Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00 Geotechnical DataPark Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION 00 31 32 - 1 SECTION 00 31 32 – GEOTECHNICAL AND CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS INFORMATION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings, Specifications and general provisions of the Contract, including Gen- eral and Supplementary Conditions, SECTION 00 31 32A Geotechnical Evaluation Report, SECTION 00 31 32B - Controlled Modulus Column (CMC) rigid inclusions design report, Division 00 and 01 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION A. A Geotechnical Evaluation was conducted at the site. B. The Geotechnical Evaluation Report is issued with Contract Documents for ex- amination by Contractor and are part of Contract Documents. C. Contractor, however, is responsible for any conclusions drawn from the Ge- otechnical data; if he prefers not to assume such risk, he is under obligation of employing his own experts to analyze available information; be responsible for any consequences of acting on conclusions obtained. D. Owner does not guarantee continuity of conditions indicated at Project location. E. The attached SECTION 00 31 32A Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Terracon Consultants-NY, Inc, dated March 2017, is included for Contractor ref- erence/use and is referenced by appropriate sections of the Specifications. 1.2 CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT A. Based on Geotechnical Evaluation, a Controlled Modulus Column (CMC) rigid in- clusions design evaluation was conducted. B. The Controlled Modulus Column (CMC) rigid inclusions design evaluation design report is issued with Contract Documents for examination by Contractor and are part of Contract Documents. C. Contractor, however, is responsible for any conclusions drawn from the Con- trolled Modulus Column (CMC) rigid inclusions design data; if he prefers not to assume such risk, he is under obligation of employing his own experts to analyze available information; be responsible for any consequences of acting on conclu- sions obtained. D. Owner does not guarantee continuity of conditions indicated in the Controlled Modulus Column (CMC) rigid inclusions design evaluation. Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION 00 31 32 - 2 E. The attached SECTION 00 31 32B - Controlled Modulus Column (CMC) rigid in- clusions design report prepared by DGI Menard, Inc dated May 2020, is included for Contractor reference/use and is referenced by appropriate sections of the Specifications. Use of Controlled Modulus Column (CMC) rigid inclusions to limit settlement and provide the required bearing capacity for the foundations and slab on grade. . END OF SECTION 00 31 32 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 REPORT COVER PAGE Geotechnical Engineering Report __________________________________________________________________________ Carpenter Park Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 Terracon Project No. J5195080 Prepared for: Park Grove Realty, LLC Rochester, New York Prepared by: Terracon Consultants-NY, Inc. Rochester, New York SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Terracon Consultants-NY, Inc. 15 Marway Circle, Suite 2B Rochester, New York 14624 P (585) 247 3471 F (585) 363 7025 terracon.com REPORT COVER LETTER TO SIGNNovember 13, 2019 Park Grove Realty, LLC 46 Price Street, Suite 2003 Rochester, New York 14607 Attn: Mr. Andrew Bodewes P: (770) 541 1700 E: abodewes@parkgrovellc.com Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park Route 13 and 3rd Street Ithaca, New York Terracon Project No. J5195080 Dear Mr. Bodewes: We have completed the Geotechnical Engineering services for the above referenced project. This study was performed in general accordance with Terracon Proposal No. PJ5195080 dated July 15, 2019. This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical recommendations concerning earthwork and the design and construction of foundations, floor slabs, and pavement for the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants-NY, Inc. Michele A. Fiorillo, P.E.Qamar A. O. Kazmi, P.E., F. ASCE Department Manager - Geotechnical Senior Consultant SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 1 REPORT TOPICS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 SITE CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 3 GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION ...................................................................... 4 GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 5 EARTHWORK ................................................................................................................ 8 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ......................................................................................... 13 GROUND IMPROVEMENT ........................................................................................... 14 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................... 15 FLOOR SLABS ............................................................................................................ 15 PAVEMENTS ................................................................................................................ 17 ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION ............................................. 20 GENERAL COMMENTS ............................................................................................... 20 FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... 22 Note: This report was originally delivered in a web-based format.Orange Bold text in the report indicates a referenced section heading. The PDF version also includes hyperlinks which direct the reader to that section and clicking on the GeoReport logo will bring you back to this page. For more interactive features, please view your project online at client.terracon.com. ATTACHMENTS EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS EXPLORATION RESULTS SUPPORTING INFORMATION Note: Refer to each individual Attachment for a listing of contents. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 1 INTRODUCTION Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park Route 13 and 3rd Street Ithaca, New York Terracon Project No. J5195080 November 13, 2019 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering services performed for the proposed Carpenter Park development to be located southwest of the intersection of Route 13 and 3rd Street in Ithaca, New York. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: ■Subsurface soil conditions ■Foundation design and construction ■Groundwater conditions ■Floor slab design and construction ■Site preparation and earthwork ■Seismic site classification per IBC ■Demolition considerations ■Dewatering considerations ■Excavation considerations ■Pavement design and construction A preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report was prepared by Terracon for the site (refer to Terracon’s Geotechnical Engineering Report No. J5185077, dated July 24, 2019). The field and laboratory test results presented in the preliminary report have been included in Exploration Results section of this report. The additional geotechnical engineering Scope of Services for this project included the advancement of seven deep test borings within the footprint of the proposed building and eight shallow test borings within proposed pavement areas. The building borings were advanced to depths generally ranging from approximately 62 to 152 feet below existing site grades. The pavement borings were advanced to a depth of approximately 6 feet below existing ground surface. Maps showing the site and exploration locations are shown in the Site Location and Exploration Plan sections, respectively. The results of the laboratory testing performed on soil samples obtained from the site during the field exploration are included on the boring logs and/or as separate graphs in the Exploration Results section. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 2 SITE CONDITIONS The following description of site conditions is derived from our site visit in association with the field exploration and our review of publicly available geologic and topographic maps. Item Description Parcel Information The project is located southwest side of the intersection of Route 13 and 3rd Street in Ithaca, New York. Approximate coordinates: Latitude 42.4469° N and Longitude 76.5091° W Existing Improvements The project site is developed with existing roadways, concrete sidewalks, overhead and underground utility lines, and existing commercial buildings. A community garden is located within the middle portion of the site. The areas within the proposed buildings’ footprints consist of vacant lots. Current Ground Cover Lightly vegetated, asphalt paved and gravel roadways, concrete sidewalks, grass. Existing Topography (from Site Plans prepared by Passero Associates, dated May 2019 Ground surface elevation is generally level across the site. Ground elevations (El.) range from approximately El. 385 to El. 391 feet above MSL. Geology1 The project area is located along the eastern side of Cayuga Inlet, in the central portion of Tompkins County, within the Allegheny Plateau physiographic province. Some 12,000 years ago glaciers from the most recent ice age reached their southern-most extent in New York. The ancient valley, which is the current location of Cayuga Lake, was deepened by the glaciers and flooded by glacial melt water. Deposits of ice and scoured material (till) formed dams that trapped large pools of water as the glaciers receded. Although these impoundments were short-lived by geologic standards, they existed long enough to leave behind large clay deposits as very fine particles settled on the lake beds. The down-cutting of the Cayuga Valley resulted in the waterfalls and gorges, but it also left hanging valleys and steeply graded, geologically active tributary streams. The Surficial Geologic Map of New York maps soils in the area as alluvium and glacio-lacustrine silt and clay. 1.References: Fisher, D.W., Isachsen, Y.W., and Rickard, L.V., 1970, Geologic Map of New York State, consisting of 5 sheets: Niagara, Finger Lakes, Hudson-Mohawk, Adirondack, and Lower Hudson, New York State Museum and Science Service, Map and Chart Series No. 15, scale 1: 250,000. NYSDOT Geotechnical Design Manual, Chapter 3-Geology of New York State SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Our understanding of the project is based on our discussions with the client during the proposal and project planning. A period of collaboration has transpired since the project was initiated, and our current understanding of the project conditions is as follows. Aspects of the project that are assumed are highlighted in yellow.Please review this information and confirm that our assumptions are correct. Item Description Information Provided Several emails from the developer, DiMarco Group (DiMarco) with Project Plans prepared by Passero Associates, dated May 2019 and Preliminary Structural Loads provided by Barton Partners. Project Description The site will be developed with residential, retail and medical office buildings, as well as paved areas. Proposed Structure The project includes one 5-story building, one 4 story building, and two 4/2 story buildings. Building A ■5-Story Medical Office Building ■13,700 square feet footprint ■FF = 390.0 feet Building B ■4/2-Stories Mixed Use ■24,878 square feet footprint ■64 units ■FF = 390.5 feet Building C ■4/2-Stories Mixed Use ■37,459 square feet footprint ■102 units ■FF = 390.5 feet Building D ■4-Story Apartment Building ■44,641 square feet footprint ■42 units ■FF = 387.5 feet Common Areas and Parking Lots Building Construction Combination of structural steel and wood framed structures on concrete foundations and slabs. Finished Floor Elevation Ranging from 387.5 to 390.5 feet (see Proposed Structure above) SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 4 Item Description Maximum Loads and Tolerable Settlements (provided by Barton Partners or assumed) ■Typical Columns: DL= 40 to 340 kips; LL = 25 to 215 kips ■Typical Wall Loadings: DL = 8 to 17 kips per linear foot (klf); LL= 1 to 6 klf ■Slabs: 150 pounds per square foot (psf), assumed ■Maximum tolerable total settlements of 1 inch (assumed) ■Maximum tolerable differential settlements of 0.5 inch over a length of 40 feet (assumed) Grading Finished floor elevation (FFE) is expected to be about the same as existing grades. Minimal (i.e. less than 2 feet) earthwork cut and fill are anticipated across the site. Below-Grade Structures Below-grade structures (i.e. basements; below grade parking garages) are not planned for this project. Retaining Walls No retaining walls are anticipated for this project. Pavements Both rigid (concrete) and flexible (asphalt) pavement sections will be required for the project. Anticipated traffic is as follows: ■Autos/light trucks: 1,000 vehicles per day ■Light delivery and trash collection vehicles: 10 vehicles per day ■Tractor-trailer trucks: 1 per week The pavement design period is 20 years. GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION We have developed a general characterization of the subsurface conditions based upon our review of the subsurface exploration, laboratory data, geologic setting and our understanding of the project. This characterization, termed GeoModel, forms the basis of our geotechnical calculations and evaluation of site preparation and foundation options. Conditions encountered at each exploration point are indicated on the individual logs. The individual logs can be found in the Exploration Results section and the GeoModel can be found in the Figures section of this report. As part of our analyses, we identified the following model layers within the subsurface profile. For a more detailed view of the model layer depths at each boring location, refer to the GeoModel. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 5 Model Layer Layer Name General Description 1 Fill/Topsoil Topsoil; Mixtures of silt, sand, and gravel with debris (bricks; concrete; glass) and organic matter; gray, brown, black 2 Native Upper Fine-Grained Soils Mixtures of silt, clay, and fine sands; with shell and seams of peat/marl; brown, gray, black; generally very soft to soft or loose 3 Sand and Gravel1 Mixture of Sand and Gravel with Silt; generally medium dense tovery dense 4 Native Lower Fine-Grained Soils Mixtures of silt, clay, and fine sands; with shell and seams ofpeat/marl; brown, gray, black; generally very soft to soft or loose 1.Generally encountered at an average depth of about 80 feet below ground surface (or at an averageelevation of about 308 feet) and ranged in thickness from a minimum of 15 feet to greater than 40 feet. Groundwater Conditions Due to the low permeability of the soils encountered in the borings, a relatively long period may be necessary for a groundwater level to stabilize in a borehole. Long-term observations in piezometers or observation wells sealed from the influence of surface water are required to define groundwater levels in materials of this type. For design purposes, due to the proximity of site to the Cayuga Inlet, groundwater should be anticipated at same elevation as that in Cayuga Inlet. Groundwater level fluctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on the boring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW The subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings performed at the project site generally consist of 2 to 7 feet of fill material overlying deep deposits of very soft to stiff or loose lacustrine (glacial lake) deposits, consisting of mixtures of silt, fine sand, and clay. Organic matter and peat layers were also observed at several locations within the natural soils. Interbedded within the deep glacio-lacustrine deposits is a layer of granular silty sand-gravel. This medium dense to very dense granular sand/gravel layer was generally encountered in the borings at an average depth of about 80 feet below ground surface (or at an average elevation of about 308 feet) and ranged in thickness from a minimum of 15 feet to greater than 40 feet. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 6 The subsurface conditions encountered in our investigation are generally consistent with the Surficial Geologic Map of New York, which maps the soil at the project site as alluvial soils and lacustrine silt and clay. The lacustrine deposits extend at this location to depths greater than 150 feet. Bedrock may be 200 feet or more below the existing ground surface but has not been confirmed by this or the previous geotechnical investigations performed at the project site. Due to the significant risk for excessive differential and total settlements, it is our opinion that the existing natural soils, extending to approximately 80 feet below existing grades, are unsuitable for the direct support of shallow foundations or floor slabs-on-grade. Recommendations for soil improvement are discussed in this report. Several alternatives were considered for support of the foundations and floor slabs for the new structures, including deep foundations and improved soil. Deep foundations would need to penetrate the fill (GeoModel Layer 1) and upper soft layer (GeoModel Layer 2) and derive support from the underlying native sand/gravel layer (GeoModel Layer 3). We have evaluated driven piles, such as closed-end pipe piles, and drilled grouted displacement piles (DGDP). However, because of the variable thickness of the medium dense to dense granular sand/gravel layer, there is a possibility that the granular layer may be too thin in localized areas and driven piles or DGDP may “punch” through this layer. In such a case, the piles would need to be driven to greater depths in order to achieve the required capacity, or additional piles may need to be added. Such changes during construction would result in significant increase to the cost and delays to the schedule.Accordingly, we do not recommend using a deep foundation system for this project. Shallow foundations and floor slabs supported on improved soils is in our opinion a better option for the project. Two possible ground improvement options were considered: Pre-compressing the soft soils by placement of a surcharge fill and the use of controlled modulus columns/rigid inclusions. Both options are discussed below. ■Surcharge Fill Load and Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PV Drains): This method would consist of surcharging each of the building footprint with a temporary fill embankment. The surcharge fill would be maintained for some period of time so that the soil is pre- compressed such that, after removal of the surcharge fill and construction of shallow foundations, the magnitude of settlement is limited to acceptable levels under anticipated building loads. Consolidation of low permeability soils such a s those present at the site (GeoModel Layer 2), is a slow very process that occurs over many years. However, to accelerate the rate of consolidation in these soils, PV drains can be installed to significantly shorten the length of the drainage path and take advantage of the possible higher horizontal soil permeability. PV drains typically consist of a corrugated plastic core through which water can flow, with a permeable geotextile outer cover. The drains are usually installed using a mandrel. A drainage layer is placed at the ground surface to collect and SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 7 discharge the water that would be squeezed out of the soil. The surcharge load is then placed to consolidate the underlying soft compressible soils. Although this method could be technically feasible, there are some key issues that should be considered for this site when using this ground improvement method. o As noted in the borings, organic layers of peat/organic matter where encountered in the borings. Pre-loading the soils does not address the long-term decomposition of the organic soils and the corresponding settlements. The settlements due to decomposition of organic matter/peat may be significant, are difficult to predict, and may occur over many years, resulting in unpredictable settlement of the structures. o If the building construction will occur in phases, surcharge load from fill placed in a proposed building location may impact the stability and settlements of adjacent previously constructed facilities, such as buildings, foundations, and buried or above-ground utilities. Based on the above considerations, we do not recommend the Surcharge Fill and PV Drains option for this project. ■Controlled Modulus Columns (CMC) or Rigid Inclusion Elements (RIE): The on-site soils may be improved in-situ by such proprietary ground improvement systems as Controlled Modulus Columns or Rigid Inclusion Elements. After the soils are improved, shallow foundations and slabs-on-grade may be supported on the improved soils. It is our opinion that CMC or RIE improved soils technically feasible as well as likely the most cost- effective solution for this site. Further discussion of the ground improvement is presented in the Ground Improvement section of this report. Support of pavements on or above existing fill materials is discussed in this report. However, even with the recommended construction procedures, there is inherent risk for the owner that compressible fill or unsuitable material, within or buried by the fill, will not be discovered. This risk of unforeseen conditions cannot be eliminated without completely removing the existing fill but can be reduced by following the recommendations contained in this report. We recommend the excavated subgrades be observed by the Geotechnical Engineer after excavation to proposed grades. Terracon should be retained to observe ground improvement operations, earthwork operations, as well as to monitor the ground improvement operations. The General Comments section provides an understanding of the report limitations. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 8 EARTHWORK Earthwork is anticipated to include clearing and grubbing, excavations, and fill placement. The following sections provide recommendations for use in the preparation of specifications for the work. Recommendations include critical quality criteria, as necessary, to render the site in the state considered in our geotechnical engineering evaluation for foundations, floor slabs, and pavements. Demolition As part of the construction, we anticipate removal/relocation of existing structures (i.e. slabs; foundations; pavements; sidewalks; underground utilities; etc.) may be required. We also recommend the following: ■Existing structures and utilities should be removed from beneath proposed foundations and floor slabs. ■Existing structures should be removed from proposed pavement areas to a minimum depth of 2 feet below of the pavement subgrade. Existing floor slabs (if left at a minimum depth of 2 feet below the bottom of floor slab) should be broken up to promote drainage and minimize the potential for trapped water. ■Existing underground pipes to be abandoned may remain in-place if the top of the pipe is at least 2 ft below pavement subgrade or floor slab bottom and filled with Flowable Fill with a minimum compressive strength of 500 psi. Existing piping/structures should be disconnected from other existing piping intended to be left in place and functioning, and properly capped prior to placing Flowable Fill. Site Preparation Prior to placing fill, existing vegetation and root mat should be removed. Complete stripping of the topsoil should be performed in the proposed building and parking/driveway areas. Subgrades within the building pad and pavement areas should be proof-rolled with a minimum 10-ton (static weight) smooth drum roller compactor. We recommend a minimum of two overlapping passes in one direction, followed by two overlapping passes in a direction perpendicular to the first passes. The intent is to identify unacceptable (excessively loose/soft) subgrade areas, compact areas with relatively loose surficial soil, and to re-compact areas loosened by stripping operations. As an alternative, in pavement areas, proof-rolling can also be performed with an adequately loaded vehicle such as a loaded tandem axle dump truck or other heavy, rubber-tired construction equipment weighing at least 20 tons. Areas which excessively deflect under the proof-roll should be delineated and subsequently addressed by the Geotechnical Engineer. Unstable subgrades, as identified by the Geotechnical SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 9 Engineer, should be over-excavated from the building footprint, footing bearing zones, and pavement areas to competent material and replaced with compacted Structural Fill. Fill Material Types Earthen materials used should meet the following material property requirements: Fill Type1 USCS Classification Acceptable Parameters Structural Fill (used below, or within 10 feet of structures, pavements or constructed slopes) GW, GW-GM, SW, SW-SM, SP, SM, GP Liquid Limit less than 40, Plasticity Index less than 20, and less than 25% retained on No. 200 sieve; maximum particle size: 3 inches Slab Aggregate Base/Subbase Course GW, GW-GM, SW, SW-SM, SP, GP NYSDOT, Subbase Course, Type 2. Less than 10% passing No. 200 sieve. General Fill (used in landscape areas) GW, GP, GM, SW, SP, SM, CL, ML General Fill may be used for general site grading; General Fill should not be used under settlement or frost-sensitive structures. General Fill should have a maximum particle size of 6 inches and no more than 40 percent by weight passing the No. 200 sieve. Non-Frost Susceptible (NFS) Fill GW, GP, SW, SP NFS Fill should contain less than 5 percent material passing No. 200 sieve size and have a maximum particle size of 3 inches Crushed Stone GP May be used to level subgrades at the bottom of pipe trenches and to facilitate dewatering. Should be uniform ¾-inch angular Crushed Stone wrapped in a geotextile separation fabric (Mirafi 140N, or similar). Lean Concrete Not applicable Lean Concrete should be flowable, self-compacting concrete with a compressive strength between 750 and 2,000 psi. 1.Compacted fill should consist of approved materials that are free of organic matter and debris. Frozen material should not be used, and fill should not be placed on a frozen subgrade. A sample of each material type should be submitted to the Geotechnical Engineer for evaluation prior to use on this site. Excavated on-site soils are anticipated to consist primarily of fine sand, silt, and clay mixtures. We do not recommend reusing excavated on-site soils as Structural Fill. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 10 Fill Compaction Requirements Structural and General Fill should meet the following compaction requirements. Item Structural Fill General Fill Maximum Lift Thickness 12 inches or less in loose thickness whenheavy, self-propelled compaction equipment isused. 6 to 8 inches in loose thickness when hand-guided equipment (i.e. jumping jack or platecompactor) is used. Same as Structural fill Minimum Compaction Requirements 1, 2, 3 95% of maximum dry density below foundationsand within 1 foot of finished pavement subgrade 90% of max. above foundations, below floorslabs, and more than 1 foot below finishedpavement subgrade 85% of max. Water Content Range 1 Workable moisture levels As required to achieve min.compaction requirements 1.Maximum density and optimum water content as determined by the modified Proctor test (ASTM D 1557).2.We recommend testing fill for moisture content and compaction during placement. Should the results of thein-place density tests indicate the specified moisture or compaction limits have not been met, the arearepresented by the test should be reworked and retested, as required, until the specified moisture andcompaction requirements are achieved. The zone of fill compacted to meet this criterion should extend atleast 5 feet horizontally beyond the building footprint.3.For NFS fill material (with less than 5 percent fines), compaction testing is typically not feasible. Werecommend that NFS fill be thoroughly tamped in place in horizontal lifts not to exceed 6 inches loosethickness. Compaction should be by uniform passes of compaction equipment in sufficient number, but notless than four passes, such that no further consolidation is evident. The NFS fill should not be dumped intoplace but should be distributed in horizontal lifts by blading and dozing in such a manner as to ensureproper placement into final position. Utility Trench Backfill Trench excavations should be made with sufficient working space to permit construction including backfill placement and compaction. Trenches should be backfilled with material that approximately matches the permeability characteristics of the surrounding soil to reduce the infiltration and preferential conveyance of surface water through the trench backfill. Fill placed as backfill for utilities located below the slab should consist of compacted Structural Fill or suitable bedding material. Utility trenches are a common source of water infiltration and migration. All utility trenches that penetrate beneath the building should be effectively sealed to restrict water intrusion and flow through the trenches, which could migrate below the building. The trench should provide an effective trench plug that extends at least 5 feet out from the face of the building exterior. The plug material should consist of cementitious flowable fill or low permeability clay. The trench plug material should be placed to surround the utility line. If used, the clay trench plug material should SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 11 be placed and compacted to comply with the water content and compaction recommendations for Structural Fill stated previously in this report. Grading and Drainage Grades must provide effective drainage away from the building during and after construction and should be maintained throughout the life of the structure. Water retained next to the building can result in soil movements greater than those discussed in this report. Greater movements can result in unacceptable differential floor slab and/or foundation movements, cracked slabs and walls, and roof leaks. The roof should have gutters/drains with downspouts discharging onto splash blocks at a distance of at least 10 feet from the buildings. Exposed ground should be sloped and maintained at a minimum 5 percent away from the building for at least 10 feet beyond the perimeter of the building. Locally, flatter grades may be necessary to transition ADA access requirements for flatwork. After buildings construction and landscaping, final grades should be verified to document effective drainage has been achieved. Grades around the structure should also be periodically inspected and adjusted as necessary as part of the structure’s maintenance program. Where paving or flatwork abuts the structure a maintenance program should be established to effectively seal and maintain joints and prevent surface water infiltration. Earthwork Construction Considerations Shallow excavations for the proposed structure are anticipated to be accomplished with conventional construction equipment. Upon completion of filling and grading, care should be taken to maintain the subgrade water content prior to construction of floor slabs. Construction traffic over the completed subgrades should be avoided. The site should also be graded to prevent ponding of surface water on the prepared subgrades or in excavations. Water collecting over or adjacent to construction areas should be removed. If the subgrade freezes, desiccates, saturates, or is disturbed, the affected material should be removed, or the materials should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted prior to floor slab construction. Fine-grained soil layers and uncontrolled fill were encountered in the borings. Perched groundwater conditions could be encountered in excavations where these soil/fill conditions are encountered. Accordingly, groundwater may be encountered in foundation or utility excavations. If groundwater is encountered, the contractor should select a dewatering method to lower groundwater at least 2 feet below the excavation subgrade in order to minimize bearing surface disturbance during construction of footings and utilities. Dewatering, if required, can likely be accomplished using filtered pumps placed in crushed stone. If ¾-inch crushed stone is used, a geotextile separation fabric (Mirafi 140N, or equivalent) should be placed between the crushed stone and on-site soil. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 12 As a minimum, excavations should be performed in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations” and its appendices, and in accordance with any applicable local, and/or state regulations. The contractor should be aware that slope height, slope inclination, and excavation depth should in no instance exceed the OSHA guidelines. OSHA guidelines are strictly enforced and if they are not followed, the owner, contractor, and/or earthwork and utility subcontractor could be liable and subject to substantial penalties. Construction site safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor who controls the means, methods, and sequencing of construction operations. Under no circumstances shall the information provided herein be interpreted to mean Terracon is assuming responsibility for construction site safety, or the contractor's activities; such responsibility shall neither be implied nor inferred. Construction Observation and Testing The earthwork efforts should be monitored under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Monitoring should include documentation of adequate removal of vegetation and topsoil, proofrolling, and mitigation of areas delineated by the proofroll to require mitigation. Each lift of compacted fill should be tested, evaluated, and reworked, as necessary, until approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of additional lifts. Each lift of fill should be tested for density and water content at a frequency of at least one test for every 2,500 square feet of compacted fill in the building areas and 5,000 square feet in pavement areas. One density and water content test should be performed for every 50 linear feet of compacted utility trench backfill. In areas of foundation excavations, the bearing subgrade should be evaluated under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. If unanticipated conditions are encountered, the Geotechnical Engineer should prescribe mitigation options. In addition to the documentation of the essential parameters necessary for construction, the continuation of the Geotechnical Engineer into the construction phase of the project provides the continuity to maintain the Geotechnical Engineer’s evaluation of subsurface conditions, including assessing variations and associated design changes. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 13 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS The proposed buildings may be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on improvedsoil, as discussed in the Ground Improvement section of this report. Design Parameters – Compressive Loads Item Description Maximum Net Allowable Bearing Pressure 1, 2 A value of 3,000 to 5,000 psf may be used for shallowfoundation installed upon improved soil. The final designbearing capacity for the improved soils should bedetermined by the design-build ground improvementcontractor Required Bearing Stratum 3 In-situ improved soil or structural fill placed aboveimproved soil Minimum Foundation Dimensions Columns: 24 inches Continuous:18 inches Ultimate Coefficient of Sliding Friction 4 0.50 (Footing on compacted Structural Fill) Minimum Embedment below Finished Grade 5 Exterior footings in unheated areas: 48 inches Exterior footings in heated areas: 48 inches Interior footings in heated areas:18 inches Estimated Total Settlement from Structural Loads 2 Ground improvement should be designed to allow for amaximum of 1 inch of total settlement. The final designtotal settlement for foundations placed upon improvedsoils should be determined by the design-build groundimprovementcontractor Estimated Differential Settlement 2, 6 Ground improvement should be designed to allow for amaximum of 0.5 inch of differential settlement. The finaldesign differential settlement for foundations placed uponimproved soils should be determined by the design-buildground improvement contractor 1.The maximum net allowable bearing pressure is the pressure in excess of the minimum surroundingoverburden pressure at the footing base elevation. 2.Values provided are for maximum loads noted in Project Description. 3.Unsuitable or soft soils should be over-excavated and replaced per the recommendations presented in the Earthwork. 4.Can be used to compute sliding resistance where foundations are placed on suitable soil/materials. Shouldbe neglected for foundations subject to net uplift conditions. 5.Embedment necessary to minimize the effects of frost and/or seasonal water content variations. For slopingground, maintain depth below the lowest adjacent exterior grade within 5 horizontal feet of the structure. 6.Differential settlements are as measured over a span of 50 feet. Foundation Construction Considerations As noted in Earthwork, the footing excavations should be evaluated under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. The base of all foundation excavations should be free of water and SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 14 loose soil, prior to placing concrete. Concrete should be placed soon after excavating to reduce bearing soil disturbance. Care should be taken to prevent wetting or drying of the bearing materials during construction. Excessively wet or dry material or any loose/disturbed material in the bottom of the footing excavations should be removed/reconditioned before foundation concrete is placed. GROUND IMPROVEMENT Ground improvement methods are proprietary systems designed by licensed contractors who design and implement the ground improvement system to meet the project needs. The ground improvement elements are installed by geotechnical specialty contractors who retain their own engineer to produce, sign, and seal the design, which effectively results in a design-build scenario for the ground improvement portion of the project. Accordingly, the design-builder should be provided a copy of this report and the settlement tolerances of the building to be able to produce a cost-effective design for the project. Installation of the ground improvement system is usually conducted following the stripping and utility relocation, but prior to subgrade preparation activities and placement and compaction of structural fill below the building. Following installation of the ground improvement system, the slab and foundation subgrades should be prepared in accordance with the ground improvement designer's requirements. This may include placement of a compacted fill layer between the slab and the ground improvement elements. We recommend that the ground improvement be extended at least 10 feet laterally beyond the footprint of each building. As discussed in Geotechnical Overview, we recommend that controlled-modulus columns (CMCs) or rigid inclusion elements (RIEs) be used to support the new buildings. Controlled-modulus columns or rigid inclusion elements consist of stiff unreinforced concrete column designed to transfer the load of the new structures through the soft compressible soil layer to a firm foundation layer. A Load Transfer Platform (LTP), consisting of geogrid reinforced granular aggregate, is generally used to transfer the load to the columns. The CMCs/RIEs are generally installed on a grid pattern utilizing a specialized boring tool and extend to an adequate deep layer. Once at the specified tip elevation within the bearing soils, the elements are formed with or without soil displacement by low-pressure injection (generally up to 30 psi) of a grout or concrete through the hollow core of the drilling tool. Concrete or grout is pumped through the auger stem and discharges from the auger tip as it is raised. The auger is extracted while a positive concrete head is maintained. The concrete/grout fills the void created by the auger during extraction. The RIEs and CMCs generally have a diameter between 12 and 18 inches. RIE or CMC are a specialty foundation system typically designed and installed by a contractor licensed by the owner of the patented/proprietary ground improvement system and are usually SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 15 part of the foundation contractor’s design-build system. Therefore, the subsurface exploration information should be provided to the foundation contractor for detailed analysis and design cost information. We recommend the design parameters be verified by a full-scale modulus test (similar to a pile load test) performed in the field. The Geotechnical Engineer should be retained to monitor the modulus test and subsequent production RIE/CMC installation. Construction Considerations The ground improvement installer should have a minimum of 5 years of experience installing the proposed ground improvement system for projects of similar size and complexity. The installer of the ground system should provide detailed design calculations sealed by a professional engineer licensed in the New York. The design calculations should demonstrate the ground improvement system is estimated to control long-term total and differential settlements to that required for the project. The installer should warrant their work as well as the maximum total and differential settlements they predict. A detailed work plan should be prepared by the ground improvement installer and should be reviewed and approved by Terracon prior to implementation of ground improvement operations. As part of the ground improvement installation, an in-depth QA/QC program should be implemented. Terracon should be provided the opportunity to assist with the review of the specifications for this work to confirm that appropriate quality control steps are implemented. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The seismic design requirements for buildings and other structures are based on Seismic Design Category. Site Classification is required to determine the Seismic Design Category for a structure. The Site Classification is based on the upper 100 feet of the site profile defined by a weighted average value of either shear wave velocity, standard penetration resistance, or undrained shear strength in accordance with Section 20.4 of ASCE 7 and the International Building Code (IBC). Based on the soil properties encountered at the site and as described on the exploration logs and results, it is our professional opinion that the Seismic Site Classification is E. FLOOR SLABS We anticipate the building slabs to be supported on Structural Fill placed over the improved soil, as per the design-build submittal. Design parameters for floor slabs assume the requirements for Ground Improvement section and those of the Ground Improvement Contractor have been followed. Specific attention should be given to positive drainage away from the structure and positive drainage of the Aggregate Base beneath the floor slab. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 16 Floor Slab Design Parameters Item Description Floor Slab Support 1,3 Minimum 12 inches3 of imported Slab Aggregate Base compacted to at least 90% of Modified Proctor (ASTM D 1557) placed directly upon improved soils. Estimated Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 2,4 100 pounds per square inch per inch (psi/in) for point loads 1.Floor slabs should be structurally independent of building footings or walls to reduce the possibility of floor slab cracking caused by differential movements between the slab and foundation. 2.Modulus of subgrade reaction is an estimated value based upon our experience with the subgrade condition, the requirements noted in Earthwork, and the floor slab support as noted in this table. It is provided for point loads. For large area loads the modulus of subgrade reaction would be lower. 3.Based upon the ground improvement system, the minimum Slab Aggregate Base thickness may be revisited and potentially reduced. The final aggregate base thickness for the floor slab bearing upon improved soils should be determined by the design-builder ground improvement contractor. For example, the material used for the load transfer platform (if required) may contribute toward the aggregate base required beneath slab. 4.Based upon the ground improvement system, the Modulus of Subgrade Reaction may be revisited and potentially increased. The final Modulus of Subgrade Reaction for the floor slab bearing upon improved soils should be determined by the design-builder ground improvement contractor. The use of a vapor retarder should be considered beneath concrete slabs on grade covered with wood, tile, carpet, or other moisture sensitive or impervious coverings, or when the slab will support equipment sensitive to moisture. When conditions warrant the use of a vapor retarder, the slab designer should refer to ACI 302 and/or ACI 360 for procedures and cautions regarding the use and placement of a vapor retarder. Saw-cut control joints should be placed in the slab to help control the location and extent of cracking. For additional recommendations refer to the ACI Design Manual. Joints or cracks should be sealed with a water-proof, non-extruding compressible compound specifically recommended for heavy duty concrete pavement and wet environments. Where floor slabs are tied to perimeter walls or turn-down slabs to meet structural or other construction objectives, our experience indicates differential movement between the walls and slabs will likely be observed in adjacent slab expansion joints or floor slab cracks beyond the length of the structural dowels. The Structural Engineer should account for potential differential settlement through use of sufficient control joints, appropriate reinforcing or other means. Settlement of floor slabs supported on improved soil should be determined by the design-build ground improvement contractor. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 17 Floor Slab Construction Considerations Finished subgrade, within and for at least 10 feet beyond the floor slab, should be protected from traffic, rutting, or other disturbance and maintained in a relatively moist condition until floor slabs are constructed. If the subgrade should become damaged or desiccated prior to construction of floor slabs, the affected material should be removed, and Structural Fill should be added to replace the resulting excavation. Final conditioning of the finished subgrade should be performed immediately prior to placement of the floor slab support course. The Geotechnical Engineer should approve the condition of the floor slab subgrades immediately prior to placement of the floor slab support course, reinforcing steel, and concrete. Attention should be paid to high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbed earlier, and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. PAVEMENTS General Pavement Comments Pavement designs are provided for the traffic conditions and pavement life conditions as noted in Project Description and in the following sections of this report. A critical aspect of pavement performance is site preparation. Pavement designs, noted in this section, must be applied to the site, which has been prepared as recommended in the Earthwork section. Pavement Design Parameters Pavement designs were based on AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1993)and our experience with similar projects. The thickness of each course is a function of subgrade strength, traffic, design life, serviceability factors, and frost susceptibility. An assumed subgrade CBR of 4 was used for the AC pavement designs, and a modulus of subgrade reaction of 100 pci was used for the PCC pavement designs. The values were empirically derived based upon the results of our geotechnical investigation and our understanding of the quality of the subgrade as prescribed by the Site Preparation conditions as outlined in Earthwork. Pavement Section Thicknesses Frost susceptibility is a major factor in the overall pavement section thickness. The total pavement structural sections presented in this report are based also upon the expected depth of freeze, which for the project site is anticipated at 48 inches. Because of the fine-grained nature of the in-situ soil, and possible variations across the site of subgrade material (i.e. existing fill; native soils; compacted Structural Fill), we recommend a separation high-strength woven geotextile be placed upon all new approved flexible and rigid SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 18 pavement subgrades prior to placing the subbase course materials. A Mirafi RS280i or HP370 or approved equivalent should be used. These geotextiles will provide separation (i.e. mitigate migration of fines into the overlying subbase course material, which may contribute to its degradation and loss of strength), filtration (i.e. allows for movement of water across the plane of the geotextile with limited soil loss), confinement (i.e. will restrain lateral movement of the aggregate), and reinforcement. The following tables provides options for Asphaltic Concrete and for Portland Cement Sections: Asphaltic Concrete Design Layer Thickness (inches) Light Duty 1 Heavy Duty 1 Asphalt Top Course 2 1.5 1.5 Asphalt Binder Course 2 2.5 3.5 Aggregate Base Course 2 12.0 12.0 1.See Project Description for more specifics regarding pavement type. 2.All materials should meet the current NYSDOT Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) StandardSpecifications. ■Asphalt Top Course, NYSDOT Sect. 402 for Type 12.5 F2 Top Course HMA, Item No. 402.127202 ■Asphalt Binder Course, NYSDOT Sect. 402 for Type 19 F9 Binder Course HMA, Item No. 402.197902 ■Aggregate Base Course,NYSDOT Sect.304 for Type 2 Subbase Course, Item No. 304.12 Portland Cement Concrete Design Layer Thickness (inches) Light Duty 3,4 Heavy Duty 2,3,4 PCC 1 6.0 8.0 Aggregate Base 1 12.0 12.0 1.All materials should meet the current State, County, and City Department of Transportation (NYSDOT)Standard Specifications for Highway and Bridge Construction. ■Concrete Pavement, NYSDOT Portland Cement Concrete Section 502, with a minimum compressivestrength of 4,000 psi at 28 days. ■Aggregate Base Course, NYSDOT Section 304 for Type 2 Subbase Course, Item No. 304.12 2.In areas of anticipated heavy traffic, fire trucks, delivery trucks, or concentrated loads (e.g. dumpster pads),and areas with repeated turning or maneuvering of heavy vehicles. 3.Proper joint spacing will be required to prevent excessive slab curling and shrinkage cracking. Joints should besealed to prevent entry of foreign material and doweled where necessary for load transfer. 4.Where practical, we recommend early-entry cutting of crack-control joints in PCC pavements. Cutting of theconcrete in its “green” state typically reduces the potential for micro-cracking of the pavements prior to the crackcontrol joints being formed, compared to cutting the joints after the concrete has fully set. Micro-cracking ofpavements may lead to crack formation in locations other than the sawed joints, and/or reduction of fatigue lifeof the pavement. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 19 The estimated pavement sections provided in this report are minimums for the assumed design criteria, and as such, periodic maintenance should be expected. Areas for parking of heavy vehicles, concentrated turn areas, and start/stop maneuvers could require thicker pavement sections. Edge restraints (i.e. concrete curbs or aggregate shoulders) should be planned along curves and areas of maneuvering vehicles. A maintenance program that includes surface sealing, joint cleaning and sealing, and timely repair of cracks and deteriorated areas will increase the pavement’s service life. As an option, thicker sections could be constructed to decrease future maintenance. Pavement Drainage Pavements should be sloped to provide rapid drainage of surface water. Water allowed to pond on or adjacent to the pavements could saturate the subgrade and contribute to premature pavement deterioration. In addition, the pavement subgrade should be graded to provide positive drainage within the granular base section. Openings in pavements, such as decorative landscaped areas, are sources for water infiltration into surrounding pavement systems. Water can collect in the islands and migrate into the surrounding subgrade soils thereby degrading support of the pavement. This is especially applicable for islands with raised concrete curbs, irrigated foliage, and low permeability near- surface soils. The civil design for the pavements with these conditions should include features to restrict or to collect and discharge excess water from the islands. Examples of features are edge drains connected to the storm water collection system, longitudinal subdrains, or other suitable outlet and impermeable barriers preventing lateral migration of water such as a cutoff wall installed to a depth below the pavement structure. Pavement Maintenance The pavement sections represent minimum recommended thicknesses and, as such, periodic maintenance should be anticipated. Therefore, preventive maintenance should be planned and provided for through an on-going pavement management program. Maintenance activities are intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration and to preserve the pavement investment. Maintenance consists of both localized maintenance (e.g. crack and joint sealing and patching) and global maintenance (e.g. surface sealing). Preventive maintenance is usually the priority when implementing a pavement maintenance program. Even with periodic maintenance, some movements and related cracking may still occur, and repairs may be required. Pavement performance is affected by its surroundings. In addition to providing preventive maintenance, the civil engineer should consider the following recommendations in the design and layout of pavements: ■Final grade adjacent to paved areas should slope down from the edges at a minimum 2% SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 20 ■Subgrade and pavement surfaces should be properly sloped to promote proper surface drainage ■Drainage systems should be installed below pavements where surrounding areas are anticipated to be wet frequently ■Joint sealant and seal cracks should be installed immediately ■Seal all landscaped areas in or adjacent to pavements to reduce moisture migration to subgrade soils ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION The engineering recommendations provided in this report are based on the information obtained from the subsurface exploration and laboratory testing. However, conditions on the site may vary between the discrete locations that were observed at the time of our subsurface exploration. The nature and extent of variations between borings may not become evident until during construction. To account for this variability, Terracon should provide construction observation and testing of subsurface conditions revealed during construction as an extension of our engineering services. These services will also help in evaluating the Contractor's conformance with the plans and specifications. Because of our understanding of the intent of the geotechnical engineering recommendations, retaining Terracon for these services will allow us to provide consistent service throughout the project construction. Construction phase monitoring services may include, but are not limited to, observe earthwork operations and evaluate excavated soils for possible re-use as Structural Fill, monitoring the ground improvement operations, observation of shallow foundation subgrades, and placement and compaction of all fill materials. These services should be performed by a qualified representative working under supervision of the Geotechnical Engineer. GENERAL COMMENTS Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Natural variations will occur between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in this report, to provide observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If variations appear, we can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. If variations are noted in the absence of our observation and testing services on-site, we should be immediately notified so that we can provide evaluation and supplemental recommendations. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 21 Our Scope of Services does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. Our services and any correspondence or collaboration through this system are intended for the sole benefit and exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and are accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices with no third-party beneficiaries intended. Any third-party access to services or correspondence is solely for information purposes to support the services provided by Terracon to our client. Reliance upon the services and any work product is limited to our client, and is not intended for third parties. Any use or reliance of the provided information by third parties is done solely at their own risk. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site characteristics as provided are for design purposes and not to estimate excavation cost. Any use of our report in that regard is done at the sole risk of the excavating cost estimator as there may be variations on the site that are not apparent in the data that could significantly impact excavation cost. Any parties charged with estimating excavation costs should seek their own site characterization for specific purposes to obtain the specific level of detail necessary for costing. Site safety, and cost estimating including, excavation support, and dewatering requirements/design are the responsibility of others. If changes in the nature, design, or location of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid unless we review the changes and either verify or modify our conclusions in writing. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable FIGURES Contents: GeoModel (2 pages) SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 ELEVATION (MSL) (feet)Carpenter Park Ithaca, NY Terracon Project No. J5195080 Layering shown on this figure has been developed by thegeotechnical engineer for purposes of modeling the subsurfaceconditions as required for the subsequent geotechnical engineeringfor this project.Numbers adjacent to soil column indicate depth below ground surface. NOTES: B-1 B-2 B-3 AB-1 AB-2 AB-3 AB-4 AB-5 AB-6 AB-7 GEOMODEL-Building Borings This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model only. See individual logs for more detailed conditions. Second Water Observation Third Water Observation First Water Observation Mixture of Sand and Gravel with Silt; generally medium denseto very dense3 Mixtures of silt, clay, and fine sands; with shell and seams ofpeat/marl; brown, gray, black; generally very soft to soft orloose4 LEGEND Topsoil Fill Sandy Silt Sandy Silty Clay Clayey Sand with Gravel Organic Silt with Sand Silty Clay Silty Sand Silt Poorly-graded Sand withSilt Silty Sand with Gravel Silty Gravel with Sand Well-graded Gravel withsilt and sand Well-graded Sand withGravel Poorly-graded Sand Model Layer General DescriptionLayer Name Topsoil; Mixtures of silt, sand, and gravel with debris (bricks;concrete; glass) and organic matter; gray, brown, black1 Mixtures of silt, clay, and fine sands; with shell and seams ofpeat/marl; brown, gray, black; generally very soft to soft or loose2 Sand/Gravel Soils Native Lower FineGrained Soils Fill/Topsoil Native Upper FineGrained Soils 2 80 92 1 2 3 7 83 105 152 1 2 3 4 15 4 87 100 152 8.3 1 2 3 4 14.7 78 93 125 2 3 4 63 68 8387 125 2 3 2 3 4 6872 2 3 11.75 72 2 60 98 125 2 3 4 7 78 108 1 2 3 9 3 62 1 2 SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 ELEVATION (MSL) (feet)Carpenter Park Ithaca, NY Terracon Project No. J5195080 Layering shown on this figure has been developed by thegeotechnical engineer for purposes of modeling the subsurfaceconditions as required for the subsequent geotechnical engineeringfor this project.Numbers adjacent to soil column indicate depth below ground surface. NOTES: P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 GEOMODEL- Pavement Borings This is not a cross section. This is intended to display the Geotechnical Model only. See individual logs for more detailed conditions. Second Water Observation Third Water Observation First Water Observation Mixture of Sand and Gravel with Silt; generally medium denseto very dense3 Mixtures of silt, clay, and fine sands; with shell and seams ofpeat/marl; brown, gray, black; generally very soft to soft orloose4 LEGEND Fill Silty Clay Silt Model Layer General DescriptionLayer Name Topsoil; Mixtures of silt, sand, and gravel with debris (bricks;concrete; glass) and organic matter; gray, brown, black1 Mixtures of silt, clay, and fine sands; with shell and seams ofpeat/marl; brown, gray, black; generally very soft to soft or loose2 Sand/Gravel Soils Native LowerFine-Grained Soils Fill/Topsoil Native UpperFine-Grained Soils 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 4 6 1 2 4 6 1 2 3 6 1 2 SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable ATTACHMENTS SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES 1 of 2 EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES Test Borings Number of Borings Boring Depth (feet)Location 10 (B-1 through B-3; AB-1 through AB-7) 62 to 152 Building 8 (P-1 through P-8)6 Pavement Boring Layout and Elevations: Terracon personnel provided the boring layout. Coordinates were obtained with a handheld GPS unit (estimated horizontal accuracy of about ±20 feet) and approximate elevations were obtained by interpolation from the grading plans prepared by Passero Associates, dated May 2019. If elevations and a more precise boring layout are desired, we recommend borings be surveyed following completion of fieldwork. Subsurface Exploration Procedures: We advanced the borings with an ATV-mounted rotary drill rig using continuous hollow stem flight augers. Most of the borings were advanced using rotary wash boring methods, and drilling mud was generally employed as a drilling fluid to advance the borehole. At the location of B-3 a temporary groundwater well was installed. Soil sampling was performed using thin-wall tube and/or split-spoon sampling procedures. In the thin-walled tube sampling procedure, a thin-walled, seamless steel tube with a sharp cutting edge is pushed hydraulically into the soil to obtain a relatively undisturbed sample. In the split-spoon sampling procedure, a standard 2-inch outer diameter split-barrel sampling spoon is driven into the ground by a 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampling spoon the middle 12 inches of a normal 24-inch penetration is recorded as the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) resistance value. The SPT resistance values, also referred to as N-values, are indicated on the boring logs at the test depths. Borings AB-1, AB-2, AB-3, AB-4, and AB-5 were advanced to a depth of 45 to 50 without sampling. For safety purposes, all borings are backfilled with auger cuttings after their completion. The sampling depths, penetration distances, and other sampling information was recorded on the field boring logs. The samples were placed in appropriate containers and taken to our soil laboratory for testing and classification by a Geotechnical Engineer. Our exploration team prepared field boring logs as part of the drilling operations. These field logs included visual classifications of the materials encountered during drilling and our interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples. Final boring logs were prepared from the field logs. The final boring logs represent the Geotechnical Engineer's interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on observations and tests of the samples in our laboratory. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Geotechnical Engineering Report Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York November 13, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. J5195080 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES 2 of 2 Laboratory Testing The project engineer reviewed the field data and assigned laboratory tests to understand the engineering properties of the various soil strata, as necessary, for this project. Procedural standards noted below are for reference to methodology in general. In some cases, variations to methods were applied because of local practice or professional judgment. Standards noted below include reference to other, related standards. Such references are not necessarily applicable to describe the specific test performed. ■ASTM D2216 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass ■ASTM D4318 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils ■ASTM D422 Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils ■ASTM D2435/D2435M Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading ■ASTM D2166 Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil The laboratory testing program included examination of soil samples by a geologist. Based on the material’s texture and plasticity, we described and classified the soil samples in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS Contents: Site Location Plan Exploration Plans (5 pages) Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 SITE LOCATION Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, NY Terracon Project No. J5195080 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY QUADRANGLES INCLUDE: ITHACA WEST, NY (1/1/1949), ITHACA WEST, NY (1/1/1978) and ITHACA EAST, NY (1/1/1978). DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES SITE SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 EXPLORATION PLAN - AERIAL Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, NY Terracon Project No. J5195080 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 EXPLORATION PLAN - OVERLAY Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, NY Terracon Project No. J5195080 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 EXPLORATION PLAN - 1 Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York Terracon Project No. PJ5195080 Base Drawing Provided by DiMarco Group DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 EXPLORATION PLAN - 2 Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York Terracon Project No. PJ5195080 Base Drawing Provided by DiMarco Group DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 EXPLORATION PLAN - 3 Carpenter Park ■ Ithaca, New York Terracon Project No. PJ5195080 Base Drawing Provided by DiMarco Group DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable EXPLORATION RESULTS Contents: Boring Logs (37 pages) Grain Size Distribution (2 pages) Atterberg Limits (2 pages) Unconfined Compressive Strength (4 pages) Consolidation (5 pages) Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 5-18-16-8N=34 5-5-7-12N=12 9-8-5-6 N=13 3-3-2-2N=5 WOH/1.0-2-3N = 2 3-4-5-5 N=9 Undisturbed Sample 2-2-1-2N=3 2-2-2-2N=4 WOH-2-2-2N = 4 WOR/1.0-1-1 N = 1 WOH/2.0'N = WOH WOH/2.0'N = WOH 20 21 12 18 16 15 17.5 5 2 12 20 19 22 TOPSOIL FILL - SILTY SAND , with gravel, black and brown SANDY SILT (ML), trace clay, trace organic matter, brown with black,medium dense SANDY SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace gravel, trace organic matter, olive-brown and black, stiff CLAYEY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SC), trace organic matter, olive-brown and black, loose ORGANIC CLAY (OL), trace sand, occasional Peat seams, occasional shellfragments, black, medium stiff SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, mottled brown and gray, stiff Becomes olive brown, soft SILTY SAND (SM), trace organic matter, gray, loose SILT (ML), trace sand, occasional find sand lenses, occasional clay partings, brown - gray with black, soft Becomes gray, contains frequent shell fragments SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, trace shell fragments, olive - gray, verysoft 0.3 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 25.0 30.0 40.0 387.5+/- 386+/- 384+/- 382+/- 380+/- 378+/- 363+/- 358+/- 348+/- WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4459° Longitude: -76.5092°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 3 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-1 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 05-31-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 05-30-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOH/2.0'N = WOH WOR/2.0' N = WOR WOR/2.0' N = WOR 3-3-5-7N=8 4-5-5-7N=10 1-1-1-1 N=2 2-3-4-5 N=7 18-24-16-16N=40 20-17-16-22 23 24 20 0 16 18 21 16 SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, trace shell fragments, olive - gray, verysoft (continued) POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), dark gray, medium dense SILT (ML), trace sand, gray, very loose to loose Contains occasional clay partings SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM), gray, medium dense to dense 65.0 70.0 80.0 323+/- 318+/- 308+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4459° Longitude: -76.5092°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 3 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-1 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 05-31-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 05-30-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 3 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 N=33 16-12-16-17 N=28 20 12 SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM), gray, medium dense to dense(continued) Boring Terminated at 92 Feet 92.0 296+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)90 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4459° Longitude: -76.5092°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 3 of 3 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-1 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 05-31-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 05-30-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 3 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 8-12-14-22N=26 13-7-9-11N=16 7-3-4-4 N=7 7-5-3-2N=8 1-3-3-3N=6 3-2-2-2 N=4 2-1-1-1 N=2 WOH/1.0-1-2N = 1 2-1-2-1N=3 WOH/1.0-1-WOH N = 1 WOR/2.0N = WOR WOH/2.0'N = WOH 9 6 0 0 10 18 19 24 24 24 24 24 TOPSOIL FILL - SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL , trace brick fragements, traceconcrete fragments, brown and black, saturated SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, trace organic matter, occasional Peat inclusions, olive-brown with black, soft to medium stiff Becomes brown-gray Becomes gray, very soft Contains frequent peat seams SILTY SAND (SM), trace peat, fine grained, dark gray and black, very loose,saturated SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, occasional fine sand lenses, brown to gray, very soft Contains numerous shell fragments 0.3 7.0 25.0 30.0 390+/- 383+/- 365+/- 360+/- WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4466° Longitude: -76.5092°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 390 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 4 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-2 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 06-12-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 06-06-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole 15 ft BGS on 6/12/18 (Open hole to 152 ft BGS) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOR-WOH/1.5'N = WOH WOR/2.0 N = WOR WOR/2.0 N = WOR WOH-1-2-4N = 3 1-2-3-5N=5 3-4-3-3 N=7 3-2-2-2 N=4 8-10-12-8N=22 18-20-20-23 24 24 24 24 18 22 18 16 SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, occasional fine sand lenses, brown togray, very soft (continued) SILT (ML), trace sand, trace clay, gray, soft POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), loose, saturated SILT (ML), occasional fine sand lenses, gray and brown, soft to medium stiff, saturated SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND (GM), gray, dense, saturated 60.0 65.0 70.0 83.0 330+/- 325+/- 320+/- 307+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4466° Longitude: -76.5092°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 390 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 4 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-2 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 06-12-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 06-06-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole 15 ft BGS on 6/12/18 (Open hole to 152 ft BGS) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 3 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 N=40 22-24-20-20 N=44 18-23-25-25N=48 15-15-20-24N=35 10-8-5-5 N=13 3-3-2-2 N=5 2-3-2-3N=5 2-3-6-2N=9 1-1-WOH/1.0'N = 1 0 3 6 10 10 12 10 12 18 SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND (GM), gray, dense, saturated (continued) WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH SILT AND SAND (GW-GM), brown-gray,dense SILTY SAND (SM), fine grained, brown-gray, dense SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, brown, stiff Contains occasional silt seams and partings, becomes medium stiff SILT (ML), occasional fine sand lenses, gray and black, soft to medium stiff SILTY CLAY (CL), trace sand, brown to light brown, very soft to soft 95.0 100.0 105.0 120.0 125.0 295+/- 290+/- 285+/- 270+/- 265+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4466° Longitude: -76.5092°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 390 (Ft.) +/- Page 3 of 4 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-2 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 06-12-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 06-06-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole 15 ft BGS on 6/12/18 (Open hole to 152 ft BGS) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 3 4 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOH/1.5 - 3 N = WOH 1-2-1-1N=3 UndisturbedSample 2-3-3-2 N=6 5-7-9-15 N=16 20 0 24 10 13 SILTY CLAY (CL), trace sand, brown to light brown, very soft to soft(continued) SILT (ML), occasional clay partings, occasional fine sand lenses, gray toblack, soft to medium stiff Boring Terminated at 152 Feet 145.0 152.0 245+/- 238+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)130 135 140 145 150 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4466° Longitude: -76.5092°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 390 (Ft.) +/- Page 4 of 4 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-2 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 06-12-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 06-06-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole 15 ft BGS on 6/12/18 (Open hole to 152 ft BGS) WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 4 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 3-7-9-7N=16 7-4-3-3N=7 5-7-6-8 N=13 4-3-5-5N=8 WOH-2-1-2N = 3 WOH/1.0' -2-2 N = 2 WOH/2.0' N = WOH 2-2-2-1N=4 2-3-1-1N=4 WOH/2.0' N = WOH WOR/2.0'N = WOR WOH/2.0'N = WOH 18 8 6 12 14 20 10 18 12 24 24 24 TOPSOIL FILL - SILTY SAND , trace gravel, trace wood fragments, trace brickfragments, brown Becomes brown-black SANDY SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace gravel, olive-brown, stiff SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, trace organic matter, olive-brown, soft to medium stiff Becomes soft Becomes olive gray and black, contains occasional peat seams POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), trace organic matter, traceshell fragments, fine grained, gray, loose SILT (ML), with sand, trace clay, trace organic matter, gray, soft to mediumstiff SILT (ML), trace organic matter, gray, soft, saturated SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, trace organic matter, trace shell fragments, gray, very soft 0.3 4.0 6.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 389+/- 385+/- 383+/- 369+/- 364+/- 359+/- 354+/- WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4473° Longitude: -76.5087°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 4 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-3 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 06-18-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 06-04-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole. 1" PVC GW observation well installed at completion 14.7 ft BGS on 6/13/18. Casing at 75' BGS 8.3 ft BGS on 7/23/18 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 UndisturbedSample WOH/2.0' N = WOH Undisturbed Sample 6-6-8-8N=14 14-6-5-6N=11 9-6-6-9 N=12 3-3-4-7 N=7 10-9-13-15N=22 7-3-5-11 0 22 0 12 10 12 18 12 SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, trace organic matter, trace shellfragments, gray, very soft (continued) SILTY SAND (SM), trace gravel, fine grained, gray, loose to medium dense,saturated 60.0 329+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4473° Longitude: -76.5087°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 4 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-3 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 06-18-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 06-04-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole. 1" PVC GW observation well installed at completion 14.7 ft BGS on 6/13/18. Casing at 75' BGS 8.3 ft BGS on 7/23/18 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 N=8 9-9-13-12N=22 3-5-9-15N=14 5-3-3-5 N=6 6-10-9-12N=19 3-5-5-7N=10 2-4-6-10N=10 14 6 18 6 18 10 12 WELL GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL (SW), trace silt, gray, medium dense, saturated POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, dark gray toblack, loose to medium dense, saturated SILT (ML), trace sand, frequent fine sand lenses, brown, loose to mediumdense Contains occasional clay partings SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, occasional silt seams and partings,brown and dark gray, stiff 87.0 100.0 115.0 125.0 302+/- 289+/- 274+/- 264+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4473° Longitude: -76.5087°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 3 of 4 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-3 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 06-18-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 06-04-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole. 1" PVC GW observation well installed at completion 14.7 ft BGS on 6/13/18. Casing at 75' BGS 8.3 ft BGS on 7/23/18 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 3 4 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 3-3-10-12 N=13 2-3-13-20N=16 4-6-9-14N=15 8-12-15-19 N=27 11-17-12-17 N=29 14 18 SILT (ML), dark gray, medium dense SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, occasional silt seams and partings, brown, very stiff SILT (ML), trace sand, gray and brown, medium dense SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), occasional fine sand lenses, occasional silt partinngs, gray, very stiff Boring Terminated at 152 Feet 130.0 135.0 140.0 150.0 152.0 259+/- 254+/- 249+/- 239+/- 237+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)130 135 140 145 150 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4473° Longitude: -76.5087°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 4 of 4 Advancement Method:Open hole/Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bit and 2inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: CME-550X BORING LOG NO. B-3 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: R. Brown Boring Completed: 06-18-2018 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 06-04-2018 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole. 1" PVC GW observation well installed at completion 14.7 ft BGS on 6/13/18. Casing at 75' BGS 8.3 ft BGS on 7/23/18 WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 4 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Boring advanced to 50 feet BGS without sampling WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4456° Longitude: -76.5094°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-1 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-09-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-07-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH 4-5-4-4N=9 5-5-5-7N=10 3-4-4-3 N=8 WOH/2.0' N=WOH 16-21-21-18N=42 20-20-14-18 24 24 24 18 14 18 62 35 30 18 20 29 10 Boring advanced to 50 feet BGS without sampling (continued) SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace peat, occasional marl seams, gray, very soft SILT (ML), trace clay, gray, very soft POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), occasional clay seams,gray, loose to medium dense SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace peat, gray, very soft SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM), gray, dense 50.0 53.0 63.0 73.0 78.0 339+/- 336+/- 326+/- 316+/- 311+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4456° Longitude: -76.5094°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-1 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-09-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-07-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 3 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 N=34 WOR-WOH/1.0'-2N=WOH 4-8-12-18N=20 WOR/1.0'-4-6 N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH 6-2-WOH-5N=2 WOR/1.0'-WOH/1.0'N=WOH WOH/2.0'N=WOH 15 19 24 24 24 16 12 10 5 19 28 22 22 27 27 SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (SM), gray, dense (continued) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), trace silt, dark gray, very loose SILTY SAND (SM), fine grained, dark gray, medium dense to dense SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), dark gray, very soft SILTY SAND (SM), trace clay, dark gray, very loose SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), gray, very soft to soft Boring Terminated at 125 Feet 93.0 97.0 103.0 107.0 113.0 125.0 296+/- 292+/- 286+/- 282+/- 276+/- 264+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4456° Longitude: -76.5094°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 3 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-1 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-09-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-07-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 3 4 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Boring advanced to 50 feet BGS without sampling WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4467° Longitude: -76.5095°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-2 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 09-30-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-26-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Shelby Tube 8-9-7-6 N=16 4-5-6-10N=11 7-9-12-14N=21 WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOR/1.0'-WOH/1.0' N=WOH 6-3-12-15N=15 15-12-13-15 22 18 16 19 20 14 43 52-30-22 Boring advanced to 50 feet BGS without sampling (continued) ELASTIC SILT (MH), trace sand, gray, stiff to very stiff POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL (SP-SM), trace clay,fine grained, dark gray, medium dense SILT (ML), trace sand, dark gray, very soft Becomes stiff WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH SILT AND SAND (GW-GM), dark gray,medium dense 50.0 63.0 68.0 83.0 338+/- 325+/- 320+/- 305+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4467° Longitude: -76.5095°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-2 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 09-30-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-26-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 3 2 3 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 N=25 3-WOH-1-4 N=1 7-7-10-15N=17 WOH/1.5'-4N=WOH WOR/1.0'-WOH-2 N=WOR 7-7-10-9 N=17 WOR/1.0'-WOH-2N=WOR 6-11-14-12N=25 14-14-10-9N=24 12 22 12 7 18 16 20 9 12 SILTY SAND (SP-SM), fine grained, dark gray, loose to medium dense SILT (ML), trace sand, dark gray, very soft Becomes stiff POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), occasional clay seams,fine grained, dark gray, medium dense SILT (ML), trace sand, gray, very stiff Boring Terminated at 125 Feet 87.0 97.0 115.0 123.0 125.0 301+/- 291+/- 273+/- 265+/- 263+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4467° Longitude: -76.5095°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 3 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-2 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 09-30-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-26-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 3 4 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Open hole Boring advanced to 45 feet BGS without sampling WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4463° Longitude: -76.5091°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 2 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-3 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-02-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-02-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY 11.9' BGS at Completion of Sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Shelby Tube WOR/1.0'-WOH/1.0' N=WOH WOR/1.0'-WOH/1.0' N=WOH 5-5-6-4N=11 5-4-6-7N=10 4-3-4-4 N=7 22 19 14 11 12 74 66-41-25 Boring advanced to 45 feet BGS without sampling (continued) ELASTIC SILT (MH), Occasional shell fragments and occasional marlseams, gray, very soft SILTY SAND (SM), gray, medium dense WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH SILT AND SAND (GW), trace silt, grayand black, loose Boring Terminated at 72 Feet 45.0 58.0 68.0 72.0 343+/- 330+/- 320+/- 316+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4463° Longitude: -76.5091°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 2 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-3 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-02-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-02-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY 11.9' BGS at Completion of Sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 3 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Boring advanced to 50 feet BGS without sampling WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4475° Longitude: -76.5081°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 387 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 2 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-4 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-09-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOH-3-2-WOHN=5 3-4-6-3N=10 WOH-3-5-2 N=8 24 14 20 15 12 Boring advanced to 50 feet BGS without sampling (continued) SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, gray, very soft SILT (ML), trace sand, trace peat, brown gray, very soft Becomes medium stiff POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), occasional shellfragments, gray, loose to medium dense Boring Terminated at 72 Feet 50.0 53.0 63.0 72.0 337+/- 334+/- 324+/- 315+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4475° Longitude: -76.5081°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 387 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 2 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-4 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-09-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4471° Longitude: -76.5091°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 390 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-5 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 09-25-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-19-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 SAMPLE TYPEBoring advanced to 50 feet BGS without sampling SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOH/2.0' N=WOH Shelby Tube 6-6-7-8N=13 11-10-11-13N=21 10-11-11-8 N=22 12-13-18-16 N=31 7-8-9-15N=17 15-15-18-18 22 17 11 3 11 11 47 36-28-8 SILT (ML), trace shell fragments, gray, very soft SILTY SAND (SP-SM), with gravel, dark gray, medium dense to dense WELL GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SW-SM), with gravel, dark gray,medium dense WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH SILT AND SAND (GW-GM), gray, dense 50.0 60.0 77.0 83.0 340+/- 330+/- 313+/- 307+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4471° Longitude: -76.5091°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 390 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-5 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 09-25-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-19-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 3 SAMPLE TYPEBoring advanced to 50 feet BGS without sampling SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 N=33 23-21-26-31 N=47 18-22-23-20N=45 49-37-32-33N=69 13-25-39-40 N=64 10-11-14-7 N=25 3-WOH-1-WOHN=1 WOR/2.0'N=WOR WOH/1.0'-2-3N=2 16 11 8 17 23 17 5 7 12 WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH SILT AND SAND (GW-GM), gray, dense(continued) SILT (ML), trace sand, gray, hard Becomes very stiff, Contains occasional find sand lenses Becomes very soft to soft Boring Terminated at 125 Feet 98.0 125.0 292+/- 265+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4471° Longitude: -76.5091°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 390 (Ft.) +/- Page 3 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-5 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 09-25-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-19-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 3 4 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 17-19-15-18N=34 11-8-3-2N=11 3-1-1-3 N=2 WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOR-WOH-3-3N=3 WOH/2.0'N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH Shelby Tube WOR/2.0'N=WOR 17 3 14 18 11 18 20 22 45 43-38-5 FILL - SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL , trace Brick Fragments, gray brown FILL - SILTY CLAY , trace Brick Fragments, olive and black POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine grained, gray, very loose ORGANIC SILT (OL), trace sand, occasional silty clay partings andoccasional peat seams, gray and black, very soft POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), occasional peat lenses, fine grained, gray, very loose SILT (ML), trace sand, trace peat, occasional clay partings, gray and black,very soft SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, trace peat, occasional clay partings,gray, very soft SILT (ML), Contains occasional shell fragments and occasional marl seams 3.0 7.0 13.0 18.0 23.0 28.0 35.0 386+/- 382+/- 376+/- 371+/- 366+/- 361+/- 354+/- WOH = Weight of Hammer and RodsWOR = Weight of Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4488° Longitude: -76.5078°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-6 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-02-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-30-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY At completion of drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOR/2.0'N=WOR WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOH/2.0'N=WOH WOH/1.5'-5N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH 39-49-42-35N=91 31-49-35-36 22 18 17 18 17 14 18 9 SILT (ML), Contains occasional shell fragments and occasional marl seams(continued) Contains occasional silt partings and seams SILT (ML), trace clay, trace sand, gray, very soft SANDY SILT (ML), trace clay, gray, very loose SILT (ML), trace clay, occasional fine sand lenses, gray, very soft SANDY GRAVEL WITH SILT (GM), gray, very dense 53.0 58.0 63.0 78.0 336+/- 331+/- 326+/- 311+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4488° Longitude: -76.5078°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-6 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-02-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-30-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY At completion of drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 3 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 N=84 8-32-42-37 N=74 16-50/5" 16-11-10-13N=21 18-24-41-15 N=65 WOR/2.0' N=WOR 23-22-24-22N=46 11-17-20-15N=37 14-19-23-28N=42 2 10 2 8 15 15 8 16 10 SANDY GRAVEL WITH SILT (GM), gray, very dense (continued) SILTY SAND (SM), trace gravel, gray, very dense WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH SAND (GW), gray, very dense WELL GRADED SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL (SW-SM), gray,medium dense POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), trace silt, trace gravel, gray brown, verydense Becomes very loose, contains occasional silt seams Becomes dense Boring Terminated at 125 Feet 88.0 93.0 97.0 108.0 125.0 301+/- 296+/- 292+/- 281+/- 264+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4488° Longitude: -76.5078°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 3 of 3 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-6 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-02-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 09-30-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY At completion of drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 3 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 4-8-12-12N=20 WOH/2.0'N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH 1-1-1-1 N=2 WOH/2.0'N=WOH WOH/2.0'N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH WOH/2.0'N=WOH WOH/2.0'N=WOH 15 24 22 16 18 17 24 24 24 FILL - SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL , trace peat trace glass fragments,dark brown SILTY CLAY (CL/ML), trace peat, brown, very loose Becomes light brown and gray SILT (ML), trace clay, dark gray, very soft Contains occasional shell fragents SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), contains occasional shell fragments, gray, very soft 3.0 18.0 33.0 43.0 384+/- 369+/- 354+/- 344+/- WOH = Weight of Hammer and Rods Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4491° Longitude: -76.5075°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 387 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 2 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-7 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-03-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-03-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 WOH/2.0'N=WOH WOH/2.0' N=WOH 5-5-4-5N=9 22 24 24 SANDY SILT (ML), trace clay, dark gray, very soft SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace gravel, gray, very soft Becomes stiff Boring Terminated at 62 Feet 48.0 62.0 339+/- 325+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)45 50 55 60 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4491° Longitude: -76.5075°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 387 (Ft.) +/- Page 2 of 2 Advancement Method:Open Hole / Mud Rotary with 3 7/8 inch tricone roller bitand 2 inch OD Split Barrel Sampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. AB-7 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-03-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-03-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY Drilling Mud utilized to advance borehole WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 3-7-8-9N=15 6-12-15-14N=27 39-8-5-5 N=13 17 8 5 FILL - ORGANIC SILT WITH GRAVEL , trace gravel, brown and gray Contains numerous wood fragments, trace brick fragments Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 6.0 382+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4464° Longitude: -76.5104°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:3.25 inch ID Hollow Stem Augers and 2 inch OD Split BarrelSampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. P-1 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-11-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY None encountered at completion of sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 2-10-13-20N=23 12-8-8-4N=16 3-2-3-2 N=5 20 9 FILL - ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND , trace gravel, trace brick fragments,trace wood, gray and brown Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 6.0 381+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4466° Longitude: -76.5101°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 387 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:3.25 inch ID Hollow Stem Augers and 2 inch OD Split BarrelSampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. P-2 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-11-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY None encountered at completion of sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 2-4-7-5N=11 4-2-3-7N=5 4-3-1-3 N=4 18 9 7 FILL - ORGANIC SILT , trace gravel, trace brick fragments, gray and black Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 6.0 380+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.447° Longitude: -76.5098°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 386 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:3.25 inch ID Hollow Stem Augers and 2 inch OD Split BarrelSampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. P-3 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-11-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY None encountered at completion of sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 5-6-6-8N=12 4-8-8-8N=16 8-12-4-4 N=16 24 14 20 FILL - SILTY SAND , trace gravel, trace brick fragments, gray and brown Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 6.0 382+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4473° Longitude: -76.5093°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:3.25 inch ID Hollow Stem Augers and 2 inch OD Split BarrelSampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. P-4 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-11-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY None encountered at completion of sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 6-12-13-50/2" N=25 9-6-6-4N=12 10-12-6-12 N=18 15 9 10 FILL - ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND , brown and gray Contains numerous concrete fragments Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 6.0 383+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.446° Longitude: -76.5095°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 389 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:3.25 inch ID Hollow Stem Augers and 2 inch OD Split BarrelSampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. P-5 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-11-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY None encountered at completion of sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 3-7-3-8N=10 8-14-16-12N=30 5-5-5-5 N=10 14 7 4 FILL - ORGANIC SILT , with gravel, dark brown Becomes brown-black SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace gravel trace sand, light olive gray, stiff Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 4.0 6.0 383+/- 381+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4464° Longitude: -76.5089°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 387 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:3.25 inch ID Hollow Stem Augers and 2 inch OD Split BarrelSampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. P-6 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-11-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY None encountered at completion of sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 2-3-4-3N=7 2-5-3-2N=8 3-3-4-5 N=7 24 6 20 FILL - SILTY CLAY WITH SAND , trace sand, trace brick fragments, grayand dark red SILTY CLAY (CL-ML), trace sand, occasional silt partings, gray, medium stiff, less saturated, contains peat seams and no sand Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 4.0 6.0 382+/- 380+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.447° Longitude: -76.5084°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 386 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:3.25 inch ID Hollow Stem Augers and 2 inch OD Split BarrelSampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. P-7 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-11-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY None encountered at completion of sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 1-2-4-7N=6 4-5-3-3N=8 2-2-2-3 N=4 9 12 2 FILL - SILTY SAND , dark gray to black SILT (ML), trace sand, brown gray, soft Boring Terminated at 6 Feet 3.0 6.0 385+/- 382+/- Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19WATER LEVELOBSERVATIONSDEPTH (Ft.)5 FIELD TESTRESULTSRECOVERY (In.)WATERCONTENT (%)ATTERBERGLIMITS LL-PL-PI LOCATION See Exploration Plan Latitude: 42.4477° Longitude: -76.5082°GRAPHIC LOGMODEL LAYERDEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) Approximate Surface Elev.: 388 (Ft.) +/- Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method:3.25 inch ID Hollow Stem Augers and 2 inch OD Split BarrelSampler Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. Notes: Project No.: J5195080 Drill Rig: Diedrich D-50 BORING LOG NO. P-8 Park Grove Realty LLCCLIENT:Rochester, NY Driller: J. Tojdowski Boring Completed: 10-11-2019 PROJECT: Carpenter Park Elevations were interpolated from a topographic siteplan. See Exploration and Testing Procedures for adescription of field and laboratory procedures usedand additional data (If any). See Supporting Information for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY SITE: Boring Started: 10-11-2019 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY None encountered at completion of sampling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 1 2 SAMPLE TYPESECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0010.010.1110100 3/4 1/23/8 30 403 60 PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHTGRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTM D422 / ASTM C136 HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES 16 20 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 44 1006321014506 2001.5 81 140 PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHTPROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE: NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY PROJECT: Carpenter Park CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GADOT_GRAIN SIZE: USCS 1 J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/190.0 0.0 0.0 78.8 4.3 2.5 59.8 58.3 21.2AB-1 AB-2 AB-3 fine coarse finemediumCOBBLESGRAVELSAND SILT OR CLAY 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 39.2 D10 D75 0.405 0.016 0.013 0.319 0.011 0.009 BORING ID #4#10#40#200 100.099.2796.8877.9644.625.9821.23 #40#200 100.095.73 100.099.6997.5 #10#40#200 CC CU coarse Silty Sand, trace gravel (SM) ELASTIC SILT (MH) ELASTIC SILT (MH) 80 - 82 50 - 52 45 - 47 D60 SM MH MH D30 0.167 0.004 0.004 Sieve REMARKS SOIL DESCRIPTION % Finer% Finer SieveSieve% Finer USCS% CLAY% FINES% SILT% SAND% GRAVEL% COBBLESDEPTH COEFFICIENTS GRAIN SIZE SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0010.010.1110100 3/4 1/23/8 30 403 60 PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHTGRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTM D422 / ASTM C136 HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES 16 20 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 44 1006321014506 2001.5 81 140 PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHTPROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE: NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY PROJECT: Carpenter Park CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GADOT_GRAIN SIZE: USCS 1 J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/190.0 0.0 2.1 4.5 56.0 93.9 1.68 AB-5 AB-6 fine coarse finemediumCOBBLESGRAVELSAND SILT OR CLAY 0.0 0.0 41.9 1.6 D10 D75 0.011 0.061 0.008 0.052 0.031 BORING ID #10#40#200 100.099.8297.92 #10#40#200 100.099.8695.46 CC CU 0.90 coarse SILT (ML) SILT (ML) 55 - 57 35 - 37 D60 ML ML D30 0.004 0.038 Sieve REMARKS SOIL DESCRIPTION % Finer% Finer SieveSieve% Finer USCS% CLAY% FINES% SILT% SAND% GRAVEL% COBBLESDEPTH COEFFICIENTS GRAIN SIZE SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 20 40 60 80 100CH or OHCL or OLML or OL MH or OH"U" Line"A" Line ATTERBERG LIMITS RESULTS ASTM D4318 P LAS TIC ITY I NDE X LIQUID LIMIT PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE: NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY PROJECT: Carpenter Park CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. ATTERBERG LIMITS J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/1952 66 36 43 30 41 28 38 22 25 8 5 PIPLLLBoring ID Depth AB-2 AB-3 AB-5 AB-6 95.7 97.5 97.9 95.5 Fines 50 - 52 45 - 47 55 - 57 35 - 37 MH MH ML ML ELASTIC SILT ELASTIC SILT SILT SILT DescriptionUSCS CL-ML SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 20 40 60 80 100CH or OHCL or OLML or OL MH or OH"U" Line"A" Line ATTERBERG LIMITS RESULTS ASTM D4318 P LAS TIC IT Y I NDE X LIQUID LIMIT PROJECT NUMBER: J5185077PROJECT: Carpenter Park SITE:CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY EXHIBIT: B-1 12460 Plaza DrParma, OH LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. ATTERBERG LIMITS J5185077_CORRECTED.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 7/13/18140 - 142B-2 USCSLL 91726 Fines CL GRAY LEAN CLAY with Silt lenses DescriptionBoring ID Depth PIPL CL-ML SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 AXIAL STRAIN - % UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST ASTM D2166 COMPRESSIVE STRESS - tsfPROJECT: Carpenter Park PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE:CLIENT: 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. UNCONFINED WITH PHOTOS J5195080 CARPENTER PARK - ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/190.0517 0.27 76 43 Strain Rate:in/min Failure Strain:% Calculated Saturation:% Height:in. Diameter:in. Dry Density:pcf Moisture Content:% 1.58 1.98 2.7 SPECIMEN TEST DATA Height / Diameter Ratio: Calculated Void Ratio: Assumed Specific Gravity: SAMPLE TYPE: Shelby Tube 0.13Undrained Shear Strength:(tsf) Unconfined Compressive Strength (tsf) 52 30 22 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: ELASTIC SILT(MH) SPECIMEN FAILURE PHOTOGRAPH Remarks: 96 Percent < #200 Sieve 5.67 2.87 1.20 96.27 PIPLLL SAMPLE LOCATION: AB-2 @ 50 - 52 feet NYS Route 13 Rochester, NY Park Grove Realty, LLC Rochester, NY SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 AXIAL STRAIN - % UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST ASTM D2166 COMPRESSIVE STRESS - tsfPROJECT: Carpenter Park PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE:CLIENT: 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. UNCONFINED WITH PHOTOS J5195080 CARPENTER PARK - ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/190.0496 0.14 56 74 Strain Rate:in/min Failure Strain:% Calculated Saturation:% Height:in. Diameter:in. Dry Density:pcf Moisture Content:% 1.11 1.97 2.7 SPECIMEN TEST DATA Height / Diameter Ratio: Calculated Void Ratio: Assumed Specific Gravity: SAMPLE TYPE: Shelby Tube 0.07Undrained Shear Strength:(tsf) Unconfined Compressive Strength (tsf) 66 41 25 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: ELASTIC SILT(MH) SPECIMEN FAILURE PHOTOGRAPH Remarks: 97 Percent < #200 Sieve 5.64 2.87 1.98 101.00 PIPLLL SAMPLE LOCATION: AB-3 @ 45 - 47 feet NYS Route 13 Rochester, NY Park Grove Realty, LLC Rochester, NY SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 AXIAL STRAIN - % UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST ASTM D2166 COMPRESSIVE STRESS - tsfPROJECT: Carpenter Park PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE:CLIENT: 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. UNCONFINED WITH PHOTOS J5195080 CARPENTER PARK - ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/190.0496 0.19 75 47 Strain Rate:in/min Failure Strain:% Calculated Saturation:% Height:in. Diameter:in. Dry Density:pcf Moisture Content:% 0.96 1.98 2.7 SPECIMEN TEST DATA Height / Diameter Ratio: Calculated Void Ratio: Assumed Specific Gravity: SAMPLE TYPE: Shelby Tube 0.09Undrained Shear Strength:(tsf) Unconfined Compressive Strength (tsf) 36 28 8 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SILT(ML) SPECIMEN FAILURE PHOTOGRAPH Remarks: 98 Percent < #200 Sieve 5.61 2.83 1.24 102.62 PIPLLL SAMPLE LOCATION: AB-5 @ 55 - 57 feet NYS Route 13 Rochester, NY Park Grove Realty, LLC Rochester, NY SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 AXIAL STRAIN - % UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST ASTM D2166 COMPRESSIVE STRESS - tsfPROJECT: Carpenter Park PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE: NYS Route 13, Ithaca, NY CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC, Rochester, NY 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. UNCONFINED WITH PHOTOS J5195080 CARPENTER PARK - ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/190.0496 0.21 76 45 Strain Rate:in/min Failure Strain:% Calculated Saturation:% Height:in. Diameter:in. Dry Density:pcf Moisture Content:% 1.32 1.98 2.7 SPECIMEN TEST DATA Height / Diameter Ratio: Calculated Void Ratio: Assumed Specific Gravity: SAMPLE TYPE: Shelby Tube 0.10Undrained Shear Strength:(tsf) Unconfined Compressive Strength (tsf) 43 38 5 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SILT(ML) SPECIMEN FAILURE PHOTOGRAPH Remarks: 95 Percent < #200 Sieve 5.65 2.86 1.21 100.97 PIPLLL SAMPLE LOCATION: AB-6 @ 35 - 37 feet SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 2410 100 1,000 10,000 105AXIAL STRAIN, (%)CONSOLIDATION TEST (D2435) PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE: NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY PROJECT: Carpenter Park CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. CONS_LOAD-DEF_PROP_STRESS-STRAIN_CV J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19Borehole: AB-2 Depth: 50 ft A-7-5MH NOTES: ELASTIC SILT 16,4762252 AXIAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, (psf) 310082.1 0 2.5 5.0 10 100 1,000 10,000 105CV (ft2/day)2.90114.732 Cc(% / logstress) Cr(% / logstress) Natural % 36.0 % Initial Dry Density(pcf)LL PI Sp. Gr. Overburden(psf)Pc(psf)Initial VoidRatio AASHTO Moisture MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Saturation 2.7 1.052 SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 3010 100 1,000 10,000 105AXIAL STRAIN, (%)CONSOLIDATION TEST (D2435) PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE: NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY PROJECT: Carpenter Park CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. CONS_LOAD-DEF_PROP_STRESS-STRAIN_CV J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19Borehole: AB-3 Depth: 45 ft A-7-5MH NOTES: ELASTIC SILT 2,8122566 AXIAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, (psf) 280061.1 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 10 100 1,000 10,000 105CV (ft2/day)3.29823.093 Cc(% / logstress) Cr(% / logstress) Natural % 62.5 % Initial Dry Density(pcf)LL PI Sp. Gr. Overburden(psf)Pc(psf)Initial VoidRatio AASHTO Moisture MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Saturation 2.7 1.758 SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 710 100 1,000 10,000 105AXIAL STRAIN, (%)CONSOLIDATION TEST (D2435) PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE: NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY PROJECT: Carpenter Park CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. CONS_LOAD-DEF_PROP_STRESS-STRAIN_CV J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19Borehole: AB-5 Depth: 55 ft A-4ML NOTES: SILT 4,368836 AXIAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, (psf) 3400101.7 0 2 4 6 10 100 1,000 10,000 105CV (ft2/day)1.2725.537 Cc(% / logstress) Cr(% / logstress) Natural % 23.7 % Initial Dry Density(pcf)LL PI Sp. Gr. Overburden(psf)Pc(psf)Initial VoidRatio AASHTO Moisture MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Saturation 2.7 0.658 SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 2810 100 1,000 10,000 105AXIAL STRAIN, (%)CONSOLIDATION TEST (D2435) PROJECT NUMBER: J5195080 SITE: NYS Route 13 Ithaca, NY PROJECT: Carpenter Park CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY 15 Marway Cir, Ste 2BRochester, NY LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. CONS_LOAD-DEF_PROP_STRESS-STRAIN_CV J5195080 CARPENTER PARK -MERGEDFINAL_LAB.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 11/8/19Borehole: AB-6 Depth: 35 ft Date Started: 10/24/19 Date Completed: 10/25/19 A-5ML NOTES: SILT 2,065543 AXIAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, (psf) 240074.7 0 4 8 12 10 100 1,000 10,000 105CV (ft2/day)20.138 Cc(% / logstress) Cr(% / logstress) Natural % 43.9 % Initial Dry Density(pcf)LL PI Sp. Gr. Overburden(psf)Pc(psf)Initial VoidRatio AASHTO Moisture MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Saturation 2.7 1.2553.435 SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.56 100 1,000 10,000 105VOID RATIOCONSOLIDATION TEST (D2435) Cc(vr / logstress) Cr(vr / logstress) 0.141 0.039 PROJECT NUMBER: J5185077PROJECT: Carpenter Park SITE:CLIENT: Park Grove Realty LLC Rochester, NY EXHIBIT: B-1 12460 Plaza DrParma, OH LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. CONS_LOAD-DEF_PROP_STRESS-VOIDRATIO J5185077_CORRECTED.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 7/13/18AXIAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, (psf) Natural 0.550 LL Initial VoidRatioSaturation Moisture 26 9 3,111 GRAY LEAN CLAY with Silt lenses NOTES: CL Borehole: B-2 Depth: 140 ft Specimen #: 1 108.8 PI Sp. Gr. 2.70 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS InitialDry Density (pcf) AASHTO 105.4 % 21.5 % Pc(psf)Overburden(psf) NYS Route 13Ithaca, NY SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable SUPPORTING INFORMATION Contents: General Notes Unified Soil Classification System Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Carpenter Park Ithaca, NY Terracon Project No. J5195080 0.25 to 0.50 > 4.00 2.00 to 4.00 1.00 to 2.00 0.50 to 1.00 less than 0.25 Unconfined Compressive StrengthQu, (tsf) AugerCuttings ShelbyTube StandardPenetrationTest Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dryweight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined on the basisof their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINESRELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION LOCATION AND ELEVATION NOTES SAMPLING WATER LEVEL FIELD TESTS N (HP) (T) (DCP) UC (PID) (OVA) Standard Penetration Test Resistance (Blows/Ft.) Hand Penetrometer Torvane Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Unconfined CompressiveStrength Photo-Ionization Detector Organic Vapor Analyzer Medium 0Over 12 in. (300 mm) >12 5-12 <5 Percent ofDry Weight TermMajor Component of Sample Modifier With Trace Descriptive Term(s) ofother constituents >30Modifier <15 Percent ofDry WeightDescriptive Term(s) ofother constituents With 15-29 High Trace PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Water levels indicated on the soil boring logs arethe levels measured in the borehole at the times indicated. Groundwater level variations will occur over time. In low permeability soils, accuratedetermination of groundwater levels is not possible with short term water level observations. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL NOTES > 30 11 - 30 1 - 10Low Non-plastic Plasticity Index #4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm Boulders 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm)Cobbles 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm)Gravel Sand Passing #200 sieve (0.075mm)Silt or Clay Particle Size Water Level After a Specified Period of Time Water Level After a Specified Period of Time Water InitiallyEncountered Unless otherwise noted, Latitude and Longitude are approximately determined using a hand-held GPS device. The accuracy ofsuch devices is variable. Surface elevation data annotated with +/- indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted to confirm the surface elevation. Instead, the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of thearea. Standard Penetration orN-ValueBlows/Ft. Descriptive Term(Density) CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS Hard 15 - 30Very Stiff> 50Very Dense 8 - 15Stiff30 - 50Dense 4 - 8Medium Stiff10 - 29Medium Dense 2 - 4Soft4 - 9Loose 0 - 1Very Soft0 - 3Very Loose (50% or more passing the No. 200 sieve.) Consistency determined by laboratory shear strength testing, field visual-manualprocedures or standard penetration resistance STRENGTH TERMS > 30 Descriptive Term(Consistency)Standard Penetration orN-ValueBlows/Ft. RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve.) Density determined by Standard Penetration Resistance SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Soil Classification Group Symbol Group NameB Coarse-Grained Soils:More than 50% retainedon No. 200 sieve Gravels:More than 50% ofcoarse fractionretained on No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels: Less than 5% fines C Cu ³ 4 and 1 £ Cc £ 3 E GW Well-graded gravelF Cu < 4 and/or [Cc<1 or Cc>3.0]E GP Poorly graded gravel F Gravels with Fines: More than 12% finesC Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelF, G, H Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelF, G, H Sands:50% or more of coarsefraction passes No. 4sieve Clean Sands: Less than 5% fines D Cu ³ 6 and 1 £ Cc £ 3E SW Well-graded sand I Cu < 6 and/or [Cc<1 or Cc>3.0]E SP Poorly graded sandI Sands with Fines: More than 12% fines D Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G, H, I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandG, H, I Fine-Grained Soils:50% or more passes theNo. 200 sieve Silts and Clays:Liquid limit less than 50 Inorganic:PI > 7 and plots on or above “A”lineJ CL Lean clayK, L, M PI < 4 or plots below “A” line J ML SiltK, L, M Organic:Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75 OL Organic clayK, L, M, N Liquid limit - not dried Organic siltK, L, M, O Silts and Clays:Liquid limit 50 or more Inorganic:PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clayK, L, M PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic SiltK, L, M Organic:Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75 OH Organic clayK, L, M, P Liquid limit - not dried Organic siltK, L, M, Q Highly organic soils:Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat A Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve. B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders, or both” to group name. C Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorlygraded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. D Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly gradedsand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay. E Cu = D60/D10 Cc = 6010 2 30 DxD )(D F If soil contains ³ 15% sand, add “with sand” to group name. G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. HIf fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name. I If soil contains ³ 15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name. J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. KIf soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add “with sand” or “with gravel,” whichever is predominant. L If soil contains ³ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. MIf soil contains ³ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. NPI ³ 4 and plots on or above “A” line. OPI < 4 or plots below “A” line. P PI plots on or above “A” line. QPI plots below “A” line. SECTION 00 31 32A - GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTAION REPORT Park Grove – Cayuga Medical Center MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Cayuga Park, Ithaca, NY 14850 HOLT Project No. 2018089 END OF SECTION 00 31 32A Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Spec Section: Submittal No.: 001 Review Cycle No.: 1 Sent Date: June-01-2020 Due Date: Within 5 business days from Sent Date Spec Section Title: CMC design submittal documents SUBMITTAL COVER SHEET 1950 Brighton Henrietta Town Line Road Rochester, NY 14623 Office: 585-272-7760 Fax: 585-272-0720 Project: 20-001 Carpenter Park Medical Office Building Ithaca, NY 14850 SUBCONTRACTOR Subcontractor: DGI-Menard, Inc. Contact: Nina Carney CONTRACTOR STAMP REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Contractor: DiMarco Constructors LLC Date: June-01-2020 Submittal Contact: Sunil Cheriyan ARCHITECT STAMP ENGINEER STAMP SHOP DRAWING REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCEWITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTSNO RESPONSIBILITY IS ASSUMED FORCORRECTNESS OF DIMENSIONS OR QUANTITIES JENSEN/BRV ENGINEERING, PLLCSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERS1653 EAST MAIN STREETROCHESTER, NY 14609 NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED AMEND AND RESUBMIT REJECTED - SEE REMARKS Date 06/08/2020 By Ryan Filkins NOTE: UTILITIES MUST BE COORDINATED WITH CMC PIER LOCATIONS. REVIEWED FOR STRUCTURAL PURPOSES ONLY. SEE PLUMBING VS CMC OVERLAY AT THE LAST PAGE SPC 07/10/2020 SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 May 22, 2020 Sunil Cheriyan DiMarco Constructors 1950 Brighton-Henrietta Town Line Road Rochester, NY 14623 Sent via email to scheriyan@dimarcogroup.com SUBJECT: Controlled Modulus Column (CMC) Design Summary Medical Office Building (MOB) Carpenter Park Development - Ithaca, New York Menard Prospect No. 18357 Dear Mr. Cheriyan, This letter describes our design procedure for the ground improvement for the planned five-story Medical Office Building (MOB) in Ithaca, New York. We are proposing the use of Controlled Modulus Column (CMC) rigid inclusions to limit settlement and provide the required bearing capacity for the spread, strip, and slab foundations. To analyze settlement of the supported foundations, we assumed the sustained loads (dead load, live load, and snow load) were acting on the columns. To analyze bearing capacity, structural integrity, and geotechnical capacity, we assumed the sustained loads and the transient loads (wind load and seismic load) were acting on the columns. The resulting loads per spread footing range from 50 to 1020 kips. The given live load on the building slab is 100 psf and the wall load is 2.5 klf. The foundations were designed for an allowable bearing capacity of 4,000 psf. We reviewed the available geotechnical information and developed a soil profile for the CMC design. The soil profile across the site was generally consistent; therefore, we selected a general soil profile for design. Attached is a summary of the soil profile and parameters we used for design, which were selected based on commonly used reference material and the data provided in the following documents: · Draft Terracon Geotechnical Engineering Report Dated June 12, 2018, and · Terracon Geotechnical Engineering Report Dated November 13, 2019. Our design evaluates the performance of 17.8-inch-diameter CMCs installed under the isolated spread footings and wall footings and 12.5-inch-diameter CMCs installed under the slab-on-grade. CMCs will be installed through the fill and clay and will be terminated in the silty sand and gravel layer. We evaluated the soft cohesive soils beneath the bearing layer and determined that deep seated SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Uncontrolled when printed settlement of this layer is approximately 0.2 inches. We designed our CMC system to settle less than 0.8 inches to achieve a total settlement of 1.0 inches. We do not anticipate differential deep-seated settlement. The length of the CMC will vary across the site based on the design embedment length and termination criteria determined following our analysis of the single-element compressive load test. We designed the CMCs supporting the isolated spread footings and wall footings using a proprietary software package developed by Menard that accounts for the interaction between the footing, the CMC, and the surrounding soils. Our calculations model the transfer of the loads from the point of application directly under the footing to the bearing stratum assuming strain compatibility. It also includes various factors derived from empirical data. The result is an estimate of the settlement and the load in both the CMC and the soil. We designed the CMC ground improvement system under the slab-on-grade of the building using PLAXIS, a finite element analysis program. Our model considered the long-term drained analysis under the applied slab load. We used axisymmetric models, which are unit cell analyses that represent the behavior of uniform square grids of CMC elements. We performed an axisymmetric model to evaluate the performance of 12.5-inch-diameter CMCs spaced at 10 feet on center under the slab. The final unimproved model output and improved model outputs are in the appendices. The unimproved settlement of the system is 3.1 inches and the ground improvement reduces the settlement to 0.8 inches. We provide sample output from both calculations in the appendix. The results of our calculations show total settlement following construction of the floor slab limited to less than 1 inch for both the column foundations and floor slab and the differential settlement between the two support systems limited to ½ inch or less. The maximum anticipated CMC load for the 12.5-inch-diameter CMC is approximately 74 kips. Based on that design load and the allowable stresses for grout provided in IBC 2018, the minimum required compressive strength for the grout is 2,100 psi. One 12.5-inch-diameter CMC load test should be performed to 150% of the corresponding design load, or approximately 111 kips, to confirm the design assumptions regarding the load carrying capacity of the bearing layer. We evaluated bearing capacity of each foundation using the principle of load sharing between the soil and CMCs to determine an improved bearing capacity of the CMC-soil system. We estimate the load carrying capacity of the CMC by calculating the geotechnical capacity of the CMC within the bearing layer. The improved bearing capacity of the system is calculated using the area replacement ratio of the support plan and the bearing capacities of the in-situ soil and CMC. The results of this analysis indicate the support plan used in this design will provide a bearing capacity of at least 4,000 psf below the foundations. SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Uncontrolled when printed Please contact Nina Carney at 412-620-6171 if you have questions or concerns about the design process described in this letter. Sincerely, Menard USA Nina F. Carney, PE Taylor J. Towle, PE Design Engineer Senior Design Engineer SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Tables SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Table 1: Summary of Soil Properties Top El.Bottom EL.N -Value Unit Weight Young's Modulus, Ey Pressuremeter Modulus, Em (ft) (ft) (bpf) (pcf) (psf) (psf) Silty Sand Fill 390 385 20 115 555,657 183,367 Soft Clay 1 385 365 4 110 37,143 24,514 Very Soft Silt 365 310 0 100 12,600 8,316 Silty sand and gravel-1 310 275 30 120 980,571 323,589 Very soft clay- deep 275 235 0 100 25,013 16,509 Dense sand and gravel-2 235 230 50 125 980,571 323,589 LTP /WP 125 701,585 701,585 Groundwater El. Soil Layer 377 ft SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Table 2: Summary of Footing Models Footing ID CMC Diameter # CMCs per footing Settlement Total Applied Load Maximum Load in CMC * (in) (in) (kips) (kips) F4 12.5 1 0.4 80 53 F5 12.5 1 0.3 65 42 F8 12.5 2 0.8 218 72 F10 12.5 3 0.8 316 77 F12 12.5 3 0.7 326 71 F14 12.5 6 0.8 608 76 F15 12.5 6 0.8 600 74 F16 12.5 4 0.4 236 44 Wall Load 12.5 1 per 10 LF 0.3 2.5 10 Table 3: Summary of Slab Model Total Deflection Maximum Load in CMC (in) (kips) Slab- Improved 0.8 22 Slab- Unimproved 3.1 #N/A Note: *Predicted Load in CMC after load sharing with surrounding soils Model All models except for the slab model were run with Menard's proprietary software. The slab model was run in Plaxis. SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Footing Spreadsheet Output Files SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Rectangular footing:12.00 ft x 12.00 ft embedded of 2.00 ft loaded at 326 kips Description of Controlled Modulus Columns Lc 83 ft CMC's length Dc 1 ft CMC's diameter Description of the material in the columns Ec 155,000,000 psf Young's modulus fck 3,000 psi 28-day unconfined compressive strength Soil displacement:With Type of test:Load-bearing capacity ULS:Fundamental Steel reinforcement:NO fcd;moy;ELS 694 psi Average compressive stress in operation allowable by the material fcd;moy;ELU 1,015 psi Ultimate average compressive stress allowable by the material Description of bearing soil layer qb 116,000 psf Limit soil resistance at the tip of inclusions kq 4.8 Frank & Zhao factor for the tip (according to the table below) Em 325,000 psf Pressuremeter modulus kq values (according to Frank & Zhao) Fine-grained soils 11 Coarse-grained soils 4.8 Type of footing:Rectangular Description of the rectangular footing L 12 ft Length of footing B 12 ft Width of footing Number of CMC under footing n 3 Number of CMC under footing Description of natural soil surrounding the CMC qnet 3,600 psf Net soil resistance under footing without CMC reinforcement Spheric component Deviatoric component lc 1.10 ld 1.12 ac 0.44 ad 0.54 L/B 1.00 Description of load transfer platform hM 0.00 ft Thickness of LTP φ 38 °Internal friction angle Terms λ are automatically extracted from the table below (as a function of L/B) (Note: for a strip footing we considers L/B = ¥) Analysis model Description of reinforced soil Calculation of footing on Controlled Modulus Columns Carpenter Park- F12 Calculation according to O. Combarieu method (Fondations mixtes. LCPC 1988) Taking into account the Frank & Zhao method for the settlement calculation of CMC z Lc d B/2 hM Bedrock B L y x Hlim Soft soil Supporting soil Q(-hM) 0 SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Hw 7 ft Depth of the grounwater table from footing bottom H Em α qs kτ γ Ktanδ z (ft) (psf) (-) (psf) (-) (pcf) (-)(ft) 0 0.00 183,300 0.33 835 0.8 115 0.45 0.00 1 3.00 183,300 0.33 835 0.8 115 0.45 3.00 2 20.00 24,500 0.67 100 2.0 110 0.30 23.00 3 55.00 8,300 0.66 75 2.0 100 0.20 78.00 4 5.00 325,000 0.33 1,671 0.8 120 1.00 83.00 5 30.00 325,000 0.33 1,671 0.8 120 1.00 113.00 6 40.00 16,500 0.66 100 2.0 100 0.20 153.00 Notations H Thickness of each layer γ Unit weight of the layer Em Pressuremeter layer in each layer Ktanδ Empirical factor depending on the type of inclusion and on soft soil properties a Structural coefficient qs Ultimate skin friction for each layer kτ Frank & Zhao factor for the friction (according to the table below) z Depth of layer base 4. kτ values (according to Frank & Zhao) Fine-grained soils 2 Coarse-grained soils 0.8 SLS load applied on footing Reinforced soil settlement Q(-hM)326 kips W 0.73 in. Settlement distribution Settlement of deep layers (below CMC)0.00 in. Punching at the inclusion tip 0.26 in. Punching at the inclusion head 0.00 in. Elastic shortening of the inclusion 0.47 in. Settlement of LTP 0.00 in. SLS load distribution % total load % total load Negative skin friction in LTP 0.0 kips 0.0%0.0 kips 0.0% Load applied on inclusion head 71.2 kips 21.8%213.7 kips 65.5% Negative skin friction along the inclusion 0.0 kips 0.0%0.0 kips 0.0% Max. load in inclusion 71.2 kips 21.8%213.7 kips 65.5% Positive skin friction 48.4 kips 14.9%145.3 kips 44.6% Load applied on inclusion tip 22.8 kips 7.0%68.3 kips 21.0% Depth of neutral point 0.00 ft Stress in soil at LTP base 793 psf Load transferred to the soil at LTP base 37.4 kips 11.5%112.3 kips 34.5% STR verifications: compressive stresses in CMC The material used allows an average compressive stress of 694 psi 1015 psi The average compressive stress is 630 psi 850 psi GEO verifications: creep resistance and bearing capacity of the ground The soil resistance below the footing is 184.8 kips 303.5 kips The load applied on the soil at LTP base is 112.3 kips 151.6 kips The soil resistance below the CMC tip is 73.5 kips 105.1 kips The axial load within CMC is 71.2 kips 96.2 kips OK OK > Footing (as defined in french National Application Standards Shallow foundations NF P 94 261) Inclusion (as defined in french National Application Standards Deep foundations NF P 94 262) OK Description of natural soil Layer n° ULS NED →Domain: Note: By convention, the bottom of CMC is at layer n° ULSSLS OK per inclusion Results on all OK SLS Rv;d 1 OK 34.5% 21.0% 44.6% Distribution load on the scale of 1 CMC at neutral point level Soil surrounding the CMC Tip resistance Skin friction (positive) 65.5%65.5% 21.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% At inclusion head At neutral point At inclusion tip% Total load on the scale of 1 CMCEfficiency of CMC v;Rv;d;R net γγ Sq ´ ´= SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Graphic results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Depth z (ft)Settlement (in.) Soil CMC 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 20 40 60 80 Depth z (ft)SLS vertical load within CMC (kips) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Depth z (ft)Skin friction (psf) mobilized maximal 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 100 200 300 400 Depth z (ft)SLS vertical load within soil (kips) SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Rectangular footing:15.00 ft x 15.00 ft embedded of 2.50 ft loaded at 600 kips Description of Controlled Modulus Columns Lc 82.5 ft CMC's length Dc 1 ft CMC's diameter Description of the material in the columns Ec 155,000,000 psf Young's modulus fck 3,000 psi 28-day unconfined compressive strength Soil displacement:With Type of test:Load-bearing capacity ULS:Fundamental Steel reinforcement:NO fcd;moy;ELS 694 psi Average compressive stress in operation allowable by the material fcd;moy;ELU 1,015 psi Ultimate average compressive stress allowable by the material Description of bearing soil layer qb 116,000 psf Limit soil resistance at the tip of inclusions kq 4.8 Frank & Zhao factor for the tip (according to the table below) Em 325,000 psf Pressuremeter modulus kq values (according to Frank & Zhao) Fine-grained soils 11 Coarse-grained soils 4.8 Type of footing:Rectangular Description of the rectangular footing L 15 ft Length of footing B 15 ft Width of footing Number of CMC under footing n 6 Number of CMC under footing Description of natural soil surrounding the CMC qnet 3,600 psf Net soil resistance under footing without CMC reinforcement Spheric component Deviatoric component lc 1.10 ld 1.12 ac 0.49 ad 0.50 L/B 1.00 Description of load transfer platform hM 0.00 ft Thickness of LTP φ 38 °Internal friction angle Terms λ are automatically extracted from the table below (as a function of L/B) (Note: for a strip footing we considers L/B = ¥) Analysis model Description of reinforced soil Calculation of footing on Controlled Modulus Columns Carpenter Park- F15 Calculation according to O. Combarieu method (Fondations mixtes. LCPC 1988) Taking into account the Frank & Zhao method for the settlement calculation of CMC z Lc d B/2 hM Bedrock B L y x Hlim Soft soil Supporting soil Q(-hM) 0 SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Hw 6.5 ft Depth of the grounwater table from footing bottom H Em α qs kτ γ Ktanδ z (ft) (psf) (-) (psf) (-) (pcf) (-)(ft) 0 0.00 183,300 0.33 835 0.8 115 0.45 0.00 1 2.50 183,300 0.33 835 0.8 115 0.45 2.50 2 20.00 24,500 0.67 100 2.0 110 0.30 22.50 3 55.00 8,300 0.66 75 2.0 100 0.20 77.50 4 5.00 325,000 0.33 1,671 0.8 120 1.00 82.50 5 30.00 325,000 0.33 1,671 0.8 120 1.00 112.50 6 40.00 16,500 0.66 100 2.0 100 0.20 152.50 Notations H Thickness of each layer γ Unit weight of the layer Em Pressuremeter layer in each layer Ktanδ Empirical factor depending on the type of inclusion and on soft soil properties a Structural coefficient qs Ultimate skin friction for each layer kτ Frank & Zhao factor for the friction (according to the table below) z Depth of layer base 4. kτ values (according to Frank & Zhao) Fine-grained soils 2 Coarse-grained soils 0.8 SLS load applied on footing Reinforced soil settlement Q(-hM)600 kips W 0.81 in. Settlement distribution Settlement of deep layers (below CMC)0.01 in. Punching at the inclusion tip 0.30 in. Punching at the inclusion head 0.00 in. Elastic shortening of the inclusion 0.49 in. Settlement of LTP 0.00 in. SLS load distribution % total load % total load Negative skin friction in LTP 0.0 kips 0.0%0.0 kips 0.0% Load applied on inclusion head 73.7 kips 12.3%442.0 kips 73.7% Negative skin friction along the inclusion 0.0 kips 0.0%0.0 kips 0.0% Max. load in inclusion 73.7 kips 12.3%442.0 kips 73.7% Positive skin friction 47.3 kips 7.9%284.0 kips 47.3% Load applied on inclusion tip 26.3 kips 4.4%158.0 kips 26.3% Depth of neutral point 0.00 ft Stress in soil at LTP base 717 psf Load transferred to the soil at LTP base 26.3 kips 4.4%158.0 kips 26.3% STR verifications: compressive stresses in CMC The material used allows an average compressive stress of 694 psi 1015 psi The average compressive stress is 651 psi 879 psi GEO verifications: creep resistance and bearing capacity of the ground The soil resistance below the footing is 287.3 kips 472.0 kips The load applied on the soil at LTP base is 158.0 kips 213.3 kips The soil resistance below the CMC tip is 72.9 kips 104.1 kips The axial load within CMC is 73.7 kips 99.5 kips OK OK > Footing (as defined in french National Application Standards Shallow foundations NF P 94 261) Inclusion (as defined in french National Application Standards Deep foundations NF P 94 262) OK Description of natural soil Layer n° ULS NED →Domain: Note: By convention, the bottom of CMC is at layer n° ULSSLS OK per inclusion Results on all OK SLS Rv;d 1 Change 26.3% 26.3% 47.3% Distribution load on the scale of 1 CMC at neutral point level Soil surrounding the CMC Tip resistance Skin friction (positive) 73.7%73.7% 26.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% At inclusion head At neutral point At inclusion tip% Total load on the scale of 1 CMCEfficiency of CMC v;Rv;d;R net γγ Sq ´ ´= SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Graphic results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Depth z (ft)Settlement (in.) Soil CMC 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 20 40 60 80 Depth z (ft)SLS vertical load within CMC (kips) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Depth z (ft)Skin friction (psf) mobilized maximal 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 200 400 600 800 Depth z (ft)SLS vertical load within soil (kips) SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Rectangular footing:16.00 ft x 16.00 ft embedded of 6.00 ft loaded at 236 kips Description of Controlled Modulus Columns Lc 79 ft CMC's length Dc 1 ft CMC's diameter Description of the material in the columns Ec 155,000,000 psf Young's modulus fck 3,000 psi 28-day unconfined compressive strength Soil displacement:With Type of test:Load-bearing capacity ULS:Fundamental Steel reinforcement:NO fcd;moy;ELS 867 psi Average compressive stress in operation allowable by the material fcd;moy;ELU 1,015 psi Ultimate average compressive stress allowable by the material Description of bearing soil layer qb 116,000 psf Limit soil resistance at the tip of inclusions kq 4.8 Frank & Zhao factor for the tip (according to the table below) Em 325,000 psf Pressuremeter modulus kq values (according to Frank & Zhao) Fine-grained soils 11 Coarse-grained soils 4.8 Type of footing:Rectangular Description of the rectangular footing L 16 ft Length of footing B 16 ft Width of footing Number of CMC under footing n 4 Number of CMC under footing Description of natural soil surrounding the CMC qnet 3,600 psf Net soil resistance under footing without CMC reinforcement Spheric component Deviatoric component lc 1.10 ld 1.12 ac 0.67 ad 0.52 L/B 1.00 Description of load transfer platform hM 0.00 ft Thickness of LTP φ 38 °Internal friction angle Calculation of footing on Controlled Modulus Columns Carpenter Park- F16 Calculation according to O. Combarieu method (Fondations mixtes. LCPC 1988) Taking into account the Frank & Zhao method for the settlement calculation of CMC Terms λ are automatically extracted from the table below (as a function of L/B) (Note: for a strip footing we considers L/B = ¥) Analysis model Description of reinforced soil z Lc d B/2 hM Bedrock B L y x Hlim Soft soil Supporting soil Q(-hM) 0 SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Hw 3 ft Depth of the grounwater table from footing bottom H Em α qs kτ γ Ktanδ z (ft) (psf) (-) (psf) (-) (pcf) (-)(ft) 0 0.00 24,500 0.67 100 2.0 110 0.30 0.00 1 0.00 24,500 0.67 100 2.0 110 0.30 0.00 2 19.00 24,500 0.67 100 2.0 110 0.30 19.00 3 55.00 8,300 0.66 75 2.0 100 0.20 74.00 4 5.00 325,000 0.33 1,671 0.8 120 1.00 79.00 5 30.00 325,000 0.33 1,671 0.8 120 1.00 109.00 6 40.00 16,500 0.66 100 2.0 100 0.20 149.00 Notations H Thickness of each layer γ Unit weight of the layer Em Pressuremeter layer in each layer Ktanδ Empirical factor depending on the type of inclusion and on soft soil properties a Structural coefficient qs Ultimate skin friction for each layer kτ Frank & Zhao factor for the friction (according to the table below) z Depth of layer base 4. kτ values (according to Frank & Zhao) Fine-grained soils 2 Coarse-grained soils 0.8 SLS load applied on footing Reinforced soil settlement Q(-hM)236 kips W 0.35 in. Settlement distribution Settlement of deep layers (below CMC)0.01 in. Punching at the inclusion tip 0.08 in. Punching at the inclusion head 0.00 in. Elastic shortening of the inclusion 0.26 in. Settlement of LTP 0.00 in. SLS load distribution % total load % total load Negative skin friction in LTP 0.0 kips 0.0%0.0 kips 0.0% Load applied on inclusion head 43.8 kips 18.6%175.3 kips 74.3% Negative skin friction along the inclusion 0.0 kips 0.0%0.0 kips 0.0% Max. load in inclusion 43.8 kips 18.6%175.3 kips 74.3% Positive skin friction 35.9 kips 15.2%143.4 kips 60.8% Load applied on inclusion tip 8.0 kips 3.4%31.9 kips 13.5% Depth of neutral point 0.00 ft Stress in soil at LTP base 240 psf Load transferred to the soil at LTP base 15.2 kips 6.4%60.7 kips 25.7% STR verifications: compressive stresses in CMC The material used allows an average compressive stress of 867 psi 1015 psi The average compressive stress is 388 psi 523 psi GEO verifications: creep resistance and bearing capacity of the ground The soil resistance below the footing is 329.8 kips 541.8 kips The load applied on the soil at LTP base is 60.7 kips 81.9 kips The soil resistance below the CMC tip is 69.4 kips 99.1 kips The axial load within CMC is 43.8 kips 59.2 kips per inclusion Results on all OK SLS Rv;d 2 OK Note: By convention, the bottom of CMC is at layer n° ULSSLS OK Description of natural soil Layer n° ULS NED →Domain: OK OK ≤ Footing (as defined in french National Application Standards Shallow foundations NF P 94 261) Inclusion (as defined in french National Application Standards Deep foundations NF P 94 262) OK 25.7% 13.5%60.8% Distribution load on the scale of 1 CMC at neutral point level Soil surrounding the CMC Tip resistance Skin friction (positive) 74.3%74.3% 13.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% At inclusion head At neutral point At inclusion tip% Total load on the scale of 1 CMCEfficiency of CMC v;Rv;d;R net γγ Sq ´ ´= SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Graphic results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Depth z (ft)Settlement (in.) Soil CMC 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 Depth z (ft)SLS vertical load within CMC (kips) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Depth z (ft)Skin friction (psf) mobilized maximal 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 50 100 150 200 250 Depth z (ft)SLS vertical load within soil (kips) SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Plaxis Output Files SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Output Version 20.2.0.83Project descriptionProject filenameStepDateCompanyCarpenter Park- Medical Building- Ithaca, NY5/20/202020200408-18357-Carpen ... 8 Menard, Inc.Total displacements uy (scaled up 20.0 times)Maximum value = 0.000 ft (Element 2045 at Node 49)Minimum value = -0.2574 ft (Element 9 at Node 17173)[*10-3 ft]-260.00-240.00-220.00-200.00-180.00-160.00-140.00-120.00-100.00-80.00-60.00-40.00-20.00 0.00 20.00-125.00-100.00-75.00-50.00-25.000.0025.0050.0075.00100.00125.00150.00225.00250.00275.00300.00325.00350.00375.00400.00Overall deformation of unimprovedsubsurfaceSECTION 00 31 32B -CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN(CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGNREPORTReceived by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Output Version 20.2.0.83Project descriptionProject filenameStepDateCompanyCarpenter Park- Medical Building- Ithaca, NY5/20/202020200408-18357-Carpen ... 8 Menard, Inc.Total displacements uy (scaled up 50.0 times)Maximum value = -0.2574 ftMinimum value = -0.2574 ft[ft] 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6-12.00-8.00-4.000.004.008.0012.0016.0020.0024.0028.0032.0036.00368.00372.00376.00380.00384.00388.00392.00396.00400.00Deflection under slab- unimprovedsystem=0.2575ft x 12in/ft= 3.1 inchesSECTION 00 31 32B -CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN(CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGNREPORTReceived by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Output Version 20.2.0.83Project descriptionProject filenameStepDateCompanyCarpenter Park- Medical Building- Ithaca, NY5/20/202020200408-18357-Carpen ... 30 Menard, Inc.Total displacements uy (scaled up 50.0 times)Maximum value = 0.000 ft (Element 2045 at Node 49)Minimum value = -0.06609 ft (Element 27 at Node 16947)[*10-3 ft]-68.00-64.00-60.00-56.00-52.00-48.00-44.00-40.00-36.00-32.00-28.00-24.00-20.00-16.00-12.00 -8.00 -4.00 0.00 4.00-120.00-90.00-60.00-30.000.0030.0060.0090.00120.00150.00180.00210.00240.00270.00300.00330.00360.00390.00Overall deformation of improvedsubsurfaceSECTION 00 31 32B -CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN(CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGNREPORTReceived by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Output Version 20.2.0.83Project descriptionProject filenameStepDateCompanyCarpenter Park- Medical Building- Ithaca, NY5/20/202020200408-18357-Carpen ... 30 Menard, Inc.Total displacements uy (scaled up 50.0 times)Maximum value = -0.06585 ftMinimum value = -0.06609 ft[ft] 0 0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 0.125 0.15 0.175 0.2 0.225-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.00382.00384.00386.00388.00390.00392.00Deflection under slab, on top of LTP- improved system =0.066ft x 12in/ft= 0.8inchCMCSECTION 00 31 32B -CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN(CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGNREPORTReceived by DiMarco 02/25/2021 Output Version 20.2.0.83Project descriptionProject filenameStepDateCompanyCarpenter Park- Medical Building- Ithaca, NY5/20/202020200408-18357-Carpen ... 30 Menard, Inc.Cartesian effective stress σ'yy (scaled up 1.00*10-3 times)Maximum value = -4713 lbf/ft²Minimum value = -25.60*103 lbf/ft²[*103 lbf/ft²] 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180-75.00-50.00-25.000.0025.0050.0075.00100.00125.00150.00175.00200.00225.00250.00275.00300.00325.00350.00375.00400.00Maximum Load in CMC Area of CMC = 0.85 ft2 Stress in CMC=25.6 ksf CMC Load = 21.8 kips (0.85 ft2 x 25.6 ksf)SECTION 00 31 32B -CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN(CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGNREPORTReceived by DiMarco 02/25/2021 .\PURCHASE AREAS FOR BREAK IN ACCESS #1FIRE APPARATUS ROADPROPOSED 5'WIDE SIDEWALKCAR P E N T E R B L V D FIRE L A N EPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINEBIO RETE NTI ON G.I.#5BIO RETENTI ON G.I.#6FIRE L A N E BOXTRUCK141533FIRE L A N E23 LIGHT POLE AND FIXTURE(TYP.) SEE DETAIL.PROPOSED WALLPACK LIGHT(TYP.) SEE DETAIL.4'R0.5 FC 1 FC 0.5 FC1 FC0.5 F C 1 FC 0.5 FC 1 FC 0.5 FC1 FC1 FC0.5 FC1 FC 0.5 FC 1 FC0.5 FC 1 FC 0.5 F C 1 F C 0.5 FC26'24'24'18'(TYP.)8.5'(TYP.) 8' 24' 8.5' 101.5'5'10'87285655'RBIO RETENTION G.I. #7 8.5'18'20'18'20'5'8'22'45'R5'R10'R20'FIRE L A N E 5'R20'R5'R15'R25'RROA D C 4'R 5'R5'RSTRIPE D D R O P OFF LO O P FIRE A P P A R A T U S R O A D FIRE A P P A R A T U S R O A D 26'27'26'20'28'13'26'36'26'ITHACAFIRETRUCKITHACA FIRETRUCKOUTSIDETIRE EDGEPROPOSED F.D.C.24'PROPOSEDHYDRANT(TYP.)PROPOSEDWATERMAINUP 26'PROPOSE D PR OPERTY LINEPROPOSED CONCRETESIDEWALK (TYP.) CURB BREAK (TYP.)PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)PROPOSED STA MPED CONCRETE (TYP.)PROPOSED HANDICAP PARKING SIGNAGE (TYP.)PROPOSED ACCESSRAMP WITH DETECTABLEWARNING (TYP.)PROPOSED DU MPSTER ENCLOSURE (TYP.)LIGHT HAT CH ARE PARKI NG AREAS WITH LIGHT DUTY PAVE MENT AREAS(SEE DETAILS)PROPOSE D SIDEWALKPROPOSED DU MPSTER ENCLOSURE (TYP.)SEVEN PROPOSE D SPECIAL PARKINGSPACES WITHSIGNAGECURB BREAKSNO STANDING SIGNA A B B C C D D 1 1 2 2 3 3 3.8 3.8 4 4 5 5 6 6 3.5 3.9 E B.5 B.5 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.6 A.5 A.5 B.3 B.3 2.7 2.7 D.5 D.3 CMC-1 GENERAL NOTES ---- V:\PROSPECTS\#18357 - CMC - Carpenter Park Buildings\4 - SUBMITTALS\Design\Drawings\200522-18357-CMC-CARPENTER PARK BUILDINS-MOB.dwg - 5/27/2020 APPISSUE/REVISIONNO. DATE If this scale bar does not measure 1" then drawing is not original scale. Attention:Menard GROUND IMPROVEMENT SPECIALISTS 150 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 CARNEGIE, PA 15106 (412) 620-6000 0 1" Project: #18357 DWG. NO.Designed: Checked: Drawn: N. CARNEY S. SWIFT G. COX T. TOWLE TJT0 5/22/20 Title:SENIOR DESIGN ENGINEER CMC GROUND IMPROVEMENT PARK GROVE - CAYUGA MEDICAL CENTER ITHACA, NEWY YORKSubmitted By: P.E. Number: 100365-1FOR REVIEW SHEET NO. DRAWING INDEX DRAWING NO. SHEET NO.DRAWING TITLE CMC-1 1 GENERAL NOTES CMC-2 2 CONSTRUCTION/FIELD INSPECTION NOTES CMC-3 3 CMC LAYOUT CMC-4 4 SECTIONS & DETAILS GENERAL NOTES: 1. THIS DRAWING CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO MENARD AND IS BEING FURNISHED FOR THE USE OF DIMARCO CONSTRUCTORS AND THE OWNER ONLY IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT, AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS NOT TO BE TRANSMITTED TO ANY OTHER ORGANIZATION OR REUSED, ALTERED, OR REPURPOSED IN ANY MANNER BY ANY PARTY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY MENARD. MENARD IS THE OWNER OF THE CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) PATENTS IN THE UNITED STATES AND FURNISHING THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED LICENSE UNDER THE CMC PATENTS. 2. THE DESIGN SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE OWNER (SEE REFERENCE DOCUMENTS SECTION BELOW). ON THE BASIS OF THIS INFORMATION, MENARD HAS PREPARED A DESIGN FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: A. THE CMCS B. WORKING PLATFORM (WP) C. LOAD TRANSFER PLATFORM (LTP) ANY OTHER ITEM BEYOND THESE COMPONENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER. THESE DRAWINGS SHOW THE DESIGN AND ITEMS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION OF ITEMS A THROUGH C LISTED ABOVE. OTHER ITEMS SHOWN WERE DESIGNED BY OTHERS, MAY BE INCOMPLETE, AND ARE SHOWN HERE ONLY FOR REFERENCE. REFER TO DRAWINGS BY OTHERS FOR ITEMS ABOVE THE TOP OF THE LTP. 3. THE GROUND IMPROVEMENT LIMITS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED BY THE OWNER. MENARD IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THE UNSUPPORTED AREAS, NOR THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE SUPPORTED AND UNSUPPORTED AREAS. 4. THESE DRAWINGS ARE PROVIDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR USE ON THE PROJECT INDICATED IN THE TITLE BLOCK. ANY OTHER USE, REPRODUCTION, OR REDISTRIBUTION OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF MENARD IS PROHIBITED. 5. IF ELECTRONIC VERSIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS ARE USED TO SCALE OR LOCATE INDIVIDUAL CMCS, THE USER OF THE ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS ASSUMES SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENSURING THE DRAWINGS AND ALL INDIVIDUAL CMCS ARE LOCATED, ORIENTED, AND SCALED APPROPRIATELY WITHIN THE PROJECT COORDINATE SYSTEM. 6. THE CMC PLAN DRAWINGS SHOW THE LAYOUT OF CMCS RELATIVE TO THE BUILDING FOUNDATION DETAILS LOCATED IN THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. THE OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING CONGRUITY BETWEEN THE CMC LAYOUT PLANS AND THE LOCATION OF THE CMCS AND OTHER STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THE CMC PLAN DRAWINGS. LAYOUT OF ALL CMCS MUST BE PERFORMED BASED ON SURVEY CONTROL POINTS ESTABLISHED BY OTHERS, WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT BETWEEN CMC PLAN DRAWINGS AND THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS, NOTIFY MENARD IMMEDIATELY. DESIGN NOTES: 1. THE GROUND IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM WILL MEET THE FOLLOWING PERFORMANCE CRITERIA: A. TOTAL SETTLEMENT OF FOOTINGS AND SLAB OF 1 INCH OR LESS B. DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT BETWEEN ADJACENT FOOTINGS OF 1 2 INCH OR LESS C. BEARING CAPACITY OF 4 KSF BENEATH SUPPORTED STRUCTURES 2. THE GROUND IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM WAS DESIGNED WITH THE FOLLOWING ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: A. EXISTING GRADE VARIES, APPROXIMATE EL. +387' TO +390' B. OTHERS TO REGRADE SITE AND PREPARE WP TO APPROXIMATE EL. +389' C. MENARD TO INSTALL CMCS TO THE DESIGN EMBEDMENT CRITERIA, CUTTING OFF TOP OF GROUT TO APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES BELOW PROPOSED BOTTOM OF FOOTING ELEVATION D. CURING PERIOD ACCORDING TO CONSTRUCTION/FIELD INSPECTION CMC NOTE 2. E. OTHERS TO EXCAVATE DOWN TO TOP OF CMC ELEVATION AND EXPOSE CMCS AND UNDER ALL SPREAD AND STRIP FOOTINGS. ACCORDING TO MEANS AND METHODS DESCRIBED IN MENARD'S PROCEDURAL SUBMITTAL. RE-COMPACT WP ABOVE SLAB CMCS, PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE LTP F. OTHERS TO PREPARE SUBGRADE AND PLACE AND COMPACT 6 INCHES OF LTP MATERIAL BENEATH ENTIRE STRIP FOOTING FOOTPRINT, 1 FOOT OF LTP MATERIAL BENEATH ENTIRE SLAB FOOTPRINT AREA, AND 6 INCHES OF FLOWABLE FILL BENEATH THE ENTIRE SPREAD FOOTING G. OTHERS TO PLACE FOOTINGS AND SLAB AND PROCEED WITH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. FFE ELEVATION +390' IF THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE VARIES FROM WHAT IS LISTED ABOVE, CONTACT MENARD PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, SO THAT THEY CAN EVALUATE IMPACTS ON THE DESIGN. 3. USING LOADS BASED ON THE FOOTING REACTIONS PROVIDED BY JENSEN BRV ENGINEERING,ON A 3/27/20 S100 FOUNDATION PLAN AND DESIGN CALCULATIONS PERFORMED BY MENARD, THE MAXIMUM CMC DESIGN AXIAL LOAD IS 74 KIPS. THEREFORE, THE TARGET CMC TEST AXIAL LOAD WILL BE 1.5 DL OR 111 KIPS. 4. THE CMCS ARE DESIGNED TO BE INSTALLED AT APPROXIMATELY 85 FT AND TERMINATED IN THE DENSE SAND AND GRAVEL LAYER. MENARD WILL PERFORM A LOAD TEST TO CONFIRM THE ADEQUACY OF THIS EMBEDMENT AND THE ASSOCIATED TERMINATION CRITERIA DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. 5. FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON EXPECTED PERFORMANCE, SEE THE "CALCULATIONS RESULTS MEMO" BY MENARD DATED MAY 27, 2020 AND SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: 1. THE DESIGN FOR GROUND IMPROVEMENT CONTAINED HEREIN WAS PERFORMED USING THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: A. "DRAFT TERRACON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT" DATED JUNE 12, 2018 B. "TERRACON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT" DATED NOVEMBER 13, 2019 C. "DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DRAWINGS FOR PRICING - MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING" BY HOLT ARCHITECTS DATED MARCH 30, 2020 D. "CP FOOTING LOADS 2020.04 JBRV".10 TRANSMITTED TO MENARD BY APRIL 30 AND UPDATED ON MAY 20, 2020 E. CIVIL PLAN "20172420.0001 SITE" DATED APRIL 24, 2017 F. CAD DRAWINGS "2020-02-13 CARPENTER PARK MOB FOUND PROG.DWG", TRANSMITTED TO MENARD ON 04/02/20 2. REPORT CHANGES IN SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS TO MENARD IMMEDIATELY SO THAT MENARD CAN EVALUATE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO THE DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS OR THE DESIGN SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN GROUND IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM CARPENTER PARK - ITHACA, COUNTY, NEW YORK PARK GROVE - CAYUGA MEDICAL CENTER - OFFICE BUILDING VICINITY - KEY PLAN NOT TO SCALE 1 of 4 CMC-3 SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 CMC-2 CONSTRUCTION/FIELD INSPECTION NOTES & REQUIREMENTS ---- V:\PROSPECTS\#18357 - CMC - Carpenter Park Buildings\4 - SUBMITTALS\Design\Drawings\200522-18357-CMC-CARPENTER PARK BUILDINS-MOB.dwg - 5/27/2020 APPISSUE/REVISIONNO. DATE If this scale bar does not measure 1" then drawing is not original scale. Attention:Menard GROUND IMPROVEMENT SPECIALISTS 150 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 CARNEGIE, PA 15106 (412) 620-6000 0 1" Project: #18357 DWG. NO.Designed: Checked: Drawn: N. CARNEY S. SWIFT G. COX T. TOWLE TJT0 5/22/20 Title:SENIOR DESIGN ENGINEER CMC GROUND IMPROVEMENT PARK GROVE - CAYUGA MEDICAL CENTER ITHACA, NEWY YORKSubmitted By: P.E. Number: 100365-1FOR REVIEW SHEET NO. CONSTRUCTION/FIELD INSPECTION NOTES: 1. REFER TO THE PROCEDURAL SUBMITTAL BY MENARD SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER. DETAILS AND CLARIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION OF THE CMCS/LTP/WP ARE CONTAINED IN THE PROCEDURAL SUBMITTAL. 2. REFER TO TABLE 1 FOR A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THIRD-PARTY FIELD INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. CMC NOTES: 1. INSTALL CMCS TO THE SPECIFIED INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPED FROM THE INSTALLATION OF TEST CMCS AND THE RESULTS OF THE STATIC LOAD TESTS. PERFORM LOAD TESTS IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D1143, PROCEDURE A (QUICK TEST), IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF COLUMN LINE 3D. 2. CAST-IN-PLACE GROUT FOR CMCS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28-DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (FC) OF 2,100 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH (PSI). SAMPLES FOR COMPRESSION STRENGTH TESTING SHALL BE TAKEN PRIOR TO PUMPING AS DETAILED IN TABLE 1. EARTHWORK WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE CMCS MAY PROCEED A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS AFTER CMC INSTALLATION, OR AFTER VERIFICATION THAT GROUT HAS REACHED 80% OF DESIGN STRENGTH. WP/LTP NOTES: 1. DIMARCO TO PROVIDE THIRD-PARTY OBSERVATION OF THE TESTING, PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF THE WP & LTP PER TABLE 1. THIRD-PARTY INSPECTION REPORTS SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A LETTER SEALED BY A STATE OF NEW YORK REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER THAT STATES THAT THE WP & LTP HAVE BEEN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS (TABLE 1) AND THE CMC DESIGN REPORT. 2. WP/LTP MATERIAL SHOULD NOT BE PLACED OR COMPACTED ON FROZEN GROUND. IF FROZEN GROUND IS ENCOUNTERED DURING OR PRIOR TO WP/LTP PLACEMENT, CONTACT MENARD IMMEDIATELY TO DETERMINE THE MOST APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE APPROACH. 3. THE MATERIAL USED FOR THE LTP SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DENSE-GRADED AGGREGATE (DGA), AS SHOWN BELOW AND REFERENCED IN TABLE 1. DGA SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBBASE TYPE 4 IN SECTION 733-04, SHOWN BELOW. SIEVE SIZE: 2” : PERCENT PASSING = 100% SIEVE SIZE: 14” : PERCENT PASSING = 30-65% SIEVE SIZE: NO. 40 : PERCENT PASSING = 5-40% SIEVE SIZE: NO. 200 : PERCENT PASSING = 0-10% 4. LTP MATERIAL BELOW SPREAD FOOTINGS SHALL BE FLOW FREE GROUT WITH A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 1,000 PSI, QC/QA FOR FLOW-FILL MATERIAL SHALL FOLLOW THE SAME PROCEDURE AS CMC GROUT IN TABLE 1. 2 of 4 TOPIC ITEM DESC.RESPONSIBLE PARTY VALUE FREQUENCY DELIVERABLES NOTE ON TRANSMITTAL & FREQUENCY TO MENARD PE STAMP REQ'D ON REPORT? WP/LTP PROCTOR DIMARCO MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT PER ASTM D-1557-12 1 TEST PER 100-CY OR IF MATERIAL VISIBLY CHANGES ALL PROCTOR RESULTS AND NEW PROCTORS (MAX. DRY DENSITY AND MOISTURE CURVE) WHEN MATERIAL IS CHANGED.AS PERFORMED GRADATION DIMARCO PER WP/LTP NOTE 3 (CMC-2)1 PER 1,000 TONS SIEVE ANALYSIS REPORT WITH COMPARISON TO SPECIFIED GRADATION OR CERTIFICATION LETTER FROM SOURCE / SUPPLIER IN LIEU OF CONTINUAL TESTING. WEEKLY YES OBSERVATION DIMARCO VERIFY THICKNESS, LIMITS OF PLACEMENT, LIFTS, ELEVATIONS, SLOPES, DEGRADATION, VISUALLY CONSISTENT. CONTINUOUS DURING PLACEMENT AND UNTIL COVERED PROVIDE OBSERVATION REPORT DETAILING EACH SHIFT OF PRODUCT PLACEMENT. IF MATERIAL VISUALLY CHANGES DO NOT PERMIT PLACEMENT UNTIL ANOTHER SAMPLE HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND ANOTHER PROCTOR/GRADATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. WEEKLY YES COMPACTION DIMARCO 95% OF MAX. DRY DENSITY PER MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM 9-INCH-THICK LOOSE LIFTS SPREAD FOOTINGS: ONCE PER FOOTINGS STRIP FOOTINGS: ONE PER 100 LF SLAB: ONE PER 2,500 SF PER 9 INCH LOOSE LIFT, SPACED EVENLY THROUGHOUT THE TREATMENT AREA PROOF TEST WORKING PAD USING FULLY LOADED TRIAXLE TRUCK TO CHECK PUMPING OR RUTTING. FOR LTP TESTING, INCLUDE TEST #, REFERENCE LOCATION OF TEST, LIFT NUMBER, TESTING DEPTH, ELEVATION, COMPACTION RESULTS, PASS/FAIL DESIGNATION, AND IF FAILED, WHICH TEST LOCATION DOES RETEST CORRESPOND WITH. WEEKLY CMC GROUT COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH DIMARCO PER CMC NOTE 2 (CMC-2) A MIN. OF SIX (6) CYLINDERS WILL CONSTITUTE ONE (1) SET. ONE (1) SET OF CYLINDERS SHOULD BE TAKEN PER EVERY 100 CUBIC YARDS OF GROUT INSTALLED OR FRACTION THEREOF OF GROUT DELIVERED ON A GIVEN SHIFT. CYLINDERS SHALL BE 3” BY 6” OR 4” BY 8” USING PREPARATION PROCESS IN ASTM C31. CYLINDERS TO BE BROKEN: TWO (2) AT 7 DAYS, TWO (2) AT 28 DAYS, AND TWO (2) ON A 56 DAY HOLD TO BE TESTED AS REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL RESULTS (E.G. THREE DAY BREAKS) WILL REQUIRE THE CASTING OF TWO (2) ADDITIONAL CYLINDERS PER SET. WEEKLY SLUMP DIMARCO NO REQUIREMENT MINIMUM OF ONCE PER 100 CUBIC YARDS OF GROUT DELIVERED OR ONCE PER SHIFT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. ADDITIONAL SLUMP TESTING SHOULD BE TAKEN IN INSTANCES WHERE CONSISTENCY OF GROUT APPEARS TO VARY FROM PREVIOUS BATCHES. MATERIALS GROUT SUPPLIER AS REQUIRED PER GROUT MIX DESIGN 1 BATCH TICKET PER TRUCK EVERY LOAD OF GROUT DELIVERED TO SITE SHALL HAVE A BATCH TICKET DETAILING MIX PROPORTION BY WEIGHT (THEORETICAL AND ACTUAL), ADMIXTURE DOSAGE, TIME OF BATCHING, DESIGN SLUMP, AND ALLOWABLE TRIM WATER. IF WATER IS ADDED TO TRUCK BEFORE STARTING TO UNLOAD, IT SHALL BE NOTED ON TICKET. DAILY TESTING & INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (TABLE 1) SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 A A B B C C D D 1 1 2 2 3 3 3.8 3.8 4 4 5 5 6 6 3.5 3.9 E 6'-1 1/2"5'-1 3/4"33'-1 1/4"30'-6"29'-3"31'-6"30'-6"31'-6"31'-10"27'-10 3/8" 18'-8 7/ 8 "33.00° 25'-2 1 / 2"16'-6 5/8"5'-4 3/4"96'-0" F12 96'-0" F15 96'-0" F15 96'-0" F15 B.5 B.519'-0"11'-6"96'-0" F6 96'-0" F12 96'-0" F15 96'-0" F15 96'-0" F10 96'-0" F10 96'-0" F8 99'-0" F14 99'-0" F14 96'-0" F14 96'-0" F10 96'-0" F10 96'-0" F5 96'-0" F5 96'-0" F10 96'-0" F15 96'-0" F10 96'-0" F12 96'-0" F8 96'-0" F15 99'-0" F14 95'-0" F14 95'-0" F14 96'-0" SF1 96'-0" SF1 96'-0" SF1 96'-0" SF1 96'-0" SF1 96'-0" SF1 96'-0" SF1 95'-0" 96'-0" SF1 5.5 5.513'-8 3/4"18'-8 3/4"15 7/8 10 3/45.6 5.6 33.00°1'- 3 "30' -5 5 /8 "31' -5 1 /2 " 0' - 3 " 2' - 1 " 4'-1 7 / 8" 1'-3"1'-3"1'-3"6'-8 1/2" P4 P4 P4 P3 P4 P3 P1 P1 P1 P3 P3P3P3 P3 P2 P4 P3 P3 P3 P4P4 P4P4 A.5 A.5 B.3 B.3 2.7 2.7 D.5 D.3 6'-9 1/2"10'-6 3/4"6'-11 3/4" 99'-7" F6 8'-8"+/- 99'-7" F6 3'-3"+/-12.00°78.00°21'-1"+/-96'-0" SF1 5'-1" 10'-0" TYP. 4'-9"5'-3 " 8 ' -6 " 10 ' - 0 " TYP . 10 ' -2 " TYP . 10'-0" T Y P. 10'-0" TYP.10'-0" TYP.8'-11"8'-11"6'-6"5'-2" 2'-11" 8'-5"10'-0" TYP.10'-0" TYP. 7'-11"5'-8"9'-4"6'-2 " 10'-0" TYP.7'-4"APPROXIMATE LOAD TEST LOCATION 2'-5"1'-6"5'-0"7'-7"7'-7" CMC-3 3 of 4CMC LAYOUT ---- V:\PROSPECTS\#18357 - CMC - Carpenter Park Buildings\4 - SUBMITTALS\Design\Drawings\200522-18357-CMC-CARPENTER PARK BUILDINS-MOB.dwg - 5/27/2020 APPISSUE/REVISIONNO. DATE If this scale bar does not measure 1" then drawing is not original scale. Attention:Menard GROUND IMPROVEMENT SPECIALISTS 150 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 CARNEGIE, PA 15106 (412) 620-6000 0 1" Project: #18357 DWG. NO.Designed: Checked: Drawn: N. CARNEY S. SWIFT G. COX T. TOWLE TJT0 5/22/20 Title:SENIOR DESIGN ENGINEER CMC GROUND IMPROVEMENT PARK GROVE - CAYUGA MEDICAL CENTER ITHACA, NEWY YORKSubmitted By: P.E. Number: 100365-1FOR REVIEW SHEET NO. CMC LAYOUT PLAN 0 SCALE: 10 20 1" = 10' LEGEND ITEM SYMBOL 12.5 INCH DIA. SPREAD FOOTING CMC (TYP.) 12.5 INCH DIA. WALL FOOTING CMC (SPACING VARIES SEE PLAN) 12.5 INCH DIA. SLAB CMC (SPACING VARIES SEE PLAN) NOTE: FOUNDATIONS THAT ARE BUBBLEDARE BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED IN LOADING SUMMARY. FINAL DESIGN DRAWINGS WILL BE SUBMITTED ONCE THE UPDATED CAD FILE IS RECEIVED. SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021 COLUMN OR WALL - DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS TOP OF CMC, EL. VARIES MIN. 6" COMPACTED DENSE GRADED AGGREGATE MATERIAL BENEATH STRIP FOOTINGS - INSTALLED BY OTHERS 12.5 INCH DIA. CMC SUPPORT AT ALL WALL FOOTINGS FOOTING - DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS TYPICAL WALL SECTION NOT TO SCALE 12.5" Ø CMC 2,100 PSI GROUT (SEE CMCS NOTE 2 ON DWG. CMC-2) TYPICAL CMC SECTION NOT TO SCALE CMCS BENEATH WALL FOOTINGS ARE CENTERED ON THE WALL FOOTING UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED(VARIES)SEE PLANTYPICAL WALL FOOTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 12.5 INCH Ø CMC (TYP.) 12.5 INCH DIA. CMC TOP OF CMC, EL. VARIES 1'-0" WORKING PLATFORM 1'-0" LOAD TRANSFER PLATFORM 5 INCH THICKNESS CONCRETE SLAB - DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS TYPICAL SLAB SECTION NOT TO SCALE 6"15'-0" TYP. 14'-0" TYP. 8'-0" TYP. 10'-0" TYP. F8 F10 F15 AND F15.1 F14 TYPICAL FOOTINGS NOT TO SCALE 14'-0" TYP. F14 12'-0" TYP. F12 2'-0"2'-0"3'-6"1'-9"3'-0"3'-0"4'-0"4'-5"4'-5"5'-4"5'-4"1'-9"4'-6"4'-6"4'-6"4'-6"4'-6" 4'-5"4'-6"3'-6"3'-6"2'-0"5'-7"4'-6"3'-3"3'-3"1'-9"15'-0" TYP. F15 16'-0" TYP. 4'-6"4'-6"4'-6"4'-6"F16 5'-4"5'-4"4'-6"5'-7"4'-6"3'-3"3'-3"1'-9"4'-0" TYP. 5'-0" TYP. 2'-0"2'-0"2'-6"2'-6"2'-0" F5F4 2'-0"COLUMN OR WALL - DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS TOP OF CMC, EL. VARIES MIN. 6" FLOWABLE FILL MATERIAL BENEATH FOOTINGS - INSTALLED BY OTHERS 12.5 INCH DIA. CMC SUPPORT AT ALL SPREAD FOOTINGS FOOTING - DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS TYPICAL FOOTING SECTION NOT TO SCALE CMC-4 4 of 4SECTIONS & DETAILS ---- V:\PROSPECTS\#18357 - CMC - Carpenter Park Buildings\4 - SUBMITTALS\Design\Drawings\200522-18357-CMC-CARPENTER PARK BUILDINS-MOB.dwg - 5/27/2020 APPISSUE/REVISIONNO. DATE If this scale bar does not measure 1" then drawing is not original scale. Attention:Menard GROUND IMPROVEMENT SPECIALISTS 150 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 500 CARNEGIE, PA 15106 (412) 620-6000 0 1" Project: #18357 DWG. NO.Designed: Checked: Drawn: N. CARNEY S. SWIFT G. COX T. TOWLE TJT0 5/22/20 Title:SENIOR DESIGN ENGINEER CMC GROUND IMPROVEMENT PARK GROVE - CAYUGA MEDICAL CENTER ITHACA, NEWY YORKSubmitted By: P.E. Number: 100365-1FOR REVIEW SHEET NO. SECTION 00 31 32B - CONTROLLED MODULUS COLUMN (CMC) RIGID INCLUSIONS DESIGN REPORT Received by DiMarco 02/25/2021