HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-BPW-2015-08-24BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF ITHACA, NEW YORK
Regular Meeting 4:45 p.m. August 24, 2015
PRESENT:
Mayor Myrick
Commissioners (3) - Warden, Darling, Jenkins
OTHERS PRESENT:
Superintendent of Public Works - Thorne
Asst. Supt. for Streets & Facilities — Benjamin
Director of Engineering - West
Parking Director — Nagy
City Attorney - Lavine
Information Management Specialist — Myers
Alderperson/Liaison Fleming
Bridge Engineer - Gebre
Civil Engineer - Yost
DPW/Suet. Office 2015 Interns:
David Picinich, Cornell Local Roads Program Pavement Management Project
Mykola Kyrychuk, Retaining Wall Inventory Project
EXCUSED:
Asst. Supt. for Water & Sewer - Whitney
Commissioners Greene, Goldsmith
Call to Order/Agenda Review:
Commissioner Warden voiced his concern about item 9C entitled "Resolution Authorizing
Agreement with Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services for Future Improvements to Lake
Avenue and Eastern Portion of Adams Street" being a voting item on today's agenda. He
questioned whether discussion of the resolution had taken place prior to today's meeting.
He wants to make sure that the neighbors of the project support it and have had an opportunity
to provide input.
Commissioners Jenkins and Darling responded that the item had been discussed a few months
ago by the Board.
Commissioner Warden stated that if the neighborhood was fine with the proposal, then he did
not have a problem with voting on it today.
Mayor's Communications:
The Mayor had no communications at this time.
Communications and Hearings From Persons Before the Board:
No one appeared to address the Board.
Reports:
Director of Engineering West reported on the following items:
o Great progress is being made with the repair/construction of sidewalk around the
City — especially on the north side of the City.
o The opening ceremony for the final phase of the Cayuga Waterfront Trail is
August 30tn
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
o All the concrete repairs have been made at the Seneca Street Parking Garage;
they will be shop blasting and coating on Thursday, 8/28. They will not work on
Friday because of the Commons Grand Opening Celebration taking place that
day.
o The 2015 road paving project will start on Wednesday, August 2611, on Cayuga
Street; the street will be posted for no -parking. The work will include sidewalk
and ramp work, then the repaving of the street. The project will then move to
Giles Street three weeks later (weather permitting).
Mayor Myrick stated that he is very happy with the great reviews he has been receiving on all of
the sidewalk work being done — especially from Disability Advisory Council Chair, Larry Roberts.
Assistant Superintendent for Streets and Facilities Benjamin reported on the following items:
o Crews finished the complete repaving project (including utility work underneath
the road) on South Aurora Street in time for Ithaca College students returning for
the Fall semester.
o Drainage pipes have been installed on the roof of the Streets and Facilities
building on Pier Road that connect to the roof drains. The water from the roof will
now be directed towards the ditch.
o Crews have been catching up on requests for different paving patches around
the City — mostly small ones that were created as a result of utility work. The
requests had been piling up and so it will be good to get caught up. A lot of staff
are on vacation as well so that has affected work being done. He has been
doing double duty as his Supervisor for streets is on vacation.
Director of Parking Nagy reported on the following items:
o Digital Pay Machine Statistics to Date:
16,358 transactions
$27,888.00 in revenue
1,100.00 transactions/day
$21,588.00 from meters
$49,476.00 Total Revenue
o Total Revenue from meters in 2014: $64,263.00; projected for 2015:
$76,818.00, an increase of 19.5%.
o The pay machines are working; he is working with people that have
communicated challenges to their use to find solutions
o He is working to have additional signage placed on meter poles to help direct
people to the location of the pay stations
o He is also working to inform the public on the Park Mobile application for smart
phones that can be used to set up accounts from which to pay for parking that
will just require people to enter the amount of time they want to pay for parking
because everything else will already be set up; people can also set up a Park
Mobile account online or by calling them.
o The Park Mobile Application became available on August 14th, which was a
Friday, there were 19 transactions even though there was no prior notice given to
the public about that option. On Monday, August 171h, there were 34
transactions, 89 transactions on Tuesday, August 18th, 107 transactions on
Wednesday, August 19th, 134 transactions on Thursday, August 201h, and 158
transactions on Friday, August 21st. That is a total of 541 transactions using the
2
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
Park Mobile app. A total revenue of $1,661.00, so it seems to be very well
received by members of the community.
Superintendent Thorne reported on the following items:
o Temporary asphalt repairs were made to the sidewalk on Osmun Place because
they were in such terrible condition. This is in a historic district and so people are
upset about the use of asphalt; it is not a permanent repair but something had to
be done because it had become hazardous.
o A suggestion was made to staff that the millings from the Giles Street repaving
project be put in the parking lot at the Wildflower Preserve. Right now, it is
muddy with big holes in it; the millings would provide a permeable surface and be
a good reuse of the road surface millings. He did reach out to the Natural Areas
Commission and Conservation Advisory Council and they thought it was a good
idea.
Common Council Liaison Fleming reported on the following concerns from constituents:
o The crosswalks at construction sites on Dryden Road need to be maintained
o A crosswalk is needed at the bottom of the hill on State/Martin Luther King, Jr.
Street at the Tuning Fork
o A crosswalk is needed at the intersection of Quarry and State/Martin Luther King,
Jr. Street
o Concerns regarding noise from the construction of the new water plant; work is
beginning before 7:30 a.m. — which is the allowed start time.
Superintendent Thorne responded that staff did deliver the message to the contractor of the
new water treatment plant that construction noise cannot begin before 7:30 a.m. He stated that
there was an instance recently, where a last minute decision was made the night before, to
allow the pouring of concrete at the site to begin prior to 7:30 a.m. This was done because of
rain forecast for later in the day, and they needed to get the concrete poured that day. Please
let staff know if noise before 7:30 a.m. is occurring so they can address it with the contractor
accordingly.
New Project Presentation:
A. Pavement Management Project — Presented by David Picinich, Intern for the Engineering
Department:
Mr. Picinich had a PowerPoint presentation (which will be attached to the minutes for reference)
which he used to show the Board information gained through the project, which was jointly
funded by Cornell University and the City of Ithaca.
He highlighted the following items:
o 700 segments of roadway evaluated (excluding private roads and bridges) for a
total of 67 miles of pavement inventory
o The data was collected through a City of Ithaca GIS program which generated
online maps which were very helpful to verify information from the field
o The survey included the following categories:
■ Condition of roadways
■ Types of cracking and reasons for cracking
■ Identification of ruts in roads
■ Identification of bleeding, which is when the road surface wears away (it's
not seen too often)
3
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
■ Bridges not included because those repairs are so difficult
o NYS Route 13 left out; it is a roadway maintained by New York State Department
of Transportation; private roads on Cornell Campus left out as well
o The program used will suggest the best repair for each road since there are a
variety of ways to repair roadways
o The program will provide cost of different types of repairs and months of life for
roadway gained by doing the repairs using the different methods
o The program can assign a priority value, which is self- explanatory, for
determining budgets and which roads to repair first
o Roads with more traffic take priority over lower traveled roads
o The annual budget can be input into the program to observe a possible yearly
repair plan based upon the budget
o The program can determine what roads are in which condition, by percentage, as
well as by condition such as poor, fair and good as well as how priorities should
be ranked based on that information
o The program can suggest what the repairs involve and associated costs
The Mayor thanked Mr. Picinich for the valuable and remarkable information that resulted from
his work throughout the summer. He likes the scoring system as a way to prioritize what roads
should be repaired first. He noted that the maps with that information show the reality of what
city staff already knows. This will be a most useful tool for staff because it will provide the ability
to show both the Mayor and Common Council where road repairs are needed, costs,
prioritization, and what will happen if the roadways are not repaired. This information will help
the City make better decisions as well as explain those decisions to public.
Mr. Picinich noted that the maps that were created as a result of this work can be updated as
repairs are made to various roadways. Supt. Thorne stated that the City will have ownership of
the program, and he would recommend that a similar type project be conducted every 3-5 years
to update the data so that it can continue to be used as a tool for the City going forward. He
noted that Cornell University would like to get on a 5 year schedule to do study to provide a
snapshot of where we are and what needs to be done
Director of Engineering West stated that this information can also be used as a tool for
evaluating other repair programs, and demonstrating "how much bang for the buck" could be
gained if repair work done one way; or, if something less expensive is done -- what are you
losing in terms of length of life of the road by doing that.
Alderperson Fleming asked what the relationship was for this project between the City of Ithaca
and Cornell University. Supt. Thorne responded that Cornell University provided the funding,
the computer program, and instructions on how to evaluate the roads.
Civil Engineer Yost, who supervised Mr. Picinich (and Mr. Kyrychuk, who will do the next
presentation on Retaining Walls) stated that with this information regarding the condition of
roadways that different scenarios can be evaluated to see what could be done with various
budgets, to see where to do the work, and what the costs would be.
The Mayor and Board expressed their thanks to Mr. Picinich and Civil Engineer Yost for
conducting the research on the condition of roadways and for providing the very useful
information that can be used in the future to determine budgets and work plans.
.19
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
B. Retaining Wall Inventory Project:
Mr. Kyrychuk used a PowerPoint presentation (which will be attached to the minutes for
reference) to show the Board the information gained through the project about city -owned
retaining walls. He highlighted the following items for the Board:
The program goal was to determine the number of retaining walls in the city, determine
who owns them, and where there are right-of-ways
It determined the condition of the walls — bad, good, new
A GIS app (ARCgis) a mobile app was developed by the City's GIS team to use in the
field to document findings — there are 255 city -owned segments/walls as shown on a map
identified with red dots; private walls are identified by blue dots (map included in PowerPoint
presentation which will be attached to the minutes).
The program used a table where various values could be input related to condition,
location, if there is a road or sidewalk supported by the wall, what condition they are in as well
as the wall, what kind of repair work would be required
Other values such as definition of the primary function of the wall, slopes, whether its
near a stream bank, private or public land
The condition assessment of the wall is very important — the bottom, middle, and top are
evaluated and then assigned numerical ratings according to their condition, whether the wall
passes or fails, and what the consequences would be if the wall fails
The evaluation determined that there are 29 walls that need immediate attention, 41 are
okay, and 185 will need work in the future.
Mayor Myrick thanked Mr. Kyrychuk for the wonderful presentation that provided very
quantitative results.
Director of Engineering West asked about the rating system, and how did a rating get assigned
to the wall. Mr. Kyrychuk responded that the rating was given for the part of the wall that was in
the worst condition.
Civil Engineer Yost explained that the program also indicates what the impact of a wall failing
would be. For example, the retaining wall along East State/Martin Luther King, Jr. Street, if that
wall failed a lane of the street would be lost. So, one of the great things about this program will
be the ability to prioritize retaining wall work based upon its proximity to a street or sidewalk.
When that is known, then budgets can be developed for repair of both items in conjunction with
one another. She stated that the study was proposed by New York State Department of
Transportation similar to the way that the bridge inspection process works.
Asst. Supt. Benjamin asked whether the study would be able to indicate the impact that a
private retaining wall failing would have on city property?
Civil Engineer Yost responded that the program would be able to do that once it had the
information, the study conducted this summer only evaluated city -owned retaining walls,
because there was not enough time to do both. It would be a great program to continue, as
time, staff, and budgets allow. The study could verify the location and condition of private walls,
and include similar information as was done for study of city -owned walls. She also noted that
this study was able to document some, but not all, of the various materials that the walls were
constructed with.
Mayor Myrick stated that the City was very fortunate to have such remarkable interns and
projects completed this summer. He thanked them and Civil Engineer Yost for her supervision,
and for providing this remarkable data to use going forward as budget decisions need to be
made.
5
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
Administration and Communications:
Approval of the July 27, 2015 Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes - Resolution
By Commissioner Darling: Seconded by Commissioner Warden
RESOLVED, That the minutes of the July 27, 2015 Board of Public Works meeting be approved
as published.
Carried Unanimously
Buildings, Properties, Refuse & Transit:
Appeal of Bill for Tree Clean Up at 612 Cliff Street - Resolution
By Commissioner Darling: Seconded by Commissioner Warden
WHEREAS, Barbra Jastran, owner of 612 Cliff Street, was billed for the cost of calling in City
crews to remove a portion of tree that fell into the roadway at 612 Cliff Street on October 15,
2014; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Jastran claimed the tree was in the City's right-of-way and showed evidence
that she had paid a tree service to remove the rest of the tree that fell outside of the roadway;
and
WHEREAS, Assistant Superintendent Benjamin's investigation of the tree's location revealed
that the tree was actually astride the right-of-way line; and
WHEREAS, the tree was partially on the City right-of-way and partially on Ms. Jastran's
property, and that Ms. Jastran already paid for the cleanup of the tree outside of the roadway,
staff recommends that the bill for the City's response to clear the roadway be expunged along
with any penalties associated with that bill; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works hereby expunges invoice #00019766, for $686.75
and the penalty of $34.34 associated with that invoice.
Carried Unanimously
Highways, Streets & Sidewalk:
A. Recommendation That Common Council Approve a New Bus Service in the City of
Ithaca - Resolution
By Commissioner Warden: Seconded by Commissioner Jenkins
WHEREAS, Section 346-31 of the City Code states that no bus shall operate, stop on or stand
on any City street, nor shall such bus pick up or discharge passengers on any such City street
or curb, or any other public property, or at or within 200 feet of any City bus stop in the
corporate limits of the City of Ithaca, unless a permit is obtained therefor from the Common
Council or its designee; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works has received an application from Big Red Bullet,
LLC to operate a transit service between Ithaca and New York City, including stops in the City;
and
WHEREAS, Tompkins County Area Transit (TCAT) has expressed concerns about the two
proposed bus stops, namely in front of the Performing Arts Center and the East Seneca Street
bus stop; and
WHEREAS, TCAT and staff have recommended use of the south curbline of East Green Street,
immediately east of the pedestrian signal, staff has discussed the option with the representative
of Big Red Bullet, who is in agreement with this location; and
WHEREAS, the applicant and staff have not yet found an acceptable alternate location in
Collegetown, but are both willing to continue working on a possible location; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works hereby recommends to Common Council approval
of the use of the East Green Street location and the related proposed City streets; and, be it
further
A
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
RESOLVED, That the Board recommends that Common Council delegate the authority to
approve a second location for passenger pick up and discharge to the Board of Public Works,
should the applicant and staff find an acceptable alternate location in Collegetown, after
consultation with TCAT.
Carried Unanimously
B. Award of Professional Services Contract for West State/Martin Luther King, Jr. Street
Corridor Enhancements - Resolution
By Commissioner Darling: Seconded by Commissioner Warden
WHEREAS, professional services proposals were received on January 20, 2015 for the West
State/Martin Luther King Jr. Street Corridor Enhancements (CP 790, PIN 395050) project; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the nine proposals received and made recommendations for
award; and
WHEREAS, engineering studies and designs are a Type II action requiring no further review
under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental Quality Review
Ordinance; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the City of Ithaca Board of Public Works hereby awards the professional
services contract for West State/Martin Luther King Jr. Street Corridor Enhancements (CP 790,
PIN 395050) to C&S Engineers, Inc., of Syracuse, New York, for an amount not to exceed
$130,000; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That the Superintendent of Public Works of the City of Ithaca be hereby
authorized to enter into said contract under the usual terms and conditions.
Carried Unanimously
C. Resolution Authorizing Agreement with Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services for
Future Improvements to Lake Avenue and the Eastern Portion of Adams Street
By Commissioner Darling: Seconded by Commissioner Jenkins
WHEREAS, Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. (INNS) in 2014 purchased the parcel
known as 210 Hancock Street and began seeking community and Planning Board input; and
WHEREAS, based on this input, INHS has proposed a development plan of the 210 Hancock
parcel that includes improvements to Lake Avenue for a pedestrian and bicycle pathway and
incorporation of a playground structure in the eastern section of Adams Street; and
WHEREAS, City staff is generally supportive of the development plans proposed by INHS, and
INHS is in the process of obtaining site plan approval; and
WHEREAS, INHS has agreed to construct and maintain such improvements at its cost in
accordance with City specifications affording City vehicles the ability to continue to access the
creek through the improved site as needed for public works or safety purposes; and
WHEREAS, the improvements and land underneath such improvements shall be the property of
the City, and will be open to the public; and
WHEREAS, INHS has agreed to be responsible for maintenance and liabilities resulting from
use of the improved site, except for any liabilities which are caused by the City's negligence or
willful misconduct, which shall be the City's responsibility; and
WHEREAS, in consideration for these agreements, the City has agreed to seek discontinuance
of Lake Avenue and the eastern portion of Adams Street; and
WHEREAS, the discontinuance process will require environmental review, public comment, and
discretionary approval (or denial) by the Board of Public Works; and
7
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
WHEREAS, INHS has asked for an agreement from the City that it commits to seek
discontinuance in order to satisfy certain requirements related to the Low Income Housing Tax
Credits that INHS is seeking; and
WHEREAS, the Common Council is considering a resolution to this same effect; now, therefore
be it
RESOLVED, That the Mayor is authorized to execute an agreement with INHS substantially
similar to that included herewith, and for a term not to exceed fifty (50) years, concerning the
use of Lake Avenue and the eastern portion of Adams Street.
The Parks Commission provided the following recommendation regarding the Proposed
Playground and Creek Walk as Part of the 210 Hancock Street Project:
Ithaca Neighborhood Housing Services (INNS) presented its proposed development at 210
Hancock Street to the Parks Commission at its meeting on May 12, 2015. The Commission's
discussion focused on the creation of a new playground and green space along a walkway
adjacent to Cascadilla Creek. The playground will be located in the northeast corner of the site,
along Adams Street and across from Conley Park. INHS will build and maintain the playground,
but it will be open to the public. The creek walk is proposed for construction in the current Lake
Street right -of- way along the east side of the project site. It will be primarily a pedestrian
walkway but will be open to City and emergency vehicles. After discussion of the project, the
Parks Commission voted unanimously to support the development of a creek walk within the
Lake Street right-of-way and the construction of a playground as part of the proposed
development at 210 Hancock Street, noting that both features will be positive additions to the
Northside neighborhood. The Commission also noted the importance of creating a visual
connection between the new playground and Conley Park so that the new playground feels
open to the public.
City Attorney Lavine explained that this resolution pertains to the block of Lake Avenue that is
adjacent to Hancock Street and a small section of Adams Street. Currently, they are city streets,
the proposal would discontinue the use of the street by the City of Ithaca. This resolution does
not approve the discontinuance of the street; this resolution authorizes Ithaca Neighborhood
Housing Services (INNS) to make the necessary improvements along Lake Avenue, with
approval by the City. If the City were to discontinue the use of this portion of Lake Avenue it
would take months and lots of discussion by both the Board of Public Works and Common
Council before it could be removed from the City's inventory of streets.
Commissioner Warden stated that he has been following the evolution and discussions of the
proposed project. He knows that there have been changes made as a result of those
discussions and input from the public. He questioned whether or not the neighborhood has
provided input that supports this proposal? He also has some concern about the berm in the
area, how it meets up with the existing park (Conley Park), how it effects the creek, and do the
residents of Willow Avenue support it.
Commissioner Darling asked what sort of right-of-way will the City keep along Cascadilla creek,
and would the proposal maintain access for the City to do any necessary work in the creek?
City Attorney Lavine responded that this agreement explicitly provides to the City of Ithaca, the
right to get equipment in, and do work anytime - cart blanc. The actual design of the street right-
of-way will create a path to Conley Park and the playground there. The Planning and
Development Board wanted emergency vehicles and the city vehicles/equipment to have
access anytime for whatever work in the area and around the creek might be needed. This
proposal would help to make the street feel more like the Cayuga Waterfront Trail and be very
pedestrian and bike oriented. The multi -age playground will be fenced and accessed from a
portion of Adams Street. Fencing or a hedgerow will clearly delineate city property from INHS
owned property. INHS will also maintain the area once the new housing project is constructed.
The project will contain one building that will be one and two story townhouses, a Head Start
facility, office suite, and ground floor parking. The second building will be three stories and
contain one and two bedroom apartments.
1.1
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes August 24, 2015
Director of Parking Nagy asked how many parking spaces were planned. City Attorney Lavine
responded that there will be sixty-four spaces. The Planning and Development Board has been
reviewing this proposed project at length since February, with final approval expected on August
25th. The Board of Zoning Appeals has granted three variances for the property as well.
Commissioner Jenkins asked how many townhouses are included in the project. City Attorney
Lavine responded that there will be twelve two-story townhouses that will be constructed to look
like typical Fall Creek homes with seven for sale and five for rent.
Mayor Myrick asked Mr. Joe Bowes, from INHS, who has been involved with the project since
the beginning, to talk about how public input was obtained for the project.
Mr. Bowes explained that INHS bought the property in August 2014. They went through a four
month community engagement process. INHS provided a really basic presentation of project
for input and then proposed designs to community; from the input received they then narrowed
the project down from three proposed designs to one. The community provided input for the
final design. The public loved and very much supported the idea of the creek walk and closing
Lake Avenue to vehicle traffic.
Director of Engineering West reviewed the map and information that was presented earlier in
the meeting regarding the road pavement study, and determined that the condition of Lake
Avenue is very poor, so it would be good to take the street out of the city's street inventory at
some point in the future because it would save the City the money it would cost to make
improvements to it.
Commissioner Warden asked what impact it would have on the project if the Board delayed a
vote on the resolution until its next meeting.
City Attorney Lavine responded that Common Council meets on September 2nd, and does not
necessarily need a resolution from the Board of Public Works to vote, but it would be helpful to
have the recommendation from the Board prior to their vote.
Commissioner Warden expressed his concern that the neighborhood be provided with more
time and opportunity to provide input into the proposal as he has received a lot of feedback from
the neighborhood expressing various concerns. He would like something e-mailed to him that
would indicate that the neighborhood supports the project.
Commissioner Darling, as the Board of Public Works liaison to the Planning and Development
Board, responded that all the public input and feedback is available online and was also
provided to the Planning and Development Board before they made their decision. He stated
that everyone has supported the idea of closing Lake Avenue even though they may not
necessarily support the project proposed by INHS on Hancock Street.
Mayor Myrick stated that he would like the Board to vote on this today. It would be good for
Common Council to have their recommendation before they vote. In addition, he has heard no
objections to the proposed creek walk.
Commissioner Warden expressed concern about how the creek walk would interact/impact
Conley Park?
Commissioner Darling responded that no work is being done at Conley Park as a result of the
project; but the creek walk would open up the walkway to the park for better access. He stated
that the Parks Commission supports the proposal and is very interested in thinning out some of
the brush there to make a nicer connection between Lake Avenue and Conley Park. INHS has
no plans to do anything with the Conley Park.
E
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes August 24, 2015
City Attorney Lavine confirmed that no work is planned for Conley Park as a result of this
project. The proposed agreement provides the City of Ithaca with a great deal of latitude across
the next twenty years to make any improvements that may be needed. The City of Ithaca will
not have any control over the playground that INHS will build as part of their project.
Asst. Supt. Benjamin noted that there is a catch basin is located on the south side of the curb
line on the corner of Lake Avenue and Franklin Street; it then goes on to Adams Street and
Second Street; an area where flooding or ice jams have occurred in the past.
Discussion followed on the floor regarding what options might be open to the City, when and if,
the catch basin for the storm sewer should need repair or replacement. It was noted that
INHS's proposed playground, to be constructed as part of their project, might interfere with work
the City might need to do on the infrastructure in that area. The City of Ithaca would be
responsible for the cost to repair or replace the playground after the work is completed.
Supt. Thorne noted that this is a lower type concern at this point for both the City and INHS. He
stated that he is sure the City could work with INHS as their project progresses to make sure
something new is not built on or near the storm sewer/catch basin infrastructure.
City Attorney Lavine noted that the actual construction of INHS' project is still a couple of years
off from now; perhaps 2017. If INHS had to adjust the location of the playground they would be
open to that; and the Board of Public Works would have a lot of leverage over the placement of
it. In addition, the future discussion of discontinuance of Lake Avenue will entail a huge and
lengthy process with lots of discussion by the Board of Public Works and Common Council; this
concern could be raised at that time.
A Vote on the Resolution Resulted As Follows:
Carried Unanimously
Parkinq & Traffic:
A. A ResolutionTo Amend the Vehicle and Traffic Schedules for Bridge Street, Schedule
XII, Parking Prohibited at All Times and Schedule XV, Parking Prohibited Certain Hours
By Commissioner Warden: Seconded by Commissioner Darling
WHEREAS, the Board of Public Works is authorized by Section 346-4 of the City of Ithaca Code
to adopt and to amend a system of Schedules in order to administer the Vehicle and Traffic
Law; and
WHEREAS, residents of Bridge Street have petitioned to change the on -street parking
regulations for the east side of the street to be "No Parking, Noon to 9 P.M., from May 1 st to
September 30th"; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Public Works is in agreement with this proposal; and
WHEREAS, staff has noticed that Bridge Street is not currently listed in the parking related
Schedules and therefore the Schedules do not reflect the No Parking Anytime signage as
currently posted on the west side of the street; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the west side of Bridge Street, from East State/MLK Jr. Street to Giles Street,
be listed in Schedule XII, Parking Prohibited at All Times, to reflect the existing, posted signs;
and, be it further
RESOLVED, That the east side of Bridge Street be listed in Schedule XV, Parking Prohibited
Certain Hours, as shown below:
Name of Street
Side
Time Limit; Hours/Days
Location
Bridge Street
East
12pm to 9pm/All Days May 1st—
September 3011
From East State/MLK
Jr. St. to Giles Street
Carried Unanimously
10
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
Authorization to Begin a Merchant Parking Validation Program - Resolution
By Commissioner Darling: Seconded by Commissioner Warden
WHEREAS, a validation program was established in October 2014 to assist customers to the
downtown merchants by allowing up to two hours of free parking in the city -owned parking
garages; and
WHEREAS, the validation program was funded by the Commons Project and the Downtown
Ithaca Alliance; and
WHEREAS, the program ended on July 31, 2015, to coincide with the opening of the Commons
to the public; and
WHEREAS, merchants are interested in establishing a new validation program through the use
of the new parking pay stations which allow single -use discount codes; and
WHEREAS, Tracer Tickets are already available for anyone to purchase at $.65 per hour for
use in the parking garages; and
WHEREAS, staff would recommend a discount parking program for merchants of the city to
provide parking to their customers at a rate of $.75 per hour for on -street parking and $.50 per
hour for garage parking; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works approves the establishment of a Merchant
Validation Program for merchants to purchase discount codes for on -street parking at $.75 per
hour and/or Tracer Tickets for garage parking at $.50 per hour to be given to customers for up
to two hours of free parking. These codes and tracer tickets should be used to promote future
visits to their businesses.
Carried Unanimously
Water & Sewer:
Appeal of Water Bill for Ithaca Children's Garden at 600 Block of Taughannock Boulevard
- Resolution
WHEREAS, in 2004 the City of Ithaca DPW Water & Sewer Division installed a water service
line in the Ithaca Children's Garden (ICG). DPW installed roughly 300-LF of 2-inch diameter K
Copper water service line along with a curb valve, 8 unions, and a tee fitting for a yard hydrant;
and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the installation of ICG's water service it was discovered that the 2-
inch K copper tubing we had purchased was flawed, in that the outside diameter (OD) did not
meet industry specifications because it was slightly smaller. This smaller OD is a problem where
the pipe is coupled (joined) using compression fittings which are all designed for standard OD
tubing. We have encountered leaks from loose fittings in one other location where this pipe had
also been used; and
WHEREAS, DPW W&S Division has repaired leaks on at least two compression connections at
the ICG since 2004, and we recognize that there are at least 8 more locations where this run of
copper tubing is joined with compression couplings where potential leaks are a high probability;
and
WHEREAS, DPW W&S plans to locate existing leaks and schedule repairs for the current leaks
on this service line in the Fall of 2015; and
WHEREAS, the ICG is requesting relief for the years 2013-2015 where the water billing is
above a previous annual average of 168-HCF; and
WHEREAS, the difference between the previous annual average and the billing for 2013 of 177-
HCF is 9-HCF and for the 2104 billing of 805-HCF is 637-HCF; and
WHEREAS, 9-HCF at the 2013 water rate of $4.73/HCF totals $42.57, and 637-HCF at the
2014 water rate of $5.11/HCF totals $3,255.07, and 2015 readings to date have not yet
exceeded the 168-HCF; and
11
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes August 24, 2015
WHEREAS, the ICG has been paying the bill all along; and
WHEREAS, Water Department Staff recommends to the Board of Public Works, based upon
the forgoing, that actual metered consumption above an annual 168-HCF will not be billed until
the DPW completes repairs on the water service line we originally installed in 2004, and all
consumption above 168-HCF over the last two years be refunded; now, therefore be it
RESOLVED, That a refund of $42.57 be made for 2013, a refund of $3,255.07 be made for
2014, and future use above 168-HCF in 2015 not be billed, until all the necessary repairs are
made by the Water and Sewer Department, to the Ithaca Children's Garden account
#7717306400.
Carried Unanimously
Discussion Items:
Approval of Locations in Cass Park for the Public Art Commissions Mural and Street Art
Program:
WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca Public Art Commission (PAC) has been established to, among
other duties, review and advise Common Council on proposals for the exhibition and display of
public art in City spaces, buildings, facilities, infrastructure, and to review development
proposals for decorative elements in the city's public spaces; and
WHEREAS, in 2010, the PAC created a mural and street art program to beautify blank walls
within the city while providing local artists from all sections of the community an opportunity to
showcase their work; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Public Works approved several City -owned sites for inclusion on the
list of potential sites in City of Ithaca Public Art Commission's Mural and Street Art Program by
resolution on May 19, 2010, and approved additional sites for inclusion in the program since that
time; and
WHEREAS, as a result of this approval, the PAC has worked with more than 50 artists to install
murals on City -owned property throughout the city, and the response to the new murals has
been overwhelmingly positive; and
WHEREAS, the PAC would like to consider all five outbuildings and the exterior of the
main building in Cass Park as locations for future murals; and
WHEREAS, the Parks Commission has discussed these sites as locations for future
murals and is supportive of murals in Cass Park, provided that the murals are
appropriate for a family park setting; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works approves the five outbuildings and the exterior of
the main building in Cass Park for inclusion on the list of potential sites for the PAC's Mural and
Street Art Program; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That the PAC will continue to work with Planning Department staff to conduct a
mutually acceptable public input procedure for engaging nearby businesses, residences, and/or
business and neighborhood associations for each specific project; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That the PAC will work with the City Attorney to ensure that any art mural RFP or
contract with a participating artist reflects and accommodates the needs and constraints of the
City.
Mayor Myrick read the proposed resolution. Commissioner Warden expressed his support for
the project. He also hopes that the Board would be able to review the actual designs once they
are available.
12
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes August 24, 2015
Mayor Myrick stated that all the proposed mural designs for Cass Park would need to come
before the Board of Public Works for approval. He voiced his support for the project and feels it
is a great program to beautify the City of Ithaca. The most recent mural was done in the Dryden
Road parking garage and is beautiful. It has made a big difference in the appearance of the
garage in a very positive way.
Board of Public Works members voiced their support for the proposal; the resolution will be
placed on the September 1411 agenda for a vote.
Director of Engineering West brought up a point of interest for the Board, as a result of the last
time that Director of Parking Nagy and Planner Wilson, took the proposal for the mural for the
Dryden Road parking garage to Common Council for support. Common Council members were
very surprised to find out that the City would be financing some of the cost of the mural painting.
It might be helpful, in the future, if statistics on costs for the clean-up of graffiti on City structures
versus the cost to support public art murals could be presented to Common Council to show
them how much maintenance costs have been reduced by the public art mural program. He
hoped that Mayor Myrick could assist staff in providing this information to Common Council at
future Common Council meetings. Mayor Myrick responded that he would because that was a
very fitting anecdote to share with Common Council members to encourage their support for the
program.
Board of Public Works members voiced their support for the proposal; the resolution will be
placed on the September 1411 agenda for a vote.
Lake Street Public Park Enhancements - Design Alternatives - Proposed Resolution
WHEREAS, currently, the City of Ithaca Department of Public Works and Project Consultant
(Trowbridge & Wolf Landscape Architects LLP) are working on the Lake Street Public Park
Enhancement Project ("Enhancement'); and
WHEREAS, the Enhancement proposes safety improvements and aesthetic enhancements to
the existing public park located at the southeast corner of the Lake Street Bridge over Fall
Creek; and
WHEREAS, on December 1st, 2014, the Board of Public Works unanimously authorized staff to
undertake said Enhancement as part of the Lake Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project (CP#791);
and
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2015, Common Council approved an increase to CP #791 by an
amount not to exceed $30,000 for a total project authorization of $1,494,250; and
WHEREAS, multiple design alternatives are being considered for the project; and
WHEREAS, after consulting with the public and advisory groups, the City of Ithaca Engineering
Department, together with project consultant, has recommended a design alternative which
includes pedestrian safety rail design (wood handrail, galvanized steel posts with wider
galvanized mesh -Alternative 2B), chip seal pavement (Alternative 1) and chain with sign as an
alternative to a gate (Alternative 1); and
WHEREAS, the estimated total cost to implement the recommended alternative is $199,400;
and
WHEREAS, total funding of $199,500 for the Enhancement is derived from $30,000 in IURA
block grant monies, $97,500 from the Regional Economic Development Council, up to $11,000
from the City of Ithaca Sidewalk Program, $20,000 from the Tompkins County Tourism Capital
Grant Program, $30,000 from the issuance of Serial Bonds, and $11,000 from the Lake Street
Bridge Project; and, therefore be it further
RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works hereby approves the implementation of the
recommended design alternative; and, be it further
13
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works hereby authorizes the Superintendent of Public
Works to proceed with the recommended design.
Bridge Systems Engineer Gebre walked the Board through the proposed design alternatives.
He reported that both the Parks Commission and Natural Areas Commission provided input
about the project.
He reported that the main concerns about the project have centered around the safety rail and
pavement designs. He is looking to the Board for their input as to how to proceed with the
project, knowing the concerns and constraints of the project and the approved funding for it. He
stated that staff would recommend the wood and galvanized steel rail design to reflect the
natural area the project is located in, and provide for a longer life of the railing. Staff would
recommend concrete for the pathway; however, there was no support for concrete by the
Natural Areas Commission or the Parks Commission. Staff also recommends a chain gate with
a sign to close/open the pathway.
Mayor Myrick wanted to make sure that the proposed chipped seal for the trail is porous; staff
confirmed that it is. Commissioner Warden wanted to make sure that the chipped seal would be
wheelchair accessible; it will.
Commissioner Darling stated that he favors the use of concrete for the walkway. He visited the
area this past weekend, and feels that a concrete path would provide more access to everyone
and cost less cost for the City. He noted that the same type of proposed railing material —
galvanized steel — was also used for the Six Mile Creek Walkway. He wanted to know what kind
of repair work had been done on it by the City since it was installed. Asst. Supt. Benjamin
responded, none — and it's been there 10 years and still looks good.
Director of Engineering West noted that staff can provide what the cost reduction would be to
replace a concrete walkway with chip seal, and using concrete would save $3,000.00.
Supt. Thorne stated that the chip seal has to be re -done every 8 years; concrete will last longer.
Mayor Myrick noted that the public, Natural Areas Commission, and Parks Commission would
push staff to take the project the other direction as far as what type of materials to use instead
of following staff's recommendations.
Commission Darling reported that this is a very small place that people visit. The City of Ithaca
would be improving access for everyone by following staff recommendations for what type of
materials to use. If the City used the materials that the public and Natural and Parks
Commission recommend that they will need maintenance more often. In addition, the City will
end up paying more in maintenance and replacement costs if they are used. Concrete is
cheaper, lasts longer, and will provide more access for everyone to the area.
Bridge Systems Engineer Gebre stated that $12,500 would be saved by using galvanized
instead of stainless steel.
Director of Engineering West stated that staff feel all the proposed alternatives are good and the
City could live with them. What drives staffs' recommendation is that the use of the proposed
materials fits within the authorization that the City has budgeted for it. It's the Board's call; if it
does not have to go back to Common Council for additional funding, then the conversation is
done. If concrete is not used, it will place the project over budget and will need additional
funding and approval from Common Council.
Commissioner Darling expressed his support for the use of concrete with galvanized steel, and
the less expensive railing.
Bridge Systems Engineer Gebre noted that stainless steel could be used if the bike racks and
benches were eliminated from the project.
14
Board of Public Works Meeting Minutes
August 24, 2015
Mayor Myrick stated that he would rather not send the proposal back to Common Council for
additional funding approval. In addition, it's aesthetically cleaner to use concrete because it's
sturdier. He also has not supported the objections raised by the Natural Areas Commission and
Parks Commission; he would also vote for chip seal to make sure the project happens.
Commissioner Darling stated that the proposal provides better access than there is now for both
pedestrians and wheelchairs which would allow everyone to enjoy the space.
Mayor Myrick stated that he would vote in support of the proposed resolution at the September
14th meeting of the Board, and for a project that fits within its approved budget.
The resolution will be placed on the Board's September 14th agenda for a vote.
Adjournment:
On a motion the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m.
Sarah L. Myers,
Information Mgt. Specialist
Svante L. Myrick,
Mayor
15
Pavement
Inventory,
Inspection and
Management
David Picinich
The Process: Segments
700 within city limits
Bridges and private roads excluded
Usually one block, i.e. from one cross street
to the next
Not always this simple
Comes out to an average of 500 feet per
segment, 67 miles of pavement inventoried
The Process: Verifying Data
Verify and update GIS data for each segment
of pavement -
Lanes
Curb to Curb Width
Shoulder Type (Curb or no curb, curb material)
Surface Type (Asphalt, unpaved, brick)
Guardrail
Length, type (material), condition
Culvert
Type (material), condition
The Process: Verifying data
A
6
C
1 NAME
Framstreet
Tostreet
2 MITCHELLST
COLLEGEAVE
BLAIRST
3 MITCHELLST
LINDEN AVE
COLLEGEAVE
4 MITCHELLST
DELAWAREAVE
LINDEN AVE
5 MITCHELLST
ITHACA RD
DELAWARE AVE
6 MITCHELLST
ELMWOOD AVE
ITHACA RD
7 MITCHELLST
CORNELLST
ELMWO0DAVE
8 MITCHELLST
COBBST
CORNELLST
9 MITCHELLST
PEARLST
COBBST
10 MITCHELLST
TOWN OF ITHACA LINE
PEARLST
11 ITHACA RD
MITCHELLST
BRYANTAVE
12 ITHACAED
BRYANTAVE
ELMWOOD AVE
13 ITHACA RD
ELMWOODAVE
DRYDEN RD
14 DRYDEN RD
ITHACA RD
HOY RD
1.5 DRYDEN RD EB LANE
BEFORE HOY RD
DRYDEN RD
16 DRYDEN RD
HOY RD
CITYTOWN LINE
17
1s
19
20
21
D
E I
F
G
ROUTE TOTALANES
ROW WIDTH WIDTH
C_C UID
356
2.0
49.5
30.0
356
2.0
49.5
M.0
356
2.0
49.5
30.0
356
2.0
43.5
30.0
2.0
49.5
24.0
2.0
49.5
26.1
2.0
49.5
26.1
2.0
49.5
25.1
2.0
49.5
25.1
356
2.0
55.0
30.0
356
2.0
55.0
30.0
356
2.0
55.0
30.0
356
2.0
49.5
25.0
356
1.0
0.0
16.0
356
2.0
0.0
30.0
H
Location_n
893 100 Blk Mitchell St.
894 200 Rik Mitchell St.
995 300 Blk Mitchell St.
421 300 Rik Mitchell St.
422 400 Blk Mitchell St.
996 500 Rik Mitchell St.
997 500 Rik Mitchell St.
494 700 Elk Mitchell St.
953 BW Elk Mitchell St.
423 100 Elk Ithaca Rd.
900 2W Elk Ithaca Rd.
425 3W Elk Ithaca Rd.
415 600 Elk Dryden Rd.
1051 5W Elk Dryden Rd EB LANE
417 5W Rik Dryden Rd.
Shape _Le_1
K
INTERZINCL
336.03 EAST
300.11 EAST
203.55 EAST
397.75 EAST+
841.29 EAST
318.93 EAST
310.25 EAST
311.84 EAST
209.27 NONE
743.73 NEAST
362.90 NEAST
711.97 EAST+
875.75 EAST
287.50 NONE
417.59 NONE
The Process: Online Maps
Verify segment data and reference current
information
HOME . RoadPavement5
Details + Add - I ` Edit
Q About 0 Content = Legend
Legend
Culverts
Inlet
i Outlet
• UNKNOWN
roadpavingcondition
hyd rocl
RoadlRaving
New Map
David -
00 Doo 6asemap
� Save e '�'
Share � Print !�,`�,� Directions
Measure
1111 Bookmarks
Find address or r:!
0,
psh
`A
�1�
Y
~
'- 7
1T
5yS
o
7
~ E YATES
y
STE YATES 3Y
Y
w YATES ST
r�
m
L-j
�
z
i
IkRRt
7
�,
.eD``FT
C
Esn.— A,iGIS Marketplace Help Terms. aF
Use pnvacy Contact Esri C—ta& Us Rap-t
Abuse
sA 's.+,�-'�
OBJECTIG_I
763
OBJECTID
1075
R+OADID
670104000
IPA 9�0
ST
NAME
N GENEVA ST
GASGAnILLA ST GASGAEMLLA
`e
ALTNAME
ti 9
ROUTE
E3TY ST r ESTY ST Ems ff ST r
HISTRCNAME
E5TY 3r
TOTALANES
2
SPEED
30
S t'
W GpuxrsrwcouRT 3rw cc uRT Sr o^ W Co URT5T y. y _...
PRIMAR:Y_
Secondary
r
BLOCK
400
� 9
x
y s
DEED DATE
1887 (Dewitt)
l
k ! W BuFFALG sT W auFFALG 3T
Fn ak Pr, 1�1-117
rrr
i z W BEN EGA ST
0 W SENEGR ST
sn E
E SEN
S£NFGi4SI EL
m W SENEGA ST y w SERE -GA 5T
ti b
'L
M
JR ST y W STATE ST . L 1(. JR 5T
yy STATE STI M K.
m GORNELLAVIE-+,
4ge'f SOU"
4�PP� AVE
C
EDGEhkOOR LA
m
h
,yav y
3T �
G�
aSMUN PL
AlY E 9llFFPLO ST E BUFFALO ST y r
L
re o
! � a
m
STE SElIECA 5T E 3ENECR 3T E SEN EGA ST E SENECA ST
:5
Ika$lobe. G—E..� Micro -aft,. R'r SDGP. USG-'. F'=..4., =fd ESIAwbus IDS lit
The Process: Condition Surveys
Assign a numerical value to each distress
based on
severity a n d
extent
DRARqN
RO-1-RqESS
L1-10r3c read fa
0
K7fp---
- uoev n urfwe
frrpt heaves
CONDMON
1 �ic+ad
Fav
i P.
LONGrr TDCN
'
ALLIGATOR
�TRA-1,SMERSE
C1AING
IY4
LleEects
EXr
GR Cr
NO
#
BAEd5
Low !'algid ffol
6
M
L apex -med FL *
Effd
EDGE
PAT Y-r
CRAOUNG
POTfIDUE
Nib
�r
NC7
MM
L*W hid Hi*
M89
0
1
"gh
Bcrd Putctizs
7�r�
F 4_.'TT11 #�]
BLEEDING
L11�'ECC6
L"
Hied
Low Mad Hipk
1 2 3
4 5 6
COI �DL O *I
1
Faa
" �
7 8 9
� Rxir
Distresses: Cracking
Distresses: Patching/Potholes,
Gutting, Bleeding
ALL
The Process: Condition Surveys
A B
C
D
1
OBJECTID_1 NAME
FromAreet
Tostreet
2
359 N AURORA ST
E LINCOLN ST
E FALLS ST
3
359 N AURORA ST
QUEEN ST
E LINCOLN ST
4d
369 N AURORA ST
KING ST
QUEEN ST
5
370 N AURORA ST
ETOMPKINS ST
KING ST
5
464NAURORA ST
EYATES ST
ETOMPKINSST
7
463 N AURORA ST
E MARSHALL ST
EYATESST
a
462 N AURORA ST
FARM ST
E MARSHALLST
9
460 N AURORA ST
CASCADILLA CREEK
FARM ST
10
1072 N AURORA ST
CASCADILLA CREEK
CASCADILLA CREEK
11
461 N AURORA ST
E COURT ST
CASCADILLA CREEK
12
459 N AURORA ST
E BUFFALO ST
E COURT ST
13
458 N AURORA ST
E SENECA ST
E BUFFALO ST
14
457 N AURORA ST
E STATE ST
E SENECA ST
15
56 S AURORA ST
E STATE ST
E GREEN ST BRIDGE
16
1074 S AURORA ST EB LANE
S AURORA ST
E STATE ST
17
699 S AURORA ST
E GREEN ST
HUDSON ST
18
456 S AURORA ST
PROSPECT ST
BRIDGE
19
1075 S AURORA ST WB LANE
PROSPECT ST
E CLINTON ST
20
453 S AURORA ST
PLEASANT ST
PROSPECT ST
21
454SAURORA ST
COLUMBIAST
PLEASANT ST
22
455 S AURORA ST
HILLVIEW PL
COLUMBIA ST
23
1037 S AURORA ST
HILLVIEW PL
GRANDVIEW AVE
24
1039 S AURORA ST
TOWN OF ITHACA LINE
GRANDVIEW AVE
x
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
AE
DRAINAGE ROUGHNESS LNGTRCRACK
ALLIGCRACK EDGECRACK PATCHPOT RUTTING BLEEDING
4
1
1
4
5
1
a
1
4
4
3
D
2
1
2
1
7
1
3
D
2
a
3
1
7
1
7
a
5
1
a
1
4
1
5
0
D
1
2
1
7
1
2
4
a
a
a
1
4
1
5
0
5
0
2
1
4
1
1
5
4
2
0
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
NIA
NIA
1
4
5
0
0
2
5
1
1
1
1
5
2
a
2
1
1
1
1
D
1
D
D
1
1
1
0
0
D
D
1
1
1
1
1
0
a
a
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
D
5
1
NIA
N/A
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
1
1
4
0
D
a
1
4
1
1
1
0
D
D
0
1
1
1
1
2
2
a
8
1
1
4
0
1
D
2
3
4
1
1
1
0
D
a
5
4
1
1
1
2
S
0
6
4
1
1
1
5
1
1
5
1
A
The Process: CAMP-RS Software
Stores segment information, including traffic
and importance
CAMP-RS 1.2.0.0
File Surveys Budgeting Reports Admin Settings Scripts
M:\DeptPmjects\G IS Engineer\Pavement condition\Gthaca2015.mdb
Pdd New []elate Sravey Apply Repae
RIN Name From To Begin (Feet) End (Feet) Length (Feet) Width (Feet) Lanes Surface Type TShoelder Traffic Importance Survey w
DD7 E CLINTON ST SIXMILECREEK S CAYUGA ST 1 D 171.1327 38 2 Asphak None f
1011
STEWART AVE
CAMPUS RD
CORNELLAVE
0
0
529.3997
34
2
Asphalt
None
3
2
7/7/201
103
E LINCOLN ST
N TOGA ST
UTICA ST
0
0
299.201
34
2
Asphalt
None
2
3
7/7/201-
1030
CHESTNUTST
306CHESTNUT
HOOKPL
0
0
162.OD69
20
2
Asphak.
Curb - Concrete
1
1
6/1620
1034
5CAYUGA ST
SPENCERST
BRIDGE
0
0
136.2911
28.1
2
Asphalt
Curb - Granite
3
2
6/19/20
1039
SAURORAST
HILLVI:EWPL
GRANDMEWAVE
0
0
1376.671
20.5
2
Asphalt
Curb - Granite
4
3
G/8/201
104
E LINCOLN ST
N AURORA ST
N AURORA ST
0
0
63.49984
34
2
Asphak
None
1
3
7171201
1040
SAURORAST
TOWN OFITHA...
GRANDMEWAVE
0
0
199.217
25
2
Asphalt
Curb - Granite
4
3
618201
105
E LINCOLN ST
LAKE ST
N AURORA ST
0
0
467.4507
30
2
Asphalt
Nave
2
3
7/7201
1061
DRYDEN RD EB...
BEFORE HOY RD
DRYDEN RD
0
0
297.601
16
1
Surface Treated
Curb - Granite
3
3
611020
1062
NCAYUGA ST
FALL CREEK
TOWN LINE PR.._
0
0
499.4667
34
2
Asphak
Mied Type
3
3
6/1920
1076
S AURORA ST E...
S AURORA ST
E STATE ST
0
0
137.9011
20
1
Asphalt
Curb -Granite
4
1
619201
1077
SAURORAST ...
PROSPECT ST
ECLINTON ST
0
0
138.2351
15
1
Asphalt
Curb - Granite
4
1
6/9/201
1078
TAUGHANNOCK....
NORTH END OF...
PAST CROSSW...
0
0
526.6707
28
2
Asphak
None
3
2
7/7201
1032
UNIVERSITYAV....
UNIVERSITYAVE
UNIVERSITYAVE
0
0
87.39533
14
1
Asphalt
Muted Type
3
3
7/7/201
130
W LINCOLN ST
N CAYUGA ST
AUBURN ST
0
0
344.9741
34
2
Asphalt
Nave
2
2
7/7201
134
❑EY ST
W LINCOLN ST
STATE ROUTE ...
0
0
173.7499
40
2
Asphalt
None
2
2
7/71201
157
W TOMPKINS ST
N CAYUGA ST
AUBURN ST
0
0
342.4093
30
2
Asphalt
None
2
2
7/7/201
173
NALBANY ST
ESTY ST
CASCADILLAST
0
0
393.7413
20.1
2
Asphalt
Curb - Concrete
2
2
G/1G20
180
N PLAIN ST
W BUFFALO ST
W COURT ST
0
0
469.3609
35.5
2
Asphalt
Curb - Concrete
2
3
6/19/20
181
N ALBANY ST
W BUFFALO ST
W COURT ST
0
0
467.6565
28.1
2
Surface Treated
Curb - Concrete
4
3
611620
132
N ALBANY ST
W S.ENECA ST
W BUFFALO ST
0
0
333.1029
30.5
2
Surface, Treated
Curb - Granite
4
3
6116120
133
N ALBANY ST
W STATE ST
W SENECA ST
0
0
313.4376
30.5
2
Surface Treated
Curb -Granite
4
3
6/16/20
135
W BUFFALO ST
PARK PL
WASHINGTON ST
0
0
266.0929
37
2
Asphalt
Curb -Granite
3
3
7/1/201
137
N PLAIN ST
W GREEN ST
W STATE ST
0
0
331.2935
40
2
Asphalt
Curb - Concrete
2
3
6/1920
1
The Process: CAMP-RS Software
Input condition information into CAMP-RS
-• CAMP-RS
- Collect Survey Data
Inventory
Information
RIN
1CC
Name
From
SIXMILECREEK
To
S CAYUGA ST
40-D—age
� Pln pistra_::.
Edent Seventy
F
LowMediumHigh
45-Patching/Potholes
❑ No Distress
Edent Severity
Low Low
Medium I I Medium
High High
41-Roughness.
4In Distress
Edent Severiv
M9
Medium I Medium
ium
Hl h Hi
Begin MP 0
End MP 0
Length 171.1.327
Width 3&
45-Rutting
_ No Distress
Edent Severity
Low
MwuMedi
um
Hihm
High
Save Cancel
\\111A - - 01 �b ba
42-Long/Trans Cracking
17 No Distress
Eden Severity
P�]
w
Medium
High
47-Bleeding-Raveling
Eden Severity
F
MediumHigh
Lanes
2
Surface Type
Asphaft
Shoulder Type
None
Survey Date
7./20/2015
43-Alligator Cracks 44-Edge Cracking
r❑ No Distress n No Distress
edent Seventy
Edent Severity
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium Medium
Mg
H"
H
High H
Road Pavement
Condition Survey 2015
m r,i
F
i
U
L
7 W' SEN ECn SC
Sl
y E SEN
ECA
Ca
E GREEN S7'
•sue W GREEN ST fS} S -
rc
�
<:
r
J W CLINTON 5116
a -
S
p
..•...
....•........•............................. ,r
..............
Legend
Pavement Survey Status
•
r
IN
with miles and number of segments
r•""''�
Q~P
Surveyed 67 m (691)
S
Bridge <1 m (25)
�`;•
TBD- NYS Rte 13 4 m (37)
a,
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
0.8 1
�'"• ....
I t i i
i I NIA (127)
Miles
The Analysis: ICI
CAMP-RS gives Pavement Condition Index for
each segment based on distresses
File Surveys Budgeting Reports Admin Settings Scripts
M:\DeptPmjeds\G Add New s\G ISEE� n��gitneer\Pavemeut condltion\Cdhaca2015.mdb
u Delete Survef' APPIY ReP�'
RIN ® Name Width (Feet) Lanes. Surface Type Shoulder Tragic Importance Survey Date
k4
PC Re
ivory Repair Type Repair Cost
1011.
STEWART AVE
34
2
Asphalt
Nave
3
2
7/7/2015
80
Suff
e Treatme...
Micro Pave 3/9' ...
_
7200
103
E LINCOLN ST
34
2
Asphalt
None
2
3
7/7/2015
60
Box Out 25%(W/...
8983
1030
CHESTNUT ST
20
2
Asphalt
Curb - Concrete
1
1
6/16/2015
64
Ove
y
2" Mill & FBI
3953
1034
5 CAYUGA ST
28.1
2
Asphalt
Curb-C-uande
3
2
6/1.9/2015
78
Drat
ge Work
Repay Catch Bas...
6166
1039
S AURORA ST
20.5
2
Asphalt
Curb - Grarete
4
3
6/8/2015
69
Box Out 25% (r/...
24920
104
E LINCOLN ST
34
2
Asphalt
None
1
3
7/7/2015
80
Swf
a Treatme...
M empaving T&L ...
437
1040
5 AURORA ST
25
2
Asphalt
Crab-Gram[e
4
3
6/8/2015
73
Ov
Z' Mill & PII
6077
105
E LINCOLN ST
30
2
Asphalt
None
2
3
7/7/2015
56
Box Out Z54 (W/...
12383
1061
❑RYDEN RD EB LANE
16
1
Surface Treated
Curb - Grande
3
3
G/10/2015
90
De
Maintenance
Do Nothing
0
1062
N CAYUGA ST
34
2
Asphalt
M—d Type
3
3
6/192015
64
Ov
Zr Mill & PII
20713
1076
S AURORA ST EB LANE
20
1
Asphalt
Curb - Grande
4
1
6/9/2015
83
Dv
2" Mill & RII
3365
1077
5 AURORA ST WB LANE
15
1
Asphalt
Gab - Grande
4
1
6/9/2015
92
Repairs.
Gads Repairs
153
1078
TAUGHANNOCK BLVD
28
2
Asphalt
N—
3
2
7/7/2015
83
Ov
Zr Mill & Ptl
17992
1032
UNIVERSITY AVE EB LANE
14
1
Asphalt
Mixed Type
3
3
7/7/2015
86
DvrW�k
2" Mill & RII
1502
130
W LINCOLN ST
34
2
Asphalt
None
2
2
W7/2015
80
2" Mill & RII UD:...
21310
134
DEY ST
40
2
Asphalt
None
2
2
7+7/2015
57
Zr Mill & RII UD:...
13299
157
W TOMPKINS ST
30
2
Asphalt
None
2
2
7/7/2015
33
Repair Catch Biss...
16539
173
N ALBANY ST
2B.1
2
Asphalt
Gab - Concrete
2
2
6/162015
68
iReplaceGaSs
1476
180
NPLAIN ST
35.5
2
Asphalt
Curb -Concrete
2
3
6/192015
6S
iRepair
Catch Bas...
2GB27
131
N ALBANY ST
Z8.1
2
Surface Treated
Curb - Concrete
4
3
6/162015
77
Rec
istmct
Stabilize Baw & ...
8201
132
N ALBANY ST
30.5
2
Surface Treated
Gab - Grande
4
3
6/16/2015
69
Surf
e Treatment
Micro Pave UD: (...
10567
133
N ALBANY ST
30.5
2
Surface Treated
Curb - Grande
4
3
6>162015
74
Aso
It Overlay
Zr Mill & RII
11664
135
W BUFFALO ST
37
2
Asphalt
Curb - Grande
3
3
7/12015
59
Ov
Z' Mill & RII UD:...
18313
137
N PLAIN ST
40
2
Asphalt
Curb -Concrete
2
3
6/19/2015
72
Draflige
Work.
Install Underdrain
335
The Analysis: Repair Categories
Program suggests repair category based on
distresses
File Surveys Budgeting Reports Admin Settings Scripts
M:\DeptPmjects\GISEngineer\Pavemerft conditionl.Dthaca2015.mdb
Add New EKI D iEl
Survey Apply Repair
n
RIN Shoulder Name Surface Type Type Traffic Importance Survey Dale PCI
r
Repair
Category
air Type Repair Cost Priority Valu
1011
STEWART AVE
Asphak
None
3
2
7/712015
80
Surface Treatments
M Pave 3/9' (no T&L)
7200
_
75
103
E LINCOLN ST
Asphalt
None
2
3
7/712015
W
Rehab
1 Out 254 (W1 Base)
8983
3B
1030
CHESTNUTST
Asphalt
Curb-Convete
1
1
6/16/2015
64
Overlay 2'
ill&FII
3953
40
1034
S CAYUGA ST
Asphalt
Curb -Gavle
3
2
G/19/2015
78
Drainage Work
R r Catch Bawls
616G
90
1039
S AURORA ST
Asphalt
Curb- Granite
4
3
G/812015
69
Rehab
but 254(W1 Base Work)
24920
32
104
E LINCOLN ST
Asphalt
Nave
1
3
7/7/ZU15
80
Surface Treatments
M fap.mg T&L If1" Ruts
437
70
1040
S AURORA ST
Asphalt
Curb - C—ite
4
3
618/2015
73
Overlay Z'
Fill & FII
6077
64
105
E LINCOLN ST
Asphalt
None
2
3
7/7/2015
56
Rehab
B Out 254 (W1 Base)
123M
38
1061
DRYDEN RD EB LANE
Surface Treated
Curb - Grande
3
3
6/10/2015
90
Deter Maintenance,othing
0
51
1052
N CAYUGA ST
Asphalt
Moved Type
3
3
6/19/2015
64
Overlay 2'
ill & Fill
20718
56
1076
5 AURORA ST EB LANE
Agrhak
Curb - Grande
4
1
6/912015
83
(Merlay
Z pill & Fill
3365
GO
1077
S AURORA ST WB LANE
Asphalt
Curb - Granite
4
1
G/912015
92
Crack Repairs C,
Repairs
153
96
1073
TAUGHANNOCK B:LVD
Asphalt
None
3
2
7/7/2015
83
Overlay
Z Jill & Fill
17992
60
1082
UNIVERSITY AVE EB LANE
Asphalt
Mooed Type
3
3
7/7/2015
86
Overay 2'
Fill & Fill
1502
68
131)
W LINCOLN ST
Asphalt
None
2
2
7/712015
80
Overlay
Z ill & FII UD: w/under drain
21310
80
134
DFYST
Asphalt
None
2
2
7/7/2015
57
Dveday Z'I
I & RII UD_.hauler drain
13299
84
157
W TOMP QNS ST
Asphalt
None
2
2
M12015
83
Drainage Work
v Catch Basins
16539
100
173
N ALBANY ST
Asphalt
Curb - Concrete
2
2
6/16/2015
68
Drainage Work
Draeiage Work
Reconstrud Stxe
Surface Treatment
.Asphalt Ove1ay 2'
Rce Curbs
1476
95
85
20
8B
38
180
NPLAIN ST
Asphalt
Curb - Conaaie
2
3
6/19/2015
66
Rr Catch Bas"ais
26827
181
N ALBANY ST
Surface Treated
Curb -Concrete
4
3
6/16/2015
77
Base & 2'Asphak Top
3201
182
183
N ALBANY ST
N ALBANY ST
Surface Treated
Surface Treated
Curb - Granite
Curb - Granite
4
4
3
3
G/16I2015
6/16/2015
69
74
MPave UD: (w/under drain, No T&L)
10597
ill & Fit
11664
195
187
W BUFFALO ST
N PLAIN ST
Asphalt
Asphalt
Curb - Grande
Curb - Concrete
3
2
3
3
7/1/2015
6/19/2015
59
72
Overlay 2'
Drainage Work
ill & RII UO: w/under drain
II Underdrain
18313
335
s)
100
The Analysis: CAMP-RS Software
User chooses specific repair from suggested
category. Costs and life months gained are
givenfor each repair � =AMP-RS-poPl,R.Pei.
Road Nary JECLINTON ST
From
SIXMILECREEK
To
I S CAYUGA ST
Linear Feet
171.1327
Square Feet
16503.0426
Repair Category
I Overlay
Repair Options
1.5" Overlay CS: w/Sh .
Overlay RS: w/Sh-
1.5" Overt U®: w/Uru
2" Mill A RII UC1: w/und
Repair Cost. S
79�.71
Life, Months
PPS Cancel
Analysis: Priority Value
Software assigns each segment a priority value -
number that takes into account distresses, repair
type, PCI, traffic, and importance
File Surveys Budgeting Reports Admin Settings Script:.
M.\Dep[Pmjed"\' EngineerSPavemenl conditior\Maea2015.mdb
Add New Eder DeIere S Appq Repak
RIN Name er Tra0ic Importance Survey Bale PC I "ec4 Repair Type Repair Cast
Pro* Value Bu
Year
10117
E CLINTON ST
4
3
7/7/2015
86
Oveday
7' MAI & FM
7934
72
1
_
1011
STEWART AVE
3
2
7/7/2015
so
Surface Treatments
Micro Pare 3/8"hw T&L)
7200
75
0
103
E LINCOLN ST
2
3
7/7/2015
60
R,ehab
Box (Art 25% (W/ Base)
89M
38
2
LJ.,
1030
CH ESTNUT ST oncrete
S CAYUGA ST mntle
1
1
6/162015
64
Overlay
7'Mm B FT
390
40
2
1034
3
2
6/192015
78
O-anage. Work
Rep- Catch Bates.
8166
90
0
1039
5AUHORA ST —1.
4
3
6/82015
69
Rehab
Box Od 25%(WI Brie Wwk)
2492B
32
2
104
E LINCOLN ST
1
4
2
3
3
3
7/72015
6/8/2615
7/72015
80
73
56
5uf— Trcabnerts.
Orer4W
Rehah
Mksoparng T&L 12" Fhts
7' Mill & FY
Box Cut 25% (W/ Base)
437
BB77
12383
70
64
38
0
1
2
1040
SAURCRAST imnile
105
ELINCOLN ST
DRYDEN RD EB LANE +cantle
1061
3
3
6/102015
90
Defer Maintenance
D. Nothing
0
51
0
1062
N CAYUGA 5T
ype,
3
3
6/192915
64
6rerlay
7' Mill & F11
20713
56
2
107B
S AURO RA ST FR LANE
—do
4
T
6/92015
83
D.HW
T Mtll 8 -
3365
60
1
1077
S AURORA ST WE LANE
4
1
6/9/2015
92
Crate Repass
Crack R,airs.
153
96
0
1078
TAUGHANNOCK BLVD
3
2
717/2015
83
Oveday
7'Mi11&Ftl
17592
60
1
1032
UNIVERSITY AVE EB LANE
3
3
7/7/2015
86
Oraday
2" Mill & FII
1502
68
0
130
W LINCOLN ST
2
2
7/7/2015
31)
D—i y
7' MII & Fill UD: wAmder dram
2181.0
80
0
134
DBY ST
2
2
717/2015
57
Overlay
7' WII A RI UD: w/under de r
13299
84
0
157
W TOM PKINS ST
2
2
7172015
83
D—ge. Wodk
Repas Catch Bases
16539
100
0
173
N ALBANY ST
2
2
B/15/2015
G8
Bminage. Weds
R p.- Curb.
147G
95
0
130
N PLAIN ST
-te
2
3
6/19/2015
66
Dr inage Work
Repay Catch Basiu9.
26827
35
0
181
N ALBANY ST
4
3
6/162015
77
Reconshud
Stabilize Base & Zr Asphat Top
8201
20
3
182
N ALBANY ST
e
4
3
G/162015
69
Surface Treatment
Micro Pave DD. (wAarder drain. No T&L)
10597
88
0
183
N ALBANY ST
e
4
3
6/162015
74
Awhett Cretay
7' Mil & FN
114£4
38
2
185
W EUFFALO ST
3
3
7J72015
59
Overlay
7' Mill 8 FII UD: w/under dean
18313
80
0
187
N PLAIN ST
2
3
6/192:
12
Drainage Wodc
Install Underdrair
335
100
0
a
g
�
Input annual budget and observe yearly plan
for repairs
File Surveys Budgeting Reports Admin Settings Scripts
M:'1DeptPmjec[s\GISEngineer\Pavemern conddion\Cilhaca2015mdb
Add New E�tl Delete E�n:] Apply Repac
RIN Name d� Traffic lmportarce Survey➢ale Pa Wipair n, Repat Type Repair Cost Prlorty Value
ego
Budget Yea
3"
N CAYLIGAST
1, -Grand.
3
3
6/19/2015
&3
Drainage Work
Install Llnderdmin
490
85
0
932
ECOURTST
2
3
7/7/M5
76
Drainage Work
Repay Curbs
958
90
0
454
FROSPECT ST
e
4
3
7/7/2015
92
Defer Maintenance.
Do Nothing
0
54
0
916
FLORAL AVE
e
3
3
7/72015
88
Crack Repairs
Crack Reps
39M
102
0
58
S ADRCRAST
-C-c t.
4
3
6/8/2015
92
Crack Repairs
Crack Repairs
288
108
0
842
NCAYUGA ST
1B -Concrete
3
3
6/192015
89
Drainage Work
Repar Curbs
432
100
0
465
N AURORA ST
-C-sa¢2e
2
3
6/8f2015.
78
Drainage Work
Replace Curbs
1532
105
0
895
MITCHELL ST
ied Type
4
3
6/102015
81
Drainage Work
Repair Shoulders
306
100
0
394
MITCHELL ST
-Graite
4
3
6/10/2015
87
Crack Repairs
Crack Repairs
331
108
0
494
MITCHELL ST
1B -C-aade
3
2
6/10/2015
94
Defer Maintenance
Do Nothing
0
48
0
518
TAUGHANNOCK BLVD
ne
3
2
7/72015
90
Crack Repairs
Crack Repairs
147D
96
0
562
5 ALBANY ST
b -C—ste,
2
3
6/19201..5
76
Drainage Work
Cst Shoulders
am
90
0
919
W CLINTON ST
ne
4
3
7/7/2015
87
Drainage Work
Repair Catch Basins
30700
105
0
57
S CAYUGA ST
-Crmnle
3
3
G119/2015
64
Drainage Work
Repair Catch BaSns
20081
95
0
638
TAUGHAN NOCK BLVD
3
2
7/72015
90
Crack Repairs
Crack Repairs
1296
96
0
784
S PLAIN ST
1, -Concrete
2
3
G/192015
84
Dranage Work
Repair Curbs
497
90
0
G74
TAUGiHAN NDCK BLVD
2
2
77721115
88
Crack Repairs
Crack Repairs
law
90
0
9m
ITHACA RD
b -C—crate,
3
3
6/10.2015
90
Defer Mdtdenarce
Do Nothtrg
0
51
0
897
MITCHELLST
b -Crate
3
2
G/10/2015
85
Drainage Work
Remavo & halml Shorkk—
742
90
0
56
IN CAYUGA ST
b -Grate
3
3
6/192015
83
Drainage Work
Repair Cacti Basins
19377
95
1
829
STEWART AVE
3
2
7/7/2015
73
Drainage Work
Remove, Install Shorders
im
85
1
97
LAKE ST
3
3
7/72015
62
0-1
T' Mill A RII UD: w/under dry
3%15
92
1'
445
W BUFFALO ST
b -Cradle
3
3
7/12015
76
Dranage Wark
Repair Catch Be.-
2GB73
95
1
93G
S PLAIN ST
b -Concede
2
3
G/192015
34
Surface Treatments
Chip Sea (Sirrje)
733
75
1
476
LINN ST
e
3
3
7/72015
57
Overlay
2" Mill S Fill UD: wA ndderdrain
15200
92.
1
What We Can Learn
What percentage of roads are in each
condition (in terms of PCI ranges)?
File Surveys Budgeting Reports Admin Settings Scripts
M_\Dept P.jeds\G ISEngineer\Pavement condlion\Othaca2015mdb
Add New � Dde �1PPh' Repair
RN Name er Traffic Importance Sr.evey Dale PCI eg.y Repay Type Repair Cost N.* Value Budget Year
353
UNIVERSITYAVE
ype
3
13
6/162015
35
Rehab
StabiI.Base& Asp, 2"New Asph
23932
48
2
202
5 PLAN ST
—te,
2
3
6/192015
43
Rehab
SIa6il.13ase & Asp, P' New Asph
11837
40
2
9"
STEWART AVE
3
2
7!7/2015
47
Reconstruct
Total Recap. w/ Under Drain
85%5
21
3
941
STEWART.AVE
3
2
7/7J2015
51
Overlay
1.5" Overay RS. w/Sh rider Repair
IGG41
GO
1
431
OAK. AVE WB LANE
e
t
1
W12015
51
Reconstrud
Taal Reran. w/Under amain
10056
12
3
942
STEWART AVE
3
2
7/72015
53
Reconstruct
Total Recon. w/ Under Drain
47892
18
3
62
UNIVERSITY AVE
vpe
3
3
6/16/2015
53
Rehab
St bil.Base & Asp, 2" New Asph
23007
38
2
432
STEWART AVE
3
2
7172015
54
Reconstruct
Total Recon. w/ Under Drain
556U
21
3
601
WAIT AVE
e
2
1
G/162015
54
Rehab
Box Out 25*4 (No Base Worle)
9542
32
2
786
S PLAN ST
ancrete
2
3
6/192015
54
Re ristnid
Taal Recon. w/Under Drain
78097
13
3
105
ELINCOLN ST
2
3
7/7/2315
56
Rehab
Box Out 254 W/Base)
12393
38
2
423
OAK AVE EB LANE
ranite
1
1
7/1/2015
56
Rehab
Stabll.B.- & Asp, Zr New Asph
864
26
1
433
i OLLEGE AVE
ranite,
3
3
7/12015
55
Rehab
Box W 254 (W/ Base Work)
14298
40
2
712
E LINCOLN ST
2
3
7/72015
56
Rehab
Bax Out 254 (W1 Base)
78M
38
2
WS
N CAYUGA ST
ranite
3
3
G/19C2315
57
Rehab
Stabll.Base & Asp, 2" New Asph
12613
34
2
134
DEYST
2
2
717/M5
57
Ovelay
Z'Mill&All UD: w/under drain
13M
84
0
476
LINN ST
3
13
7/7/2015
57
Overlap
2' Mill & RII UD: w/under drain
15200
192.
0
265
CHESTNUT ST
rc ete
t
1
6/lfi/m15
58
Overlay
7' Mill & RII
9407
52
2
53
HUDSON ST
3
2
7/72015
58
Overlay
2' Kill & RII
20979
52
2
135
W BUFFALO ST
"e
3
3
7/1/2015
59
Overlay
2' Mill & RII UD: w/under drain
13313
80
0
573
UORNELLST
2
2
G/162315
59
Rehab
Box Out 25%(No Base Work)
21124
30
2
318
WAIT AVE
c
3
3
G/1612015
59
Asphaft O-H y
2' Mill & RII U D:./under dram
26324
40
2
60
UNIVERSITY AVE
e
3
3
67162015
59
Rehab
Stabil. Base & Asp, 2" New Agrh
165E5
40
2
579
CO RNELL ST
crate
2
2
6/16/2015
59
Asphak overlay
2' Mill & FII UD:./under drain
23291
36
2
997
COLLEGEAVE
crae
3
3
7/12015
60
Overlay
2'Will &All
10325
68
1
r ti �
What We Can Learn
Excel lem
Gwd 4 1 DrGp in Quality
Fair 7$ of Life
Pbor
Failed
4M Drop in Quality
is
5pendiog 51 on
preservarion here-
-Airni ote5 or delays
speindirg $6 to 10
on r P @1 i11 C 6i ri �^
reconstruction 1efe,
12% of Life!
2.0
Road Pavement
Condition Survey 2015
�. Pavement Condition Index Value (PCI)
y� City of Ithaca, NY
z
w
z �.
m;
o % . +mow
W SENECA
SE.NEGI S,
� '1 fro LItEF:N tiT E. tiHF F.N SI'
O 9 r
YJ CLlNTON 5'E. y
4p
I,
2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Miles
Legend
Road Pavement Condition
Index value (PCI)
4 - 59 P— 6.8 m (57)
•� 60 -79 Fair 38 m (370)
80 -94 Goad 22 m (264)
What We Can Learn
Which roads does the program give highest
priority to?
File Suweys Budgeting Reports Admin Settings Scripts
M:\NeptProlerds\GISEngi i—\Pavemerrt candAion\Gthaca2015:mdb
Add—
E:K:l Delde Srmr 5` APPH �
RIN Name Type Traffic Importance Survey Dote PCI eg-y Repair Type Repair Cost Pi Value Budgd Year
395
MITCHELLST
M6ced Type
4
3
6/10/2015
81
Drainage Work
Repair Sheulders.
306
100
0
372
N AURORA ST
Cub -Gard e,
2
3
6/82015
68
Drainage Work
Repae Curbs
1074
100
0
157
W TOMPKINS ST
None
2
2
7172015
83
Drainage Work
Repair Catch Basins
16539
100
0
842
NCAYUGAST
Curb -Cmaei
3
3
6/19/2015
89
Drainage Wok
Repair Cubs
432
100
0
188
S ALBANY ST
Cub -G ft.
4
3
6/192015
76
Drainage Work
Instill UnderdnIn
335
100
0
187
N PLAIN ST
Cub -Concede
2
3
6/19/2015
72
Dainage Work
Ini Underdrain
335
100
0
438
E BUFFALO ST
Csb -6- de
3
3
7/1,20i5
92
Gade Repairs
Gadc Repairs
352
102
0
354
N CAYUGA ST
Curb -Condo
3
3
6/1921115
88
Crack Repair
Crack Repai.
390
IU2
0
916
FLORAL AVE
None
3
3
7/72015
88
Or.& Repars
Crack Rep-
39M
102
0
460
N AURORA ST
Curb-Graritc
3
3
G182015
90
Crack. Repars
Crack Repair
359
102
0
919
W CLINTON ST
None
4
3
7/7/2015
87
Drwage Work
Repay Catch Easins
30700
105
0
465
NAUR0RA ST
Curb - Grarrte
2
3
6/82015
78
➢ravage Work
Replace Cubs.
1532
105
0
98
LAKE ST
None
3
3
7/721315
74
Drug. Wodk
Remove, Install Shoulders
1235
105
0
53
S AUR0RA ST
Curb -Garde
4
3
6/8/2015
92
Cack Repairs
Lack Repairs.
238
1.08
0
834
MITCH ELL ST
Cub -Gracile
4
3
W10/2015
87
Crack Repairs
Crack Repairs
331
10B
0
431
OAK AVE WB LANE
Curb -G ke
1
1
7/12015
51
Reconkn d
Trial Recon..1Lhder Dram
100%
12
3
997
CORNELL ST
Curb-Concrde
2
2
6/16/2015
64
R—bud
R&Iise Base 67' Asphalt Tpp
5701
15
3
786
S PLAIN ST
Curb-Concrde
2
3
G/192015
54
Reconsbud
Trial Recon, w/Under Dram
78097
13
3
942
STEWART AVE
Nana
3
2
7/7/2015
53
Reconitrud
Trial Recon. w/ Under Drain
47852
18
3
181
N ALBANY ST
Ciub -Cares to
4
3
6/16/2015
77
R—LA i cud
SI.Wixe Base 8 7' Asphak Top
3201
20
3
482
STEWART AVE
None
3
2
7/72015
54
Rei
Total Recon. w/ Under Drain
556V
21
3
944
STEWART AVE
None
3
2
7/7/2015
47
Rec—n Mcl
Tdal Recon. w/ Under Dram
33965
21
3
42B
OAK AVE EO LANE
I Curb -Granite
I 1
11
7/12015
56
1 Rehab
I Sli 0-8 Asp, Zr New Asph
354
2G
1
444
J W BUFFALC ST
I Cub -Grate
13
13
7/12015
161
Rehab
I Bore Out 25%(Nc Base Work)
114543
123
3
316
1 WAIT AVE
Curb-Cnoete
2
1 1
6/162i115
68
Rehab
Box Out 25%(No Base Wrnk1
4142
30
2
4
111
M
------------------
Road Pavement
Condition Survey 2015
Pavement Priority Value
City of Ithaca, NY
i
9 31
Z
�..
z
z WSENECA ST
SENECA ST �� -
,� LP
GREEN ST-
`
j, r m
y W� CM�1J�ON 5T C i�
1p
........... ............................................ 1
Legend
�p N Road Pavement Priority
Value With number of segments
12 - 49 how 18 m (193)
50-75 Medium 36 m (333)
1
76 - 108 High 13 m (165)
What We Can Learn
Are scheduled repairs what's best for the
roads? Should we consider repair alternatives?
File Surveys Budgeting Reports Admin Settings Scripts
M_0eptP jeda\G ISEngineer'1Paverrrent condition\Qhaca2015mdb
Add New Edit Delete Surrey Appty Repair
RIN Name t Shoulder Traffic Importance Surrey Date PC] Category Repair Type RepairCot Priwdy Value Budget Year
1030
CHESTNUT ST
Curb - Concrete
1
1
G/162015
64
Overlay
T' Mill& Fill
3953
40 2
265
CHESTNUT ST
Curb - Concrete
1
1
6/162015
56
Overlay
T' Mill & Fill
9407
552 2
L
2G7
CHESTN UT ST
Moced Type
1
1
G71G12015
GO
Rehab
Box but 25%(W/ Base Work)
13"2
32 2
815
CHESTNUT ST
Vegetation
1
1
G71G12015
Gl
Rehab
Stabtl.Base & Asp. T' New Asph
21111
32 2
433
COLLEGEAVE
Curb -Granite
3
3
7/12015
56
Rehab
Brn but 25e4 (W/ Base Work)
14298
40 2
429
COLLEGEAVE
Curb - Granite
3
1
7/12015
63
Overlay
T'Mill&FII UD_w/under drain
28264
Gn 2
907
COLLEGE AVE
Curb - Concrete
3
3
7/t/2015
60
Overlay
TMill & AN
10325
68 1
90B
COLLEGE AVE
Curb - Co—t.
3
3
7/1/2015
69
Overlay
T Mill & AN UD: w/under drvn
46002
72 1
959
CORNELL ST
Maed Type
2
2
6/162015
167
Overlay
1 1.5" Overlay
162&5
164 11
997
CORNELL ST
Curh -Concrete
2
2
6/162015
64
Recanstrud
Stabtli_ Base & Zr Asphalt Top
5701
15 3
99S
CORNELLST
Cwb -Concrete
2
2
G/1fv2015
62
Asphalt Overlay
T' Mill & Fill UD: Wunder drain
18594
36 2
579
CORNELLST
Cush -Concrete
2
2
G/1G/2015
59
Asphalt Overlay
T' Mill & Fill UD:w/under drain
23291
3G 2
578
ODRNELL ST
Vegetation
2
2
UlGI2015
59
Rehab
Box Out 254,1Na Base Work)
21124
30 2
958
CORNELL ST
M-d Type
2
2
6/16/2015
70
Overlay
T' Mill & Fill
11271
52 2
979
DEY ST
Norre
2
2
7/7/2015
64
Rehab
Bc. W 25%R/ Base W.0
10715
36 2
550
DEY ST
None
2
2
7/7/2015
1 GO
Overlay
T' Mfll & Id U D: w/under drain
j 26094
84 0
134
DEY ST
None
2
2
7/7/2015
57
Overlay
2" Mill & Fill UD: w/under drain
13299
84 10
427
DRYDEN RD
Cub -Concrete
3
3
7/12015
67
Patdrvig
Sami-Pennanert Patch
109%
75 0
415
DRYDEN RD
Mbmd Type
3
3
G/102015
79
Patching
Patch Mill & HI RS: W/Shoulders Repaired
53576
80 0
426
DRYDEN RD
Curb -Concrete
3
3
7/12015
61
Rch b
Box Out 254(Nc Base Work)
4093
34 2
414
DRYDEN RD
Curb-Grarde
3
3
7/1/2015
73
Overlay
TMill & Fill
23331
72 1
902
DRYDEN RD
MBced Type
3
3
7/1/2015
72
Overlay
Zr Mill & Fill
10939
72 1
905
DRYDEN RD
Curb - Concrete
13
13
17=2
1 Overly
IZr Mill & FN
14921
12 1
x Road Pavement
't Condition Survey 2015
General Repair Category
City of Ithaca, NY
�w
....._ _..._._r....-.__.......
Fr 1
P y -
f' R _
1
_ �aE
e _ z —,
{` _ '7
/ �,peast
F
/ z wstn0
E GREEN
W�CREEN ST
C
W C4INTON Sg'
s
,t,.... ................................. ....... .r
Legend
-r�•,< Road Pavement Repair Category
4a F 'f e •, Category name w miles and number of
s'' CAMP-RS Values segments
31: 41; lll4 !]eler Mantenance 1.7 ra (19)
Minor RepairslPrevenlaBve Maintenance
—334; 39', 4z', 43; 48 —146 m(159)
35:37:44:45.100 — Corrective Maintenance 35,B 1(359)
—38; 46; 48, 181
Reconstrucd—R.haGl&Wn 142 m
I151)
m
�
a�
u
Road Pavement
Condition Survey 2015
Current Projects with Condition
and Priority Values
City of Ithaca, NY
�'� PClB rRIRyA RRD ..........
NARAV£ 8
�., WA17 AVE P.y qp V'C159
` MT( AM4
j
h Q
� b9E�5�iy pVEEa�peiE
URi .1 53
Ty AVE
pV
UNNfR�lr'•AbE .� y t9
6 V
ilU �w
V
,4,
f m �
_ ~ � 4 J
� p
u U
-T-
.............................................
O
1..O¢�yg1
Legend
DPW Current Projects
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
I i i i i 1 H► 2015 Projects 2.3 m (28)
Miles
Questions?
Retaining Wall Asset
Management Program
Myl<ola W. Kyrychul<
Department of Public Works
[9111 ro 17, UI I r M MAO In 17.1
To find the total number of the retaining
walls
To determine their location and parameters
To determine current condition using
, variation of a procedure developed by
NYSDOT
Results of the inventory and condition
assessment used as a comparison tool
Retaining Wall Definition
Any structure that supports the
highway and its underlying soils or
prevents fill from falling into the
travelled way of vehicles or pedestrians.
Provides stability and resistance to the
lateral movement of earthen material.
({ M j DPW Infr... Ids City Prop. 4,� Downloa,,, ESpencen,ArcGIS �r 0 Retain,,, nys dot ,,, sidewalk,,, 4 gExpecte,,, ]' Microsoft u Density o,,, - + e
F Q https://ithacanv.map=_,arcgis.comiapps/wehappviewer/index.html?id=223ldg'e4249d4ae2bc3c82b8e4.afcefc
2 e aca
etery fir,
i
ro o
=+ v�k Court '-',t i *• i i
.t • i I
• • .� - I • • • • • • • • Maple••• • •
w�s� �z S, IIlltxcaEast Law
'� i •.
r,� i • •
• W-Gfeen'St • i
0
0
so 9
r `
ti o
..� �� Lea � f � i � +� •� ".�, i
• 'ra i i • :� k� •
• 7 •
w• - �{_� _-ion _ —
[7C
® [] 42.430-76.483Degrees -
0 0.1 0.2mi _
i i of Tompkins Ontano Ease flap Province of Ontario Esn HERE DeLorme, Intermap. USGS... 'F
Ill'
Determining Jurisdiction
Public wall:
supports roadway, sidewalk, land along large creek,
culverts and utilities
Resources used to verify jurisdiction:
survey and tax maps (if survey map is not
available)
Types of Retaining Walls
Cantilever
Concrete Panel
Concrete Crib
Gabion Basket
Geosynthetic
Reinforced Earth
Gravity
Laid Stone
Precast Block
Reinforced Earth
Steel Bin
Steel Sheeting
Timber Sheeting
Soldier Piles with
Precast Panels
RW Primary Function
Highway
RW Primary Function
Slope
RW Primary Function
0
Stream Bank
� A,
. . . . . . . . . . . .
RW Primary Function
Bridge Wall
l
I
Condition Assessment
Measure length of the wall, Max and Min height (New
wall system if type changes, height changes by 4 feet or
more, or length exceeds 60o feet)
Calculate area of the exposed face of the wall
Assign the numerical rating for the different sections
of the wall (Base - bottom a feet, Top - top z feet,
Middle -remaining wall height)
Walls with height of less then 6 feet receive same
rating for all sections (the lowest value)
era%ll Condition
I
ing
RATING =
5% (TOP)+
25% (BASE)+
70% (MIDDLE)
Wall Condition Ratings
PM
i -Totally deteriorated or in failed condition
3
Wall Condition Ratings
I 4AM&
AM
7
FrAq
Serious deterioration, or not functioning as
originally designed
U
Wall Condition Ra
a
tings
5 -Minor deterioration, but functioning as
originally designed
Condition Evaluation
Bulging/Movement
Condition Evaluation
fr`�!
Spalling
Conditi
Tom.
on Evaluation
-t
Cracking
mLi
6i
Condition Evalua
Scour
tlon
Consequence of Failure
i - Debris on shoulder
2- Loss of roadway shoulder
3 - Debris in lane
4 - Loss of one or more lane of roadway
V-
6 -Loss of other build structure, including
utilities
Inventory Results
There are total of 255 wall segments
Total Area of Exposed Face (S.F.) 214,174 s. f.
41
123
91 Smaller than 6 feet (<6ft)
Between 6 and lz feet
Higher than lz feet (>iz ft)
Inventory Results
Public
Bridge Land,i6
Wall, 31
Stream
Bank, 86
Private
Land, 6
Road, 63
Slope, 5Z
Condition Assessment
A 7 1 n
Rating 3 and bellow
Rating between 3 and 5
w Rating higher than 5
J
Walls with rating 3 and lower
-
-
z
_ vl
• - '� _ �;� -.�. +mil-y��-T�
Cascadilla Creek between N Tioga St and N Aurora St
Walls with rating 3 and lower
•'.-
Cascadilla creek, between N Cayuga St and N Tioga St
Walls with rating 3 and lower
10
ar
�• e . t
r
Along E State St, above Gateway Apartments parking lot
Walls with rating 3 and lower
i;: - -,-t
Osmun PL, next to the Chapter House
-.1
Walls with rating 3 and lower
Under sidewalk on S Cayuga St
Other problematic walls
1
�- .ems_ _.. - - F s • -.. � -
'�1 v
_
Terrace PL
Other ro ematic walls
jo
Edge of Cemetery along Stewart Ave
I
..dam