The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-NSF-Danby-Consolidated-Submission-Package-121721 December 17, 2021 Town of Danby Attn: Mr. West 1830 Danby Road Danby, NY Re: NSF Danby Response Package – 12/17/21 Revised Dear Mr. West: On Behalf of our client, Norbut Solar Farms, LLC. Attached to this letter is the consolidated application package (originally dated 12/08/21) for the Norbut Solar Danby Project, with your noted corrections. Below are any revisions made to the materials since their original submission dates: SECTION 2: Long Environmental Assessment Form – Revised 12/06/21 Revisions to D.2.b, D.2.e.III & E.1.b are to match the new site design, avoiding all wetlands described in the BME Wetlands Report, as well as Wetlands generally described by Tompkins County Online Wetland Mapper. (11/05/21)Revisions are to various sections of the form due to satisfy the comments from the Tompkins County Soils and Water, Tompkins County Planning, TG Miller, P.C. comments, as well as town board members from previous meetings. SECTION 3: Solar Array Civil Design Plans – Revised 12/06/21 Revisions are for new solar array layout to avoid wetlands described in BME Wetlands report. Array layout stays within setbacks & regulated stream buffers set previously. The design also incorporates a new POI location that is set away from Danby Road and away from the ROE Family Barn. (11/05/21)Revisions are across the plan set to satisfy the comments received from the Tompkins County Soils and Water, Tompkins County Planning, TG Miller, P.C. comments, as well as town board members from previous meetings. SECTION 3a: Solar Array Additional Screening Plans – Revised 12/08/21 The screening plans have been revised to show the location of the most up to date proposed access drive. The driveway is farther west from the closest residence at 54 Bald Hill, maintaining a strip of existing vegetation compared to the original road location. Page 2 of 3 SECTION 4: Subdivision Plan – Revised 12/10/21 The subdivision plan was revised to show the new driveway location. The plan was also updated to match the new solar array layout so all parcels have 5MW generative capacity or less; meeting the NYSERDA NY-Sun community solar program requirements. SECTION 5: Electrical Agregate Map – 12/06/21 The Agregate map was revised to match the new site layout described in sections 2 & 3 of this submission iteration above. SECTION 6: Tax Map – Revised 12/08/21 The Tax map in the submission package was not of the project location. The proper tax map of Danby has been placed in the package. (06/30/21) The Tax map of the site has been placed in this package to satisfy application requirement “g” showing actual access to the project site. The parcel is directly connected to Bald Hill Road. SECTION 8: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan – Revised 12/06/21 Revisions are to match the described new solar array layout. The SWPPP makes notice of existing and not to be disturbed ephemeral drainage patterns to prevent alteration to existing drainage patterns. The SHPO Effect Finding Letter has been added to Appendix H of the SWPPP. (09/27/21) Revisions are to provide hydrological calculations and provide a diversion structure to protect the creek to satisfy the comments received from the Tompkins County Soils and Water, Tompkins County Planning, TG Miller, P.C. comments. SECTION 9: Contractor Information & Proof of Liability Insurance – To be Submitted Applicant will provide Name, address and contact information for the professional system installation company prior to start of construction. A system installer has not yet been selected for this project. NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; NSF Danby Site 3, LLC of the Solar Energy facility shall provide the Town Clerk with liability insurance coverage prior to the start of construction and operation. Industry standards are that insurance certificates are generated and provided, to the authority having jurisdiction, prior to, but within reasonable proximity to the start of onsite construction or system operations. Insurances are specific to each project and location and are not typically carried in formal policy until just prior to the start of operations. APPENDIX D: Noise Study – Revised 12/17/21 Revisions are to reflect the new solar array layout that avoids wetlands. APPENDIX E: Visualizations – Revised 12/07/21 Revisions include removing the visualizations for the POI location next to the ROE barn, these visuals are replaced with new ones showing the new proposed driveway & POI location. The visualizations also include showing the POI behind the Town Hall. (11/02/21)Revisions are to show the height of the panels from 16.5’ to 18’ to make sure all panels are still un-visible from all areas previously discussed. Page 3 of 3 APPENDIX H: Wetland Delineation Report – 12/06/21 A Northern Harrier Evaluation Letter by Environmental Resources, LLC is provided in this submission, the letter describes that the site does not currently provide a habitat used by the Northern Harrier. (09/02/21)At the request of the Town, a second wetland delineation map and report is being created by a third party team and will be submitted when completed. The original wetland delineation report by Gene Pellet with Environmental Resources, LLC is included. The additional report will be added to the submission package shortly. Ultimately, the US Army Corps of Engineers is the authority or governing body on the boundaries of the wetlands. The USACE has responded to the request for a site visit. The USACE will provide a Jurisdictional Determination Letter (JD Letter) providing the final say on wetland boundaries for the project area. We have received the following communication from June Lathrop, Administrative Support, at the US Army Corps of Engineers – Your jurisdictional determination request has been received by the Buffalo District Regulatory Branch and assigned Department of the Army File No. LRB-2021-01396 (Norbut Solar Farms, Environmental Resources, LLC – Danby). You will be notified by email when a project manager has been assigned. Sincerely, David L. Cox, PE MBA Associate|Civil Department Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Application Letter from Nixon Peabody – 6/30/21 SECTION 1a: Development Review Application – 6/30/21 SECTION 1b: Agricultural Data Statement – 6/30/21 SECTION 2: Long Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 (Revised) – 12/06/21 SECTION 3: Solar Array Civil Design Plans (Revised) – 12/06/21 SECTION 3a: Solar Array Additional Screening Plans (Revised) – 12/08/21 SECTION 4: Subdivision Plan (Revised) – 12/10/21 SECTION 5: Electrical Aggregate Plans (Revised) – 12/06/21 SECTION 5a: Solar Panel & Inverter Specifications – 06/30/21 SECTION 5b: Photovoltaic Simulation Report – 06/30/21 SECTION 6: Tax Map of Parcel Showing Direct Access to Site – 12/08/21 SECTION 7: Operation, Maintenance & Emergency Response Plan – 06/30/21 SECTION 8: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Revised) – 12/06/21 *SHPO Effect Finding Letter included in Appendix H of the SWPPP report. SECTION 9: Contractor & Proof of Liability Insurance (To be submitted at a later date) SECTION 10: Decommissioning Plan – 06/30/21 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A: Sample of Proposed Fence – 06/30/21 APPENDIX B: SHPO Historic Resources Report – 11/01/21 APPENDIX C: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment – 07/15/21 APPENDIX D: Noise Study (Revised) – 12/17/21 APPENDIX E: Visualizations (Revised) – 11/02/21 APPENDIX F: Response Letters to Tompkins County – 09/27/21 APPENDIX G: Response Letter to TG Miller – 09/20/21 APPENDIX H: Wetland Delineation Report by BME Associates & Northern Harrier Evaluation Letter – 12/06/21 Nathan E. Vander Wal, Esq. T 585-263-1312 nvanderwal@nixonpeabody.com 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604-1792 585-263-1000 4822-9466-6992.1 June 30, 2021 Town Board Planning Board Town of Danby 1830 Danby Road Ithaca, NY 14850 RE: Application to the Town of Danby Town Board and Planning Board for the Establishment of a Planned Development Zone for Property Located at No Number Bald Hill Road, Town of Danby, Tompkins County, New York, Tax Parcel No. 10.-1-21.122, to Accommodate the Development and Operation of a Solar Energy Generation Facility Dear Members of the Town Board and the Planning Board: Norbut Solar Farm, LLC; NSF Danby Site 1, LLC; NSF Danby Site 2, LLC; and NSF Danby Site 3, LLC (the “Applicant”) proposes to construct three 5-MW(AC) ground-mounted photovoltaic (PV) electricity generation facilities (the “Project”) on certain undeveloped land located at No Number Bald Hill Road in the Town of Danby, Tax Parcel No. 10.-1-21.122 (the “Site”). The Project includes the construction of three (3) immediately adjacent PV facilities at the Site, with related improvements to include pad-mounted electrical equipment, overhead electrical interconnection to existing public utilities, a gravel access drive, perimeter security fencing, limited land grading, and stormwater management improvements. The Property is located in the Medium Density Residential (MD) Zoning District. The Project, a “Solar Energy Facility” under the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Danby (the “Code”), is not a permitted use in the MD district. However, pursuant to the Code, and following discussions with the Town Planner, David West, Section 604 of the Code provides for the establishment of a Planned Development Zone (“PD Zone”) to accommodate certain development of land within the Town, including a Solar Energy Facility, and to establish appropriate standards pursuant to which such development shall occur. Accordingly, the following enclosures are submitted for the Town’s review connection with the establishment of a PD Zone at the Property for the Project (collectively, the “Application”): • Town Development Application Form for Establishment of PD Zone, Site Plan and Subdivision Approvals for Project • Project Site Plan in compliance with Code Sections 800 (Rezoning) and 808 (Solar Energy Facility) 4822-9466-6992.1 Town of Danby Town Board and Planning Board June 30, 2021 Page 2 • Long Environmental Assessment Form • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan • Project Operation and Maintenance Plan • Project Decommissioning Plan • Landscape Screening Plan • Agricultural Data Statement • Emergency Response Plan • PV Array Layout and Design Drawing • Three line Diagrams • Project Equipment Specifications As reflected in the above-referenced enclosures, the proposed PD Zone meets the regulations set out for a PD Zone under Section 604 of the Code, except as reflected in the Project Site Plan, for which regulations the Applicant will seek a waiver or alteration from the Town Board pursuant to Section 604(2) of the Code. Given the Site’s location within 500 feet of a farm operation in the TOMP002 Agricultural District, the Project must be referred to the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability, as required under New York General Municipal Law Section 239-m, and the Applicant has submitted an Agricultural Data Statement (with adjoiner exhibit) pursuant to Town Law Section 283-a. The Applicant respectfully requests that the Town make the required GML 239-m referral and mail the written notice to the landowners identified in the adjoiner exhibit to the Ag Data Statement. Upon receipt and review of the enclosed materials, please place this Application on the next available meeting agenda for the Town Planning Board pursuant to Section 800 of the Code. If the Town requires any additional information or materials to deem this Application preliminarily complete, please let us know. We look forward to working with the Town in connection with this exciting opportunity. Thank you. Sincerely, Nathan E. Vander Wal 06/29/2021 Rev. June 27, 2019 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT Town of Danby Tax Parcel No. _______________ Tompkins County Agricultural District No. 1 or 2 NOTE: Section 283-a of the Town Law (effective July 1, 1993) requires that any application for a Special Permit, Site Plan Approval, Use Variance or Subdivision Approval on property within an Agricultural District containing a farm operation, OR on property with boundaries within five hundred (500) feet of a farm operation that is located in an Agricultural District, include an Agricultural Data Statement. ALL applications requiring an Agricultural Data Statement must be referred to the Tompkins County Planning Board in accordance with amended section 239-m and 239-n of the General Municipal Law (effective July 1, 1993). Part I: Agricultural Data Statement Name of Applicant __________________________________________________________________ Mailing Address __________________________________________________________________ Description of Project________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Names and addresses of those owners of land within Tompkins County Agricultural District #1 or #2 that contain farm operations AND are located within five hundred (500) feet of the project property: 1. ________________________________________________________________ 2. ________________________________________________________________ 3. ________________________________________________________________ 4. ________________________________________________________________ 5._________________________________________________________________ Attach to this form a copy of a tax map showing the site of the proposed project relative to the locations of farm operations identified above. Farm Operations are defined as “...the land used in agricultural production, farm buildings, equipment and farm residential buildings” according to Section 301, Article 25 AA of the Agricultural and Markets Law. Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Agricultural District Review 2019 Ü 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30.25 Miles TOWN OF DANBY Removals Additions Agricultural District 1 Agricultural District 2 Municipal Boundaries Page 1 of 13 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A.Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO:State: Zip Code: Page 2 of 13 B. Government Approvals B.Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Required Application Date (Actual or projected) a.City Counsel, Town Board, 9 Yes 9 No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village 9 Yes 9 No Planning Board or Commission c.City, Town or 9 Yes 9 No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies 9 Yes 9 No e. County agencies 9 Yes 9 No f. Regional agencies 9 Yes 9 No g. State agencies 9 Yes 9 No h. Federal agencies 9 Yes 9 No i. Coastal Resources. i.Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?9 Yes 9 No ii.Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? 9 Yes 9 No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?9 Yes 9 No C. Planning and Zoning C.1. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the 9 Yes 9 No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? •If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. •If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site 9 Yes 9 No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes 9 No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; 9 Yes 9 No Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance.9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit?9 Yes 9 No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i.What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. What parks serve the project site? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action?_____________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed?_____________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?_____________ acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i.Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? 9 Yes 9 No iii.Number of lots proposed? ________ iv.Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ 9 Yes 9 No _____ months _____ _____ month _____ year e.Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? i.If No, anticipated period of construction: ii.If Yes: •Total number of phases anticipated •Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) •Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year •Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 4 of 13 f. Does the project include new residential uses?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family (four or more) Initial Phase ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ At completion of all phases ___________ ___________ ____________ ________________________ g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii.Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii.Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes 9 No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i.Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii.If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams 9 Other specify: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v.Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi.Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? 9 Yes 9 No (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii.How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? •Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ •Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii.Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? 9 Yes 9 No If yes, describe. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v.What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi.What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii.What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii.Will the excavation require blasting?9 Yes 9 No ix.Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes 9 No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i.Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 13 ii. iii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: ___________________________________________________________ •expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:________________________________________ •purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ •if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v.Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/day ii.Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ •Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? 9 Yes 9 No •Is the project site in the existing district? 9 Yes 9 No •Is expansion of the district needed? 9 Yes 9 No •Do existing lines serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No iii.Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? 9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv.Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? 9 Yes 9 No If, Yes: •Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ •Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ •Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v.If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi.If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/day ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ •Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ •Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project?9 Yes 9 No • Is the project site in the existing district?9 Yes 9 No • Is expansion of the district needed?9 Yes 9 No Page 6 of 13 9 Yes 9 No •Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? •Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv.Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: •Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ •Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ •What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v.If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi.Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes 9 No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i.How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii.Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ •If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties?9 Yes 9 No iv.Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater?9 Yes 9 No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 Yes 9 No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,9 Yes 9 No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i.Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet 9 Yes 9 No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii.In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) •___________Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 7 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,9 Yes 9 No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i.Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes 9 No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i.When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii.For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): _____________ iii. iv. v. Parking spaces: Existing ___________________ Proposed ___________ Net increase/decrease _____________________ Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No 9 Yes 9 No vi.Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing 9 Yes 9 No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 Yes 9 No for energy? If Yes: i.Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation?9 Yes 9 No l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction:ii.During Operations: •Monday - Friday: _________________________•Monday - Friday: ____________________________ •Saturday: ________________________________•Saturday: ___________________________________ •Sunday: _________________________________•Sunday: ____________________________________ •Holidays: ________________________________•Holidays: ___________________________________ If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 8 of 13 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction,9 Yes 9 No operation, or both? If yes: i.Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen?9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ n. W th ill prop e os actio ed hav n e outd ligh oor ting? 9 Yes 9 No If yes: i.Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen?9 Yes 9 No Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ o.Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p.9 Yes 9 No Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i.Product(s) to be stored ______________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) iii.Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides,9 Yes 9 No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: i.Describe proposed treatment(s): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices?9 Yes 9 No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal 9 Yes 9 No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i.Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: •Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) •Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: •Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: •Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ •Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 9 of 13 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: •________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or •________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii.If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes 9 No waste? If Yes: i.Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v.Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i.Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. 9 Urban 9 Industrial 9 Commercial 9 Residential (suburban) 9 Rural (non-farm) 9 Forest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic 9 Other (specify): ____________________________________ ii.If mix of uses, generally describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Covertype Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change (Acres +/-) •Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces •Forested •Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) •Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) •Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) •Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) •Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) •Other Describe: _______________________________ ________________________________________ Page 10 of 13 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes: explain: __________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes 9 No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i.Identify Facilities: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Does the project site contain an existing dam?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: •Dam height: _________________________________ feet •Dam length: _________________________________ feet •Surface area: _________________________________ acres •Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii.Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii.Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility,9 Yes 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed?9 Yes 9 No •If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii.Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i.Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i.Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: 9 Yes – Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Yes – Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ________________________________ 9 Neither database ii.If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database?9 Yes 9 No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): ______________________________________________________________________________ iv.If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 11 of 13 v.Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses?9 Yes 9 No •If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ •Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ •Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ •Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ •Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place?9 Yes 9 No •Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? ________________ feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: ___________________________ __________% ___________________________ __________% ____________________________ __________% d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: 9 Well Drained:_____% of site 9 Moderately Well Drained: _____% of site 9 Poorly Drained _____% of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 9 0-10%:_____% of site 9 10-15%: _____% of site 9 15% or greater: _____% of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes, describe: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ h. Surface water features. i.Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers,9 Yes 9 No ponds or lakes)? ii.Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii.Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal,9 Yes 9 No state or local agency? iv.For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: •Streams: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ •Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________•Wetlands: Name ____________________________________________ Approximate Size ___________________ •Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v.Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 9 Yes 9 No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i.Is the project site in a designated Floo dway?9 Yes 9 No j.Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain?9 Yes 9 No k.Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain?9 Yes 9 No l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 12 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii.Extent of community/habitat: •Currently: ______________________ acres •Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres •Gain or loss (indicate + or -): ______________________ acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as 9 Yes 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of 9 Yes 9 No special concern? q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing?9 Yes 9 No If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes 9 No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present?9 Yes 9 No i.If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii.Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes 9 No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i.Nature of the natural landmark: 9 Biological Community 9 Geological Feature ii.Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i.CEA name: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Basis for designation: _____________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Designating agency and date: ______________________________________________________________________________ If Yes: i.Species and listing (endangered or threatened):______________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If Yes: i.Species and listing:____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 13 of 13 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district 9 Yes 9 No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: 9 Archaeological Site 9 Historic Building or District ii.Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for 9 Yes 9 No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site?9 Yes 9 No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii.Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h.9 Yes 9 No Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i.Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii.Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii.Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9 Yes 9 No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i.Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii.Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666?9 Yes 9 No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Date_______________________________________ Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________ EAF Mapper Summary Report Saturday, June 26, 2021 10:30 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area]No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area]No C.2.b. [Special Planning District]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Potential Contamination History] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Listed] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Environmental Site Remediation Database] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site] No E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features]No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features]Yes E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features]Yes E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features]Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Name] 898-339, 898-338 E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Classification] B, C E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Name] Federal Waters E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies]No E.2.i. [Floodway]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. 1Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.l. [Aquifers]Yes E.2.l. [Aquifer Names]Principal Aquifer E.2.n. [Natural Communities]Yes E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Name]Rich Hemlock-Hardwood Peat Swamp E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Acres]0.0 E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species]Yes E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species - Name] Northern Harrier E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals]No E.3.a. [Agricultural District]Yes E.3.a. [Agricultural District]TOMP002 E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark]No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area]No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites]No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor]No 2Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report ED G E O F P A V E M E N T E D G E O F P A V E M E N T SH O U L D E R SH O U L D E R W H I T E D A S H E D L I N E WH I T E S O L I D L I N E RO A D ℄ & D O U B L E Y E L L O W S O L I D L I N E ED G E O F P A V E M E N T E D G E O F P A V E M E N T SH O U L D E R SH O U L D E R W H I T E D A S H E D L I N E WH I T E S O L I D L I N E RO A D ℄ & D O U B L E Y E L L O W S O L I D L I N E x HP:1211.912 1 1 12 1 1 12101209 12101209120 8 No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 200100 400 SCALE: 1"=200' HORIZONTAL SCALE 200 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 0 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n COVER C 101 1 1" = 200' SITE PLANS FOR NORBUT SOLAR DANBY TOWN OF DANBY, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NEW YORK P.N. 20213129.0001 SHEET C 105SHEET C 103 SHEET C 102 SHEET C 104 SHEET C 106 SHEET C 107 SHEET C 109 SHEET C 108 DRAWING INDEX C 101 COVER C 102 - 110 SITE PLANS C 201- 202 NOTES & DETAILS T/A 10-1-57 N/F RADIN REAL ESTATE LLC INSTRUMENT #591007-003 T/A 10-1-56 N/F MONTGOMERY INSTRUMENT #2018-10051 T/ A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 5 5 N / F W E A V E R I N S T R U M E N T # 2 0 1 4 - 0 3 2 5 5 T/A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 1 N/F MC G R A T H / V I N E Y A R D IN S T R U M E N T #20 2 0 - 1 2 8 8 1 T/A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 3 1 N/F M C G R A T H / V I N E Y A R D IN S T R U M E N T # 2 0 2 0 - 1 2 8 8 1 T / A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 3 2 N / F H O L L Y D A Y / B E N S O N LI B E R 7 0 8 O F D E E D S , P A G E 5 T/A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 8 N/F E A S T M A N / R Y C R O F T INS T R U M E N T # 4 2 9 2 0 5 - 0 0 1 T/ A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 2 3 N / F D E Y O U N G I N S T R U M E N T # 2 0 1 7 - 0 9 1 5 4 T/ A 1 0 - 1 - 2 1 . 1 6 N / F O A T E S I N S T R U M E N T # 5 2 4 5 8 8 - 0 0 2 T/A 1 0 - 1 - 5 4 . 2 N/F R U D D / C O U L O M B E INS T R U M E N T #20 1 9 - 1 1 6 8 6 T/A 10-1-21.15 N/F BEENERS INSTRUMENT #450507-001 T/A 10-1-21.14 N/F STIEFEL INSTRUMENT #2018-07355 T/A 10-1-19.12 N/F ROE LIBER 610 OF DEEDS, PAGE 852 T/A 10-1-23 N/F TOWN OF DANBY LIBER 245 OF DEEDS, PAGE 484 T/A 10-1-19.12 N/F ROE LIBER 610 OF DEEDS, PAGE 852 T/A 10-1-19.11 N/F BALL INSTRUMENT # 2510-4234 T/A 10-1-19.12 N/F ROE LIBER 610 OF DEEDS, PAGE 852 T/A 10-1-19.2 N/F ROE LIBER 880 OF DEEDS, PAGE 25 T/A 9-1-11.22 N/F BRUCE/AUGE LIBER 859 OF DEEDS, PAGE 67 T/A 9-1-11.42 N/F BRUCE/AUGE LIBER 859 OF DEEDS, PAGE 67 T/A 9-1-13.22 N/F NITCHMAN INSTRUMENT #2020-12573 T/A 9-1-13.23 N/F MASTROBERTI INSTRUMENT #2018-06188 T/A 10-1-57.11 N/F SHALLOWAY INSTRUMENT #590094-001 T/A 10-1-57.32 N/F RADIN REAL ESTATE LLC INSTRUMENT #2015-06571 T/A 10-1-21.124 N/F MONTGOMERY INSTRUMENT #2018-10051 SHEET C 110 N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62' N0 ° 0 1 ' 1 3 " E 4 7 8 . 2 6 ' N89°17'09"E 460.00' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N89°19'46"W 1005.62' SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16' 16' 16 ' 16' 16 ' 23'23' 23' 23'23'15' 15'15' 50 ' 75' 50 ' 15 8 ' 17 4 ' PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE SFSF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) 70' 27 ' 26 ' 83' 14 4 ' EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 1 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 102 2 1" = 40' DISTURBANCE AREAS CONCRETE PAD TOTAL SF TOTAL AC 2.58 AC 112,243 SF 6 PADS (15.5' X 13' PAD) = 1,209 SF NOTE: THE SITE IS NOT WITHIN A 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN PER FIRM MAP 360845 B DATED 6/25/1976. FENCELINE 14,317 LF * 1' = 14,317 SF PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES MATCH LINE C 103 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 4 NOTE: TOWN OF DANBY REQUIRES <25% SITE COVERAGE (DISTURBANCE AREAS + PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE + SOLAR ARRAYS) 112,243 SF DISTURBANCE AREAS + 1,093,306 SF SOLAR ARRAYS = 1,205,549 SF = 27.68 AC 27.68 AC / 111.59 PARCEL SIZE = (24.80%) COVERAGE MATCH LINE C 103 96,717 SFPERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' N1 ° 2 8 ' 1 8 " E 4 0 1 . 2 8 ' N2 ° 0 6 ' 5 5 " E 3 5 1 . 1 5 ' N1 ° 4 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 9 6 . 3 1 ' SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16 ' 16' 16' 23' 23' 23' 23' 15' 15' 75' 50 ' 50 ' PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE 35 ' 40 ' 49' 68' EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 1 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 103 3 1" = 40' MATCH LINE C 102 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 5 MATCH LINE C 102 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS N89°49'58"W 1532.08'N89°49'58"W 1532.08' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 16 15' 16 16'16' 16 ' 50 ' 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50' TRIBUTARYBU F F E R TWO PAD MOUNTED SWITCHBOARDS W/ XFMR & PV EQUIPMENT (TYP.) 20 ' PROPOSED ACCESS GATE 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 14 9 ' NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR S F SF S F S F S F SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) SF SF 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 SF SF S F S F 20 ' 20'20' 28'R 2 8 ' R 28'R 2 8 ' R 16 ' 16 ' S F S F MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 6 No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 2 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 104 4 1" = 40' MATCH LINE C 105 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 2 MATCH LINE C 105 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFPROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16' 16' 16 ' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 15' 15' 50 ' 50 ' PROPOSED TREELINE 33 ' 16' 16' 16 ' 16' 16 ' 23'15' PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR MATCH LINE C 104 No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 2 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 105 5 1" = 40' MATCH LINE C 104 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 7 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 3 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' N89°18'34"W 1049.08' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 4 1 6 . 0 0 ' SF S F SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF S F SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 965' 16 ' 16 ' 23' 23' 23' 16' 16 15' 50 ' 75' 50' TRI B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50' TRI B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50 ' TWO PAD MOUNTED SWITCHBOARDS W/ XFMR & PV EQUIPMENT (TYP.) 20 ' 20' 90 ' 20 ' 20 ' 20' 90 ' 10' R 1 0 ' R 28'R 48' R 28'R 2 8 ' R 28'R 48' R 28'R 48'R 28 ' R 48 ' R 28'R 48'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED ACCESS GATE D 64"X40" END INV=1304.35 D-1 65"X40" END INV=1303.10 39 LF 65"X40" CMP ARCH STM.@ 3.20% D-2 65"X40" END INV=1296.40 D-3 65"X40" END INV=1295.10 39 LF 65"X40" CMP ARCH STM.@ 3.31% 50' TRI B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50' TRI B U T A R Y B U F F E R 30 ' 30 ' SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF NATURAL SCREENING AREA OF HONEYSUCKLE SHRUB AND NATURAL VEGETATION TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. MAINTAIN TO A HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 25" PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE PR O P O S E D T R E E L I N E PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR S F SF S F 60' TO PROPOSED CLEARING LIMIT 19 ' 19 ' 20 ' PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) 16 ' 23'16' PROPOSED SILT FENCE No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 3 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 106 6 1" = 40' MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 8 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 4 MATCH LINE C 107MATCH LINE C 107 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS S89°51'55"E 3573.55'S89°51'55"E 3573.55'7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 965' 16 ' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23' 23'23'16 16 16 50 ' 50 ' PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE 5 0 ' T R I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 5 0 ' T R I B U T A R Y B U F F E R SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF S F SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR 25 ' PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) MATCH LINE C 108 No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 3 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 107 7 1" = 40' MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 9 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 5 MATCH LINE C 108 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16 ' 23'16' 50 ' A R R A Y B U F F E R 20 ' 75' 75' 50 ' 43 ' 20 ' 1 0 0 ' S O L A R A R R A Y T O A D J A C E N T S T R U C T U R E S B U F F E R 28'R 48'R 28'R 48'R 2 8 ' R 4 8 ' R 28'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED 20' DOUBLE SWING BARRIER GATE WITH LOCK AND OPTIONAL ARM GATE & POST SAFETY TAPE KIT. PRODUCED BY BARRIER GATE BRANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL. SF SF SF NATURAL SCREENING AREA OF HONEYSUCKLE SHRUB AND NATURAL VEGETATION TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. MAINTAIN TO A HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 25" 73 ' 87 ' 30 ' 48 ' R 28 ' R SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE EXISTING 12" CPP TO BE EXTENDED BY 11'. INV=1256.68 NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE PER DETAIL. PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE ENDS AT PROPOSED GATE EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE FOR #54 BALD HILL ROAD TO MAINTAIN EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS. #54 BALD HILL ROAD TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED D-5 12" END INV=1258.32 D-4 12" END INV=1258.82 23 LF 12" HDPE STM.@ 2.20% 171' TO CLEARING LIMI T S 18 ' 20' No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 3 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 108 8 1" = 40' MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 6 MATCH LINE C 109MATCH LINE C 109 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) N89°07'38"W 30.04' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E S1 ° 5 5 ' 1 1 " E 34 . 1 6 ' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S1°55'11"E 5.10' N89°05'50"E 874.40' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 23' 23' 23' 23'16' 16' 16' 50 ' 50 ' 75' 75' 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 28'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE SF SF SF PR O P O S E D T R E E L I N E 48'R 48' R 28'R 28' R 2 0 ' S F S F S F S F SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR. DOUBLE SILT FENCE IN PROXIMITY TO TRUCK/CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED TRUCK/CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. AREA TO BE INSTALLED PER DETAILS AND REMOVED WHEN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED. AREA TO BE RETURNED TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. S F 22 ' 315' TO PROPOSED CLEARING LIMITS PROPOSED SILT FENCE SF SF S F SF SF SF SF 16 ' 16 ' 16' No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 4 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 109 9 1" = 40' TRUCK WASHDOWN AREA N.T.S. PROVIDE 12" THICK STONE BASE WITH 2% MIN. CROSS SLOPE 8' WIDE MIN. 3' DEEP MIN. NOTE: A 10 MIL LINER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WASHDOWN AREA. WASHDOWN AREA TO BE CLEANED OUT AT 75% CAPACITY. MATCH LINE C 108 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 7 MATCH LINE C 108 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS MATCH LINE C 110 D A N B Y R O A D S T A T E R O U T E 9 6 B ( R . O . W . V A R I E S ) C H M E A S . = N 8 ° 5 4 ' 2 1 " W 2 7 0 . 3 0 ' E D G E O F P A V E M E N T E D G E O F P A V E M E N T S H O U L D E R S H O U L D E R W H I T E D A S H E D L I N E W H I T E S O L I D L I N E R O A D ℄ & D O U B L E Y E L L O W S O L I D L I N E D A N B Y R O A D S T A T E R O U T E 9 6 B ( R . O . W . V A R I E S ) C H M E A S . = N 8 ° 5 4 ' 2 1 " W 2 7 0 . 3 0 ' E D G E O F P A V E M E N T E D G E O F P A V E M E N T S H O U L D E R S H O U L D E R W H I T E D A S H E D L I N E W H I T E S O L I D L I N E R O A D ℄ & D O U B L E Y E L L O W S O L I D L I N E N90°00'00"W 192.96' S55°16'16"E 133.69' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E 52 . 7 5 ' N0°00'00"E 86.29' N5 ° 0 5 ' 5 5 " E 18 6 . 2 8 ' S87°16'05"W 356.78' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S0°00'00"E 52.24' N90°00'00"E 153.58' S55°16'16"E 128.39' S0°00'00"E 27.86' N90°00'00"W 106.40' N3 ° 3 0 ' 3 7 " E 23 7 . 9 5 ' N87°16'05"E 234.33' S89°53'58"E 83.28' S 1 7 ° 4 0 ' 5 5 " E 4 1 . 4 0 ' EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) APPROXIMATE 30-FT WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT APPROXIMATE EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC LINES AND INTERCONNECTION ACCESS (TYP) APPROXIMATE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES (TYP.) PROPOSED NINE (9) NYSEG OWNED POWER POLES, 3 PER SITE CONNECTION. TO REMAIN 33.4' 3 0 2 . 1 ' 82.3' 1 5 9 . 3 ' 65 . 5 ' PROPOSED NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE PER DETAIL. THREE ARRAY POWER LINES CARRIED BY ONE POLE THREE OVERHEAD WIRE CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC GRID 40 ' 20 ' 50 ' 20'20' 15' 39 ' 15'15'15' PROPOSED SIX (6) CUSTOMER OWNED POWER POLES, 2 PER SITE CONNECTION. 20' D-7 65"X40" END INV=1207.85 D-6 65"X40" END INV=1208.00 1211 1 2 1 0 12 0 9 1 2 0 8 1 2 1 0 1 2 0 9 1 2 0 8 1 2 0 7 12 0 7 1 2 0 8 1 2 0 9 1 2 0 9 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 36 LF 65"x40" CMP ARCH STM.@ 0.42% x HP:1211.91 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 12101209 12101209120 8 PROPOSED 20' DOUBLE SWING BARRIER GATE WITH LOCK AND OPTIONAL ARM GATE & POST SAFETY TAPE KIT. PRODUCED BY BARRIER GATE BRANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL. 50' No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y E S & C . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 4 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 110 10 1" = 40' MATCH LINE C 109 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 9 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y N O T E S & D E T A I L S . D W G 12 / 7 / 2 0 2 1 2 : 1 4 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n NOTES & DETAILS C 201 11 N/A EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, AND IF NECESSARY, MODIFY THE PLAN WITH THE CONTRACTOR'S INTENDED SEQUENCE AND TYPES OF OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR'S MODIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL, ALONG WITH A PROGRESS SCHEDULE THAT ADDRESSES THIS WORK. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE AN "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR" FOR THE PROJECT. THE SUPERVISOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND FOR INSPECTING AND MAINTAINING THE CONTROL MEASURES. THE NAME AND QUALIFICATIONS (TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE) OF THIS INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO STARTING EARTHWORK. 3.THE DESIGNATED "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR" SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN ADVANCE OF ANY FIELD CHANGES TO THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE ENGINEER MAY REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT A MODIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING ANY FIELD CHANGES. 4.THE SITE SHALL AT ALL TIMES BE GRADED AND MAINTAINED SUCH THAT ALL STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS IS DIVERTED TO SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE. 5.EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SOIL DISTURBANCE FOR WHICH THEY ARE INTENDED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL SOILS ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 6.UNDER NO CONDITION SHALL DISCONTINUED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN AREAS WITH SOIL DISTURBANCES BE LEFT FOR A PERIOD OF GREATER THAN 7 DAYS WITHOUT TEMPORARILY STABILIZING THOSE AREAS WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH. MAINTENANCE OF THOSE AREAS SHALL INCLUDE RESEEDING AND REMULCHING AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS. THERE SHALL BE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR RESEEDING AND REMULCHING. NO WET OR FRESH CONCRETE, LEACHATE, MATERIAL, OR DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ESCAPE INTO A WATER BODY OR WETLAND, NOR SHALL WASHINGS FROM CONCRETE TRUCKS, MIXERS OR OTHER DEVICES BE ALLOWED TO ENTER A WATER BODY OR WETLAND. ANY MATERIAL OR DEBRIS ACCIDENTALLY DROPPED INTO THE CHANNEL SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY AND COMPLETELY REMOVED AND DEPOSITED IN AN UPLAND AREA. 7.AT THE VERY MINIMUM, EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. EROSION CONTROL MAY CONSIST OF SEDIMENT TRAPS AND/OR ENVIRONMENTAL FENCES. THE CONTRACTOR AND THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INTEGRITY, MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL NO LONGER DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE TOWN OR IT'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM UNTIL THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN AND OWNER. SEEDING NOTE TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING SEED MIXTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION: TEMPORARY SEEDING: RYEGRASS (ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL) @ 30LBS. PER ACRE OR 0.7 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET. PERMANENT SEEDING: 65% KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLEND @ 85LBS. PER ACRES OR 2.0-2.6 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET 20% PERENNIAL RYEGRASS @ 26-35 LBS. PER ACRE OR 0.6-0.8 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET 15% FINE FESCUE @ 19-26 LBS. PER ACRE OR 0.4-0.6 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET FOR ALL SEEDING & STABILIZATION MEASURES IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER & DEVELOPER TO ENSURE THAT FINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS AS REQUIRED BY THE NYSDEC. AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY CEASES FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE. ONCE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CEASES PERMANENTLY IN AN AREA, THAT AREA WILL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT SEED AND MULCH. AFTER THE ENTIRE SITE IS STABILIZED, THE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT BASIN(s). CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: 1.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 2.CONSTRUCT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 3.GRADE IMPROVEMENTS AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY CEASES FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE. 4.SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 10 DAYS AFTER FINAL GRADING, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RESEED IF GRADING IS UNSATISFACTORY. 5.UPON APPROVAL OF THE TOWN, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROLS. 6.ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED BASED UPON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AOBE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR THIS COST IN HIS CONTRACT. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FROM INSTALLATION THROUGH MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL AFTER REVEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 8.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL METHODS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NEW YORK STATE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" MESH SPACING) 36" MIN. LENGTH FENCE POSTS DRIVEN MIN. 16" INTO GROUND. HEIGHT OF FILTER = 16" MIN. 8" MIN.FLO W FLO W 10' MAX. C. TO C. 5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION. FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 14 GAUGE, 6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER- LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, OR STAPLES. POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER "T" OR "U" TYPE OR HARDWOOD. 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. MIRAFI 100X, STABILINKA T140N, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. EMBED FILTER CLOTH A MIN. OF 6" IN GROUND. 4" 16"MIN. WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" MESH SPACING) WITH FILTER CLOTH 36" MIN. FENCE POST FLOW COMPACTED SOIL 20"MIN. PERSPECTIVE VIEW SECTION VIEW L L SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. UNDISTURBED GROUND NYSDAM DECOMISSIONING NOTES: 1.DECOMMISSIONING 2.IF THE OPERATION OF THE GENERATION FACILITY IS PERMANENTLY DISCONTINUED, REMOVE ALL ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES 3.(INCLUDING PANELS, RACKING, SIGNAGE, EQUIPMENT PAD, SECURITY FENCING) AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IF LESS THAN 48- 4.INCHES DEEP. ALL CONCRETE PIERS, FOOTERS, OR OTHER SUPPORTS MUST BE REMOVED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 48-INCHES 5.BELOW THE SOIL SURFACE. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS LOCATED AT THE RESPECTIVE RANGE 6.OF DEPTH BELOW THE SURFACE: 7.• 48-INCHES PLUS: ALL UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONDUITS AND DIRECT BURIED CONDUCTORS MAY BE ABANDONED IN 8.PLACE. APPLICABLE CONDUIT RISERS MUST BE REMOVED, AND ABANDONED CONDUIT MUST BE SEALED OR CAPPED TO 9.AVOID A POTENTIAL TO DIRECT SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE ONTO NEIGHBORING LAND USES. 10.• LESS THAN 48-INCHES: ALL UNDERGROUND DIRECT BURIED ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS AND CONDUCTORS IN CONDUIT AND 11.ASSOCIATED CONDUIT WITH LESS THAN 48-INCHES OF COVER MUST BE REMOVED, BY MEANS OF CAUSING THE LEAST 12.AMOUNT OF DISTURBANCE AS POSSIBLE. 13.ACCESS ROADS IN AGRICULTURAL AREAS MUST BE REMOVED, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE LANDOWNER. IF ACCESS IS TO 14.BE REMOVED, TOPSOIL WILL HAVE TO BE RETURNED FROM RECORDED PROJECT EXCESS NATIVE TOPSOIL DISPOSAL AREAS, IF 15.PRESENT, OR IMPORTED TOPSOIL FREE OF INVASIVE SPECIES THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE QUALITY OF TOPSOIL ON THE AFFECTED 16.SITE. RESTORE ALL AREAS INTENDED FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION, ACCORDING TO RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE CURRENT 17.LANDOWNER OR LEASING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCER, AND AS REQUIRED BY ANY APPLICABLE PERMIT, THE SOIL AND WATER 18.CONSERVATION DISTRICT, AND NYSDAM. 19.MONITORING AND RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE TO THE PRIOR SECTIONS OF THESE GUIDELINES, WILL BE REQUIRED 20.FOR THE DECOMMISSION CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 3'5:1 PLAN VIEW PROFILE EXISTING GROUND FILTER CLOTH EXISTING PAVEMENT MOUNTABLE BERM (OPTIONAL) EXISTING PAVEMENT 10'MIN. 10'MIN. 15'MIN. 50'MIN. 12"MIN. EXISTING GROUND 50'MIN. 12'MIN. 1. STONE SIZE - USE 2" STONE, OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. 2. LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET (EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE A 30 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH WOULD APPLY). 3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES. 4. WIDTH - FIFTEEN (15) FOOT MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS. TWENTY-FOUR (24) FOOT IF SINGLE ENTRANCE TO SITE. 5. FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE. 6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. 7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 8. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON A AREA STABILIZED WITH STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. 9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. FENCE SUPPORT POLE INSTALLATION DETAIL N.T.S. 5' 7' SOLIDLOCK PRO 20 PROFESSIONAL STRENGTH FIXED KNOT FENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL CLASS 5 WOODEN POLE. MINIMUM SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE OR DOUGLAS FIR. SET 10.0' O.C. ALL POLES TO BE SET PLUMB. N.T.S. 4' MIN. (TYP.) SELECT GRANULAR FILL NYSDOT ITEM 203.07 PAVEMENT SECTION 65" 40" SEE PLANS 6"2' 18" PROPOSED RIP RAP SCOUR PROTECTION NYSDEC CLASS III, FROM TABLE 5B.3 FROM NYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (TYP) ALUMINUM BASE CHANNEL 115 16" CONCRETE FOUNDATION (4,000 PSI) 12" 33 8" N.T.S. ARCH TO FOUNDATION CONNECTION DETAIL 9"x2-1/2" ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE ARCH (THICKNESS 0.125") BY LANE ENTERPRISES OR APPROVED EQUAL 2' STRUCTURAL PLATE ISOMETRIC DETAIL N.T.S. #4 BARS @ 24" O.C. (TYP) #4 BARS (TYP) 3 4"Ø x 1-3 4" 3 4"Ø x 3-12" 1"x37 8" KNOCKOUT ANCHORS (BEND DOWN AND TWIST) NOTE: PROVIDE ANCHORS EVERY 12" PER DETAIL BELOW LENGTH OF ARCH PLACE LARGE STONES SIDE BY SIDE ON THE BEDDING MATERIAL WITH SMOOTH SURFACES FACING UP. 18" MIN 1.SLOPE SHALL BE GRADED TO 2:1 OR FLATTER PRIOR TO PLACING RIP RAP. 2.PLACE THE FABRIC DIRECTLY ON THE PREPARED FOUNDATION. OVERLAP THE EDGES BY AT LEAST 2 FEET. BURY THE UPPER AND LOWER ENDS OF THE FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES BELOW GROUND. TAKE PRECAUTIONS NOT TO DAMAGE THE FABRIC BY DROPPING THE RIPRAP. IF DAMAGE OCCURS, REMOVE THE RIPRAP AND REPAIR THE SHEET BY ADDING ANOTHER LAYER OF FILTER FABRIC WITH A MINIMUM OVERLAP OF 12 INCHES AROUND THE DAMAGED AREA. 3.PLACEMENT OF THE RIPRAP SHOULD FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLACEMENT OF THE FILTER FABRIC. PLACE RIPRAP SO THAT IT FORMS DENSE, WELL-GRADED MASS OF STONE WITH A MINIMUM OF VOIDS. THE DESIRED DISTRIBUTION OF STONES THROUGHOUT THE MASS MAY BE OBTAINED BY SELECTIVE LOADING AT THE QUARRY AND CONTROLLED DUMPING DURING FINAL PLACEMENT. PLACE RIPRAP TO ITS FULL THICKNESS IN ONE OPERATION. DO NOT PLACE RIPRAP BY DUMPING THROUGH CHUTES OR OTHER METHODS THAT CAUSE SEGREGATION OF STONE SIZES. BE CAREFUL NOT TO DISLODGE THE UNDERLYING BASE OR FILTER WHEN PLACING THE STONES. 4.ENDS OF THE RIP RAP SHALL BE KEYED INTO A STABLE BANK. WHEN TYING INTO OTHER STRUCTURES, LARGER RIPRAP CAN BE LAID IN STEPS OR STACKED AS NEEDED TO FIT. STONES LARGER THAN THOSE DESIGNATED FOR FLOW (12") SHALL BE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTES: N.T.S. RIP-RAP INSTALLATION DETAIL CLASS III RIP-RAP PER TABLE 5B.3 FROM THE NYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL TENCATE MIRAFI H2Ri OR APPROVED EQUAL EXTEND RIP RAP END TREATMENT 2' ABOVE THE TOP OF ARCH NYSDEC CLASS III, FROM TABLE 5B.3 FROM NYS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (TYP) 18"CREEK BOTTOM PLATE ARCH GAUGE = 0.125 T-II RIBS @ 9" SPACING ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE BOX CULVERT DETAILS 2' - 33 8" RIP-RAP SCOUR PROTECTION CONCRETE FOUNDATION FOUNDATION SUB-BASE No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION NOTES & DETAILS C 202 12 N/A NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD N.T.S. BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' BAL D H I L L R O A D (49 . 5 ' R . O . W . ) N3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " E 4 1 6 . 0 1 ' N89°21'34"W 250.00' S3 ° 0 5 ' 0 8 " W 7 1 6 . 4 7 ' S6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " E 2 8 1 . 7 8 ' S 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " E 4 3 9 . 3 6 ' T O ℄ S43 ° 1 8 ' 1 9 " W 4 5 . 0 1 ' N 4 5 ° 3 1 ' 3 3 " W 4 4 2 . 4 1 ' T O ℄ L=70.93' R=150.00' Δ=27°05'34" N6 1 ° 3 8 ' 3 3 " W 2 1 5 . 6 5 ' N88°44'08"W 141.34' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE BY TRC ENGINEERS. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 16 ' 23'16' 50 ' A R R A Y B U F F E R 20 ' 75' 75' 50 ' 43 ' 20 ' 1 0 0 ' S O L A R A R R A Y T O A D J A C E N T S T R U C T U R E S B U F F E R 28'R 48'R 28'R 48'R 2 8 ' R 4 8 ' R 28'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED 20' DOUBLE SWING BARRIER GATE WITH LOCK AND OPTIONAL ARM GATE & POST SAFETY TAPE KIT. PRODUCED BY BARRIER GATE BRANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL. SF SF SF NATURAL SCREENING AREA OF HONEYSUCKLE SHRUB AND NATURAL VEGETATION TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. MAINTAIN TO A HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 25" 73 ' 87 ' 30 ' 48 ' R 28 ' R SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR (TYP.) PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE EXISTING 12" CPP TO BE EXTENDED BY 11'. INV=1256.68 NYSDEC APPROVED PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE PER DETAIL. PERVIOUS ACCESS DRIVE ENDS AT PROPOSED GATE EXISTING ACCESS DRIVE FOR #54 BALD HILL ROAD TO MAINTAIN EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS. #54 BALD HILL ROAD TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED D-5 12" END INV=1258.32 D-4 12" END INV=1258.82 23 LF 12" HDPE STM.@ 2.20% 171' TO CLEARING LIMI T S 18 ' 20' No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y P L A N T I N G P L A N S 1 2 0 7 2 1 . D W G 12 / 8 / 2 0 2 1 4 : 4 5 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 108 8 1" = 40' MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 6 MATCH LINE C 109MATCH LINE C 109 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS PLANT LIST SYMBOL CC SC-W TO SCIENTIFIC NAME CARPINUS CAROLINIANA SALIX CAPREA (WETLAND) THUJA OCCIDENTALIS ʻTECHNYʼ alt. ʻEMERALDʼ alt. ʻNIGRAʼ COMMON NAME AMERICAN HORNBEAM PUSSY WILLOW AMERICAN ARBORVITAE MATURE HEIGHT X WIDTH 20-25 x 20 15-25 x 12-15 10-15 x 8 10-15 x 4 20 x 5-10 NOTES: 1. NUMBER AND POSITION OF PLANTS IS INDICATIVE AND WILL BE BASED ON GAPS IN EXISTING VEGETATION, FENCE LOCATION, AS WELL AS SIGHT LINES FROM NEARBY RESIDENCES. 2. SALIX CAPREA TO BE LOCATED IN WETLAND BUFFER IF PERMITTED. 3. ARBORVITAE SPECIES ARE VARIED AND NAMES NOT CONSISTENT ACROSS SOURCES. TARGET HEIGHT TO BE VERIFIED WITH SUPPLIER NOT TO EXCEED 25 FT. (3) CC (3) CC (3) CC (3) TO-T (3) TO-T (3) TO-T pebble stream LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1010 Highland AvenueRochester, NY 14620 tel: 585-760-994 NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE SCREEN PLANTING PLAN ITHACA, NY DRAWING DATE:12-08-2021 REVISED: www.pebble-stream.com TOMPKINS COUNTY S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) S1 ° 1 7 ' 5 5 " W 6 9 9 . 0 9 ' S88°44'09"E 12.16' N89°51'55"W 3687.30' (DEED & MEAS.) N89°07'38"W 30.04' S0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " E S1 ° 5 5 ' 1 1 " E 34 . 1 6 ' S89°05'57"W 875.40' S1°55'11"E 5.10' N89°05'50"E 874.40' 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 7' TALL WIRE FENCE WITH 6" WOODEN POLES SET 10' O.C. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C 201 EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) EXISTING SLOPES >15% (TYP.) PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT PROPOSED SOLAR ARRAY LAYOUT SF SF SF SF SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 23' 23' 23' 23'16' 16' 16' 50 ' 50 ' 75' 75' 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 50 ' TR I B U T A R Y B U F F E R 28'R PROPOSED TREELINE PROPOSED TREELINE SF SF SF PR O P O S E D T R E E L I N E 48'R 48' R 28'R 28' R 2 0 ' S F S F S F S F SF SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR. DOUBLE SILT FENCE IN PROXIMITY TO TRUCK/CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR PROPOSED TRUCK/CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. AREA TO BE INSTALLED PER DETAILS AND REMOVED WHEN CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED. AREA TO BE RETURNED TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. S F 22 ' 315' TO PROPOSED CLEARING LIMITS PROPOSED SILT FENCE SF SF S F SF SF SF SF 16 ' 16 ' 16' No. Revisions ARTICLE 147 SECTION 7307. THESE PLANS ARE COPYRIGHT PROTECTED VIOLATION OF STATE EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 SECTION 7209 AND UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THIS DRAWING IS IN c Date By Description Sheet No. Project No. Date Drawing No. Scale: Town/City: County:State: Designed by Project Manager Principal-in-Charge PASSERO ASSOCIATES Client: PASSERO ASSOCIATES engineering 242 West Main Street Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14614 (585) 325-1000 Fax: (585) 325-1691 architecture NORBUT SOLAR 1241 UNIVERSITY AVE. ROCHESTER, NY 14607 Jess Sudol, PE David Cox, PE Austin Goodwin, EIT. NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE ITHACA TOMPKINS NEW YORK 20213129.0001 OCTOBER 2021 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Town of Danby LOCATION SKETCH N.T.S. PROJECT LOCATION 00 4020 80 SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZONTAL SCALE 40 Y: \ P R O J E C T S - N E W \ 2 0 2 1 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 \ 2 0 2 1 3 1 2 9 . 0 0 0 1 \ 0 1 C A D - B I M - M O D E L S \ C I V I L \ S L D A N B Y P L A N T I N G P L A N S 1 2 0 7 2 1 . D W G 12 / 8 / 2 0 2 1 4 : 4 5 P M Au s t i n G o o d w i n SITE PLAN C 109 9 1" = 40' TRUCK WASHDOWN AREA N.T.S. PROVIDE 12" THICK STONE BASE WITH 2% MIN. CROSS SLOPE 8' WIDE MIN. 3' DEEP MIN. NOTE: A 10 MIL LINER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WASHDOWN AREA. WASHDOWN AREA TO BE CLEANED OUT AT 75% CAPACITY. MATCH LINE C 108 MA T C H L I N E C 1 0 7 MATCH LINE C 108 PROPOSED FENCE SF EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 520 521 PROPOSED SILT FENCE LEGEND: PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CENTER LINE ROAD R.O.W.R.O.W. EXISTING TREE LINE REMOVE TREES SLOPES >15% PROPOSED TREE LINE PROPOSED SOLAR PANELS MATCH LINE C 110 PLANT LIST SYMBOL CC SC-W TO SCIENTIFIC NAME CARPINUS CAROLINIANA SALIX CAPREA (WETLAND) THUJA OCCIDENTALIS ʻTECHNYʼ alt. ʻEMERALDʼ alt. ʻNIGRAʼ COMMON NAME AMERICAN HORNBEAM PUSSY WILLOW AMERICAN ARBORVITAE MATURE HEIGHT X WIDTH 20-25 x 20 15-25 x 12-15 10-15 x 8 10-15 x 4 20 x 5-10 NOTES: 1. NUMBER AND POSITION OF PLANTS IS INDICATIVE AND WILL BE BASED ON GAPS IN EXISTING VEGETATION, FENCE LOCATION, AS WELL AS SIGHT LINES FROM NEARBY RESIDENCES. 2. SALIX CAPREA TO BE LOCATED IN WETLAND BUFFER IF PERMITTED. 3. ARBORVITAE SPECIES ARE VARIED AND NAMES NOT CONSISTENT ACROSS SOURCES. TARGET HEIGHT TO BE VERIFIED WITH SUPPLIER NOT TO EXCEED 25 FT. (3) CC (3) TO-T (3) TO-T (3) SC-W (3) SC-W (3) TO-T (3) CC (3) CC (3) CC (3) TO-T (3) TO-T pebble stream LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1010 Highland AvenueRochester, NY 14620 tel: 585-760-994 NORBUT SOLAR DANBY SITE SCREEN PLANTING PLAN ITHACA, NY DRAWING DATE:12-08-2021 REVISED: www.pebble-stream.com TOMPKINS COUNTY