Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-23-16 Planning and Development Board Meeting Agenda
r CITY OF ITHACA �1T1 108 E.Green Street—3rd Floor Ithaca,NY 14850-5690 i 4, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING BUILDING ZONING&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT €'µ 1�1�€I 0`s� Division of Planning&Economic Development JOANN CORNISH,DIRECTOR OF PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT PHYLLISA A.DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � C�ApdRA;E[1 Telephone: Planning&Development—607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA—607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558 If you have a disability&would like specific �j APPLICANT OVERHEAD PROJECTOR NOTE: accommodation to participate, AG E N DAD The City only has a VGA plug/cable ®®® 7 available to connect to our overhead projector. If you need to connect another ®®m way, you will need to provide your own ADAPTOR. (Macs & many newer, lighter please contact the City Clerk at 274-6570 by laptops may not have a VGA port.) 12:00 p.m.,the day before the meeting. ,�eevaa J-- The regular meeting of the PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD will be held at 6:00? .m. onA:EBRUARyr!23RD,20161fln COMMON COUNCIL CHAMBERS, City Hall, 108 E. Green Street, Ithaca, NY. AGENDA©TE M® Sta rtLTi me 1.1fl M Agenda[ReviewN 6:00 2.H M Special®rdeftflMusinessM] 6:02 M 0 Project:M Chain Works District Redevelopment Project M M Locatiorl 620 S.Aurora St. I?] M ApplicantO Scott Whitham &Jamie Gensel for David Lubin of UnChained Properties, LLCM M M Actions:M O Adequacy Discussion M M M ProjectMDescription:MProposed Chain Works District seeks to redevelop and rehabilitate the +/-800,000-SF former Morse Chain/Emerson Power Transmission facility, located on a 95-acre parcel traversing City and Town of Ithaca's municipal boundary. Applicant has applied to Common Council for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for development of a mixed-use district, including residential, commercial, office, and manufacturing. This is a Type I Action under City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance, §176-4 B. (6), and State Environmental Quality Review Act, §617.4 (b)(3), for which Lead Agency made a Positive Declaration of Environmental Significance on October 28, 2014, and adopted a Scope for the GEIS on January 13, 2015.M 3.M M Privilegenb0hel loor13-minute maximum per person — if you will be speaking about a project 6:50 with a scheduled PUBLIC HEARING below b, you are highly encouraged to speak at that time)M 4.21 M Subdivision[ReviewN M A.M Project:M Minor Subdivision 7:00 M M Locatiorl 101-107 Morris Ave. M M ApplicantO George Frantz for Habitat for Humanity M M Actions:M O Consideration of Preliminary& Final Approval M M Projectmescription:M? pplicant proposes to consolidate two existing tax parcels (#44.-5-5 & #44.-5-6); and subdivide resulting 6,154-SF (0.141-acre) parcel into two lots: Lot 1, measuring approximately 3,076 SF with 31 feet of frontage on Third Ave.; and Lot 2, measuring approximately 3,078 SF with 30 feet of frontage on Third Ave. Applicant intends to construct two affordable owner-occupied homes. Project is in the R-2b Zoning District, which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF for one- or two-family homes, minimum street frontage of 35 feet and minimum front side and rear yards of 25 feet, 10 feet, 10 feet and 25% or 50 feet, but no less than 20 feet, respectively. The project requires Area Variances. This is an Unlisted Action under City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance ("CEQRO") and State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"), and is subject to Environmental Review. M 0 B.0 Project:[ Minor Subdivision 7:10 0 0 Location:[ 210 Hancock St. 0 0 Applicant:[ Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services (INHS) 0 0 Actions:[ O PUBLIC HEARING O Consideration of Preliminary& Final Approval[ 0 0 Projectmescription:RlThe project site contains two tax parcels: #35-3-1, at 423 First Street and containing a one- story building; and #33.-3-3, at 210 Hancock Street and containing the former Neighborhood Pride grocery store, with a total combined area of 2.012 acres (87,643 SF). After consolidating the two parcels, the applicant proposes to create two new parcels: Parcel A, measuring 1.631 acres (71,046 SF) with the following street frontages: 166' on Hancock St., 326' on First St., 269' on Adams St., and 163' on Lake Ave.; and Parcel B, measuring 0.381 acres (16,597 SF) with 101 feet of frontage on Hancock Street and 163 feet on Lake Avenue. The project is in the B-2a Zoning District, which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF, minimum width-at-street of 40', and minimum front, side, and rear yards of 0', 10'/5', and 15%or 20', but no less than 10', respectively. The purpose of the Subdivision is to implement the Site Plan for the project, approved on August 25, 2015. This is a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance ("CEQRO") and the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") for which the Planning Board, acting as Lead Agency, made a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance on May 26, 2015. 5.0 0 Site[Flan[Review0 0 A. Project:® Brindley Street Bridge 7:20 0 0 Location:® Brindley Street at Cayuga Inlet 0 0 Applicant:® Addisu Gebre for the City of Ithaca 0 0 Actions:[ O Lead Agency Concurrence for Board of Public Works 0 0 Projectmescription: The current Brindley Street bridge is a single-lane structure, constructed in 1938 with the last major rehabilitation occurring in 1952. It has been posted for a 20-ton weight limit since January 1965 with a condition rating of 3.859 and sufficiency rating of 62.5. The bridge is not historically eligible and carries gas/water lines, and vehicular/pedestrian traffic. Motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians using the structure use the same lane. There are no traffic signals, pedestrian-crossing signals, or stop signs to aid coordination of movement across the bridge. Crossing the bridge depends on opposing users indicating to each other when it is safe to cross. This is an unsafe condition and as usage of this road increases it will create a greater potential for head-on collisions or traffic queuing into the Brindley St./W. State St. intersection. Brindley Street and the adjoining Taber Street provide a second "local street" access to major shopping center situated approximately 0.6 miles south, in addition to serving businesses located along them. Project's main objectives are to: replace existing single-lane structure on Brindley Street with two-lane structure with accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians; restore crossing to condition which provides minimum 75-year design life, using cost effective techniques to minimize life-cycle cost of maintenance/repair; and implement measures that enhance safety and mobility consistent with improvements proposed for the W. Martin Luther King,Jr. Blvd./W. State St. 0 B.0 Project:® Hilton Canopy Hote10 7:35 0 0 Location:® 320-324 E. State St.O 0 0 Applicant:[] Scott Whitham for Neil Pate10 0 0 Actions:[ O Project Update O Conditions of Site Plan Approval O Requested Changes 0 0 ProjectODescription:00Project was approved on February 24, 2015. Applicant is requesting changes to approved Site Plan, including the following: increase from 123 to 131 guest rooms; increase from 74,475 GFA to 77,884 GFA; minor landscape changes; size and location of windows and doors; and exterior materials and colors. 0 C.0 Project:[ Parking for Five Cars 0 8:00 0 0 Location:[ 424 Dryden Rd. 0 0 Applicant:[ Daniel Hirtler for William &Angie Chen 0 0 Actions:[ O PUBLIC HEARING O Determination of Environmental Significance O Recommendation to BZA 0 "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." 2 0 0 ProjectMescription:OThe property at 424 Dryden Road was subdivided in 2015 to form a new parcel at 319 Oak Avenue. The required off-street parking for 424 Dryden Road was formerly located on the part of the original parcel which was subdivided. The goal of this project is to provide the five required off-street parking spaces for the small site, while providing the best maneuverability and retaining a vegetative buffer at the rear of this parcel. The applicant is proposing two potential layouts. The preferred layout retains an existing mature tree, preserves a portion of the 10-foot vegetative buffer, but requires variances. The alternate plan is to construct a garage that occupies a larger portion of the 10-foot buffer and removes a mature tree, but does not require a variance. Both layouts include a trash enclosure. The project is in the CR-2 Zoning District. This is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance ("CEQRO") and the State Environmental Quality Review Act("SEQRA"), and is subject to environmental review. 0 0 D.0 Project:® Hughes Hall Renovations 8:25 0 0 Location:111 Cornell University Campus 0 0 Applicant:0 Ram Venkat for Cornell University 0 0 Actions:0 O Declaration of Lead Agency O PUBLIC HEARING 0 0 Projectmescription:Mz he applicant is proposing to renovate four levels of Hughes HallOn order toOmprove academic space use. Exterior and site modifications include: enclosing existing ground-floor loggia; a new entry from the courtyard; a new exterior stair tower on a west facade; and renovations to the gorge-facing dining terrace, including a new entrance and stair. The project includes removal and redesign of the courtyard area to include new paving, seating, lighting, walkway, bike racks, landscaping, and drainage improvements. The project is in the U-1 Zoning District. This is a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance ("CEQRO"), §176-4 B(1)(h)[2], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"), §617.4(b)(11), and is subject to Environmental Review. 0 0 E.0 Project:0 Cornell Ag. Quad Renovations 8:45 0 Location:0 Cornell University Campus 0 Applicant:0 Davies Orinda for Cornell University0 0 Actions:0 O Declaration of Lead Agency O PUBLIC HEARING 0 0 ProjectmescriptionMe applicant proposes to renovate the existing landscape and replace underground utilities in the Agricultural Quad. The project is needed to upgrade existing utilities and enhance accessibility, expand gathering spaces, and provide new lighting and site furnishings. Site work will include removal of all existing hardscape, as well as 14 trees, installation of new pedestrian paths, plazas, stone bench seating, lighting, and blue light phones, as well as new plantings with amended soil conditions. The project also includes a large bioretention area east of Kennedy Hall. The project is in the U-1 Zoning District. This is an Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance ("CEQRO"), §176-4 B(1)(h)[4], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"), §617.4(b)(9), and is subject to Environmental Review. 0 F.0 SKETCHPIPLAN:Maplewood Apartments® 9:00 0 G.0 SKETCHIPLAWM/laguire Automotive Project at Carpenter Business Park® 9:20 6.0 Zoning[Appeals0] 9:40 •C #3009,3%rea3/ariance,14062Stewart[Ave.O 0 •C #3013,[Sign3lariance,OL201S.Murora[St.lithacaMAarriott3iotel)0] 0 •iF #3015,[Special[Permit,1305Cfaylor3)1.0 •1-1 #3016,Mrea3/ariance,1424®ryden[Rd.® 7.0 Old/NewMusiness0] 9:50 A. PlanningMoard[Annual[Report0] 0 0 "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." 3 8.0 Reports® 10:05 A.[PIanningMoard[EhairIverbal)M B.®i recto rlbf[Manning[&MeveIopmentIverbal)R] C.MBoardlbf[PublicUorksliaison3verbal)0 9.M Approvalrbf[Minutes:©uly[28,C2015,[September[22,[2015,mecember[22,2015C time permitting) 10:15 10.0 Adjournment0 10:16 ACCESSINGAMEETINGM- ATERIALSCONLINED Site Plan Review&Subdivision Applications(and Related Documents) Site Plan Review application documents are accessible electronically via the"Document Center"on the City web site(www.cityofithaca.org/DocumentCenter),under "Planning&Development">"Site Plan Review Project Applications,"and in the relevant year/month folder. Subdivision application materials can be similarly located, but in the"Subdivision Applications"folder. Zoning Appeal Materials are also accessible electronically via the"Document Center"on the City web site,under"Board of Zoning Appeals." Agenda You may access this agenda(including attachments)by going to the"Agenda Center"on the City web site(www.citvofithaca.org/agendacenter),under"Planning& Development Board." For ease-of-access,a link to the most recent Planning Board agenda is always accessible on the Planning Board home page: http://www.citvofithaca.org/354/Planning-Development-Board. "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." 4 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Minor Subdivision Preliminary& Final Approval City of Ithaca Tax Parcel#19.-2-4 101 & 107 Morris Ave. City of Ithaca Planning&Development Board February 23,2016 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for a Minor Subdivision of City of Ithaca tax parcels:#44.-5-5 and#44.-5-6, located at 101 and 107 Morris Ave. The parcels will be consolidated first,then subdivided. The application is by George Frantz for Habitat for Humanity, and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to consolidate the existing two tax parcels (#44.-5-5 and#44.-5-6) and subdivide the resulting 6.154-SF (0.141 acre) parcel into two lots: Lot 1, measuring approximately 2,949 SF with 31 feet of frontage on Third Ave.; and Lot 2, measuring approximately 3,205 SF with 30 feet of frontage on Third Ave. The resultant parcels will have Third Street addresses. The applicant intends to construct two semi-detached, affordable for-sale homes. The project is in the R-2b Zoning District which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF for one- or two-family homes, minimum street frontage of 35 feet, and minimum front, side and rear yards of 25 feet, 10 feet, 10 feet and 25%or 50 feet,but no less than 20 feet,respectively. The project received Area Variances, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act,both of which require environmental review, and WHEREAS: this is considered a Minor Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1,Minor Subdivision—Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of a maximum of one additional buildable lot, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board, being the local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on January 26, 2016 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of this action, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 B. (4) and 176-12 A. (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on January 26,2016, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council, Tompkins County Planning Department, and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: this Board, acting as Lead Agency in environmental review, did on January 26, 2016 review and accept as adequate: a Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Part 2, prepared by Planning staff, a draft Subdivision plat entitled"Habitat for Humanity Proposed Re-Subdivision of Tax Parcels #44.-5-5 and #44.-5-6, "dated 1/7/16, and prepared by George R. Frantz&Associates; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board did, on January 26, 2016 determine the proposed Subdivision would result in no significant impact on the environment, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board recognizes that information received and reviewed for this Subdivision indicates the resultant parcels have received the required Area Variances from area requirements in the R-2b Zoning District, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby grant Preliminary and Final Subdivision Approval to the proposed Subdivision located at 101 and 107 Morris Ave., subject to submission of three (3)paper copies of the final approved plat, all having a raised seal and signature of a registered licensed surveyor. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Minor Subdivision Preliminary& Final Approval City of Ithaca Tax Parcels#35:3-1&35:3-3 210 Hancock Street City of Ithaca Planning&Development Board February 23,2016 WHEREAS: an application has been submitted for review and approval by the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board for a Minor Subdivision of City of Ithaca tax parcels #35.-3-1 and #35.-3-3, located at 423 First St. and 210 Hancock St., respectively. The parcels will be consolidated first, then subdivided. The application is by Joe Bowes for Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services(INNS), and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to consolidate the existing two tax parcels (#35.-3-1 and#35.-3-3) and subdivide the resulting 2.012-acre (87,729.84 SF)parcel into two lots: Parcel A, measuring approximately 43,560 SF (1.631 acres) with 166 feet of frontage on Hancock St., 326 feet on First St., and approximately 100 feet on Adams St. (excluding portions of Adams St. that have been discontinued); and Parcel B, measuring approximately 16,596.36 SF (0.381 acres) with 101.46 feet of frontage on Hancock St. The resultant addresses will be Parcel A, 210 Hancock St., and Parcel B, 202 Hancock St. The project is in the B-2a Zoning District which has a minimum lot size of 3,000 SF and minimum street frontage of 35 feet and minimum front, side and rear yards of 0 feet, 1015 feet, and 15% or 20 feet,but no less than 10 feet,respectively, and WHEREAS: the purpose of the proposed Subdivision is to implement the Site Plan for the 210 Hancock Street project, approved by the Planning and Development Board on August 25,2015, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board did on May 26, 2015 determine the proposed project, including the Subdivision, would result in no significant impact and did make a Negative Determination of Environmental Significance, and WHEREAS: this is considered a Minor Subdivision in accordance with the City of Ithaca Code, Chapter 290, Article 1, §290-1, Minor Subdivision—Any subdivision of land resulting in creation of a maximum of one additional buildable lot, and WHEREAS: legal notice was published and property posted in accordance with Chapters 276-6 B. (4) and 176-12 A. (2) (c) of the City of Ithaca Code, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board held the required Public Hearing on February 23,2016, and WHEREAS: the Tompkins County Planning Department and other interested parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project and any comments received have been considered, and WHEREAS: this Board, did on February 23, 2016 review and accept as adequate: a Subdivision plat entitled "Subdivision map No. 210 Hancock and No. 423 First Street, City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York," dated 11/24/15, and prepared by T.G. Miller,P.C.; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the Planning and Development Board recognizes that information received and reviewed for this Subdivision indicates the resultant parcels have received the required Area Variances from area requirements in the B-2a Zoning District,now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does herby grant preliminary and final subdivision approval to the proposed subdivision located at 210 Hancock and 423 First Streets subject to submission of three (3)paper copies of the final approved plat, all having a raised seal and signature of a registered licensed surveyor. Moved by: Seconded by: In favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 ob b CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street Ithaca New York 14850-6590 e ain, OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER '0" Telephone: 607 274-6530 Fax: 607/274-6587 fig MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Development Board FROM: Addisu Gebre, Bridge Systems Engineer DATE: February 1, 2016 RE: Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project(CP#764) This memo is intended to inform you that City of Ithaca's Department of Engineering staff and engineers from Delta Engineers, Architects, & Land Surveyors will present Brindley Street Bridge Replacement project's objectives and alternatives being considered on February 23, 2016. I would also like to inform you that on January 25, 2016, the Board of Public Works discussed the project and concurred with the preliminary project scope as presented by the project consultant during the meeting. The Board also agreed to declare its intention to act as a lead agency for the environmental review of the project foucused on Design Alterantive 2 (which would include the construction of new roadway and bridge on a relocated horizontal alignment that would connect Taber Street with the West State Street/Taughnnock Boulevard intersection). For your additional information, the following are the Environmental Classification for the proj ect: • NEPA Classification: NEPA Class II Categorical Exclusion (CE) action in accordance with 23 CFR 771.117c and the FEAW checklist. • SEQR Classification: an Unlisted Action, per 6 NYCRR Section 617.2, Subdivision(ak). • CEQR Classification: The proposed project is anticipated to meet the criteria established for a CEQR Type I Action in accordance with the CEQR Chapter 176 Section 4. Brindley Street Bridge Replacement Project Project description: The current Brindley Street bridge is a single lane structure. The bridge was constructed in 1938 with the last major rehabilitation occurring in 1952. It has been posted for a 20 ton weight limit since January of 1965 and has a condition rating of 3.859 and a sufficiency rating of 62.5. The bridge is not historically eligible, and carries gas and water lines as well as vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The motorists, bicyclist and pedestrians using the structure utilize the same lane. There are no traffic signals, pedestrian crossing signals or stop signs to aid in the coordination of movement across this bridge. Crossing of the bridge is dependent upon opposing users indicating to each other when it is safe to cross. This is an unsafe condition and as usage of this road increases it will create a greater potential for head-on collisions or queuing of traffic into the Brindley Street/West State Street intersection. Brindley Street and the adjoining Taber Street provide a second "local street" access to a major shopping center situated approximately 0.6 miles to the south in addition to serving the businesses located along them. The project's main objectives are to: l. Replace the existing single lane structure on Brindley Street with two lane structure with accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians; 2. Restore the crossing to a condition which provides a minimum 75 year design life, using cost effective techniques to minimize the life cycle cost of maintenance and repair; and 3. Implement measures that enhance safety and mobility consistent with improvements proposed in the West Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard/West State Street corridor under PIN 3950.50. Project design alternatives considered for the project are: Bridge Alternative I —Brindley Street Bridge replacement on existing horizontal alignment: This alternative will replace the existing single lane structure on Brindley Street with a two lane structure with a span length of approximately 88' in the same location, shifting the alignment of Brindley Street slightly to better fit within the existing right-of-way and avoid unnecessary impacts. Bridge Alternative 2—New roadway and bridge construction on relocated horizontal alignment: This alternative will involve the relocation of Brindley Street by connecting Taber Street with the West State Street/Taughannock Boulevard intersection where a City of Ithaca parking lot currently exists. A new bridge will be constructed on the proposed roadway to carry traffic over the Cayuga Inlet and the existing Brindley Street roadway and structure will remain(with appropriate improvements) and be utilized for pedestrian traffic. CITY OF ITHACA FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ,AF Purpose: This Full Environmental Assessment F )is designedto help applicants and agencies determine,in an orderly manner,whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whetheri a significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there ec s of a proposedaction t are subjective immeasurable. It is also understoodthose determine significance may have little r no formal knowledgethe environment or may not be aware of the broader concerns t® the questionf significance. In e FEAF Is intended to provide a'method wherebyapplicants and agencies can assured the determinationprocess has been orderly,comprehensive in re,yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a projectr action. FEAF Components: Part 1: Provides objective to and information about a given action its site. By identifying baslc project data,it assists in a revi ew of the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part .® Focuses on identifying e range of possiblei cts t may ay occur o ct or action. It provides guidance as o whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies het er an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part . If any impact in Part 2 is identified oten' y large,then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA I5 FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—TYPE I AND UNLISTED ACTIONS Identif the portions of FEAF completed for this action: []Part 1 []Part 2 []Fart 3 3' l� � Upon review of the information recorded on this FE (Parts,2,and 3,if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact,it is reasonably determined by the Lead Agency that; []A. The Proposed Action will not result in any large and important impact(s)and will not have a significant impact on the environment;therefore,A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OB. Although the proposed action could have a significant impact on the environment,there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action,because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required;therefore, CONDITIONED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. The proposed action may result in one or more large and important'Impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment;therefore,A POSITIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED* Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valx for Unlisted Actions. M. Name of Action: Name f Lead Agency.: Agency:Name and Thle ot"Responsible Officer M" Lead Signature si r _ Signaturer : . FULL ENVIRONAdIENTAIL ASSESSMENT FORM(FEAF) PAR71 1—PROJECT 1JNFO%1%4ATI0N (prepa,red by project sponsorlapplicant) ® This document 'is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional *information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the FEAF will depend on 'Information currently available and will not 'Involve new studies, research, or investigation. If 'Information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each'Instance. Name of Action:Replacement of Brindley Street Bridge over Cayuga Inlet ---------------- Location of Action: Brindley Street(Taber Street to Taughannock Boulevard) Name of Applicant/Sponsor:Mr.Addisu Gebre Address: 108 East Green Street M7, City/To wnNifllage.- Ithaca State. NY ZIP: 14850 �;t,; ........... Business Phone:607-274-6530 ............ .Name of Owner(if different): Address: City/Town/Village: State: ZIP: 77 Business Phone: Descri tion of Action: This project involves the replacement of Brindley Street Bridge(BIN 2210400) p over Cayuga Inlet within the City of Ithaca,Tompkins County,New York.The replacement of the e is necessary to address the serviceable life of the currents structure,the bridge foundation U nstableness,the unsafe traffic and pedestrian conditions,and the significant number® accidents , in the i mmediate vicinity of the bridge.The following are proposed: :., AtJ Null alternative®maintain the existing single lane structure on Brindley Street. Alternative I Bridge replacement on existing horizontal angnment-replace existing single lane structure on Brindley Street with a two lane structure. ign Alternative 2.- Bridge replacement on relocated horizontal alignment-relocate Brindley Street to al' with the West State Street and Taughannock Street intersecation through the construction of a new single span bridge carrying Brindley Street over Cayuga Inlet. In that existing single span, single lane mult* le steel girder br'dge will addition, IP be I converted to a pedestrian(non-motorized)bridge. 2 Please complete each question (indicate , if not applicable). A-9 SY]FE DESCRIPIE"'10N Physical setting of overall project,both developed and un_ . i�4. Present Land Use: Commercial P Industrial ubl'c Forest Urban 'f 5 Agricultural I.� _ ... ,. ♦ }' 'A::-_i}-6 r_.L-.AaS'a a A.at < -:.:1_.+a_>•;'a-e --1...J >_R,_ '! A,�A�.1,_ai.- - Y.. .•IY.... . -:., Y„_ -.A«., _�., a'1t_:.:_»LLA...x.AJL-..._.:.vJAL..'Sf. ;.a.r w: .._...ffi'.^t0.4 i r a ,..r wM a6- 1. •.Y yJ".,.r:l_. r_4.P�'•t-:: ..4 a n,� •r- ram• _ _ ,r„sue ♦-.:�, r v `;r„.a,^,t."�'-^__-»•:�_�_:..._.,..-.....,,.._i,;J I._,_.,......_...�._�.�..t� Total ,--.r-_,s.�•.,a.:...,�.:,,.i-.._>>_..,,.~-.r.__,_..,:aa-,._..�,>a-L-,,,.,.;,>r„;.>«_.s,,mamfc':_.;,- ...y�..y-.-��.ez>-�-�-.�z�„».>.,__..�..,..,._..._,z...._-._acres square-.,-r.,ss�«_,.r...._,".•s r_t_;->�_.....-,�• :�.a.r.. ,.6 :a'..s•B �rarea, - - u - s.i.q'I>A:Lk_a:a__.., ♦ After Completion Currently Approximate Area(Units 8*fi Question 2 apply to thi's +'. •, ...,,,._.a.....__.._ .,$ a<< ; 2a.Meadow or a.- a ms.- u. :,,;... a .>,r.,}...._._,._m•.-_,_a.a-.:a _ A.:_. :.Ba ,_..-:.:a.-..._:a.... ...-... ...a...,:. __,::s.. _._. .,<:C#♦ _..x:..r i.>,.....:.',,.",KL_,_s.....�.,.�_r,-:M..-_r<:::.e s�ar.Ll..t.�.r,.e...xaw._m...::_s:...-.,,, ,.:;sG_..-t__....,._,__ ...__..,,._r..,c..,,..._=:R..... ,..._-_>.,c:s.sir < .9 s r 27 30 _..-.-.- .. ... :. .._ .. -.. ... .. ....: .._- _. ,.. , .:: .. tr aJ[Y sT.i>r_ LzaA._J:A f_A.."p al.�. ::LIa B,S•-:'AB •Ii.LN �:�"a_�n_ . , Forested oJ_::.ret s_.,..t.a e>f 0.05 =.Y...i::a_a:.Y,.•,.•n_:w-fT ,s-•r.t-,A 2 m.:..-r,J TY-„»:maw,x>.,..:! :5 -)-_m_>z;:..,>L i'.Y,«1 a:....•.'.•_.. --a,.�.> z,•.. ,,_.,f,...: {_ _ ...,�,)�f:�•'../�� a 1 S r'':_ .-.�✓,r.,-_,. ,v -.�.'St .. ....... ._ r . Agricultural ir„-,-,,..wt„„+r,,..�.a.,_,..,,�.,v�.�...._��.«a,.,".s...r.,..:.s-,.«.,.,.,.p�,_,..,,<.w.._..,.<.._....._:,.s_�.,<v._.L.�•....¢ <r_..,.... _... ._.. _ y_,_.. ....z... _ - " 2d.Wetland per Article 24 of Environmental Conservation Law(E LE)] _ .._.. .... _ _ ._r =a-,.:P-,a.-s_,.:-aa...>s:-i�..,...._..:>Rw...,:1a_-.t-->a:_:._.u._.:__....��.�< ._:m: .,'-,,..,.,w K�:t. A 1..:;: ;a'v'f -._ ?f ..jn• ♦ ?__-. . f+la,tr:i..Oar.,i•,+•....r .. _,,.._ .- _ ,.. _ . ,.-...,., ,_..-.,..- ._-,. - - 4'L,var_=.x_._., ....,wx _„ ,,..__... •.. „ - ,:•. « •,_. r ...., _.-.-..,. .♦ :,Y 4v,a_..� , ..-�._A�:.._:L,.�.:.ra.......3i�aa'.t .,r w.,.is ' .# 2e. Water Surface Area � .19 0.0 ...+a.Y.fasY-ic - �iy J s f. Public : - .,_ jd i x .Water Surface area Seef above .. :,., :aI.T L a.a_.A araxa._.._::.:JJ .4.w •a..:f'-a_}:a.:,i,A',...a..'S: ._ .-._v_•.a„.4,;_..,v-.:.• t....a}18. 3 r , ,_ � !h v�...•B. -,...__.. a -1 ...,�... , _ _ :_:,., �.. _._., a .rry rf._..-_=ds «..t__- .._-�...5. .,.__ ...._.. .._._.,..-r ♦-..,_._ -.. ?T' _. :__•.. ... ,c.. ...,.: ., ..;x....,. ,..« .._..„+,..».�..r."._.._-..i ;✓...i_-,u_Y.w+v..4' ter_,.+, ®Unve etated r�ac e , or filly 0.0 .0 ,r . ti � t.:._...,�-.�'_...._..a._3...,:..s�.,�::...«,._...•..vr_.,,..r...v..�v,,,.._.,-I...c,,•ar.....lS�:•,.-s..r.x_..:_..'�,.t...�...._...r.a,y.s,....<.,...*..,<.r_::ru�aa�.♦.;u..a.$r...a.rsw...a-,..:..ww....:cw.+.�.,r._ =t..�y ._ 3 s 1. Roads,buildin and other_paved surfaces 0.77 , or ,.r.._ .__.-•,,, ,,.Y<u,N s...��:.-rs.-•__z,.s�.:�...,...,.,.,.._:,,_,,.._..�....�L,.,,,,•„Y.c...,U....::,,.>,__-.:.�;.,...r,c_:....�..-:. ,.,_.,-..v<t_.':�,.Lx. .:,3r::-�._..�__ .. �. ..r._.._.- _ . . _ 2'. Other r,indicate t � -, ,. �.. a aa•,.ai ..' ,:...: .'.. .. ,.., :.. f ....,.._�,..__.___:. - .;.� �..<->�_._AB .s :.., -a ::#•PL «_.:i__a.^..:• _.• Y_t .r_a,_,: .;:.rs-. .- .4..•. _ ,._..,.,.. ...,.»ic.+..,.';.• 3a. at is predominant soil e(s)on project site(e.g.,HdB, silty loam,etc.):ML,Ua,and W. il- .. x a :,.z a_,_...-_1.t...::.w•,«::,r._ref A_a_.,-:. } a-__i ..�.r.' .. - ' .--_.:a_..w_i-,...._ ------- .,,.rt_.L<'.:..i..-... .<.,_,....,c__.r>.>-..,..•._„-;s.,:.v...a«...�..,.,,._..._....:.....a._L, n..,..,�«zrtY/�...Cr.-rwr.-:;.......�rw-+,_..�."T w«.�.�� ....r.....a,.+,......, ._.... -..-�........._..._�,_...�.....,. ,.. oil rain e: Well-Drained. %of Site Moderately Well-Drained %of Site Poorly r i e ©of S it - „.,5 .. t - -...,. .- ,,, _,. .., ,. a�,. .,-..._-_._..�_a.K,_«r,.I.,ar.:.._..�,.,,,_..•-,,.�..;�_ar,af:-a,...:�,_��:.,.,...,:.� Ex,.y.-,..,.•_�.w-,..rw.a....:w"<..:A...,,.1�w.-.';,.,_-ra-..w,.v'�-s=-+r..:<.�..-...A:».,.,_-��Lt�:.,.�W.;....1.._._.-,..+:.s6...s2..«:L,K.•«,.-«:..�..,.a-,,_.2_..5.!<::f...._..�.._.... ',-A a. Are there bedrock outcroppings on roj eet site ;Al0Yes o❑ / r , .:;:.azB a_ .. .:• �, ::,__ a •,a a,s �. a.. ...- _ .... , �...,.. ._......:..,.. ,..,,. >_ r___..<a,.�._.,�._a«.5..�-�.,� ,..»-.-.r..'.+:.,"..r. . .:..,It_a.:'�..:.'�LY._.r:.'�'_:-:.-.,'s:,..'nr�..,,"�..., ., _. .�....��J�..,=._.,�._._..a.`�a_.:,.s.,.._�.ri.a..r-'•,...2'-.4_ .i'L.`�a.r_�Th.s:.., ._...:a�.r....._vx.�r...v�..+- ,.< .._,<. ,. i 77 ,,.4c. What is depth to e .ter table`? < 10 (Feet) _ .::.�....e::.,....__�_>ti..♦..>..,,a.a,`>...,.;;s:.t.-..rr.,.^X=:..�.:7..u*_.,.�r-3..w-::,'�--:.,,.,,,.,�._v:..._.....<._..._.3I:14...-._r....1._.:..--......,._._�_ .,...,EZ _., 0_640% -... r„ r % 10-15% 10 % aApproximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes 1 K. 15%or greater- % 1. -...,..'�i4..�:_ ,,.-_,..w^...,m aw:�....r.d'r_..-.-.,�....„-y_.,,.♦..�.Y-�a.s........_YGZ..1_se,_.�,.Ra.,..r_?i_.n,,.0:..:.�.�S..S ....rr..l.ofw,.._ r t 5 l i , it l i i ' i , sie ita t,listed Historic Places ,..,,.� ..i,`..:.?- r:,,.. __: _ ....>...., ,_,,..._e k. ,_ ri. ». ..:. __, ._. -. .. . - - r.�a r✓.+.s ra....s-.__a.�..a.,_.N r....Y• A.rv'..r r� y.:�a .v _ •-�,: '�,::r,....,.,`L«.;�>.,r.t_.K ,,. '.•.i: rr.....�„».__..,a.r.../....+....,...... _._a.._.».. .„e�-__....zd_. _.3.__i_a=... �r'E�;�>_r..-n.... '; . ...Or a dedesignated t in aes No y JLJy LJ /f rlocal landmarK aistrict �« - _.,,. _.,,,., T 4a_,... ,a•. r.. r,w.-r s +r,_# . f > 8..._Rv_. .8 y.:>.YY•....RA T- _*i �,:�_._...�♦�..,_ -> u,_-.,.:, .r fir,,,.-. �._ .. ..y.. .. .<,. , _ ,. _..•, �7. Do hunting and/or fishing opportunities currently9 Yes E]NoE]i4 p A If yes, identify each species'. exist in the p ect r0i ® Y. :. hrrRainbow&Brown Trout Atlantic Salmon, Bass g 3 SITE :-aa...,_ _ S1• .mm03_.:. ! ___ .Y_i '._•. __.- ... :._ _-..- - __ .-'.,....2___'..'T.'.. .1...:.�.,.g.. r a:.-;�.-. i&�sw Wit':.-...1a.„_a.�..__-8...,v...:�� 7bar 3._m..<i._._-b..:,.. �:✓-i,.,.::-6.:._..i.L_�._.-. mn yr ® t slate .q a .�. x.a. �m m ai1; r s a^a x+�b dpt.�y �5� r. a animal.148. Does s NO MA LiYe LJ 'Identified endangered. 1 : Identify species: �rw s..;,.� .rr:..-:,,,�.,.,.. ...�...,,.:. ..t_•r__.:�:_....__y�v.,w.s_,...�._.;s�,.,:a�...:;.�...._:r�w._,.'-�_�_rx....wr_,�-��.,�....,x.,,.c_�..-r._,..-_tz.:�.�z-,�.,._........,..�._..x...�..;x..x..�..,�._..�s,.�...�a�.�.x__._�.,.r,.ffi.a._...x ,:.= a�..� i"s_=.��,._�:;:xse`:,, .:.:.s�.:��t�.;�.:..,,�' Are there any unique or unusual 1 a n c on the project site i.e.,cuffs,other geological Oyes o N/A d' formations)? Describe-. e :. -... _ _. ..,_..-a;--.a�w+a-...>..r..w :;.....w...�Y•-.:.o._-.a,n,.<... m h' :s:- ::f.t..r., - #e.a:r.......r.t�S.7r:-.��, �'.-.✓;...�,...:,,�_:..v�s.�..,.,,.��.0:-,.<.s-al_s...T_.:se' vSes..d>...'?a: ;:',ram_-�.�a�;:._'5,.,_. .y.,: �.Z.b,v.;ffi.._::. .,8we.:�vm:.r-tm:.u,�,.. - '�. " , t10. Is project site t se e community or?`a �.� []Yes / neighborhood s an open space r recreation ,} .. area If es, : x_...dJ J..,:a9�- J♦ ,..n-.-. L.L :....:_.. i':'I>__��:._J_JJ:,:_L___,I_, �.: .._'.:x._.._ ,„ ...,,,r �_,...::.�r o s presentsite offer . elu scenic i }�1 x•�. OYes g No / known to be important o the community? Describe: r.-.,�.....ta,....:...,,�....:�7a.++u.+.4L.........>'.fs.«...'L.i.,iri:.._,..,r-..-�...�:._._.,.,.l...wls..w--S..r�.:.�.�,._J....raa_.....3�,.�..I..a:.i•�.....R.:.�4�..�...r�rf,..iA-..:.:. T+..rl.a.w,...-rd4...t��.k-_,..._ .rai_�� - ®Is roj ect within or contiguous to a site []Yes Z No LA designated a Clique Natural Area(UNA)o y critical environmental area b a local or state ,� Describe: agencv? ._ ..:.. ...:: _ .... :.-. __ ... .. .. ., _ ..._ .......:. •�.-•• .:«.a..:sd•.;,.:.:.rm••-r..�rl.,«...•�t-..- ...�._z.x rr. a:: a.._ �.. .>,.r,r....r.nar ,.:L�.,..,r.t.■J rai-:. ...r.h-_..rr--::>�.. .. �t.+Y... r�>".� ,_��a a.. :�. s:L_. !..::t �'t. - - �c_.�=. .r• 1113. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Names of stream(s)or name(s)of river(s)to which it is a tributary: Cayuga Inlet& Six Mile Greek .:.:., ..:: _.::,J►-:_. _:.:•.:.:-: -.._....:...:.�-r�Ir..,.:..r.:�...r.�.:.:.r..v...::,:a_.:rr_Lr...:,:rr..s .:s.:;�.s�ra._a._.r_::s• :.�u•.J.i--:.�mr �.�::.:....m _ , .,.,,�...,-:,�..�..r..*<w:w�_.-ii.�,�J.Y'::.:w1::1R...i.w��-'..:.....::.rr.�...s.T�'+....,-+..�.,,.._.�:^'.7L. _...-...-_..•...-3.,..r..,,,..�•.;;Z.71-A4.._.i...S�L� 1: _..�1. ..�L'FJ�--z'a'l�_: IS..""�-�L..a:a!..-3 z� ... t Lakes,ponds,or wetland areas within or Name(s) I coati o s t r J ect area: tab. ze(,$)(i acres ; / ,...,..,..m xa.,. _.x.<_x:�t_:..>..r-...�....._. T. .,.�. -,..,.,.s._-_...a..._-._y_...t-_...-.a_._..i�a-♦s.. � _.Z,_..h. ._'i._.._.9 t- x ", m s site been use or l disposal o soli OYes / and/ors wastes? s r . u ..._ .�,._,._..,.......-.,..,.. ......_.�s.._:....�,._.,,._,,..s>.._.�.._.s..,,w_...,:;:.:-,..,.._...;,>,_..,..,.�,....,.z....:., s...ar ..�..,.....�w�...rr :.mot: ;.� ® the site sere existingpublic utilities? : 4T.; e o []N/ . If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allOW c e ti `? OYes []No M N/A b. f Yes,will improvements be necessaryOYes []No EN/A allow i 4 ... ,...:. - ,.. ....,__ ♦. �m::,•1 Aa,:•.,<sA :._ .�.�� e a^.'a.T.4# >':�•4:41s4,JA#.. _ �2:R. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .._. ct, am.a..:,, IDe> )i m,.:.t..a,m +.a4. _..aatY.... .a ._ .. r="a ,......_ a::r. _: ..::y..'v....•ec4'> �.[.•':Bt. _... ....-., ,.__ _•_.a..,•a.'P ....,..+�6.. ---.- . � .. w .Y.�.«..r...::a.,:n-..m._... 'aa _..,..-,a_::.».....a.u. ,......_ .. "f..`.:•Z: .sa'7 S`..srt.o.:-...�,......'w.'.. ill ��1 Physicaldimensions _ � � dimensionsi�t y �I.^:..>E..'�a_.^._�=?:3�..x'.»..$a}.._.,JL-"_..�a:..�fL�.-..^t.�,.�...�.�L,-9':�:....n^-a.6,.a.5.....��....�.u. �+G,La.v.�."'i�`"J`:.�:.ID...a..,..G....,,_...v_�.._..'#.r'iP+.J�.�i.....,.Lia_ra. _sr.L.t -r•�.. -" r i, feet: • • ° Totaltl s r ec _ on.sorn acres• • car s .. �.ar'e,.::-.Aa�YJs.�:;:w.raza.....•a..s..e.:.�.:Y..-..aW['.i..-e..vu.:,._+s-tea.:r�.a_.e.-�.�_.�....,. r:.e.-+ - r :r- ...::. .-.-. ..,, __r.. ::Y....:.,mom:,,..r...=�fi,_::.4��5. ��',H_....,r.�7..ra_,-L'.�SI'.S"e.C'$�3..=�,:;...�_.e..c��s_�G.a:2+��sy�.a,..:.�fi.�'�,DC.vnB-,r.--v.7f'.?.,AEI'', ✓!t�t>.u.,�iLL.i�a..,._L_.....i=�.a.�......�t�_i...G:a..u.7.,7dtS.,.__.....,_ �_...�„_s. .. « _ • • 0 ® r ect afire to m5 Acres It ll • ores a at l r • 4,. a z V•7.:: .t, . .. _...;>., ,._ ._..... :: .. .,<L__r..u�r�^�- '.: �» - ._>.•r7G-..... ... ..__, z....�. J o•ect acreaLye to remain undeveloped- 3.77 ...4 f a project • es (if • o ....ice,„ r �}g . {.d jJ . f pro ect is an ans�o , 1n � r t of cha ro posed: J ..- .. ,_ -_...._.... . akin` ._.:.cx.L..r-.�*_*_ci = t z...u-_..�..�.....�.--,..,,:,..s..-aa�x•�.tr....--,..a...Y� .la.-.,.i�.�3.1:.�...vLt.�._� - - : _ _ >. .z m • s 4' Number of off-street .r spaces existing: Est. 1 r� s _ .. _ _ _ �- ..,.:� SJ'..>_ .._....'-Y•...�"...�S.iir._.3.7__.>..sa l_<.r..5��a,,.i3.Jr..1:::.,.a- r .....,.A ....._+�,. -•, '..;,•i - .::_.. , t Maximum vehicular tri enerated etior�o ro�ec er a r_=y er hours0 a .. .•YA •,.:,tL.,ne{,.:�i Rf '^ iY.w...«. _ ..._.... .d,:a.�.=_....�....G,.�+.....a_,.�..�H-,�;�..�aZ:..:�s.:..,_,,..�.y.._-�_,.,=.i�.x►._...a...i.�rr74..._.'3' _.9"J..�......,....A.`.-a»_.aSL. g htproposed _ tallest ro case structure in feet. / 4� ..... .... �..� ..,: ..... 40 »._.c:.'..i.._....wi_......aD"_�"1_,t.3.�._3.._..3 - ° ®� �n:ea feet o ;(p�'��9 fron e along a public street or thoroughfare that the uraj ect ill oco aarrs,w r r;.ar a as .•ar Yi..-.a.-,s.a...�-..a.w.:..... r., .. ♦...�.a w ,. .-.. _ :�. _-. a : .:- r :.a......... ( _ 32 , ® Specifyat e of natural material(i.e.,rock, earth,etc.)and o much ill be remeve o site. or added to the site: row• ravel A xz 4 } ,.-::.x_:�._ .+� - -J....�.�e-C.:�vh_4..::.r30£_-a�S..a.:z7:•:�m.: ..'��..r.. �... ,.w. .,_,«.r<..,�.....7}� --....:... ,...., .,._._...,._.»r....�. '�i.-u�.=,,.�._,._..�is ,.,�-.+.s:-..z.�......a_.,:.; •s-._....>. .�»'�': rs�y o-..:._..^y" ,... e i y what t o vegetation(trees,s bs,, ou:nd saver)and how mue n will' ere owed from the s1te:r acres: 0.23 Me of vegetation: trees&shrubs r ...,.,. ...-_....-«. _....._...:. .. -.... .,,. ....•.,......._.. .,,.,,_.,. -..._...,..,. •.�^;.tt.... .�.�;:'L._.. ._.�...... _.arm.... - ��Y..,,�_ �....,_�::,,� _._u..-a-�.••:...�:ra.._ _w�...._.s_....�,s. _...,.__.�..-�E_-..r--- -�r.�..s�_ :.,r._..r.:....� _=-�..��, .. ...,5.�r.. 1�z."'.. Will tore trees or other o�c� l in1 ortant ve etation be removed for this pro��ct?_ des ,. ,.: j^�/�� ,�..,.rt=.,,,.tao..�.s..-,.iw-.�::.:4:.►zrr_- -�.•_- r-:�.,a.«w :.r. .. ■ s-r4•e_rr .-. ., ._... ���J/j 4sr.,�•:,r<:. _4rF...s.r i'.4..t _.::s-r_..',a^.. arTc'ss it.r::t�•r-sr...._•r.>-�s_a�.s.....rwrs_.a....m..a,Ew. -..- _ ._ _ .... ..:. _._. '.4�'::!`, - mac...». .._'^^3.1:.L:-v-!`.:.,;'iS...:�i':_ .• i......_..,,ti...w"r'�-.\.. �_,�,.#. ,�•-."�-.1_s.�_,.".�-:_S:L-->.»sa_::4.'.?>,.«•w.�.._..W-#a•:;........�...:��- .c_....v:�e..��»_..,._...,3.a...._.... .._._...�...7�i«<.'its._a.1L.-<:0':..,�..."Z....Aw..w-:"...e�s.....ra....,_..._�....5._,....,_....w`=4 • o Are there a.n 'plans for re-ve station to re lase vegetation removed duringconstruction? Yes ..... :. -_ 1>a.w i•a _..:;: •p. ;ri- ,:L:.6.. '-,:. ! is m.4 1 :L:4 -+1..-c J'6 t ?-�L .'['� .�<...4....Y.:.,.,,r,.... ...r:.�Yr._4--.•. •.-.�.-.�.taXa..A.;eIF. .• .+.�_•...:a ,..,r,.. . _.. S,, 3u..a�,_T.-.�:t._.�✓, �TAi'.�c. ��.»,>«.��-��..:n.c'�,.l:�r.��'^.1-w'.+_.�*.��._r+'a'SAG..�^=���«.Yx. _ r-a,. ...t�.�..z11.....w.� ...�. - .r<oIf sin � R_ *ect ..3,!anticipated .x-...�M.u,>..,.:...:.....s.d�w....•.::.o,....,.f.-.�Y.c.-..:_.. 5�n. s..tr...,,..cti.oan.,�_,.:......_ 7 months demolition) emol itionY) . - _ : ..s i._....>. :'. �r"• .•_' l ° r • • 7. If rnult- ha.sed ro e�ct,annti c� ated erlod of construction: months`+including demolition .:J '�j`r'�] .,.�.J_..Y3�4J4L_iL.. J��. sue•'w-..... ... .._. _._ .... ,.. -.._.,...-......-,. :.,...., -•- :.,., ,.ter,.•.•..: ,.,,,:;. ....,,:.: . _. _x�.�......�...:...,..�., y_..,x. +wwwr^'! _e.�-iv.'"":�.?au r..�.sv Y.;..1"i»i""'?�;"»f',r "`i+T ^s'_....a...ti...YY�'Yc4�-A./.w-.v,'^'a...Y•t-... -.> ♦..„, .. _.r- _rr'r...J .. _`. `�• _` •new..f'.x� r_r_K-.a 7a.Total number of phases antic ated '}}'''��... .-; :. __...+Lis'l ... .:4Y_�,•e ,.-..... •lA=-: ,.._..1a� .-.:Y i� �4!•:: sJ'4 .Y 1. 4! _.....�,..-<..aw...,c. a_Y.�.._�..:._�S. .,:�t x>,;,.._ .>,._>T_...:,W.u,��h_......_:_.v7v,r..,._..a>,,.:. _a.--3;. .1..:-....._..»,:_...►......+.a.0___.,_..�..Y.k....,,«. . _.. t.f _-�.. - 7 . n.ticii ated date of commencement for firstphase: month year(including demolition.---,,-,..,:,,, s.:.._.y .t._ _... ..._ _ ., .,.., ,.,. ::Pb I� ♦,F S�.;} .�: :ram l�'�.�ans .� .,. ._.;. _.,x,.....a,v - ,e. Kv -1...-..,..-._......-........."�1�_.s..._L.....a..ca -�..���v]. ....:er.,za...,..�-.,�...�; a.� ,.,..._... 7 � proximate com le�tion date of final base; month f; _. .. .. , -...> ,.,..,;:;s-.... ,..,-�:.:.r._....,r..s. �A+y 4r,.a+..z.a.•,-:;s.:a,:y ,.Y r+�S•_!�• a ,�. z k: ar• - _ <-a..�_ :..♦.� .....,�,a..r•.:".,, ....,.......♦ _ _ ._;_ ..m4;'n r+ .'•ter, .. ..:.Y, '-�e•.. .M .`R.�-.:..>r�,....... �,..,_.:.a ...Y._:.Y4 ..i aaC4'.,..<J..Tf�ill. _. _... i.. ...' .t:...,Y.... ..:._ .,.-__ ..._..,. .,V, , ,A... �.►�...,:war:cr��r.w.zr.ww .sn�il>'w ,« s..m..cv:,f.x-:=:',�..,..N-.,w ,...,�,_.__._..,...v"1R..�``+wi..,..�:�.--,s_+�:`1'_•'__...,,�,-`=,5-:•'y�.,,:a...�::_...,.,......:......�,rf^_<:.:�;.�.wr...�...:t*.r�.v,r=:�.:.......<„�<..�....m1i�_... �.-�v+....��a:.....Y._ss::..:...sr..c>..,.«T,wa..,..._ ,,-z._t r.� �... ._1..,. r'. K. 7d.Is hase one financial de Indent on subsequent phases? ' :Yes = o >' l 4 s zc r t ..., _ .. .:.. ..,:.. . ._ '���/J(T �z�,:__�-.,�_._:..�.. ».a... _. . t••......_ ..,,. .... ..,.., :,. w.. « _ .:Y J.eCA.._. y,•a J:.AL F.LYi�f}..A ,. a.AYeY',.. ..ae,U+. _ ._ ...':... _. .. ._ - _,.......'] ... .ML.,�..:.. :,..,.✓.,..,..: ..x +1'. �j}(+�jq _. _ ._• __ __..,;, .. .. ,;t.: ,.,,:-,.. ,. +-4.,,.. ., m, .:,. �•; t �. .w::,=._��....�-'�.;v♦<. .....c ® 1�1 bra t1r� occur dung constructlon`� :.�, esYTo __�., LA Ifs explain: r._• mew ,... .f .n _ -- z _ '7 ,.._ ., Number of jobs generated uri construction: Est. 10 After projectis completed: 0 ...: ....: .,. .... ...,._, 4:Y.v':._. -�-.4�>_ _t<iY'_+o•YV v:�.Jva....7 ated .x,... ...._. _ _.. .,-,..�-.._......:..,,,,....-.;♦.., ,...... .....,.,...,.�...... ...a< ,�'-L'1'�' - ,....3:�6�.::,...tyw`r:,..:.:A.�• ;aa...:,,,:...a.._ ._,,.4.-�._:.m.Z.a7d+.._.....;"..Tl;.-y..;...>�..:. _ �1.�.t _Number ®o s el i _ is ro' t: i e? ,z �'._, sass�t_�'.�.::,.y......__.._ Dy r,.,..:..�_�.,ax�.m�:s,s :; .�-r•�a�.:=. �..........,en.:w$�H•,v_.,t-:�4.. ._.r.�...;a� - ._.., .:. -,..,.�.... ..,,:: '•'�.'.: yes, � . i project require _ o r s or f ci , ' s7 es fp r `P j explain: �,Relocation of Brindley Street k: .» ♦ R..yJm.A J4 ». ,.,[.�..._.aa. v-., .a:....y4,.._ _ :.., --... .��. ..:�,>. � .. 12a m-►:w..><t.::a[._-a-�.>......_,�-K,....-ua+.,,�.�... -a_ -� },,..,�._�1.�:..? -s.a ...tea._c..._..i.,_sa,:�. r' . s r subsurface_ waste1disposal i . � . Y F'_. �_ N a , • ..... - ._.. ....,,. .... �'..._..:.> c_:,t, :,..., ..«,..,,J._,A..=S:�4K_....." �•waste M' dus ria t,__ : _n a (sewag�, ..1�.:..•.,,...t.9slv.Aw'.mw--:..ems ....A. .�. Y.s. ..rs'.19....,.ae4 a..:..a.w� ♦ ,.. .._- . .. .._ a...: ,,.,. . a._....,�: ..._�<.a_ a.._<..-a._ _. __�._Y."a•s . :... .. _ ,_.. ._ _} ...__. _a s..,...: -♦...3_., ,_„-.....- ., r. ,:..""<•-vE. --n-'t: ^,^s: ,. .:.�aram ri+'.. �,r :'v'•�..•:..+,ww:�.. - xC,�w _ � :�.`'�e..Ya,�..�.r-4_,.c,�,�.�r--'^._._.:_..,.<4s =..»_;ti,.,,.<..��a_.r..-s_>,..r.4.,.s....1.. .,.•.-�,_ .tea....._.�r,aa.._�.:_ a_x�...., �t._.�.�a..., - `"�'�_.,.......mow- .a,+. =..a ....w.--:^,...r..P.• ... ,,...,.. . ...., ...:z fr . . e :� . If s disposal, r • win ... _ Y .. -_.. _ . . existing43. Will surface area of s, s, streams, r s '3a 3 al'? �4 { ..4 -._....�.;>e.. _,:..,_� s * es o N/A -. -.. a •'k_ -- - �.. ...ot.,:;i_ .L -< ^m ..... ;..._,.z_,:,..�n�_y_. r' =3w ' -a WHI P 'ect or any portion of p ect occur wholly or partially within or conti { b . 3 r 1 >' 1°4 p nq Yes 5 .,._ _ .»- _ .,�.....ae 8.' !..t dw'..'..:$... '�_-A'�0.•:�!'At�i..-3-�Y_:r6r'e'.- ice.--a ':4 ..:.:a za..'....mma :ws _ rPROJECT DESCRIPTION a!(�onclude(ta <aEga-lniep f":s -»'�:r�%i:a:-aBm. ::«.SR�:'.::rt.:...i.ti.:-;^:'$�-.sA=.:•:=a,"t'ii•.�a__s4�i..,�:.k'L.",. _.:::Ti.'D'+a-.a.#r®¢_.. d..a__-�3....�5��....1d.,._ '_L_s...w.._..:.'8.:��_...r'�IY....I....,<_..__� �_ 4114b. Does pr "ect or any portion of p "ect occur wh011' etially with" nt'guoua LUs. "I 1 1 11 i ,r .s..r, ..>r- ..:.sraaa :..:-....- .1:.9 F:,.•.k-.x.... - r..r ....��'im. _ _- _- :... -•-,.._.�.._._....--.. -.-_ .-,. ::.- .. ,:.._ .. , .. ,.,, ... -.v.,. .as: ✓su'3:_3G s�=;:=.d.-.- i• .s w• rS�c.•.�.....::�..r.&:..�_...aa._._._. ,.. .::.:,..'....�.s��:.Pols.�-.:�'..,d....�t`�a..r�.u.:..:.: _z-• :-...... rr 44c. proi r l partially i wetlands as described 'in Article 24 of the ECL 99 �,No . jam-'•+ :�9Jlf� •6.rr.:YiS Y«_9i�x �-•_•s's u ..: . - ... . _ _: a- _..-.i.u:',l.:as-f•Y_aif___�.:..'Lr'-..�..-:.r^.::..�-nw+w••.._�L':.s[vaw�.waC.:.a.. _"::,•c«'__•i:- ta4 Yz isY.t>i.�2-. ,_.:r a a laaa.l::YBlfa..' A!•P!. ♦ ..�'«AJ a.+ti S-..-._ _ _ _ _.--.;..,.. ...-. = a. .r aT rA..:.._r a_ .r-.:_. .. ..z s w a•,.♦ rya. 4.rf _.. .:.. g. :.2¢ .- ..,+.. »-.--...... _•r::..,.. � �Fmr...r...um �'.:LA- ":::.. r"i:m._:.>� w�:r+..r.... r.L.:�.:... ,. �T•;;v J3.Y::>.�i:r.7...aSB La.:�_ Cayuga Inlet ,r ., b., or c. is yes, a Bridge to be constructed over .;: ::.: _ ,,.. -,;:. .. aa-+,.+.,.::.._.-�...a+m.m^w..a.-:..,,,..,:::a.-.ams.^._.:,:a.a n'. ..:_:.., . ..... :.,..,;.'_4r,.,__..,,$?,,1 sm-a". •'si+:9 5.:: +n•m�« u+.'1. _ `"O.n_»n.._.a..n .... .-... _ ....,. Y..ffi.,.Y::.A�:«9.r'�::d•a..�•..:_:^a:g-. -,.a.,,.' r. ,. ,...-L...�ri,,."i`..,- .u.'a�r..,_.....ffitJ.�<.,�z ..>.-,..5._.::,;s.^�.t - ..,......__�`ta, ..r�.,..i..._.... .. ` 1 solid s / a ® s i i ' :..-- .:: _✓..::.• aar...,.aw4..,,;:::•s:::M. �.� :.t:� .:aax♦'r'4" a v:::a a......-" >a.'a_.-. T ..... - ..avlar.a_,_,.m_.raa .::.. :r-a^a:a....v�r:,..n-.r-•.r..:" ::...... _.�:::._.. _:._.._ T 2-:: .3•+ -. ♦..n,... •._n s, ,., ,,,_:-.,. ".. •.a e.a-..._r.�..._•.,-...w-.__.. Tls.-.:'a .t. _- :.:..-..,,. -�:�'_�_�'.•..__.g.;r__ „. ,-_,... ._.... 'ram-'Y .:L_.a.>: _wr.,...ffi�._...`.�_.:..a-,.. ...w.._.a_ : . s , i i iS .. 1 s t - .y - _ , ..:-..-r. =_.Yx:.:s.a-»r-....:..:sue_^:..;.y'_..>�t'�:.l..::a. a:•a..' L.�;..a"a :-amafC .r^�' z �:-i.r yes ♦....,, -_ ,... ...,..:. v..._,..,,_.._.ri^_.,..... .;.... w_....:, ,,._..:: .,,�.a... ,.,.. s.a:3r-.. ._. '.Y a._.L...S,$::..u,�•r,..»x._......�:...i'.._L__..-r.>....._ .,....L"�. ,1-_^.a........v..._i��A..4'......d�<'a LCL•.': J • .'.;15c. If#15b. is yes, give name of disposalfacility: / is location. N/A _ 1 _ ...:.. ...-_ -........ e:: �•...s..-.ar::,_a»_,_r_ ••:.� ._ .....;�, .a.;..a.rx_�__s.al-a.+ea�. -vv^,,`:m •.. -- - -.. .- , s.._...,.e:.-».._,a_._.-.a• s_....«:ra..-:ra-. ,...rr•...aa_s f.,. .._.r .... ar.,�._a,,..2..,...:.�s�.. �a:.,.e...,.:..w.-....__''3 aT.3...._.r:*.�•:_.. _.... - -. r ;< 5d. Will there be any wastes t i sewage, disposal system into a sanitary landfiII9 No,J f+ t t o l.r I,._+_ , •2 • -. t i'J L air-JI'_:� Y. I ai .. ..v:.,:.. ":a«•.ma9car r.._t.,,.:.T.:.:::v .�.a:J_,r:.,:,..c_a.:-..a_ =a.::.y_:N/A f rasa ,rs.•s•. '...:>__..j_____,.__.SL ._;_•,•-.,'_....<.Y,-,'_:�,,.,..ter... ,,, ,�.�:...._rIL-�._-..''ra.a..__.._....,_..>..tom _u. _3:w.,......, ��:�='+:.w"n=._ >a_ _ ,z _ _a .. -... 1-. .._Y -ur,a.' x i Y F�-,,._! .� fir.^,.,'�;.."�yG'+L-�w.w'_a:_��a.'„j� i��wt,�.}•..� e� ill an solid waste e disposed of on site? Nes � 1 / If y es,a laidy p �' .:.,._,.•,�...L_ar.v,.. _.,._...•a...>..•.,::..>„<..:r�i..-,. ..._v--•_.:.._-r :4 -. .,�s. i_.,.,.,. ».:: �.:::.n...'�3' i +' Will projectherbicides ? e , .�,°'f n f a� / `f yes, specify.- 14'16. �� •.•'- __.:- ..:tea Y..,.,. tr.. ..n .,._. .-.... .-.._':.... •-. .- -, .,, > ...._. .w. .r:3_r..�-:[•�a_.._...'.a.._4';::ram.,.,..:_.,�_..._".,.�._:a_..,.._.rr.•.._...:.,,..,_�__„_„:__t_..-^�A..._L..w.L ..y.,...,.. - `..._,,tea r m ill project affect a building or site listed , o o eligible for the National car State Register o Historic Ft{ Places or a local landmark or in a landmark district? r: _Yes ;~ . 1To► N/ ; if yes,explain: a �. , ::! - 'T1• ♦.:. a: _. .V,..:sir!,....:. !..aai Y-«'�."" --'.�, ! �t'. ... :. -. ._ .. .,..:,.� ..:. -.•.... as�.•..ul:v ..ar...l-.a.s.. .vi.l..:.:a a a. ,9aaCf ..T,...:•a _ _'wi a6 r�_a'Y�_,.�� ..x.. « -.. .,,,1.....Y �...„,.....a.r. •.+r.•w v • a.. ... i....+.ar.............?,,,.,....,- ...,sv"-•�,„--ti. ,.o-, _. r .::+... ,<.-.., ::P. .. ...,:-„r..,,,::r,..:--2u L.0 .,.-��a-::^ai.S:;,:ta..�" �3R.�,:3w:.8,:Y."r L:•S,.L..:sw..A.._.:...' IT, ::— _ ject produce o ors? . � es u'.�_.y'� o r . / f es,explain: .. .: .-.,:: .... .. :.r..ya!=.Z�__R.._,,'::a a..l.ru..s al,r.: _.�„�.,...,... :w -.-ar.._ ;. l+;:u r._ ar i'-i3r 1 �.♦ -y�,c •ar l '-.`. .1 _. ._. _•�(�), •..,..sy ss.:..�_tr.._-.:.:..'-ar>Yar+_�..:::...a.r'1,,..t'.♦ •-. saa7tL. + u - .,.t. �'_-_ •a3*._..e....y„Y�-�<.'�L_....�-3_a..N,LL:•.'^'.m.:•.3.•.,.:..,w,...ti_•.._....�..aE.,.a=�_..._wx"._•.^::w..R..-....{rG.:J�'..._,....._ ta,..l.... .v_.. yai_.,E,..__..1.....�....... - '19. ill project product operating oise exceed the local ambient noise level during construction? { ,, s f, o 1 /A .After lconstructiont`2r des To 1 }/rj�� , <... „ .. ... :.... .._ r-:.:,s-•r a. • ra:�!},.7 aR�.,r_+.-..,.�. �A .:...:... �' fir. .�c ,. -♦„ .t ..�..3',•.: ..� L t fi ..,_ �; .. ,..«. <. r .-.,,.:; .,*�... ,.,,., .:M„r,,,• ..a.aT:.. --�.s- +v_I ,.-.u. ,... ...^na. : . Will project`eat result in increase of use?•: es ,X"No /A If yes,indicate~types) p energy ..v':�:.ry w._•a's..+Yr�-.::.,.,r,.• .<S. � ... ...,..>.y.. • _.r-ra--�.r+.�•�--.50���w.. - ..r'L,.,, .r.r.9....-„r.,. „.-.w.r,�...aA1,^ .72..... _.,.. ..-.. a. Y - al s.. w+ri'.,•4..-. •>r.'ate _ :+.v..,.+. .r+. ® Total anticipated water usage perin gals./day: Source t / '` Co ZONING AND PLANNING INFORMATION .-..n- a.. -.. ....r. .a:.m.. ,w "¢, c...::A_..«mee,l yr:.ra.ac w®...sm:^��t..>.w z.rA>.r:_..a�.;,7y,.b[.,.a,->aa,..,,.ace>maA.-v�>-.�tr>.a">.:>¢_ ._:.m>....._..:.-a¢YmPq•.,-. .a, x.,...>- .:¢.:+•,Y-¢:m-'r_ a:aASR}.._a..,.....e a J. Does the proposed act' Ive a planni :¢ ,Yes Nor TJ oni Z Zonthe decision required-. rt: I I ng ianceti 'New/Rev's'on of Master Plan ing Amendment _Si Othert Special Use it "�<._ ' t ;� - Resource Wh at is e eu en onin lasi eatio .o site`? -1 �,,a•-#,4•:r,»- .�x•.c.�>__.�,_._az=._.x.::— _.:__,.,'�'�...,,..�;.>..c__:r.'»:�...�:. sm..<,:�.c=. ...._�•... ,..m.__w. __w_._.,a�,. �."�s.�: .a s.,.a..,..._.rz_.z._.•cm.a_"-= -r>...rm.a:._._�.>-.,e._...:a.__..�,P .s.,,.;,:�_.�s.:..._�..._;.._..�,..-... .: , . If the site is developed as permittedthe t zoning,what is the maximumpotential development? ;f >'__-.•.:: n••» ¢. >:::» a..:sr» :::aova>v.-,.»re...f ::x,>♦. 1:qa, V• 4wu-. i ,.::x-- i»6 a'Ma^,r_i,'e._:-.w ♦1_e .).a_ .Y - _. with A •••A> _.___ »�_.w.A:?,:.�m7..r,-a a�.r_+r..rA.Ys;.:,..,.,${.Z.v.�_..,.,.... -B.La.I__ 33 s t:B consistent r s t s )#2 r-y0 P'' ® Y ty 3 »ys present _..._._-. ✓r..._._aL«.a_._ wY.w::.zonin._..:.;a.o:"�:aT Gi..f ac.. .m.....S+t v_.�•...�•.a. - - -- __,... .. .. .. ..... .ct ..... -.,....1 a"4: r>•s. .. :... ... .._._ z'--ffi........ _..._... rl _.. .. _. _ _...__�a, •i.�..,.,.a_.,g,..�.:.{..a....q;,� -�_ _ -PT .. _,�.,.,__,._ ..,..•-,.._.,,.«� �.m..<..,t...,<,__.,v..--•wa.awaA.___..>-<...,.,»a�....ua:...ti�.,..�...r,_=.<�.:Y.�....,..,,,.:>.z.¢._,a:,wa_,.�. •,._�.at<;..�.-a`.... ��..•.a�a-.,,...lac:ea<. ..¢,s,...v... ..:.�-,.. ,.,.-.a.._:�:...,. '+ . If#4 is no, *Indicate desiredi : :' . If the site is developed by the ed zonm* g,what' the maximumpotential development of _the site s .._...._..:......-.a. ...__.. .- r._-..;.._....r.......v...�,,...�,:....._.z,.�.>....,�.-.s°...•. ...,. ...:'n,...,:r__...,_.�..._.�.,,,.. _._ .__,.r._ ._,_.s.._...r:�� ..._ .,_......ash....,.t:,_< ..Y..._. .s_�.. ._w�...:�•` .. .. `-� s the prcposeddo listent with the recommended _.. uses in adoptedl se plans? i t` r1yesr " o T i s • lain. .: ¢...,,.. What is the dominant land use axed zonin +classi cation within a 1/4 mile radius of the project? (e.g.,R-I a or R-1 b) WF-2 l A .: ...c-.___ '..-.•..__,a_.u _rY..¢-,...-..r.r.1.m ,, ::r...wc.:s.. r...¢..:. ...x,., ate.„.: •-�.-.«.�,z._1..:..r.A_.ano-a..._.. _... _. ..,a.�::a:a�r;1,f.l..+,�,,...�i:.,.. �Y.�... ,.�>.y,-'":a. �+r+�.�'•J.,..Y:a a.t .asa•.r .w�..._.w, ♦�....1 ..r.. ....... .....,._t....-.___...._._...._.,,,,,=^s�.,..._a."..._ t.._. y-,....,...a+.�a-,.+»+•_.�-._r..,t.a.- �,..r_....�:'C x r��.a-.:�a• ,,_....a.c.h.'f.++.r'�.>,:a,-„_�..,axa,::.,,.:� �,., ....s:'•. o^ Is the proposed aet�or� ornpatible with adjacent land uses9 Yes � � To `� ;'�1`�lA Explain: . t e pro oe aetio is t e subdivision o land dots areproposed? ,> .JA..1 l.Ji YI..�t';...1R_..•• .,; _1: . T L P V.::1.! x":.:.•tt I.JI•T:' .A-:arJTf.'S"T '"^11 J w•Yf.:...�.,'A#.1'tr,,.w.Ts.Y 1 ••.:•-;.i ., <,YY.. Qx.-:_+r...,..._:--1_ h.:Y.,11 :::'•1. ffi1.¢ae.•9 :t.`a .+.:•r.,!.1»...�.. ..- _. ..-.--. ..... _ti ♦.xw aY ...warn _ �4- Y,f':�'.!Y :. _ .:. ,�."� ._.: ,:.^1. a f..r. r'fiw'"Y.'"Iu..vw�w:.�l'r.'.rt ur,.•sue�a.�l..•S i.we"'a ... ayp "°S_ :-� T .(.._.i..."... "91n`}...rw. ...,wL.J.r.wwl.1aww_.ra.av w'wlwia Kr'�.r.«.aLar...w. rr,. .^'s.0�.aY_a._>i._ w,s.u,rw_.r.._wrt.td..-ar--.•ri'.�wn_.r.w:ri. a_._- -<"7 What is the minimum of size r use v; 1. W ill the proposedactioncreate a demand for y community-providedservices?(e.g.,recreation, education,police, fire protection, etc.)` Yyes o N/A Explain: r: oj s �- oIf yes, is existingcapacity s f iei n to handle pr ? Ti r. la.i • ..E .-..94- 4-._••�.....w..w.3L...'t..d3�...iC.u3.,.... ...8_..3Lv ,L..... .Ili.,L.1.: ,. 3•.�a.l� •.._.rr._w..i�.c.r..tom._._i..2_a r.. ::: ,.., �:,12. Will the proposed action result in the generation oftraff c significantly above presentlevels? •y � es ,av¢ o / f yes, is existing road network to to handleadditional traffic9 a4 es �' 30 N/A f a Aa� • APPROVALS :�,_..,LL ...�._..,3....x_,-......K�"..,. --.,�,r...,......,:. >„�..,...c:.:�_._.:.�..-.�-,......>,..r,....a:..<�.+�Ha _ems. ..: a 1-ya. any Federal perm :. � �egp.®fig �. k x �' <'<�, yy No requ A Spec* •. "..y'; % .I. 2 h. Does Project involve State or Federal funding or financing'?"�``�',,Xes ly"N 0 1�4/A If Yes,Specify, �' m Local and Reg*onalr is® r Type of Submittal Approval Yes or No App il R Date Date v Common Council a Appeals,.,'Board of ZonijIg (BZA) f' Planningto ment Board LandmarksIthaca res 6ion tt Commissions`+ ` Board of PublicWorks : Fire e e t Police De2artment : Building Commissioner Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency U 8 E, INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach ny additional n or -ation as may e needed to clarify ur preject. if there are r may be any adverseimpacts associated It I se discuss such impacts and the measures which you proposeto iniffigater v them. certifyF. VIERHICATION information prov1 v is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Signature.- Title.- END OF PART • • .y off:'. .✓'., - --, ..✓,.,^"" fir.. ,g,+'a.,. • • -:ew.'. - fir! 1.�,. .� � • w � ; �,�� • �� 4{ LL!L+LAP "� y `9Ji+fS7M .". all OR • - kFm IV) LPG wr�( w • LLJ ct vi Of .ter 3 Q U — 4 [ ...1 t D �y _ e. to - 1 ca 41 04 Iw Cr { �, ` Ysh?/1P! • 2' �. AI `CM S V03N3S M ° CwVff NA+b; s x' L AJ LD � i�Ml i�31 7 01 It LAJ 131 + w• .mar.r�r. 3V4 i Y ��L{� w cD Q z � (D w 0 CO � L O¢ u) I.LJ CWC ° LLI c co Q LLB C Q elf HU w �•o O¢Q (D > Q W � LLJ U) Lu - O J Cc w z Q LU LLJ 12, Q U) C)J Z ��- cn N-0 o J �� W m � �U-Q��� O CU w 0� J %%III,!*, Z O= c� Q m =.x �., 73 LULU o -� C7 m o w U � CD o >- CO w 0 C� +i �= ~ w Cn N c� • m o o �..m CD o w > OC z cn Q w z = w Q D � cn 0 m Z m cr� LU o 0 LUo m �- LLI LU Q ZO Q z � _ O � i p I- o w LUO m w J w L1J o J W 0 0 N LU> CD r C) co �'j o : 00 w U) o41 0 >- Q ai w � So w o 0 CL CLcc z CCo j�: o pH w O z -' Lli o z a n O )-6•_ ®C? - -- 3 0r N W m Q LU 2 vio U) W (D 0 m _O LU U)F— LUO wO - o U)^ w W F= o : w J O z W Q LO O F=z +i Q . _ _�O U) �LLI pU) ZDw > H zQ 0> b � U) z Fw—Q 5 n-No C: Y J Ucy- p W 0 LU p �- o _ 1 F-- o``_ X `f' C) �� �a J L1J ZD C)F— . m _ w rTlu co z U) c 4w (D:�E--�- F- 4 zw� LU Of� O w CD z O¢ w LUoU O� La z o = o F- z Q F— O S r it �-- / , ! 3 41. uj J � YS M1 {} 0 J 3, J l 1 sm.®r",- Q.� gyp. f H e l y � i t f R� •T � J.r 4 �`�� �A£�`J` Xv l s l �: <$JTA a 0 • Q . Y .. W W N - � ' •� Q W � tQiz • = W � y f �� � WZ w - c. CLJ 131Ni ann>,an '•� OV Q NC 8 olaw -.. p.... _ t _ finds • is ` Oa N3s 'M i MldQN ,(, � • I=� a � N Z 1 �4 I dr w $ w Y'P 2 2 Lu A At y, r, �!�. Ott � •R4 .� , ;./;I'J •� ■ 1 •t F- rs w RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK AND CURB FOR NEW fq I CROSSWALKS _ PAVEMENTLa � END 1 ., ,-1'— -4 RECONSTRUCTION ST ®6 6+36.5 >r SR` (� - Ll- ENO BRIDGE La 5 W0-s, 1_ f ; BEGINBRIDGE `'' ; STA.B 4+6.0 1 C�3 ' `\ 5.-0' 5 0 E 2!;1 —cz T / ! 12'-0® TRAVEL LANE Lai 60 CURVE LA- _ _ NJ f ) UJLu Li MORE Qg ICJ LLA f 1 4%%oo ` e Ltd'' 1 (/ r ♦ � ♦ l _jW Q ! ( 1 ♦ 1 �� 1 =Am . %-- 1 r l } r r ILLY An Ll lo � 1 `1.l f f i CC� 1 J ¢ 1 cm'� i �`"j , ' H.C.L T.G.L..STATION a ' Q -� •` r` Ltr 1 LINE& Cti BRINDLEY STREET It 'r- ------ _ TRAVEL LANE •, \ , r 1 v STONE CURB (TYPJ .�.® ' C. a, Q ; j• ; % Q 5'-&' SHOIA.DER �♦ -`�, . � � G��„!c5 wui - � LiJ� ( )).�,, � ' ! ` /r/ ♦- ` /I Jai + rn f S , , ,' a 5'-0" SIDEWALK zW � r� � J 1 � If a ; RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK 0'' 1 �z m r ! . AND CURB FOR NEW � ;' 'f __ � ��rr r CR SN(ALKS 1�1��' .��"r _..,.= -...® ~, •'~`IN CURVE 1 40 0 ss � _ r 1 G=,,, + <<-- _r � 10'-0' SNARED W m d _ USE PATHAt ''" ®•' �,9 cm IL Lo fall ft c� LA5 / � � � cn FA EM , RELOCATED DRIVEWAY � la � N E v CL < 1 /� i Jcnl Ln �/' ,� - - ,-~- ��® � GIN ENT CU m :. i / ��'� ASS _VE 4 - t STA.B' 1RUCT10 cv, -a % % r,,,,�� STA. l��D0.0 �oo , a /.s' 'ch La- � G STAB - 4. W 1+ 1®6c. o= " PIN 375&11 BIN 2210400 f$� �.�' , L = 61.66+ r T - +3�115 Nam-. W REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET _ - •+, BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET 0 0- CURVE 2 EXISTING BRIDGE TO REMAIN � �► ' r AS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CC STA.B +61® ALTERNATIVE 2 cr W GENERAL PLAN = 23475 ui R=24037' 20' 0 20' 41Y s L = 1 B1.7O' SCALE DRAWING NO. T= 95.42' SSHW ON P-2 E 1 B°22° SCALE BAR emalm�, ,a UMD summvomSHEET DECE ER 2015 E OF Lnwj zi Lai LL� W Ln La L&J P.: cp 4 CL V7"nC-) cp rm PROPOSE D GRADE Ln • rn PROPOSED BRINDLEY STREET ALIGNMENT C-3 q La Ln Ln ch fn 1= te 1*4- Ln wl wl a V,CJ cn LA Lo wl La Ln La 4 w cn P.c! rl .11. 60 ............................ ..... ...................... 0..................n ............... ............ ......... ............. 395 ........ ...................................... ..................cc ............. CNA ...................................... in ................................... rml� 395 ................................................................................. .................................................. L-W La Lm Cl n.La Zoo La to en + cn _j In 0.Lu Lp rn Cl UJ 3cc z oo co LU I.-oLan --. ---- L -O%9Ln u = c s ----- .............. c ........ ..... ........................----------......... ...................... ............................................... ... .... ... . --- ------ ---- - ------ 39 a90 , -,................... -- ---- :.x-_ 0 02 -0.F9% I.-Lu La L -- 100.00 F T 13 w O.Blz E: 0.19 T. 0- p 61 2.2T/. AM% w HSI) =220.00 FT. -3.99%L 50.00 FT. G2 L 50.00 FT. GI --.:0.817. . - . . . . .............................. ........ ..................................... . ... E---Q 1Q.. 385 ....................... ......................................... ......................... '229%.......... ......... ......................................... . .................................................................................. V ................ 24 F ........ ... 0.69 fT® ------------------------------- SSD .8 G2 . Ec 0.05 FT.: HSD 189.54 FT. : HSD 309.45 F T. FE co ................................ Zip 380 La ................................................................................................................................... ............................................................. ........................ r-)—A LLJ� 380 ..................................................................................... .......................................................................... LAJ LJ6 ...............f.............................. 375 ............................................................................................ ------- ........................................................................................... .............................................................................................................................. .. . .................................. 375 ..................................... ....................................... _jcc = PROPOSED BRIDGE .- J APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE ci La Im ................................................................................................ Lu .......................................... ........................ 370 ........................................................ ............................................................................................................................................. ................. ch -K�_ ....: 370 ..................................... 0 CAYUGA INLET cc: rqCM: C%j .%n; cm 00'.A coi A ca cra: Ch cc co: : cc rn rn i to A 365 I R rn rn .1565 L LL,LL. B 6+00 B 7+00 CI'm B 3+00 B 4+00 B 5+00 es B 1+00 i 2+00 4- >zlu to La STATION Ln p C3. W W Ln LAJ LAJ ce cm L.A QK qn :3 Lai-at "s Lfij u -S, 0S. :02 Lai 4A_J C3 mi F-: co LAJ Ln CL =n d= -q- Lai r LN LLr LLJ m C\j IV m ® PIN 375L]I BIN 2210400 -wGAO ui L 0 0 a r� REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET m" cn.4 BRIDGE OVER CAYLIGA INLET 2 Ln.-i .j qr AL TERNATIVE 2 PROF ILE 4m uJ C3 M La 10' 20' 30' 40' M I ...... SCALE DRAWINO G NO. Lj_ HOR A WN PR -2 SCALE BAR KNEDIMEM6,ARCMEM, LMD BURVMWOM SHEET DECEMBER?015 Joe, W W STATION LINE, H.C.L.v BRINDLEY STREET W 2'®311 5a_ 5•® 1 '- i 2 A0 5`® 5r ®� SID AL SHOULDER L L TRAVEL L E SIDEWALK .---ITEM .1 ° r, (T P.) ITEM 1 .1 21 2X a IT rc� 1 .1 01 1 2 2r 1 / - 2 L-A kn u 11 1/ W ®® 11 7 ��� 1 � 1 LI IJ 0 LIJ 1.5" ITEM402.098302 4- .0101 2®® ITEM402.198902 ----- ---- 5" ITE 402.3T8902 ,n ITEM609.0201 `° ITEM . a ui �o XIST G G us TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION <W O H 1 a m® e O Ln j=o0 �ui 4°w STATION LINE® H.C.L., BRINDLEY STREET �a- UQa uw H v- ®® i ��a + n n 5a- 1 s-8® 1-8o 5 50 , .a.. .. . ... to SIDEWALK SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE SHOULDER SIDEWALK U= u 6® g z (TYP.) u r 2x O. �J �= EXISTING BRIDGE SECTION c 4 470 REMAIN AS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE) -o Ui W ITEM 568.51 ITEM 568.51 � z v v N W D ITEM 609.0302 LnUJ ITEM 609.0302 84MAX.I EXODERMIC DECK ° o EXISTING BRINDLEY STREET EXISTING -&- I a F-,_ RELOCATED GRAVEL AREA .- W UTILITIES M1 en pQ..W inO. AND SPACING OF BEAUS TO BE DETERMINED IN FINAL DESIGN R EMOVE EXISTING Gl si J W O= A.C.PAVEMENT 10'-d" VARIES ITEM 411.01 ITEM 610.1402 N (® THICK)m (" THICK) ITE 610.1601 STATION 10 1. W J �Q - ---- _.--- LINE 'EB-- ---- - -- ----- 4�� �Q ITEM203.02 4 �w EXISTING G OU 0 L. w+c.s o mn�a= SHARED USE �,� SA CUT N � � �z ITEM Wel ITEM 520.d90dOdi 0 L ~� 203.02 CLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL CY ® i 30 .15 SUBBASE COURSE, OPTI L TYPE CY -v 4 W 402®09 302 9.5 F3 TOP COURSE HMA, 80 SERIES COMPACTION N u-W 02.19 902 19 F9 BINDER COURSE H ,80 SERIES COMPACTION J 402.378902 37.5 F9 BASE COURSE N ® 80 SERIES COMPACTION TO ui t.-I.- cr 1.01 STABILIZED R VEL SURFACE COURSE Y 7 52 ® 9001SCUTISPHLT CONCRETE LF C%J 568.51 STEEL RIDE RAILING OUR RAIL) F REPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET � INLET �0 P.- BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA I 1-vi-°-mg 606.10 O GUIDE RAILINGL 608.0101 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAYS Y EB RCI'D I' ALTERNATIVE 2 Wes, 609.0201 STONE CURB, GRANITE (TYPE Al L TYPICAL SECTIONS mo cc w '� 609.0302 STONECURB - BRIDGE (TYPE FI l LF J 610.1402 TOPSOIL ® ROADSIDE CY 610.15 PREPARATION OF SUBSOIL FORT F ESTABLISHMENT TYP E T -- SY SCALE DR t - N0. - ® 10.1601 TURF ESTABLISHMENT ROADSIDE SY ENGI SHEET QECE 2015 O Sell I BRUNEI CA 4^-4 LAJ LAJ =I Lai W C-) Le- CD ®.I.- z 2z %AJ LLJ do LA_9M U LAJ LLA ba LL dogJ 101W q.CJ La cm.4= = C-3 LLJ EXISTING BRINDLEY STO rn en La"j Ln PROPOSED GRA DE c" Ln rm cn. F.- cc ................................................... Ln .............................. 395 --cc ...................................................... Lu ............................. ................. ........ .............. ...............................................................................I. %n rn ................................ ...... ............ ......................................... 395 ....................................... w c" a Cj Lai `D®: mw +01 CM tD M 1-7 11-2 cc re.00 LAJ F.-cc cis -W cc rn OEM 4. cc ro.co co LLI .4"Lmaie W e r :qC� .� N - - a .. . .. ... .... . .............................. . ................... me me" -8� L W 9.r ...2u09 lm- 390g ................ .......... ................4727...... ...... I 9 1.9 390 ................+. D ...............c'a ----- ---------- JCJINDIn cJ --------------- --- L ScLa GI w 'top CL C.) 0. 9. A GI 1.72% G2 1.99Y.; W U- Em 0.29 FT.: of ....... G2 -2.85Z ....... 385 cc L 50.00 FT. ...... ........................................................................ ........... ....... ............................ .. ..... .................................ffSDAI-0Z20'iT.............................. co ............................................................................. ................................... ........................................................ 385 CR............................... SSD 206.14 FT. *%o G2.: 1.722 CM c* E=*O.11 FT. • Ln HSD=5905.91 FT. i C3 ........................................................................................................................................ 380 ............. ................................... ................................ Lu= .....................................................J.................................................... I.-= .. . ...................................380 ........................................ ......................................... % c M ui 0 M APPROXIMATE:EXISTING GRADE ............................... ................... ................ 375 ...... ........ ...... ...... ...... ......... --EXISTI WBRIDGE........................................ .......................... ..........-----------------------------------..................... ........... ..................................... 375 w............................................................................................................ LJ LA LA iRDPOSED BRIDGE LAS 1 3 W cy� �� o CAYUGA INLET co: :a 01 vc,n. co co en: cm "I =4 cc: cn: cc, GO. 3TO CO- FnIR tin 000- Room J%A 370 B 6*00 8 7400 B 8+00 i(D L&J B 4+00 B 5400 = 8 3+00 o 8 2+00 STATION c O O Lai a =n w go -dK LLJ CL_ Ln n) Ln 1 :21 = 0 LA 4z tn_j cc a) w F.:= ul U LLJ co CZ kA LAJ OF LAJ a C3 L& tM J PIN 375LI I BIN 2210400 La z .19 eREPLACEMENT OF BRINDLEY STREET MLn 08 c;—:3!vuj BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET J o r Ln;g a kc �l.:"J., ALTERNATIVE I 1® is go w ui PROF IL E t.—CM U. -a uJ 10' 20' 30' 40' cn SCALE DRAWING NO. HORL ASSHOWN PROJ SCALE BAR I MMMEM,OMMWEM, LMD ou"s DECEMBER 2015 SHEET OF if es / . ' � 1 Ln UJ cm TRUE NORTH AT THE 76,35® LAJ La A. ER1DiAM or SST LONGITUDE 'Jr ` ` / / I/! `�. it ! Mh GO ' ' > t Ln Lai La J t •¢O- Uj es= oCCC J' y / r r ♦a BI 00£+s _ F tea., •$, JP J r ,r r '" -- _�y r Ln `Cr j e -vLa ECOTRUCT SIDEWALK AND CURB FOR NEW ® CROSSWALKS W LA , Q Wuj ECO STRUCIO STA.B 7+67 W y RECtc ®® A C D CURB FOR E v, � °F` cc CROSSWALKS U,.., M m_ z Fri ' �� ERS �� a tom, CD ow •` 4&jgW FZQ �� '�' ��' �� `'.' c qn 1^�` �. 5'-0' SIDEWALK F Q ♦ L t ca .G O WQi.c - ' ~ SHOULDER -r w ``__-__-_- ------ END BRIDGE � --------CURVE_ H.C.L..T.G.I..STATION 12'-0" TRAVEL LA LIN t BRINDLEY STREET STA.B 6 ; iI w t ; , ♦`�. { `~-----------•'J '- GRASS/WEEDS 6, Jr 04.0 ®A _ BN---- ----- BEGIN BRIDGE - GRASS _ �.' 1 W ' -a _ - - , STA.B 5+14 - -- ► �'• °- Uj / f ' "'. t STONE CURB CfYP.I w w ` 01 ? IJ t 1 •®'r ' rr-Lir_a!s- �-'yr•9ss. ♦ { Q \ / 1 ♦ t t Z �. ®'ra . ram• � 1 . t0 LZ ` ' cj w 'WSEZ r ®o' y ro ro W®• 4r :y�. ;, i t AYEL ¢dp ; 'TALL - GRAVEL -..----AZ.357`59'28" `, CURVE 1 U. ■ GRAVEL 5W X 6 _ LO MLUnJ.vx!= , +.� -Nil ` 15 SURt� BASE A� � sT •. xo40ulrrw �RINDLEY-STREET - ------ ------------. ' -- C6 .1 : (p 4*_ 40 RIM 38673 o :'`�''�i�; N 1NV.383 --- -;- ----- ------ ---- -- -- - ..®..r.,. . _...._r - - , - `1r . �.... ®.®_ S,lkV.38 - - - y �, R1�u - _ z c�a THE siF ce cc pi low-- 15't�D ® ' ' 8H TG 388.53 N 1w.38723 o ® oC:h ``ti w ^� y o� 0T/PL TER c" ASPHALT s`' �, + '` ` 12-0' TRAVEL LANE Q IL , .� °' 1 •'°` "ITHACA GRAIN ALT VIA SUPPLY° � 5°-O' SHOULDER ORNAMENTAL • 1 oc>n .a x LU AKy AND PET �, et -o w ca a ,t, + ; ► i ca RETAINING ALLY �+ y itsQ � 1 ASPHALT wa- I .� GRASS 5'-0" SIDEWALKc► • °L' F_n - ` ca i I CURVE 3 1 ,,� % c- GRASS W ,r L a Q® LU BEGINPAVEMENT w � RECONSTRUCTION ' m v �W �` + Fitz Q„�L� LL y STA.B 2+00 ® _ m ;_`—' �' w Liim P5 CONC � wz L ATE EXISTING -...kw" N,4CT 1`� ; l LL) �1 'g w4!R UTILITIES TO E BRIDGE ��ASP OS . CAT A ® 0 1. ri M v �'/ ca Ct= 6 Wpticr Lu 4 GUSH y a W � � 0 �W ® ,A_Lad ` HUB ��� Q+ G J B 3 EL E EENCHVdX®3 IS THE FIRST i�'='`= C 1 C U 3 FLOOR OF 0120 QRINDLEY STREET REPLACEWNT OF BRINDLEY STREET �o p�P_ c=-' BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET ad .a ,_j PC STA.B 2400.00 FCC STA,B 2415.80 PC STA.B6*18.66 CC STA.B 2 1530 P7 STA®B 3447.57 PT STA.8 7+26 3 It ® 11 -. a b 6150211' LT. =88048117m LT. ii- a2 '59® RT. ALTERNATIVE I Q aw c' GENERAL PLAN Cc- 8,011'50" DC= 67°2 '24" 2® ,26" o cn = 150.00" =85. ' R m 175.00 0' 0 20' 0' L ® 15 0' L _ 131.77' Ld10.7' T ® 7.9 ' T e 3.27' T =5 .88' V E 0.21' E = 33.�99' E = .70' - SCALE DRAWING O° SCALE BAR S SHOWN GNP-1 ENGINEERS,ARCH 4,a LMD SURVIEVOU DECEMBER 2015 SHEET 0F J Z son,I LA s {i CZ CL W 4 J 6a. G a �' ®e STATION LINE, •C•L.® W LA ® - BRINDLEY STREET �vcc 7, cWLU W at 12 1 '- '_ ® '-D- co W �D® N 5D- O_ W I= SIDEWALK SHOL DER TRAVEL LANE T L L E a SI AL o EXISTING �.. I (TYP®) 2X , I 2% I I 2/. I 2 ------- z W W W 1. " ITEM 02 96302 4" ITEM 608.0101 2" ITEM 402.198902 Q 6 ITE 304.15 5" ITEM402.3T6902 ITEM 60►5.1 TO1 '"s ITE 05.001 Q LAITE_ 609.0201 12" ITEM 304.15 r W mLa TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION JCJ J� W V Oi i� W 1i- t— S�- u m ao ui tf.W fJ J cn-a G STATION LINE. H.C,L.. & ui_ CL BRINDLEY STREET ui � ' ►_gr 5#-0` 5 12'_p- 5'_0,1 '-0' 12'-0' 5D.a1 s-g® mc; -- 2 SIDEWALK SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE S DER SIDEWALK IO o v" % 3 m iTYP.I L. V 2/ 1 iE G :0- 1 _.a 2�1. 1 1 - rlT .-. La1-- ~ N W cm ITEM 568.51 M ` �' L. �J ITEM 568.51 .p U m o cn ITEM 60 .00 °1 23 Ln ITEM 0 ® 302 W 0 1-- " (MAX.) X IC DEC L C UTILITIES I,v �ui D SPACING OF BEAUS TO BE DETERMINEDIN FINAL DESIGN Li TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTION W u cl) t-o ,. Ln'41 N W ° J r. W Lai L.co o u V1 [ITEM NO.1 DESt"."RIPTION ') ui 4 C Y 4tmSUBBASE.15 C E® TIO L Y TONa2 02.030 ® TO COURSE SERIES . L&.W ® J� 02.1 1 F 1 COURSESE IES C4 OTIOTON `` 0 ® 7 90 . 9 SEC S IES CO C 10 T ON L �� STEEL BRIDGEL RAILI5 6.51 m °'Z�c 5®090 U D D I FIL TER, TYPE C =° BRIDGE OVER CAYUGA INLET �C2 to o � 605.1701 OPTIONAL D it PIPE INCH DIAMETER LG = .0101 C C E E SIDEWALKS DRIVEWAYS CY ujw�—cr- '® • ZI S E - GAIT YPEA) 14. S IO ITY Fl) L 610.1402 TOPSOIL SI Y . .------------.__ SCALE DRAWIN TYPct 0® ®..Jmn'afta, ECE B 2015 SHEET PROPOSED RESOLUTION Brindley Street Bridge Lead Agency Concurrence City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board February 23,2016 WHEREAS: State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review, the Lead Agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, and WHEREAS: the Board of Public Works (BPW)has identified the Planning Board as an Involved Agency in the Environmental Review of the Brindley Street Bridge Project, and WHEREAS: the Board of Public Works (BPW) has notified the Planning Board of its intent to act as Lead Agency in the Environmental Review,now, therefore, be it, RESOLVED:that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby consent to the BPW acting as Lead Agency for the Environmental Review for the Brindley Street Bridge Project. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 PROPOSED RESOLUTION City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board Project Changes Approval Downtown Hilton Canopy Hotel 320-324 M.L.K.,Jr.Blvd./E. State St. February 23,2016 WHEREAS: the project applicant is requesting materials and building fagade changes for the proposed Hilton Canopy Hotel at 320-24 M.L.K., Jr. Blvd./E. State Street, which was approved by the Planning Board on February 24,2015, and WHEREAS: in accordance with §276-6 D., "Changes to approved site plan," the Director of Planning and Development has reviewed the changes and determined the changes are significant enough to require re-opening the review, but are not significant enough to require a new Site Plan Review application, and WHEREAS: the changes consist of an increase from 74,475 GFA to 77,884 GFA (due to the addition of a basement) and a slight change to the building footprint, an increase from 123 to 131 guest rooms, minor landscape changes, size and location of windows and doors, and exterior materials and colors, and WHEREAS: the Board, has on February 23, 2016 reviewed and accepted as adequate: revised and updated plans entitled "Proposed Site Plan— Option I(L100)," "Proposed Site Plan— Option 2(L100)," and "Site Plan Details (L105)," all dated 12/3/15 and prepared by Whitham Planning/STREAM Collaborative, and "Basement Floor Plan," "First Floor Plan," "Second Floor Plan," "Typical Floor Plan," "Roof Plan," "Exterior Elevations - North," "Exterior Elevations - East," "Exterior Elevations - South," "Exterior Elevations - West," "Materials Palette," "View from East State Street," and "View from Seneca Way(two sheets),"all dated 2/8/16 and"Signage Details-I,""Signage Details-2,""Signage Details-3," "Signage Details-4,"and "Signage Details-5," all dated 10/8/15, and prepared by spg3 Architects; and other application materials, and WHEREAS: the Board, has on February 23, 2016, determined the proposed changes are consistent with the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance filed on January 27, 2015 and therefore no further Environmental Review is required, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board agrees to the changes proposed by the applicant, subject to the following conditions: Conditions unique to revised proposal: Insert any New Conditions Applicable Unsatisfied Conditions from the 2-24-15 Site Plan Approval: i. Written approval from the City of Ithaca Fire Chief that the project meets all fire access needs, and ii. Submission for approval by the Planning Board of project details including,but not limited to, signage,paving materials, exterior furnishings, and lighting(including any exterior ornamental lighting plan), and iii. Submission to the Planning Board of visual documentation that the penthouse enclosure walls are at the lowest height that will still provide effective screening for the mechanicals within, and iv. Submission to the Planning Board of a Landscape Plan keyed to a species list, and Submission of a color copy of the materials board, Satisfied—to be removed V. Applicant to explore using pavers in place of asphalt on some or all of the parking and car-access area off E. State Street, to better connect the design of the hotel to that street, and Satisfied—to be removed vi. Applicant to explore: (1)potential incorporation of decorative terra cotta salvaged during the demolition of the Strand Theater(which once stood on this site) into the low wall facing E. State Street or elsewhere on the site, and(2)potential re-creation, at some appropriate location on the building, of the prominent Strand stage-house mural(by artist David Finn)which formerly faced E. Seneca Street, and vii. Noise-producing construction shall take place only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday, and viii. Bike racks shall be installed prior to granting of Certificate of Occupancy, and ix. Applicant shall work with the Community School of Music and Arts (CSMA) and appropriate City staff members to seek mutually-acceptable solutions that would improve loading and pedestrian access to CSMA (for example, via potential mutual cross- easements or a potential land swap between applicant and CSMA), and The following provisions discussed in the adopted FEAF,Part 3: X. If drilled and/ or driven steel piles are used in the foundation, then: (1) noise-producing installation work thereon shall be limited to the hours between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, and (2) ongoing seismic testing shall be conducted to make certain the pile driving or drilling operations do not in any way have a negative impact on any adjacent or nearby structure, and xi. Applicant shall, as appropriate, employ the dust-control measures listed in the "Impact on Air" section of the FEAF, Part 3 during the project's construction, and xii. All restaurant and hotel kitchen exhaust will be vented through the roof, and hotel laundry venting will be at ground-floor level, behind the existing concrete wall on the adjacent property, in an area not accessible to hotel guests or other pedestrians; any future exterior venting, not located in a screened location on the roof,that may cause noise, odor or street-level air flow shall be reviewed by Planning Division staff or the Planning Board, and xiii. Exterior signage shall be of equal scale and quantity as the signage illustrated on the project renderings and elevations dated January 13, 2015, and xiv. Applicant shall actively pursue implementation of the mitigations (including proposed valet routes to and from the hotel)recommended in the Traffic Impact Study prepared by SRF and dated January 2015, though it is understood that providing a two-space loading area on Seneca Way and making signal-timing changes to two intersections will require the cooperation of governmental agencies, and Applicant shall work with the adjacent property owner on the east(CSMA) to potentially provide a cross-block pedestrian passage extending through applicant's and the adjacent owner's parcels, Satisfied—to be removed Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 PROPOSED RESOLUTION City of Ithaca Planning&Development Board CEQR Negative Declaration Parking for 5 Cars 424 Dryden Rd. February 23,2016 WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Approval for a 5-car parking area to be located a 424 Dryden Road by Daniel Hirtler for William and Angie Chen,and WHEREAS: the property at 424 Dryden Road was subdivided in 2015 to form a new parcel at 319 Oak Avenue. The required off-street parking for 424 Dryden Road was formerly located on the part of the original parcel which was subdivided. The applicant proposes to provide the five required off-street parking spaces for the small site, while providing the best maneuverability and retaining a vegetative buffer at the rear of this parcel. The layout retains existing mature tree, preserves a portion of the 10-foot vegetative buffer, and requires variances as shown in drawings A2 and A5,more fully described below. The project is on the CR-2 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: this is an Unlisted Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review and is subject to environmental review, and WHEREAS: the Planning Board, being the local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, did on January 26, 2016 declare itself Lead Agency for the environmental review of this action, and WHEREAS: this Board, acting as Lead Agency in Environmental Review, did on February 23, 2016 review and accept as adequate: a Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF), Part 1, submitted by the applicant, and Part 2, prepared by Planning staff, drawing titled"Site Alteration for Requires Off-Street Parking and Required Landscaping— Option B (A2, A3 and A5)," dated 11/6/15, and prepared by Daniel R. Hirtler; and other application materials,now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board determines the proposed Subdivision will result in no significant impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration for purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law be filed in accordance with the provisions of Part 617 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will there be an effect as a result of a physical change to project site? ❑ Yes ❑ No Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater(15-foot rise per 100 feet of length) or where general slope in the project ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No exceeds 10%. Construction on land where depth to the water table is less ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No than 3 feet. Construction of parking facility/area for 50 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No more than one phase or stage. Evacuation for mining purposes that would remove more than ❑ ❑ [:] Yes No 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Construction in designated floodway. ❑ ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No Other impacts (if any). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No 2. Will there be an effect on any unique land forms found on the site (i.e., cliffs, gorges, geological formations, etc.)? ❑Yes ❑ No Specific land forms (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No 1 of 11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will project affect any water body designated as protected (under article 15 or 24 of Environmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Developable area of site contains protected water body. ❑ ❑ [:] Yes [:] No Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes [:] No of protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through protected ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No water body. Construction in designated freshwater wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 4. Will project affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ® Yes ❑ No A 10% increase or decrease in surface area of any body of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No water or more than 10,000 sq. ft. of surface area. Construction, alteration, or conversion of body of water that ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No exceeds 10,000 sq. ft. of surface area. Fall Creek, Six Mile Creek, Cascadilla Creek, Silver Creek, ® ❑ ® Yes ❑ No Cayuga Lake, or Cayuga Inlet? Other impacts (if any): A portion of the project involves work in close proximity to the edge of Cascadilla Gorge ❑ ❑ ❑d(es ❑ No 2of11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER(cont.) 5. Will project affect surface or groundwater quality? ❑ Yes ❑ No Project will require discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Project requires use of source of water that does not have ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No approval to serve proposed project. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No public water supply system. Project will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No do not currently exist or that have inadequate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 20,000 gallons per day or 500 gallons per minute. Project will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an ❑ ❑ [—] Yes [:] No obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed action will require storage of petroleum or chemical El ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No products greater than 1,100 gallons. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 3of11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON WATER(cont.) 6. Will project alter drainage flow, drainage patterns, or surface water runoff? ® Yes ❑ No Project would impede floodwater flows. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Other impacts (if any): Project will be reviewed by the City Stormwater Management Officer. ❑ ❑ ❑wes ❑ No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will project affect air quality? ❑ Yes ❑ No Project will induce 500 or more vehicle trips in any 8-hour El ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No period per day. Project will result in the incineration of more than 2.5 tons of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No refuse per 24-hour day. Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million ❑ ❑ [—] Yes ❑ No BTUs per hour. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ [—] Yes ❑ No 4of11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACTS ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will project affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑ Yes ❑ No Reduction of any species, listed on New York or Federal list, El ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No using the site, found over, on, or near site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 9. Will proposed action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? [—] Yes ❑ No Proposed action would substantially interfere with any ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No resident or migratory fish, or wildlife species. Proposed action requires removal or more than '/z acre of El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No mature woods or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 5of11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 10. Will proposed action affect views, vistas, or visual character of the neighborhood or community? [—] Yes ❑ No Proposed land uses or proposed action components obviously different from, or in sharp contrast to, current ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses or proposed action components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or ❑ ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No significantly reduce their enjoyment of aesthetic qualities of that resource. Proposed action will result in elimination or major screening ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ [—] Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric, or paleontological importance? ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed action occurring wholly or partially within, or contiguous to, any facility or site listed on or eligible for ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No the National or State Register of Historic Places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No within the project site. Proposed action occurring wholly or partially within, or contiguous to, any site designated as a local landmark or in a ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No landmark district. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 6of11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 12. Will the proposed action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces, or recreational opportunities? ❑ Yes ❑ No The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational ❑ ❑ [:] Yes No opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON UNIQUE NATURAL AREAS OR CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 13. Will proposed action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a site designated as a unique natural area (UNA) or a critical environmental area (CEA) by a local or state agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed action to locate within a UNA or CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed action will result in reduction in the quality of the El ❑ [] Yes ❑ No resource. Proposed action will impact use, function, or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No resource. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ [—] Yes ❑ No 7of11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ® Yes ❑ No Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or El ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No goods. Proposed action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Other impacts: Project may impact the trail along Cascadilla Gorge rim. ❑ ❑ ❑wes ❑ No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed action causing greater than 5% increase in any El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No form of energy used in municipality. Proposed action requiring creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single- ❑ ❑ [—] Yes ❑ No or two-family residences. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 8of11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON NOISE AND ODORS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturbance during construction of, or after completion of, this proposed action? ® Yes ❑ No Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school, or other ❑ ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No sensitive facility? Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed action will produce operating noise exceeding local ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structure. Proposed action will remove natural barriers that would act as El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No noise screen. Other impacts (if any): Minor construction impacts only ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will proposed action affect public health and safety? ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed action will cause risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e., oil, pesticides, chemicals, El ❑ [:] Yes No radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be chronic low-level discharge or emission. Proposed action may result in burial of"hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e., toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No irritating, infectious, etc.) Proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of ❑ ❑ [—] Yes ❑ No solid or hazardous wastes. Proposed action will result in handling or disposal or hazardous wastes (i.e., toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., including wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid, or contain gases). 9of11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH (cont.) Storage facilities for 50,000 or more gallons of any liquid fuel. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Use of any chemical for de-icing, soil stabilization, or control of vegetation, insects, or animal life on the premises of any ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No residential, commercial, or industrial property in excess of 30,000 square feet. Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ❑ Yes ❑ No The population of the city in which the proposed action is located is likely to grow by more than 5% of resident human ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No population. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No this proposed action. Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No goals. Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No use. Proposed action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No structures, or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create demand for additional community El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No services (e.g., schools, police, and fire, etc.) Proposed action will set an important precedent for future ❑ ❑ [:] Yes ❑ No actions. Proposed action will relocate 15 or more employees in one or El ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No more businesses. 10 of 11 2/17/2016 City of Ithaca Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) Part 2 — Project Impacts Project Name: Cornell Hughes Hall Renovation Date Created: 2/17/16 Small-to- Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Reduced by Impact Impact Project Change? IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD (cont.) Other impacts (if any): ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 19. Is there public controversy concerning the proposed action? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown — If any action in Part 2 is identified as a potential large impact, or if you cannot determine the magnitude of impact, proceed to Part 3 — 11 of 11 2/17/2016 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Site Plan Review Declaration of Lead Agency Hughes Hall Renovations Cornell University Planning&Development Board February 23,2016 WHEREAS: 6 NYCRR, Part 617, of the State Environmental Quality Review Law and Chapter 176.6 of the City Code,Environmental Quality Review, require a Lead Agency be established for conducting Environmental Review of projects, in accordance with local and state environmental law, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Review for renovations to Hughes Hall, located on the Cornell University campus, by Cornell University, applicant and owner, and WHEREAS: the applicant is proposing to renovate four levels of Hughes Hall in order to improve academic space use. Exterior and site modifications include: enclosing existing ground- floor loggia; a new entry from the courtyard; a new exterior stair tower on a west fagade; and renovations to the gorge-facing dining terrace, including a new entrance and stair. The project includes removal and redesign of the courtyard area to include new paving, seating, lighting, walkway,bike racks, landscaping, and drainage improvements. The project is in the U-1 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: this is a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance ("CEQRO"), §176-4 B(1)(h)[2], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"), §617.4(b)(11), and is subject to Environmental Review. WHEREAS: State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review the Lead Agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby declare itself Lead Agency for the Environmental Review for the action of site plan approval for the project. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 _= 1111111111111 Steam Removal _= Innlnnnl CCF New Steam -_-_ ODNCxEEPAYE119rrcT7Pa CIT Ductbank PLwnma(mP 9W jmAy0MKE■ETT PHEK'WOONCP ER EIEPAV $ —— ED9ETHEA7MENi(G4,) ON OONMETE WE Er aTDNE Iu.ARaEAr Irma =_ ■ALIANp ENMITIAM arM4 Utilities New Steam PA C C CORNELL 8Nµ�MOM == PAVEYBJI �p ® Utilities Water 8NYRAKE ENLRGEM (FVPJ -- ved EN HNL r EHIRANCE I3IAF1G9XEW _ WAXID MOOED ■m n'PIOIL MAN IN71ASECTION —— NEWPA'IH MLAR 61F}if- SHEET419 �CALDWELL HALL =_ - - — E,E,� P„ECAa7GI)NGFEM = WARREN HALL WE'MANDHANDTAL • I — t �i - f; nnuul • � ■ ■ � • uuuuu 1R`NTEGRAIM - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _� _ • 1 r.� I . ,. , �• I I r- � � - _ I � I1..-. .`(\ ♦ 1 // ■ A. ■ - _ - FIAt7f5 ON ARaWIIE N17a In'Pa "Y} q GI-LEWEL COWRETE aEATNYW 1. f ISI1N4 TREE(IYP.] • ``-- _rJ• • _ ■ �.• * ■1 • M7Di■TKIWC1P(7NP.) 9GNETDGM DNA" ,� �•� - _ • x ' Eamnlp ANal� 15'DOD FNICI4FD 9 *�_ AMDRWRACIC TI'1 X — I • v R"E191,II111TME I�■3;: PRLM- TCOHG w,�„�, �,� /r PATFIO AOC1TaiNE Lc I r Y ° M[7VFAOUTAMMAN} M N I CAN Ik7NOR- v - CHAIRS(FWJ rAADEATDUILD■ID I r I' 17ON9„I,rr ,, ■ PEC07a� I ,a�,L I-ITI ° MANN LIBRARY EWR%NCF3pWJ fi IJhMI NEE IRprIEN1a ITNl cDI1cHElE PAn-m _ "y, ■ 1 IT I PEFYdEA6LE PRECA9r GO P1,47A ■'11IDE(fTPJ - �.. .T... I 1�'4" I�)� IIGAE:IE PAl> 31T PEANE,ADI.EPR64l9T I -8F#.kr41U = ' �. I - -pi9T aXln7cislE;PAWr3es Cp71CRElE PAV@B7T ' - ■ • - • ONOWNIEMIRNM MCINFM�.ETANLEa -1-� OFOMEN1'ALTFIEER G"Am H7P•1 ROBE 11.�11NTfPEEKMfM4 �_� _.. • _ *, ) i�.i _gAlf�.d.G01 HIC IJG117Pfp.E11 HA LI,T , - _ rpr!■.r ..• -' ANDMXMRair"Pi DIONETEMMON WABIN I -� lJl / ,�..° --_ _�C 9PANTE BULLARD EAATIWM TREE TO rTL#VJImPa I�:_I aJ I ° III SII`PJ ✓ ■EEMANNURRAIIT PLAZAERWINEWENIF I • PAVE T 11 _- - — .. -_ - - NDSIAP ___ - = 7 - _ I111111 ■r �, I • 4ERM q ' --- . II11•l. r 1:11 ..L........ PRESIASrcrNa:RETE. .. - PAVERS IDIV p:MCFE7@ I���L IF■NU■jM'N_- 'b-,}j _ I - FiBCf.PTAfXE33(I'fP) �s 9PU9llAC611C�.E@41I N!G TREEA Ow.) I I 1 - VWW WWI SENCH mPa ENiMANCE FJYIAROEMBTr 1r WIDE HFP14 5 A • • •• I PIEl'dISTDt9NC1 TE PAYER -8}EETI to CNRWWATHIEFa11M i Ile -- I 1 • _ ONCOEICREIEMISEAT IPVADEGAANIE CURB PIaX',A$rDONCAE, lE I'A _ = I ACADEMIC l IRINDINM EIITNIYYPB 7RIX 9-REVEML(IVP"a PLANT SCIENCE,BUILDING IiOWCAI■,C TAaAiA. i ;SURGE A i _ • -- AND CFWRS9WJ __ I I • OONG�EIe HLRNNNO COIDRFDC,ONCETE f - I - NOYI-rRln■rpaEd;AP PAVEI@lr(M4 I FUTURE BUILDING I _ • MD RAIL PI.NITTIk 7A7Ri NFNP IRION]4ED3mGE ORNAEEHIALTREMA T Pa 1 . TREES(Ty" - SEE IffMEW WVL KAM - I I - - -- W-IAW UDE PATIP,12 WIPE _.- I3IJNIODA W-1■1M L,17 • _•� KENNEDY HALL i ACADEMIC i .l SURGE B I 1 • _ _ RUAJQHAMDF5BRAM PATH CONAIL ATAND N OIDETR ODRI✓w"M C VI1NU DIwD57FHis __ -. -e WMEfMCla 1]I ITTPJ -_-- 1 I - __a RRlwrn=acraTa(rrP.1 L-----------------J _ OOLIAPS-9 - , - I"IARM •• � : I■I NGRnT �L uN1r UMq' M[1 1 AG QUADA�11 _ Q CORNELL UNIVERSITY �'] LI 4J r OONCFFWAL13MMIN DE•NAI/gNMn*w: L-9A IlCl�'rise Hangen BvuOlin, Inc. e, 4b ITHACA,NEW YORK OVERALL DESIGN PLAN-ALTERNATNE 1/ � � �I ASSOCIATES.LLC. Infrastructure Properties and Planning Davies O.Orinda,AIA,LEER AP Cornell University Project Manager 102 Humphreys Service Building Ithaca,New York 14853 t.607.255.0441 f.607.255.1968 e.doo4@cornell.edu The A2 Quad Landscape Revitalization Proiect—Info on trees to be removed Caliper Species 1 12.5" Ace saccharum 2 13.5" Ze I kova se rrata 3 16.5" Ze I kova se rrata 4 20" Tilia tomentosa 5 19.5" Ace saccharum 6 12" Fraxinus americana 7 19" Cornus mas/Cornellian cherry 8 14" Cornus mas/Cornellian cherry 9 20" Cornus mas/Cornellian cherry 10 22" Cornus mas/Cornellian cherry 11 23" Ze I kova se rrata 12 13" Styphnolobium japonicum 13 13" Styphnolobium japonicum 14 11" Styphnolobium japonicum 15 14.5" Ace saccharum Please refer to the attached plan for the location of the trees. Cornell University is an equal opportunity affirmative action educator and employer. o v \., \\ AG QUAD UTILITY E S E R V 01 v I \\ INFRASTRUCTURE EAT WALLS SHE�"S-01 \ UPGRADES & o o LANDSCAPE REMoVE EXISTING =' REVITALIZATION CONCRETE PAVEMENT I GGG EXISTING STEPS AND — ^xign _ - I EXISTING STEPS AND X CORNELL UNIVERSITY REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING ENTRANCE STEPS To REMAIN { EXISTING STEPS AND• BUILDING ENTRANCE ITHACA,NEW YORK CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO REMAINCTED AND BE q REMOVE EXISTING O * BUILDING ENTRANCE XISTING GRANITE PAVEMENT TO BRICK PAVEMENT TO REMAIN AND BE TO REMAIN AND BE REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED EXISTING S S NtOTECTED PROTECTED MOVCALDWELL HALL AND BUI 01N - WAR EN HALL ( _ y ENTRANCE TO _ ESTIN AND SALVAGE EXISTING GRANITE REMAIN AND BIKE RACKS T • \ I —CLL I I REMOVE EXISTING REMAIN AND BEa EXISTING GRANITE CURB. REMOVE AND BENCHES TO REMAIN REMOVE AND REMAIN AND BE PROTEC CONCRETE PROTECTED J UGHTS EXISTING SALVAGE IXISTIN C CLIENT' O 'I \ 5 • j — — REMOVE AND S U_VAGE I�—• \ — \ • • __ EXISTING BENCI ES O w r I V v /' R 8 O 1, r _---- ---- —% — —ET ROREN HALL AYPd i^ \ AIN _ I : � / ._ \ • _�•_9•. R=16'-7}J"( j \ REMOVE ERI�NG • / �\ OBE TE D CO NELL ITY NEW R�SALVAGE - >s / \ \ / / / \\ " STEPS/FOOTINGS • % /� /-�� \ X.GRANITE RE TO ) I EXISTING BENCH �I • • 1 \ / / (OI (O� \ EMAIN A BE PROTEC J / R OVE E STING I / • �\ \ Fo TNGs \ / `�R—B'-o' R=24'-0" LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: EXISTING BUILONG _ (. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED — - EXISTING STEPS AND �R=7-10}' / • I BUILDING ENTRANCE REMOVE EXISTING * /` TO REMAIN AND BE 2 7EI PORARY P D LIGHT _ REMOVbEX15nNN\ \' PROTECTED ROBERTS L 1 FENCE PROTEO R 51-0" /T v ` • / 2 EMPORARY TREE A D _ MANN L�BRARY �� , +ASSOCIATES,LLC. HALL SHRUB PRO ECn — R=4T-0° SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS andscape Arch tecture Ste Planning Urban Design REMOVE CONCRETE R=g'-1 R�2lT-3" FT910E R=28-7°° /� �'I[ • I INFORMATION •1 CIVIL D AWI 27-9" / \ — 39 PARK AVENUE RUTHE0.FOR0 NJ OYOJO a ' PAVERSINF U CITIES / l ' �O• ( \\ / CONSULTANT TEAM: REMOVE AND - .6• I / / �- _ I • // REMOVE IXISIING SALVAGE EXISTING - I • CONCRETE PAVEMENT CIVIL ENGINEERS: • TRASH RECEPTACLE �y /.> REMOVE AND �✓ / / \ / / EXISTING STEPS AND SALVAGE EXISTINGBUILDING ENTRANCE �� BENCHES AND - \ { SEE CINL DRAWINGS \ / TO REMAIN AND BE O REMOVE CONCRETE • ) 2 = - / „FOR ALL UnunEs \ ( / VHB ENGINEERING, SURVEYING AND SLABS AND BASE \ • / INFORMATION \ • I 6 • / _ PROTECTED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, P.C. COURSES I L , / / / REMOVE c�E'TE PAVE ENT 100 GREAT OAKS BOULEVARD 1 — — --- _ _ ❑ ALBANY, NY 12203 _ T: 518.389.3600 `— R=17 3" .� - F: 51 8.452.0324 I i I 44'1 « �I • ❑ ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS: II „ O 6 _ L---- ----- [HU✓►GASSMAN ■ • IT - _ f 1 f f f �� iaw�h+q.Erynrrn PC INVI cLL 559 UNION AVENUE REMOVE CONCRETE - - _ I REMOVE EXISTING EXISTING STEPS AND BUILDING ENTRAN E REMO EXIsnNG MIDDLESEX, NJ 08846 PAVERS AND SUB-BASE I BLUE LIGHT TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED CONCR PAVEMENT T: DLESE , NJ 0 REMOVE EXISTING PLANT SCIENCE BUILDING GL KENNEDY HALL ACADEMIC SURGE A REMOVE EXISTING EXI NG STEPS AND FOOTINGS EXISTING STEPS TO U NG5 q T REMAIN - TEMPORARY w • I TREE GUARD b q O o El wZ I '1/� . I I > q TO REMAINXISTING STEPS/RAMP Q ACADEMIC SURGE B e c 0 z _ w rR`15-5" b EXISTING TREE I� CENTER OF TO REMAIN CROSS MEMBER /O\ t" 10 DIA PEELED CEDAR STARE AT � I \ I �E to•o.c.Max j —� ° HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE Q q \ 4 `t"` L MESH.SECURE TO TREE GUARD / \ REMOVE EXISTING TREE OUTER SURFACE PATH bLL LL GALVANIZED WIRE OR STAPLES COLOR TO BE BRIGHT ORANGE ( ( • q _ EXISTING _ FINISH GRADE GX E oN PAVER EMM —AND NOTE:USE EIGHT �/( •\ I1 / 6 0' BE P PENNY GALVANIZED NAILS, MIN.4 PER CROSS MEMBER R=6'1JC \ 1 12/21/2015 ADDENDUM#1 TEMPORARY TREE GUARD REV# DATE COMMENTS R-27-9; _ / rR=27 _R=2 9" u uT L_�__] Ll L_1 SCALE:3/16"=1'-O" q ) / 2 IPORARY TREE A D • • i • •/ L-1 SFHNRUCB PROTECTION O -- -- -- — -- — O 15' 80' R' a DD John P. g, stere New Yark e' tl Lantlecope Al--t N Y RLA § T O W E R R 0 O 0 30' 120' 11 SCALE: 1" = 30—0 N 0 R T H DRAWING TITLE: 3°DIA PEELED CEDAR STAKE AT �10'D.C.MAX FCt � F � LLL� �LLFF� HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE DEMOLITION REMOVALS LEGEND FE t t.. tFtF t LL _OUTER SECURE TO T SURFACE WITREE GUARD CLL REMOVE PAVERS AND «« [[ GALVANIZED WIRE OR STAPLES. AND REM 0 V A L S CONTRACT LIMIT LNE COLOR TO BE BRIGHT ORANGE TEMPORARY WOODEN e BE E%ISnNG GRADE PLAN CF— CONSTRUCTION FENCE ® TREE GUARD L-1 REMOVE AND SALVAGE REMOVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT 10'-0"MAX(TYP) GRANITE CURB REMOVE ITEM REM VE REMOVE WALL ANDOSUBCBASE CONCRETE PAVEMENT ------------ SAWCUT LINE pO TRANSPLANT TREE r AREA TO BE PROTECTED AROUND 2 DRAWN BY: MKW L-- EXISTING TREE OR PLANTINGS L-7 CHECKED BY: MKW ------- TEMPORARY TREE k PLANTING L.— 1 PROTECTON FENCE DATE: 12-11-2015 2 TEMPORARY TREE AND SHRUB PROTECTION FENCE SCALE: I"=30' L-1 SCALE:3/16"=1'-0" PROJECT# PL13009 O ovoaa — P _ -- "-- CONCRETE PAVEMENT(TYP.) -- - -- .WALKWAY GRANITE SETT-PLANTINGPRECAST CONCRETE PAVERS \ \ \ (TYP) -�— EDGE TREATMENT(TVPJ ON CONCRETE BASE AT \ " SEATram`'__-- BUILDING ENTRANCES(TYP) P PRE SEE T N EENLARG ME)NTBIKE RACKS ON RVP.--- -- GRANITE BENCHES AND PAVERS(TVp)CRETE CCC ENTRANCE ENLARGEMENT GRANITE SETTS PA WARREN AS PER \ ` CORNELL STANDARD -�-- WARREN HALL PROJECT _ WOOD BACKED BENCH SEE TYPICAL MAIN -SHEET L-16 - INTERSECTION NEW PATH ENLARGEMENT- = C/I LD`A/ELL H/I LL SNLARGEHEET 2 - l.'F1 VV rl/'1 rSEE AG QUAD CORNER - WARREN HALL I ENLARGEMENT- - PRECAST CONCRETE " \ - SHEET L-12 _ STEPS AND HANDRAIL ` //III • • � ��� �� �low • • ��� ��� = _ \ \_ k CORNELLGOTHIC • • pp QQ • - 'I l -♦-- -pppp • • 0000'^' • 1111111111 FIX DRIES ES AND • • 0000 0O FIXTURES(TYP) _ 1111 1111 I 1 00 12 WIDE GRANITE00 �00L - - - CURB WITH 2 REVEAL ... R ..!... _•.._ __.. _.I ... - ....... \ TL� I �. i � I I � �� II • r "`�^„ R CORNELL STANDARD BIKE \.\ ;g�• • ' 1 /, • I r ---- I-I - RACKS ON GRANITE SEEPS(TYP) EXISTING TREE(TYP.) BI-LEVEL CONCRETE SEATWALL• - • • I -il • WITH STONE CAP(TYP) \ BIORETENTION BASIN EXISTING SUSTAINABLE / i- • VE EXISTING I • SITES INITIATIVE PROJECT WOOD BACKED BENCH(TYP T , AND REG A • • I �• MOVEABLE TABLES AND PRECAST CONCRETE _ L PATHS A 03LE l6bT PAVERS ON CONCRETE RECONSTRUCT • CHAIRS(TYP.) BASE AT BUILDING I I RECONSTRUCT • t`i•r�. ENTRANCES(TYP.) LAWN •iR'••`777•R�""" `"W" 4 � MANN LIBRARY SECONDAR RED I �� • PERMEABLE PRECAST CORNELL"ELEMENT L CONCRETE PATHS • SEE ROBERTS HALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT OF TRAD11!ION" I PLAZA ENLARGEMENT 8'WIDE(TYP.) 99 PERMEABLE PRECAST 1 I -SHEETL-19 I^ 4�' CONCRETE PAVEMENT ,• 99 • ONE CONCRETE B SE PAVERS MOVEABLE TABLES AND - • — I) • ORNAMENTAL TREES CHAIRS(TYPT ROBE TS �L 1�� V �$ I IN TREE PITS(TYp.) • = CORNELL GOTHIC UGHTPOLES � a HALL +# I f ` M AND FIXTURES(TIP.) BIORETENTION BASIN - / \`' 1 Pt 1 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN(TYP.) 'I I I • • „� GRANITE BOLLARD T^� SEE MANN LIBRARY t (CPO 2 1 - RED CONCR ENLARGEMENT - ` � I • PAVEMENT(TYP)E � I I ..._.... ..: •.. ..,_ _ __......,.. ... ... .... _... �_�'....... SHEETL 0 _ �x PLAZA GROUNDCOVER • _ CORNELL STANDARD PLANTING STRIP I III S_J_ ��-7{'�T]T-�'- 1 _ - _ _ - _ �1 (TYP.) 1 O-r r O�I-! H O- .... ..... - - ... - GRANITE I111111 BIKE RACKS ON I SETTS(TYP.) - - - - - 1111 . I1111 1i PRECASTCONCRETE I I e'�"'• I PAVERS ON CONCRETE .• • • r------- - -------��• f • SAS \ TREES I I TRASH AND RECYCLING ` STONE SLAB SEATS(TYP.) OR) NTAL • • ® �... RECEPTACLES(TYP.) \ I SEE PLANT SCIENCE BUILDING >� P.) I I I I _ - WOOD BACKED BENCH(TVP.) ENTRANCE ENLARGEMENT 12"WIDE GRANITE • I PRECAST CONCRETE PAVERS -SHEET L-14 CURB WITH 2"REVEAL PRECAST CONCRETE PAVE I ON CONCRETE SSEAT WI WIDE GRANITE CURB I I ACADEMIC I BUILDING ENTRANCES WITH 2"REVEAL(TYP.) ON CONCRETE BASE �__ --_ _ PLANT SCIENCE BUILDING MOVEABLETABLES T I SURGE A I NEW STEPS -- -I 1 AND CHAIRS(TVP I I I = CONCRETE RETAINING COLORED CONCRETE - I WALL WITH STONE CAP PAVEMENT(TYP.) I _: I I - • AND BARRIER RAIL_ FUTURE BUILDING f' PLANTING STRIP 'PLANTER WITH NEW I I < PROPOSED SHADE IRNAMENTAL TREES(TYP.) I _ • TREES(TYP.) 6EE KENNEDY HALL PLAZA I I _j "SHARED USE PATH",12'WIDE NLARGEMENT-SHEET L-17 '' EXISTING KENNEDY HALL - i ACADEMIC • TREE ITYP.) BIORETENTION • i SURGE B r I BASIN I I I I REALIGN AND REGRADE PATH S%MAX.SLOPE) PROPOSED I - - CORNELL STANDARD I I - SHADE TREES BIKE RACKS ON (TYP.) I I GRANITE SETTS(TYP.) T • 1-�.. LE— -d \ BOLLARDS - O� 1 0F �r1 q i - av 1za NORTH urol AG QUAD Date:August 1,2014 8 p CORNELL UNIVERSITY- t CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Drawing Number: L.-9A S91Jfi Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc ITHACA, NEWYORK OVERALL DESIGN PLAN-ALTERNATIVE I I+ASSOCIATES,LLC. !/ at D 11 0• Landscape AmivWm 1$ito Nanning I Urbnn De•gn O O PROPOSED RESOLUTION Site Plan Review Declaration of Lead Agency Ag. Quad Renovations Cornell University Planning&Development Board February 23,2016 WHEREAS: 6 NYCRR, Part 617, of the State Environmental Quality Review Law and Chapter 176.6 of the City Code, Environmental Quality Review,require a Lead Agency be established for conducting Environmental Review of projects, in accordance with local and state environmental law, and WHEREAS: the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board has one pending application for Site Plan Review for landscape renovations to the Ag. Quad, located on the Cornell University campus, by Cornell University, applicant and owner, and WHEREAS: the applicant proposes to renovate the existing landscape and replace underground utilities in the Agricultural Quad. The project is needed to upgrade existing utilities and enhance accessibility, expand gathering spaces, and provide new lighting and site furnishings. Site work will include removal of all existing hardscape, as well as 14 trees, installation of new pedestrian paths, plazas, stone bench seating, lighting, and blue light phones, as well as new plantings with amended soil conditions. The project also includes a large bioretention area east of Kennedy Hall. The project is in the U-1 Zoning District, and WHEREAS: this is an Type I Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance ("CEQRO"), §176-4 B(1)(h)[4], and the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"), §617.4(b)(9), and is subject to Environmental Review. WHEREAS: State Law specifies that for actions governed by local environmental review the Lead Agency shall be that local agency which has primary responsibility for approving and funding or carrying out the action, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED: that the City of Ithaca Planning and Development Board does hereby declare itself Lead Agency for the Environmental Review for the action of site plan approval for the project. Moved by: Seconded by: In Favor: Against: Abstain: Absent: Vacancies: 0 CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street—3rd Floor Ithaca,New York 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT b a JOANN CORNISH,DIRECTOR OF PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT arygyIt PHYLLISA A. DeSARNO, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone: Planning&Development—607-274-6550 Community Development/IURA—607-274-6559 Email: dgrunder@cityofithaca.org Email: iura@cityofithaca.org Fax: 607-274-6558 Fax: 607-274-6558 TO: Planning& Development Board, Common Council From: Lisa Nicholas, AICP, Senior Planner RE: 2015 Planning Board Annual Report—Site Plan Applications and Approved Projects Date: February 10, 2015 Site Plan Applications Submitted 2015: New Site Plan Applications Filed—Type, Name, Construction Cost, Fees Collected and Status Fees Project Construction Project Name Collected Status as of 2/05/16 Type Cost in 2015 Commercial Texas Roadhouse $1,350,000 $2,025 Under Construction Residential 804 E. State Street House $600,000 $900 Under Construction Commercial Johnson School Dryden Road $12,000,000 $18,000 Under Construction Residential 707 E Seneca St $585,000 $878 Complete Mixed Use 210 Hancock Street Redevelopment $13,771,000 $20,656 Approved-Mar. 2016 Construction Public Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation $1,000,000 N/A Approved-2017 Construction Commercial Maguire Fiat/Chrysler Renovations $360,000 $540 Approved-Est.2016 Construction Commercial Ithaca Plaza Pad Site $600,000 $900 Approved-Est.2016 Construction Commercial Tompkins Financial Headquarters $26,500,000 $39,750 Approved-Est.2016 Construction Residential 215-212 Spencer St. $2,000,000 $3,000 Approved-Construction Unknown Mixed Use Chain Works District $8,645,050* $6485 In Approval Process Commercial 416 E. State St. Project N/A $50 Withdrawn Mixed Use State Street Triangle N/A $60,000 Withdrawn Residential 4-Unit Multi-Family 525 W. Green St. N/A $225 Withdrawn Residential 815 S.Aurora St.4-Story Apartments N/A $1,200 Withdrawn Commercial Herson Wagner Funeral Home N/A $750 Withdrawn Total $66,826,050** $154,709 *Phase 1 of project only ** Excludes withdrawn projects 1 2015 Planning Board Annual Report Site Plan Projects Approved in 2015 2015:Approved Housing Projects- Number,Type and Number of New Units All New Housing Units For Sale For Rent Market Market LMI LMI Student** 95* Rate Rate** 7 1 59 12 16 *Excludes Canceled Projects * *Applicant's target market 2015 Approved Commercial Projects—Type,and New Square Feet All New Commercial Industrial General Commercial Office 123,563 0 20,563 110,000 Site Plan Approvals—Five Year Activity 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Number of Board Approvals 18 19 14 12 13 Number of Staff Approvals n/a n/a 12 7 6 Fees Received—Full Site Plan Review $79,142 $113,544 $83,831 $167,614 $154,709 Fees Received -Staff Review n/a n/a $700 $600 $300 Est. Construction Cost—Board Approved Projects* $54,228,566 $64,315,500 $69,904,800 $53,241,650 $110,751,000 Est.Construction Cost—Staff Approved Projects n/a n/a $11,283,195 $3,050,000 $3,080,000 SF of Commercial Development Approved in 2015 71,311 SF 117,179 SF 102,057 SF 25,800 123,563 *Excludes withdrawn or cancelled projects Attachments: Major Development Projects 2009-February 2016 (showing developments of all types) List of Housing Units- Name, Location, Number,Type and Completion Status 2006-2014 (showing type, number and completion status) Housing Units Approved, Built, and Under Construction 2006-2015, and Pending Construction in 2016 (showing numbers and percentages by type and completion status) "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification." 2 Summary of Major Development Projects 2009- January 2016 Total Investments: $366,132,610 Complete, Under Construction or Planned for 2016 Site Plan Review Fees Collected: $551,447 Projects listed here (does not include cancelled or smaller projects) Total New SF of Commercial Space 610,606 Complete, Under Construction or Planned for 2016 Total New Dwellings: 1,045 Complete, Under Construction or Planned for 2016 Low/Moderate Dwellings: 153 Complete, Under Construction or Planned for 2016 Projects in Development in 2016(Not yet approved- Unknown construction date) Chainworks District Mixed Use Up to 915 Housing Units over 10-15 years Dewitt House (Old Library Site) Up to 60 Housing Units and 13,000 SF of Commercial Space Gun Hill Apartments Hughes Hall (Cornell) Planning Development February 2016 3 Housing and Mixed Use Projects Total For Rent Status Project Name Construction Fees SQ. FT For Low/Mod Cost Collected Commercial Sale Apts Income Student Complete Breckenridge $10,700,000 $16,050 50 50 0 Complete Magnolia House $2,236,000 $3,354 14 14 0 Complete 309 Eddy Street-Apts $2,400,000 $3,600 24 0 24 Complete 601-W. Seneca Street Apts $1,000,000 $1,500 24 0 24 Complete 107 Cook Street $865,000 $1,297 4 0 4 Complete Seneca Way Apts. $7,081,500 $10,622 9,311 39 0 0 Complete Coal Yard Apt Phase 2 $2,534,000 $3,801 24 0 24 Complete Aurora St Dwelling Circle $550,000 $825 3 0 0 0 Complete Thurston Avenue Apartments $3,000,000 $4,815 20 0 20 Complete Stone Quarry Apartments $7,000,000 $9,460 35 35 0 Complete Collegetown Terrace Apts Buildings 1-E $16,666,660 $25,000 354 0 354 Complete 707 E. Seneca Street House $585,000 $548 6 0 6 Complete 114 Catherine St. Apartment Building $500,000 $750 3 0 3 Complete Cayuga Place Residences $6,000,000 $0 44 0 0 Complete 140 College Ave. Addition $865,000 $1,297 3 0 3 Under Construction 205 Taughannock $350,000.00 $50.00 7 0 0 Under Construction 804&810 E. State Street $822,000 $620 6 0 6 Under Construction 327 Eddy St. Mixed-Use Apartment Building $5,000,000 $7,500 4,100 22 0 22 Under Construction Dryden South Mixed-Use Project $5,000,000 $7,500 2,100 10 0 10 Under Construction Collegetown Crossing $5,500,000 $8,250 5,000 50 0 50 Under Construction Collegetown Terrace Apts- Building 7 N/A N/A 235 0 235 Under Construction Carey Building $1,600,000 $2,400 3,600 17 0 0 Subtotals $80,255,160 $109,239 24,111 3 991 99 785 Construction 2016 210 Hancock Street $13,771,000 $20,656 10,000 8 54 54 0 Subtotals $13,771,000 $20,656 10,000 8 54 54 0 Approved Projects-Unknown Construction Date Construction date Unknown 215-212 Spencer St. $2,000,000 $3,000 0 12 0 12 Construction date Unknown 128 W. Falls St. Residences $485,000 $728 0 6 0 0 Construction date Unknown Harold Square $27,000,000 $20,166 52,200 72 0 0 Construction date Unknown 323 Taughannock $29,485,000 $5,250 230 20 0 0 Subtotals $58,970,000 $29,144 52,430 0 110 0 12 Total Fees SQ. FT For For Rent Construction Collected Commercial Sale Apts Low/Mod Student Cost Income Total Complete, Under Construction or Construction Planned for 2016 $94,026,160 $159,038 34,111 11 1045 153 785 Planning Development February 2016 4 Commercial Projects(Office, Retail, Hotel & Medical ) Total Fees SQ. FT Status Project Name Construction Collected Commercial Cost Complete Maines Source $1,500,000 $2,250 25,300 Complete Airplane Factory Renovations $274,050 $435 0 Complete Maguire Vehicle Sales Lot $43,600 $100 0 Complete Honda of Ithaca $350,000 $550 5,636 Complete Tim Hortons $500,000 $750 2,500 Complete Enterprise Rent-A-Car $350,000 $450 0 Complete Maguire Automotive $150,000 $225 595 Complete 111 Tioga St. (fagade) $80,000 $200 1,100 Complete Ports of NY Expansion $2,000 $50 255 Complete Ports of NY Green House $6,000 $50 500 Complete Delta Chi Improvements $227,000 $341 0 Complete 359 Elmira Road-Fairfield Inn $6,500,000 $9,750 59500 Complete Wal-Mart Outparcel $784,800 $1,122 28,663 Complete Pressbay Alley Marketplace $150,000 $50 0 Complete Planned Parenthood $4,100,000 $6,150 6,500 Complete Crossfit Pallas Gym&Black Irish Boxing $700,000 $1,050 10,384 Complete Colitvare $5,400,000 $0 0 Complete Purity Ice Cream Mixed-Use $3,664,000 $5,746 2,866 Under Construction 209-215 Dryden Road(Johnson School) $12,000,000 $18,000 60,000 Under Construction Former Kmart $424,000 $659 14,744 Under Construction Holiday Inn Express $3,000,000 $4,500 11,555 Under Construction Rick's Rental World Expansion $100,000 $200 2,430 Under Construction Downtown Marriot $15,000,000 $25,000 100,649 Under Construction Texas Roadhouse $1,350,000 $2,025 7,163 Subtotal $56,655,450 $79,653 340,340 2016 Construction Ithaca Plaza Pad Site $600,000.00 $900.00 3,400 2016 Construction Maguire Fiat $425,000 $638 8,910 2016 Construction Tompkins Financial Headquarters $26,500,000 $39,750 110,000 2016 Construction Downtown Canopy Hotel $11,500,000 $12,250 100,000 2016 Construction Hotel Ithaca Renovation $11,000,000 $16,500 13,845 Subtotal $50,025,000.00 $70,037.50 236,155 Approved Projects-Unknown Construction Date Construction Unknown Wegmans Retail Building $4,000,000.00 $6,000.00 15,700 Construction Unknown 4-Story Hotel $1,700,000 $2,550 27,600 Subtotal $5,700,000 $8,550 43,300 Total Fees SQ. FT Construction Cost Collected Commercial Grand Total Complete,Pending&In Process $106,680,450 $158,240 610,606 Planning Development February 2016 5 Institutional Projects (Cornell & IC) Total Fees Status Project Name Construction Collected SF Cost Complete Big Red Marching Band $1,800,000 $2,700 5,200 Complete Cornell Law School Addition $13,084,000 $19,626 16,500 Complete University Ave Reconstruction $1,400,000 $2,100 0 Complete Cornell Rowing Center $4,930,000 $7,395 9,600 Complete IC Boathouse $1,600,000 $2,400 6,000 Complete Kite Hill Electrical Substation Upgrade $983,000 $1,475 0 Complete Cornell Univ. Means Restriction $4,899,000 $7,348 0 Complete Cornell Univ. CIS Building $31,000,000 $46,725 103,000 Complete Kimball Hall Renovations $9,000,000 $50 0 Complete Statler Hall East Avenue Entry $2,400,000 $3,600 1,500 Complete Cascadilla Trail Rehab $300,000 $450 0 Under Construction Upson Hall Renovation $40,000,000 $60,000 0 Under Construction Garden Ave/Tower Rd. Intersection $530,000 $50 0 Under Construction Klarman Hall (Goldwin Smith Hall) $28,000,000 $42,000 67,511 Under Construction Gannett Health Center $25,500,000 $38,250 35,000 Total $165,426,000 $234,169 244,311 Planning Development February 2016 6 Planning Board 2015 Annual Report:Housing List of Housing Units-Name, Location, Number,Type and Completion Status 2006-2015 Page 1 of 1 Units: Number&Type Year Project Name Project Address Units for Sale Units For Rent w/Target Market Approved N6888 LMI Student Market Rate SFH Dplx LMI Units #BR Units #BR Units #BR 0 2006 Coalyard Apartments Phase 1 143 Maple Avenue 10 14 c v 2006 Cayuga Green Apartments Green Street 68 88 2006 Top of the Hill 320 Dr den Rd 15 40 0• 2006 719-23 Hudson Street 719-23 Hudson Street 1 x 2006 Lakeview SRO 310 Third St 38 38 38 38 0 2007 Cedar Creek Apartments Floral Ave 39 88 39 88 3 2007 616 W.Buffalo St 616 W.Buffalo St 17 24 17 24 2008 Cayuga Green II Cayuga Street 39 50 39 50 v Y 2009 Coalyard Apartments Phase 11 143 Maple Av 24 39 24 39 3 2009 Aurora St Dwelling Circle Aurora St 3 2010 130-32 The Commons 130-32 The Commons 8 8 2 2 6 6 2010 309 Eddy Street—A is 309 Eddy St 24 45 24 45 2010 601-W.Seneca Street A is 601 Seneca 24 47 24 47 t o 2010 Magnolia House N Meadow St 1 14 14 14 14 t a 2011 Collegetown Terrace E State St 354 532 354 1 532 N 2011 140 College Ave 140 College Ave 3 12 3 12 � N 2011 Breckenridge 100 Seneca 50 60 50 60 o '0 2011 Seneca WayA is 120 Seneca Way39 44 39 44 a 2012/14 Stone QuarryApt 400 Spencer Street 35 82 35 82 •y 2012 Housing(4 Units) 107 Cook St 4 12 4 12 4 2012 201 Grandview 201 Grandview 1 2 1 2 1 x 2013 Apartments Thurston Avenue 20 59 20 59 20 °' 2013 Harold's Square The Commons 46 64 46 64 R v w 2014 Dryden South Mixed-Use 205 Dryden Rd. 10 40 10 40 0 2014 Residential Mixed-Use 323 Taughannock Blvd. 21 26 21 26 `� 2014 Duplex 605 S Aurora St 2 6 2 6 0 2014 Collegetown Crossing 307 College Ave 11 46 96 46 96 cncn 2014 Residential Mixed-Use 327 Eddy St. 22 56 22 56 V 2014 Apartment Building 114 Catherine St. 3 17 1 3 1 17 w 2014 Apartments(Carey Building) 324 E State/MLK Blvd. 16 20 16 20 ¢ 2014 Apartments 205 Taughannock 7 10 7 10 a 2015 Apartments 707 E Seneca 6 18 6 18 C 2015 Duplexes 1128 W Falls St 5 12 5 w > 2015 Duplexes 1804&810 E State St 6 18 6 18 cc 2015 Multi Family&Townhomes 1210 Hancock 7 7 59 89 59 89 °- a 2015 Apartments 212-215 S ecer St 12 16 1 1 12 15 a No anticipated construction date=67 Units TOTALS 11 =0 7 1087 1786 237 373 550 1006 300 419 2006 Coalyard Apartments Phase 1 143 Maple Avenue 10 14 10 14 2006 Cayuga Green Apartments Green Street 68 88 68 88 2006 Top of the Hill 320 Dryden Rd 15 40 15 40 2006 719-23 Hudson Street 719-23 Hudson Street 1 2006 Lakeview SRO 310 Third St 11 38 38 38 38 2007 Cedar Creek Apartments Floral Ave 39 88 39 88 N 2007 616 W.Buffalo St 616 W.Buffalo St 17 24 17 24 0 2010 130-32 The Commons 130-32 The Commons 8 8 8 8 N 2009 Coalyard Apartments Phase 11 143 Maple Avenue 24 39 24 39 F 2010 309 Eddy Street—A is 309 Eddy St 24 45 24 45 W 2011 140 College Ave 140 College Ave 3 12 3 12 2011 Collegetown Terrace-Phase 1 E State/MLK Blvd 140 210 140 210 a 2012 Housing(4 Units) 107 Cook St 4 12 4 12 w 2010 Apartments 601-W.Seneca St. 24 47 24 47 ¢ 2010 Magnolia House N Meadow St 14 14 14 14 Q 2011 Breckenridge 100 Seneca 50 60 50 60 J 0 2011 Seneca Way A is 120 Seneca Way 37 44 1 37 44 w 2009 Aurora St Dwelling Circle N Aurora St 3 H J 2011 Collegetown Terrace Phase 2 E State/MLK Blvd 71 106 71 106 a 2012 Apartment 201 Grandview 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 2013 Thurston Avenue A is Thurston Avenue 20 59 20 59 V 2008 Cayuga Green II Cayuga St. 39 50 45 66 2012 Stone Quarry Apt 400 Spencer Street 35 82 35 82 2014 Duplex 605 S Aurora St 1 2 6 2 6 2014 Apartment Building 114 Catherine St. 3 17 3 17 2015 707 Sececa Street 707 Seneca Street 6 18 6 18 TOTALS: 4 0 0 692 1123 176 282 1 323 579 199 278 Duplex-2 units 413 Lincoln 2 2 2 Single Family Home Westmount Dr 1 0 Duplex-2 units 313 Corn St. 2 2 2 Single FamilyHome 502 First St 1 1 N Single Family Home 104 Hopper PI 1 0 Duplex-2 units 301 Madison 2 2 v Single Family Home 102 Hopper PI 1 1 Single Family Home 507 Warren 1 1 M Duplex-2 units 638 Spencer 2 6 2 6 o Duplex-2 units 634 Spencer 2 6 2 6 0 Duplex-2 units 636 Spencer 2 6 2 6 Duplex-2 units 407 Elm St 2 2 m a Single Family Home 409 Elm St 1 1 0 c Duplex-2 units 317 Corn St 2 2 0 N Single Family Home 711 Hancock 1 1 > Single Family Home Floral Ave 1 3 0 Duplex-2 units 528-30 Chestnut St. 4 4 a o Duplex-2 units 806 State St 1 2 6 2 6 Q N Duplex-2 units 808 State St 2 6 2 6 Z Duplex-2 units 305 Falls St 2 2 N Duplex-2 units 507 Cascadilla St 2 2 Duplex-2 units 122 Sunrise St. 1 1 1 = Single Family Home 120 Pearl St 1 w Single Family Home 215 Cornell St 1 H cn Duplex-2 units 502 Hudson Street 2 6 2 6 o Duplex-2 units 504 Hudson Street 2 6 2 6 w oC Duplex-2 units 108 Blair Street 1 2 6 1 2 6 LU Duplex-2 units 214 Second Street 2 2 Q Single Family Home 1 Westwood Knoll 1 V CI) Single Family Home 203 Pearl St 1 Sin Ie Family Home 1201 Clinton St 1 1 TOTALS: 13 20 25 20 52 6 18 10 1 30 0 2015 4 Duplexes 804&810 E State St 6 18 6 18 c 2014 Apartments(Carey Building) 324 E State/MLK St. 16 1 20 16 20 i 2014 Apartments 205 Taughannock 7 10 7 10 y 2014 Dryden South Mixed-Use 205 Dryden Rd. 10 40 8 32 0 R 2014 Collegetown Crossing 307 College Ave 46 96 46 96 2011 Collegetown Terrace Building 7 E State/MLK St. 142 213 1 142 213 0 2014 1 Residential Mixed-Use 1327 Eddy St. 22 56 1 22 1 56 m TOTALS 0 0 0 249 453 0 0 224 415 23 30 6 2015 IMulti Family&Townhomes 1210 Hancock 7 7 59 89 59 89 t2 2015 JApartments 212-215 S ecer St 12 16 12 15 cmo c 2015 Duplexes 128 W Falls St 5 12 5 12 a 0 TOTALS 7 0 7 76 117 59 89 0 0 17 27 7 Planning Board 2015 Annual Report-Housing Summary Housing Units Approved, Built, and Under Construction 2006-2015, and Pending Construction in 2016 LMI = Low/Moderate Income FOR SALE FOR RENT ° % ° °/° #Not %not Housing Units #all # LMI /°LMI Total for #Not %Not Total /o for # Approved in Units Units Units for Sale Sale #LMI %LMI LMI LMI For Rent Student Student #LMI %LMI LMI LMI Rent 2015* 95 66 69% 8 1.6% 7 88% 1 13% 87 92% 12 14% 59 68% 28 32% FOR SALE FOR RENT /o not Housing Units #all # LMI %LMI Total %for #Not %Not Total %for # % #Not ° g Units Units Units for Sale Sale #LMI %LMI LMI LMI For Rent Student Student #LMI %LMI LMI LMI Approved Rent 2006-2015* 1151 275 24% 44 4% 32 73% 12 27% 1107 96% 560 51% 243 21% 864 78% FOR SALE FOR RENT Housing Units #all # LMI %LMI Total %for #LMI %LMI #Not %Not For Total %for # % #LMI %LMI #Not ° /°not Built Units Units Units for Sale Sale LMI LMI Rent Rent Student Student LMI LMI 2006-2015 749 207 28% 37 5% 25 68% 12 32% 712 95% 333 47% 182 26% 530 74% FOR SALE FOR RENT HousingUnits o o ° Total o o #Not %not #all # LMI /o LMI Total /o for #LMI %LMI #Not /o Not For /°for # /° #LMI %LMI Under Units Units Units for Sale Sale LMI LMI Rent Student Student LMI LMI Construction as Rent of Jan 2016 249 0 0% 0 0% 0 N/A 0 N/A 249 100% 224 90% 0 0% 249 100% FOR SALE FOR RENT Housing Units #all # LM Total #Not /o notI %LMI Total %for #Not %Not %for # % ° Pending Units Units Units for Sale Sale #LMI %LMI LMI LMI For Rent Student Student #LMI %LMI LMI LMI Construction in Rent 2016 83 66 801% 1 7 8% 7 100% 0 0% 1 76 92% 0 0% 59 77.6% 17 220% *Does not include projects that have been canceled or for which Site Plan Approval has expired As of February 6,2016 Yearly DevTotals&Housing UnitsJ:\GROUPS\Planning and Dev Board\Yearly DevTotals&Housing Units