Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-ILPC-2008-05-13Approved by ILPC – 08/14/08 Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission May 13, 2008 Present: Alphonse Pieper, Chair Nancy Brcak, Vice-Chair Kristen Brennan George Holets Susan Jones Susan Stein Lynn Truame Mary Tomlan, Common Council Liaison Leslie Chatterton, Staff Megan Gilbert, Staff Chair A. Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm and read the legal notices for the public hearings. I. PUBLIC HEARING A. 123 Roberts Place, Cornell Heights Historic District – proposal for replacement of slate roof Property owners Jeff and Michelle Tambroni were present to address the Commission. They explained their proposal to replace a deteriorating slate roof with asphalt shingle to match the roof on the non-historic garage. They explained that they were aware of significant water damage and mold when they bought the home and intended to make repairs as soon as possible. They are in the process of making interior repairs and intended to replace the roof at the same time. They were unaware their home was in an historic district until this time. They asked how they would have known about the home’s historic designation prior to buying the house. L. Chatterton stated that their real estate agent would have known. The information can also be found by reviewing the property’s deed in the Building Department. L. Truame noted that the Commission is guided by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation when it approves or denies applications. She also noted that the flashings seem to be the problem; overall the slate is in fair to good condition. The Commission cannot approve replacement when repair is possible. J. Tambroni stated that the Evans’ estimate that they have was done from the ground. A full roof study would have cost $700. He also noted that the garage as well as a neighbor’s home have asphalt shingle. L. Truame stated that new construction is held up against different standards and considered “non-contributing” to the significance historic district. L. Chatterton explained the economic hardship process, whereby the owners can appeal the denial of their application based on economic hardship.. This process is more explicit when the property is income producing, but she cited a previous example of a residential property where, based on accurate and validated documentation the cost difference between replacing a deteriorated slate roof with slate rather than shingle was more that $57,000. The Commission was clearly able to make the determination that the requirement of a slate roof would cause an economic hardship for the owners. 1 J:\GROUPS\Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission\Minutes\2008\0513.doc ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 J. Tambroni asked if it would matter if the roofing study shows that the whole roof needs to be replaced. L. Truame responded that if would matter because it would show that the historic material is so deteriorated that it cannot be saved. At that point, in the case of a non income producing property, it would be easier to demonstrate that a replacement in slate would cause the owner an economic hardship. A. Pieper noted that there are materials other than asphalt that could be used if that were to occur. J. Tambroni asked if it matters whether the slate is replaced all at one time or if all of the slate is replaced over 5-10 years and the cost is incurred annually. The Commission noted that it would be appropriate to the cost an annual maintenance from a professional should be included in the hardship appeal. K. Brennan explained that the economic hardship appeal is the second of a two-step process. The first step focuses on how the proposed alteration will impact the historic district. If the Commission determines that the proposal will have a negative effect on the property and the historic district, the economic hardship appeal is a discussion that looks at the economic impact of in-kind replacement or repair on the owner. The Commission told the property owners that annual maintenance, acquisition cost, and other repair costs should all be included in the economic analysis. Public Hearing On a motion by G. Holets, seconded by L. Truame, Chair A. Pieper opened the public hearing. There being no one to address the Commission, the public hearing was closed on a motion by S. Stein, seconded by S. Jones. RESOLUTION: Moved by K. Brennan, seconded by G. Holets WHEREAS, 123 Roberts Place is located in Cornell Heights Historic District as provided for in Section 228-3 and 228-4 of the Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4(E) of the Municipal Code, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness was submitted by property owners Jeff and Michelle Tambroni for review by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission, (ILPC), and WHEREAS, the action under consideration is the replacement of the existing slate roof, and WHEREAS, the project is a Type II Action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance for which no further environmental review is required, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed the submitted documentation dated April 10, 2008 and April 20, 2008, including a narrative description of the proposal -2- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 submitted by Jeff and Michelle Tambroni and the proposal from jd Ferro Roofing LLC dated 4/4/2008 (attachment C) for replacement of the slate roof with asphalt architectural grade shingles, and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC meeting on May 13, 2008, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and the proposal: The period of significance for the area now known as the Cornell Heights Historic District is identified in the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic District Summary Significance Statement as 1898-1937. As documented in the New York State Building Structure Inventory form, completed in 1990 by historic preservation expert Judith Dulburger, 123 Roberts Place was constructed in 1902. Constructed within the district’s period of significance and retaining a relatively high level of integrity, 123 Roberts Place is a contributing element of the Cornell Heights Historic District. As described in the narrative dated April 10, 2008 and in the proposal from JD. Ferro Roofing, LLC (attachment C), the proposal involves the replacement of the original slate roof with 30-year CertainTeed Landmark architectural shingles. The purpose of the proposal is to remove and replace the existing deteriorated roof to eliminate water damage to the roof and the interior of the residence. In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in -3- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 accordance with Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code. In making this determination the Commission is guided by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and in this case specifically the following Standards: #2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. #5 Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. #6 Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. When the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities, and where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. The slate roof is an historic feature that characterizes the property in keeping with Standard #2 and #5. The CertainTeed Landmark architectural shingles do not match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities, in keeping with Standard #6. WHEREAS, the proposal will have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the Cornell Heights Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-4E(1)(a), now, therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal does not meet criteria for approval under Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code, and be it further RESOLVED, that the ILPC denies the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. RECORD OF VOTE: Carried 7-0-0 Yes A. Pieper N. Brcak K. Brennan G. Holets S. Jones S. Stein L. Truame No 0 Abstain 0 -4- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 B. 916 Stewart Avenue, Cornell Heights Historic District – proposal to replace three historic windows and three doors Property owners Stuart McDougal and Nora Gunneng were present to address the Commission. Public Hearing On a motion by S. Stein, seconded by N. Brcak, Chair A. Pieper opened the public hearing. There being no one to address the Commission, the public hearing was closed on a motion by S. Jones, seconded by G. Holets. RESOLUTION: Moved by G. Holets, seconded by N. Brcak WHEREAS, 916 Stewart Avenue is located in the Cornell Heights Local Historic District, designated as provided for in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4(E) of the Municipal Code, Landmarks Preservation, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness has been submitted by property owners Stuart McDougal and Nora Gunneng for review by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC), and WHEREAS, the action under consideration is to replace three existing doors, and WHEREAS, the project is a Type II Action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and thus requires no further environmental review, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed documentation including a narrative description of the proposal submitted by Stuart McDougal, photocopied photographs of the property, and elevations SK73, SK74, SK75 and SK77, prepared by architect Charles Hoover dated March 4, 2008 and a May 6, 2008 drawing of the replacement window proposed to be enlarged to provide legal egress, also by Charles Hoover and WHEREAS, over the course of three site visits, all seven members of the ILPC have visited 916 Stewart Avenue to observe existing conditions, and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and -5- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC meeting on May 13, 2008, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and the proposal: The period of significance for the area now known as the Cornell Heights Historic District is identified in the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic District Summary Significance Statement as 1898-1937. Constructed in 1905, the building is architecturally and historically significant as an example of the mixing of different stylistic features, showing influence of Craftsman and Tudor Revival styles. The residence, including the 1920s entrance and kitchen, was constructed within the district’s period of significance and retains a relatively high level of integrity, making it a contributing element of the Cornell Heights Historic District. WHEREAS, in its evaluation the Commission has considered the following: As shown on the architectural elevations dated March 4, 2008, and referenced above, the proposal involves the replacement of the three existing doors with wood panel doors with a three-light top light as shown on elevations dated March 4, 2008, submitted for the April ILPC meeting. The purpose of the proposal is to introduce doors that are compatible with the Craftsman style features of the residence. There is no documentation supporting the age of the doors, whether they were installed at the time of the 1920s additions or whether they are part of an overall rehabilitation in the 1950s or 1960s. In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in -6- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 accordance with Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code. In making this determination the Commission is guided by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and in this case specifically the following Standards: #2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. As described in the narrative submitted at the April 10th ILPC meeting and observed at the site, the three existing doors proposed for replacement are not character-defining features of the residence as stated in Standard #2, WHEREAS, the proposal will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the Cornell Heights Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-4E(1)(a); now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal meets criteria for approval under Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Commission approves the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness with the following condition: Staff shall approve the selection of the replacement door. RECORD OF VOTE: Carried 5-2-0 Yes N. Brcak K. Brennan G. Holets S. Stein L. Truame No A. Pieper S. Jones Abstain 0 -7- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 RESOLUTION: Moved by L. Truame, seconded by N. Brcak WHEREAS, 916 Stewart Avenue is located in the Cornell Heights Local Historic District, designated as provided for in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4(E) of the Municipal Code, Landmarks Preservation, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness has been submitted by property owners Stuart McDougal and Nora Gunneng for review by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC), and WHEREAS, the action under consideration is to replace and enlarge a second floor window, and WHEREAS, the project is a Type II Action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and thus requires no further environmental review, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed documentation including a narrative description of the proposal submitted by Stuart McDougal, photocopied photographs of the property, and scaled elevations prepared by architect Charles Hoover dated March 4, 2008 and a May 6, 2008 drawing of the replacement window proposed to be enlarged to provide legal egress, also by Charles Hoover and WHEREAS, over the course of three site visits, all seven members of the ILPC have visited 916 Stewart Avenue to observe existing conditions, and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC meeting on May 13, 2008, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and the proposal: The period of significance for the area now known as the Cornell Heights Historic District is identified in the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic District Summary Significance Statement as 1898-1937. Constructed in 1905, the building is architecturally and historically significant as an example of the mixing of different stylistic features, showing influence of Craftsman and Tudor Revival styles. -8- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 The residence, including the 1920s entrance and kitchen, was constructed within the district’s period of significance and retains a relatively high level of integrity, making it a contributing element of the Cornell Heights Historic District. WHEREAS, in its evaluation the Commission has considered the following: As shown on the architectural elevations dated May 6, 2007, the proposal involves the replacement of the existing second floor window with a three- light fixed upper sash, above a casement window. The new window opening will be 7.5” wider and 4.5” taller than the existing opening. The purpose of the proposal is to meet code requirements for egress. In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code. In making this determination the Commission is guided by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and in this case specifically the following Standards: #2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. -9- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 The existing casement window as shown in the photocopied photograph accompanying elevation sk112 dated May 6, 2007 is not a character- defining feature of the residence, in reference to Standard #2, The installation of the proposed window as shown in elevation sk112 dated May 6, 2007 will not destroy historic materials that characterize the property, in keeping with Standard #9. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features of the property, in keeping with Standard #9. WHEREAS, the proposal will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the Cornell Heights Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-4E(1)(a); now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal meets criteria for approval under Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Commission approves the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness with the following conditions: • Staff shall approve the replacement window. • The egress window shall be enlarged only if required by building code. RECORD OF VOTE: Carried 7-0-0 Yes A. Pieper N. Brcak K. Brennan G. Holets S. Jones S. Stein L. Truame No 0 Abstain 0 RESOLUTION: Moved by N. Brcak, seconded by G. Holets WHEREAS, 916 Stewart Avenue is located in the Cornell Heights Local Historic District, designated as provided for in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4(E) of the Municipal Code, Landmarks Preservation, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness has been -10- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 submitted by property owners Stuart McDougal and Nora Gunneng for review by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC), and WHEREAS, the action under consideration is to replace three existing pocket windows, and WHEREAS, the project is a Type II Action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and thus requires no further environmental review, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed documentation including a narrative description of the proposal submitted by Stuart McDougal, photocopied photographs of the property, and scaled elevations prepared by architect Charles Hoover dated March 4, 2008 and a May 6, 2007 drawing of the replacement window proposed to be enlarged to provide legal egress, also by Charles Hoover and WHEREAS, over the course of three site visits, all seven members of the ILPC have visited 916 Stewart Avenue to observe existing conditions, and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC meeting on May 13, 2008, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and the proposal: The period of significance for the area now known as the Cornell Heights Historic District is identified in the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic District Summary Significance Statement as 1898-1937. Constructed in 1905, the building is architecturally and historically significant as an example of the mixing of different stylistic features, showing influence of Craftsman and Tudor Revival styles. The residence, including the 1920s entrance and kitchen, was constructed within the district’s period of significance and retains a relatively high level of integrity, making it a contributing element of the Cornell Heights Historic District. -11- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 WHEREAS, in its evaluation the Commission has considered the following: As described in the narrative prepared for the April 10, 2008 meeting and shown on accompanying photocopied photographs and the architectural elevations dated March 4, 2008, the proposal involves the replacement of three existing double hung pocket windows. The proposed replacements are double-pane wood windows configured to match the existing windows except that the upper sash shall be fixed, allowing the pocket to be insulated. The purpose of the proposal is to replace deteriorated windows, reduce draftiness, and improve energy efficiency. In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code. In making this determination the Commission is guided by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and in this case specifically the following Standards: #2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. #6 Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. When the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. In reference to Standard #2, the existing pocket windows are not a character-defining feature of the residence. -12- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 On site observation conducted by the commission members indicate that the windows proposed for replacement are not easily visible to the public. Review of the materials submitted by the applicant, including the narrative submitted for the April 13, 2008 ILPC meeting and the accompanying photographs, on-site observation conducted by commission members, and comments of Chris Lowe, who is qualified to assess condition and rehabilitation of historic windows indicate that the windows cannot be rehabilitated to meet the owner’s requirement for less drafty, double-paned windows and that there is sufficient cause to support replacement of the windows. The proposed replacement windows as described in the narrative submitted for the April 10, 2008 ILPC meeting and shown in elevations SK73 , SK74, SK75 and SK77 will be compatible with the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities in keeping with Standard #6. WHEREAS, the proposal will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the Cornell Heights Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-4E(1)(a); now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal meets criteria for approval under Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Commission approves the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness with the following condition: Staff shall approve the replacement windows. RECORD OF VOTE: Carried 5-2-0 Yes A. Pieper N. Brcak G. Holets S. Jones S. Stein No K. Brennan L. Truame Abstain 0 RESOLUTION: Moved by L. Truame, seconded by N. Brcak WHEREAS, 916 Stewart Avenue is located in the Cornell Heights Local Historic District, designated as provided for in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, and -13- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4(E) of the Municipal Code, Landmarks Preservation, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness has been submitted by property owners Stuart McDougal and Nora Gunneng for review by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC), and WHEREAS, the action under consideration is to replace existing windows, and WHEREAS, the project is a Type II Action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and thus requires no further environmental review, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed documentation including a narrative description of the proposal submitted by Stuart McDougal, photocopied photographs of the property, scaled elevations prepared by Charles Hoover dated March 4, 2008, and a May 6, 2008 drawing of the replacement window proposed to be enlarged to provide legal egress, also by Charles Hoover, and WHEREAS, over the course of three site visits, all seven members of the ILPC have visited 916 Stewart Avenue to observe existing conditions, and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC meeting on May 13, 2008, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and the proposal: The period of significance for the area now known as the Cornell Heights Historic District is identified in the City of Ithaca’s Cornell Heights Historic District Summary Significance Statement as 1898-1937. Constructed in 1905, the building is architecturally and historically significant as an example of the mixing of different stylistic features, showing influence of Craftsman and Tudor Revival styles. The residence, including the 1920s entrance and kitchen, was constructed within the district’s period of significance and retains a relatively high level of integrity, making it a contributing element of the Cornell Heights Historic District. WHEREAS, in its evaluation the Commission has considered the following: -14- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 As shown on the architectural drawings dated March 4, 2008, the proposal involves the replacement of the existing double hung, casement, sliding, or single pane fixed windows with a three light fixed upper sash with a double hung window below. It is believed that these existing windows are not original to the house. The purpose of the proposal is to create a uniform appearance among all of the windows in the house. In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code. In making this determination the Commission is guided by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and in this case specifically the following Standards: #2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. In reference to Standard #2, the existing windows are not a character- defining feature of the residence. The installation of the proposed windows will not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The proposed three light fixed upper sash with a double hung window below will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features in keeping with Standard #9. -15- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 WHEREAS, the proposal will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the Cornell Heights Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-4E(1)(a); now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal meets criteria for approval under Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code, and be it further RESOLVED, that the Commission approves the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness with the following condition: Staff shall approve the replacement windows. RECORD OF VOTE: Carried 7-0-0 Yes A. Pieper N. Brcak K. Brennan G. Holets S. Jones S. Stein L. Truame No 0 Abstain 0 *K. Brennan left the meeting. C. 418-428 Eddy Street, East Hill Historic District – proposal to replace doors at 426 Eddy Street Property manager Sharon Marx was present to address the Commission on behalf of property owner Jason Fane. Public Hearing On a motion by L. Truame, seconded by G. Holets, Chair A. Pieper opened the public hearing. There being no one to address the Commission, the public hearing was closed on a motion by L. Truame, seconded by G. Holets. RESOLUTION: Moved by G. Holets, seconded by S. Stein WHEREAS, 418-428 Eddy Street is located in the East Hill Local Historic District, designated as provided for in Section 228-4 of the Municipal Code, and WHEREAS, as set forth in Section 228-4(E) of the Municipal Code, Landmarks Preservation, an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness has been submitted by Sharon Marx on behalf of property owner Jason Fane for review by the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission (ILPC), and -16- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 WHEREAS, the action under consideration is to replace the front door at 426 Eddy Street, and WHEREAS, the project is a Type II Action under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and the City Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and thus requires no further environmental review, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has reviewed the documentation dated April 30, 2008 including a narrative description of the proposal submitted by Sharon Marx, photographs of the existing door, a sketch of the proposed door, and product specifications for the proposed door, intercom, and electronic key tag reader, and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided sufficient documentation and information to evaluate impacts of the proposal on the subject property and surrounding properties, and WHEREAS, a public hearing for the purpose of considering approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness was conducted at the regularly scheduled ILPC meeting on May 13, 2008, and WHEREAS, the ILPC has made the following findings of fact concerning the property and the proposal: • The period of significance for the area now known as the East Hill Historic District is identified in the City of Ithaca’s East Hill Historic District Summary of Significance Statement as 1830-1932. • Constructed in 1909, the building is historically and architecturally significant as a representative example of a mixed use, commercial and residential building built in response to housing needs resulting from the expansion of Cornell University in the early twentieth century. • Constructed within the district’s period of significance and retaining sufficient integrity to reflect its architectural and historical significance, 418-428 Eddy Street is a contributing element to the East Hill Historic District. WHEREAS, in its evaluation the Commission has considered the following: The proposal involves the replacement of paired 24” wide doors, each with a clear glass light with a 36” Lemieux brand Artisan exterior #521 oak door with a single clear glass light. The proposed door would have an electronic lock, and a proximity electronic reader will be installed to the right of the door. An intercom system will also be installed either directly above or below the electronic reader. -17- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 The purpose of the proposal is to make necessary security upgrades and allow tenants to monitor who enters the building. In consideration of this and all approvals of proposals for alterations, new construction or demolition in historic districts, the ILPC must determine that the proposed exterior work will not have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical or architectural significance and value of either the landmark or, if the improvement is within a district, of the neighboring improvements in such district. In considering architectural and cultural value, the Commission shall consider whether the proposed change is consistent with the historic value and the spirit of the architectural style of the landmark or district in accordance with Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code. In making this determination the Commission is guided by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and in this case specifically the following Standard: #2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. #9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. As illustrated in the photocopied photographs of the building, the existing doors are historic features that characterize the property in keeping with Standard #2. As described in the applicant’s submitted narrative and shown in the product specifications, the proposed Lemieux brand Artisan oak door is differentiated from the old and is not compatible with the massing size sale and does not match the old in design, color, texture, materials, and other visual qualities in keeping with Standard #9. WHEREAS, the proposal will have a substantial adverse effect on the aesthetic, historical, or architectural significance of the East Hill Historic District, as set forth in Section 228-4E(1)(a); now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission determines that the proposal does not meet criteria for approval under Section 228-4E (1)(a) of the Municipal Code, and be it further -18- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 RESOLVED, that the Commission denies the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness. RECORD OF VOTE: Carried 6-0-0 Yes A. Pieper N. Brcak G. Holets S. Jones S. Stein L. Truame No 0 Abstain 0 II. PLEASURE OF THE CHAIR A. Administrative Matters None B. Public Comment on Matters of Interest • Susan Cummings, 214 Fayette Street, spoke on the need to protect the historic character of the Clinton House. C. Communications None III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – none IV. OLD BUSINESS None V. NEW BUSINESS A. Clinton House, Clinton Block Historic District – Historic Ithaca proposal to sell the Clinton House Jim Tantillo, Executive Director of Historic Ithaca, was present to explain that Historic Ithaca voted at its March meeting to sell the Clinton House to an appropriate buyer. He explained that in addition to financial concerns, Historic Ithaca decided it may not want to be a long-term landlord when faced with other critical historic preservation projects. The Board has discussed the protections for the property and will state the range of things they would like to protect as they seek a potential buyer. Some of the protections may be negotiable while others will not be. The Clinton House will be marketed locally and regionally first. If there are no offers, the property will be listed with a broker in August and marketed nationally. -19- ILPC Minutes May 13, 2008 L. Chatterton asked how the Historic Ithaca Board received the Ithaca Urban Renewal Agency’s (IURA) recent resolution. J. Tantillo stated that it was well received and the Board was happy for the IURA’s support. B. Goldwin Smith Hall, Arts Quad Historic District – proposal to install outdoor seating David Cutter, Landscape Architect, and Henry Cranes, Director of Facilities for the Arts College, were present to explain their proposal to the Commission. The proposal involves the installation of bluestone pavers and outdoor furniture near the southwest corner of the building. The proposal would be a pilot project to see if the design would be desirable in other locations on the Arts Quad. The proposed project would not disturb the existing trees on the site. They hope to have the project completed in time for alumni weekend. Because project materials were not submitted in time to advertise a public hearing, the Commission agreed to hold a special meeting to conduct a public hearing and determine if the proposal meets the criteria for a Certificate of Appropriateness. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:23 p.m. on a motion by S. Stein, seconded by G. Holets. Respectfully Submitted, Leslie A. Chatterton, Secretary Ithaca Landmarks Preservation Commission -20-