HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-IURA-2018-05-24Approved: 6/29/18
108 E. Green St.
Ithaca, NY 14850
(607) 274-6565
MINUTES
ITHACA URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY
Common Council Chambers, City Hall
8:30 A.M., Thursday, May 24, 2018
Members: Tracy Farrell, Vice‐Chair; Chris Proulx; Karl Graham; Laura Lewis (Common Council
Liaison)
Excused: Svante Myrick, Chair; Eric Rosario
Staff: Nels Bohn; Anisa Mendizabal; JoAnn Cornish; Charles Pyott
Guests: Liddy Bargar, Catholic Charities of Tompkins/Tioga Counties
I. Call to Order
Vice‐Chair Farrell called the meeting to order at 8:32 A.M.
II. Agenda Additions/Deletions
No changes were made to the agenda.
III. Public Comment (3‐min. maximum per person)
IV. Review of Meeting Minutes: April 26, 2018
Graham moved, seconded by Proulx, to approve the April 26, 2018 minutes, with two minor
modifications.
Carried Unanimously 3‐0
V. Neighborhood Investment Committee (NIC)
A. Designation of Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. (INHS) as Community‐Based
Development Organization (CBDO)
Graham reported the Committee reviewed the CBDO application and concluded it met all the
requirements.
Ithaca
Urban
Renewal
Agency
IURA Minutes
May 24, 2018
Page 2 of 8
Moved by Graham, seconded by Proulx:
2018 IURA Designation of Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. (INHS) as
Community‐Based Development Organization (CBDO)
WHEREAS, the Board of Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. (INHS) seeks designation
by the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) as a Community‐Based Development Organization
(CBDO), and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca has designated the IURA to administer the City’s HUD Entitlement
Program that oversees Community Development Block Grant funds awarded to the City, and
WHEREAS, an eligible category of CDBG activities is a “Special Activity by CBDO”, that offers
certain advantages, such as exemption from the 15% expenditure cap otherwise applicable to
public service activities, authorization to carry out new housing construction (normally
prohibited with CDBG funds), and discretion to allow income generated by a CDBG‐funded
activity to not be considered CDBG program income, and
WHEREAS, the following four tests established at CFR Title 24 §570.204 must be met to qualify
under a category of “Special Activity by CBDOs:”
1. The entity qualifies as a CBDO, including the 51% board membership test;
2. The CBDO will undertake an eligible project;
3. That the CBDO will carry out the funded activity directly or with an entity other than the
grantee;
4. That the CBDO will not carry out a prohibited activity, and
WHEREAS, a CBDO must maintain at least 51% of its governing body’s membership to be made
up of any combination of the following:
Low‐ and moderate income residents of its area of operation
Owners or senior officers of private establishments and other institutions located in its
area of operation
Representatives of low‐ and moderate‐income neighborhood organizations located in its
area of operation, and
WHEREAS, a CBDO must have as its primary purpose the improvement of the physical,
economic, or social environment of its geographic area of operation, with a particular
emphasis on the needs of low‐ and moderate‐income persons, and
WHEREAS, the project undertaken by the CBDO must qualify as one or more of the following
project types:
neighborhood revitalization;
community economic development;
energy conservation project; and
IURA Minutes
May 24, 2018
Page 3 of 8
WHEREAS, at its May 11, 2018 meeting, the Neighborhood Investment Committee evaluated
INHS’s CBDO application and recommended the following; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the IURA determines that INHS meets the requirements for eligibility as a
CBDO, and that the Program Income Loan project qualifies as an eligible neighborhood
revitalization CBDO activity, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the IURA hereby designates INHS as a Community‐Based Development
Organization (CBDO) and the “Scattered Site Preservation Project – Phase 2” project as eligible
for CDBG funding under the category of “Special Activities by CBDOs.”
Carried Unanimously 3‐0
B. Annual Appointment of Committee Chairperson
Moved by Graham, seconded by Proulx:
Selection of 2018 IURA Neighborhood Investment Committee Officers
WHEREAS, amendments to the IURA By‐laws adopted on September 27, 2008 established
procedures for selecting officers of IURA committees, and
WHEREAS, the IURA By‐laws provide that the committee membership shall elect its own committee
Vice‐Chairperson and nominate a committee Chairperson to the Agency, which shall have authority
to appoint each committee Chairperson, and
WHEREAS, an Agency member shall fill either the committee Chairperson or committee Vice
Chairperson position, and
WHEREAS, officers of each committee serve a one‐year term, but continue to hold office until their
successor is selected or appointed, and
WHEREAS, the IURA Neighborhood Investment Committee is composed of the following members:
● Karl Graham
● Fernando de Aragón
● Tracy Farrell
● Teresa Halpert
● Paulette Manos
WHEREAS, at their May 11, 2018 meeting, the IURA Neighborhood Investment Committee
nominated Karl Graham to serve as Committee Chairperson and elected Tracy Farrell to serve as
Committee Vice‐Chairperson; now, therefore, be it
IURA Minutes
May 24, 2018
Page 4 of 8
RESOLVED, that the IURA hereby appoints Karl Graham to serve as Chairperson of the IURA
Neighborhood Investment Committee.
Carried Unanimously 3‐0
C. Committee Chairperson Report
Graham reported that the Committee discussed that many of this year’s HUD Entitlement Program
funding applicants mentioned several of the same needs and issues ― case management services in
particular. At the meeting, it was suggested the IURA may be able to facilitate a means of actively
centralizing those kinds of services, or determine a standard practice for local organizations to refer
their clients to other organizations with that kind of capacity. Kathleen Schlather, Human Services
Coalition (HSC), was present at the Committee meeting and indicated that HSC organization is actively
exploring several possible collaborative solutions for case management services. Schlather will keep
the Committee informed about what HSC determines may be the best approach.
The Committee also met with Leslyn McBean‐Clairborne, Greater Ithaca Activities Center (GIAC), to
discuss the funding needs of the Hospitality Employment Training Program (HETP), which was awarded
$100,000 of the $125,000 in IURA funds it requested this year. McBean‐Clairborne indicated that the
lower funding amount would require a reduction in staff time dedicated to the program, representing a
serious blow to the program. She also mentioned GIAC has been seeking other funding sources for the
program ―with the ultimate goal of incorporating HETP into the regular part of GIAC programming
(i.e., from the City of Ithaca budget). In the meantime, the IURA should expect to see HETP continuing
to approach the IURA for the bulk of its funding. Graham added it may be helpful for the IURA to
discuss how it should approach similar requests in the future.
Mendizabal added that she contacted HETP staff to ask if they were planning on applying to the NYS
economic development Consolidated Funding Application (CFA) program. They replied they have been
discussing the possibility with Julia Mattick of Tompkins WorkforceNY.
Bohn mentioned he also knows of a specific NYS training program for underemployed and unemployed
individuals.
VI. HUD Entitlement Program Grants
A. Amendment #4 to 2017 Action Plan ― Supplemental Funding for Security Deposit Assistance
Program
Mendizabal explained that, due to exceedingly high demand, the Security Deposit Assistance Program
has run out of its 2017‐18 funding.
Bargar explained that part of the reason is that Catholic Charities has streamlined its processes, thereby
making it easier for people to apply. Landlords also seem more aware of the program and have been
directly referring potential applicants. The Housing for School Success Program participants who receive
Security Deposit Assistance also increased the program’s costs this past year, since Catholic Charities
committed to funding their entire security deposits, rather than the standard $500 or $750 contribution.
IURA Minutes
May 24, 2018
Page 5 of 8
Farrell noted Bargar mentioned that landlords have become more interested in the program. Bargar
replied, that is correct. Specific landlords (e.g., Poets Landing Apartments, West Village Apartments)
refer people to Catholic Charities, now that they know how the program works. Smaller private
landlords have also begun to refer people regularly to the program.
Farrell asked if Bargar believes all the landlords are returning security deposits to program participants.
Bargar responded that, while she has not analyzed any landlords in particular, generally speaking
approximately 60% of program participants get their security deposits back.
Moved by Graham, seconded by Proulx:
2017 AcƟon Plan ― Program Amendment #4:
Reallocate Additional $19,000 to Project #5, Security Deposit Assistance
WHEARAS, in May 2018, the IURA unexpectedly received $19,955.70 in accrued interest loan
repayments from the Stone Quarry Apartments and 210 Hancock Street Low‐Income Housing Tax
Credit (LIHTC) projects, which funding is considered HOME Program Income, and
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2018, Catholic Charities of Tompkins/Tioga Counties (Catholic Charities)
requested an additional $20,000 to augment the $42,750 Security Deposit Assistance (2017 Project #5)
which has been expended through the issuance of 71 security deposits since October 2017, and
WHEREAS, the Security Deposit Assistance program serves families and individuals, including elderly,
disabled, and single‐parent households at risk for homelessness and whose incomes are below 60% of
Area Median Income (AMI), and
WHEREAS, the Security Deposit Assistance project is recommended for funding in the 2018 Action Plan,
which funding in not expected to be available until October 2018, and
WHEREAS, providing supplemental funding to the Security Deposit Assistance program will prevent a
multi‐month gap in the program, thereby increasing housing affordability and decreasing potential for
homelessness, and
WHEREAS, inspection of units to be rented through Security Deposit Assistance must be completed by
an IURA‐designated contractor, and
WHEREAS, an increase of Security Deposit Assistance funding necessitates an increase in funding for
housing inspections, and
WHEREAS, allocating $19, 955.70 in unanticipated HOME Program Income will not alter recommended
awards for any projects of the IURA‐adopted 2018 Draft Action Plan, and
WHEREAS, the HUD Citizen Participation Plan does not require a Public Hearing or Common Council
approval for Action Plan amendments of less than $25,000, and
IURA Minutes
May 24, 2018
Page 6 of 8
WHEREAS, environmental review for the program was previously completed, and
WHEREAS, the IURA reviewed the Catholic Charities funding request and supporting documentation at
its May 24, 2018 meeting; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the IURA hereby approves Amendment #4 to the 2017 Action Plan to allocate an
additional $19,000.00 of unanticipated HOME Program Income funds to Project #5 for Catholic
Charities Security Deposit Assistance, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the IURA hereby further approves an additional $950.70 of unanticipated HOME
Program Income funds to Project #5a for Security Deposit Housing Inspections.
Carried Unanimously 3‐0
B. FY2018 HUD EnƟtlement Grant AllocaƟon LeƩer ― Discussion
Bohn announced that the IURA received formal notice from HUD of the IURA’s 2018 funding
allocations, which were higher than anticipated in the IURA’s 2018 Action Plan:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) $686,071 (+$52,071)
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) $368,803 (+$107,803)
The adopted action plan resolution directs any surplus CDBG funds to be allocated to the Economic
Development Loan project, while surplus HOME funding is earmarked for the CHDO Set‐Aside category,
unless the IURA decides to reallocate them. IURA staff will it seek advice from each Committee for its
recommendations on how to use any excess funds.
Graham asked what the timeline for making a decision on allocating any additional funds is likely to be.
Bohn replied there is no urgency, since the IURA Program Year does not begin until August 1, 2018, and
any funding would not be received until September or October.
VII. Green Street Garage Redevelopment Request for Proposals (RFP)
A. Guidance from Planning & Economic Development Committee (PEDC) of Common Council ―
Report
Bohn explained that PEDC discussed the Green Street Parking Garage site RFP and provided further
refinement of its expectations for the project (listed below), in order to give more guidance to potential
developers. There remains only one applicant to date, but IURA staff expect at least one other
developer to submit its qualifications by June 1st, 2018.
“A majority of the PEDC members ranked housing as their top priority. Inclusion of “housing affordable
to low‐ and middle‐income households” was particularly called out as a high priority. One member
identified public parking as their top priority. There was a consensus that housing and public parking
were the top two priorities; however each listed preferred project element was retained.”
IURA Minutes
May 24, 2018
Page 7 of 8
“A minimum of 50‐60 housing units affordable to low‐ and middle‐income households are expected to
be included in the project.”
“PEDC members would consider supporting some additional financial incentive if the project meets
expectations for the number of affordable housing units and public parking spaces constructed in the
project. Such financial support is unlikely to exceed $4‐$5 million. However, the project’s ability to
achieve financial benefit to the City continues to be one of the evaluation criteria for proposals.”
VIII. Other New/Old Business
A. Review of IURA Financials: April 2018
Bohn explained that most grant activities are progressing as planned, except the two City of Ithaca
projects: GIAC Wading Pool Renovations and Spencer Road Sidewalks. IURA staff had been hoping
both projects would be spending additional funds by this month, but that did not turn out to be the
case.
Bohn reported all loans repayments and all lease payments are current, as of today.
Bohn noted IURA staff generated a new IURA Summary Balance Sheet report, which includes
highlighted portions that correlate back to the standard financial summary reports the IURA is
accustomed to seeing. The intent of the Summary Balance Sheet is to convey a better, more complete
picture of the IURA’s financial status. The Governance Committee believed it would be a useful report
for the IURA to review on a quarterly basis.
B. IURA Chairperson Report
None.
C. Common Council Liaison Report
Lewis reported that the City’s new Community Life Commission recently held its second meeting and
heard presentations on free‐range kids, public art, and the NYS Department of Environmental
Conservation review process. It will also dedicate a meeting to the Chain Works District development
project on June 7th, 2018. Lewis noted that Common Council will be reviewing the historic designation
of The Nines at its regular June meeting, which will be controversial, as well as the Parks Master Plan.
She added that affordable housing issues appear to be of great interest to the Community Life
Commission (especially Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers).
D. Staff Report
Bohn reported he met with the Ithaca Housing Authority (IHA), which is seriously considering applying
to HUD’s Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program. RAD is being promoted to Public Housing
Authorities as an alternative operational model to address deferred maintenance issues, given the
continuing decline in Federal affordable housing funding. Under RAD, public housing units would be
converted to a Section 8 model with a long‐term contract.
IURA Minutes
May 24, 2018
Page 8 of 8
Mendizabal announced that the Continuum of Care (CoC) has organized a housing workshop at
Tompkins County Public Library (TCPL) on July 31st, 2018, 9:00 a.m.‐4:00 p.m., for landlords, service
providers, and public officials to discuss various local public/affordable housing accessibility issues.
IX. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 9:33 A.M.
— END —
Minutes prepared by C. Pyott, edited by N. Bohn.