HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-08-22 TOWN OF DANBY
TOWN BOARD MEETING
Special Meeting August 22 , 19900 8 : 15 P . M .
PRESENT :
Supervisor Dietrich
Councilpersons : Eckstrom , Marisa , OJtz
Town Clerk - Sczepanski
ABSENT :
Councilperson Schwartz ( excused )
AA special meeting of the Town of Danby Town Board was called at
8 : 15 P . M .
Supervisor Dietrich requested that the Town of Danby Town Board
adjourn to Executive Session to discuss possible litigation .
No Board member objected .
The meeting of the Town of Danby Town Board resumed at 9 : 30 P . M .
ADJOURNMENT :
On a motion the Town of Danby Town Board adjourned at 9 : 30 P . M .
_GV e • / a4-1 L/ _
Carol We Scze in � . i , Town Clerk
•
3754
1 Public He -arina
August 22 , 1990
TOWN OF DANBY
PUBLIC HEARING
August 22 , 1990 - 7 : 30 P . M .
PRESENT :
Supervisor Dietrich
Councilpersons : Eckstrom , Marisa , Oltz
ABSENT :
Councilperson Schwartz ( Excused )
O thers Present :
Town Clerk - Carol Sczepanski
Members of the Public : Nancy Weitzel , Paul Uisruso
Michael. Hovanec
The Public Hearing was called to order by Supervisor Dietrich to
h ear all interested persons on the Proposed Planned Development
D istrict for Bailey Homes of Ithaca , inc . , 1395 Danby Road ,
Ithaca , New York . Mr . Michael Hovanec is proposing to extend the
boundaries of Bailey Park for additional units .
Michael Hovanec addressed the Town of Danby Town Board and
presented the Proposed Planned Development District for Bailey
Homes of Ithaca . Mr . Hovanec described in detail his proposal to
✓ emove ten ( 10 ) single wide trailers from Bailey Homes Park and
to replace them with fourteen ( 14 ) double - wide units on a larger
parcel of land .
The Town Board reviewed the Bailey Homes Park proposal packet ,
map , recommendations from the Town of Danby Planning Board ,
communications from Tompkins County Health Department and
Tompkins County Department of Planning .
The following list of conditions were requested by the Planning
Board on June 20 , 1990 . and Mr . lin anec stated that they
h ave been corrected .
1 ) The area that the boundaries of the business district
be clearly indicated ;
2 ) That the water and sewer systems be installed and
approved before any building permits are issued ;
3 ) That the following items be addressed as suggested by
Tompkins County Health Department in their letter of
June 20 , 1990 to Mr . Hovanec .
1 ) Office Sewage System
2 ) Application and Fees
3 ) Questions on Engineers Plans
4 ) SEAR Requirements
5 ) Testing of Water System .
Mr . Hovanec presented the map of the proposed park , the
e ngineer ' s plans for the septic / sewage and water system and
e xplained that the plans had been changed to meet Tompkins County
Health Department approval .
D iscussion followed .
No public addressed the Public Hearing .
3 li<
Public Hearing
- 2 - August 22 , 1990
Resolution # 66 of 1990
Approval of Bailey park o f Ithaca Planned Development
District
By Supervisor Dietrich : Seconded by Councilperson Eckstrom
WHEREAS , the Town Board of the Town of Danby has duly advertised
and held a Public Hearing to hear public comment in regard
to the Proposed Bailey Park Planned Development District ,
and
WHEREAS , Mr . Michael Hovanec has presented the Proposed Bailey
Park Planned . Development District for fourteen ( 14 )
doublewide trailers to be placed on five ( 5 ) acres as described
in a proposal packet and survey map to the Town of Danby Town
Board , now therefore be it ,
RESOLVED , That the Town Board of the Town of Denby approve Bailey Park Planned! Development District toconsist
of fourteen ( 14 ) doublewide trailers only , to he placed on
the five ( 5 ) acres as described in the proposal packet and
on the survey map as presented ; and , be it further
RESOLVED , That singlewide trailers are not permitted in the
Bailey Park Planned Development District .
Discussion followed in regard to the following :
1 ) This Planned Development District is not an expansion of
an existing grandfathered trailer park ; •
2 ) It is in some sense a loss to the town as we do not
currently have a facility where someone can keep single -
wide trailers ;
•
3 ) The Planned Development District is strictly for double -
wides ;
4 ) Provides some relief with regard to the issue of modular
vs doublewides .
5 ) The Town is changing Bailey Park to fourteen ( 14 ) double -
wides , not expanding to fourteen ( 14 ) doublewides with
the explicit understanding that no singlewide :; are
allowed in this planned development district .
6 ) It is an expansion in space only .
A roll call vote on the resolution resulted as follows :
Eckstrom Aye
Marisa Aye
Oltz Aye
Dietrich Aye
Carried Unanimously
ADJOURNMENT :
On a motion the meeting adjourned at 8 : 15 P . M .
t c
Carol W . Sczepa i , Town Clerk
. /6 " Q" . ; . f : . . ' v•- 1' , ?IL - flti ... ti. )- . : .
.,. I. 8Y. j) • n iti- � r' .11 • L �:, ^ r (L � �. • .i . . •• •
!• � , '1 ..t� • j , 1 �' + L .' ,� igi I ,!• .+ „
Il C u .' l:r ..�1.� y' •, { 1j X . . 1 '1 ' a. . J r. t ♦ • ' '� . _ t}♦17C,•• • Ln ...Y
.i t y'(f• 1 , . ..• s'w Y f •rj 11PI1 ' _ 1 ' ' ��/1�� �1[.'9 , ;••� �Gt ' -.•�. •, ' T���"�.� � � •F - �T -
�• ' I7 'r j1�, p tv; � ° •�FI Y . .. ., ' • I t'ir . iTdi v� • ,r, dver',-it i+ i viz,,wg.• fie ; r.'. v ' '( 4 r .a..140 may✓ t 1
• "AM' k {: tt •I `l" 1'tj .. vi1:; L4:c ..: 'l :,✓t. .t ' ' • pendlx A ;\' • "t '� r NI ;4 : ' `IC✓M ^. . t, ,.IN ' .*'• ' • .
ffffft,•ki_ ^ ;f 1 1 f � r • 7al Y' '"'Cr. ,� ]-,`�' •• • 1 �r r L '/"u
.1 �E�.•••.F 'S r. •K1 � . I . ! ! �.', ti + \ �"1r • into • u 1 Y l � : 1 11 , ' ti ,' . i) • ' . 'rya, y .41A IA 1.kZ40.� `y11
•;. 1 7 •1 '.4, /r/ 44%J: 1 ` { •yn �' � . • �,] • . . 1V• „. : ' ,!% T ) ..Ent t 4-+^rJy. .�l. �:?nt •y " '.
[jj • b t ' - �•r. fc0.1 'jJ' 1� I • , � 1 , ` C C �■• t l ��j•���� • • • , C _.��.a �( Lrr��yy • ..+' �`(1��}(�Y ' Y•4 •• 1 r�( "1: I,SI1AI 11'. ••i T-. ! . . , - • �; , r Y � I..' �l , .tin , ` r � 1 ,+„ � . •. : IA Jpii.-. vi e..pR 'i '•, . � • . • r 777 , I. : + • I 1 C I ( . ' � +� 1 1 w .t . :•r , �'; r. � ; . ! L I , . I .f • ' • • , • ,• ' 1 ♦ 1 � . ;'�• •1.. T : r {. , : i •1 j ♦ .y . • .. ' �)y1: (�i•• :7 z - ib4:.:. Y •
• • p t,j1a:y,% ; CI? , ; '=1t. r, ' '• e ' : ,. .. . y 1 '• '1i �fraw 0 I 't , i • .i :,3 ri-i �; ;t ' T} .; f r•_ itir �j:1J .ft3 ► '/, 1t.34, : t 1 • • •
4 ,111' , i' V.• Ie,y; I:4.1111 ) 11 I. ref t I. jl : T ! 4 a dIr 1 I. : r • , , 111 :1 t, 1 ;r1' � ��1'.ii ,s rl } -,At r4In 7f :4r 7 :7,3 /9 '�d..f•! A • .I " ,+, . 5.,
'. ' 1 .• . 1I • 1 I; 9 134'-Ig ;felr r 4 If •• 1 • .t't � '. I11IL .44 , 5 rI • Litii,: ill. ! Irii .r i ' '. .# !i1 ' r . 11rr . ,•1- Jkaf.:;!M ci ' I,�A / ' •lir •HI
- - •'S i7 r ., . j:. fit; tl •l iit .: -:F1'it• : f • • .1: I .IP• ttJ .{I� •\ • 11t- ! : ' ', . tti iIiI S.li 1' .. , 7 ••,,]S' {ll' :i\1 o1 . '1` " 1�J, '
. : 1 r t ->iI .l , : I . • �} • • ), y� ��t j� j �.. �* y y (T t^ y .i �( j� �( ' ^7"S
. .r.'; * •ir,; I "., 1 }}1 :.•-r ' :1gi •1 i •! 111i':. /'{jif . h.+ It . Ii D r c, Otr-1!•�' t (I�7`' 1 � T ~ -3'� If7` T `, ' i '7J 1 C4-. '�� ti !/t.i1
t 1rl• tl .ii i� tifi,•F.114, •�•+ t 1 l 1 Ir ! ,r, C:1 1•{}r��Y' ii ,. , :At . . R4. •. i , ; ' 1 I• - . r.. . '. .4 • L ; •:1!.. -4 ,
J. rIl ' C J� ti . iyitritl �i1 er by RP.Scanjs t . l Y ...Ir. ,
�, 'T'�it �,, r f • et 1 � Ibij to 8112 . • • •►• L` • MA to°' l _ • ro
siiv• • • - , ' e li • • it ✓ � ,.Jr it t �� I t :1 ,/!• t • , ,; :•IZ Ld.1 •: 1.r 41 .. ' • x:,. .1:1 t 4J.lilt
11 '•• , Jp'1 ' 1 T, 1 . r : . : . . •, t' t " Y ! ' 1 '! ♦ r v- S• 1 . +• '� 11
yy •�� {. E to • ( y', . i. �'
• r . P.41; % • • • • '• • ♦ .P4::4 .',f' 6 • p't t 1c.: Y 1 ,♦ �y •ni t i.1 c fi lI^ }
+ .11 • 1w1 .-1{I.11.4,',. 1 ' !rid } r . , = 1 ) ,♦ 1 'PO:' 1 E , -,v..::.,4 �' 1I • vY '�'� ,�99�}�'Sjl;. of t�l ,+'b;])1L•,1 ^j rt III 17. ' en f in basic ro ect lir j is • .14r, 1 • f (� r't�: }� ! . r 1 . • ou n era ec `# 1 [� g P i'PI y �.ij• 11 ill rt11.1111/1/i r •Vi a r ! J. : ce'• ' ' '--;‘ •'- !•. ::k , ,',
• j v Ii , t . Y •�nv:S •!fill.. ; K:.,..•
r:.!eti 4' . +1'! ,L �R .1 • ,' , .<,•i, , \, :0C 4 I. .l , . .;•1 .f ..1 •• ti•' it . v • • • r ' { ' J}{1;_rf; �•' ✓ AC�a" ;4:1%! 171 v w‘'l•:.e �«i'r•' I .' � . ; ' • i • mac i ai ma . . ccur • co ect or ac�n- It provides
a Z. ocustt s on iden•` • e . e pos e mpac may . . ,� Ran
' ni` i ulaanceas to whett;er:an tmpaci; s likelji�to be considered small to mo erate or whether it is a potentially-
',t7 ' � .J, . . . . . . . , . : fr • 4 yr
, ' • .1: large impact- The eforjn also identifies whether an imypact can be' mitaated,or deduced.
` ;�;'vl? ? lY .4 t '.I: . : '.; 1.4.1.1.14::V31 fi ''rfr :iturvt: gre.;:izt5t ?t: :: ii zia esvert ;:VtVI :.it' ?. ,.q. ..:: it;.4,°ftry)%-tchyN . : �',', .;.. ,• . , : , . .
art 3: If any iriepact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-iarge. :then Part 3 is used to evaluate ;whether or not the
. . impact is actual) important. - ! kr ' 1' ' ,
Jr . .F ,, .1 X2.. 1 •• 1 .:Y ,, { i ,• •. , . ••1' f � • ' . t ',1 ;i :. . L.' . 1 I • '
1 1• ri • '
• ,, • . .Ik ' • 1 i , ��y .
•1•
• . ;ti•.• ' 1st .. f•: t •". • `•1 r •1 a I Ir • ; i , ',{ :�:. . ... 1. . I ?2/;IrtrL� ..1• . .
•
.?•_• ..
ti,, ' %• 7 1 r Y • +:.. ..0•_"�. : t • ;i. •. , .1 ' .. w ..r•1' It1 , t ' .•
S•; . ' . t"4 1 .. i 17l^ e'1.�..:..� \6ri' •- : . • r ' ✓ t.c 1 . re ; 1 ��:. ril .ill�i •� is il DETERMINATION OF ' SIGNIFICANCE =' Type 1 and U tste . Ac
ons
o- •, •, n,
., i• '•'1., 1r. 1 , . 1. r• +•. 1y1 . ,. r1 W. C t1pi0•tat)i<$ r' i • ` • r / 15.4~� • I. h • t. , `•.• ..1 • , •t'. i , . )."2". t.'41;,if'b2 � ' .•.0 . .; . II . r1 ., o •� } . . ; Tr!: • .i " yrlfr.�A ''�,� ''1 rr, ..t.1. N• • , i s � •• �:: , '1% ' �• 'r :
•
SIC PART 1 — PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE : This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E . Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review . Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 .
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies , research or investigation . -If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Bailey Park
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
1395 Danby Rd . - Town of Danby To Akins County
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Michael F . Hovanec 607 ) 272 - 2706
ADDRESS
1395 Danby Rd .
CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE
Ithaca J NY 1 14850
NAME OF OWNER (If different) r BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Same ( )
ADDRESS
CITY/PO
STATE ZIP CODE
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Submission of information for existing PDD plus expansion of same .
•
Please Complete Each Question — Indicate N .A . If not applicable
A. Site Description •
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas .
1 . Present land use: ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ® Commercial 12 Residential (suburban) ❑ Rural ( non-farm )
OForest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Other
2 . Total acreage of project area : 7 acres .
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMRLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 5 . 4 acres t1
acres
•
Forested • 1 / 2 acres 1 / 2 acres
Agricultural ( Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc . ) 0 acres 0
acres
Wetland ( Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL ) 0 acres 0
acres
Water Surface Area 0 acres . n
acres
Unvegetated ( Rock , earth or fill ) 0 acres n
acres .
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1 • 1 acres 2 . 3
acres
Lawn
Other ( Indicate type) 0 acres 4 . 2
acres
3 . What is predominant soil type( s ) on project site ?
a . Soil drainage: ❑ Well drained RU % of site ❑ Moderately well drained 30 % of site
OPoorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification System ? acres . ( See 1 NYCRR 370).
4 . Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site ? ❑ Yes EJNo
a . What is depth to bedrock ? 20 ' . ( in feet)
2
•
377
5 . Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes : 00- 10 % 100 % 010- 15 %
015 , or greater a/,
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places ? OYes 1 ) No
7 . Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks ? OYes ONo
8 . What is the depth of the water table ? 80 ( in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal , or sole source aquifer ? OYes ® No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area ? OYes ® No
11 . Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered ?
O Yes No According to
Identify each species
12 . Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site ? ( I . e . , cliffs, dunes, other geological formations )
O Yes No Describe
13 . Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area ?
O Yes ■:' No If yes, explain
14 . Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community ?
O Yes ri No
15 . Streams within or contiguous to project area : NONE
a . Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16 . Lakes, ponds , wetland areas within or contiguous to project area :
a . Name NONE b . Size ( In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities ? OYes ® No
a ) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection ? OYes ONo
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection ? OYes ONo
18 . Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA ,
Section 303 and 304 ? OYes ® No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617 ? ■ Yes No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes ? OYes No •
.
. Project Description
Physical dimensions and scale of project ( fill in dimensions as appropriate)
I
a . Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor K acres .
b. Project acreage to be developed : s acres initially; 0 acres ultimately .
c . Project acreage to remain undeveloped __ 0 acres .
d . Length of project, in miles: ( If appropriate)
e . If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 100 % ;
f . Number of off-sheet parking spaces existing 39 ; proposed 50 .
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project )?
h . If residential : Number and type of housing units :
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially
Ultimately 14
i . Dimensions ( in feet) of largest proposed structure 10 height: 28 width; 66 length .
j . Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is ? 574 ft .
3
2. How much natural material ( i . e . . rock , earth, etc . ) will be removed from the sites 0 tons/cubic yards
•
4 3 . Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ? ® Yes ONo ON/A
3 '° a . If yes, • for what intend . .. purpose is the site being reclaimed ? Lawn
3 b . Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation ? ® Yes ONo
c . Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation ? ® Yes ONo
4 . How many acres of vegetation ( trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site ? . 1 acres .
5 . Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project ?
• Yes E No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months , (including demolition ).
7 . If multi-phased:
a . Total number of phases anticipated ( number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, ( including demolition ).
c . Approximate completion date of final phase month year .
d . Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases ? • Yes ONo
8 . Will blasting occur during construction ? ° Yes ilNo
9. Number of jobs generated : during construction 0 ; after project Is complete ).
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0
11 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities ? OYes ® No If yes , explain
12 . Is surface liquid waste disposal involved ? OYes No
a . If yes , indicate type of waste ( sewage, industrial, etc . ) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effuent will be discharged
13 . Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved ? eaYes ONo Type Sewage System
14 . Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal ? OYes E] No
Explain
15 . Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain ? OYes No
16. Will the project generate solid waste ? el Yes ■ No •
a . If yes, what is the amount per month 1 tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used ? ® Yes ONo
c. If yes, give name Lanstrom .
; location Spencer , NY
'
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill ? ■ Yes ® No
i
e. If Yes, explain
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste ? OYes allo
a . If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal ? tons/month .
b . If yes , what is the anticipated site life ?
years .
18 . Will project use herbicides or pesticides ? ° Yes Ea Ne
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes ® No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels ?
OYes it7No
21 . Will project result in an increase in energy use? !) Yes ONc.
If yes , indicate type(s) Natural Gas , Electric
22 . If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 20 gallons/minute,
23 . Total anticipated water usage per day . 3500 gallons/day.
24 . Does project Involve Local, State or Federal funding ? • Yes fNo
If Yes, explain
4
•
4
si/
Part 2 — PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE
General Information (Read Carefully) Responsibility of lead Agency
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question : Have my responses
reasonable, The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.t mean that it is also necessarily significant.
• Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2 ) does not y and determinations been
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying
asks that it be looked at further. Y g an impact in column 2 simply
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally a
mple of impacts and wherever possible the threshold d
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower
Y ppficable throughout the State and
for a Potential Large Impact response,
• The impacts of each project, on ea h shte, in eachglocaluatlon In Part 3. thresholds may be appropriate
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts an d thresholds to answer each question.
h
• The number of examples per question does not Indicate vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumla ve effectseach question..
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example prodded, check column to 2. If impactwe l occur b size of the
is lower than example, check column 1 .
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as p will occur but threshold
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
• impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates thasu htaereduct project n is small to moderate
must be explained in Part 3.
ion is not possible. This
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
1 • Will the proposed action MeACTsO a physical L LAND
to the project site? Moderate Large Mitigated 8
Impact Impact Project Change
I
Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES
• Any construction on slopes of 15 % or greater, (1S foot rise per 100
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ® 0 ❑ Yes ONo
10 % .
Construction on land where the depth to the water table Is less than El
3 feet. 0 ❑ Yes ONo
• Construction of paved parking area for 1 ,000 or more vehicles.
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within O • 0 • Yes ONo •
3 feet of existing ground surface. ® O Oyes • No
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or Involve more
than one phase or stage. I ® 0 Oyes ONo
• Excavation for mining
tons of natural material (i. e l remove more than 1 ,000 O
. rock or so l) peryear 0 Oyes ONo
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
El a
• Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ Yes ❑ No
• Other impacts ® ❑ Ye,
O 0 ❑ Yr
2 . Will there be an effect 0. ... ,y unique or unusual land forms found on
the site ? (i. e. , cliffs, dunes. geological formations, etc . )11) NO OYES
• Specific land forms:
25.:'Approvals Required: Submittal
$34A Type Date
City, Town, Village Board ® Yes ONo
City, Town, Village Planning Board ® Yes ONo
City, Town Zoning Board OYes ® No
City, County Health Department ® Yes ONo
Other Local Agencies ■ Yes ® No
Other Regional Agencies OYes ONo
State Agencies ® Yes ONo nn. r
Federal Agencies OYes tiNo
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision ? Yes ■ No
If Yes, indicate decision required:
!?9zoning amendment Ozoning variance Ospecial use permit Osubdivision Osite plan
Onew/revision of master plan Oresource management plan Mother PDD
2 . What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Commercial
3 . What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
Gas Station , HnEPt . Ftr .
4 . What is the proposed zoning of the site? PDD .
5 . What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
14 Single family wide homes .
6 . Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans ? ElYes ■ No
7 . What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a V. mile radius of proposed action ?
Commercial & Residpntia1
8 . Is the proposed action compatible with adjolning/surrounding land uses within a 'A mile ? aisles ■ No
9 . If• the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed ?
a . What Is the minimum lot size proposed?
•
10 . Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes No
11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? ® Yes ONo
a . If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand ? IZYes ONo
12 . Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic slgnificantly above present levels? ° Yes 1!9No
a . If yes, Is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic ? ° Yes ONo
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor N • me . _
" . _ Date 4/24/96)
Sirature e _ Title c944.4ere
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment form before proceeding
' th this assessment.
5
•
•
1 2 3, 353
IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be
3 . Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected ? Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
( Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ( Cl )
® NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ • Yes ONo
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes 0 N
• Other impacts: ❑ . ❑ • Yes ONo
. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ® NO OYES
- • Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10 % increase or decrease in the surface aria of any body of water • ❑ ❑ Yes • No
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area . ❑ ❑ • Yes ONo
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes • No
5 . Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? ® NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. • ❑ ❑ • Yes • No
• Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ` • ❑ ❑ Yes • No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ • • Yes • No
gallons per minute pumping capacity. .
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ . ❑ ❑ Yes • No
supply system .
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. • ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
• Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ • Yes ❑ No
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ • Yes ONo
day. •
Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge Into an ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes 0 N
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or Chemical ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
products greater than 1 ,100 gallons. :
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses In areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes • No
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may • ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts: 0 ❑ ❑ Yes • No
6 . Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff ? ONO ® YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows . f] 0 ❑ Yes • No
31 3
3 gr
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ® • ■ Yes ONo
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ® • OYes ONo
• Other impacts: 0 OYes ONo
• • OYes ONo
IMPACT ON AIR
7 . Will proposed action affect air quality ?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO OYES
• Proposed Action will induce 1 ,000 or more vehicle trips in any given •
hour. • [' Yes ONo
• Proposed Action will result In the incineration of more than 1 ton of •
refuse per hour. • ■ Yes ❑ lVo
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed S lbs. per hour or a •
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ Yes ONo
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed •
to industrial use. LJYes • No
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas. • ■ Yes • No
• Other impacts:
0 • ❑ Yes ONo
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
•
9 . Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species ?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO OYES
I Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. 0
❑ Yes • No
I Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a yeah O 0 Yes • No
r, oter
than for agricultural purposes. • •
Other impacts: ■ Yes ONo
0 0 ❑ Yes ONo
. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
•
non-endangered species?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ® NO OYES
•
Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or • •
•
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ Yes • No
Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ■
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally Important O ❑ Yes ONo
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural and resources ?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO OYES
the proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural •
and ( includes cropland, hayfields, pasture. vineyard, orchard, etc. ) ■ ❑ Yes ❑ No
8
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ • Yes ONo
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would Irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ 0 ❑ Yes • No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2 . 5 acres of agricultural land.
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent Installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
land management systems (e. g. , subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e. g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
?her impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
•
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources ? ® NO OYES
( If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617. 21 ,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from • ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ . • • Yes ONo
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or Significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes • No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area .
• Other impacts : i ❑ ❑ [ Yes ❑ No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12 . Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance ? ; N NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
oposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially • •ntiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register ❑ Yes ONo
historic places.
• Anyimpact to 'an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ . 0
project site. Oyes • No
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ Yes • No
• Other impacts:
0, ❑ ❑ Yes , • No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13 . Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities ?
Examples that would apply to column 2 . NO OYES
• The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑
• A major reduction of an open space important to the community. • ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
❑ ❑ Oyes ONo
9
31' 6"
---IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3
Small to
14 . Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems ? Moderate Potential Can Impact Be
Large Mitigated By
Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO OYES Impact Impact Project Change
• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. •
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. O ■ Yes ONo
❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
• Other impacts:
• • ❑ Yes ONo
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15 . Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? ® NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5 % increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ • OYes . ONo
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy •
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family ❑ ❑ Yes • No
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
• Other impacts:
• ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16 . Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action ? NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Blasting within 1 , 500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑
facility. ❑ ❑ Yes • No
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). •
• Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local • • • Yes • No
ambient noise levels for noise - outside of structures. • ■ Yes • No
•
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ •
noise screen. ❑ Yes ONo
• Other impacts: ❑ ■
° • • Yes • No .
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17 . Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
Examples that would! apply to Column 2 ENO OYES •
• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑
substances (i. e. oil, pesticides, cherlicals, radiation, etc. ) in the event of ® ❑ Yes ONo
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
• Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" In any
form (i. e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, Irritating, ❑ ❑ Yes ONo
infectious, etc. )
• Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑
gas or other flammable i!;quuds. ❑ ■ Yes ONo
• Proposed action may re:tult in the excavation or other disturbance ❑
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the' disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ ■ Yes ONO
waste.
• Other impacts: ❑
• ❑ Yes • No
10
I 434
•
37
1
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 2 3
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be
18 . Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community ? Moderate Large Mitigated By
ONO :s YES Impact Impact Project Change
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5 % . ■ ❑ Yes • No
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services •
will increase by more than 5 % per year as a result of this project. ■ ❑ Yes • No
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. •
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ Yes • No
Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ® 0 • Yes ONo
or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No
Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑
(e. g. schools, police and fire, etc. ) • ❑ Yes ❑ No
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ •
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ■ Yes • No
• Other impacts: `� ❑ ■ Yes ❑ No
❑ 0 • Yes ONo
19 . Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts ? MNO OYES
L
a
II Any Action In Pad 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
4
•
Part 3 — EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(:) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(:) may be
gate
r d
ructions
uss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: .
1 . Briefly describe the impact.
2 . Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3 . Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider.
• The probability of the impact occurring v
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
• Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
• Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. a
(Continue on attachments)
11