Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBZA 3295 - Cayuga Park - November Decision (1) CITY OF ITHACA BOARD of ZONING APPEALS Sign Variance Findings & Decision Appeal No.: 3295B Applicant: Whitham Planning & Design on behalf of property owner Park Grove Realty Property Location: Cayuga Park Lane Zoning District: Market District (MD) Applicable Section of City Sign Ordinance: §272-6B(2) Requirement for Which Variance is Requested: Number and Size of Permitted Signs in a Commercial Zone Publication Dates: August 28, 2025 and September 2, 2025. Meeting Held On: September 2, 2025 and November 4, 2025. Summary: Appeal of Whitham Planning & Design on behalf of owner Park Grove Realty for a sign variance from §272-6 B(2), Number and Size of Permitted Signs in a Commercial Zone. The applicant is constructing two new mixed-use buildings with ground floor commercial space and upper story residential units as part of the Cayuga Park project, located on Cayuga Park Lane. The project site includes multiple parcels with internal circulation and external access via Third Street and an intersection at Route 13 and Fifth Street. The applicant previously presented a proposal for four 10’ freestanding signs to assist with wayfinding throughout the project site. The BZA tabled the appeal at its meeting on September 2, 2025. The applicant also proposed a freestanding monument sign at its Third Street entrance, and the Board denied the request for the additional freestanding sign at the September meeting. The applicant has revised the sign package and is now proposing five freestanding signs that will be 44” tall. Four of the proposed signs will feature a 9 SF single panel. The fifth sign is a 18 SF double panel sign. The Cayuga Health was granted a sign variance (BZA #3207) to install 5 building signs on its building within Cayuga Park, and three of those signs exceed the maximum size of 50 SF. The Market View Apartments was granted a sign permit to install a 24 SF, internally illuminated building sign. This sign should have been reviewed by the Board of Zoning Appeals, as it exceeds the maximum 12 SF allowed for a residential building; however, the sign permit was issued without this review. The Cayuga Park campus was granted additional sign variances (BZA #3295) on September 2, 2025 for the following signs: • Aurora North: 24 SF projecting sign CITY OF ITHACA 108 E. Green Street — 3rd Floor Ithaca, NY 14850-5690 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Lisa Nicholas, Director Telephone: 607-274-6550 Fax: 607-274-6558 • Aurora South: 24 SF projecting sign • Cayuga Park (intersection at Rt 13 and Fifth Street): 60.5 SF monument sign The property is located in the Carpenter Circle Planned Unit Development in which the proposed uses are permitted. However, the Sign Ordinance, §272-18, requires that variances be granted before a sign permit is issued. Public Hearing Held On: September 2, 2025. Members present: Michael Cannon Donna Fleming Joseph Kirby Andre Gardiner David Barken, Chair Tompkins County Review per Section 239 -l & -m of New York State General Municipal Law: The Tompkins County Department of Planning & Sustainability has reviewed the proposal as required by New York State General Municipal Law §239-l, -m, and -n and has no comments or recommendations. Environmental Review: This variance is a component of an action that also includes site plan review. Considered together, this is a Type 1 Action under the City of Ithaca Environmental Quality Review Ordinance and the State Environmental Quality Review Act for which the Planning and Development Board, acting as Lead Agency, made a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance on June 26, 2025. Deliberations & Findings: The Board discussed the five requested signs and the associated variances. The Board noted that signs are smaller and lower than the signs previously presented, based on previous feedback from the Board. The signs are an improved design and are a much better fit for the site. MOTION FIVE: WAYFINDING SIGNS Motion: A motion to grant variance #3295B for five wayfinding signs was made by D. Fleming. Factors Considered: 1. Environmental Impact • The Planning and Development Board, acting as lead agency, has conducted appropriate environmental review and has determined the requested variance will have no negative impacts on the environment. The Board of Zoning Appeals finds no additional evidence of environmental impact. 2. Size of sign: • The applicant is proposing five freestanding signs that will be 44” tall. Four of the proposed signs will feature a 9SF single panel. The fifth sign is a 18 SF double panel sign. • The signs are proportionate to the site, the appropriate distance from other buildings and signs, and legible for the public. 3. Number of letters: • The proposed signage will feature the names of the residential buildings and/or types of uses (e.g., medical offices, parking). It is not feasible to reduce the text or number of letters. The signs are easy to read and meet the wayfinding objectives of the applicant. 4. Other signs: • There are a mix of signs in this area, including a variety of sizes and heights. The proposed signs are proportionate to the site and previously approved site signage. They are consistent with one another and work well as a wayfinding system. 5. The character of the neighborhood: • The proposed signs are not detrimental to the general neighborhood character. • The project site is surrounded by the Market District, which was recently established to help implement the City of Ithaca Waterfront Plan. The area is expected to see significant redevelopment and change in the coming years, and this project will be the first of several that will transform the area into a more vibrant, mixed-use area. • The project site is located across Route 13 from a predominantly residential neighborhood. 6. Public Interest: • The signs will not negatively impact the public interest, including lighting, open spaces, and views. Second Motion to Grant Variance: Made by M. Cannon. Vote: 4-0-0 Michael Cannon YES Donna Fleming YES Andre Gardiner YES David Barken, Chair YES Determination of the BZA Based on the Above Factors: The BZA, taking into consideration the six factors for a sign variance finds that the benefit to the applicant outweighs the determinant to the neighborhood or community. The BZA further finds that variances from the Sign Ordinance, §272-4A(1) and §272-6B(2) are the minimum variance that should be granted in order to preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. __________________________ November 4, 2025 Megan Wilson, Zoning Administrator Date Secretary, Board of Zoning Appeals