Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-25-02 Budget & Administration Committee Meeting Agenda BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2002 7 :00 P.M. COMMON COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA Statements from the Public Amendments to Tonight' s Agenda A. Common Council 1 . Reserved Community Service Agency Funding - Discussion 2 . Request Sponsorship of Celebration - Resolution B. Youth Bureau 1 . Request to Approve 2002 Recreation Partnership Agreement - Resolution C. Planning Department 1 . Request Funds for Parking Studies - Resolution D. Police Department 1 . Request Approval of Mutual Aid Assistance Agreement with the County of Tompkins - Resolution E. Reports 1 . Approval of October, 2001 Budget Meeting Minutes 2 . Approval of September 25, 2001 and October 29, 2001 B & A Minutes 3 . Mayor' s Report 4 . Council Members' Announcements 5 . Next Month' s Meeting: March 27, 2002 Susan Blumenthal, 08 :33 AM 2/28/02 , Firehouse funds and public art X-Sender: dlk8 @postoffice3.mail.cornell.edu Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:33:03 -0500 To: domc @ci.ithaca.ny.us From: Susan Blumenthal <susanb @cityofithaca.org> Subject: Firehouse funds and public art Hello Dominick, Below is the resolution for transferring Firehouse funds. Please add a proper title and Resolved clause(s) . Also, please check the first whereas and change Community Service Projects if that's not the correct name of the budget title. I'll be here until 1:30 if you have questions. Thanks very much. Susan Resolution to transfer funds ----- Dominick to write title ------ ��\..11. � _'V 1.� �� /.1 l 41.C, ✓0 �����-�,`�/ Whereas, Common Council allocated $3500 in r ^. -� c :� y funds as part of the Community Service1P*e+eet-r allocation in the 2002 budget for the Firehouse Theater, and 1�U-t4 C04*xup Whereas, the Firehouse Theater in no longer operating, and Whereas, a request has been made to reprogram this money to hire staff support to assist the Public Art and Design Commission in developing a plan for public art, and Whereas, said plan will provide a framework and mechanisms for implementation of a public art program, and Whereas, transferring the Firehouse funds to the public art project will help enrich the visual and aesthetic environment of public, private and semipublic spaces in the city, and Whereas, the Budget and Administration voted to approve this request at its February 25 meeting, now therefore be it Resolved, that ---------- Dominick to insert language to transfer money ------ (�MKAA�O, -�. p 2. t L C T l� inn lM l V f Pq 1,00'2— Printed for Dominic Cafferillo <domc@ci.ithaca.ny.us> 1 Steven Tha er Firehouse Page 1 From: "Patricia Vaughan" <pvaughan @fcsith.org> To: "Pater Mack"<peterm @cityofithaca.org>, "Patricia ... Date: Tue, Feb 19, 2002 11:24 AM Subject: Firehouse Gary Weisbrot of the former Firehouse Theater has come to speak to me. Their deal with Ralph Thorpe has fallen through, and Gary has informed me that they will not be able to use the building or the money this year. They are exploring other ways to make community theater a possibility, but are not in a position to use the money. We will need to decide what we want to do with the $3500 which we have reserved for the Firehouse. I would like to have this as a discussion item for the February 25th B&A agenda. Perhaps after that discussion we could have a recommendation to Council. Pat CC: <mayor @lcityofithaca.org>, <stevet @cityofithaca.or... Youth Bureau - Request to Approve 2002 Recreation Partnership Agreement RESOLVED, That the Mayor be authorized to enter into an agreement with the Towns of Caroline, Danby, Dryden, Enfield, Groton, Ithaca, Newfield and Ulysses, the Village of Lansing and Tompkins County for the term beginning January 1, 2002 and continuing through until December 31, 2006 for the Intermunicipal Cooperative Recreation Partnership Agreement attached. Carol Shipe- Fw: U dated language for Recreation Partnership A reement „ r Page 1 From: "Patricia Vaughan" <paty @main.ci.ithaca.ny.us> To: <carols @cityofithaca.org>, <domc @cityofithaca.org>... Date: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:59:59 PM Subject: Fw: Updated language for Recreation Partnership Agreement Here's the revised and presumable final Rec Partnership agreement. It should go on the agenda for Feb. 25. Pat ----- Original Message----- From: "David Whitmore"<dkw2 @cornell.edu> To: <paty @cityofithaca.org> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 1:52 PM Subject: Updated language for Recreation Partnership Agreement Pat, Enclosed please find instructions from the Rec Partnership Board re: new language for the Rec. Partnership Agreement. Let me know if you have any questions. Municipalities that have already passed the agreement will amend it at their next meeting to reflect the new language. Note: Attached agreement with new language. David If your municipality has not yet approved the January 8th version, please substitute the attached February 11th version. I am enclosing a revised copy that includes the revised language. "Pursuant to Section 119-o of the General Municipal Law, the undersigned municipalities hereby enter into this Agreement to form a five year renewable Recreation Partnership. This agreement shall become effective upon execution by each and every municipality listed below and shall be in force for the period beginning January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2006 and may be renewed for an additional five years by appropriate resolution by the municipal partners on or before December 31, 2006 all other terms and conditions of this agreement remaining the same. If all of the approvals and signatures are not obtained by April 30, 2002 this agreement shall be null and void." Nancy Zahler Tompkins County Youth Bureau 320 W. State St. Ithaca, NY Carol Shi lJ dated Ian page for Recreation Partnershi A reement Pa a 2' 14850 Phone: 607-274-5310 Fax: 607-274-5313 nzahler @tompkins-co.org 4 ree2-1.doc _. . Pa e 1 AGREEMENT FOR INTERMUNICIPAL COOPERATIVE RECREATION PARTNERSHIP Pursuant to Section 119-o of the General Municipal Law, the undersigned municipalities hereby enter into this Agreement to form a five year renewable Recreation Partnership. This agreement shall become effective upon execution by each and every municipality listed below and shall be in force for the period beginning January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2006 and may be renewed for an additional five years by appropriate resolution by the municipal partners on or before December 31, 2006 all other terms and conditions of this agreement remaining the same. If all of the approvals and signatures are not obtained by April 30, 2002 this agreement shall be null and void. Establishing a Program The parties hereby establish an on-going program partnership for the purpose of jointly planning, financing,providing, and coordinating shared, recreational services that supplement and complement those offered by localities. A governing board of partners will direct and oversee the contracted services of the Ithaca Youth Bureau's Recreation Division and other providers. The Partnership will be governed independently of any municipality. The Partnership will have no authority over any locally planned, locally funded, and locally operated programs except at the request of the sponsoring municipality. Local programs may choose to use the Partnership as a vehicle for voluntarily sharing information, equipment, publicity about programs, and/or coordinating their respective services. The Ithaca City School District participates by providing access to school facilities for Ithaca Youth Bureau programming in a reciprocal and mutually beneficial arrangement outlined in a Memorandum of Understanding. Sharing Program Costs 1 agree2-1.doc . . age r,. P .2 For 2001, the Ithaca Youth Bureau, in consultation with the current Recreation Partnership Board, developed a diverse set of services that cost no more than $185,000 after program revenues were subtracted. This required a combined approach of increasing sponsorships, raising fees, trimming costs and reducing new offerings since the projected cost for 2001 was originally$195,000. The $185,000 in net operating costs of programs was split four ways. The City of Ithaca paid one quarter of the total, the Town of Ithaca paid one quarter, and the County paid one quarter.The remaining one-quarter was shared among smaller municipalities. The cost for each smaller municipality was calculated using an index that combined the 1999 assessed value of its taxable properties in the Ithaca School District and its share of program participation in 1998. The Planning Group selected this formula, which assigns the assessed value twice the weight of participation, for several reasons. First, the use and weighting of assessed value was used as a measure of each municipality's ability to pay for services. Second, the formula recognizes that children from the Ithaca City School District have been significant users of the services and a number of municipalities have been concerned about providing equitable support to all their youth. Third, the use of Ithaca City School District properties as opposed to the municipalities' full assessment, acknowledges that towns like Dryden, Ulysses, Groton, and Lansing also invest significantly in their own local recreation programs which are used primarily by children from their own school districts. Finally, by assigning a heavier weight to the assessed values of properties in the Ithaca School District, the amounts in this fiscal scenario resulted in more modest changes over the current amounts than most of the other formulas considered. A chart outlining 2001 and 2002 proposed costs is attached as Appendix 1. To determine future contributions: A) The governing board shall review preliminary budget projections by May and decide on the acceptable net program cost for the upcoming year; 2 a reel-1.doc Pa e 3 B) The governing board shall develop budget guidelines for allocating the cost of any agreed upon increases. e.g. The governing board may specify how much of the increase should be raised through fee increases, how much is to be raised through sponsorships,how much through cost cutting, and how much should be subsidized by partners; C) Every year, the participation rates of the three previous years shall be reviewed, averaged and used along with the most recent assessed valuation to re-calculate the members' contribution rate for the upcoming year; D) The governing board shall periodically re-examines the basis for cost allocation (e.g. The 4 way split and the use of the index with smaller municipalities) for all participating municipalities. If the City is not able to achieve an acceptable facilities agreement by July 1, 2002, the City Youth Bureau, as a provider, reserves the right to re- negotiate the facility costs charged to partners for Ithaca Youth Bureau Recreation Division Programs beginning in January 2003. Governance Name: The governing board shall be called the Recreation Partnership Board. It will replace the Recreation Partnership Board that existed from 1995-2000. Membership: The board shall have a total of 14 members. The partners include: Towns of Caroline, Danby, Dryden, Enfield, Groton, Ithaca, Newfield and Ulysses, the Village of Lansing,City of Ithaca and Tompkins County. Each participating municipality will have at least one seat on the governing board (11). The Recreation Planning Group recommends that these seats be filled with an elected official willing and able to make policy decisions. When deemed necessary by any municipality, a lay designee who has the confidence of that municipal board may be appointed. In addition,the City of Ithaca,the Town of Ithaca, and Tompkins County may appoint one more representative each to reflect their greater investment in the Partnership (3). These additional appointed representatives may be elected or lay members. The Recreation Partnership Board may determine if it wants to create any non-voting at-large seats to add expertise or coordinating links to other key stakeholder groups e.g. Ithaca School District, 3 acree2 1 doc Page 4 youth with disabilities. Members will serve two-year terms. The governing board will elect its own officers: a Chair,a vice chair,and a treasurer. 4 a reel-1.doc a. Page 5 Roles of the Recreation Partnership Board The Recreation Partnership Board will develop its own operating by-laws to be ratified by all municipal partners. Future amendments will be subject to ratification by all participating municipalities. The Board will develop a work plan of key policy,program, and planning issues to be addressed annually. The Board will select providers,set program and budget priorities,and approve the net operating budget for programs, set fees for all programs and sponsorships and fiscal targets and guidelines for scholarships for use by the provider(s). Municipal boards will ratify the budget annually. The Board will meet monthly to review progress toward goals, address policy questions, review performance data, and finances to assure that provider(s) are meeting the goals and expectations of the partners. The Board will authorize any addition or deletion in programs and acceptance of any large group sponsorships. The Board will periodically evaluate the performance of its providers and make recommendations to enable providers to improve services The Board may assign a liaison to program advisory committees to work with the group and staff to identify any policy questions that need action by the full governing board. Recreation Partnership Board representatives will be required to make regular reports to their municipalities. Roles of officers The Chair shall develop the agenda in consultation with the Tompkins County Youth Bureau staff and providers, chair the meetings, represent the Recreation Partnership Board at inter-municipal or public meetings, assist as needed in contract negotiations to implement the wishes of The Recreation Partnership Board. The Vice Chair shall act in the absence of the chair. 5 a reel-1.doc _ Page 6 The Treasurer will work with the provider(s) and Tompkins County Youth Bureau staff to develop a format for regular financial reports that meet the needs of the Recreation Partnership Board. The Treasurer will review the financial report prior to the Board meetings and present the report to the full Board, noting any significant changes in expenses or revenues. The Treasurer will recommend to the Board a budget timetable and guidelines to enable providers to prepare budgets for the upcoming year. Fiscal agent and staff support: The participating municipalities will make their payments to Tompkins County. The funds will be managed as a separate program within the Tompkins County Youth Bureau's budget. The County Youth Bureau will contract with and make payments to providers authorized by the Recreation Partnership Board. It is a goal of the Recreation Partnership Board to establish a program coordinator position that would exist independent of any individual participating municipality. Within two years of signing the agreement,the Recreation Partnership Board will develop a proposal that includes the role and relationship of the coordinator to the partnership board,its members and providers,the duties and qualifications of the position, the cost to members,and designate the employer of record. The proposal shall be reviewed by all participating municipalities. Staff from the Tompkins County Youth Bureau will work in close cooperation with the Recreation Division of the Ithaca Youth Bureau and other providers to provide support to the Recreation Partnership Board that includes: • coordination of orientation to the Partnership and its services; • orientation to the roles of the Recreation Partnership Board and its members; • assistance in developing an annual work plan of priority planning, oversight, and evaluation issues; • assistance in developing policy options and guidelines as needed to implement the work plan; • preparation of meeting agendas in consultation with the Board chair and providers; • preparation of minutes; 6 a�ree2 e1 doc ..Pa e 7 • preparation of contracts with providers as authorized by the Recreation Partnership Board; • coordination with the providers to assure that program and financial reporting meets the needs of the Recreation Partnership Board; • coordination with providers to assure that their program policy questions that require Board decisions are acted on in a timely way; • authorization of payments after Board review of expenses; • assistance to the Board in monitoring and evaluating providers,as requested. The provider(s)will be responsible for: • providing the programs and services authorized by the Recreation Partnership Board in compliance with all relevant laws and safety regulations; • providing a summary of participation, program highlights, participant feedback, expenses and revenues for each program within two months after the last date of the provision of service to enable the Board to evaluate the program and make recommendations for the future; ;articipants; convening advisory groups as needed to review operational details of interest to • providing adequate liability coverage for approved programs and holding the participating municipalities harmless • tracking and reporting expenses and revenues in formats requested by the Recreation Partnership Board,in account(s)separate from the provider's main budget; • tracking participation in formats and on a schedule requested by or acceptable to the Board; • periodically highlighting any trends or significant changes in programming, participation, customer feedback, expenses or revenues for the Recreation Partnership Board; • recommending programs or changes to improve services and/or lower costs; • working with the Tompkins County Youth Bureau to present any policy questions and options related to programs or financing that require Board action. FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY Independence: The Partnership will be a free-standing inter-municipal commission governed by its partners. Role and Relationship of the City of Ithaca: In the past, the City of Ithaca has been a member, the sole provider, coordinator, and the fiscal agent for the partnership. In the future, the City will be a member responsible for one quarter of the program costs. Like other members, it will make a payment to Tompkins County for its share of the approved budget. Like Tompkins County and the Town of Ithaca, it will have two seats on the governing board. Like other members, it may ask or convene local advisory committees to recommend the 7 ...........I -1.doc kinds of recreation services they want for the residents of their own municipality. As a provider selected to operate programs for the next two years, the City of Ithaca will hire/contract staff as needed within the approved budget to provide services authorized by the Recreation Partnership Board. The Ithaca Youth Bureau will be subject to normal civil service rules and procedures and to approved collective bargaining agreements.As a provider, the City will use its own facilities and may enter into agreements with other municipal partners or agencies to use other facilities throughout the partnership for approved programs. As a provider,the City will keep separate account of partnership funds and report in a format and on a timetable requested by the Recreation Partnership Board. Role of Tompkins County: Tompkins County is the fiscal agent for the Partnership. The County shall provide bills to the municipalities based on the agreed upon cost allocation and shall receive funds from the municipalities. The County Youth Bureau will administer those funds in accordance with the wishes of the Recreation Partnership Board by creating and managing contracts with designated providers and making approved payments to providers. The providers will continue to be responsible for tracking line item expenses and program revenues and will provide this information in a format required by the Recreation Partnership Board. Fiscal accountability As a condition of this agreement, designated provider(s) will maintain completely separate accounting for the Partnership that clearly shows all revenues by program,cluster and total; that shows all expenses, including direct, administrative, and facility-related costs by program,cluster and total. The providers must be able to track surpluses and deficits across budget years. The providers will prepare financial reports in a format that satisfies the governing board which includes proposed budget,year to date cumulative expenses and revenues. The providers will also identify any potential for under or over-spending in the upcoming quarter so the governing board can make decisions on how to address changes. 8 agree2-1 doc Pa e'9. How surpluses and deficits will be handled The Recreation Partnership Board will decide how unanticipated under-spending or surpluses will be handled. For example, a surplus or savings might be carried over for one- time program expenses, reserved for future deficits, used to pilot new self-supporting programs,used as credits to reduce next year's municipal payments or budgeted into a reserve fund for equipment/vehicle replacement. A provider may experience a deficit from shortfalls in revenue despite its due diligence in trying to meet projections or unanticipated increases in costs. If this occurs, the Recreation Partnership Board will, in consultation with the provider, develop a plan to handle the deficit which may include: authorizing mid-year changes to increase revenue or cut costs; authorizing use of a contingency fund. How Municipalities Join or Leave the Partnership The Towns of Lansing and Newfield may join the Partnership on a trial basis for one year starting in 2001 at the costs shown in Appendix 1. During the trial period, they would not be subject to the member withdrawal requirements listed below. If they elect to join,they will be invited to appoint one elected official or designee to serve on the Partnership Board. If any municipality chooses to join after October 2001, the Recreation Partnership Board will decide how to handle the increased municipal contribution for the trial period. After the trial year,the cost-sharing formula will be re-adjusted for all continuing partners. A member municipality may elect to withdraw from the Partnership. Since a withdrawal from the Partnership will financially affect all of the remaining partners, the municipality seeking to withdraw must give fifteen months notice. E.g. A municipality must notify the Partnership by October 1, 2001 of its intention to withdraw at the end of December 2002. If a municipality withdraws and the remaining partners agree to assume some or all of the shortfall caused by the withdrawal, the same cost allocation plan shall be used to re- calculate their annual program contributions. 9 a reel-1.doc Pa a 10 Participation in Programs by Residents on Non-Member Municipalities Residents from non-member municipalities are welcome to participate on a space- available basis. Since they are not contributing through local taxes to subsidize the programs, they will be charged a fee twice the rate charged to members OR the actual unsubsidized cost, based on the prior year's calculation,whichever amount is higher. Dated: Town of Caroline by Town of Danby by Town of Dryden by TOWN OF ENFIELD by Town of Groton by Town of Ithaca 10 a reel-1.doc Pa all by Town of newfield by Town of Ulysses by 11 a reel-1.doc Page 12 Village of Lansing by City of Ithaca by County of Tompkins by 12 agree2-1.doc Attachment 1 Cost Sharing Plan for Recreation Partnership Municipal Members In the plan agreed to by all eleven participating municipalities, the cost to partners is calculated by subtracting all fees and other revenues from the cost of providing registration- based programs approved by the Partnership Board. Note: This net cost does not include the operating costs of facilities offering open skating, swimming. The net cost is to be shared according the following formula: City of Ithaca shall pay one quarter. Town of Ithaca shall pay one quarter. Tompkins County shall pay one quarter to underwrite the cost to all municipalities. Smaller municipalities shall share the remaining one-quarter. Formula for sharing one quarter of the net cost of programs among smaller municipalities: The following figures were calculated using an index of assessed value of taxable properties in the Ithaca City School District and the percentage of participation from each municipality. As approved by the Recreation Partnership Planning Group and Board, property assessments were assigned a value of twice that of participation. (Detailed calculations are on file at Tompkins County Youth Bureau) For 2001, the 1998 assessed values were used with 1998 participation. For 2002, the 2000 assessed values were used with an average of participation in 98,99,2000 Partner 2001 2002 City of Ithaca $46,250 $47,638 Town of Ithaca $46,250 $47,638 Tompkins County $46,250 $47,638 Town of Caroline $5,618 $5,814 Town of Danby $7,622 $7,679 Town of Dryden $10,736 $10,377 Town of Enfield $4,821 $4,969 13 agree?-1.doc u. Pane 14 Town of Groton $ 434 $ 414 Village of Lansing $11,046 $11,512 Town of Newfield $ 640 (pro-rated) $788 Town of Ulysses $5,972 $6,085 $185,000 $190,550 Youth/recreation partnership/finalversions/finalagree 1-09-02 14 i T LIE, CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 FEB 2 J DEPARTMENT OF PLA-NNING AND DEVELOPMENT H. XL-kTTHYS VAN CORI DIRECTOR 01: PLANNING AND DF,"ELOPMENT DOUGLAS B. McDONALD. DIRECTOR 01: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JOANN CORNISH, DEPL TY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DL%FLOP.MENT Telephone: Planning & Development - 60--2-4-6550 COMMUnitV Development IL RA - (,O--2-4-0i;) Email: planning(t:lcitvofitti.ica.c)rg Email: iLira-:citN oh0mcamrg Fax: 607-274-6558 FaX, (10--2-4-0558 To: Budget&Administration Committee From: Jennifer Kusznir, Economic Development Planner r111- Date: February 19, 2002 Subject: Parking Garage Circulation Study and Green Street Garage Structural Evaluation Enclosed, please find a summary of the funding for the City's parking projects as well as copies of a proposal to perform a structural evaluation of the Green Street Garage, a proposal to perform the parking garage circulation study and a proposed addendum to the contract of services for Wilbur Smith Associates. Planning and Engineering staff recommend that these two additional studies be undertaken before decisions are made regarding building new parking garages on Cayuga and Green Streets or expanding the Green Street garage. The cost of the two additional studies as well as the preparation of data for the study by Wilbur Smith Associates is $54,125. The original capital project#250 for parking studies contained$140,000, of which$138,400 has already been allotted for the current parking studies. The balance remaining in the Parking Reserve Fund under Capital Project 250 after the price of all of the studies currently underway is subtracted is $1,600. Another source of funding for these studies is Parking Area Reserve Fund #4, which has $150,000 available. To that end, please find enclosed three resolutions for your consideration. Q:\PLANNINGIPROJECTS\ParkinglB&A Resolulion02-02-19.doc "An Equal Opportunity Employer with a commitment to workforce diversification.- qW Parking Projects and Funding Original Funding Parking Reserve Fund opened under CP 250 $140,000 Current studies Desman - Parking Garage Feasibility Study not to exceed $ 84,000 Shears & Leese - Design not to exceed $ 26,400 TOTAL $110,400 Remaining Funding Parking Reserve Fund $ 29,600 NDC (portion of contract) $ 28,000 TOTAL REMAINING $ 1,600 Studies to Fund Parking Circulation Study (SRF) $ 15 q oGb Data Prep by WSA $ 4,200 Green Street Garage Evaluation (Novelli) $ 34,200 TOTAL $ 5 , 6-), BALANCE $ (5 2, S) Other possible funding Parking Area Reserve Fund #4 $150,000 DRAFT 212C 02 BUDGET &ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM FOR COMMON COUNCIL MEETING February 19, 2002 Approval of Funding for Green Street Parking Garage Structural Evaluation WHEREAS, the City is currently considering a proposal to expand the Green Street Parking Structure, and WHEREAS, the engineering department recommended that, before the City can expand the existing Green Street garage, a full structural evaluation of the building must be completed, and WHEREAS, staff has received proposals from three engineering firms to evaluate the Green Street garage, and WHEREAS, only one of the proposals submitted by Novelli Engineering was for a full structural evaluation and testing of the parking structure, and WHEREAS,planning staff and engineering staff have reviewed the submitted proposals and recommend that the City contract Novelli Engineering to perform the structural evaluation of the Green Street garage, and /-00 WHEREAS, the proposal submitted by Novelli Engineering is for$34,DWand there is $150,000 reserved for Parking Area Reserve Fund #4, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED,that the Mayor for the City of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to enter into contract with Novelli Engineering to conduct a detailed structural analysis of the Green Street Parking Garage and to make recommendations to the City in regard to the structural condition of the Green Street Parking Garage for an amount not to exceed $34,QeT, including all reimbursable expenses, and be it further g° RESOLVED, that contract with Novelli Engineering Firm be funded by Parking Area Reserve Fund#4. O:IPLANNINGIPROJECTSIParkinglB&A Resolubon02-02-19.doc NOVELLI ENGINEERING 203 NORTH AURORA STREET POST OFFICE BOX 7004 ITHACA.NEW YORK 1451-7004 (6071275-9707 (607)275-0964(FAX) PDN @NOVEL Il-ENG.COM January 23, 2002 Tim Logue Department of Planning and Development City of Ithaca 108 East Green Street Ithaca,NY 14850 Re: Proposal for Structural Evaluation and Testing Services Green Street Parking Garage Dear Mr. Logue: Our proposal for this project contains the following parts: • technical proposal for a thorough condition survey including non-destructive testing and evaluation of the garage • structural analyses of the garage based on its present condition • selection of proposed repair techniques and associated costs • evaluation of alternate scenarios using life cycle costing approach: demolition,partial demolition, repair We can offer the City several advantages as the Engineer for this project: • We all know that this garage suffers from deterioration typical for a 20-plus year old parking garage in the northeast U.S. Indeed, one could write one report that would apply to any number of similar garages. We think we offer different perspectives for evaluation of this garage in addition to the obvious. This proposal contains options for evaluating alternatives for repair and/or replacement of parts, or the entirety, of this garage. Life-cycle costing can be employed in our analyses to provide the City with useful information for decision-making. • Peter Novelli has over 15 years of firsthand experience with this garage,providing a great deal of understanding as to the performance and behavior of this particular structure. We can track the history of repairs and their performance. We are presently completing a project to investigate and design repairs to the bridge connecting the helix to the garage over Green Street. • Our office has continuing communications with some of the original players during design and construction of this garage, providing the benefit of their insight. Mr. Logue January 23, 2002 Page 2 • We own a full range of nondestructive concrete testing equipment, an investment of tens of thousands of dollars, that is unmatched even by the major materials testing firms in the area. Testing will be accomplished with the participation of myself, the Principal Structural Engineer for your project and not just by a technician sent by a testing firm working as subcontractor to an engineering firm. Testing will be modified based on our findings as the project proceeds. For example, we are one of the first firms in the United States to own a portable ASTM- certified chloride testing apparatus utilizing a photometer, which allows us to modify the testing program as information is obtained, rather then ordering an inflexible testing program and waiting two weeks or more for the results. • Peter Novelli is an active member of ACI International (American Concrete Institute) and has been appointed to the Committee on Service Life Prediction of Concrete. Service life prediction is essentially the crux of the problem with the Green Street Garage. He is an active member of International Concrete Repair Institute, and a member of its Structural Strengthening Committee. Our office has ties to some of the leaders in the field of nondestructive concrete testing and repair. Peter Novelli has recently_ authored the following publications and made the following presentations: y Long-Term Repair History of Parking Garage Helixes, 4th South African Conference on Polymers in Concrete, Rand Africaans University, Republic of South Africa, 2000 (published proceedings). This paper was actually written about the Green Street Garage and 14 years of repair history(copy enclosed). Long-Term Repairs to an Historic Concrete Arch Dam, published in proceedings of International Concrete Repair Institute Conference, June 2000. Communication, Coordination and Concrete Problems, to be presented and published in proceedings of Challenges in Concrete Construction 2002 Conference, University of Dundee, Scotland. Historic Concrete Dams: Evaluation and Preservation, American Society of Civil Engineers, Ithaca Section, Cornell University, December 2001. Nondestructive Concrete Testing, Presentation to Construction Specifications Institute, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, January 2002. • Our office is working on similar projects in the northeast ranging from Vermont, to Syracuse,to Philadelphia. • Our office routinely designs new and innovative concrete structures with an emphasis on long-term durability; we can compare the repair alternatives with full or partial replacement options. Mr. Logue January 23, 2002 Page 3 Scone of Services A. Testing and Evaluation This phase of the work will be crucial to understand the status of both concealed and visible deterioration in the structure. It will include: 1. Review repair history and performace of repairs to date. 2. Visual survey of all parts of garage. Digital photo documentation. 3. Delamination survey not only of all decks and helixes, but underside of slabs where separation of the precast"filigree"slab may be of concern. 4. Electric potential half-cell measurement of corrosion potential throughout the structure, using the Proceq Canin instrument. This instrument is capable of mapping corrosion potential similar to a topographic map, showing trends and areas of increased activity. Corrosion potential mapping is important because it indicates areas of increased activity, even where they are not visible. We have found excellent correlation between large electric potential and serious concealed deterioration. 5. Corrosion/resistivity measurements can be made at areas of high electric potential to indicate ongoing active damage due to corrosion. 6. Chloride contamination: we will take concrete powder samples at helixes, bridge, upper and lower decks, and beams. These will be measured for chloride content. Data will be compared with chloride tests previously performed to indicate trends. Heavy chloride contamination is, in our experience, one of the factors that renders parking garages"least likely to succeed." Chloride combined with moisture accelerates corrosion of embedded steel rebar which then initiates the familiar cycle of concrete spalling and delamination. This proposal includes 90 chloride tests at $25 each. 7. Concrete cores will be taken for petrographic analyses. This test is performed by a type of geologist known as a Petrographer. A thin slice of concrete is examined under high-power magnification. Much information about the original makeup and life history of the concrete can be obtained. These tests will be compared with previous petrographics to augment that information and indicate trends in the status of the concrete. We have allowed for 4 tests at $1200 each, including extraction of cores. 8. Carbonation tests on concrete indicate the extent of carbonation due to reaction of atmospheric carbon dioxide with the alkali component of the concrete. This alkali component helps to protect the rebar from corrosion by encasing it in an alkaline barrier. Carbonation tends to progress further into the concrete with time and destroy this passivating layer. We propose to perform carbonation testing on the cores extracted for petrographics,plus other samples on the decks and helixes. We have allowed for 12 tests at $25 each, including sample extraction. Mr. Logue January 23, 2002 Page 4 9. Pachometer testing: this locates concealed and embedded rebars and post-tensioning tendons, determines their location, depth and size. This testing will be used to supplement other tests where structural capacity is an issue. 10. Precast parapet panel weld anchorages: we propose to examine all of these. After an auto struck a parapet wall in 1999, the weld anchors failed in a rather unsafe manner and the panel, weighing tons, nearly fell. In our opinion any condition survey of the garage should include a detailed examination of these connections and any repair recommendations should include this. 11. Post-tensioning anchorage evaluation: this is a costly procedure that requires exposure of post-tension anchorages at ends of beams and visual observation for moisture, corrosion, and anchorage failure. At the same time, the anchorages are tested with hydraulic jacks to determine whether the cables are actually working at the requires stress levels. The beams and slabs of this garage depend on the integrity of high-strength steel post-tensioning cables, and these cables are restrained at ends of beams and slabs by clusters of anchors. These anchors must withstand loads on the order of 30,000 pounds. Selected anchorages were opened and examined about ten years ago, and we are uncertain as to the need to do this again. We have decided to wait and see if this appears necessary as the project proceeds and information is gathered. The added cost (estimated $5,000 to $8,000, most of which would be paid to a post-tensioning contractor) is not included at this time. B. Structural Analysis We will perform structural analyses of the various elements of the garage: bridges, beams, helixes, slabs, parapet walls to estimate their remaining structural capacity after having deducted allowances for loss by deterioration (as determined by Part A,Testing and Evaluation). We will then evaluate the structural capacity to support a proposed vertical addition to the garage. C. Repair/Demolition Alternatives and Costs We will evaluate the repair procedures and related costs for each element (columns, beams, slabs, helixes, bridges) for its intended purpose. We will next evaluate combinations of alternatives, for example retaining the concrete columns but demolishing the slabs and beams. We will discuss these options with City officials before proceeding. We will prepare life-cycle cost comparisons (using spreadsheet so they can be adjusted using different future maintenance scenarios and varying interest and cost escalation rates) so that the Planning Department can make realistic analyses and decisions regarding repair, demolition and rebuild, or partial demolition. Mr. Logue January 23, 2002 Page 5 We will advise the City of our findings as the project progresses, and review the final product with the Planning Department and other City officials. Engineering Fees A. Testing and Evaluation (includes all lab work, materials, core extraction by masonry contractor, photography. miscellaneous expenses) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22.500 B. Structural Analysis of existing condition and alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,500 C. Repair/Demolition Alternatives and Costs; report prep . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,200 TOTAL $ 34,200 With respect to Item A, we request assistance with City Electrician's lift truck which we have used in the past for similar work. As you compare proposals for this project we ask that you also compare the scope of work that is proposed; our proposal includes significantly more structural analysis, cost analysis and comparison of alternatives than a basic condition survey. Also, be aware that certain tests such as petrographics and chlorides can become very costly. Costs for fairly large numbers of tests are included in our fees. Please review this information; we would be pleased to discuss this project further. Ve truly yours, V j� . � �� V Peter D. Novelli, P.E. Consulting Engineer Encl: Long-Term Repair H'story of Parking Garage Helixes Qualifications DRAFT 212002 BUDGET &ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM FOR COMMON COUNCIL MEETING February 19, 2002 Approval of Funding for Parking Circulation Study WHEREAS, proposals for ne«- parking structures on Green Street and Cayuga Street have been submitted and are currently being considered by the City, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that before the City can approve of these new parking structures, traffic circulation within the garage as well as impacts on the surrounding intersections must be studied, and WHEREAS, SRF Associates has submitted a proposal to perform a parking circulation study on the proposed garages and their impacts on the surrounding intersections, and WHEREAS, staff has evaluated the proposal and recommends that the City hire SRF Associates to complete the study, and WHEREAS, the proposal submitted by SRF Associates is for $1 , and there is $150,000 reserved for Parking Area Reserve Fund #4, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED,that the Mayor for the City of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to enter into contracts with SRF Associates to study and make recommendations to the City in regard to the traffic circulation associated with the proposed parking structures for an amount not to exceed $1,5;72r , including all reimbursable expenses, and be it further Jai 00 RESOLVED,that contracts with SRF Associates be funded by Parking Area Reserve Fund#4. Q:IPLANNINGIPROJECTS1Parking\BBA Resolubon02-02-19.doc SRF & ASSOCIATES Traffic Engineering Planning Consultants (716) 272 - 4660 phone 3495 `Vinton Place (716) 272 - 4662 fax Building E, Suite 110 Rochester. NY 14623 January 9, 2002 Mr. H.Matthys VanCort City of Ithaca Department of Planning&Development 108 E. Green Street Ithaca, New York 14850 RE: Traffic Study Proposal Revised 01109102 -Proposed Cayuga&Green Parking Garages City of Ithaca,New York Dear Mr. VanCort: We are pleased to provide the following revised proposal for a Traffic Study associated with the planned Cayuga and Green Street parking garages, and the proposed land use and circulation changes included in the overall garage site design and traffic evaluation. Based upon the discussions with the Mayor and yourself, we have outlined a revised scope to address the traffic impact and access concerns pertinent to this project. The study will identify the traffic patterns associated with the existing and planned parking facilities within the primary study area. Future weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions that result from the proposed changes, will be determined. The future access and circulation conditions will be evaluated with mitigation recommended, as required. One alternative access scenario evaluation (Cayuga Street access) for the garages will be included as part of the study. A recommended access scenario will be identified and evaluated as needed. The major components of the study include the anticipated traffic impacts from the following development proposals: • Proposed Cayuga Building Land Uses • Proposed Green Building Land Uses • Proposed Parking Garage operations • Intermodal Center on Green Street The evaluation will also assume the conversion of Spencer Street to two-way traffic flow. The study will evaluate the future intersection operations (LOS) with the development proposals in place, Issues related to access, circulation, on-site and off-site queueing and event traffic for the proposed garages will be addressed. A final report will be prepared that summarizes the study procedures,findings and recommendations. Green &Cayuga Parking Garages Traffic Study Proposal City of Ithaca,New York Rev.01/09/02 SCOPE OF WORK Work Tasks: 1. Project initiation, scoping, held reconnaissance of existing transportation system, traffic control features, review of existing surface parking lot and Green Street parking garage operational characteristics and existing and proposed land uses adjacent to project site. 2. Collect and review available traffic reports, traffic related data, model information, (e.g. Six Point Plan Evaluation, machine and traffic count data,TCATS program plans, schedules, SYCHRO files, etc.)pertinent to this project. The following agencies will be contacted: NYSDOT, City of Ithaca,TCATS, and ITCTC. 3. Collect/obtain current AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes at the following locations: • Existing Green Street parking lot and garage access drives • Existing Cayuga Street access to surface lot The Client(City of Ithaca)will provide current turning movement volumes at the Prospect Street/S.Aurora St. intersection during the 7-9AM and 4-6PM hours.Data will be collected when colleges are in session. 4. In consultation with City staff, derive existing AM and PM peak hour"2001 Base Volumes"on the adjacent roadways, taking into account the shifts in travel due to the conversion of Spencer Street to two-way traffic. Client(City of Ithaca) to provide for all study intersections, 2001 base weekday PM peak hour link and intersection turning movement volumes with Spencer Street conversion. The study intersections include the(11) locations identified on the attached Plan. 5. Update base traffic analysis SYNCHRO models and analysis for"2001 Base Volume" conditions as required. 6. In consultation with City staff,derive future"Background"volumes on the adjacent roadways with two-way Spencer Street,taking into account the increased traffic from developments either approved or under construction within the near-by study area. 7. Consult with City and other key stakeholders on the future AM and PM peak hour trip generation and parking characteristics and anticipated operations for the proposals listed on Page 1. Identify future event traffic and parking related data available for the existing surface lots noted above. 8. The evaluations for the access scenarios assumes no cross connection for motorists the two proposed parking garages. 9. Derive AM and PM peak hour trip generation, trip distributions and assignment estimates for the garage land use proposals and the proposed parking garages. Green &Cayuga Parking Garages Traffic Study Proposal City of Ithaca,New York Rev.01/09/0= 10. Derive future AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes with the new garages and land uses operational, assuming access onto Green and East Clinton Streets. Future projections include conversion of Spencer Street to two-way traffic. 11. Derive future traffic diversions and resulting AM and PM peak hour volumes for alternative access scenario onto Cayuga and Green Streets, only. 12. Prepare flow diagrams that illustrate the traffic changes resulting from the new parking garages and land uses for the two (2) access scenarios. 13. Determine typical weekday ABM and PM peak hour levels of service, operations and queueing conditions at the study intersections, and at the proposed parking garage access locations, for the two(2)access scenarios. 14. Prepare traffic simulations(SIM TRAFFIC) for future full build conditions for the two access scenarios. 15. Evaluate the need for any traffic mitigation measures for future conditions (e.g. modifications in pavement markings, signing, signalization, access location and control, and garage cross access connection) 16. Meet with City staff to present and review study findings. 17. Prepare written Draft Traffic Study Report summarizing study results, and recommendations.Three copies of draft report will be submitted to Client. 18. Prepare final report with Client review comment revisions. Five copies of the final report will be submitted to Client. The work tasks can be completed within approximately six weeks of notice to proceed for lump sum fee of $14000.Billings will be made at the end of the month for the percent work completed. Any work beyond this scope, such as additional meetings; or later report revisions is not included in our scope or budget estimate. Additional meetings will be billed separately at our standard hourly rates, depending upon staff needed.Additional work items beyond the traffic report preparation would be entirely at your discretion, and we would not proceed without your authorization. Respectively Submitted, SRF inR.sociates tep Ferranti, P.E.,P.T.O.E. Principal Traffic Engineer SRF/jmf Attach. C i;■■t�-1��*dal � � � ___ — - i i ; �,�,.�� i Via' ���;'; , .r: ■ �. i MINI - �` ' � -� � � �� r�f� 111 ■ r iii min DRAFT 220,02 BUDGET &ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM FOR COMMON COUNCIL MEETING February 19, 2002 Approval of Funding for the Wilbur Smith Contract Addendum WHEREAS, a proposal for new parking structures on Green and Cayuga Streets have been submitted and are currently being considered by the City, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that before the City can approve of these new parking structures the traffic circulation within the garage as well as the impacts on the surrounding intersections must be studied, and WHEREAS, the budget and Administration committee has authorized the mayor to enter into contract with SRF Associates for the completion of a parking circulation study on the proposed garages and their impacts on the surrounding intersections, and WHEREAS,in order to complete the study SRF associates must use the traffic count information that was collected by Wilbur Smith Associates as part of the Evaluation of the Six Point Traffic Plan, and WHEREAS, the required information is not currently in the format that is needed by SRF associates, and WHEREAS,Wilbur Smith Associates has prepared a proposal for an addendum to their contract that would allow them to prepare the data in the format that is needed for the Parking Garage Circulation Study, and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the contract be amended to add the additional required services, and WHEREAS, the fee proposal for the contract addendum is $4,198 and there is $150,000 reserved for Parking Area Reserve Fund #4, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Mayor for the City of Ithaca is hereby authorized and directed to amend the contract with Wilbur Smith Associates to allow them to update the Six Point Travel Demand Model and prepare the data to be used by SRF Associates, and be it further RESOLVED, that addendum to the Wilbur Smith contract be funded by Parking Area Reserve Fund#4. Q:IPLANNINGIPROJECTSIParkinglS&A Resolubon02-02-19.doc SRF & ASSOCIATES Traffic Engineering & Planning Consultants (716) 272 -4660 phone 3495 Winton Place (716) 272 -4662 fax Building E, Suite 110 Rochester,NY 14623 MEMORANDUM TO: Thys FROM: Steve Ferranti DATE: 01/09/02 RE: Intersection Turning Movement Data Collection S.Aurora Street/Prospect Street The intersection of S.Aurora Street/Prospect Street will be evaluated as part of the traffic study for the proposed Cayuga/Green Garage Plan. Intersection counts for all movements at this location will be provided by City staff, as we discussed. Counts should be recorded on a weekday (Tu, Wed. or Th), 7-9AM and 4-6PM while the colleges are in session. Counts should be recorded in 15 minute intervals. Also, please have the recorders make note of queueing and delay conditions during the study periods, particularly for eastbound traffic on Prospect Street attempting to enter S.Aurora during the PM peak. If you have any questions pertaining to this, please contact me. Dan Cole is familiar with the standard procedures for collecting this info. 1 February 7, 2002 Mr. Timothy Logue Department of Planning and Development City of Ithaca Department of Planning and Development 108 E. Green Street, Ithaca. New York 14850 Dear Mr. Logue, Per your request, WSA has developed an addendum to the work provided in the Six Point Plan Study. Based our understanding of the City's requests, we have prepared the following scope and fee to complete the work. Update Six Point Travel Demand Model Travel Demand Modeling - Using existing regional peak hour models (ITCTC and the Six Point Plan), WSA will model the year 2001 traffic condition and a year 2001 build scenario that includes the Plain Street Bridge and the West Spencer Street improvements. The year 2001 model will include the Southwest Development trips that were distributed in the ITCTC model, but will reflect an existing condition (no-build) traffic network. The build model will include the two improvements as defined in the previously published Six Point Plan report. Synchro Model- WSA will analyze intersections and roadway segments that are impacted by the traffic projected from the models using procedures identified in the Highway Capacity Manual. The Synchro models that were developed for the Six Point Plan will updated to reflect the 2001 build and no-build scenarios described above. Appropriate manual adjustments will be made to reflect actual turning movements recorded in the field data collection phase of the Six Point Plan Study. Deliverable — WSA will provide the City with the GIS layers containing the results (hand adjusted) of the year 2001 build and no-build models. In addition, the two Synchro files generated from the traffic projections will be provided. These files will be recorded on a Compact Disc and mailed to the City. Fee Proposal - WSA would propose to accomplish these work tasks $4,198. This cost includes firm overhead and a 10 percent profit margin. The cost correlates to 56 hours of labor, including the physical modifications and data entry to the model, and QA/QC of the final product. Please feel free to call with any questions you may have on this proposal. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES Michael L. Morehouse,P.E. Manager of Transportation Planning Evaluation of Six Point Traffic Plan Wilbur Smith Associates Police Department - Request Approval of Mutual Aid Assistance Agreement with the County of Tompkins WHEREAS, local governments are authorized to request and provide police assistance to each other pursuant to Section 209-m of the New York General Municipal Law (GML) , and WHEREAS, the temporary exchange of Law Enforcement Officers and equipment for the purpose of mutual assistance is further contemplated by GML, and WHEREAS, GML Section 119-0 authorizes municipal corporations to enter into agreements for the performance of their respective functions, powers and duties on a cooperative basis, and WHEREAS, GML Section 209-m, New York Criminal Procedure Law Sections 140 . 10-1 & 3 , 120 . 60 et seq. , and 690 .25, and other applicable authority authorize Law Enforcement Officers to exercise certain police powers and authorities outside their geographic area of employment when a request for assistance is forthcoming from another law enforcement agency, and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca and Tompkins County have determined that it is in the best interests of the respective communities and of mutual advantage to enter into an assistance agreement for the provision of inter-agency Law Enforcement Services, and WHEREAS, a Mutual Aid Assistance Agreement has been negotiated and drafted by the Tompkins County Sheriff and the City of Ithaca Chief of Police, as well as by the County Attorney and the City Attorney; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the City enter into such Mutual Aid Assistance Agreement, and be it further RESOLVED, That the Mayor and the Chief of Police are hereby authorized to execute any documents necessary to formalize such Agreement . RESOLUTION NO. 11 -AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE SHERIFF TO ENTER INTO A MUTUAL AID ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ITHACA MOVED by Mrs. Schuler, seconded by Ms. McBean. WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the citizens of the County of Tompkins for police agencies to cooperate with each other and to aid one another in appropriate circumstances, and WHEREAS, an agreement providing for mutual aid between the City of Ithaca Police Department and the Sheriffs Department will enhance the efficiency of service to the public,and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca and the County benefit by defining the rights and liabilities of each agency,now therefore be it RESOLVED, on recommendation of the Public Safety Committee, That the County Administrator and the County Sheriff are authorized to enter into a Mutual Aid Assistance Agreement as attached with the City of Ithaca. SEQR ACTION: TYPE II-20 cc: Administration—via Network Finance Department Public Works Sheriff's Office City of Ithaca STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS ) I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct transcript of a resolution adopted by the Tompkins County Board of Representatives on the 5`h day of February, 2002. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said Board at Ithaca,New York, this 6h day of February, 2002. Clerk Tompkins County Board of Representatives MUTUAL AID ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT (OUTSIDE SERVICE BY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT) THIS AGREEMENT made , 2002 by and between the Tompkins County Sheriff, hereinafter refer to as Sheriff, as joint employer with the County of Tompkins, hereinafter referred to as the "County of Tompkins", with it's office located at 125 E. Court Street, Ithaca, New York, and the City of Ithaca, a municipal operation with its office located at 108 E. Green Street, Ithaca, New York, hereinafter referred to as the "City of Ithaca". The parties are sometimes referred to as a "local government" or collectively as "local governments". WHEREAS, local governments are authorized to request and provide police assistance to each other pursuant to § 209-m of the New York General Municipal Law (GML), and WHEREAS, the temporary exchange of Law Enforcement Officers and equipment for the purpose of mutual assistance is further contemplated by GML § 209-m, and WHEREAS, GML § 119-0 authorizes municipal corporations to enter into agreements for the performance of their respective functions, powers and duties on a cooperative basis, and WHEREAS, GML § 209-m, New York Criminal Procedure Law §§ 140.10- 1 & 3, 120.60 et seq., and 690.25, and other applicable authority authorize Law Enforcement Officers to exercise certain police powers and authorities outside their geographic area of employment when a request for assistance is forthcoming from another law enforcement agency, and WHEREAS, the parties have determined that it is in the best interests of the respective communities and of mutual advantage to enter into this agreement for the provision of inter-agency Law enforcement services; NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the above considerations and the covenants and mutual benefits herein expressed, the parties agree as follows: 1. Approval. This Agreement is executed pursuant to approvals of the respective governing Boards of the parties. 2. Purpose. It is recognized that in certain situations the use of law enforcement officers to perform law enforcement duties and the use of law enforcement equipment and supplies outside the territory of the local government where the officers are legally employed may be desirable and necessary in order to preserve and protect the health, safety and welfare of the public. Although the City of Ithaca is located within Tompkins County, solely for purposes of this Agreement, the City shall not be considered to be within the territorial limits of Tompkins County. Operations by the Tompkins County Sheriffs Office within the City of Ithaca shall be considered operations outside the territory of the Sheriffs Office. The additional objectives of this agreement are: a. the more efficient utilization of Law enforcement resources and services; b. an enhanced degree of cooperation between the Ithaca City Police Department and the Tompkins County Sheriffs Office; C. an enhanced effectiveness of response to requests to handle and resolve Law enforcement intervention situations; d. to ensure an adequate number of trained and equipped law enforcement officers to handle and resolve emergency, disaster and violent situations which cannot be met with the resources of one of the parties to this agreement, and e. the development and use of training exercises or programs where skills, knowledge, procedures and expertise are shared with other departments and personnel. 3. Authorization. Intergovernmental law enforcement service and assistance (mutual aid) may be provided among the parties during those times of both: a. emergency, and b. routine law enforcement work of a non-emergency nature to fulfill a mutual aid request. Examples of the latter situation would be pre-arranged training exercises and programs as well as temporary assignment of law enforcement officers and/or equipment to another law enforcement agency for training or patrol purposes where the officers and/or equipment may be involved in police intervention situations. 4. Power and Authorization. a. Each party authorizes the Police Chief, the Sheriff or the officer commanding the Law Enforcement Agency in the Chiefs or the Sheriffs absence to render and request mutual aid or assistance to and from the other party to the extent of available personnel, supplies and equipment not required for adequate protection of the local government rendering aid. The judgement of the Police Chief, the Sheriff, or officer commanding in the Chief s or Sheriffs absence of each municipality rendering aid as to the amount of personnel, supplies and equipment available shall be final. 2 b. The obligation to render mutual aid is strictly voluntary in nature. It does not place either the Ithaca City Police Department or the Tompkins County Sheriffs Office under any obligation to respond to a request for mutual aid or assistance of the other party that it is unable or unwilling to honor. Such Law enforcement aid may be provided on an actual or standby basis. C. The commanding Law Enforcement Officer of the assisting local government shall report to and receive instructions from the commanding law enforcement officer of the municipality receiving mutual aid. d. Law Enforcement Officers who shall be commanded by their superior to act outside of the territorial limits of the local government which regularly employs the officer shall be under the direction and authority of one person designated by the commanding officer of that law enforcement agency. e. That person shall, in turn, be under the direction and authority of the local commanding Law Enforcement Officer of the municipality to which they are called to perform Law Enforcement or peace duties, i.e. the municipality receiving mutual aid. Law Enforcement Officers assisting another local government outside the geographical area of employment shall have all powers and authority of Law Enforcement and Peace Officers in such other jurisdiction as provided by law including the power of arrest. f. Further, each party authorizes The Police Chief or Sheriff and such Chiefs or Sheriffs designee's to pre-arrange training exercises and programs as well as temporary assignment of officers and/or equipment to another law enforcement agency for training purposes. 5. Compensation, Expenses and Liability a. All individuals shall retain all of their pension, disability, contractual and compensation rights while performing duties in accordance with this agreement. All salaries, legal and contractual benefits, and other personnel costs together with equipment and supply costs will be the responsibility of the respective local government employing the officer. 3 b. Except for claims relating to compensation, expenses and liabilities set forth in this Section 5, each local government shall waive any and all claims against all other local governments parties to this agreement, which may arise out of a local government's activities outside of their respective jurisdictions while rendering aid under this agreement. C. The local government receiving aid pursuant to this agreement shall assume the liability for all damages and loss for equipment, materials arising out of any act performed in rendering such aid and shall reimburse the assisting local government for such damages or loss. Specifically exempt from this agreement are the payment of wages, benefits (including workers' compensation and GML 207-C benefits), salaries, and other sundry operational and supply expenses. Each law enforcement agency will be responsible for its respective salaries, wages, benefits (including workers' compensation and GML 207-C benefits) and sundry operational expenses unless agreed to separately by the Police Chief and Sheriff. d. All immunities from liability enjoyed by the local government within its boundaries shall extend to its participation in rendering aid under this agreement outside of its boundaries unless otherwise provided by law. All the immunities from liability and exemptions from laws, ordinances and regulations which Law Enforcement Officers employed by local governments which are parties to this agreement have in their own jurisdictions shall be effective in the jurisdiction in which they are giving aid unless otherwise provided by law or this agreement. e. Each party shall be liable for the negligence of its officers and personnel in the same manner and to the same extent as if such negligence occurred in the performance of their duties within their territorial limits. Each party shall indemnify and defend the other for claims alleging such negligence. 6. Rules and Regulations. The Police Chief and the Sheriff of the local governments shall establish uniform rules and regulations for requesting and rendering mutual aid as necessary and appropriate to implement this agreement. Vehicles, firearms, equipment and apparatus furnished in or for mutual aid shall be operated by personnel trained in the proper use of same. It is understood that under no circumstance will privately owned vehicles or equipment be utilized in providing mutual aid unless 4 commandeered or authorized by the commanding officer of the local government receiving aid. 7. Cooperation. In the event a mutual aid or assistance situation results in an officer-involved shooting, accidental injury or other event or results requiring investigation or review, both parties will cooperate and consult with each other in the conduct of such investigation or review. Each local government and each law enforcement agency will make available to the other any information or resources necessary to conduct such investigation or review. 8. The Police Chief and the Sheriff will fully communicate, consult and cooperate with each other to insure that a thorough, efficient and effective investigation or review is conducted and that unnecessary duplication is avoided.- The results of such investigation shall be shared with each local government. 9. Effective Date and Termination. a. This agreement shall be effective when signed by each local government. b. This agreement may be terminated at any time by passage of a resolution terminating same by the governing board of a party to the Agreement. A copy of the resolution shall be promptly filed with the Clerk of each local government following its passage. However, obligations previously incurred are not extinguished by the termination of the Agreement. 10. Miscellaneous. a. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and cannot be modified or amended except by written agreement of the parties. b. Any media release or press conference regarding a mutual aid event will be coordinated in advance between the Police Chief and the Sheriff. C. This agreement shall not be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit for any third party or parties. No third party or parties shall have any right of action under this agreement for any cause whatsoever. d. The laws of the State of New York shall govern this agreement. 5 e. This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. f. For the purposes of this agreement, when involved in routine Law Enforcement work of a non-emergency nature, temporary assignments and training exercises, the Law Enforcement Agency from which the equipment is assigned, or which is providing the training, or which is sponsoring the training exercise shall be deemed the assisting local government. 6 r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have placed their hands and seals. By: Peter J. Meskill Sheriff of Tompkins County By: Steve Whicher Tompkins County Administrator By: Richard Basile, Chief of Police City of Ithaca Police Department By: Alan Cohen, Mayor City of Ithaca City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 THIS AGREEMENT Made as of the day of March, 2002 (retroactive to 01/01/02) by and between the BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS and the COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ITHACA, Tompkins County, New York, (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), party of the first part, and THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA, (hereinafter referred to as the "Town", acting as and for the Fire Protection District of the said town. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the party of the first part is the governing Board of the Municipal Fire Department and Common Council of the City of Ithaca, and has under its control and custody personnel and fire fighting equipment of said Department, and WHEREAS, there has been duly established in said Town a fire protection district known as "Town of Ithaca Fire Protection District", embracing all of the territory in said Town, except the Village of Cayuga Heights. and a portion of the northeast portion of the Town, which district is more particularly shown on Schedule A annexed hereto, and City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 WHEREAS, following a public hearing duly held, said Town was duly authorized to contract with the part of the first part for fire protection and emergency medical service to the portion of said district hereinafter defined, upon the terms and provisions herein set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED as follows: 1 . Provision of Services. The City shall provide fire protection services and emergency medical services on an equal basis throughout the fire service area, inclusive of the City and Town Fire Protection District, as more fully defined, as follows: ALL of the Town of Ithaca, excepting the following areas: (a) The Village of Cayuga Heights; (b) The northeast section of the Town of Ithaca that is situated east of the Village of Cayuga Heights/Town of Ithaca boundary, south of the Village of Lansing/Town of Ithaca boundary, west of the Town of Dryden/Town of Ithaca boundary, and north of the toe of slope which runs roughly parallel to and along the Plantation Road on the Cornell University Campus; (c) The Hamlet of Forest Home, including the structure housing the Cornell University Filtration Plant. 2 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 2. Hydrant Mal2s. To aid in the determination of hydrant and water source locations with reference to particular alarms, the Town shall furnish to the City the most recently available map of all areas of the Town having hydrant service, showing hydrant locations, normal static hydrant pressure, hydrant flows, static water sources, streets and highways, location and addresses of improved properties and the identity of the owner thereof. The Department shall be entitled to rely on such map and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies therein. 3. Use of Mutual Aid. The City warrants and covenants that as soon as a serious fire or other emergency makes the Town of Ithaca potentially without adequate coverage from the Ithaca Fire Department, the City, through its fire department, shall immediately seek protection through the Tompkins County mutual aid assistance agreement providing coverage to the Town of Ithaca through deployment of equipment and/or personnel brought into the City or the Town of Ithaca pursuant to the City's request for mutual aid. 4. Term. The term of this agreement shall commence January 1 , 2002, and shall terminate December 31 , 2006. 5. Payments by Town. The Town shall pay to the City the following 3 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 estimated sums as payment for each of five years of the term of this Agreement, in the manner set forth below: (a) Annual Operation Expenditures. Based on the approved operating budget for each year of the agreement, the Town shall make estimated quarterly payments to the City. To facilitate this agreement, the Town shall make a 1/12 payment on January 1 , and on February 1 a 2/12 payment. Subsequent quarterly payments shall be made April 1 , July 1 and October 1 of each year. The annual percentage share shall be established as prescribed in Section ( 5(d) ) of this agreement. The actual annual cost will be determined by March 31 of the subsequent fiscal year, with a corresponding adjustment being made in the remaining annual quarterly payments. The City shall maintain a detailed program record of all activity relating to the Fire Department. If a surplus remains at the end of any fiscal year during this agreement, after all actual revenues and expenditures have been accounted for, said amount shall be used to reduce the participating shares to be paid in the following year. Should the estimated budget amount paid for any year during this agreement be insufficient to meet the spending needs of the Fire Department, said deficit shall be added to the next year's participating shares. 4 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 (b) Investment of Fire Department Program Funds. The City shall maintain a complete record of all investments involving Fire Department program funds. Should the cash balance necessary to fund departmental activities during any fiscal year be insufficient, the City and Town shall advance any required amounts based on the participating shares then in effect. If the City or the Town is required to fund any cash flow deficit, the lost interest based on the average General Fund investment earnings rate, would be reimbursed, or the interest earnings during that quarter would be adjusted by the interest lost on any cash flow advances. (c) The total taxable assessed valuation of real properties in the City shall be combined with the total taxable assessed valuation of real properties outside the City but within the area for which fire protection services are being provided pursuant to this contract. Such amounts are hereinafter referred to as the "Combined Taxable Assessed Valuation". The Combined Taxable Assessed Valuation shall be calculated as close as reasonably possible to September 1 of each year. (d) The portion of the Combined Taxable Assessed Valuation located within the Town and outside the City, as defined by paragraph 5(c), shall be divided by the total Combined Taxable Assessed Valuation. The result is 5 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 referred to hereinafter as the "Town's Percentage". (e) The Town's Percentage shall be multiplied times the Net Expenditures, and the resulting figure shall be the amount of the Town's payment for the ensuing calendar year. (f) An example of the foregoing calculation is as follows: Assuming the Net Expenditures (which number includes debt service but excludes depreciation) is equal to $5,500,000 and assuming that the Taxable Assessed Valuation of the area of the Town outside the City covered by the Fire Protection Contract is $120,000,000 and that Taxable Assessed Valuation of real property in the City is $240,000,000, the Combined Taxable Assessed Valuation will be $360,000,000 ($120,000,000 plus $240,000,000), the Town's Percentage will be 33.33% ($120,000,000 divided by $360,000,000) and the annual payment from the Town to the City will be $1 ,831 ,500 ($5,500,000 times 33.33%). (g) For the purpose of this agreement, (including paragraphs 5(b) through 5(f) above) "expenditures" shall mean (i) actual expenses incurred, and not reimbursed from bonds or other forms of debt, to pay for equipment (including capital renovations to existing equipment) and improvements (including new stations in the Town and renovations to City stations) and (ii) 6 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 the debt service expenses (principle and interest payments) during the year for any debt incurred to pay for equipment or improvements purchased during 1995 and subsequent years of this contract. (i.e., it is the intention that if equipment is purchased and paid for in cash during the year, the entire cost of the equipment shall be the basis of calculations. If equipment is purchased and paid for by financing over a period of years, only the portion of debt paid during the year shall be considered an "expenditure". There is included in "expenditures" any debt service during the year in question related to purchases or construction in earlier years of this contract, provided that no purchases or construction incurred earlier than 1987 shall be so included). The Town agrees to the inclusion of administrative overhead costs in an amount not to exceed 2.75% of the actual Fire Department expenditures, commencing in 2002. The overhead charge is based on a proportionate share of the actual general administrative expense. The 2.75% represents approximately one third of the average administrative overhead. 6. Review of Operating Budget. The City agrees to provide the Town with the budget proposed to the Mayor by the Fire Department by September 1 , of each year, and the Mayor's proposed budget by October 1st, of each 7 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 year. The Town Board shall have the opportunity to provide input to the Mayor and Council during the balance of the budget deliberation process. The Town shall be notified of, and have the opportunity to attend and participate in the various budget meetings which may be held to develop, review and approve the Fire Department's capital and operating budgets. The Fire Chief shall provide notice of such meetings as soon as they are scheduled. The Fire Chief and City Controller will be available to provide assistance during this review process. 7. Approval of Capital Budgets. The parties agree that capital renovations in excess of $100,000 per project or aggregating in excess of $200,000 per annum, and new station construction, shall be accomplished within a capital budget for each project. The budgets shall be approved by the appropriate governing body of each municipality prior to commitments for construction or financing of any of such projects by the City. For the purposes of this agreement a "capital" expenditure or renovation shall mean any improvement of a capital nature having a period of probable usefulness set forth in Section 11 of the Local Finance Law. 8. Maximum Equipment Expenditures. Expenditures in any year for new equipment shall not exceed $200,000 absent the mutual agreement of 8 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 the parties hereto prior to commitments for such purchases and financing of same. 9. New Fire Stations in Town Manner of Title Lease Reimbursement. Title to the land for the new stations was taken in the name of the Town and then leased by the Town to the City. The lease is for 30 years at the rate of $1.00 per year, provided that the lease shall terminate upon termination of this contract and payment by the Town of any remaining City indebtedness on the premises. Title to the two new stations constructed in the Town was taken in the name of the City. Should this agreement terminate at any time for any cause, (including a breach by the Town) upon termination the City will convey whatever interest it has in and to the land and the two stations in the Town or other entity upon the Town (a) reimbursing the City for its 30% of the construction expenditures for said stations paid by the City during the duration of this and prior agreements; and (b) paying to the City any remaining unpaid debt service obligations of the City relating to the stations. There shall be credited to the amounts owed from the Town to the City the 27% contributions made by the Town to the City for the renovations of 9 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 existing stations within the City limits. The City shall convey its interest in said stations located within the Town to the Town by such instruments as the attorneys for the Town may reasonably require, such conveyance to be made within 30 days of demand for same, provided that such conveyance by the City is not illegal. If illegal, the City will immediately take all necessary steps to remove any legal impediment and will convey such stations as soon as such impediments are removed. In any event, the City will within ten days of demand for same by the Town, and pending legal title transfer, deliver immediate possession and occupancy of such stations so that the Town or any entity (such as a fire company) may occupy and use same immediately for fire protection and emergency medical service purposes. Such use and occupancy shall be granted without any further compensation from the Town to the City. In the event of any breach of the obligations to convey or to grant immediate occupancy the Town may seek specific performance in addition to any other remedies available to the Town under law. 10. The City as the lessee of the South Hill (Station 5) and West Hill (Station 6) fire stations shall provide adequate insurance coverage for the property and buildings during the duration of the lease. The cost of the 10 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 insurance shall be included in the annual operating budget. The City shall name the Town as an additional insured on said coverage. 11 . Equipment Reimbursement . Upon termination of the agreement for any cause the Town shall be entitled to receive 27% of those items of equipment which originally cost $25,000.00 or more, or 27% of the dollar value of such equipment purchased by the City during the term of this agreement reduced by the depreciation on such equipment. For this purpose equipment so purchased shall be depreciated on a straightline basis over fifteen years assuming a 20% residual value. To the extent feasible the equipment to be transferred to the Town will be the equipment located in the stations to be located within the Town. Such conveyance shall be by such appropriate documentation such as bills of sale, vehicle registration, etc. as may be reasonably required by the attorneys for the town. If the City fails to transfer such items, the Town may seek specific performance in addition to any other remedies available to the Town under law. 12. Contributions from Tax Exempt Entities. The City agrees to share the total cash contribution made by Cornell University and Ithaca College for fire protection and emergency medical services on the basis of the percentage share of operating expenditures paid each year of said 11 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 agreement. Any amounts received from Cornell University or Ithaca College shall be applied in reduction of the Fire Department's operating budget. Additionally, the City and the Town agree to continue joint discussions with Cornell University and Ithaca College in the interest of deriving a contribution, be it monetary, in kind, or a combination thereof, in a direct relation to the fire services provided to those institutions. It is also understood that any in kind contributions from tax exempt entities will accrue to the direct benefit of the cost of operating fire protection services (Le., said amounts should be used to reduce the operating budget for purposes of calculating the costs of the parties), without any apportionment between the town and City. 13. Staffing Levels. The number of paid career personnel in the fire department used as a basis for determining shared costs under this agreement is 51 firefighters, 8 lieutenants, 5 assistant chiefs, 1 deputy chief, 1 chief, 1 fire alarm superintendent, 1 administrative secretary, 1 director of development (40 hours), 1 administrative assistant-financial, and 1 account clerk typist, (total of 71 positions). In the event that additional positions and/or personnel are approved by the City, such positions and/or personnel must be approved by the parties hereto and made 12 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 an amendment to this Agreement in order to be considered as a shared cost. Should the City choose to add any positions or personnel which are not deemed by both parties to be beneficial to both parties, all costs relating thereto would be borne solely by the City. Should the Town request the addition of any paid positions or paid career personnel which are not agreed by both parties to be beneficial to both parties, all costs relating thereto would be borne solely by the Town. Unless the Town agrees to a lesser level of staffing, the City agrees that each of the two fire stations to be located in the Town of Ithaca will be staffed in the same manner as individual stations in the City. 14. Expansion and Town Representation on Fire Commission. The total membership of the Board of Fire Commissioners shall be 5, two of which shall be representatives of the Town of Ithaca Fire Protection District appointed by the Mayor of the City from names recommended by the Town Board of the Town of Ithaca. No persons shall be appointed as the Town representatives unless recommended by the Town Board. 15. Indemnity. The City shall hold the Town harmless for all claims by third parties with regard to personal injury, wrongful death and for property damage arising out of any act or negligence of the City, its officers or 13 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 agents, for answering such calls in the Town, such indemnity to include reasonable costs of defending such claims, including attorneys fees. The obligation to indemnity shall survive termination of this Agreement (e.g.: the City shall provide such indemnification for any claims made with respect to actions by the City prior to the termination of this Agreement even if the claim itself is not made until after termination of the Agreement). 16. Exculpation. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to limit in any lawful way any lawful right of the Board, the City, the Town, or any member of the Ithaca Fire Department provided by the general statutes of the State of New York, provided that this provision shall not be deemed to abrogate or modify any rights or obligations provided for in this agreement. 17. Authority of Chief. It is specifically understood and agreed that the number of personnel, the amount and type of apparatus and equipment dispatched in answer to a fire call or to an emergency medical services call, the manner of fighting the fire, or handling the medical services, and other operations upon the scene of the fire or medical emergency, are matters within the judgment of the Fire Chief of the City of Ithaca Fire Department (the "Chief") or his designees and there shall be no liability or responsibility whatever upon the Board or the City of Ithaca for any failure, act or 14 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 omission in connection therewith, subject to the provisions of paragraph 15 and further subject to the understanding that the City and its officers shall use sound professional judgment based on generally accepted standards in the provision of its fire protection, emergency medical, emergency, and non- emergency services provided pursuant to this Agreement. The word "Chief" shall mean the person duly appointed to that office in the Ithaca Fire Department by the Mayor of the City. 18. Payment of moneys from Foreign Insurance Companies. The Town agrees to pay over to the City the percentage collected by or received by the Town from foreign insurance companies writing property insurances in the area protected for the benefit of the Ithaca Volunteer Firemen's Relief Fund, or its successor, as required by law. 19. Upon 60 day notice by either party of a need for a modification, the parties may agree to re-enter negotiation for the purpose of making such change or modification as may be agreed upon. 20. The Town reserves the right to cause an audit of City accounts related to this agreement on demand. If an overpayment error equal to or exceeding 5% of the Town's share is not found after final settlement each year, such audit shall be done at the expense of the Town. If an 15 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 overpayment error equal to or exceeding 5% of the Town's contract share is found after final settlement each year, the City shall pay for such audit. (An overpayment error in this context is defined as a calculation of the Town's contribution that resulted, or would have resulted, in an overpayment by the Town.) 16 City-Town of Ithaca Fire Contract 01/01/02 - 12/31/06 Instrument to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF ITHACA By: By: Board of Fire Commissioners Board of Fire Commissioners By: Mayor TOWN OF ITHACA By: 17 Schedule A (Draft) For the purposes of the agreement between the City and Town of Ithaca, the southern line of the "Hamlet of Forest Home" referenced in section 1(c) is further described as follows: That section of the Town of Ithaca situated east of the east boundary of the City of Ithaca and north of the toe of slope beyond the southern edge of Plantations Road, including that section of Cornell University known as " the Plantation's Arboretum". Included is the length of Forest Home Drive, from the City boundary to the boundary line between the Towns of Ithaca and Dryden. The boundary line at the southwest corner runs from Forest Home Drive where the City/Town boundary crosses to the westerly end of a dead-end service road running behind the Plantations Service Building, and includes that building in this area. From there, the southerly boundary described herein travels in an easterly direction along the toe of slope of an uphill grade to the south,crossing Judd Falls Road and Caldwell Road, and continuing easterly and south easterly to a point along the center of the elevated grade that runs between the Arboretum Road and New York State Route 366, then swings northerly and northeasterly to a point at the northwest corner of the parking area attached to the former Cornell University Transit Facility, and then northerly to the point where Forest Home Drive crosses the boundary line between the Town of Ithaca and Dryden. Said southerly line is more particularly shown on the attached map (Exhibit A)by the dashed line running from the intersection of the Town of Ithaca and City of Ithaca boundary to the Town of Ithaca and Town of Dryden boundary. Generally, the intent is to exclude those buildings and properties from the "Hamlet" area that are accessed via Tower Road, Judd Falls Road, and Caldwell Road south of the Plantations Road, or accessed from NYS Route 366; and to include those buildings or properties that are accessed from Plantations Road, and north. Additionally, the Cornell University Filtration Plant, which had been historically covered by the City of Ithaca Fire Department, will no longer be part of the City's responsibility.