Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-BPW-2011-05-25BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS PROCEEDINGS CITY OF ITHACA, NEW YORK Regular Meeting 4:45 p.m. May 25, 2011 PRESENT: Vice Chair Jenkins Commissioners (5) - Wykstra, Acharya, Warden, Goldsmith, Morache OTHERS PRESENT: City Attorney - Hoffman Superintendent of Public Works - Gray Assistant Superintendent of Streets and Facilities - Benjamin Assistant Superintendent of Water and Sewer – Whitney Common Council Liaison – Zumoff Information Management Specialist - Myers EXCUSED: Mayor Peterson DAC Liaison – Roberts ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA: Supt. Gray noted that a substitute resolution had been provided for item 8.5A entitled “Award of Bid for a New Compact Rough Terrain Telehandler”, that City Attorney Hoffman provided a resolution for item 8.2A entitled “Determination as to the Status of “Woodcock Street” and Valentine Place Extension”, and that additional information regarding tree lawn maintenance was distributed to Board members at the start of the meeting. MAYOR’S COMMUNICATIONS There were no communications from the Mayor as she was out of town at the New York Conference of Mayors. COMMUNICATIONS AND HEARINGS FROM PERSONS BEFORE THE BOARD Tom Hanna, City of Ithaca and member of “Friends of Newman Golf Course”, addressed the Board regarding concerns to preserve and enhance the golf course. Membership is low and due to the poor weather this Spring the course has not been used, so one-third of the season has been lost, which affects revenue. The Friends of Newman Golf Course would like to work with the City to promote the golf course and encourage its use. He also extended thanks and appreciation to Asst. Supt. Benjamin and his staff for the work they have done to keep the golf course in such great shape. Jon Parmenter, City of Ithaca and Secretary for the Ithaca Babe Ruth Youth League, addressed the Board to encourage their support for the league’s request to modify the backstop on field #8 at Cass Park. The league has been working with Jim D’Alterio at Cass Park on the proposed improvements which will enhance the appearance of the field for the upcoming Babe Ruth tournament. He noted that money for the renovations has been raised through donations. Ellen McCollister, Third Ward Alderperson, addressed the Board on behalf on a constituent who has concerns about the very badly deteriorated road condition on the 100 block of Eastwood Avenue. Garrick Blalock, City of Ithaca, addressed the Board regarding the poor condition of Cobb Street with suggestions for how the City should proceed with its maintenance, and requested that it stop using cold patch asphalt in an effort to fill the potholes as it does not last. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC Commissioner Warden responded to comments made about the City’s golf course and a brief discussion took place between the Board, Tom Hanna, Asst. Supt. Benjamin, and Supt. Gray. Supt. Gray reminded the Board that the City is bound by the 2011 budget that is in place for the golf course, and knows that there will be a problem on the revenue side as the City tries to balance its budget. 2 May 25, 2011 Supt. Gray responded to comments about the poor condition of Cobb Street. He stated that the condition of this road is the result of ten years or so of not providing routine maintenance on City streets as required. He further stated that Cobb Street requires a complete rebuild. He further noted that Common Council makes the decision about what should be included in the Department of Public Works annual budget and that they need to know what will or will not be able to be done within that budget, which affects maintenance of streets. Commissioner Goldsmith asked when or who decides where sidewalks should be installed. Supt. Gray explained how and when sidewalks get constructed, and noted that property owners are responsible for the cost – whether they get a private contractor to do the work or they have the City do the work. Commissioner Wykstra noted that it is important for the Town of Ithaca to coordinate their development projects with the City as they impact the infrastructure of the City. REPORTS Board Liaisons Commissioner Acharya provided Board members information on topics that the Planning and Development Board has been discussing. Superintendent and Staff Asst. Supt. Benjamin reported that work on the 700 block of West Court Street began to repair catch basins and will be re-paved in short sections at a time so as to limit the amount of disruption that it causes to businesses. He further stated the repaving work was completed on the 100 block of West State Street, but it was difficult due to all the recent rain. Crews have also been doing concrete repair/patch work on the Commons as well. He stated that the Hangar Theatre has requested the City’s assistance to do some repair work because of recent flooding there. Asst. Supt. Whitney reported that work on East Seneca Street is being done between 6:00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m. in order to cause the least disruption to traffic and businesses. Once the water and sewer work is complete there, the street will be repaved. He stated that vibrations from the machinery used in the water and sewer repair work has caused other water mains in the vicinity to leak and require replacement as well. He further reported that on June 1, 2011 from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Meadow Street northbound will be narrowed down to one lane as work is done on the Buffalo Street pumping station. This will cause major traffic delays as this is where the highest vehicle counts in the City have been noted. Supt. Gray reported that the Seneca Street Parking Garage will be closed for 5-10 days beginning June 20th. He stated that this will require a lot of public notice, and education as to the why and when of the work, and arrangements that have been made with the Green Street and Cayuga Street garages to provide temporary parking for those with parking permits at the Seneca Street parking garage that are being displaced by the repair work. HIGHWAYS, STREETS, AND SIDEWALKS Determination as to the Status of “Woodcock Street” and “Valentine Place Extension” By Commissioner Acharya: Seconded by Commissioner Warden WHEREAS, various City maps and other historical documents show or describe certain short, dead-end streets referred to as “Valentine Place Extension” and “Woodcock Street,” located to the south of East State/Martin Luther King, Jr., Street, in the City of Ithaca; and WHEREAS, certain components of a development project proposed for a 16.4-acre site on East Hill, known as “Collegetown Terrace,” would occupy parts of what are known as Valentine Place Extension and Woodcock Street; and 3 May 25, 2011 WHEREAS, in late 2009 and in 2010 the developer of the Collegetown Terrace project (John Novarr, through certain legal entities under his control), who owns most of the site, commenced “quiet title” proceedings in the New York Supreme Court, for Tompkins County, seeking exclusive title to Valentine Place Extension and Woodcock Street, respectively, based on the doctrine of adverse possession; and WHEREAS, said proceedings named as defendants certain persons who were former owners or mortgagees of real property in the vicinity of Valentine Place and Woodcock Street or who may have had an interest in the streets themselves, but did not name the City of Ithaca, nor was the City directly notified of these proceedings; and WHEREAS, the Court awarded judgment (i.e., “sole and complete possession”) in both actions to Mr. Novarr, essentially by default, as a result of the non-appearance of any of the named defendants; and WHEREAS, thereafter, Mayor Peterson sought an independent legal opinion as to the history and current status of Valentine Place Extension and Woodcock Street, to determine whether either of them was or is a City street, whether the City owned either of them, and/or whether the public retains any rights in them; and WHEREAS, title research conducted by the City’s special counsel (David A. Tyler, Esq.), aided by preparation of an extensive abstract, resulted in his issuing a legal opinion that is contained in letters to the Mayor dated April 20, 2011, and May 13, 2011; and WHEREAS, Attorney Tyler concluded that “it is doubtful the City now retains any rights it may have once possessed [in the 185-foot-long Valentine Place Extension],” but that a right-of-way across the 80-foot-long, so-called “stub” of Woodcock Street (as it runs westerly from Valentine Place), acquired by the City in 1922, was never conveyed by the City to subsequent owners of the surrounding property (including Mr. Novarr’s entities), and therefore is still held by the City (and shared with the adjoining owner); and WHEREAS, attorneys for Mr. Novarr dispute Attorney Tyler’s conclusions regarding the status of Woodcock Street and any public rights therein, and seek the immediate issuance of a building permit for the proposed Collegetown Terrace building (“#3”) that would encroach (relatively slightly) upon a portion of the City’s claimed Woodcock Street right-of-way; and WHEREAS, both the City and Mr. Novarr seek a timely, negotiated resolution to this situation, without the costs and risks of litigation, if possible; and WHEREAS, the Superintendent of Public Works has indicated that the City does not rely upon the use of Valentine Place Extension or Woodcock Street for any essential public works functions; that Valentine Place itself (north of Valentine Place Extension) can be maintained and treated as a City street whether or not the City retains or asserts rights in Woodcock Street or Valentine Place Extension – provided that a feasible “turn- around” opportunity for City snowplows or other vehicles is available at or near the south terminus of Valentine Place, which it is, per the approved design of internal circulation for Collegetown Terrace and with the consent of its owner; and that for at least the past 20 years, Valentine Place Extension and Woodcock Street have not functioned as or been treated as City streets; and WHEREAS, the developer asserts that since the 1980s he has continuously maintained what he refers to as the “driveways” that constitute Valentine Place Extension and Woodcock Street, and will continue to do so as the Collegetown Terrace project is constructed and in operation; and WHEREAS, the City of Ithaca does not maintain an “Official Map” which designates established City streets; and 4 May 25, 2011 WHEREAS, all real property on both sides of Woodcock Street (and Valentine Place Extension) is owned by the developer of the Collegetown Terrace project, and the City’s conveyance of any rights it may retain in either of said streets would not leave any parcels without public street frontage or render them non-conforming, nor would it affect any property owners other than Mr. Novarr; and WHEREAS, clarification of the ownership of the areas known as Valentine Place Extension and Woodcock Street, in favor of the adjoining property owner, would definitively relieve the City of any future responsibility or liability for maintenance or repair of these areas; now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works hereby finds that: a. based on the practice and experience of the past 20 years or more, the so-called Valentine Place Extension and Woodcock Street do not qualify as City streets; b. from a public works standpoint, the City of Ithaca does not need to have or maintain rights in or control of any part of Valentine Place Extension (i.e., land that is to the south of the City street known as Valentine Place, as that land is described in the first Supreme Court proceeding referenced above, Index No. 09-1410), or Woodcock Street (i.e., land that is to the west of Valentine Place, as that land is described in the second Supreme Court proceeding referenced above, Index No. 2010- 0742); and c. from a public works standpoint, any such rights are and should be treated as surplusage; and be it further RESOLVED, That the Board indicate to the Common Council that the Board has no objection to the City’s conveyance of whatever rights it may possess in Valentine Place Extension or Woodcock Street. City Attorney Hoffman explained the background history regarding rights in what appeared to be city streets on various maps. He further explained how this project impacts the area, the two streets in question, and how the developer got claim to them. He stated that a building permit is being held up because of the situation described in this resolution, and that this request would be on the City Administration Committee agenda this evening as well. The approval of this resolution would resolve the problem and allow development to proceed, with the role of Common Council to convey any city property rights after the Board of Public Works provides its recommendation. He further noted that the quit claim title clarifies who owns what, and the issue is that the City was not invited to participate in that process. Supt. Gray explained that the existing site plan has met the City’s needs for the past twenty years, and as long as the property owner and city agree to terms and layout, he is supportive of the request. He also noted that the Ithaca Fire Department supports the request as well. Discussion followed on the floor regarding the Board’s receipt of the resolution at the meeting with no time to review it beforehand, and the fact that a map would have been useful as well. City Attorney Hoffman responded that he understands the Board’s discomfort and that discussions were taking place between the city and property owner up until early this afternoon. John Novarr, property owner, addressed the Board to note that the City should be happy to get rid of this liability, and that he will take over complete maintenance of the area for City, which he has actually been doing since 1987, as well as paying taxes on the property. He doesn’t feel that there is any possible use the City could have for the streets. A Vote on the Resolution Resulted As Follows: Carried Unanimously 5 May 25, 2011 Approval of Decorative Chain in Front of Monuments in DeWitt Park The City Attorney is waiting for the church to provide some requested information. Motion to Remove from the Table: By Commissioner Acharya: Seconded by Commissioner Goldsmith RESOLVED, That the substitute “Award of Bid for a New Compact Rough Terrain Telehandler – Resolution” be removed from the table for further review and discussion. Award of Bid for a New Compact Rough Terrain Telehandler – Resolution WHEREAS, bids were received on April 19, 2011, for one new Rough Terrain Telehandler, and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the bids and determined that the lowest bid machine does not meet all specifications, and WHEREAS, staff has concluded that the exception related to the hydraulic pump should not exclude the low bid, since the bid specifications were expanded to allow bidding by the lower horse power variable pressure pump machine which was not the low bid, and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Board of Public Works award the bid to the lowest bidder, now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Public Works awards the bid of the Rough Terrain Telehandler to Liftech Equipment Companies of 6847 Ellicott Drive, East Syracuse, NY 13057 for their total bid of $56,458, which includes the optional bucket, and be it further RESOLVED, That the Board requests that the City Controller transfer $2,458 from account F8330-215 to account F8330-225 to cover the purchase of the machine. Amending Resolution: By Commissioner Wykstra: Seconded by Commissioner Goldsmith RESOLVED, That the second whereas clause be amended to read as follows: “WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the bids and determined that the lowest bid machine does not meet all original specifications, and” Carried Unanimously Main Motion as Amended: A Vote on the Main Motion As Amended Resulted As Follows: Carried Unanimously DISCUSSION ITEMS Appeal of Snow Removal Bill for 205 Thurston Avenue – Discussion Supt. Gray explained that the DPW cleared and salted the sidewalk at 205 Thurston Avenue on February 10, 2011, two days after a modest snowfall and a week after more significant snowfall. The property owner has protested the bill. Supt. Gray further explained that when he questioned Streets and Facilities they provided photos of the sidewalk in question. City staff explained that hard packed snow was cleared and salt added which improved the walking surface markedly. Supt. Gray believes the question for the Board is the quality of walking surface that is expected of the property owners to maintain. The code says it should be "free and clear (or substantially clear in another location) of snow, ice and other obstructions...." Supt. Gray stated that the owners paid the bill, but protested it, and he wants to be able to respond to that appeal. The Board requested that Supt. Gray provide a resolution that denies the appeal for their consideration at the June 8, 2011 Board of Public Works meeting. 6 May 25, 2011 Curb Lawn Gardens Supt. Gray explained that in a preview discussion of this item, a few Board members expressed concerns about visibility issues associated with plantings in curb lawns. The only regulations he is aware of that is directly related to that are the provisions in Section 325-17 of the City Code. He further stated that Executive Assistant Gehring spent time looking through other small municipalities’ codes, some don’t allow them, and some do allow more ornamental approaches to the curb lawn gardens. Extensive discussion followed on the floor regarding different approaches that could be taken to address complaints about tall plantings that reduce visibility for motorists, and interfere with on street parking and access to the nearby sidewalk. It was felt that overall there are very few gardens in the City where height and visibility are problems, and that in some cases parked cars pose more a problem for visibility than plantings. The Board felt that there isn’t a need right now to add to or put into effect requirements for curb lawns. It was also felt that a lot of curb lawn gardens add a lot of beauty to different areas of the City. The Board also felt that, where possible, neighbors should address concerns about curb gardens with the property owner and try to resolve issues that way. They also recognized the fact that in doing that there may be safety concerns, and that caution should be used. Discussion also followed on the floor regarding whether or not public service announcements regarding guidelines for curb lawn gardens might be helpful. Request to Allow Goats on the Commons Supt. Gray explained that the Downtown Ithaca Alliance has requested permission for two baby goats on the Commons on June 9th as part of a celebration planned for the 175th anniversary of the Tompkins Trust Company. He stated that these kinds of requests have been granted and successfully handled in the past by the requirements provided as part of the Special Events Committee oversight. Vicki Taylor, from the Downtown Ithaca Alliance, joined the Board for the discussion of this request. She stated that the goats would be kept in a small pen during the event and that the staff of the Downtown Ithaca Alliance would be responsible for all clean up after the event. She noted that in the past they have been given permission to have reindeer, cows, and ponies on the Commons for various events. Supt Gray stated that in the past, the City has had great cooperation from the Downtown Ithaca Alliance when hosting special events of this type. He further stated that as long as the Board is in support of the request that he could handle it administratively. The Board expressed their support for the request, and noted that it sounds like a fun, and enjoyable event for the public. Cal Ripken Field 8 Backstop Modification Supt. Gray explained that the Ithaca Babe Ruth League would like to upgrade the backstop on Field 8 (south west field) prior to a July tournament they will be hosting. He stated that the request has gone before the Parks Commission who were supportive. Jon Parmenter, Secretary for the Ithaca Babe Ruth League, and Jim D’Alterio, Recreation Supervisor at Cass Park, joined the Board for the discussion of this topic. City Attorney Hoffman questioned whether the batting cage at the ball field is open to the public when not in use by the league. Mr. Parmenter responded that it is open and accessible to the public between April and August, and that at the end of the season it is closed. City Attorney Hoffman further questioned if there would be any liability issues for the City with the use of the batting cage. Mr. Parmenter responded that the league has full liability insurance coverage for the season with both the City of Ithaca and Town of Ithaca. He will check with their insurance agent to make sure they have adequate coverage, and noted that the new backstop will greatly reduce the number of claims resulting from flying balls going into the parking lot and damaging vehicles. 7 May 25, 2011 Discussion followed on the floor regarding when the league would like to install the backstop, what materials will be used, and how construction will be done. Recreation Supervisor D’Alterio expressed his support for the request as well. The Board expressed their support for the request, and Supt. Gray noted that he would handle it administratively and work with the league to make sure there is adequate liability insurance coverage. Mr. Parmenter thanked the Board for their time and support for the league’s request. Cornell Bridge Means Restriction – Update Supt. Gray reported that Cornell is preparing to submit its recommendation to Common Council for their Means Restriction project by May 31, 2011, in accordance with the Common Council resolution which allowed temporary barriers to be installed under emergency conditions. This item was not discussed and will be placed on a future agenda. No Left Turns at Aurora/Prospect Street Intersection – Update This item was not discussed. Water Supply Project This item was not discussed. ADJOURNMENT: On a motion the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Sarah L. Myers Carolyn K. Peterson Information Management Specialist Mayor