Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-24-15 Planning and Development Board Meeting AgendaCITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING, ZONING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning & Economic Development JOANN CORNISH, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone: Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558         NOTICE OF MEETING    APPLICANT OVERHEAD PROJECTOR NOTE::   The City only has a VGA plug/cable  available to connect to our overhead  projector.  If you need to connect another  way, you will need to provide your own  ADAPTOR.  (Macs & many newer, lighter  laptops may not have a VGA port.)  If you have a disability & would like specific accommodation  to participate, please contact the City Clerk at 274‐6570 by  12:00 p.m., the day before the meeting.  The regular meeting of the PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD will be held at 6:00 p.m. on FEBRUARY 24TH, 2015 in COMMON  COUNCIL CHAMBERS, City Hall, 108 E. Green Street, Ithaca, NY.      AGENDA ITEM  Start Time 1.  Agenda Review  6:00 2.  Privilege of the Floor (3‐minute maximum per person)6:01 3.  Subdivision Review     A. Project: Minor Subdivision 6:20   Location: 424 Dryden Rd. (Tax Parcel #64.‐3‐4)     Applicant: Daniel Hirtler, for owners, William and Angie Chen     Actions: ˆ Declaration of Lead Agency  ˆ Public Hearing  ˆ Determination of Environmental  Significance  ˆ Consideration of Preliminary & Final Subdivision Approval     Project Description:  The applicant proposes to subdivide the 0.251‐acre (10,934 SF) parcel into two lots: Lot  1, measuring 0.156 acres (6,789 SF) with 64.5 feet of street frontage on Dryden Road and 105 feet of street  frontage on Oneida Place, and containing an existing multiple dwelling; and Lot 2, measuring 0.095 acres  (4,154 SF) with 71 feet of street frontage on Oak Avenue and 50 feet of street frontage on Oneida Place, on  which the applicant intends to build a new two‐family home.  The property is in the CR‐2 Zoning District  which has the following minimum area requirements: 4,000 SF lot size for 1‐ or 2‐family dwellings and 5,500  SF for other uses, 35% maximum lot coverage, 10‐ft. front yard and 5‐ft. side yard setbacks, and a rear yard  setback of 20 feet or 20% of lot depth.  The district also requires a minimum 35% green space.  The  proposed new dwelling is subject to Limited Site Plan Review.  The applicant received an Area Variance from  the Board of Zoning Appeals for an existing front yard deficiency.      4.  Site Plan Review    A. Project: Ithaca Marriot Hotel ― Signage 6:30   Location: 120 S. Aurora St.    Applicant: Urgo Hotels     Actions: ˆ Review & Approval of Signage        B. Project: 123‐Room Downtown Hotel (Hilton Canopy) 6:50   Location: 320‐324 E. M.L.K., Jr./E. State St.     Applicant: Scott Whitham for Neil Patel     Actions: ˆ Public Hearing  ˆ Potential Consideration of Preliminary & Final Site Plan Approval                                       Project Description:  The applicant is proposing to build a six‐story, 70’‐tall hotel with 123 guest rooms.  The  ground floor will include a breakfast room, a bar/lounge, a meeting room, and an approximately 2,000‐SF  retail/restaurant space.  The second floor includes meeting rooms, a fitness area, and an outdoor terrace.   Exterior finishes include stone and brick veneers, metal panel systems, and aluminum windows.  The site  layout features a drop‐off area with a glass and aluminum porte‐cochère, a 12‐space parking area, bike  racks, a walkway accessible from State Street, and a pedestrian entrance to the hotel and retail space on  Seneca Way.  The project is in the CDB‐100 Zoning District.  The project site consists of three tax parcels:   two currently owned by the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) and used as metered parking; and a  portion of another tax parcel in private ownership, also used as parking.  Parcel consolidation and possible  subdivision will be required.  This is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review  Ordinance, §176‐4 B. (1) (h.) (4), (k.), and (n.), and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (b)(9),  for which the Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency, made a Negative Determination of Environmental  Significance on January 27, 2015.  The project has received DESIGN REVIEW.       C. Project: Lake St. Bridge Rehabilitation Site Plan Review & Recreational River Permit  AND Lake Street Park ― Sketch Plan     7:00   Location: Lake Street at Fall Creek    Applicant: City of Ithaca      Actions: ˆ Declaration of Lead Agency  ˆ Determination of Environmental Significance   ˆ Consideration of Completeness of Recreational River Permit Application & Determination  of Public Hearing Date      Project Description:  The proposed project involves rehabilitation of the Lake Street Bridge.  The existing  bridge, built in 1966, is a steel beam and concrete deck superstructure supported on reinforced concrete  abutments.  The bridge’s concrete deck slab deterioration has progressed to the point of necessary repair  and the City of Ithaca has determined the need to replace the deck slab and repair the existing reinforced  concrete abutments. The bridge is also currently on the Federal Scour Critical Bridges list due to the  uncertainty of whether the substructures are either pile‐supported or founded on bedrock.  To remove the  bridge from the Federal list, this project proposes to install steel‐sheet piling and heavy‐stone fill scour  protection at the substructures as scour mitigation measures.  The proposed rehabilitation also involves  concrete deck slab replacement and substructure repairs.  The project requires site plan approval, a  Recreational River Permit, as well as permits from NYSDEC and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  The  project has received approval from the Board of Public Works and Common Council.     D. Project: Major Subdivision & 5 Units of Housing  7:30   Location: 128 W. Falls St.     Applicant: Ron Ronsvalle     Actions: ˆ Final Subdivision Approval  ˆ Preliminary & Final Site Plan Approval      Project Description:  The applicant proposes to subdivide the parcel and construct one single‐family home  and two duplexes.  The proposal is to subdivide the 16,352‐SF (0.375‐acre) parcel into three:  Parcel I will  measure 3,686.9 SF with 37.5’ of frontage and will contain a new single‐family home; Parcel 2, measuring  4,389 SF and with 46 feet of street frontage, will contain the existing single‐story single‐family home; and    Parcel 3, measuring 8,276 SF with 98 feet of street frontage, will contain two new duplexes.  The property is  in the R‐2b Zoning District, which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF for two‐family dwellings, minimum  width at‐street of 35 feet, and minimum front, side, and rear‐yard setbacks of 25 feet, 10 and 5 feet, and  "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." 2 25% or 50 feet, respectively.  The project includes eight off‐street parking spaces, two driveways,  sidewalks/walkways, and landscaping.  This is an Unlisted Action under both the City of Ithaca  Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, for which the  Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency, made a Negative Determination of Environmental Significance on  September 23, 2014. The project received the required Area Variances for an existing front yard deficiency,  as well as new front and rear yard deficiencies in January 2015 and Preliminary Subdivision Approval in  November 2014.        E. Project: Upson Hall Renovations 7:40   Location: 124 Hoy Rd. (Cornell University Campus)      Applicant: Mike Husar for Cornell University    Actions: ˆ Determination of Environmental Significance  ˆ Consideration of Preliminary & Final   Project Description:  The applicant proposes a total internal and façade renovation of the 160,000‐SF  building.  Phases 1 and 2 of the project include reconfigured entryways with expanded spaces above,  resulting in a net addition of 4,000 SF.  The project also includes civil and landscape improvements to the  grounds, including retaining walls and an accessible ramp.  A construction staging area is proposed for the  area between Upson and Hoy Road.  Site development and staging will require the removal of 35 trees, and  other landscaping.  Phase 3 of the project includes expanded outdoor areas, including an expansive plaza  fronting Hoy Road, and a terrace and series of stairs connecting the entrance on the southwest interior  corner to the ramp and walkways at the northwest entrance.   The project is in the U‐1 Zoning District.  This  is an Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance §176‐4 (h)[2] and the  State Environmental Quality Review Act §617.4 (11) and is subject to environmental review.      F. Project: Six‐Unit Apartment Building   8:00   Location: 707 E. Seneca St.    Applicant: Schickel Architecture for 707 E. Seneca St., LLC    Actions: ˆ  Consideration of Preliminary & Final Approval   Project Description:  The applicant proposes to build a 3‐story‐plus‐basement multiple dwelling with a  footprint of 2,400 SF on the vacant 7,449‐SF parcel.  The project will have parking and storage in the  basement, and two 3‐bedroom apartments on each of three floors for a total of six units.  Site development  includes 5 exterior parking spaces, a driveway, and landscaping.  Due to the topography of the site, the  proposed design requires retaining walls along the east, north, and portions of the west development area.  The northern retaining wall is up to ten feet in height and includes a stair.  The project is located in the R‐3a  Zoning District and the East Hill Historic District, and requires an Area Variance from the BZA.  It has received  a Certificate of Appropriateness, with conditions, from the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission.  This  is a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State  Environmental Quality Review Act, and is subject to environmental review.       G. 210 Hancock St. Mixed‐Use Development ― Sketch Plan 8:20    H. Simeon’s Rebuild ― Sketch Plan/Update 8:40   5. Zoning Appeals  9:00  • # 2974 Sign Variance, 134 E. State St. (Cayuga Optical)    • # 2957 Area Variance, 402 S. Cayuga St. (INHS)       "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." 3 6. Old/New Business  • Proposed Historic District Designation ― Titus‐Wood Historic District. Board Report & Support  Resolution  • Proposed Landmark Designation ― 421 N. Albany St. (a.k.a. the Dennis‐Newton House) Board  Report & Support Resolution  9:10    7. A.  Planning Board Chair (verbal) 9:30  B.  Director of Planning & Development (verbal) 9:40  C.  Board of Public Works Liaison (verbal) 9:50    8. Approval of Minutes (none) 10:00     9. Adjournment 10:10     ACCESSING MEETING MATERIALS ONLINE    Site Plan Review & Subdivision Applications (and Related Documents)  Site Plan Review application documents are accessible electronically via the “Document Center” on the City web site  (www.cityofithaca.org/DocumentCenter), under “Planning & Development” > “Site Plan Review Project Applications,” and in the relevant year/month  folder.  Subdivision application materials can be similarly located, but in the “Subdivision Applications” folder.    Zoning Appeal Materials are also accessible electronically via the “Document Center” on the City web site, under “Board of Zoning Appeals." "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." 4 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Minor Subdivision Declaration of Lead Agency City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #64.-3-4 424 Dryden Rd. City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for a Minor Subdivision of City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #64.-3-4, by Daniel Hirtler for owners, William and Angie Chen, and WHEREAS: the applicant proposes to subdivide the 0.251-acre (10,934 SF) parcel into two lots: Lot 1, measuring 0.156 acres (6,789 SF) with 64.5 feet of street frontage on Dryden Road and 105 feet of street frontage on Oneida Place, and containing an existing multiple dwelling; and Lot 2, measuring 0.095 acres (4,154 SF) with 71 feet of street frontage on Oak Avenue and 50 feet of street frontage on Oneida Place, on which the applicant intends to build a new two-family home. The property is in the CR-2 Zoning District which has the following minimum area requirements: 4,000 SF lot size for 1- or 2-family dwellings and 5,500 SF for other uses, 35% maximum lot coverage, 10-ft. front yard and 5-ft. side yard setbacks, and a rear yard setback of 20 feet or 20% of lot depth. The Zoning District also requires a minimum 35% green space. The proposed new dwelling is subject to Limited Site Plan Review. The applicant received an Area Variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals for an existing front yard deficiency, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, both of which require environmental review, and WHEREAS: this is considered a Minor Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1, Minor Subdivision – Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of a maximum of one additional buildable lot, and WHEREAS: State Law specifies that, for actions governed by local environmental review, the Lead Agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review for the action of Subdivision approval for City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #64.-3-4, by Daniel Hirtler for owners, William and Angie Chen. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Vacancies: 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Minor Subdivision CEQR ― Negative Declaration City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #64.-3-4 424 Dryden Rd. City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for a Minor Subdivision of City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #64.-3-4, by Daniel Hirtler for owners, William and Angie Chen, and WHEREAS: the applicant proposes to subdivide the 0.251-acre (10,934 SF) parcel into two lots: Lot 1, measuring 0.156 acres (6,789 SF) with 64.5 feet of street frontage on Dryden Road and 105 feet of street frontage on Oneida Place, and containing an existing multiple dwelling; and Lot 2, measuring 0.095 acres (4,154 SF) with 71 feet of street frontage on Oak Avenue and 50 feet of street frontage on Oneida Place, on which the applicant intends to build a new two-family home. The property is in the CR-2 Zoning District which has the following minimum area requirements: 4,000 SF lot size for 1- or 2-family dwellings and 5,500 SF for other uses, 35% maximum lot coverage, 10-ft. front yard and 5-ft. side yard setbacks, and a rear yard setback of 20 feet or 20% of lot depth. The Zoning District also requires a minimum 35% green space. The proposed new dwelling is subject to Limited Site Plan Review. The applicant received an Area Variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals for an existing front yard deficiency, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, both of which require environmental review, and WHEREAS: this is considered a Minor Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1, Minor Subdivision – Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of a maximum of one additional buildable lot, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, being the local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on February 24, 2015 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council and the Tompkins County Planning Department have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and all comments received to date on the aforementioned have been considered, and WHEREAS: this Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on February 24, 2015 review and accept as adequate: a Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Part 2, prepared by Planning staff; a plat entitled “Minor Subdivision Map, No. 424 Dryden Road, City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York,” dated 1/14/15 and prepared by T.G.Miller, P.C.; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board recognizes that information received and reviewed for this subdivision indicates the resultant parcels have received the required area variances for relief from the City of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance for properties located in the CR-2 Zoning District, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board determines the proposed subdivision will result in no significant impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law be filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Vacancies: 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Minor Subdivision Preliminary & Final Approval City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #64.-3-4 424 Dryden Rd. City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for a Minor Subdivision of City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #64.-3-4, by Daniel Hirtler for owners, William and Angie Chen, and WHEREAS: the applicant proposes to subdivide the 0.251-acre (10,934 SF) parcel into two lots: Lot 1, measuring 0.156 acres (6,789 SF) with 64.5 feet of street frontage on Dryden Road and 105 feet of street frontage on Oneida Place, and containing an existing multiple dwelling; and Lot 2, measuring 0.095 acres (4,154 SF) with 71 feet of street frontage on Oak Avenue and 50 feet of street frontage on Oneida Place, on which the applicant intends to build a new two-family home. The property is in the CR-2 Zoning District which has the following minimum area requirements: 4,000 SF lot size for 1- or 2-family dwellings and 5,500 SF for other uses, 35% maximum lot coverage, 10-ft. front yard and 5-ft. side yard setbacks, and a rear yard setback of 20 feet or 20% of lot depth. The district also requires a minimum 35% green space. The proposed new dwelling is subject to Limited Site Plan Review. The applicant received an Area Variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals for an existing front yard deficiency, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, both of which require environmental review, and WHEREAS: this is considered a Minor Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1, Minor Subdivision – Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of a maximum of one additional buildable lot, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, being the local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on February 24, 2015 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted, and adjacent property owners notified in accordance with Chapters 290-9 C. (1), (2), & (3) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on February 24, 2015, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council and the Tompkins County Planning Department have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and all comments received to date on the aforementioned have been considered, and WHEREAS: this Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on February 24, 2015 review and accept as adequate: a Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Part 2, prepared by Planning staff; a plat entitled “Minor Subdivision Map, No. 424 Dryden Road, City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York,” dated 1/14/15 and prepared by T.G.Miller, P.C.; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board recognizes that information received and reviewed for this subdivision indicates the resultant parcels have received the required area variances for relief from the City of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance for properties located in the CR-2 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board did on February 24, 2014 make a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance for the proposed subdivision, and now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby grant Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval to the proposed minor subdivision of City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #64.-3-4, by Daniel Hirtler for owners, William and Angie Chen subject to the submission of three (3) paper copies of the final approved plat, all having a raised seal and signature of a registered licensed surveyor. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Vacancies: 1 R11-JP/1.27.15/rev. signs A & C MARRIOTT B. TEEL RFF 01.08.15 0367946Ar13 7 120 S. AURORA ST. ITHACA, N.Y. R12-JP/2.12.15/rev. signs A & C R13-KMc-2/17/15-larger sign A 1 11 1 ' - 6 " ± A NORTHEAST ELEVATION B 1/16"=1'-0" 27’-0” 3’-0” 1’-0” R11-JP/1.27.15/rev. signs A & C MARRIOTT B. TEEL RFF 01.08.15 0367946Ar13 7 120 S. AURORA ST. ITHACA, N.Y. R12-JP/2.12.15/rev. signs A & C R13-KMc-2/17/15-larger sign A 2 CHANNEL LETTERS/LOGO SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" (1) SET REQUIRED - MANUFACTURE & INSTALLA (LED ILLUMINATION) U.L. LABELS REQUIRED INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES LOGO SECTION NOT TO SCALE 5'' REMOTE FABRICATED ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS - .040 RETURNS & .063 BACKS - OUTSIDE RETURNS PAINTED MATTHEWS MP 08937 RED SATIN FINISH - PAINT LETTER INTERIORS WITH STAR-BRITE LIGHT-ENHANCING WHITE PAINT 1'' RED JEWELITE RETAINERS (MATCH VT 11331 RED) .177 WHITE CYRO FACES WITH FIRST SURFACE VT-11331 RED VINYL OVERLAY LETTERS MOUNTED FLUSH TO WALL w/ ANCHORS & NON-CORROSIVE HARDWARE WEEP HOLES IN ALL LOW POINTS POWER CABLE THRU 1/2" DIA. FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT TO REMOTE POWER SUPPLY IN TRANSFORMER BOX BEHIND FASCIA AS REQUIRED. LETTERS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED W/ GELCORE TETRA RED L.E.D. MODULES U.L. LABELS REQUIRED INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES MARRIOTT LETTER SECTION FABRICATED ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS - .040 RETURNS & .063 BACKS - OUTSIDE RETURNS PAINTED MATTHEWS BLACK SATIN FINISH PAINT LETTER INTERIORS WITH STAR-BRITE LIGHT-ENHANCING WHITE PAINT 1'' BLACKRED JEWELITE RETAINERS (MATCH VT 11331 RED) LETTERS MOUNTED FLUSH TO WALL w/ ANCHORS & NON-CORROSIVE HARDWARE WEEP HOLES IN ALL LOW POINTS 5'' POWER CABLE THRU 1/2" DIA. FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT TO REMOTE POWER SUPPLY IN TRANSFORMER BOX BEHIND FASCIA AS REQUIRED. LETTERS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED W/ GELCORE TETRA WHITE L.E.D. MODULES REMOTE .177 CLEAR CYRO FACES WITH 1ST SURFACE BLACK DUAL COLOR VINYL & 2ND SURFACE WHITE DIFFUSER VINYL (LED ILLUMINATION) NOT TO SCALE 4’ - 3 ” 1 2’ - 2 /4 ” 27’-0” R11-JP/1.27.15/rev. signs A & C MARRIOTT B. TEEL RFF 01.08.15 0367946Ar13 7 120 S. AURORA ST. ITHACA, N.Y. R12-JP/2.12.15/rev. signs A & C R13-KMc-2/17/15-larger sign A 4 E F Entrance Entrance WEST ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" 11 1 ' - 6 " ± C 125’-1 /4 ” 3 2’ - 1 1 /4 ” R11-JP/1.27.15/rev. signs A & C MARRIOTT B. TEEL RFF 01.08.15 0367946Ar13 7 120 S. AURORA ST. ITHACA, N.Y. R12-JP/2.12.15/rev. signs A & C R13-KMc-2/17/15-larger sign A 5 CHANNEL LETTERS/LOGO SCALE: 3/8”=1'-0" (1) SET REQUIRED - MANUFACTURE & INSTALLC (LED ILLUMINATION) U.L. LABELS REQUIRED INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES LOGO SECTION NOT TO SCALE 5'' REMOTE FABRICATED ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS - .040 RETURNS & .063 BACKS - OUTSIDE RETURNS PAINTED MATTHEWS MP 08937 RED SATIN FINISH - PAINT LETTER INTERIORS WITH STAR-BRITE LIGHT-ENHANCING WHITE PAINT 1'' RED JEWELITE RETAINERS (MATCH VT 11331 RED) .177 WHITE CYRO FACES WITH FIRST SURFACE VT-11331 RED VINYL OVERLAY LETTERS MOUNTED FLUSH TO WALL w/ ANCHORS & NON-CORROSIVE HARDWARE WEEP HOLES IN ALL LOW POINTS POWER CABLE THRU 1/2" DIA. FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT TO REMOTE POWER SUPPLY IN TRANSFORMER BOX BEHIND FASCIA AS REQUIRED. LETTERS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED W/ GELCORE TETRA RED L.E.D. MODULES U.L. LABELS REQUIRED INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES MARRIOTT LETTER SECTION FABRICATED ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS - .040 RETURNS & .063 BACKS - OUTSIDE RETURNS PAINTED MATTHEWS BLACK SATIN FINISH PAINT LETTER INTERIORS WITH STAR-BRITE LIGHT-ENHANCING WHITE PAINT 1'' BLACKRED JEWELITE RETAINERS (MATCH VT 11331 RED) LETTERS MOUNTED FLUSH TO WALL w/ ANCHORS & NON-CORROSIVE HARDWARE WEEP HOLES IN ALL LOW POINTS 5'' POWER CABLE THRU 1/2" DIA. FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT TO REMOTE POWER SUPPLY IN TRANSFORMER BOX BEHIND FASCIA AS REQUIRED. LETTERS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED W/ GELCORE TETRA WHITE L.E.D. MODULES REMOTE .177 CLEAR CYRO FACES WITH 1ST SURFACE BLACK DUAL COLOR VINYL & 2ND SURFACE WHITE DIFFUSER VINYL (LED ILLUMINATION) NOT TO SCALE 3 2’ - 1 1 /4 ” 1 2’ - 2 /4 ” 125’-1 /4 ” SIGN GUIDELINES April 2014 contents section 2 channel letters section 3 directional signs section 4 monument signs section 5 pylon signs section 6 architectural finishes section 1 introduction & overview This Sign Guidelines manual provides the general criteria for selection, sizing and placement of the Exterior Signs on Marriott hotel prototypical buildings. Sign selection, sizing and placement of custom buildings, conversions and retrofitting existing buildings should be coordinated through one of Marriott’s approved exterior sign vendors or Marriott’s A&C Design and Project Management Team. Alternate colors and materials should never be substituted on the signage products shown in these guidelines. Any requests for deviations must be submitted to the A&C Design and Project Management Team. The manual is a guideline for hotel owners and/or their architects and contractors and contains enough information for rendering building elevations for the permitting process. The Sign Guidelines manual is not intended for actual fabrication of signs. Contact one of Marriott’s approved exterior sign vendors or the A&C Design and Project Management Team for procurement and installation information. Five major types of property signs are available for Marriott properties: 1 Channel Letters 2 Directional Signs 3 Monument Signs 4 Pylon Signs 5 Architectural Finishes The selection of colors, materials and formats for Marriott property signage reflect the stature associated with Marriott. The color, Marriott red, is utilized on the signs to reflect the significance of the brand. 1 introduction & overview Channel letter size relative to the space available - Design intent is to increase legibility so that they will be read from a greater distance. New build designs will be modified as required to follow for signs to fit. Raceways remain an undesirable method for wiring. Raceways should only be used in cases where absolutely necessary and approval must be obtained from the A&C Design and Project Management Team. If used, the raceways should be painted to match the building background color. Appropriate wall space should be allowed around the channel letters (see guidelines). The stacked “M” and “MARRIOTT” composition is preferred (see illustrations). The horizontal orientation will be allowed based on facade constraints and approval from the A&C Design and Project Management Team. Channel letter color - Normally the sign letters are Marriott red (logo) and black (Marriott copy) by day, Marriott red (logo) and white (Marriott copy) at night. Alternate colors and materials should never be substituted on the illuminated channel letters shown in these guidelines. 2 channel letters 2-1 channel letters A B C D E F MAR CL 6 6'-0"7'-8"1'-2 3/8"11 '-0 7/8"7'-7 13/1 6"12'-11 5/1 6" MAR CL 8 8'-0"1 0'-2 1 1/16"1 '-7 3/16"14'-9 3/16"10'-2 3/8"1 7'-3 1 /8" MAR CL 10 1 0'-0"12'-9 5/16"2'-0"18'-5 1/2"12'-9"21'-6 7/8" MAR CL 12 1 2'-0"15'-4 "2'-4 13/1 6"22'-1 1 3/1 6"15'-3 5/8"25'-1 0 11 /1 6" MODEL OVERALL LEN GTH O VER ALL HEIG HT COPY LENGTH LETT ER "M" HEIGHT "M" LOGO LENGTH "M" LOG O HEIGHT A C B D F E front view | not to scale 3/16" 2447 WHITE ACRYLIC FACE WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE 3/16" 2447 WHITE ACRYLIC FACE WITH 3M 3635-222 BLACK DUAL-COLOR FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE (APPEARS BLACK DURING THE DAY, ILLUMINATES WHITE AT NIGHT) nighttime view | not to scale dark building background view | not to scale logo profile | not to scale letter profile | not to scale construction specifications - .050" aluminum channel letter construction with .063" aluminum backs. 1" black trim cap used on letters, 1" trim cap painted Matthews MP08937 red on logos smaller than 7'-0" in height, 3/4" routed aluminum retainer used on logos 7'-0" in height and larger. Faces constructed of 3/16" 2447 white acrylic with 1st surface film decoration. 3/16" 7328 white faces used on “Marriott” letters on dark colored buildings. “M” logo illuminated with red LED’s and “Marriott” copy illuminated with white LED’s. color specifications - Letter exterior, trim cap & retainer: Matthews MP08937 satin red Black Face: 3/16" 2447 white acrylic (colored face option) 3/16" 7328 white acrylic (light face option) Film Decoration: 3M 3630-2382 translucent red film (1st surface) 3M 3635-222 black dual-color film (1st surface) Note: The “M” logo appears white during the day and illuminates red at night. 3 directional signs Directional signs provide clear direction to guide the guest about the property. They are placed near entrances and exits to the property as well as other key positions on the property providing information on where amenities are located. Directional signs feature a white brand panel containing the “M” logo and Marriott word mark, and a gray information panel with wayfinding information. There is a red center core panel on which the brand panel and information panel appear to float. The narrow reveal at the bottom of the information panel also reveals the red core panel. Requirements and Recommendations - Double-sided signs as required. Marriott brand panel and information panel are opaque with only the “M” logo, Marriott word mark and wayfinding information illuminated. The “M” logo red during the day and illuminates red at night with white halo-illumination. The wayfinding information is red during the day and illuminates red at night. TheMarriott word mark is black by day and halo-illuminates white at night. Benefits - Offers both maximum impact both day and night through the use of distinctive colors. Presents clear and legible “M” logo and Marriott word mark. Signs coordinate with other communication elements guests encounter. 3-1 entrance sign 2'-6" 2'-4" front view | scale: 3/4" = 1'-0"end view | scale: 3/4" = 1'-0" 1' - 7 1 / 8 " 8 7 / 8 " 6 3 / 4 " 1 1 / 4 " 2' - 4 " 3' - 0 " 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED WHITE 1/2" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “M” LOGO WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE 1/2" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “MARRIOTT” COPY WITH 3M 7725-22 BLACK OPAQUE FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .080" ALUMINUM POLE COVER PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .080" ALUMINUM REVEAL PAINTED MATTHEWS MP08937 RED .118" WHITE SOLAR GRADE POLYCARBONATE BACKER PANEL WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE nighttime view | scale: 3/4" = 1'-0" “M” LOGO TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT WITH WHITE HALO-ILLUMINATION “MARRIOTT” COPY TO HALO-ILLUMINATE WHITE AT NIGHT “ENTRANCE” COPY AND ARROW TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT face options | scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" right arrow left arrow top view | scale: 3/4" = 1'-0" 9 1/4" construction specifications - Cabinets constructed of aluminum frame construction with 1/8" routed aluminum faces. “M” logo and “Marriott” copy to be 1/2" push-thru copy and entrance copy and arrows to be routed copy with backer panel. Reveal to be con- structed of .080" aluminum. Pole cover to be aluminum frame construction with aluminum skin. All directional signs must include a pole cover. Internally illuminated with CWHO fluorescent lamps. color specifications - Frame, reveal & pole cover: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Matthews MP08937 satin red Face: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Film Decoration: 3M 3630-2382 translucent red film (1st surface) 3M 7725-22 black opaque film (1st surface) 3M 3635-30 white diffuser film (2nd surface) construction specifications - Cabinets constructed of aluminum frame construction with 1/8" routed aluminum faces. “M” logo and “Marriott” copy to be 1/2" push-thru copy and directional copy and arrows to be routed copy with backer panel. Reveal to be con- structed of .080" aluminum. Pole cover to be aluminum frame construction with aluminum skin. All directional signs must include a pole cover. Internally illuminated with CWHO fluorescent lamps. color specifications - Frame, reveal & pole cover: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Matthews MP08937 satin red Face: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Film Decoration: 3M 3630-2382 translucent red film (1st surface) 3M 7725-22 black opaque film (1st surface) 3M 3635-30 white diffuser film (2nd surface) 2'-6" 2'-4" front view | scale: 3/4" = 1'-0"end view | scale: 3/4" = 1'-0" 1' - 7 1 / 8 " 6 3 / 4 " 1 1 / 4 " 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED WHITE 1/2" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “M” LOGO WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE 1/2" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “MARRIOTT” COPY WITH 3M 7725-22 BLACK OPAQUE FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .080" ALUMINUM POLE COVER PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .080" ALUMINUM REVEAL PAINTED MATTHEWS MP08937 RED .118" WHITE SOLAR GRADE POLYCARBONATE BACKER PANEL WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE nighttime view | scale: 3/4" = 1'-0" “MARRIOTT” COPY TO HALO-ILLUMINATE WHITE AT NIGHT DIRECTIONAL COPY AND ARROWS TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT top view | scale: 3/4" = 1'-0" 8 1/4" 2' - 8 7 / 8 " 4' - 4 " 5' - 0 " “M” LOGO TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT WITH WHITE HALO-ILLUMINATION 3-2 directional sign Monument signs are the primary Marriott hotel sign. They are placed at eye-level near the entrance to the building. Their location near building entrances mean they are viewed every time a guest enters or leaves the building. Monument signs feature a white brand panel containing the “M” logo and Marriott word mark, and a gray information panel with the hotel “identifier.” There is a red center core panel on which the brand panels appear to float. The narrow reveal at the bottom of the information panel also reveals the red core panel. Requirements and Recommendations - Double-sided signs as required. Marriott brand panel and information panel are opaque with only the “M” logo, Marriott word mark and identifier illuminated. The “M” logo is red during the day and illuminates red at night with white halo-illumination. The location identifier are red during the day and illuminated red at night. The “Marriott” word mark is black during the day and halo-illuminated white at night. Benefits - Offers maximum impact both day and night through the use of distinctive colors. Presents clear and legible logo and word mark. Signs coordinate with other communication elements the guests encounter. 4 monument signs 8' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 2' - 0 " 4' - 3 1 / 4 " 6' - 3 1 / 4 " 2 3 / 4 " 6'-5 3/4" 6'-8 1/2" 1'-4" front view | scale: 3/8" = 1'-0"end view | scale: 3/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED WHITE 3/4" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “M” LOGO WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE 3/4" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “MARRIOTT” COPY WITH 3M 7725-22 BLACK OPAQUE FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE .118" WHITE SOLAR GRADE POLYCARBONATE BACKER PANEL WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .080" ALUMINUM POLE COVER PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .080" ALUMINUM REVEAL PAINTED MATTHEWS MP08937 RED nighttime view | scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" “M” LOGO TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT WITH WHITE HALO-ILLUMINATION “MARRIOTT” COPY TO HALO-ILLUMINATE WHITE AT NIGHT OPTIONAL LOCATION COPY TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT construction specifications - Cabinets constructed of aluminum frame construction with 1/8" routed aluminum faces. “M” logo and “Marriott” copy to be 3/4" push-thru copy and optional location copy to be routed copy with backer panel. Reveal to be constructed of .080" aluminum. Pole cover to be aluminum frame construction with aluminum skin. All monument signs must include a pole cover. Internally illuminated with CWHO fluorescent lamps. color specifications - Frame, reveal & pole cover: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Matthews MP08937 satin red Face: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Film Decoration: 3M 3630-2382 translucent red film (1st surface) 3M 7725-22 black opaque film (1st surface) 3M 3635-30 white diffuser film (2nd surface) 4-1 monument signs front view | scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"end view | scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 6'-5 3/4" 6'-8 1/2" 4' - 3 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 2 3 / 4 " 8' - 3 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 1'-4" 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED WHITE 3/4" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “M” LOGO WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE 3/4" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “MARRIOTT” COPY WITH 3M 7725-22 BLACK OPAQUE FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE .118" WHITE SOLAR GRADE POLYCARBONATE BACKER PANEL WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .080" ALUMINUM REVEAL PAINTED MATTHEWS MP08937 RED .080" ALUMINUM POLE COVER PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .118" WHITE SOLAR GRADE POLYCARBONATE BACKER PANEL WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE 1" nighttime view | scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" “M” LOGO TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT WITH WHITE HALO-ILLUMINATION “MARRIOTT” COPY TO HALO-ILLUMINATE WHITE AT NIGHT OPTIONAL LOCATION COPY TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT OPTIONAL AMENITIES COPY TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT 1" DIVIDING LINE TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT construction specifications - Cabinets constructed of aluminum frame construction with 1/8" routed aluminum faces. “M” logo and “Marriott” copy to be 3/4" push-thru copy and optional location copy and amenities copy to be routed copy with backer panel. Reveal to be constructed of .080" aluminum. Pole cover to be aluminum frame construction with aluminum skin. All monument signs must include a pole cover. Internally illuminated with CWHO fluorescent lamps. color specifications - Frame, reveal & pole cover: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Matthews MP08937 satin red Face: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Film Decoration: 3M 3630-2382 translucent red film (1st surface) 3M 7725-22 black opaque film (1st surface) 3M 3635-30 white diffuser film (2nd surface) 4-2 monument signs Pylon signs are placed near roadways and are utilized to provide long-range visibility. Pylon signs have the same appearance as the monument sign, with a small gray field which anchors the brand panel. The pylon signs feature a red set-back reveal on the sides. Pylon signs reinforce the brand by providing long-range visibility. The identifier is never used on the pylon sign. Site conditions and local ordinances determine the sign size. Requirements and Recommendations - Double-sided sign. Marriott brand panel is opaque with only the “M” logo and Marriott word mark illuminated. The “M” logo is red during the day and illuminates red at night (mid-rise incorporates white halo- illumination). The Marriott word mark is black during the day and halo-illuminates white at night (mid- rise) or illuminated white at night (hi-rise). Benefits - Offers maximum impact both day and night through the use of distinctive colors. Provides long-range visibility. Presents a clear and legible logo. Signs coordinate with other communication elements guests encounter. 5 pylon signs front view | scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"end view | scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3'-0" 1'-10 1/4" 1'-6" 1/8" ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED WHITE 3/4" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “M” LOGO WITH 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE 3/4" CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU “MARRIOTT” COPY WITH 3M 7725-22 BLACK OPAQUE FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE AND 3M 3635-70 WHITE DIFFUSER FILM APPLIED TO 2ND SURFACE .080" ALUMINUM ESCUTCHEON PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY .080" ALUMINUM POLE COVER PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY nighttime view | scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" “M” LOGO TO ILLUMINATE RED AT NIGHT WITH WHITE HALO-ILLUMINATION “MARRIOTT” COPY TO HALO-ILLUMINATE WHITE AT NIGHT 11'-7 1/8" 7' - 4 9 / 1 6 " 1' - 5 3 / 4 " 8' - 1 0 5 / 1 6 " 25 ' - 0 " T Y P I C A L 16 ' - 1 1 1 / 1 6 " T Y P I C A L front view end view construction specifications - Cabinets constructed of aluminum frame construction with 1/8" routed aluminum faces. “M” logo and “Marriott” copy to be 3/4" push-thru copy and optional location copy and amenities copy to be routed copy with backer panel. Reveal to be constructed of .080" aluminum. Pole cover to be aluminum frame construction with aluminum skin. All monument signs must include a pole cover. Internally illuminated with CWHO fluorescent lamps. color specifications - Frame,escutcheon & pole cover: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Matthews MP08937 satin red Face: Matthews MP30933 satin white Film Decoration: 3M 3630-2382 translucent red film (1st surface) 3M 7725-22 black opaque film (1st surface) 3M 3635-30 white diffuser film (2nd surface)front detail view | scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"end detail view | scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" top detail view | scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" Note: All mid-rise pylon signs are required to include a pole cover at least 3'-0" wide. 5-1 mid-rise pylon front view | scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"end view | scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" 19'-0" 12 ' - 1 1 / 8 " 2' - 5 1 / 8 " 14 ' - 6 1 / 4 " nighttime view | scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" VA R I E S 3'-6" 3M PANAGRAPHICS III FLEXIBLE FACE WITH 3M 3635-20B WHITE BLOCKOUT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE 3M 3630-2382 RED TRANSLUCENT FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE 3M 3635-222 BLACK DUAL-COLOR FILM APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE .080" ALUMINUM FACE PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY POLE STRUCTURE PAINTED MATTHEWS MP23486 GRAY WHITE FACE BACKGROUND APPEARS WHITE DURING THE DAY AND DOES NOT ILLUMINATE AT NIGHT “M” LOGO ILLUMINATES APPEARS RED DURING THE DAY AND ILLUMINATES RED AT NIGHT “MARRIOTT” COPY APPEARS BLACK DURING THE DAY AND ILLUMINATES WHITE AT NIGHT Note: all pylon signs up to 35'-0" overall heigh are required to have a pole cover. construction specifications - Cabinets constructed of steel and aluminum frame construction with flexible and aluminum faces. Faces to bleed to edge of cabinet. Flexible faces to be 3M film decoration on 1st surface. Escutcheon faces to be constructed of .080" aluminum. Pole cover to be aluminum frame construction with aluminum skin. All monument signs must include a pole cover. Internally illuminated with CWHO fluorescent lamps or H.I.D. lamps. color specifications - Frame,escutcheon & pole/pole cover: Matthews MP30933 satin white Matthews MP23468 gray (gloss finish) Matthews MP08937 satin red Escutcheon Face: Matthews MP23486 gray (gloss finish) Film Decoration: 3M 3630-2382 translucent red film (1st surface) 3M 3635-222 black dual-color film (1st surface) 3M 3635-20B white blockout film (1st surface) 5-2 hi-rise pylon For hotels located in buildings where signs are specifically designed as an extension of the architecture of the hotel, or for interior sign applications, special consideration may be required. For example, hotels in historic districts or hotels with gated entrance monoliths. Here, the “M” logo and Marriott word mark can be applied in a range of architectural material finishes compatible with various interior and exterior architectural settings. Although materials may vary, the presentation of the “M” logo and Marriott word mark will be consistently applied in these material finishes when presented at different hotels. Requirements and Recommendations - Use only the color variations shown here when applying the “M” logo and Marriott word mark in archi- tectural material finishes. Never use alternate colors and materials on the freestanding monument, pylon, directional or entrance signs shown in these guidelines. Benefits - Signs are well integrated into hotel architecture. Marriott brand appears consistent across a range of material finishes. Signs coordinate with other communication elements guests encounter. 6 architectural finishes dark background light background chrome or steel background brass background glass background “M” logo and “Marriott” word mark: raised in white white film etched in glass • • • “M” logo and “Marriott” word mark: raised brass in contrasting satin finish deeply etched in brass• • “M” logo and “Marriott” word mark: raised in white white film etched and filled white • • • “M” logo and “Marriott” word mark: raised in white white film raised in chrome • • • “M” logo and “Marriott” word mark: raised in red and black brand colors red and black film (brand colors) etched and filled red and black brand colors • • • 6-1 architectural finishes PROPOSED RESOLUTION City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board Preliminary & Final Approval Downtown Hilton Canopy Hotel 320-324 M.L.K., Jr./E. State St. February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Approval for a hotel to be located at 320-324 M.L.K., Jr./E. State Street by Scott Whitham for Neil Patel, developer, and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to build a seven-story, 80’-tall hotel with 123 guest rooms. The ground floor will include a café and bar, a retreat area, public restrooms, a garden patio, and an approximately 2,000-SF retail / restaurant space. Exterior finishes include stone and brick veneers, metal panel systems, and aluminum windows. The site layout features a drop-off area with a glass and aluminum porte-cochère, an 11-space parking area, bike racks and walkway accessible from State Street, and a pedestrian entrance to the hotel and retail space on Seneca Way. The project site consists of three tax parcels: two currently owned by the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) and used as metered parking; and a portion of another tax parcel in private ownership, also used as parking. Parcel consolidation and possible Subdivision are required. The project has received Design Review, and WHEREAS: this is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176-4 B. (1)(h.)(4), (k.), and (n.), and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (b)(9) and (11), and is subject to environmental review, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board did on October 28, 2014 declare itself Lead Agency for the action of Site Plan Review for this project, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 (B) (4) and 176-12 (A) (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: a Public Hearing for the proposed action was held on February 24, 2015, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council (CAC) and other interested agencies have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: in a memo from Ed Marx, Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning to Lisa Nicholas, Senior Planner, dated October 28, 2014, he recommended that: “The City should require a full analysis of the impacts of this project including an assessment of the traffic and parking impacts. Of particular interest are turning movements onto East State / MLK Street upon exiting the site and the capacity of downtown parking facilities to accommodate this and other projects under development downtown,” and WHEREAS: in response to County comments, as well as concerns expressed by the Lead Agency and others, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by SRF Associates and dated January 2015, and WHEREAS: the TIS recommends 3 mitigations to address traffic impacts created by the new project, and WHEREAS: the Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, has on January 27, 2015 reviewed and accepted as adequate: a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3, prepared by Planning Staff; plans entitled “Existing Survey,” “Demolition Plan,” “Utility Plan,” “Grading Plan,” and “Site Layout Plan,” prepared by T.G. Miller, P.C. and Whitham Planning and Design, LLC; “Landscape Plan” and “Landscape – Trellis / Bench Detail” and “Terrace – Trellis / Bench Detail” prepared by Whitham Planning and Design, LLC; “Ground + Second Floor Plan,” “Typical + Seventh Floor Plan,” “View from East State Street,” “Hotel Arrival Experience,” “View from Seneca Way” (two sheets), “Exterior Elevations,” and “Context Views” (three sheets), prepared by Group One and all dated 1/13/15; and “Overall Site Plan,” prepared by Whitham Planning and Design, LLC and dated 1/22/15; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board did on January 27, 2015 determine the proposed project will result in no significant impact on the environment and did make a Negative Determination Of Environmental Significance, and WHEREAS: the Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval granted for the project on January 27, 2015 is null because no public hearing was held, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the Planning and Development Board does hereby grant Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval to the project subject to the following conditions: i. Written approval from the City of Ithaca Fire Chief that the project meets all fire access needs, and ii. Submission for approval by the Planning Board of project details including, but not limited to, signage, paving materials, exterior furnishings, and lighting (including any exterior ornamental lighting plan), and iii. Submission to the Planning Board of visual documentation that the penthouse enclosure walls are at the lowest height that will still provide effective screening for the mechanicals within, and iv. Submission to the Planning Board of a Landscape Plan keyed to a species list, and v. Submission of a color copy of the materials board, and vi. Applicant to explore using pavers in place of asphalt on some or all of the parking and car-access area off E. State Street, to better connect the design of the hotel to that street, and vii. Applicant to explore: (1) potential incorporation of decorative terra cotta salvaged during the demolition of the Strand Theater (which once stood on this site) into the low wall facing E. State Street or elsewhere on the site, and (2) potential re-creation, at some appropriate location on the building, of the prominent Strand stage-house mural (by artist David Finn) which formerly faced E. Seneca Street, and viii. Noise-producing construction shall take place only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and ix. Bike racks shall be installed prior to granting of Certificate of Occupancy, and 2 The following provisions discussed in the adopted FEAF, Part 3: i. If drilled and / or driven steel piles are used in the foundation, then: (1) noise-producing installation work thereon shall be limited to the hours between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, and (2) ongoing seismic testing shall be conducted to make certain the pile driving or drilling operations do not in any way have a negative impact on any adjacent or nearby structure, and ii. Applicant shall, as appropriate, employ the dust-control measures listed in the “Impact on Air” section of the FEAF, Part 3 during the project’s construction, and iii. All restaurant and hotel kitchen exhaust will be vented through the roof, and hotel laundry venting will be at ground-floor level, behind the existing concrete wall on the adjacent property, in an area not accessible to hotel guests or other pedestrians; any future exterior venting, not located in a screened location on the roof, that may cause noise, odor or street-level air flow shall be reviewed by Planning Division staff or the Planning Board, and iv. Exterior signage shall be of equal scale and quantity as the signage illustrated on the project renderings and elevations dated January 13, 2015, and v. Applicant shall actively pursue implementation of the mitigations (including proposed valet routes to and from the hotel) recommended in the Traffic Impact Study prepared by SRF and dated January 2015, though it is understood that providing a two-space loading area on Seneca Way and making signal-timing changes to two intersections will require the cooperation of governmental agencies, and vi. Applicant shall work with the adjacent property owner on the east to potentially provide a cross-block pedestrian passage extending through applicant’s and the adjacent owner’s parcels. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Vacancies: 1 3 SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION REPORT 401 LAKE STREET LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS LAKE STREET FALLS STREET CONTRACT LIMIT LINE CONTRACT LIMIT LINE FALL CREEK CITY OF ITHACA, ITHACA, NEW YORK FEBRUARY 13, 2013 PREPARED BY: TROWBRIDGE WOLF MICHAELS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS LLP 1001 WEST SENECA STREET SUITE 101 ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 607.277.1400 February 13, 2015 JoAnn Cornish and Members of the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board Department of Planning and Development City of Ithaca 108 West Green Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Re: Site Development Review Application: Lake Street Public Park Enhancements Project Dear Ms. Cornish: This letter transmits to you the Site Development Plan Review Application and FEAF for the Lake Street Public Park Enhancements (LSPPE) project at approximately 401 Lake Street. The proposed enhancements seek to improve the area with park-like amenities and accessible routes. Enhancements include an accessible curb ramp and concrete loop walkway, creek viewing areas with benches, bike racks, a guardrail along the top of the existing stone abutment wall, and granite columns. Proposed gates will provide a controllable entrance to the Ithaca Falls Recreation Area. The attached materials include: • Detailed project description • Full Environmental Assessment Form and supplemental information o Wild, Scenic, and Recreational River permit application o Fall Creek Recreational River Boundary map o Lake Street Bridge Plaza (LSPPE project) SHPO letter o Lake Street Bridge Plaza (LSPPE project) Description and Photographs SHPO o Email: FW_ Ithaca Falls Plaza_Park - contamination concerns o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Pollution Report o Ithaca Falls Overlook investigation soil sample results 12-101-4 • Site Furnishings (benches) – cut sheets • Project Drawings for Site Development Review (11”x17”) On behalf of those involved, we look forward to reviewing the project with you and members of the Planning and Development Board. Please do not hesitate to call should you have questions or require additional information. Best Regards, Peter Trowbridge Principal cc: Addisu Gebre, EIT, City of Ithaca Bridge Systems Engineer Trowbridge Wolf Michaels Landscape Architects LLP 1001 West Seneca Street, Suite 101 Ithaca, New York 14850 ph: 607.277.1400 www.twm.la 1 LOCATION LOCATION: The project site is at 401 Lake Street. It is on the east side of Lake Street on the south bank of Fall Creek. It is in the far northwest corner of the Ithaca Falls Recreation Area. MAP OF ITHACA PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP PROJECT LIMITS 2 ZONING ZONING The properties are located within the P-1 Public and Institutional Zoning District . The existing public usage of the site will remain the same, and complies with the Public Recreation allowed use for P-1 zoned properties. The P-1 District has the following requirements which the 108 Lake Street project complies with: • Off Street Parking Requirements: 1 space per 10 users • Off Street Loading Requirements: None • Maximum Building Heights: None • Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% ZONING MAP LEGEND PROJECT SITE 3 EXISTIING CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS The property has a large public open space adjacent to a 5’-18 tall stone abutment along Fall Creek. There currently is not a guardrail at the top of the wall. This presents a safety hazard for users and is a liability for the City. A pathway down to creek level at the east end of the site is steep and undeveloped. The city currently uses a temporary roadway barrier during the winter to control access down to the nature trail. Existing site furnishings show signs of wear and are not positioned in optimal locations through the park. The existing benches have donor plaques from the 1970 Kiwanis Club of Ithaca. There are no accessible routes into the site from the sidewalk along Lake Street. VIEW LOOKING AT THE PARK FROM THE BRIDGE ON THE NORTH VIEW LOOKING ACROSS LAKE STREET TOWARDS THE PARK 4 SITE DESIGN SITE DESIGN The proposed improvements will enhance the area with park-like amenities and accessible pedestrian walks. A 5’ wide concrete walk will provide access from the sidewalk on Lake Street to new viewing areas that will be paved with stone dust paving and a bluestone paving border. The viewing areas include benches that aesthetically fit the industrial character of the adjacent building ruins. Donor plaques from the existing benches will be transferred to the new benches. A steel frame guardrail is proposed behind the 5’-18’ tall stone abutment wall along Fall Creek at the north edge of the site. The new guardrail will comply with NYS Building Code, and improves safety in this public space. The guardrail will not be attached to the existing abutment wall. It will be anchored in new concrete footings located behind the wall. Granite columns are located at key points along the guardrail, and a gate provides the city with a controllable entrance to the nature trails leading to Ithaca Falls. A new accessible curb ramp is aligned with the sidewalk on the north side of Falls Street. PROPOSED SITE PLAN RENDERING SUPPLEMENT: EXISTING CONDITIONS CityofIthaca SITEPLANREVIEW(SPR)APPLICATION REQUIRED BuildingPermitNumber:___________  APPLICANT:Name:Title/Role: Address1: Address2:City,State,&ZipCode:  Telephone:CellPhone:EͲMail:  CONSULTANT:Name:Title/Role: Address1: Address2:City,State,&ZipCode:  Telephone:CellPhone:EͲMail:  PROJECTOWNER:Name:Title/Role: (ifotherthanapplicant) Address1: Address2:City,State,&ZipCode:  Telephone:CellPhone:EͲMail:  ʊPROJECTDESCRIPTIONʊ ProjectTitle:  ProjectAddress:  Type(checkone):ResidentialCommercialIndustrialInstitutional ScopeofWork(checkallthatapply&indicateapproximateoperation/constructioncost): VegetationRemoval$FaçadeChange$Demolition$ NewPaving$Earthwork$NewPlanting$ NewStructure$StructureExpansion$AccessoryStructure $ TotalConstructionCost:$AnticipatedConstructionPeriod:to (bestestimate)  ʊ OTHERINFORMATIONʊ  1.Ifthedevelopmentsiteisleasedproperty,listthepropertyowner'snameandaddressbelow:   LengthofLease: Note:Ownermustincludewiththisapplicationawrittenstatement authorizingtheapplicanttoserveastheagentofSitePlanReview(SPR). CONTACT:  LisaNicholas,SeniorPlanner DIVISIONOFPLANNING&ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT 108E.GreenStreet,3rdFloor Ithaca,NY14850Ͳ5690 (607)274Ͳ6550͸Fax:(607)274Ͳ6558 lnicholas@cityofithaca.org 1of2 AddisuGebreBridgeSystemsEngineer 108EastGreenStreet Ithaca,NY14850 607-274-6530607-279-7386 agebre@cityofithaca.org JamesFruechtl ProjectManager 1001WestSenecaStreet,Suite201 Ithaca,NY14850 607-277-1400 jlf@twm.la LakeStreetPublicParkEnhancements +/-401LakeStreet,Ithaca,NY14850 $167,300 $16,600 $7,000 $18,300 $114,500 $10,900 (sitefurnishing&railings) 6/2015 11/2015 CITY OF ITHACA CITY OF ITHACA FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (FEAF) FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (FEAF) Purpose: This Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a proposed action that are subjective or immeasurable. It is also understood those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. Purpose: This Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a proposed action that are subjective or immeasurable. It is also understood those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The FEAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. The FEAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. FEAF Components: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given action and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists in a review of the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA IS FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—TYPE I AND UNLISTED ACTIONS Identify the portions of FEAF completed for this action: __Part 1 __Part 2 __Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this FEAF (Parts, 2, and 3, if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the Lead Agency that: __A. The Proposed Action will not result in any large and important impact(s) and will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. __B. Although the proposed action could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action, because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required; therefore, A CONDITIONED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. * __C. The proposed action may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, A POSITIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions. Name of Action: Name of Lead Agency: Name and Title of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Signature of Preparer: Date: X FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (FEAF) PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION (prepared by project sponsor/applicant) NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the FEAF will depend on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research, or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action: Location of Action: Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Address: City/Town/Village: State: ZIP: Business Phone: Name of Owner (if different): Address: City/Town/Village: State: ZIP: Business Phone: Description of Action: 2 Lake Street Bridge Plaza East of Lake Street and on south bank of Fall Creek City of Ithaca Engineering Department 108 East Green Street Ithaca New York14850 607-274-6530 The Lake Street Bridge Plaza Project, in Ithaca, NY, involves new park like amenities in the open area to the east of Lake Street and on the upper side of the head wall south of Fall Creek. The project proposed the following improvements: -New concrete walkway loop providing an accessible route to Fall Creek overlooks -Metal guardrail behind existing stone retaining wall -Movable gate providing controlled access to the Ithaca Falls Natural Area Trail -Stone columns anchoring the ends of the guardrail and gate -2 overlook areas with wood benches and stonedust paving -Replace the existing bike racks with 4 new bike racks -Potential interpretative signage for building ruins to the south -Small under story trees in the center of the loop walk -Shrub plantings at connection to the Lake Street Bridge Please complete each question (indicate N/A, if not applicable). A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: Urban Industrial Commercial Public Forest Agricultural Other: 2. Total area of project area: ____ acres ____ square feet (Chosen units apply to following section also.) Approximate Area (Units in Question 2 apply to this section.)CurrentlyAfter Completion 2a. Meadow or Brushland (non-agricultural) 2b. Forested 2c. Agricultural 2d. Wetland [as per Article 24 of Environmental Conservation Law (ECL)] 2e. Water Surface Area 2f. Public 2g. Water Surface Area 2h. Unvegetated (rock, earth, or fill) 2i. Roads, buildings, and other paved surfaces 2j. Other (indicate type) 3a. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site (e.g., HdB, silty loam, etc.): 3b. Soil Drainage: Well-Drained ______% of Site Moderately Well-Drained ______% of Site Poorly Drained ______% of Site 4a. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Yes No N/A 4b. What is depth of bedrock? (feet) 4c. What is depth to the water table? (feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10%% 10-15%% 15% or greater % 6a. Is project substantially contiguous to, or does it contain a building, site or district, listed on or eligible for the National or State Register of Historic Places? Yes No N/A 6b. …Or a designated local landmark or located in a local landmark district? Yes No N/A 7. Do hunting and/or fishing opportunities currently exist in the project area? Yes No N/A If yes, identify each species: _________________________ 3 URBAN 50 50 X X X Varies +/-24' Varies +/-19 X X X X TROUT XX 7350 490 SF 1440 SF 370 SF0 SF 5540 SF0 SF SITE DESCRIPTION (concluded) 8. Does project site contain any species of plant and/or animal life identified as threatened or endangered? Yes No N/A According to: _____________________________ Identify each species: _______________________ 9. Are there any unique or unusual landforms on the project site (i.e., cliffs, other geological formations)? Yes No N/A Describe: ___________________________________ 10. Is project site currently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Yes No N/A If yes, explain:_______________________________ 11. Does present site offer or include scenic views known to be important to the community? Yes No N/A Describe: _________________________________ 12. Is project within or contiguous to a site designated a Unique Natural Area (UNA) or critical environmental area by a local or state agency? Yes No N/A Describe: _________________________________ 13. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Names of stream(s) or name(s) of river(s) to which it is a tributary: ___________________________ _________________________________________ 14. Lakes, ponds, or wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name(s): _________________________________ b. Size(s) (in acres): ___________ 15. Has site been used for land disposal of solid and/or hazardous wastes? Yes No N/A Describe: __________________________________ 16. Is the site served by existing public utilities? a.If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b.If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A 4 X X X X X Federal Highway Administration Fall Creek - Tributary to Cayuga Lake Rock Outcroppings Fall Creek Natural Area Ithaca Falls on Fall Creek Fall Creek Natural Area N / A X X X X X B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate): ______________ 1a. Total contiguous area owned by project sponsor in acres: _______ or square feet: _______ 1b. Project acreage developed: Acres initially: Acres ultimately:________ 1c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ____________________ 1d. Length of project in miles (if appropriate): ___________ or feet: ____________ 1e. If project is an expansion, indicate percent of change proposed: _________% 1f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing: proposed:_____________ 1g. Maximum vehicular trips generated (upon completion of project) per day: _______ and per hour: ______ 1h. Height of tallest proposed structure in feet. _______ 1j. Linear feet of frontage along a public street or thoroughfare that the project will occupy? ________ 2. Specify what type of natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) and how much will be removed from the site: _______________________________ or added to the site: ________________________________ 3. Specify what type of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground cover) and how much will be removed from the site: acres:___________ type of vegetation:_____________________________________________________ 4. Will any mature trees or other locally important vegetation be removed for this project? ______ 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace vegetation removed during construction? _______ 6. If single-phase project, anticipated period of construction: months (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased project, anticipated period of construction: __________ months (including demolition) 7a. Total number of phases anticipated: ______________ 7b. Anticipated date of commencement for first phase: month year (including demolition) 7c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. 7d. Is phase one financially dependent on subsequent phases? Yes No N/A 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes No N/A If yes, explain: __________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ 9. Number of jobs generated during construction: __________ After project is completed: __________ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project: Explain: _____________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes No N/A If yes, explain: ______ ________________________________________________________________________________________ 12a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes No N/A; if yes, explain: _______ ________________________________________________________________________________________ 12b. If #12a is yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc): ______________ 12c. If surface disposal, where specifically will effluent be discharged? _____________________ 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes No N/A If yes, explain: __________________________ 14a. Will project or any portion of project occur wholly or partially within or contiguous to the 100-year flood plain? Yes No N/A 5 X X X X X X N/A 102 FT N/A 0 0 N/A N/A 00 0 7350 SF N/A? N/A 0 CY 10 CY STONE BASE, 40 CY SOIL 0 N/A NO N/A 5 N/A 1 JUNE 2015 NOV 2015 0 0TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION(concluded) 14b. Does project or any portion of project occur wholly or partially within or contiguous to: Cayuga Inlet Fall Creek, Cascadilla Creek, Cayuga Lake, Six Mile Creek, or Silver Creek? (Circle all that apply.) 14c. Does project or any portion of project occur wholly or partially within or contiguous to wetlands as described in Article 24 of the ECL? Yes No N/A; 14d. If #14a., b., or c. is yes, explain: _______________________ 15a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes No N/A 15b. If #15a. is yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes No N/A 15c. If #15b. is yes, give name of disposal facility: and its location: __________ 15d. Will there be any wastes that will not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes No N/A If yes, explain: ___________________________________ 15e. Will any solid waste be disposed of on site? Yes No N/A If yes, explain: _____________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes No N/A If yes, specify: ________________ 17. Will project affect a building or site listed on or eligible for the National or State Register of Historic Places or a local landmark or in a landmark district? Yes No N/A; if yes, explain: 18. Will project produce odors? Yes No N/A If yes, explain: 19. Will project product operating noise exceed the local ambient noise level during construction? Yes No N/A After construction? Yes No N/A 20. Will project result in an increase of energy use? Yes No N/A If yes, indicate type(s): ______ ____________________________________________________________________________________ 21. Total anticipated water usage per day in gals./day: Source of water: 6 X X X X X X X X X X X ? ? N/A C. ZONING AND PLANNING INFORMATION 1. Does the proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes No N/A If yes, indicate the decision required: _________________________ Zoning Amendment Zoning Variance New/Revision of Master Plan Subdivision Site Plan Special Use Permit Resource Management Plan Other: ______ 2. What is the current zoning classification of site? ________________________ 3. If the site is developed as permitted by the present zoning, what is the maximum potential development? 4. Is proposed use consistent with present zoning? Yes No N/A 5. If #4 is no, indicate desired zoning: _________________________ 6. If the site is developed by the proposed zoning, what is the maximum potential development of the site? ______________________________________________________ 7. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land-use plans? Yes No N/A If no, explain: _____________________________________________ 8. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a ¼ mile radius of the project? (e.g., R-1a or R-1b) _____________________________________________________________ 9. Is the proposed action compatible with adjacent land uses? Yes No N/A Explain: ________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ 10a. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 10b. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community-provided services? (e.g., recreation, education, police, fire protection, etc.)? Yes No N/A Explain: _____________________ If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes No N/A Explain: _____________________________ 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes No N/A If yes, is existing road network adequate to handle additional traffic? Yes No N/A Explain: __________________________________________ 7 X X X X X X R-1A (RESIDENTIAL) P-1 (PARK) N/A N/A N/A D.APPROVALS 1. Approvals: ______________________________________ 2a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes No N/A Specify: _________________ 2b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Yes No N/A If Yes, Specify: ______________________________________ 2c.Local and Regional approvals: AgencyYes or No Type of Approval Required Submittal Date Approval Date Common Council Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Planning & Development Board Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) Board of Public Works (BPW) Fire Department Police Department Building Commissioner Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency (IURA) 8 X X NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO SITE PLAN REVIEW FEB 2015 SITE PLAN REVIEW 9 E.INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. F. VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name: Signature: Title: ***************** END OF PART 1 ***************** PeterTrowbridge TWMLA,Principal Name: A Piil February 13, 2015 Ms. Lisa Nicholas Department of Planning and Development City of Ithaca 108 E. Green Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Wild, Scenic, and Recreational River Permit Application: Lake Street Public Park Enhancements Project Dear Lisa: Please accept this letter as the application to the Planning Board for a permit under the regulations for Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers. The segment of Fall Creek from Cayuga Lake upstream to the Beebe Dam footbridge has been designated a Recreational River under section 15-2714 hh of the New York Environmental Conservation Law, also known as the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers System Act (the Act). It is adjacent to the Lake Street Public Park Enhancements Project. The project will need to make a small incursion into the designated Recreational River area. Please incorporate and refer to the project's pending application for Site Plan Review for the Full Environmental Assessment Form. The proposed project involves enhancements to the open area at 401 Lake Street located above the stone abutment wall on the south side of Fall Creek and on the east side of Lake Street. Major enhancements include installing a guardrail behind the abutment wall, benches and stone dust overlook areas behind the guardrail, and a concrete loop walk through the open area. After construction the area will be seeded and the lawn will be re-established. This permit is required due to the project’s adjacency to Fall Creek. An abutment wall with no direct contact with the shore line separates the site from the creek. Measures will be taken to prevent any possible sediment from flowing into the creek. Standard erosion control measures will be in place prior to and throughout the duration of construction. Refer to the attached project documents for the locations and details of the measures. Please refer to the attached documents as part of our permit submission: 1. Site Plan Review Application and supplemental information 2. City of Ithaca FEAF 3. Site Plan Review Drawings 4. Fall Creek Recreation River Boundary Map Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions or require additional information. Best Regards, Peter Trowbridge cc: Addisu Gebre, EIT, City of Ithaca Bridge Systems Engineer Trowbridge Wolf Michaels Landscape Architects LLP 1001 West Seneca Street, Suite 101 Ithaca, New York 14850 ph: 607.277.1400 www.twm.la .-----Legend----, Nl A CPOZ Bounda ry 0 NY State Plane, Central GRS 80 Datu m ---------0 500 1,000 US survey feet Map Source : Tompk ins County Digital Plan imetric Map 1991-2005 State of New York Tompkins County Ove rfli ght , 2007 Map Prepared by: GIS Planning , City of Ithaca , NY , 19 Aug ust 20 08. Lake Street Bridge Plaza Enhancements Project Description and Photographs    Description  The City of Ithaca proposes safety improvements and aesthetic enhancements to an  existing underutilized public park area located at the southeast corner of the Lake Street  Bridge over Fall Creek, Ithaca, NY.      CDBG funds will be used for the extension of an ornamental steel picket fence along the  top of an existing stone wall.  This work forms a relatively small portion of a much larger  project, which will eventually include a new stairway down to Fall Creek, new landscape  plantings, a new section of sidewalk, scenic overlooks and interpretive signage,  landscape bollards, and new crosswalks and ADA access ramps at Lake Street.      Photographs of Existing Conditions    View of site looking north down Lake Street     View of site from corner of Lake Street and E. Falls Street, looking northeast        View of site from Lake Street and E. Falls Street, looking directly east              Detail of top of wall where new railing is proposed    View of site from a point on Lake Street bridge, looking south      View of site from north terminus of Lake Street bridge, looking south  From:Peter Trowbridge To:jlf@twm.la ; arm@twm.la Subject:FW: Ithaca Falls Plaza/Park - contamination concerns Date:Wednesday, January 21, 2015 11:08:32 AM Attachments:Binder EPA soil removal at base of IG gorge wall binder.pdf Ithaca Falls Overlook investigation soil sample results 12-101-4.pdf This memo will get added to our FEAF for submission on the 13 th . Peter From: Addisu Gebre [mailto:AGebre@cityofithaca.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:46 AM To: Peter Trowbridge [pjt@twm.la] Cc: Mieczkowski, Joseph Subject: FW: Ithaca Falls Plaza/Park - contamination concerns FYI.... From: Nels Bohn Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:39 PM To: Cynthia Brock; Goldsmith, Bill; dwk5@cornell.edu ; Leventry, Ellen; Jim Dalterio; Jeanne Grace; JoAnn Cornish; Fabbroni, Lawrence; mhobbie@verizon.net; Ray Benjamin; rmannin4@twcny.rr.com; rmm5@cornell.edu ; sjs96@cornell.edu ; Common Council; Svante Myrick; Steve Thayer; Aaron Lavine Cc: Addisu Gebre; Tom West; Michael Thorne; Deschere, Ken; Travis, Frost; Priscott, Gary; dhanny@bartonandloguidice.com ; snostrand@BartonandLoguidice.com; Kevin Sutherland; Michael Thorne; Tom Parsons; Mike Niechwiadowicz; Bob Ripa Subject: RE: Ithaca Falls Plaza/Park - contamination concerns Cynthia, After some research, and assistance from DEC project manager Gary Priscott, I can confirm that the EPA removed lead-contaminated soil from the base of the cliff under the former Ithaca Gun site in 2004. Please see attached EPA Pollution Report prepared by Jack Harmon and three photos. The description of EPA work indicates full removal of impacted soil at the base of the cliff and indicates that post mitigation confirmation sampling was conducted. The actual sample results do not appear to be available on the webpage, but post-EPA mitigation sample results from other areas of the Ithaca Gun site have been confirmed at well below 400 parts per million (ppm) for lead, the soil clean up objective for safe recreational and restricted residential use. The EPA webpage can be accessed at the following link: EPA Ithaca Gun emergency removal action webpage The City's environmental engineer, Barton & Loguidice has visually inspected conditions at the base of the gorge wall. They did not observe slag or industrial soils as seen at locations of the Ithaca Falls Overlook Site were lead has been identified. Rather, they observed a small slope of dark gray shale talus consistent with natural erosion of the shale cliffs, so there are no obvious signs of contaminated soils from the former Ithaca Gun factory site collecting at the base of the gorge wall. As you note, the City has been conducting a site investigation of the City-owned Ithaca Falls Overlook site with NYS Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) grant assistance. Due to ERP restrictions, we are conducting interim remedial measures to remediate contaminated areas as we proceed with the site investigation. Once the site investigation is formally completed our funding will expire. Attached are maps depicting draft soil sample results from the site investigation work to define the extent of soil contamination. Please note that these sample results are intended to augment previous soil sampling conducted in the Ithaca Gun area. The current Ithaca Falls Overlook Site Investigation has not collected samples at the base of the gorge wall. This area was presumed to be clean as a result of the EPA cleanup and original data that suggested a border of vegetation at the top of the gorge wall would remain undisturbed. In other words, any erosion of contaminated soils would move into the raceway or western slope rather than down the gorge wall. Soil samples collected in the following locations meet soil cleanup objectives (less than 400 ppm): the western (lower) raceway below the plunge pool the eastern (upper) raceway above the concrete pad the downslope bench below the western slope of the "island" the upper "island" east of the concrete pad Remediation work was completed on the western accessway (narrow connector from Lake St. to Ithaca Gun chimney area) of the Ithaca Falls Overlook site in 2013. Work is now underway to remediate the "island" portion of the City site, the area generally located between the raceway and the gorge wall. Very recent soil sampling shows that that a narrow area of soils located between the concrete pad and the top of the gorge wall also need to be removed. This area is vegetated and includes several trees, which promotes stabilization of the soils in this area. During the removal of these soils, it is possible that some soils may fall to the gorge floor. The contractor is required to collect any soils that fall to the gorge floor for removal and the City's environmental engineer will be on-site to spot any material that falls. This work is scheduled to commence the week of December 15th and be complete within one week. Following removal of the soils from the "island" area near the gorge wall, and as weather permits, it is our intent to conduct soil sampling for lead at the base of the gorge wall to confirm that the soils in the gorge are safe for public recreational use. Sampling will be scheduled for conditions when the base of the gorge wall is free of snow and ice. Given the 2004 EPA cleanup, the visual inspection of the talus at the base of the gorge wall, and the vegetated nature of the soils at the top of the gorge wall and intact concrete cap, I do not anticipate to find that any significant amount of contaminated soils from the "island" have collected at the base of the gorge wall since the 2004 EPA cleanup. I hope funding for design and cost estimation for an enhanced Ithaca Falls gorge entrance plaza will be authorized now so the City will be in position to make a decision to authorize construction later in the year. Given weather conditions, it could be several months before confirmatory sampling can be completed at the gorge floor. Nels PS One note regarding "dust and debris", please note that air monitoring is being conducted during all invasive activity at the Ithaca Falls Overlook Site. To date, there have been no exceedances during remediation work. PPS The NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation Database information included with your email is for the former Ithaca Gun factory site, not the area directly above the gorge wall. The City-owned Ithaca Falls Overlook site is located between the former factory site and the gorge wall. . Nels Bohn, Director of Community Development Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency 108 W Green Street Ithaca, NY 14850 e-mail: NBohn@cityofithaca.org phone: 607-274-6547 From: Cynthia Brock Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:49 PM To: Goldsmith, Bill; dwk5@cornell.edu ; Leventry, Ellen; Jim Dalterio; Jeanne Grace; JoAnn Cornish; Fabbroni, Lawrence; mhobbie@verizon.net; Ray Benjamin; rmannin4@twcny.rr.com; rmm5@cornell.edu ; sjs96@cornell.edu ; Common Council; Svante Myrick Cc: JoAnn Cornish; Nels Bohn; Addisu Gebre Subject: Ithaca Falls Plaza/Park - contamination concerns Dear Council Colleagues, Mayor and Parks Commission, I am writing in response to the proposal to create a formal entrance into the Fall Creek natural area. These enhancements are intended to be funded through a $195,000 increase to Capital Project #791 Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project and include (among others) stairway construction, signage, and handicap access ramps. As outlined in Addisu's memo dated 19 November 2014, these enhancements are intended to provide safety improvements in the area, increase the numbers of visitors, contribute to the economy, and achieve local/state/Federal Environmental and Public Park Standards. I support of the creation of a plaza/park at the entrance to the lower Ithaca Falls natural area. However, I feel very strongly that prior to construction of this new entrance, the soils in the natural area must be tested for lead and related toxins which are being currently remediated at the Ithaca Gun site, to ensure that the area is free from contamination in exceedance of required residential use standards. As you may know the former Ithaca Gun site – a portion of which is also intended to become a City park – is currently being remediated for lead and TCE contamination. One of the Ithaca Gun remediation sites (the “Island”) overlooks the Ithaca Falls natural area, and a quick visit to the Falls will demonstrate how dust and debris resulting from the remediation activities above are impacting the natural area. Nels Bohn informed me by email on December 5th that he has made a request of the City’s environmental consultants to “relook at the question of the northern extent of lead contamination from the former Ithaca Gun site given that some soils under the concrete cap on 'the island' have been confirmed to contain elevated levels of lead. Specifically, I am seeking confirmation that lead concentrations above 400 ppm do not extend down into the base of the gorge floor where the public walks to enjoy the Ithaca Falls.” I am deeply appreciative of Nels’ efforts and look forward to receiving these test results and what I hope will be good news. If however it is discovered that the area is impacted by contamination from Ithaca Gun, it would be best to delay any recreational enhancements until after the remediation of the Ithaca Falls waterfront has been completed. Once we are assured of the area meeting NYS Environmental and Public Park Standards, I will be in full support of approving the establishment of the Ithaca Falls Plaza/Park, and the fulfillment of the City’s long-overdue obligation (1995) for this beautiful area and regional attraction to serve as substitute parkland for Inlet Island.[1] Environmental Site Remediation Database Search Details Site Record Administrative Information Site Name: Former Ithaca Gun Factory Site Code: C755019 Program: Brownfield Cleanup Program Classification: A EPA ID Number: Location DEC Region: 7 Address: 121-125 Lake Street City:Ithaca Zip: 14850 County:TOMPKINS Latitude: 42.451627000 Longitude: -76.492829833 Site Type: Estimated Size: 1.630 Acres Site Owner(s) and Operator(s) Current Owner Name: IRF Development, LLC Current Owner(s) Address: 323 North Tioga Street Ithaca,NY, 14850 Site Document Repository Name: Tompkins County Public Library Address: 101 East Green Street Ithaca,NY 14850 Site Description Location: The Former Ithaca Gun Factory site is located at 121-125 Lake Street in an urban area of the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County. It is situated in an area with the Ithaca Falls and Fall Creek to the north, Cornell University to the east, Lake Street to the south, and a residential neighborhood to the west. The proposed Brownfield Cleanup Program (BCP) site approximately 1.6 acres in size. Site Features: The site consists mostly of an open undeveloped parcel. The manufacturing buildings that previously occupied most of this property were demolished in 2009. One small single-story building and the boiler stack still exist on the western portion of the site. The site property is positioned on the side of a hill; however, most of the site is terraced with significant level areas suitable for development. Elevations at the site range from approximately 490 feet above mean sea level (amsl) on the western portion of the site to 545 feet amsl in the eastern portion of the site. Current Zoning/Uses: Currently the site is vacant and consists mostly of open land; it is zoned industrial. Surrounding land uses to the east, south and west are mostly residential. Property that is contiguous along north and west portions of this site are part of Ithaca Falls Overlook, Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) site and owned by the City of Ithaca. Past Use of the Site: The site was originally developed for industrial use in 1813. Companies that may have operated at the site prior to the Ithaca Gun Company include the Ithaca Manufacturing Company (agricultural equipment) and the W.H. Baker & Company gun factory. The Ithaca Gun Company operated at the site from 1885 through 1986. The main operations included manufacture of firearms and munitions. Supporting manufacturing activities and site uses included spray-painting, drying gun stocks in ovens, firing ranges, metal plating, machine shop, and forging. Prior uses by the Ithaca Gun Company appear to have led to contamination of both on-site and near off-site areas. From 1995 to 1998, following discovery of lead shot in the Falls Creek gorge area, soil sampling was conducted in on-site and off-site areas. In 2000, leaking transformers and associated PCB-contaminated soils were removed from the site. From 2000 to 2002, the EPA conducted a removal assessment, limited building demolition, and soil removal activities mostly on adjacent off-site areas; however, some portions of the former Ithaca Gun Factory property were included. In 2001, an Environmental Site Assessment and a Site Investigation were completed for and funded by the site owner at that time. In 2002, this site was part of the property included within the Voluntary Cleanup Agreement for the Ithaca Gun Company Site, with the site identification of V00511. In 2009, the on-site buildings were demolished and removed from the site. Funding for the demolition activities were at least partially supported by the Empire State Development Restore NY program. Post-demolition site investigation activities have included surface soil screening and sampling, and groundwater sampling. Site Geology and Hydrogeology: Bedrock is exposed at the ground surface in level areas and is outcropping in many areas of the site. The bedrock in other areas is covered by soil or crushed masonry type building materials with thicknesses ranging from a few inches to approximately 15 feet. Groundwater is encountered within the fractured bedrock. Depth to groundwater is approximately 15 to 20 feet below ground surface. The generalized direction of groundwater flow is to the west-northwest. Contaminants of Concern (Including Materials Disposed) Type of Waste Quantity of Waste cis-1,2-Dichloroethene UNKNOWN TRICHLOROETHENE (TCE)UNKNOWN LEAD UNKNOWN TETRACHLOROETHYLENE (PCE)UNKNOWN VINYL CHLORIDE UNKNOWN Site Environmental Assessment Based upon preliminary investigations conducted to date, the primary contaminant of concern in soil appears to be lead, and the primary contaminants of concern in groundwater include tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), cis-1,2- dichloroethene (c12DCE), and vinyl chloride. Soil – Lead has been found in shallow soils covering nearly the entire site at concentrations that exceed the soil cleanup objective (SCO) for residential use (400 ppm). Concentrations of lead in surface soils, as derived from laboratory data, show a range from 66 to 190,000 ppm. The depth of contamination in the soils has not been delineated. Groundwater – PCE, TCE, c12DCE and vinyl choride have been detected in groundwater at monitoring wells located hydraulically downgradient from the site at concentrations exceeding the respective groundwater standards (5 ppb for PCE, TCE, and c12DCE; and 2 ppb for vinyl choride) and indicate an on-site source area of contamination. Maximum concentrations of PCE, TCE, c12DCE, and vinyl choride in a downgradient well are 230, 1500, 2100, and 91 ppb, respectively. The full nature and extent of groundwater contamination are unknown. Soil Vapor and Indoor Air – The nature and extent of contamination in soil vapor is unknown. Information regarding the environmental conditions at the site will be revised as additional information becomes available. Site Health Assessment People are not drinking contaminated groundwater associated with the site because the area is served by a public water supply that obtains its water from a different source not affected by this contamination. The site is partially fenced; however, people who enter the site may contact contaminants in the soil by walking on the soil, digging, or otherwise disturbing the soil. Volatile organic compounds in the groundwater may move into the soil vapor (air between soil particles), which in turn may move into overlying buildings and affect the indoor air quality. This process, which is similar to the movement of radon gas from the subsurface into the indoor air of buildings, is referred to as soil vapor intrusion. Currently, there are no buildings on the site, so inhalation of site contaminants in indoor air due to soil vapor intrusion does not represent a concern for the site in its current condition. The potential for soil vapor intrusion to occur on and near the site will be evaluated. [1] http://image.iarchives.nysed.gov/images/images/129376.pdf NYS Senate Bill No. S5365 “An Act to authorize the city of Ithaca, county of Tompkins, to discontinue the use of certain real property for park purposes. Summary: establishes a new unconsolidated law to remove the parkland designation on certain parcels of land located on Inlet Island in Ithaca, New York; to designate as parkland certain other parcels of land located at Ithaca Falls, Six-Mile Creek and Cayuga Inlet in Ithaca, New York.” Cynthia Brock Alderperson, First Ward 607 398-0883 cbrock@cityofithaca.org "We may have different religions, different languages, different colored skin, but we all belong to one human race." ~~ Kofi Annan, Former United Nations Secretary General and Nobel Laureate U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY POLLUTION REPORT I. HEADING Date: May 3, 2004 From: Jack D. Harmon Removal Action Branch To: R. Salkie, ERRD-RAB J. Rotola, EPA-RAB J. Malleck, EPA-SPB G. Shanahan, EPA-ORC M. Cervantes, 2CD M. Basile, 2CD R. Cahill, 2CD-POB R. Byrnes, 2OIG T. Johnson, 5202G T. Suozzo, NYSDEC R. Parker, NYSDEC D. Geraghty, NYSDOH S. Mabee, TCDPH S. Steuteville, NAC C. Peterson, City of Ithaca Mayor Subject: Ithaca Gun Company Removal Action Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York POLREP #: 17 (Seventeen) II. BACKGROUND Site #: QJ Contract #: 68-S2-99-08 Delivery Order: 0059 Response Authority: CERCLA CERCLIS NO.: NYN000204292 NPL Status: Not Listed State Notification: NYSDEC & NYSDOH Notified Action Memorandum (AM) Status: Approved September 19, 2001 Removal Start Date: January 30, 2002 Mobilization Date: April 8, 2002 Demobilization Date: N/A \ 2 III. SITE INFORMATION A.Incident Category CERCLA Incident Category: Former Gun Manufacturing Facility - Lead-contaminated soil B.Site Description 1.Site Description See Previous POLREP 2. Description of threat See Previous POLREP C.Site Evaluation Results See Previous POLREP IV. RESPONSE INFORMATION A.Situation 1. Removal Actions To Date Resumption of site activities will occur the week of March 1, 2004 with site preparation tasks being performed. Next week, removal of lead contaminated material from the base of the Fall Creek gorge is planned to commence. This material will be consolidated, both manually and with a mini-excavator, into small piles where it will then be put into one-cubic yard sacks. These sacks will then be hoisted up by a crane positioned on the island parcel and placed into a roll-off container spotted along side. During the week of March 8, 2004, Earth Tech mobilized manpower and equipment to remove lead contaminated material from the base of Fall Creek gorge. Invasive species of vegetation identified by members of the NAC and the City Forester were cut and removed to provide access to the work area. The work area was delineated with a high visibility fence as well as hay bales to serve as a sediment barrier in case of high water. A total of 51 one-cubic yard bags were filled, staged and secured. Samples were collected both for disposal analyses as well as to confirm removal of contaminated material. Earth Tech continued removal of lead contaminated material from the base of Fall Creek gorge. The work area continues to be delineated with a high visibility fence as well as hay bales to serve as a sediment barrier in case of high water. A 35-ton crane with an operator was mobilized on 3 Monday to hoist bagged material from the gorge. Thru Friday, 116 one-cubic yard bags have been filled, 100 of which have been hoisted from the gorge and staged awaiting transportation and disposal. During the week of March 29, 2004, Earth Tech completed the removal of lead contaminated material from the base of Fall Creek gorge. A total of 258 one-cubic yard Asuper sacks@ were filled and staged on the island. A final Ascrape@ of the work area was also completed and post excavation samples collected to confirm effectiveness of the removal. Complications with the disposal facilities developed which prevented the material to be sent off-site last week. Due to these complications, arrangements were finalized with another disposal facility. Shipments of lead contaminated material from the gorge were completed on Thursday, April 8th. A total of 15 loads (258 bags/259.6 tons) was sent to the Ontario County landfill in Stanley. Limited activities were accomplished during the week of April 19th, i.e., site preparation and accepting deliveries of topsoil. A small crew will be mobilized for the week of the April 26th in preparation for beginning restoration of excavated areas on the island parcel. The Administrative Record has been placed in the Tompkins County Library. The Site=s website,www.epaosc.net/ithacagun is being updated frequently with site progress reports, photographs, and air monitoring results. The current ceiling for the ERRS contractor was increased by $50,000 to $3,350,000. Funding was allocated from the $365,000 in contingency. 2. Enforcement Effective June 6, 2003, EPA entered into a Settlement Agreement pursuant to CERCLA Section 122(h) with the City of Ithaca and State Street Associates, L.P. II, and a Prospective Purchaser Agreement with Fall Creek Redevelopment, L.L.C. These two agreements resulted in a total recovery of $365,000 in past EPA costs. B.Planned Removal Actions Vacuum operations will continue down the Aisland parcel@ and through the lower Millrace. C.Key Issues The NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation has completed their review of the Phase I Archeology Report (Areport@) in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, and the implementing regulations. Based upon their review, it is the State Historical Preservation Office=s (ASHPO@) opinion that the removal action will have ANo Effect upon cultural resources in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic 4 Places.@ The SHPO concurs with the report=s recommendations that encourage preservation of millrace features and historic foundation remains where possible and providing notification of any major discoveries and/or archeological monitoring. The EPA will abide by the report=s recommendations and will proceed with as much sensitivity toward the historic remains as possible. V. COST INFORMATION (thru 04/30/04) Cost To Date Information Summary Amount Budgeted Costs to Date Total Remaining ERCS Contractor $3,350,000 3,236,748 113,252 START/AST $ 300,000 290,379 9,621 EPA $ 265,000 185,131 79,869 TOTAL $3,915,000 3,712,258 202,742 The above accounting of expenditures is an estimate based on figures known to the OSC at the time this report was written. The OSC does not necessarily receive specific figures on final payments made to any contractor(s). Other financial data, which the OSC must rely upon, may not be entirely up-to-date. The cost accounting provided in this report does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery. im a g e s Navigate epa osc It h a c a G u n C o m p a n y S i t e De s c r i p t i o n : Re m o v a l o f l e a d m a t e r i a l f r o m F a l l C r e e k G o r g e Da t e T a k e n : 3/ 1 0 / 2 0 0 4 Se c u r i t y L e v e l : Pu b l i c Ca t e g o r y : La t i t u d e : Lo n g i t u d e : Ta g s : Go B a c k | we b s i t e s | re g i o n a l w e b s i t e s | pr o f i l e | bu l l e t i n s | im a g e s | do c u m e n t s | PO L R E P s | co n t a c t s | li n k s | Page 1of 2 Im a ge Z o o m 12/10/2014 ht t p : / / w w w . e p a o s c . o r g/s i t e / i m a ge_zo o m . a s p x ? s i t e _id = Q J & c o u n t e r = 6 9 9 9 & c a t e gor y= imagesNavigate epa osc It h a c a G u n C o m p a n y S i t e De s c r i p t i o n : Fi l l i n g a Da t e T a k e n : 3/ 1 1 / 2 0 0 4 Se c u r i t y L e v e l : Pu b l i c Ca t e g o r y : La t i t u d e : Lo n g i t u d e : Ta g s : Go B a c k | we b s i t e s | re g i o n a l w e b s i t e s | pr o f i l e | bu l l e t i n s | im a g e s | do c u m e n t s | PO L R E P s | co n t a c t s | li n k s | Page 1 of 2 Im a ge Z o o m 12/10/2014 ht t p : / / w w w . e p a o s c . o r g/s i t e / i m a ge_zo o m . a s p x ? s i t e _id = Q J & c o u n t e r = 7 0 0 0 & c a t e gor y= Page 2 of 2 Im a ge Z o o m 12/10/2014 ht t p : / / w w w . e p a o s c . o r g/s i t e / i m a ge_zo o m . a s p x ? s i t e _id = Q J & c o u n t e r = 7 0 0 0 & c a t e gor y= imagesNavigate epa osc It h a c a G u n C o m p a n y S i t e De s c r i p t i o n : Fa l l C r e e k G o r g e W o r k A r e a Da t e T a k e n : 3/ 1 1 / 2 0 0 4 Se c u r i t y L e v e l : Pu b l i c Ca t e g o r y : La t i t u d e : Lo n g i t u d e : Ta g s : Go B a c k | we b s i t e s | re g i o n a l w e b s i t e s | pr o f i l e | bu l l e t i n s | im a g e s | do c u m e n t s | PO L R E P s | co n t a c t s | li n k s | Page 1 of 2 Im a ge Z o o m 12/10/2014 ht t p : / / w w w . e p a o s c . o r g/s i t e / i m a ge_zo o m . a s p x ? s i t e _id = Q J & c o u n t e r = 7 0 0 1 & c a t e gor y= Page 2 of 2 Im a ge Z o o m 12/10/2014 ht t p : / / w w w . e p a o s c . o r g/s i t e / i m a ge_zo o m . a s p x ? s i t e _id = Q J & c o u n t e r = 7 0 0 1 & c a t e gor y= LEGEND !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A!A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A!A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A !A osdb-2e osdb-2d osdb-2cosdb-2b osdb-2a osdb-1e osdb-1d osdb-1c osdb-1b osdb-1a western slope 9 western slope 8 western slope 7 western slope 4 western slope 5 western slope 1 western slope 3 western slope 10 western slope 11 former walkway 5 former walkway 4 former walkway 3 former walkway 2 former walkway 1 western slope 6 5 western accessway 1e western accessway 1d western accessway 1c western accessway 1b western accessway 2e western accessway 2d western accessway 2c western accessway 2b western accessway 1-a western accessway 2-a western slope 6 1western slope 6 2 western slope 2 western slope 6 3western slope 6 4 border post plunge pool off site 2d off site 2c off site 2a off-site 1b off site 2-e off site 2-b off site 1-e off-site 1-d off-site 1-c survey post 2 plunge pool e plunge pool dplunge pool c plunge pool 1b plunge pool 1-a western raceway 5western raceway 6 western raceway 3 western raceway 4 western raceway 2e western raceway 2d western raceway 2c western raceway 2b western raceway 1e western raceway 1d eastern raceway 2e eastern raceway 2d eastern raceway 2c eastern raceway 1e eastern raceway 1d eastern raceway 1c eastern raceway 1b eastern raceway 1a off site 1-a western raceway 2a western raceway 1c western raceway 1b western raceway 1a eastern raceway 2b eastern raceway 2a µ 1 inch = 40 feet Sources: Aerial Photo - ESR I Map Service;Soil Sample Locations - B&L; Parcel Boundary -Tompkins County Tompkins County New York Figure 1 ProjectNo.1307.002 Soil Sample Locations City of Ithaca 7/20/12 Legend !A Soil Sample Point Parcel Boundary -All drawings, specifications, design and details on this page remain the property of Maglin Site Furniture Inc. and may not be used without Maglin authorization. -Details and specifications may vary due to continuing improvements of our products. MATERIALS: Bench ends are made from solid cast aluminum. The seat employs Ipe Slats. FINISH: The Maglin Powdercoat System provides a durable finish on all metal surfaces. Wood slats are treated with penetrating sealers. INSTALLATION: The bench is delivered pre-assembled. Holes (0.5") are provided in each foot for securing to base. TO SPECIFY: Select MLB1200-W-A Choose: - Powdercoat Color OPTIONS: - Personalization - Plaque - Skate Deterrent COMPLEMENTARY PRODUCTS: - MLB1200B-W - MLPT1200-W MLB1200-W-A DIMENSIONS: Height: 30.50" (77.5 cm) Length: 70.00" (177.8 cm) Depth: 23.00" (58.4 cm) Weight: 135lbs (61kg) TM*T 800-716-5506 F 877-260-9393 www.maglin.com sales@maglin.com 30.50 17.00 70.00 benches * MAGLIN is a registered trade mark of Maglin Site Furniture Inc. ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 COPYRIGHT C 2015IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS OR HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY HIS OR HER SIGNATURE AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATIONS.LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02/13/2015 13033 PJT / ARMJLF1001 W. Seneca St., Ste. 101 Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-1400 Fax 607-277-6092 File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwgPlot Date: 2/11/2015 L000COVER IL L U S T R A T I V E P L A N CI T Y O F I T H A C A LA K E S T R E E T PU B L I C P A R K E N H A N C E M E N T S TW M L A P r o j e c t N o . 2 0 1 3 0 3 3 PR E L I M I N A R Y S I T E P L A N R E V I E W CI T Y O F I T H A C A 40 1 L A K E S T R E E T It h a c a N Y 1 4 8 5 0 DR A W I N G L I S T Su r v e y S1 S I T E S U R V E Y La n d s c a p e L1 0 0 R E N D E R E D P L A N L1 0 1 D E M O L I T I O N P L A N L2 0 1 L A Y O U T P L A N L3 0 1 G R A D I N G P L A N L4 0 1 P L A N T I N G P L A N L5 0 1 S I T E D E T A I L S File: G:\LSPP_Preliminary SPR\PRINT, report, application, rr, dwgs\dwgs\TWMLA2013033 BASE_r3 - Standard\TWMLA2013033 SURVEY_TTBLK.dwgPlot Date: 2/6/2015 S-1SURVEY ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 COPYRIGHT C 2015IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS OR HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY HIS OR HER SIGNATURE AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATIONS.LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02/13/2015 13033 PJT / ARMJLF1001 W. Seneca St., Ste. 101 Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-1400 Fax 607-277-6092 RE M O V E B E N C H A N D C O N C R E T E PA D ( K E E P P L A Q U E F O R RE M O U N T I N G - S E E N O T E 1 6 ) RE M O V E B E N C H A N D C O N C R E T E PA D ( K E E P P L A Q U E F O R RE M O U N T I N G - S E E N O T E 1 6 ) UT I L I T Y B O X T O B E A D J U S T E D PE R G R A D I N G P L A N - S E E L 3 0 1 SI L T F E N C E IN L E T P R O T E C T I O N A5 L1 0 1 B5 L1 0 1 CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E LAKE STREET FA L L S S T R E E T CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E GENERAL NOTES - DEMOLITION 1.CONSTRUCTION FENCING TO BE INSTALLED AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT PEDESTRIANS, CONTROL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND PROTECT ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS.2.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY OWNERS HAVING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON SITE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.3.AS PER N.Y.S. INDUSTRIAL CODE 753: CONTRACTOR TO CALL DIG SAFELY NEW YORK (1-800-962-7962) TO LOCATE BURIED CABLES OR OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NO LESS THAN TWO OR MORE THAN TEN WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING, DRILLING, EXCAVATING, DRIVING POSTS, ETC.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP STREET AND EXISTING WALKWAYS CLEAR OF ALL DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT AND SHALL CLEAN STREET AND WALKWAYS AT THE END OF EACH DAY.5.PROVIDE SILT FENCING AT ALL DOWNHILL SIDES OF WORK AS INDICATED.6.PROVIDE SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS AT ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE INLETS AFFECTED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION.7.ENCIRCLE ALL STOCKPILES WITH SILT FENCE AND COVER THEM WITH A TARP WITHIN 7 DAYS OF FORMATION.8.EXISTING BIKE RACK AND BENCHES SHALL BE REMOVED COMPLETELY INCLUDING FOOTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN.9.BASE MATERIAL IN AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVEMENT TO BE EXCAVATED TO SUB-GRADE ELEVATIONS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE BASE COURSE.10.PROTECT ALL SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE UTILITIES TO REMAIN DURING DEMOLITION WORK.11.ALL REMOVED/DEMOLISHED MATERIAL SHALL BECOME CONTRACTOR'S PROPERTY AND BE REMOVED FROM SITE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. OWNER TO RESERVE RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL ON ALL DEMOLISHED MATERIAL.12.PROTECT EXISTING PAVEMENTS, LANDSCAPE, & SITE FEATURES TO REMAIN. ANY DAMAGED OR DISTURBED PAVEMENTS, LANDSCAPE OR SITE FEATURES SHOWN TO REMAIN ARE TO BE REPAIRED / REPLACED IN KIND AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.13.TOPSOIL TO BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED FOR RESPREADING.14.PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. DO NOT STORE EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF TREES.15.MINIMIZE IMPACT TO EXISTING, REMAINING LANDSCAPE WHILE EXCAVATING. GREAT CARE IS TO BE TAKEN TO AVOID DISTURBING ROOTS OF EXISTING TREES. HAND EXCAVATION & AIR SPADE REQUIRED WHERE EXISTING TREE ROOTS ARE PRESENT.16.DONOR PLAQUES ON BENCHES TO BE REMOVED AND CLEANED FOR REINSTALLATION ON NEW BENCHES.CONSTRUCTION FENCEBENCHES, BIKE RACKS, AND CONCRETE PADS TO BE REMOVED SAWCUT PAVEMENT CONTRACT LIMIT LINEGRANITE CURB TO BE REMOVEDLEGENDINLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE GRADE 1'-8" MIN.1'-4" MIN.6"6"NOTES:1.WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POST WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES.2.FILTER FABRIC TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION.3.WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FABRIC ADJOIN EACH OTHER, OVERLAP BY 6" AND FOLD.4.PERFORM MAINTENANCE AS NEEDED AND REMOVE SILT WHEN BULGES DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE.5.ALL SILT FENCING AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO BE IN PLACE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS AND MUST REMAIN INTACT UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND NEW LAWN IS MORE THAN 50% GROWN IN.Scale: 1/2"=1'-0"SILT FENCEB52" HARDWOOD FENCE POST @ 8'-0" O.C.WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14-1/2" GAUGE WITH 6" MESH SPACING) WITH FABRIC OVER FILTER FABRIC: MIRAFI 100X ENVIROFENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL SILT DIG 6" WIDE & DEEP TRENCH, BURY BOTTOM 12" OF FABRIC, TAMP IN PLACE NOTES:1.FILTER FABRIC TO BE CUT FROM CONTINUOUS ROLL TO ELIMINATE JOINTS. IF JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, OVERLAP TO EXTEND TO NEXT STAKE.2.SPACE STAKES EVENLY AROUND DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AT MAXIMUM 3' INTERVALS AND DRIVE TO MINIMUM 18" DEPTH INTO SOIL.3.FILTER FABRIC TO BE SECURELY FASTENED TO LUMBER FRAME AND SHALL BE EMBEDDED A MINIMUM 12" INTO SOIL.12"MIN.1'-6" MIN.Scale: 1/2"=1'-0"INLET PROTECTIONA52X4 LUMBER STAKES AND RAILS OVERFLOW WEIR BELOW ADJOINING GRADE AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT BYPASS OF RUNOFF TO NEXT DOWNSTREAM STRUCTURE FILTER FABRIC DRAINAGE INLET OR STORM MANHOLE File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwgPlot Date: 2/11/2015 L101DEMO PLAN ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 COPYRIGHT C 2015IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS OR HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY HIS OR HER SIGNATURE AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATIONS.LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02/13/2015 13033 PJT / ARMJLF1001 W. Seneca St., Ste. 101 Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-1400 Fax 607-277-6092 96.50' CO N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ST O N E D U S T P A V I N G W I T H B L U E S T O N E E D G I N G BE N C H W I T H C O N C R E T E P A D ( B E N C H I S A D D A L T E R N A T E ST O N E D U S T P A V I N G W I T H B L U E S T O N E E D G I N G BE N C H W I T H C O N C R E T E P A D ( B E N C H I S A D D A L T E R N A T E ) GR A N I T E C O L U M N GR A N I T E C O L U M N GR A N I T E C O L U M N GR A N I T E C O L U M N GR A N I T E C O L U M N GU A R D R A I L GA T E GR A N I T E C O L U M N BA R R I E R R A I L BE N C H W I T H C O N C R E T E P A D (B E N C H I S A D D A L T E R N A T E ) ST O N E D U S T P A V I N G W I T H ME T A L E D G I N G #1 C R U S H E D S T O N E P A V I N G ME T A L E D G I N G PO T E N T I A L IN T E R P R E T I V E P A N E L (N O T I N C O N T R A C T ) CL CL CL GU A R D R A I L A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 B1 L5 0 1 B4 L5 0 1 B4 L5 0 1 B3 L5 0 1 A4 L5 0 1 A4 L5 0 1 A4 L5 0 1 A4 L5 0 1 C1 L5 0 1 C1 L5 0 1 C1 L5 0 1 A5 L5 0 1 A5 L5 0 1 A3 L5 0 1 GR A N I T E C O L U M N AC C E S S I B L E C U R B R A M P CR O S S W A L K S T R I P I N G (N O T I N C O N C T R A C T ) CO N C R E T E P A V E M E N T 10 7 . 7 5 ' 5.00' 2 . 0 0 ' 6.00' 1.50' 4 . 0 0 ' 4. 7 5 ' +/ - 5 . 0 0 ' (M A T C H WI D T H ) 11.75' 6. 0 0 ' 2.00' 2.50' 2. 0 0 ' 6.0 0 ' 1.7 5 ' 4.50' 10. 0 0 ' 4.50 ' 10. 2 5 ' R4.00' R13. 2 5 ' R 1 8 . 5 0 ' R53.75' R39.25' R 1 1 . 0 0 ' R 2 1 . 0 0 ' 3.25' 6 . 0 0 ' 10.0 0 ' 17.00' R 5 . 0 0 ' CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E LAKE STREET FA L L S S T R E E T CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E UT I L I T Y B O X C O V E R T O B E R E P L A C E D WI T H A N A D A C O M P A T I B L E C O V E R GENERAL SHEET NOTES - LAYOUT 1.VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND ACCEPT CONDITIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR INSTRUCTION BEFORE PROCEEDING. DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWINGS.2.WALKS, STONE DUST AREAS, RAILINGS, AND GATE TO BE LAID OUT IN THE FIELD BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR.3.SEE GRADING PLANS FOR SPOT ELEVATIONS AT SITE FEATURES INCLUDING CORNERS OF PAVEMENTS AND RAILING POST.4.THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD UTILITIES,WHETHER FUNCTIONAL OR ABANDONED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE WORK AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNS WHERE NECESSARY, CONSISTENT WITH ALL RELEVANT BUILDING CODES.6.INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 30' IN CONCRETE AS NOTED ON PLANS AND IN AREAS WHERE CONCRETE ABUTS CURBS AND OTHER FIXED OBJECTS.7.ANY DAMAGED OR DISTURBED PAVEMENTS, LANDSCAPE OR SITE FEATURES SHOWN TO REMAIN ARE TO BE REPAIRED / REPLACED IN KIND AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.CONTRACT LIMIT LINECONCRETE PAVEMENT #1 CRUSHED STONE PAVINGLEGENDSTONE DUST PAVING ADA DETECTABLE WARNING PLATESADA DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 COPYRIGHT C 2015IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS OR HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY HIS OR HER SIGNATURE AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATIONS.LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02/13/2015 13033 PJT / ARMJLF1001 W. Seneca St., Ste. 101 Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-1400 Fax 607-277-6092 File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwgPlot Date: 2/11/2015 L201LAYOUT PLAN 407 408 409 407 408 409 406 405 404 40 3 406 40 5 CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E LAKE STREET FA L L S S T R E E T CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E 4 0 7 . 9 0 4 0 7 . 9 0 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 8 . 9 0 40 8 . 9 5 MA T C H E X I S T I N G TC + / - 4 0 9 . 2 0 BC + / - 4 0 8 . 7 0 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 3 . 5 0 +/ - 4 0 3 . 5 0 40 6 . 4 3 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 8 . 8 0 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 8 . 8 0 4 0 5 . 7 0 4 0 5 . 4 0 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 9 . 3 0 4 0 5 . 3 0 4 0 5 . 3 0 40 5 . 7 3 4 0 5 . 2 0 2.0%10.0 % 5. 0 % MA X 5.0 % MA X 2 . 0 % 4 0 8 . 5 0 4 0 7 . 7 5 4 0 5 . 6 3 4 0 8 . 9 0 5.0 % MA X 4 0 8 . 1 5 4 0 8 . 1 5 MA T C H E X I S T I N G TC + / - 4 0 9 . 4 0 BC + / - 4 0 8 . 6 0 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 9 . 1 2 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 9 . 1 8 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 8 . 6 8 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 8 . 6 2 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 8 . 9 0 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 9 . 2 0 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 9 . 3 2 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 9 . 2 5 40 8 . 9 5 40 6 . 8 0 40 6 . 6 8 AD J U S T U T I L I T Y B O X F R A M E T O M A T C H G R A D E GENERAL SHEET NOTES - GRADING 1.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES HAVING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON SITE OR IN RIGHT-OF-WAY PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING COMPANY AND LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO GRADING START.2.GRADING AROUND EXISTING TREES TO BE MINIMIZED.3.MINIMIZE IMPACT TO EXISTING, REMAINING LANDSCAPE WHILE EXCAVATING. GREAT CARE IS TO BE TAKEN TO AVOID DISTURBING ROOTS OF EXISTING TREES. HAND EXCAVATION AND/OR EXCAVATION WITH AN AIR SPADE WILL BE REQUIRED WHERE EXISTING TREE ROOTS ARE PRESENT.4.ALL EXISTING UTILITY COVERS AND GRATES WITHIN THE AREA OF DISTURBANCE ARE TO BE ADJUSTED TO MEET GRADES.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH WILL AFFECT THE WORK REQUIRED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.DO NOT PROCEED WITH ANY GRADING ACTIVITIES UNTIL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE. REFER TO SHEET L101 FOR LOCATIONS.EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONCONTOUR BC BOTTOM OF CURBTC TOP OF CURBEL 802.07LEGEND CONTRACT LIMIT LINE File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwgPlot Date: 2/11/2015 L301GRADING PLAN ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 COPYRIGHT C 2015IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS OR HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY HIS OR HER SIGNATURE AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATIONS.LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02/13/2015 13033 PJT / ARMJLF1001 W. Seneca St., Ste. 101 Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-1400 Fax 607-277-6092 CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E LAKE STREET FA L L S S T R E E T CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E CS C 5 CS C 7 CC N 1 BE D ED G E BE D E D G E GENERAL SHEET NOTES - PLANTING 1.TOPSOIL MUST BE SCREENED AND AMENDED TO MEET PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. SEE WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIREMENTS OF VARIOUS SOIL MIXES.2.ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE PREPARED AS SPECIFIED: SHRUB BEDS TO BE PREPARED IN THEIR ENTIRETY WITH 24" OF PLANTING SOIL MIX. LAWN AREAS TO BE PREPARED WITH 4"OF TOPSOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS.3.AFTER BEDS ARE PREPARED, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS TO LOCATE SHRUBS AND TREE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SHRUB AND TREE LOCATIONS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE THEY ARE PLANTED.4.ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS PAVED OR PLANTED BED ARE TO BE SEEDED AS LAWN. PREPARE LAWN AS PER SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.5.ALL PLANTS TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI 260.1 "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK".6.MAINTAIN AND WARRANTY ALL LIVING PLANT MATERIAL AS PER SPECIFICATIONS.TREE SHRUBS / PERENNIALSLEGEND TURF SOIL SEED MIX LOW MOW SEED MIX CONTRACT LIMIT LINE SYMBOLQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEROOTCOMMENTS TREES CCNCercis Canadensis 'Northland Strain'Eastern Redbud6-8'B&B SHRUBS CSCCornus sericea 'Cardinal'Redosier Dogwood#5ContFull, MaleFull112 File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwgPlot Date: 2/11/2015 L401PLANTING PLAN ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 COPYRIGHT C 2015IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS OR HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY HIS OR HER SIGNATURE AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATIONS.LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02/13/2015 13033 PJT / ARMJLF1001 W. Seneca St., Ste. 101 Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-1400 Fax 607-277-6092 CONCRETE WALK 6 X 6 X W2.9 X W 2.9 WELDED WIRE MESH,FLAT SHEETS SET ON CHAIRS COMPACTED SUBBASE COMPACTED SUBGRADENOTES:1.2" MINIMUM CONCRETE COVERAGE ON MESH AND TIES WIDTH AS SHOWN ON PLAN CROSS SLOPE AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN 5"8"Scale: 1"=1'-0"MEDIUM DUTY CONCRETE WALK DETAILA53"LIMESTONE DUST PAVING OR #1 ANGULAR CRUSHED STONE (1/8" TO 1/2" DIA.)COMPACTED SUBGRADE3" Sc a l e : 1 " = 1 ' - 0 " ST O N E D U S T ( O R C R U S H E D S T O N E ) W I T H B L U E S T O N E E D G I N G A4 SEPARATION FABRIC 4" 2" BLUESTONE EDGING (IRREGULAR EDGE)1" SAND SETTING BED COMPACTED SUBBASE NO T E : 1. P A T T E R N B L U E S T O N E I R R E G U L A R E D G E 2. D I M E N S I O N S : 4 " x 4 " M I N I M U M , 4 " x 8 " M A X I M U M 3. P R O V I D E A R A N G E O F S I Z E S . 4. S A W C U T S T O N E A T P A T H E D G E S W H E R E N E C E S S A R Y T O A C H I E V E A S M O O T H , L I N E A R E D G E . 5. M E T A L E D G I N G T O B E B L A C K C O L M E T S T E E L E D G I N G O R A P P R O V E D E Q U A L 6. R E F E R T O L A Y O U T P L A N L 2 0 1 F O R L O C A T I O N S O F S T O N E D U S T A N D C R U S H E D S T O N E 1/8" METAL EDGINGLAWN316" X 3" X 3" S.S.WELDED WIRE MESH114" ID STAINLESS STEEL PIPE VARIES, SEE SHEET L201 (6'-0" MAX.)NOTES:1.ALL RAILINGS, POSTS, AND WIRE MESH TO BE STAINLESS STEEL 2.FINISH SHALL BE BEAD BLAST 3.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED ONCE GRANITE COLUMNS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED.4.REFER TO DETAIL A2/L501 FOR INTERFACE WITH GRANITE COLUMNS.5.PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS AT APPROXIMATELY EVERY 18'6.PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS SHOWING ALL TYPICAL RAIL COMPONENTS AND LOCATIONS OF EXPANSION JOINTS AND FIELD WELDS PRIOR TO FABRICATION.7.METAL FABRICATOR TO INSTALL ALL GUARDRAILS.8.GUARDRAILS TO BE STEPPED WITH SLOPING GRADES. REFER TO GRADING PLAN L301 FOR GRADES 3'-6"114" ID STAINLESS STEEL PIPE 4" MAX.34"Ø PICKET 3'-6"4"5"5"6"SECTION Scale: 1/2"=1'-0"GUARDRAIL B412" Ø 3000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING 4'-0"3'-6"12" Ø 3000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING COMPACTED SUBBASE 1'-0" Sc a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " AD A C U R B R A M P A3 6' - 0 " T Y P 6' - 0 " PITCH 1:12 DE T E C T A B L E W A R N I N G S - S E E S P E C S . NO T E S : 1. S E E L A Y O U T P L A N F O R L O C A T I O N A N D D I M E N S I O N O F C U R B R A M P S 2. G R A D E C H A N G E S T O B E S M O O T H A N D E V E N L Y P I T C H E D . 6'-0" TYP 1: 4 6' T Y P . 4 1 IS O M E T R I C V I E W N . T . S . PL A N 2' T Y P . 2' T Y P . PIT C H 1 : 1 2 1 4 6' T Y P . 6" TYP 6' - 0 " T Y P 1: 4 LA W N LA W N PL A N T S H A L L B E S E T A T O R S L I G H T L Y A B O V E TH E E S T A B L I S H E D F I N I S H G R A D E 4" S P E C I F I E D S H R E D D E D B A R K M U L C H UN T I E A N D R O L L B A C K B U R L A P F R O M 1 / 3 M I N . OF R O O T B A L L . S Y N T H E T I C W R A P I S UN A C C E P T A B L E . C U T A N D R E M O V E EV E R Y T H I N G E X C E P T B U R L A P . SP E C I F I E D P L A N T I N G M I X SP A D E E D G E O F M U L C H P E R I M E T E R SC A R I F Y S I D E S A N D B O T T O M O F T R E E P I T T O PR E V E N T G L A Z I N G O F S U B G R A D E . S E T T R E E DI R E C T L Y O N F I R M L Y P A C K E D S U B G R A D E T O PR E V E N T S E T T L I N G . 3X W I D T H O F R O O T B A L L ( 7 ' M I N . ) 6" MIN KE E P M U L C H A W A Y F R O M T R U N K A N D T R U N K FL A R E PR U N E A N D R E M O V E D E A D A N D B R O K E N BR A N C H E S Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " TR E E P L A N T I N G C3 Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " BI K E R A C K O N P A D D E T A I L A1 DE R O ' H O O P R A C K ' H D ST A I N L E S S S T E E L B I K E R A C K CO N C R E T E P A D : S E E D E T A I L A 5 / L 5 0 1 SU R F A C E M O U N T T O C O N C R E T E B A S E PA D W I T H S T A I N L E S S S T E E L FA S T E N E R S 114" I D S T A I N L E S S S T E E L P I P E VA R I E S , S E E S H E E T L 2 0 1 (6 ' - 0 " M A X . ) NO T E S : 1. A L L R A I L I N G S A N D P O S T S T O B E S T A I N L E S S S T E E L . 2. F I N I S H S H A L L B E B E A D B L A S T T O M A T C H G U A R D R A I L . 3. A L L D I M E N S I O N S A R E T O B E F I E L D V E R I F I E D O N C E G R A N I T E C O L U M N S H A V E B E E N I N S T A L L E D . 4. R E F E R T O D E T A I L A 2 / L 5 0 1 F O R I N T E R F A C E W I T H G R A N I T E C O L U M N S . 5. P R O V I D E E X P A N S I O N J O I N T S A T A P P R O X I M A T E L Y E V E R Y 1 8 ' . 6. P R O V I D E S H O P D R A W I N G S S H O W I N G A L L T Y P I C A L R A I L C O M P O N E N T S A N D L O C A T I O N S O F E X P A N S I O N JO I N T S A N D F I E L D W E L D S P R I O R T O F A B R I C A T I O N . 7. M E T A L F A B R I C A T O R T O I N S T A L L A L L B A R R I E R R A I L S . 8. B A R R I E R R A I L S T O B E S T E P P E D W I T H S L O P I N G G R A D E S . R E F E R T O G R A D I N G P L A N L 3 0 1 F O R G R A D E S 3'-0" 3'-6" 4" 5" 5" 6" SE C T I O N Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " BA R R I E R R A I L B3 12 " Ø 3 0 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E F O O T I N G 4'-0" 3'-6" 12 " Ø 3 0 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E F O O T I N G CO M P A C T E D S U B B A S E 1' - 0 " 3'-6" 316 " X 3 " X 3 " S . S . WE L D E D W I R E M E S H 30 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E FO O T I N G 5' - 0 " 10" 5" SE C T I O N Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " GA T E B1 30 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E F O O T I N G 4'-0" 3'-6" NO T E S : 1. A L L R A I L I N G S , P O S T S , A N D W I R E M E S H T O B E S T A I N L E S S S T E E L . 2. F I N I S H S H A L L B E B E A D B L A S T T O M A T C H G U A R D R A I L . 3. A L L D I M E N S I O N S A R E T O B E F I E L D V E R I F I E D O N C E G R A N I T E C O L U M N S H A V E BE E N I N S T A L L E D . 4. R E F E R T O D E T A I L A 2 / L 5 0 1 F O R I N T E R F A C E W I T H G R A N I T E C O L U M N S . 5. P R O V I D E S H O P D R A W I N G S S H O W I N G A L L T Y P I C A L G A T E C O M P O N E N T S A N D LO C A T I O N S O F F I E L D W E L D S P R I O R T O F A B R I C A T I O N . 6. M E T A L F A B R I C A T O R T O I N S T A L L G A T E . 1' - 6 " 3'-6" 10" 3'-6" 5" 32 PL A N N. T . S . 114" I D S T A I N L E S S S T E E L P I P E 4'-0" TE N S I O N C A B L E SS S L E E V E S F O R C A N E B O L T S (3 ) L O C A T I O N S E A C H S I D E : 1. O P E N 2. P A R T I A L L Y O P E N 3. C L O S E D 2 1 1 3 4"Ø P I C K E T 4" Ø P O S T 4" GR A N I T E C O L U M N CO M P A C T E D S U B B A S E 1' - 3 " GR A N I T E C O L U M N 2' - 0 " S Q R . 3'-6"4'-0"6" 12 " BA C K F I L L 30 0 0 P S I C O N C R E T E B A C K I N G Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " GR A N I T E C O L U M N A2 AD J A C E N T C O N C R E T E F O O T E R CO M P A C T E D S U B B A S E GU A R D R A I L , B A R R I E R R A I L , O R GA T E ( S E E L 2 0 1 F O R L O C A T I O N S ) 4" 24 " X 2 4 " G R A N I T E B O L L A R D WI T H R O C K E D S A W N A N D TH E R M A L E D T O P , S P L I T F A C E SI D E S Scale: 1/2"=1'-0"SHRUB PLANTINGC4NOTES:1.PLANT AT SAME DEPTH AS PREVIOUSLY PLANTED IN NURSERY OR CONTAINER 2.PROVIDE COMPACTED BASE UNDER ROOT BALL ONLY TO PREVENT SETTLING 3.ENTIRE BED TO BE EXCAVATED AND BACKFILLED WITH PLANTING MIX SHREDDED BARK MULCH, EXTENT OF BEDLINE, INCLUDE IN PLANTING ITEMS:x4" (100mm) FOR SHRUBS x3" (75mm) FOR PERENNIALS AND BULBSUNTIE AND ROLL BACK BURLAP FROM MIN. 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. SYNTHETIC WRAP IS UNACCEPTABLE. CUT WIRE BASKETS AND REMOVE.SPECIFIED PLANTING MIXSPADED BED EDGE COMPACTED BASE24" MIN, SEE SOIL AND MULCH PLAN AN C H O R B E N C H T O C O N C R E T E P A D WI T H 6 " L S . S . H A R D W A R E O R A S DI R E C T E D B Y M A N U F A C T U R E R CO N C R E T E P A D ; S E E D E T A I L A 5 / L 5 0 1 NO T E S : 1. B E N C H T O B E U S E D I S M L B 1 2 0 0 b y M A G L I N SI T E F U R N I T U R E P H : 8 0 0 . 7 1 6 . 5 5 0 6 2. W O O D S E A T A N D B A C K T O B E I P E . 3. C O L O R T B D . 4. O P T I O N S : A R M S B O T H S I D E S 5. L E V E L B E N C H U S I N G S H I M S A S N E E D E D . 6. D O N O R S I G N F R O M " K I W A N I S C L U B O F IT H A C A " T O B E T R A N S F E R E D F R O M EX I S T I N G P A R K B E N C H E S T O N E W BE N C H E S . P L A C E M E N T O N B E N C H E S T B D Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " BE N C H W I T H C O N C R E T E P A D ( B E N C H I S A D D A L T E R N A T E ) C1 IM A G E : M A G L I N M L B 1 2 0 0 B E N C H ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 ABCD DATE:PROJECT:CHECKED:DRAWN BY: 12 3 4 5 COPYRIGHT C 2015IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON THIS DOCUMENT WHO ALTERS THIS DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO AFFIX HIS OR HER SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY HIS OR HER SIGNATURE AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF ALTERATIONS.LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02/13/2015 13033 PJT / ARMJLF1001 W. Seneca St., Ste. 101 Ithaca, NY 14850 607-277-1400 Fax 607-277-6092 File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 DETAILS.dwgPlot Date: 2/11/2015 L501SITE DETAILS A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 CO P Y R I G H T C 2 0 1 5 I T I S A V I O L A T I O N O F L A W F O R A N Y P E R S O N , U N L E S S A C T I N G U N D E R T H E D I REC TI ON OF A L IC EN S E D LAN D S CA P E ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON TH IS D O C U M E N T W H O A L T E R S T H I S D O C U M E N T I S R E Q U I R E D B Y L A W T O A F F I X H I S O R H E R S E A L A N D T H E N OTATI ON " A LTER E D B Y" FOLLOW ED BY HI S OR HER SIGN ATUR E AND A SPECI FIC D E S C R I P T I O N O F A L T E R A T I O N S . LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 13 0 3 3 PJ T / A R M JL F 10 0 1 W . S e n e c a S t . , S t e . 1 0 1 I t h a c a , N Y 1 4 8 5 0 60 7 - 2 7 7 - 1 4 0 0 F a x 6 0 7 - 2 7 7 - 6 0 9 2 File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwg Plot Date: 2/11/2015 L0 0 0 CO V E R IL L U S T R A T I V E P L A N CITY OF ITHACALAKE STREETPUBLIC PARK ENHANC E M E N T S TWMLA Project No. 2013033PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REVIEWCITY OF ITHACA401 LAKE STREETIthaca NY 14850DRAWING LISTSurveyS1 SITE SURVEYLandscapeL100 RENDERED PLANL101DEMOLITION PLANL201LAYOUT PLANL301 GRADING PLANL401 PLANTING PLANL501 SITE DETAILS File: G:\LSPP_Preliminary SPR\PRINT, report, application, rr, dwgs\dwgs\TWMLA2013033 BASE_r3 - Standard\TWMLA2013033 SURVEY_TTBLK.dwg Plot Date: 2/6/2015 S- 1 SU R V E Y A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 CO P Y R I G H T C 2 0 1 5 I T I S A V I O L A T I O N O F L A W F O R A N Y P E R S O N , U N L E S S A C T I N G U N D E R T H E D I REC TI ON OF A L IC EN S E D LAN D S CA P E ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON TH IS D O C U M E N T W H O A L T E R S T H I S D O C U M E N T I S R E Q U I R E D B Y L A W T O A F F I X H I S O R H E R S E A L A N D T H E N OTATI ON " A LTER E D B Y" FOLLOW ED BY HI S OR HER SIGN ATUR E AND A SPECI FIC D E S C R I P T I O N O F A L T E R A T I O N S . LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 13 0 3 3 PJ T / A R M JL F 10 0 1 W . S e n e c a S t . , S t e . 1 0 1 I t h a c a , N Y 1 4 8 5 0 60 7 - 2 7 7 - 1 4 0 0 F a x 6 0 7 - 2 7 7 - 6 0 9 2 RE M O V E B E N C H A N D C O N C R E T E PA D ( K E E P P L A Q U E F O R RE M O U N T I N G - S E E N O T E 1 6 ) RE M O V E B E N C H A N D C O N C R E T E PA D ( K E E P P L A Q U E F O R RE M O U N T I N G - S E E N O T E 1 6 ) UTILITY BOX TO BE ADJUSTEDPER GRADING PLAN - SEE L301 SI L T F E N C E INLET PROTECTIONA5L101 B5 L1 0 1 CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E LAKE STREETFALLS STREET CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E GE N E R A L N O T E S - D E M O L I T I O N 1. CO N S T R U C T I O N F E N C I N G T O B E I N S T A L L E D A S N E C E S S A R Y T O P R O T E C T P E D E S T R I A N S , C O N T R O L VE H I C U L A R T R A F F I C A N D P R O T E C T O N - S I T E C O N S T R U C T I O N M A T E R I A L S . 2. GE N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L N O T I F Y A L L U T I L I T Y O W N E R S H A V I N G U N D E R G R O U N D U T I L I T I E S O N SI T E P R I O R T O E X C A V A T I O N . 3. AS P E R N . Y . S . I N D U S T R I A L C O D E 7 5 3 : C O N T R A C T O R T O C A L L D I G S A F E L Y N E W Y O R K (1 - 8 0 0 - 9 6 2 - 7 9 6 2 ) T O L O C A T E B U R I E D C A B L E S O R O T H E R U N D E R G R O U N D U T I L I T I E S N O L E S S T H A N TW O O R M O R E T H A N T E N W O R K I N G D A Y S P R I O R T O D I G G I N G , D R I L L I N G , E X C A V A T I N G , D R I V I N G PO S T S , E T C . 4. CO N T R A C T O R S H A L L K E E P S T R E E T A N D E X I S T I N G W A L K W A Y S C L E A R O F A L L D E B R I S A N D SE D I M E N T A N D S H A L L C L E A N S T R E E T A N D W A L K W A Y S A T T H E E N D O F E A C H D A Y . 5. PR O V I D E S I L T F E N C I N G A T A L L D O W N H I L L S I D E S O F W O R K A S I N D I C A T E D . 6. PR O V I D E S E D I M E N T A T I O N C O N T R O L S A T A L L E X I S T I N G D R A I N A G E I N L E T S A F F E C T E D B Y N E W CO N S T R U C T I O N . 7. EN C I R C L E A L L S T O C K P I L E S W I T H S I L T F E N C E A N D C O V E R T H E M W I T H A T A R P W I T H I N 7 D A Y S O F FO R M A T I O N . 8. EX I S T I N G B I K E R A C K A N D B E N C H E S S H A L L B E R E M O V E D C O M P L E T E L Y I N C L U D I N G F O O T I N G S UN L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D O N P L A N . 9. BA S E M A T E R I A L I N A R E A S T O R E C E I V E P A V E M E N T T O B E E X C A V A T E D T O S U B - G R A D E E L E V A T I O N S AS R E Q U I R E D T O A C C O M M O D A T E B A S E C O U R S E . 10 . PR O T E C T A L L S U R F A C E A N D S U B S U R F A C E U T I L I T I E S T O R E M A I N D U R I N G D E M O L I T I O N W O R K . 11 . AL L R E M O V E D / D E M O L I S H E D M A T E R I A L S H A L L B E C O M E C O N T R A C T O R ' S P R O P E R T Y A N D B E RE M O V E D F R O M S I T E , U N L E S S N O T E D O T H E R W I S E . O W N E R T O R E S E R V E R I G H T O F F I R S T RE F U S A L O N A L L D E M O L I S H E D M A T E R I A L . 12 . PR O T E C T E X I S T I N G P A V E M E N T S , L A N D S C A P E , & S I T E F E A T U R E S T O R E M A I N . A N Y D A M A G E D O R DI S T U R B E D P A V E M E N T S , L A N D S C A P E O R S I T E F E A T U R E S S H O W N T O R E M A I N A R E T O B E RE P A I R E D / R E P L A C E D I N K I N D A T N O C O S T T O T H E O W N E R . 13 . TO P S O I L T O B E S T R I P P E D A N D S T O C K P I L E D F O R R E S P R E A D I N G . 14 . PR O T E C T E X I S T I N G T R E E S T O R E M A I N . DO N O T S T O R E E Q U I P M E N T O R M A T E R I A L S W I T H I N T H E DR I P L I N E O F T R E E S . 15 . MI N I M I Z E I M P A C T T O E X I S T I N G , R E M A I N I N G L A N D S C A P E W H I L E E X C A V A T I N G . G R E A T C A R E I S T O BE T A K E N T O A V O I D D I S T U R B I N G R O O T S O F E X I S T I N G T R E E S . H A N D E X C A V A T I O N & A I R S P A D E RE Q U I R E D W H E R E E X I S T I N G T R E E R O O T S A R E P R E S E N T . 16 . DO N O R P L A Q U E S O N B E N C H E S T O B E R E M O V E D A N D C L E A N E D F O R R E I N S T A L L A T I O N O N N E W BE N C H E S . CO N S T R U C T I O N F E N C E BE N C H E S , B I K E R A C K S , A N D CO N C R E T E P A D S T O B E R E M O V E D SA W C U T P A V E M E N T CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E GR A N I T E C U R B T O B E R E M O V E D LE G E N D IN L E T P R O T E C T I O N SI L T F E N C E G R A D E 1'-8" MIN.1'-4" MIN. 6" 6" NO T E S : 1. WO V E N W I R E F E N C E T O B E F A S T E N E D S E C U R E L Y T O F E N C E P O S T W I T H W I R E T I E S O R ST A P L E S . 2. FI L T E R F A B R I C T O B E F A S T E N E D S E C U R E L Y T O W O V E N W I R E F E N C E W I T H T I E S S P A C E D EV E R Y 2 4 " A T T O P A N D M I D S E C T I O N . 3. WH E N T W O S E C T I O N S O F F A B R I C A D J O I N E A C H O T H E R , O V E R L A P B Y 6 " A N D F O L D . 4. PE R F O R M M A I N T E N A N C E A S N E E D E D A N D R E M O V E S I L T W H E N B U L G E S D E V E L O P I N T H E SI L T F E N C E . 5. AL L S I L T F E N C I N G A N D S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L S T O B E I N P L A C E B E F O R E C O N S T R U C T I O N BE G I N S A N D M U S T R E M A I N I N T A C T U N T I L C O N S T R U C T I O N I S C O M P L E T E A N D N E W L A W N I S MO R E T H A N 5 0 % G R O W N I N . Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " SI L T F E N C E B5 2" H A R D W O O D F E N C E P O S T @ 8 ' - 0 " O . C . WO V E N W I R E F E N C E ( M I N . 1 4 - 1 / 2 " G A U G E WI T H 6 " M E S H S P A C I N G ) W I T H F A B R I C O V E R FI L T E R F A B R I C : M I R A F I 1 0 0 X EN V I R O F E N C E O R A P P R O V E D E Q U A L SI L T DI G 6 " W I D E & D E E P T R E N C H , B U R Y BO T T O M 1 2 " O F F A B R I C , T A M P I N PL A C E NO T E S : 1. FI L T E R F A B R I C T O B E C U T F R O M C O N T I N U O U S R O L L T O E L I M I N A T E J O I N T S . I F J O I N T S A R E NE C E S S A R Y , O V E R L A P T O E X T E N D T O N E X T S T A K E . 2. SP A C E S T A K E S E V E N L Y A R O U N D D R A I N A G E S T R U C T U R E A T M A X I M U M 3 ' I N T E R V A L S A N D DR I V E T O M I N I M U M 1 8 " D E P T H I N T O S O I L . 3. FI L T E R F A B R I C T O B E S E C U R E L Y F A S T E N E D T O L U M B E R F R A M E A N D S H A L L B E E M B E D D E D A MI N I M U M 1 2 " I N T O S O I L . 12" MIN. 1'-6" MIN. Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " IN L E T P R O T E C T I O N A5 2X 4 L U M B E R S T A K E S A N D R A I L S OV E R F L O W W E I R B E L O W AD J O I N I N G G R A D E A S NE C E S S A R Y T O P R E V E N T BY P A S S O F R U N O F F T O N E X T DO W N S T R E A M S T R U C T U R E FI L T E R F A B R I C DR A I N A G E I N L E T O R S T O R M MA N H O L E File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwg Plot Date: 2/11/2015 L1 0 1 DE M O P L A N A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 CO P Y R I G H T C 2 0 1 5 I T I S A V I O L A T I O N O F L A W F O R A N Y P E R S O N , U N L E S S A C T I N G U N D E R T H E D I REC TI ON OF A L IC EN S E D LAN D S CA P E ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON TH IS D O C U M E N T W H O A L T E R S T H I S D O C U M E N T I S R E Q U I R E D B Y L A W T O A F F I X H I S O R H E R S E A L A N D T H E N OTATI ON " A LTER E D B Y" FOLLOW ED BY HI S OR HER SIGN ATUR E AND A SPECI FIC D E S C R I P T I O N O F A L T E R A T I O N S . LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 13 0 3 3 PJ T / A R M JL F 10 0 1 W . S e n e c a S t . , S t e . 1 0 1 I t h a c a , N Y 1 4 8 5 0 60 7 - 2 7 7 - 1 4 0 0 F a x 6 0 7 - 2 7 7 - 6 0 9 2 96.50' CO N C R E T E P A V E M E N T ST O N E D U S T P A V I N G W I T H B L U E S T O N E E D G I N G BE N C H W I T H C O N C R E T E P A D ( B E N C H I S A D D A L T E R N A T E ST O N E D U S T P A V I N G W I T H B L U E S T O N E E D G I N G BE N C H W I T H C O N C R E T E P A D ( B E N C H I S A D D A L T E R N A T E ) GR A N I T E C O L U M N GRA N I T E C O L U M N GRANITE COLUM N GR A N I T E C O L U M N GR A N I T E C O L U M N GU A R D R A I L GA T E GR A N I T E C O L U M N BA R R I E R R A I L BE N C H W I T H C O N C R E T E P A D (B E N C H I S A D D A L T E R N A T E ) ST O N E D U S T P A V I N G W I T H ME T A L E D G I N G #1 C R U S H E D S T O N E P A V I N G ME T A L E D G I N G PO T E N T I A L IN T E R P R E T I V E P A N E L (N O T I N C O N T R A C T ) CL CL CL GU A R D R A I L A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 A2L501 A2L501 A2 L5 0 1 A2 L5 0 1 B1 L5 0 1 B4 L5 0 1 B4 L5 0 1 B3 L5 0 1 A4 L5 0 1 A4L501 A4 L5 0 1 A4 L5 0 1 C1 L5 0 1 C1 L5 0 1 C1 L5 0 1 A5 L5 0 1 A5L501A3L501 GR A N I T E C O L U M N ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP CROSSWALK STRIPING(NOT IN CONCTRACT)CONCRETE PAVEMENT 10 7 . 7 5 ' 5.00' 2.00'6.00'1.50'4.00'4.75'+/-5.00'(MATCHWIDTH)11.75'6.00'2.00'2.50'2.00' 6.0 0 ' 1.7 5 ' 4.50' 10. 0 0 ' 4.50 ' 10 . 2 5 ' R4.00'R13.25' R 1 8 . 5 0 ' R53.75' R39.25' R 1 1 . 0 0 ' R 2 1 . 0 0 ' 3.25' 6 . 0 0 ' 10.00'17.00'R5.00' CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E LAKE STREETFALLS STREET CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E UTILITY BOX COVER TO B E R E P L A C E D WITH AN ADA COMPATIBL E C O V E R GE N E R A L S H E E T N O T E S - L A Y O U T 1. VE R I F Y D I M E N S I O N S A N D A C C E P T C O N D I T I O N S B E F O R E P R O C E E D I N G W I T H W O R K . R E P O R T DI S C R E P A N C I E S T O L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T F O R I N S T R U C T I O N B E F O R E P R O C E E D I N G . D O NO T S C A L E F R O M D R A W I N G S . 2. WA L K S , S T O N E D U S T A R E A S , R A I L I N G S , A N D G A T E T O B E L A I D O U T I N T H E F I E L D B Y A LI C E N S E D S U R V E Y O R . 3. SE E G R A D I N G P L A N S F O R S P O T E L E V A T I O N S A T S I T E F E A T U R E S I N C L U D I N G C O R N E R S O F PA V E M E N T S A N D R A I L I N G P O S T . 4. TH E R E I S N O G U A R A N T E E T H A T A L L E X I S T I N G U N D E R G R O U N D O R O V E R H E A D U T I L I T I E S , WH E T H E R F U N C T I O N A L O R A B A N D O N E D W I T H I N T H E P R O J E C T A R E A A R E S H O W N O N T H E PL A N S . T H E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L D E T E R M I N E T H E E X A C T L O C A T I O N O F A L L U T I L I T I E S BE F O R E S T A R T I N G W O R K A N D S H A L L B E R E S P O N S I B L E F O R A L L D A M A G E R E S U L T I N G F R O M TH E W O R K A S S H O W N O N T H E D R A W I N G S . 5. CO N T R A C T O R T O P R O V I D E T E M P O R A R Y T R A F F I C S I G N S W H E R E N E C E S S A R Y , C O N S I S T E N T WI T H A L L R E L E V A N T B U I L D I N G C O D E S . 6. IN S T A L L E X P A N S I O N J O I N T S E V E R Y 3 0 ' I N C O N C R E T E A S N O T E D O N P L A N S A N D I N A R E A S WH E R E C O N C R E T E A B U T S C U R B S A N D O T H E R F I X E D O B J E C T S . 7. AN Y D A M A G E D O R D I S T U R B E D P A V E M E N T S , L A N D S C A P E O R S I T E F E A T U R E S S H O W N T O RE M A I N A R E T O B E R E P A I R E D / R E P L A C E D I N K I N D A T N O C O S T T O T H E O W N E R . CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E CO N C R E T E P A V E M E N T #1 C R U S H E D S T O N E P A V I N G LE G E N D ST O N E D U S T P A V I N G AD A D E T E C T A B L E W A R N I N G P L A T E S AD A D E T E C T A B L E W A R N I N G P L A T E S A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 CO P Y R I G H T C 2 0 1 5 I T I S A V I O L A T I O N O F L A W F O R A N Y P E R S O N , U N L E S S A C T I N G U N D E R T H E D I REC TI ON OF A L IC EN S E D LAN D S CA P E ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON TH IS D O C U M E N T W H O A L T E R S T H I S D O C U M E N T I S R E Q U I R E D B Y L A W T O A F F I X H I S O R H E R S E A L A N D T H E N OTATI ON " A LTER E D B Y" FOLLOW ED BY HI S OR HER SIGN ATUR E AND A SPECI FIC D E S C R I P T I O N O F A L T E R A T I O N S . LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 13 0 3 3 PJ T / A R M JL F 10 0 1 W . S e n e c a S t . , S t e . 1 0 1 I t h a c a , N Y 1 4 8 5 0 60 7 - 2 7 7 - 1 4 0 0 F a x 6 0 7 - 2 7 7 - 6 0 9 2 File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwg Plot Date: 2/11/2015 L2 0 1 LA Y O U T P L A N 407 408 409 407 408 409 406 405 404 4 0 3 406 40 5 CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E LAKE STREETFALLS STREET CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E 407.9 0 4 0 7 . 9 0 MATCH EXISTING+/-408.90408. 9 5 MATCH EXISTINGTC +/- 409.20BC +/-408.70 MA T C H E X I S T I N G +/ - 4 0 3 . 5 0 +/ - 4 0 3 . 5 0 40 6 . 4 3 MATCH EXISTING+/-408.80MATCH EXISTING+/-408.80 4 0 5 . 7 0 4 0 5 . 4 0 MATCH EXISTING+/-409.30 4 0 5 . 3 0 4 0 5 . 3 0 40 5 . 7 3 4 0 5 . 2 0 2.0%10.0 % 5. 0 % MA X 5.0 % MA X 2.0% 408.50 4 0 7 . 7 5 4 0 5 . 6 3 408.905.0%MAX 408.15 408.15MATCH EXISTINGTC +/- 409.40BC+/-408.60 MATCH EXISTING+/-409.12MATCH EXISTING+/-409.18 MATCH EXISTING+/-408.68 MATCH EXISTING+/-408.62 MATCH EXISTING+/-408.90 MATCH EXISTING+/-409.20 MATCH EXISTING+/-409.32MATCH EXISTING+/-409.25408. 9 5 40 6 . 8 0 40 6 . 6 8 ADJUST UTILITY BOX F R A M E T O M A T C H G R A D E GE N E R A L S H E E T N O T E S - G R A D I N G 1. GE N E R A L C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L N O T I F Y A L L U T I L I T Y C O M P A N I E S H A V I N G U N D E R G R O U N D UT I L I T I E S O N S I T E O R I N R I G H T - O F - W A Y P R I O R T O E X C A V A T I O N . C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L CO N T A C T U T I L I T Y L O C A T I N G C O M P A N Y A N D L O C A T E A L L U T I L I T I E S P R I O R T O G R A D I N G ST A R T . 2. GR A D I N G A R O U N D E X I S T I N G T R E E S T O B E M I N I M I Z E D . 3. MI N I M I Z E I M P A C T T O E X I S T I N G , R E M A I N I N G L A N D S C A P E W H I L E E X C A V A T I N G . G R E A T C A R E IS T O B E T A K E N T O A V O I D D I S T U R B I N G R O O T S O F E X I S T I N G T R E E S . H A N D E X C A V A T I O N AN D / O R E X C A V A T I O N W I T H A N A I R S P A D E W I L L B E R E Q U I R E D W H E R E E X I S T I N G T R E E RO O T S A R E P R E S E N T . 4. AL L E X I S T I N G U T I L I T Y C O V E R S A N D G R A T E S W I T H I N T H E A R E A O F D I S T U R B A N C E A R E T O B E AD J U S T E D T O M E E T G R A D E S . 5. TH E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L F I E L D V E R I F Y E X I S T I N G T O P O G R A P H Y P R I O R T O CO M M E N C E M E N T O F E A R T H W O R K O P E R A T I O N S . A N Y D I S C R E P A N C I E S W H I C H W I L L A F F E C T TH E W O R K R E Q U I R E D A S P A R T O F T H E C O N T R A C T D O C U M E N T S S H A L L B E I M M E D I A T E L Y RE P O R T E D T O T H E L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T . 6. DO N O T P R O C E E D W I T H A N Y G R A D I N G A C T I V I T I E S U N T I L A L L E R O S I O N C O N T R O L M E A S U R E S AR E I N P L A C E . R E F E R T O S H E E T L 1 0 1 F O R L O C A T I O N S . EX I S T I N G C O N T O U R MA J O R C O N T O U R SP O T E L E V A T I O N EX I S T I N G S P O T E L E V A T I O N CO N T O U R BC B O T T O M O F C U R B TC T O P O F C U R B EL 8 0 2 . 0 7 LE G E N D CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwg Plot Date: 2/11/2015 L3 0 1 GR A D I N G P L A N A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 CO P Y R I G H T C 2 0 1 5 I T I S A V I O L A T I O N O F L A W F O R A N Y P E R S O N , U N L E S S A C T I N G U N D E R T H E D I REC TI ON OF A L IC EN S E D LAN D S CA P E ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON TH IS D O C U M E N T W H O A L T E R S T H I S D O C U M E N T I S R E Q U I R E D B Y L A W T O A F F I X H I S O R H E R S E A L A N D T H E N OTATI ON " A LTER E D B Y" FOLLOW ED BY HI S OR HER SIGN ATUR E AND A SPECI FIC D E S C R I P T I O N O F A L T E R A T I O N S . LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 13 0 3 3 PJ T / A R M JL F 10 0 1 W . S e n e c a S t . , S t e . 1 0 1 I t h a c a , N Y 1 4 8 5 0 60 7 - 2 7 7 - 1 4 0 0 F a x 6 0 7 - 2 7 7 - 6 0 9 2 CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E LAKE STREETFALLS STREET CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E CSC5CSC7 CC N 1 BEDEDGE BE D E D G E GE N E R A L S H E E T N O T E S - P L A N T I N G 1. TO P S O I L M U S T B E S C R E E N E D A N D A M E N D E D T O M E E T P R O J E C T S P E C I F I C A T I O N S . S E E WR I T T E N S P E C I F I C A T I O N S F O R R E Q U I R E M E N T S O F V A R I O U S S O I L M I X E S . 2. AL L P L A N T I N G B E D S T O B E P R E P A R E D A S S P E C I F I E D : S H R U B B E D S T O B E P R E P A R E D I N TH E I R E N T I R E T Y W I T H 2 4 " O F P L A N T I N G S O I L M I X . L A W N A R E A S T O B E P R E P A R E D W I T H 4 " OF T O P S O I L P E R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S . 3. AF T E R B E D S A R E P R E P A R E D , T H E L A N D S C A P E C O N T R A C T O R I S T O L O C A T E S H R U B S A N D TR E E A S S H O W N O N P L A N S . S H R U B A N D T R E E L O C A T I O N S A R E T O B E A P P R O V E D B Y LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T B E F O R E T H E Y A R E P L A N T E D . 4. AL L D I S T U R B E D A R E A S T H A T A R E N O T S H O W N A S P A V E D O R P L A N T E D B E D A R E T O B E SE E D E D A S L A W N . P R E P A R E L A W N A S P E R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S A N D D E T A I L S , U N L E S S OT H E R W I S E I N D I C A T E D . 5. AL L P L A N T S T O C O M P L Y W I T H A P P L I C A B L E R E Q U I R E M E N T S O F A N S I 2 6 0 . 1 " A M E R I C A N ST A N D A R D F O R N U R S E R Y S T O C K " . 6. MA I N T A I N A N D W A R R A N T Y A L L L I V I N G P L A N T M A T E R I A L A S P E R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S . TR E E SH R U B S / P E R E N N I A L S LE G E N D TU R F S O I L S E E D M I X LO W M O W S E E D M I X CO N T R A C T L I M I T L I N E SY M B O L QT Y BO T A N I C A L N A M E CO M M O N N A M E SI Z E RO O T CO M M E N T S TR E E S CC N Ce r c i s C a n a d e n s i s ' N o r t h l a n d S t r a i n ' Ea s t e r n R e d b u d 6- 8 ' B& B SH R U B S CS C Co r n u s s e r i c e a ' C a r d i n a l ' Re d o s i e r D o g w o o d #5 Co n t Fu l l , M a l e Fu l l 112 File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 BASE.dwg Plot Date: 2/11/2015 L4 0 1 PL A N T I N G P L A N A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 CO P Y R I G H T C 2 0 1 5 I T I S A V I O L A T I O N O F L A W F O R A N Y P E R S O N , U N L E S S A C T I N G U N D E R T H E D I REC TI ON OF A L IC EN S E D LAN D S CA P E ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON TH IS D O C U M E N T W H O A L T E R S T H I S D O C U M E N T I S R E Q U I R E D B Y L A W T O A F F I X H I S O R H E R S E A L A N D T H E N OTATI ON " A LTER E D B Y" FOLLOW ED BY HI S OR HER SIGN ATUR E AND A SPECI FIC D E S C R I P T I O N O F A L T E R A T I O N S . LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 13 0 3 3 PJ T / A R M JL F 10 0 1 W . S e n e c a S t . , S t e . 1 0 1 I t h a c a , N Y 1 4 8 5 0 60 7 - 2 7 7 - 1 4 0 0 F a x 6 0 7 - 2 7 7 - 6 0 9 2 CO N C R E T E W A L K 6 X 6 X W 2 . 9 X W 2 . 9 W E L D E D W I R E M E S H , FL A T S H E E T S S E T O N C H A I R S CO M P A C T E D S U B B A S E CO M P A C T E D S U B G R A D E NO T E S : 1. 2" M I N I M U M C O N C R E T E C O V E R A G E O N M E S H A N D T I E S WI D T H A S S H O W N O N P L A N CR O S S S L O P E A S S H O W N ON G R A D I N G P L A N 5"8" Sc a l e : 1 " = 1 ' - 0 " ME D I U M D U T Y C O N C R E T E W A L K D E T A I L A5 3" LI M E S T O N E D U S T P A V I N G OR #1 A N G U L A R C R U S H E D ST O N E ( 1 / 8 " T O 1 / 2 " D I A . ) CO M P A C T E D S U B G R A D E 3" Sc a l e : 1 " = 1 ' - 0 " ST O N E D U S T ( O R C R U S H E D S T O N E ) W I T H B L U E S T O N E E D G I N G A4 SE P A R A T I O N F A B R I C 4" 2" B L U E S T O N E E D G I N G (I R R E G U L A R E D G E ) 1" S A N D S E T T I N G B E D CO M P A C T E D S U B B A S E NO T E : 1. P A T T E R N B L U E S T O N E I R R E G U L A R E D G E 2. D I M E N S I O N S : 4 " x 4 " M I N I M U M , 4 " x 8 " M A X I M U M 3. P R O V I D E A R A N G E O F S I Z E S . 4. S A W C U T S T O N E A T P A T H E D G E S W H E R E N E C E S S A R Y T O A C H I E V E A S M O O T H , L I N E A R E D G E . 5. M E T A L E D G I N G T O B E B L A C K C O L M E T S T E E L E D G I N G O R A P P R O V E D E Q U A L 6. R E F E R T O L A Y O U T P L A N L 2 0 1 F O R L O C A T I O N S O F S T O N E D U S T A N D C R U S H E D S T O N E 1/ 8 " M E T A L E D G I N G LA W N 3 16 " X 3 " X 3 " S . S . WE L D E D W I R E M E S H 11 4" I D S T A I N L E S S S T E E L P I P E VA R I E S , S E E S H E E T L 2 0 1 (6 ' - 0 " M A X . ) NO T E S : 1. AL L R A I L I N G S , P O S T S , A N D W I R E M E S H T O B E S T A I N L E S S S T E E L 2. FI N I S H S H A L L B E B E A D B L A S T 3. AL L D I M E N S I O N S A R E T O B E F I E L D V E R I F I E D O N C E G R A N I T E C O L U M N S H A V E B E E N I N S T A L L E D . 4. RE F E R T O D E T A I L A 2 / L 5 0 1 F O R I N T E R F A C E W I T H G R A N I T E C O L U M N S . 5. PR O V I D E E X P A N S I O N J O I N T S A T A P P R O X I M A T E L Y E V E R Y 1 8 ' 6. PR O V I D E S H O P D R A W I N G S S H O W I N G A L L T Y P I C A L R A I L C O M P O N E N T S A N D L O C A T I O N S O F E X P A N S I O N J O I N T S A N D F I E L D W E L D S P R I O R T O FA B R I C A T I O N . 7. ME T A L F A B R I C A T O R T O I N S T A L L A L L G U A R D R A I L S . 8. GU A R D R A I L S T O B E S T E P P E D W I T H S L O P I N G G R A D E S . R E F E R T O G R A D I N G P L A N L 3 0 1 F O R G R A D E S 3'-6" 11 4" I D S T A I N L E S S S T E E L P I P E 4" MAX. 3 4‘  3 , & . ( 7 3'-6" 4" 5" 5" 6" SE C T I O N Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " GU A R D R A I L B4 12 " ‘ 3 0 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E F O O T I N G 4'-0" 3'-6" 12 " ‘ 3 0 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E F O O T I N G CO M P A C T E D S U B B A S E 1' - 0 " Sc a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " AD A C U R B R A M P A3 6' - 0 " T Y P 6' - 0 " PITCH 1:12 DE T E C T A B L E W A R N I N G S - S E E S P E C S . NO T E S : 1. SE E L A Y O U T P L A N F O R L O C A T I O N A N D D I M E N S I O N O F C U R B R A M P S 2. GR A D E C H A N G E S T O B E S M O O T H A N D E V E N L Y P I T C H E D . 6'-0" TYP 1: 4 6' T Y P . 4 1 IS O M E T R I C V I E W N . T . S . PL A N 2' T Y P . 2' T Y P . PIT C H 1 : 1 2 1 4 6' T Y P . 6" TYP 6' - 0 " T Y P 1: 4 LA W N LA W N PL A N T S H A L L B E S E T A T O R S L I G H T L Y A B O V E TH E E S T A B L I S H E D F I N I S H G R A D E 4" S P E C I F I E D S H R E D D E D B A R K M U L C H UN T I E A N D R O L L B A C K B U R L A P F R O M 1 / 3 M I N . OF R O O T B A L L . S Y N T H E T I C W R A P I S UN A C C E P T A B L E . C U T A N D R E M O V E EV E R Y T H I N G E X C E P T B U R L A P . SP E C I F I E D P L A N T I N G M I X SP A D E E D G E O F M U L C H P E R I M E T E R SC A R I F Y S I D E S A N D B O T T O M O F T R E E P I T T O PR E V E N T G L A Z I N G O F S U B G R A D E . S E T T R E E DI R E C T L Y O N F I R M L Y P A C K E D S U B G R A D E T O PR E V E N T S E T T L I N G . 3X W I D T H O F R O O T B A L L ( 7 ' M I N . ) 6" MIN KE E P M U L C H A W A Y F R O M T R U N K A N D T R U N K FL A R E PR U N E A N D R E M O V E D E A D A N D B R O K E N BR A N C H E S Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " TR E E P L A N T I N G C3 Scale: 1/2"=1'-0"BIKE RACK ON PAD DETAILA1 DERO 'HOOP RACK' HDSTAINLESS STEEL BIKE RACKCONCRETE PAD: SEE DETAIL A5/L501 SURFACE MOUNT TO CONCRETE BASEPAD WITH STAINLESS STEELFASTENERS 11 4" I D S T A I N L E S S S T E E L P I P E VA R I E S , S E E S H E E T L 2 0 1 (6 ' - 0 " M A X . ) NO T E S : 1. AL L R A I L I N G S A N D P O S T S T O B E S T A I N L E S S S T E E L . 2. FI N I S H S H A L L B E B E A D B L A S T T O M A T C H G U A R D R A I L . 3. AL L D I M E N S I O N S A R E T O B E F I E L D V E R I F I E D O N C E G R A N I T E C O L U M N S H A V E B E E N I N S T A L L E D . 4. RE F E R T O D E T A I L A 2 / L 5 0 1 F O R I N T E R F A C E W I T H G R A N I T E C O L U M N S . 5. PR O V I D E E X P A N S I O N J O I N T S A T A P P R O X I M A T E L Y E V E R Y 1 8 ' . 6. PR O V I D E S H O P D R A W I N G S S H O W I N G A L L T Y P I C A L R A I L C O M P O N E N T S A N D L O C A T I O N S O F E X P A N S I O N JO I N T S A N D F I E L D W E L D S P R I O R T O F A B R I C A T I O N . 7. ME T A L F A B R I C A T O R T O I N S T A L L A L L B A R R I E R R A I L S . 8. BA R R I E R R A I L S T O B E S T E P P E D W I T H S L O P I N G G R A D E S . R E F E R T O G R A D I N G P L A N L 3 0 1 F O R G R A D E S 3'-0" 3'-6" 4" 5" 5" 6" SE C T I O N Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " BA R R I E R R A I L B3 12 " ‘ 3 0 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E F O O T I N G 4'-0" 3'-6" 12 " ‘ 3 0 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E F O O T I N G CO M P A C T E D S U B B A S E 1' - 0 " 3'-6"316" X 3" X 3" S.S.WELDED WIRE MESH 30 0 0 P S I CO N C R E T E FO O T I N G 5'-0"10"5" SE C T I O N Scale: 1/2"=1'-0"GATEB1 3000 PSICONCRETE FOOTING4'-0"3'-6"NOTES:1.ALL RAILINGS, POSTS, AND WIRE MESH TO BE STAINLESS STEEL.2.FINISH SHALL BE BEAD BLAST TO MATCH GUARDRAIL.3.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED ONCE GRANITE COLUMNS HAVEBEEN INSTALLED.4.REFER TO DETAIL A2/L501 FOR INTERFACE WITH GRANITE COLUMNS.5.PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS SHOWING ALL TYPICAL GATE COMPONENTS ANDLOCATIONS OF FIELD WELDS PRIOR TO FABRICATION.6.METAL FABRICATOR TO INSTALL GATE. 1' - 6 " 3'-6" 10" 3'-6" 5" 3 2PLANN.T.S.114" ID STAINLESS STEEL PIPE4'-0"TENSION CABLE SS S L E E V E S F O R C A N E B O L T S (3 ) L O C A T I O N S E A C H S I D E : 1. O P E N 2. P A R T I A L L Y O P E N 3. C L O S E D 21134‘3,&.(7 ‘3 2 6 7 4" GR A N I T E C O L U M N COMPACTED SUBBASE1'-3" GR A N I T E C O L U M N 2'-0" SQR.3'-6"4'-0"6"12" BA C K F I L L 30 0 0 P S I C O N C R E T E B A C K I N G Scale: 1/2"=1'-0"GRANITE COLUMNA2 AD J A C E N T C O N C R E T E F O O T E R CO M P A C T E D S U B B A S E GUARDRAIL, BARRIER RAIL, ORGATE (SEE L201 FOR LOCATIONS)4"24 " X 2 4 " G R A N I T E B O L L A R D WI T H R O C K E D S A W N A N D TH E R M A L E D T O P , S P L I T F A C E SI D E S Sc a l e : 1 / 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " SH R U B P L A N T I N G C4 NO T E S : 1. PL A N T A T S A M E D E P T H A S P R E V I O U S L Y PL A N T E D I N N U R S E R Y O R C O N T A I N E R 2. PR O V I D E C O M P A C T E D B A S E U N D E R R O O T BA L L O N L Y T O P R E V E N T S E T T L I N G 3. EN T I R E B E D T O B E E X C A V A T E D A N D BA C K F I L L E D W I T H P L A N T I N G M I X SH R E D D E D B A R K M U L C H , E X T E N T O F BE D L I N E , I N C L U D E I N P L A N T I N G I T E M S : x 4" ( 1 0 0 m m ) F O R S H R U B S x 3" ( 7 5 m m ) F O R P E R E N N I A L S A N D B U L B S UN T I E A N D R O L L B A C K B U R L A P F R O M M I N . 1 / 3 OF R O O T B A L L . S Y N T H E T I C W R A P I S UN A C C E P T A B L E . C U T W I R E B A S K E T S A N D RE M O V E . SP E C I F I E D P L A N T I N G M I X SP A D E D B E D E D G E CO M P A C T E D B A S E 24" MIN, SEE SOIL AND MULCH PLAN ANCHOR BENCH TO CONCRETE PADWITH 6"L S.S. HARDWARE OR ASDIRECTED BY MANUFACTURERCONCRETE PAD; SEE DETAIL A5/L501 NOTES:1.BENCH TO BE USED IS MLB1200 by MAGLINSITE FURNITUREPH: 800.716.55062.WOOD SEAT AND BACK TO BE IPE.3.COLOR TBD.4.OPTIONS: ARMS BOTH SIDES5.LEVEL BENCH USING SHIMS AS NEEDED.6.DONOR SIGN FROM "KIWANIS CLUB OFITHACA" TO BE TRANSFERED FROMEXISTING PARK BENCHES TO NEWBENCHES. PLACEMENT ON BENCHES TBDScale: 1/2"=1'-0"BENCH WITH CONCRETE PAD (BENCH IS ADD ALTERNATE)C1 IMAGE: MAGL I N M L B 1 2 0 0 B E N C H A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 A B C D DA T E : PR O J E C T : CH E C K E D : DR A W N B Y : 12 3 4 5 CO P Y R I G H T C 2 0 1 5 I T I S A V I O L A T I O N O F L A W F O R A N Y P E R S O N , U N L E S S A C T I N G U N D E R T H E D I REC TI ON OF A L IC EN S E D LAN D S CA P E ARCHITECT TO ALTER ANY ITEM ON TH IS D O C U M E N T W H O A L T E R S T H I S D O C U M E N T I S R E Q U I R E D B Y L A W T O A F F I X H I S O R H E R S E A L A N D T H E N OTATI ON " A LTER E D B Y" FOLLOW ED BY HI S OR HER SIGN ATUR E AND A SPECI FIC D E S C R I P T I O N O F A L T E R A T I O N S . LAKE STREET PUBLIC PARK ENHANCEMENTS Ithaca, New York City of Ithaca 02 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 13 0 3 3 PJ T / A R M JL F 10 0 1 W . S e n e c a S t . , S t e . 1 0 1 I t h a c a , N Y 1 4 8 5 0 60 7 - 2 7 7 - 1 4 0 0 F a x 6 0 7 - 2 7 7 - 6 0 9 2 File: T:\PROJECTS\City of Ithaca Lake Street Bridge\ACAD\TWMLA2013033 DETAILS.dwg Plot Date: 2/11/2015 L5 0 1 SI T E D E T A I L S PROPOSED RESOLUTION Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation Declaration of Lead Agency Site Plan Review/Recreational River Permit Lake Street at Fall Creek City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: an application for Site Plan Approval and a Fall Creek Recreational River Permit has been submitted to the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board by the City of Ithaca, and WHEREAS: the proposed project involves rehabilitation of the Lake Street Bridge. The existing bridge, built in 1966, is a steel beam and concrete deck superstructure supported on reinforced concrete abutments. The bridge’s concrete deck slab deterioration has progressed to the point of necessary repair and the City of Ithaca has determined the need to replace the deck slab and repair the existing reinforced concrete abutments. The bridge is also currently on the Federal Scour Critical Bridges list due to the uncertainty of whether the substructures are either pile-supported or founded on bedrock. To remove the bridge from the Federal list, this project proposes to install steel-sheet piling and heavy-stone fill scour protection at the substructures as scour mitigation measures. The proposed rehabilitation also involves concrete deck slab replacement and substructure repairs. The project requires site plan approval, a Recreational River Permit, as well as permits from NYSDEC and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The project has received approval from the Board of Public Works and Common Council, and WHEREAS: this project was previously determined to be “replacement-in-kind” which is considered a Type II Action not requiring environmental review. Upon further review, it has been determined to be a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176-4 B. (h) [2], [3], and (m), and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (11), and is subject to environmental review.   WHEREAS: it has been requested that the New York State Department of Transportation (DOT), the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) the City of Ithaca Board of Public Works, and, Common Council, all potentially involved agencies, consent to the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board’s being Lead Agency for this project, and WHEREAS: the NYSDOT, NYSDEC, the City of Ithaca Board of Public Works, and the City of Ithaca Common Council, have consented to the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board’s being Lead Agency for this project, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of the Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Vacancies: 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Regarding Completeness Recreational River Permit Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation at Fall Creek City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: an application for a Fall Creek Recreational River Permit has been submitted to the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board by the City of Ithaca, and WHEREAS: the permit is required due to the project being entirely within the designated Recreational River Area, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board is acting as a delegate for the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, pursuant to Title 27,15-2714.3hh of the State of New York Environmental Conservation Law, and WHEREAS: the proposed project involves rehabilitation of the Lake Street Bridge. The existing bridge, built in 1966, is a steel beam and concrete deck superstructure supported on reinforced concrete abutments. The bridge’s concrete deck slab deterioration has progressed to the point of necessary repair and the City of Ithaca has determined the need to replace the deck slab and repair the existing reinforced concrete abutments. The bridge is also currently on the Federal Scour Critical Bridges list due to the uncertainty of whether the substructures are either pile-supported or founded on bedrock. To remove the bridge from the Federal list, this project proposes to install steel-sheet piling and heavy-stone fill scour protection at the substructures as scour mitigation measures. The proposed rehabilitation also involves concrete deck slab replacement and substructure repairs. The project requires site plan approval, a Recreational River Permit, as well as permits from NYSDEC and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers., and WHEREAS: this is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176-4 B. (h) [2], [3], and (m), and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (11), and is subject to environmental review, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on February 24, 2015 make a Negative Determination of Environmental Significance for the project, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board has reviewed the application for completeness and has, with assistance of City staff, found the application to be complete in accordance with the requirements of 621.4(d), now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board hereby finds that the Recreational River Permit application for the rehabilitation of the Lake Street Bridge is complete, and be it further RESOLVED: that a Public Hearing on the application will be held by the Planning and Development Board at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 24, 2015, and be it further RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board hereby directs City of Ithaca Planning staff to take those steps, including filing a Notice of Completeness of the application in the Environmental Notice Bulletin and distributing the application to all involved agencies and the public, as may be necessary or appropriate to commence public review of the project. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation CEQR ― Negative Declaration Site Plan Review/Recreational River Permit Lake Street at Fall Creek City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: an application for Site Plan Approval and a Fall Creek Recreational River Permit has been submitted to the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board by the City of Ithaca, and WHEREAS: the proposed project involves rehabilitation of the Lake Street Bridge. The existing bridge, built in 1966, is a steel beam and concrete deck superstructure supported on reinforced concrete abutments. The bridge’s concrete deck slab deterioration has progressed to the point of necessary repair and the City of Ithaca has determined the need to replace the deck slab and repair the existing reinforced concrete abutments. The bridge is also currently on the Federal Scour Critical Bridges list due to the uncertainty of whether the substructures are either pile-supported or founded on bedrock. To remove the bridge from the Federal list, this project proposes to install steel-sheet piling and heavy-stone fill scour protection at the substructures as scour mitigation measures. The proposed rehabilitation also involves concrete deck slab replacement and substructure repairs. The project requires site plan approval, a Recreational River Permit, as well as permits from NYSDEC and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The project has received approval from the Board of Public Works and Common Council, and WHEREAS: this project was previously determined to be “replacement-in-kind” which is considered a Type II Action not requiring environmental review. Upon further review, it has been determined to be a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176-4 B. (h) [2], [3], and (m), and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (11), and is subject to environmental review, and   WHEREAS: the NYSDOT, NYSDEC, the City of Ithaca Board of Public Works, and the City of Ithaca Common Council, have consented to the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board being Lead Agency for this project, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board did on February 24, 2015 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of the Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation project, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council (CAC) and other interested agencies have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: the Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, has on February 24, 2015 reviewed and accepted as adequate: a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3, prepared by Planning Staff; plans entitled “Preliminary Plan and Elevation (P-1),” dated 12/2014, “Under Bridge Access Plan” and “Erosion and Sediment Control Details,” dated 1/2015, “General Plan and Elevation,” “Bridge Railing Layout,” “Begin Right Wing Repair Details,” “Permanent Sheet Pile Layout Plan and Details,” “Light Pilaster and Fascia Details,” and “Bridge Railing Details,” dated 2/2015; and other application materials, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board determines that, with the provisions described in the FEAF, Part 3, the proposed project will result in no significant impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law be filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Vacancies: 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Subdivision Final Subdivision Approval 128 W. Falls St. City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #13.-2-20 City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for a subdivision of City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #13.-2-20, located at 128 West Falls Street, by Ron Ronsvalle, applicant and owner, and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcel and construct one single-family home and two duplexes. The proposal is to subdivide the 16,352-SF (0.375-acre) parcel into three: Parcel I will measure 3,686.9 SF with 37.5’ of frontage and will contain a new single-family home; Parcel 2, measuring 4,389 SF and with 46 feet of street frontage, will contain the existing single-story single-family home; and Parcel 3, measuring 8,276 SF with 98 feet of street frontage, will contain two new duplexes. The property is in the R-2b Zoning District, which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF for two-family dwellings, minimum width at-street of 35 feet, and minimum front-, side-, and rear-yard setbacks of 25 feet, 10 and 5 feet, and 25% or 50 feet, respectively. The project includes seven off-street parking spaces, one driveway, sidewalks/walkways, and landscaping, and WHEREAS: the project received Area Variances for an existing front-yard deficiency, as well as new front- and rear- yard deficiencies; however, subsequent design changes required an additional appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) for one new Area Variance, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and is subject to environmental review, and WHEREAS: the subdivision is considered a Major Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1, Major Subdivision – Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of two or more additional buildable lots, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board, being the that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on September 23, 2014 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of the project, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 B. (4) and 176-12 A. (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on November 25, 2014, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council, Tompkins County Planning Department, and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board, acting as Lead Agency in Environmental review, did on September 23, 2014 review and accept as adequate a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Part 2, prepared by Planning staff; plans entitled “Subdivision Plat, 128 West Falls Street (S- 100),” dated 6/23/14 and prepared by L. Fabbroni, and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on September 23, 2014 make a Negative Determination of Environmental Significance, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board did on November 25, 2014 grant Preliminary Site Plan Approval to the project, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board recognizes that information received and reviewed for this subdivision indicates the resultant parcels have received all the required area variances for relief from the City of Ithaca Zoning Ordinance for properties located in the R-2b Zoning District, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board grants Final Subdivision Approval to City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #13.-2-20, located at 128 West Falls Street, subject to submission of three (3) paper copies of the final approved plat, all having a raised seal and signature of a registered licensed surveyor. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Site Plan Review Final Site Plan Approval 128 W. Falls St. 2 Duplexes & 1 Single-Family Home City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for 2 duplexes and one single-family home, as well as a subdivision, by Ron Ronsvalle, applicant and owner, and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcel and construct one single-family home and two duplexes. The proposal is to subdivide the 16,352-SF (0.375-acre) parcel into three: Parcel 1 will measure 3,686.9 SF with 37.5’ of frontage and will contain a new single-family home; Parcel 2, measuring 4,389 SF and with 46 feet of street frontage, will contain the existing single-story single-family home; and Parcel 3, measuring 8,276 SF with 98 feet of street frontage, will contain two new duplexes. The property is in the R-2b Zoning District, which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF for two-family dwellings, minimum width at-street of 35 feet, and minimum front-, side-, and rear-yard setbacks of 25 feet, 10 and 5 feet, and 25% or 50 feet, respectively. The project includes seven off-street parking spaces, one driveway, sidewalks/walkways, and landscaping, and WHEREAS: the project received Area Variances for an existing front-yard deficiency, as well as new front- and rear- yard deficiencies; however, subsequent design changes require an additional appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) for one new Area Variance, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and is subject to environmental review, and WHEREAS: this is considered a Major Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1, Major Subdivision – Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of two or more additional buildable lots, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board, being the that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on September 23, 2014 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of the project, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 B. (4) and 176-12 A. (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on November 25, 2014, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council, Tompkins County Planning Department, and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board acting as Lead agency in Environmental review did on September 23, 2014 review and accept as adequate: a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Part 2, prepared by Planning staff; plans entitled “Subdivision Plat, 128 West Falls Street (S-100),” dated 6/23/14 and prepared by Lawrence J. Fabbroni; and “Location Plan (S-101)” and “Illustrative Plan ( S-102.1),” dated 2/20/14, and “Site Layout Plan (S-102),” “Building Elevations (S-104.1 and S-104.2),” “Street Elevations (S- 105),” “Parking (S-106),” “Open Spaces (S-107),” and “Bioretention Areas (S-108),” all dated 8/1/14, and prepared by Lawrence J. Fabbroni; and “Revised Conceptual Landscape Plan (S-103)” and “Revised Conceptual Landscape Plant List and Photographs (S-103.1),” both dated 8/1/14 and prepared by Empire Landscape Architects; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on September 23, 2014 make a Negative Determination of Environmental Significance, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board has on November 25, 2014 reviewed and accepted as adequate: revised drawings titled and “Site Layout Plan (S-102),” last revised on October 30, 2014, “Illustrative Plan ( S-102.1),” last revised on November 11, 2014, and “Building Elevations (S-104.1,S-104.2, S-104-3, & S-104.4),” all either dated or last revised on November 11, 2014 and all prepared by Lawrence Fabronni; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board did, on November 25, 2014 grant Preliminary Site Plan Approval for the proposed project, subject to the following conditions: i. Variance must be granted before Final Site Plan Approval, and ii. Applicant to explore adding more windows to the rear façades of Buildings 1 and 2, and iii. Submission of a revised site and landscape plans, showing removal of planting areas along driveway, and iv. Submission of elevations with building materials labeled and keyed to materials sample sheet, and v. Submission of project details (e.g., building materials samples, pavers, lighting, benches, raised planters, bike racks, etc.), and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has determined that condition “i.” has been satisfied, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby grant Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed project, subject to the following conditions: i. Applicant to explore adding more windows to the rear façades of Buildings 1 and 2, and ii. Submission of a revised site and landscape plans, showing removal of planting areas along driveway, and iii. Submission of elevations with building materials labeled and keyed to materials sample sheet, and iv. Submission of project details (e.g., building materials samples, pavers, lighting, benches, raised planters, bike racks, etc.). Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 1 FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ― Part III    Project Name: Upson Hall Renovation   Date Created:2/10/15 Revised 2/18/15   Construction documents for the project will require the Contractor to generate and implement an  erosion and sediment control plan prepared in accordance with New York State “Guidelines for  Urban Erosion & Sediment Control.”    Dust or mud from construction vehicles tracked onto road surfaces could end up in the storm sewer  system.  The applicant will work to control this impact by restricting site access and requiring a  stabilized site access (or tire cleaning operation).  The contractor will also be required to clean  streets in a timely manner should they be soiled by construction vehicles.  Controlled site access will  be in place and site control measures, such as mist or fog spray, will be used as necessary to help  reduce any potential impact from the deposition of airborne dust on impervious surfaces being  flushed into the storm sewer.    No impact anticipated.    IMPACT ON DRAINAGE    Overall site disturbance will be less than 1 acre and the new impervious development (primarily  landscaping stone and sidewalk) is less 1/4 acre.  The project will not substantially alter existing  stormwater management on site.   The amount of hardscape expansion is minimal and most of the  increased building square footage is elevated.  The landscape design includes slot drains and other  means to intercept flow and slow the run‐off prior to delivery to existing stormwater management  systems.  While the project is adjacent to Cascadilla Creek, the immediate project site is separated  from the creek slope by a paved service road (to the southeast) and by other development in other  directions, and an engineered stormwater collection system which is unaltered by the project.   Therefore, no direct or additional impact to Cascadilla Creek is anticipated.  Also see impacts to water.    No impact anticipated.    IMPACT ON AIR  See Impact on Land.    No impact anticipated.    IMPACT ON PLANTS & ANIMALS  Exterior work will require removal and replacement of landscaping and some minor structural  elements adjacent to the building.  Approximately 35 trees will be removed.  Selected trees that are  healthy and can be protected will remain.  Additional trees will be considered for removal and  transplant by Cornell Grounds Department, if judged to be of sufficient value and viability to permit  successful transplanting.     The originally proposed Phase 1 & 2 Planting Plan (L1401 and L1402) called for 3 trees, while the  potential future Phase 3 Planting Plan had an additional 5 trees.   Lead Agency was concern about  replacing the 35 trees that would be removed during construction.  In response, the applicant  revised the Phase 1 and 2 Planting Plan to include nineteen (19) new trees.     Page 2 of 4 PROPOSED RESOLUTION City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board CEQR ― Negative Declaration Upson Hall Renovations 124 Hoy Rd. (Cornell University Campus) February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Approval for a renovation to Upson Hall located at 124 Hoy Road by Cornell University, and WHEREAS: the applicant proposes a total internal and façade renovation of the 160,000-SF building. Phases 1 and 2 of the project include reconfigured entryways with expanded spaces above, resulting in a net addition of 4,000 SF. The project also includes civil and landscape improvements to the grounds, including retaining walls and an accessible ramp. A construction staging area is proposed for the area between Upson and Hoy Roads. Site development and staging will require the removal of 35 trees, and other landscaping. Phase 3 of the project includes expanded outdoor areas, including an expansive plaza fronting Hoy Road, and a terrace and series of stairs connecting the entrance on the southwest interior corner to the ramp and walkways at the northwest entrance. The project is in the U-1 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: this is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176-4 (h)[2], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (11), and is subject to environmental review, WHEREAS: the Planning Board, being that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on January 27, 2015 declare itself the Lead Agency for environmental review of the project, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council, Tompkins County Planning Department, and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board acting as Lead agency in Environmental review has on February 24, 2015 reviewed and accepted as adequate: a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3, prepared by Planning staff; plans entitled “Existing Conditions Plan (C-0100),” “Phase 1 & 2 Utility Demolition /Sediment Control Plan (C-1101),” “Phase 1 & 2 Utility Plan (C-1102 and C1103),” “Phase 3 Add Alt. Utility Demolition /Sediment Control Plan (C-3101),” and “Phase 3 Add Alt. Utility Plan (C-3102 and C-3103)” dated 8-22-14, and “Building Axonometric (A-3000)” and “Overall Building Elevations (A-3001, A-3002, A-3003 and A- 3004)” dated 11-7-14 and all prepared by LTL Architects and Perkins + Will, and “Phase 1 & 2 Staging Plan (L-1101and L-1102),” “Phase 1 & 2 Demolition Plan (L-1103and L-1104),” “Phase 1 & 2 Northing and Easting Plan (L-1201and L- 1202),” “Phase 1 & 2 Layout Plan (L-1203 and L-1204),” “Phase 1 & 2 Grading Plan (L-1301and L-1302),” “Phase 1 & 2 Planting Plan (L-1401and L-1402)” dated 1/26/15, and “Phase 1 & 2 Pavement, Furnishings, and Landscape Details (L- 1501),” “Phase 1 & 2 Site Stair Details (L-1502),” “Phase 1 & 2 Site Ramp Details (L-1503),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Demolition Plan (L-1301 & L-1302),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Northing and Easting Plan (L-3201 & L-3202),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Layout Plan (L-3203 & L-1204),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Grading Plan (L-3301 & L-3302),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Planting Plan (L-3401 & L-3402),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Site Details (L-3501),” and “Phase 3 Add Alt Site Stair Details (L-3502),” dated 8/29/14 and all prepared by LTL Architects, Perkins+Will, and TWLA, and “Upson Hall Phase 1 & 2 Site Plan” and “Upson Hall Phase 3 Site Plan,” dated 2/5/15 (no attribution), a series of renderings dated 1/27/15, prepared by LTL Architects and Perkins+Will; and “Exterior Materials,” dated December 2014 and prepared by LTL Architects and Perkins+Will; and other application materials, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board determines that the proposed project will result in no significant impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law be filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board Preliminary & Final Approval Upson Hall Renovations 124 Hoy Rd. (Cornell University Campus) February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Approval for a renovation to Upson Hall located at 124 Hoy Road by Cornell University, and WHEREAS: the applicant proposes a total internal and façade renovation of the 160,000-SF building. Phases 1 and 2 of the project include reconfigured entryways with expanded spaces above, resulting in a net addition of 4,000 SF. The project also includes civil and landscape improvements to the grounds, including retaining walls and an accessible ramp. A construction staging area is proposed for the area between Upson and Hoy Roads. Site development and staging will require the removal of 35 trees, and other landscaping. Phase 3 of the project includes expanded outdoor areas, including an expansive plaza fronting Hoy Road, and a terrace and series of stairs connecting the entrance on the southwest interior corner to the ramp and walkways at the northwest entrance. The project is in the U-1 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: this is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176- 4 (h)[2], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (11), and is subject to environmental review, WHEREAS: the Planning Board, being that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on January 27, 2015 declare itself the Lead Agency for environmental review of the project, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 B. (4) and 176-12 A. (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on January 27, 2015, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council, Tompkins County Planning Department, and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board acting as Lead agency in Environmental review has on February 24, 2015 reviewed and accepted as adequate: a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3, prepared by Planning staff; plans entitled “Existing Conditions Plan (C-0100),” “Phase 1 & 2 Utility Demolition /Sediment Control Plan (C-1101),” “Phase 1 & 2 Utility Plan (C-1102 and C1103),” “Phase 3 Add Alt. Utility Demolition /Sediment Control Plan (C-3101),” and “Phase 3 Add Alt. Utility Plan (C-3102 and C-3103)” dated 8-22-14, and “Building Axonometric (A- 3000)” and “Overall Building Elevations (A-3001, A-3002, A-3003 and A-3004)” dated 11-7-14 and all prepared by LTL Architects and Perkins + Will, and “Phase 1 & 2 Staging Plan (L-1101and L-1102),” “Phase 1 & 2 Demolition Plan (L-1103and L-1104),” “Phase 1 & 2 Northing and Easting Plan (L-1201and L- 1202),” “Phase 1 & 2 Layout Plan (L-1203 and L-1204),” “Phase 1 & 2 Grading Plan (L-1301and L-1302),” “Phase 1 & 2 Planting Plan (L-1401and L-1402)” dated 1/26/15, and “Phase 1 & 2 Pavement, Furnishings, and Landscape Details (L-1501),” “Phase 1 & 2 Site Stair Details (L-1502),” “Phase 1 & 2 Site Ramp Details (L-1503),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Demolition Plan (L-1301 & L-1302),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Northing and Easting Plan (L-3201 & L-3202),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Layout Plan (L-3203 & L-1204),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Grading Plan (L-3301 & L-3302),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Planting Plan (L-3401 & L-3402),” “Phase 3 Add Alt Site Details (L-3501),” and “Phase 3 Add Alt Site Stair Details (L-3502),” dated 8/29/14 and all prepared by LTL Architects, Perkins+Will, and TWLA, and “Upson Hall Phase 1 & 2 Site Plan” and “Upson Hall Phase 3 Site Plan,” dated 2/5/15 (no attribution), a series of renderings dated 1/27/15, prepared by LTL Architects and Perkins+Will; and “Exterior Materials,” dated December 2014 and prepared by LTL Architects and Perkins+Will; and other application materials, WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on February 24, 2015 make a Negative Determination of Environmental Significance, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does herby grant Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval to the Upson Hall Renovation project subject to the following conditions: i. Submission to the Planning Board of a drawing illustrating the relationship between the window glazing, yellow trim and terra cotta siding material, and ii. Submission of a drawing or photograph showing both colors of the proposed terra cotta siding material detail. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board Preliminary & Final Approval Six-Unit Apartment Building 707 E. Seneca St. February 24, 2015 WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Approval for a six-unit apartment building to be located at 707 E. Seneca St., by Tom Schickel for 707 E. Seneca St., LLC, and WHEREAS: the applicant proposes to build a 3-story-plus-basement multiple dwelling with a footprint of 2,400 SF on the vacant 7,449-SF parcel. The project will have parking and storage in the basement, and two 3-bedroom apartments on each of three floors for a total of six units. Site development includes 5 exterior parking spaces, a driveway, and landscaping. Due to the topography of the site, the proposed design requires a retaining wall along the driveway on the west property line. The project is located in the R-3a Zoning District and the East Hill Historic District. It has received the required area variance from the BZA and a Certificate of Appropriateness, with conditions, from the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC), and WHEREAS: the Planning Board, being the local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on January 27, 2015 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of the project, and WHEREAS: this is a Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176-4 (h)(4), and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (9), and is subject to environmental review, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 B. (4) and 176-12 A. (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on January 27, 2015, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council, Tompkins County Planning Department, and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any received comments have been considered, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on January 27, 2015 reviewed and accepted as adequate: a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3, prepared by Planning staff; and the following drawings “Boundary & Topographic Map, No. 707 E Seneca St, City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York,” dated 7/30/14 and prepared by T.G. Miller, P.C.; “Renderings”, “Location Plan and Demolition Plan (L0)” and “Utility Plan (L3),” dated 12/15/14; “Floor Plans (A1)” and “Street View Elevation,” dated 12/30/14; “Site Layout & Planting Plan (L1),” and “Grading Plan (L2),” both dated 1/27/15; and “Elevations (A2),” “Site Elevations (A3),” and “Site Sections (A4),” dated 1/21/15 and all prepared by Schickel Architecture; and other application materials WHEREAS: an original proposal for the parking area included a retaining wall ― up to ten feet in height ― to retain the southern edge of the parking area, and WHEREAS: the project received a Certificate of Appropriateness on January 13, 2015 with a condition that the ILPC will review and provide final approval of all landscape features or site modifications associated with the installation of the five exterior parking spaces. This includes, but may not be limited to, grading and the construction of retaining walls, stairs, fences, or any other features, and that any changes required by other involved agencies to the approved plans will be resubmitted to the ILPC for review and approval, and WHEREAS: the applicant revised the original plan and removed the retaining wall (see drawings L1 and L2, dated 1/21/15). In its place, the applicant has created a sloped area, stabilized with plantings. The grading plan creates a form that is flat on all sides with sharp angles, that is a sharp contrast to the surrounding topography. In addition the grading does not appear to adequately protect existing trees, and WHEREAS: the Lead Agency required that the applicant work with a licensed landscape architect to develop grading and landscaping plans that addresses the treatment of the proposed southern slope to accomplish the following: (1) the contours of the slope should, to the extent practicable, be sympathetic to the surrounding landforms; (2) the slope should be stabilized with appropriate plantings and intermediate stabilization methods; and (3) the trees affected by the grading plan should be evaluated for health and value. Based on the results of such evaluation, provisions should be made to protect the existing trees or replace them with more appropriate species, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board did on January 27, 2015 determine that the proposed project will result in no significant impact on the environment and issued a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance, and WHEREAS: on February 24, 2015, the Planning Board reviewed and accepted as adequate revised drawings entitled: “Site Layout and Planting Plan (L1),” “Grading Plan (L2),” “Elevations (A-10),” “Site Elevations (A-3),” and “Site Details Plan (L-4),” all dated 2/17/15 and prepared by Schickel Architecture, in consultation with Noah Demarest, Landscape Architect, and WHEREAS: the Board finds that the landscape solution as shown in the drawings listed immediately above sufficiently addresses the Boards concerns in that it lessens the visual impact of the retaining wall, while preserving the existing trees on the adjacent property, and now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the Planning Board does hereby grant Preliminary and Final Site Plan Approval to the project subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant to investigate tinting or otherwise darkening the portion of the concrete wall along the driveway that is visible from the public way, and ii. Revised site plan drawing with a note stating that the sidewalk will be rebuilt to City Standards, and iii. Written documentation of consultation with Noah Demarest regarding Site and Planting Plan. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 1 CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT JOANN CORNISH, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone: Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558 To: Svante Myrick, Mayor Michael Thorne, Superintendent of Public Works Common Council Conservation Advisory Council To: Svante Myrick, Mayor Michael Thorne, Superintendent of Public Works Common Council Conservation Advisory Council Julie Holcomb, City Clerk Planning & Development Board Julie Holcomb, City Clerk Planning & Development Board Aaron Lavine, City Attorney Phyllis Radke, Director of Zoning Administration Aaron Lavine, City Attorney Phyllis Radke, Director of Zoning Administration Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission Rental Housing Advisory Commission (RHAC) Rental Housing Advisory Commission (RHAC) JoAnn Cornish, Director of Planning, Building, & Economic Development JoAnn Cornish, Director of Planning, Building, & Economic Development Mike Niechwiadowicz, Director of Code Enforcement Mike Niechwiadowicz, Director of Code Enforcement Edward Marx, Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning Edward Marx, Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning From: Bryan McCracken From: Bryan McCracken Date: January 26, 2015 Date: January 26, 2015 RE: Proposed Designation of the Local Titus-Wood Historic District RE: Proposed Designation of the Local Titus-Wood Historic District At its regular monthly meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, at 5:30 p.m., the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) will hold a Public Hearing to consider the local designation of the Titus-Wood Historic District. The proposed properties to be included in the district are 301, 307, 310, 314 and 317 W. State Street and 108 and 110 S. Albany Street, and the rear portion of 310-314 W. Green Street. All interested parties are invited to speak for or against the designation at the hearing, in person, by representative, or by written statement submitted to the ILPC secretary. Included in this packet are: the Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF); a map showing the proposed district boundaries; the Statement of Significance for the proposed district; and a brief explanation of the designation criteria and protections/restrictions conferred by the designation. Full documentation of the historic and architectural significance of the district and its individual properties is available for public review at the City of Ithaca Division of Planning & Economic Development, Third Floor, City Hall, 108 East Green Street, during regular business days between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Immediately following the hearing, or at a later, properly-noticed meeting, the ILPC will decide by resolution whether or not to recommend designation of the local Titus-Wood Historic District. Should the ILPC vote to recommend designation, the Planning and Development Board will be asked to file a report to Common Council with respect to the relation of the designation to the Comprehensive Plan, zoning laws, projected public improvements, and any plans for renewal of the site or area involved. The Common Council will then act to approve, veto, or refer the designation back to the ILPC for modification. Summary of Significance and Boundary Justification: The proposed Titus-Wood Historic District contains seven very good remaining examples of residential architecture constructed between the period from 1880 to c.1922 when the West State Street and South Albany area was a desirable and prominent residential location in Ithaca. Now primarily a commercial neighborhood, this proposed district contains examples of Stick style, Queen Anne style, second phase Italian Renaissance Revival and Craftsman residential architecture. West State Street, originally known as Owego Street, was a principal thoroughfare leading from the inlet and railroad station areas into the downtown core of Ithaca. On its westernmost end, State Street originally featured a mix of commercial structures and small businesses. Travelling west to east toward the downtown core in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, one would have encountered commercial, residential and religious buildings that created a prominent entry to the heart of Ithaca. The proposed district is historically significant because the residences served as the homes for several locally prominent businessmen and a local physician. Several of these individuals were also active in local politics and civic life. The district is also architecturally significant because the houses were designed by early Ithaca architect A.B. Dale, Cornell-trained architects A. B. Wood and Arthur Gibb, Ithaca architect John Wilgus, and Auburn architect John Alnutt. The proximity to downtown Ithaca and to the nearby fashionable houses constructed from the 1870s through 1900 on land acquired by businessman and developer Charles M. Titus (1832- 1907) made this area appealing. Those houses are now in the Henry St. John Local Historic District and the houses in this proposed district serve as an ideal complement to this existing district. The proposed name for the district, Titus-Wood, reflects the significant influence Charles M. Titus and A.B. Wood had on the development of this area. Two large buildings that originally dominated this area are now lost but their original presence reveals why it was attractive to construct large houses in this proposed district starting in 1880. Charles M. Titus’ own house stood at the south side at 315 West State Street. A grand Italianate house with a cupola on a large lot, it was demolished in the post-World War II period. In the 1860s, Titus’ large house and lot occupied approximately half of the block bounded by Owego (now State), Plain, Green and Albany Streets. Between 1888 and 1921, portions of this Titus land were sold and five of the seven houses in this district were built on the former Titus property. On the north side of West State Street, the State Street Methodist Episcopal Church originally stood at the northwest corner at Albany Street with its tall, brick bell tower reaching up to the sky as a visible landmark. The church was built in 1879 and stood as a commanding presence on the street until it was demolished in 1961. Buildings in the district are primarily two-and-a-half story detached residences with similar setbacks and small front lawns. The lot sizes varying but all occupy long lots that are deeper than they are wide. Two of the buildings contain contributing resources in the form of early automobile garages. One property retains its historic bluestone sidewalk slabs leading from the public sidewalk to the front porch steps. The Central Fire Station parking lot on West State Street is the original site of Charles M. Titus’s Italianate-Style house and is included in the district as a non-contributing parcel of land for this reason. The period of significance is 1880 through c.1922. The houses are significant examples of residential architecture in modes that were popular in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, including Stick, Queen Anne, second phase Italian Renaissance Revival and Craftsman styles. Three of the houses retain their early automobile garages (although one has been altered) and one of them maintains a particularly high level of integrity, offering excellent evidence of an early-twentieth century automobile-related structure. These houses, with the exception of one, are now actively used and maintained as prime office spaces. They stand as a visible record of this era of residential development in Ithaca. The geographic boundaries of the district were delineated to capture the houses built on the historic Titus house lot and the remaining historic residential properties on the north side of West State Street that were once adjacent to the State Street Methodist Episcopal Church. The proximity of the houses reinforces the original primarily residential character of the district. NY State Plane, Central GRS 80 DatumMap Source: Tompkins County Digital Planimetric Map 1991-2012Data Source: City of Ithaca GIS Program, 2012Map Prepared by: D epartment of Planning, City of Ithaca, NY, February, 2015 W S TAT E S T / M . L . K . J R S T S A LB A N Y S T N A L B A N Y S T 0 100 20050 Feet 1:800± Proposed Titus-Wood Historic D istrict Legen d Buildings Parcels Roads Proposed Titus-Wood Historic District CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING, ZONING, & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JOANN CORNISH, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone: Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558 To: Svante Myrick, Mayor Michael Thorne, Superintendent of Public Works Common Council Conservation Advisory Council To: Svante Myrick, Mayor Michael Thorne, Superintendent of Public Works Common Council Conservation Advisory Council Julie Holcomb, City Clerk Planning & Development Board Julie Holcomb, City Clerk Planning & Development Board Aaron Lavine, City Attorney Phyllis Radke, Director of Zoning Administration Aaron Lavine, City Attorney Phyllis Radke, Director of Zoning Administration Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission Rental Housing Advisory Commission (RHAC) Rental Housing Advisory Commission (RHAC) JoAnn Cornish, Director of Planning, Building, & Economic Development JoAnn Cornish, Director of Planning, Building, & Economic Development Mike Niechwiadowicz, Director of Code Enforcement Mike Niechwiadowicz, Director of Code Enforcement Edward Marx, Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning Edward Marx, Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning From: Bryan McCracken From: Bryan McCracken Date: January 26, 2015 Date: January 26, 2015 RE: Proposed Local Landmark Designation of 421 North Albany Street, a.k.a. the Dennis-Newton House RE: Proposed Local Landmark Designation of 421 North Albany Street, a.k.a. the Dennis-Newton House At its regular monthly meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, at 5:30 p.m., the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC) will hold a Public Hearing to consider the local designation All interested parties are invited to speak for or against the designation at the hearing, in person, by representative, or by written statement submitted to the ILPC secretary. Included in this packet are: the Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF); the Summary Statement of Significance for the property; and a brief explanation of the designation criteria and protections/restrictions conferred by the designation. Full documentation of the historic and architectural significance of the property is available for public review at the City of Ithaca Division of Planning & Economic Development, Third Floor, City Hall, 108 East Green Street, during regular business days between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Immediately following the hearing, or at a later, properly-noticed meeting, the ILPC will decide by resolution whether or not to recommend designation of 421 North Albany Street. Should the ILPC vote to recommend designation, the Planning and Development Board will be asked to file a report to Common Council with respect to the relation of the designation to the Comprehensive Plan, zoning laws, projected public improvements, and any plans for renewal of the site or area involved. The Common Council will then act to approve, veto, or refer the designation back to the ILPC for modification. Summary Statement of Significance: 421 North Albany Street, a.k.a the Dennis-Newton House The house at 421 North Albany is historically significant on a national level for its direct connection to the early formation of the Alpha Phi Alpha fraternity, the first Greek letter, African-American collegiate fraternity in the United States. It is also significant locally for its connection to its African-American owners. The house was originally built around 1868-69 for Norman Dennis (1833-1908), an early African- American resident of Ithaca who was born in New York State and worked as a laborer and mason. Dennis help found the first African-America lodge of the Odd Fellows in Elmira, New York. Norman Dennis’ daughter, Lula (1859- 1928), married Edward Newton (c.1856-1932), a longtime employee at the Psi Upsilon fraternity house at Cornell University and an active member of Ithaca’s African-American community. In this house in 1905, Edward Newton provided a welcoming environment by hosting the first meeting of the social study group of African-American male students at Cornell, a group that evolved into the Alpha Phi Alpha fraternity when they formally established themselves in 1906. Lula Newton died in 1928 and Edward Newton continued to live in the house until his death in 1932. The period of significance for the house is 1868-1932.   CITY OF ITHACA  108 E. Green Street — 3rd Floor   Ithaca, NY   14850‐5690  DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING, & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT  JOANN CORNISH, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT  PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT  Telephone:  Planning & Development – 607‐274‐6550 Community Development/IURA – 607‐274‐6559  Email:  dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email:  iura@cityofithaca.org  Fax:  607‐274‐6558 Fax:  607‐274‐6558  TO: Board of Zoning Appeals  FROM: Planning & Development Board  DATE: February 25, 2015  SUBJECT: Comments for Zoning Appeals #2974 and 2957   On February 24, 2015 members of the Planning and Development Board discussed the above‐listed zoning  appeals and agreed to forward the following recommendations:    APPEAL #2974                                                                                 134 EAST STATE STREET  (ITHACA CAYUGA OPTICAL)  Sign Variance     Appeal of F. Alexander Wood for a Sign Variance from Sign Ordinance, Section 272‐4 A. (1), which limits the  distance in which signs can project from the face of a building wall.    In order to make Ithaca Cayuga Optical, at 134 East State Street, more visible to customers, the applicant  proposes to add a new sign at the entrance of his business.  This new sign advertising the store will be 4.5 SF in  size and will project 36” over the store’s entrance; the Sign Ordinance only allows wall signs to project a  maximum of 18 inches from the face of a building.    Cayuga Optical at 134 East State Street is located in a CBD‐60 Zoning District where signs are permitted.   However, Section 272‐18 requires that the Board of Zoning Appeals grant a Variance allowing the increased  projection before a Sign Permit can be issued for this proposal.    The Board does not recommend granting this appeal.  For decades, one of the long‐term planning goals for the  Ithaca Commons has been to open up east‐west views along the length of the Commons, both near its storefronts  and along its center. This goal will finally be realized later this year with the completion of the rebuilt Commons.    Allowing a sign to project 36 inches into the Commons pedestrian space, rather than the permitted 18 inches,  would contradict the above long‐term City planning goal. If the City allows one retail store to hang a sign  projecting 36 inches, it is then extremely likely that a host of other retailers will also want to hang signs with  similar projections, because they, too, will want better visibility for their businesses.    The result could be exactly the kind of clutter of projecting signs, obstructing long views up and down the  Commons, which the 18‐inch regulation was intended to prevent. Furthermore, in this unfortunate scenario, each  new projecting sign would obstruct the visibility of other projecting signs. All in all, this would be a losing game.  The sign’s design per se is fine, so long as it can be either (1) re‐sized to conform to the 18‐ inch projection limit,  (2) redesigned for installation flat against the storefront, pr (3) incorporated into an awning.        APPEAL #2957                                                                                                                    402 SOUTH CAYUGA STREET  “An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification.” 1 of 2  “An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification.” 2 of 2  Area Variance    Appeal Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services (INHS) for the owner, Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency, owner of 402  South Cayuga Street for Area Variances from Section 325‐8, Column 11, Front Yard, requirements of the Zoning  Ordinance.  The applicant proposes to construct a new townhouse with four attached three‐story, single‐family  units to be located at 402 South Cayuga Street.  The building measures approximately 34’ x 72’8” and the new  townhouse will contain three 2‐bedroom units and one 3‐bedroom unit.  Parking for one car will be provided at  the lowest level of each unit.  The property at 402 South Cayuga Street is on the corner of South Titus and South  Cayuga Streets and has two front yards.  The proposed construction will cause the Cayuga Street front yard to be  deficient.  The proposed front will be 5’1” of the required 10‐foot front yard setback.     This proposed project is in the R‐3b Zoning District, where the proposed use is permitted.  However, Section 325‐ 38 requires Area Variances be granted before a Building Permit is issued.    The Board fully supports granting this appeal as it furthers the goal of providing more housing within the City and  brings a vacant corner lot into active use.