Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-HRC-2003-05-22HUMAN RESOURCES (HR) COMMITTEE
Regular Meeting
May 22, 2003
Members
Present: Alderperson Peterson, Alderperson Cogan, Alderperson Hershey, Alderperson
Blumenthal (arrived at 8:40 p.m.), Mayor Alan J. Cohen
Members
Excused: Alderperson Mack
Staff
Present: Steve Thayer (Controller), Schelley Michell-Nunn (HR Director), Andy Olmetti
(Employee Health & Safety Coordinator), Julie Holcomb (City Clerk), Sarah Myers
(Administrative Secretary), Alan Karasin (Sr. Network Administrator), Leslie
Moskowitz (Mgr of Organizational Development), Norma Schwab (City Attorney),
Rick Ferrel (Asst Superintendent), (City Attorney), Denise Malone (Administrative
Secretary)
Others
Present: Members of the Media
Meeting called to order by Chairperson Peterson at 7:13 p.m.
A. Agenda Review, Approval of Minutes & Announcement
There were no minutes to approve or no announcements.
Chairperson Peterson stated that the City Clerk has put a revised resolution on the desk, that
Personnel Item F.2 – DPW (Engineering) has been pulled at the request of the department head
and Item F.2 - DPW (Streets & Facilities) has been added at the request of Asst
Superintendent Ferrel.
B. Employee Comments & Common Council Response. None.
C. Chairperson’s Report. None.
Human Resources Committee Meeting
May 22, 2003
Page 2
D. Affirmative Action Advisory Committee (AAAC) Update
Chairperson Peterson stated that she attended the AAAC meeting, which was held on May 16,
2003. Leslie Chatterton (Historic Preservation and Neighborhood Planner) and Julie Holcomb
(City Clerk) attended the meeting and updated the AAAC on duties and responsibilities of the
ADA Officer.
Ms. Holcomb stated that the AAAC invited Leslie Chatterton and herself to the meeting, as
they (Leslie and Julie) are the designated ADA Officers for the City of Ithaca. Ms. Chatterton
handles the parking space issues, and ensures that City buildings are handicapped accessible.
Ms. Holcomb stated that her office makes the arrangements for people with disabilities to
attend meetings (i.e. special accommodations, interpreter, etc.) Ms. Holcomb has worked with
the Disability Advisory Council (DAC) and has addressed concerns regarding audible traffic
signals, sidewalk accessibility and different types of citizens based complaints. Ms. Holcomb
continues to work with the DAC on accessibility to City and community events and making sure
that when events are planned that people with disabilities are accommodated. The Clerk’s
Office helps people receive City services that may not be accessible to them (i.e. for people
who can’t make it to other floors in City Hall or are uncomfortable in the elevator, the Clerk’s
Office has asked staff in departments to come down and meet with them.) The City does not
own, and/or employees are not trained on, equipment (such as TDD/TTY or relay communication
services) to assist people with hearing disabilities. The AAAC recognized the training needed
for Ms. Holcomb and Ms. Chatterton. HR Director Michell-Nunn offered to help raise
awareness throughout City departments and to identify department head’s responsibilities in
terms of employees that may have disabilities as well as helping to provide training in order to
handle issues the City currently faces.
Chairperson Peterson stated that the AAAC is continuing to work on the Workforce Diversity
Plan. Once completed, the draft would be brought to the HR Committee.
E. Sub-Committee Updates
a. Budget Process and Layoffs Sub-Committee
Chairperson Peterson stated that the Budget Process and Layoffs Sub-Committee
has completed its work and had its last meeting. Ms. Peterson reported that
highlights from the meeting were: 1) to create a special edition of the City Lights
newsletters that would focus on the budget process; 2) to encourage employee
Human Resources Committee Meeting
May 22, 2003
Page 3
input in all different aspects by having suggestion boxes throughout the City; 3) to
have a viable way to respond to suggestions that come in; and 4) to develop a layoff
notification procedure and have the procedure linked to the new schedule that was
created by the Sub-Committee of the Budget & Administration Committee.
Chairperson Peterson reported that notification of possible layoffs should be given
early in the budget process, possibly starting with the budget overview into the
departmental budgets. Department heads would notify bargaining units if potential
layoffs are being discussed, clarifying that the department heads process is one
step in the budget process. The departmental budget goes to the Mayor, where
there are further possibilities of cuts or retentions of jobs. When the budget
goes to the Mayor, if a job is still potentially being cut, there should be a formal
notification to the employee. Finally, in the October and November process, the
affected employee would get a written document from the HR Department about
the layoff and what the recourses are for that employee. By going through this
process, this is another way to quell rumors that may arise throughout the
workplace.
Prior to distributing, Chairperson Peterson will review the information with HR
Director Michell-Nunn to ensure accuracy.
F. Personnel Items
1. City Clerk
a. Request to Amend Personnel Roster
The City Clerk’s Office requested to amend the Personnel Roster by deleting
one (1) Deputy City Clerk position and one (1) Administrative Secretary
position and adding one (1) Information Management Specialist (40 hr)
position and one (1) Information Management Specialist (20 hr) position.
After discussion, Alderperson Cogan made a motion to approve the request.
Seconded by Alderperson Hershey. Motion carried 4-0. (Alderperson
Blumenthal was absent from the vote.)
Chairperson Peterson read the following letter from an employee affected
by the reorganization:
Human Resources Committee Meeting
May 22, 2003
Page 4
“Many of you are already aware of the negative effect that the proposed
reorganization has on my future employment with the City, so my statement
would not serve to clarify that issue. It would be easier for me to
comprehend the reasoning behind the reorganization if a strategic plan
existed that could be used to guide future effort. The changes before you
are based on the pilot records project using equipment that is yet to be
purchased. My intent is not to question the use of resources but to ask for
additional consideration during the process. I have dedicated nearly twenty
years of my professional life to the City and its residents. From an
educational perspective, I have worked hard to strengthen my skills and view
this change in my life as an opportunity to explore professional development
beyond the departmentalized structure that exists within this organization.
Boldly, I have requested that the Committee support the allocations of
additional hours with another City department to supplement the part-time
status that would be possibly imposed on me after June 30, 2003 if the
resolution before you is passed. Having maintained my City residence as a
bona fide occupational qualification for my current management position, I
must have income provided by full-time employment to stay in my home.
Conquering this challenge with dignity can easily be met with some assistance
of this Committee. Having worked for two decades to conserve financial
resources by working in team settings to meet changing objectives, staffing
vacant duties for targeted retirement arrangements and always volunteering
to fill a void when needed, I do not feel as though this request is beyond
what is reasonable and fair. The City’s mission statement on the East wall of
Common Council Chambers states that each person that the City employs is
“respected, developed, supported and valued.” For many reasons that I will
not go into, this statement represents an objective that is impossible to
meet given the current climate. As fiscal restraints require additional
staffing shifts, I urge this Committee to be cognizant of the fact that
effects on personnel occur long before resolutions appear on Human
Resources Committee agendas. To maintain a positive work environment the
effects of change needs to be minimized by using the most basic
management tool, Communication. Thank you for your time.”
Human Resources Committee Meeting
May 22, 2003
Page 5
City Clerk Julie Holcomb clarified that the Clerk’s Office is embarking on a
records management project, which includes an electronic document imaging
system, and that the reconfiguration of the office has nothing to do with that
project.
2. DPW – Streets & Facilities
a. Request to Hire Automotive Mechanic Above Minimum Salary
The Department of Public Works (Streets & Facilities) requested to hire an
Automotive Mechanic above the minimum salary, at the rate of $10.50/hour.
After discussion, Alderperson Cogan made a motion to approve the request.
Seconded by Alderperson Hershey. Motion carried 4-0. (Alderperson
Blumenthal was absent from the vote.) The Committee agreed that this item
would be put on consent agenda.
G. Directors’ Reports
a. Grievances
HR Director Michell-Nunn reported that a non-unionized employee submitted a
grievance. According to the City Charter, when non-unionized employees submit a
grievance, the Mayor must appoint a grievance board to hear the grievance. After
discussion, Alderpersons Cogan and Hershey volunteered to be on the grievance
board subject to the Mayor’s approval. Alderperson Blumenthal would be asked to
serve on the grievance board. Mayor Cohen would appoint the grievance board and
schedule a hearing.
Ms. Michell-Nunn reported that a union submitted an appeal on a grievance. This
grievance must come before the HR Committee. Ms. Michell-Nunn suggested that
this Committee or a subset of this Committee review and hear the grievance prior
to the next HR Committee meeting.
H. Mayor’s Report
Mayor Cohen stated that HR Staff member Leslie Moskowitz has started preparing for the
Employee Picnic. The Employee Picnic will be held on Friday – September 19, 2003.
Human Resources Committee Meeting
May 22, 2003
Page 6
I. New Business
1. 1st Quarter Injury & Loss Report
Employee Health and Safety Coordinator Andy Olmetti reviewed with the
Committee the 1st Quarter Injury and Loss Report for 2003. Mr. Olmetti stated
that since the City hired Travelers Insurance as the Workers’ Comp Carrier the
reports generated are more detailed.
The Committee reviewed the first quarter of 2003 Department Loss Costs,
Accident Causes – Body Parts (what part of the body was injured; i.e. shoulders,
knees, eyes, etc.) and Department Accident Causes (how injury occurred; i.e. falls,
slips, cuts, strains, lifting, etc.) Mr. Olmetti stated that by reviewing the reports
for each department a determination could be made on what safety training could
be offered to lower the number of injuries.
Mr. Olmetti reviewed the Yearly 1st Quarter Loss Comparison Report. The report
showed the number of claims reported, the number of open claims and the incurred
losses in actual dollars for the first quarter of 2001, 2002 and 2003. Mr. Olmetti
stated that there has been a decline in the number of claims reported and in the
actual dollar amounts for 2003.
Ms. Michell-Nunn asked Mr. Olmetti what might be reasons for the decline in
reported claims and the cost. Mr. Olmetti stated that one reason is employee
conscientiousness. Employees are taking safety more seriously and supervisors are
being more proactive in enforcing safety. Mr. Olmetti stated that all levels of City
employees should be responsible and accountable for safety.
Ms. Michell-Nunn stated that it is really important, especially now, to ensure that
our workforce is educated in the proper safety procedures. The report shows the
causes of the injuries. Employees need to be properly trained on how to lift, pull,
and push so that these types of injuries are reduced. Currently, an employee out
on worker’s comp could affect an entire department because our numbers are so
limited. Ms. Michell-Nunn encouraged Common Council and the Mayor to stress
that safety is a priority.
The Committee thanked Mr. Olmetti for a job well done.
Human Resources Committee Meeting
May 22, 2003
Page 7
2. Possible Motion for Executive Session
Alderperson Cogan made a motion to go into Executive Session to discuss the
employment history of an individual and collective bargaining. Seconded by
Alderperson Hershey. Motion carried 4-0. (Alderperson Blumenthal was absent
from the vote.)
After Executive Session, Chairperson Peterson reported that no action was taken.
J. Old Business
1. City Administrator Local Law
Chairperson Peterson stated that a copy of the draft legislation was included in
the packet. Ms. Peterson stated that the Sub-Committee addressed the following
sections:
Section 2: City Administrator.
a. Search Process: The Sub-Committee suggested that the appointment of the
City Administrator be subject to a search committee process with five
voting members, three Common Council members, the Mayor, a professional
in government administration and the HR Director, who will serve as a non-
voting member. The process would follow the search process for
department heads listed in the City Charter. Language would be reviewed by
the City Attorney’s Office.
b. Appointment: The appointment would be a five-year contract and renewed
upon satisfactory service. Compensation would be established periodically.
Question raised: Can the Common Council appoint the Administrator or can
only the Mayor make the appointment? City Attorney Norma Schwab stated
that NYCOM and sources that she spoke to strongly advised that
appointment power be given only to one single person as opposed to a body of
individuals. The body could approve the appointment.
Human Resources Committee Meeting
May 22, 2003
Page 8
Chairperson Peterson stated that the original language tried to create a
term that was staggered between Common Council members so that it would
not be politically aligned.
This section also included language about the Residency Requirement and
that the City Administrator would be chosen primarily on the basis of
executive and administrative qualifications with special consideration to
actual experience.
c. Removal Process. Common Council could remove the City Administrator at
any time with a 2/3 vote of the total membership of Common Council.
d. Powers and Duties: Duties listed are from the approved civil service job
description. Performs work under the direction of the Mayor and Common
Council. Supervises and oversees all city department heads.
Alderperson Blumenthal arrived at 8:40 p.m.
Alderperson Hershey made a motion to move the local law subject to the
further language to be presented at the full Common Council by the City
Attorney. Seconded by Alderperson Blumenthal. After discussion,
Alderperson Hershey withdrew his motion and Alderperson Blumenthal
withdrew her second.
Questions raised and not resolved: Would supervising and overseeing all city
department heads include the Mayor, the Police Chief and the City
Attorney? Is the Mayor a department head? Is it necessary to keep the
City Attorney an appointed/at will position? Should department heads
appoint his/her deputies?
City Attorney Schwab stated that language should be included to say, “there
shall be a City Administrator.”
Chairperson Peterson summarized the discussion as follows:
a. Use the language of “shall be a City Administrator”;
Human Resources Committee Meeting
May 22, 2003
Page 9
b. Adjust language under the search process: describe thoroughly how
the search committee is appointed;
c. Under appointment: The City Administrator is appointed by the
Mayor, subject to Common Council approval;
d. Delete “except for the Chief of Police” under the department head
appointments;
e. Benchmark what similar communities do with a City Administrator.
Who appoints the City Attorney? Who appoints the Chief of Police?
f. Supervise and oversee all city department heads. Should this include
the Mayor and City Attorney? Include some language about “except
elected officials”;
g. Add discussion about compensation for the City Administrator.
The Committee will continue this discussion at next month’s meeting.
Alderperson Blumenthal left at 9:45 p.m.
2. Managerial Leave Time
The Committee reviewed the financial impact of giving additional annual leave days
in lieu of a salary increase for the year 2003 for managerial employees hired prior
to January 1, 2003. After discussion, Alderperson Cogan made a motion to approve
the one-time increase of seven (7) annual leave days, which is equivalent to a 2.5%
increase, for individuals covered by the Managerial Compensation Plan and that the
seven (7) days be pro-rated in the event that such managerial staff person leave
employment with the City before December 31, 2003 and that the additional leave
be awarded only to managerial staff on the payroll as of January 1, 2003.
Seconded by Alderperson Hershey. Motion carried 4-0. Alderperson Blumenthal
was absent from the vote.
K. Adjournment
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:37 p.m.