HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-CABLECOMM-1989-03-09 PUBLIC ACCESS ADVISORY BOARD
Minutes 3/9/89
Present: Annie Ball, Mary Jo Dudley, John Efroymson, Richard
Herskowitz, Louis Metzgar, Lauren Stefanelli, Julie Fox (non-
member)
Secretary: Richard Herskowitz
Summary: Most of the meeting was spent defining the issues that
the Access Board should address.
I Opening Questions
HOW SHOULD WE RUN OUR MEETINGS?
Hearings, like cable commission?
WHAT IS OUR RELATIONSHIP TO ACC, ACCESS STAFF AND CABLE
COMMISSION?
Advisory Board? Board of Directors?
or do we just advise cable commission?
Mary Jo suggested that our minutes be submitted to the cable
commission and therefore added to the public record.
(Richard will distribute access provisions at next meeting)
WHAT IS OUR CHARGE?
Some felt we should define it ourselves, produce a statement
of understanding, and submit that to the cable commission and ACC
for their agreement.
(For the next meeting, members will bring specific ideas for this
statement )
II Hiring a 3d Access Person
Board members agreed that we should participate in
-formulating the job description
-joining a search committee
-evaluation of staff
Richard said that he feels Access needs an outreach person
mobilizing interest and participation in the community, and
helping to publicize Access activities.
(Lauren said that she would bring the existing job descriptions
to the next meeting )
III Advice from NFLCP
The board will look into the possibility of getting advice on
setting up an Access Board from the National Federation of Local
Cable Programmers (NFLCP), or sending members to their annual
conference.
IV ACC Customer Service and Antipathy to Access
Board members discussed the palpable distrust and hostility
conveyed by receptionists and technicians and ACC to Access
people and others with Access inquiries. This seems to be an
after-effect of the franchise lobbying, during which ACC
employees felt their company was under excessive attack over
Pubic Access.
What kind of overtures can we make to remedy this poor
communication?
V Public Attitudes Towards Access
Resentment towards access for increasing cable fees.
Stereotypes about poorly-produced television.
Lack of information, even about programs on the air.
What can the Board do to improve this situation?
VI Local Origination beyond Access
The question was raised whether the Access Board would get
involved in the promotion and development of I-Net and Local
•
Origination channels.
VII Should Access Board Meetings be Cablecast?
Members agreed that the meetings would be boring and awkward to
televise, but that we should develop programs in which we and
others discuss current cable issues.
(Questions for Ralph Nash--are all meetings subject to Open
Meetings Law? Is there a specific charge to this board? )
VIII Meeting Times and Procedures
First Mondays
Next meeting: April 3, 7:00p. m. , Tompkins County Public Library.
Mary Jo Dudley was voted "Vice-Chair".
The secretarial responsibilities will rotate in alphabetical
order among board members.
IX The Absent Studio and Other Violations
The board unanimously endorsed the Cable Commission's pressing
forward with the violation charge against ACC, since there has
not been an access studio since December.
Board members also felt that ACC does not have an extension on
hiring the third Access person till June 1.
(Question for Ralph Nash : Does the franchise specify $75 per day
per violation, or $75 per day for all violations? )
Board members agreed that the charging of a second violation
could be avoided if ACC agreed that we will be partners with them
in developing job descriptions; that we can participate in some
manner in the interviewing process, and advise ACC on the hiring;
and develop with ACC and their staff a mechanism for
participating in the review/evaluation of staff. Since Public
Access is a public part of ACC, and we are their representatives,
this should be feasible (check with Nash on this point as well) .
■
CITY OF ITHACA CABLE COMMISSION
Minutes -- March 14, 1989
Present : William Demo, Richard Herskowitz, Janice Streb, Tom
Terrizzi . David Lytel as Common Council liaison.
Absent: Chris Heegard
1 . The meeting was called to order at 7 :35 pm.
2 . The Minutes of the February 14 meeting were approved.
3 . Chair 's Report:
Chairperson Janice Streb related a complaint received from
George Alexander, 104 Ridgedale Avenue, who reported experiencing
recurring interference on Channel 19 . Mike Withiam, ACC General
Manager, responded that this was an ongoing problem involving
police radio frequencies . He stated that ACC would check to see
if there is leakage in any of the lines in the area of Mr .
Alexander 's residence and report back to the Commission.
Chairperson Streb outlined the contents of a letter received
from Sean Killeen of Common Council regarding additional means of
qualifying senior citizens for the needs-based discount. These
included eligibility for HEAP assistance, Social Security SSI,
and Medicaid. Mike Withiam indicated that ACC would need only a
list or other documentation to qualify subscribers for the
discount . Chairperson Streb agreed to gather more information on
other qualifying means and report back to the Commission.
Chairperson Streb provided a brief update on the complaint
lodged by Alan Cohen of 310 Utica St . and then turned the floor
over to Mr . Cohen who addressed the Commission about the status
of his complaint . He has been seeking some form of relief from
the noise emanating from a pole-mounted ACC power supply box
located 27 ft. from his bedroom window. He summarized his
previous exchanges with Mr . Withiam and City Attorney Nash. Mr .
Cohen was concerned about whether the noise from the box violates
the City noise ordinance which sets a ceiling of 55 decibels.
Whether or not the noise ordinance would apply, he would like to
have the box relocated, possibly to a corner location.
In responding to Mr . Cohen's complaint, Mike Withiam cited
the difficulty of moving the box given the overall design and
power supply needs of the system rebuild in that area. While he
feels that re-situating the box on an adjacent pole would still
place it too close to other houses, he would look into the
feasibility of corner pole placement. Chairperson Streb
volunteered to contact the City Engineer for assistance, and Mr.
Withiam said he would report back on efforts to solve the problem
at the next Commission meeting and would send Chairperson Streb
the specifications of the box in the meantime .
1
4 . Public Comment: None during the Public Comment Session.
5. Report from American Community Cablevision:
Mike Withiam reported on the progress of the system rebuild.
He expects completion by mid to late May and said that the I-NET
was in the design phase . He related ACC's intent to provide
subscribers with' information on ownership of converters, remote
controllers, and internal wiring by mid-May.
Mr . Withiam reported a problem that had been discovered with
the billing system affecting senior citizen discounts . He will
be sending a letter to qualified subscribers explaining the
problem and providing retroactive crediting of discounts to
February, 1988 .
Regarding the Access Advisory Board, ACC's appointees are
Rick Lawrence and Carl Frederick as announced by Mr . Withiam.
6 . Access Advisory Board:
Commissioner Herskowitz reported on the first meeting of the
Access Advisory Board held on March 9 and also distributed
minutes of the meeting. In the only formal action taken at that
meeting, the Board voted unanimously to support the Commission
in moving forward with the finding of the violation of the
franchise agreement .
Another issue arising at the Access Advisory Board meeting
concerned the hiring of the third access staffer which was to
have been carried-out by March 1 . ACC' s position, as outlined by
Mr . Withiam, is that the hiring of the third access staffer is--
along with other Franchise Provisions said to be related to
system rebuild--deferred until June 1, as provided for in the
October 5, 1988 Common Council Resolution. Rather than pursue a
possible violation against ACC, the Access Advisory Board would
like to work out a process which would involve it in the filling
of the third access position. Mr . Withiam outlined ACC's
considerations in filling the position and expressed a
willingness in providing an advisory role for the Board or a
possible subcommittee . Commissioner Herskowitz responded that a
subcommittee of the Board would be formed for the purpose of
meeting with Mr . Withiam to discuss its interests and help to
review the applicants . Mr . Withiam agreed to bring ACC's list of
considerations to the April 3 Access Advisory Board meeting and
to participate in a subsequent meeting of the subcommittee.
John Efroymson asked about Access Advisory Board input on
the performance of ACC's access employees . Mr . Withiam responded
that personnel performance information is not for public
discussion and that the focus of such concerns should be on
how well a function is being carried-out rather than on how well
an individual is performing his/her job.
Mr . Efroymson questioned whether current access staff are
full-time as required by the franchise agreement . Mr .
2
Withiam reported that one is full-time, a second works 35
hours, and a third works 10 hours, netting a full-time
equivalency of two staffers . Mr . Efroymson expressed concern
about potential conflicts arising from this arrangement and
suggested that the Access Advisory Board monitor the staffing
situation.
Commissioner Terrizzi inquired about the 2% of Gross City
Revenue to be used for PEG access equipment replacements and
additions. Mr . Withiam responded that a decision on equipment
purchases would need to be delayed until September-October in
order to ascertain how much of the 2% is needed during the year
for maintenance . He stated that the Access Advisory Board input
would be sought in this process.
7 . Public Access Studio:
Mr. Withiam reported that the access studio problem had been
partially addressed by moving some equipment into a make-shift
control room. There was general agreement that the studio
condition was somewhat improved, but producers were still finding
it difficult to put programs together . Mr . Withiam cited the
non-specific nature of the Commission's resolution which found
ACC in violation of the franchise provisions on the access
studio. He emphasized that the new access studio would be
operational by the end of April . In light of the fact that ACC's
deadline for responding formally to the resolution was 10 days
away, the Commission delayed further consideration until
Commissioners Herskowitz and Terrizzi had the opportunity to
consult with City Attorney Ralph Nash. After reviewing the
Commission's options, they would report back at the next
Commission meeting.
8 . Converter Box and Remote Control Ownership:
In response to a question from Commissioner Demo, Mr .
Withiam reported that ACC would fully meet the franchise
provisions 16 . 15, 16 . 16, and 16 .17 related to converter box, home
wiring, and remote control ownership options by June 1, 1989 .
9 . Common Council Resolution:
Common Council member David Lytel asked that the Commission
consider adopting a resolution drafted by Ben Nichols that
proposes Congressional action on re-regulation of cable rates and
services by municipalities . Commission approved the resolution
by a vote of 3 For, 0 Opposed, 1 Abstention.
The next meeting was set for Tuesday, April 11.
The meeting was adjourned at 9 : 50 pm.
(Minutes recorded by Bill Demo)
3
By Alderperson Nichols: Seconded by Alderperson Killeen
WHEREAS, the Cable Deregulation Act of 1984 removed (with limited
exceptions) the rights of municipalities to regulate the rates
and services of cable companies, and
WHEREAS, cable companies are attempting to subvert even the
limited exceptions provided under the Act, and
WHEREAS, the services provided by the cable company is a public
convenience and necessity like other utilities, and
WHEREAS, once franchised most cable companies are effectively
monopolies, operating without effective competition, and
WHEREAS, municipalities have historically held the right to
regulate and oversee the rates and services of public utility
monopolies; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council of the City of Ithaca, New York
urges Congressional action to restore the right of a municipality
to regulate the rates and services of a cable system where such a
system exists without 25% penetration by another cable company or
alternative technologies, and be it further
RESOLVED, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to
Representative McHugh and Senators D'Amato and Moynihan.
Ayes (9) - Schlather, Killeen, Johnson, Booth, Lytel,
Cummings, Peterson, Hoffman, Nichols
Abstention (1) - Romanowski (conflict of interest)
Carried
CORRECTION in 5th WHEREAS:
Municipalities changed to "Public Service Commission"