HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-CLC-2019-08-19 Date: August 19,2019
Time: 6:00 PM
Wok Location: Common Council Chambers,
" COMMUNITY LIFE 3rd Floor, City Hall
M
COMMISSION MINUTES
PRESENT: Chair Swayze
Commissioners (8): Keeler, Scriber, Hillson, Byrne, Das & Bakhle
OTHERS PRESENT: Common Council Liaisons: Lewis & Fleming and Executive
Assistant Hallett-Harris
ABSENT: Hagood
Excused: Scriber
Meeting called to order: 6:04 p.m.
Review and Approval of Minutes: July 15, 2019 Minutes: 1 St Hillson and Bakhle 2nd _
all in favor - Minutes approved
Alexander Phillips, Planner, City of Ithaca Office of Planning and Development —
Proiect Presentation: The Tompkins Giant Proiect: This was previously discussed
by John Spence at a prior CLC Meeting and Alex passed around the information packet
that was emailed earlier in the day to CLC Members regarding the sculpture. Alex is
asking CLC to vote for permission to publically distribute this proposal. The current
sculpture is 20' tall and weighs 2,000 #s, it has steel bars and will patina w/age and
time. Currently three placement possibilities at Stewart Park and two sites at Cass
Park; Alex will be meeting with Jeanne Grace and will also be meeting with Public
Works regarding soil issues with this sculpture and placement regarding tree line, etc.
Alex will be coming to September meeting for CLC's recommendation after public
comments are received. This sculpture is inspired by the Taughannock Giant hoax that
was done in early 18t" century and this would be fun project adding to city landscape
along Cayuga Waterfront Trail. The sculpture will be delivered in pieces, once site
chosen, a concrete foundation will be constructed for it and either in Oct/Nov, and again
after approval processes are obtained. The artist to come to Ithaca to assemble this
and would take approximately 7 days to erect. Why the city not closer to Taughhanock,
visibility of the Waterfront Trail. This will be paid by for the Tompkins County Tourism
grant received and County already approved.
Normally, notifications would be sent out to public that resided within 400 feet from the
site, then to City website and press release to different publications to advise the public
of new public art coming to City; since it would be in the City Park, there were
suggestions of how to have more robust strategy in getting public comments from
shared public space and have more robust than murals; Megan to assist with this.
Alex also advised that the "Water is Life" mural from 2nd round deadline of murals by
Lynn Golan and was just approved by Common Council.
Community Life Commission
August 19, 2019
Ithaca Moves Sculpture also has 2nd sculpture grant and Request for Qualifications
were just sent out and Alex will come to future meeting to get CLC recommendations,
this was different process as it was through Community Arts Partnership (CAP) that
chose the artist, similar to Art in the Heart.
There were some questions/concerns from members regarding possible
vote/referendum regarding recommendation of sculptures and getting feedback from
wider range of people; Alex will have artist renders as well. Some concerns were:
there are different tastes in the public arena and one person doesn't like it and some
love it— how do you accommodate a range of taste with public art? It's not offensive,
but general tastes — it was explained that is where the public comments come in and
suggestion of having a large variety of public art so there are more choices/variety.
Have more public opinion and have a larger public comment? How are any submissions
submitted/circulated to the public? Follow same path as the mural, this is different as it
is sculpture, notification to people within 400' from the site of mural and then post on
public website and press release to different publications of new art coming to the city.
Since this would be in a park and is a sculpture, Alex will speak with Megan to have
more robust strategy than with the murals. Permission to circulate the sculpture -
Keeler made motion and Das 2nd —All in favor of Alex moving forward with publication of
sculpture, The Tompkins Giant Project.
Chair advised that they have just received updated forms from Dan Cogan to create
working group at end of last week which has more concrete info/forms for working
groups.
Public Art Mural Subcommittee - Keeler stated that he has proposal for line item for
art for City Budget; who will administrate this: John Spence Director of Community Arts
Partnership, regarding past /historical there was $ 10,000 in past on the budget— late
90's. John Spence would be interested in help administrating the funds. We
recommend there is a budget line item for public art and send along to Common Council
to vote and there would be a mechanism in the works that CAP would administer it and
get City's point of view, including meeting with Megan, Joann, Alex, etc., for
maintenance fund for existing art, etc., The proposed language read out to members:
Community Life Commission hereby recommends that City Council create
a $10,000.00 line item for Public Art in the 2020 Budget to support
maintenance of current works and commission new public art work,
Community Life Commission has been in communication with John
Spence of Community Arts Partnerships (CAP) to help assist the City to
help administrate funds for maintenance and new art commissions.
Talk with Community Arts Partnership (CAP) to get suggestions of language and more
background and what the deadline would be for Common Council to have the specific
info; get more information from Alex concerning city property for current art already in
place — come here to CLC to get permission to get that sculptor/mural to get
maintenance and currently artist cannot just fix existing artwork w/o approval from CLC
2
Community Life Commission
August 19, 2019
on City property. In some cases artist no longer in the area and maintenance would
help preserve the artwork.
Final language with CLC Member's input:
Community Life Commission hereby recommends that City Council create
a $10,000.00 line item for Public Art in the 2020 Budget to support
maintenance of current works and commission new public art work.
Conversations have begun with Community Arts Partnerships (CAP) and
City Planning and will continue to develop the best way to administer
funds.
Vote on final language — Bakhle 1 st and Byrne 2 nd motion, all in favor for
recommendation for City to put a public art budge line for 2020.
Note to Mayor and cc'd Dan Cogan and Deb Mehlonoff. Chair to send the language
from minutes.
Chair Swayze discussed email that was forwarded from Tom Shelley regarding the
Anthropocene Sculpture. Someone to connect with Tom Shelley to find out more
information and what exactly is wanted and it seems they are looking for site for this art
piece. This sculpture currently in place at CU and consists of old car parts in a circle
and looking to have it placed within the City. Chair will email Tom and follow up to refer
him to Planning Department and they can follow up with CLC. This is connected to
projects at CU as well.
Keeler matching funds for public art line so he has meeting set up with Gary Stewart
with CU regarding art work and invite him to one of our meetings once we have our
project form and working group organized and that will be the next step to have him
then come. Suggestions that we reach out ahead of time and we are interested in
hearing from CU regarding matching city funds and can give him a heads up regarding
the MOU.
Elag_— Hillson in process of writing up from the video from City Council meeting and in
process of writing something up with Chair.
Cornell Working Group — Byrne working on Commission Project Plan Form. They
have met, and between Byrne and Hillson they have are now working on getting on the
form and who else are the players that would be good to have as a working group less
commissions more advisors/general population. CLC to brainstorm ideas of who would
be good: INNS, having someone from housing, Human Services Coalition, CC Action,
any other input as advisors that have good knowledge and/or just a part of the working
group to do research? Check in with Nels who is Director of IURA, Collegetown
Neighborhood Council, Marty's Postal on Dryden Rd (Uncle Marty's Shipping &
Storage) and Downtown Ithaca Alliance, in their group or businesses affiliated. One
question we had was about in the MOU it vague about what should be done by Cornell
and there were commitments made - were they documented? Is there a list CU has and
what they have contributed? Maybe asking CU to provide a list of what they have
given/contributed to the City? Have contributed to housing fund, TCAT, Library, etc.,
3
Community Life Commission
August 19, 2019
good to see the whole list. When inviting them to meeting ask for outline of all different
places CU has contributed and $$ figures, where it's going. Members to give other
ideas, people or places to be emailed to Byrne and Chair. Once Byrne has draft, send
the CPP to Chair.
Shopping Carts Follow Up: Bakhle touched based with Scriber and neither have had
success contacting retailers, they are unresponsive, what's lacking is the understanding
of how the carts are abandoned and get the research and receive recommendation from
Common Council for research from City Forester. Chair advised CLC should create first
report back to Council and update them on this, give these suggestions and get
permission to have research from City Forester. Bakhle & Scriber to get more
information they can gather on that and get point by point of what has been done.
The July minutes have all the proposals/details and proposals; Bakhle will put together
an initial progress report by September's meeting and give to City Admin, Chair Deb
Mehlenoff. Bakhle to draft proposal to Chair Swayze. Any ideas from CLC members?
Keeler emailed members pictures and info regarding retailer's in San Jose. The piece
regarding retailer paying a fee and completing form. It makes businesses bear some of
the cost of recouping carts; business should provide some of the cost in recouping the
carts and basically the City of Ithaca is providing a service to local retailers. Why
people need them and how to help with that is another piece of this as well.
Sexual Harassment Training with Leslie for remainder of the meeting
6:58 pm Adjourned
Next Meeting:
Monday, September 16, 2019, 6:00 p.m., Common Council Chambers, 3rd Floor
Adjournment:
On a motion, the meeting was adjourned at 6:58 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted by,
Jody Hallett-Harris, Executive Assistant
4
The Tompkins Giant Project
Sculpture title: Gromely
Artist: Jarod Charzewski
Contact info: Jarodcharzewskihotmail,com
Cell: 612-701-4883
The Tompkins Giant Project has inspired me to create something grand in scale and visually fantastic.
Something that will be a landmark for the town of Ithaca NY that will inspire its residence as well as its
visitors for years to come. Gromely is the name of the figure I have designed. It encapsulates aspects of
the original story of the Tompkins Giant as well it fosters a sense of fantasy and wonder.
Drawings
r
�.flsf
'd
r
(f q
t
r�k {
y 1
:
1'
t
tJ
�t
t
�Y
{
3
t}
The towering sculpture stands a full 20 feet tall. The piece is designed with an armature or skeleton of
steel tubing that will be bolted together on site. In keeping with the conceptual thread of my portfolio
the outer layer would be made mostly of recycled steel tubing with sizes ranging from 1, 2 and 4-inch
square and welded together. This material was chosen for its durability in the natural elements. This will
provide a maintenance free public sculpture long into the future. Each piece of the outer layer would
have a patina that would create a spectrum of natural colors to blend with fall colors of the region. The
entire piece will be sprayed in a clear finish to ensure a lasting protective coat.
r.rss.
The Outer Shell
9" 1 '
20_
The sculpture will have a milti colored
patinaed surface then clearcoated
for longlastinq protection.
Like all my public work consultation with a structural engineer would take place. This would provide a
credible method of construction of the steel tubes as well as the foundation. The piece would be built
entirely in my studio space at the College of Charleston. There I have ample space and equipment to
build the piece as well as plenty of assistance to help stay on schedule. I would transport the sculpture
to Ithaca in pieces and assemble it in place. The piece would require a reinforced concrete slab be
poured in place. There would be nothing unique about the slab and can be poured by any local
contractor.
The Armature
4"Steei Tubing
Concrete Slab
The piece will be constructed can a 4"square x 1/4"steel
tube armature frame.The piece will be made in pieces,
transported and bolted together on site..
Foundation
4"steel tube armature Front View
anchored into slab
4'
4"steel tubing .armature
Side View
G"thick concrete slab
r Ground level
12"footings directly under armature contact points
The armature would be anchored to the slab using ASTM F1554 10"x 5/8" hot dipped galvanized
threaded rod. The rods would be fastened to the slab with a Hilti HY- Hit 200A injectable adhesive or as
prescribed by my structural engineer. I have used this system for much heavier loads in the past and
always had great success.
Budget
Fabrication expenses $1200.00
New steel tubing for armature $2100.00
Recycled steel tubing for outer layer $1800.00
Patina $250.00
Clear coat sealer $420.00
Installation expenses $450.00
Fabrication assistance $2700.00
Shipping $3300.00
Personal Travel $350.00
Accommodations on site for 5 nights $400.00
Artist fee $5030.00
Total $18000.00
Site preparation
The piece would require a minimum 16'x14'x6" reinforced concrete slab. This would need to be poured
7 days before my arrival. The cost of the slab would be between $3500.00 and $4000.00. 1 would need
two able volunteers to help assemble the piece. I would require a JLG Telescopic Boom Lift rented for
duration of the install. On site assembly would take between 2 and 4 days.
Time frame
Late June - consult with my structural engineer
July 1st - begin fabrication
Mid-September- complete fabrication
Late September—ship to Ithaca NY
Early October—4 days to install - project complete
buy `
'�.:'."
..,.;.� .
c +
........
r
k
r l t t r t tt 1 cc t{ t i F t8 h
t }a t
{ 3
"
f
SITE # 1
Date 411712019
CITY OF ITHACA
City Commissions
PROJECTCOMMISSION PLAN
ASSIGNED COMMISSION Public Safety and Information ®_ Parks.; Recreation and Natural Resources
Community Life Mobility, Accessibility and Transportation
REPORT UP TO city Administration Committee Planning and Economic Development Committee
Mayor Common Council d city Staff(specify): Jeanne Grace
1. Project Title, Description and Background
13 Give Chas pirojecta 960,ddsWbe how it rarae q t, ram ,aad who is inv61vod
Shopping Cart Ordinance Update
Residents (particularly downtown) have identified abandoned shopping carts as a blight to
neighborhood aesthetics, a hazard to the public, and an obstruction to pedestrian and vehicular
traffic. City staff finds the current ordinance time-consuming to enforce and ineffective.We have
proposed ordinances changes and have received initial feedback from retailers. Council would like a
well-researched and well-vetted recommendation for updates to the existing ordinance.
2. Project Deliverables
P10$0 check offend 04aHbO bWplwthe "fit dam" le( )your OM"Ooog OOM f ssibft,and add details as
✓ Research the topic and provide a summary report on your findings. Include any recommendations along with reasons
for the recommendations. (Requires a vote of the commission)
®Review a program, process or legislation from Council and provide feedback on the pros and cons. Report back
should indicate whether the commission supports the program, does not support the program, or is neutral, along with the
reasons why. (Requires a vote of the commission)
i Arrange for a public presentation on the topic, gather feedback, solicit questions, and synthesize feedback in a
findings report. (Vote of commission not required)
- Gather feedback from retailers on the proposed ordinance change
- Gather feedback from people most likely to take shopping carts and/or the organizations that work
with them
- Propose a change in legislation (likely based off draft already presented to City Administration)
Propose ways to mitigate the impact on populations who need ways to transport their groceries
. City Staff Participation
Describotplow the axpvctavans 01 ow$6ffto suppon this , Us er of Owstaffasswo fea-Faf7f,
City Forester Jeanne Grace and her crew are responsible for picking up abandoned shopping
carts when they're unable to perform other work. Jeanne can provide insight into the shortcomings
and issues with the current shopping cart ordinance and what her preferred solutions would be.
. Resources/Materials
List belowany misona matedalt or, that should 40 eo : dby the s part of their work,
Alderperson Nguyen presented a draft of a new shopping cart ordinance to the City Administration
Committee, sent letters summarizing the changes to retailers known to have significant shopping
cart inventories, and has feedback from two of those retailers. The Twitter account @ithacascenery
documents abandoned shopping carts around the city.
. Other Stakeholders or Community Partners
ners
L�stboloWaAyothtrpgttlesth.etsh,ouldbeifftliidd,d' .. lon err an" I € £
Ithaca Housing Authority operates Titus Towers, which houses one of the largest collections of
shopping carts in Ithaca outside of a retailer. Their residents have a clear need for ways to transport
their groceries.
. Tirneiine and Milestones
13 plea,-4 to the foltowingmaestonp,oates,if 4flown at 4 oiyo
Public input dates am required only if tie prblect!.;to gotherpublic input.
Progress Report 1 Public Input Fief Deliverables Due: Nov 20 1'g
MONTH/YEAR EAR Aug �019 MONTHIYEAR MONTHIYEAR
Progress Report 2' Public Input 2:
MONTHiYEAR MONTFI/YEAR
d i.�,` 4� pp �� { t� 5.� � ���t �#�'�LCS�ix }#t� r� r �1 ?t 2�s � �t��,�tt�F?�� ,,,
� �"y 'Y�" t}tt�ri {\ � 4t tS"�SZ{ tta2 � � aY �R a� < 4'} z?}�z � U�t ,
., a`,Y � k }Lip �:� � `Z'1�#�4 {21'r 9 `�. � 'T ��d �t
';' . `: tSs.. �"d `.`�ts}ts,,;.,ti� �.}����5.�txzx`�`i�'stt�� �xl,t'1,3{� � ��t�� '��t��;s t�(}�. ry 7
`�:, ��1,. ,;.��<�;> i ,' ;Y.°`� �� ��``�.�<i t�,�ZtSi{ 7,#�F.!S� r,�T�'tS � ��Ec�.Ult �`iC '.i.
�' "z �.a,>• � ::}ns`:3�;, '� �; ?:e.:: �z:, �y ���...tiR2�.,.R1t 4�� xSc �ti:,tt lx�zs# 3 � ;<vc'�}tat }�S�`z„�
4k� };,o., �J.,;t� .r,�{`-t�'r���t`t� ::t€s {a�z'ist x�����;\•�x•1tt'� �������.t1 t>�h'
s� � {:, :k �� r#}ct �y��3�� ,2c}ti� � �� ti`y { � ����.
a.,y tt4r;'` i�Ray � ,�s+zz 1�21 ��> t r}�1�.Z tE,��``��,i t{srs~s �t}.# xx'�� tt'��.�s','�' �� .
�, t �� rt�y zt2� k^��.j?'r�ri�� rtttr! t�a .a
"` at� �xr ��� i ��� 3Frx,z ��� � x t4 �t� lzzzxz# ys sa,
v�� �{.,tt';t„` }'��L?�y �?;ti?�?� f��� t c�t�l�� }tz}�i �t �t '�l`�x4i�� elf{�,i ;`iy
"�"nls Y,,y',: 7 .., �;���n t3}�}�\;x�'�,�1 �* ��r� t`„ :.tt A x�x br}�ti,� �,is
��i
� ��, e� ��S` �.i ,`...,}Yfrt24��11t„:,��`t?�. t���}t��y� ;stc rr $:Sji) '�rz�3�` LCt}tf£?
,tt�#<,z "' �\;;'v,�� �.s£`. �t ����#��`1,��zi 4:. �)�,� u�t�}tt rt'`�t4S tS,��is�vr,�t� ;l,s..�r k3.
.�,: � �, r,," \s iE1�.x 2} � � ` if tt`ZS`l�St��..F�t' �''?st't t :tS�fi x #x £ � sa,,
Sa't S�'x.;yc, �t�:: }tt� ;r7�z1`�Y ;� tzs t}'����f?? �� t'� t'� }t1^, {� 4�����,. ,}„
����., s � t zxt � �tirt{ `'�`.zzi��� c 2R�?��i (`{� r�,2....
"�,i�, t, fix.tt `:xt O"tt ft} �Zs`xt��� r� �°1S 2{�t"l�y t��3iy} �91�'x s�xz�� G ,,,
a>} 1zt? x z Rx z3rY sytr .#ty �.,t,.,.
{tttw3 t a1 `�. �y l � £ t
� y z rss {t}z 1�T,s ;a w �t}z i� �{�
t '��R` t�t�f}#y x F �31i}ti{i+ +w i., „��,'Yx<.�.,
x,,. �axj t}c z r��Y€z fl+.� ���m'#�?"}t..
�c �,�{ z y�ty r
R�y�'~
tia+ ���
�"� a"� � y.,�t,..t
.:.x..,t
' �''
� � � �
�, s �., x�' Z ��'�{ #
� � �4 u: t� t.� t�w as�� a,�,�a fix`aR
a t� � ��� y:am�a�s,��un ,x��y�
�' R � tit. tx�. > �s�
~r a to : .t � 3
a
sz' ,,.. � .,,
k � n
x s �'a R„=
y�' R R
s�.,
�= ti
..
i
� ,
x � � ���° � m,,
�.
�'� "� e. �`6.���
,a
���ti",'
a
y sad ,
��
1 �l
�4 >,,} l
It ���
u
�.
t
��t� {�
.,
�,, � � ,_
t �° ,�
,. �. � ti
�.
;: .
,, ..,
��
SY � �' :. �.Aar* .....
4
A S�
v �. ...
q� � � � �
E
r
t z
r,
t�
}
or
l
A
ton,
m,hi, e ,, ,�romova
Un-ii' ovd`z, ,,,
S . 5to
S
fi
01 0
a 's
ener
iness Law
at Bus,
10k-
'on of the
s"'punith
able by
ot
..........
'Y
an
low
4
1
F
z
y
E
r
e,
I
t
�f
as m
1
s
ART, SOCIAL SCIENCE AND SOCIAL VISION
In the perceptual rendering of human experience and thought, art both reflects
social existence, and asserts the possibility for transforming social existence.Art's capacity
for transformative perception holds potential for enriching social science, given society's
inability to resolve its twin existential dilemmas, namely growing economic inequality and
escalating climate change.Any practical solution to either of these dilemmas depends upon
social transformation. This, in turn, depends upon people's capacity to envision
transformation and its rationale, as well as the final result. Positive social transformation is
possible to the extent that leaders, along with a significant number of people,hold fast to a
clear vision of what needs to change and how a new society can come about.
Social transformation is presently underway due to innovations in science and
technology, giving humanity the opportunity to consciously shape its own future.This
proposition is evident when examining rates of change over the past 50 years (Ford 2014;
Green 2019; Kaku 1998). Since their invention in the 1960s, microprocessors have grown
in processing power exponentially, as has scientific knowledge. This suggests that future
economic, social and political structures will be organized around qualitatively different
logic, and that the character of this difference will be determined by what people do.
Our proposed multidisciplinary collaboration is between an artist and a social
scientist. It deploys a sculpture to inspire and organize thinking on the present state of the
world (economically and ecologically), and to imagine future possibilities about what can
and should be. The proposed sculpture "Anthropocene" will be placed on Cornell campus
and is a large hollow circle, 12' high, comprised of industrial relics,trashed car parts,
crushed and welded to an interior frame. The colors of the parts illustrate climate
temperature zone; chrome bumpers at the top and bottom represent the Arctic/Antarctic,
the adjacent level made from green and yellow parts corresponding to bodies of water and
plant life, and the equator region is red and orange corresponding to the warmer equatorial
region. Solar lights are affixed within the crushed parts, illuminating the structure at night,
mimicking earth's solar halo on its dark side, and symbolizing'sustainability.'
The round form illustrates unity and our shared space on earth; cause and effect.
The meaning is: what goes around comes around. Industrial fossil fuels are the largest
source of greenhouse gasses, and automobiles symbolize the destructive use of industrial
era technology for private profit.At earlier stages of development,the auto industry
provided mass industrial employment. Cars were a symbol of social status and seeming
efficiency. Humanity now has the technological capacity to build electric cars, and more
broadly,to establish new sets of relationships that address the public purpose for planetary
balance benefitting from the ever-evolving tools of science.
Description of activity/project
The sculpture is designed by artist Monica Franciscus (2019) and built in
collaboration with a team of welders and contractors.Taitem Engineering (2019) has
provided stamped structural drawings
Viewers may interact directly with the Anthropocene sculpture by walking through
it; it is slightly sunk into the ground. There will be a plaque nearby with a website address
where the public can partake in a questionnaire, and offer commentary. The website will
feature the project rationale, and a blog.
1
Several separate audiences will engage with the sculpture. First, Cornell scientists,
among the architects of the ongoing scientific revolution,will be interviewed for their take
on the present global economic and ecological crises and possible solutions. Second,the
sculpture will engage local residents whose feedback is particularly interesting given that
Ithaca is within the "rust belt region"which has been deindustrializing since the 1970s. The
proposal is integrated with a large undergraduate class (DSoc 1101; taught by the principal
investigator) to experiment with the sculpture as a component of the curriculum. The
students will conduct interviews (a Human Subjects IRB application is currently under
review). The artist will approach elementary, middle and high schools to conduct
workshops about the sculpture, to discuss art and society and how materials in the
sculpture convey social concepts.
Visitors will be encouraged to leave comments on the website, and a set of self-
selected DSoc 1101 students will analyze these comments and the questionnaire, and
respond to a set of four structured questions, and the responses posted to a research blog.
These students will have substituted their final examination for work on the sculpture
research, namely interviewing scientists, analyzing the survey data and posting findings to
a class sponsored research blog.
The artist will respond to the students' posts, and the principal investigator will
utilize these interactions to facilitate a two-way dialogue between social science concepts
and art.The boundaries of each discipline will be explored, and forms of fruitful interaction
identified.
This project aims to:
1) Illustrate and conceptualize the frontier between art and social science, and possibilities
for stimulating and inspiring awareness and efforts toward social transformation; 2)
determine the extent that citizens' and scientists' conceptualization fit real possibilities for
sustainable and equitable development under the options presented by current
technological means and scientific trends; 3) estimate how scientists and citizens define
and understand the conceptual interrelationships between sustainability, inequality,
science and technology, and the extent that the sculpture assists in furthering this
understanding.
References
Ford, M. (2015). The rise of the robots: Technology and threat of a jobless future. New York:
Basic Books.
Franciscus, Monica. (2019).Art by Monica Franciscus,www.artbymf.com.
Green, M.A. (2019). "How did solar cells get so cheap?"Joule 3:631-33.
Kaku, M. (1998). Visions:How science will revolutionize the 21st Century. New York: Dell.
Taitem Engineering. (2019). Anthropocene sculpture, Cornell University. (Electronic file,
architectural drawing,www.taitem.com).
2
10'-0"
i #6 @ 8" 0. C.
o I T&B
00
I.
�I
0
N
0
i
N
1' 5 5/16" 7' -1 5/16" 1I'-5 5/1
FOOTING MAT PLAN
SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0"
2" 7" 7" 2"
1" NON -SHRINKING
ON -METALLIC GROUT
HSS 8"x6"x3/8"
SHOP WELDED TO
PLATE(TYP.)
' 18" x16"x5/8"
1554 ANCHOR BOLTS,
16" MIN. EMBED. W/5" HOOK
BASE PLATE DETAIL
SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0"
WELDED SPLICE POINT
TYP. BOTH SIDES
00
00
Ln
SS 8"x6"x3/8"
fYP.)
HSS 6"x2"x1/4" STRUT
(TYP. BOTH SIDES)
1 TAMPED
SHED STONE
* APPROXIMATE WIDTH OF SCULPTURE PARTS BASE
STEEL FRAME ELEVATION & FOOTING MAT SECTION
SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0"
n i nrrr.
1- ALL STEEL SHALL BE 36 KSI YIELD STRENGTH,
EXCEPT STRUCTURAL TUBE, SHALL BE 46 KSI.
2- ALL STEEL SHALL BE SHOP PRIMED WITH A
RUST -PROOF PRIMER & FIELD PAINTED W/(2) COATS
OF EPDXY PAINT.
3- CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL BE 4,000 PSI WITH
W/C = 0.45 AND AIR -ENTRAINED ADMIX.
4- CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT CONCRETE MIX DESIGN,
REBAR SHOP DRAWINGS AND STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS
FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING AND/OR
FABRICATION.
5- MAXIMUM WEIGHT OF SCULPTURE CAR PARTS
SHALL NOT EXCEED 2,200 LBS.
6- DESIGN PARAMETERS:
A) ASSUMED ALLOWABLE BEARING = 2,000 PSF
B) SOIL DENSITY = 120 PCF
C) WIND SPEED Vu = 115 MPH, EXPOSURE C
IREVI DESCRIPTION I DATE
TITLE:
PLANS, ELEVATION, SECTIONS
AND DETAILS
DRAWN BY: JER
CHECKED BY: JER
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET NUMBER:
LU
4
�� "� � � � i � � � ' k ; �— _ l �-. � ' l ' � � ♦� I k � ( � i � � f k �� j] �^ �� � � � i���a � t� j o:a'i �''",. { i k �.., ..
k ,
WOOD ST (nEil
tv
L,I€ j�W 1 ✓�`'� ��
v
14
9 Z(
I_` i � ' M's �' v'
�i� �� '�•Qw Y --
it . y EI—.. ✓ f £✓' � gl : r r 4 J w''.,.. �.`.
�R-1.•
e�
o �5
t
{
{ {
�j
` ` 3r {
Al
NY State Plane, Central GRS 80 Datum
N Map Source: Tompkins County Digital Planimetric Map 1991-2019
A 0 400 Feet @�r�w' Data Source: City of Ithaca Department of Planning,
Property Management Database, 2019
Map Prepared by: Dept. of Planning, City of Ithaca, NY, September, 2019