Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.827.001-Wetland-Peer-Review-Summary-Report-with-Attachments-Final 6700 Thompson Road, Suite 1 Syracuse, NY 13211 t& Tel: 315.695.7228 DELTAwww.detta-eas.com ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & SURVEYORS AN • • ••1:2015 COMPLIANT COMPANY January 10, 2022 David West, LEED AP Town Planner Town of Danby 183 Danby Road Ithaca,NY 14850 RE: Wetland Peer Review—Norbut Solar Site, Town of Danby, Tompkins County,New York Delta Project No.: 2021.827.001 Dear Mr. West: Delta Engineers, Architects, Land Surveyors, & Landscape Architects, DPC (Delta) conducted a wetland peer review at the Norbut Solar site in the Town of Danby, Tompkins County,New York (Figure 1). The site is approximately 111 acres in size and is composed of one(1)lot(10.-2-21.22)located on Bald Hill Road in the Town of Danby. Delta conducted this wetland review on December 7, 10, and 15, 2021. The wetland review was conducted following the methods outlined in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Corps Regional Supplement (2012). The wetlands were previously delineated by other consultants in 2021. This report includes a review of the methods, results, which include site ecology, wetlands, and a summary of our findings. Methods Delta conducted a peer review of the wetlands area previously delineated by Norbut Solar wetland consultant and assessed the rest of the site for potential wetlands on December 7, 10, and 15, 2021. The boundaries were approximated using the federal criteria for vegetation,soils,and hydrology(Environmental Laboratory 1987, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2020, NRCS 2018, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2012). To support the approximate wetland boundaries, data on the vegetation, the soils, and hydrology were obtained from sample plots located within the wetland boundaries. Delta sampled 51 plots in and around the wetland and upland sides of the flagged wetland boundaries. The plot data were recorded on data sheets that comply with those used in the regional supplement (Corps 2012). Stream profile data (8 plots) was also collected for the streams that were found, including stream bed width, surface water depth,bank height and substrate. Vegetation data were collected in all sample plots. Ocular estimates of the percent areal cover by plant species for each vegetation layer (tree, shrub, and herbaceous) were recorded. The sample plots varied in size according to the vegetation layer being sampled. The sizes were: 30-foot radius for the tree layer, 15- foot radius for the shrub, and 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer. The presence of wetland vegetation was determined when more than 50 percent of the dominant species in a sample plot had an indicator status of obligate (OBL), facultative-wet (FACW), or facultative (FAC). "We are a seamless extension of our clients' organizations" /'_DELTA Page 2 of 8 COMPANYRNEW-__ AN ISO 9001:2015 COMPLIANT The dominant species for each layer in a plot were determined by ranking the species in decreasing order of percent cover and recording those species which, when cumulatively totaled, immediately exceeded 50 percent of the total cover of that layer. Additionally, any plant species that comprised 20 percent or more of the total cover for each layer was considered to be a dominant species. Plant species were identified primarily using the Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada (Gleason and Cronquist 1991), New Britton and Brown Illustrated Flora (Gleason 1952), Gray's Manual of Botany (Fernald 1950). Scientific nomenclature follows the National Wetland Plant List, Version 3.5. (United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2020),A Checklist of New York State Plants (Mitchell and Tucker 1997), and Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of New York State (Werier 2017). The indicator status for each plant species was determined using the National Wetland Plant List, Version 3.5. (United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2020). Soil and hydrology data were collected in soil pits or soil borer holes to a minimum depth of 18 inches within each sample plot,unless a restrictive layer was found. Soil characteristics were noted along the soil profile at the depth specified by the Corps criteria(USDA NRCS 2018). Procedures for identifying hydric soils as outlined in the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA NRCS 2018)were also followed. Soil colors were determined by using the Munsell color chart. Primary and secondary indicators of hydrology were also noted at each sample plot. Results Wetland areas are summarized in the wetland section in Table 1. Full data sheets for wetlands on the site are included in Appendix A. Photographs of the wetlands on the site are included in Appendix B. Site Ecology The site consists of areas of deciduous forest, open field, scrub-shrub, and active agriculture. The open field area consists of species such as wild carrot (Daucus carota), orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), corn (Zea mays), and red clover (Trifolium repens). The deciduous forest upland area consists of tree species such as sugar maple (Acer saccharum), shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), red maple (Acer rubrum), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red oak (Quercus rubra), and black cherry (Prunus serotina). The mixed forest upland area consists of species such as white pine(Pinus strobus) and red maple. The scrub-shrub areas consist of species in the shrub layer such as gray dogwood (Cornus racemosa) and Morrow's honeysuckle (Lonicera morrowii). The areas of active agriculture consist of corn. Wetlands and Waters Twelve wetlands and four waters were delineated by Norbut Solar's wetland consultant. Delta reviewed the previously delineated and waters and identified areas new wetlands and waters as well as modifications to the previously delineated wetlands and waters (Figure 1). Wetland determination data sheets are found in Appendix A and photographs are shown in Appendix B. Approximate wetland locations are shown on Figure 1. Wetland plot locations are shown on Figure 2. Delta collected plots in areas that were determined to be upland(UP-1, UP-2, etc.)to demonstrate what areas had no wetland criteria or had some wetland criteria but did not have all three criteria to fit the federal definition of a wetland. The provided approximate wetland maps can be used as guidance and for informational purposes. "We are a seamless extension of our clients' organizations" /'_DELTA Page 3 of 8 COMPANYAN ISO 9001:2015 COMPLIANT Table 2. Wetland and Stream Summary Wetland/Stream(a) Primary Cover Types s (b) Wetland A Palustrine Emergent Wetland Stream A Perennial Stream Wetland B Palustrine Forested Wetland Wetland C Palustrine Forested Wetland Stream C Ephemeral Stream Stream D Ephemeral Stream Stream E Perennial Stream Wetland F Palustrine Forested Wetland Wetland G Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Wetland H Palustrine Emergent Wetland Wetland I Palustrine Emergent Wetland Wetland J Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Wetland K Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Wetland L Palustrine Forested Wetland Wetland M Palustrine Forested Wetland Wetland N Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Wetland O Palustrine Emergent Wetland Wetland P Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Wetland Q Palustrine Emergent Wetland Wetland R Palustrine Emergent Wetland Stream S Intermittent Stream Wetland T Palustrine Emergent Wetland Wetland U Palustrine Forested Wetland Wetland V Palustrine Forested Wetland Stream W Intermittent Stream Wetland X Palustrine Forested Wetland Stream Y Ephemeral Stream Wetland Z Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Stream 1 Ephemeral Stream Wetland 2 Palustrine Forested Wetland Wetland 3 Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Wetland Wetland 4 Palustrine Forested Wetland (a)Wetlands assessed by Delta Engineers,Architects,&Land Surveyors,DPC(Delta)on December 7, 10,and 15,2021. (b)Wetland cover types observed by Delta on December 7, 10,and 15,2021. Summary Delta was contracted to do a peer review at the 111-acre Norbut Solar site on Bald Hill Road in the Town of Danby, Tompkins County,New York. Delta reviewed available delineation maps prior to the field review. "We are a seamless extension of our clients' organizations" /'_DELTA Page 4 of 8 COMPANYAN ISO 9001:2015 COMPLIANT Previous consultants delineated twelve wetlands and four waters on the site. Delta reviewed and located twenty-four wetlands and eight waters on site. The provided wetland maps and wetland plot/stream cross- section datasheets can be used for informational purposes. I trust this letter report is sufficient for your needs at this time. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Respectfully, DELTA ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, LAND SURVEYORS, & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, DPC 4t a, Elizabeth MacEwen Environmental Scientist Enc. "We are a seamless extension of our clients' organizations" /'_DELTA Page 5 of 8 AN ISO 9001:2015 COMPLIANT COMPANY References Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th Edition. American Book Company,New York, NY. Gleason, H. A. 1952. The New Britton and Brown Illustrated Flora of the United States and Adjacent Canada. Hafner Press,New York,NY (3 vols). Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx NY. Mitchell, R. S. and G. C. Tucker. 1997. A Revised Checklist of New York State Plants. The State Education Department,NYS Museum Bulletin No. 490,Albany,NY. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar,C.V.Noble,and J.F.Berkowitz.ERDC/EL TR-12-1.Vicksburg,MS:U.S.Army Engineer Research and Development Center. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2020. National Wetland Plant List, Version 3.4. http://wetland- plants.usace.army.mil. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover,NH. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2018. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 8.2. L.M. Vasilas, G.W. Hurt, and J.F. Berkowitz (eds.). USDA,NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. Werier, D. 2017. Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of New York State. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Society: Volume 27. The Torrey Botanical Society. Bronx,New York. "We are a seamless extension of our clients' organizations" FIGURES 3 NORTH Approximate Wetland N = 41 4! , Approxinlate ' Wetianf 4 Approximate o Wetland 3 M Approximate Approximate - .,f Q, Wetland W Wetland 2 U cn � Approximate 1 Approximat 1 pproximaNt Approximate 01 200' 400' Wetland V Wetland X Wetland T Approximate , � Site Location Stream A APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET . r If t Approximate 1�r Stream Y � - 1 • ; • 1 Base Map Provided by ,_�W 1 �;' Approximate = IC—UP � � `� Wetland U _� 1 Approximate �' BME Associates _ 1 '• • ' �, Wetland C Approximate WIT. Wetland R -0 - Wetland P i 1 Figure Prepared by H—UP I Delta Engineers ._, UP''. -` Approximate Approximate s 1 - Wetland K Wetland B • ;, Approximate • Wetland O Approximate Approximate Approxi ate Stream 1 Approximate Approximate and G r: Approxi to Strea S Stream C Wetland J Wetlan Q Approximate Approximate Approximate �\ Approximate Wetland H Approximate Approximate Stream D Wetland I Wetland F Wetland Z Stream E ' ' . f Figure 1. _//'- � 'i�; / .�""✓ �'s Yl - > i�" y'H '."i -1. .� -. � tit �' Ir 6f r � '- ••: Approximate Wetland rd l'y yY dy*�w o� s Sketch � Delta File:2021.827.001\2021.827.001 Approximate Wetland Sketch.cdr\1-7-21 w: s7^ -dip 4004 LEGEND 01 Approximate >4 A-1 W Sample Plot Location p Wetland N - T � .:y Approximate n - • o 3: Wetland 4 gpproxima1e ,�' 1 0 _0 Wetland 3 1m Approximate Approximate ° x; +; c Wetland W Wetland 2 Approximate 0 Approximate 1 11 11 Approximate Approximate NORTH Wetland V Wetland T _ Wetland X Approximate Site Location Stream A V-1 U Stream a �, ► N-1 W 3-1 W UP- 2-1 W . UP-1 h} " V-1 W X-1 WT T-1 W r A-1 W Approximate \ k. .. _ Stream A Stream Y "" X-1 U 4-1 W M-1 W 3-1 U 1 1 F Approximate UP-5 L-1 U L-1 W K-1 W ' Approximate Cn 01 200' 400' Wetland U -• • ' Wetland C ° UP-4 UP 1 1-2 . - -1U fir".• o APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET Approximate � Stream Y w�T J-1 U B-1 U C-1 W Approximate Wetland R U-1 W I_' W - J-1 W J` T _ UP 1. Wetland P -1 U O-1 U P- P-1 W H_0P Stream C 1 1 G-1 U O.1 W Figure Prepared by Stream S _ Stream 1 G-1 W Delta Engineers Q-1 U R-1 U H-1 W Approximate 7. Approximate Q-1 W R-1 W H-1 U ' Wetland K ;: Wetland B ALL •' F-1 W ." r Z-1 W pproximate • F-1 U Wetland O Base Map Provided by • Stream E Stream D Approximate Approximate \ BME Associates Approxi ate Stream 1 Approximate Approximate Wetland G Appr, to Strea S Stream C Wetland Wetlan Q Approximate Approximate Approximate Q�\ Approximate Wetland H Approximate Approximate Stream D Wetland I Wetland F Wetland Z Stream E ' Figure 2. Wetland Boundaries with �A Sample Plot Locations Delta File:2021.827.001\2021.827.001-Plotphoto.cdr\1-7-21 APPENDIX A - FIELD DATA SHEETS Stream Determination Data Form Project/Site: Danby Solar Site City/County: Danby/Tompkins Sampling Date: 12/10/21 Applicant/Owner: State:NY Stream ID:stream-1 Investigator(s): EM/SB Section, Township, Range: Watershed:Oswego/Finger Lakes Coordinates: E;376826 m N:4689809 m Associated Wetland/Water Feature: Sampling Point:stream-Y Photo Number: 10S, 11 N Bank Height Width Slo e A Bank Slo e B Height(A) Width of Surface Water Height(B) Surface Water Substrate Depth Stream Bed Width Slope (A): 25% Slope (B):25% Stream Bed Width:0.5 foot Bank height Width:2 feet Bank Height (A): 6 inches Bank Height (B): 6 inches Surface Water Depth: 1 inch Substrate:Silt and cobble Braided Stream: Yes_ No—✓ _ (If yes, photo number ) Direction of Flow: Unknown Wrack Line: Yes_ _ No—✓ _ (If yes, bank height ) Gradient: 5% OHWM: 0.5 feet Stream Type: Ephemeral ✓ Intermittent Perennial— Riffles/Runs/Pools: None Remarks: Vegetation: Honeysuckle, red maple © 2017, Terrestrial Environmental Specialists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-15 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: 2-1U Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 10 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3532764 Long: -76.4926726 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No / Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 29 to S HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 2-1U Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Acer saccharum 30 ✓ FACU Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Carya ovata 30 ✓ FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 60% =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2 FACU species 60 x 4= 240 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals: 60 (A) 240 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.00 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 — 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover — 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r — 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) — 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation ✓ Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 2-11-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 5 10YR 3/2 100 Silt Loam 5 - 18 10YR 5/3 100 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-15 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: 2-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Toeslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 5 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3533900 Long: -76.4927296 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes If No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 28 to N HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes '/ No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 2-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Acer rubrum 50 ✓ FAC Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Fagus grandifolia 5 FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 66.7 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 55% =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1 FAC species 55 x 3= 165 2. FACU species 7 x 4= 28 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals: 62 (A) 193 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.11 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r _ 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Acer rubrum 5 ✓ FAC data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Polystichum acrostichoides 2 ✓ FACU _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH 9, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 7/ height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes '� No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 2-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 8 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 8 - 15 10YR 3/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loam 15 - 18 2.5Y 5/2 90 2.5Y 5/6 10 C M Clay Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ✓ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-15 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: 3-11JI Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): None Slope(%): 0 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3526719 Long: -76.4940342 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 33 to S HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 3-11U Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2. FACU species 15 x 4= 60 UPL species 60 x 5= 300 3. Column Totals: 75 (A) 360 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.80 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 — 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover — 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r — 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Daucus carota 30 ✓ UPL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Zea mays 30 ✓ UPL _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Trifolium repens 15 ✓ FACU Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 75/ height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation ✓ Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 3-11-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 3 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Clay Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 3 Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-15 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: 3-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Toeslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 5 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3527693 Long: -76.4940985 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LbB - Lansing gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes If No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes If No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 32 to N HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes '/ No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 3-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 80 x 2= 160 1. Cornus amomum 30 ✓ FACW FAC species 30 x 3= 90 2. Cornus racemosa 20 ✓ FAC FACU species 0 x 4= 0 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3' Column Totals: 110 (A) 250 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.27 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 50% Total Cover ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50% = 5 ft r ✓ 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Solidago gigantea 40 If FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Cornus amomum 10 FACW _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Cornus racemosa 10 FAC Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 60% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes '� No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 3-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 3 10YR 3/1 100 Mucky Loam/Clay 3 - 15 10YR 3/1 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Clay Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ✓ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-15 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: 4-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Toeslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 20 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3525896 Long: -76.4960690 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: EbB- Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes If No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes If No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 38 to W HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 4 Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 4-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Acer rubrum 20 ✓ FAC Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 20% =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 70 x 2= 140 1. Cornus racemosa 30 ✓ FAC FAC species 50 x 3= 150 2. FACU species 0 x 4= 0 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3' Column Totals: 120 (A) 290 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.42 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 30% Total Cover ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50% = 5 ft r ✓ 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Onoclea sensibilis 40 If FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Solidago gigantea 30 ✓ FACW _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH 9, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 70% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes '� No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 4-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 8 10YR 4/1 97 10YR 4/6 3 C M Clay Loam 8 - 18 10YR 5/1 75 10YR 4/6 25 C M Clay 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 Stream Determination Data Form Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins Sampling Date: '2/7/2, Applicant/Owner: State:NY Stream ID:Stream Investigator(s):SB/EM Section, Township, Range: Watershed:Oswego/Finger Lakes Coordinates: E:377452 m,N:4690024 m Associated Wetland/Water Feature: Sampling Point:A-1 Photo Number:37 W,38 E Bank Height Width Slo e A Bank Slo e B Height(A) Width of Surface Water Height(B) Surface Water Substrate Depth Stream Bed Width Slope (A): 20% Slope (B):20% Stream Bed Width:6 feet Bank height Width:8-10 feet Bank Height (A): 2 feet Bank Height (B): 2 feet Surface Water Depth:4lnches Substrate:Cobble,gravel,small boulder Braided Stream: Yes_ No—✓ _ (If yes, photo number ) Direction of Flow: East Wrack Line: Yes_✓_ No— _ (If yes, bank height 2 inches ) Gradient: 1°/° OHWM: 2 inches Stream Type: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial ✓ Riffles/Runs/Pools: Remarks: 39 to S, 40 to N Vegetation: Honeysuckle, Canada goldenrod, silky dogwood © 2017, Terrestrial Environmental Specialists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-07 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: A-1U Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 5 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3528763 Long: -76.4869955 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No / Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: 34 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 32 to W, 33 to S, 34 to E HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: A-1U Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 50 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1. Cornus racemosa 40 ✓ FAC FAC species 40 x 3= 120 2 FACU species 35 x 4= 140 UPL species 5 x 5= 25 3. Column Totals: 80 (A) 285 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.56 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 — 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 40% =Total Cover — 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r — 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Solidago canadensis 30 If FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Daucus carota 5 UPL _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Fragaria virginiana 5 FACU Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 40% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation If Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: A-11J Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 10 10YR 3/3 100 Silt Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 10 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-07 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: A-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Toeslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 30 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3529207 Long: -76.4870510 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Ws-Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes,frequently flooded NWI classification: PEM1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes If No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes If No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 35 to E, 36 to N HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 1 Water Table Present? Yes No J Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: A-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 85 x 1 = 85 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 15 x 2= 30 1 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2. FACU species 0 x 4= 0 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals: 100 (A) 115 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.15 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. ✓ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation - ✓ Total Cover 2-Dominance Test is>50% Herb Stratum (Plot size: = - 5 ft r ✓ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Typha latifolia 80 ✓ OBL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Onoclea sensibilis 15 FACW _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Carex stricta 5 OBL Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 100% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes '� No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: A-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 12 10YR 3/1 100 Mucky Loam/Clay 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 12 Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-07 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: 13-1U Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Upland, Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): None Slope(%): 5 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3516718 Long: -76.4881532 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No / Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photos 57 N, 58 W, 59 S HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: B-1U Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status 1 Malus sylvestris 10 ✓ UPL Number of Dominant Species 0 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 10% =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1. Lonicera morrowii 15 ✓ FACU FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2 FACU species 30 x 4= 120 UPL species 20 x 5= 100 3' Column Totals: 50 (A) 220 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.40 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 — 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 15% =Total Cover — 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r — 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Solidago canadensis 15 If FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Artemisia vulgaris 10 ✓ UPL _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 25% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation If Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: B-1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 0 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-07 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: 13-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3516949 Long: -76.4880705 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: PUBFx Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Ifwithin a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 56 E HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 2 Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: B-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status 1 Malus sylvestris 15 ✓ UPL Number of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 80 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 15% =Total Cover OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 35 x 2= 70 1. Cornus amomum 15 ✓ FACW FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 UPL species 15 x 5= 75 3' Column Totals: 60 (A) 155 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.58 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 15% Total Cover ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50% = 5 ft r _ 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Onoclea sensibilis 10 If FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Scirpus cyperinus 10 ✓ OBL _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Soliclago gigantea 10 ✓ FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 30% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes '� No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 13'11W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 18 2.5Y 3/1 100 Mucky Loam/Clay Professional judgement 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ✓ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 Stream Determination Data Form Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins Sampling Date: 12/7/21 Applicant/Owner: State:NY Stream ID:stream c Investigator(s):SB/EM Section, Township, Range: Watershed:Oswego/Finger Lakes Coordinates: E:376621 m,N:4689818 m Associated Wetland/Water Feature: Sampling Point: -1 Photo Number:30 N,31 SW Bank Height Width Slo e A Bank Slo e B Height(A) Width of Surface Water Height(B) Surface Water Substrate Depth Stream Bed Width Slope (A): 5% Slope (B): 50/0 Stream Bed Width: 1 fOot Bank height Width:2feet Bank Height (A): 1 foot Bank Height (B): 1 foot Surface Water Depth:2 inches Substrate:Cobble and gravel Braided Stream: Yes_ No—✓ _ (If yes, photo number ) Direction of Flow:southeast Wrack Line: Yes_✓_ No— _ (If yes, bank height a inches ) Gradient: 5°/° OHWM: 2 inches Stream Type: Ephemeral ✓ Intermittent Perennial Riffles/Runs/Pools: Remarks: Drainage Swale Vegetation: Reed canary grass, giant goldenrod, mugwort © 2017, Terrestrial Environmental Specialists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-07 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: C-1U Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 2 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3518949 Long: -76.4878261 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No / Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 62 to E, 63 to W HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: C-1U Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1. Lonicera morrowii 10 ✓ FACU FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2. FACU species 25 x 4= 100 UPL species 40 x 5= 200 3. Column Totals: 65 (A) 300 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.62 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 - 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 10% =Total Cover - 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r - 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Daucus carota 40 ✓ UPL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Solidago canadensis 15 ✓ FACU _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 55% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation If Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: C-1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 18 10YR 3/3 100 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 18 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-07 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: C-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Toeslope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Convex Slope(%): 15 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3518983 Long: -76.4878861 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: PUBFx Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes If No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 60 to N, 61 to W HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 3 Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: C-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 15 x 1 = 15 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 90 x 2= 180 1 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2. FACU species 0 x 4= 0 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals: 105 (A) 195 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.86 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. ✓ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation - ✓ Total Cover 2-Dominance Test is>50% Herb Stratum (Plot size: = - 5 ft r ✓ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Phalaris arundinacea 90 ✓ FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Scirpus cyperinus 10 OBL _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Typha latifolia 5 OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 105% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: C-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 5 2.5Y 4/1 95 2.5Y 6/6 5 C M Mucky Loam/Clay 5 - 10 2.5Y 4/1 92 2.5Y 6/6 5 C M Mucky Loam/Clay 10YR 3/6 3% 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 10 Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 Stream Determination Data Form Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins Sampling Date: 12/7/21 Applicant/Owner: State:NY Stream ID:stream c Investigator(s):SB/EM Section, Township, Range: Watershed:Oswego/Finger Lakes Coordinates: E:376621 m,N:4689818 m Associated Wetland/Water Feature: Sampling Point: -1 Photo Number:30 N,31 SW Bank Height Width Slo e A Bank Slo e B Height(A) Width of Surface Water Height(B) Surface Water Substrate Depth Stream Bed Width Slope (A): 5% Slope (B): 50/0 Stream Bed Width: 1 fOot Bank height Width:2feet Bank Height (A): 1 foot Bank Height (B): 1 foot Surface Water Depth:2 inches Substrate:Cobble and gravel Braided Stream: Yes_ No—✓ _ (If yes, photo number ) Direction of Flow:southeast Wrack Line: Yes_✓_ No— _ (If yes, bank height a inches ) Gradient: 5°/° OHWM: 2 inches Stream Type: Ephemeral ✓ Intermittent Perennial Riffles/Runs/Pools: Remarks: Drainage Swale Vegetation: Reed canary grass, giant goldenrod, mugwort © 2017, Terrestrial Environmental Specialists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Stream Determination Data Form Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins Sampling Date: 12/7/21 Applicant/Owner: State:NY Stream ID:stream D Investigator(s):SB/EM Section, Township, Range: Watershed:Oswego/Finger Lakes Coordinates: E:376513m,N: 4689742m Associated Wetland/Water Feature: Sampling Point:stream-D Photo Number: 11 N,12 s Bank Height Width Slo e A Bank Slo e B Height(A) Width of Surface Water Height(B) Surface Water Substrate Depth Stream Bed Width Slope (A): 50% Slope (B): 500/0 Stream Bed Width:2 feet Bank height Width:4 feet Bank Height (A): 2 feet Bank Height (B): 2 feet Surface Water Depth:2 inches Substrate:Cobble,gravel,small boulders Braided Stream: Yes_ No—✓ _ (If yes, photo number ) Direction of Flow:south Wrack Line: Yes_ _ No—✓ _ (If yes, bank height ) Gradient: 5% OHWM: 2 inches Stream Type: Ephemeral ✓ Intermittent Perennial Riffles/Runs/Pools: Remarks: Vegetation: Alder, Canada goldenrod, flattop goldenrod, © 2017, Terrestrial Environmental Specialists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Stream Determination Data Form Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins Sampling Date: 12/7/21 Applicant/Owner: State:NY Stream ID:Stream E Investigator(s):SB/EM Section, Township, Range: Watershed:Oswego/Finger Lakes Coordinates: E:376468 m,N:4689721 m Associated Wetland/Water Feature: Sampling Point:E-1 Photo Number: 13 W,14 E Bank Height Width Slo e A Bank Slo e B Height(A) Width of Surface Water Height(B) Surface Water Substrate Depth Stream Bed Width Slope (A): 50% Slope (B): 500/0 Stream Bed Width:5 feet Bank height Width:8 feet Bank Height (A): 1 foot Bank Height (B): 1.5 feet Surface Water Depth:4lnches Substrate:Cobble,gravel,small boulders Braided Stream: Yes_ No—✓ _ (If yes, photo number ) Direction of Flow: East Wrack Line: Yes_✓_ No— _ (If yes, bank height 6 inches ) Gradient: 5°/° OHWM: s inches Stream Type: Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial ✓ Riffles/Runs/Pools: Remarks: Vegetation: Mugwort, poison ivy, sugar maple, American elm © 2017, Terrestrial Environmental Specialists, Inc. All Rights Reserved. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-10 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: F-1U Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): None Slope(%): 0 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3503676 Long: -76.4934523 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: EbB- Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes If No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 21 to SW HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: F-1U Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2. FACU species 100 x 4= 400 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals: 100 (A) 400 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.00 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 - 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover - 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r - 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Elymus hystrix 80 ✓ FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Solidago canadensis 20 ✓ FACU _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 100% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation ✓ Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: F-1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 3 10YR 3/1 100 Loam 3 - 12 10YR 4/1 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M Loam 12 - 18 2.5Y 5/3 80 7.5YR 5/6 20 C M Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) ✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-10 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: F-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): None Slope(%): 0 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3503764 Long: -76.4936507 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: EbB- Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes If No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes If No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 22 to NW HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 4 Water Table Present? Yes No J Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: F-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 60 x 1 = 60 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1 FAC species 15 x 3= 45 2. FACU species 0 x 4= 0 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals: 75 (A) 105 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.40 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r ✓ 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Typha latifolia 50 ✓ OBL data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Cornus racemosa 15 ✓ FAC _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Scirpus cyperinus 10 OBL Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 75/ height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes '� No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: F-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 8 2.5Y 5/2 90 2.5Y 5/6 10 C M Clay Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-10 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: G-1U Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Upland, Flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): None Slope(%): 0 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3509145 Long: -76.4929960 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: EbB- Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes If No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No / Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 20 W HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: G-11.1 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 0 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: NaN (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 2 x 1 = 2 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2 FACU species 75 x 4= 300 UPL species 5 x 5= 25 3. Column Totals: 82 (A) 327 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.99 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 — 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover — 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r — 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Elymus hystrix 65 ✓ FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Erigeron annuus 10 FACU _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Artemisia vulgaris 5 UPL Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. Carex vulpinoidea 2 OBL be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 82/ height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation ✓ Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: G-11-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 5 10YR 4/2 100 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 5 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-10 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: G-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3509782 Long: -76.4929876 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: EbB- Erie channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes If No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes If No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photo 19 E HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes '/ No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: G-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0 1. Cornus racemosa 25 ✓ FAC FAC species 50 x 3= 150 2 FACU species 5 x 4= 20 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals: 55 (A) 170 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.09 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 25% Total Cover ✓ 2-Dominance Test is>50% = 5 ft r _ 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Cornus racemosa 15 If FAC data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Euthamia graminifolia 10 ✓ FAC _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Solidago canadensis 5 FACU Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 30% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes '� No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: G-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 8 10YR 3/1 95 10YR 3/4 5 C M Mucky Loam/Clay 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ✓ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 8 Hydric Soil Present? Yes '� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-07 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: H-1U Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Upland, Flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): None Slope(%): 0 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3503523 Long: -76.4991791 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No / Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No If Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photos 25 E, 26 S, 27 W HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '� Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: H-1U Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 2 x 1 = 2 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 2 x 2= 4 1 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2 FACU species 35 x 4= 140 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3• Column Totals: 39 (A) 146 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.74 6• Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7 — 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover — 2-Dominance Test is>50% 5 ft r — 3-Prevalence Index is<_3.0' Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Elymus hystrix 25 ✓ FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2• Solidago canadensis 10 ✓ FACU _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3• Agrostis gigantea 2 FACW Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. Carex lurida 2 OBL be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5 Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree—Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub—Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 39 height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation ✓ Present? Yes No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: H-1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0 - 5 10YR 3/2 100 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR R, _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR K, L,MLRA 149B) Histic Epipedon(A2) MLRA 149113) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Black Histic(A3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR R,MLRA 149B) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR K, L) _ Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR K, L) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR K, L) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149B) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) _ Mesic Spodic(TA6)(MLRA 144A,145, 149B) Sandy Redox(S5) _ Red Parent Material(F21) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR R,MLRA 14913) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Rock Depth(inches): 5 Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Danby City/County: Danby/Tompkins County Sampling Date: 2021-12-07 Applicant/Owner: State: New York Sampling Point: H-1W Investigator(s): EM, SB Section,Township, Range: 10.-1-21.122 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0 Subregion(LRR or MLRA): R 140 Lat: 42.3505089 Long: -76.4992271 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: LaB - Langford channery silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes If No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No If yes,optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Photos 28 E, 29 W HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks(136) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Drainage Patterns(1310) High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Moss Trim Lines(1316) Saturation(A3) _ Marl Deposits(1315) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief(D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 1 Water Table Present? Yes No J Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region—Version 2.0 VEGETATION- Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: H-1W Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: =Total Cover OBL species 5 x 1 = 5 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r ) FACW species 40 x 2= 80 1 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 2. FACU species 0 x 4= 0 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 3. Column Totals: 45 (A) 85 (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 1.89 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. ✓ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation - ✓ Total Cover 2-Dominance Test is>50% Herb Stratum (Plot size: = - 5 ft r ✓ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' ) _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 1. Phalaris arundinacea 15 ✓ FACW data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 2. Solidago gigantea 15 ✓ FACW _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 3, Onoclea sensibilis 10 ✓ FACW Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 4. Carex vulpinoidea 5 OBL be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 5. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: 6. Tree-Woody plants 3 in.(7.6 cm)or more in diameter 7. at breast height(DBH),regardless of height. 8. Sapling/shrub-Woody plants less than 3 in.DBH g, and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft(1 m)tall. 10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless 11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vines-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 45% height. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r ) 1. 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? Yes '� No =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region-Version 2.0