HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-11-21 Planning Board Minutes (Final)
Town of Danby Planning Board
Minutes of Regular Mee ng
November 21 2023
PRESENT:
Ed Bergman (arrived 7:10pm)
Kelly Maher
Jamie Vanucchi
Jody Scriber (chair)
ABSENT:
Jacob Colbert
Colleen Cowan
Sco Davis
OTHER ATTENDEES:
Town Planner Greg Hutnik
Recording Secretary Cindy Katz
Public (in-person)Zachary Larkins; Heather Coffey; Olivia Vent; Christel
Trutmann, Leslie Connors (Town Board Member); Betsy Lamb
(BZA Member)
Public (virtual)Ronda Roaring; Ted Crane; Joel Gagnon (Town Board
Member); Katharine Hunter (Town Board Member)
This mee ng was conducted in person with virtual access on the Zoom pla orm
The mee ng was called to order at 7:01 p.m.
(1) CALL TO ORDER/AGENDA REVIEW
There were no addi ons or dele ons to the agenda.
(2) PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR
Ted Crane commented that the market is a "nice idea" that he wishes success. He relayed
Mary Ann Barr 2021
The Town of Danby
1830 Danby Road
Ithaca, NY 14850
danby.ny.gov
Planning Board Minutes
Tuesday 21 Nov 2023 at 7:00PM
that he believed it was inappropriate that a Planning Board member wrote on a Facebook
post in a local Facebook group that "he or perhaps he was referring to the Planning
Board in general" was doing everything it could to make this project [a market in Danby]
happen.
(3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES (October 2023)
Because there was no quorum met this me, the Planning Board could not vote.
(4) TOWN BOARD LIAISON REPORT
Town Board member Leslie Connors gave her verbal report:
●The Town Board will be interviewing for vacant commi ee/board posi ons at the
second Board mee ng in December
●Star ng in the New Year, the Town Board will be mee ng now on the first and
third Mondays of the month, at 6 p.m.
●Town Planner Greg Hutnik is working on some tweaks to the zoning law and
hopefully the Planning Board will be able to provide input
(5) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
1.Development Review
SPR-2023-2 1843 Danby Road "Danby Food and Drink" Parcel: 10.-1-49.2
Applicant: Olivia Vent
An cipated Board ac on(s) this month: Preliminary Site Plan Review
Zone: Hamlet Center Zone (Habitat Corridor Overlay) SEQR Type: Type II
Proposal: Renova ng an exis ng ~950 square foot garage into a full service
market/cafe
Planner Hutnik provided an overview of the project and the objec ve of the current
mee ng. He stated how the Planning Board had previously reviewed the project and that
the only change to the site is that the parking lot in front of the building. There are two
variances that will be needed and that will be heard next week at the Board of Zoning
Appeals ("BZA"). Those variances will be in regards to building set backs and in regards to
the parking. A er the Applicants go to the BZA, the Planning Board will hold a Public
Hearing and SEQR review in December. Today they will look at the new items that the
Applicant has submi ed since they were last at the Planning Board.
Planner Hutnik worked for a moment on the tech and then posted the site map on the
large screen for all to see. He pointed out the relevant areas. The Applicant held up
sample photos of landscaping -- fencing, grasses and various plan ngs -- that they have
in mind and that will provide some screening.
Planner Hutnik posted another map, this one with more dimensions in it, that the
Applicant recently submi ed. Maher and Bergman commented on how it looks good and
the circle driveway makes sense. They noted signage would be used in order to clearly
delineate where the tenant parking is.
The Applicant pointed out where the sep c will be in response to an inquiry from
Planner Hutnik. Planner Hutnik reminded the Planning Board that no decisions can be
made un l the BZA makes their decisions. The idea tonight is for the Board to provide
feedback before the December mee ng.
Planner Hutnik suggested, as he wrote in his memo, that it would be good to show the
dimension from the edge of the pavement to the new parking area. He suggested it be a
minimum of twenty feet, in order to ensure that someone pulling into the parking lot
does not block any of the main road or the bike lane. They discussed variances between
the different planes of the buildings as well how the start of the pavement begins at
different places along the property and how that influenced measuring. Vent
commented that they calculated using the white line and it came to 25 feet, which is
similar to the 27 feet that Planner Hutnik came up with.
They sought to understand the measurements and property lines shown on the survey
more clearly. Planner Hutnik put the survey up on the screen and pointed out a "jog" or
devia on in the property line. Why it was shown like that was unclear to him, but he
clarified that regardless, nothing is being measured from that; the set backs are measured
from the top of the ditch edge. They discussed methods of measuring, and she said she
can provide the needed measurements. Planner Hutnik recapped that the right now the
measurements are showing to adequate distance for safety concerns. The parking lines
up with other parking on the property and, he thinks, matches the intent to not have it
too far in front of the buildings. They are s ll seeking the variance though and they will
see if the BZA agrees.
Maher asked if they need any addi onal documents in order to get site plan approval at
the next mee ng. Planner Hutnik said no, not necessarily, but that the dimensions from
the road previously discussed could be shown. They clarified from where the
measurements can occur.
Maher wondered if they needed to review signage. Planner Hutnik noted this area does
not currently allow free-standing signs and one of his "zoning tweak" sugges ons is to
allow "hamlet scale" freestanding signage. They commented on the signs of other local
businesses, and Planner Hutnik stated he believes the inten on of the policy might have
been to prevent the Dollar General [Note: The Dollar General a empted to build in
Danby but pulled out] from pu ng up their signs, which many dislike. He thinks there
are other ways we can allow signs that are funky without them being distasteful. The
Applicant commented on the presence of other town and park related signs currently on
the property already.
Planner Hutnik thought they were addressing everything asked of them. He said for the
next Planning Board mee ng they should bring something on the suggested signage and
they could send something upda ng the dimensions if they want. They discussed what
to expect at the next Planning Board mee ng. They considered the ligh ng situa on and
how to illuminate the entrance and exits. Steve Cortright, the Town Code Officer, spoke
to them already about some of this. They discussed who is responsible for street lights --
probably the Department of Transporta on thought Planner Hutnik. From Zoom, Crane
commented that there are some very good low energy freestanding, even solar, ligh ng
that may work, although perhaps they would be stolen. They wondered if solar would be
feasible in this climate and Bergman added that many have ba eries. Maher reminded
the Applicants that whatever ligh ng they do decide to add, it must be dark sky
compliant. The Applicant noted the current plan is for four outdoor lights around the
building. The Applicants added that the color is currently yellow and they might add
black trim to make it look like bee. Vanucchi commented on the plan for allo ng space
for parking, and Planner Hutnik added it would be helpful to show the spots and their
sizes more clearly. The Applicants reviewed the dimensions and loca ons currently
planned for the parking. Planner Hutnik commented it would be helpful to combine the
two different maps with parking informa on so one of them had all the details on it. The
Applicant collected some of the paperwork and they agreed on which map she would be
upda ng for the next mee ng.
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Because Bergman was now present and quorum was met, the Planning Board voted on
the approval of the Oct 2023 minutes.
MOTION: Approve the October 2023 mee ng minutes
Moved by Maher, seconded by Vanucchi
The mo on passed.
In favor: Bergman, Maher, Vanucchi, Scriber
(6) PLANNER REPORT (VERBAL)
Planner Hutnik provided a verbal report:
●He is working on a few tweaks for the zoning ordinance which he will send to the
Planning Board
●Larger topic amendments for the zoning ordinance will be considered in the New
Year, probably alongside the review of the Comprehensive Plan. These documents
can be found online at the Town's website
●He met with someone about 1429 Danby Road (at Muzzy) regarding a poten al
daycare center there. The poten al business owner already owns the Owl's Nest
daycare. He and the Planning Board discussed this poten al plan and what would
be required in order to make it happen. The business owner hopes to have a
sketch plan review in December with a possible Public Hearing in January. The
owner is seeking a grant from Cornell and Scriber wondered if the Planning Board
could provide a le er of support with the grant applica on. Planner Hutnik was
unsure if that would be possible, since the Planning Board is the governing body
responsible for approval. He thought maybe they could send the le er once the
plan was approved.
(7) ADJOURNMENT
The mee ng adjourned 7:48 p.m.
Cindy Katz -- Recording Secretary