06 00:00:00 PFAS - Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) A search of the PFAS database, dated Jan 16, 2019 has found that there are 1 PFAS site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. 3 2 12 1 4 6 7 11 13 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft)Map Key Danby Fire Co 1780 Danby Rd Ithaca NY ENE 0.32 / 1,701.21 m-8-875974646-a 8 #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* m4c m7c m8c m5c m6c m2 c m1c m9c m1 2c m1 0c m11c m3c(4) B utter m ilk C re e k Lick Br o o k Da n b y C r e ek Cayuga I n l e t Danby Rd 76°28'W76°28'30"W76°29'W76°29'30"W76°30'W76°30'30"W76°31'W76°31'30"W 42°22'30"N 42°22'N 42°22'N 42°21'30"N 42°21'30"N 42°21'N 42°21'N 42°20'30"N 42°20'30"N 42°20'N 42°20'N 0.4 0 0.40.2 Miles Order Number: 21040800589 Map: 1.0 Mile Radius 1:26600 Ad dress: Bald Hill Road, Ithaca, NY Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Info rmation Inc. Project Property Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites w ith H igher Elevation ")Eris Sites w ith Same Elevation #*Eris Sites w ith Low er Elevation (Eris Sites w ith U nknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Z one 500 Year Flood Z one FWS Special Designation Areas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield Areas State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas)Historic Fill 4 7 8 5 6 2 1 9 12 10 11 3 (4) #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* m4c m7c m8c m5c m6c m2 c m1c m9c m1 2c m1 0c m11c m3c(4) B u t t e r m i l k C r e e k Danb y C r eek J e n n i n g s P o n d D a n b y R d 76°28'30"W76°29'W76°29'30"W76°30'W76°30'30"W 42°22'N 42°22'N 42°21'30"N 42°21'30"N 42°21'N 42°21'N 42°20'30"N 42°20'30"N 0.25 0 0.250.125 Miles Order Number: 21040800589 Map: 0.5 Mile Radius 1:17400 Ad dress: Bald Hill Road, Ithaca, NY Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Info rmation Inc. Project Property Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites w ith H igher Elevation ")Eris Sites w ith Same Elevation #*Eris Sites w ith Low er Elevation (Eris Sites w ith U nknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Z one 500 Year Flood Z one FWS Special Designation Areas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield Areas State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas)Historic Fill 4 7 8 5 6 2 1 9 12 10 11 3 (4) #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* m4c m7c m8c m5c m6c m2 c m1c m9c m1 2c m10c m3c(4) B u tt e r m i l k C r e e k J e n n i n g s P o n d D a n b y R d C o m f o r t R d Li e b R d Bald Hill Rd G u n d e r m a n R d MichiganHollowRd White Ha w k Ln H o r n b r o o k R d J enningsPondRd 76°29'W76°29'30"W76°30'W76°30'30"W 42°21'30"N 42°21'30"N 42°21'N 42°21'N 42°20'30"N 42°20'30"N 0.2 0 0.20.1 Miles Order Number: 21040800589 Map: 0.25 Mile Radius 1:12700 Ad dress: Bald Hill Road, Ithaca, NY Source: © 2016 ESRI © ERIS Info rmation Inc. Project Property Buffer Outline #*Eris Sites w ith H igher Elevation ")Eris Sites w ith Same Elevation #*Eris Sites w ith Low er Elevation (Eris Sites w ith U nknown Elevation County Boundary Rails Major Highways Major Highways Ramps Major Roads Major Roads Ramps Secondary Roads Secondary Roads Ramps Local Roads and Ramps State Boundary National Priority List Sites National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Z one 500 Year Flood Z one FWS Special Designation Areas State Brownfield Sites State Brownfield Areas State Superfund Areas:Dept. of Defense State Superfund Areas:NPL WQARF Areas Federal Lands: Dept. of Defense (owned/administered areas)Historic Fill 4 7 8 5 6 2 1 9 12 10 3 (4) Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CN ES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 76°29'W76°29'30"W76°30'W 42°21'30"N 42°21'30"N 42°21'N 42°21'N 42°20'30"N 42°20'30"N0.1 0 0.10.05 Miles Order Number: 21040800589Aerial 1:10000 Address: Bald Hill Road, Ithaca, NY © ERIS Info rmation Inc. Source: ESRI World Imager y Year: 2018 76°28'W76°28'30"W76°29'W76°29'30"W76°30'W76°30'30"W76°31'W 42°22'30"N 42°22'30"N 42°22'N 42°22'N 42°21'30"N 42°21'30"N 42°21'N 42°21'N 42°20'30"N 42°20'30"N 42°20'N 42°20'N 0.35 0 0.350.175 Miles Order Number: 21040800589Topographic Map 1:24000 Address: Bald Hill Road, NY © ERIS Info rmation Inc. Source: USGS Topographic Map Quad rangle(s): West Danby, NY; Willseyville, NY; Ithaca East, NY; Ithaca West, NY Year: 2016 19 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Detail Report Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-1-813869670-b 1 of 1 ESE 0.06 / 323.27 1,263.34 / -58 SURDELL RESIDENCE 60 BALD HILL ROAD DANBY NY p1p-813869670-y1y Spill No:0165105 Spill Date:2001-12-03 10:00:00 Site ID:268646 Received Date:2001-12-03 10:00:00 DER Facility ID:218852 CAC Date: CID:Insp Date:2001-12-03 00:00:00 Program Type:ER Close Date:2002-02-01 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5522 Create Date:2001-12-04 08:54:00 Contributing Factor:Unknown Update Date:2002-02-01 00:00:00 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Unknown Lead DEC:JEOKESSO Class:A3 Reported by:Health Department Meets Std:True Referred to:SHORT TERM Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:False Caller Remark: "HOMEOWNER HAS AN UNKNOWN OIL IN WELL." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was JOS 12/3/01 - VISITED SITE WITH HOMEOWNER AND TCHD. INSPECTED WELL AND WATER INSIDE HOME. FOUND BEADS OF OIL SUBSTANCE IN HOLDING TANK OF TOILET. SUSPECT SUBMERSIBLE PUMP AS GONE BAD. SELF SPILLER.NO NEARBY RECEPTORS. HOME ON ELECTIC/WOOD HEAT. WELL IS ARTISIEN. NOTED OIL SHEEN COMING FRON TOP OF CASING. HOMEOWNER TO CONTACT A WELL DRILLING TO PULL PUMP AND CLEAN. HEALTH DEPT TO ASSIST.JEO. 2/1/02 - WELL HAS BEEN CLEANED AND RESAMPLED. ALL N.D.NFA. JEO." Material Information OP Unit ID:849974 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID:563045 Med GW:True Material Code:0066A Med SW:False Material Name:unknown petroleum Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:False Spiller Information Spiller Name:GARY SURDELL Spiller Zip: Spiller Company:GARY SURDELL Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address:60 BALD HILL ROAD Contact Name:GARY SURDELL Spiller City:DANBY Contact Phone:(607) 277-9630 Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude:42.350131592 Longitude:-76.486077645 1 NY SPILLS Detail Report 20 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB m-2-813717482-b 1 of 1 W 0.18 / 935.59 1,484.16 / 163 741 COMFORT RD. - DANBY 741 COMFORT RD DANBY NY p1p-813717482-y1y Spill No:9310105 Spill Date:1993-11-19 11:10:00 Site ID:294201 Received Date:1993-11-19 11:36:00 DER Facility ID:238088 CAC Date:1994-12-14 00:00:00 CID:Insp Date:1993-11-23 00:00:00 Program Type:ER Close Date:1995-02-02 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5522 Create Date:1993-11-23 00:00:00 Contributing Factor:Human Error Update Date:1995-02-02 00:00:00 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Tank Truck Lead DEC:ROMOCKI Class:A2 Reported by:Responsible Party Meets Std:True Referred to: Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:False Caller Remark: "FUEL OIL DUMPED INTO BASEMENT BY ACCIDENT. FILL PIPE HAD BEEN DISCONNECTED . MAJORITY OF THE FUEL ENTERED FOOTER DRAIN AND DISCHARGED TO SURFACE AT REMOTE LOCATION." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was MR 11/23/93: CLEANUP BEING DONE BY ABC CLEANERS AND PAL OIL PERSONNEL. " Material Information OP Unit ID:991810 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID:392735 Med GW:False Material Code:0001A Med SW:False Material Name:#2 fuel oil Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:200.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:100.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:True Spiller Information Spiller Name:Spiller Zip:14522 Spiller Company:PAL OIL CO.Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address:3849 RT 31 Contact Name: Spiller City:PALMYRA Contact Phone: Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude:42.356015331 Longitude:-76.505972687 m-3-810367896-b 1 of 4 E 0.23 / 1,238.12 1,237.92 / -83 SERVICE STATION 1860 DANBY RD ITHACA NY 14850-9419 p1p-810367896-y1y EPA Handler ID:NYD000703868 Gen Status Universe:No Report Contact Name: Contact Address:1860 , DANBY RD , , ITHACA , NY, 14850 , US Contact Phone No and Ext: Contact Email: Contact Country:US County Name:TOMPKINS 2 3 NY SPILLS RCRA NON GEN 21 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB EPA Region:02 Land Type: Receive Date:20070101 Location Latitude: Location Longitude: Violation/Evaluation Summary Note:NO RECORDS: As of Jan 2021, there are no Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement (violation) records associated with this facility (EPA ID). Handler Summary Importer Activity:No Mixed Waste Generator:No Transporter Activity:No Transfer Facility:No Onsite Burner Exemption:No Furnace Exemption:No Underground Injection Activity:No Commercial TSD:No Used Oil Transporter:No Used Oil Transfer Facility:No Used Oil Processor:No Used Oil Refiner:No Used Oil Burner:No Used Oil Market Burner:No Used Oil Spec Marketer:No Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:1 Receive Date:19800818 Handler Name:SERVICE STATION Source Type:Notification Federal Waste Generator Code:1 Generator Code Description:Large Quantity Generator Waste Code Details Hazardous Waste Code:D000 Waste Code Description:DESCRIPTION Hazardous Waste Code:D001 Waste Code Description:IGNITABLE WASTE Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:1 Receive Date:19990708 Handler Name:SERVICE STATION Source Type:Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code:N Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:2 Receive Date:20060101 Handler Name:SERVICE STATION Source Type:Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code:N 22 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Hazardous Waste Handler Details Sequence No:3 Receive Date:20070101 Handler Name:SERVICE STATION Source Type:Implementer Federal Waste Generator Code:N Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Owner/Operator Details Owner/Operator Ind:Current Operator Street No: Type:Private Street 1:NOT REQUIRED Name:BENJAMIN JOHN D Street 2: Date Became Current:City:NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current:State:WY Phone:212-555-1212 Country:US Source Type:Implementer Zip Code:99999 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:NOT REQUIRED Name:BENJAMIN JOHN D Street 2: Date Became Current:City:NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current:State:WY Phone:212-555-1212 Country:US Source Type:Implementer Zip Code:99999 Owner/Operator Ind:Current Owner Street No: Type:Private Street 1:NOT REQUIRED Name:BENJAMIN JOHN D Street 2: Date Became Current:City:NOT REQUIRED Date Ended Current:State:WY Phone:212-555-1212 Country: Source Type:Notification Zip Code:99999 Historical Handler Details Receive Dt:20060101 Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Handler Name:SERVICE STATION Receive Dt:19990708 Generator Code Description:Not a Generator, Verified Handler Name:SERVICE STATION Receive Dt:19800818 Generator Code Description:Large Quantity Generator Handler Name:SERVICE STATION m-3-810956644-b 2 of 4 E 0.23 / 1,238.12 1,237.92 / -83 BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP, INC. 1860 DANBY RD. ITHACA NY 14850 p1p-810956644-y1y Site ID:45667 Expiry:N/A Site Status:Unregulated/Closed County:Tompkins Program No:7-416959 UTM X:378022.10760 Program Type Code:PBS UTM Y:4689970.58517 Program Type Desc:Petroleum Bulk Storage Program Site Type:Retail Gasoline Sales Tank Information 3 UST 23 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Prog No:7-416959 UDC Ind:1 Tank ID:132085 Red Tag Start Date: Tank No:002 Red Tag End Date: Tank Status:3 Tank Last Test:1992-11-01 00:00:00 Tank Status Desc:Closed - Removed Tank Next Test Due: Tank Type:01 Test Method:00 Tank Type Desc:Steel/Carbon Steel/Iron Date Tested: Install Date:1972-01-01 00:00:00 Next Test: Close Date:2001-05-15 00:00:00 Line Last Test Due: Tk Out of Serv Dt:Next Line Test Due: Capacity (Gal):2000 Line Test Method: Registered:True Modified by:TRANSLAT Tank Model:Last Modified:2017-04-14 14:30:47.863000000 Pipe Model: Tank Location:5 Tank Location Desc:Underground Category:1 Category Desc:Category 1 means a tank which was installed before December 27, 1986 Subpart: Subpart Desc: Class A Operator: Class B Operator: Tank Owner Name: Tank Owner Address: Material Information Material Name:gasoline Percent:100.00 Equipment Information Equipment:B00 Code Name:None Type:Tank External Protection Equipment:D02 Code Name:Galvanized Steel Type:Pipe Type Equipment:G00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Secondary Containment Equipment:K01 Code Name:Catch Basin Type:Spill Prevention Equipment:A00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Internal Protection Equipment:C02 Code Name:Underground/On-ground Type:Pipe Location Equipment:F00 Code Name:None Type:Pipe External Protection Equipment:J02 Code Name:Suction Dispenser Type:Dispenser Equipment:H99 Code Name:Other 24 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Type:Tank Leak Detection Tank Information Prog No:7-416959 UDC Ind:1 Tank ID:132086 Red Tag Start Date: Tank No:003 Red Tag End Date: Tank Status:3 Tank Last Test:1992-11-01 00:00:00 Tank Status Desc:Closed - Removed Tank Next Test Due: Tank Type:01 Test Method:00 Tank Type Desc:Steel/Carbon Steel/Iron Date Tested: Install Date:1972-01-01 00:00:00 Next Test: Close Date:2001-05-15 00:00:00 Line Last Test Due: Tk Out of Serv Dt:Next Line Test Due: Capacity (Gal):4000 Line Test Method: Registered:True Modified by:TRANSLAT Tank Model:Last Modified:2017-04-14 14:30:47.863000000 Pipe Model: Tank Location:5 Tank Location Desc:Underground Category:1 Category Desc:Category 1 means a tank which was installed before December 27, 1986 Subpart: Subpart Desc: Class A Operator: Class B Operator: Tank Owner Name: Tank Owner Address: Material Information Material Name:gasoline Percent:100.00 Equipment Information Equipment:K01 Code Name:Catch Basin Type:Spill Prevention Equipment:F00 Code Name:None Type:Pipe External Protection Equipment:C02 Code Name:Underground/On-ground Type:Pipe Location Equipment:B00 Code Name:None Type:Tank External Protection Equipment:D02 Code Name:Galvanized Steel Type:Pipe Type Equipment:J02 Code Name:Suction Dispenser Type:Dispenser Equipment:G00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Secondary Containment Equipment:H99 25 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Code Name:Other Type:Tank Leak Detection Equipment:A01 Code Name:Epoxy Liner Type:Tank Internal Protection Tank Information Prog No:7-416959 UDC Ind:1 Tank ID:132084 Red Tag Start Date: Tank No:001 Red Tag End Date: Tank Status:3 Tank Last Test:1992-11-01 00:00:00 Tank Status Desc:Closed - Removed Tank Next Test Due: Tank Type:01 Test Method:00 Tank Type Desc:Steel/Carbon Steel/Iron Date Tested: Install Date:1984-01-01 00:00:00 Next Test: Close Date:2001-05-15 00:00:00 Line Last Test Due: Tk Out of Serv Dt:Next Line Test Due: Capacity (Gal):4000 Line Test Method: Registered:True Modified by:TRANSLAT Tank Model:Last Modified:2017-04-14 14:30:47.863000000 Pipe Model: Tank Location:5 Tank Location Desc:Underground Category:1 Category Desc:Category 1 means a tank which was installed before December 27, 1986 Subpart: Subpart Desc: Class A Operator: Class B Operator: Tank Owner Name: Tank Owner Address: Material Information Material Name:gasoline Percent:100.00 Equipment Information Equipment:J02 Code Name:Suction Dispenser Type:Dispenser Equipment:C02 Code Name:Underground/On-ground Type:Pipe Location Equipment:A00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Internal Protection Equipment:K01 Code Name:Catch Basin Type:Spill Prevention Equipment:G00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Secondary Containment Equipment:D02 Code Name:Galvanized Steel Type:Pipe Type 26 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Equipment:F00 Code Name:None Type:Pipe External Protection Equipment:B00 Code Name:None Type:Tank External Protection Equipment:H99 Code Name:Other Type:Tank Leak Detection Tank Information Prog No:7-416959 UDC Ind:1 Tank ID:132088 Red Tag Start Date: Tank No:005 Red Tag End Date: Tank Status:3 Tank Last Test:1992-11-01 00:00:00 Tank Status Desc:Closed - Removed Tank Next Test Due: Tank Type:01 Test Method:00 Tank Type Desc:Steel/Carbon Steel/Iron Date Tested: Install Date:1972-01-01 00:00:00 Next Test: Close Date:2001-05-15 00:00:00 Line Last Test Due: Tk Out of Serv Dt:Next Line Test Due: Capacity (Gal):4000 Line Test Method: Registered:True Modified by:TRANSLAT Tank Model:Last Modified:2017-04-14 14:30:47.863000000 Pipe Model: Tank Location:5 Tank Location Desc:Underground Category:1 Category Desc:Category 1 means a tank which was installed before December 27, 1986 Subpart: Subpart Desc: Class A Operator: Class B Operator: Tank Owner Name: Tank Owner Address: Material Information Material Name:gasoline Percent:100.00 Equipment Information Equipment:K01 Code Name:Catch Basin Type:Spill Prevention Equipment:H99 Code Name:Other Type:Tank Leak Detection Equipment:D02 Code Name:Galvanized Steel Type:Pipe Type Equipment:F00 Code Name:None Type:Pipe External Protection Equipment:A00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Internal Protection 27 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Equipment:C02 Code Name:Underground/On-ground Type:Pipe Location Equipment:J02 Code Name:Suction Dispenser Type:Dispenser Equipment:B00 Code Name:None Type:Tank External Protection Equipment:G00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Secondary Containment Tank Information Prog No:7-416959 UDC Ind:1 Tank ID:139801 Red Tag Start Date: Tank No:006 Red Tag End Date: Tank Status:4 Tank Last Test: Tank Status Desc:Closed - In Place Tank Next Test Due: Tank Type:01 Test Method:NN Tank Type Desc:Steel/Carbon Steel/Iron Date Tested: Install Date:Next Test: Close Date:2001-05-17 00:00:00 Line Last Test Due: Tk Out of Serv Dt:Next Line Test Due: Capacity (Gal):1000 Line Test Method: Registered:True Modified by:TRANSLAT Tank Model:Last Modified:2017-04-14 14:30:47.863000000 Pipe Model: Tank Location:5 Tank Location Desc:Underground Category:1 Category Desc:Category 1 means a tank which was installed before December 27, 1986 Subpart: Subpart Desc: Class A Operator: Class B Operator: Tank Owner Name: Tank Owner Address: Material Information Material Name:empty Percent:100.00 Equipment Information Equipment:A00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Internal Protection Equipment:F00 Code Name:None Type:Pipe External Protection Equipment:C00 Code Name:No Piping Type:Pipe Location Equipment:I00 Code Name:None 28 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Type:Overfill Equipment:H00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Leak Detection Equipment:D00 Code Name:No Piping Type:Pipe Type Equipment:G00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Secondary Containment Equipment:B00 Code Name:None Type:Tank External Protection Equipment:J00 Code Name:None Type:Dispenser Tank Information Prog No:7-416959 UDC Ind:1 Tank ID:132087 Red Tag Start Date: Tank No:004 Red Tag End Date: Tank Status:3 Tank Last Test:1992-11-01 00:00:00 Tank Status Desc:Closed - Removed Tank Next Test Due: Tank Type:01 Test Method:00 Tank Type Desc:Steel/Carbon Steel/Iron Date Tested: Install Date:1972-01-01 00:00:00 Next Test: Close Date:2001-05-15 00:00:00 Line Last Test Due: Tk Out of Serv Dt:Next Line Test Due: Capacity (Gal):4000 Line Test Method: Registered:True Modified by:TRANSLAT Tank Model:Last Modified:2017-04-14 14:30:47.863000000 Pipe Model: Tank Location:5 Tank Location Desc:Underground Category:1 Category Desc:Category 1 means a tank which was installed before December 27, 1986 Subpart: Subpart Desc: Class A Operator: Class B Operator: Tank Owner Name: Tank Owner Address: Material Information Material Name:gasoline Percent:100.00 Equipment Information Equipment:G00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Secondary Containment Equipment:F00 Code Name:None Type:Pipe External Protection Equipment:B00 29 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Code Name:None Type:Tank External Protection Equipment:C02 Code Name:Underground/On-ground Type:Pipe Location Equipment:K01 Code Name:Catch Basin Type:Spill Prevention Equipment:J02 Code Name:Suction Dispenser Type:Dispenser Equipment:H99 Code Name:Other Type:Tank Leak Detection Equipment:A00 Code Name:None Type:Tank Internal Protection Equipment:D02 Code Name:Galvanized Steel Type:Pipe Type Affiliation Information Affiliation Type:11 Affiliation Name:Emergency Contact Affiliation Sub Type:NNN Company:BENJAMINS ONE STOP, INC. Contact Title: Contact Name:LINDA WILSON Address1: Address2: City: State:NN Zip Code: Country Code:001 Phone:(607) 273-8362 Phone Ext: Email: Fax: Affiliation Type:01 Affiliation Name:Facility Owner Affiliation Sub Type:E Company:BENJAMINS ONE STOP, INC. Contact Title: Contact Name: Address1:1860 DANBY RD. Address2: City:ITHACA State:NY Zip Code:14850 Country Code:001 Phone:(607) 272-9161 Phone Ext: Email: Fax: Affiliation Type:07 Affiliation Name:Mail Contact Affiliation Sub Type:NNN Company:BENJAMINS ONE STOP, INC. Contact Title: 30 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Contact Name:LINDA WILSON Address1:1860 DANBY RD. Address2: City:ITHACA State:NY Zip Code:14850 Country Code:001 Phone:(607) 272-9161 Phone Ext: Email: Fax: Affiliation Type:04 Affiliation Name:Facility Operator Affiliation Sub Type:NNN Company:BENJAMINS ONE STOP, INC. Contact Title: Contact Name:JOHN D. BENJAMIN Address1: Address2: City: State:NN Zip Code: Country Code:001 Phone:(607) 272-9161 Phone Ext: Email: Fax: m-3-814012197-b 3 of 4 E 0.23 / 1,238.12 1,237.92 / -83 BENJAMIN ONE STOP 1860 DANDY ROAD ITHACA NY p1p-814012197-y1y Spill No:9610827 Spill Date:1996-12-02 13:45:00 Site ID:209950 Rcvd Date:1996-12-02 14:28:00 DER Facility ID:174039 CAC Date: CID:282 Insp Date:1996-12-04 00:00:00 Program Type:ER Close Date:1996-12-05 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5530 Create Date:1996-12-02 00:00:00 Contribute Factor:Tank Overfill Update Date:1996-12-05 00:00:00 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Gasoline Station or other PBS Facility Lead DEC:ROMOCKI Class:C4 Reported by:Responsible Party Meets Std:False Referred to: Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:True Caller Remark: "NO REMARKS" Dec Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was MR 12/04/96: VISITED SITE. SPILL HAS BEEN CLEANED UP. SOME SORBENTS STILL REMAIN IN DRAINAGE DITCH ADJACENT TO GAS STATION. NO SHEEN OBSERVED IN DITCH. SPOKE WITH BILL CARMALT OF WILLIAMS OIL. I INFORMED HIM THAT NO FURTHER CLEANUP WAS REQUIRED. SOME CONTAMINATED SOIL MAY REMAIN BENEATH THE PAVEMENT. FACILITY TO BE UPGRADEDNEXT YEAR. SOIL DISPOSAL MAY BE AN ISSUE." Material Information OP Unit ID:1042208 Med Air:False OU:01 Med in Air:False Material ID:343043 Med GW:False Material Code:0009 Med SW:False Material Name:gasoline Med DW:False 3 LST 31 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:10.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:True Spiller Information Spiller Name:WILLIAM CARMALT Spiller Zip:18848- Spiller Company:WILLIAMS OIL COMPANY Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address:PO BOX 207 Contact Name:MANAGER Spiller City:TOWANDA Contact Phone:(607) 272-9161 Spiller State:PA Contact Ext: Latitude:42.352101000 Longitude:-76.480773000 m-3-814037205-b 4 of 4 E 0.23 / 1,238.12 1,237.92 / -83 BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP 1860 DANBY ROAD ITHACA NY p1p-814037205-y1y Spill No:0065136 Spill Date:2001-02-05 10:15:00 Site ID:117333 Rcvd Date:2001-02-05 10:15:00 DER Facility ID:102085 CAC Date:2003-11-25 00:00:00 CID:Insp Date:2003-11-20 00:00:00 Program Type:ER Close Date:2007-07-10 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5530 Create Date:2001-02-05 10:38:00 Contribute Factor:Tank Failure Update Date:2007-07-13 15:03:43.810000000 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Gasoline Station or other PBS Facility Lead DEC:jeokesso Class:B2 Reported by:DEC Meets Std:False Referred to:LONG TERM Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:True Caller Remark: "SITE IS VACANT WITH TANKS STILL CONTAINING PRODUCT. WATER HAS BEEN NOTED IN THE TANKS. COMMUNITY IS CONCERNED WITH TANKS LEAKING." Dec Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was JOA 11/02/2001 STATE PIN PROJECT. MONITORING QUARTERLY. SOULE 'S SUPPLY WELL SAMPLED MONTHLY. ALL ND SO FAR. No petroleum found in supply well. Low level petroleum remains on site." Material Information OP Unit ID:837030 Med Air:False OU:01 Med in Air:False Material ID:537839 Med GW:False Material Code:0009 Med SW:False Material Name:gasoline Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:True Spiller Information Spiller Name:LINDA WILSON Spiller Zip:14850- Spiller Company:BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP Spiller Country:001 3 LST 32 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Spiller Address:1860 DANBY ROAD Contact Name:LINDA WILSON Spiller City:ITHACA Contact Phone:(607) 272-9161 Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude:42.344455010 Longitude:-76.468441320 m-4-813964959-b 1 of 1 E 0.24 / 1,264.53 1,235.48 / -86 BENJAMIN'S ONE STOP RT 96B & BALD HILL RD DANBY NY p1p-813964959-y1y Spill No:8911795 Spill Date:1990-03-14 09:19:00 Site ID:153857 Received Date:1990-03-14 09:19:00 DER Facility ID:130505 CAC Date:1990-06-20 00:00:00 CID:Insp Date:1990-06-20 00:00:00 Program Type:ER Close Date:1990-06-20 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5522 Create Date:1990-03-19 00:00:00 Contributing Factor:Equipment Failure Update Date:1990-06-21 00:00:00 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Gasoline Station or other PBS Facility Lead DEC:JEOKESSO Class:Reported by:Citizen Meets Std:True Referred to:LONG TERM Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:False Caller Remark: "CITIZEN INDICATED THAT OIL WAS IN DITCH NEXT TO GAS STATION." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was JOA 03/16/90: FOUND ABOVEGROUND KEROSENE TANK PIPING LEAKING. DRAIN UNDER TANK ANDLEADS TO STORM DRAIN.SHEEN COMING OUT OF STORM DRAIN.TOLD SPILLER OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY. BOOMS PUT IN DITCH.SPILLER TO MONITOR. 06/20/90: VISITED SIGHT. NO SHEEN NOTED IN STORMDRAIN. " Material Information OP Unit ID:938634 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID:441297 Med GW:True Material Code:0066A Med SW:False Material Name:unknown petroleum Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:False Spiller Information Spiller Name:Spiller Zip: Spiller Company:JOHN BENJAMIN Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address:1860 DANBY RD.Contact Name: Spiller City:ITHACA Contact Phone: Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: Tank Test Information Spill Tank ID:1536857 Source: Tank No:Test Method:00 Tank Size:0 Leak Rate:.00 4 NY SPILLS 33 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Material:0066A Gross Fail: EPA UST:Modified by:Spills UST:Last Modified:2004-10-01 04:00:45.140000000 Cause:Alt Test Method:Unknown m-5-881496400-b 1 of 1 E 0.27 / 1,402.30 1,219.27 / -102 Tompkins Co Food Scrap Drop Spot - Danby Rd 1830 Danby Road Danby NY 14850 p1p-881496400-y1y Active:No Owner Address:122 Commercial Avenue Activity No:[55R14]Owner Addr2: Regltry Status:Registration Owner City:Ithaca Auth No:55R14 Owner State:NY Auth Issue Dt:8/24/2017 Owner ZIP:14850 Expiration Date:Owner Email: Operator Type:Owner Phone:6072736632 Operator Name:Contact Name: East Coord:377949 Contact Addr: North Coord:4690156 Contact Addr2: Accuracy Code:4.1 - Address Matching Contact City: County:Tompkins Contact State: Region:7 Contact ZIP: Phone No:6072736632 Contact Email: Owner Name:Tompkins Co Solid Waste Contact Phone: Owner Type:Municipal Date of Last Inspection: Waste Types:Food Scraps Activity Desc:Transfer station - registration m-6-845358127-b 1 of 1 E 0.27 / 1,431.89 1,263.01 / -58 NIKI ALLING @ 1894 DANBY ROAD 1894 DANBY ROAD DANBY NY p1p-845358127-y1y Spill No:1511087 Spill Date:2016-02-17 19:10:00 Site ID:522803 Received Date:2016-02-17 19:31:00 DER Facility ID:477057 CAC Date:2016-07-28 00:00:00 CID:Insp Date: Program Type:ER Close Date:2016-08-17 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5522 Create Date:2016-02-17 19:35:00 Contributing Factor:Equipment Failure Update Date:2016-08-17 10:02:28.350000000 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Private Dwelling Lead DEC:CXROSSI Class:B2 Reported by:Other Meets Std:True Referred to: Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:True UST Trust:False Caller Remark: "caller reporting flooding in basement of location,FD requesting help with cleaning up. petroleum based product is mixed in with the water" DEC Remark: "Basement flooded due to frozen sump line. Fuel oil tank, left after changing over to natural gas leaked to water in basement. Home owner advised of her responsibility but could not afford to hire contractor therefore DEC hired NRC to vac petroleum and contaminated water. Pressure wash basement containing fluids and disposed. ISR completed 8/17/16 ~ctr~" Material Information OP Unit ID:1271807 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:True Material ID:2276118 Med GW:True 5 6 SWF/LF NY SPILLS 34 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Material Code:0001A Med SW:False Material Name:#2 fuel oil Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:True Quantity:75.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:75.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:False Spiller Information Spiller Name:NIKI ALLING Spiller Zip: Spiller Company:NIKI ALLING Spiller Country:999 Spiller Address:1894 DANBY ROAD Contact Name:NIKI ALLING Spiller City:DANBY Contact Phone:(607) 351-7744 Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: m-7-821357113-b 1 of 1 E 0.30 / 1,605.54 1,262.46 / -59 ROADWAY MICHIGAN HOLLOW RD AND ROUTE 96B DANBY NY p1p-821357113-y1y Spill No:1406648 Spill Date:2014-09-23 11:53:00 Site ID:500126 Received Date:2014-09-23 11:53:00 DER Facility ID:455144 CAC Date: CID:Insp Date: Program Type:ER Close Date:2014-09-23 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5522 Create Date:2014-09-23 11:57:00 Contributing Factor:Unknown Update Date:2014-09-23 12:11:45.017000000 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Unknown Lead DEC:CXROSSI Class:D5 Reported by:Citizen Meets Std:False Referred to: Penalty:County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:False Caller Remark: "spill at intersection to paved roadway/caller states ditch line by side of road leads to a creek" DEC Remark: "no caller information. unsubstantiated and no creek seen in mapping. Closing for lack of information and reported small amount." Material Information OP Unit ID:1249529 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID:2251146 Med GW:False Material Code:0008 Med SW:False Material Name:diesel Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:1.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:Oxygenate: Med Soil:False Spiller Information Spiller Name:Spiller Zip: 7 NY SPILLS 35 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Spiller Company:UNKNOWN Spiller Country:999 Spiller Address:Contact Name:N/A Spiller City:Contact Phone: Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: m-8-875974646-b 1 of 1 ENE 0.32 / 1,701.21 1,195.57 / -126 Danby Fire Co 1780 Danby Rd Ithaca NY p1p-875974646-y1y Facility ID:FDP0368 County:Tompkins Survey Complete:YES Survey:Class B Fire Suppression Foam Usage Survey - New York State Fire Departments Q. 6:NO Q. 7:NO Q. 8:NO Q. 9:NO Q. 10:NO Q. 11:NO Q. 12: Q. 13: Reference:If a respondent indicated that the facility used/stored/disposed PFOA/PFOS substances, it does not necessarily mean that there is an environmental/public health concern associated with that facility. Also, if a respondent indicated that they currently/formerly used, stored, disposed of, or released Class B firefighting foam it does not necessarily mean that the foam contains/contained PFOA/PFOS since many Class B foams do not contain these substances. DEC is in the process of reviewing/evaluating the returned surveys to determine if additional follow-up or study is needed. Return rate: 91 surveys were sent to facilities; 90 were returned completed as of June 1, 2017. Questions 1 & 2 relate to name and address; questions 3-5 relate to facility ownership. Q. 6: Is any Class B fire suppression foam currently stored and/or used at the facility? Q. 7: Has any Class B fire suppression foam ever been stored and/or used at the facility? Q. 8: Has Class B fire suppression foam ever been used for training purposes at the facility? Q. 9: Has Class B fire suppression foam ever been used for firefighting or other emergency response purposes at the facility? Q. 10: Has the facility ever experienced a spill or leak of Class B fire suppression foam? Q. 11: Has your facility ever been responsible for the use of Class B fire suppression foam at a location other than the facility (i.e. offsite training, emergency response, or spill)? m-9-814019248-b 1 of 1 ENE 0.37 / 1,930.75 1,191.21 / -130 DANBY MARKET 1774 DANBY RD ITHACA NY p1p-814019248-y1y Spill No:9904500 Spill Date:1999-07-16 09:50:00 Site ID:201519 Rcvd Date:1999-07-16 09:58:00 DER Facility ID:167663 CAC Date: CID:211 Insp Date: Program Type:ER Close Date:1999-10-13 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5530 Create Date:1999-07-16 00:00:00 Contribute Factor:Tank Failure Update Date:1999-10-13 00:00:00 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Commercial/Industrial Lead DEC:LARRY? Class:C3 Reported by:Other Meets Std:False Referred to:SHORT TERM Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:False Caller Remark: "caller is potential buyer for property - buck labs is on site doing assessment and found sheen on groundwater" Dec Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was LCS " 8 9 PFAS LST 36 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Material Information OP Unit ID:1083310 Med Air:False OU:01 Med in Air:False Material ID:304380 Med GW:True Material Code:0001A Med SW:False Material Name:#2 fuel oil Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:False Spiller Information Spiller Name:ERNIE SPENCER Spiller Zip: Spiller Company:DANBY MARKET Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address:1774 DANBY RD Contact Name:ERNIE SPENCER Spiller City:ITHACA Contact Phone:(607) 753-3403 Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude:42.349552350 Longitude:-76.478248520 m-10-814023920-b 1 of 1 NNE 0.37 / 1,977.70 1,233.07 / -88 DANBY FACILITY 54 GUNDERMAN RD DANBY NY p1p-814023920-y1y Spill No:9708923 Spill Date:1997-10-30 12:00:00 Site ID:168020 Rcvd Date:1997-10-30 13:30:00 DER Facility ID:141552 CAC Date: CID:999 Insp Date: Program Type:ER Close Date:2004-05-05 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5522 Create Date:1997-10-30 00:00:00 Contribute Factor:Tank Overfill Update Date:2004-05-05 00:00:00 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Institutional, Educational, Gov., Other Lead DEC:ROMOCKI Class:C4 Reported by:DEC Meets Std:False Referred to: Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:False Caller Remark: "VISITED TANKS REMOVAL JOB. SOME CONTAMINATED SOIL EXCAVATED FROM AROUND FILL PORT." Dec Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was MR " Spiller Information Spiller Name:SANDRA NOVELLI Spiller Zip:14850- Spiller Company:ITHACA CITY SCHOOLS Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address:400 LAKE ST Contact Name:SANDRA NOVELLI Spiller City:ITHACA Contact Phone:(607) 257-1555 Spiller State:NY Contact Ext:460 Latitude:42.359241524 Longitude:-76.489937597 m-11-813646817-b 1 of 1 ESE 0.39 / 2,046.85 1,278.45 / -43 ABC CLEANING 1754 DANBY RD p1p-813646817-y1y 10 11 LST NY SPILLS 37 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB DANBY NY Spill No:9004948 Spill Date:1990-08-02 12:00:00 Site ID:258154 Received Date:1990-08-02 16:00:00 DER Facility ID:211326 CAC Date:1995-06-06 00:00:00 CID:Insp Date:1990-08-07 00:00:00 Program Type:ER Close Date:1995-06-06 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5522 Create Date:1990-08-08 00:00:00 Contributing Factor:Housekeeping Update Date:1995-06-07 00:00:00 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Commercial/Industrial Lead DEC:CLWARNER Class:B3 Reported by:Citizen Meets Std:True Referred to:LONG TERM Penalty:False County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours:False UST Trust:False Caller Remark: "WASTE OIL, GAS, AND POSSIBLE SOLVENTS DUMPED ON GROUND." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was CWA 08/07/90: REMOVED CONTAMINATED SOIL AND STOCKPILED ON PLASTIC. SAMPLES TAKEN AND DELIVERED TO FRIEND LAB. " Material Information OP Unit ID:945437 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID:436022 Med GW:False Material Code:0009 Med SW:False Material Name:gasoline Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:True OP Unit ID:945437 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID:436023 Med GW:False Material Code:0059A Med SW:False Material Name:solvents Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Other Med Surf:False Quantity:.00 Med Subway:False Units:Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:True Spiller Information Spiller Name:Spiller Zip: Spiller Company:ABC CLEANING Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address:1754 DANBY RD.Contact Name: Spiller City:DANBY Contact Phone: Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude:42.359241568 Longitude:-76.484187587 m-12-813637581-b 1 of 1 WNW 0.45 / 2,356.77 1,410.27 / 89 ROADSIDE DITCH GUNDERMAN/ COMFORT p1p-813637581-y1y 12 NY SPILLS 38 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB DANBY NY Spill No:0712232 Spill Date:2008-02-20 12:30:00 Site ID:393824 Received Date:2008-02-20 15:11:00 DER Facility ID:343404 CAC Date: CID:404 Insp Date: Program Type:ER Close Date:2008-03-07 00:00:00 SWIS Code:5522 Create Date:2008-02-20 15:39:00 Contributing Factor:Traffic Accident Update Date:2008-03-07 10:30:54.370000000 Water Body:DEC Region:7 Source:Institutional, Educational, Gov., Other Lead DEC:MJROMOCK Class:C3 Reported by:Other Meets Std:False Referred to: Penalty:County:Tompkins REM Phase:0 After Hours: UST Trust: Caller Remark: "not sure whether it is gas or diesel; it is about 40 gallons spilled; FD on scene; has went into a ditch not yet contained or cleaned up" DEC Remark: "2/20/08 -K.Kemp responded to scene of accident. Op-Tech was hired by spiller (Metro Mattress) to clean up. 2/22/08 - M. Romocki inspected site. Cleanup appears complete." Material Information OP Unit ID:1150776 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID:2141415 Med GW:False Material Code:0009 Med SW:False Material Name:gasoline Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:True OP Unit ID:1150776 Med Air:False OU:01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID:2141416 Med GW:False Material Code:0008 Med SW:False Material Name:diesel Med DW:False CAS No:Med Sewer:False Material Family:Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity:.00 Med Subway:False Units:G Med Utility:False Recovered:.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil:True Spiller Information Spiller Name:Spiller Zip: Spiller Company:UNKNOWN Spiller Country:999 Spiller Address:Contact Name:FIRE CHIEF 463 Spiller City:Contact Phone:(607) 592-0640 Spiller State:NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: 39 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Unplottable Summary Total: 11 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Name Address City Zip ERIS ID uu-LST-814044330-aa T/DANBY HWY DEPT BALD HILL RD DANBY (T) NY 814044330 Spill No | Close Date: 8909867 | 1990-07-09 00:00:00 uu-LST-814002533-aa DANBY ROAD ITHACA COLLEGE DANBY ROAD ITHACA NY 814002533 Spill No | Close Date: 8602637 | 2003-10-23 00:00:00 uu-NY SPILLS-822822456-aa NYSEG JENNINGS POND RD POLE 13-3 LINE 30 SPENCER NY 822822456 Spill No | Close Date: 1502860 | 2015-11-16 00:00:00 uu-NY SPILLS-813639086-aa DANBY STATE FOREST MICHIGAN HOLLOW ROAD DANBY NY 813639086 Spill No | Close Date: 9965064 | 1999-08-19 00:00:00 uu-NY SPILLS-813644386-aa ITHACA COLLEGE DANBY RD. ITHACA NY 813644386 Spill No | Close Date: 8906975 | 1989-10-17 00:00:00 uu-NY SPILLS-813737663-aa HILLVIEW MOBIL HOME PARK SOUTH DANBY RD OFF RT 96B DANBY NY 813737663 Spill No | Close Date: 8801906 | 1988-06-15 00:00:00 uu-NY SPILLS-813644410-aa ITHACA COL.- FISCAL PLANT DANBY ROAD - FISCAL PLANT ITHACA (T) NY 813644410 Spill No | Close Date: 8909423 | 1990-12-29 00:00:00 uu-NY SPILLS-827223310-aa CASELLA TRUCK SOUTH DANBY RD SPENCER NY 14883 827223310 Spill No | Close Date: 1504774 | 2015-08-03 00:00:00 uu-NY SPILLS-813923804-aa ITHACA COLLEGE PHYSICAL PLANT DANBY RD. ITHACA NY 813923804 Spill No | Close Date: 9006866 | 1990-09-24 00:00:00 uu-SHWS-814053686-aa NCR Sewer Danby Road Ithaca NY 14850 814053686 uu-SHWS-814053685-aa NCR Sewer Offsite Danby Road Ithaca NY 14850 814053685 LST LST NY SPILLS NY SPILLS NY SPILLS NY SPILLS NY SPILLS NY SPILLS NY SPILLS SHWS SHWS Unplottable Summary 40 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Unplottable Report Site:T/DANBY HWY DEPT BALD HILL RD DANBY (T) NY uu-LST-814044330-bb Spill No: 8909867 Spill Date:1990-01-15 08:00:00 Site ID: 206025 Rcvd Date:1990-01-15 08:20:00 DER Facility ID: 171089 CAC Date:1990-07-02 00:00:00 CID: Insp Date:1990-01-16 00:00:00 Program Type: ER Close Date:1990-07-09 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5500 Create Date:1990-01-16 00:00:00 Contribute Factor: Tank Failure Update Date:1990-07-09 00:00:00 Water Body: DEC Region:7 Source: Institutional, Educational, Gov., Other Lead DEC:CLWARNER Class: B3 Reported by:Responsible Party Meets Std: True Referred to:LONG TERM Penalty: False County:Tompkins REM Phase: 0 After Hours:True UST Trust: True Caller Remark: "1000 GAL DIESEL TANK DEVELOPED HOLES. SMALL AMOUNT CAME THROUGH FOUNDATION AND LEAKED ONTO GARAGE FLOOR." Dec Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was CWA 01/15/90: REQUESTED GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION. 01/29/90: MONITORING WELLS INSTALLED ON 1-29 AND 1-30. SAMPLES WERE TAKEN. AWAITING TEST RESULTS. 01/29/90: MONITORING WELLS INSTALLED ON 1-29 AND 1-30. SAMPLES WERE TAKEN. AWAITING TEST RESULTS. RESULTS SHOWED VERY LITTLE CONTAMINATION. REQUESTED ANOTHER ROUND OF SAMPLING. 05/11/90: BUCK LABS TO RESAMPLE WELLS. DETERMINATION FOR FURTHER WORK TO BE MADE UPON RECEIPT OF TEST RESULTS. 07/02/90: RECEIVED TEST RESULTS FROM BUCK LABS. ALL RESULTS WELL BELOW GROUNDWATER STANDARDS. NO FURTHER ACTION. SENT LETTER TO TOWN ON 7-9 TELLING THEM NO FURTHER ACTION WILL BE REQUIRED. " Material Information OP Unit ID: 936874 Med Air:False OU: 01 Med in Air:False Material ID: 562184 Med GW:True Material Code: 0008 Med SW:False Material Name: diesel Med DW:False CAS No: Med Sewer:False Material Family: Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity: .00 Med Subway:False Units: G Med Utility:False Recovered: .00 Oxygenate: Med Soil: False Spiller Information Spiller Name: Spiller Zip: Spiller Company: T/DANBY HWY DEPT.Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address: BALD HILL RD.Contact Name: Spiller City: DANBY Contact Phone: Spiller State: NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: Tank Test Information LST Unplottable Report 41 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Spill Tank ID: 1536678 Source: Tank No: Leak Rate:.00 Tank SIze: 0 Gross Fail: Material: 0008 Modified by:Spills EPA UST: Last Modified:2004-10-01 04:00:45.140000000 UST: Test Method:00 Cause: Alt Test Method:Unknown Site:DANBY ROAD ITHACA COLLEGE DANBY ROAD ITHACA NY uu-LST-814002533-bb Spill No: 8602637 Spill Date:1986-07-22 17:00:00 Site ID: 315249 Rcvd Date:1986-07-22 17:41:00 DER Facility ID: 254160 CAC Date: CID: Insp Date: Program Type: ER Close Date:2003-10-23 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5530 Create Date:1987-04-21 00:00:00 Contribute Factor: Tank Test Failure Update Date:2003-10-23 00:00:00 Water Body: DEC Region:7 Source: Institutional, Educational, Gov., Other Lead DEC:CSCUIPLY Class: B3 Reported by:Affected Persons Meets Std: False Referred to: Penalty: False County:Tompkins REM Phase: 0 After Hours:True UST Trust: True Caller Remark: "" Dec Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was CC / / : LINE TEST. FAILURE RATE .336 GALS/HR. NORMAN WALL, ITHACA COLLEGE 607-274-3353. " Material Information OP Unit ID: 899902 Med Air:False OU: 01 Med in Air:False Material ID: 565380 Med GW:True Material Code: 0008 Med SW:False Material Name: diesel Med DW:False CAS No: Med Sewer:False Material Family: Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity: .00 Med Subway:False Units: L Med Utility:False Recovered: .00 Oxygenate: Med Soil: False Spiller Information Spiller Name: Spiller Zip: Spiller Company: ITHACA COLLEGE Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address: Contact Name: Spiller City: Contact Phone: Spiller State: ZZ Contact Ext: Latitude:42.339209994 Longitude:-76.457945000 Tank Test Information Spill Tank ID: 1530068 Source: Tank No: Leak Rate:.00 Tank SIze: 0 Gross Fail: Material: 0008 Modified by:Spills EPA UST: Last Modified:2004-10-01 04:00:45.140000000 UST: Test Method:00 LST 42 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Cause: Alt Test Method:Unknown Site:NYSEG JENNINGS POND RD POLE 13-3 LINE 30 SPENCER NY uu-NY SPILLS-822822456-bb Spill No: 1502860 Spill Date:2015-06-12 19:30:00 Site ID: 509142 Received Date:2015-06-15 09:08:00 DER Facility ID: 463788 CAC Date: CID: Insp Date: Program Type: ER Close Date:2015-11-16 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5434 Create Date:2015-06-15 09:10:00 Contributing Factor: Equipment Failure Update Date:2015-11-16 14:46:19.907000000 Water Body: DEC Region:7 Source: Transformer Lead DEC:CFNORRIS Class: D4 Reported by:Other Meets Std: False Referred to: Penalty: County:Tioga REM Phase: 0 After Hours:False UST Trust: False Caller Remark: "loss to soil, c/u complete" DEC Remark: "Spill to soil. Awaiting report. 10/14/2015 I called Debbie Dunlap, the NYSEG report contact. She said she would get me an update on spill list by Monday. 10/27/2017 emailed Debbie as follow-up, asking for reports or at least an ETA on when reports would arrive. 11-3-2015 Debbie emailed analytical and incident report. Awaiting disposal report. 11-16-2015 MANIFEST PROVIDED BY NYSEG" Material Information OP Unit ID: 1258435 Med Air:False OU: 01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID: 2261589 Med GW:False Material Code: 0020A Med SW:False Material Name: transformer oil Med DW:False CAS No: Med Sewer:False Material Family: Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity: Med Subway:False Units: G Med Utility:False Recovered: Oxygenate: Med Soil: True Spiller Information Spiller Name: MIKE STEIGERWALT Spiller Zip: Spiller Company: NYSEG Spiller Country:999 Spiller Address: JENNINGS POND POLE 13-3 LINE 30 Contact Name:MIKE STEIGERWALT Spiller City: SPENCER Contact Phone:(607) 347-2188 Spiller State: NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: Site:DANBY STATE FOREST MICHIGAN HOLLOW ROAD DANBY NY uu-NY SPILLS-813639086-bb Spill No: 9965064 Spill Date:1999-08-19 10:55:00 Site ID: 291102 Received Date:1999-08-19 10:55:00 DER Facility ID: 235721 CAC Date: CID: Insp Date:1999-08-19 00:00:00 Program Type: ER Close Date:1999-08-19 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5522 Create Date:1999-08-23 13:43:00 Contributing Factor: Unknown Update Date:1999-08-23 00:00:00 Water Body: LAKE OUTLET STREAM DEC Region:7 Source: Unknown Lead DEC:LARRY? Class: E6 Reported by:DEC NY SPILLS NY SPILLS 43 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Meets Std: True Referred to:SHORT TERM Penalty: False County:Tompkins REM Phase: 0 After Hours:False UST Trust: False Caller Remark: "APPARENT GASOLINE SHEEN AND ODOR IN STREAM BELOW LAKE ON FINGERLAKES TRAIL AT DIANES CROSSING IN DANBY STATE FOREST." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was LCS 08/19/99 VISITED SITE. NO PETROLEUM ODORS DETECTED. VISIBLE SHEEN WAS BIOLOGICAL IN ORIGIN (IRON BACTERIA). CLOSE SPILL." Material Information OP Unit ID: 1093228 Med Air:False OU: 01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID: 290649 Med GW:False Material Code: 0009 Med SW:True Material Name: gasoline Med DW:False CAS No: Med Sewer:False Material Family: Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity: .00 Med Subway:False Units: G Med Utility:False Recovered: .00 Oxygenate: Med Soil: False Spiller Information Spiller Name: Spiller Zip: Spiller Company: UNKNOWN Spiller Country:999 Spiller Address: Contact Name:LAURA STENZLER Spiller City: Contact Phone:(607) 539-6893 Spiller State: NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: Site:ITHACA COLLEGE DANBY RD. ITHACA NY uu-NY SPILLS-813644386-bb Spill No: 8906975 Spill Date:1989-10-16 15:04:00 Site ID: 248376 Received Date:1989-10-16 16:00:00 DER Facility ID: 203801 CAC Date:1989-10-16 00:00:00 CID: Insp Date: Program Type: ER Close Date:1989-10-17 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5530 Create Date:1989-10-17 00:00:00 Contributing Factor: Human Error Update Date:2004-09-30 21:28:29.950000000 Water Body: DEC Region:7 Source: Institutional, Educational, Gov., Other Lead DEC:PETERSON Class: Reported by:Responsible Party Meets Std: True Referred to:LONG TERM Penalty: False County:Tompkins REM Phase: 0 After Hours:False UST Trust: False Caller Remark: "SPILL CONTAINED ON CONC. TO BE DISPOSED AS HAZ. MAT." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was GPA 10/03/95: This is additional information about material spilled from the translation of the old spill file: SODIUM DICROMATE" NY SPILLS 44 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Spiller Information Spiller Name: Spiller Zip: Spiller Company: ITHACA COLLEGE Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address: Contact Name: Spiller City: Contact Phone: Spiller State: ZZ Contact Ext: Latitude:42.339209994 Longitude:-76.457945000 Site:HILLVIEW MOBIL HOME PARK SOUTH DANBY RD OFF RT 96B DANBY NY uu-NY SPILLS-813737663-bb Spill No: 8801906 Spill Date:1988-03-15 12:00:00 Site ID: 72843 Received Date:1988-06-01 11:26:00 DER Facility ID: 68657 CAC Date:1988-06-15 00:00:00 CID: Insp Date:1988-06-15 00:00:00 Program Type: ER Close Date:1988-06-15 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5522 Create Date:1988-06-07 00:00:00 Contributing Factor: Other Update Date:1988-08-10 00:00:00 Water Body: DEC Region:7 Source: Unknown Lead DEC:CSCUIPLY Class: Reported by:Affected Persons Meets Std: True Referred to: Penalty: False County:Tompkins REM Phase: 0 After Hours:False UST Trust: False Caller Remark: "FUEL OIL SPILLED WHILE MOVING TRAILER. CONTAMINATED AREA APPROX 5'X 20'." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was CC 06/15/88: POSES NO THREAT TO ENVIRONMENT. " Material Information OP Unit ID: 919056 Med Air:False OU: 01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID: 461035 Med GW:False Material Code: 0001A Med SW:False Material Name: #2 fuel oil Med DW:False CAS No: Med Sewer:False Material Family: Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity: .00 Med Subway:False Units: Med Utility:False Recovered: .00 Oxygenate: Med Soil: True Spiller Information Spiller Name: Spiller Zip: Spiller Company: UNKNOWN Spiller Country:999 Spiller Address: Contact Name: Spiller City: Contact Phone: Spiller State: NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: Site:ITHACA COL.- FISCAL PLANT DANBY ROAD - FISCAL PLANT ITHACA (T) NY uu-NY SPILLS-813644410-bb Spill No: 8909423 Spill Date:1989-12-29 09:57:00 Site ID: 70421 Received Date:1989-12-29 10:49:00 DER Facility ID: 66824 CAC Date:1990-12-29 00:00:00 CID: Insp Date:1989-12-29 00:00:00 NY SPILLS NY SPILLS 45 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Program Type: ER Close Date:1990-12-29 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5500 Create Date:1989-12-29 00:00:00 Contributing Factor: Human Error Update Date:1990-05-04 00:00:00 Water Body: DEC Region:7 Source: Commercial/Industrial Lead DEC:JEOKESSO Class: Reported by:Affected Persons Meets Std: True Referred to:LONG TERM Penalty: False County:Tompkins REM Phase: 0 After Hours:False UST Trust: False Caller Remark: "DRIVER PLACED HOSE ON FILL PIPE. WENT TO TRUCK TO START PTO. NOTICED HOSE ON GROUND W/ GAS COMING OUT. LOST 10 GAL. F.D. PUT DOWN FOAM. CORNELL HAZ. MAT. ON ROUTE." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was JOA 12/29/89: SPOKE W/ PEG SERINO. GAS RAN 5 FT. ON GROUND AND THEN HIT PARKING LOT. COLLEGE CONTAINED SPILL. " Material Information OP Unit ID: 936598 Med Air:False OU: 01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID: 442591 Med GW:False Material Code: 0009 Med SW:False Material Name: gasoline Med DW:False CAS No: Med Sewer:False Material Family: Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity: 10.00 Med Subway:False Units: G Med Utility:False Recovered: .00 Oxygenate: Med Soil: True Spiller Information Spiller Name: Spiller Zip:14850 Spiller Company: ANDREE PETROLEUM Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address: 684 THIRD ST.Contact Name: Spiller City: ITHACA Contact Phone: Spiller State: NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: Tank Test Information Spill Tank ID: 1536623 Source: Tank No: Test Method:00 Tank Size: 0 Leak Rate:.00 Material: 0009 Gross Fail: EPA UST: Modified by:Spills UST: Last Modified:2004-10-01 04:00:45.140000000 Cause: Alt Test Method:Unknown Site:CASELLA TRUCK SOUTH DANBY RD SPENCER NY 14883 uu-NY SPILLS-827223310-bb Spill No: 1504774 Spill Date:2015-08-03 14:00:00 Site ID: 511126 Received Date:2015-08-03 14:31:00 DER Facility ID: 465675 CAC Date:2015-08-03 00:00:00 CID: Insp Date: Program Type: ER Close Date:2015-08-03 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5522 Create Date:2015-08-03 14:33:00 Contributing Factor: Equipment Failure Update Date:2015-08-03 14:42:31.473000000 Water Body: DEC Region:7 Source: Commercial Vehicle Lead DEC:KCKEMP NY SPILLS 46 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Class: C4 Reported by:Responsible Party Meets Std: False Referred to: Penalty: False County:Tompkins REM Phase: 0 After Hours:False UST Trust: False Caller Remark: "Oil spilled to the roadway. Clean up is in progress." DEC Remark: "Cleaned by Casella personnel using absorbent. Absorbent placed into back of offending vehicle and transported with load to Ontario Co LF for disposal. Spill closed. KCKemp" Material Information OP Unit ID: 1260387 Med Air:False OU: 01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID: 2263765 Med GW:False Material Code: 0010 Med SW:False Material Name: hydraulic oil Med DW:False CAS No: Med Sewer:False Material Family: Petroleum Med Surf:True Quantity: 10.00 Med Subway:False Units: G Med Utility:False Recovered: 10.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil: False Spiller Information Spiller Name: ANDREA KUNTZ Spiller Zip:14561 Spiller Company: CASELLA Spiller Country:999 Spiller Address: 1897 US 20 Contact Name:ANDREA KUNTZ Spiller City: STANLEY Contact Phone:(585) 797-4501 Spiller State: NY Contact Ext: Latitude: Longitude: Site:ITHACA COLLEGE PHYSICAL PLANT DANBY RD. ITHACA NY uu-NY SPILLS-813923804-bb Spill No: 9006866 Spill Date:1990-09-21 17:45:00 Site ID: 315807 Received Date:1990-09-21 19:30:00 DER Facility ID: 254603 CAC Date:1990-09-21 00:00:00 CID: Insp Date: Program Type: ER Close Date:1990-09-24 00:00:00 SWIS Code: 5530 Create Date:1990-09-24 00:00:00 Contributing Factor: Abandoned Drums Update Date:2004-09-30 21:28:29.950000000 Water Body: DEC Region:7 Source: Institutional, Educational, Gov., Other Lead DEC:CLWARNER Class: Reported by:Responsible Party Meets Std: True Referred to:LONG TERM Penalty: False County:Tompkins REM Phase: 0 After Hours:True UST Trust: False Caller Remark: "MOVING DRUMS AND ONE RUPTURED. F.D., CORNELL UNIV. HAZ-MAT TEAM ON SITE. SPEEDY DRY APPLIED TO SPILL AND CLEANED UP." DEC Remark: "Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead_DEC Field was CWA 09/21/90: SPEEDY DRY APPLIED TO SPILL AND MATERIAL WAS CLEANED UP. 10/03/95: This is additional information about material spilled from the translation of the old spill file: PETRO. DISTILATE." NY SPILLS 47 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Material Information OP Unit ID: 947370 Med Air:False OU: 01 Med Ind Air:False Material ID: 434311 Med GW:False Material Code: 0066A Med SW:False Material Name: unknown petroleum Med DW:False CAS No: Med Sewer:False Material Family: Petroleum Med Surf:False Quantity: 10.00 Med Subway:False Units: G Med Utility:False Recovered: 8.00 Oxygenate: Med Soil: True Spiller Information Spiller Name: Spiller Zip:14850 Spiller Company: ITHACA COLLEGE Spiller Country:001 Spiller Address: DANBY RD.Contact Name: Spiller City: ITHACA Contact Phone: Spiller State: NY Contact Ext: Latitude:42.419836000 Longitude:-76.501617000 Site:NCR Sewer Danby Road Ithaca NY 14850 uu-SHWS-814053686-bb Site Code: 387242 Latitude: Site Code (Web): Longitude: HW Code: 755017 Latitude (Web): SWIS: 5530 Longitude (Web): Site Class: N X Coord (Web): Site Class (Web): Y Coord (Web): Program: HW Acres:63.000 Town: Ithaca Record Added:2007-09-17 09:21:00 County: Tompkins Record Update:2009-04-01 12:52:00 Region: 7 Updated by:BRWOLOSE County (Web): Site Class Desc (Web): Site Class Desc:No Further Action at this Time: Sites are given a classification of "N" when: a. the investigation and evaluation of a Class P site results in a determination that contamination at the site does not warrant placing the site on the Registry or it is being addressed under a brownfield program; b. a site was in a brownfield program (BCP, ERP or VCP) or other non-Registry program, remediation was not completed, and the site did not otherwise qualify for listing on the Registry. As an example, this occurs when a volunteer begins a brownfield project and then for economic or other reasons, determines they cannot complete the work and the brownfield project is terminated. If the contamination at the brownfield site qualifies it for placement on the Registry, the Department acts to do so. If the site re-enters a brownfield program, it can be reclassified to Class A (active) to indicate that work has recommenced; c. a site was identified simply as the location(s) where a drum(s) or other discrete waste was at one time present and subsequently removed by DEC or others and, based on the resulting conditions, no need for additional work was apparent; or d. an application to the BCP, ERP or VCP was submitted, and was then withdrawn or terminated before any actions were taken to investigate or remediate the site. Assess DOH: Description: Description Not Available Assessment: Site:NCR Sewer Offsite Danby Road Ithaca NY 14850 uu-SHWS-814053685-bb SHWS SHWS 48 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Site Code: 387240 Latitude: Site Code (Web): Longitude: HW Code: 755016 Latitude (Web): SWIS: 5530 Longitude (Web): Site Class: N X Coord (Web): Site Class (Web): Y Coord (Web): Program: HW Acres:9.000 Town: Ithaca Record Added:2007-09-17 08:36:00 County: Tompkins Record Update:2008-02-11 11:56:00 Region: 7 Updated by:BRWOLOSE County (Web): Site Class Desc (Web): Site Class Desc:No Further Action at this Time: Sites are given a classification of "N" when: a. the investigation and evaluation of a Class P site results in a determination that contamination at the site does not warrant placing the site on the Registry or it is being addressed under a brownfield program; b. a site was in a brownfield program (BCP, ERP or VCP) or other non-Registry program, remediation was not completed, and the site did not otherwise qualify for listing on the Registry. As an example, this occurs when a volunteer begins a brownfield project and then for economic or other reasons, determines they cannot complete the work and the brownfield project is terminated. If the contamination at the brownfield site qualifies it for placement on the Registry, the Department acts to do so. If the site re-enters a brownfield program, it can be reclassified to Class A (active) to indicate that work has recommenced; c. a site was identified simply as the location(s) where a drum(s) or other discrete waste was at one time present and subsequently removed by DEC or others and, based on the resulting conditions, no need for additional work was apparent; or d. an application to the BCP, ERP or VCP was submitted, and was then withdrawn or terminated before any actions were taken to investigate or remediate the site. Assess DOH: Description: Description Not Available Assessment: 49 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program:rr-DOE FUSRAP-bb The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from the Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. The DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) established long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) requirements for remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE evaluates the final site conditions of a remediated site on the basis of risk for different future uses. DOE then confirms that LTS&M requirements will maintain protectiveness. Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017 National Priority List:rr-NPL-bb National Priorities List (Superfund)-NPL: EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency) list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021 National Priority List - Proposed:rr-PROPOSED NPL-bb Includes sites proposed (by the EPA, the state, or concerned citizens) for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021 Deleted NPL:rr-DELETED NPL-bb The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory:rr-SEMS-bb The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2021 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985:rr-ODI-bb The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 DOE FUSRAP NPL PROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL SEMS ODI Appendix: Database Descriptions 50 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites:rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-bb The Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2021 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS: rr-CERCLIS-bb Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands:rr-IODI-bb Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned:rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-bb An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens:rr-CERCLIS LIENS-bb A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action:rr-RCRA CORRACTS-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities:rr-RCRA TSD-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 RCRA Generator List:rr-RCRA LQG-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG 51 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA SQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators List:rr-RCRA VSQG-bb RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Additionally, VSQG may not accumulate more than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste at any time. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 RCRA Non-Generators:rr-RCRA NON GEN-bb RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs:rr-FED ENG-bb Engineering controls (ECs) encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Aug 26, 2020 Federal Institutional Controls- ICs:rr-FED INST-bb Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's (United States Environmental Protection Agency ) expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. Government Publication Date: Aug 26, 2020 Land Use Control Information System:rr-LUCIS-bb The LUCIS database is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Navy and contains information for former Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) properties across the United States. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2006 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System:rr-ERNS-bb Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports made available by the United States Coast Guard National Response Center (NRC). The NRC fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. These data contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Government Publication Date: Nov 9, 2020 RCRA SQG RCRA VSQG RCRA NON GEN FED ENG FED INST LUCIS ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS 52 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database:rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jan 6, 2021 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing:rr-FEMA UST-bb The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 Facility Response Plan:rr-FRP-bb List of facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRP) to EPA. Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs). Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 2020 Historical Gas Stations:rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-bb This historic directory of service stations is provided by the Cities Service Company. The directory includes Cities Service filling stations that were located throughout the United States in 1930. Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1930 Petroleum Refineries:rr-REFN-bb List of petroleum refineries from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Refinery Capacity Report. Includes operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new refineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year located in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Survey locations adjusted using public data. Government Publication Date: Jul 10, 2020 Petroleum Product and Crude Oil Rail Terminals:rr-BULK TERMINAL-bb List of petroleum product and crude oil rail terminals made available by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Includes operable bulk petroleum product terminals located in the 50 States and the District of Columbia with a total bulk shell storage capacity of 50,000 barrels or more, and/or the ability to receive volumes from tanker, barge, or pipeline; also rail terminals handling the loading and unloading of crude oil that were active between 2017 and 2018. Petroleum product terminals comes from the EIA-815 Bulk Terminal and Blender Report, which includes working, shell in operation, and shell idle for several major product groupings. Survey locations adjusted using public data. Government Publication Date: Apr 28, 2020 LIEN on Property:rr-SEMS LIEN-bb The EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides LIEN information on properties under the EPA Superfund Program. Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2021 Superfund Decision Documents:rr-SUPERFUND ROD-bb This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021 State Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York State:rr-SHWS-bb State-and tribal- equivalent CERCLIS. State Superfund Program (Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Remedial Program) (IHWDS) - Oversees the identification, investigation and cleanup of sites where consequential amounts of hazardous waste exist. These sites go through a process of investigation, evaluation, cleanup and monitoring that has several distinct stages. This list is made available by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's State Superfund Program. FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST FRP HIST GAS STATIONS REFN BULK TERMINAL SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD SHWS 53 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Delisted Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York:rr-DSHW-bb This database contains a Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal sites which have been removed from New York Department of Environmental Conservation's Environmental Site Remediation database. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Vapor Intrusion Legacy Site List:rr-VAPOR-bb New York is currently re-evaluating previous assumptions and decisions regarding the potential for soil vapor intrusion exposures at sites. As a result, all past, current, and future contaminated sites will be evaluated to determine whether these sites have the potential for exposures related to soil vapor intrusion. This list is made available by Department of Environmental Conservation's Vapor Intrusion Legacy Site List. This database is state equivalent CERCLIS. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2018 Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills:rr-SWF/LF-bb Solid Waste Information Management System (SWIMS) is an inventory containing active and inactive facilities throughout the state. This list is made available by Department of Environmental Conservation's Solid Waste Information Management System (SWIMS). Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2020 Inactive Landfill Facilities:rr-LANDFILL INACTIVE-bb List of inactive landfills in the State of New York. This data is made available by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). DEC notes that these are preliminary data and should not be regarded as a complete inventory of all landfills in the State, and also that site locations and attributes are preliminary and should not be relied upon without independent verification. Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2020 Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Sites:rr-HSWDS-bb A list of sites included in Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Site Study reports made available by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Hazardous Waste Remediation. Provides information regarding the evolving status of hazardous substance waste disposal sites in New York. Government Publication Date: Oct 24, 2003 Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-LST-bb This database contains records of chemical and petroleum spill incidents. They include leaking aboveground storage tanks or leaking underground storage tanks, with incidents of tank test failures, tank failures and tank overfill. This list is made available by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's Spill Response Program. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 Delisted County Records:rr-DELISTED COUNTY-bb Records removed from county databases. Records may be removed from the county lists made available by the respective county departments because they are inactive, or because they have been deemed to be below reportable thresholds. Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 2019 Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED LST-bb List of Leaking Storage Tank sites which has been removed from New York Department of Environmental Conservation's Spill Response Program Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 Underground Storage Tanks- UST-Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS):rr-UST-bb Facilities within the Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) that have underground storage tanks. Underground petroleum storage facilities with a combined storage capacity over eleven hundred (1,100) gallons. This list is made available by NewYork Department of Environmental Conservation's Environmental Site Database Search. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 The Bulk Storage Program Database - AST:rr-AST-bb Facilities within the Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) that have aboveground storage tanks. Aboveground petroleum storage facilities with a combined storage capacity over eleven hundred (1,100) gallons. This list is made available by New York State Department of Environmental conservation's Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) program. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 DSHW VAPOR SWF/LF LANDFILL INACTIVE HSWDS LST DELISTED COUNTY DELISTED LST UST AST 54 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Delisted Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED TANKS-bb List of Storage Tank sites which has been removed from New York Department of Environmental Conservation's Environmental Site Database. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 Petroleum Bulk Storage:rr-TANKS-bb The Bulk Storage Program Database maintains the registrations of active and inactive bulk storage sites statewide. This database includes Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) tanks where no information is available on whether they are ASTs or USTs. This list is made available by Department of Environmental Conservation's Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) program. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 Chemical Bulk Storage (CBS):rr-CBS-bb Facilities that store regulated hazardous substances in underground tanks . "Hazardous substance" means any substance listed as hazardous or acutely hazardous in 6 NYCRR Part 597 or a mixture thereof. This list is made available by Department of Environmental Conservation's Chemical Bulk Storage (CBS) Program. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 Major Oil Storage Facilities (MOSF):rr-MOSF-bb In 1977, the New York State Legislature passed the "Oil Spill Prevention, Control and Compensation Act" (Article 12 of the Navigation Law). This law regulates all oil terminals and transport vessels operating in the waters of the State which have a storage capacity of 400,000 gallons or more. (Terminals and vessels with a capacity of 400,000 gallons or more are commonly referred to as major oil storage facilities or MOSFs). This list is made available by Department of Environmental Conservation's Major Oil Storage Facility (MOSF) Program. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 Registry of Engineering Controls in New York State:rr-ENG-bb Registry of Engineering Controls in New York State taken from the Environmental Site Remediation Database. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Registry of Institutional Controls in New York State:rr-INST-bb Registry of Institutional Controls in New York State taken from the Environmental Site Remediation Database. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Voluntary Cleanup Agreements:rr-VCP-bb New York established its Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) to address the environmental, legal and financial barriers that often hinder the redevelopment and reuse of contaminated properties. The Voluntary Cleanup Program was developed to enhance private sector cleanup of brownfields by enabling parties to remediate sites using private rather than public funds and to reduce the development pressures on "greenfield" sites. This list is made available by Department of Environmental Conservation's Voluntary Cleanup Program. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Environmental Restoration Program Listing:rr-ERP-bb Environmental Restoration Program - Provides municipalities with financial assistance for site investigation and remediation at eligible brownfield sites. In an effort to spur the cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields, New Yorkers approved a $200 million Environmental Restoration Fund as part of the $1.75 billion Clean Water/Clean Air Bond Act of 1996 (Bond Act). Under the Environmental Restoration Program, the State provides grants to municipalities to reimburse up to 90 percent of on-site eligible costs and 100% of off-site eligible costs for site investigation and remediation activities. This list is made available by Department of Environmental Conservation's Environmental Restoration Program. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Brownfields Site List (Subset of Site Remediation):rr-BROWNFIELDS-bb Brownfield Cleanup Program was developed to enhance private-sector cleanups of brownfields and to reduce development pressure on "Greenfields". A Brownfield site is real property, the redevelopment or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a contaminant. Contaminants include hazardous waste and/or petroleum. This list is made available by Department of Environmental Conservation's Brownfield Cleanup Program. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN LUST-bb LUSTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 2, which includes New York and New Jersey. There are no LUST records in New York at this time. DELISTED TANKS TANKS CBS MOSF ENG INST VCP ERP BROWNFIELDS INDIAN LUST 55 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2016 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on Indian Lands:rr-INDIAN UST-bb USTs on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 2, which includes New York and New Jersey. Government Publication Date: Apr 04, 2016 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED ILST-bb Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Apr 14, 2020 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks:rr-DELISTED IUST-bb Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Apr 14, 2020 County No County databases were selected to be included in the search. Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal PFOA/PFOS Contaminated Sites:rr-PFAS NPL-bb List of sites where PFOA or PFOS contaminants have been found in drinking water or soil. Made available by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Mar 1, 2021 Facility Registry Service/Facility Index:rr-FINDS/FRS-bb The Facility Registry Service (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites, or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, and data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. This list is made available by the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Government Publication Date: Nov 2, 2020 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program:rr-TRIS-bb The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U. S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date: Feb 19, 2020 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Releases:rr-PFAS TRI-bb List of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities at which the reported chemical is a Per- or polyfluorinated alkyl substance (PFAS) included in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. Government Publication Date: Feb 19, 2020 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Water Quality:rr-PFAS WATER-bb The Water Quality Portal (WQP) is a cooperative service sponsored by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council (NWQMC). This listing includes records from the Water Quality Portal where the characteristic (environmental measurement) is in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. Government Publication Date: Jul 20, 2020 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System:rr-HMIRS-bb US DOT - Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation. INDIAN UST DELISTED ILST DELISTED IUST PFAS NPL FINDS/FRS TRIS PFAS TRI PFAS WATER HMIRS 56 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2020 National Clandestine Drug Labs:rr-NCDL-bb The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: Oct 5, 2020 Toxic Substances Control Act:rr-TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2019 Hist TSCA:rr-HIST TSCA-bb The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing:rr-FTTS ADMIN-bb An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing:rr-FTTS INSP-bb An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List:rr-PRP-bb Early in the cleanup process, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties (PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. Government Publication Date: Feb 23, 2021 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing:rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-bb The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS):rr-ICIS-bb The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance (FE&C) and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs. The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities. These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement. The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits, limits, discharge monitoring data and other program reports. Government Publication Date: Jan 6, 2021 NCDL TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP PRP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS 57 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Drycleaner Facilities:rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-bb A list of drycleaner facilities from Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) online search. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: Feb 17, 2021 Delisted Drycleaner Facilities:rr-DELISTED FED DRY-bb List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: Feb 17, 2021 Formerly Used Defense Sites:rr-FUDS-bb Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DoD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. This list is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2020 Former Military Nike Missile Sites:rr-FORMER NIKE-bb This information was taken from report DRXTH-AS-IA-83A016 (Historical Overview of the Nike Missile System, 12/1984) which was performed by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. for the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Assessment Division. The Nike system was deployed between 1954 and the mid-1970's. Among the substances used or stored on Nike sites were liquid missile fuel (JP-4); starter fluids (UDKH, aniline, and furfuryl alcohol); oxidizer (IRFNA); hydrocarbons (motor oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, heating oil); solvents (carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane, stoddard solvent); and battery electrolyte. The quantities of material a disposed of and procedures for disposal are not documented in published reports. Virtually all information concerning the potential for contamination at Nike sites is confined to personnel who were assigned to Nike sites. During deactivation most hardware was shipped to depot-level supply points. There were reportedly instances where excess materials were disposed of on or near the site itself at closure. There was reportedly no routine site decontamination. Government Publication Date: Dec 1, 1984 PHMSA Pipeline Safety Flagged Incidents:rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-bb A list of flagged pipeline incidents made available by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). PHMSA regulations require incident and accident reports for five different pipeline system types. Government Publication Date: Jul 7, 2020 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS):rr-MLTS-bb A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date: Aug 5, 2020 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites:rr-HIST MLTS-bb A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File:rr-MINES-bb The Master Index File (MIF) contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself. Government Publication Date: Nov 3, 2020 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Sites:rr-SMCRA-bb An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of Abandoned Mine Land (AML) impacts, as well as information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Government Publication Date: Dec 18, 2020 Mineral Resource Data System:rr-MRDS-bb FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS FORMER NIKE PIPELINE INCIDENT MLTS HIST MLTS MINES SMCRA MRDS 58 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 The Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world. Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The USGS has ceased systematic updates of the MRDS database with their focus more recently on deposits of critical minerals while providing a well-documented baseline of historical mine locations from USGS topographic maps. Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2006 Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Sites:rr-URANIUM-bb The Legacy Management Office of the Department of Energy (DOE) manages radioactive and chemical waste, environmental contamination, and hazardous material at over 100 sites across the U.S. The L.M. Office manages this database of sites registered under the Uranium Mill Tailings Control Act (UMTRCA). Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017 Alternative Fueling Stations:rr-ALT FUELS-bb List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Propane) stations, Ethanol (E85) stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations, and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) obtains information about new stations from trade media, Clean Cities coordinators, a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website, and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and industry groups. Government Publication Date: Jan 18, 2021 Registered Pesticide Establishments:rr-SSTS-bb List of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide-producing and device-producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides, active ingredients, or devices be registered. The list of establishments is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Mar 31, 2020 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers:rr-PCB-bb Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date: Nov 19, 2020 State Manufactured Gas Plants:rr-MGP-bb A list of former Manufactured Gas Plants (MGP) made available by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). From the late 1800's to the mid 1900's, hundreds of manufactured gas plants across New York State supplied homes and industry with fuel. Former MGP structures such as gas holders, tar separators, wells, and tanks were often susceptible to spills and leaks. As a result, these structures were a significant source of contamination from the release of tar and other toxic by-products. Government Publication Date: Oct 16, 2019 Spill Incidents Database:rr-NY SPILLS-bb Spill Incidents Database has records dating back to 1978. This database contains records of chemical and petroleum spill incidents. The DEC Spill Response program receives and compiles reports of hazardous material spills occurring anywhere in New York State. These reports are submitted through the Spill Hotline and other mechanisms, and entered by DEC spill response staff into the state's official data base of Spill Incidents Reports. This list is made available by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's Spill Response Program. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 PFAS Remedial Sites:rr-PFAS CONTAM-bb List of sites being addressed under one of the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Division of Environmental Remediation (DER)'s remedial programs, where the waste or contaminant of concern is a Per- or polyfluorinated alkyl substance (PFAS) included in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. Government Publication Date: Jan 22, 2021 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS):rr-PFAS-bb URANIUM ALT FUELS SSTS PCB MGP NY SPILLS PFAS CONTAM PFAS 59 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 A list of sites surveyed by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation to determine locations that manufacture, use, store, or release into the environment materials containing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) are a group of chemicals used to make fluoropolymer coatings and products that resist heat, oil, stains, grease, and water. Some PFAS are difficult to break down and persist in the environment that may cause harm to the public. This list is made available by the Department of Environmental Conservation of New York State. Government Publication Date: Jan 16, 2019 Landfill Investigations PFAS Sampling Results:rr-PFAS LANDFILL-bb A list of inactive landfill sites that have been investigated for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the state of New York made available by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2020 Registed Dry Cleaner Facilities:rr-DRYCLEANERS-bb The Division of Air Resources of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) tracks all registered dry cleaner facilities. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 Delisted Dry Cleaner Facilities:rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-bb Sites removed from the list of dry cleaner facilities registered with the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC)'s Division of Air Resources. Government Publication Date: Mar 9, 2021 Hazardous Waste Manifest - Facilities:rr-NY MANIFEST-bb List of facilities located in New York that are included in the Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Downloads Location Address data file made available by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), with which no manifests are associated. The Hazardous Waste Manifest Data made available by the NY DEC is compiled from hazardous waste manifest shipments to, from, or within New York State. The Bureau of Program Management, in the Division of Environmental Remediation, is responsible for maintaining hazardous waste manifest records. Government Publication Date: Feb 22, 2021 Receivers from Hazardous Waste Manifests:rr-REC MANIFEST-bb List of receiver facilities located in New York that are included in the Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Downloads Location Address data file made available by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), which are identified as a receiver in associated manifests. The Hazardous Waste Manifest Data made available by the NY DEC is compiled from hazardous waste manifest shipments to, from, or within New York State. The Bureau of Program Management, in the Division of Environmental Remediation, is responsible for maintaining hazardous waste manifest records. Hazardous Waste Code Descriptions are from NY Part 371.4 (6 CRR-NY 371.4) Identification and Listings of Hazardous Waste, unless otherwise noted. Government Publication Date: Feb 22, 2021 Generators from Hazardous Waste Manifests:rr-GEN MANIFEST-bb List of generator facilities located in New York that are included in the Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Downloads Location Address data file made available by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), which are identified as a generator in associated manifests. The Hazardous Waste Manifest Data made available by the NY DEC is compiled from hazardous waste manifest shipments to, from, or within New York State. The Bureau of Program Management, in the Division of Environmental Remediation, is responsible for maintaining hazardous waste manifest records. Hazardous Waste Code Descriptions are from NY Part 371.4 (6 CRR-NY 371.4) Identification and Listings of Hazardous Waste, unless otherwise noted. Government Publication Date: Feb 22, 2021 New York City E-Designated Sites:rr-E DESIGNATION-bb List of sites with an E-Designation - a NYC zoning map designation that indicates the presence of an environmental requirement pertaining to potential hazardous materials contamination, window/wall noise attenuation, or air quality impacts on a particular tax lot. The New York City Office of Environmental Remediation administers the E-Designation Environmental Review Program to avoid significant adverse impacts to human health or the environment through exposure to these hazards. Government Publication Date: Jul 30, 2020 Tier 2 Report:rr-TIER 2-bb A list of Tier 2 facilities in the state of New York. This is a list of facilities which have reported hazardous substances provided by Homeland Security and Emergency Services. Government Publication Date: Jan 28, 2019 NY DEC Projects of Interest:rr-PROJECTS-bb A list of permits for notable projects - permit applications that have received a lot of public attention - made available by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). PFAS LANDFILL DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYCLEANERS NY MANIFEST REC MANIFEST GEN MANIFEST E DESIGNATION TIER 2 PROJECTS 60 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 Government Publication Date: Jan 14, 2021 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County No County additional environmental record sources available for this State. 61 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589 h-Definitions Database Descriptions:This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including:source,information available,time coverage,and acronyms used.They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report:This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record.Records are summarized by location,starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance:The distance value is the distance between plotted points,not necessarily the distance between the sites'boundaries.All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation:The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted.All values are an approximation. Source:Google Elevation API. Executive Summary:This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'-Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and,within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'-This section lists all the records which fall on the project property.For more details,see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'-This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties,listing them in order of proximity from the project property.For more details,see the 'Detail Report'section. Map Key:The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property.Map Key numbers always start at #1.The project property will always have a map key of '1'if records are available.If there is a number in brackets beside the main number,this will indicate the number of records on that specific property.If there is no number in brackets,there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation':the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation',the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation'and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons,including limited geographic information.These records may or may not be in your study area,and are included as reference. Definitions Appendix 2 Historical information Privileged and Confidential 1895 Topographic Map N 1900 Topographic Map N 1906 Topographic Map N 1949 Topographic Map N Project Property:2211481 Bald Hill Road Ithaca, NY 14850 Project No: Requested By:LaBella Associates Order No:21040800589 Date Completed:April 13, 2021 Search Results Summary Date Source Comment 2018 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2014 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2010 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2006 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 2002 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 1998 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 1960 MANNINGS 1956 MANNINGS 1951 MANNINGS 1946 MANNINGS 1940 MANNINGS 1935 MANNINGS 1930 MANNINGS 1925 MANNINGS April 13, 2021 RE: CITY DIRECTORY RESEARCH 2211481 Bald Hill Road Ithaca, NY Thank you for contacng ERIS for an City Directory Search for the site described above. Our staff has conducted a reverse lisng City Directory search to determine prior occupants of the subject site and adjacent properes. We have provided the nearest addresses(s) when adjacent addresses are not listed. If we have searched a range of addresses, all addresses in that range found in the Directory are included. Note: Reverse Lisng Directories generally are focused on more highly developed areas. Newly developed areas may be covered in the more recent years, but the older directories will tend to cover only the "central" parts of the city. To complete the search, we have either ulized the ACPL, Library of Congress, State Archives, and/or a regional library or history center as well as mulple digized directories. These do not claim to be a complete collecon of all reverse lisng city directories produced. ERIS has made every effort to provide accurate and complete informaon but shall not be held liable for missing, incomplete or inaccurate informaon. To complete this search we used the general range(s) below to search for relevant findings. If you believe there are addional addresses or streets that require searching please contact us at 866-517-5204. Search Criteria: 1-150 of Bald Hill Road 1-150 of Lieb Road 1800-1850 of Danby Road 700-780 of Comfort Road Page: 2 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... BALD HILL ROAD2018 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... COMFORT ROAD2018 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 3 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 1850 LANE'S AUTOMOTIVE...Automobile Parts & Supplies-retail-new 1850 LANE'S AUTOMOTIVE...Automobile Repairing & Service 1850 LANE'S AUTOMTV...Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment 1850 LANE'S AUTOMTV...Enginesrebuilding & Exchanging 1850 PARK RIDE...Park & Ride DANBY ROAD2018 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... LIEB ROAD2018 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 4 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 39 UNCLE BILLS ANTIQUES...Used Merchandise Stores BALD HILL ROAD2014 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... COMFORT ROAD2014 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 5 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 1830 DANBY TOWN COURT...Courts 1830 DANBY ZONING OFFICE...Urban & Rural Development Administration 1850 LANE'S AUTOMTV...Automotive Parts & Accessories Stores 1850 LANE'S AUTOMTV...Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment 1850 LANE'S AUTOMTV...Automobile Parts & Supplies-retail-new DANBY ROAD2014 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 62 ITHACA SHEEPSKIN SANDAL...Luggage & Leather Goods Stores LIEB ROAD2014 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 6 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 39 UNCLE BILLS ANTIQUES...Used Merchandise Stores BALD HILL ROAD2010 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... COMFORT ROAD2010 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 7 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 1830 DANBY TOWN CLERKS OFFICE...Legislative Bodies 1830 DANBY TOWN COURT...Courts 1830 DANBY TOWN SUPERVISOR...Legislative Bodies 1830 DANBY ZONING OFFICE...Urban & Rural Development Administration 1850 LANES AUTOMOTIVE...General Automotive Repair DANBY ROAD2010 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... LIEB ROAD2010 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 8 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 39 UNCLE BILLS ANTIQUES...Used Merchandise Stores BALD HILL ROAD2006 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... COMFORT ROAD2006 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 9 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 1830 DANBY TOWN CLERKS OFFICE...Legislative Bodies 1830 DANBY TOWN COURT...Courts 1830 DANBY TOWN SUPERVISOR...Legislative Bodies 1830 DANBY ZONING OFFICE...Urban & Rural Development Administration 1850 LANES AUTOMOTIVE...General Automotive Repair DANBY ROAD2006 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... LIEB ROAD2006 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 10 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 39 UNCLE BILL'S ANTIQUES...Antiques BALD HILL ROAD2002 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... COMFORT ROAD2002 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 11 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 1830 DANBY COMMUNITY COUNCIL... 1830 DANBY TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE...Legislative Bodies Level Of Government 1830 DANBY TOWN COURT...Courts, Level Of Government 1830 DANBY TOWN SUPERVISOR...Legislative Bodies Level Of Government 1830 DANBY ZONING OFFICE...Urban And Community Development Level Of Government 1850 LANE'S AUTOMOTIVE...Engine Repair DANBY ROAD2002 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 56 ITHACA ZEN CTR... LIEB ROAD2002 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 12 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... BALD HILL ROAD1998 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY NO LISTING FOUND FOR THIS YEAR... COMFORT ROAD1998 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 13 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com 1830 DANBY TOWN OF TOWN CLERKS OFC... 1830 DANBY TOWN OF ZONING OFC... 1849 J & J VACUUM REPAIR...Electrical Repair Shops 1850 BENJAMINS USED CARS...New And Used Car Dealers 1850 LANES AUTOMOTIVE...General Automotive Repair Shops DANBY ROAD1998 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY 56 ITHACA ZEN CENTER STUDY... LIEB ROAD1998 SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY Page: 14 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED BALD HILL ROAD1960 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED COMFORT ROAD1960 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 15 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com DANBY ROAD1960 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED LIEB ROAD1960 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 16 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED BALD HILL ROAD1956 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED COMFORT ROAD1956 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 17 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com DANBY ROAD1956 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED LIEB ROAD1956 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 18 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED BALD HILL ROAD1951 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED COMFORT ROAD1951 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 19 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com NO LISTINGS IN RANGE DANBY ROAD1951 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED LIEB ROAD1951 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 20 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED BALD HILL ROAD1946 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED COMFORT ROAD1946 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 21 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com NO LISTINGS IN RANGE DANBY ROAD1946 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED LIEB ROAD1946 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 22 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED BALD HILL ROAD1940 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED COMFORT ROAD1940 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 23 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com NO LISTINGS IN RANGE DANBY ROAD1940 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED LIEB ROAD1940 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 24 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED BALD HILL ROAD1935 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED COMFORT ROAD1935 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 25 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com NO LISTINGS IN RANGE DANBY ROAD1935 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED LIEB ROAD1935 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 26 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED BALD HILL ROAD1930 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED COMFORT ROAD1930 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 27 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED DANBY ROAD1930 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED LIEB ROAD1930 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 28 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED BALD HILL ROAD1925 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED COMFORT ROAD1925 SOURCE: MANNINGS Page: 29 Report ID: 21040800589 - 4/13/2021 www.erisinfo.com STREET NOT LISTED DANBY ROAD1925 SOURCE: MANNINGS STREET NOT LISTED LIEB ROAD1925 SOURCE: MANNINGS Appendix 3 Aerial Photographs Privileged and Confidential Appendix 4 Site Reconnaissance Worksheet Privileged and Confidential Site Reconnaissance Worksheet 1 Project # 2211481 Address Bald Hill Road Inspector Name/Date of Inspection Mike Delaney June 29, 2021 Site contact name/Title/Years associated with Site Mr. Russell Nitchman Owner 10 years Site Contact Phone#/email Site Size (acres) 111.58 Nature of Site Industrial Residential Commercial Agricultural Past Site Use (Evidence or per Site Contact) Nature of Area (circle one) Rural Urban Suburban Topography (If Sloping – Note Direction) Slightly sloping to the east Nearest Body of Water (Note Distance and Direction) Unnamed tributary of Buttermilk Creek on the eastern portion of the Site Adjacent Properties (Address and Use): North Rural vacant (Gunderman Road) and manufactured housing (1820 Danby Road) East Rural residential and recreational (22 Bald Hill Road), residential homes (52 and 54 Bald Hill Road), and residential vacant land (Bald Hill Road) South Residential homes (80 and 94 Bald Hill Road), rural residential and recreational (104 Bald Hill Road and 90 Lieb Road), David Radin (56 Lieb Road) West Rural vacant (Comfort Road), residential home (747 Comfort Road) Adjacent Property Notes: Northeast: Medical offices (229 State Street) Southwest: City Church First Assembly of God (255 Washington Street) Limitations: None Overgrown vegetation Topography Snow Size Material Storage Unaccompanied During Site Inspection Access (Note Inaccessible Structures): Site Reconnaissance Worksheet 2 Site Building(s) add extra pages for additional buildings # of Structures N/A Date of Construction N/A Building Size (sq.ft.) N/A No. Stories N/A Basement (full/partial) N/A Frame Building Condition N/A Site Tenants and Operations N/A Site Sketch (label north): Include buildings and adjoining roads Refer to Figure 3 Utilities Servicing the Site: Electric: NYSEG Heating Source: N/A WaterSupply: N/A Sewer/Septic: N/A 3 Site Reconnaissance Worksheet Petroleum/Hazardous Substance Yes Disposal Receipts (circle one) Yes No N/A No x Type Quantity/Storage Container Type Location Staining Purpose Additional Notes Aboveground Storage Tanks Yes Note: Location, capacity, contents, usage, in-service (yes/no), fill port location, vent pipe location, No x leaks/stains/spills in vicinity, storage conditions – under asphalt, vaulted, under grassy area, fuel pumps) AST Table # Capacity Contents Location Storage Conditions Usage Notes: 4 Site Reconnaissance Worksheet Underground Storage Tanks Yes (i.e., vent pipes, fill ports, pumps, fill port covers) No x (Note: Location, Type of Evidence, capacity, contents, usage, in-service (yes/no), fill port location, vent pipe location, leaks/stains/spills in vicinity, storage conditions – under asphalt, vaulted, under grassy area, fuel pumps) UST Table # Capacity Contents Location Storage Conditions Usage Evidence of the Potential Removal/Closure of Yes Underground Storage Tanks (e.g., patches in pavement, piping, ect.) (Note: Location, Type of Evidence, leaks/stains/spills in vicinity) Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors Yes (Note: Type and Source) No x No x Pools of Liquid Likely to Contain Hazardous Substances Yes Or Petroleum Products (Note: Location, Potential Product/Hazardous Substance(s), Source) No x 5 Site Reconnaissance Worksheet Drums Yes (Note: Location, Contents, Quantity, leaks/stains/spills in vicinity) Unidentified Substances or Containers Yes (Note: Type and Quantity) Parts Washers Yes (Note: Type – Self-contained or Not, Location, Waste Disposal Receipts) Oil Water Separator Yes No x No x No x No x (Note: Location, Discharge Location, Type of Wastewater Discharged to OWS, Age, Service Provider, etc.) Stains or Corrosion Yes (Note: Location, Potential Product/Hazardous Substance(s), Source) Floor Drains Yes No x No x (Note: Location, Discharge Location, Type of Wastewater Discharged to Drain, Associated Oil/Water Separator) 6 Site Reconnaissance Worksheet Sumps Yes (Note: Location, Discharge Location, Type of Wastewater Discharged to Sump) A sump is located in the basement of the Site Building. The sump reportedly collects storm water and discharges to the public sewer system. Equipment Potentially Containing Polychlorinated Bi-phenyls Yes x (Note: Location, Type – Pad/Pole Mounted, PCB-containing, Owner, Condition) A pole-mounted transformer was observed on the eastern portion of the Site. The pole- mounted transformer did not appear to be leaking at the time of the site visit. Elevators Yes (Note: Location, Hydraulic/Mechanical/Electric, Underground Components, Location of Reservoir) Lifts/Lift Scars Yes (Note: Location, Hydraulic/Mechanical/Electric, Underground Components, Location of Reservoir) Stained Soil/Pavement Yes (Note: Location, Apparent Type of Staining, Source) Stressed Vegetation Yes (Note: Location, Source) No x No No x No x No x No x 7 Site Reconnaissance Worksheet Evidence of Solid Waste Disposal and/or Filling Yes (e.g., mounding, piles, ect.) (Note: Location, Contents, Staining, Odors) Storm Drains/Ditches Yes No x No x (Note: Location, Associated with Wastewater Treatment or Disposal, Discharge Location, Staining, Odors) Underground Injection Well/Dry Well/Monitoring Wells Yes No x (Note: Location, Associated with Wastewater Treatment or Disposal, Type of Wastewater Discharged To, Analytical Data Available) Septic Systems Yes (Note: Location, Direction of Leach Lines, Type of Wastewater Discharged) Potable Water Wells Yes (Note: Location and Analytical Data Available) No x No x Appendix 5 Site Representative Interview Privileged and Confidential Appendix 6 FOIL and Real Property Information Privileged and Confidential 1 Delaney, Michael From:Janice Adelman, Danby Town Clerk <townclerk@townofdanbyny.org> Sent:Friday, April 9, 2021 2:35 PM To:Delaney, Michael Subject:Re: FOIL Request Hi Mike, Thank you for your email; I have received your request for records related to tax parcel 10.-1-21.122. The town will respond to your request with our findings within the next 15-20 business days (i.e., no later than 7 May). Please note that some of these records may be housed at the Tompkins County level rather than the town level. Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions. Best regards, Janice ~~~ Janice R. Adelman, PhD Town Clerk Town of Danby Office Open To The Public By Appointment Only Tuesday–Friday from 12pm–2pm & 4pm–6pm View & book available appointments Town Clerk’s Office 1830 Danby Road Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-4788 townclerk@townofdanbyny.org Town of Danby On 8 Apr 2021, at 18:36, Delaney, Michael <mdelaney@LaBellaPC.com> wrote: Good Afternoon, Please see the attached FOIL request. Please confirm when this email is received. Best, Mike Delaney LaBella Associates | Phase I Analyst 2 <image001.png> 585-694-0655 cell 585-287-9082 office 300 State Street, Suite 201 Rochester, NY 14614 labellapc.com <Town of Danby FOIL Request.pdf> 1 Delaney, Michael From:Tompkins_NoReply@tompkins-co.org Sent:Friday, April 9, 2021 7:37 AM To:Delaney, Michael Subject:The FOIL you have submitted has been accepted. Dear Mike, The FOIL you submitted on 4/8/2021 6:38:18 PM has been received and will be assigned to the appropriate department. You will hear from us within 20 business days. Please refer to FOIL 64488 if you contact us about this request. FOIL Records Access Officer Tompkins County NY 125 E. Court Street Ithaca, NY 14850 607-274-5551 Email: foil@tompkins-co.org Foil website: http://www.tompkinscountyny.gov/ctyadmin/foilprocess County website: http://www.tompkinscountyny.gov 1 Delaney, Michael From:New York DEC Support <newyorkdec@mycusthelp.net> Sent:Thursday, April 8, 2021 6:47 PM To:Delaney, Michael Subject:FOIL Request :: W081044-040821 Dear Michael: Thank you for your Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request. Your request has been received and is being processed. Your request was received in this office on 4/8/2021 and given the reference number FOIL #W081044-040821 for tracking purposes. You may expect the Department's response to your request no later than 5/7/2021. Record Requested: Any records of environmental enforcement; permits regarding environmental matters; information on any environmental remediation, hazardous materials, solid materials, and land use restrictions present on the Site including any existing engineering controls and previous environmental law enforcement regarding these issues. Any information on environmental investigation, including water, air, and any spills reported on the Site. Records for any Petroleum Bulk Storage tanks, Brownfield Cleanup Programs, and Voluntary Cleanup Programs on the Site: Address: Bald Hill Road, Ithaca, NY 14850 (directly west of 54 Bald Hill Road) TaxID: 10.-1-21.122 Owner: Russel H Nitchman You can monitor the progress of your request at the link below and you'll receive an email when your request has been completed. Again, thank you for using the FOIL Center. Please note that due to the COVID-19 outbreak, DEC may be experiencing staffing shortages and some records custodians may be working remotely. This may result in a delayed response time to your FOIL request. We appreciate your understanding and cooperation. https://mycusthelp.com/NEWYORKDEC/_rs/RequestLogin.aspx New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Record Access Office Track the issue status and respond at: https://newyorkdec.mycusthelp.com/webapp//_rs/RequestEdit.aspx?rid=81044 1 Delaney, Michael From:New York DEC Support <newyorkdec@mycusthelp.net> Sent:Monday, April 19, 2021 9:46 AM To:Delaney, Michael Subject:Freedom of Information Law Request :: W081044-040821 --- Please respond above this line --- To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Region 7 - Syracuse P: 315-426-5992 | F: 315-426-7408 www.dec.ny.gov RE: PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST of 4/8/2021, Reference # W081044-040821 Date: 04/19/2021 Dear Michael, I write in response to your Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request seeking: Any records of environmental enforcement; permits regarding environmental matters; information on any environmental remediation, hazardous materials, solid materials, and land use restrictions present on the Site including any existing engineering controls and previous environmental law enforcement regarding these issues. Any information on environmental investigation, including water, air, and any spills reported on the Site. Records for any Petroleum Bulk Storage tanks, Brownfield Cleanup Programs, and Voluntary Cleanup Programs on the Site: Address: Bald Hill Road, Ithaca, NY 14850 (directly west of 54 Bald Hill Road) TaxID: 10.-1-21.122 Owner: Russel H Nitchman Please be advised that a diligent search of the files maintained by DEC produced no responsive records. If you believe you have been unlawfully denied access to responsive records, you have the right to appeal. Any such appeal must be submitted in writing and within thirty (30) days of the date of this email. Appeals must be directed to: FOIL Appeals Officer Office of General Counsel New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany, NY 12233-1500 Your FOIL request is now closed. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 315-426-5992 and reference FOIL #W081044- 040821, or simply reply to this email. Thank you. Sincerely, Region 7 FOIL Coordinator 1 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Property Information Order Number:21040800589p Date Completed:April 9, 2021 Project Number: Project Property:2211481 Bald Hill Road Ithaca NY 14850 Coordinates: Latitude:42.35197464 Longitude:-76.4942487 UTM Northing:4689938.00345 Meters UTM Easting:376932.864176 Meters UTM Zone:UTM Zone 18T Elevation:1,321.32 ft Slope Direction:SSE Topographic Information........................................................................................................................................2 Hydrologic Information.........................................................................................................................................12 Geologic Information............................................................................................................................................18 Soil Information....................................................................................................................................................21 Wells and Additional Sources..............................................................................................................................50 Summary..........................................................................................................................................................55 Detail Report....................................................................................................................................................57 Radon Information.............................................................................................................................................103 Appendix............................................................................................................................................................104 Liability Notice....................................................................................................................................................106 The ERIS Physical Setting Report - PSR provides comprehensive information about the physical setting around a site and includes a complete overview of topography and surface topology, in addition to hydrologic, geologic and soil characteristics. The location and detailed attributes of oil and gas wells, water wells, public water systems and radon are also included for review. The compilation of both physical characteristics of a site and additional attribute data is useful in assessing the impact of migration of contaminants and subsequent impact on soils and groundwater. Disclaimer This Report does not provide a full environmental evaluation for the site or adjacent properties. Please see the terms and disclaimer at the end of the Report for greater detail. Topographic Information Topographic Information Topographic Information Topographic Information Topographic Information Topographic Information 7 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p The previous topographic map(s) are created by seamlessly merging and cutting current USGS topographic data. Below are shaded relief map(s), derived from USGS elevation data to show surrounding topography in further detail. Topographic information at project property: Elevation:1,321.32 ft Slope Direction:SSE Topographic Information 8 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Topographic Information 9 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Topographic Information 10 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Topographic Information 11 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Hydrologic Information Hydrologic Information Hydrologic Information Hydrologic Information Hydrologic Information Hydrologic Information 17 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p The Wetland Type map shows wetland existence overlaid on an aerial imagery. The Flood Hazard Zones map shows FEMA flood hazard zones overlaid on an aerial imagery. Relevant FIRM panels and detailed zone information is provided below. No records found for the project property or surrounding properties. Geologic Information Geologic Information Geologic Information 20 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p The previous page shows USGS geology information. Detailed information about each unit is provided below. Geologic Unit Ds Unit Name: "Enfield" and Kattel Formations Unit Age: Upper Devonian Primary Rock Type: shale Secondary Rock Type: siltstone Unit Description: "Enfield" and Kattel Formations - shale, siltstone, sandstone. Geologic Unit Dwm Unit Name: Beers Hill, Dunn Hill, Millport, and Moreland Shales Unit Age: Upper Devonian Primary Rock Type: shale Secondary Rock Type: black shale Unit Description: Beers Hill, Dunn Hill, Millport, and Moreland Shales. Soil Information Soil Information Soil Information 23 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p The previous page shows a soil map using SSURGO data from USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Detailed information about each unit is provided below. Map Unit BaC (4.54%) Map Unit Name:Bath channery silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:69cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Bath(80%) horizon Ap(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(23cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(38cm to 64cm)Channery loam horizon E(64cm to 74cm)Channery loam horizon Bx(74cm to 132cm)Very channery silt loam horizon C(132cm to 183cm)Very channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: BaC - Bath channery silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes Component: Bath (80%) The Bath component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from gray and brown siltstone, sandstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 26 to 38 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 27 inches during January, February, March, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Mardin (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Component: Volusia (7%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Component: Lordstown (3%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Map Unit BaD (0.26%) Map Unit Name:Bath channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:69cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Bath(85%) horizon Ap(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam Soil Information 24 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p horizon Bw1(23cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(38cm to 64cm)Channery loam horizon E(64cm to 74cm)Channery loam horizon Bx(74cm to 132cm)Very channery silt loam horizon C(132cm to 183cm)Very channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: BaD - Bath channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Component: Bath (85%) The Bath component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from gray and brown siltstone, sandstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 26 to 38 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 27 inches during January, February, March, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. This component is in the F140XY030NY Well Drained Dense Till ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Lordstown (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Component: Mardin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Map Unit BgC (3.54%) Map Unit Name:Bath and Valois soils, 5 to 15 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:61cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Bath(40%) horizon Ap(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(23cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(38cm to 64cm)Channery loam horizon E(64cm to 74cm)Channery loam horizon Bx(74cm to 132cm)Very channery silt loam horizon C(132cm to 183cm)Very channery silt loam Valois(35%) horizon H1(0cm to 5cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H2(5cm to 81cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H3(81cm to 124cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H4(124cm to 152cm)Gravelly silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: BgC - Bath and Valois soils, 5 to 15 percent slopes Component: Bath (40%) The Bath component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from gray and brown siltstone, sandstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 26 to 38 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not Soil Information 25 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 27 inches during January, February, March, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Valois (35%) The Valois component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 15 percent. This component is on valley sides, end moraines, uplands, lateral moraines. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from sandstone, siltstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 24 to 36 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 24 inches during March, April, May. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Lordstown (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Component: Langford (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Langford soil is a minor component. Component: Mardin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Component: Volusia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Component: Erie (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Erie soil is a minor component. Map Unit BgC3 (0.39%) Map Unit Name:Bath and Valois soils, 5 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:61cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Bath(40%) horizon Ap(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(23cm to 33cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(33cm to 59cm)Channery loam horizon E(59cm to 69cm)Channery loam horizon Bx(69cm to 127cm)Very channery silt loam horizon C(127cm to 183cm)Very channery silt loam Valois(35%) horizon H1(0cm to 5cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H2(5cm to 81cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H3(81cm to 124cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H4(124cm to 152cm)Gravelly silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: BgC3 - Bath and Valois soils, 5 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Component: Bath (40%) The Bath, eroded component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from gray and brown siltstone, sandstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 26 to 38 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer Soil Information 26 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 25 inches during January, February, March, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Valois (35%) The Valois component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 15 percent. This component is on lateral moraines, end moraines, uplands, valley sides. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from sandstone, siltstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 24 to 36 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 24 inches during March, April, May. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Mardin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin, eroded soil is a minor component. Component: Erie (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Erie soil is a minor component. Component: Volusia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Component: Lordstown (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown, eroded soil is a minor component. Component: Langford (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Langford, eroded soil is a minor component. Map Unit BgD (0.69%) Map Unit Name:Bath and Valois soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:61cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Bath(40%) horizon Ap(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(23cm to 33cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(33cm to 59cm)Channery loam horizon E(59cm to 69cm)Channery loam horizon Bx(69cm to 127cm)Very channery silt loam horizon C(127cm to 183cm)Very channery silt loam Valois(35%) horizon H1(0cm to 5cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H2(5cm to 81cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H3(81cm to 124cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H4(124cm to 152cm)Gravelly silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: BgD - Bath and Valois soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded Component: Bath (40%) The Bath, eroded component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from gray and brown siltstone, sandstone, and shale. Depth to a root Soil Information 27 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p restrictive layer, fragipan, is 26 to 38 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 25 inches during January, February, March, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Valois (35%) The Valois component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on lateral moraines, uplands, end moraines, valley sides. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from sandstone, siltstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 24 to 36 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 24 inches during March, April, May. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Howard (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Howard soil is a minor component. Component: Lordstown (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Component: Langford (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Langford, eroded soil is a minor component. Component: Mardin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin, eroded soil is a minor component. Component: Volusia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Map Unit BoE (0.28%) Map Unit Name:Bath and Valois soils, 25 to 35 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:61cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Bath(45%) horizon A(0cm to 10cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(10cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(38cm to 64cm)Channery loam horizon E(64cm to 74cm)Channery loam horizon Bx(74cm to 132cm)Very channery silt loam horizon C(132cm to 183cm)Very channery silt loam Valois(35%) horizon H1(0cm to 5cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H2(5cm to 81cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H3(81cm to 124cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H4(124cm to 152cm)Gravelly silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: BoE - Bath and Valois soils, 25 to 35 percent slopes Component: Bath (45%) The Bath component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 25 to 35 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The Soil Information 28 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from gray and brown siltstone, sandstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 26 to 38 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 27 inches during January, February, March, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 10 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Valois (35%) The Valois component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 25 to 35 percent. This component is on valley sides, lateral moraines, uplands, end moraines. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from sandstone, siltstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 24 to 36 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 24 inches during March, April, May. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 6e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Mardin (7%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Component: Lordstown (7%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Component: Lansing (6%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lansing soil is a minor component. Map Unit BvA (0.05%) Map Unit Name:Braceville gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:33cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C/D - These soils have moderately high runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Braceville(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H2(18cm to 61cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H3(61cm to 91cm)Silt loam horizon H4(91cm to 152cm)Stratified sand to silt to g Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: BvA - Braceville gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Component: Braceville (75%) The Braceville component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 5 percent. This component is on terraces, proglacial deltas, outwash plains. The parent material consists of loamy glaciofluvial deposits of stratified sand, silt, and gravel derived mainly from noncalcareous sandstone and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 15 to 30 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 13 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Tioga (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Tioga soil is a minor component. Component: Arkport (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Arkport soil is a minor component. Soil Information 29 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Component: Chenango (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Chenango soil is a minor component. Component: Phelps (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Phelps soil is a minor component. Component: Red Hook (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Red Hook soil is a minor component. Map Unit DgB (0.72%) Map Unit Name:Darien gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:23cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C/D - These soils have moderately high runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Darien(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H2(23cm to 33cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H3(33cm to 76cm)Gravelly silty clay loam horizon H4(76cm to 152cm)Gravelly silty clay loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: DgB - Darien gravelly silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Component: Darien (75%) The Darien component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on drumlinoid ridges, hills, till plains. The parent material consists of loamy till derived predominantly from calcareous gray shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 9 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 6 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. Component: Rhinebeck (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Rhinebeck soil is a minor component. Component: Erie (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Erie soil is a minor component. Component: Ovid (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Ovid soil is a minor component. Component: Lyons (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Lyons soil is a minor component. Component: Ilion (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Ilion soil is a minor component. Map Unit EbB (49.5%) Map Unit Name:Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:23cm Soil Information 30 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Erie(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(23cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(38cm to 107cm)Channery loam horizon H4(107cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: EbB - Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Component: Erie (80%) The Erie component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 3 to 8 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 21 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 10 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 4 percent. Component: Langford (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Langford soil is a minor component. Component: Chippewa (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chippewa soil is a minor component. Component: Fremont (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Fremont soil is a minor component. Map Unit EbC3 (0.25%) Map Unit Name:Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:23cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Erie(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(23cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(38cm to 107cm)Channery loam horizon H4(107cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: EbC3 - Erie channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Component: Erie (80%) The Erie, eroded component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 21 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is Soil Information 31 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p at 10 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 4 percent. Component: Langford (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Langford, eroded soil is a minor component. Component: Fremont (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Fremont soil is a minor component. Component: Chippewa (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chippewa soil is a minor component. Map Unit EcA (0.27%) Map Unit Name:Chippewa and Alden soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:0cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Chippewa(55%) horizon Ap(0cm to 18cm)Silt loam horizon Eg(18cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bgx(38cm to 114cm)Channery silt loam horizon C(114cm to 183cm)Channery silt loam Alden(30%) horizon H1(0cm to 25cm)Mucky silt loam horizon H2(25cm to 58cm)Silt loam horizon H3(58cm to 91cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(91cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: EcA - Chippewa and Alden soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes Component: Chippewa (55%) The Chippewa component makes up 55 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 8 percent. This component is on depressions on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till dominated by siltstone, sandstone, and shale fragments. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 8 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 0 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 7 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4w. This soil meets hydric criteria. Component: Alden (30%) The Alden component makes up 30 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 3 percent. This component is on depressions, uplands. The parent material consists of a silty mantle of local deposition overlying loamy till. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is very poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is frequently ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 0 inches during January, February, March, April, May, June, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 7 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 5w. This soil meets hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. Component: Volusia (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Soil Information 32 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Component: Chippewa (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chippewa, very poorly drained soil is a minor component. Map Unit Em (0.26%) Map Unit Name:Eel silt loam Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:54cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:B/D - These soils have moderately low runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Eel (teel)(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 25cm)Silt loam horizon H2(25cm to 69cm)Fine sandy loam horizon H3(69cm to 152cm)Fine sandy loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: Em - Eel silt loam Component: Eel (teel) (75%) The Eel (teel) component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on flood plains. The parent material consists of silty alluvium. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is occasionally flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 21 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 4 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent. Component: Chenango (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Chenango soil is a minor component. Component: Middlebury (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Middlebury soil is a minor component. Component: Tioga (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Tioga soil is a minor component. Component: Wayland (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Wayland soil is a minor component. Component: Genesee (Hamlin) (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Genesee (Hamlin) soil is a minor component. Map Unit ErA (4.61%) Map Unit Name:Erie-Chippewa channery silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:0cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Erie(60%) Soil Information 33 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p horizon H1(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(23cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(38cm to 107cm)Channery loam horizon H4(107cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Chippewa(30%) horizon Ap(0cm to 18cm)Channery silt loam horizon Eg(18cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bgx(38cm to 114cm)Channery silt loam horizon C(114cm to 183cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: ErA - Erie-Chippewa channery silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes Component: Erie (60%) The Erie component makes up 60 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 3 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 21 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 10 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 4 percent. Component: Chippewa (30%) The Chippewa component makes up 30 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 3 percent. This component is on depressions on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till dominated by siltstone, sandstone, and shale fragments. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 8 to 20 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 0 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 7 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4w. This soil meets hydric criteria. Component: Langford (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Langford soil is a minor component. Component: Chippewa (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chippewa, very poorly drained soil is a minor component. Map Unit Ha (0.46%) Map Unit Name:Halsey silt loam Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:0cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:B/D - These soils have moderately low runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Halsey(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 20cm)Silt loam horizon H2(20cm to 71cm)Fine sandy loam horizon H3(71cm to 152cm)Stratified sandy loam to very gravelly sand Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: Ha - Halsey silt loam Soil Information 34 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Component: Halsey (75%) The Halsey component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on depressions. The parent material consists of loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is occasionally ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 0 inches during January, February, March, April, May, June, September, October, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 10 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 5w. This soil meets hydric criteria. Component: Canandaigua (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Canandaigua soil is a minor component. Component: Phelps (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Phelps soil is a minor component. Component: Lamson (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Lamson soil is a minor component. Component: Muck and peat (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Muck and peat soil is a minor component. Component: Fredon (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Fredon soil is a minor component. Map Unit HdA (0.04%) Map Unit Name:Howard gravelly loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:null Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:A - Soils in this group have low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water is transmitted freely through the soil. Major components are printed below Howard(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm)Gravelly loam horizon H2(23cm to 64cm)Loam horizon H3(64cm to 119cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H4(119cm to 152cm)Stratified g to sand Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: HdA - Howard gravelly loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Component: Howard (75%) The Howard component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 5 percent. This component is on valley trains, terraces. The parent material consists of gravelly loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits, containing significant amounts of limestone. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 4 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2s. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Eel (Teel) (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Eel (Teel) soil is a minor component. Component: Fredon (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Fredon soil is a minor component. Component: Valois (5%) Soil Information 35 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Valois soil is a minor component. Component: Genesee (Hamlin) (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Genesee (Hamlin) soil is a minor component. Component: Phelps (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Phelps soil is a minor component. Map Unit HdC (0.08%) Map Unit Name:Howard gravelly loam, 5 to 15 percent simple slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:null Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:A - Soils in this group have low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water is transmitted freely through the soil. Major components are printed below Howard(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm)Gravelly loam horizon H2(23cm to 64cm)Loam horizon H3(64cm to 119cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H4(119cm to 152cm)Stratified g to sand Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: HdC - Howard gravelly loam, 5 to 15 percent simple slopes Component: Howard (75%) The Howard component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 15 percent. This component is on valley trains, terraces. The parent material consists of gravelly loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits, containing significant amounts of limestone. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 4 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Lansing (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Lansing soil is a minor component. Component: Phelps (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Phelps soil is a minor component. Component: Fredon (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Fredon soil is a minor component. Component: Genesee (Hamlin) (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Genesee (Hamlin) soil is a minor component. Component: Valois (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Valois soil is a minor component. Map Unit LaB (7.01%) Map Unit Name:Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:38cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Soil Information 36 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Langford(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(18cm to 56cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(56cm to 132cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(132cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Component: Langford (85%) The Langford component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 15 to 28 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 20 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Erie (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Erie soil is a minor component. Component: Schuyler (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Schuyler soil is a minor component. Map Unit LaB3 (0.13%) Map Unit Name:Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:38cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Langford(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(18cm to 56cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(56cm to 132cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(132cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: LaB3 - Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded Component: Langford (85%) The Langford, eroded component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 3 to 8 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 15 to 28 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 18 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Erie (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Erie soil is a minor component. Soil Information 37 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Component: Valois (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Valois soil is a minor component. Map Unit LaC (0.3%) Map Unit Name:Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:38cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Langford(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(18cm to 56cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(56cm to 132cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(132cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: LaC - Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Langford (85%) The Langford component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 15 to 28 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 20 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Schuyler (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Schuyler soil is a minor component. Component: Erie (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Erie soil is a minor component. Component: Chadakoin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chadakoin soil is a minor component. Map Unit LaC3 (0.34%) Map Unit Name:Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:38cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Langford(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(18cm to 56cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(56cm to 132cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(132cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Soil Information 38 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: LaC3 - Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Component: Langford (85%) The Langford, eroded component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 15 to 28 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 18 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Valois (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Valois soil is a minor component. Component: Erie (5%) The Erie component makes up 80 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 3 to 8 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 21 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 10 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 4 percent. Component: Schuyler (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Schuyler soil is a minor component. Map Unit LnC (0.66%) Map Unit Name:Lordstown channery silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:76cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min:null Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Lordstown(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 25cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(25cm to 66cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(66cm to 76cm)Extremely channery silt loam horizon H4(76cm to 86cm)Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: LnC - Lordstown channery silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes Component: Lordstown (90%) The Lordstown component makes up 90 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 5 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on glaciated uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived from sandstone and siltstone. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Arnot (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Arnot soil is a minor component. Component: Mardin (5%) Soil Information 39 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Map Unit LnD (0.8%) Map Unit Name:Lordstown channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:76cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min:null Drainage Class - Dominant:Well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C - Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water transmission through the soil is somewhat restricted. Major components are printed below Lordstown(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 25cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(25cm to 66cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(66cm to 76cm)Extremely channery silt loam horizon H4(76cm to 86cm)Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: LnD - Lordstown channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes Component: Lordstown (85%) The Lordstown component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on hills on glaciated uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived from sandstone and siltstone. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Mardin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Component: Cadosia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Cadosia, very stony soil is a minor component. Component: Arnot (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Arnot soil is a minor component. Map Unit MaB (4.22%) Map Unit Name:Mardin channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:43cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Mardin(85%) horizon Ap(0cm to 20cm)Channery silt loam horizon BE(20cm to 30cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(30cm to 41cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(41cm to 51cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx1(51cm to 91cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx2(91cm to 145cm)Channery silt loam horizon C(145cm to 183cm)Channery silt loam Soil Information 40 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: MaB - Mardin channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Component: Mardin (85%) The Mardin component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 14 to 26 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 17 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Volusia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Component: Bath (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Bath soil is a minor component. Component: Lordstown (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Map Unit MaC (0.73%) Map Unit Name:Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:43cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Mardin(88%) horizon Ap(0cm to 20cm)Channery silt loam horizon BE(20cm to 30cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(30cm to 41cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(41cm to 51cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx1(51cm to 91cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx2(91cm to 145cm)Channery silt loam horizon C(145cm to 183cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: MaC - Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Mardin (88%) The Mardin component makes up 88 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 14 to 26 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 17 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Bath (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Bath soil is a minor component. Component: Volusia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Soil Information 41 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Component: Lordstown (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Map Unit MaC3 (0.06%) Map Unit Name:Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:43cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Mardin(88%) horizon Ap(0cm to 20cm)Channery silt loam horizon BE(20cm to 25cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(25cm to 36cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw2(36cm to 46cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx1(46cm to 86cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx2(86cm to 140cm)Channery silt loam horizon C(140cm to 183cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: MaC3 - Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Component: Mardin (88%) The Mardin, eroded component makes up 88 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 14 to 26 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 17 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Bath (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Bath, eroded soil is a minor component. Component: Volusia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Component: Lordstown (2%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Map Unit MfD (0.03%) Map Unit Name:Mardin and Langford soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:38cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Mardin(40%) horizon Ap(0cm to 20cm)Channery silt loam horizon BE(20cm to 30cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw1(30cm to 41cm)Channery silt loam Soil Information 42 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p horizon Bw2(41cm to 51cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx1(51cm to 91cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx2(91cm to 145cm)Channery silt loam horizon C(145cm to 183cm)Channery silt loam Langford(35%) horizon H1(0cm to 18cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(18cm to 56cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(56cm to 132cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(132cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: MfD - Mardin and Langford soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes Component: Mardin (40%) The Mardin component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 14 to 26 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 17 inches during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Langford (35%) The Langford component makes up 35 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 15 to 28 inches (depth from the mineral surface is 15 to 26 inches). The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 20 inches (depth from the mineral surface is 18 inches) during January, February, March, April, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 72 percent. Below this thin organic horizon the organic matter content is about 10 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Erie (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Erie soil is a minor component. Component: Volusia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Component: Bath (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Bath soil is a minor component. Component: Lordstown (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Component: Valois (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Valois soil is a minor component. Map Unit PhA (0.23%) Map Unit Name:Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:38cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Moderately well drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:B/D - These soils have moderately low runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Phelps(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H2(23cm to 38cm)Gravelly loam Soil Information 43 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p horizon H3(38cm to 64cm)Silt loam horizon H4(64cm to 152cm)Stratified gravelly loam to silt Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: PhA - Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Component: Phelps (75%) The Phelps component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 3 percent. This component is on terraces, valley trains. The parent material consists of loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly glaciofluvial deposits, containing significant amounts of limestone. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 15 inches during March, April, May. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 5 percent. Component: Fredon (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Fredon soil is a minor component. Component: Palmyra (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Palmyra soil is a minor component. Component: Howard (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Howard soil is a minor component. Component: Braceville (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Braceville soil is a minor component. Component: Arkport (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Arkport soil is a minor component. Map Unit RhA (0.36%) Map Unit Name:Red Hook gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:20cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:B/D - These soils have moderately low runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Red Hook(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 20cm)Gravelly silt loam horizon H2(20cm to 66cm)Silt loam horizon H3(66cm to 152cm)Very gravelly loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: RhA - Red Hook gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes Component: Red Hook (75%) The Red Hook component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 5 percent. This component is on valley trains, terraces. The parent material consists of loamy glaciofluvial deposits. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 8 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 8 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Soil Information 44 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Component: Braceville (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Braceville soil is a minor component. Component: Fredon (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Fredon soil is a minor component. Component: Phelps (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Phelps soil is a minor component. Component: Chenango (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Chenango soil is a minor component. Map Unit RkB (0.09%) Map Unit Name:Rhinebeck silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:25cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C/D - These soils have moderately high runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Rhinebeck(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 30cm)Silt loam horizon H2(30cm to 58cm)Silty clay loam horizon H3(58cm to 152cm)Silty clay loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: RkB - Rhinebeck silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Component: Rhinebeck (75%) The Rhinebeck component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on proglacial lake plains. The parent material consists of clayey and silty glaciolacustrine deposits. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 10 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 6 percent. Component: Hudson (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Hudson soil is a minor component. Component: Canandaigua (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Canandaigua soil is a minor component. Component: Madalin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Madalin soil is a minor component. Component: Ovid (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Ovid soil is a minor component. Component: Niagara (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Niagara soil is a minor component. Map Unit TeA (0.09%) Map Unit Name:Tuller channery silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes Soil Information 45 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Bedrock Depth - Min:61cm Watertable Depth - Annual Min:20cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:C/D - These soils have moderately high runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Tuller(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 20cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(20cm to 61cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(61cm to 71cm)Unweathered bedrock Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: TeA - Tuller channery silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes Component: Tuller (75%) The Tuller, moderately deep component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 6 percent. This component is on ridges, hills, benches. The parent material consists of loamy till derived mainly from acid sandstone, siltstone, and shale. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, lithic, is 20 to 40 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is very low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 8 inches during January, February, March, April, May, June, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 7 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil meets hydric criteria. Component: Volusia (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Volusia soil is a minor component. Component: Erie (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Erie soil is a minor component. Component: Lordstown (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Lordstown soil is a minor component. Component: Alden (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Alden soil is a minor component. Component: Chippewa (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major components. The Chippewa soil is a minor component. Map Unit VbB (2.67%) Map Unit Name:Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:20cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Volusia(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 20cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(20cm to 36cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(36cm to 122cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(122cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Soil Information 46 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Map Unit: VbB - Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes Component: Volusia (90%) The Volusia component makes up 90 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 3 to 8 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived from interbedded sedimentary rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 22 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 8 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. This component is in the F140XY024NY Moist Dense Till ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Mardin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Component: Chippewa (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chippewa soil is a minor component. Map Unit VbC (0.26%) Map Unit Name:Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:20cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Volusia(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 20cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(20cm to 36cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(36cm to 122cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(122cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: VbC - Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Volusia (90%) The Volusia component makes up 90 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived from interbedded sedimentary rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 22 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 8 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. This component is in the F140XY024NY Moist Dense Till ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Mardin (6%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Component: Chippewa (4%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chippewa soil is a minor component. Map Unit VbC3 (0.05%) Map Unit Name:Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:20cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Soil Information 47 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Volusia(75%) horizon H1(0cm to 20cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(20cm to 36cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(36cm to 122cm)Channery silt loam horizon H4(122cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: VbC3 - Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Component: Volusia (90%) The Volusia, eroded component makes up 90 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of loamy till derived from interbedded sedimentary rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 22 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 9 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. This component is in the F140XY024NY Moist Dense Till ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Mardin (6%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin, eroded soil is a minor component. Component: Chippewa (4%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chippewa soil is a minor component. Map Unit VrD (0.04%) Map Unit Name:Volusia and Erie soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:21cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Somewhat poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:D - Soils in this group have high runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water movement through the soil is restricted or very restricted. Major components are printed below Volusia(45%) horizon Ap(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bw(23cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon Eg(38cm to 43cm)Channery silt loam horizon Bx1(43cm to 74cm)Channery loam horizon Bx2(74cm to 137cm)Extremely channery loam horizon C(137cm to 183cm)Channery silt loam Erie(40%) horizon H1(0cm to 23cm)Channery silt loam horizon H2(23cm to 38cm)Channery silt loam horizon H3(38cm to 107cm)Channery loam horizon H4(107cm to 152cm)Channery silt loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: VrD - Volusia and Erie soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes Component: Volusia (45%) Soil Information 48 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p The Volusia component makes up 45 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on hills on hills. The parent material consists of loamy till derived from interbedded sedimentary rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 22 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 8 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Component: Erie (40%) The Erie component makes up 40 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 15 to 25 percent. This component is on hills on uplands. The parent material consists of till. Depth to a root restrictive layer, fragipan, is 10 to 21 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is low. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 10 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 5 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 4 percent. Component: Langford (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Langford soil is a minor component. Component: Mardin (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Mardin soil is a minor component. Component: Chippewa (5%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Chippewa soil is a minor component. Map Unit W (0.77%) Map Unit Name:Water No more attributes available for this map unit Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: W - Water Component: Water (100%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Water is a miscellaneous area. Map Unit Ws (15.19%) Map Unit Name:Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded Bedrock Depth - Min:null Watertable Depth - Annual Min:0cm Drainage Class - Dominant:Poorly drained Hydrologic Group - Dominant:B/D - These soils have moderately low runoff potential when drained and high runoff potential when undrained. Major components are printed below Wayland(60%) horizon A(0cm to 15cm)Silt loam horizon Bg1(15cm to 30cm)Silt loam horizon Bg2(30cm to 46cm)Silt loam horizon C1(46cm to 117cm)Silt loam horizon C2(117cm to 183cm)Silty clay loam Wayland(30%) horizon A(0cm to 15cm)Mucky silt loam horizon Bg1(15cm to 30cm)Silt loam horizon Bg2(30cm to 46cm)Silt loam Soil Information 49 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p horizon C1(46cm to 117cm)Silt loam horizon C2(117cm to 183cm)Silty clay loam Component Description: Minor map unit components are excluded from this report. Map Unit: Ws - Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded Component: Wayland (60%) The Wayland component makes up 60 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 3 percent. This component is on flood plains on valleys. The parent material consists of silty and clayey alluvium derived from interbedded sedimentary rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is frequently flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 0 inches during January, February, March, April, May, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 9 percent. This component is in the F139XY009OH Wet Floodplain ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 5w. This soil meets hydric criteria. Component: Wayland (30%) The Wayland, very poorly drained component makes up 30 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 3 percent. This component is on flood plains on valleys. The parent material consists of silty and clayey alluvium derived from interbedded sedimentary rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is very poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is very high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is frequently flooded. It is frequently ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 0 inches during January, February, March, April, May, June, September, October, November, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 15 percent. This component is in the F139XY009OH Wet Floodplain ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 5w. This soil meets hydric criteria. Component: Wakeville (10%) Generated brief soil descriptions are created for major soil components. The Wakeville soil is a minor component. Wells and Additional Sources Wells and Additional Sources Wells and Additional Sources Wells and Additional Sources Wells and Additional Sources Wells and Additional Sources Summary 55 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Federal Sources Public Water Systems Violations and Enforcement Data Map Key PWS ID Distance (ft)Direction 10 NY5415455 1,568.45 NNE Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) Map Key PWS ID Distance (ft)Direction 10 NY5415455 1,568.45 NNE USGS National Water Information System Map Key Monitoring Loc Identifier Distance (ft)Direction 2 USGS-422128076294201 1,448.54 N 3 USGS-422054076291601 481.57 SE 4 USGS-422057076291501 252.89 ESE 6 USGS-422059076291301 302.14 ESE 7 USGS-422128076292901 1,464.45 NNE 8 USGS-422056076291301 428.26 ESE 9 USGS-422130076292901 1,666.82 NNE 11 USGS-422130076292501 1,671.72 NNE 12 USGS-422128076291701 1,479.12 NE 14 USGS-04233210 552.01 E 15 USGS-422104076285901 544.38 E 16 USGS-422105076285801 600.60 E 17 USGS-422107076285901 760.38 E 18 USGS-422104076285801 583.45 E 19 USGS-422122076290101 1,189.86 ENE 20 USGS-422109076285701 1,007.18 E 21 USGS-422057076302301 1,152.70 WSW 22 USGS-422116076285601 1,249.21 ENE 24 USGS-422110076302401 1,400.18 W 25 USGS-422128076301501 1,765.14 NW 26 USGS-422125076290001 1,515.74 ENE 27 USGS-422124076285801 1,503.57 ENE 28 USGS-422130076290501 1,810.26 NE 29 USGS-422050076302201 1,438.28 WSW 31 USGS-422142076293401 2,856.59 N 32 USGS-422142076294201 2,882.65 N 35 USGS-422134076290401 2,215.97 NE 36 USGS-422145076294501 3,176.04 N 37 USGS-422028076294401 3,180.11 S 38 USGS-422104076284801 1,421.00 E 39 USGS-422054076285001 1,506.59 ESE 40 USGS-422129076302501 2,343.67 NW 41 USGS-422116076284701 1,943.56 E 43 USGS-422139076290501 2,679.13 NE 44 USGS-422132076302401 2,562.81 NW 45 USGS-422143076291101 3,013.14 NNE 46 USGS-422100076284301 1,724.84 E 48 USGS-422125076303301 2,628.70 WNW 49 USGS-04233212 2,851.24 NE 51 USGS-422145076290801 3,188.09 NNE 55 USGS-422133076303401 3,178.26 WNW Wells and Additional Sources Summary 56 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p 58 USGS-422026076301401 3,523.34 SSW 59 USGS-422150076290901 3,732.28 NNE 61 USGS-422132076283601 3,307.27 ENE 63 USGS-422135076283701 3,449.11 ENE 65 USGS-422202076292201 4,875.23 NNE 67 USGS-422119076282401 3,567.88 E 68 USGS-422014076301101 4,639.48 SSW 69 USGS-04233216 4,930.32 NNE 70 USGS-422043076281101 4,566.57 ESE State Sources Oil and Gas Wells Map Key API Well No Distance (ft)Direction 13 31109004830000 1,793.27 NNW 52 31109044460000 3,747.39 S 53 31109004820000 3,092.21 NW 57 31109004900000 3,662.43 NNE 62 31109040070000 4,279.70 NNW Water Wells Database Map Key Dec Well NO Distance (ft)Direction 1 TM1793 993.86 SSW 5 TM1209 471.26 SE 23 TM1792 1,389.36 W 25 TM1541 1,765.14 NW 27 TM1235 1,503.57 ENE 30 TM2542 2,856.32 N 33 TM2459 2,887.84 N 34 TM2198 1,513.88 E 36 TM2463 3,176.04 N 42 TM1210 2,544.42 NW 47 TM1883 1,732.11 E 50 TM1743 3,185.49 NNE 54 TM2906 2,511.05 WSW 56 TM1363 3,178.29 WNW 58 TM2082 3,523.34 SSW 59 TM1607 3,732.28 NNE 60 TM1239 3,542.17 NW 64 TM1234 3,455.42 ENE 66 TM1528 4,875.58 NNE 70 TM2069 4,566.57 ESE Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 57 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Public Water Systems Violations and Enforcement Data Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 10 NNE 0.30 1,568.45 1,239.81 PWSV Address Line 2:54 GUNDERMAN ROAD State Code:NY Zip Code:14850 City Name:ITHACA Address Line 1: PWS ID:NY5415455 PWS Type Code:NTNCWS PWS Type Description:Non-Transient Non-Community Water System Primary Source Code:GW Primary Source Desc:Groundwater PWS Activity Code:I PWS Activity Description:Inactive PWS Deactivation Date:01/01/1996 Phone Number:607-277-3484 --Details-- Population Served Count:95 City Served: County Served: State Served:NY Zip Code Served: Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 10 NNE 0.30 1,568.45 1,239.81 SDWIS PWS ID:NY5415455 PWS Type:Non-Transient non-community system No of Facilities:3 No of Violations:0 No of Site Visits:0 Cities Served:- Counties Served:- Population Served Count:95 Primacy Agency:New York EPA Region:Region 2 USGS National Water Information System Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 2 N 0.27 1,448.54 1,281.19 FED USGS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 58 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:38 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3578512 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.494663 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 599 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422128076294201 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1285 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 3 SE 0.09 481.57 1,289.73 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:99 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:99 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20000426 Latitude:42.3484722 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4878333 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1209 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422054076291601 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 59 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1290 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 4 ESE 0.05 252.89 1,277.09 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:70 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3492401 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4871628 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 609 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422057076291501 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1275 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 60 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 6 ESE 0.06 302.14 1,267.93 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:67 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3497956 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4866072 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 608 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422059076291301 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1270 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 7 NNE 0.28 1,464.45 1,251.74 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:40 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 61 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3578512 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4910518 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 600 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422128076292901 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1255 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 8 ESE 0.08 428.26 1,272.27 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:50 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3489623 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4866072 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 610 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422056076291301 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 62 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1270 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 9 NNE 0.32 1,666.82 1,250.76 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:45 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:19660101 Latitude:42.3584067 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4910518 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 47 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422130076292901 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:5 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1250 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:10 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 11 NNE 0.32 1,671.72 1,238.61 FED USGS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 63 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:180 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:19660101 Latitude:42.3584067 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4899407 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 46 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422130076292501 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1240 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:10 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 12 NE 0.28 1,479.12 1,226.93 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:50 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3578511 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4877184 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 601 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422128076291701 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 64 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1230 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 14 E 0.10 552.01 1,227.38 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type: Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3512778 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.483 Monitoring Loc Name:BUTTERMILK CREEK AT DANBY NY Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-04233210 Monitoring Loc Type:Stream Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from Digital MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure: Vertical Measure Unit: Vertical Accuracy: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 65 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Vertical Accuracy Unit: Vertical Collection Mthd: Vert Coord Refer System: Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 15 E 0.10 544.38 1,228.12 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:12 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:12 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:19900129 Latitude:42.3511667 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4829722 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1027 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422104076285901 Monitoring Loc Type:Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1233.15 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:0.1 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Level or other surveyed method. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 16 E 0.11 600.60 1,227.48 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:12 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:12 Provider Name:NWIS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 66 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:19900130 Latitude:42.3514167 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4828889 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1028 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422105076285801 Monitoring Loc Type:Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1231.88 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:0.1 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Level or other surveyed method. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 17 E 0.14 760.38 1,228.21 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:50 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3520178 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4827182 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 607 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422107076285901 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 67 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1230 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 18 E 0.11 583.45 1,234.29 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Till Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:20 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:20.4 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:19900129 Latitude:42.3510556 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4827778 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1026 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422104076285801 Monitoring Loc Type:Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1243 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:1 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Level or other surveyed method. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 19 ENE 0.23 1,189.86 1,201.92 FED USGS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 68 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:71 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:71 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20110810 Latitude:42.3560583 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4836722 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2905 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422122076290101 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Mapping grade GPS unit (handheld accuracy range 12 to 40 ft) Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1206 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:1 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Light Detection And Ranging, airplane Vert Coord Refer System:NAVD88 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 20 E 0.19 1,007.18 1,224.08 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:74 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3525734 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4821626 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 605 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422109076285701 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 69 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1230 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 21 WSW 0.22 1,152.70 1,522.83 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:41 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3492401 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.5060525 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 634 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422057076302301 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1525 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 70 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 22 ENE 0.24 1,249.21 1,209.30 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:200 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:200 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:19971009 Latitude:42.3543889 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4822778 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1018 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422116076285601 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1216 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:0.1 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Level or other surveyed method. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 24 W 0.27 1,400.18 1,495.75 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Java-West Falls Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:300 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:300 Provider Name:NWIS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 71 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20031112 Latitude:42.3527222 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.5067222 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1792 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422110076302401 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1500 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 25 NW 0.33 1,765.14 1,410.64 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:54 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:54 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20020709 Latitude:42.3576667 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.5041944 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1541 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422128076301501 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 72 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1413 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 26 ENE 0.29 1,515.74 1,195.41 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:30 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:30 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3570639 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4833833 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1037 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422125076290001 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1196 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 27 ENE 0.28 1,503.57 1,198.92 FED USGS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 73 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:44 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:44 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20000711 Latitude:42.3566056 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4827722 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1235 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422124076285801 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1199 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 28 NE 0.34 1,810.26 1,189.03 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:27 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3584067 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4843849 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 604 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422130076290501 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 74 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1190 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 29 WSW 0.27 1,438.28 1,526.55 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:144 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:19660101 Latitude:42.3472957 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.5057747 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 38 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422050076302201 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1225 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:10 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 75 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 31 N 0.54 2,856.59 1,235.78 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:160 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:160 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20080603 Latitude:42.3616944 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4928611 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2542 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422142076293401 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1238 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 32 N 0.55 2,882.65 1,257.18 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:98 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:240 Provider Name:NWIS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 76 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20071031 Latitude:42.3617917 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4949944 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2459 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422142076294201 Monitoring Loc Type:Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Mapping grade GPS unit (handheld accuracy range 12 to 40 ft) Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1260 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 35 NE 0.42 2,215.97 1,185.43 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:27 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3595178 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4841071 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 603 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422134076290401 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 77 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1185 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 36 N 0.60 3,176.04 1,258.91 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:140 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:140 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20071101 Latitude:42.3626 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4957 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2463 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422145076294501 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Reported. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1261 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 37 S 0.60 3,180.11 1,390.65 FED USGS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 78 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:98 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3411846 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4952187 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 616 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422028076294401 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1390 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 38 E 0.27 1,421.00 1,248.19 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:57 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3511845 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4796625 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 606 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422104076284801 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 79 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1250 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 39 ESE 0.29 1,506.59 1,286.11 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:79 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3484068 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4802181 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 615 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422054076285001 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:02050103 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1290 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 80 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 40 NW 0.44 2,343.67 1,420.72 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Java-West Falls Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:60 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3581289 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.506608 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 633 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422129076302501 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1425 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 41 E 0.37 1,943.56 1,219.88 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:41 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:70 Provider Name:NWIS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 81 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20081021 Latitude:42.3543167 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4796167 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2588 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422116076284701 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Mapping grade GPS unit (handheld accuracy range 12 to 40 ft) Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1220.6 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:.1 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Level or other surveyed method. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 43 NE 0.51 2,679.13 1,180.73 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:23 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3609067 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4843849 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 602 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422139076290501 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 82 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1180 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 44 NW 0.49 2,562.81 1,414.73 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Java-West Falls Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:120 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:120 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20000503 Latitude:42.359 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.5066111 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1210 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422132076302401 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1415 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 45 NNE 0.57 3,013.14 1,178.82 FED USGS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 83 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:47 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:47 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20101014 Latitude:42.3620444 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4864194 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2806 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422143076291101 Monitoring Loc Type:Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Mapping grade GPS unit (handheld accuracy range 12 to 40 ft) Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1178.5 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:0.5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Reported method of determination. Vert Coord Refer System:NAVD88 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 46 E 0.33 1,724.84 1,259.87 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:106 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:106 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20040715 Latitude:42.3498889 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4785833 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1883 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422100076284301 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 84 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p HUC Eight Digit Code:02050103 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1264 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 48 WNW 0.50 2,628.70 1,467.83 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Java-West Falls Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:220 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3570178 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.5088303 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 632 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422125076303301 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1460 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 85 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 49 NE 0.54 2,851.24 1,180.58 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type: Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3613889 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4843611 Monitoring Loc Name:BUTTERMILK CREEK TRIB 1 AT SR-96B AT DANBY NY Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-04233212 Monitoring Loc Type:Stream Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from Digital MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure: Vertical Measure Unit: Vertical Accuracy: Vertical Accuracy Unit: Vertical Collection Mthd: Vert Coord Refer System: Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 51 NNE 0.60 3,188.09 1,176.55 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:30 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:30 Provider Name:NWIS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 86 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20030814 Latitude:42.3624778 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4855389 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1743 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422145076290801 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1177 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 55 WNW 0.60 3,178.26 1,447.86 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:300 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:300 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20021115 Latitude:42.3591111 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.5095 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1363 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422133076303401 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 87 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1425 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 58 SSW 0.67 3,523.34 1,618.82 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Java-West Falls Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:140 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:140 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20050915 Latitude:42.3404444 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.5037778 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2082 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422026076301401 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1620 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 59 NNE 0.71 3,732.28 1,172.55 FED USGS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 88 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:40 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:40 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20020926 Latitude:42.364 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4858889 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1607 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422150076290901 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1174 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 61 ENE 0.63 3,307.27 1,216.68 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:23 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:23 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3587972 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4766278 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1038 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422132076283601 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 89 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Mapping grade GPS unit (handheld accuracy range 12 to 40 ft) Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1217.3 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:.1 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Level or other surveyed method. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 63 ENE 0.65 3,449.11 1,219.39 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:28 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:28 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20000928 Latitude:42.3596944 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4768611 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1234 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422135076283701 Monitoring Loc Type:Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1220 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 90 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 65 NNE 0.92 4,875.23 1,159.31 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name:Sand and gravel aquifers (glaciated regions) Well Depth:43 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:43 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20020624 Latitude:42.3671944 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4894722 Monitoring Loc Name:TM1528 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422202076292201 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1160 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 67 E 0.68 3,567.88 1,220.35 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sand and Gravel Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:75 Aquifer Type:Confined single aquifer Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:89 Provider Name:NWIS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 91 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20071114 Latitude:42.3553222 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4732528 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2467 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422119076282401 Monitoring Loc Type:Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:02050103 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.01 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Mapping grade GPS unit (handheld accuracy range 12 to 40 ft) Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1224.2 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:0.1 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Level or other surveyed method. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 68 SSW 0.88 4,639.48 1,617.14 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Java-West Falls Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:50 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3372958 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.502719 Monitoring Loc Name:TM 636 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422014076301101 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:02050103 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:1 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 92 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1615 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 69 NNE 0.93 4,930.32 1,167.31 FED USGS Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type: Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:Latitude:42.3673056 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4862778 Monitoring Loc Name:BUTTERMILK CREEK TRIB 2 AT DANBY NY Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-04233216 Monitoring Loc Type:Stream Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:04140201 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from Digital MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure: Vertical Measure Unit: Vertical Accuracy: Vertical Accuracy Unit: Vertical Collection Mthd: Vert Coord Refer System: Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 70 ESE 0.86 4,566.57 1,275.74 FED USGS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 93 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Organiz Identifier:USGS-NY Formation Type:Sonyea Formation Organiz Name:USGS New York Water Science Center Aquifer Name: Well Depth:120 Aquifer Type: Well Depth Unit:ft Country Code:US Well Hole Depth:120 Provider Name:NWIS W Hole Depth Unit:ft County:TOMPKINS Construction Date:20050812 Latitude:42.3453056 Source Map Scale:24000 Longitude:-76.4696111 Monitoring Loc Name:TM2069 Monitoring Loc Identifier:USGS-422043076281101 Monitoring Loc Type:Well Monitoring Loc Desc: HUC Eight Digit Code:02050103 Drainage Area: Drainage Area Unit: Contrib Drainage Area: Contrib Drainage Area Unit: Horizontal Accuracy:.1 Horizontal Accuracy Unit:seconds Horizontal Collection Mthd: Interpolated from MAP. Horiz Coord Refer System: NAD83 Vertical Measure:1275 Vertical Measure Unit:feet Vertical Accuracy:5 Vertical Accuracy Unit:feet Vertical Collection Mthd:Interpolated from topographic map. Vert Coord Refer System:NGVD29 Oil and Gas Wells Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 13 NNW 0.34 1,793.27 1,336.32 OGW API Well No:31109004830000 Operator No:9260 Well Name:Taubman Mary 2 Company Name:Fralick C.W. & Assoc. Well Status:UN Financial Security:False Well Status Desc:Unknown Integration: Well Type:DH State Lease:NA Well Type Desc:Dry Hole Hole:483 Well Compl. Dt.:1942-12-20 00:00:00 Slant:Vertical Original Well Type:NL Elevation:1328 General Well Status:Unplugged Well Confidential:Pre-1989 Well (N/A) General Well Type:Other Well Side Trck:0 Date Well Plugged:Completion:0 Well Confid. Dt.:Kick Off:0 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 94 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Date Status:Map Symbol Cd.:DH Dt Hearing:Surface Location:SURF Dt Mod:2017-10-30 14:44:16 Surface Longitude:-76.500020000000006 Permit Appl. Dt.:Surface Latitude:42.358849999999997 Permit Issued:Bottom Hole Loc.:BH Permit Fee:0 Bottom Hole Long.:-76.500362999999993 Date Spudded:1942-12-20 00:00:00 Bottom Hole Lat.:42.358781999999998 Date Total Depth:Spacing Acres: Measured Depth:2431 Town:Danby Drilled Depth:2431 Quad:West Danby Proposed Depth:0 Quad Description:C True Vertical Depth:2431 County:Tompkins Depth Fee:0 Cnty:109 Producing Name:Danby Region:7 Produc. Formation:Not Applicable Location Verified:NO Obj. Formation:Not Applicable Spacing: Map Symbol Desc.:Dry Hole Link:http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/GasOil/search/wells/index.cfm?api=31109004830000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 52 S 0.71 3,747.39 1,456.80 OGW API Well No:31109044460000 Operator No:9290 Well Name:Turk Floyd 1 Company Name:Bentley et al Well Status:UN Financial Security:False Well Status Desc:Unknown Integration: Well Type:DW State Lease:NA Well Type Desc:Dry Wildcat Hole:4446 Well Compl. Dt.:1963-10-26 00:00:00 Slant:Vertical Original Well Type:NL Elevation:1448 General Well Status:Unplugged Well Confidential:Pre-1989 Well (N/A) General Well Type:Other Well Side Trck:0 Date Well Plugged:Completion:0 Well Confid. Dt.:Kick Off:0 Date Status:Map Symbol Cd.:DH Dt Hearing:Surface Location:SURF Dt Mod:2003-01-24 15:54:36.200000000 Surface Longitude:-76.496300000000005 Permit Appl. Dt.:Surface Latitude:42.339640000000003 Permit Issued:Bottom Hole Loc.:BH Permit Fee:0 Bottom Hole Long.:-76.496641999999994 Date Spudded:1963-09-16 00:00:00 Bottom Hole Lat.:42.339570999999999 Date Total Depth:Spacing Acres: Measured Depth:3050 Town:Danby Drilled Depth:3050 Quad:Willseyville Proposed Depth:0 Quad Description:A Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 95 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p True Vertical Depth:3050 County:Tompkins Depth Fee:0 Cnty:109 Producing Name:Not Applicable Region:7 Produc. Formation:Not Applicable Location Verified:NO Obj. Formation:Not Applicable Spacing: Map Symbol Desc.:Dry Hole Link:http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/GasOil/search/wells/index.cfm?api=31109044460000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 53 NW 0.59 3,092.21 1,394.19 OGW API Well No:31109004820000 Operator No:57 Well Name:Taubman Mary 1 Company Name:CNG Transmission Corp. Well Status:PA Financial Security:False Well Status Desc:Plugged and Abandoned Integration: Well Type:GW State Lease:NA Well Type Desc:Gas Wildcat Hole:482 Well Compl. Dt.:1939-11-02 00:00:00 Slant:Vertical Original Well Type:NL Elevation:1397 General Well Status:Plugged Well Confidential:Pre-1989 Well (N/A) General Well Type:Gas Well Side Trck:0 Date Well Plugged:1968-11-15 00:00:00 Completion:0 Well Confid. Dt.:Kick Off:0 Date Status:1968-11-15 00:00:00 Map Symbol Cd.:GWP Dt Hearing:Surface Location:SURF Dt Mod:1995-10-06 00:00:00 Surface Longitude:-76.505589999999998 Permit Appl. Dt.:Surface Latitude:42.361350000000002 Permit Issued:Bottom Hole Loc.:BH Permit Fee:0 Bottom Hole Long.:-76.505928999999995 Date Spudded:1939-11-02 00:00:00 Bottom Hole Lat.:42.361282000000003 Date Total Depth:Spacing Acres: Measured Depth:2478 Town:Danby Drilled Depth:2478 Quad:West Danby Proposed Depth:0 Quad Description:C True Vertical Depth:2478 County:Tompkins Depth Fee:0 Cnty:109 Producing Name:Danby Region:7 Produc. Formation:Oriskany Location Verified:NO Obj. Formation:Not Applicable Spacing: Map Symbol Desc.:Gas Well Plugged Link:http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/GasOil/search/wells/index.cfm?api=31109004820000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 57 NNE 0.69 3,662.43 1,173.60 OGW Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 96 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p API Well No:31109004900000 Operator No:9554 Well Name:Miller Brothers 1 Company Name:NYS Natural Gas Corp. Well Status:UN Financial Security:False Well Status Desc:Unknown Integration: Well Type:DW State Lease:NA Well Type Desc:Dry Wildcat Hole:490 Well Compl. Dt.:1939-12-22 00:00:00 Slant:Vertical Original Well Type:NL Elevation:1179 General Well Status:Unplugged Well Confidential:Pre-1989 Well (N/A) General Well Type:Other Well Side Trck:0 Date Well Plugged:Completion:0 Well Confid. Dt.:Kick Off:0 Date Status:Map Symbol Cd.:DH Dt Hearing:Surface Location:SURF Dt Mod:2017-10-30 14:56:26 Surface Longitude:-76.485590000000002 Permit Appl. Dt.:Surface Latitude:42.363790000000002 Permit Issued:Bottom Hole Loc.:BH Permit Fee:0 Bottom Hole Long.:-76.485928999999999 Date Spudded:Bottom Hole Lat.:42.363717999999999 Date Total Depth:Spacing Acres: Measured Depth:2350 Town:Danby Drilled Depth:2350 Quad:Willseyville Proposed Depth:0 Quad Description:A True Vertical Depth:2350 County:Tompkins Depth Fee:0 Cnty:109 Producing Name:Not Applicable Region:7 Produc. Formation:Not Applicable Location Verified:NO Obj. Formation:Not Applicable Spacing: Map Symbol Desc.:Dry Hole Link:http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/GasOil/search/wells/index.cfm?api=31109004900000 Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 62 NNW 0.81 4,279.70 1,316.23 OGW API Well No:31109040070000 Operator No:9554 Well Name:Smiley Jean H 1 Company Name:NYS Natural Gas Corp. Well Status:UN Financial Security:False Well Status Desc:Unknown Integration: Well Type:DH State Lease:NA Well Type Desc:Dry Hole Hole:4007 Well Compl. Dt.:1960-06-21 00:00:00 Slant:Vertical Original Well Type:NL Elevation:1313 General Well Status:Unplugged Well Confidential:Pre-1989 Well (N/A) General Well Type:Other Well Side Trck:0 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 97 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Date Well Plugged:Completion:0 Well Confid. Dt.:Kick Off:0 Date Status:Map Symbol Cd.:DH Dt Hearing:Surface Location:SURF Dt Mod:2003-01-24 15:54:36.187000000 Surface Longitude:-76.502979999999994 Permit Appl. Dt.:Surface Latitude:42.365470000000002 Permit Issued:Bottom Hole Loc.:BH Permit Fee:0 Bottom Hole Long.:-76.503324000000006 Date Spudded:1960-03-28 00:00:00 Bottom Hole Lat.:42.365398999999996 Date Total Depth:Spacing Acres: Measured Depth:8555 Town:Danby Drilled Depth:8555 Quad:West Danby Proposed Depth:0 Quad Description:C True Vertical Depth:8555 County:Tompkins Depth Fee:0 Cnty:109 Producing Name:Danby Region:7 Produc. Formation:Not Applicable Location Verified:NO Obj. Formation:Not Applicable Spacing: Map Symbol Desc.:Dry Hole Link:http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/GasOil/search/wells/index.cfm?api=31109040070000 Water Wells Database Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 1 SSW 0.19 993.86 1,352.76 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1793 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:360 Foil Loc:LIEB RD Rock Depth:47 Latitude:42 20 49.9 Gw Depth:30 Longitude:76 29 45.4 Cased Dept:47.5 DD Lat:42.347194 Yt Avg Disc:1 DD Long:-76.495944 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 5 SE 0.09 471.26 1,288.31 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1209 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:99 Foil Loc:BALD HILL RD Rock Depth:-999 Latitude:42 20 54.6 Gw Depth:25 Longitude:76 29 15.8 Cased Dept:99 DD Lat:42.3485 Yt Avg Disc:20 DD Long:-76.487722 Scr:NO Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 98 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 23 W 0.26 1,389.36 1,495.75 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1792 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:300 Foil Loc:COMFORT RD Rock Depth:46 Latitude:42 21 09.7 Gw Depth:37 Longitude:76 30 24.1 Cased Dept:46.5 DD Lat:42.352694 Yt Avg Disc:0.75 DD Long:-76.506694 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 25 NW 0.33 1,765.14 1,410.64 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1541 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:54 Foil Loc:GUNDERMAN RD Rock Depth:-999 Latitude:42 21 27.6 Gw Depth:15 Longitude:76 30 15.1 Cased Dept:54 DD Lat:42.357667 Yt Avg Disc:12 DD Long:-76.504194 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 27 ENE 0.28 1,503.57 1,198.65 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1235 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10056 Town:Danby Well Depth:44 Foil Loc:DANBY RD Rock Depth:-999 Latitude:42 21 23.8 Gw Depth:7 Longitude:76 28 58.0 Cased Dept:44 DD Lat:42.356611 Yt Avg Disc:15 DD Long:-76.482778 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 30 N 0.54 2,856.32 1,236.62 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM2542 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10079 Town:Danby Well Depth:161 Foil Loc:WHITE HAWK LN Rock Depth:103 Latitude:42 21 42.1 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 99 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Gw Depth:20 Longitude:76 29 34.4 Cased Dept:DD Lat:42.361694 Yt Avg Disc:3 DD Long:-76.492889 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 33 N 0.55 2,887.84 1,258.18 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM2459 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:280 Foil Loc:DANBY RD Rock Depth:116 Latitude:42 21 42.5 Gw Depth:31 Longitude:76 29 42.0 Cased Dept:DD Lat:42.361806 Yt Avg Disc:3 DD Long:-76.495 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 34 E 0.29 1,513.88 1,224.41 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM2198 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10150 Town:Danby Well Depth:50 Foil Loc:DANBY RD Rock Depth:Latitude:42 21 13.4 Gw Depth:6 Longitude:76 28 51.8 Cased Dept:DD Lat:42.353722 Yt Avg Disc:3.5 DD Long:-76.481056 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 36 N 0.60 3,176.04 1,258.91 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM2463 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:140 Foil Loc:DANBY RD Rock Depth:48 Latitude:42 21 45.4 Gw Depth:40 Longitude:76 29 44.5 Cased Dept:46.5 DD Lat:42.362611 Yt Avg Disc:1.5 DD Long:-76.495694 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 42 NW 0.48 2,544.42 1,416.22 WATER WELLS Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 100 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Dec Well NO:TM1210 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:120 Foil Loc:COMFORT RD Rock Depth:48 Latitude:42 21 32.0 Gw Depth:41 Longitude:76 30 24.0 Cased Dept:51 DD Lat:42.358889 Yt Avg Disc:6 DD Long:-76.506667 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 47 E 0.33 1,732.11 1,259.87 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1883 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10056 Town:Danby Well Depth:106 Foil Loc:DANBY RD Rock Depth:19 Latitude:42 20 59.6 Gw Depth:10 Longitude:76 28 42.8 Cased Dept:19 DD Lat:42.349889 Yt Avg Disc:6 DD Long:-76.478556 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 50 NNE 0.60 3,185.49 1,175.50 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1743 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10079 Town:Danby Well Depth:30 Foil Loc:DANBY RD Rock Depth:-999 Latitude:42 21 44.9 Gw Depth:0 Longitude:76 29 08.0 Cased Dept:DD Lat:42.362472 Yt Avg Disc:23 DD Long:-76.485556 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 54 WSW 0.48 2,511.05 1,528.35 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM2906 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:240 Foil Loc:COMFORT RD Rock Depth:58 Latitude:42 20 50.2 Gw Depth:26 Longitude:76 30 37.6 Cased Dept:60.5 DD Lat:42.347278 Yt Avg Disc:3 DD Long:-76.510444 Scr:NO Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 101 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 56 WNW 0.60 3,178.29 1,447.86 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1363 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:305 Foil Loc:GUNDERMAN RD Rock Depth:16 Latitude:42 21 32.7 Gw Depth:15 Longitude:76 30 34.3 Cased Dept:16.5 DD Lat:42.359083 Yt Avg Disc:3 DD Long:-76.509528 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 58 SSW 0.67 3,523.34 1,618.82 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM2082 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10079 Town:Danby Well Depth:140 Foil Loc:COMFORT RD Rock Depth:24 Latitude:42 20 25.6 Gw Depth:45.299999237 Longitude:76 30 13.6 Cased Dept:24 DD Lat:42.340444 Yt Avg Disc:3 DD Long:-76.503778 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 59 NNE 0.71 3,732.28 1,172.55 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1607 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10509 Town:Danby Well Depth:40 Foil Loc:DANBY RD Rock Depth:-999 Latitude:42 21 50.4 Gw Depth:Longitude:76 29 09.2 Cased Dept:40 DD Lat:42.364 Yt Avg Disc:20 DD Long:-76.485889 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 60 NW 0.67 3,542.17 1,371.22 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1239 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10150 Town:Danby Well Depth:23 Foil Loc:COMFORT RD Rock Depth:-999 Latitude:42 21 46.6 Gw Depth:23 Longitude:76 30 17.8 Wells and Additional Sources Detail Report 102 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Cased Dept:23 DD Lat:42.362944 Yt Avg Disc:7 DD Long:-76.504944 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 64 ENE 0.65 3,455.42 1,219.39 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1234 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10150 Town:Danby Well Depth:28 Foil Loc:HORNBROOK RD Rock Depth:-999 Latitude:42 21 35.0 Gw Depth:28 Longitude:76 28 36.7 Cased Dept:28 DD Lat:42.359722 Yt Avg Disc:10 DD Long:-76.476861 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 66 NNE 0.92 4,875.58 1,159.76 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM1528 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:43 Foil Loc:WEST MILLER RD Rock Depth:-999 Latitude:42 22 01.9 Gw Depth:0 Longitude:76 29 21.7 Cased Dept:43 DD Lat:42.367194 Yt Avg Disc:15 DD Long:-76.489361 Scr:NO Map Key Direction Distance (mi)Distance (ft)Elevation (ft)DB 70 ESE 0.86 4,566.57 1,275.74 WATER WELLS Dec Well NO:TM2069 County:TOMPKINS Reg Number:NYRD10080 Town:Danby Well Depth:120 Foil Loc:DANBY RD Rock Depth:5 Latitude:42 20 43.1 Gw Depth:50 Longitude:76 28 10.6 Cased Dept:19.5 DD Lat:42.345306 Yt Avg Disc:5 DD Long:-76.469611 Scr:NO Radon Information 103 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p This section lists any relevant radon information found for the target property. Federal EPA Radon Zone for TOMPKINS County: 1 Zone 1: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels greater than 4 pCi/L Zone 2: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels from 2 to 4 pCi/L Zone 3: Counties with predicted average indoor radon screening levels less than 2 pCi/L Federal Area Radon Information for TOMPKINS County No Measures/Homes:460 Geometric Mean:5.8 Arithmetic Mean:4.4 Median:2.6 Standard Deviation:2.7 Maximum:54.6 % >4 pCi/L:32 % >20 pCi/L:2 Notes on Data Table:Table 1. Screening indoor radon data compiled by the New York State Department of Health. Data represent 1-7 day charcoal canister measurements from the lowest level of each home tested. Appendix 104 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Federal Sources FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FEMA FLOOD The National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) data incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) databases published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and any Letters Of Map Revision (LOMRs) that have been issued against those databases since their publication date. The FIRM Database is the digital, geospatial version of the flood hazard information shown on the published paper FIRMs. The FIRM Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The FIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published FIRMs, flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. Indoor Radon Data INDOOR RADON Indoor radon measurements tracked by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and the State Residential Radon Survey. Public Water Systems Violations and Enforcement Data PWSV List of drinking water violations and enforcement actions from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) made available by the Drinking Water Protection Division of the US EPA's Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water. Enforcement sensitive actions are not included in the data released by the EPA. Address information provided in SWDIS may correspond either with the physical location of the water system, or with a contact address. Radon Zone Level RADON ZONE Areas showing the level of Radon Zones (level 1, 2 or 3) by county. This data is maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)SDWIS The Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) contains information about public water systems as reported to US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the states. Addresses may correspond with the location of the water system, or with a contact address. Soil Survey Geographic database SSURGO The Soil Survey Geographic database (SSURGO) contains information about soil as collected by the National Cooperative Soil Survey at the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Soil maps outline areas called map units. The map units are linked to soil properties in a database. Each map unit may contain one to three major components and some minor components. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wetland Data US WETLAND The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wetland layer represents the approximate location and type of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the United States. USGS Current Topo US TOPO US Topo topographic maps are produced by the National Geospatial Program of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The project was launched in late 2009, and the term "US Topo" refers specifically to quadrangle topographic maps published in 2009 and later. USGS Geology US GEOLOGY Seamless maps depicting geological information provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). USGS National Water Information System FED USGS The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)'s National Water Information System (NWIS) is the nation's principal repository of water resources data. This database includes comprehensive information of well-construction details, time-series data for gage height, streamflow, groundwater level, and precipitation and water use data. State Sources Oil and Gas Wells OGW The Division of Mineral Resources maintains a data management system on wells regulated under the Oil, Appendix 105 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Gas and Solution Mining Law (OGSML). To assist the Division in the regulation of wells subject to the OGSML, a database of the wells was created in the early 1980's and significantly upgraded in 1998 by the adoption of the Risk Based Data Management System. This system provides information on well ownership, well owners and operators, registered driller, pluggers and companies that provide financial security instruments. Regulatory Freshwater Wetlands WETLAND The Regulatory Freshwater Wetlands data are a set of ARC/INFO coverages composed of polygonal and linear features. Coverages are based on official New York State Freshwater Wetlands Maps as described in Article 24-0301 of the Environmental Conservation Law. Coverages are not, however, a legal substitute for the official maps. Coverages are available on a county basis for all areas of New York State outside the Adirondack Park. This dataset is provided by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Water Wells Database WATER WELLS The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Bureau of Water Resource Management works to protect, manage, and conserve New York State's groundwater and surface water supply sources, develop management strategies to enhance and protect these waters, and protect both the groundwater and surface water quality in the New York City Watershed and other major watersheds. This dataset does not include information on wells located in Nassau, Suffolk, Kings, and Queens counties. Liability Notice 106 erisinfo.com| Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 21040800589p Reliance on information in Report: The Physical Setting Report (PSR) DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as a review of environmental databases and physical characteristics for the site or adjacent properties. License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS Information Inc. disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report(s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. Appendix 7 User Interview Privileged and Confidential 300 State Street, Suite 201 | Rochester, NY 14614 | p 585-454-6110 | f 585-454-3066 www.labellapc.com USER QUESTIONNAIRE Project No. Date: Site Name/ Address: Site Contact (to arrange site visit/conduct Site owner interview): Name: Site Contact’s Relationship to Site (owner/realtor/facility manager/etc.): Phone Number: Email Address: In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the “Brownfields Amendments”), the user must conduct the following inquiries required by 40 CFR 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30, and 312.31. These inquiries must also be conducted by or on behalf of EPA Brownfield Assessment and Characterization grantees. The user should provide the following information to the Environmental Professional. Failure to conduct these inquiries could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiries” is not complete. User (Print Name): Title: Signature: Information regarding these questions was obtained from the following parties (if applicable): Purpose of this Assessment: Selling the property Purchasing the property Construction loan Re-financing the property Other (explain): 1.Title Records Land title records (or judicial records where appropriate, see Note 1 below) are filed under federal, tribal, state or local law and should be reviewed to identify environmental liens or activity and use limitations (AULs), if any, that are currently recorded or filed against the property. Are land title records available for review? No Yes (If yes, please provide.) Unknown Note 1 – In certain jurisdictions, federal, tribal, state, or local statues, or regulations specify that environmental liens and AULs be filed in judicial records rather than in land title records. In such cases, judicial records must be searched for environmental liens and AULs. 2.Environmental liens that are filed or recorded against the property (40 CFR 312.25) Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate, see Note 1 above) identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information: 2 3.Activity and land use restrictions (AULs) that are in place on the property or that have been filed or recorded against the property (40 CFR 312.26(a)(1)(v) and (vi)) Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate, see Note 1 above) identify any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state, or local law? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information 4.Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP (40 CFR 312.28) Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or and adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information: 5.Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated (40 CFR 312.29) Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? No Yes Unknown N/A- there is no transfer of ownership If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information: 6.Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30) Are you aware of any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that could help the Environmental Professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example: (a)Do you know of the past uses of the property? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information: (b)Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information: (c)Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information: 3 (d)Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information: 7.The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation (40 CFR 312.31) Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at that property? No Yes Unknown Based on review of readily available information: Please provide attachments if necessary to explain any answers to the above questions. Appendix 8 Previous Reports Privileged and Confidential No Previous Environmental Reports were reviewed through the course of this assessment. Appendix 9 Additional Services Privileged and Confidential No Additional Services were requested. Appendix 10 Reference of Published Sources Privileged and Confidential Reference of Published Sources USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map West Danby and Willseyville, New York United State Geological Survey (USGS) website Tompkins County Soil Survey Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) USEPA NPL, Delisted NPL, SEMS, SEMS Archived, RCRA CORRACTS, RCRA TSD, RCRA Generators, Federal ICs/ECs, and ERNS Listings ERIS NYSDEC ICs/ECs, IHWDS, VCP, BCP, ERP, SWIMS, Hazardous Substance Disposal Sites, PBS, CBS, MOS, and Updated Spills ERIS Local Landfill or Solid Waste Information Tompkins County Health Department Aerial Photographs ERIS Historical Topographic Maps USGS online resources Street Directories ERIS Appendix 11 Qualifications Privileged and Confidential Michael delaney Michael has conducted numerous Environmental Site Assessments. Site assessments include evaluation of environmental liability associated with properties such as commercial properties, undeveloped land, natural gas regulator stations, and residential homes. Michael provides efficient analysis and has completed environmental assessments for the following groups: Financial Institutions • Canandaigua National Bank • Community Bank • Counterpoint Mortgage • Northwest Bank • Steuben Trust Company • Genesee Regional Bank • Lyons National Bank • Evans Bank • The Upstate National Bank • Key Bank • Tompkins Bank of Castile • Family First FCU Development and Construction Companies • Buckingham Properties • Flaum Management Company, Inc. • Prime Development, Inc. • Triangle Squared Realty Main Street LLC • El-Mar Property Development, LLC • Cayuga Crushed Stone, Inc. • Home Leasing LLC • NPV, Inc. • Pulte Group • Edgemere Development Engineering and Architectural Firms • MRB Group • Passero Associates Electric and Gas Utility Companies • NYSEG Medical Institutions • Southern Tier AIDS Program (STAP) Non-Profit Organizations • Hillside Children’s Center EDUCATION SUNY College at Brockport, Geology: BS Environmental Analyst Michael is an Environmental Analyst working with the Due Diligence Program of Labella’s Environmental Division. Michael is responsible for preparing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and Transaction Screen ESAs technical reports, and completing other environmental due diligence reports. Phase I ESA for 249 South Main Street Herkimer, NY for Edgemere Development As port of a potential sale, Michael conducted a Phase I investigation on an apartment building that was originally constructed as a school in 1910 and converted for residential use in 1988. Based on the results of the investigation, no environmental concerns were identified pertaining to the site and no additional investigation was warranted at the time. Phase I ESA for 1 Mustard Street Rochester, NY for Hillside Children’s Center As part of a potential future purchase, Michael conducted a Phase I investigation on a former food product manufacturing facility. Based on the results of the investigation, three USTs were found associated with former site operations with no associated closure documentation. In addition, historical records suggested the site was formerly wired as a machine shop. Michael was able to assist the client in assessing the environmental risk associated with the site. Phase I ESA for 4700 West Henrietta Road Rochester, NY for Canandaigua National Bank As part of a real estate transaction, Michael conducted a Phase I investigation on an automotive dealership. Historical records indicated that the site was historically utilized as a construction equipment dealership with repair operations for approximately 50 years. No analytical testing had been completed on-site. In addition, an oil/water separator associated with the dealership had no disposal receipts or inspection records available for review. Michael was able to assist the client in assessing the environmental risk associated with the site and LaBella recommended a subsurface investigation be completed at the site. michael delaney Rhiannon Leonhardt Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Ms. Leonhardt has completed environmental assessments for, but not limited to, the following entities. Financial Institutions • Bank of Akron • Berkshire Bank • Canandaigua National Bank • Chemung Canal Trust • Community Bank, N.A. • ESL Federal Credit Union • Evans Bank • Five Star Bank • Genesee Regional Bank • JP Morgan Chase • Key Bank • Lake Shore Savings Bank • Lyons National Bank • M&T Bank • Northwest Savings Bank • PNC Bank • Solvay Bank • Tompkins Bank of Castile • Visions Credit Union • Bank OZK • TruMark FCU Municipal & Government Clients • City of Gloversville • City of Rochester • Wayne County • Village of Clyde • City of Elmira • NYSDOT • Rush Henrietta School District • Small Business Administration EDUCATION SUNY University at Buffalo: B.S., Geological Studies SUNY Environmental Science and Forestry, Wanakena: AAS, Forest Technology certifications/ registrations Air & Waste Management Association Geological Society of America Environmnetal Due Diligence Technical Manager Rhiannon is LaBella’s Environmental Due Diligence Manager responsible for overseeing the completion of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), Transaction Screens, and Risk Assessment Reports. The site assessments include the evaluation of properties ranging from residential to industrial operations. Rhiannon has managed over 1,000 Environmental Site Assessments throughout the Eastern United States, including, New York State, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina, Massachusetts, Ohio, and Maryland. Rhiannon has been involved in various projects, including Phase I and Phase II ESA, Remediation Project, and Brownfield Cleanup Projects. With over eight years of experience in the environmental field, Rhiannon is able to provide a comprehensive analysis of properties required prior to commercial transactions. Developers, Attorneys, Renewal Agencies, Etc. • Buckingham Properties • Dorchel Automotive Group • Enterprise Rent-A-Car • Harris Beach PLLC • Harter Secrest & Emery LLP • Iberdrola/NYSEG/RG&E • The NRP Group • Pathstone Corporation • Rochester Cornerstone Group • MAP Energy Funding Solutions • The Community Preservation Corp. • Bond, Schoenick, & King PLLC • Morgan Management LLC • NVR, Inc./Ryan Homes • Western New York Land Conservancy • Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP • Eastman Kodak • CJS Architechs, LLP • Underberg & Kessler • Nixon Peabody LLP • Home Leasing LLC • Bowich & Coffey, LLC The Strong National Museum of Play Expansion Rhiannon managed the Due Diligence investigation associated with the expansion of the Strong Museum. The investigation included a portion of the former inner loop and numerous historical City of Rochester blocks. Based on the results of the investigation, it was determined that USTs may be present at the site in association with former residential dwellings. The client was prepared to address the full UST that was subsequently uncovered during construction activities. Commercial Property Adjacent to former Dry Cleaner- Albany, NY As part of a real estate transaction, Rhiannon managed a Phase I investigation on a commercial property adjacent to a former dry cleaning facility with an active NYSDEC spill. Through correspondence with the NYSDEC, Rhiannon was able to secure vapor intrusion testing within the site building at no cost to the client. In addition, based on Rhiannon’s diligence in conducting this site assessment, a soil vapor mitigation system was installed within the site building at no cost to the client. Former Gasoline Station - East Avenue Rhiannon managed a Phase I investigation that identified a gasoline station with numerous generations of USTs that had not been removed from the Site. In addition, the investigation identified floor drains within the site building that had discharged to the surface of the site with various automotive hazardous substances discharged through the drains. Rhiannon was able to assist the client in assessing the environmental risk associated with the site and the scope of the subsurface investigation. Automotive Dealerships – Rochester NY As part of a potential sale, Rhiannon managed environmental due diligence service on a portfolio of eight large automotive dealerships in the Rochester area. Operations at the dealership locations included large scale automotive repair. Potential environmental issues identified at the dealerships included in- ground hydraulic lifts, oil/water separators, and petroleum bulk storage systems, and long term automotive repair. Rhiannon was responsible to assisting the client to assess the environmental liability of each Site. Former Machine Shop – Gates, New York Rhiannon managed environmental due diligence investigations associated with a real estate transaction at a warehouse facility. Through historical research it was determined that the facility had historically been utilized as a precision grinding facility. Based on the results of the initial investigation, a subsurface investigation was conducted at the site. Petroleum related solvents were detected in both on-Site soils and groundwater and a NYSDEC spill resulted. The site was subsequently remediated to the satisfaction of the NYSDEC and closed prior to the real estate transaction saving the client from inheriting the liability associated with the contamination that was present at the site. Medical Facility – Gates, New York Rhiannon managed a Phase I investigation involving a medical facility that identified environmental concerns associated with adjacent dry cleaning and manufacturing operations. Through research, it was determined that these facilities were hydraulically up-gradient of the subject site. Subsequent to issuing the Phase I ESA, a Phase II investigation conducted on the site identified chlorinated solvents in the groundwater at the Site. A sub- slab depressurization system (SSDS) was installed within the rhiannon leonhardt site building to mitigate potential soil vapor intrusion within the structure. Automotive Repair Facility – Rochester, New York Rhiannon managed completion of environmental due diligence for a long standing automotive repair facility and several vacant lots that had been formerly developed with residential structures. Based on the results of the Phase I investigation, environmental concerns were identified associated with floor drains within the automotive repair facility and fill material at the vacant lots. To further assess the risk at the site, Based on a subsurface investigation was conducted. Low levels of petroleum impact was identified at the automotive repair facility and regulated solid waste was identified within the fill material present at the site. To reduce the client’s liability, an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) was developed to manage these materials during future redevelopment activities at the site. Confidential Client – East Avenue Rhiannon managed a Phase I investigation that identified a gasoline station with numerous generations of USTs that had not been removed from the Site. In addition, the investigation identified floor drains within the site building that had discharged to the surface of the site with various automotive hazardous substances discharged through the drains. Rhiannon was able to assist the client in assessing the environmental risk associated with the site and the scope of the subsurface investigation. rhiannon leonhardt Brownfield Cleanup Program 111 Hydraulic Street, C915235 Conducted field work at a multi-parcel former industrial/ commercial site that had included dry cleaning, linen and laundry services, auto body services, gas tank removal and refurbishing services, and door and radiator sand blasting services. Soil and groundwater at the site were determined to be contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and metals. Rhiannon oversaw the removal of underground storage tanks (USTs) and the removal of 14,360 tons of contaminated soil from the site. Rhiannon conducted soil and groundwater sampling and analysis of laboratory analytical results. Rhiannon assisted in preparing Final Engineering Report (FER) that was submitted to and approved by the NYSDEC to obtain a Certificate of Completion for the client. SPDES Program Rhiannon conducted water sampling at Buffalo area scrap and salvage yards to ensure compliance with the New York State Department of Environmental Protection (NYSDEC) State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) program. The sampling program included quarterly sampling of all surface wastewater and stormwater discharge points at three facility locations. Phase II ESAs Rhiannon has been involved in numerous Phase II ESAs throughout the Western New York area. These investigations were conducted on facilities such as former gasoline stations and automotive repair facilities, and active machine shops and industrial facilities. Rhiannon has experience overseeing test pitting excavations, direct push soil borings, and groundwater monitoring well installation and sampling. 242 West Main Street, Suite 100 | Rochester, NY 14614 | 585.325.1000 | www.passero.com NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY NORBUT SOLAR FARMS - DANBY NOISE STUDY DANBY, NY PREPARED FOR: NORBUT SOLAR FARMS, LLC 1241 UNIVERSITY AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14607 20213129.0001 December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................... 1  APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................................................. 1  1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 2  2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................. 3  2.1 Solar Law .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3  2.2 Calculation of Noise Levels ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4  3.0 CALCULATIONS & RESULTS ............................................................................................................................... 5  Table 1: Total sound level in decibels at each lot line. ............................................................................................................................ 5  4.0 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................... 5  APPENDICES  AERIAL PHOTO   SOUND DISSIPATION CALCULATIONS   EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION SHEETS  December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed project, located on vacant farmland along Bald Hill Road (TA#10-1-21.122) in the Town of Danby, is the next installment of renewable green energy by Norbut Solar Farms. The project covers ±74.8 acres & includes the construction of three (3) immediately adjacent PV facilities with related improvements such as pad mounted electrical equipment, inverters, gravel access drive, perimeter security fencing and stormwater management improvements. This Noise Study has been prepared at the request of the Town of Danby to independently define levels of ambient noise generated by the electrical equipment proposed on site. This report evaluates noise levels at various property line locations to determine any potential significant impacts to local residences. The project includes a total of 120 inverters centrally located on racks adjacent to the 6 concrete pad transformer enclosures. This will keep the inverters farther away from the property lines compared to the original study. To do this, the project will use DC combiner boxes, located at the southern end of each panel row. These boxes take the individual panel wires and combine then to one larger gauge wire, these boxes do not make noise. December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Solar Law The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) oversees the development of solar fields and provides guidance on their design and construction. The proposed solar array was designed to meet these guildlines. Section (7)(c)(vii)(14) of the Solar Law states: “Inverters shall be located or installed in such a manner as to minimize or eliminate any possible noise as measured at the nearest lot line.” Examples of typical noise levels 45 db = NYSDEC recognized ambient noise level in rural farmland December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx 2.2 Calculation of Noise Levels The proposed 120 Inverters located centrally racked generate an ambient noise level of less than 65 decibels at a distance of 1 meter away (3.28 feet). Calculations for this report will assume a conservative continuous max output of 65 decibels from all inverters. The proposed 6 concrete pad mounted transformer enclosures (2 per solar array) generate an ambient noise level of 65 decibels at a distance of 1 foot away. Sound levels are measured in decibels (dBA) and can calculate loss over distance using the following formula: L – L1 + 20*Log(R1/R2) Where: L = calculated sound level L1 = The sound level at the reference distance R1 = The reference distance R2 = the distance to the point of interest (ie. Nearest lot line) It is important to note that these calculations do not consider other factors that mitigate noise levels by natural barriers like trees, brush, grasses, natural topography or mitigation created by the perimeter fence or buildings. The calculation also does not factor in absorption of sound by the air, or offsetting against wind conditions. The actual ambient noise levels at the property lines will likely be even lower than those calculated due to these conditions. The sum of the total noise at each lot line needs to incorporate the total sum of noise from all 120 inverters & 6 transformer enclosures. This resulting decibel level can be calculated with the following formula: Lsum = 10*log(10L1/10 dBA) + 10*log(10L2/10 dBA) + 10*log(10L3/10 dBA)…… 10*log(10Ln/10 dBA) Where: Lsum = noise level in decibels heard at the lot line (ignoring all natural buffers) Ln = sound level at the lot line from individual inverters (ignoring all natural buffers) December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx 3.0 CALCULATIONS & RESULTS Results of the noise study are summarized in table 1 below: Table 1: Total sound level in decibels at each lot line. Sound Levels at Property Line 763' 226' 1140' Lot Line: Distance of Closest Inverters North South East Total Sound Level (dBA) West 1295' 33 dBA 37 dBA 48 dBA 35 dBA Based upon the methodology laid out in this report, the greatest sound level due to the inverters and concrete pad mounted equipment is 48 decibels at the closest point on the southern property line. This level of noise is only found on the property line directly south of the inverter/transformer locations. As an individual travels east or west along this property line, the noise level drops. The NYSDEC Guide lines for solar arrays states that the typical quiet rural farmland sound level is 45 dBA. The ambient noise already produced by this type of area is louder than what will be heard at 3 of the 4 property lines. Along the southern property line, when the ambient noise level for the area is combined with the proposed noise generated using the methodology in section 2, the total noise increase is less than 5 dBA. The NYSDEC Guide lines note that an increase of 5 dBA would not be a noticable increase of total loudness. In addition, the total decibel level will be further reduced by the natural buffers located on and adjacent to the site, which are not calculated in this report. As a point of reference, most municipalities require that a project not produce a dBA above 65 or 70 at the property line. The proposed noise levels are well below this reference level as well. 4.0 SUMMARY In summary, the proposed project will provide a benefit to the community and provide a way for the Town of Danby to embrace green energy production for the future. The total noise produced by the project is less than the ambient noise level at the North, East, and Western Property Lines. The Southern property line would see an increase of no more than 5 decibels in total loudness. This increase is stated by the DEC to not be a noticeable increase for the area. The proposed calculations are also a conservative measurement, as this study does not take into account sound mitigation factors including natural barriers like trees, brush, grasses, natural topography or mitigation created by the perimeter fence or buildings. The calculation also does not factor in absorption of sound by the air, or offsetting against wind conditions. December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx APPENDICES December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx AERIAL PHOTO 6707 Winchester Cir, Boulder, CO 80301 888 Federal Blvd, Denver, CO 80204 www.NamasteSolar.com · 303.447.0300 CL I E N T : PR O J E C T : SI T E A D D R E S S : DRAWING SET ISSUE: SHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: DE S C R I P T I O N : RE V . DA T E NO T E S A B C D E F G H I J K A B C D E F G H I J K 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 DRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY: NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N OR P E R M I T APP L I C A T I O N 20 2 1 / 0 3 / 3 1 ST A R T -- NO R B U T S O L A R S. A . T . G R O U N D M O U N T 54 B A L D H I L L R D , IT H A C A , NY 14 8 5 0 0.2 TH HT A101 AGGREGATE SITE PLAN SCALE: 0 200100 400 1" = 200' Note: Aerial image provided for context only BAL D H I L L R O A D SYSTEM SUMMARY: ITEM DETAIL SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 TOTAL SYSTEM SIZE, DC:kW-DC 6,697.50 6,697.50 6,697.50 20092.50 SYSTEM SIZE, AC:kW-AC 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 15000.00 MODULE:TRINA SOLAR, TSM-DEG15VC.20(II), 475W 14,100 14,100 14,100 42 INVERTER:CPS SCA125KTL-DO/US-600, 125kW 40 40 40 120 STRINGS:30 MODULES IN SERIES 470 470 470 1410 ORIENTATION:TILT AND AZIMUTH +/- 60° TILT, 0° AXIS AZ +/- 60° TILT, 0° AXIS AZ +/- 60° TILT, 0° AXIS AZ --- RACKING:TERRA SMART, SINGLE AXIS TRACKER, GROUND-MOUNT 40% GCR 40% GCR 40% GCR --- SITE FENCE, TYPICAL PROPERTY LINE, TYPICAL PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD SITE 2 SITE 3 SITE 1 100' RESIDENTIAL SETBACK, TYPICAL INVERTERS DISTRIBUTED IN ARRAY, TYPICAL PAD MOUNTED SWITCHBOARD W/ XFMR AND PV EQUIPMENT, TYPICAL NOTES: 1) POLE #1: NYSEG RECLOSER WITH SCADA CONTROL 2) POLE #2: NYSEG BI-DIRECTIONAL UTILITY METER, POINT OF COMMON COUPLING 3) POLE #3: SURGE ARRESTORS AND GOAB 4) CUSTOMER RISER POLE #4: CUSTOMER OWNED RECLOSER D A N B Y R O A D PARCEL ID: 10.1-21.122 (EAST) 75' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE TO MODULES, TYPICAL(WEST) 75' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE TO MODULES, TYPICAL (SOUTH) 50' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE TO MODULES, TYPICAL 20 2 1 / 0 3 / 3 1 HU M P H R E Y R E V I S I O N 01 (NORTH) 50' SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE TO MODULES, TYPICAL WETLAND, TYPICAL 16' SETBACK FROM FENCE 475W PV MODULE, TYPICAL SITE 3 20 2 1 / 0 6 / 2 5 MO D A N D R A C K I N G C H A N G E 02 INTERMITTENT STREAM, TYPICAL 50' INTERMITTENT STREAM SETBACK, TYPICAL NS F D A N B Y A L L S I T E S SITE 2 20 2 1 / 1 1 / 2 2 WE T L A N D S A D D E D 03 EPHEMERAL STREAM, TYPICAL December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx SOUND DISSIPATION CALCULATIONS Specifications Distance 65 dBA 3.28 feet 65 dBA 1 feet Row Distance (ft) dBA 10^(L1/10) Row Distance (ft) dBA 10^(L1/10) 1 1164 14 25 1 275 27 450 2 1164 14 25 2 275 27 450 3 1164 14 25 3 275 27 450 4 1164 14 25 4 275 27 450 5 1164 14 25 5 275 27 450 6 1164 14 25 6 275 27 450 7 1164 14 25 7 275 27 450 8 1164 14 25 8 275 27 450 9 1164 14 25 9 275 27 450 10 1164 14 25 10 275 27 450 11 1164 14 25 11 275 27 450 12 1164 14 25 12 275 27 450 13 1164 14 25 13 275 27 450 14 1164 14 25 14 275 27 450 15 1164 14 25 15 275 27 450 16 1164 14 25 16 275 27 450 17 1164 14 25 17 275 27 450 18 1164 14 25 18 275 27 450 19 1164 14 25 19 275 27 450 20 1164 14 25 20 275 27 450 21 1164 14 25 21 275 27 450 22 1164 14 25 22 275 27 450 23 1164 14 25 23 275 27 450 24 1164 14 25 24 275 27 450 25 1164 14 25 25 275 27 450 26 1164 14 25 26 275 27 450 27 1164 14 25 27 275 27 450 28 1164 14 25 28 275 27 450 29 1164 14 25 29 275 27 450 30 1164 14 25 30 275 27 450 31 1164 14 25 31 275 27 450 32 1164 14 25 32 275 27 450 33 1164 14 25 33 275 27 450 34 1164 14 25 34 275 27 450 35 1164 14 25 35 275 27 450 36 1164 14 25 36 275 27 450 37 1164 14 25 37 275 27 450 38 1164 14 25 38 275 27 450 39 1164 14 25 39 275 27 450 40 1164 14 25 40 275 27 450 41 1217 14 23 41 226 28 666 42 1217 14 23 42 226 28 666 43 1217 14 23 43 226 28 666 44 1217 14 23 44 226 28 666 45 1217 14 23 45 226 28 666 46 1217 14 23 46 226 28 666 47 1217 14 23 47 226 28 666 48 1217 14 23 48 226 28 666 49 1217 14 23 49 226 28 666 50 1217 14 23 50 226 28 666 51 1217 14 23 51 226 28 666 CPS 100/125 kW, 1500Vdc Inverter Noise level Cooper Power Three Phase Transformer North Lot Line South Lot Line 52 1217 14 23 52 226 28 666 53 1217 14 23 53 226 28 666 54 1217 14 23 54 226 28 666 55 1217 14 23 55 226 28 666 56 1217 14 23 56 226 28 666 57 1217 14 23 57 226 28 666 58 1217 14 23 58 226 28 666 59 1217 14 23 59 226 28 666 60 1217 14 23 60 226 28 666 61 1217 14 23 61 226 28 666 62 1217 14 23 62 226 28 666 63 1217 14 23 63 226 28 666 64 1217 14 23 64 226 28 666 65 1217 14 23 65 226 28 666 66 1217 14 23 66 226 28 666 67 1217 14 23 67 226 28 666 68 1217 14 23 68 226 28 666 69 1217 14 23 69 226 28 666 70 1217 14 23 70 226 28 666 71 1217 14 23 71 226 28 666 72 1217 14 23 72 226 28 666 73 1217 14 23 73 226 28 666 74 1217 14 23 74 226 28 666 75 1217 14 23 75 226 28 666 76 1217 14 23 76 226 28 666 77 1217 14 23 77 226 28 666 78 1217 14 23 78 226 28 666 79 1217 14 23 79 226 28 666 80 1217 14 23 80 226 28 666 81 763 18 58 81 267 27 477 82 763 18 58 82 267 27 477 83 763 18 58 83 267 27 477 84 763 18 58 84 267 27 477 85 763 18 58 85 267 27 477 86 763 18 58 86 267 27 477 87 763 18 58 87 267 27 477 88 763 18 58 88 267 27 477 89 763 18 58 89 267 27 477 90 763 18 58 90 267 27 477 91 763 18 58 91 267 27 477 92 763 18 58 92 267 27 477 93 763 18 58 93 267 27 477 94 763 18 58 94 267 27 477 95 763 18 58 95 267 27 477 96 763 18 58 96 267 27 477 97 763 18 58 97 267 27 477 98 763 18 58 98 267 27 477 99 763 18 58 99 267 27 477 100 763 18 58 100 267 27 477 101 763 18 58 101 267 27 477 102 763 18 58 102 267 27 477 103 763 18 58 103 267 27 477 104 763 18 58 104 267 27 477 105 763 18 58 105 267 27 477 106 763 18 58 106 267 27 477 107 763 18 58 107 267 27 477 108 763 18 58 108 267 27 477 109 763 18 58 109 267 27 477 110 763 18 58 110 267 27 477 111 763 18 58 111 267 27 477 112 763 18 58 112 267 27 477 113 763 18 58 113 267 27 477 114 763 18 58 114 267 27 477 115 763 18 58 115 267 27 477 116 763 18 58 116 267 27 477 117 763 18 58 117 267 27 477 118 763 18 58 118 267 27 477 119 763 18 58 119 267 27 477 120 763 18 58 120 267 27 477 Transform 1 1164 14 25 Transform 1 275 27 450 Transform 2 1164 14 25 Transform 2 275 27 450 Transform 3 1217 14 23 Transform 3 226 28 666 Transform 4 1217 14 23 Transform 4 226 28 666 Transform 5 763 18 58 Transform 5 267 27 477 Transform 6 763 18 58 Transform 6 267 27 477 37 dBA 48 dBA Row Distance (ft) dBA 10^(L1/10) Row Distance (ft) dBA 10^(L1/10) 1 1258 13 21 1 1295 13 20 2 1258 13 21 2 1295 13 20 3 1258 13 21 3 1295 13 20 4 1258 13 21 4 1295 13 20 5 1258 13 21 5 1295 13 20 6 1258 13 21 6 1295 13 20 7 1258 13 21 7 1295 13 20 8 1258 13 21 8 1295 13 20 9 1258 13 21 9 1295 13 20 10 1258 13 21 10 1295 13 20 11 1258 13 21 11 1295 13 20 12 1258 13 21 12 1295 13 20 13 1258 13 21 13 1295 13 20 14 1258 13 21 14 1295 13 20 15 1258 13 21 15 1295 13 20 16 1258 13 21 16 1295 13 20 17 1258 13 21 17 1295 13 20 18 1258 13 21 18 1295 13 20 19 1258 13 21 19 1295 13 20 20 1258 13 21 20 1295 13 20 21 1258 13 21 21 1295 13 20 22 1258 13 21 22 1295 13 20 23 1258 13 21 23 1295 13 20 24 1258 13 21 24 1295 13 20 25 1258 13 21 25 1295 13 20 26 1258 13 21 26 1295 13 20 27 1258 13 21 27 1295 13 20 28 1258 13 21 28 1295 13 20 29 1258 13 21 29 1295 13 20 30 1258 13 21 30 1295 13 20 31 1258 13 21 31 1295 13 20 East Lot Line West Lot Line Resulting dBA: Resulting dBA: 32 1258 13 21 32 1295 13 20 33 1258 13 21 33 1295 13 20 34 1258 13 21 34 1295 13 20 35 1258 13 21 35 1295 13 20 36 1258 13 21 36 1295 13 20 37 1258 13 21 37 1295 13 20 38 1258 13 21 38 1295 13 20 39 1258 13 21 39 1295 13 20 40 1258 13 21 40 1295 13 20 41 1166 14 25 41 1384 12 18 42 1166 14 25 42 1384 12 18 43 1166 14 25 43 1384 12 18 44 1166 14 25 44 1384 12 18 45 1166 14 25 45 1384 12 18 46 1166 14 25 46 1384 12 18 47 1166 14 25 47 1384 12 18 48 1166 14 25 48 1384 12 18 49 1166 14 25 49 1384 12 18 50 1166 14 25 50 1384 12 18 51 1166 14 25 51 1384 12 18 52 1166 14 25 52 1384 12 18 53 1166 14 25 53 1384 12 18 54 1166 14 25 54 1384 12 18 55 1166 14 25 55 1384 12 18 56 1166 14 25 56 1384 12 18 57 1166 14 25 57 1384 12 18 58 1166 14 25 58 1384 12 18 59 1166 14 25 59 1384 12 18 60 1166 14 25 60 1384 12 18 61 1166 14 25 61 1384 12 18 62 1166 14 25 62 1384 12 18 63 1166 14 25 63 1384 12 18 64 1166 14 25 64 1384 12 18 65 1166 14 25 65 1384 12 18 66 1166 14 25 66 1384 12 18 67 1166 14 25 67 1384 12 18 68 1166 14 25 68 1384 12 18 69 1166 14 25 69 1384 12 18 70 1166 14 25 70 1384 12 18 71 1166 14 25 71 1384 12 18 72 1166 14 25 72 1384 12 18 73 1166 14 25 73 1384 12 18 74 1166 14 25 74 1384 12 18 75 1166 14 25 75 1384 12 18 76 1166 14 25 76 1384 12 18 77 1166 14 25 77 1384 12 18 78 1166 14 25 78 1384 12 18 79 1166 14 25 79 1384 12 18 80 1166 14 25 80 1384 12 18 81 1140 14 26 81 2270 8 7 82 1140 14 26 82 2270 8 7 83 1140 14 26 83 2270 8 7 84 1140 14 26 84 2270 8 7 85 1140 14 26 85 2270 8 7 86 1140 14 26 86 2270 8 7 87 1140 14 26 87 2270 8 7 88 1140 14 26 88 2270 8 7 89 1140 14 26 89 2270 8 7 90 1140 14 26 90 2270 8 7 91 1140 14 26 91 2270 8 7 92 1140 14 26 92 2270 8 7 93 1140 14 26 93 2270 8 7 94 1140 14 26 94 2270 8 7 95 1140 14 26 95 2270 8 7 96 1140 14 26 96 2270 8 7 97 1140 14 26 97 2270 8 7 98 1140 14 26 98 2270 8 7 99 1140 14 26 99 2270 8 7 100 1140 14 26 100 2270 8 7 101 1140 14 26 101 2270 8 7 102 1140 14 26 102 2270 8 7 103 1140 14 26 103 2270 8 7 104 1140 14 26 104 2270 8 7 105 1140 14 26 105 2270 8 7 106 1140 14 26 106 2270 8 7 107 1140 14 26 107 2270 8 7 108 1140 14 26 108 2270 8 7 109 1140 14 26 109 2270 8 7 110 1140 14 26 110 2270 8 7 111 1140 14 26 111 2270 8 7 112 1140 14 26 112 2270 8 7 113 1140 14 26 113 2270 8 7 114 1140 14 26 114 2270 8 7 115 1140 14 26 115 2270 8 7 116 1140 14 26 116 2270 8 7 117 1140 14 26 117 2270 8 7 118 1140 14 26 118 2270 8 7 119 1140 14 26 119 2270 8 7 120 1140 14 26 120 2270 8 7 Transform 1 1258 13 21 Transform 1 1295 13 20 Transform 2 1258 13 21 Transform 2 1295 13 20 Transform 3 1166 14 25 Transform 3 1384 12 18 Transform 4 1166 14 25 Transform 4 1384 12 18 Transform 5 1140 14 26 Transform 5 2270 8 7 Transform 6 1140 14 26 Transform 6 2270 8 7 35 dBA 33 dBAResulting dBA: Resulting dBA: December 17, 2021 NSF DANBY – NOISE STUDY Y:\Projects-New\2021\20213129\20213129.0001\Tech Docs\Reports\Noise\NSF DANBY NOISE STUDY BODY.docx EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION SHEETS Technical Data 100/125kW, 1500Vdc String Inverters for North America The 100 & 125kW high power CPS three phase string inverters are designed for ground mount applications. The units are high performance, advanced and reliable inverters designed specifically for the North American environment and grid. High efficiency at 99.1% peak and 98.5% CEC, wide operating voltages, broad temperature ranges and a NEMA Type 4X enclosure enable this inverter platform to operate at high performance across many applications. The CPS 100/125kW products ship with the Standard or Centralized Wire-box, each fully integrated and separable with AC and DC disconnect switches. The Standard Wire-box inlcudes touch safe fusing for up to 20 strings. The CPS Flex Gateway enables communication, controls and remote product upgrades. NFPA 70, NEC 2014 and 2017 compliant Touch safe DC Fuse holders adds convenience and safety CPS Flex Gateway enables remote FW upgrades Integrated AC & DC disconnect switches 1 MPPT with 20 fused inputs for maximum flexibility Copper and Aluminum compatible AC connections Key Features Datasheet CPS SCH100/125KTL-DO/US-600 100/125KTL Centralized Wire-box CHINT POWER SYSTEMS AMERICA 2020/01-MKT NA Chint Power Systems America 6800 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 235 Pleasanton, CA 94566Tel: 855-584-7168 Mail: AmericaSales@chintpower.com Web: www.chintpowersystems.com NEMA Type 4X outdoor rated, tough tested enclosure Advanced Smart-Grid features (CA Rule 21 certified) kVA Headroom yields 100kW @ 0.9PF and 125kW @ 0.95PF Generous 1.87 and 1.5 DC/AC Inverter Load Ratios Separable wire-box design for fast service Standard 5 year warranty with extensions to 20 years 100/125KTL Standard Wire-box Technical Data Model Name CPS SCH100KTL-DO/US-600 CPS SCH125KTL-DO/US-600 Max. PV Power Max. DC Input Voltage Operating DC Input Voltage Range Start-up DC Input Voltage / Power Number of MPP Trackers MPPT Voltage Range1 Max. PV Input Current (Isc x1.25) Number of DC Inputs DC Disconnection Type DC Surge Protection Rated AC Output Power 100kW 125kW Max. AC Output Power2 100kVA (111KVA @ PF>0.9)125kVA (132KVA @ PF>0.95) Rated Output Voltage Output Voltage Range3 Grid Connection Type4 Max. AC Output Current @600Vac 96.2/106.8A 120.3/127.2A Rated Output Frequency Output Frequency Range3 Power Factor >0.99 (±0.8 adjustable)>0.99 (±0.8 adjustable) Current THD Max. Fault Current Contribution (1-cycle RMS) Max. OCPD Rating 150A 175A AC Disconnection Type AC Surge Protection Topology Max. Efficiency CEC Efficiency Stand-by / Night Consumption Enclosure Protection Degree Cooling Method Operating Temperature Range Non-Operating Temperature Range5 Operating Humidity Operating Altitude Audible Noise User Interface and Display Inverter Monitoring Site Level Monitoring Modbus Data Mapping Remote Diagnostics / FW Upgrade Functions Dimensions (WxHxD) Weight Mounting / Installation Angle AC Termination DC Termination Fused String Inputs Safety and EMC Standard Selectable Grid Standard Smart-Grid Features Standard6 Extended Terms 1) See user manual for further information regarding MPPT Voltage Range when operating at non-unity PF 2) "Max. AC Apparent Power" rating valid within MPPT voltage range and temperature range of -30°C to +40°C (-22°F to +104°F) for 100KW PF >0.9 and 125KW PF >0.95 3) The "Output Voltage Range" and "Output Frequency Range" may differ according to the specific grid standard. 4) Wye neutral-grounded, Delta may not be corner-grounded. 5) See user manual for further requirements regarding non-operating conditions. 6) 5 year warranty effective for units purchased after October 1st, 2019. 20 PV source circuits, pos. & neg. fused (Standard Wire-box) 1 PV output circuit, 1-2 terminations per pole, non-fused (Centralized Wire-box) DC Input 15 - 90 degrees from horizontal (vertical or angled) 1500V 860-1450Vdc 900V / 250W 1 LED Indicators, WiFi + APP 870-1300Vdc <65dBA@1m and 25°C CPS Flex Gateway (1 per 32 inverters) SunSpec/CPS Standard / (with Flex Gateway) Modbus RS485 8202ft / 2500m (no derating) 0-100% -22°F to +140°F / -30°C to +60°C (derating from +113°F / +45°C) AC Output System Environment <4W 60Hz 57-63Hz Type II MOV (with indicator/remote signaling), Up=2.5kV, In=20kA (8/20uS) 600Vac 528-660Vac 3Φ / PE / N (Neutral optional) 98.5% NEMA Type 4X Variable speed cooling fans 41.47A Load-rated DC switch Type II MOV (with indicator/remote signaling), Up=2.5kV, In=20kA (8/20uS) 10, 15 and 20 years 5 years Safety IEEE 1547a-2014, CA Rule 21, ISO-NE Volt-RideThru, Freq-RideThru, Ramp-Rate, Specified-PF, Volt-VAr, Freq-Watt, Volt-Watt 187.5kW 275A UL1741-SA-2016, CSA-C22.2 NO.107.1-01, IEEE1547a-2014; FCC PART15 Warranty 45.28x24.25x9.84in (1150x616x250mm) with Standard Wire-box 39.37x24.25x9.84in (1000x616x250mm) with Centralized Wire-box Inverter: 121lbs / 55kg; Wire-box: 55lbs / 25kg (Standard Wire-box); 33lbs / 15kg (Centralized Wire-box) Screw Clamp Fuse Holder (Wire range: #12 - #6AWG CU) - Standard Wire-box Busbar, M8 PEMserts (Wire range: #1AWG - 250kcmil CU/AL, Lugs not supplied) - Centralized Wire-box 15A or 20A fuses provided (Determined by product SKU) Display and Communication Mechanical M10 Stud Type Terminal Block [3Φ] (Wire range: 1/0AWG - 500kcmil CU/AL, Lugs not supplied) Screw Clamp Terminal Block [N] (#12 - 1/0AWG CU/AL) -40°F to +158°F / -40°C to +70°C maximum <3% Load-rated AC switch Transformerless 99.1% Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer General At Eaton, we are constantly striving to introduce new innovations to the transformer industry, bringing you the highest quality, most reliable transformers. Eaton’s Cooper Power series Transformer Products are ISO 9001 compliant, emphasizing process improvement in all phases of design, manufacture, and testing. In order to drive this innovation, we have invested both time and money in the Thomas A. Edison Technical Center, our premier research facility in Franksville, Wisconsin. Such revolutionary products as distribution-class UltraSIL™ Polymer-Housed Evolution™ surge arresters and Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid have been developed at our Franksville lab. With transformer sizes ranging from 45 kVA to 12 MVA and high voltages ranging from 2400 V to 46 kV, Eaton has you covered. From fabrication of the tanks and cabinets to winding of the cores and coils, to production of arresters, switches, tap changers, expulsion fuses, current limit fuses, bushings (live and dead) and molded rubber goods, Eaton does it all. Eaton’s Cooper Power series transformers are available with electrical grade mineral oil or Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid, a less-flammable and bio-degradable fluid. Electrical codes recognize the advantages of using Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid both indoors and outdoors for fire sensitive applications. The bio- based fluid meets Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and Section 450.23 NEC Requirements. Three-Phase Transformers CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Supersedes 210-12 August 2013 COOPER POWERSERIES Figure 1. Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer. LOW- VOLTAGE BUSHING SUPPORT SILLSuitable for skidding, rolling, and jacking 5-position tap changer Ground pad and strap for x0Parking stand Liquid level gauge Nameplate laser-scribed anodized aluminum Removable cabinet walls Drip shield Type Three Phase, 50 or 60 Hz, 65 ºC Rise (55 ºC, 55/65 ºC), 65/75 °C, 75 °C Fluid Type Mineral oil or Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid Coil Configuration 2-winding or 4-winding or 3-winding (Low-High-Low), 3-winding (Low-Low-High) Size 45 – 10,000 kVA Primary Voltage 2,400 – 46,000 V Secondary Voltage 208Y/120 V to 14,400 V Specialty Designs Inverter/Rectifier Bridge K-Factor (up to K-19) Vacuum Fault Interrupter (VFI) UL® Listed & Labeled and Classified Factory Mutual (FM) Approved® Solar/Wind Designs Differential Protection Seismic Applications (including OSHPD) Hardened Data Center Table 1. Product Scope Bay-O-Net fusing LOW-VOLTAGE BUSHING Low-voltage molded epoxy bushings with NEMA® spades LOADBREAK SWITCH 2 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries HIGH-VOLTAGE BUSHING Table 4. Audible Sound Levels Self-Cooled, Two Winding kVA Rating NEMA® TR-1 Average Decibels (dB) 45-500 56 501-700 57 701-1000 58 1001-1500 60 1501-2000 61 2001-2500 62 2501-3000 63 3001-4000 64 4001-5000 65 5001-6000 66 6001-7500 67 7501-10000 68 Table 6. Temperature Rise Ratings 0-3300 Feet (0-1000 meters) Standard Optional Unit Rating (Temperature Rise Winding)65 ºC 55 °C, 55/65 ºC, 75 °C Ambient Temperature Max 40 ºC 50 ºC Ambient Temperature 24 Hour Average 30 ºC 40 ºC Temperature Rise Hotspot 80 ºC 65 ºC Table 2. Three-Phase Ratings Three-Phase 50 or 60 Hz kVA Available1: 45, 75, 112.5, 150, 225, 300, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3750, 5000, 7500, 10000 1Transformers are available in the standard ratings and configurations shown or can be customized to meet specific needs. Table 3. Impedance Voltage Rating (kVA) Low-voltage rating ≤ 600 V 2400 Δ through 4800 Δ 6900 Δ through 13800GY/7970 or 13800 Δ 45-75 2.70-5.75 2.70-5.75 2.70-5.75 112.5-300 3.10-5.75 3.10-5.75 3.10-5.75 500 4.35-5.75 4.35-5.75 4.35-5.75 750-2500 5.75 5.75 5.75 3750 5.75 5.75 6.00 5000 6.00 6.50 otee:N The standard tolerance is ± 7.5% Table 5. Insulation Test Levels KV Class Induced Test 180 or 400 Hz 7200 Cycle kV BIL Distribution Applied Test 60 Hz (kV) 1.2 Twice Rated Voltage 30 10 2.5 45 15 5 60 19 8.7 75 26 15 95 34 25 125 40 34.5 150 50 3 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries D E B F A* I C F-3 H G PAD DIMENSIONS 3.5" I-3 CABINET/TANK DIMENSIONS Figure 2. Transformer and pad dimensions. * Add 9" for Bay-O-Net fusing. Table 8. Fluid-Filled—Copper Windings 55/65 °C Rise1 1 Weights, gallons of fluid, and dimensions are for reference only and not for construction. Please contact Eaton for exact dimensions. * Add 9" for Bay-O-Net fusing. 65° Rise DEAD-FRONT—LOOP OR RADIAL FEED—BAY-O-NET FUSING OIL FILLED—COPPER WINDINGS kVA Rating OUTLINE DIMENSIONS (in.)Gallons of Fluid Approx. Total Weight (lbs.)A* B C D E F G H I 45 50 64 39 34 30 64 69 43 20 110 2,100 75 50 64 39 34 30 64 69 43 20 115 2,350 112.5 50 64 49 34 30 64 69 53 20 115 2,500 150 50 64 49 34 30 64 69 53 20 120 2,700 225 50 64 51 34 30 64 73 55 20 140 3,250 300 50 64 51 34 30 64 75 55 20 160 3,800 500 50 81 53 34 30 64 85 57 20 200 4,800 750 64 89 57 42 30 72 93 61 20 255 6,500 1000 64 89 59 42 30 72 93 63 20 300 7,800 1500 73 89 86 42 30 72 93 90 24 410 10,300 2000 73 72 87 42 30 72 76 91 24 420 11,600 2500 73 72 99 42 30 72 76 103 24 500 14,000 3000 73 84 99 46 37 84 88 103 24 720 18,700 3750 84 85 108 47 38 85 88 112 24 800 20,500 5000 84 96 108 48 48 96 100 112 24 850 25,000 7500 94 102 122 54 48 102 100 126 24 1,620 46,900 Table 7. Fluid-filled—aluminum windings 55/65 °C Rise1 65° Rise DEAD-FRONT—LOOP OR RADIAL FEED—BAY-O-NET FUSING OIL FILLED—ALUMINUM WINDINGS kVA Rating OUTLINE DIMENSIONS (in.)Gallons of Fluid Approx. Total Weight (lbs.)A* B C D E F G H I 45 50 68 39 42 26 68 72 43 20 110 2,100 75 50 68 39 42 26 68 72 43 20 115 2,250 112.5 50 68 49 42 26 68 72 53 20 120 2,350 150 50 68 49 42 26 68 72 53 20 125 2,700 225 50 72 51 42 30 72 76 55 20 140 3,150 300 50 72 51 42 30 72 76 55 20 160 3,650 500 50 89 53 42 30 72 93 57 20 190 4,650 750 64 89 57 42 30 72 93 61 20 270 6,500 1000 64 89 59 42 30 72 93 63 20 350 8,200 1500 73 89 86 42 30 72 93 90 24 410 10,300 2000 73 72 87 42 30 72 76 91 24 490 12,500 2500 73 72 99 42 30 72 76 103 24 530 14,500 3000 73 84 99 46 37 84 88 103 24 620 16,700 3750 84 85 108 47 38 85 88 112 24 660 19,300 5000 84 96 108 48 48 96 100 112 24 930 25,000 7500 94 102 122 54 48 102 100 126 24 1,580 41,900 1 Weights, gallons of fluid, and dimensions are for reference only and not for construction. Please contact Eaton for exact dimensions. * Add 9" for Bay-O-Net fusing. 4 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries Standard features Connections and neutral configurations • Delta - Wye: Low voltage neutral shall be a fully insulated X0 bushing with removable ground strap. • Grounded Wye-Wye: High voltage neutral shall be internally tied to the low voltage neutral and brought out as the H0X0 bushing in the secondary compartment with a removable ground strap. • Delta-Delta: Transformer shall be provided without a neutral bushing. • Wye-Wye: High voltage neutral shall be brought out as the H0 bushing in the primary compartment and the low voltage neutral shall be brought as the X0- bushing in the secondary compartment. • Wye-Delta: High voltage neutral shall be brought out as the H0 bushing in the primary compartment. No ground strap shall be provided (line to line rated fusing is required). High and low voltage bushings • 200 A bushing wells (15, 25, and 35 kV) • 200 A, 35 kV Large Interface • 600 A (15, 25, and 35 kV) Integral bushings (dead-front) • Electrical-grade wet-process porcelain bushings (live-front) Tank/cabinet features • Bolted cover for tank access (45-2500 kVA) • Welded cover with hand hole (>2500 kVA) • Three-point latching door for security • Removable sill for easy installation • Lifting lugs (4) • Stainless steel cabinet hinges and mounting studs • Steel divider between HV and LV compartment • 20” Deep cabinet (45-1000 kVA) • 24” Deep cabinet (1500-7500 kVA) • 30” Deep cabinet (34.5/19.92 kV) • Pentahead captive bolt • Stainless steel 1-hole ground pads (45-500 kVA) • Stainless steel 2-hole ground pads (750-10,000 kVA) • Parking Stands (dead-front) Valves/plugs • One-inch upper filling plug • One-inch drain plug (45-500 kVA) • One-inch combination drain valve with sampling device in low voltage compartment (750-10,000 kVA) • Automatic pressure relief valve Nameplate • Laser-scribed anodized aluminum nameplate Figure 3. Drain valve with sampler.Figure 4. Automatic Pressure relief valve.Figure 5. Liquid level gauge. Figure 6. External Gauges.Figure 7. External visible break with gauges. 5 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries Optional features High and low voltage bushings • 200 A (15, 25 kV) bushing inserts • 200 A (15, 25 kV) feed thru inserts • 200 A (15, 25 kV) (HTN) bushing wells with removable studs • High-voltage 600 A (15, 25, 35 kV) deadbreak one-piece bushings • Low voltage 6-, 8-holes spade • Low voltage 12-, 16-, 20-holes spade (750-2500 kVA) • Low voltage bushing supports Tank/cabinet features • Stainless steel tank base and cabinet • Stainless steel tank base, cabinet sides and sill • 100% stainless steel unit • Service entrance (2 inch) in sill or cabinet side • Touch-up paint (domestic) • Copper ground bus bar • Kirk-Key provisions • Nitrogen blanket • Bus duct cutout Special designs • Factory Mutual (FM) • UL® Classified • Triplex • High altitude • K-Factors • Step-up • Critical application • Modulation transformers • Seismic applications (including OSHPD) Switches • One, two, or three On/Off loadbreak switches • 4-position loadbreak V-blade switch or T-blade switch • Delta-wye switch • 3-position V-Blade selector switch • 100 A, 150 A, 300 A tap changers • Dual voltage switch • Visible break with VFI interrupter interlock • External visible break (15, 25, and 35 kV, up to 3 MVA) • External visible break with gauges (15, 25, and 35 kV, up to 3 MVA) Gauges and devices • Liquid level gauge (optional contacts) • Pressure vacuum gauge (optional contacts and bleeder) • Dial-type thermometer (optional alarm contacts) • Cover mounted pressure relief device (optional alarm contacts) • Ground connectors • Hexhead captive bolt • Molded case circuit breaker mounting provisions • External gauges in padlockable box Overcurrent protection • Bay-O-Net fusing (Current sensing, dual sensing, dual element, high amperage overload) • Bay-O-Net expulsion fuse in series with a partial range under-oil ELSP current limiting fuse (below 23 kV) • Cartridge fusing in series with a partial range under-oil ELSP cur- rent limiting fuse (above 23 kV) • MagneX™ interrupter with ELSP current-limiting fuse • Vacuum Fault Interrupter (VFI) • Visible break window • Fuse/switch interlock Valves/plugs • Drain/sampling valve in high-voltage compartment • Globe type upper fill valve Overvoltage protection • Distribution-, intermediate-, or station-class surge arresters • Elbow arresters (for dead-front connections) Metering/fan/control • Full metering package • Current Transformers (CTs) • Metering Socket • NEMA® 4 control box (optional stainless steel) • NEMA® 7 control box (explosion proof) • Fan Packages Testing • Customer test witness • Customer final inspection • Zero Sequence Impedance Test • Heat Run Test • ANSI® Impulse Test • Audible Sound Level Test • RIV (Corona) Test • Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) Test • 8- or 24-Hour Leak Test Coatings (paint) • ANSI® Bell Green • ANSI® #61 Light Gray • ANSI® #70 Sky Gray • Special paint available per request Nameplate • Stainless steel nameplate Decals and labels • High voltage warning signs • Mr. Ouch • Bi-lingual warning • DOE compliant • Customer stock code • Customer stenciling • Shock and arc flash warning decal • Non-PCB decal 6 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries Construction Core The three-legged, step-lap mitered core construction is manufac- tured using a high-quality cutting machine. For maximum efficiency, cores are precisely stacked, virtually eliminating gaps in the corner joints. Five-legged wound core or shell-type triplex designs are used for wye-wye connected transformers, and other special transformer designs. Cores are manufactured with precision cut, burr-free, grain-oriented silicon steel. Many grades of core steel are available for optimizing core loss efficiency. Coils Pad-mounted transformers feature a rectangular coil configuration with wire-wound, high-voltage primaries and sheet-wound secondaries. The design minimizes axial stress developed by short circuits and provides for magnetic balancing of tap connections. Coils are wound using the highest quality winding machines provid- ing exacting tension control and conductor placement for superior short-circuit strength and maximum efficiency. Extra mechanical strength is provided by diamond pattern, epoxy- coated paper insulation, used throughout the coil, with additional epoxy at heavy stress points. The diamond pattern distribution of the epoxy and carefully arranged ducts, provide a network of passages through which cooling fluid can freely circulate. Coil assemblies are heat-cured under calculated hydraulic pressure to ensure performance against short-circuit forces. Core and coil assemblies Pad-mounted transformer core and coil assemblies are braced with heavy steel ends to prevent the rectangular coil from distorting under short-circuit conditions. Plates are clamped in place using presses, and welded or bolted to form a solid core and coil assembly. Core and coil assemblies exceed ANSI® and IEEE® requirements for short-circuit performance. Due to the rigidity of the design, impedance shift after short-circuit is comparable to that of circular wound assemblies. Tanks Transformer tanks are designed for high strength and ease of handling, installation, and maintenance. Tanks are welded using precision-cut, hot rolled, pickled and oiled steel. They are sealed to protect the insulating fluid and other internal components. Transformer tanks are pressure-tested to withstand 7 psig without permanent distortion and 15 psig without rupture. Tank finish An advanced multi-stage finishing process exceeds IEEE Std C57.12.28™-2014 standards. The eight-stage pre-treatment process assures coating adhesion and retards corrosion. It converts tank surfaces to a nonmetallic, water insoluble iron phosphate coating. The paint method consists of two distinct layers of paint. The first is an epoxy primer (E-coat) layer which provides a barrier against moisture, salt and corrosives. The two-component urethane final coat seals and adds ultraviolet protection. Vacuum processing Transformers are dried and filled with filtered insulating fluid under vacuum, while secondary windings are energized. Coils are heated to drive out moisture, ensuring maximum penetration of fluid into the coil insulation system. Insulating fluid Eaton’s Cooper Power series transformers are available with electrical-grade mineral insulating oil or Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid. The highly refined fluids are tested and degassed to assure a chemically inert product with minimal acid ions. Special additives minimize oxygen absorption and inhibit oxidation. To ensure high dielectric strength, the fluid is re-tested for dryness and dielectric strength, refiltered, heated, dried, and stored under vacuum before being added to the completed transformer. Eaton’s Cooper Power series transformers filled with Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid enjoy unique fire safety, environmental, electrical, and chemical advantages, including insulation life extend- ing properties. A bio-based, sustainable, natural ester dielectric coolant, Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid quickly and thoroughly biodegrades in the environment and is non-toxic per acute aquatic and oral toxicity tests. Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES) total life cycle assessment software, utilized by the US Dept. of Commerce, reports its overall environmental performance impact score at 1/4th that reported for mineral oil. Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid has also earned the EPA Environmental Technology Verification of transformer materials. With a fire point of 360 °C, Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid is FM Approved® and Underwriters Laboratories (UL®) Classified “Less- Flammable” per NEC® Article 450-23, fitting the definition of a Listed Product per NEC®. Pad-mounted VFI transformer Eaton’s Cooper Power series VFI transformer combines a conventional distribution transformer with the proven Vacuum Fault Interrupter (VFI). This combination provides both voltage transformation and transformer over current protection in one space saving and money saving package. The pad-mounted VFI transformer protects the transformer and provides proper coordination with upstream protective devices. When a transformer fault or overload condition occurs, the VFI breaker trips and isolates the transformer. The three-phase VFI breaker has independent single-phase initiation, but is three-phase mechanically gang-tripped. A trip signal on any phase will open all three phases. This feature eliminates single-phas- ing of three phase loads. It also enables the VFI breaker to be used as a three-phase load break switch. Due to the resettable characteristics of the VFI breaker, restoring three-phase service is faster and easier. The sealed visible break window and switch is an option that can be installed to provide visible break contact. This feature provides enhanced safety and allows an operator to see if the loadbreak switch contacts are in an open or closed position before performing maintenance. Figure 8. VFI transformer with visible break. 7 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries Envirotran™ FM Approved special protection transformer Eaton’s Cooper Power series Envirotran™ transformer is FM Approved and suitable for indoor locations. Factory Mutual Research Corporation’s (FMRC) approval of the Envirotran transformer line makes it easy to comply with and verify compliance with Section 450.23, 2008 NEC, Less-Flammable Liquid-Filled Transformer Requirements for both indoor and outdoor locations. Envirotran FM Approved transformers offer the user the benefit of a transformer that can be easily specified to comply with NEC, and makes FM Safety Data Sheet compliance simpler, while also providing maximum safety and flexibility for both indoor and outdoor installations. Because the “FM Approved” logo is readily visible on the transformer and its nameplate, NEC compliance is now easily verifiable by the inspector. Envirotran FM Approved transformers are manufactured under strict compliance with FMRC Standard 3990 and are filled with FM Approved Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid, a fire-resistant dielectric coolant. Special application transformers Data Center transformer With focus rapidly shifting from simply maximizing uptime and supporting demand to improving energy utilization, the data center industry is continually looking for methods to increase its energy efficiency and reliability. Utilizing cutting edge technology, Eaton’s Cooper Power series Hardened Data Center (HDC) transformers are the solution. Designed with special attention given to surge protection, HDC liquid-filled transformers provide superior performance under the harshest electrical environments. Contrary to traditional dry-type units, HDC transformers provide unsurpassed reliability, overloadability, operational life, efficiency, thermal loading and installed footprint. These units have reliably served more than 100 MW of critical data center capacity for a total of more than 6,000,000 hours without any reported downtime caused by a thermal or short-circuit coil failure. The top priority in data center operations is uninterrupted service. Envirotran HDC transformers from Eaton, having substantially higher levels of insulation, are less susceptible to voltage surges. Eaton has experienced zero failures due to switching transients. The ANSI® and IEEE® standard impulse withstand ratings are higher for liquid-filled transformers, making them less susceptible to insulation failure. The Envirotran HDC transformer provides ultimate protection by increasing the BIL rating one level higher than standard liquid-filled transformer ratings. The cooling system of liquid-filled transformers provides better protection from severe overloads—overloads that can lead to significant loss of life or failure. Data center design typically includes multiple layers of redundancy, ensuring maximum uptime for the critical IT load. When best in class transformer manufacturing lead times are typically weeks, not days, an unexpected transformer failure will adversely affect the facility’s reliability and profitability. Therefore, the ability to determine the electrical and mechanical health of a transformer can reduce the probability of costly, unplanned downtime. Routine diagnostic tests, including key fluid properties and dissolved gas analysis (DGA), can help determine the health of a liquid-filled transformer. Although sampling is not required for safe operation, it will provide the user with valuable information, leading to scheduled repair or replacement, and minimizing the duration and expense of an outage. With a dry-type transformer, there is no reliable way to measure the health or likelihood of an impending failure. Solar transformer As a result of the increasing number of states that are adopting aggressive Renewable & Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards, the solar energy market is growing—nearly doubling year over year. Eaton, a key innovator and supplier in this expanding market, is proud to offer its Cooper Power series Envirotran transformers specifically designed for Solar Photovoltaic medium-voltage applications. Eaton is working with top solar photovoltaic developers, integrators and inverter manufacturers to evolve the industry and change the way we distribute power. In accordance with this progressive stance, every Envirotran Solar transformer is filled with non-toxic, biodegradable Envirotemp™ FR3™ dielectric fluid, made from renewable seed oils. On top of its biodegradability, Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid substantially extends the life of the transformer insulation, saving valuable resources. What better way to distribute green power than to use a green transformer. In fact, delaying conversion to Envirotran transformers places the burden of today’s environmental issues onto tomorrow’s generations. Eaton can help you create a customized transformer, based on site specific characteristics including: temperature profile, site altitude, solar profile and required system life. Some of the benefits gained from this custom rating include: • Reduction in core losses • Improved payback on investment • Reduction in footprint • Improved fire safety • Reduced environmental impact For the solar photovoltaic industry, Eaton is offering standard step up transformers and dual secondary designs, including 4-winding, 3-winding (Low-High-Low) and 3-winding (Low-Low-High) designs. Wind transformer Eaton is offering custom designs for renewable energy power generation. Eaton manufactures its Cooper Power series Generator Step-Up (GSU) transformers for installation at the base of every wind turbine. Additionally, grounding transformers are available for wind power generation. DOE efficiency The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has mandated efficiency values for most liquid type, medium voltage transformers. As a result, all applicable Eaton’s Cooper Power series transformers 2500 kVA and below conform to efficiency levels as specified in the DOE ruling “10 CFR Part 431 Energy Conservation Program”. Underwriters Laboratories® (UL®) Listed and Labeled/ Classified The Envirotran transformer from Eaton can be specified as UL® Listed & Labeled, and/or UL® Classified. Underwriters Laboratories (UL®) listing is a verification of the design and construction of the transformer to the ANSI® and IEEE® standards. UL® listing generally is the most efficient, cost-effective solution for complying with relevant state and local electrical codes. UL® Combination Classification/Listing is another way in which to comply with Section 450.23, 2008 NEC® requirements. This combines the UL® listed transformer with a UL® Classified Less-Flammable Liquid and complies with the use restrictions found within the liquid Classification. 8 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries K-Factor transformer With a drastic increase in the use of ferromagnetic devices, arcing devices, and electric power converters, higher frequency loads have increased significantly. This harmonic loading has the potential to generate higher heat levels within a transformer’s windings and leads by as much as 300%. Harmonic loading has the potential to induce premature failure in standard-design distribution transformers. In addition to standard UL® “K-Factor” ratings, transformers can be designed to customer-provided specifications detailing precise loading scenarios. Onsite measurements of magnitude and frequency, alongside harmonic analysis of the connected load can be performed by Eaton engineers or a third party consultant. These field measurements are used to determine exact customer needs and outline the transformer specifications. Eaton will design harmonic-resistant transformers that will be subjected to the unique harmonic loads. These units are designed to maintain normal temperature rise under harmonic, full-load conditions. Standard UL® “K-Factor” designs can result in unnecessary costs when the “next-highest” K-Factor must be selected for a calculated design factor. To save the customer these unnecessary costs, Eaton can design the transformer to the specific harmonic spectrum used in the application. Eaton’s Cooper Power series K-factor transformers are filled with mineral oil or Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid and enjoy the added benefits of dielectric cooling such as higher efficiencies than dry-type transformers. Modulation transformer Bundled with an Outboard Modulation Unit (OMU) and a Control and Receiving Unit (CRU), a Modulation Transformer Unit (MTU) is designed to remotely achieve two way communication. The use of an MTU reduces travel time and expense versus tra- ditional meter reading performed by high voltage electricians. Additionally, with MTU it is possible to manage and evaluate energy consumption data, providing reduced metering costs and fewer ten- ant complaints. An MTU utilizes existing utility infrastructure, therefore eliminating the need to engineer and construct a dedicated communication network. Inverter/rectifier bridge Eaton complements its range of applications for transformers by offering dual winding designs. These designs are intended for connection to 12-pulse rectifier bridges. Product attributes To set us apart from other transformer manufactures, Eaton includes the following guarantees with every three-phase pad-mounted transformer. Engineered to order (ETO) Providing the customer with a well developed, cost-effective solution is the number one priority at Eaton. Using customer specifications, Eaton will work with the customer from the beginning to the end to develop a solution to fit their needs. Whether it is application specific, site specific, or a uniquely specified unit, Eaton will provide transformers with the best in class value and performance, saving the customer time and money. Made in the U.S.A. Eaton’s three-phase pad-mounted transformers are produced right here in the United States of America. Our manufacturing facilities are positioned strategically for rapid shipment of products. Furthermore, should the need arise, Eaton has a broad network of authorized service repair shops throughout the United States. Superior paint performance Protecting transformers from nature’s elements worldwide, Eaton’s E-coat system provides unrivaled transformer paint life, and exceeds IEEE Std C57.12.28™-2014 and IEEE Std C57.12.29™-2005 standards. In addition to the outside of the unit, each transformer receives a gray E-coat covering in the interior of the tank and cabinet, providing superior rust resistance and greater visibility during service. If the wide range of standard paint selections does not suit the cus- tomer’s needs, Eaton will customize the paint color to meet their requirements. Rectangular coil design Eaton utilizes a rectangular coil design. This winding technique results in a smaller overall unit footprint as well as reducing the transformer weight. The smaller unit size does not hinder the transformer performance in the least. Units have proven short circuit withstand capabilities up to 10 MVA. Testing Eaton performs routing testing on each transformer manufactured including the following tests: • Insulation Power Factor: This test verifies that vacuum processing has thoroughly dried the insulation system to required limits. • Ratio, Polarity, and Phase Relation: Assures correct winding ratios and tap voltages; checks insulation of HV and LV circuits. Checks entire insulation system to verify all live-to-ground clearances. • Resistance: This test verifies the integrity of internal high-voltage and low-voltage connections; provides data for loss upgrade calculations. • Routine Impulse Tests: The most severe test, simulating a lightning surge. Applies one reduced wave and one full wave to verify the BIL rating. • Applied Potential: Applied to both high-voltage and low-voltage windings, this test stresses the entire insulation system to verify all live-to-ground clearances. • Induced Potential: 3.46 times normal plus 1000 volts for reduced neutral designs. • Loss Test: These design verification tests are conducted to assure that guaranteed loss values are met and that test values are Figure 9. Modular transformer. 9 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries within design tolerances. Tests include no-load loss and excitation current along with impedance voltage and load loss. • Leak Test: Pressurizing the tank to 7 psig assures a complete seal, with no weld or gasket leaks, to eliminate the possibility of moisture infiltration or fluid oxidation. Design performance tests The design performance tests include the following: • Temperature Rise: Our automated heat run facility ensures that any design changes meet ANSI® and IEEE® temperature rise criteria. • Audible Sound Level: Ensures compliance with NEMA® requirements. • Lightning Impulse: To assure superior dielectric performance, this test consists of one reduced wave, two chopped waves and one full wave in sequence, precisely simulating the harshest conditions. Thomas A Edison Research and Test Facility We are constantly striving to introduce new innovations to the transformer industry, bringing you the highest quality transformer for the lowest cost. Eaton’s Cooper Power series Transformer Products are ISO 9001 compliant, emphasizing process improvement in all phases of design, manufacture, and testing. We have invested millions of dollars in the Thomas A. Edison Technical Center, our premier research facility in Franksville, Wisconsin affirming our dedication to introducing new innovations and technologies to the transformer industry. This research facility is fully available for use by our customers to utilize our advanced electrical and chemical testing labs. 10 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries 11 Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries Eaton, Cooper Power, MagneX, UltraSIL, Evolution, and Envirotran are valuable trademarks of Eaton in the U.S. and other countries. You are not permitted to use these trademarks without the prior written consent of Eaton. IEEE Std C57.12.28™-2005 and Std C57.12.29™-2005 standards are trademarks of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE). This publication is not endorsed or approved by the IEEE. IEEE® is a registered trademark of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. ANSI® is a registered trademark of American National Standards Institute. National Electrical Code® and NEC® are registered trademarks of the National Fire Protection Association, Inc., Quincy, MA. Underwriters Laboratories® and UL® are registered trademarks of UL LLC. FM Approved®, FMRC, and Factory Mutual Research Corporation are trademarks of FM Global. Envirotemp™ and FR3™ are licensed trademarks of Cargill, Incorporated. Three-phase pad-mounted compartmental type transformer Eaton 1000 Eaton Boulevard Cleveland, OH 44122 United States Eaton.com Eaton’s Cooper Power Systems Division 2300 Badger Drive Waukesha, WI 53188 United States Eaton.com/cooperpowerseries © 2015 Eaton All Rights Reserved Printed in USA Publication No. CA202003EN Catalog Data CA202003EN Effective July 2015 For Eaton’s Cooper Power series three-phase transformer product information call 1-877-277-4636 or visit: www.eaton.com/cooperpowerseries. September 27, 2021 Tompkins County Department of Planning & Sustainability Attn: Megan McDonald 121 East Court Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Review Pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law for Subdivision and Site Plan Review for proposed solar (“the project” farm located on Bald Hill Road, Town Of Danby Tax Parcel # 10.-1-21.122, Russell Nitcheman, Owner; NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; NSF Danby Site 3, LLC, Bald Hill Road, LLC, Applicants. We are in receipt of your letter dated August 12, 2021 to the Town of Danby, recommending certain modifications to the Project proposal. The comments are in the order set out in your August 12, 2021 letter, with our comments following in bold italics. 1. We recommend the Town require the applicant to maintain a natural, vegetative cover under and around the proposed panel installations in order to help maintain long-term soil health and natural stormwater management Response: The proposed Project design so complies. The proposed project will be maintaining the natural vegetative cover underneath the solar arrays, utilizing seed mixes that provide strong, healthy coverage. These practices are to be in accordance with the NYSDEC, Division of Water April 5th, 2018 Memorandum. Criteria #4 of this memorandum is to provide well-established vegetative cover. 2. We recommend development on the wetlands on the site be avoided, but, if unavoidable, be considered only where hydrologic function can be maintained. All wetlands on the site should be delineated in order to implement this recommendation. Response: The proposed Project so complies. A Wetland Delineation Report, published August 30th, 2021 by Wetland Biologist Gene Pellet with Environmental Resources, LLC. (the “8/30/21 Wetland Delineation”) was provided to the Town of Danby and Tompkins County Soil & Water Conservation District, and a copy is included with this letter. As shown in the 8/30/31 Wetland Delineation, all development is outside of the delineated wetlands. We recommend the proposed project be located outside a 50- foot buffer of intermittent streams. A 50-foot buffer is provided for a portion of the intermittent stream on the property but a portion of that stream, as mapped by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) is not shown on the project map nor is it buffered. Response: Per the comment above, the Project was designed based on the 8/30/21 Wetland Delineation, and as designed in full compliance with the requirement of a 50-foot buffer or intermittent streams. It is the Applicant’s position that the Tompkins County Wetland Mapper, created over 20 years ago, no longer represents an accurate depiction of the Page 2 of 2 wetlands currently existing at the Project site, and in addition to the current depiction of the wetlands present at the site as shown in the 8/30/21 Wetland Delineation, the Applicant has submitted a request to the US Army Corps of Engineers for a JD letter confirming the results of the 8/30/21 Wetland Delineation in order to satisfy the Town and County concerns. Subject to review of the additional resources by the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability, the Applicant respectfully requests that the County amend its letter of August 12, 2021 insofar as the letter represents that the Applicant’s application materials inaccurately depict the intermittent streams currently present at the Project site and recommend a redesign of the Project to provide a 50-foot buffer around a portion of an intermittent stream that is no longer existing at the Project site, and to re-issue its response letter to the Project referral. If necessary, the Applicant requests the opportunity to appear before the County at an upcoming meeting to discuss the issues and present its materials in support of this request. Sincerely, David Cox, PE Associate|Civil Dept. Manager September 27, 2021 Tompkins County Soil & Water Conservation District Attn: Angel Hinickle 170 Bostwick Road Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Comments Letter – Norbut Solar-Solar Field dated September 13, 2021 We are in receipt of your letter dated September 13, 2021, in regard to the above-mentioned project. The comments are in the order received and our comments are in bold italics. Provide the hydrology analysis that shows there will be no change in hydrology onsite. 33 acres of woods will be removed on mostly D soils. Response: The hydrology analysis has been added to the SWPPP report and included with this letter. The stream mapped on the plan, extends further north-west on the site, clearly show the stream location and buffer area. Response: The delineated wetland report provided by Gene Pellet with Environmental Resources, LLC shows, in their professional opinion, that the designated wetlands end where shown on the plans. The additional features referred to by the Tompkins County Wetland Inventory Mapper were reviewed by Environmental Resources, LLC and determined these should not be considered delineated water resources. The report has been submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to obtain a JD letter. The report has also been submitted to the NYSDEC. We recognize the Tompkins County Mapper shows otherwise, however the mapper is based on a 20-year-old inventory. The wetland biologist will be present for a site visit with the USACE to review and modify the report (if needed) to obtain a JD letter from the Army Corps. This letter will be provided when obtained. I reviewed the wetland delineation for the site. The delineation should be sent to the Army Corp of Engineers for concurrence. Response: Per the previous comment, a USACE visit will be scheduled to obtain a JD letter. This letter will be provided when available. A gravel driveway at entrance is shown on the plans, please provide post construction controls. Response: The gravel driveway detail shown on the plans was provided by NYSDEC, which recognize the design as a pervious surface. There is no proposed increase to impervious surfaces or runoff in the area of the driveway connection. Page 2 of 3 Provide a construction phasing plan for tree clearing, grubbing, and stump removal for 33 acres of woods. Are you opening more than 5 acres at a time? Provide an erosion and sediment control plan for during tree removal. Response: The project does not propose stump removal under the solar arrays. By not removing stumps, the tree clearing would not be considered ground disturbance. Silt fence is shown wrapped around the site, not on contour. Will the silt fence be installed on the contour? Response: Silt fence is placed around the site as a way for contractors to designate their project areas as well as sediment control. Silt fences have been revised to add/alter areas to follow existing contours. Access drives will be created across the site to install solar panels, explain how compacted areas will be restored. Response: Solar panels are installed utilizing tracked mini excavators and tracked skid steers. These machines contributed minimal compaction to the underlying soils. The access road is installed by tracked dump trucks to minimize any compaction. These practices protect the existing soils from any significant compaction. For solar panels installed on slopes greater than 15%, what measures will be taken to ensure adequate treatment and non-erosive conveyance of runoff? Response: The vegetative cover underneath solar panels is maintained, resulting in no increase to impervious surfaces as water sheet flow between panels to the ground below. Slopes >15% are in small pockets and panels are oriented in North - South rows, installed along existing contours of the site which flows West - East. We have not experienced any erosion issues at any existing sites with slopes >15%. Sediment Basin for truck wash down is mentioned in the SWPPP, but I don’t see it in the plans. Please provide location and detail of the practice if it will be used. Response: A truck washdown will be added to the plans. Concrete wash out is mentioned in the SWPPP, but I don’t see it on the plans or in the details. Is one needed and if so, where will it be installed? Response: A Concrete washout will be added to the plans. I see the response from NYSHPO, was a GIS viewshed analysis of the Zone of Visual Impact prepared and approved by OPRHP? Response: A ZVI map was prepared by Passero Associates and submitted to SHPO, as well as a third party certified architectural firm Presentation Studios in Buffalo, NY. The study is ongoing and results can be provided when available. Study is scheduled for the first week of October and submission for mid October. Page 3 of 3 Check dam and filter fabric drop inlet protection are listed in the SWPPP, where are they on the plans? Response: These items have been removed from the SWPPP. When will the limited use pervious access road be installed, initial phases of construction or post- construction? The detail also states that this practice should be avoided in poorly drained areas unless no alternative location is available. If the practice is used in poorly drained areas, then the project shall utilize woven geotextile material as detailed. Since most of the site is poorly draining soils, will woven geotextile be used? Response: The pervious access drive is installed at initial phases of construction using tracked dump trucks to minimize any compaction to the underlying soil by delivery trucks. The design is the NYSDEC approved pervious access road and geotextile fabric will be used. Sincerely, David Cox, PE Associate|Civil Dept. Manager October 7, 2021 David West, LEED, AP, Town Planner Town of Danby 1830 Danby Road Ithaca, NY 14850-9419 Re: Project Review Comments Letter – Norbut Solar, Ball Hill Road – dated 9/20/21 We are in receipt of a comments letter from Donald Harner, P.E, of T.G. Miller, P.C. dated September 20, 2021, regarding the above-mentioned project. The comments are in the order received and our responses are in bold italics. Stormwater Management 1. Is the section of common drive to House #54 intended to have the same road section as outlined on Sheet C201? If so, we feel this drive section may not be best suited for daily residential traffic and winter maintenance. Response: The pervious access drive design is to be incorporated beyond the driveway currently used by House #54. This change in design will begin at the proposed swing gate shown on C108 of the plans. The existing driveway will not be altered to become a pervious access drive. Sheet C 108 of the plans have been revised to clarify this change at the proposed swing gate. 2. It appears there is an existing drainage swale within the area of the proposed road alignment near House #54. Clarify if the culvert is to be replaced and if any swales need to be relocated. Response: The plans have been revised to replace the existing culvert to Page 2 of 5 accommodate the addition of the proposed access drive for the solar arrays. 3. It appears plan notes are cut off near Bald Hill Road on Sheet C108. Response: The plans have been revised to correct the cut off plan notes on Sheet C108. 4. Provide dimensions to proposed clearing limits from property line or perimeter fencing. Will there be any select clearing beyond the limit of clearing identified for shading? Response: The plans have been revised to show dimensions from the property line to proposed clearing limits. The areas shaded show the areas that will be cleared. 5. Show any proposed grading necessary for drive and racking. Will installation of drive create swales or redirect water? Response: The proposed access drive will follow the existing contours on site. The proposed access drive is the NYSDEC approved pervious access drive used for solar array projects. The access drive will not increase runoff of alter drainage characteristics of the site. The access drive and panel installation is done with tracked vehicles that have minimal impact on the existing ground conditions. 6. Revise SWPPP for interconnect location. Response: The plans have been revised to call out the gravel access drives for the interconnect as pervious access drives. These drives will not alter the drainage characteristics of the existing area or alter runoff characteristics. Wetland Report 1. Based on aerial imagery and Tompkins County Water Resources GIS mapping, it appears there are multiple other wet areas on the site. Have these areas been observed for potential wetlands? See aerial image and Tompkins County wetland mapping exhibits attached. Response: The site has undergone a complete Wetland Delineation Study, finalized by Gene Pellet with Environmental Resources, LLC. The Site design was created based upon this report and avoids all delineated wetlands. The delineation report is included with this letter. Visual 1. Clarify if there are two or three interconnections proposed to NYSEG System. How many overhead lines will be routed across Dandy Road? Visual rendering appears to show two overhead lines crossing Danby Road. Will the existing overhead service line near the proposed interconnect location remain in addition to the three new interconnect crossings? Response: The interconnect location has three connections to the NYSEG system. There will be 3 lines routed across Danby Road per the requirements for each array to have its own emergency shutoff systems and infrastructure. The plans have been revised to relocate the existing pole and will remain. The site renderings have been revised to show the three service lines crossing Danby Road at street level (see page 16 of 18), these renderings are included with this letter. Page 3 of 5 2. Are the visual renderings representative of interconnection proposed and approved by NYSEG? Will additional ground mount or pole mounted equipment be required? If so, provide additional renderings. Response: NYSEG has approved the proposed interconnect that is shown. The proposal does not require additional ground mount or pole mounted equipment beyond what is shown in the renderings. 3. Show land control and clearing limits for electrical connection from the site to NYSEG point of connection and provide enlarged site plan. Will the installation of the electric line from the site to Danby Road create a line of sight that would need to be mitigated? Response: Sheet C110 of the plans has been revised to show clearing limits for the electrical connection from the site to the NYSED interconnection point. The proposed interconnect and access drives are along a straight roadway with no mitigations required due to line of sight. 4. Review driveway curb cuts with NYSDOT for proposed interconnect location. Will two entrances off state highway be allowed? Response: Any required approvals and permits from NYSDOT for the proposed interconnect location will be obtained for the proposed access driveways. 5. Have there been any alternate location for interconnection considered? Is it possible to limit the number of crossings over Danby Road? Response: This is located due to the existing step-down transformer location and the reduced voltage on the circuit south of the NYSEG approved point of interconnection. The number of crossings is not possible to be limited because each array requires its own connection and emergency shutoff gear. 6. Clarify if the electrical trench is to be located outside the limits of clearing as shown on A101. Consider showing overhead and underground routing on enlarge plan review. Response: Electrical trenches will require clearing. Clearing limits have been revised. Overhead and underground routing is shown on the enlarged plans. The underground lines located on the property have been relocated to within 5’ of the northern fenceline to limit any clearing required to install these lines. FEAF Part D.1b.b – Clarify total disturbance area with SWPPP and tree clearing activities. Response: The proposed disturbance area and SWPPP take into account that the existing tree stumps will not be removed, therefore it is not considered a ground disturbing action. Part D.2b – Clarify if any wetlands will be disturbed. Response: Per the Wetland Delineation Report by Environmental Resources, LLC included with this letter, there are no existing wetlands that will be disturbed by this project. Page 4 of 5 Part D.3e- Clarify total new impervious surface including any drives for interconnect or shared driveway for residential use. Response: The proposed access drives for the proposed interconnect are to be installed as NYSDEC approved pervious access drives and will not alter existing drainage conditions or increase impervious area. The FEAF has been revised to consider alteration to the existing shared driveway. Part E1 g and h – How did the applicant complete the answer to questions E1-g and h on Part 1 with regards to hazardous waste/site contamination? Has a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment been completed or other documentation? Response: A phase 1 ESA has been completed for the project location and is included with this letter. Nothing of note was found. Part E2.e – Clarify if there are slope greater than 15% on the site. Sheet C103 makes reference to slopes greater than 15%. Response: Section E.2.e of the Long EAF indicated a small amount of the site has slopes >15%. These areas are small scattered pockets and are not located in areas of concern. The areas of slopes >15% are marked on the plans with a “plus hatch” and callouts. Part E3.h – Complete question ii and iii. Response: The Long EAF has been revised to answer these questions. Misc. 1. Provide additional detail for electrical crossing Buttermilk Creek. Will crossing be overhead or underground? Response: The proposed electrical crossing of Buttermilk Creek is by overhead wires. No disturbance to the creek is proposed. 2. Has Tompkins County Highway Department reviewed upgrades to drive entrance onto County Road? Response: The Highway Department should have been included with the county referral. We will follow up to confirm if the Highway Department has any comments. 3. Provide summary of any correspondence with NYSEG. Are there any NYSEG system upgrades required at the proposed tie-in? Is the proposed tie-in location amenable with NYSEG? Response: NYSEG provides their definitive response to application for grid interconnection in the form of CESIR Study reports. The CESIR reports for this project indicate that the proposed interconnection locations and the projects as submitted are feasible. Various system upgrades are required to NYSEG owned equipment along the circuit path. There are no upgrades noted within the Page 5 of 5 interconnection facility beyond the typical interconnection equipment required by NYSEG. Copies of the redacted CESIR Studies and interconnection location submissions to NYSEG are provided with this response letter. 4. Provide additional information for the foundation system proposed for the solar racking. Response: The solar racking system is pole-direct bury. 5. Is there a long-term maintenance plan being considered for the vegetative screening that is being proposed? Will any vegetative screening be required as mitigation of visual impacts? If so, recommend providing additional visual renderings of planting areas including any existing vegetation to remain. Response: Landscaping is included in routine site maintenance along with perimeter fence checks, mowing and panel cleaning. The proposed landscape plan is included with this letter. 6. Are private underground electric easements required for the electric feed from each proposed lot to the point of connection? Response: The easement provided on the plans is one combined easement to serve all three transmission lines from the solar arrays to the interconnection. One easement is all that is required over these lines. 7. Is there any battery storage proposed or planned to be used at the site? Response: No, there is no battery storage located on site. Sincerely, David Cox, PE Associate|Civil Dept. Manager DC:paf Cc: File Donald Harner, P.E. Danby Site Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 Federal Wetland Delineation Report for Norbut Solar Danby Site Town of Danby Tompkins County New York Prepared for: Norbut Solar Farms 1241 University Avenue Rochester, NY 14607 Prepared by: 10 Lift Bridge Lane East Fairport, NY 14450 (585) 377-7360 BME Project No. 2089-104 November 2021 Danby Site Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Agency Resource Information ...................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Site Ecology .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Water Resource Descriptions ........................................................................................................................ 5 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................. 12 References ................................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendices Appendix A Exhibits Exhibits 1 – Aerial Site Location Map Exhibits 2 – USGS Quadrangle Exhibits 3 – USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Exhibits 4 – NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper Exhibits 5 – NRCS Soil Survey Exhibits 6 – Aerial Wetland Delineation Map Exhibits 7 – Photo Location Map Appendix B Site Photographs Appendix C Data Forms Norbut Solar Danby Site 1 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 INTRODUCTION Norbut Solar Farms contracted BME Associates (BME) to examine and delineate wetlands on a ± 125-acre area of interest located west of Danby Rd in the Town of Danby, Tompkins County, New York (Appendix A, Exhibit 1). The site includes tax parcel number 10-1-21.122 and a portion of 10-1-19.12. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination is requested for the subject site. The presence and location of wetlands and streams were determined using methods established in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, 2012 Northeast Regional Supplement, 2018 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, and other appropriate guidelines. The results of the delineation study are contained in this report. AGENCY RESOURCE INFORMATION Prior to initiating the field wetland delineation study, BME reviewed the following background information: • GIS Aerial Photo of the Site (Exhibit 1) – The site consists of undeveloped land including natural forest cover, successional shrubland, grassland, and areas of food plots. The site is located west of Danby Rd and northwest of Bald Hill Rd. Surrounding land use is mainly agricultural and residential. • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Quadrangle 7.5-minute topographic series was used to determine possible drainage patterns and the presence of streams and other water bodies (see Exhibit 2). The USGS map indicates that the site is sloped in the eastern direction. The USGS topographic map shows wetland symbols in the northern parcel within the area of interest. A stream is shown in the eastern portion of the site within the larger parcel as well as a stream at the southwest corner of the property and a perennial stream (Buttermilk Creek) is shown running through the east portion of the parcel parallel to Danby Rd as well. • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map was used to locate any mapped Federal wetlands on the site. The NWI map shows two wetlands, both Norbut Solar Danby Site 2 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 classified as PEM1C. A small freshwater pond is also shown within the area of interest. Additionally, three streams are shown within the site boundaries. • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Environmental Resource Mapper was used to determine the presence of any mapped NYSDEC wetlands on the project site (see Exhibit 4). The resource mapper does not show any mapped state wetlands on site, however it does show streams in the northeastern portion of the area of interest as well as in the southwest corner. • The Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey was used to locate any hydric soils, or soils with potential hydric inclusions (see Exhibit 5). The soils map indicates the presence of the following soils within the site (Area of Interest): Summary by Map Unit — Tompkins County, New York (NY109) Collapse Summary by Map Unit — Tompkins County, New York (NY109) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI BgC Bath and Valois soils, 5 to 15 percent slopes 0 6.2 5.0% EbB Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes 5 42.1 33.7% EcA Chippewa and Alden soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes 90 0.7 0.6% ErA Erie-Chippewa channery silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes 35 1.8 1.4% HdC Howard gravelly loam, 5 to 15 percent simple slopes 0 0.1 0.1% LaB Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 0 58.7 46.9% LaB3 Langford channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 0 3.1 2.5% MaC Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 0 0.2 0.1% RhA Red Hook gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes 0 9.2 7.4% Ws Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded 90 3.0 2.4% Totals for Area of Interest 125.2 100.0% Norbut Solar Danby Site 3 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 METHODOLOGY BME conducted the federal wetland delineation for the site according to methods described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, and the 2012 North Central and Northeast Region Supplement. Atypical Situation methods were not utilized. The 2018 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Wetland Plant List was utilized for wetland indicator status while the USDA, NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States was utilized for hydric soil identification. A general survey of the site was conducted to determine the presence of waters of the U.S. and potential wetland areas. Where potential wetlands were found, pairs of sample points were established to document soil and hydrological conditions in both the upland and wetland communities. A pair of sample points were taken at the wetlands, along with additional upland sampling points to support the location and extent of any wetlands. Site hydrology was evaluated by looking for and noting wetland hydrology indicators. Soils were evaluated by comparing soils taken from the sample sites with the Munsell Soil Color Charts (X- Rite Incorporated, Revised 2009), as well as evaluating additional hydric soil indicators. Soils were tested along wetland boundaries to aid in determining accurate wetland limits. At each data sampling location, a list of dominant plants was documented and the percent cover for each species was estimated. Generally, a 5-foot radius from the sampling point was used to define herbaceous plants within the plant community, a 30-foot radius was used to define trees and woody vines, and a 15-foot radius to define shrubs and saplings. The “dominance measure methods” outlined in the 1987 Federal Delineation Manual (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation 1987) and the 2012 Northcentral and Northeast Region Supplement were used to determine the presence of wetland vegetation while the 2018 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Wetland Plant List was utilized for plant identification and determination of wetland plant indicator status. Sample point locations and wetland boundaries were marked in the field by flags for identification by GPS equipment. The field survey of wetland points was completed by BME Associates. All delineated wetland boundaries and sample point locations are shown on Exhibits 6 and 7, and site photograph locations are shown on Exhibit 8 in Appendix A. Site photographs can be found in Appendix B, and data forms can be found in Appendix C. Norbut Solar Danby Site 4 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 SITE ECOLOGY General upland plant communities on the site include primarily mature wooded upland (rich mesophytic forest), successional shrubland, and successional field. General wetland plant communities consist of emergent wetland (shallow emergent marsh), and shrub swamp (Shrub Carr). Rich mesophytic forest The forested areas on site are dominated primarily by mature hardwoods, saplings, and shrubs with some understory herbs. Common tree species within these areas include mature trees such as silver maple (Acer saccharinum), red maple (Acer rubrum), white ash (Fraxinus americana), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red oak (Quercus rubra), black cherry (Prunus serotina), and common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica). Understory shrubs and herbs include multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), honeysuckles (Lonicera spp.), white avens (Geum canadense), Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Successional Shrubland Shrubby upland areas on site are co-dominantly vegetated by grasses, forbs, and upland shrub species. Common shrub species within these areas include multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartia), and honeysuckles (Lonicera spp.). Grasses and forbs that dominate these areas include big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe), and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Successional Field The open field areas on site are dominated primarily by grasses and forbs with some upland shrub species. Common shrub species within these areas include multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) and honeysuckles (Lonicera spp.). Grasses and forbs that dominate these areas include big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), grass- leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia), and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Shrub Swamp (Shrub Carr.) Shrubby wetland areas on site are dominated by willows (Salix spp.) and shrub species such as red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea) and silky dogwood (Cornus amomum). Dominant herbs Norbut Solar Danby Site 5 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 include emergent species such as sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), and joe-pye weed (Eutrochium purpureum). Shallow Emergent Marsh The western portion of Wetland “B” consists of shallow emergent marsh comprised of mucky soils that are vegetated primarily by narrow-leaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia), common rush (Juncus effusus), and sedges (Carex spp.). WATER RESOURCE DESCRIPTIONS The site includes fourteen (14) delineated wetlands and five (5) streams (see exhibit 6). Table 1. Water Resource Summary Name Identification Size (within site) OHWM Dimensions Flow Regime Lat. and Long. Wetland “A” PEM 0.27 AC - - 42.3531 -76.4871 Wetland “B” PEM 0.09 AC - - 42.3517, -76.4879 Wetland “C” PEM 0.04 AC - - 42.3520, -76.4880 Wetland “D” PFO 0.06 AC - - 42.3538, -76.4844 Wetland “E” PSS/PEM 2.00 AC - - 42.3546, -76.4836 Wetland “F” PEM 0.62 AC - - 42.3506, -76.4943 Wetland “G” PEM 0.07 AC - - 42.3508, -76.4935 Wetland “H” PEM 0.69 AC - - 42.3508, -76.4990 Norbut Solar Danby Site 6 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 Wetland “I” PEM 0.03 AC - - 42.3518, -76.4965 Wetland “J” PEM 0.18 AC - - 42.3516, -76.4946 Wetland “K” PEM 0.14 AC - - 42.3522, -76.4935 Wetland “L” PEM 0.07 AC - - 42.3524, -76.4953 Wetland “M” PEM 0.07 AC - - 42.3529, -76.4959 Wetland “N” PEM 0.10 AC - - 42.3534, -76.4969 Stream “A” - ± 2,810 LF ± 5-10’ wide, ± 1-3’ deep ± 620 LF ephemeral, ± 2,190 LF intermittent 42.3510, -76.4919 Stream “B” - ± 555 LF ± 3-5’ wide, ± 1-2’ deep Perennial 42.3547, -76.4827 Stream “C” - ± 750 LF ± 18” wide, OHWM not detectable Ephemeral 42.3518, -76.4966 Stream “D” - ± 100 LF ± 3’ wide, ± 1’ deep Ephemeral 42.3503, -76.4994 Stream “E” - ± 930 LF ± 4-6’ wide, 6-12” deep Ephemeral 42.3499, -76.4997 SITE WETLANDS: Wetland “A” (Area = ± 0.27 AC) Wetland “A” is an emergent floodplain wetland located in the eastern portion of the site. This wetland is shown on the National Wetlands Inventory and classified as PEM1C. Soils are mapped as Wayland Soils Complex with a hydric rating of 90. Hydrology originates from Norbut Solar Danby Site 7 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 surface runoff as well as water from Stream A. There was ± 8” of standing water at times of site visits in October and November. Wetland hydrology included saturation and standing water. The dominant vegetation in this wetland includes willows (Salix spp.), dogwoods (Cornus spp.), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis) and narrow-leaf cattail (Typha angustifolia). Wetland “B” (Area = ± 0.09 AC) Wetland “B” is an emergent wetland pocket located south of a road path in the eastern portion of the area of interest. This wetland is separated from Wetland C through a culvert at the north end, which conveys water between the two in the northern direction. This wetland is shown on the National Wetlands Inventory as a freshwater pond. This was a man-made farm pond which has not been maintained and therefore has overgrown with hydrophytic vegetation including rice-cut grass (Leersia oryzoides), grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia), and willows (Salix spp.). There was standing water in this wetland during site visits. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Langord channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes with a hydric rating of 0. There was ± 10” of standing water at times of site visits in November. Wetland “C” (Area = ± 0.04 AC) Wetland “C” is a small emergent wetland pocket located north of a path in the eastern portion of the area of interest. This wetland is connected to Wetland “B” via a culvert located at its south end. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Langord channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes with a hydric rating of 0. There was ± 6” of standing water at times of site visits in November. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), narrow-leaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), and rice-cut grass (Leersia oryzoides). Wetland “D” (Area = ± 0.06 AC) Wetland “D” is a small emergent/ shrub swamp wetland pocket located in the northeastern parcel of the area of interest adjacent to the southern boundary line of the parcel. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes with a hydric rating of 0. There was ± 8” of standing water at times of site visits in November. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes dogwoods (Cornus spp.) and sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis). Norbut Solar Danby Site 8 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 Wetland “E” (Area = ± 2.00 AC) Wetland “E” is located in the northeastern parcel in the area of interest. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes with a hydric rating of 0, Erie channery silt loam with a hydric rating of 5, and Wayland Soils Complex with a hydric rating of 90. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas. There was ± 3” of standing water at times of site visits. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes dogwoods (Cornus spp.), buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), pussy willow (Salix discolor), red- top grass (Agrostis gigantea), and joe-pye weed (Eutrochium purpureum). This wetland is classified as emergent/ scrub shrub. Wetland “F” (Area = ± 0.62 AC) Wetland “F” is in the southern portion of the site. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a hydric rating of 5. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas. There was ± 6” of standing water at times of site visits. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sedges (Carex spp.), narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), and common rush (Juncus effusus). Based on field observations, this wetland appears to be isolated and may not be jurisdictional, subject to USACE final determination. Wetland “G” (Area = ± 0.07 AC) Wetland “G” is a small wetland pocket (former farm pond) located in the southern portion of the site. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a hydric rating of 5. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas. This wetland was a man-made farm pond which has overgrown over the years with hydrophytic vegetation. There was ± 2” of standing water at times of site visits. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), reed canary (Phalaris arundinacea), and common rush (Juncus effusus). Based on field observations, this wetland appears to be isolated and may not be jurisdictional, subject to USACE final determination. Wetland “H” (Area = ± 0.69 AC) Wetland “H” is an emergent wetland (wetland meadow) located in the western portion of the site. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a Norbut Solar Danby Site 9 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 hydric rating of 5. There was no standing water at times of site visits. However, soils were saturated. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas. There is a small ephemeral stream located south of the wetland which carries water and contributes to its hydrology (Stream D). Wetland H drains northeast by overland flow which is then culverted into an ephemeral stream. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), and Hairy willow-herb (Epilobium hirsutum). Wetland “I” (Area = ± 0.03 AC) Wetland “I” is a small emergent wetland pocket located in the center portion of the area of interest. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a hydric rating of 5. There was ± 6” of standing water at times of site visits. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas as well as overflow/drainage from ephemeral Stream C during rain events. This wetland is an old farm pond which has since overgrown with hydrophytic vegetation due to lack of maintenance. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), and grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia). Wetland “J” (Area = ± 0.18 AC) Wetland “J” is a wetland pocket located in the center portion of the area of interest. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a hydric rating of 5. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas. There was ± 12” of standing water at times of site visits. This wetland is an old man-made farm pond which was not maintained and has since grown an abundance of hydrophytic vegetation. There is a culvert directing pond overflow to Stream “A”. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes willows (Salix spp.), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia), and grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia). Wetland “K” (Area = ± 0.14 AC) Wetland “K” is an old man-made farm pond which has overgrown with emergent vegetation. Soils in this wetland are mapped as Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, with a hydric rating of 5. There was ± 4-20” of standing water at times of site visits. Hydrology of this wetland originates from surface runoff of surrounding upland areas to the west. Dominant vegetation in Norbut Solar Danby Site 10 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 this wetland includes willows (Salix spp.), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), reed canary (Phalaris arundinacea), wool grass (Scirpus cyperinus), and grass-leaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia). This wetland appears to be isolated and may be non-jurisdictional, subject to USACE final determination. Wetland “L” (Area = ± 0.07 AC) Wetland “L” is a wetland pocket located at the conjunction of Stream C and Stream A in the center portion of the area of interest. There was ± 3” of standing water at times of site visits in November. Hydrology of this wetland originates from the adjacent stream as well as runoff/drainage from surrounding upland and wetland areas to the northwest. This wetland drains to the southeast through Stream “A.” Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes willows (Salix spp.) and sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis). Wetland “M” (Area = ± 0.07 AC) Wetland “M” is a wetland pocket located in the northern portion of the area of interest. There was ± 2” of standing water at times of site visits in November. Hydrology of this wetland originates from runoff/drainage from surrounding upland and wetland areas to the north and northwest. This wetland drains to the southeast through the ephemeral portion of Stream “A.” Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), reed canary (Phalaris arundinacea), calico aster (Symphyotrichum lateriflorum), and moneywort (Lysimachia nummularia). Wetland “N” (Area = ± 0.10 AC) Wetland “N” is a wetland pocket located in the northern portion of the area of interest. There was ± 3” of standing water at times of site visits in November. Hydrology of this wetland originates from runoff/drainage from surrounding upland to the north and west. This wetland drains southeast through the ephemeral portion of Stream “A” to Wetland “M.” Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes reed canary (Phalaris arundinacea), joe-pye weed (Eutrochium purpureum), and green ash (Fraxinus pensylvanica). Norbut Solar Danby Site 11 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 STREAMS IN AREA OF INTEREST: Stream “A” ( ± 2,810 LF) Stream “A” runs through a large portion of the area of interest. This stream runs through Wetlands “M” and “L” in the southeast direction, starting from the southeast corner of Wetland “N.” The stream has an ephemeral flow regime from the northeast corner until approximately 120 feet southeast of Wetland “L” where the stream becomes more defined and has more of an intermittent flow regime. This stream continues southeast and then bends and flows in the northeast direction into Wetland “A” in the northeastern portion of the site. Stream “A” is ± 620 LF ephemeral stream and ± 2,190 LF of intermittent stream. This stream varies in dimension from ± 5-10 feet wide, to ± 1-3 feet deep. Stream “B” ( ± 555 LF) Stream “B” is a perennial stream which runs through the northeastern parcel within the area of interest. This stream runs in the northern direction. This stream varies in dimension from ± 3-5 feet wide and ± 1-2 feet deep at OHWM. Stream “C” ( ± 750 LF) Stream “C” is located in the center portion of the area of interest. This stream has an ephemeral flow regime. It is approximately 18 inches wide and OHWM is not detectable. This stream collects overland flow from a drainage swale to the southwest and carries water to Stream “A.” Stream “D” ( ± 100 LF) Stream “D” is an ephemeral stream (man-made ditch) approximately 100 feet in length located near the southern boundary of the area of interest. This stream runs in the northern direction and carries water to the small pocket of Wetland “H” during storm events, which is connected to the larger portion of the wetland through a culvert. This stream receives runoff of surrounding upland areas to the west and south. Stream “E” ( ± 930 LF) Stream “E” is in the southwestern portion of the area of interest. This stream appears to have an ephemeral flow regime. The stream collects surface runoff and flows southeast off the project site. Norbut Solar Danby Site 12 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 CONCLUSIONS Within the area of interest, fourteen (14) wetlands (Wetlands “A” through “N”) were identified and field delineated by BME Associates based on the presence of all three parameters for federal jurisdictional wetlands (Appendix A, Exhibits 6, & 7). Furthermore, five (5) streams were observed, and their flow regimes evaluated (Streams “A” through “E”). Based on our field observations, Wetlands B, C, D, G, F, H, and K appear to be isolated and may be non- jurisdictional, subject to USACE final determination. On behalf of Norbut Solar Farms, BME Associates is requesting an Approved Jurisdictional Determination for the subject site. Norbut Solar Danby Site 13 Project # 2089-104 BME Associates November 2021 REFERENCES • Department of the Army. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. • Edinger, G.J., D.J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T.G. Howard, D.M. Hunt, and A.M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke's Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY. • Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conversation Service, Washington, DC. Cooperative Technical Publication. • Munsell Color. (Revised) 2009. Munsell Soil Color Charts. X-Rite Incorporated. Grand Rapids, Michigan USA. • National Wetland Inventory Maps, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetland Inventory, St. Petersburg, FL. • Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb’s Wildflower Guide. Hachette Book Group, Inc. New York, NY. • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Freshwater Wetlands Maps, NYSDEC, New York. • Ogden, E.C. 1981. Field Guide to Northeastern Ferns. Contributions to a Flora of New York State III, R.S. Mitchell (Ed.), Bull. 444, New York State Museum, Albany, NY 122 pp. • Reed, P.B., Jr. 1995. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88(26.1). St. Petersburg, FL. • Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region, January 2012, Volume 2.0. • U.S.D.A. Soil Conversation Service. 1986. Soil Survey of Monroe County, New York. USDA SCS. Washington, DC. • U.S.D.A. Soil Conversation Service. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1491. Washington, DC. • U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. 2017, V. 8.1. National Hydric Soils List. Lincoln, NE. • Williams, A.E. 1992. Clarification and Interpretation of the 1987 Manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 6, 1992 Memorandum. USACE. Washington, DC. • U.S Army Corps of Engineers 2018. National Wetland Plant List, Version 3.4 BME Wetland Field Delineators Martin Janda, Abigail Lanterman, Jenna Lynch APPENDIX A Exhibits 1 – 7 Exhibit 1 – Aerial Site Location Map Exhibit 2 – USGS Quadrangle Exhibit 3 – USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Exhibit 4 – NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper Exhibit 5 – NRCS Soil Survey Exhibit 6 – Aerial Wetland Delineation Map Exhibit 7 – Photo Location Map 10 L I F T B R I D G E L A N E E A S T FA I R P O R T , N E W Y O R K 1 4 4 5 0 PH O N E 5 8 5 - 3 7 7 - 7 3 6 0 WW W . B M E P C . C O M No r b u t S o l a r D a n b y S i t e Ae r i a l S i t e L o c a t i o n M a p To w n o f D a n b y , T o m p k i n s C o u n t y , N e w Y o r k Sc a l e : 1" = 5 0 0 ' Da t e : 1 1 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 1 Pr o j e c t N u m b e r : 20 8 9 - 1 0 4 10 L I F T B R I D G E L A N E E A S T FA I R P O R T , N E W Y O R K 1 4 4 5 0 PH O N E 5 8 5 - 3 7 7 - 7 3 6 0 WW W . B M E P C . C O M No r b u t S o l a r D a n b y S i t e US G S Q u a d r a n g l e To w n o f D a n b y , T o m p k i n s C o u n t y , N e w Y o r k Sc a l e : 1" = 7 0 0 ' Da t e : 1 1 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 1 Pr o j e c t N u m b e r : 20 8 9 - 1 0 4 10 L I F T B R I D G E L A N E E A S T FA I R P O R T , N E W Y O R K 1 4 4 5 0 PH O N E 5 8 5 - 3 7 7 - 7 3 6 0 WW W . B M E P C . C O M No r b u t S o l a r D a n b y S i t e US F W S N a t i o n a l W e t l a n d s I n v e n t o r y To w n o f D a n b y , T o m p k i n s C o u n t y , N e w Y o r k Sc a l e : 1" = 5 0 0 ' Da t e : 1 1 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 1 Pr o j e c t N u m b e r : 20 8 9 - 1 0 4 10 L I F T B R I D G E L A N E E A S T FA I R P O R T , N E W Y O R K 1 4 4 5 0 PH O N E 5 8 5 - 3 7 7 - 7 3 6 0 WW W . B M E P C . C O M No r b u t S o l a r D a n b y S i t e NY S D E C E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e s o u r c e M a p p e r To w n o f D a n b y , T o m p k i n s C o u n t y , N e w Y o r k Sc a l e : 1" = 5 0 0 ' Da t e : 1 1 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 1 Pr o j e c t N u m b e r : 20 8 9 - 1 0 4 10 L I F T B R I D G E L A N E E A S T FA I R P O R T , N E W Y O R K 1 4 4 5 0 PH O N E 5 8 5 - 3 7 7 - 7 3 6 0 WW W . B M E P C . C O M N o r b u t S o l a r D a n b y S i t e NR C S W e b S o i l S u r v e y To w n o f D a n b y , T o m p k i n s C o u n t y , N e w Y o r k Sc a l e : 1" = 5 0 0 ' Da t e : 1 1 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 1 Pr o j e c t N u m b e r : 20 8 9 - 1 0 4 10 L I F T B R I D G E L A N E E A S T FA I R P O R T , N E W Y O R K 1 4 4 5 0 PH O N E 5 8 5 - 3 7 7 - 7 3 6 0 WW W . B M E P C . C O M No r b u t S o l a r D a n b y S i t e Ae r i a l W e t l a n d D e l i n e a t i o n E x h i b i t To w n o f D a n b y , T o m p k i n s C o u n t y , N e w Y o r k Sc a l e : 1" = 5 0 0 ' Da t e : 1 1 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 1 Pr o j e c t N u m b e r : 20 8 9 - 1 0 4 17 20 18 19 1 4 2 35 8 6 7 9 12 10 11 13 16 14 15 21 24 22 23 25 28 26 27 29 32 30 31 17 20 18 19 1 4 2 35 8 6 7 9 12 10 11 13 16 14 15 21 24 22 23 25 28 26 27 29 32 30 31 33 36 34 35 37 40 38 39 44 42 43 41 45 48 46 47 49 52 50 51 53 56 54 55 57 60 58 59 61 64 62 63 65 68 66 67 69 72 70 71 73 76 74 75 7 7 7 8 8 685 81 84 82 83 7 9 8 0 90 88 89 87 94 92 93 91 98 96 97 95 102 100 101 99 106 104 105 103 110 108 109 107 11 2 111 116 114 115 113 120 118 119 117 12 2 121 126 124 125 123 130 128 129 127 134 132 133 131 138 136 137 135 142 140 141 139 146 144 145 143 150 148 149 147 154 152 153 151 1 5 5 1 5 6 160 158 159 157 164 162 163 161 168 166 167 165 10 L I F T B R I D G E L A N E E A S T FA I R P O R T , N E W Y O R K 1 4 4 5 0 PH O N E 5 8 5 - 3 7 7 - 7 3 6 0 WW W . B M E P C . C O M No r b u t S o l a r D a n b y S i t e Ph o t o L o c a t i o n M a p To w n o f D a n b y , T o m p k i n s C o u n t y , N e w Y o r k Sc a l e : 1" = 5 0 0 ' Da t e : 1 1 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 1 Pr o j e c t N u m b e r : 20 8 9 - 1 0 4 24 27 25 26 APPENDIX B Site Photographs Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 1:Upland,facing north Photo 2:Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 3:Upland,facing south Photo 4: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 5:Boundary of Wetland E,facing north Photo 6: Facing upland east of Wetland E Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 7:Facing south,boundary of Wetland E Photo 8: Facing west into Wetland E Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 9:Wetland E,facing north Photo 10: Wetland E, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 11:Wetland E,facing south Photo 12: Wetland E,facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 13:Wetland D,facing north Photo 14: Wetland D, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 15:Wetland D,facing south Photo 16: Wetland D, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 17:Upland,facing north Photo 18: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 19:Upland,facing south Photo 20: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 21:Culvert between Wetlands B and C,facing north Photo 22: At culvert between wetlands B and C, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 23:At culvert between wetlands B and C,facing south Photo 24: At culvert between wetlands B and C, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 25:Upland,facing north Photo 26: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 27:Upland,facing south Photo 28: Upland,facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 29:Upland field,facing north Photo 30: Upland field, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 31:Upland field,facing south Photo 32:Upland field, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 33:At Stream A,facing north Photo 34: At Stream A, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 35:At Stream A,facing south Photo 36: At Stream A, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 37:Upland,facing north Photo 38: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 39:Upland,facing south Photo 40: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 41:Wetland G border,facing north Photo 42: Wetland G border, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 43:Wetland G border,facing south Photo 44: Wetland G border, facing west (toward wetland) Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 45:Upland,facing north Photo 46:Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 47:Upland,facing south Photo 48: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 49:Wetland F,facing north Photo 50: Wetland F, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 51:Wetland F,facing south Photo 52: Wetland F, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 53:Upland,facing north Photo 54: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 55:Upland,facing south Photo 56: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 57:Upland,facing north Photo 58: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 59:Upland,facing south Photo 60: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 61:Upland,facing north Photo 62: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 63:Upland,facing south Photo 64: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 65:Wetland H,facing north Photo 66: Wetland H, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 67:Wetland H,facing south Photo 68: Wetland H, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 69:Upland,facing north Photo 70: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 71:Upland,facing south Photo 72: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 73:Upland,facing north Photo 74: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 75:Upland,facing south Photo 76: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 77:Culvert,facing downstream of Stream C Photo 78: Facing upstream/culvert of overland flow into Stream C Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 79:Facing downstream of Stream C Photo 80: Facing upstream of Stream C Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 81:Wetland I,facing north Photo 82: Wetland I, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 83:Wetland I,facing south Photo 84: Wetland I, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 85:Facing downstream of Stream C Photo 86: Facing upstream of Stream C Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 87:Wetland J,facing north Photo 88: Wetland J, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 89:Wetland J,facing south Photo 90: Wetland J, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 91:Wetland J,facing north Photo 92: Wetland J, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 93:Wetland J,facing south Photo 94: Wetland J, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 95:At stream A,facing north Photo 96: At stream A, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 97:At stream A,facing south Photo 98: At stream A, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 99:Upland,facing north Photo 100: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 101:Upland,facing south Photo 102: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 103:Wetland K,facing north Photo 104: Wetland K, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 105:Wetland K,facing south Photo 106: Wetland K, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 107:Upland,facing north Photo 108: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 109:Upland,facing south Photo 110: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 111:Ephemeral Stream A,downstream Photo 112: Ephemeral stream A, upstream Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 113:Upland,facing north Photo 114: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 115:Upland,facing south Photo 116: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 117:Wetland L,facing north Photo 118: Wetland L, facing easr Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 119:Wetland L.facing south Photo 120: Wetland L, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 121:Ephemeral Stream A,.downstream Photo 122: Ephemeral Stream A, upstream Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 123:Wetland M,facing north Photo 124: Wetland M, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 125:Wetland M,facing south Photo 126: Wetland M, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 127:Upland,facing north toward Wetland M Photo 128: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 129:Upland,facing south Photo 130: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 131:Wetland N,facing north Photo 132: Wetland N, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 133:Wetland N,facing south Photo 134: Wetland N, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 135:Upland,facing north Photo 136: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 137:Upland,facing south Photo 138: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 139:Upland,facing north Photo 140: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 141:Upland,facing south Photo 142: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 143:Upland,facing north Photo 144: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 145:Upland,facing south Photo 146: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 147:Upland,facing north Photo 148: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 149:Upland,facing south Photo 150: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 151:Upland,facing north Photo 152: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 153:Upland,facing south Photo 154: Upland, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 155:Intermittent Stream A,facing downstream Photo 156: Intermittent Stream A, facing upstream Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 157:Wetland A,facing north Photo 158: Wetland A, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 159:Wetland A,facing south Photo 160: Wetland A, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 161:Wetland A,facing north Photo 162: Wetland A, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 163:Wetland A,facing south Photo 164: Wetland A, facing west Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 165:Upland,facing north Photo 166: Upland, facing east Norbut Solar Danby Site Photos Photo 167:Upland,facing south Photo 168: Upland, facing west APPENDIX C Data Forms