HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-02-11 Common Council Meeting AgendaOFFICIAL NOTICE OF MEETING
A Regular meeting of the Common Council will be held on Wednesday March 2, 2011,
at 6:00 p.m. in the Common Council Chambers at City Hall, 108 East Green Street,
Ithaca, New York. Your attendance is requested.
AGENDA
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
2. ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA:
3. PROCLAMATIONS/AWARDS:
4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS BEFORE COUNCIL:
5.1 Update from the City of Ithaca Youth Council
6. PETITIONS AND HEARINGS OF PERSONS BEFORE COUNCIL:
7. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR – COMMON COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR:
8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
City Administration Committee:
8.1 Police Department Request to Amend 2011 Budget - Resolution
8.2 Human Resources Request to Amend the Human Resources Department 2011
Budget – Resolution
8.3 IURA - Downtown Housing Market Study Funding Request - Resolution
9. PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:
No items were submitted for the agenda.
10. CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE:
10.1 IURA - Establish Capital Project for Ithaca Falls Overlook Investigation and
Remediation Project - Resolution
10.2 Information Technology - Policy Regarding Appropriate Use of Computer,
Network and Phone Resources
10.3 Planning & Development - Establishment of Trust Fund for Martin Luther King Jr.
Freedom Walkway - Resolution
10.4 DPW - Intersection Bulb-outs on West Green & West Seneca Street at Corn
and Plain Streets - Resolution
10.5 DPW - Master Agreement for Floral Avenue Multi-Use Trail Facility - Resolution
10.6 DPW - Master Agreement for Traffic Signal Upgrade Phase II - Resolution
10.7 Human Resources - Request For Extension of Supplemental Military Leave
Benefits – Resolution
10.8 Human Resources - Amendment to Personnel Roster – Resolution
10.9 Human Resources - Request To Transfer Funds From Unrestricted Contingency
Resolution
Common Council Agenda
March 2, 2011
Page 2
10. CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE (CONTINUED):
10.10 Attorney’s Office - A Local Law to Amend the Charter of the City of Ithaca,
Section C-10 (“Election and terms of office of Mayor, Judge and Council
members”), to provide for certain two-year terms following the federal census in
conjunction with the possible redistricting of City wards.
10.11 Attorney’s Office - Approval of Agreement between Village of Cayuga
Heights and the City for Building Inspection Services - Resolution
10.12 City Controller’s Report
11. REPORTS OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES:
12. NEW BUSINESS:
12.1 Viva Taqueria & Cantina Alcohol Permit Request - Resolution
12.2 Possible Motion to Enter Into Executive Session to Discuss Possible Litigation -
Resolution
13. INDIVIDUAL MEMBER – FILED RESOLUTIONS:
13.1 Alderperson Zumoff - Endorsement of and Authorization to Implement the
Allocation of Costs Associated with a Lawsuit Against the City of Ithaca
Regarding the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility Site (NYSEG v.
FirstEnergy Corp.; FirstEnergy Corp. v. City of Ithaca, et al) - Resolution
14. MAYOR’S APPOINTMENTS:
14.1 Reappointment to Civil Service Commission – Resolution
15. REPORTS OF COMMON COUNCIL LIAISONS:
16. REPORT OF CITY CLERK:
17. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY:
18. MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
18.1 Approval of the January 31, 2011 Special Meeting Minutes – Resolution
18.2 Approval of the February 2, 2011 Regular Meeting Minutes – Resolution
18.3 Approval of the February 8, 2011 Special Meeting Minutes – Resolution
19. ADJOURNMENT:
If you have a disability that will require special arrangements to be made in order for you
to fully participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 274-6570 at least 48
hours before the meeting.
______________________________
Julie Conley Holcomb, CMC
City Clerk
Date: February 25, 2011
8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
City Administration Committee:
8.1 Police Department Request to Amend 2011 Budget - Resolution
WHEREAS, the Ithaca Police Department will be hosting a training titled “Traffic Crash
Reconstruction I” and
WHEREAS, the course cost is $1,100 per participant with 12 participants expected, and
WHEREAS, the tuitions paid by participants will be used to pay for expenses related to
the course, and
WHEREAS, the training course was not part of the 2011 authorized Police Department
budget; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby approves the following 2011 budget
amendment for the purpose of accounting for said training program in the amount of
$13,200 as follows:
Increase Revenue Account:
A3120-2770 Unclassified Revenue $13,200
Increase Appropriation Account:
A3120-5440-5001 Staff Development $13,200
8.2 Human Resources Request to Amend the Human Resources Department
2011 Budget - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca has included in its 2011 authorized budget $5,000 for
thirty (30) city employees to participate in the 2011 Undoing Racism series facilitated by
David Billings from the People’s Institute for Survival and Beyond, nationally recognized
as one of the foremost anti-racism training and organizing institutions in the nation, and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca is one of several local employers participating in this
valuable experience and has agreed to serve as the point of contact for contracting with
David Billings, and
WHEREAS, local employers have committed up to the sum of $10,000 additional funds
for a total not to exceed the sum of $15,000 that will be paid to the City of Ithaca to
cover the cost of their employees participating, and
WHEREAS, the City will issue a lump sum payment not to exceed $15,000 to David
Billings for all participants; now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby amends the 2011 authorized budget for the
Human Resources Department by an amount not to exceed $10,000 for the purposes of
accounting for the 2011 Undoing Racism Series facilitated by David Billings as follows:
Increase Revenue Account:
A1430-2705 Donations $10,000
Increase Appropriation Account:
A1430-5440 Staff Development $10,000
8.3 IURA - Downtown Housing Market Study Funding Request - Resolution
WHEREAS, the Downtown Ithaca Alliance (DIA) proposes to commission a
comprehensive housing market study for downtown and center city, and
WHEREAS, the DIA has received a proposal to conduct such a study from the Danter
Company, a nationally renowned housing market research firm specializing in
residential market studies, and
WHEREAS, the study will provide an analysis of the overall demand for market-rate and
affordable multi-family apartments and condominiums in the downtown area by
rent/sales price, unit mix, unit size and absorption rate, and
WHEREAS, the study will additionally analyze the impact on housing demand if an
enhanced public transportation system connecting downtown to Cornell University and
Ithaca College were developed, and
WHEREAS, the cost of the study is $12,250, and
WHEREAS, the DIA has committed $5,250 toward the study, and seeks match funding
from Tompkins County, City of Ithaca, Cornell University and Ithaca College, and
WHEREAS, the DIA requests $2,000 in funding from the City of Ithaca for this housing
market study, and
WHEREAS, the 2011 City of Ithaca budget includes $167,000 in the unrestricted
account, and
WHEREAS, the results of the study will assist the public and private sector in
developing housing in the downtown area that would meet market demand, assess the
impact on housing demand of developing an enhanced public transit system, and
provide baseline housing data for development of the City’s Comprehensive Plan
Update; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the City of Ithaca Common Council does hereby authorize the City
Controller to make payment of an amount not to exceed $2,000 to the Downtown Ithaca
Alliance for a portion of the cost of a downtown housing market study to be conducted
by the Danter Company, and be it further
RESOLVED, That funding for this expense shall be transferred from Account # A1990 –
unrestricted contingency to Account A1010-5435 Common Council contracts.
10. CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE:
10.1 IURA - Establish Capital Project for Ithaca Falls Overlook Investigation and
Remediation Project - Resolution
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca (City) executed a State Assistance Contract (SAC) with
the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for $700,200 through
the Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) for the City-owned Ithaca Falls Overlook
site, and
WHEREAS the 0.95 acre Ithaca Falls Overlook site adjoins the former Ithaca Gun
factory building and extends from Lake Street North over the raceway to an overlook of
Ithaca Falls, and
WHEREAS, capital project funding will be used to conduct an investigation to determine
the nature and define the limits of contamination both on-site and off-site and devise
alternative strategies to remediate environmental contamination for a future public park
use and facilitate private-sector redevelopment of the adjoining former Ithaca Gun
factory site, and
WHEREAS, the project is also anticipated to include interim remedial measures to
remove existing sources of contamination, including subsurface lead contamination, and
WHEREAS, the ERP program provides 90% reimbursement for eligible on-site
expenses and 100% reimbursement for eligible off-site expenses, and
WHEREAS, the estimated total project cost is $778,000, and
WHEREAS, the 10% local match ($77,800) has been pledged to the City by the
redeveloper of the former Ithaca Gun factory site, Travis and Travis Development, LLC
per a public/private redevelopment agreement executed on September 25, 2007, and
WHEREAS, the investigation phase of the ERP qualifies as a Type II action under the
City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance at §176-5(C)(17):
“Information collection, including basic data collection and research, water quality and
pollution studies, traffic counts, engineering studies, surveys, subsurface investigations
and soils studies that do not commit the agency to undertake, fund or approve any Type
I or unlisted action”, and
WHEREAS, should the site investigation recommend undertaking any interim remedial
measures to remove source contamination, such action shall undergo a separate
environmental review; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Common Council hereby establishes Capital Project # 768 Ithaca
Falls Overlook Investigation & Remediation in an amount not to exceed $778,000 for
the purpose of accounting for project expenses to be reimbursed from the ERP program
and Travis and Travis Development, LLC, and be it further
RESOLVED, That funds needed for said Capital Project be derived from the issuance of
bonds or the advance from the General Fund with later repayment from the ERP and
Travis Development.
10.2 Information Technology - Policy Regarding Appropriate Use of Computer,
Network and Phone Resources - Resolution
WHEREAS, the Department of Information Technology has collaborated with City staff
as a whole to develop a policy regarding the appropriate use of computer, network and
phone resources; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby adopts the “Policy Regarding Appropriate
Use of Computer, Network and Phone Resources” dated February 15, 2011.
Policy Regarding Appropriate Use of Computer, Network and Phone Resources
City of Ithaca
Draft
2/15/11
1.0 Overview
The City of Ithaca is committed to protecting the City's employees, partners and the
municipality from illegal or damaging actions performed knowingly or unknowingly by
individuals while using the City’s computer, network, and phone resources. Such
resources include but are not limited to computer equipment, phone equipment, cell
phones, software, operating systems, storage media, electronic mail, World Wide Web
browsers, and file transfer tools. These resources and/or related licenses are the
property of the City and are to be used only for business purposes in serving the
interests of the City, its partners and its customers, with the exception of allowable
incidental personal use. It is the responsibility of every user of a City computer, network,
or phone resource to know this policy, and to conduct activities accordingly.
Note that the usage of the term “network” throughout this document refers to all wired
and wireless data and communication networks owned or leased by the City that
constitute the City’s Institutional Network, or that connect to the City’s Institutional
Network either directly via a network interconnection or indirectly via a device that
resides within the City’s Institutional Network.
2.0 Definitions
Term Definition
Denial of Service Preventing legitimate users of a service from using that service.
Forged Routing Routing information which is misleading or incorrect or which
Information would tend to disguise the origin of the routed material. Usually refers to
information that is not generated by any routing device (such as a mail server), but is
inserted by a party using software which is designed to produce false routing
information (headers in the case of E-mail). Can provide unauthorized access to a
computer resource or generate denial-of-service attacks.
Log in or login To gain secured access to a computer, or to a resource accessed
through a computer, by use of credentials assigned. Typically, credentials consist of a
user name or account name, and an associated password.
Log off or logoff To discontinue secured access to a computer or to a resource
accessed through a computer.
Malware Any computer code created and distributed for malicious purposes.
Network Sniffing A process of observing all of the traffic flowing into and out of a
computer attached to a network. Similar to eavesdropping on a phone line.
Packet Spoofing One of the most common forms of on-line camouflage that allows
an attacker to gain unauthorized access to a computer or a network.
Pinged Flood A simple type of denial-of-service attack.
Pop-up A form of web advertising or dialog box that appears in a new window.
Port Scanning Probing a computing resource that is connected to the network to
discover information about its access points. Hackers use this method to test for
possible weaknesses.
Security Scanning A means of testing a network for security vulnerabilities.
Spam Unauthorized and/or unsolicited electronic mass mailings.
3.0 Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to set forth the acceptable use of computer, network, and
phone resources of the City of Ithaca. The goals are to protect the user and the City, to
facilitate excellent service to the community, and to ensure the appropriate use of
taxpayer funds. Inappropriate use of these resources exposes the City to risks including
malware attacks; unauthorized access to City computer, network, and phone resources;
and legal consequences.
4.0 Scope
This policy applies to all employees, contractors, consultants and other workers in the
City, including all personnel affiliated with third parties, who access any computer,
network, or phone resource that is owned or leased by the City.
5.0 Policy
5.1 General Use and Ownership
1. Users of the City’s computer, phone and network resources must be aware that
the data they create and/or store on the City's systems remains the property of the City
of Ithaca. Because of the need to protect the City's assets and interests, management
cannot guarantee the privacy of information stored on any computer, network, or phone
resource belonging to the City with the exception of legally confidential information.
2. Users of the City’s computer, phone and network resources may use them for
incidental personal purposes in a manner that does not violate any City policy nor
interfere with the performance of their duties nor incur any cost to the City.
3. The City reserves the right to audit computer, network and phone resources as
needed to ensure compliance with this policy.
a. The Director of Human Resources, Director of Information Technology, or a
department head may request an audit of any computer, network or phone resource to
investigate possible misuse when a reasonable suspicion might arise. The respective
department head and either the Director of Human Resources (or her/his designee) or
the Director of Information Technology (or her/his designee) must be present for the
audit. The audit must be performed by a computer technician designated by the Director
of Information Technology; and the date, time and outcome of the audit must be
documented.
b. A Department Head may request an audit of any computer, network or phone
resource in their departments for a legitimate business purpose, e.g., the need to
access information when an employee is absent for an extended period of time. The
department head (or her/his designee) and the Director of Information Technology (or
her/his designee) must be present for the audit. The audit must be performed by a
computer technician designated by the Director of Information Technology; and the
date, time and outcome of the audit must be documented.
c. The Director of Information Technology (or her/his designee) may access
computer, network and phone resources as needed to resolve an emergency. An
emergency occurs during a disruption to a service essential to the operation of any
department.
5.2 Security and Confidential Information
1. Users shall take all necessary and prudent steps to prevent unauthorized access
to the City’s computer, network and phone resources, and to the City’s data.
2. Authorized users are responsible for the security of their passwords and
accounts, and shall not share accounts and/or passwords.
3. Login access to all computer, network and phone resources must be secured
using a security measure approved by the Department of Information Technology.
Users must log off any resource that will go unattended for 15 or more minutes; and the
automatic logoff feature must be set to activate if the resource goes unused for 15
minutes.
4. Postings by any employee or agent of the City to any newsgroups, message
boards, Web forums or other public forums from a City email address or by use of any
City electronic resource must be consistent with the responsibilities and professional
standards of their position.
5. All computer, network or phone resources, whether owned by the user or the
City, when connected to the City network shall continually execute approved anti-virus
software with a current set of virus definitions.
6. Users must use extreme caution when opening e-mail attachments received from
unknown senders. Such attachments may contain viruses, worms, e-mail bombs, Trojan
horse code, or other forms of malware.
7. Users must use caution with pop-ups that appear via a web browser. If possible,
they should activate the pop-up blocker provided with their web browser. Pop-ups often
provide a means for malware to transfer onto a computer. The most dangerous are pop-
ups that announce a malware infection on your computer which can be sanitized using
their advertised anti-virus or security solution. This deceptive advertising provides no
solution; instead, it actually transfers malware onto your computer.
8. For security and network maintenance purposes, individuals authorized by the
Director of Information Technology may monitor equipment, systems and network traffic
at any time.
5.3 Unacceptable Use
The following activities are prohibited. Some users may be exempted from certain of
these restrictions if their legitimate job responsibilities require them to perform actions
otherwise defined as unacceptable (e.g., systems administration staff may have a need
to disable the network access of a device if that device is disrupting production
services). However, under no circumstances is an employee or agent of the City
authorized or permitted to engage in any activity that is illegal under local, state or
federal law while utilizing City-owned resources.
5.3.1 System and Network Activities
The following activities are prohibited:
1. Violations of laws or regulations pertaining to copyright, trade secret, patent or
other intellectual property rights, including, but not limited to, the installation or
distribution of "pirated" or other software products that are not appropriately licensed for
use by the City.
2. Revealing one’s account password to others or allowing use of one’s account by
others. This includes family and other household members when work is being done at
home.
3. Allowing use of City-owned equipment and resources by unauthorized persons
including family and other household members.
4. Using a City computer, network or phone resource to deliberately engage in
procuring or transmitting material that is in violation of or inconsistent with the following
City rules or policies (except when doing so is solely for the purpose of fulfilling the
user’s normal job duties, such as investigation of a crime or violation of policy):
a. Sexual Harassment Policy,
b. Workplace Violence Prevention Policy,
c. Employee Standards of Conduct,
d. Code of Ethics,
e. Electronic Mail Policy,
f. Other City policies.
5. Intentionally causing security breaches or disruptions of City network resources.
Security breaches include, but are not limited to, accessing data of which the user is not
an intended recipient, or logging into a server or account that the user is not expressly
authorized to access, unless these actions are within the scope of regular duties. For
purposes of this section, "disruption" includes, but is not limited to, network sniffing,
pinged floods, packet spoofing, denial of service, and forged routing information for
malicious purposes. (Please see section 2 above for definitions).
6. Port scanning or security scanning is expressly prohibited unless this activity is a
part of the user's normal job duties. (Please see section 2 above for definitions).
7. Executing any form of network monitoring which will intercept data not intended
for the user, unless this activity is a part of the user's normal duties.
8. Circumventing user authentication practices or other security measures related to
any equipment, network or account, unless this activity is a part of the user's normal job
duties.
9. Intentionally interfering with or denying service to any user or device (for
example, denial of service attack). (Please see section 2 above for definitions).
10. Using any program, script or command, or sending messages of any kind, with
the intent to interfere with a user's terminal session or network connection, either locally
or via the Internet.
11. Connecting an unauthorized device such as a router, switch, hub, phone, or
computer to the City’s data or phone networks except as allowed either via advertised
guest accounts or by approval of the Director of Information Technology.
12. Providing information about computer or electronic accounts of City employees to
parties outside the City, except as a part of one’s normal job duties.
13. Accessing Internet Radio, Internet Television and/or other audio or video
streaming of a commercial or entertainment nature may be done only for work-related
activity. Any exception must be approved by the involved department head and the
mayor, and may be rescinded by either.
14. Use of Internet file sharing services that function by means of peer-to-peer
network protocols, and/or that are known to facilitate the illegal distribution of
copyrighted materials. Such networks include but are not limited to Kazaa, BitTorrent,
The Pirate Bay, etc.
15. Use of a computer or other digital devices while driving except as allowed by
state or federal law.
5.3.2 Email and Phone Activities
The following activities are prohibited:
1. Any form of harassment via email, telephone or other communication device,
whether through offensive language or images, or through unreasonable frequency,
size, and/or type of messages.
2. Unauthorized use, or forging, of email header information.
3. Creating or forwarding "chain letters" or "Ponzi" or other "pyramid" schemes of
any type.
4. Use of text messaging except as required for City business purposes.
5. Use of a cell phone or other portable communication devices while driving except
as allowed by state or federal law.
6. Downloading files, ringtones and games except as required for business
purposes.
6.0 Implementation and Enforcement
The Director of Information Technology is responsible for the proper implementation of
this policy and for monitoring the use of City computer, network and phone resources.
Any user of the City’s computer, phone or network resources found to have violated this
policy may be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of
employment. Any violation shall be reported to the user’s supervisor who will be
responsible for deciding upon the appropriate discipline with guidance from the Human
Resources Department.
7.0 Revision History
10.3 Planning and Development - Establishment of Trust Fund for Martin Luther
King Jr. Freedom Walkway - Resolution
WHEREAS, in 2008 Mayor Carolyn Peterson established a committee charged with the
planning and implementation of a walk to commemorate the life, work, and spirit of
Martin Luther King Jr., and the struggles for civil rights and social justice, and
WHEREAS, the Martin Luther King Jr. Freedom Walkway Implementation Committee
has met regularly since its establishment and over that time has developed a
conceptual plan for the content and physical manifestation of such a trail, and
WHEREAS, in 2010 the Committee conducted several activities to highlight progress of
the freedom walk and to engage members of the public, including a design competition
for the development of a project logo and the development of a relationship with artist
Rob Licht who has been commissioned by a private donor to create a sculpture
commemorating Martin Luther King Jr. that, by way of agreement with the artist, will
constitute the first “marker” of the Martin Luther King Jr. Freedom Walkway, and
WHEREAS, on November 9th 2010, the Committee hosted a “Launch Party” at the
Community School of Music and Art, open to all and attended by 35 – 45 people
representing a broad spectrum of the Ithaca community, and
WHEREAS, the “launch” celebrated the unveiling of the initial Southside and Northside
trail “loops,” the unveiling of the winning logo design and announcement of the winning
artist, and the unveiling of a wax model of Rob Licht’s work in progress, and
WHEREAS, at the launch, Committee Chairperson Leslyn McBean Clairborne
encouraged attendees to get involved with the project and enumerated several specific
means of involvement including monetary donations for planning and implementation of
the Martin Luther King Jr. Freedom Walkway, and
WHEREAS, donated funds could be used for items including, but not limited to,
consultant contracts for research and development; fees for physical aspects of the trail
including artist and designer fees, fabrication of markers and signs, and development
and implementation of printed and electronic interpretive materials, and
WHEREAS, several donations were made to the Martin Luther King Jr. Freedom
Walkway, both during and after the launch event, and
WHEREAS, the Greater Ithaca Activities Center agreed to hold the funds in trust for a
limited time in order to give the Committee time to procure a permanent fund, and
WHEREAS, Committee staff has discussed with the City Controller the proposal to
establish a trust fund such that interested donors can make tax deductible donations to
the Martin Luther King Jr. Freedom Walkway, and the City Controller has suggested the
Committee seek approval from the Common Council; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the City of Ithaca Common Council establishes a trust fund dedicated
to the planning and implementation of the City of Ithaca Martin Luther King Jr. Freedom
Walkway.
10.4 DPW - Intersection Bulb-outs on West Green & West Seneca Street at Corn
and Plain Streets - Resolution
WHEREAS, a Project for the Intersection Bulb-outs on West Green & West Seneca at
Corn and Plain Streets, P.I.N. 375462 (the “Project”) is eligible for funding under Title 23
U.S. Code, as amended, that calls for the apportionment of the costs of such program to
be borne at the ratio of 80% Federal funds and 20% non-federal funds, and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca desires to advance the Project by making a commitment
of 100% of the non-federal share of the costs of Preliminary Engineering/Design; and
WHEREAS, preliminary engineering and design are exempt from further environmental
review as Type II actions; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Common Council hereby approves the above-subject project,
subject to further environmental review of construction, and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Common Council hereby authorizes the City of Ithaca to pay in
the first instance 100% of the federal and non-federal share of the cost of Preliminary
Engineering/Design work for the Project or portions thereof, and be it further
RESOLVED, That the sum of $36,000 is hereby appropriated from the issuance of
serial bonds or General Fund advance and made available to cover the cost of
participation in the above phase of the Project, and it is further
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby creates Capital Project # 769, Intersection
Bulb-outs on West Green & West Seneca Street, to include the Project costs of
$36,000, and be it further
RESOLVED, That in the event the full federal and non-federal share costs of the project
exceeds the amount appropriated above, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca
shall convene as soon as possible to appropriate said excess amount immediately upon
the notification by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) thereof,
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Mayor of the City of Ithaca be and is hereby authorized to
execute all necessary Agreements, certifications or reimbursement requests for Federal
Aid on behalf of the City of Ithaca with the NYSDOT in connection with the
advancement or approval of the Project and providing for the administration of the
Project and the municipality’s first instance funding of Project costs and permanent
funding of the local share of federal-aid and state-aid eligible Project costs and all
Project costs within appropriations therefore that are not so eligible, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this project be undertaken with the understanding that the final cost
of the Project to the City of Ithaca will be roughly 20% of said portion, currently
estimated at $7,200 of the $36,000 authorized for this portion of the project, in monies
and in-kind services as managed by the Superintendent of Public Works and monitored
by the City Controller, and be it further
RESOLVED, That a certified copy of this resolution be filed with the New York State
Commissioner of Transportation by attaching it to any necessary Agreement in
connection with the Project, and be it further
RESOLVED, This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
10.5 DPW - Master Agreement for Floral Avenue Multi-Use Trail Facility -
Resolution
(A resolution authorizing implementation and funding in the first instance 100%
of the federal aid-eligible costs and State “Marchiselli” program-aid eligible costs,
of a transportation federal-aid project, and appropriating funds therefore.)
WHEREAS, a Project for the Floral Avenue Multi-Use Trail Facility, P.I.N. 375463 (the
“Project”) is eligible for funding under Title 23 U.S. Code, as amended, that calls for the
apportionment of the costs of such program to be borne at the ratio of 80% Federal
funds and 20% non-federal funds, and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca desires to advance the Project by making a commitment
of 100% of the non-federal share of the costs of Preliminary Engineering/Design and
Right-of-Way Incidentals; and
WHEREAS, preliminary engineering and design are exempt from further environmental
review as Type II actions; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, that the Common Council hereby approves the above subject project,
subject to further environmental review of construction, and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Common Council hereby authorizes the City of Ithaca to pay in
the first instance 100% of the federal and non-federal share of the cost of Preliminary
Engineering/Design and Right-of-Way Incidentals work for the Project or portions
thereof, and be it further
RESOLVED, That the sum of $92,000 is hereby appropriated from the issuance of
serial bonds or General Fund advance and made available to cover the cost of
participation in the above phase of the Project, and be it further
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby creates Capital Project # 770, Floral
Avenue Multi-Use Trail Facility, to include the Project costs of $92,000, and be it further
RESOLVED, That in the event the full federal and non-federal share costs of the project
exceeds the amount appropriated above, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca
shall convene as soon as possible to appropriate said excess amount immediately upon
the notification by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) thereof,
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Mayor of the City of Ithaca be and is hereby authorized to
execute all necessary Agreements, certifications or reimbursement requests for Federal
Aid on behalf of the City of Ithaca with the New York State Department of
Transportation in connection with the advancement or approval of the Project and
providing for the administration of the Project and the municipality’s first instance
funding of Project costs and permanent funding of the local share of federal-aid and
state-aid eligible Project costs and all Project costs within appropriations therefore that
are not so eligible, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this project be undertaken with the understanding that the final cost
of the Project to the City of Ithaca will be roughly 20% of said portion, currently
estimated at $18,400 of the $92,000 authorized for this portion of the project, in monies
and in-kind services as managed by the Superintendent of Public Works and monitored
by the City Controller, and be it further
RESOLVED, That a certified copy of this resolution be filed with the New York State
Commissioner of Transportation by attaching it to any necessary Agreement in
connection with the Project, and be it further
RESOLVED, This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
10.6 DPW - Master Agreement for Traffic Signal Upgrade Phase II - Resolution
(A resolution authorizing implementation and funding in the first instance 100%
of the federal aid-eligible costs and State “Marchiselli” program-aid eligible costs,
of a transportation federal-aid project, and appropriating funds therefore.)
WHEREAS, a Project for the Traffic Signal Upgrade Phase II, P.I.N. 375464 (the
“Project”) is eligible for funding under Title 23 U.S. Code, as amended, that calls for the
apportionment of the costs of such program to be borne at the ratio of 80% Federal
funds and 20% non-federal funds, and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca desires to advance the Project by making a commitment
of 100% of the non-federal share of the costs of Preliminary Engineering and Design;
and
WHEREAS, the installation of traffic signals is a Type II Action exempt from further
environmental review; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Common Council hereby approves the above-subject project,
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Common Council hereby authorizes the City of Ithaca to pay in
the first instance 100% of the federal and non-federal share of the cost of Preliminary
Engineering and Design work for the Project or portions thereof, and be it further
RESOLVED, That the sum of $174,000 is hereby appropriated from the issuance of
serial bonds and made available to cover the cost of participation in the above phase of
the Project, and be it further
RESOLVED, That Common Council, as part of the 2011 authorized budget, established
Capital Project # 765, Traffic Signal Upgrade Phase II, with a project cost of $174,000
and be it further
RESOLVED, That in the event the full federal and non-federal share costs of the project
exceeds the amount appropriated above, the Common Council of the City of Ithaca
shall convene as soon as possible to appropriate said excess amount immediately upon
the notification by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) thereof,
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Mayor of the City of Ithaca be and is hereby authorized to
execute all necessary Agreements, certifications or reimbursement requests for Federal
Aid on behalf of the City of Ithaca with the New York State Department of
Transportation in connection with the advancement or approval of the Project and
providing for the administration of the Project and the municipality’s first instance
funding of Project costs and permanent funding of the local share of federal-aid and
state-aid eligible Project costs and all Project costs within appropriations therefore that
are not so eligible, and be it further
RESOLVED, That this project be undertaken with the understanding that the final cost
of the Project to the City of Ithaca will be roughly 20% of said portion, currently
estimated at $34,800 of the $174,000 authorized for this portion of the project, in
monies and in-kind services as managed by the Superintendent of Public Works and
monitored by the City Controller, and be it further
RESOLVED, That a certified copy of this resolution be filed with the New York State
Commissioner of Transportation by attaching it to any necessary Agreement in
connection with the Project, and be it further
RESOLVED, This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
10.7 Human Resources - Request For Extension of Supplemental Military Leave
Benefits - Resolution
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2001, October 2, 2002, February 5, 2003, and June 6,
2007, Common Council passed resolutions providing Supplemental Military Leave
benefits for City employees who were called to active military duty due to the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan, and
WHEREAS, the Supplemental Military Leave benefits granted by Common Council
expired on December 31, 2008, and
WHEREAS, Reservists continue to be called to active military duty due to the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan, and
WHEREAS, it continues to be the desire of Common Council to ease the financial strain
on the families of those Reservists continuing to serve their country due to active
military action; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That upon the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding with the CSEA
Administrative Unit, CSEA Department of Public Works Unit, Police Benevolent
Association, Ithaca Professional Firefighters Association, Chief Officers Unit, and the
City Executive Association, the City will pay the difference between the military pay
received from the United States Government and/or the State of New York by a City
employee in such unit or association and the base City salary such employee would
have received for his/her regularly scheduled work week if such employee had not been
called to active duty, through March 31, 2012, and be it further
RESOLVED, That in the event that an employee’s military pay exceeds or equals
his/her base City salary, no supplemental pay shall be authorized, and be it further
RESOLVED, That upon the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding with the CSEA
Administrative Unit, CSEA Department of Public Works Unit, Police Benevolent
Association, Ithaca Professional Firefighters Association, Chief Officers Unit, and the
City Executive Association, the City will hereby continue to provide individual and family
health insurance coverage, in the same manner as it was provided when the employee
was working, through March 31, 2012, for those employees called to active duty.
10.8 Human Resources Department - Amendment to Personnel Roster –
Resolution
WHEREAS, the Manager of Organizational Development has been called to active
military duty for a minimum of twelve months, and
WHEREAS, in recognition of the City’s budget situation, the Human Resources
Department is willing to leave the position vacant during the Manager of Organizational
Development’s absence, and
WHEREAS, the Human Resources Department will attempt to utilize existing staff to
absorb some of the position’s responsibilities, and will reduce or suspend the provision
of other services during the Manager of Organizational Development’s absence, and
WHEREAS, the Deputy Director of Human Resources has agreed to return to a full-time
work schedule to assist with this interim staffing plan, and
WHEREAS, this interim staffing plan will result in a significant budgetary savings for the
City; now therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby amends the 2011 authorized Personnel
Roster for the Human Resources Department as follows: the workweek of the position
of Deputy Director of Human Resources is hereby increased from thirty (30) hours/week
to forty (40) hours/week effective immediately.
10.9 Human Resources - Request To Transfer Funds From Unrestricted
Contingency - Resolution
WHEREAS, in 2010, Mayor Carolyn K. Peterson formed an a working group to develop
and institute performance measures for all City Departments, and
WHEREAS, in 2011, Common Council provided funding to hire a consultant to work
with the City on organizational effectiveness strategies, and
WHEREAS, the working group has drafted a Request For Proposals to develop an
Organizational Effectiveness Framework that will enable the City to operate as
effectively and efficiently as possible, especially given the lean economic times, and
WHEREAS, in addition to the organizational effectiveness work to be conducted by the
consultant, the working group has determined that it is necessary and prudent to
conduct a survey to identify the services most important to the City residents, identify
resident attitudes toward city services, understand what services enhance the quality of
life for city residents, as well as establish a baseline for future surveys, and
WHEREAS, it is believed that the results of said survey will enable the City to align its
limited budgetary resources with city priorities, and
WHEREAS, the working group has identified a local resource, the Survey Research
Institute at Cornell, to develop a survey instrument , conduct a city-wide survey, and
analyze the survey, utilizing best practices, now therefore be it,
RESOLVED, That Common Council hereby authorizes the Controller to transfer an
amount not to exceed $6,500 from account A1990 unrestricted contingency to account
A1430 5430 Human Resources Fees for the purposes of funding said survey.
10.10 Attorney’s Office - A Local Law to Amend the Charter of the City of Ithaca,
Section C-10 (“Election and terms of office of Mayor, Judge and Council
members”), to provide for certain two-year terms following the federal census in
conjunction with the possible redistricting of City wards
WHEREAS, the federal census of the population is conducted every ten years, in years
ending in “0”, such as 2010; and
WHEREAS, following any such census, it may be necessary to adjust the boundaries or
number of wards in the City of Ithaca, in order to ensure equitable representation as
required by law and/or to achieve other desirable objectives; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council intends for any such redistricting to be in effect in the
City for the 2013 general election (following thorough study and consideration of the
2010 census data and of various options for addressing ward composition in
conjunction therewith); and
WHEREAS, in order to avoid the confusing situation where one alderperson from a
ward is representing the “old” ward area (as defined before redistricting), and the other
is representing the “new” ward area (post-redistricting), the Council has, after each
census since at least 1980, provided for two-year terms for those alderpersons elected
in the following year (e.g., 1981, 1991, etc), and, in the subsequent local election year
(e.g., 1983, 1993, etc), for one-half of those alderpersons elected to have two-year
terms, while the other half have four-year terms; and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to use this same approach following the 2010 federal
census, and to institutionalize it for future decades; and
WHEREAS, State Election Law requires the City Clerk, at least eight months before
each general election, to certify to the Board of Elections which offices will be voted on
at such election; now therefore
Local Law ___ - 2011
BE IT ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as follows:
Section 1:
Section C-10 of the Charter of the City of Ithaca is hereby amended (subject to
mandatory by the electors of the City) to read as follows:
[Language to be deleted is so designated;” language to be added is underlined.]
§ C-10. Election and terms of office of Mayor, Judge and Council members.
A. At the general election held in November 1995, and in every four years thereafter, a
Mayor shall be elected for a term of four years. At the general election held in
November 1989 and each sixth year thereafter, a City Judge shall be elected for a term
of six years. At the general elections held in November 1983 and in November 1985,
one Council member shall be elected from each of the [five new] City wards, as
described in § C-3 of the Ithaca City Charter, for a term of four years. Thereafter[,]
(except as described in the following paragraph), in each odd-numbered year, one
Council member shall be elected from each such ward,_for a term of four years, in
place of the Council member from that ward whose term of office shall next thereafter
expire. [, such Council member to hold office for a term of four years.] Nothing in this
section shall operate to shorten the term of any public officer in office. In the case of any
special election for the office of any Council member, such vacancy shall be filled by
election from the ward from which the Council member who caused the vacancy was
elected.
B. Notwithstanding the above, the term of all Council members elected in [November
2001] the general election following the year of the decennial, federal census (for
example, in 2011 or 2021) shall be for a period of two years. In the next general
election in an odd-numbered year thereafater (for example, in 2013 or 2023), [T]the
terms of one-half [1/2] of the Council members elected, at that time (to fill those
seats with expiring, two-year terms) [in November of 2003] shall be for a period of
two [four] years, while [. T]the terms of the other half [1/2] of the Council members
elected at that time, [in November 2003] shall be for a period of four [two] years.
Thereafter, for the remainder of each decade (for example, 2015, 2017, and 2019),
the terms of all Council members elected in those years shall [revert to] be four years.
C. For elections of Common Council members to be held in in years ending in “3” (as
described above) [November 2003], two Common Council members shall be elected
for each ward. On the election ballot there shall be printed, for each ward, the [an] office
of “member of Common Council for a term of four years” and the [an] office of
“member of Common Council for a term of two years.” In all matters affecting the
nomination and designation of candidates for election, it shall be designated whether
the candidate is seeking the office with a term of four years or the office with a term of
two years.
Section 2. Severability.
Severability is intended throughout and within the provisions of this local law. If any
section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this local law is held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, then that decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion.
Section 3. Mandatory Referendum.
This local law shall be submitted to a referendum at the next general election, on
November 8, 2011.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This local law shall take effect after it is approved by the electorate at the next general
election and is subsequently filed in the office of the Secretary of State.
To: Mayor & Common Council
From: Daniel L. Hoffman, City Attorney
Date: February 15, 2011
Re: Proposed Local Law/Charter Change to Provide for 2-Year Terms for
Certain Council Seats in 2011 and 2013 Elections (subject to referendum)
As a result of the 2010 census, it may be necessary for Common Council to modify the
boundaries of existing City wards, so that they meet legal requirements for population
equivalence (and/or, Council may want to change the ward structure for other reasons).
Since at least 1980, following each federal census, Council has tried to anticipate such
redistricting and to avoid the confusing situation where one alderperson from a ward
represents the “old” (pre-redistricting) ward, and the other represents the “new” (post-
redistricting) ward. The way it has chosen to do this is to have those Council members
elected in a year ending in “1” receive 2-year terms. As a result, all 10 Council seats
have been up for election in the years ending in “3,” at which time half of the seats are
filled for 2-year terms and half for 4-year terms.
The Mayor’s working group on Charter & Code Revision considered this issue recently,
and recommended using the same approach for 2011 and 2013. Last month, I learned
(from Election Commissioner Steve DeWitt) that State law requires the City Clerk to
inform the Board of Elections at least 8 months before an election as to what local
offices will be voted on; he understands that requirement to involve the terms (i.e., 2-
year or 4-year) as well as the offices themselves. In order to meet that deadline,
Council would need to decide about the 2-year terms before March 8th (i.e., at your
March 2nd meeting).
This would be a change to the Charter (as the current language only addresses the
elections following the 2000 census). It is subject to mandatory referendum (which
would also occur at the November 8, 2011, election), and it must be accomplished by
local law. A local law must be “laid on the desks” of Council members “in its final form,”
at least 8 calendar days before being voted on (i.e., by February 22nd). Unfortunately,
the timing of that requirement is such that it precedes (by a day) the City Administration
Committee meeting at which the matter is scheduled for consideration and
recommendation. I note that courts have allowed “non-substantive” changes to be
made to local laws after they were laid on the desk. I also note that I’m not sure the 8-
month deadline has always been strictly observed in the past, and yet elections have
happened anyway…
10.11 Attorney’s Office - Approval of Agreement between Village of Cayuga
Heights and the City for Building Inspection Services - Resolution
WHEREAS, both the Village of Cayuga Heights and the City of Ithaca are required to
issue permits for, and cause the inspection of alterations and construction within their
jurisdictional limits; and
WHEREAS, both the City and the Village enforce the provisions of the New York State
Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code and the New York State Multiple Residence
Law, as well as their own zoning, site plan development review, environmental review,
building, housing and fire codes, where applicable; and
WHEREAS, certain improvements are located on parcels which lie partially in both
jurisdictions, and are therefore subject to the code enforcement programs of each
municipality; and
WHEREAS, both municipalities are desirous of providing qualified building and fire
inspection services in a cost-effective manner and avoiding a duplication of services
and/or confusion to property owners to the extent possible; and
WHEREAS, the parties are desirous of entering into an inter-municipal agreement in
which the City would provide the Village with required building and fire inspection
service under the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code and the
New York State Multiple Residence Law, to the extent applicable, for alterations and
construction taking place on property which lies within both jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the City has appropriate, trained and certified building and fire code
enforcement personnel; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Mayor is hereby authorized to enter into the attached Inter-
Municipal Agreement between the City of Ithaca and the Village of Cayuga Heights for
building inspection services.
CITY OF ITHACA -- VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS
INTERMUNICIPAL AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES
This agreement, effective 1st day of January, 2011, by and between the City of
Ithaca, a municipal corporation having its office and place of business at 108 East
Green Street, Ithaca, New York 14850, hereinafter referred to as the “City” and the
Village of Cayuga Heights, a municipal corporation, having its office and place of
business at 836 Hanshaw Road, Ithaca, New York, hereinafter referred to as the
“Village.”
WHEREAS, both the Village and the City are required to issue permits for, and
cause the inspection of alterations and construction within their jurisdictional limits; and
WHEREAS, both the City and the Village enforce the provisions of the New York
State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code and the New York State Multiple
Residence Law, as well as their own zoning, site plan development review,
environmental review, building, housing and fire codes, where applicable; and
WHEREAS, certain improvements are located on parcels which lie partially in
both jurisdictions, and are therefore subject to the code enforcement programs of each
municipality; and
WHEREAS, both municipalities are desirous of providing qualified building and
fire inspection services in a cost-effective manner and avoiding a duplication of services
and/or confusion to property owners to the extent possible; and
WHEREAS, the parties are desirous of entering into an intermunicipal agreement
in which the City would provide the Village with required building and fire inspection
service under the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code and the
New York State Multiple Residence Law, to the extent applicable, for alterations and
construction taking place on property which lies within both jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the City has appropriate trained and certified building and fire code
enforcement personnel.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements, and
considerations heretofore set forth, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
1. All new property improvements where the improvement currently lies in
both jurisdictions will be inspected by City Inspectors who have successfully completed
the code enforcement training program through the Department of State of New York,
and who are otherwise qualified as inspectors as a result of the current and previous
employment by the City as code enforcement officials in the field of building and fire
construction inspection. The properties listed below are those which contain one or
more buildings or structures that are partially in the Village and partially in the City and
intended by this agreement to be inspected by City inspectors.
115 Ridgewood Road (a Cornell Sorority)
102 Needham Place (a private residence)
105 Needham Place (a multiple residence)
126 Westbourne Place (a multiple residence)
425 Wyckoff Place (a Cornell Fraternity)
208 Dearborn Place (a Cornell Rooming House)
220 Dearborn Place (a multiple residence)
207 Kelvin Place (a multiple residence)
In the event of the proposed construction of new improvements on property
which lies partially in both jurisdictions, the parties may add to the above list by written
agreement between the City Building Commissioner and Fire Chief and the Village Fire
Chief and the Chief Code Enforcement Officer of the Village.
2. The properties covered by this agreement shall be treated for all building,
housing, and fire code enforcement purposes, except zoning and site plan development
review, as though they were completely within the City of Ithaca. Each jurisdiction shall
continue to enforce and operate its own zoning, site plan review, environmental review
and landmarks preservation programs.
3. The number of personnel assigned shall be at the discretion of the City
Building Commissioner and/or City Fire Chief, depending upon the availability of said
personnel to be assigned to inspect properties which lie on the line between the
jurisdictions.
4. The term of this agreement shall be ten (10) years from the 1st day of
January 2011 and expiring on December 31, 2020, subject to authorization by the
governing legislative bodies of the respective municipalities.
5. The City shall be reimbursed for its services by the payment of all building,
housing and fire inspection and permit fees directly to the City by the property owner at
the rates charged to similar properties located totally within the City limits. Both
jurisdictions may charge applicants for zoning, site plan review, and/or environmental
review fees, where applicable.
6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit by the City, the City will obtain
written confirmation from the Village Zoning Officer that the proposed plans do not
violate provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village or that a variance from the
Village ordinance has been obtained. Properties which lie in both jurisdictions shall be
subject to the zoning, site plan development and environmental review regulations and
ordinances of both municipalities.
7. Both parties agree that they will, at their own expense, indemnify, defend,
and hold harmless each other, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all
liability, judgment costs, damages, attorneys’ fees and expenses arising out of the
negligence of its employees or by not adhering to the guidelines as established by the
City or the New York State Department of State in the provision and performance of
inspection work as set forth in this agreement, providing, however, that timely notice
shall be given by each party to the other of any claim that may be asserted with regard
to the work, labor, and services set forth in this agreement.
8. Each party will certify to the other that insurance in the amount of
$1,000,000 to cover liability exists and will make the other municipality the named co-
insured on said policy.
9. Each party will provide its own workers’ compensation insurance covering
its own employees.
10. In the event that the City or Village is, or becomes, self-insured for general
liability and/or automobile liability at any time during the term of this agreement, the
following language is to be incorporated in the agreement without any need for special
resolution:
WHEREAS, either party, its agents, servants or employees, pursuant to this
agreement between the parties are or may be performing various kinds and types of
work, labor or services in cooperation with each other: be it resolved that each party
agrees that it will, at its own expense, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other,
its officers, agents and employees from any liability, judgment, costs, damages,
attorneys’ fees and expenses arising out of the negligent performance of the work, labor
or services of the respective party, its agents, servants or employees, providing,
however, that timely notice be given to the other party of any action, claim or
proceedings which may be filed or commenced against the parties by reason of the
performance of such work.
Each party certifies, by entering into this agreement, that this section was
approved by the governing body of each municipality as part of this agreement, and it is
binding upon each party in the event it becomes self-insured as if a special resolution
had been adopted by it.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement the
day and year first above written.
THE CITY OF ITHACA
_________________________________
By: Carolyn K. Peterson, Mayor
THE VILLAGE OF CAYUGA HEIGHTS
_________________________________
By: Kate Supron, Mayor
STATE OF NEW YORK )
)ss.:
COUNTY OF TOMPKINS )
On this _____ day of ____________, Two Thousand and Eleven, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared CAROLYN K.
PETERSON, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his
signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person of which the individual acted,
executed the instrument.
__________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF TOMPKINS )
On this _____ day of ___________, Two Thousand and Eleven, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared KATE
SUPRON, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his
signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person of which the individual acted,
executed the instrument.
__________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
12. NEW BUSINESS:
12.1 Viva Taqueria & Cantina Alcohol Permit Request - Resolution
WHEREAS, in 1998 the City of Ithaca issued a license to the Viva Taqueria & Cantina
Restaurant allowing that restaurant to utilize certain areas along Aurora Street for
outdoor dining, and
WHEREAS, this use of public property has been deemed proper and successful, and
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca wishes to promote diverse uses of the Primary and
Secondary Commons, including outdoor dining, and
WHEREAS, it is Common Council's responsibility to determine whether or not to allow
the serving and consumption of alcohol on the Primary and Secondary Commons, and
WHEREAS, Common Council has determined that the use of this public property for
outdoor dining at the Viva Taqueria & Cantina Restaurant, including the responsible
sale and consumption of alcohol, is desirable, and
WHEREAS, Common Council has determined that any use of this or similar public
property involving the same and consumption of alcohol should be covered by a
minimum of $1,000,000 insurance under the Dram Shop Act; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, For the year 2011, Common Council hereby approves a revocable
Alcoholic Beverage Permit for the outdoor sale and consumption of alcohol for the Viva
Taqueria & Cantina Restaurant that includes the sale of alcohol in accord with the terms
and conditions set forth in application therefore, including minimum Dram Shop
coverage in the amount of $1,000,000 and the approval of an outdoor dining permit.
13. INDIVIDUAL MEMBER – FILED RESOLUTIONS:
13.1 Endorsement of and Authorization to Implement the Allocation of Costs
Associated with a Lawsuit Against the City of Ithaca Regarding the Ithaca Area
Wastewater Treatment Facility Site (NYSEG v. FirstEnergy Corp.; FirstEnergy
Corp. v. City of Ithaca, et al) - Resolution
WHEREAS, the Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility (IAWTF), a joint operation
of the City of Ithaca, Town of Ithaca and Town of Dryden, occupies a site on Third
Street Extension in the City of Ithaca, which site is owned by the City; and
WHEREAS, the IAWTF site was previously owned by New York State Electric & Gas
Corporation (NYSEG), prior to its conveyance to the City in 1959, and
WHEREAS, in approximately 1927, NYSEG constructed on the site a coal gasification
plant, which was operated by NYSEG until approximately 1932; and
WHEREAS, a by-product of the coal gasification process was coal tar, a substance
which was originally and for many years used for various commercial purposes; and
WHEREAS, coal tar is now recognized as a substance that can be hazardous to human
health, a fact that was not generally known in 1959 or for many years thereafter; and
WHEREAS, after its acquisition of the property, the City relocated certain of its
municipal sewage treatment facilities to the site; and
WHEREAS, in 1981, the City and the Towns of Ithaca and Dryden entered into a Joint
Sewer Agreement which committed them to joint design, construction and operation of a
new, intermunicipal sewage treatment facility at the site on Third Street Extension; and
WHEREAS, early in the construction of the new facility, during excavation, a substantial
amount of coal tar and coal tar-contaminated soil was encountered (and then treated as
advised by NYSEG and the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation), some of which contaminated soil was stored on the property until its
disposal in 1996; and
WHEREAS, in 1994, NYSEG entered into a Consent Order with the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation, in which NYSEG agreed to investigate and
remediate coal tar contamination at 33 former coal gasification sites in New York State,
including the IAWTF site; and
WHEREAS, in October, 2009, the City was served with a Summons and Third-Party
Complaint, joining the City as a third-party defendant in a lawsuit (New York State
Electric & Gas Corporation v. FirstEnergy Corporation v. I.D. Booth, Inc., Ithaca City
School District, City of Ithaca, New York, and City of Oneonta, New York) brought in
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York pursuant to the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA),
seeking apportionment of and contribution for the costs of coal tar remediation, at
various sites and among all potentially responsible parties (including the City of Ithaca,
by virtue of its ownership of the site in question, since 1959), and similar joinder of the
Town of Ithaca and the Town of Dryden, as joint owners and operators of the plant, by
FirstEnergy or NYSEG, was a possibility; and
WHEREAS, the IAWTF municipal partners’ 1981 agreement (and subsequent,
amended versions) provides that “in the event any liability is asserted against any of the
Parties hereto arising out of the construction, operation or maintenance of the
Treatment Plant, the parties shall be jointly and severally liable for the defense and
payment of any such claims” and that “liability shall be apportioned among the Parties in
proportion to the interests of each Party in the Treatment Plant or in accordance with
such other methods as the Parties may agree;” and
WHEREAS, the Parties did agree, by Agreement dated December 29, 2009, to share
the costs associated with this litigation, including attorney’s fees for special counsel, as
well as any award of costs or damages; and
WHEREAS, following an unsuccessful summary judgment motion on behalf of the City,
relying in part on the “innocent purchaser” defense, the litigation (as against the City)
was settled by voluntary stipulation, with the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal filed on
December 7, 2010; and
WHEREAS, the settlement between the City of Ithaca and FirstEnergy was made after
consultation among and with the consent of the three IAWTF partners, and “without
admission of liability,” but it required the sum of $200,000 to be paid to First Energy over
ten years (without interest); and
WHEREAS, the City’s attorney’s fees and costs for the litigation totaled $84,249; and
WHEREAS, the municipal parties’ aforementioned Cost Sharing Agreement did not
explicitly provide a cost sharing formula for the specific circumstances of the settlement;
and
WHEREAS, representatives of the partners have met and discussed this situation,
including the comparative liability risks the City may have faced at trial, under CERCLA
standards, for the period of its sole ownership prior to 1981 (approximately 22 years)
versus for the period of “joint ownership” (by IAWTF partners) from 1981 to the present
(approximately 29 years); and
WHEREAS, said representatives have recommended that the total cost ($284,249) be
allocated among the parties in a manner that takes into account all of the following
factors:
- the City’s longer period of ownership;
- an assumption that there was a liability risk associated with the City’s acquisition
of the property in 1959 (as it was difficult to find witnesses who could testify to the City’s
due diligence at that time), and a somewhat greater liability risk associated with the
period of new plant construction and operation (when coal tar was actually encountered
and handled); and
- the current usage-based formula for apportioning the IAWTF’s operational costs
(by which the City’s, Town of Ithaca’s and Town of Dryden’s shares are approximately
57.4%, 40.7% and 1.9%, respectively);
and
WHEREAS, said recommendation is for the following apportionment of the settlement
amount and legal costs:
City of Ithaca: $200,000 (approximately 70%);
Town of Ithaca: $80,000 (approximately 28%); and
Town of Dryden: $4,249 (approximately 2%);
now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Common Council hereby endorses the following allocation of the
settlement amount in the FirstEnergy v. City of Ithaca lawsuit, together with the
attorney’s fees and costs associated with the City’s defense therein (a total of
$284,249.00):
City of Ithaca: $200,000.00
Town of Ithaca: $80,000.00
Town of Dryden: $4,249.00
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Mayor, upon the advice of the City Attorney, is hereby authorized
to execute any and all agreements and documents necessary to implement this
allocation, and the City Controller is hereby authorized to make the necessary budget
adjustments and expenditures to account for this allocation.
14. MAYOR’S APPOINTMENTS:
14.1 Reappointment to Civil Service Commission – Resolution
RESOLVED, That Arlene Richardson be reappointed to the Civil Service Commission
with a term to expire May 31, 2016.
14.2 Appointments to Community Police Board – Resolution
RESOLVED, That Richard C. Rogers be appointed to the Community Police Board to
fill a vacancy with a term to expire December 31, 2013, and be it further
RESOLVED, That Shelby E. Hang be appointed to the Community Police Board to fill
the youth member vacancy with a term to expire December 31, 2011.