The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-23-16 Planning and Development Board Meeting Agenda AGENDA The regular meeting of the PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD will be held at 6:00 p.m. on FEBRUARY 23RD, 2016 in COMMON COUNCIL CHAMBERS, City Hall, 108 E. Green Street, Ithaca, NY. AGENDA ITEM Start Time 1. Agenda Review 6:00 2. Special Order of Business 6:02 Project: Chain Works District Redevelopment Project Location: 620 S. Aurora St. Applicant: Scott Whitham & Jamie Gensel for David Lubin of UnChained Properties, LLC Actions:  Adequacy Discussion Project Description: Proposed Chain Works District seeks to redevelop and rehabilitate the +/‐800,000‐SF former Morse Chain/Emerson Power Transmission facility, located on a 95‐acre parcel traversing City and Town of Ithaca’s municipal boundary. Applicant has applied to Common Council for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for development of a mixed‐use district, including residential, commercial, office, and manufacturing. This is a Type I Action under City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176‐4 B. (6), and State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (b)(3), for which Lead Agency made a Positive Declaration of Environmental Significance on October 28, 2014, and adopted a Scope for the GEIS on January 13, 2015. 3. Privilege of the Floor (3‐minute maximum per person ― if you will be speaking about a project 6:50 with a scheduled PUBLIC HEARING below , you are highly encouraged to speak at that time) 4. Subdivision Review A. Project: Minor Subdivision 7:00 Location: 101‐107 Morris Ave. Applicant: George Frantz for Habitat for Humanity Actions:  Consideration of Preliminary & Final Approval Project Description: Applicant proposes to consolidate two existing tax parcels (#44.‐5‐5 & #44.‐5‐6); and subdivide resulting 6,154‐SF (0.141‐acre) parcel into two lots: Lot 1, measuring approximately 3,076 SF with 31 feet of frontage on Third Ave.; and Lot 2, measuring approximately 3,078 SF with 30 feet of frontage on Third Ave. Applicant intends to construct two affordable owner‐occupied homes. Project is in the R‐2b Zoning District, which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF for one‐ or two‐family homes, minimum street frontage of 35 feet and minimum front side and rear yards of 25 feet, 10 feet, 10 feet and 25% or 50 feet, but no less than 20 feet, respectively. The project requires Area Variances. This is an Unlisted Action under City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”) and State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), and is subject to Environmental Review. CITY OF ITHACA 108 E. Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, NY 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING, ZONING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning & Economic Development JOANN CORNISH, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone: Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558 APPLICANT OVERHEAD PROJECTOR NOTE: The City only has a VGA plug/cable available to connect to our overhead projector. If you need to connect another way, you will need to provide your own ADAPTOR. (Macs & many newer, lighter laptops may not have a VGA port.) If you have a disability & would like specific accommodation to participate, please contact the City Clerk at 274‐6570 by 12:00 p.m., the day before the meeting. “An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification.” 2 B. Project: Minor Subdivision 7:10 Location: 210 Hancock St. Applicant: Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services (INHS) Actions:  PUBLIC HEARING  Consideration of Preliminary & Final Approval Project Description: The project site contains two tax parcels: #35‐3‐1, at 423 First Street and containing a one‐ story building; and #33.‐3‐3, at 210 Hancock Street and containing the former Neighborhood Pride grocery store, with a total combined area of 2.012 acres (87,643 SF). After consolidating the two parcels, the applicant proposes to create two new parcels: Parcel A, measuring 1.631 acres (71,046 SF) with the following street frontages: 166’ on Hancock St., 326’ on First St., 269’ on Adams St., and 163’ on Lake Ave.; and Parcel B, measuring 0.381 acres (16,597 SF) with 101 feet of frontage on Hancock Street and 163 feet on Lake Avenue. The project is in the B‐2a Zoning District, which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF, minimum width‐at‐street of 40’, and minimum front, side, and rear yards of 0’, 10’/5’, and 15% or 20’, but no less than 10’, respectively. The purpose of the Subdivision is to implement the Site Plan for the project, approved on August 25, 2015. This is a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”) and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) for which the Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency, made a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance on May 26, 2015. 5. Site Plan Review A. Project: Brindley Street Bridge 7:20 Location: Brindley Street at Cayuga Inlet Applicant: Addisu Gebre for the City of Ithaca Actions:  Lead Agency Concurrence for Board of Public Works Project Description: The current Brindley Street bridge is a single‐lane structure, constructed in 1938 with the last major rehabilitation occurring in 1952. It has been posted for a 20‐ton weight limit since January 1965 with a condition rating of 3.859 and sufficiency rating of 62.5. The bridge is not historically eligible and carries gas/water lines, and vehicular/pedestrian traffic. Motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians using the structure use the same lane. There are no traffic signals, pedestrian‐crossing signals, or stop signs to aid coordination of movement across the bridge. Crossing the bridge depends on opposing users indicating to each other when it is safe to cross. This is an unsafe condition and as usage of this road increases it will create a greater potential for head‐on collisions or traffic queuing into the Brindley St./W. State St. intersection. Brindley Street and the adjoining Taber Street provide a second “local street” access to major shopping center situated approximately 0.6 miles south, in addition to serving businesses located along them. Project's main objectives are to: replace existing single‐lane structure on Brindley Street with two‐lane structure with accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians; restore crossing to condition which provides minimum 75‐year design life, using cost effective techniques to minimize life‐cycle cost of maintenance/repair; and implement measures that enhance safety and mobility consistent with improvements proposed for the W. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd./W. State St. B. Project: Hilton Canopy Hotel 7:35 Location: 320‐324 E. State St. Applicant: Scott Whitham for Neil Patel Actions:  Project Update  Conditions of Site Plan Approval  Requested Changes Project Description: Project was approved on February 24, 2015. Applicant is requesting changes to approved Site Plan, including the following: increase from 123 to 131 guest rooms; increase from 74,475 GFA to 77,884 GFA; minor landscape changes; size and location of windows and doors; and exterior materials and colors. C. Project: Parking for Five Cars 8:00 Location: 424 Dryden Rd. Applicant: Daniel Hirtler for William & Angie Chen Actions:  PUBLIC HEARING  Determination of Environmental Significance  Recommendation to BZA “An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification.” 3 Project Description: The property at 424 Dryden Road was subdivided in 2015 to form a new parcel at 319 Oak Avenue. The required off‐street parking for 424 Dryden Road was formerly located on the part of the original parcel which was subdivided. The goal of this project is to provide the five required off‐street parking spaces for the small site, while providing the best maneuverability and retaining a vegetative buffer at the rear of this parcel. The applicant is proposing two potential layouts. The preferred layout retains an existing mature tree, preserves a portion of the 10‐foot vegetative buffer, but requires variances. The alternate plan is to construct a garage that occupies a larger portion of the 10‐foot buffer and removes a mature tree, but does not require a variance. Both layouts include a trash enclosure. The project is in the CR‐2 Zoning District. This is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”) and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), and is subject to environmental review. D. Project: Hughes Hall Renovations 8:25 Location: Cornell University Campus Applicant: Ram Venkat for Cornell University Actions:  Declaration of Lead Agency  PUBLIC HEARING Project Description: The applicant is proposing to renovate four levels of Hughes Hall in order to improve academic space use. Exterior and site modifications include: enclosing existing ground‐floor loggia; a new entry from the courtyard; a new exterior stair tower on a west façade; and renovations to the gorge‐facing dining terrace, including a new entrance and stair. The project includes removal and redesign of the courtyard area to include new paving, seating, lighting, walkway, bike racks, landscaping, and drainage improvements. The project is in the U‐1 Zoning District. This is a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”), §176‐4 B(1)(h)[2], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), §617.4(b)(11), and is subject to Environmental Review. E. Project: Cornell Ag. Quad Renovations 8:45 Location: Cornell University Campus Applicant: Davies Orinda for Cornell University Actions:  Declaration of Lead Agency  PUBLIC HEARING Project Description: The applicant proposes to renovate the existing landscape and replace underground utilities in the Agricultural Quad. The project is needed to upgrade existing utilities and enhance accessibility, expand gathering spaces, and provide new lighting and site furnishings. Site work will include removal of all existing hardscape, as well as 14 trees, installation of new pedestrian paths, plazas, stone bench seating, lighting, and blue light phones, as well as new plantings with amended soil conditions. The project also includes a large bioretention area east of Kennedy Hall. The project is in the U‐1 Zoning District. This is an Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”), §176‐4 B(1)(h)[4], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), §617.4(b)(9), and is subject to Environmental Review. F. SKETCH PLAN: Maplewood Apartments 9:00 G. SKETCH PLAN: Maguire Automotive Project at Carpenter Business Park 9:20 6. Zoning Appeals 9:40  #3009, Area Variance, 406 Stewart Ave.  #3013, Sign Variance, 120 S. Aurora St. (Ithaca Marriott Hotel)  #3015, Special Permit, 305 Taylor Pl.  #3016, Area Variance, 424 Dryden Rd. 7. Old/New Business A. Planning Board Annual Report 9:50 “An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification.” 4 8. Reports A. Planning Board Chair (verbal) 10:05 B. Director of Planning & Development (verbal) C. Board of Public Works Liaison (verbal) 9. Approval of Minutes: July 28, 2015, September 22, 2015, December 22, 2015 (time permitting) 10:15 10. Adjournment 10:16 ACCESSING MEETING MATERIALS ONLINE Site Plan Review & Subdivision Applications (and Related Documents) Site Plan Review application documents are accessible electronically via the “Document Center” on the City web site (www.cityofithaca.org/DocumentCenter), under “Planning & Development” > “Site Plan Review Project Applications,” and in the relevant year/month folder. Subdivision application materials can be similarly located, but in the “Subdivision Applications” folder. Zoning Appeal Materials are also accessible electronically via the “Document Center” on the City web site, under “Board of Zoning Appeals." Agenda You may access this agenda (including attachments) by going to the “Agenda Center” on the City web site (www.cityofithaca.org/agendacenter), under “Planning & Development Board.” For ease‐of‐access, a link to the most recent Planning Board agenda is always accessible on the Planning Board home page: http://www.cityofithaca.org/354/Planning‐Development‐Board. PROPOSED RESOLUTION Minor Subdivision Preliminary & Final Approval City of Ithaca Tax Parcel #19.-2-4 101 & 107 Morris Ave. City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board February 23, 2016 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for a Minor Subdivision of City of Ithaca tax parcels:#44.-5-5 and #44.-5-6, located at 101 and 107 Morris Ave. The parcels will be consolidated first, then subdivided. The application is by George Frantz for Habitat for Humanity, and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to consolidate the existing two tax parcels (#44.-5-5 and #44.-5-6) and subdivide the resulting 6.154-SF (0.141 acre) parcel into two lots: Lot 1, measuring approximately 2,949 SF with 31 feet of frontage on Third Ave.; and Lot 2, measuring approximately 3,205 SF with 30 feet of frontage on Third Ave. The resultant parcels will have Third Street addresses. The applicant intends to construct two semi-detached, affordable for-sale homes. The project is in the R-2b Zoning District which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF for one- or two-family homes, minimum street frontage of 35 feet, and minimum front, side and rear yards of 25 feet, 10 feet, 10 feet and 25% or 50 feet, but no less than 20 feet, respectively. The project received Area Variances, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, both of which require environmental review, and WHEREAS: this is considered a Minor Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1, Minor Subdivision – Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of a maximum of one additional buildable lot, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board, being the local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on January 26, 2016 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of this action, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 B. (4) and 176-12 A. (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on January 26, 2016, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council, Tompkins County Planning Department, and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: this Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on January 26, 2016 review and accept as adequate: a Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Part 2, prepared by Planning staff; a draft Subdivision plat entitled “Habitat for Humanity Proposed Re-Subdivision of Tax Parcels #44.-5-5 and #44.-5-6, ” dated 1/7/16, and prepared by George R. Frantz & Associates; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board did, on January 26, 2016 determine the proposed Subdivision would result in no significant impact on the environment, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board recognizes that information received and reviewed for this Subdivision indicates the resultant parcels have received the required Area Variances from area requirements in the R-2b Zoning District, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby grant Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval to the proposed Subdivision located at 101 and 107 Morris Ave., subject to submission of three (3) paper copies of the final approved plat, all having a raised seal and signature of a registered licensed surveyor. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Minor Subdivision Preliminary & Final Approval City of Ithaca Tax Parcels #35.-3-1& 35.-3-3 210 Hancock Street City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board February 23, 2016 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for a Minor Subdivision of City of Ithaca tax parcels #35.-3-1 and #35.-3-3, located at 423 First St. and 210 Hancock St., respectively. The parcels will be consolidated first, then subdivided. The application is by Joe Bowes for Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services (INHS), and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to consolidate the existing two tax parcels (#35.-3-1 and #35.-3-3) and subdivide the resulting 2.012-acre (87,729.84 SF) parcel into two lots: Parcel A, measuring approximately 43,560 SF (1.631 acres) with 166 feet of frontage on Hancock St., 326 feet on First St., and approximately 100 feet on Adams St. (excluding portions of Adams St. that have been discontinued); and Parcel B, measuring approximately 16,596.36 SF (0.381 acres) with 101.46 feet of frontage on Hancock St. The resultant addresses will be Parcel A, 210 Hancock St., and Parcel B, 202 Hancock St. The project is in the B-2a Zoning District which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF and minimum street frontage of 35 feet and minimum front, side and rear yards of 0 feet, 10/5 feet, and 15% or 20 feet, but no less than 10 feet, respectively, and WHEREAS: the purpose of the proposed Subdivision is to implement the Site Plan for the 210 Hancock Street project, approved by the Planning and Development Board on August 25, 2015, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board did on May 26, 2015 determine the proposed project, including the Subdivision, would result in no significant impact and did make a Negative Determination of Environmental Significance, and WHEREAS: this is considered a Minor Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1, Minor Subdivision – Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of a maximum of one additional buildable lot, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 B. (4) and 176-12 A. (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on February 23, 2016, and WHEREAS: the Tompkins County Planning Department and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: this Board, did on February 23, 2016 review and accept as adequate: a Subdivision plat entitled “Subdivision map No. 210 Hancock and No. 423 First Street, City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York,” dated 11/24/15, and prepared by T.G. Miller, P.C.; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board recognizes that information received and reviewed for this Subdivision indicates the resultant parcels have received the required Area Variances from area requirements in the B-2a Zoning District, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does herby grant preliminary and final subdivision approval to the proposed subdivision located at 210 Hancock and 423 First Streets subject to submission of three (3) paper copies of the final approved plat, all having a raised seal and signature of a registered licensed surveyor. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Project description: The current Brindley Street bridge is a single lane structure. The bridge was constructed in 1938 with the last major rehabilitation occurring in 1952. It has been posted for a 20 ton weight limit since January of 1965 and has a condition rating of 3.859 and a sufficiency rating of 62.5. The bridge is not historically eligible, and carries gas and water lines as well as vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The motorists, bicyclist and pedestrians using the structure utilize the same lane. There are no traffic signals, pedestrian crossing signals or stop signs to aid in the coordination of movement across this bridge. Crossing of the bridge is dependent upon opposing users indicating to each other when it is safe to cross. This is an unsafe condition and as usage of this road increases it will create a greater potential for head-on collisions or queuing of traffic into the Brindley Street/West State Street intersection. Brindley Street and the adjoining Taber Street provide a second "local street" access to a major shopping center situated approximately 0.6 miles to the south in addition to serving the businesses located along them. The project's main objectives are to: 1. Replace the existing single lane structure on Brindley Street with two lane structure with accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians; 2. Restore the crossing to a condition which provides a minimum 75 year design life, using cost effective techniques to minimize the life cycle cost of maintenance and repair; and 3. Implement measures that enhance safety and mobility consistent with improvements proposed in the West Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/West State Street corridor under PIN 3950.50. Project design alternatives considered for the project are: Bridge Alternative 1 -Brindley Street Bridge replacement on existing horizontal alignment: This alternative will replace the existing single lane structure on Brindley Street with a two lane structure with a span length of approximately 88' in the same location, shifting the alignment of Brindley Street slightly to better fit within the existing right-of-way and avoid unnecessary impacts. Bridge Alternative 2-New roadway and bridge construction on relocated horizontal alignment: This alternative will involve the relocation of Brindley Street by connecting Taber Street with the West State Street/Taughannock Boulevard intersection where a City oflthaca parking lot currently exists. A new bridge will be constructed on the proposed roadway to carry traffic over the Cayuga Inlet and the existing Brindley Street roadway and structure will remain (with appropriate improvements) and be utilized for pedestrian traffic. PROPOSED RESOLUTION Brindley Street Bridge Lead Agency Concurrence City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board February 23, 2016 WHEREAS: State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review, the Lead Agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, and WHEREAS: the Board of Public Works (BPW) has identified the Planning Board as an Involved Agency in the Environmental Review of the Brindley Street Bridge Project, and WHEREAS: the Board of Public Works (BPW) has notified the Planning Board of its intent to act as Lead Agency in the Environmental Review, now, therefore, be it, RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby consent to the BPW acting as Lead Agency for the Environmental Review for the Brindley Street Bridge Project. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 PROPOSED RESOLUTION City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board Project Changes Approval Downtown Hilton Canopy Hotel 320-324 M.L.K., Jr. Blvd./E. State St. February 23, 2016 WHEREAS: the project applicant is requesting materials and building façade changes for the proposed Hilton Canopy Hotel at 320-24 M.L.K., Jr. Blvd./E. State Street, which was approved by the Planning Board on February 24, 2015, and WHEREAS: in accordance with §276-6 D., “Changes to approved site plan,” the Director of Planning and Development has reviewed the changes and determined the changes are significant enough to require re-opening the review, but are not significant enough to require a new Site Plan Review application, and WHEREAS: the changes consist of an increase from 74,475 GFA to 77,884 GFA (due to the addition of a basement) and a slight change to the building footprint, an increase from 123 to 131 guest rooms, minor landscape changes, size and location of windows and doors, and exterior materials and colors, and WHEREAS: the Board, has on February 23, 2016 reviewed and accepted as adequate: revised and updated plans entitled “Proposed Site Plan – Option 1(L100),” “Proposed Site Plan – Option 2(L100),” and “Site Plan Details (L105),” all dated 12/3/15 and prepared by Whitham Planning/STREAM Collaborative, and “Basement Floor Plan,” “First Floor Plan,” “Second Floor Plan,” “Typical Floor Plan,” “Roof Plan,” “Exterior Elevations - North,” “Exterior Elevations - East,” “Exterior Elevations - South,” “Exterior Elevations - West,” “Materials Palette,” “View from East State Street,” and “View from Seneca Way (two sheets),” all dated 2/8/16 and “Signage Details-1,” “Signage Details-2,” “Signage Details-3,” “Signage Details-4,”and “Signage Details-5,” all dated 10/8/15, and prepared by spg3 Architects; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the Board, has on February 23, 2016, determined the proposed changes are consistent with the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance filed on January 27, 2015 and therefore no further Environmental Review is required, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board agrees to the changes proposed by the applicant, subject to the following conditions: Conditions unique to revised proposal: Insert any New Conditions Applicable Unsatisfied Conditions from the 2-24-15 Site Plan Approval: i. Written approval from the City of Ithaca Fire Chief that the project meets all fire access needs, and ii. Submission for approval by the Planning Board of project details including, but not limited to, signage, paving materials, exterior furnishings, and lighting (including any exterior ornamental lighting plan), and iii. Submission to the Planning Board of visual documentation that the penthouse enclosure walls are at the lowest height that will still provide effective screening for the mechanicals within, and iv. Submission to the Planning Board of a Landscape Plan keyed to a species list, and Submission of a color copy of the materials board, Satisfied – to be removed v. Applicant to explore using pavers in place of asphalt on some or all of the parking and car-access area off E. State Street, to better connect the design of the hotel to that street, and Satisfied – to be removed vi. Applicant to explore: (1) potential incorporation of decorative terra cotta salvaged during the demolition of the Strand Theater (which once stood on this site) into the low wall facing E. State Street or elsewhere on the site, and (2) potential re-creation, at some appropriate location on the building, of the prominent Strand stage-house mural (by artist David Finn) which formerly faced E. Seneca Street, and vii. Noise-producing construction shall take place only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and viii. Bike racks shall be installed prior to granting of Certificate of Occupancy, and ix. Applicant shall work with the Community School of Music and Arts (CSMA) and appropriate City staff members to seek mutually-acceptable solutions that would improve loading and pedestrian access to CSMA (for example, via potential mutual cross- easements or a potential land swap between applicant and CSMA), and The following provisions discussed in the adopted FEAF, Part 3: x. If drilled and / or driven steel piles are used in the foundation, then: (1) noise-producing installation work thereon shall be limited to the hours between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, and (2) ongoing seismic testing shall be conducted to make certain the pile driving or drilling operations do not in any way have a negative impact on any adjacent or nearby structure, and xi. Applicant shall, as appropriate, employ the dust-control measures listed in the “Impact on Air” section of the FEAF, Part 3 during the project’s construction, and xii. All restaurant and hotel kitchen exhaust will be vented through the roof, and hotel laundry venting will be at ground-floor level, behind the existing concrete wall on the adjacent property, in an area not accessible to hotel guests or other pedestrians; any future exterior venting, not located in a screened location on the roof, that may cause noise, odor or street-level air flow shall be reviewed by Planning Division staff or the Planning Board, and xiii. Exterior signage shall be of equal scale and quantity as the signage illustrated on the project renderings and elevations dated January 13, 2015, and xiv. Applicant shall actively pursue implementation of the mitigations (including proposed valet routes to and from the hotel) recommended in the Traffic Impact Study prepared by SRF and dated January 2015, though it is understood that providing a two-space loading area on Seneca Way and making signal-timing changes to two intersections will require the cooperation of governmental agencies, and Applicant shall work with the adjacent property owner on the east (CSMA) to potentially provide a cross-block pedestrian passage extending through applicant’s and the adjacent owner’s parcels, Satisfied – to be removed Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 PROPOSED RESOLUTION City of Ithaca Planning & Development Board CEQR Negative Declaration Parking for 5 Cars 424 Dryden Rd. February 23, 2016 WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Approval for a 5-car parking area to be located a 424 Dryden Road by Daniel Hirtler for William and Angie Chen, and WHEREAS: the property at 424 Dryden Road was subdivided in 2015 to form a new parcel at 319 Oak Avenue. The required off-street parking for 424 Dryden Road was formerly located on the part of the original parcel which was subdivided. The applicant proposes to provide the five required off-street parking spaces for the small site, while providing the best maneuverability and retaining a vegetative buffer at the rear of this parcel. The layout retains existing mature tree, preserves a portion of the 10-foot vegetative buffer, and requires variances as shown in drawings A2 and A5, more fully described below. The project is on the CR-2 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review and is subject to environmental review, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board, being the local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on January 26, 2016 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of this action, and WHEREAS: this Board, acting as Lead Agency in Environmental Review, did on February 23, 2016 review and accept as adequate: a Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Part 2, prepared by Planning staff; drawing titled “Site Alteration for Requires Off-Street Parking and Required Landscaping – Option B (A2, A3 and A5),” dated 11/6/15, and prepared by Daniel R. Hirtler; and other application materials, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board determines the proposed Subdivision will result in no significant impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law be filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 1 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will there be an effect as a result of a physical change to project site? Yes No Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater (15-foot rise per 100 feet of length) or where general slope in the project exceeds 10%. Yes No Construction on land where depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Yes No Construction of parking facility/area for 50 or more vehicles. Yes No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Yes No Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Yes No Evacuation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Yes No Construction of any new sanitary landfill. Yes No Construction in designated floodway. Yes No Other impacts (if any). Yes No 2. Will there be an effect on any unique land forms found on the site (i.e., cliffs, gorges, geological formations, etc.)? Yes No Specific land forms (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 2 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will project affect any water body designated as protected (under article 15 or 24 of Environmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.)? Yes No Developable area of site contains protected water body. Yes No Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of protected stream. Yes No Extension of utility distribution facilities through protected water body. Yes No Construction in designated freshwater wetland. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No 4. Will project affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? Yes No A 10% increase or decrease in surface area of any body of water or more than 10,000 sq. ft. of surface area. Yes No Construction, alteration, or conversion of body of water that exceeds 10,000 sq. ft. of surface area. Yes No Fall Creek, Six Mile Creek, Cascadilla Creek, Silver Creek, Cayuga Lake, or Cayuga Inlet? Yes No Other impacts (if any): A portion of the project involves work in close proximity to the edge of Cascadilla Gorge Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 3 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER (cont.) 5. Will project affect surface or groundwater quality? Yes No Project will require discharge permit. Yes No Project requires use of source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed project. Yes No Construction or operation causing any contamination of a public water supply system. Yes No Project will adversely affect groundwater. Yes No Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which do not currently exist or that have inadequate capacity. Yes No Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day or 500 gallons per minute. Yes No Project will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Yes No Proposed action will require storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 4 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER (cont.) 6. Will project alter drainage flow, drainage patterns, or surface water runoff? Yes No Project would impede floodwater flows. Yes No Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Yes No Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Project will be reviewed by the City Stormwater Management Officer. Yes No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will project affect air quality? Yes No Project will induce 500 or more vehicle trips in any 8-hour period per day. Yes No Project will result in the incineration of more than 2.5 tons of refuse per 24-hour day. Yes No Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTUs per hour. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 5 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACTS ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will project affect any threatened or endangered species? Yes No Reduction of any species, listed on New York or Federal list, using the site, found over, on, or near site. Yes No Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Yes No Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year other than for agricultural purposes. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No 9. Will proposed action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? Yes No Proposed action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, or wildlife species. Yes No Proposed action requires removal or more than ½ acre of mature woods or other locally important vegetation. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 6 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 10. Will proposed action affect views, vistas, or visual character of the neighborhood or community? Yes No Proposed land uses or proposed action components obviously different from, or in sharp contrast to, current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Yes No Proposed land uses or proposed action components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of aesthetic qualities of that resource. Yes No Proposed action will result in elimination or major screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric, or paleontological importance? Yes No Proposed action occurring wholly or partially within, or contiguous to, any facility or site listed on or eligible for the National or State Register of Historic Places. Yes No Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Yes No Proposed action occurring wholly or partially within, or contiguous to, any site designated as a local landmark or in a landmark district. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 7 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 12. Will the proposed action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces, or recreational opportunities? Yes No The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. Yes No A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No IMPACT ON UNIQUE NATURAL AREAS OR CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 13. Will proposed action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a site designated as a unique natural area (UNA) or a critical environmental area (CEA) by a local or state agency? Yes No Proposed action to locate within a UNA or CEA? Yes No Proposed action will result in reduction in the quality of the resource. Yes No Proposed action will impact use, function, or enjoyment of the resource. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 8 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Yes No Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Yes No Proposed action will result in major traffic problems. Yes No Other impacts: Project may impact the trail along Cascadilla Gorge rim. Yes No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect community's sources of fuel or energy supply? Yes No Proposed action causing greater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Yes No Proposed action requiring creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single- or two-family residences. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 9 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON NOISE AND ODORS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturbance during construction of, or after completion of, this proposed action? Yes No Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school, or other sensitive facility? Yes No Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Yes No Proposed action will produce operating noise exceeding local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structure. Yes No Proposed action will remove natural barriers that would act as noise screen. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Minor construction impacts only Yes No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will proposed action affect public health and safety? Yes No Proposed action will cause risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e., oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be chronic low-level discharge or emission. Yes No Proposed action may result in burial of “hazardous wastes” in any form (i.e., toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Yes No Proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes. Yes No Proposed action will result in handling or disposal or hazardous wastes (i.e., toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., including wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid, or contain gases). Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 10 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH (cont.) Storage facilities for 50,000 or more gallons of any liquid fuel. Yes No Use of any chemical for de-icing, soil stabilization, or control of vegetation, insects, or animal life on the premises of any residential, commercial, or industrial property in excess of 30,000 square feet. Yes No Other impacts (if any): Yes No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Yes No The population of the city in which the proposed action is located is likely to grow by more than 5% of resident human population. Yes No The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this proposed action. Yes No Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Yes No Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. Yes No Proposed action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas of historic importance to the community. Yes No Development will create demand for additional community services (e.g., schools, police, and fire, etc.) Yes No Proposed action will set an important precedent for future actions. Yes No Proposed action will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more businesses. Yes No City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 11 of 11 2/17/2016 Small-to- Moderate Impact Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Reduced by Project Change? IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD (cont.) Other impacts (if any): Yes No 19. Is there public controversy concerning the proposed action? Yes No Unknown — If any action in Part 2 is identified as a potential large impact, or if you cannot determine the magnitude of impact, proceed to Part 3 — PROPOSED RESOLUTION Site Plan Review Declaration of Lead Agency Hughes Hall Renovations Cornell University Planning & Development Board February 23, 2016 WHEREAS: 6 NYCRR, Part 617, of the State Environmental Quality Review Law and Chapter 176.6 of the City Code, Environmental Quality Review, require a Lead Agency be established for conducting Environmental Review of projects, in accordance with local and state environmental law, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Review for renovations to Hughes Hall, located on the Cornell University campus, by Cornell University, applicant and owner, and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to renovate four levels of Hughes Hall in order to improve academic space use. Exterior and site modifications include: enclosing existing ground- floor loggia; a new entry from the courtyard; a new exterior stair tower on a west façade; and renovations to the gorge-facing dining terrace, including a new entrance and stair. The project includes removal and redesign of the courtyard area to include new paving, seating, lighting, walkway, bike racks, landscaping, and drainage improvements. The project is in the U-1 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: this is a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”), §176-4 B(1)(h)[2], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), §617.4(b)(11), and is subject to Environmental Review. WHEREAS: State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review the Lead Agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby declare itself Lead Agency for the Environmental Review for the action of site plan approval for the project. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 Steam Removal CCF New Steam CIT Ductbank Utilities New Steam Utilities Water Cornell University is an equal opportunity affirmative action educator and employer. Infrastructure Properties and Planning Davies O. Orinda, AIA, LEED AP Project Manager 102 Humphreys Service Building Ithaca, New York 14853 t. 607.255.0441 f. 607.255.1968 e. doo4@cornell.edu The Ag Quad Landscape Revitalization Project – Info on trees to be removed Caliper Species 1 12.5"Acer saccharum 2 13.5"Zelkova serrata 3 16.5"Zelkova serrata 4 20"Tilia tomentosa 5 19.5"Acer saccharum 6 12"Fraxinus americana 7 19"Cornus mas/Cornellian cherry 8 14"Cornus mas/Cornellian cherry 9 20"Cornus mas/Cornellian cherry 10 22"Cornus mas/Cornellian cherry 11 23"Zelkova serrata 12 13"Styphnolobium japonicum 13 13"Styphnolobium japonicum 14 11"Styphnolobium japonicum 15 14.5"Acer saccharum Please refer to the attached plan for the location of the trees. TP Landscape Architecture | Site Planning | Urban Design+ ASSOCIATES, LLC.CORNELL UNIVERSITYAG QUAD UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES &LANDSCAPE REVITALIZATION ITHACA, NEW YORK ITHACA, NEW YORKCORNELL UNIVERSITY 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Site Plan Review Declaration of Lead Agency Ag. Quad Renovations Cornell University Planning & Development Board February 23, 2016 WHEREAS: 6 NYCRR, Part 617, of the State Environmental Quality Review Law and Chapter 176.6 of the City Code, Environmental Quality Review, require a Lead Agency be established for conducting Environmental Review of projects, in accordance with local and state environmental law, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Review for landscape renovations to the Ag. Quad, located on the Cornell University campus, by Cornell University, applicant and owner, and WHEREAS: the applicant proposes to renovate the existing landscape and replace underground utilities in the Agricultural Quad. The project is needed to upgrade existing utilities and enhance accessibility, expand gathering spaces, and provide new lighting and site furnishings. Site work will include removal of all existing hardscape, as well as 14 trees, installation of new pedestrian paths, plazas, stone bench seating, lighting, and blue light phones, as well as new plantings with amended soil conditions. The project also includes a large bioretention area east of Kennedy Hall. The project is in the U-1 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: this is an Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance (“CEQRO”), §176-4 B(1)(h)[4], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”), §617.4(b)(9), and is subject to Environmental Review. WHEREAS: State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review the Lead Agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby declare itself Lead Agency for the Environmental Review for the action of site plan approval for the project. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 TO: Planning & Development Board, Common Council From: Lisa Nicholas, AICP, Senior Planner RE: 2015 Planning Board Annual Report – Site Plan Applications and Approved Projects Date: February 10, 2015 Site Plan Applications Submitted 2015: New Site Plan Applications Filed – Type, Name, Construction Cost, Fees Collected and Status Project Type Project Name Construction Cost Fees Collected in 2015 Status as of 2/05/16 Commercial Texas Roadhouse $1,350,000 $2,025 Under Construction Residential 804 E. State Street House $600,000 $900 Under Construction Commercial Johnson School Dryden Road $12,000,000 $18,000 Under Construction Residential 707 E Seneca St $585,000 $878 Complete Mixed Use 210 Hancock Street Redevelopment $13,771,000 $20,656 Approved-Mar. 2016 Construction Public Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation $1,000,000 N/A Approved -2017 Construction Commercial Maguire Fiat/Chrysler Renovations $360,000 $540 Approved- Est. 2016 Construction Commercial Ithaca Plaza Pad Site $600,000 $900 Approved- Est. 2016 Construction Commercial Tompkins Financial Headquarters $26,500,000 $39,750 Approved- Est. 2016 Construction Residential 215-212 Spencer St. $2,000,000 $3,000 Approved- Construction Unknown Mixed Use Chain Works District $8,645,050* $6485 In Approval Process Commercial 416 E. State St. Project N/A $50 Withdrawn Mixed Use State Street Triangle N/A $60,000 Withdrawn Residential 4-Unit Multi-Family 525 W. Green St. N/A $225 Withdrawn Residential 815 S. Aurora St. 4-Story Apartments N/A $1,200 Withdrawn Commercial Herson Wagner Funeral Home N/A $750 Withdrawn Total $66,826,050** $154,709 *Phase 1 of project only ** Excludes withdrawn projects CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT JOANN CORNISH, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone: Planning & Development – 607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA – 607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558 1 2015 Planning Board Annual Report "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." Site Plan Projects Approved in 2015 2015: Approved Housing Projects - Number, Type and Number of New Units All New Housing Units For Sale For Rent 95* LMI Market Rate LMI Student** Market Rate** 7 1 59 12 16 *Excludes Canceled Projects * * Applicant’s target market 2015 Approved Commercial Projects – Type, and New Square Feet Site Plan Approvals– Five Year Activity 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Number of Board Approvals 18 19 14 12 13 Number of Staff Approvals n/a n/a 12 7 6 Fees Received – Full Site Plan Review $79,142 $113,544 $83,831 $167,614 $154,709 Fees Received - Staff Review n/a n/a $700 $600 $300 Est. Construction Cost – Board Approved Projects* $54,228,566 $64,315,500 $69,904,800 $53,241,650 $110,751,000 Est. Construction Cost –Staff Approved Projects n/a n/a $11,283,195 $3,050,000 $3,080,000 SF of Commercial Development Approved in 2015 71,311 SF 117,179 SF 102,057 SF 25,800 123,563 *Excludes withdrawn or cancelled projects Attachments: Major Development Projects 2009-February 2016 (showing developments of all types) List of Housing Units- Name, Location, Number, Type and Completion Status 2006-2014 (showing type, number and completion status) Housing Units Approved, Built, and Under Construction 2006-2015, and Pending Construction in 2016 (showing numbers and percentages by type and completion status) All New Commercial Industrial General Commercial Office 123,563 0 20,563 110,000 2 To t a l I n v e s t m e n t s : $3 6 6 , 1 3 2 , 6 1 0 Co m p l e t e , U n d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n o r P l a n n e d f o r 2 0 1 6 Si t e P l a n R e v i e w F e e s C o l l e c t e d : $5 5 1 , 4 4 7 Pr o j e c t s l i s t e d h e r e ( d o e s n o t i n c l u d e c a n c e l l e d o r s m a l l e r p r o j e c t s ) To t a l N e w S F o f C o m m e r c i a l S p a c e 61 0 , 6 0 6 Co m p l e t e , U n d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n o r P l a n n e d f o r 2 0 1 6 To t a l N e w D w e l l i n g s : 1, 0 4 5 Co m p l e t e , U n d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n o r P l a n n e d f o r 2 0 1 6 Lo w / M o d e r a t e D w e l l i n g s : 15 3 Co m p l e t e , U n d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n o r P l a n n e d f o r 2 0 1 6 Ch a i n w o r k s D i s t r i c t M i x e d U s e U p t o 9 1 5 H o u s i n g U n i t s o v e r 1 0 - 1 5 y e a r s De w i t t H o u s e ( O l d L i b r a r y S i t e ) Up t o 6 0 H o u s i n g U n i t s a n d 1 3 , 0 0 0 S F o f C o m m e r c i a l S p a c e Gu n H i l l A p a r t m e n t s Hu g h e s H a l l ( C o r n e l l ) Su m m a r y o f M a j o r D e v e l o p m e n t P r o j e c t s 2 0 0 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 1 6 Pr o j e c t s i n D e v e l o p m e n t i n 2 0 1 6 ( N o t y e t a p p r o v e d - U n k n o w n c o n s t r u c t i o n d a t e ) Pl a n n i n g D e v e l o p m e n t F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 6 3 Ho u s i n g a n d M i x e d U s e P r o j e c t s Co m p l e t e Br e c k e n r i d g e $1 0 , 7 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 6 , 0 5 0 50 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e Ma g n o l i a H o u s e $2 , 2 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 3 5 4 14 1 4 0 Co m p l e t e 30 9 E d d y S t r e e t – A p t s $2 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 24 0 2 4 Co m p l e t e 60 1 - W . S e n e c a S t r e e t A p t s $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 24 0 2 4 Co m p l e t e 10 7 C o o k S t r e e t $8 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 2 9 7 4 0 4 Co m p l e t e Se n e c a W a y A p t s . $7 , 0 8 1 , 5 0 0 $1 0 , 6 2 2 9 , 3 1 1 39 0 0 Co m p l e t e C o a l Y a r d A p t P h a s e 2 $2 , 5 3 4 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 8 0 1 24 0 2 4 Co m p l e t e A u r o r a S t D w e l l i n g C i r c l e $5 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 2 5 3 0 0 0 Co m p l e t e Th u r s t o n A v e n u e A p a r t m e n t s $3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 8 1 5 20 0 2 0 Co m p l e t e S t o n e Q u a r r y A p a r t m e n t s $7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 9 , 4 6 0 35 3 5 0 Co m p l e t e Co l l e g e t o w n T e r r a c e A p t s B u i l d i n g s 1 - 6 $1 6 , 6 6 6 , 6 6 0 $2 5 , 0 0 0 35 4 0 3 5 4 Co m p l e t e 70 7 E . S e n e c a S t r e e t H o u s e $5 8 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 4 8 6 0 6 Co m p l e t e 11 4 C a t h e r i n e S t . A p a r t m e n t B u i l d i n g $5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 7 5 0 3 0 3 Co m p l e t e C a y u g a P l a c e R e s i d e n c e s $6 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $0 44 0 0 Co m p l e t e 14 0 C o l l e g e A v e . A d d i t i o n $8 6 5 , 0 0 0 $1 , 2 9 7 3 03 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 20 5 T a u g h a n n o c k $3 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 80 4 & 8 1 0 E . S t a t e S t r e e t $ 8 2 2 , 0 0 0 $ 6 2 0 6 0 6 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 32 7 E d d y S t . M i x e d - U s e A p a r t m e n t B u i l d i n g $5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 4, 1 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Dr y d e n S o u t h M i x e d - U s e P r o j e c t $5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 2, 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n C o l l e g e t o w n C r o s s i n g $5 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 , 2 5 0 5 , 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Co l l e g e t o w n T e r r a c e A p t s - B u i l d i n g 7 N/ A N/ A 23 5 0 2 3 5 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n C a r e y B u i l d i n g $1 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 4 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 1 7 0 0 Su b t o t a l s $8 0 , 2 5 5 , 1 6 0 $1 0 9 , 2 3 9 24 , 1 1 1 3 99 1 99785 Co n s t r u c t i o n 2 0 1 6 21 0 H a n c o c k S t r e e t $1 3 , 7 7 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 6 5 6 10 , 0 0 0 8 5 4 5 4 0 Su b t o t a l s $1 3 , 7 7 1 , 0 0 0 $2 0 , 6 5 6 10 , 0 0 0 8 54 540 Co n s t r u c t i o n d a t e U n k n o w n 21 5 - 2 1 2 S p e n c e r S t . $2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 2 Co n s t r u c t i o n d a t e U n k n o w n 1 2 8 W . F a l l s S t . R e s i d e n c e s $4 8 5 , 0 0 0 $ 7 2 8 0 6 0 0 Co n s t r u c t i o n d a t e U n k n o w n H a r o l d S q u a r e $2 7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 1 6 6 5 2 , 2 0 0 72 0 0 Co n s t r u c t i o n d a t e U n k n o w n 3 2 3 T a u g h a n n o c k $2 9 , 4 8 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 2 5 0 2 3 0 20 0 0 Su b t o t a l s $ 5 8 , 9 7 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 9 , 1 4 4 5 2 , 4 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 $9 4 , 0 2 6 , 1 6 0 $ 1 5 9 , 0 3 8 3 4 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 4 5 1 5 3 7 8 5 Ap t s Low/ Mod IncomeStudent To t a l C o m p l e t e , U n d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n o r C o n s t r u c t i o n P l a n n e d f o r 2 0 1 6 To t a l Co n s t r u c t i o n Co s t Fe e s Co l l e c t e d SQ . F T Co m m e r c i a l Fo r Sa l e For Rent For Rent Ap t s Low/ Mod IncomeStudent Ap p r o v e d P r o j e c t s - U n k n o w n C o n s t r u c t i o n D a t e St a t u s Pr o j e c t N a m e To t a l Co n s t r u c t i o n Co s t Fe e s Co l l e c t e d SQ . F T Co m m e r c i a l Fo r Sa l e Pl a n n i n g D e v e l o p m e n t F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 6 4 Co m m e r c i a l P r o j e c t s ( O f f i c e , R e t a i l , H o t e l & M e d i c a l ) Co m p l e t e M a i n e s S o u r c e $1,50 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 2 5 0 2 5 , 3 0 0 Co m p l e t e A i r p l a n e F a c t o r y R e n o v a t i o n s $2 7 4 , 0 5 0 $ 4 3 5 0 Co m p l e t e M a g u i r e V e h i c l e S a l e s L o t $4 3 , 6 0 0 $ 1 0 0 0 Co m p l e t e Ho n d a o f I t h a c a $3 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 5 0 5, 6 3 6 Co m p l e t e Ti m H o r t o n s $5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $7 5 0 2, 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e En t e r p r i s e R e n t - A - C a r $3 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e Ma g u i r e A u t o m o t i v e $1 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 2 5 59 5 Co m p l e t e 1 1 1 T i o g a S t . ( f a ç a d e ) $8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 0 1, 1 0 0 Co m p l e t e P o r t s o f N Y E x p a n s i o n $2 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 25 5 Co m p l e t e Po r t s o f N Y G r e e n H o u s e $6 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 50 0 Co m p l e t e D e l t a C h i I m p r o v e m e n t s $2 2 7 , 0 0 0 $ 3 4 1 0 Co m p l e t e 35 9 E l m i r a R o a d – F a i r f i e l d I n n $6 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $9 , 7 5 0 59 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e Wa l - M a r t O u t p a r c e l $7 8 4 , 8 0 0 $ 1 , 1 2 2 28 , 6 6 3 Co m p l e t e Pr e s s b a y A l l e y M a r k e t p l a c e $1 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e P l a n n e d P a r e n t h o o d $4 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 6 , 1 5 0 6 , 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e Cr o s s f i t P a l l a s G y m & B l a c k I r i s h B o x i n g $7 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 5 0 10 , 3 8 4 Co m p l e t e C o l i t v a r e $5 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $0 0 Co m p l e t e Pu r i t y I c e C r e a m M i x e d - U s e $3 , 6 6 4 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 7 4 6 2, 8 6 6 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 20 9 - 2 1 5 D r y d e n R o a d ( J o h n s o n S c h o o l ) $1 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 6 0 , 0 0 0 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n F o r m e r K m a r t $4 2 4 , 0 0 0 $ 6 5 9 1 4 , 7 4 4 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Ho l i d a y I n n E x p r e s s $3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 11 , 5 5 5 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n R i c k ' s R e n t a l W o r l d E x p a n s i o n $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 0 2 , 4 3 0 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n D o w n t o w n M a r r i o t $1 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $2 5 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 6 4 9 Un d er C o n s t r u c t i o n T e x a s R o a d h o u s e $1 , 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 2 5 7, 1 6 3 Su b t o t a l $5 6 , 6 5 5 , 4 5 0 $7 9 , 6 5 3 34 0 , 3 4 0 20 1 6 C o n s t r u c t i o n It h a c a P l a z a P a d S i t e $6 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $9 0 0 . 0 0 3, 4 0 0 20 1 6 C o n s t r u c t i o n Ma g u i r e F i a t $4 2 5 , 0 0 0 $6 3 8 8, 9 1 0 20 1 6 C o n s t r u c t i o n To m p k i n s F i n a n c i a l H e a d q u a r t e r s $2 6 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $3 9 , 7 5 0 11 0 , 0 0 0 20 1 6 C o n s t r u c t i o n Do w n t o w n C a n o p y H o t e l $1 1 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $1 2 , 2 5 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 20 1 6 C o n s t r u c t i o n H o t e l I t h a c a R e n o v a t i o n $1 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 6 , 5 0 0 13 , 8 4 5 Su b t o t a l $5 0 , 0 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $7 0 , 0 3 7 . 5 0 23 6 , 1 5 5 Co n s t r u c t i o n U n k n o w n We g m a n s R e t a i l B u i l d i n g $4 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 15 , 7 0 0 Co n s t r u c t i o n U n k n o w n 4- S t o r y H o t e l $1 , 7 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 5 5 0 27 , 6 0 0 Su b t o t a l $5 , 7 0 0 , 0 0 0 $8 , 5 5 0 43 , 3 0 0 $1 0 6 , 6 8 0 , 4 5 0 $1 5 8 , 2 4 0 61 0 , 6 0 6 Ap p r o v e d P r o j e c t s - U n k n o w n C o n s t r u c t i o n D a t e To t a l Co n s t r u c t i o n Co s t Fe e s Co l l e c t e d SQ . F T Co m m e r c i a l Gr a n d T o t a l C o m p l e t e , P e n d i n g & I n P r o c e s s St a t u s Pr o j e c t N a m e To t a l Co n s t r u c t i o n Co s t Fe e s Co l l e c t e d SQ . F T Co m m e r c i a l Pl a n n i n g D e v e l o p m e n t F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 6 5 In s t i t u t i o n a l P r o j e c t s ( C o r n e l l & I C ) Co m p l e t e B i g R e d M a r c h i n g B a n d $1 , 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 7 0 0 5 , 2 0 0 Com ple t e C o r n e l l L a w S c h o o l A d d i t i o n $1 3 , 0 8 4 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 , 6 2 6 1 6 , 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e Un i v e r s i t y A v e R e c o n s t r u c t i o n $1 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 1 0 0 0 Co m p l e t e Co r n e l l R o w i n g C e n t e r $4 , 9 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ 7 , 3 9 5 9 , 6 0 0 Co m p l e t e IC B o a t h o u s e $1 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $2 , 4 0 0 6, 0 0 0 Co m p l e t e K i t e H i l l E l e c t r i c a l S u b s t a t i o n U p g r a d e $9 8 3 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 4 7 5 0 Co m p l e t e Co r n e l l U n i v . M e a n s R e s t r i c t i o n $4 , 8 9 9 , 0 0 0 $7 , 3 4 8 0 Co m p l e t e Co r n e l l U n i v . C I S B u i l d i n g $3 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $4 6 , 7 2 5 10 3 , 0 0 0 Co m p l e t e Ki m b a l l H a l l R e n o v a t i o n s $9 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e St a t l e r H a l l E a s t A v e n u e E n t r y $2 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 1, 5 0 0 Co m p l e t e Ca s c a d i l l a T r a i l R e h a b $3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $4 5 0 0 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Up s o n H a l l R e n o v a t i o n $4 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $6 0 , 0 0 0 0 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Ga r d e n A v e / T o w e r R d . I n t e r s e c t i o n $5 3 0 , 0 0 0 $5 0 0 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n K l a r m a n H a l l ( G o l d w i n S m i t h H a l l ) $2 8 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 2 , 0 0 0 6 7 , 5 1 1 Un d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n Ga n n e t t H e a l t h C e n t e r $2 5 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $3 8 , 2 5 0 35 , 0 0 0 To t a l $ 1 6 5 , 4 2 6 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 4 , 1 6 9 2 4 4 , 3 1 1 St a t u s Pr o j e c t N a m e To t a l Co n s t r u c t i o n Co s t Fe e s Co l l e c t e d SF Pl a n n i n g D e v e l o p m e n t F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 6 6 Planning Board 2015 Annual Report: Housing List of Housing Units- Name, Location, Number, Type and Completion Status 2006-2015 Page 1 of 1 SFH Dplx LMI Units # BR Units # BR Units # BR Units # BR 2006Coalyard Apartments Phase I143 Maple Avenue 10141014 2006Cayuga Green ApartmentsGreen Street 6888 6888 2006 Top of the Hill 320 Dryden Rd 1540 1540 2006719-23 Hudson Street 719-23 Hudson Street1 2006 Lakeview SRO 310 Third St 38383838 2007Cedar Creek Apartments Floral Ave 39883988 2007616 W. Buffalo St 616 W. Buffalo St 1724 17 24 2008Cayuga Green II Cayuga Street 3950 3950 2009 Coalyard Apartments Phase II143 Maple Av 2439 2439 2009Aurora St Dwelling Circle Aurora St 3 2010 130-32 The Commons 130-32 The Commons 8822 66 2010 309 Eddy Street – Apts 309 Eddy St 2445 2445 2010 601- W. Seneca Street Apts 601 Seneca 2447 2447 2010 Magnolia House N Meadow St 14141414 2011 Collegetown Terrace E State St 354532 354532 2011 140 College Ave 140 College Ave 312 312 2011 Breckenridge 100 Seneca 50605060 2011Seneca Way Apts 120 Seneca Way 3944 3944 2012/14Stone Quarry Apt 400 Spencer Street 35823582 2012Housing (4 Units)107 Cook St 412 412 4 2012201 Grandview 201 Grandview 12 12 1 2013 Apartments Thurston Avenue 2059 205920 2013Harold's Square The Commons 4664 4664 2014Dryden South Mixed-Use 205 Dryden Rd. 1040 1040 2014Residential Mixed-Use 323 Taughannock Blvd. 2126 2126 2014Duplex 605 S Aurora St 26 26 2014Collegetown Crossing 307 College Ave 4696 4696 2014Residential Mixed-Use 327 Eddy St.2256 2256 2014Apartment Building 114 Catherine St.317 317 2014Apartments (Carey Building)324 E State/ MLK Blvd. 1620 1620 2014Apartments 205 Taughannock 710 710 2015Apartments 707 E Seneca 618 618 2015Duplexes 128 W Falls St 512 5 2015Duplexes 804 & 810 E State St 618 618 2015Multi Family & Townhomes 210 Hancock 7759895989 2015Apartments 212-215 Specer St 1216 1215 TOTALS 11 0 7 1087 1786 237 373 550 1006 300 419 2006Coalyard Apartments Phase I143 Maple Avenue 1014 1014 2006 Cayuga Green ApartmentsGreen Street 6888 6888 2006 Top of the Hill 320 Dryden Rd 1540 1540 2006 719-23 Hudson Street 719-23 Hudson Street 1 2006 Lakeview SRO 310 Third St 38383838 2007 Cedar Creek Apartments Floral Ave 39883988 2007 616 W. Buffalo St 616 W. Buffalo St 1724 1724 2010 130-32 The Commons 130-32 The Commons 88 88 2009 Coalyard Apartments Phase II143 Maple Avenue 2439 2439 2010 309 Eddy Street – Apts 309 Eddy St 2445 2445 2011 140 College Ave 140 College Ave 312 312 2011 Collegetown Terrace - Phase 1 E State/MLK Blvd 140210 140210 2012 Housing (4 Units)107 Cook St 412 412 2010 Apartments 601- W. Seneca St.2447 2447 2010 Magnolia House N Meadow St 14141414 2011 Breckenridge 100 Seneca 50605060 2011Seneca Way Apts 120 Seneca Way 3744 3744 2009Aurora St Dwelling Circle N Aurora St 3 2011 Collegetown Terrace Phase 2 E State/MLK Blvd 71106 71106 2012Apartment 201 Grandview 12 11 1 2013 Thurston Avenue Apts Thurston Avenue 2059 2059 2008Cayuga Green II Cayuga St.3950 4566 2012Stone Quarry Apt 400 Spencer Street 35823582 2014Duplex 605 S Aurora St 26 26 2014Apartment Building 114 Catherine St.317 317 2015707 Sececa Street 707 Seneca Street 618 618 TOTALS:4 0 0 692 1123 176 282 323 579 199 278 Duplex - 2 units 413 Lincoln 22 2 Single Family Home Westmount Dr 1 Duplex - 2 units 313 Corn St.22 Single Family Home 502 First St 11 Single Family Home 104 Hopper Pl 1 Duplex - 2 units 301 Madison 22 Single Family Home 102 Hopper Pl 11 Single Family Home 507 Warren 11 Duplex - 2 units 638 Spencer 2626 Duplex - 2 units 634 Spencer 2626 Duplex - 2 units 636 Spencer 2626 Duplex - 2 units 407 Elm St 22 Single Family Home 409 Elm St 11 Duplex - 2 units 317 Corn St 22 Single Family Home 711 Hancock 11 Single Family Home Floral Ave 13 Duplex - 2 units 528-30 Chestnut St. 44 Duplex - 2 units 806 State St 26 26 Duplex - 2 units 808 State St 2 6 2 6 Duplex - 2 units 305 Falls St 22 Duplex - 2 units 507 Cascadilla St 22 Duplex - 2 units 122 Sunrise St. 1 11 Single Family Home 120 Pearl St 1 Single Family Home 215 Cornell St 1 Duplex - 2 units 502 Hudson Street 26 26 Duplex - 2 units 504 Hudson Street 26 26 Duplex - 2 units 108 Blair Street 26 26 Duplex - 2 units 214 Second Street 22 Single Family Home 1 Westwood Knoll 1 Single Family Home 203 Pearl St 1 Single Family Home 201 Clinton St 1 TOTALS:13 20 25 20 52 6 18 10 30 0 20154 Duplexes 804 & 810 E State St 618 618 2014Apartments (Carey Building)324 E State/ MLK St. 1620 1620 2014Apartments 205 Taughannock 710 710 2014Dryden South Mixed-Use 205 Dryden Rd. 1040 832 2014Collegetown Crossing 307 College Ave 4696 4696 2011Collegetown Terrace Building 7 E State/MLK St.142213 142213 2014 Residential Mixed-Use 327 Eddy St.22 56 22 56 TOTALS000249453002244152330 2015Multi Family & Townhomes 210 Hancock 7759895989 2015Apartments 212-215 Specer St 1216 1215 2015 Duplexes 128 W Falls St 5 12 5 12 TOTALS 7 0 7 76 117 59 89 0 0 17 27 Units: Number & Type Year Approved AP P R O V E D P R O J E C T S 2 0 0 6 - 2 0 1 4 ( e x c l u d e s p r o j e c t s t h a t h a v e b e e n w i t h d r a w n o r e x p i r e d a n d sc a t t e r e d s i t e h o u s i n g b e l o w ) Project Name Project Address No anticipated construction date = 67 Units Units For Rent w/ Target Market Market Rate Student LMI 20 1 6 Pr o j e c t e d Co n s t r u c t Un d e r C o s s t r u c t i o n as o f J a n u a r y 2 0 1 6 All TypesUnits for Sale CO M P L E T E D L A R G E P R O J E C T S 2 0 0 6 - 2 0 1 5 S C A T T E R E D S I T E H O U S I N G - A p p r o v e d C o m p l e t e d o r U n d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 20 0 6 - J a n 2 0 1 6 7 Pl a n n i n g B o a r d 2 0 1 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t - H o u s i n g S u m m a r y H o u s i n g U n i t s A p p r o v e d , B u i l t , a n d U n d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 2 0 0 6 - 2 0 1 5 , a n d P e n d i n g C o n s t r u c t i o n i n 2 0 1 6 LM I = L o w / M o d e r a t e I n c o m e # a l l Un i t s # L M I Un i t s % L M I Un i t s To t a l fo r S a l e % f o r Sa l e # L M I % L M I # N o t LM I % N o t LM I To t a l Fo r Re n t % f o r Re n t # St u d e n t % St u d e n t # L M I % L M I # Not LMI% not LMI 95 6 6 6 9 % 8 1 . 6 % 7 8 8 % 1 1 3 % 8 7 9 2 % 1 2 1 4 % 5 9 6 8 % 2 8 3 2 % # a l l Un i t s # L M I Un i t s % L M I Un i t s To t a l fo r S a l e % f o r Sa l e # L M I % L M I # N o t LM I % N o t LM I To t a l Fo r Re n t % f o r Re n t # St u d e n t % St u d e n t # L M I % L M I # Not LMI% not LMI 11 5 1 2 7 5 2 4 % 4 4 4 % 3 2 7 3 % 1 2 2 7 % 1 1 0 7 9 6 % 5 6 0 5 1 % 2 4 3 2 1 % 8 6 4 7 8 % # a l l Un i t s # L M I Un i t s % L M I Un i t s To t a l fo r S a l e % f o r Sa l e # L M I % L M I # N o t LM I % N o t LM I To t a l Fo r Re n t % f o r Re n t # St u d e n t % St u d e n t # L M I % L M I # Not LMI% not LMI 74 9 2 0 7 2 8 % 3 7 5 % 2 5 6 8 % 1 2 3 2 % 7 1 2 9 5 % 3 3 3 4 7 % 1 8 2 2 6 % 5 3 0 7 4 % # a l l Un i t s # L M I Un i t s % L M I Un i t s To t a l fo r S a l e % f o r Sa l e # L M I % L M I # N o t LM I % N o t LM I To t a l Fo r Re n t % f o r Re n t # St u d e n t % St u d e n t # L M I % L M I # Not LMI% not LMI 24 9 0 0 % 0 0 % 0 N / A 0 N / A 2 4 9 1 0 0 % 2 2 4 9 0 % 0 0 % 2 4 9 1 0 0 % # a l l Un i t s # L M I Un i t s % L M I Un i t s To t a l fo r S a l e % f o r Sa l e # L M I % L M I # N o t LM I % N o t LM I To t a l Fo r Re n t % f o r Re n t # St u d e n t % St u d e n t # L M I % L M I # Not LMI% not LMI 83 6 6 8 0 % 7 8 % 7 1 0 0 % 0 0 % 7 6 9 2 % 0 0 % 5 9 7 7 . 6 % 1 7 2 2 % * D o e s n o t i n c l u d e p r o j e c t s t h a t h a v e b e e n c a n c e l e d o r f o r w h i c h S i t e P l a n A p p r o v a l h a s e x p i r e d Ho u s i n g U n i t s Bu i l t 20 0 6 - 2 0 1 5 Ho u s i n g U n i t s Pe n d i n g Co n s t r u c t i o n i n 20 1 6 FO R R E N T FO R S A L E FO R S A L E Ho u s i n g U n i t s Un d e r Co n s t r u c t i o n a s of J a n 2 0 1 6 FO R R E N T FO R R E N T FO R S A L E FO R R E N T Ho u s i n g U n i t s Ap p r o v e d i n 20 1 5 * Ho u s i n g U n i t s Ap p r o v e d 20 0 6 - 2 0 1 5 * FO R S A L E FO R S A L E FO R R E N T As o f F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y D e v T o t a l s & H o u s i n g U n i t s J : \ G R O U P S \ P l a n n i n g a n d D e v B o a r d \ Y e a r l y D e v T o t a l s & H o u s i n g U n i t s 8