Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMN-CC-2013-07-17COMMON COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS CITY OF ITHACA, NEW YORK Special Meeting 6:00 p.m. July 17, 2013 PRESENT: Mayor Myrick Alderpersons (9) Brock, Dotson, Murtagh, McCollister, Fleming, Smith, Kerslick, Proulx, Mohlenhoff OTHERS PRESENT: City Clerk – Conley Holcomb City Attorney – Lavine City Controller – Thayer Building - Planning & Development Director – Cornish EXCUSED: Alderperson Clairborne PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Myrick led all present in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: 2.1 Presentation from Sidewalk Task Force: Mayor Myrick announced that there would not be a public comment period tonight due to the tight time schedule; however, members of the public are encouraged to share their thoughts at the following meetings:  July 17, 2013 GPA Committee Meeting  July 22, 2013 Board of Public Works Meeting  August 7, 2013 Common Council Meeting  August 12, 2013 Board of Public Works Meeting  August 12, 2013 GPA Committee Meeting  August 26, 2013 Board of Public Works Meeting  September 4, 2013 Common Council Meeting Members of the Sidewalk Task Force include: City Attorney Aaron Lavine, Asst. City Attorney Jared Pitman, Planning and Development Board Chair/Board of Public Works Commissioner Govind Archarya, Alderpersons Donna Fleming and Seph Murtagh, Transportation Engineer Tim Logue. City Attorney Lavine explained that the City’s current sidewalk policy places full responsibility for the installation and repair of sidewalks on the abutting property owner. This policy has led to the construction of very little new sidewalk in the past 20 years and property owner resistance to construction projects that include new sidewalks. Enforcement of the repair policy is cumbersome and leads to long delays in sidewalk repairs. The new proposal includes the creation of 5 sidewalk benefit assessment districts. A map of the proposed districts is available on the City’s website: www.cityofithaca.org or by request. The money raised in each district must be used solely for work performed in that district. While the amount of money raised in each district will vary, the property owners in each district will be assessed proportionately to the scope and cost of work occurring in that district. The main objectives of this proposal are:  Reduced regressivity of the current system.  Continued inclusion of tax-exempt owners in a new system of financing.  Smoothed-out, predictable, sidewalk costs for property owners.  Reduced disincentive to new construction; sidewalk treated as a public good.  Improved sidewalk repair record in a simple and efficient system. The proposed assessment formula is as follows:  One and two family residences will pay an annual maintenance fee of $70.  Other lots will pay an annual maintenance fee of $140 plus a square footage fee of $0.015 per square foot of buildings on a lot, and a frontage fee ($30 for each 50 feet of lot frontage or portion thereof). July 17, 2013 2  Lots which have or had sidewalk construction or repairs performed at the owner’s expense will be eligible for a reduction in the assessment (1/20 of the amount of the work, subject to a cap, in each of the twenty years following completion of the work).  The proposed assessment formula will raise approximately $600,000 per year city- wide, with amounts varying by district. A question and answer period followed with Council members. The following items were clarified:  People who volunteer to replace their sidewalk as per permit requirements vs. being cited by the City are still eligible for the reduction in assessment fees (i.e. if someone replaces or repairs their sidewalk without a permit, they will not receive a reduction in assessment fees).  The credit for repaired sidewalks as per permit requirements goes with the property – not the owner (i.e. if someone moves, the credit would stay with the property).  The impact on renters is dependent upon the type of housing they live in (one-and two family residences and other properties)  Properties on private roads (i.e. Walmart) would still pay the square footage and maintenance fee but not the frontage fee.  The U-1 District exclusion was discussed  Slate sidewalks in areas, especially historic districts, can still be installed per this proposal – materials were not specified.  The Task Force did not discuss penalties for damages caused to sidewalks (i.e. trucks parking on sidewalks). IPD ticketing might be a better solution.  West Hill concerns are: new sidewalk installation work is more expensive due to topography (cliffs, rocks, etc.). There are fewer homes and larger parcel sizes, thus leading to lower funds raised comparatively in this district, and less new sidewalk will be installed. Could the district be shifted to include Inlet Island and/or the Southwest business district?  Districts were formed by using natural boundaries (like live water bodies), and effort was made to keep them neighborhood based.  The proposal does not discount the proposed assessments for lower income people or lower value properties, but those people are responsible for a much higher cost under the existing system than they would be in virtually every instance under the proposed system.  Most lots are configured on 50 ft parcels (some are 48’ or 52’) – an adjustment to the frontage figure may be needed.  The Ithaca City School District property is included in this proposal as is Tompkins County, Cornell University, the City of Ithaca, etc. Large parks may be exempted from the proposal by Common Council. Each organization has been notified of the impending law and invited to provide feedback.  The Tompkins County Assessment Department is the authority on many topics included in the proposal (square footage of building, eligibility of exemption, etc.)  Liability concerns were raised as the City would become responsible for the repair and maintenance of all sidewalks. Common Council members expressed their thanks for the hard work and creativity that went into this effort. ADJOURNMENT: On a motion the meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. ______________________________ _______________________________ Julie Conley Holcomb, CMC Svante L. Myrick City Clerk Mayor