HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-EC-1982-04-15 A ENERGY CObMI SS ION CITY OF IT HACA, NEW YORK REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 15, 1982 PRESENT: E. Bury, D. Dylla, J. Fudala, H. Jones, J. Howarth, B. Nichols, C. Peterson, N. Potter, and Department Liaison J. Clynes. The meeting was called to order at 7:31 p.m. by Vice Chairman Doug Dylla. MINUTES: The spelling of Jerry Messmer 's name was corrected from Bessmer. The minutes as corrected were approved unanimously. CONMUNITCATIONS: Mr. Dylla reported summarized letters forwarded to him from Chairman B. Wood. The first was a letter from Mayor Shaw recommending that appointments to the Energy Com- mission be for a two year period and staggered . He stated that he would like to see all current vacancies in the Commission filled. Mr. Dylla noted that there is also a need to take care of loose ends by settling the question of a Council liaison; the change from Planning and Development to Budget and Administration has not been formalized. There was no Common Council member present for most of last month's meeting and none was present tonight, it was noted. Mr. Nichols, seconded by Mr. Jones, moved that the Chair of the Commission consult with the Mayor and Comnon Council on the subject of Council Liaison and discuss any other recommended changes. There was unanimous approval. Mr. Dylla, Mr. Jones, Mr. Bury, and Ms. Fudala agreed to comprise such a committee. Next was a letter from City Engineer Phil Cox to Mayor Shaw stating that his staff had done an analysis of "1981 Costs For City-owned Buildings" (hereinafter referred to as, "In-House Analysis") . My. Dylla distributed copies of the results and also stated that the City is making arrangements with the New York State Energy Office (NYSEO) to have formal energy audits done on the City Hall Building and the Tin Can. There was also a memo from Alderman Sean Killeen to the Commission in response to a letter he had received urging that the Commission look at Tin Can, both because it has the greatest potential for energy savings and , since its clientele was the Youth Bureau, energy analyses and savings done there had great educational potential. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Ms. Fudala announced that the Tompkins County Energy/Housing Committee was sponsor- ing a SUNday Fair on the Ithaca Commons on Saturday, May 22, from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The Fair will focus primarily on solar, although there may be wind/hydro displays. Solar dealers and agencies with solar projects and information will be invited to participate. Ms. Fudala also announced the upcoming "Survival Week" and the April 22 NYSEG rate hearing. Mr. Dylla announced that there would be energy conservation workshops at Cornell on Tuesday, April 27, by Eugene Ledger . There is to be a technical one in the after- noon on Super insulation methods and a free public lecture in the evening. OLD BUSINESS: Hydro Commission Ms. Fudala reported that on April 6 the Environmental Impacts Committee of the Hydro Comnission made recommendations to the Comnission as a whole, that if a plant was built that the minimal flow rate with the plant operating be raised from 32 to 50 cubic feet per second (cfs) to minimize scenic and recreational (especially fishing) impacts and that provisions be made to guarantee public access to the Falls and pub- lic safety. A possible environmental impact, cited in her own portion of the report, was the dispacement of fossil fuels with subsequent pollutant emissions. The Proposals Comnittee summarized weaknesses in the two applications, Cornell and Synergics, at the April 13 meeting, making considerable use of the Environmental Com- mittee's report and drafted some suggestions for a more "ideal" project. Mr. Nichols reported that his "City Involvement" Committee recommended that the City file a letter of intent to develbp an application, that a firm was ready and willing to do the application (and also hoped to get the construction contract) and that the comnittee had determined that the plant would be an economic benefit to the City. The full Hydro Commission will vote on its recommendations for city action at the next meeting. Common Council must then act on these before May 6th, the deadline set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a filing to preempt existing proposals and/or intervene/ Mr. Bury, seconded by Ms. Potter, moved that the Energy Commission recommend that the City exercise its opportunity to become involved in the licensing process to ensure community control over conservation and scenic values at the Falls and to ensure the greatest financial return to the City. The motion was passed, 7-0, with one abstention (Mr. Peterson). Mr. Nichols and Ms. Fudala will bring the resolution to the next meeting of the Hydro Commission. As this is the meeting at which the Commission will make its final recom- mendations to the City, Energy Comnissioner '.B. Nichols made a special point of invit- ing members to come. Mr. Dylla stated that Mr. Nichols and Ms. Fudala were to be com- mended for their work on the Hydro Comnission. COMl2ITTEE REPORTS: Target Applications (formerly called Large Users) Committee In the absence of comnittee chair R. Lacey, Ms. Potter reported that Mr. Lacey had sent a letter to Contruction and Maintenance (CSM) Building Superintendent Jack Dougherty outlining energy-saving steps recommended by the Commission. These in- clude ('1) conversion from electric to gas heat--something which DPW has been activl y considering (2) improvement of roof insulation (3) night-time setbacks of thermostats especially in the office area (4) lowering the temperature in the vehicle storage area to at or below 50 degrees F. (5) shut off lamps in the storage area when not in use (6) automatic dampers to prevent heat loss through the ceiling and (7) support for a step C&M has already decided on--replacing overhead doors with wood panel doors. Ms. Potter stated that the meeting Tuesday of that week with Mr. Dougherty had gone well. He told committee members that most of the steps could be taken in this year's budget; conversion, however, would have to wait for the 1983 budget. Regarding the C&M conversion, Mr. Howarth reported that he had, as agreed, spoken to Jerry Messmer at NYSEG who had stated that the gas main would have to be rebuilt from across the street to accommodate the extra CSM capacity. This would be a hefty cost to NYSEG. Mr. Dylla asked Mr. Clynes what would be the most effective way to make recommena- tions. Mr. Clynes replied that the process should include a letter to the Board of Public Works with carbon copies to the Mayor and Council. Mr. Nichols added that where suggestions entailed specific departments or buildings, the main letter should go directly to the superintendent or department head. The precedent of establishing good will by working with people directly had proven thus far to be excellent. Another suggestion that had come up was a training workshop for superintendents and department heads. There was general consensus to pursue the workshop idea by work- -- 2 -- ing through the Mayor and Comnon Council. Mr. Clynes stated that any specific proposals mast be made by September 1 to tae in- cluded in the 1983 budget. Discussion then centered around the differnce between the "In House Analysis" and previous computations of Large Users obtained by the Comnission. One reason for the difference in which buildings/systems come up as the largest users is that the In House figures are based on energy costs per square foot. Ms. Peterson pointed out that a possible fallacy in that was because overall square footage misht include ground between sections of a building in some cases. Mr. Nichols urged that the Target Applications Committee take a walk through the Hall of Justice Building, shown on the In House sheet to be the second largest users (by square feet). Committee members agreed that would be a good idea; arrangements will be made. Mr. Dylla stated that he had met briefly with Police Commissioners who had offered someone as a liaison between that department and the Energy Commission. Ideas, Inc. Mr. Howarth distributed a list of Guidelines toward the goad of "reducing energy con- sumption in offices and buildings throughout the City by involving city employees". He stated that it was his understanding that there would be no legal problems with the $50 prize for suggestions actually used. Mr. Dylla suggested that others volunteer to meet with Mr. Howarth and work up a specific program for the next meeting and include some cost details. Mr Jones Vol- unteered . 1- unteered . Mr. Nichols suggested that before a lot of time was spent on this to submit Mr. Ho- warth's Goal and Guidelines to Elva Holman/B&A Committee to get a sense of how much support the concept would get. There was consensus to do this. Mr. Howarth had to leave at this point. Mr. Nichols announced that funds had been voted at the last Common Council meeting to institute gasoline control through the purchase of fuel storage tanks and the furnishing and installation of hardware. Funds over and above initial proposal had been voted to purchase more expensive fiberglass tanks rather than the originally proposed steel tanks. In response to a question, Mr. Clynes replied that the gas control devices should be in operation within eight weeks, allowing six weeks for shipment and one week for installation. Lighting/Alternate Fuels (Was to be with Target Applications but deferred for Mr. Howarth's report. ) Mr. Bury stated his interest in joining the Target Applications Committee and stated that he had a few areas to report relevant to that area. First, he stated that the costs of lighting the Green Street Parking ramp were $155,100.00 annually. If low pressure sodium (hereinafter abbreviated as LPS) were used, the annual lighting cost would be $38,400.00 resulting in a yearly savings of $116,700.00. The proposal to convert that garage and the one on Seneca Street to LPS had to come up before and had been dropped because the photographic light meter used to gauge some test LPS lamps had given the impression that an insufficient lighting level would be provided. Mr. Bury felt that a meter measuring foot candle luminosity should have been used instead. Additionally, a question had arisen re- -- 3 -- garding the safety of sodium in the disposal of it. Mr. Bury questioned this because high pressure sodium lights which contain the same amount of sodium had never been challenged on that basis; not had questions ever arisen regarding the poisonous mer- cury vapor in those far-less-energy-efficient mercury vapor lights. A report by Lustra Lighting showed a 14 month payback period for installation of LPS. Equipment would cost $48,000.00 and installation would cost approximately $11,000.00. Mr. Clynes stated that there should be a meeting with all sides of the issue present. Mr. Dylla asked Mr. Bury and Mr. Clynes if they would meet with Mr. Kinsella regarding the matter. Both agreed. Ms. Peterson explained that Mr. Kinsella was dubious about data from vendors regard- ing their own product. Mr. Bury stated that the City will spend $212,000.00 for street lighting in 1982 and added that Chuck Barber of City Engineering staff and Jerry Messmer of NYSEG were pre- paring a report on street lighting without any input from the Commission. NYSEG is apparently unwilling to put LPS lapps on poles it owns, although the City can do so on those (a good number) which it owns. Mr. Clynes stated that the Department study was a reaction to the Mayor's concerns and that for that reason the fact that such a study was being done by DPW should not be criticized. Mr. Bury replied that such had not been his intent; his concern had only been that there be consultation with the Energy Commission. Ms. Potter suggested that Mr. Clynes contact Mr. Barber to ascertain exactly what was happening with the study; Mr. Clynes agreed. Mr. Dylla suggested that Mr. Barber be invited to the next meeting and that any written material he had be sent out in advance with the April minutes to give the commission members a chance to digest it beforehand and prepare questions. There was general agreement on this. Finally, Mr. Bury noted that he hoped the City would pursue alternatives to gasoline and diesel fuels. Mr. Clynes remarked that he had just ordered two documents on the subject and had forwarded two others already in his possession to Mr. Kinsella. Accounting Committee Ms. Peterson stated that while there had been no meeting of either Accounting or Target Applications Committee between comnission meetings that she had pulled the top 15 energy users from the list provided the Target Applications Comnittee. She noted that the list did not match up exactly with the In House Analysis' list. Her list consists of the following: Seneca Street Garage GIAC Building Green Street Garage Street Lighting City Hall Vinegar Hill Pumping Station Hall of Justice Construction & Maintenance Garage Filter Plant Tin Can Sewer Plant Cass Park Central Fire Station Water Department Building No. 9 Fire Station Ms. Peterson stated that she did not wanted another month to submit the list to Elva Holman so that particular monitoring of these buildings could begin. The Commission agreed. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Dylla stated that he had received a letter from Mr. Wood stating that he was resigning from the Commission. The letter expressed regret that personal matters had forced him to take this action and because he had found his work with the Com- mission to be enjoyable and rewarding. -- 4 -- Mr. Dylla explained that he had not announced Mr. Wood's regignation until this point in the meeting because he had not wanted the news to be disruptive. Commission mem- bers agreed with this and expressed disappointment at losing such an active member. Mr. Bury suggested that new elections be tabled until the Mayor had filled the vac- ancies, hopefully by next month, and that Mr. Dylla continue to act as chair until then. A question arose as to whether the Commission should have eleven or thirteen members. The Bylaws state eleven but it was generally felt that with thirteen members there was more chance of a quorum at meetings. This, as well as making the change to B&A, will be discussed with the Mayor and Planning and Development Chairman Dennis. Ms. Fudala, seconded by Mr. Nichols, moved that present members who have not attended the last three meetings be given a chance to attend the next meeting before being considered off the Commission. This was unanimously approved. ADJOURNMENT: On a motion.the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. ENERGY COMU SSION AGENDA FOR MAY 20, 1982 MEETING 7:30 p.m. CO[NCIL CHAMBERS Correction/Approval of Minutes Announcements Correspondence Old Business: Hydro Commission Target Applications Committee/Chuck Barber Presentation Ideas Inc. Accounting New Business: Vacancies Election of Chair -- 5 -- CITY of ITHACA ' ENERGY COMMISSION 106 E. STATE ST. ITHACA, N.Y. S07-272-1713 April 8, 1982 Mr. Jack Dougherty Department of Public Works 245 Pier Road Ithaca, New York 14850 Dear Mr. Dougherty: As chairman of the Target Applications Subcommittee of the Ithaca City Energy Commission let me thank you for your cooperation regarding inspection of the Construction and Maintenance Facility. Our inspection and subsequent discussions have defined several specific measures that would improve the energy efficiency of the C & M Garage. I suspect the items on this list will be of no surprise to you as you are certainly more familiar with the building than we could become in a short tour. Accept this list as very flexible rec- omend ations from some casual observers. We are unable to fully understand the effect of these conservation measures on your operations. For this reason we have not released this list to anyone outside the Energy Commission. Your in- put is necessary before definite list of conservation measures can be released. Here are our preliminary recommendations: 1. We support your efforts to convert from electric to gas' water and space heating. The heating portion of your bill could be cut in half by this conversion. Assuming 60% of your electric consumption is used for water heating or space heating in the main garage this energy (500,000 KWH) cost you $22,000 in 1982. The same amount of heat supplied by gas at 65% efficiency and $.40 per threm would cost $10,500. Of course, the cost of conversion must be considered but we suspect a strong econcmic incentive for conversion exists. 2. Regardless of the heating fuel an effective method should be found for roof insulation in the garage area. Considerable heat loss occurs through ceiling panels that are intentionally or accidently out of place. The solution to this problem will not be easy. We suggest the present utility pipes be either a) wrapped with heat tape and insulated or b) rerouted lower in the heated area. Fiber- glass ceiling panels should then be secured in place and perhaps additional insulation could be justified. 3. Temperatures throughout the building should be acclimately controlled and should be no higher than necessary. We feel night time set-back in the office area would result in a great savings. Set-back is not practical with the present integral thermostats on each baseboard heater. Perhaps all the office heaters are grouped on one or two circuits on the peak control device and could be switched there using a hall thermostat. Please consider lowering the vehicle storage area to 500 F. , or lower. We must consider not only higher heat loss through a the walls and roof caused by higher space temperatures but also the energy cost to warm a couple hundred tons of buses and 'trucks to higher temperatures each night. 4. As you have noted the original overhead doors on this building are very poor, we support your replacement of these doors with wood panel doors. 5. Lighting levels were very good throughout the facility. Adequate back- ground light was present (10-15 footcandles in the work and storage bays) with greater illumination provided by fluorescent lamps where needed. We do recommend shuting off the lamps in the offices and storage areas whenever they are not required . 6. our final recommendation is actually a question. Does the ceiling ven- tilation system include automatic dampers to prevent heat loss during the winter? It probably does but this should be checked as heat loss through an open ventilation system would. be disasterous. Please review these observations and give them some thought before we get together to discuss them in more detail, including your perspective. Sincerely, D. Randall Lacey DRL:eg cc: Bob Wood, Chairman Target Applications Subcommittee Jeanne Fudala Nancy Potter Carolyn Peterson Doug Dylla Harold Jones Jack Clynes L ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION IN CITY HALL: 1981-82 1981 1982 Change % Diff. 60 , 000-A* Electric Consumption: 413,400 KWH 331,200 KWH —82.,200 KWH —20% * * * Electric Costs: $24,09.3 $221671 —_$1,421 —6% * * * Note: Degree day difference negligible between years, * * 50 ,000* 15% average electric rate increase in 1982. * * U low *k1m * *kbbk *kbwr S * *Wel* *k#k *beet E 40 ,000# * *okkbt* * *kkk *odor * *a*t *east* * *baet *#A* kWd4** * Maw* **dwot * *a*t *wbar* * *A*bY ***l* I * *bwot* * ** * * 81 82*oabat * ft *beet* * *bei** * *whet **AM *M* N 30 ,000** ' w-k *kid** * *oft* * kkk* *kkwt * * * * *NM* * **lddt* * *khat hwd* *arab * * *d*tkk* * &Wd** * *&W* *beat *aekk *kA*k * *badr* * *awdt* * **"* *WFA*r *a*k N*W' * * *tAkt* * *ddddr* * **btk *WM *eabb *khat * **a** * *eadt* * *kbdt ***kk *baht*beat *kaet* * * * *bark* * *boot *tbwt ***at N*k* * *khat* * ***** * **bat *babe *oekk*r* * *abat* * **eat *went *WM "VA * &We** * *NM* * MWA ***A* *dwddt* * **elk* * kum* * *kU** * *d**k **bat *awwe * *haat* * **awe* * *ad* *"*k* * *kW* * *akl** * *kk** * hum* * *kW ***l* *kw*al** K * **�*** * **W* * *kaet *ddtkk**al* *ku** * *bbUr* * *Want* * *wa** * *MM* * *brat *kW *lelokk * *a*t* * *aket* * *ddd* *ddbl** * o bw * * * * * *baht* * **btk *otkA***W ***A* *kW * *kW,* * *kkM* * **d*k *dwwelr* * *"M* * *kwdt* * * * * *A*bk* * **oa** * *kA*** * *kkM*,wart **dddr * *kwde* * *d*Wdt* * *kA*t *kw* * *adrk* * *katk* * *kU** * U*M* * *a#* * *Wa** * *da** * *adds W 2 0 ,0 0 0* * * *'a`da*t* * *'wit`k*kM d' p1dcatbat* * *otbae* * * * * * * A*kM* * * * *kW MW kbW * * * * * * *, * *kW,* * del*bt* * *dwddt* * *welet* * *bast* * dwbadt* * *btkk* * ****t* * *i*det* * **chair* * dada** * deldddt * da*we* * *boat* * ***l** * *tkbt* * **kM* * #W* * *d**r* * **tat* * WM* * **W* * *boot* * kkkM H * *"M* * **wet* * *wear* * *boat* * *kW* * dwba** * *kw* * *bear* * **bat* * *nkat* * **A*** * dada* * ***wt* * **A*** * *abet* * Wd"* * **a** * **0** * *baht* * *debk* * *A*ae* * *kW4** * *boa** * OWdA * *NM* * **bat* * *kM** * *kW* * *kW* * **bade* * *k*kk* * *dwa*e* * *d**k* * *anal* * *kW* * *boot * *kA**r* * *aaklt* * *boar* * ****k h d*k* * */ddbt* * oabtbt* * **awl* * *abet* * *kW* * *baht* * *eel* * *otbkk* * **W* * kkkM* * *abet* * *Idd** * *bkk*r* * *bei** * *bei** * *kW* * *nal** * *Wa** * **a* * *aadt* * WdM* * *a*t* * Wd** * kum* * bwl** * *Wekk* * *abet* * *abet* * **chair* * *bawl* * *MM * deldtak* * *kW* * *bel** * MW* * **bet* * *lobkk* * *kW* * *east* * *boat* * *that* * *kW* * dakar 10 0 0 0*d* k** * W*k** * *k"*bt* * kkM** * *boot* * **l** * *abet* * *eddet* * *akkt* * ftw* * *boat* * *abet r bbwwt* * *W** * *Daher* * Ndit* * WM* * *dd*** * idt*dak* * *km** * *doaet* * *akkkk* * dada** * *boat * daWwde* * *abbt* * *anal** * *bidet* * *MM* * *ddddr* * '*Uc** * 0*0** * *bark* * *bei** * W A** * **blot * *dkar* * *"M* * ko"* * *WM* * *kkM* * *o1*ddr* * Daub!** * ***A** * *haat* * *bl*t* * *kkM* * *khat * *that* * *beat* * *kk** * obadar* * *kW* * *kid** * *hoer* * *beet* * **dddr* * *#bt* * *"** * *kW * dbkbalr* * *what* * *kb** * A*k*k* * **km* * *ddduk* * *kkl*r* * kWM* * *kk*ok* * *dak**r* * *bast* * dwddat* * * *d**** * *bbl** * da*dek* * *tbY** * *kW* * oadealr* * *dd*k* * *kW* * *abet* * *nal** * *kWA* * *a*t * **km* * **kM* * *kk** * *WM* * okkW* * *kkk*r* * dr*oblrk* * *kW** * oaaaa * * **d*k* * *kW Wt* * *etkk * **k*** * Dodder* * *Woof* * *a*** * ***M* * *dekkt* * o'k*W * * ****t* * *oeeak* * ,ak*bt* * *bl*k* * Mud * **kM* * *kw* * *deck* * *dbeat* * *kadt* * *oel**r* * */Dahl* * *kW* * *d**** * *ad** * *NM* * *el** * **b%** * *bki** * WrA** * ****k* * *bldde* * *N"* * *beak* * oebk*k* * deaeet* * *bbl** * *bbwt* * *Idd& * oaaa** * *kkm* * *ddb*** * *oda** * *kkM* * daddwt* * *bddc* * **k*** * **kek* * *weal* * **U** * yWddtk 0 * obt*obt* * *ddol** * *debar* * dddbtk* * *ddddt* * ****k* * *bbl** * *bel** * dean!** * *ba k* * *bear* * *kid* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 M 0 N T H y�O,Q�..,, D CITY OF ITHACA CITY HALL 108 E. GREEN STREET ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER M E M O R A N D U M 607-272-1713 To: Donald A. Kinsella From: C. W. Barber Re: Street Lighting Proposal Date: April 16, 1982 The object of this proposal is to minimize the consumption of energy and formulate a cost effective program that will comply with all of the State and Federal standards without impairing the health and safety of the citizenry. A City-wide street lighting survey should be undertaken by the City Engineering Department to be sure the existing street lighting meets the minimum recommendation of the I .E.S. American National Standard Practice for roadway lighting, and at the same time does not exceed the standard to a degree that is not cost effective. I would also recommend replacing some high wattage mercury vapor luminaires with lower wattage high pressure sodium luminaires. If this proposal is accepted, we can save energy costs and increase the lumens (ft. candles per sq. ft.) . This program could be phased in to spread out the change-over costs. At the same time, an agreement should be worked out whereby the City owns all street light lamps and either maintains them with City crews or pays a reduced rate for NYSEG to maintain the lamps and photo control . As an example of this saving, please look on the attached street lighting resume which shows: 17,200 M.V. 460 watts - City owned (SC #2) - lamp cost @ $7.00 17,200 M.V. 460 watts - NYSEG owned - lamp cost @ $24.25. The proposal to change from mercury vapor to sodium will increase the lamp charges, but the saving in energy costs off-set this cost and produce a savings. A good place to start this program would be to request NYSE&G to replace all 9,400 lumen M.V. 292 watts with 14,400 lumen H.P.S. 199 watts; and replace 359 - 17,200 lumen M.V. 460 watts with 24,700 lumen H.P.S. 313 watts. This is a savings of 97.878 kilowatts , or 412 ,066.38 K.W.H. per year. The cost saving would be from $9,000 to $13,000 per year , depending on fuel adjustment cost. "An Equal Opportunity Employer w to ar Arhrmat,ve Acton Program ' L MEMO TO D.A. KINSELLA FROM C.W. BARBER As the cost of energy increases , so do the savings for the City. Note that the proposal on sheets 3 and 4 of the street lighting resume, pages 1 and 2 are minimum costs for existing conditions, using the 1982 NYSE&G service classification #3. The following proposal is the most cost effective from the City's standpoint. However, the NYSE&G told me they would not allow it. The proposal is that over the coming years as poles , cables and luminaires need replacement due to vandalism, accident, or otherwise, the City purchase said equipment and maintain same with City personnel . Under the service classification #/3 issued October 23, 1981 and in effect beginning October 25, 1981 , the City is bound by the following provision: ". . . If, in the sole opinion of the corporation, corporation owned facilities become subject to vandalism, the customer shall be required to reimburse the corporation for all maintenance costs incurred as a result of vandalism." The corporation also applies the requirement when a street is damaged by an auto accident, as was the case when a car knocked over a street light pole or Route 13 on February 10, 1982. The corporation is charging the City $500 for the replacement and repair of said pole. Therefore, I believe if the City must pay said cost, why not own said facility. Under said service classification #/3, the City is paying an annual fee of $52,647.65 for the lamp maintenance and $13,752.69 for cable and pole maintenance. This cost of $64,000 plus the energy savings possible by using lower wattage luminaires would save another $25,000 .at existing energy costs. This proposal would require the City to increase the electrical department by two men, a working foreman, electrician and two laborers to handle the day to day maintenance, and our construction forces could help in any difficult or larger project. Two men are now in the electrical department. The two additional men required would cost around $35,000, and another vehicle would cost $8,000 to purchase. This cost deducted from the possible savings gives the City $46,000 savings based on the existing street lighting program. This program could also give the City more freedom in using the luminaires that best meet the need of the City. The service classification limits the City of only those units listed. Unless the City does install and maintain said fixtures, the only new luminaires the NYSE&G will install and maintain are: High pressure sodium 5200 lumens 2500 " 14,400 24,700 " 45,000 " 126,000 " Mecury vapor 3,200 lumens 7,000 " 9,400 " 17,200 " 48,000 " IT OF TA "EET Ll<GHTiN(,- RESUME / 98Z ggsco oov SCg-v/cd:- scwe-DULF /,ry 0 or-TOSFR, 23, /9c9! Arvo EFS ecrjve- 0 Crc,;7E-/Z Zv,- LUMENS Numr3,ck w/AT7-s To TA L A N N UA L T.101 L -P,El::z- 0 F PER, CdST- ANNLIAZ .'LA\m P LAMP LAMP PEP, /-,q M p m p COS7- 71000 V, e56 2l 173V1 '22-85 915'519.160 fosf-r-op 210 Z5,45 8 83.SO 049 a A17.V. 30 9,qoo /0-v, 485 3,80 71 ZOO Y". 359 -,Y6O 145-11110 817057-75 g.c,'ove,z- /7, ZOO M,V. -,!P'-3 #40 /9.780 7,ao 301. 00 ye 10 oc) /W,V, 2 t to?- 2.? 7a- -�-O .0 Al 35:25 7-c,nr74 Al,V, /775- 51q, 80q olle,04 3.3 5 11,4100 9.P,S, , 16 5J9 a-11. 00 70 0 9 P,S, 70 313 ?-1. 9io 72,70 -5029. 00 2 q,70 9,F 5, /S 313 5-,437 to 7 lye.8 Co 4C."iftse 118(o � 22..356 49765 y©31. 96 //5-00 o A��S', 7,290 L1,5.a o 00 '700 PS' /500 #)p5' 2, / 0 0 1 6 0,90 11(j6 16�60 393, 40 CS q, 30 r1q L S. /77/ 67,blO -Z 7-o-r,Rvz 1 1"5 ,1(117. ,66- v p M A//)=R,C ti Pve VAPOR L-V"JtV1A1f<lES CO-S 7--= IV- K- 4 E.,fC7, AlQ1/v 7-,e-IVA N C E- CYA X.Q,E 5' CITY OF 17f-J /-\ C 3 L RA 7- 0 (ANNUAL QuQlvlrl C 0 S lrlr,,z^7 -rrqt-.C-sT- C, e 0,vz S�C 4 L ( NO.L) /?,,000Fr, 0.2137/,-r, 5 6--/. zlo o o CqZ3Lc OIV4-'Y- 7,Mt-ff7, 3 71,x-7,' J-800.8865- . 1 SrEE 8t..5- 7-,cc Z PC Z-6 S 52 ?4'1 Z/?-9- 86 0 0 ST�EL PO L C-.S (30 Frj 16 211.1100 6.1f. /,S�F/ol 0600 A 4 umllvclm Po L.C 5 Fr. fOMDc R) 23 36.00 Fv, 8Z8- 0000 �ouE,Z ldFr,) 7 3/9, zoo 0 5- 1 T3Rp cl<,c r 4, c, ,,,,,qAlcc (cpcDt7-) 9 5.yo 1^19, - /9. 6 6 0 c-) 3 0 T-Fa/ 'I-v141�7 Alo&,v,7 s p es rz yAE-,qq x 581. e/,e/4,w= Eva,; y Co s r 0 53 0//<,, 70/2 962 4o. 13-78ZO rcicL /-70,/. 0- C)a 5".9 0 ll//�Wltll /Y, y3/- 2 73 IXZ (33, 6c, z/9,vp 0-as-r- 3—zl z y7, ,6,5'6 eOO Or//4:2 /;VOIL171 Co S-7- -5 e,,P T�0 rVe- (t Foe-, Rod.) -4" ;2 f4f, 6 9/, 7�7762- V/'Oc St)13 7-oT4e- ;?Y o.9c1 ro R Ic-l-ec7- 17 rg - C 11V 7,W e- Cl 7 K 702 /Z cQ.,/,9, �VP- 3 .2411. FL I T Y of I-T- H,,,--\C STREET L1c, HTINC, RESUME S,7 4- LomF-Ns Numr3Fk WATTS TOTAL ANNUAL ToPn1L OPI COST— ANNVAZ lk-l"WAMI pEp, LoqMp -L/-\m p LAMPS LAmp 1-/\M 'P COS7- 8 2 ^7019 Af 1/1 /4/. 0 2. eS1,95"r9. tI, 0 ?vir r-P 1 70&46 14,V, 30 .210 mo .29.Y5- $-G -S C 111.40 P9, 784 100 3a t. 00 IM,0 Do 10, //o Z- -Z, Z-0 y 3 ,z s- TO 7WC /W.V, 9 A -9 9-01,9.9 111,510 Pel j79 1. 50 , 36-9 pop ell) 2 7z 704 Vo Ca"cojrse- Z2.36-4 87,e,6- S/'V 31. 90 Z1194 -7 2 YO Sryf�o t/, 57"7, 610 3 .7931 .66 T,o 7-,q IJ15-- R 7 r. 89?- oo 7&7-,,y I- /V 114 1-1?5 Z/93.336 7, yz,/). -7 A// v P,-t- Vq Po R L u tv,jv/A t f z a s H-P. S,= 141C�, H PJ?CSGU9E SoDium LW41NAIRES 1-,gMD Cas-r = N. r, 4 M F9/ r,6;-IVA N c E- CHA p ,C CIT -)- OF 1 T 0 3 y Fr V Y, 3/4"ij A4 7,6 ca ;,7 3V, 5;'Av'v, C X C,(3 S-F'coZ aN V 7 ;L 7) TW 96/Z 14.1 r y To a 2 p 57 v ,c> -ru r P L 3 Z- 9 Z- F c- CdO (;2- 1 9 Wouk L> Cos r- ---------------- 73 3, o77, k-17 ,Ym;WeKc P-qy 2T.Qct: . 9 X06 • 73 AIK .?"p A.IPP. .St =-// o coo X,%, 13 zs 13R,oc,,-ETTEa C,,:S j i-, d-,S = Fw6L R0-1 C",0 r--Q C aF 74.5 rl I3 y cer errew 74 IIV All y O. to 0 f R C?a