HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-DAC-2017-04-05Disability Advisory Council Meeting Minutes
April 5, 2017
Present:
Chair Roberts
Vice Chair Scriber
DAC Members:
Lisa Monroe
Andrew Rappaport
David McElrath
Erin Sember-Chase
CC Liaison Brock
Others Present:
Information Management Specialist – Myers
Director of Engineering – Logue
David West, Chair of the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Council (BPAC)
Jan Schwartzberg, Member of the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Council (BPAC)
Daniel Keough, Member of the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Council (BPAC)
Excused:
DAC Member Anderson
Approval of Minutes:
Approval of the February 1, 2017 Disability Advisory Council Meeting
Minutes - Resolution
By DAC Rappaport: Seconded by DAC Monroe
RESOLVED, That the minutes of the December 7, 2016 Disability Advisory Council
meeting be approved as published.
Carried Unanimously
Discussion Items:
Discussion with Director of Engineering Logue regarding public access on
sidewalks during construction projects:
Chair Roberts explained that the topic of sidewalk accessibility during construction has
come before the DAC in the past; last time this was discussed concerned the “Pop-Up
Park” in Collegetown last summer. It will be good for the DAC to discuss with staff what
the process is to close a sidewalk during construction projects. Specifically, who is
involved, how does it work, and how is it clearly communicated to contractors their
responsibility to maintain accessible and identifiable travel paths during the project.
Recently, it was brought to Chair Roberts’ attention by a member of BPAC who posted
pictures to Facebook and tagged him, regarding construction in front of New Roots
School that appeared to block the sidewalk, and why the City allowed that to happen.
Chair Roberts explained that after he was made aware of the situation he spoke with
Transportation Engineer Johnson about it, since he has been a resource in the past
regarding how sidewalk closures are done. In addition, he also thought it would be
good for the DAC to have a discussion about what the permit process is regarding the
closure of sidewalks. As a result of that discussion, it became clear that like a lot of
things in the city, the permit process is not as clear as it may look on the surface due to
different entities that have the authority to close sidewalks for construction. He
wondered whether it would make sense for the City to have a key point person for the
public to talk to when they find sidewalks closed or obstructed. The other factor that
needs to be discussed going forward is how can we ensure that all the city staff and
contractors involved in sidewalk closures know what the City expects as far as
maintaining access on the sidewalk for pedestrians.
Director of Engineering Logue explained that there are many different entities that can
close sidewalks. The first being the Department of Public Works (both Streets &
Facilities and the Water & Sewer Division crews) i.e. for installation of a new water main
to a house, and crews just close the sidewalk to do the work, with no coordination with
staff at City Hall or the public. The same thing for city crews rebuilding sidewalks;
Disability Advisory Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2017
2
although through the years, the City has worked with crews to put up signs to indicate
the sidewalk is closed at the intersection closest to where the work is occurring, so
pedestrians don’t have to turn around to get to where they need to go.
Secondly, New York State Department of Transportation can close sidewalks with no
coordination with City Hall. Currently, they are working at the new Elmira Savings Bank
building at Route 13 and Meadow Street, and the sidewalk is closed during that project.
The only responsibility they have is to make sure their work plan is ADA compliant and
they are not required to provide an alternate route for pedestrians or put up signs
alerting pedestrians to the sidewalk closure. If the nearest intersection that pedestrians
need to use because of the closure does not have an ADA ramp, the contractor may
need to install one.
A third way is where the contractor obtains a permit through the Engineering office. In
this case, the contractor would have to have a plan for the provision of an alternate path
of travel while the sidewalk is closed that is ADA compliant.
As far as other closures, they can be the result of someone who parked their car across
the sidewalk or a contractor who did not get permit.
New Roots School obtained a building permit for the work; however, no sidewalk permit
was issued even though there was encroachment occurring during the project on to the
sidewalk. In this case no one had the responsibility to make sure that the sidewalk
remained ADA compliant.
Chair Roberts responded that the DAC would like to discuss the issues of how the
policy of the City for the issuance of permits affects the right-of-way for the public.
Director of Engineering Logue explained that the public can also call the Engineer’s
office to complain about a sidewalk closure, which should be the first office contacted.
Staff will then research to see if a permit was obtained for the work. If not, staff go out to
inspect and confront the contractor with information as to what is required in order to
obtain a permit for the work. If the contractor does not comply with the request, the
City’s alternative is to call the Ithaca Police Department regarding work in a public right-
of-way without a permit. The police will write a ticket as long as the City is willing to go
through the process to prosecute the contractor. At that stage, it then becomes an
issue between the contractor and the police officer; and DPW does not get involved. It’s
not very often that happens and it is a very uncomfortable situation, especially for large
construction sites. If the contractor does comply, access will not be immediate as it will
take them a while to remove heavy equipment and open the sidewalk back up for
pedestrians.
Vice Chair Scriber questioned why there is no connection in the permit process between
staff that issue the building permit and staff that issue the sidewalk permit for the same
project.
Director of Engineering Logue responded that the building permit application only asks
whether the street or sidewalk will need to be closed; if it will, the contractor is referred
to the Engineering office. In some cases, there can be breakdown of communication
where the Engineering office is not contacted about a permit. Alternately, the code
inspector for the Building Department may inspect and approve of the work site when
they issue the building permit (this is what happened with the work occurring in front of
the New Roots School). In this case, the code inspector felt that since there was some
access on the sidewalk that it was adequate and approved the permit. There are times
when the inspectors from the Building Department do contact the Engineering office to
determine whether a sidewalk/street closure permit is required for a particular project.
Vice Chair Scriber asked if the permit applications could include additional information
that would make it more transparent to the contractor what the process and
requirements are for obtaining a street/sidewalk permit when they obtain the building
permit.
Disability Advisory Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2017
3
Director of Engineering Logue responded that if the contractor obtains a building permit
and nothing is said about work occurring in the street or on the sidewalk, then nothing
can be done. The contractor should know when the building permit application is
submitted what work and where the work will take place for their project; sometimes the
code inspector will even walk down to the Engineering office with the contractor to
ensure that appropriate permits are obtained. That process tends to work out better
since sometimes they don’t stop by the Engineering office after they have been
instructed to by the Building Department.
DAC Member Rappaport reported that he brought this problem to the attention of the
staff of the Building Department regarding the lack of or miscommunication with
contractors and staff about the process involved if the street or sidewalk has to be
closed, and the need to ensure that accessibility is maintained. This is directly related
to an upcoming project in Collegetown where building permits have been issued for two
projects on the same street, across from one another. One project will have to be
delayed so that the street and both sidewalks are not closed at the same time.
Chair Roberts stated that the purpose of this discussion was not to make a decision or
anything; it was to get a sense of what are all the moving parts involved in the issuance
of permits for construction projects. He hopes what will come out of the discussion as
to the possibility of boards/committees being consolidated, is that staff and/or the new
committee structure will continue the DAC’s ongoing efforts to education both the public
and staff on the importance of maintaining the city’s legal right-of-ways, and safe
accessible sidewalks for pedestrians – specifically disabled citizens – during every
construction project. He noted, that if he had attempted to use the sidewalk in front of
New Roots School as the construction continues that he would not have been able to do
so in his wheelchair because the access there does not allow enough space for people
in wheelchairs.
Director of Engineering stated that the issue regarding maintaining an accessible
pedestrian walkway during construction needs to be included in the site plan approval
process for every project; currently, it isn’t something that is required. The requirement
for inclusion of pedestrian access does mean that the developer/contractor will incur
additional costs for the project, when they go to apply for a street/sidewalk closure
permit. If these costs were known upfront when the project is going through site plan
review, they can be included in the total cost of the project. Otherwise, as it stands
now, it becomes very difficult for some projects to come up with the additional money to
pay to provide the required access, or the contractor is under a very tight deadline and
can’t make appropriate commendations. In which case, if the Engineering Department
had enough staff resources and could visit the particular site daily, the City could fine
them $250.00 a day for non-compliance. For some developers, that cost is insignificant,
but for others it can be an incentive to do something. One thing that the Engineering
office will be implementing is an increased fee schedule for developers who desire to
shut down a street or sidewalk because this space is being looked at like free staging
areas with no financial impact to them – but with significant impacts to the community.
The fee increase might be enough of an incentive for the length of time the public right-
of-way is not available is decreased or the contractor will create an alternate means for
pedestrian access so as to not have to pay the additional fee.
CC Liaison Brock noted that at a recent Board of Public Works meeting, there was
some discussion about the requirement, for some of the bigger development projects, to
provide a structurally sound covered structure for pedestrian access to ensure their
safety. This concern will become more relevant as new development occurring within
the city is building up and not across, as well as some sites where the structure is being
built at the property line which is flush with the sidewalk. She agreed that additional
information and education should be provided to planning board members about the
requirements to maintain safe, accessible access for pedestrians during construction
projects so those accommodations are included when the project is submitted for site
plan review.
Director of Engineering Logue explained that staff is trying to discuss this topic with
planning staff as much as they can, as well as to provide input on all site plan review
projects. Staff will continue to add more construction related questions to certain site
Disability Advisory Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2017
4
plan review applications and work to have planning staff spend more time during site
plan review on all these issues to flag and address them before approval is granted.
The requirements by the planning board should not allow sidewalks to be closed and
require that an accessible walkway be maintained for the duration of the project. The
City is implementing a new sidewalk/street closure fee to make it the most expensive it
can be. The fee will be adjusted if accessibility is maintained or the sidewalk
maintained throughout the project to the minimum fee. Staff is still deciding what to do
with permits issued prior the implementation of the new fee structure, which right now is
scheduled to go into effect April 15th.
Discussion followed on the floor regarding the new fee structure, what the requirements
are for the covered structure for pedestrian access, how the city will collect the fees, the
differences between work being done on private property versus commercial property,
and how to improve the process going forward, including adding this information to the
site plan review application.
Chair Roberts requested that for the DAC’s next meeting that someone volunteer to
write or suggest language for a recommendation from the DAC to the City on this topic
so that it would be ready for the DAC to discuss at its next meeting. DAC Member
Rappaport volunteered to write the recommendation. Chair Roberts asked that it then
be shared with both members of the DAC and BPAC for review and comment prior to
the DAC meeting next month; that way it can be voted on at the next meeting.
BPAC Chair West stated that it would be helpful as language is being proposed to have
some clarity from staff of the Engineering office regarding requirements and acceptable
pedestrian structures, if indicated. Director of Engineering Logue stated that
requirements would include that it meet ADA requirements, be lit at night, and handle
the weight load for any structure that might be required depending upon the size of the
project.
Discussion of Proposed Recommendations from Working Group on the
Restructuring of City Boards/Committees:
Chair Roberts apologized for not attending meetings or keeping on top of the topic
regarding the possible consolidation of the city’s boards and committees. He
understands that members of the Disability Advisory Council (DAC) will have questions
about how particular issues that the DAC works with will be dealt with in the future.
Chair Roberts asked CC Liaison Brock to provide an update on the topic for the DAC.
(Detailed information about the proposed new structure of boards/committees will be
attached to the minutes)
CC Liaison Brock explained that as part of an overall evaluation of the functioning and
organization of the City by Novak Consultants, they recommended the restructuring of
its board's/committee. The Mayor appointed a “Working Group” to meet and come up
with recommendations as to how its current board/committees might be consolidated so
as to utilize volunteer and staff time more effectively and tackle the many various topics
in a more efficient manner. As part of that process, the Working Group prepared and
sent a survey out to the chairs of the city’s board's/committee regarding the current
functioning of the same. The goal of that survey was to come up with a structure to
make volunteer resources feel more productive and effective, easier for the public to
bring items forward to the city as a pathway for discussion, review, input and access of
Common Council members, adequate support in terms of staff time and resources, and
lessen the number of liaison appointments of Common Council members. Basically,
allow people to feel more productive and engaged with how their city is governed.
In the proposal, there would be four commissions with two Common Council liaisons,
dedicated city staff, and the consolidation of the current responsibilities of all the
boards/committees into four commissions. The City has some committees which are
called “quasi-judicial” and their structure and member make-up will remain unchanged.
The proposal will take the city’s current twelve boards/committees and consolidate them
under these four commissions. Sample agendas and information that provides a
purview of the commissions’ responsibilities is detailed in the attached information. The
topics for the “sample” agendas were created based upon the description of types of
Disability Advisory Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2017
5
anticipated discussions from historic agendas and minutes.
In addition to the two Common Council liaisons, each commission would have seven
commissioners. As part of this proposal, a database of individuals who have certain
fields of expertise will be created that could be drawn upon for specific issues and
topics, and the seven commission members will have voting authority. As a result of
last week’s Committee of the Whole meeting of Common Council on this proposal,
discussion are occurring regarding city residency requirements to serve on the
commissions. A lot of Common Council members expressed their opinion that the
members of all the commissions should be city residents. The work of the commissions
will include the exploration and discussion of certain topics, opportunities for the public
to participate to provide input, and then the development of recommendations that
would then go to the appropriate standing committee of Common Council, and then to
Common Council for final approval.
Discussion followed on the floor regarding how topics for agendas would be decided,
certain “regular” type items that would appear on the agendas, how the make-up of the
commissions was determined based upon the various themes in the City’s Strategic
Plan, and the responsibilities of commission members. Further discussion followed on
how the working group made the determination that there would be seven commission
members, plus two Common Council members.
CC Liaison Brock explained that since the meetings of the new commissions will involve
a wide variety of topics that are now discussed by the current twelve boards/committees
in many different meetings, that the length of the new commission meetings could be
longer, maybe three hours. The length of the meeting would be determined by the
current topics of interest and certain agenda items that would occur on a regular basis
as a result consolidating the many topics under one commission.
DAC Member Sember-Chase asked whether any concerns were raised about the
proposal at the Committee of the Whole meeting that was held on March 29th.
CC Liaison Brock responded that there was extensive discussion at that meeting (3
hours). Some of it focused on what the terms would be for members of the new
commissions, how reappointments/turn-over of members would occur, whether seven
members is appropriate or should it be nine. One reason for selection seven members
was related to the current problem that some of the boards/committees with a high
number of members have been having with quorum issues; nine members sounded a
little unwieldy. She also stated that the commissions would not have the authority to
approve resolutions. The new format will allow for Common Council members to have
some back and forth conversations with the public about topics of interest.
Jan Schwartzberg, BPAC member, stated that she attended the Committee of the
Whole meeting on March 29th, and some Common Council members proposed that four
of the seven commission members should be city residents.
CC Liaison Brock added that one of the reasons for not having the entire commission
made up of city residents was the need for members to have expertise in certain areas.
CC Liaison Brock explained, as an example, how topics would come before the new
commissions for discussion. The DAC identifies a problem they want to bring to the
attention of Common Council, they would write a letter to Common Council explaining
what the need is. Common Council would direct staff to come up with legislation to
address the particular topic, then it would go to the appropriate commission for review,
discussion and input, the commission would then send a recommendation to the
appropriate standing committee of Common Council, and from there it would go to
Common Council for a final vote. The new structure will allow staff to have more
opportunities to engage in back and forth discussions during the commission meetings,
and provide support to the commission on the topics. One of her concerns is that with
only seven members the Mobility and Transportation Commission, which is assigned
issues such as quality of life, mobility and transportation, that there could be items that
are disregarded, or a special interest group determines what topics are given
consideration at their meetings. Another example is the commission assigned to
oversee parks and natural areas, the current Natural Areas Commission and Parks
Disability Advisory Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2017
6
Commission have two different philosophies when addressing the same issues, and she
is very concerned about how the commission will address and handle those topics in a
comprehensive manner. She also is concerned about the Board of Fire Commissioners
being dissolved, which right now, has similar responsibilities as the Board of Public
Works, as far as oversight of the fire department, and how volunteer and recruitment
efforts will be overseen by the new commission.
Chair Roberts stated that the foundation of the DAC, historically, has focused on
mobility and accessibility issues. However, what has become clear through the years is
that the DAC touches many different topics in its effort to increase accessibility
awareness. For example, access at Stewart Park, the new playground on the
Commons, human resources so the needs of people with disabilities can be addressed.
There are a huge number of these topics that cross more than one of the proposed
commissions. Whether the new commissions deal with topics in an effective manner
may be a different from what boards/committees do currently. He is very concerned
about items that need to be addressed, as far as accessibility, that fall outside of the
proposed framework of the Mobility and Transportation Commission. Will the Mobility
and Transportation Commission also include people with disabilities; how will the new
commissions make sure that the issues that the DAC has been discussing are not
ignored and addressed adequately. He is not saying that there isn’t a more effective
way that the current boards and committees could operate; but the ways and means
that people with disabilities are affected by the new commissions may be impacted
significantly.
CC Liaison Brock explained that the way in which the new commission will meeting will
most likely be significantly different due to the number and range of topics of the
particular commission. She would hope that with two Common Council liaisons and
dedicated staff support for each commission, there would be the ability for that cross
education to each one of the commissions on topics that may fall under more than one
of the commissions. The appointments to each commission will be made twice a year
in January and June. The public will apply, sort of like they are applying for a job, and it
will be up to the Mayor to review the information they submit to choose best candidates.
The idea is that there would be more applicants than spots and therefore only the best
applicants will be appointed based upon areas of expertise.
DAC Member Sember-Chase asked what the status of the recommendations is right
now; how set in stone are they, and where are opportunities to share concerns.
CC Liaison Brock responded that there will be opportunities for the public to provide
input at the Common Council meeting this evening and at the City Administration
Committee meeting on April 19th at 6:00 p.m. The Working Group is continuing to meet
and receive comments, and they want to continue to get feedback from the public. The
proposed changes would not be implemented prior to 2018 - due to possible changes in
the City Charter, and requirements for certain changes to be placed as referendum
items on the ballot for the General Election in November.
Vice Chair Scriber asked for further explanation/clarification on the role of the various
sub-committees and how members would be appointed to them, based upon areas of
expertise. She further noted that in order to have a pool of experts in certain topics to
be used on what could be “an as needed” basis may be difficult, and it will be very
important to have regular meeting dates and times to accommodate as large a pool of
applicants as possible.
Ms. Schwartzberg stated that it was her understanding, as far as finding experts in
particular areas, that it will be a slow process to not only find qualified applicants, but to
also find a convenient meeting time for everyone. As a result, that slow process may
affect decisions being made because of the lengthy coordination process of applicants
and meeting times.
Mr. West stated that, as he had understood the proposal, the sub-committees would
meet on a short-term basis only and be made up of topic experts in order to address a
certain problem and then the sub-committee would disband once that has been done.
Disability Advisory Council Meeting Minutes April 5, 2017
7
Chair Roberts stated that it would be very useful for DAC to have the chair of the
Working Group, Deb Mohlenhoff, attend their next meeting to talk about the
recommendations and concerns from DAC members. He would then request that DAC
members, before that meeting, write down all their questions or concerns so that he
could share them with Alderperson Mohlenhoff.
CC Liaison Brock strongly encouraged DAC members to watch the video from March
29th Common Council Committee of the Whole meeting where the recommendations
from the Working Group were presented and discussed at length. This video will be on
the City’s website.
Chair Roberts responded that he would commit to watching the video of the meeting.
He will also see if Alderperson Mohlenhoff would be available to attend the May meeting
of the DAC.
Mr. West stated that he would share the set of recommendations that BPAC developed
in response to the proposal with DAC members for their review and information.
Chair Roberts encouraged any DAC member that could, to plan to attend the Common
Council meeting this evening or the April 19th City Administration Committee meeting, to
share their concerns. Specifically, the question “given that disability issues cross a
whole range of topics, how is that going to be considered with the new commissions”?
Update on Commons Playground:
Vice Chair Scriber reported that the last information she had was an e-mail from the City
that showed the proposed new activity panels. She replied that to the e-mail that they
were fine and that the City should proceed with them. She has not received any
additional information from either the City or therapists since then.
A brief discussion followed on the floor regarding the proposed activity panels. The
question arose as to whether the openings are large enough for someone in a
wheelchair to go through because there were no dimensions provided with the
information.
Cerebral Palsy Video Possibility:
CC Liaison Brock explained that she came across information about a cerebral palsy
program that videos someone in a wheelchair’s impression of getting around a
particular city, and the various difficulties they encounter. She thought the idea was
good, and that it would be interesting to have that video filming done, unannounced, in
the City of Ithaca. She wondered what thoughts other DAC members might have on the
suggestions. It might be a great tool to educate staff and other boards/committees –
including the Board of Public Works.
Vice Chair Scriber stated that she forwarded the e-mail CC Brock shared with DAC
members about the proposal to the Public Relations Director at the Racker Center. The
Racker Center would love to be involved with a project like this, and they are an affiliate
of the Cerebral Palsy Association. More information will follow as it becomes available.
Adjournment:
On a motion the meeting adjourned at 1:40 p.m.
___________________________________ _____________________________
Sarah L. Myers, Larry Roberts,
Information Management Specialist Chair
May 4, 2016 Common Council Meeting Minutes
CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE:
9.1 Working Group to Propose Restructuring of Boards and Committees -
Resolution
By Alderperson Fleming: Seconded by Alderperson Gearhart
WHEREAS, in 2011, the City of Ithaca contracted with an outside consulting firm to
evaluate the city’s organizational structure as it relates to performance measurement
and efficiencies, resulting in what we now call “The Novak Report”; and
WHEREAS, based on the Novak Report, the Common Council identified as a priority
the task of performing a comprehensive analysis of the City’s approximately 30
boards and committees; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council now desires to complete that analysis and
consider recommendations for restructuring many of the City’s boards and
committees (which shall, for purposes of this resolution, include commissions,
councils other than the Common Council, and groups), though generally not the
City’s quasi-judicial boards and committees; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That a Boards and Committees Restructuring Working Group
(“BCRWG”) shall be formed to gather input from existing boards and committees,
and the public, on possible models for restructuring, and to propose to the City
Administration Committee a realigned structure for the City’s boards and committees
that supports the following goals:
1. To create a structure in which volunteers and citizens effectively
engage in order to drive change and address changing needs.
2. To make effective use of volunteer time and energy.
3. To create a structure in which volunteer committees can bring new
ideas and initiatives forward to Council for adoption in an easy and
consistent manner. To also create a structure in which Council and/or
the Mayor can assign an emerging issue to a committee for research,
public input, and analysis.
4. To define clearer relationships between City committees and Council.
5. To better utilize staff resources in order to most effectively empower
the committees.
6. To be even more responsive to the needs of our community.
7. To make recruitment of new board members easier.
8. To create a structure that is fluid enough to be both proactive and
reactive depending on the situation or issue.
9. To provide citizens better visibility and access into government and
how to create change.
10. To actively seek employees and volunteers with diverse backgrounds
and be it further,
RESOLVED, That the Mayor shall select, recruit, and appoint seven members of the
BCRWG as follows, who shall additionally be advised by the City Attorney:
x Two present or former board or committee members
x Two members of the Common Council
x Two City staff with familiarity with the City’s board and committee
structure
x The Chief of Staff;
and be it further,
RESOLVED, That a member of the BCRWG shall provide progress updates to the
City Administration Committee at most meetings of the City Administration
Committee.
Carried Unanimously (8-0)
dŽ͗ ŽŵŵŽŶŽƵŶĐŝů
&ƌŽŵ͗ ŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐZĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌŝŶŐtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉ
ĂƚĞ͗ ϯͬϮϬͬϮϬϭϳ
ZĞ͗ ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĨŽƵƌƵŵďƌĞůůĂĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ
,ŝƐƚŽƌLJĂŶĚdŝŵĞůŝŶĞ
/ŶϮϬϭϭ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ/ƚŚĂĐĂĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂŶŽƵƚƐŝĚĞĐŽŶƐƵůƚŝŶŐĨŝƌŵƚŽĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƚŚĞĐŝƚLJ͛ƐŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶĂů
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƐŝƚƌĞůĂƚĞƐƚŽƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐŝĞƐ͘^ĞǀĞƌĂůƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐĞŵĞƌŐĞĚĨƌŽŵ
ǁŚĂƚŝƐŶŽǁŬŶŽǁŶĂƐ͞dŚĞEŽǀĂŬZĞƉŽƌƚ͘͟/Ŷ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJŽĨϮϬϭϮ͕ŽŵŵŽŶŽƵŶĐŝůŚĞůĚĂƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƌĞƚƌĞĂƚƚŽ
ƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚƌĂŶŬƚŚĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞEŽǀĂŬZĞƉŽƌƚ͕ĂŶĚĂƚƚŚĂƚƌĞƚƌĞĂƚƚŚĞ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚ
WĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞĂŶĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂďŝůŝƚLJ;'WͿŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞǁĂƐĂƐƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŚĞƚĂƐŬŽĨƉĞƌĨŽƌŵŝŶŐĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ
ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽĨŝƚLJďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐ͘
'WǁŽƌŬĞĚŽŶƚŚŝƐƚŽƉŝĐĚƵƌŝŶŐϮϬϭϮĂŶĚϮϬϭϯ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƐĞǀĞƌĂůŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƐǁŝƚŚƐƚĂĨĨĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞĐŚĂŝƌƐ͘
,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ƚŚĞ'WŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞǁĂƐĚŝƐďĂŶĚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞĞŶĚŽĨϮϬϭϯďĞĨŽƌĞƚŚĞǁŽƌŬǁĂƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͘dŚŝƐŝƐƐƵĞ
ƐĂƚŽŶĂďĂĐŬďƵƌŶĞƌƵŶƚŝůŝƚƐƌĞǀŝǀĂůůĂƐƚLJĞĂƌďLJƚŚĞDĂLJŽƌĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ͘
ƚƚŚĞŝƌDĂLJϮϬϭϲŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͕ŽŵŵŽŶŽƵŶĐŝůĂĚŽƉƚĞĚĂƌĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐ
ZĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌŝŶŐtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉ͘;dŚĞĨƵůůƌĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĂŐĞŶĚĂƉĂĐŬĞƚ͘Ϳ
/ŶKĐƚŽďĞƌĂŶĚEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϬϭϲ͕ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂƐƵƌǀĞLJƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŝŶƉƵƚŽŶƚŚĞ
ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚƐĂŶĚĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐ͘
KŶĞĐĞŵďĞƌϭ͕ϮϬϭϲ͕ƚŚĞǁŽƌŬŝŶŐŐƌŽƵƉŚĞůĚĂǀŝƐŝŽŶŝŶŐƐĞƐƐŝŽŶǁŝƚŚϯϬƉĞŽƉůĞ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞƐ
ĨƌŽŵĂďƌŽĂĚĐƌŽƐƐͲƐĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐ͘
/Ŷ:ĂŶƵĂƌLJĂŶĚ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJ͕ƚŚĞǁŽƌŬŝŶŐŐƌŽƵƉŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚƚŚĞŝŶƉƵƚƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚƚŽĚĞƐŝŐŶƚŚĞŶĞǁƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐŵĞŵŽ͘
ZĂƚŝŽŶĂůĞĨŽƌŚĂŶŐŝŶŐKƵƌ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
•/ŶƐĞǀĞƌĂůĐĂƐĞƐ͕ƚŚĞƌĞŝƐŽǀĞƌůĂƉďĞƚǁĞĞŶďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐŝŶƐĐŽƉĞŽĨǁŽƌŬ͘/ŶƌĞĐŽŐŶŝƚŝŽŶŽĨ
ƚŚŝƐŽǀĞƌůĂƉ͕ŵĂŶLJĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐŚĂǀĞĐƌŽƐƐͲůŝĂŝƐŽŶĂƉƉŽŝŶƚŵĞŶƚƐƚŽŽŶĞĂŶŽƚŚĞƌ͕ďƵƚƚŚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ
ŽĨƚĞŶďƌĞĂŬƐĚŽǁŶĂŶĚůĞĂĚƐƚŽŝŶĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘
•dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚŝƐƐƵĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŶŽƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJďĞŝŶŐĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚďLJƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐďŽĂƌĚĂŶĚ
ĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘
•dŚĞƌĞŝƐĂůĂĐŬŽĨĂĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚĂŶĚƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚĂďůĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĨŽƌŵŽǀŝŶŐŝĚĞĂƐĂŶĚŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐĨƌŽŵďŽĂƌĚƐ
ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐƚŽŽƵŶĐŝůĂŶĚǀŝĐĞǀĞƌƐĂ͘
•dŚĞƌĞŝƐĂŶŝŶĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚƵƚŝůŝnjĂƚŝŽŶŽĨŝƚLJƐƚĂĨĨĂŶĚŽƵŶĐŝůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂŵŽŶŐĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ
ĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐ͘ŝƚLJƐƚĂĨĨĂŶĚŽƵŶĐŝůĂƌĞƐƚƌĞƚĐŚĞĚǀĞƌLJƚŚŝŶĂŶĚĂƌĞŶŽƚĂůǁĂLJƐĂďůĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ
ƚŽŝƚLJďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐ͘
•dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞǀĂƌLJŝŶŐƐƵĐĐĞƐƐŵĞƚƌŝĐƐĨŽƌĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐ͕ĂƐďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐĂƌĞ
ŚŝŐŚůLJĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚƵƉŽŶƚŚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞ͕ĂŶĚĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƌŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͘
ϯͬϮϬͬϮϬϭϳ
Ϯ
•dŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐĐŽŶĨƵƐŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĂŶĚĐŚĂůůĞŶŐŝŶŐĨŽƌĐŝƚŝnjĞŶƐƚŽ
ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŚŽǁƚŽƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞ͘
•dŚĞĂƉƉŽŝŶƚŵĞŶƚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƚŽďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐŝƐĐƵŵďĞƌƐŽŵĞĂŶĚƚŝŵĞĐŽŶƐƵŵŝŶŐ͘
'ŽĂůƐĨŽƌƚŚĞEĞǁ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
dŚĞtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉĂĚŽƉƚĞĚŐŽĂůƐĨŽƌĂŶĞǁƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞŶĞǁƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŽŶĞƚŚĂƚ
•/ŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞƐĂƐŵĂůůĞƌŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨ͞ƵŵďƌĞůůĂ͟ĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐĂƐƐŝŐŶĞĚďƌŽĂĚƚŽƉŝĐƐƚŚĂƚĞŶĐŽŵƉĂƐƐ
ƐŽŵĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚƐŽŵĞŶĞǁŐƌŽƵƉƐ
•ůĞĂƌůLJĚĞĨŝŶĞƐǁŚĂƚƚŚĞƵŵďƌĞůůĂĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐĂƌĞĐŚĂƌŐĞĚǁŝƚŚ;ŝ͘Ğ͖͘ĚƌĂĨƚŝŶŐƌĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚŝŶŐ
ƚŽƉŝĐƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌŝŶŐǁŚŝƚĞƉĂƉĞƌƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ
•ƌĞĂƚĞƐĂĐůĞĂƌĨĞĞĚĞƌƐLJƐƚĞŵĂŶĚƌĞƉŽƌƚŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŽƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŽŵŵŽŶŽƵŶĐŝůĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ǁŝƚŚŝƐƐƵĞƐĨůŽǁŝŶŐůŽŐŝĐĂůůLJ
•dĂŬĞƐŝŶƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐŽĨďŽƚŚŝƚLJƐƚĂĨĨĂŶĚǀŽůƵŶƚĞĞƌƚŝŵĞ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵƉůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚKƉĞŶ
DĞĞƚŝŶŐƐ>Ăǁ
•ůůŽǁƐĨŽƌĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƐƚĂĨĨŝŶŐĨƌŽŵŝƚLJ,ĂůůĨŽƌďŽƚŚĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞĂŶĚƐƵďũĞĐƚŵĂƚƚĞƌƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐ
•/ŶĐůƵĚĞƐĚĞĨŝŶŝƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƚĞƌŵŝŶŽůŽŐLJĨŽƌĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ;ŝ͘Ğ͘ĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͕
ǁŽƌŬŝŶŐŐƌŽƵƉƐ͕ƐƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ
•WƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐƐŬŝůůƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŝƌƐĂŶĚŵĞŵďĞƌƐ
^ƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨƚŚĞEĞǁ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
ƌĞĂƚĞĨŽƵƌƵŵďƌĞůůĂĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚůLJĂƐƐŝŐŶĞĚĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚĂů
ƐƚĂĨĨ͘
ĂĐŚĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĂŶĂƉƉŽŝŶƚĞĚŚĂŝƌĂŶĚƐŝdžĂƉƉŽŝŶƚĞĚŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͕ĨŽƌĂƚŽƚĂůŽĨƐĞǀĞŶǀŽƚŝŶŐ
ŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͘dŚĞŚĂŝƌǁŝůůďĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚďĂƐĞĚŽŶĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞĚĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƐ͘ŵĂũŽƌŝƚLJŽĨ
ŵĞŵďĞƌƐ;ŝ͘Ğ͘ĂƚůĞĂƐƚĨŽƵƌͿŵƵƐƚďĞŝƚLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘
ĂĐŚĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŶŽŶͲǀŽƚŝŶŐŵĞŵďĞƌƐĂƐƐŝŐŶĞĚĂƐƐƵďũĞĐƚͲŵĂƚƚĞƌĞdžƉĞƌƚƐ͘
ĂĐŚĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶǁŝůůŚĂǀĞƚǁŽŽƵŶĐŝůůŝĂŝƐŽŶƐĂƉƉŽŝŶƚĞĚĂƐŶŽŶͲǀŽƚŝŶŐŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͘
ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĂŐĞŶĚĂƐǁŝůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĨŽƌďƌŽĂĚƉƵďůŝĐĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĐŽƵůĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƉƵďůŝĐŝŶƉƵƚƐĞƐƐŝŽŶƐŽŶ
ƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƉŝĐƐĂŶĚͬŽƌƉƵďůŝĐYΘĨŽƌĐĞƌƚĂŝŶŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘
ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐǁŝůůŵĞĞƚŵŽŶƚŚůLJŝŶƚŚĞĞǀĞŶŝŶŐŝŶŝƚLJ,Ăůů͘
ƉƉŽŝŶƚŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůďĞŵĂĚĞŝŶ:ĂŶƵĂƌLJĂŶĚ:ƵŶĞƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂƌĞǀŝƐĞĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘dƌĂŝŶŝŶŐǁŝůůďĞŽĨĨĞƌĞĚ
ĨŽƌĐŚĂŝƌƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌƐŝŶ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJĂŶĚ:ƵůLJ͘
dŚĞƚŽƉŝĐĂƌĞĂƐŽĨƚǁĞůǀĞďŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞƌĞĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƐĞĨŽƵƌĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͘dŚŝƐǁŝůů
ƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůĂƉƉŽŝŶƚŵĞŶƚƐĨƌŽŵϴϴƚŽϮϴ͕ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŶŽŶͲǀŽƚŝŶŐƐƵďũĞĐƚͲŵĂƚƚĞƌĞdžƉĞƌƚƐ
ďĞŝŶŐŝŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞϮϴǀŽƚŝŶŐŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͘
ϯͬϮϬͬϮϬϭϳ
ϯ
dŚĞĨŽƵƌƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƵŵďƌĞůůĂĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐĂƌĞ
•DŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ
•ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚYƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ>ŝĨĞ
•WĂƌŬƐ͕ZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚEĂƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ
•WƵďůŝĐ^ĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
dŚĞŵĞŵďĞƌƐŽĨƚŚĞŽĂƌĚƐĂŶĚŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐZĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌŝŶŐtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉĂƌĞ
•ŚĂŝƌ͗ĞďDŽŚůĞŶŚŽĨĨ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůŵĞŵďĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŝƌŽĨŝƚLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ
•ZŽď'ĞĂƌŚĂƌƚ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůŵĞŵďĞƌ
• ůůĞŶDĐŽůůŝƐƚĞƌ͕ĨŽƌŵĞƌŽƵŶĐŝůŵĞŵďĞƌĂŶĚůŽŶŐͲƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŝƚLJĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂŶƚ
•:ŽĞDĂĐDĂŚŽŶ͕ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĐŚĂŝƌŽĨƚŚĞEĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞĂƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ
•ŽƌŶĞůůtŽŽĚƐŽŶ͕ĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJĞĚƵĐĂƚŽƌĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ/>ZƐĐŚŽŽůĂƚŽƌŶĞůůhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ;ĂĚǀŝƐŽƌLJƌŽůĞͿ
•WŝĞƌƌĞ^ƚ͘WĂƵů͕LJŽƵƚŚůŝĂŝƐŽŶ
•DĞŐĂŶtŝůƐŽŶ͕ŝƚLJƐƚĂĨĨĨƌŽŵW
•:ƵůŝĞ,ŽůĐŽŵď͕ŝƚLJůĞƌŬĂŶĚW/K
•ĂŶŽŐĂŶ͕ŚŝĞĨŽĨ^ƚĂĨĨ
•ƌŝ>ĂǀŝŶĞ͕ŝƚLJƚƚŽƌŶĞLJ
COMMONCOUNCIL(10CCMEMBERS)STANDINGCOMMITTEE:CITYADMINISTRATION(5CCMEMBERS)STANDINGCOMMITTEE:PLANNING&ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT(5CCMEMBERS)COMMISSION:PublicSafetyandInformation2CCLiaisonsͲnonvoting7votingCommissionersCityStaff/CommunityExperts(nonvoting)FirePoliceEmergencyPreparednessPublicInformation&CommunicationDrugAbuse/CrimeCommunityOutreach/EducationGorgeSafetyCOMMISSION:CommunityandQualityofLife2CCLiaisonsͲnonvoting7votingCommissionersCityStaff/CommunityExperts(nonvoting)Art&CultureDiversity/InclusionInitiativesCommunity:yYouthandYouthDevelopmentySeniorsandAgingyRefugeesandImmigrantsyLGBTQyCollegeStudentsHousingSustainabilityDowntownandtheCommonsFoodandFoodSystemsEnvironmentalremediationNoiseCOMMISSION:MobilityandTransportation2CCLiaisonsͲnonvoting7votingCommissionersCityStaff/CommunityExperts(nonvoting)AccessibilityBicyclesPedestriansSidewalksParkingTrafficCalmingTrafficManagementPublicTransitMultiuseTrailsTaxisCOMMISSION:Parks,RecreationandNaturalResources2CCLiaisonsͲnonvoting7votingCommissionersCityStaff/CommunityExperts(nonvoting)ParksRecreationNaturalAreasTreesWaterways/waterfrontBoating/DocksCemeteryGolfCourseNONͲCITYCOMMONCOUNCILLIAISONS:PublicArtCommission7votingvolunteers3Liaisons(CC+CAP+DIA)1staffRentalHousingAdvisory9votingvolunteers1Liaison(CC)ShadeTreeAdvisory6votingvolunteers1Liaison(CC)1staffYouthBureauAdvisoryBoardConservationAdvisoryCouncil9voting/2nonͲvotingvolunteers1CCLiaison(nonͲvoting)DisabilityAdvisoryCouncil12votingvolunteers1Liaison(CC)1staffNaturalAreasCommission9votingvolunteers2Liaison(CC+BPW)1staffParksCommission7votingvolunteers2Liaison(CC+BPW)3staffBicycleͲPedestrianAdvisoryCouncil11voting/3nonͲvotingvolunteersBoardofFireCommissioners5votingvolunteers1Liaison(CC)2staffCommonsAdvisoryBoard6votingvolunteers2votingLiaisons(CC+DIA)4Ͳ5staffCommunity AdvisoryGroupSpecialJointCommittee(IAWWTF)TCATTompkinsCountyLegislatureTompkinsCountyCouncilofGovernmentsCityͲCornellWorkingGroupDowntownIthacaAllianceTompkinsCountyChamberofCommerceHumanServicesCoalitionIthacaHousingAuthorityTownofIthacaRecreationPartnershipGIACSouthsideCommunityCenterCOMMUNITYVOLUNTEERANDEXPERTISEDATABASEQUASIͲJUDICIALorLEGALLYREQUIREDBoardofPublicWorksBoardofZoningAppealsCivilServiceCommissionIthacaLandmarksPreservationIthacaUrbanRenewalAgencyPlanningandDevelopmentBdOTHERGROUPS:CommunityPoliceBoardWorkforceDiversityAdvisoryComm.CableAccessOversightTEMPORARYWORKINGGROUPS/ADHOCCOMMITTEES/SPECIALRESEARCHPROJECTSRedistributedCommittees,Boards,Commissions,Councils:88+VolunteerAssignmentsin12Groups(+19staff)
ƵƌƌĞŶƚŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞĂƐŽĨDZ,ϮϬϭϳ W^/ Y> Dd WZEZŶŽƚĞƐ͗ŝĐLJĐůĞΘWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽƵŶĐŝůݱŽĂƌĚŽĨ&ŝƌĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶĞƌƐݱŽĂƌĚŽĨWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐݱYƵĂƐŝͲ:ƵĚŝĐŝĂůŽĂƌĚŽĨŽŶŝŶŐƉƉĞĂůƐݱYƵĂƐŝͲ:ƵĚŝĐŝĂůƵŝůĚŝŶŐŽĚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨƉƉĞĂůƐݱ;ŽŶůLJĐŽŶǀĞŶĞƐĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚͿĂďůĞĐĐĞƐƐKǀĞƌƐŝŐŚƚŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞݱWĞƌĨƌĂŶĐŚŝƐĞĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚŝƚLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞݱ^ƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŽĨŽŵŵŽŶŽƵŶĐŝůŝǀŝů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶݱYƵĂƐŝͲ:ƵĚŝĐŝĂůŽŵŵŽŶƐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽĂƌĚݱŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĚǀŝƐŽƌLJ'ƌŽƵƉݱŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJWŽůŝĐĞŽĂƌĚݱ,ĞŶĐĞĨŽƌƚŚ͕ǁŝůůŽŶůLJĐŽŶǀĞŶĞĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚĨŽƌŝŶǀĞƐƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽƵŶĐŝůݱŝƐĂďŝůŝƚLJĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽƵŶĐŝůݱ džĂŵŝŶŝŶŐŽĂƌĚŽĨ ůĞĐƚƌŝĐŝĂŶƐݱ;ŽŶůLJĐŽŶǀĞŶĞƐĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚͿ džĂŵŝŶŝŶŐŽĂƌĚŽĨWůƵŵďĞƌƐݱ;ŽŶůLJĐŽŶǀĞŶĞƐĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚͿ'/ŽĂƌĚݱƐ'/ŝƐĂůƐŽĂϱϬϭ;ĐͿϯ͕ƚŚĞLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞďŽĂƌĚ͘,ŽƵƐŝŶŐŽĂƌĚŽĨZĞǀŝĞǁݱ;ŽŶůLJĐŽŶǀĞŶĞƐĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚͿ/ƚŚĂĐĂ>ĂŶĚŵĂƌŬƐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶݱYƵĂƐŝͲ:ƵĚŝĐŝĂů/ƚŚĂĐĂhƌďĂŶZĞŶĞǁĂůŐĞŶĐLJŽĂƌĚݱƐĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞůĞŐĂůĞŶƚŝƚLJ͕/hZƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞďŽĂƌĚ͘EĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞĂƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶݱWĂƌŬƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶݱWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĂƌĚݱYƵĂƐŝͲ:ƵĚŝĐŝĂůWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂŶĚ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞݱ^ƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŽĨŽŵŵŽŶŽƵŶĐŝůWƵďůŝĐƌƚŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶݱZĞŶƚĂů,ŽƵƐŝŶŐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶݱ^ŚĂĚĞdƌĞĞĚǀŝƐŽƌLJݱtŽƌŬĨŽƌĐĞŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞݱzŽƵƚŚƵƌĞĂƵĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽĂƌĚݱzŽƵƚŚŽƵŶĐŝůݱdŚŝƐǁŝůůƌĞŵĂŝŶ͕ĂƐŝƚŝƐŵŽƌĞĂΖƉƌŽŐƌĂŵΖŽĨƚŚĞzŽƵƚŚƵƌĞĂƵ͘W^/WƵďůŝĐ^ĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶY>ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚYƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ>ŝĨĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶDdDŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶWZEZWĂƌŬƐ͕ZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚEĂƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶZĞĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞƚŽƉŝĐƐƚŽ͗ŶŽĐŚĂŶŐĞ͗ ŽƚŚĞƌ͗
WƵďůŝĐ^ĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ
^ƚĂĨĨƚƚĞŶĚŝŶŐZĞŐƵůĂƌůLJ;ĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚͿ͗WŽůŝĐĞŚŝĞĨ;ŽƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĞͿ͕&ŝƌĞŚŝĞĨ;ŽƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĞͿ͕ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨ
WƵďůŝĐ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ;ŽƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĞͿ͕W/KƐ
^ĂŵƉůĞdŽƉŝĐƌĞĂƐ
WŽůŝĐĞ
•ZĞĐĞŝǀĞŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
•ZĞĐƌƵŝƚŵĞŶƚ
•ƌƵŐĂďƵƐĞ
•WĂŶŚĂŶĚůŝŶŐ
•'ŽƌŐĞZĂŶŐĞƌƐ
•ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJKƵƚƌĞĂĐŚtŽƌŬĞƌ
&ŝƌĞ
•ZĞĐĞŝǀĞŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
•sŽůƵŶƚĞĞƌƌĞĐƌƵŝƚŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ
•ĚǀŝƐĞŽŶWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůĨŝƌĞĨŝŐŚƚĞƌƌĞĐƌƵŝƚŵĞŶƚ
ŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚWƌĞƉĂƌĞĚŶĞƐƐ
•KƵƚƌĞĂĐŚƚŽƉƵďůŝĐŽŶŚŽǁƚŽďĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚ
WƵďůŝĐ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
•ŝƚLJǁĞďƉĂŐĞƐ
•ŝƚLJŶĞǁƐůĞƚƚĞƌ
•DĂƐƐŶŽƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵ
oZĞǀŝĞǁŶŽƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĂƚŐŽŽƵƚƚŽƉƵďůŝĐĂĨƚĞƌƚŚĞĨĂĐƚƚŽƐĞĞŚŽǁǁĞĐĂŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŽƵƌ
ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘
•^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŝnjĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƉƵďůŝĐŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ
•ZĞǀŝĞǁƉƵďůŝĐŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚŐŽĞƐŽƵƚĨƌŽŵĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĂĨƚĞƌƚŚĞĨĂĐƚƚŽƐĞĞŚŽǁ
ǁĞĐĂŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŽƵƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘
•^ŽĐŝĂůŵĞĚŝĂ
^ĂŵƉůĞŐĞŶĚĂ
WƵďůŝĐ^ĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ
/ƚĞŵsŽƚŝŶŐ
/ƚĞŵ͍
WƌĞƐĞŶƚĞƌ;ƐͿdŝŵĞ
ůůŽƚƚĞĚ
ϭ͘ĂůůƚŽKƌĚĞƌ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϭ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ zĞƐ
ϭ͘Ϯ͘WƵďůŝĐŽŵŵĞŶƚEŽ
Ϯ͘WŽůŝĐĞ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJWŽůŝĐLJŽĂƌĚ EŽ WŚĂŝƌϭϬŵŝŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵWŽůŝĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚEŽ WŽůŝĐĞĞƉƚϭϬŵŝŶ
ϯ͘&ŝƌĞ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵ&ŝƌĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚEŽ &ŝƌĞĞƉƚϭϬŵŝŶ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵsŽůƵŶƚĞĞƌƐEŽ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϰ͘WƵďůŝĐ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ
ϰ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵDĂƐƐEŽƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ^LJƐƚĞŵWZ
tŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉEŽ tŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉϮϬŵŝŶ
ϰ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚŽŶƉƵďůŝĐŶŽƚŝĐĞƐƚŚĂƚǁĞŶƚŽƵƚ
ŝŶƚŚĞůĂƐƚŵŽŶƚŚEŽ ϭϱŵŝŶ
ϱ͘>ĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
ϲ͘^ƉĞĐŝĂůWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
ϳ͘hƉĚĂƚĞƐĨƌŽŵ^ƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐͬtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉƐ
ϳ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵWŽůŝĐĞͬ&ŝƌĞũŽŝŶƚƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐ
ƐƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞEŽ ^ƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŚĂŝƌ ϮϱŵŝŶ
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚYƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ>ŝĨĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ
^ƚĂĨĨƚƚĞŶĚŝŶŐZĞŐƵůĂƌůLJ;ĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚͿ͗zŽƵƚŚƵƌĞĂƵŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ͕'/ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ͕WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ^ƚĂĨĨ͕
^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚ͛ƐKĨĨŝĐĞƐƚĂĨĨ͕ŝƚLJůĞƌŬ
^ĂŵƉůĞdŽƉŝĐƌĞĂƐ
ƌƚĂŶĚƵůƚƵƌĞ
•DƵƐŝĐͬ&ĞƐƚŝǀĂůƐͬ^ƉĞĐŝĂů ǀĞŶƚƐ
•WƵďůŝĐƌƚ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
•ZĞŶƚĂů,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
•,ŽŵĞůĞƐƐŶĞƐƐ
•ŝůĂƉŝĚĂƚĞĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJͬ/ŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶ
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ
•zŽƵƚŚĂŶĚzŽƵƚŚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
•^ĞŶŝŽƌƐĂŶĚŐŝŶŐ
•ZĞĨƵŐĞĞƐĂŶĚ/ŵŵŝŐƌĂŶƚƐ
•>'dY
•ŽůůĞŐĞ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ
•dŽǁŶͬ'ŽǁŶ
YƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ>ŝĨĞ
•EŽŝƐĞ
• ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞŵĞĚŝĂƚŝŽŶ
•ŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJ
otŽŽĚƐŵŽŬĞ
•>ŝŐŚƚWŽůůƵƚŝŽŶ
•^ŽůĂƌĐĐĞƐƐ
^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJ
• ŶĞƌŐLJĂŶĚĞŶĞƌŐLJĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐLJ
•&ŽŽĚĂŶĚ&ŽŽĚ^LJƐƚĞŵƐ
•tĂƐƚĞŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƌĞĐLJĐůŝŶŐ
ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶĂŶĚƚŚĞŽŵŵŽŶƐ
•ŽŵŵŽŶƐƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ
oZĂŝŶĂƚĞWŽůŝĐLJ
oKƵƚĚŽŽƌƐƉĞĂŬĞƌƉŽůŝĐLJ
oDŽďŝůĞǀĞŶĚŝŶŐƉŽůŝĐLJ
oŵƉůŝĨŝĞĚƐŽƵŶĚƉŽůŝĐLJ
oŽŐƐŽŶƚŚĞĐŽŵŵŽŶƐ
oWůĂŶƚŝŶŐƉŽůŝĐLJ
•ƉƉĞĂůƐŽĨĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶƐƌĞ͗ŽŵŵŽŶƐ
•ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJKƵƚƌĞĂĐŚtŽƌŬĞƌ
EŽƚĞƐ
•dŚĞǁŽƌŬŝŶŐŐƌŽƵƉŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŽŵŵŽŶƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐďĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞůLJ͕
ĂŶĚƚŚĞŶĂƉƉĞĂůƐĐĂŶŐŽƚŽƚŚŝƐĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ͘
•^ĂŵƉůĞĂŐĞŶĚĂďĞůŽǁŝƐŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĞĚďLJƚŽƉŝĐĂƌĞĂƐƌĂƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘
SampleAgenda
CommunityandQualityofLife
ItemVoting
Item?
Presenter(s)Time
Allotted
1. CalltoOrder10min
1.1. ApprovalofminutesYes
1.2. PublicCommentNo
2. Commons
2.1. RaindatepolicyYesDPWstaff15min
2.2. OutdoorspeakerpolicyYesDPWstaff15min
2.3. DogsontheCommonsNoDIAstaff30min
3. Housing
3.1. Ordinancerequiringwaitingtimeforsigning
leasesNoCityAttorney25min
3.2.RequirementforcurrentCofCtolegally
advertiseapartmentsNoDirectorofCodeEnforce.25min
4. ArtandCulture
4.1. MuralproposalforGreenStGarageYesArtist20min
4.2. Porchfest–updateNoOrganizers10min
5. QualityofLife
5.1. ReportfromwoodsmokeworkinggroupNoChairperson30min
6.Sustainability
6.1. Reportfromcommunitygardensworking
group.NoChairperson15min
7. Community
(noitemsthismonth)
8. Legislation
(noitemsthismonth)
9. SpecialPresentations
DŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ
^ƚĂĨĨƚƚĞŶĚŝŶŐZĞŐƵůĂƌůLJ;ĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚͿ͗dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͕^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͕ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨWĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕/W
dƌĂĨĨŝĐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ
^ĂŵƉůĞdŽƉŝĐƌĞĂƐ
ĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJ
• ǀĂůƵĂƚĞŝƚLJĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ƉƵďůŝĐǁŽƌŬƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶƐŝŶĨƌŽŶƚŽĨƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐďŽĂƌĚĨŽƌĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
ĨŽƌƉĞŽƉůĞǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ
ŝĐLJĐůĞƐ
•ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌďŝŬĞĨƌŝĞŶĚůLJƚƌĂĨĨŝĐůĂǁƐ͖ĚƌĂĨƚůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ
•ŝŬĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
•ŝŬĞƌĂĐŬĚĞƐŝŐŶ;ĂůƐŽĂŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚYƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ>ŝĨĞхWƵďůŝĐƌƚŝƐƐƵĞͿ
•ŝŬĞƉůĂŶ
•ŝĐLJĐůĞ^ĂĨĞƚLJŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐ
• ǀĂůƵĂƚĞƉƵďůŝĐǁŽƌŬƐĚĞƐŝŐŶƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶƐŝŶĨƌŽŶƚŽĨƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐďŽĂƌĚĨŽƌďŝĐLJĐůĞ
ĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ
•tŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƉŽůŝĐĞŽŶƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐ
• ǀĂůƵĂƚĞƉƵďůŝĐǁŽƌŬƐĚĞƐŝŐŶƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶƐŝŶĨƌŽŶƚŽĨƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐďŽĂƌĚĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ
ĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ
•ZĞǀŝĞǁƚŚĞĂŶŶƵĂůƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƉůĂŶ
•'ĞƚƌĞƉŽƌƚƐŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐǁŝƚŚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƉůĂŶ
•ŝƐĐƵƐƐƵŶƵƐƵĂůƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĚĞƐŝŐŶƐ
WĂƌŬŝŶŐ
•ZĞǀŝĞǁƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌĂůůŽǁŝŶŐͬƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚŝŶŐƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂůŽŶŐĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ
•ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽŶŶĞǁĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞƐ
•ZĞǀŝĞǁƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŵĞƚĞƌƐ
•ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŽŶƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĂƚĞƐ
dƌĂĨĨŝĐĂůŵŝŶŐ
•ĞǀĞůŽƉƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŽƌĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐĨƌŽŵ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕ĨŽƌƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐ
ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͗ůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĞƚĐ
dƌĂĨĨŝĐDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ
•ZĞǀŝĞǁƉůĂŶƐĨƌŽŵdƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐĨŽƌĂĚĚŝŶŐŽƌƌĞŵŽǀŝŶŐƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐŝŐŶĂůƐ͕ŶĞǁƐŝŐŶĂŐĞ͕
ĞƚĐ͘
ĞƚŽƵƌƐĂŶĚdƌĂĨĨŝĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐ
• ǀĂůƵĂƚĞƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌĚĞƚŽƵƌƐĂŶĚƌŽĂĚĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĂůůƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐĂƌĞƚĂŬĞŶŝŶƚŽ
ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ
WƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐŝƚ
• ǀĂůƵĂƚĞƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌŶĞǁŽƌƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚďƵƐƐƚŽƉƐŽƌƐŚĞůƚĞƌĚĞƐŝŐŶƐ
DƵůƚŝƵƐĞdƌĂŝůƐ
•ZĞǀŝĞǁƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌƚƌĂŝůĚĞƚŽƵƌƐŽƌƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐ
•ZĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌŶĞǁƚƌĂŝůƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐůĂĐŬŝĂŵŽŶĚƚƌĂŝů
dĂdžŝƐ
•hƉĚĂƚĞƐƚŽƚĂdžŝĐĂďŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ
•ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌŚŽǁƚŽƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ůŝŬĞ>LJĨƚĂŶĚhďĞƌ͘ŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
ůĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚŐŽǀĞƌŶƐƚŚŝƐ͘
EŽƚĞƐ
•dŚŝƐĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶǁŝůůĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚĞǁŝƚŚĂŶĚŵĂŬĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽŽƵƌƋƵĂƐŝͲũƵĚŝĐŝĂů
ďŽĂƌĚƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJƚŚĞWtĂŶĚƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽĂƌĚ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŽŽŵŵŽŶŽƵŶĐŝů͘
•dŚĞƐĂŵƉůĞĂŐĞŶĚĂďĞůŽǁĂƌĞŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĞĚďLJŝƚLJĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƌĂƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶďLJƚŚĞƚŽƉŝĐĂƌĞĂƐ
ƐŚŽǁŶĂďŽǀĞ͘
^ĂŵƉůĞŐĞŶĚĂƐ
DŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶʹŐĞŶĚĂϭ
/ƚĞŵsŽƚŝŶŐ
/ƚĞŵ͍
WƌĞƐĞŶƚĞƌ;ƐͿdŝŵĞ
ůůŽƚƚĞĚ
ϭ͘ĂůůƚŽKƌĚĞƌ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϭ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ zĞƐ
ϭ͘Ϯ͘WƵďůŝĐŽŵŵĞŶƚEŽ
Ϯ͘ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘WƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶͬŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŝƚLJ
^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽŶϮϬϭϳǁŽƌŬƉůĂŶ EŽ ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ ϰϱŵŝŶ
ϯ͘WĂƌŬŝŶŐ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
ϰ͘WůĂŶŶŝŶŐͬƵŝůĚŝŶŐͬŽŶŝŶŐ
ϰ͘ϭ͘ZĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶŝƚLJ
ĞŶƚƌĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚzĞƐ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ^ƚĂĨĨϰϱŵŝŶ
ϱ͘>ĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
ϲ͘^ƉĞĐŝĂůWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
ϲ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵ/WŽŶũĂLJǁĂůŬŝŶŐ
ĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞEŽ WŽůŝĐĞĞƉƚϭϱŵŝŶ
ϳ͘hƉĚĂƚĞƐĨƌŽŵ^ƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐͬtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉƐ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
DŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶʹŐĞŶĚĂϮ
/ƚĞŵsŽƚŝŶŐ
/ƚĞŵ͍
WƌĞƐĞŶƚĞƌ;ƐͿdŝŵĞ
ůůŽƚƚĞĚ
ϭ͘ĂůůƚŽKƌĚĞƌ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϭ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ zĞƐ
ϭ͘Ϯ͘WƵďůŝĐŽŵŵĞŶƚEŽ
Ϯ͘ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘WƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶͬŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŝƚLJ
dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŽŶϮϬϭϳƐŝŐŶĂůǁŽƌŬ EŽ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌϯϬŵŝŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ZĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƌŝŶĚůĞLJ^ƚƌŝĚŐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐ EŽ ƌŝĚŐĞ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌϯϬŵŝŶ
ϯ͘WĂƌŬŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ZĞǀŝĞǁŽĨϮϬϭϳŵĞƚĞƌƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƉůĂŶ
ĂŶĚĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶŽĨůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐEŽ ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨWĂƌŬŝŶŐ ϯϬŵŝŶ
ϰ͘WůĂŶŶŝŶŐͬƵŝůĚŝŶŐͬŽŶŝŶŐ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
ϱ͘>ĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶ
ϱ͘ϭ͘hƉĚĂƚĞƐƚŽƚĂdžŝĐĂďůĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶzĞƐ ŝƚLJůĞƌŬϮϬŵŝŶ
ϲ͘^ƉĞĐŝĂůWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
ϲ͘ϭ͘WƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶĨƌŽŵEz^WĂƌŬƐŽŶƉůĂŶƐ
ĨŽƌůĂĐŬŝĂŵŽŶĚdƌĂŝůEŽ Ez^WĂƌŬƐ^ƚĂĨĨϯϬŵŝŶ
ϳ͘hƉĚĂƚĞƐĨƌŽŵ^ƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐͬtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉƐ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
DŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶʹŐĞŶĚĂϯ
/ƚĞŵsŽƚŝŶŐ
/ƚĞŵ͍
WƌĞƐĞŶƚĞƌ;ƐͿdŝŵĞ
ůůŽƚƚĞĚ
ϭ͘ĂůůƚŽKƌĚĞƌ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϭ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ zĞƐ
ϭ͘Ϯ͘WƵďůŝĐŽŵŵĞŶƚEŽ
Ϯ͘ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶŽĨƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐĂĨĞƚLJƉůĂŶEŽ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ͖WŽůŝĐĞ ϮϬŵŝŶ
ϯ͘WĂƌŬŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶŽĨŶĞǁƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĂƚĞƐʹƉůĂŶ
ƚŽĞdžƚĞŶĚƚŽĞǀĞŶŝŶŐƐĂŶĚǁĞĞŬĞŶĚƐ EŽ ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨWĂƌŬŝŶŐ ϯϬŵŝŶ
ϰ͘WůĂŶŶŝŶŐͬƵŝůĚŝŶŐͬŽŶŝŶŐ
ϰ͘ϭ͘ZĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶŶĞǁĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĨŽƌ&ƵůƚŽŶǀĞŶƵĞ zĞƐ WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ^ƚĂĨĨϯϬŵŝŶ
ϱ͘>ĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶ
ϱ͘ϭ͘hƉĚĂƚĞƐƚŽƚŚĞ džƚĞƌŝŽƌWƌŽƉĞƌƚLJDĂŝŶƚ͘
KƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐzĞƐ ŝƚLJƚƚŽƌŶĞLJϮϬŵŝŶ
ϲ͘^ƉĞĐŝĂůWƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
ϳ͘hƉĚĂƚĞƐĨƌŽŵ^ƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐͬtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉƐ
ϳ͘ϭ͘dĂdžŝĐĂďůĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉ EŽ dĂdžŝĐĂďtŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉ ϮϬŵŝŶ
WĂƌŬƐͬZĞĐͬEĂƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ
^ƚĂĨĨƚƚĞŶĚŝŶŐZĞŐƵůĂƌůLJ;ĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚͿ͗ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌ͕zŽƵƚŚƵƌĞĂƵZĞĐ^ƚĂĨĨ͕WůĂŶŶŝŶŐ^ƚĂĨĨ͕tĂƚĞƌƐŚĞĚ
ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŽƌ
^ĂŵƉůĞdŽƉŝĐƌĞĂƐ
WĂƌŬƐ
•ZƵůĞƐĂŶĚƐŝŐŶĂŐĞ
•ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĐĂƉŝƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
•WůĂŶƚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ
•>ŝĐĞŶƐĞĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƐ
•tŝůĚůŝĨĞŽŶƚƌŽů
•ĞŵĞƚĞƌLJ
ZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
•ĂƐƐWĂƌŬʹƉŽŽů͕ƌŝŶŬ͕ĨŝĞůĚƐ͕ĐŽƵƌƚƐ
•ůĞdž,ĂůĞLJWŽŽů
•'ŽůĨŽƵƌƐĞ
•^ŬĂƚĞWĂƌŬ
•WĂǀŝůŝŽŶƐ
•ŽĂƚƌĂĐŬƐĂŶĚďŽĂƚƌĞŶƚĂůƐ
•ŝŬĞƌĞŶƚĂůƐ
EĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞĂƐ
•tĂƚĞƌƐŚĞĚƉƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶͲƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶ
•dƌĂŝůƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝŶŶĂƚƵƌĂůĂƌĞĂƐ
•^ƚĞĞƉƐůŽƉĞƐůĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶ;ŽƌǁŽƵůĚƚŚŝƐŐŽƚŽŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚYƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ>ŝĨĞ͍Ϳ
•^ŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚWĂƌŬ
•/ƚŚĂĐĂ&ĂůůƐ
•/ŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ
dƌĞĞƐ
•/ŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ
•^ƚƌĞĞƚƚƌĞĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶ
•^ƚƌĞĞƚƚƌĞĞŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
•ZĞǀŝĞǁƐŝƚĞƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌƐƚƌĞĞƚƚƌĞĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƉůĂŶƚŝŶŐŝŶƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJ͘
tĂƚĞƌǁĂLJƐ
•,LJĚƌŝůůĂĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŝŶǀĂƐŝǀĞĂƋƵĂƚŝĐƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ
•ƌĞĚŐŝŶŐ
•ŽĂƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĚŽĐŬƐ
•tĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŶƚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
EŽƚĞƐͬYƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐ
•^ĂŵƉůĞĂŐĞŶĚĂƐďĞůŽǁĂƌĞŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĞĚďLJƚŽƉŝĐĂƌĞĂƐƌĂƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘
^ĂŵƉůĞŐĞŶĚĂƐ
WĂƌŬƐͬZĞĐͬEĂƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶʹŐĞŶĚĂϭ
/ƚĞŵsŽƚŝŶŐ
/ƚĞŵ͍
WƌĞƐĞŶƚĞƌ;ƐͿdŝŵĞ
ůůŽƚƚĞĚ
ϭ͘ĂůůƚŽKƌĚĞƌ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϭ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ zĞƐ
ϭ͘Ϯ͘WƵďůŝĐŽŵŵĞŶƚEŽ
Ϯ͘WĂƌŬƐ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŶĞǁďĞŶĐŚĞƐŝŶŽŶůĞLJWĂƌŬ zĞƐ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϭϱŵŝŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŚĞĚŐĞƚƌŝŵŵŝŶŐŝŶĞǁŝƚƚWĂƌŬ zĞƐ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϭϱŵŝŶ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘sŽƚĞŽŶůĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝŽŶƌĞ͗ŽĨĨͲůĞĂƐŚĚŽŐƐĂƚ
^ƚĞǁĂƌƚWĂƌŬzĞƐ ůĚĞƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ:͘ŽĞ ϭϱŵŝŶ
ϯ͘ZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
ϰ͘EĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞĂƐ
ϰ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƐŝŐŶĂŐĞĨŽƌ'ŝůĞƐ^ƚĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƚŽ
DƵůŚŽůůĂŶĚtŝůĚĨůŽǁĞƌWƌĞƐĞƌǀĞzĞƐ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϭϬŵŝŶ
ϰ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵĐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶůĂŶĚǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ
ŐƌŽƵƉƌĞ͗ƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJůĂŶĚƐĨŽƌĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶ EŽ tŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉŚĂŝƌ ϮϬŵŝŶ
ϱ͘^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞƐ
ϱ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌEŽ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϭϱŵŝŶ
ϱ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵ^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞDĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶ
ƐƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞEŽ tŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉŚĂŝƌ ϭϱŵŝŶ
ϲ͘tĂƚĞƌǁĂLJƐ
ϲ͘ϭ͘hƉĚĂƚĞŽŶƌĞĚŐŝŶŐEŽ ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚŽĨWƵďtŬƐ ϭϱŵŝŶ
ϲ͘Ϯ͘ZĞǀŝĞǁŽĨĂƐĐĂĚŝůůĂĐƌĞĞŬǁĂůů
ƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚEŽ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ^ƚĂĨĨϭϬŵŝŶ
WĂƌŬƐͬZĞĐͬEĂƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶʹŐĞŶĚĂϮ
/ƚĞŵsŽƚŝŶŐ
/ƚĞŵ͍
WƌĞƐĞŶƚĞƌ;ƐͿdŝŵĞ
ůůŽƚƚĞĚ
ϭ͘ĂůůƚŽKƌĚĞƌ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϭ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ zĞƐ
ϭ͘Ϯ͘WƵďůŝĐŽŵŵĞŶƚEŽ
Ϯ͘WĂƌŬƐ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨďŽĂƚƌĞŶƚĂůĐŽŶĐĞƐƐŝŽŶĨŽƌ
^ƚĞǁĂƌƚWĂƌŬzĞƐ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϭϱŵŝŶ
ϯ͘ZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ϯ͘ϭ͘WůĂŶƐĨŽƌůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĂƚƐŬĂƚĞƉĂƌŬzĞƐ ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌŽĨ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚŽŶ/ƚŚĂĐĂŝŬĞZĞŶƚĂůEŽ /z^ƚĂĨĨϭϬŵŝŶ
ϯ͘ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚŽŶƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƐƚŽĂƐƐWĂƌŬZŝŶŬ EŽ ZĞĐ&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝƌĞĐƚŽƌ ϭϱŵŝŶ
ϰ͘EĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞĂƐ
ϰ͘ϭ͘sŽƚĞƚŽƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJůĂŶĚƐĨŽƌ
ĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶƚŽŽŵŵŽŶŽƵŶĐŝůEŽ tŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉŚĂŝƌ ϭϱŵŝŶ
ϰ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚŽŶŝŶǀĂƐŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŝŶŝƚLJ
ŶĂƚƵƌĂůĂƌĞĂƐEŽ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϮϬŵŝŶ
ϱ͘^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞƐ
ϱ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌEŽ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϭϱŵŝŶ
ϱ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵ^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞDĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶ
ƐƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞEŽ tŽƌŬŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉŚĂŝƌ ϭϱŵŝŶ
ϲ͘tĂƚĞƌǁĂLJƐ
;ŶŽŝƚĞŵƐƚŚŝƐŵŽŶƚŚͿ
WĂƌŬƐͬZĞĐͬEĂƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶʹŐĞŶĚĂϯ
/ƚĞŵsŽƚŝŶŐ
/ƚĞŵ͍
WƌĞƐĞŶƚĞƌ;ƐͿdŝŵĞ
ůůŽƚƚĞĚ
ϭ͘ĂůůƚŽKƌĚĞƌ ϭϬŵŝŶ
ϭ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ zĞƐ
ϭ͘Ϯ͘WƵďůŝĐŽŵŵĞŶƚEŽ
Ϯ͘WĂƌŬƐ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌĐŽďŽǀĞŶĂƚtĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶWŬ zĞƐ WƌŝǀĂƚĞŝƚŝnjĞŶϭϱŵŝŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘WĞƚŝƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĨĞŶĐĞĂƚĂŬĞƌWĂƌŬzĞƐ ŽŐKǁŶĞƌƐŽĨ/ƚŚĂĐĂ ϭϱŵŝŶ
ϯ͘ZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵ&ƌŝĞŶĚƐŽĨEĞǁŵĂŶEŽ &ƌŝĞŶĚƐŽĨEĞǁŵĂŶ ϮϬŵŝŶ
ϰ͘EĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞĂƐ
ϰ͘ϭ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵWtŽŶƌĂǁǁĂƚĞƌŵĂŝŶ
ƌĞƉĂŝƌƐEŽ ĞƉ͘^ƵƉĞƌ͘tΘ^ ϯϬŵŝŶ
ϱ͘^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞƐ
ϱ͘ϭ͘ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨ^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞDĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶ zĞƐ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϭϱŵŝŶ
ϱ͘Ϯ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌEŽ ŝƚLJ&ŽƌĞƐƚĞƌϭϱŵŝŶ
ϱ͘ϯ͘WƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽŶ ŵĞƌĂůĚƐŚŽƌĞƌ EŽ ^ƵďũĞĐƚDĂƚƚĞƌ džƉĞƌƚ ϮϱŵŝŶ
ϲ͘tĂƚĞƌǁĂLJƐ
ϲ͘ϭ͘^ǁŝŵŵŝŶŐĂƚ^ƚĞǁĂƌƚWĂƌŬʹĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶ EŽ ŚĂŝƌϮϱŵŝŶ