HomeMy WebLinkAboutTownBoard_Minutes_20160516Danby Town Board
Minutes of Regular Meeting
May 16, 2016
Present:
Councilpersons: Rebecca Brenner, Leslie Connors, Jim Holahan, Jack Miller
Supervisor: Ric Dietrich
Others Present:
Town Clerk Pamela Goddard
Bookkeeper Laura Shawley
Planner CJ Randall
Public Ted Crane, Ronda Roaring, David Hall, Pat Woodworth, Charles Tilton, Lew and
Pam Billington, Katharine Hunter, Scott Davis, Frank Darrow.
Regular Meeting Opened at 7:00pm
Board of Zoning Appeals Vacancies—Appointments
There was a discussion regarding the applicants for a one-year vacancy on the Board of Zoning
Appeals, Esther Greenhouse and Scott Davis. Greenhouse had stated that she wanted time to think about
whether a BZA appointment was a good match for her at this time. Neither the Town Clerk nor any Board
members had heard from Greenhouse in the past week on this matter. Dietrich suggested that the Board
postpone making the one year appointment until the first June TB meeting, in order to hear more from
Esther Greenhouse. Other Board members were in agreement with this.
The Board discussed this appointment in relation to training which will be given to all of the BZA
members. Planner Randall informed the Board that this training will take place as soon as possible. She
added that she could provide training for this last appointee at a later time, if needed. Scott Davis
volunteered to attend training in the next few weeks, whether he was appointed at this time or not.
The Board discussed appointment of a BZA Chair. Connors reported that Gary Bortz is not interested
in serving as Chair. She suggested that either David Hall or Norbert Nolte be appointed BZA Chair.
Dietrich supported the suggestion that Nolte be appointed Chair, based on Nolte’s previous service on the
Town Board for eight years. Miller asked whether Hall (who was in attendance) had an opinion. Hall
spoke in support of Nolte.
RESOLUTION NO. 50 OF 2016 - APPOINT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CHAIR
Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Danby appoints Norbert Nolte as Board of Zoning Appeals Chair for
the year-2016.
Moved by Dietrich, Second by Brenner. The motion passed.
In Favor: Brenner, Connors, Holahan, Miller, Dietrich.
Financial Report - Budget Adjustment
Laura Shawley reported on required budget modifications for the fiscal year 2015. The proposed
transfers between budget lines are needed to balance the books for the 2015 Year End Financial Report.
The full list of approved budget transfers is attached in Appendix A.
RESOLUTION NO. 51 OF 2016 - APPROVAL FROM THE TOWN BOARD TO MAKE THE APPROPRIATE BUDGET
TRANSFERS NEEDED FOR THE YEAR END ACCOUNTING PROCESS
Whereas, it is necessary to modify the budget between accounts when there have been expenditures that exceed
the budget in some accounts and are under the budget in others,
Therefore be it
Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Danby authorizes the attached budget transfers to be made the the
2015 budget year.
Moved by Brenner, Second by Connors. The motion passed.
In Favor: Brenner, Connors, Holahan, Miller, Dietrich.
Award Preferred Provider—Solar Power Purchase Agreement
There was a discussion of two proposals received for Preferred Providers for a planned Solar Power
Purchase Agreement. Proposals were received from Renovus Solar Inc., and Taitem Engineering. The
quoted proposed power purchase price from both providers is similar.
The installation will be subject to a permissive referendum, as this is a lease of municipal land. The
action will be posted for 30 days. If no petition in opposition of the action is presented, the project can go
forward. If a petition is received, then the project must go to a referendum ballot vote.
Dietrich noted that further contract details for the project are to be worked out with the Preferred
Provider, once one has been selected.
Dietrich commented that the Town has had a negative experience with one of these providers on a
previous energy project. Based on that experience, Dietrich stated that he could not recommend that
Town Board_Minutes_20160516 • Friday, May 20, 2016 Page ! of !1 5
company being awarded another project with the Town of Danby. Connors asked whether there was any
recommendation regarding the other company? Dietrich reported that Paul Hansen had researched the
background of both companies. Renovus had lowered their rate from an earlier proposal. Brenner reported
positive reports of Renovus.
Holahan, an employee of Taitem Engineering, recused himself from this vote.
RESOLUTION NO. 52 OF 2016 - SELECT A PREFERRED PROVIDER, HORNBROOK ROAD SOLAR INSTALLATION
Whereas, The Town of Danby is seeking to procure an approx.. 170 kW DC, grid connected, nonresidential Solar
Photovoltaic array generating system to be placed on the Town of Danby Highway Department property, tax parcel
#10.-1-82.1, 93 Hornbrook Road through a long term (minimum 15 and up to 35 years) energy performance
agreement or power purchase agreement (“PPA”) pursuant to Article 9 of the New York Energy Law, and
Whereas, the Town of Danby has advertised according to law to solicit proposals for a turnkey generating system,
grid interconnection and all ancillary equipment and services for a solar generating system to be designed, installed,
owned, and operated by the proposer and/or third party investors; and
Whereas, the Town of Danby has reviewed the proposals received through that RFP process in accordance with the
elements requested and the evaluation process outlined in the RFP,
Therefore be it
Resolved, The Town of Danby hereby does select Renovus Solar Inc. as the most qualified firm and Preferred
Provider and wishes to engage the services of Renovus Solar Inc. to procure the above stipulated Solar Photovoltaic
array through an energy performance agreement or PPA.
Moved by Dietrich, Second by Miller. The motion passed.
In Favor: Brenner, Connors, Miller, Dietrich.
Abstain:Holahan.
Solar Installation SEQRA Negative Declaration Resolution
Randall presented the Environmental Quality Review sheets for the Hornbrook Road Solar
Installation. The proposed site of the solar installation is adjacent to a delineated wetland. Therefore, the
NYS DEC assisted in preparing a site map for the installation. Randall reported that the DEC finds the
installation a minor action, in environmental review. The proposal needs to be reviewed by the Army
Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act and the DEC needs to issue a freshwater wetlands permit.
Randall explained that once this SEQRA resolution was passed, she could send the materials to the
involved agencies.
RESOLUTION NO. 53 OF 2016 - SEQRA DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE – HORNBROOK ROAD
SOLAR INSTALLATION
Whereas, The Town of Danby is installing a 170 kW DC, grid connected, non-residential Solar Photovoltaic array
generating system to be located at the Town of Danby Highway Department, tax parcel #10.-1-82.1 (93 Hornbrook
Road) through a long-term power purchase agreement pursuant to Article 9 of the New York Energy Law; and
Whereas, 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and Section IX of Local Law 2
of 1991 Environmental Review of Actions in the Town of Danby, require that a Lead Agency be established for
conducting environmental review of projects in accordance with local and state environmental law; and
Whereas, State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review, the Lead Agency shall be that
local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and carrying out the action; and
Whereas, the Town Board declared itself lead agency with primary responsibility for approving the action on May 9,
2016;
Whereas, this is an Unlisted Action under the Town of Danby Environmental Review of Actions and an Unlisted
Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, both of which require environmental review; and
Whereas, a freshwater wetlands joint application is under review by the US Army Corps of Engineers and NYS
Department of Environmental Conservation;
Whereas, pursuant to §617.6(b)(3) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), the aforementioned
information was mailed to all involved agencies notifying them that a Lead Agency must be agreed upon within thirty
(30) calendar days of the date that the aforementioned information is mailed to involved agencies; and
Whereas, the US Army Corps of Engineers and NYS Department of Environmental Conservation have all been
identified as involved agencies and it has been requested that these involved agencies consent to the Town Board
being Lead Agency for this project and have consented, and
Whereas, this Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, has on May 16, 2016 reviewed and accepted
as adequate: a Short Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1 and Part 2, prepared by Lead Agency and Town
Planning staff;
Now Therefore, be it
Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Danby determines the proposed project will result in no significant
impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law be filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review
Act.
Moved by Brenner, Second by Holahan. The motion passed.
In Favor: Brenner, Connors, Holahan, Miller, Dietrich.
Town Board_Minutes_20160516 • Friday, May 20, 2016 Page ! of !2 5
Groundwater Protection Law - SEQRA Intent to Declare Lead Agency
The final draft of the proposed Groundwater Protection Law was presented to the Board. This draft is
the result of consultation between the Town and Planning Boards and Steve Winkley (NY Rural Water
Association). Randall also presented an associated map of water protection overlay zones.
Randall offered a draft resolution to Declaration of Lead Agency on this project. After adoption of the
resolution, the information will be shared with Tompkins County agencies and adjacent municipalities for
their review.
There was a discussion of related subdivision overlays. Randall and the Planning Board are also
working on a revision of the Subdivision Ordinance, to remove the currently allowed subdivision by
permit. Revisions to subdivision regulations related to the Groundwater Protection Law will be combined
with those related to subdivision by permit for one amendment action. These revisions have been
recommended by the Town Attorney. The Subdivision Amendments will be considered separately from
the Groundwater Protection Law. Review of these subdivision amendments should be ready for Board
review by June.
There was a question from a resident regarding the level of protection afforded the Town by this
Local Law. This person was concerned that the entire Town be protected. Councilperson Brenner and
Planner Randall clarified that the Law will cover the entire Town, with additional protection in overlay
zones which have particularly fragile conditions. While there are specific subdivision regulations
recommended for a small part of the Town, other aspects of the Groundwater Protection Law will impact
nearly every property. Information about the impact on specific properties is available through the Code/
Planning office.
It is anticipated that, in June, the Town Board will set a public hearing regarding this law for July.
RESOLUTION NO. 54 OF 2016 - SEQRA INTENT TO DECLARE LEAD AGENCY – GROUNDWATER PROTECTION LAW
Whereas, In order to preserve vulnerable unconsolidated aquifer recharge areas and wellhead protection areas for
community water systems, this action is the enactment of a local law amending the Town of Danby Zoning Ordinance
to include an Aquifer High Vulnerability (AHV) Overlay Zone in the Zoning Ordinance, overlaying approximately 4.9
percent of the land area of the Town of Danby; and
Whereas, 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and Section IX of Local Law 2
of 1991 Environmental Review of Actions in the Town of Danby, require that a Lead Agency be established for
conducting environmental review of projects in accordance with local and state environmental law; and
Whereas, State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review, the Lead Agency shall be that
local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and carrying out the action; and
Whereas, the Town Board is the local agency with primary responsibility for approving the action;
Whereas, this is an Unlisted Action under the Town of Danby Environmental Review of Actions and an Unlisted
Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, both of which require environmental review; and
Whereas, pursuant to §617.6(b)(3) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), the aforementioned
information must be mailed to all involved agencies notifying them that a Lead Agency must be agreed upon within
thirty (30) calendar days of the date that the aforementioned information is mailed to involved agencies; and
Now Therefore, be it
Resolved, that the Town Board of the Town of Danby hereby authorizes the mailing to all Involved Agencies of the
aforementioned information, together with Notice that the Town Board intends to declare itself Lead Agency for
purposes of SEQRA for this Type I and Unlisted Action, unless objection to such designation is received within thirty
(30) days.
Moved by Brenner, Second by Connors. The motion passed.
In Favor: Brenner, Connors, Holahan, Miller, Dietrich.
1987 Real Property Maintenance Law—Fines Amendment
Randall gave an update on revisions to the fee structure of the 1987 Real Property Maintenance Law
(sometimes referred to as the “junk car” law). The current fines are less than scrap storage rental fees at
other locations. As a result, it is less costly for residents to illegally store cars and scrap metal on their
property than to rent space to store it. In January, the Town Board had given informal approval for an
update of fines and fees, between $1,000 a week to $1,000 a day.
Randall reported concerns and recommendations from the Town Attorney, Guy Krogh. Krogh was
concerned that a fee of up to $1,000 per day would cross the threshold of misdemeanor violations; this
would result in additional court costs and people in violation would have the right to a jury trail with free
legal council. Krogh recommends a fine of up to $1,000 per week as being more reasonable. Randall is
working on the language for an amendment to this law.
Justice Huddle asked whether there could be a minimum–maximum fine range. He reported that this
system is in place for other violations and that this helps the court levy appropriate penalties for
violations. Dietrich suggested that the Justices have a discretionary range of $250 to $1,000 per week per
violation and that this be written into the Law.
Connors asked whether there was to be any revision to the prohibited acts section of this law? Randall
reported that the intent was for that to remain the same, as the list of prohibitions is already rather
extensive. Connors and Holahan noted that they had suggestions for minor changes to this section of the
law. These will be forwarded to Randall for review.
Town Board_Minutes_20160516 • Friday, May 20, 2016 Page ! of !3 5
Clerk Goddard summarized the standard procedure for passing an amendment to any local law,
including a public hearing.
1840 Danby Road - Update
Randall informed the Board that the purchase offer on 1840 Danby Road was rejected by the owner.
The ongoing process regarding a demolition/restoration order and violations to the Real Property
Maintenance Law will continue. The asbestos inspector did visit, but was unable to access the house at
the time of that visit. An engineering firm has been retained by the owner to devise a remediation plan.
According to the timeline for demolition/remediation, work to demolish or remove materials is to start in
the next two weeks. Hansen will be able to provide further information as the process unfolds.
Code Report
Randall gave a preliminary report of activities in the Code Office during April. The Hornbrook Road
land swap is being sorted out by the lawyers. There is a pending application with NYS Ag & Markets for
a Farmland Protection Easement on a property in Danby. More information will be available on this soon.
The environmental quality review of proposed changes to PDZ10 has been completed. A further
revised draft, based on feedback from the applicant, should be sent to County Planning soon.
Verizon Wireless has proposed a monopole communications facility (cell tower) on the American
Legion property on Danby Road. Randall has been corresponding with Verizon attorneys regarding
project submittals. Planning Board review is anticipated for June.
A proposal for the Danby Market, for site plan review, should be before the Planning Board in June.
Randall will conduct SEQRA training for the Planning Board at its May meeting.
Broadband Buildout - Update
Dietrich gave a report on the status at the Broadband Buildout. While progress has been made, there
several remaining coverage gaps in Danby, generally due to topography and vegetation obstacles.
Research has begun to see how these underserved areas will be covered. Dietrich reported that the County
Broadband committee is still in place, and may be able to assist with putting pressure on service
providers.
Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 8:03 pm. !!!!!
______________________________________
Pamela Goddard, Town Clerk
Town Board_Minutes_20160516 • Friday, May 20, 2016 Page ! of !4 5
Appendix A—Budget Transfers
!
2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS2015 BUDGET TRANSFERS
GENERAL FUNDGENERAL FUND WATER FUNDWATER FUND
FROM TO AMOUNT FROM TO AMOUNT
A1110.400 A1110.100 0.20 SW8320.400 SW8320.200 268.37
A1110.400 A1010.400 821.11 SW9010.800 SW9040.800 36.67
A1220.112 A1220.100 0.12 SW9030.800 SW9040.800 238.92
A1220.112 A1220.110 0.12 SW8340.101 SW8340.102 0.28
A1410.400 A1345.400 675.14
A1410.110 A1410.100 0.08
A1110.100 A1420.400 1,085.50
A1110.110 A1420.400 209.10 HIGHWAY FUNDHIGHWAY FUNDHIGHWAY FUND
A1110.200 A1420.400 1,000.00
A1110.400 A1420.400 1,659.33 FROM TO AMOUNT
A1220.200 A1420.400 500.00
A1220.400 A1420.400 333.42 DA5130.100 DA5130.200 60.39
A1320.400 A1420.400 6,000.00 DA5110.100 DA5142.400 3,648.08
A1410.110 A1420.400 493.39 DA5140.400 DA5142.400 4,948.00
A1410.113 A1420.400 161.23 DA5142.100 DA5142.400 16,393.83
A1410.400 A1420.400 2,890.87 DA5130.400 DA9040.800 652.90
A1410.480 A1420.400 915.25 DA9010.800 DA9040.800 996.75
A1990.400 A1420.400 9,679.30 DA9010.800 DA9030.800 425.01
A1910.400 A1420.400 4,248.05 DA5110.100 DA9060.800 6,481.52
A1620.100 A1620.410 2,664.15
A1620.100 A1620.420 480.00
A1910.400 A5132.400 4,004.20
A1989.400 A5132.400 1,792.21
A5010.200 A5132.400 1,000.00
A5010.400 A5132.400 304.24
A7150.100 A5132.400 6,576.09
A7310.400 A5132.400 6,310.59
A7150.100 A7150.400 164.91
A7310.100 A5182.400 773.18
A7330.100 A7410.400 78.73
A7330.100 A7620.400 196.30
A8010.130 A8010.110 8,084.96
A8020.100 A8020.400 1,963.37
A8160.400 A8810.400 103.00
A9030.800 A9040.800 1,051.76
A8010.130 A9060.800 4,047.26
A1220.112 A1410.400 0.27
A7330.400 A1110.400 821.31
A7330.400 A7310.100 773.18
Town Board_Minutes_20160516 • Friday, May 20, 2016 Page ! of !5 5